Next Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Hydrogen Barrier Performance of Modified Polyamide 6 Lining of IV Hydrogen Storage Tank with Graphene
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Cellulose-Based Hydrogel—Nanocomposites for Medical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anionic Anchoring Enhanced Quasi Solid Composite Polymer Electrolytes for High Performance Lithium Metal Battery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 16
Issue 15
10.3390/polym16152184
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Entrenched in Miscible Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Poly(lactic acid) Blends as Freestanding Electrodes for Supercapacitors

by
Bipin S. Chikkatti
1,
Lata S. Kanaki
2,
Ashok M. Sajjan
1,2,*,
Nagaraj R. Banapurmath
2,
M. A. Umarfarooq
2,
R. S. Hosmath
2,
Irfan Anjum Badruddin
3,
Amir Ibrahim Ali Arabi
3 and
Sarfaraz Kamangar
3
1
Department of Chemistry, KLE Technological University, Hubballi 580031, India
2
Centre of Excellence in Material Science, School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi 580031, India
3
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(15), 2184; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152184 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 26 July 2024 / Accepted: 29 July 2024 / Published: 31 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Electrolyte: Recent Progress and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The focus of the study in this article is analyzing the electrochemical properties of molybdenum disulfide on miscible poly(methyl methacrylate)-poly(lactic acid) blends for supercapacitors. The interaction between molybdenum disulfide and miscible poly(methyl methacrylate)-poly(lactic acid) blends, affinity toward water, surface morphology, and mechanical properties are inspected by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, water contact angle, scanning electron microscopy, and universal testing machine, respectively. Among the developed membranes, 0.75 wt% of molybdenum disulfide on poly(methyl methacrylate)-poly(lactic acid) shows better electrochemical performances. It exhibits a maximum specific capacitance of 255.5 F g−1 at a current density of 1.00 mA g−1, maximum energy density of 22.7 Wh kg−1, and maximum power density of 360 W kg−1. A cycle study reveals 92% capacitance retention after 2500 cycles. The designed supercapacitor device shows a maximum specific capacitance of 1240 μF g−1 at a current density of 0.5 μA g−1, maximum energy density of 43 μWh kg−1, and maximum power density of 700 μW kg−1. Flexible membranes of molybdenum disulfide are expected to be a potent combination for supercapacitor applications.

1. Introduction

The need for energy is increasing in today’s knowledge-based economies and technologies for storing energy are becoming increasingly crucial [1]. Because of the growing worldwide concern for clean and effective energy sources, such as batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells, the development of renewable energy systems is critical [2]. Because of their high power density, prolonged cycle lifespan, and moderate energy density, supercapacitors have received the greatest interest as new types of electrochemical energy-storage devices. Furthermore, supercapacitors are secure and have a low environmental effect [3]. Supercapacitors are gaining popularity because of the growing need for energy storage systems with high specific characteristics and long cycle life. The development of novel materials and storage methods in various applications has led to a lack of broadly agreed terminologies, making it challenging to describe progress in the sector [4]. Supercapacitors are divided into two classes based on how they store charge. To begin, electrical double-layer capacitors store charges at the electrode–electrolyte interface because of ion adsorption. The second type of supercapacitor, pseudocapacitors, stores charges generated by electrochemical processes at the electrode surface [5,6]. To address the constantly increasing demand for flexible portable electronic devices, high-performance and dependable power sources with exceptional flexibility, lightweight, and safety are required [7].
Polylactic acid (PLA) is an environmentally friendly, bioabsorbable, thermoplastic material, crystalline aliphatic polyester derived from sugarcane, maize, and other sources [8]. PLA is now widely used in a variety of sectors because of its beneficial qualities such as excellent mechanical strength, good processing capacity, biocompatibility, ease of molding, good transparency, strong thermal plasticity, and nontoxicity [9,10]. However, because of its high brittleness, low melt viscosity, slow crystallization rate, and low toughness, its uses are limited [11]. One method for overcoming these constraints is to modify PLA through mixing. Polymer blending is a simple industrial procedure that can improve the qualities of current materials by merging the distinct features of different materials [12]. Because of the excellent molecular interactions between poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and PLA, it is one of the most fascinating thermoplastics to melt-blend with [13]. Because of its physical and mechanical qualities, high Young’s modulus, and hardness ratio, the polymer PMMA is also known as plexiglass, acrylate, or perspex [14]. The PMMA layer may have a role in polar polymer compatibility, such as PLA. Several investigations have shown that PLA mixed with PMMA can form a miscible mixture [15]. PLA/PMMA blends have received a lot of attention due to their synergistic characteristics. When the PMMA level exceeds 50%, the crystallization behavior of PLA is severely hampered and the blends become entirely amorphous [16]. Because PMMA has a higher glass transition temperature than PLA, the miscible addition might increase the temperature resistance of a PLA-matrix in this scenario [17]. Zhang et al. in 2002 reported that Blending PLA with PMMA may be a viable way to produce PLA-based products with better characteristics over PLA alone [18].
Layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) have sparked worldwide interest due to their exceptional physical, chemical, electrical, and optical characteristics, which make them ideal candidates for energy storage and conversion [19]. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a usual member of the TMDs family and a suitable material for electrodes for supercapacitors because of its significant theoretical specific capacitance and its stacked structure [20]. MoS2 is made up of three atom layers (S-Mo-S) that are held together by van der Waals forces and may be exfoliated to form a single-layer structure using chemical or physical processes [21]. Natural MoS2 is semiconducting and has a band gap of 1.2 eV. The monolayer MoS2, on the other hand, has a straight bandgap of 1.9 eV, allowing its electrical characteristics to be tuned depending on the application [22]. Some applications, such as devices for storing energy and electrocatalytic processes, require high electrical conductivity, while others, such as sensors, require moderate electrical conductivity. There is currently a lot of curiosity in conductive MoS2 for electrode materials because of (a) its excellent electrical conductivity to attain a good current density for the equipment and (b) the potential for ensuring a porous structure, employing this material to aid ionic diffusion of the electrolyte throughout the storage of energy process, which will help to increase the device’s capacity [23]. Chen et al., in 2018, reported that the thermal and mechanical properties of PLA increase as MoS2 is added [24]. Dia et al., in 2021, reported that MoS2 enhances the electrochemical properties of carbon nanotube/polyaniline [25].
Herein, this paper demonstrates an effective strategy for the development of MoS2-doped PMMA-PLA membranes as electrodes for supercapacitors. The morphology, structure, and electrochemical nature of the MoS2@PMMA-PLA membranes are subsequently analyzed and interpreted in detail.

2. Experiments

2.1. Preparation of Membranes

The miscible PMMA (Kemphasol, Mumbai, India)-PLA (Natur Tec India Private Limited, Chennai, India) blend was synthesized by dissolving 8 wt% of PMMA and 2 wt% of PLA in chloroform (Finar Chemicals, Ahmedabad, India) by the solution-casting method [26]. The blend mixture was agitated on a magnetic stirrer at room temperature to obtain a consistent viscous solution. The resulting solution was cast on a clean glass plate and allowed to dry naturally. The completely dried membrane is peeled off and named plain PMMA-PLA. To explore the effect of MoS2 nanoparticles (~50 nm, Platonic nanotech, Mahagama, India), different weight percent of MoS2 like 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 wt% were weighed and added to the PMMA-PLA blend solution and named 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, respectively. After the addition of MoS2, the solutions were sonicated for 30 min and stirred overnight on a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. The resultant homogenous solutions were cast on a clean glass plate and allowed to dry naturally. Fully dried membranes were peeled off and considered for characterization.

2.2. Development of a Supercapacitor Device

The supercapacitor device was designed from copper sheet, electrode materials, and PVA (S. D. Fine Chem Limited, Mumbai, India)-H2SO4 (Spectrum Reagents and Chemicals, Ernakulam, India) gel. The copper sheet was cleaned with acetone and distilled water many times. To prepare the PVA-H2SO4 gel, 2 g PVA was added into 20 mL of 10 wt% aqueous solution of H2SO4 and agitated at 60 °C for 3 h. The gel was given time to cool to the ambient temperature before being utilized to construct the gadget. The MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane was made into strips and positioned on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sheet. A copper sheet was used as a current collector. PVA-H2SO4 gel electrolyte was placed in between the membrane strips and allowed to dry completely. Later, the device was sealed using another PET sheet. Figure 1a represents the scheme of fabrication of the device.

2.3. Physicochemical Measurements

The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) technique was executed for all fabricated membranes on the FTIR Spectrometer, PerkinElmer spectrum, Singapore, to confirm the functionalization. The water contact angle (WCA) technique was performed by the Sessile drop technique and a contact angle meter, Kyowa Interface measurement and analysis, Japan, to understand affinity toward water. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was utilized to analyze surface morphology by Zeiss Ultra 55 Gemini, Graz, Austria, equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Oxford Instruments X-Max, High Wycombe, UK. Universal testing machine (UTM) DAK system Inc., Thane, India, was utilized to measure the mechanical properties of membranes.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

A CHI660E electrochemical workstation from CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA, was used to conduct electrochemical investigations on MoS2@PMMA-PLA membranes. In 1 M H2SO4 aqueous solution, all electrochemical experiments were performed using a two-electrode configuration. At room temperature, electrochemical characterizations such as cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) tests were conducted. CV techniques are performed at different scan rates (5 to 100 mV s−1) in the potential range of −0.8 to +0.8 V. A frequency range of 1–100 kHz with an amplitude of 5 mV was considered during EIS analysis. Different current densities from 1 to 2.25 mA g−1 were used during the GCD technique. The specific capacitance (Csp) of a single membrane electrode using the CV technique is calculated using Equation (1).
Csp = 2∫IdV/m∆VS
where ∫IdV is the area under the CV curve, m is the mass of the electrodes, ∆V is the potential range, and S is the scan rate. The specific capacitance (Csp) of a single membrane electrode using the GCD technique is calculated using Equation (2).
Csp = 4I∆t/m∆V
where I is the discharge current, ∆t is the discharge time, m is the mass of electrodes, and ∆V is the potential range. The energy density (E) of the membrane electrode is calculated using Equation (3).
E = Csp(∆V)2/2
where Csp is specific capacitance and ∆V is the potential range. The power density (P) of the membrane electrode is calculated using Equation (4).
P = E/∆t
where E is energy density and ∆t is the discharge time. Suitable unit conversions are made during calculations [27,28].

3. Results

3.1. FTIR Study

Figure 1b demonstrates the FTIR spectra of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-loaded PMMA-PLA membranes. The peaks observed at 2990 cm−1 and 2947 cm−1 are mainly due to the C-H stretching of both PMMA and PLA [29,30]. The stretching mode of the carbonyl groups showed an absorption band at 1723 cm−1. The several bands at 1435 and 1384 cm−1 are attributed to C-H deformations. The C–O–C stretching of PMMA and PLA causes peaks at 1193, 1144, and 1091 cm−1. The band at 748 cm−1 is related to the C-C stretching of blends [31,32]. As the amount of MoS2 increases in PMMA-PLA blends, the intensity of the peaks decreases. This is because MoS2 can potentially form hydrogen bonds with PMMA-PLA blends. These interactions might weaken the existing hydrogen bonds between PLA and PMMA chains, leading to a decrease in peak intensity associated with those bonds.

3.2. WCA Study

Figure 1c illustrates the WCA measurements of fabricated membranes. In general, the lesser the value of the water contact angle, the greater the hydrophilicity nature of the membrane. WCA findings of plain PMMA-PLA, 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA are 48.4, 47.6, 46.1, 45.1, and 50.6 degrees, respectively. As the content of MoS2 in PMMA-PLA blends increases from 0.25 wt% to 0.75 wt%, the WCA values decrease, indicating the hydrophilicity of the membranes increases. This is because MoS2 has a layered structure with a large surface area and can increase the surface roughness and porosity of PLA-PMMA blends. This rougher surface can provide more grip for water droplets, leading to a decrease in the contact angle. As the content of MoS2 in PMMA-PLA blends increases from 0.75 wt% to 1 wt%, it is observed that the WCA value increases. This is because the casting solution becomes more viscous at this MoS2 concentration. As a result, a denser membrane is produced, which contains fewer pores when related to the other PMMA-PLA membranes. Furthermore, porosity and the contact angle are inversely proportional to one another [33].

3.3. SEM Study

The EDS analysis of MoS2 nanoparticles is displayed in Figure 2a, which shows that the nanoparticle is principally composed of molybdenum, oxygen, and sulfur with weight % of 57.66, 4.44, and 37.9%, respectively. Figure 2b displays an SEM image of the MoS2 nanoparticle. The SEM image shows a cluster of MoS2 nanoparticles, which appear as roughly spherical particles [34]. The surface of the nanoparticles is rough and textured, which is indicative of their crystalline nature. Figure 2c represents an SEM image of the plain PMMA-PLA membrane. No phase separation was observed on the fracture surface of the blend, suggesting that the PMMA-PLA is a miscible blend [35]. By adding MoS2, the surface was no longer as smooth as the plain PMMA-PLA. Figure 2d–g displays SEM images of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, respectively. When the amount of MoS2@PMMA-PLA was increased from 0.25 to 0.75 wt%, the presence of hydrophilic MoS2 in the casting solution accelerated the formation of the microvoid structures and the surface became rough with microcracking. However, the number of macropores was reduced with considerable agglomeration and clustering of the MoS2 nanofillers at a higher additive concentration of 1 wt% and the internal structure was more compact. This was because rheology played a leading role in the increase in the viscosity of the casting solution with the addition of MoS2, which densified the membrane structure [36].

3.4. UTM Study

The mechanical properties of developed membranes carried out at a load speed of 25.0 mm/min are shown in Table 1. Plain PMMA-PLA is quite stiff and brittle. The tensile strength is 11.1 MPa and Young’s modulus is 2130 MPa, whereas elongation at the break is 1.07%. Tensile strength and Young’s modulus rise when the MoS2 concentration in PMMA-PLA increases from 0.25 wt% to 0.75 wt% but the elongation break decreases. The mechanical property increases are directly related to the nanofiller dispersion state and nanofiller alignment in the matrix may further strengthen the reinforced effect. The considerable mechanical elevation with such a modest MoS2 dosage might be attributed to consistent MoS2 dispersion and alignment inside the polymer matrix [37,38]. Furthermore, MoS2 can act as a reinforcing filler, providing additional strength and stiffness to the material. As the MoS2 concentration in PMMA-PLA increases from 0.75 wt% to 1 wt%, tensile strength and Young’s modulus decrease, whereas elongation break values increase. The mechanical characteristics have worsened because of significant agglomeration and clustering of the MoS2 fillers at high loading percentages. Filler agglomeration reduces the interfacial contact area between the MoS2 and matrix, reducing the MoS2’s capacity to strengthen the composition [39].

3.5. CV Study

CV curves of MoS2-loaded PMMA-PLA membranes are recorded at variable scan rates. Figure 3a–d displays cyclic voltammograms of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 wt%, respectively. As the scan rate rises, the area beneath the curve as well as the peak current increases [40]. This is because, as the scan rate rises, the potential changes faster, which means there is less time for the electroactive species to diffuse toward the electrode surface. This leads to a higher concentration of the species near the electrode surface, resulting in a larger current. All CV curves display redox peaks, which indicate typical pseudocapacitance behavior. This is due to electron insertion and extraction and the Faraday reaction may store the ions in the active regions of the materials. As a result, MoS2 is responsible for the faradaic pseudocapacitances and electroconductive properties of the composites. The Faradaic redox reaction, due to the various oxidation states of Mo, and cation intercalation (H+) in between the interlayers [41] can be represented as follows:
MoS2 + H+ + e− ↔ HMoS2
Figure 3e displays the CV curve of all MoS2-loaded PMMA-PLA membranes at a fixed scan rate (50 mV s−1). From the graph, it is observed that 0.75 wt% of MoS2 at the PMMA-PLA membrane showed the highest peak current and area under the curve. As the amount of MoS2 increases from 0.25 wt% to 0.75 wt%, the area beneath the curve increases due to the presence of lots of active material, MoS2, at the PMMA-PLA membrane. When the amount of MoS2 reaches 1 wt%, the area under the curve decreases because of the agglomeration of MoS2 nanofiller. The specific capacitance of all MoS2@PMMA-PLA was calculated using Equation (1). Figure 3f illustrates the variation in Csp concerning the scan rates of all fabricated membranes. At a scan rate of 5 mV s−1, 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA displayed a specific capacitance of 74, 135, 209, and 199 F g−1, respectively. At all scan rates, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA showed the highest specific capacitance, which is considered an optimized membrane. The material’s specific capacitance falls as the scan rate increases. This is because, at a low scan rate, ions have plenty of time to reach and react with the entire electrode surface, leading to maximum utilization and hence higher Csp. Whereas, at a high scan rate, ion diffusion and reaction are limited, restricting the active area and reducing the amount of charge stored, resulting in a lower Csp.

3.6. EIS Study

Figure 4a represents the fitted Nyquist plot of all the MoS2-loaded PMMA-PLA membranes. ZSimpWin 3.21 was used to fit all the impedance data with a matched model of equivalent circuit Rs(Q(R1(Q(RctW)))), where Rs—solution resistance, Q—constant phase element, R1—resistance component, Rct—charge transfer resistance, and W—Warburg impedance [42]. Table 2 displays the impedance data of all of the fabricated membranes. From the table, it is observed that 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA displayed the lowest values of Rs, Rct, and W and the highest value of Q among all of the fabricated membranes. As the amount of MoS2 increases from 0.25 wt% to 0.75 wt%, the Rs and Rct values decrease because MoS2 creates conductive pathways that facilitate the movement of ions and electrons, thereby reducing the overall resistance of the membrane. This improved conductivity leads to a decrease in both Rs and Rct [43]. Furthermore, the W value also decreases because MoS2 potentially creates a more porous or interconnected structure. This facilitates ion diffusion through the membrane, again contributing to a lower Warburg impedance [44]. As the amount of MoS2 increases from 0.25 wt% to 0.75 wt%, the Q value increases due to the presence of numerous active material MoS2. At 1 wt% amount of MoS2@PMMA-PLA, the Rs, Rct, and W values increase whereas the Q value decreases. This is attributed to the agglomeration of MoS2 at the PMMA-PLA matrix.

3.7. GCD Study

Figure 4b represents GCD curves of optimized 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane at different current densities 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, and 2.25 mA g−1. From the graph, it is detected that the time taken to charge–discharge is more for 1.00 mA g−1. As the current density decreases, the duration of the charge–discharge process increases. The rate of electrochemical reactions at the electrodes is directly proportional to the current density. When the current density drops, the reaction rates slow down, extending the time it takes for the charge to be absorbed or released from the electrode material. The Csp of the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane was calculated at different densities using Equation (2). The variation in Csp concerning current densities is presented in Figure 4c. The 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA displayed Csp values of 255.5, 125.6, 93.0, 78.7, 50.0, and 43.8 F g−1 at current densities of 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, and 2.25 mA g−1, respectively. It is observed that as the current density decreases, the Csp of the material increases. At lower current densities, the electrolyte ions have more time to penetrate the pores and access the entire electrode surface area. This leads to more efficient charge accumulation and utilization, resulting in higher capacitance. The energy density and power density of the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane can be calculated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively.
Figure 4d represents the variation in energy density concerning power density. The 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane showed a maximum energy density of 22.7 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 160 W kg−1. The energy density decreased to 3.9 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 360 W kg−1. A cycle study was carried out for 2500 cycles at a current density of 3.00 mA g−1. Figure 4e illustrates the cycle life of the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane along with the nature of the charge–discharge curves for the first 10 cycles. After prolonged 2500 cycles, the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane exhibited capacitance retention of 92%. As the cycle life increases, both the charge and discharge capacity diminish due to the deterioration of the electrode [45]. Table 3 displays a comparison study of various electrode materials composed of MoS2. The findings of our research are compared with other MoS2-based electrode materials and it is found that MoS2 incorporated into the PMMA-PLA matrix showed better results. Electrodes exhibit excellent capacitance retention, typically maintaining over 90% of their initial capacitance even after thousands of charge–discharge cycles. This high retention rate is crucial for applications demanding long-term reliable performance.

3.8. Supercapacitor Device Study

The designed supercapacitor device was subjected to the GCD technique to analyze its Csp at different current densities. Figure 5a represents charge–discharge curves of supercapacitor devices at current densities 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 μA g−1. At a current density of 0.5 μA g−1, the device showed a maximum Csp of 1240 μF g−1 and, at a current density of 0.7 μA g−1, the device showed a minimum Csp of 1013 μF g−1. The supercapacitor device displayed a maximum energy density of 43 μWh kg−1 at a power density of 500 μW kg−1 and a minimum energy density of 35 μWh kg−1 at a power density of 700 μW kg−1. Since the device is made up of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane, it processes freestanding properties. Figure 5b–d illustrates photo images of the supercapacitor device at 0°, 90°, and 180° bending. From the figures, one can observe that the device is super flexible and that the destruction of the electrode material does not take place even after bending for 180°. Thus, supercapacitor devices of MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane can be considered for the manufacture of flexible electronic devices as energy storage applications.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated the electrochemical properties of MoS2 at PMMA-PLA membranes for supercapacitors. The FTIR technique suggested that MoS2 can form hydrogen bonds with PMMA-PLA blends. WCA tests showed the hydrophilicity of membranes and surface roughness. SEM analysis gave information about the formation of the microvoid structures and microcracking. UTM studies explained that MoS2 can act as a reinforcing filler, providing additional strength and stiffness to the material. CV and EIS techniques suggested that the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane showed better electrochemical properties. At a scan rate of 5 mV s−1, the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane has a Csp of 209 F g−1, lower findings of Rs, Rct, and W, and also higher findings of Q. From GCD tests, it can be revealed that the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane exhibited a maximum Csp of 255.5 F g−1 at a current density of 1.00 mA g−1, the maximum energy density of 22.7 Wh kg−1, and maximum power density of 360 W kg−1. The cycle study confirmed that the 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membrane displayed 92% capacitance retention after 2500 cycles. The designed supercapacitor device showed a maximum Csp of 1240 μF g−1 at a current density of 0.5 μA g−1, a maximum energy density of 43 μWh kg−1, and a maximum power density of 700 μW kg−1. The collective findings of the current study established the real-world use of MoS2-based supercapacitor devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, and Writing—Original draft preparation, B.S.C.; Conceptualization and Writing—review and editing, L.S.K.; Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, and Writing—review and editing, A.M.S.; Resources, Supervision, and Writing—review and editing, N.R.B.; Conceptualization and Writing—review and editing, M.A.U.; Formal analysis and Writing—review and editing, R.S.H.; Project administration and Writing—review and editing, I.A.B.; Data Curation, Resources, Supervision, A.I.A.A.; Writing—review and editing, Visualization, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the King Khalid University, grant number R.G.P 2/301/45.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through a Large Research Project under grant number (R.G.P 2/301/45).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Kalahal, P.B.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Khan, T.M.Y.; Khadar, S.D.A.; Shamsudeen, S.M.; Raju, A.B. A Novel Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)–Tetraethylorthosilicate Hybrid Gel Electrolyte for Lead Storage Battery. Gels 2022, 8, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Obeidat, A.M.; Gharaibeh, M.A.; Obaidat, M. Solid-State Supercapacitors with Ionic Liquid Gel Polymer Electrolyte and Polypyrrole Electrodes for Electrical Energy Storage. J. Energy Storage 2017, 13, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, S.; Huang, D.; Zhang, B.; Xu, X.; Wang, M.; Yang, G.; Shen, Y. Flexible Supercapacitors Based on Bacterial Cellulose Paper Electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Conte, M. Supercapacitors Technical Requirements Fornew Applications. Fuel Cells 2010, 10, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saidu, F.K.; Joseph, A.; Varghese, E.V.; Thomas, G.V. Characterization and Electrochemical Studies on Poly(1-Naphthylamine)-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites Prepared by in Situ Chemical Oxidative Polymerization. J. Solid. State Electrochem. 2019, 23, 2897–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, N.; Kim, S.B.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.J. Recent Advanced Supercapacitor: A Review of Storage Mechanisms, Electrode Materials, Modification, and Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, G.; Tong, Y.; Li, Y. Flexible Solid-State Supercapacitors: Design, Fabrication and Applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2160–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anakabe, J.; Zaldua Huici, A.M.; Eceiza, A.; Arbelaiz, A. Melt Blending of Polylactide and Poly(Methyl Methacrylate): Thermal and Mechanical Properties and Phase Morphology Characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Teoh, E.L.; Chow, W.S. Transparency, Ultraviolet Transmittance, and Miscibility of Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Blends. J. Elastomers Plast. 2018, 50, 596–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nofar, M.; Salehiyan, R.; Ray, S.S. Influence of Nanoparticles and Their Selective Localization on the Structure and Properties of Polylactide-Based Blend Nanocomposites. Compos. B Eng. 2021, 215, 108845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paydayesh, A.; Azar, A.A.; Arani, A.J. A Change of Phase Morphology in Poly Lactic Acid/Poly Methyl Methacrylate Blends Induced by Graphene Nano Sheets. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2015, 54, 1466–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teoh, E.L.; Mariatti, M.; Chow, W.S. Thermal and Flame Resistant Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Blends Containing Halogen-Free Flame Retardant. Procedia Chem. 2016, 19, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anakabe, J.; Orue, A.; Zaldua Huici, A.M.; Eceiza, A.; Arbelaiz, A. Properties of PLA/PMMA Blends with High Polylactide Content Prepared by Reactive Mixing in Presence of Poly(Styrene-Co-Glycidyl Methacrylate) Copolymer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zakariya’u, I.; Gultekin, B.; Singh, V.; Singh, P.K. Electrochemical Double-Layer Supercapacitor Using Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Solid Polymer Electrolyte. High. Perform. Polym. 2020, 32, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pongpilaipruet, A.; Magaraphan, R. Influence of the Admicelled Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) on the Compatibility and Toughness of Poly(Lactic Acid). J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hao, X.; Kaschta, J.; Pan, Y.; Liu, X.; Schubert, D.W. Intermolecular Cooperativity and Entanglement Network in a Miscible PLA/PMMA Blend in the Presence of Nanosilica. Polymer 2016, 82, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gonzalez-Garzon, M.; Shahbikian, S.; Huneault, M.A. Properties and Phase Structure of Melt-Processed PLA/PMMA Blends. J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Shen, D. Miscibility and Phase Structure of Binary Blends of Polylactide and Poly(Methyl Methacrylate). J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2003, 41, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiao, Y.; Hafez, A.M.; Cao, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, H. Metallic MoS2 for High Performance Energy Storage and Energy Conversion. Small 2018, 14, 1800640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Yang, S. Facile Construction of 3D Graphene/MoS2 Composites as Advanced Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2016, 331, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, G.; Peng, H.; Mu, J.; Huang, H.; Zhou, X.; Lei, Z. In Situ Intercalative Polymerization of Pyrrole in Graphene Analogue of MoS2 as Advanced Electrode Material in Supercapacitor. J. Power Sources 2013, 229, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.; Konar, A.; Hwang, W.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.; Yang, J.; Jung, C.; Kim, H.; Yoo, J.B.; Choi, J.Y.; et al. High-Mobility and Low-Power Thin-Film Transistors Based on Multilayer MoS2 Crystals. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saha, D.; Kruse, P. Editors’ Choice—Review—Conductive Forms of MoS2 and Their Applications in Energy Storage and Conversion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 126517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, P.; Liang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Nie, W. Enhanced Thermal and Mechanical Properties of PLA/MoS2 Nanocomposites Synthesized via the in-Situ Ring-Opening Polymerization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dai, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Xie, H.; Guo, C.; Zhu, A.; Xu, Y.; Fan, M.; Yuan, C.; et al. Effect of Morphology and Phase Engineering of MoS2 on Electrochemical Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Polyaniline@MoS2 Composites. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 590, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mazuki, N.F.; Nagao, Y.; Kufian, M.Z.; Samsudin, A.S. The Influences of PLA into PMMA on Crystallinity and Thermal Properties Enhancement-Based Hybrid Polymer in Gel Properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 49, 3105–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Bhutto, J.K.; Verma, R.; Yunus Khan, T.M. Fabrication of Flexible Films for Supercapacitors Using Halloysite Nano-Clay Incorporated Poly(Lactic Acid). Polymers 2023, 15, 4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Kalahal, P.B.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Ayachit, N.H. Fabrication and Assessment of Poly(Lactic Acid)-Poly(4-Styrene Sulfonate) Flexible Membranes as Electrodes for Supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Savaris, M.; Braga, G.L.; Dos Santos, V.; Carvalho, G.A.; Falavigna, A.; MacHado, D.C.; Viezzer, C.; Brandalise, R.N. Biocompatibility Assessment of Poly(Lactic Acid) Films after Sterilization with Ethylene Oxide in Histological Study in Vivo with Wistar Rats and Cellular Adhesion of Fibroblasts in Vitro. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 2017, 7158650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raheem, D.; Majid Nahi, Z. Polymethyl Methacrylate-Collagen-Magnesium Hydroxyapatite Bone Cement Preparation for Orthopedic Application. Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 29, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wei, S.Q.; Bai, Y.P.; Shao, L. A Novel Approach to Graft Acrylates onto Commercial Silicones for Release Film Fabrications by Two-Step Emulsion Synthesis. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 2728–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Muller, O.; Guerchoux, M.; Braun, S.; Dandois, M.; Citak, H.; Jean, T.; Merlat, L. Polyvinylcarbazole: A New Polymer Host for Passive Optical Limiting. In Proceedings of the Nonlinear Optics and Its Applications, Strasbourg, France, 3 April–23 May 2022; Volume 12143, pp. 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saraswathi, M.S.S.A.; Rana, D.; Vijayakumar, P.; Alwarappan, S.; Nagendran, A. Tailored PVDF Nanocomposite Membranes Using Exfoliated MoS2 Nanosheets for Improved Permeation and Antifouling Performance. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 14315–14324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lalithambika, K.C.; Shanmugapriya, K.; Sriram, S. Photocatalytic Activity of MoS2 Nanoparticles: An Experimental and DFT Analysis. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process 2019, 125, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Charasseangpaisarn, T.; Wiwatwarrapan, C.; Thunyakitpisal, P.; Srimaneepong, V. Development of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)/Poly(Lactic Acid) Blend as Sustainable Biomaterial for Dental Applications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 16904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tian, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, K. Polydopamine-Assisted Two-Dimensional Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2)-Modified PES Tight Ultrafiltration Mixed-Matrix Membranes: Enhanced Dye Separation Performance. Membranes 2021, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Eksik, O.; Gao, J.; Shojaee, S.A.; Thomas, A.; Chow, P.; Bartolucci, S.F.; Lucca, D.A.; Koratkar, N. Epoxy Nanocomposites with Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Additives. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5282–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wan, S.; Li, Y.; Peng, J.; Hu, H.; Cheng, Q.; Jiang, L. Synergistic Toughening of Graphene Oxide-Molybdenum Disulfide-Thermoplastic Polyurethane Ternary Artificial Nacre. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, X.; Xing, W.; Feng, X.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. MoS2/Polymer Nanocomposites: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Polym. Rev. 2017, 57, 440–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Ayachit, N.H. Graphene-Doped Hydrogels Promoting Ionic Conductivity in Gel-Valve-Regulated Lead Acid Batteries. Langmuir 2023, 39, 17232–17239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, F.; Meng, R.; Sui, Y.; Wei, F.; Qi, J.; Meng, Q.; He, Y. One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of a CoS2@MoS2 Nanocomposite for High-Performance Supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 742, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Kalahal, P.B.; Banapurmath, N.R. Insight into the Performance of Valve-Regulated Lead-Acid Battery Using Sodium Salt of Poly(4-Styrene Sulfonic Acid-Co-Maleic Acid)-Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Gel Electrolyte. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Kalahal, P.B.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Angadi, A.R. Insight into the Performance of VRLA Battery Using PVA-TEOS Hybrid Gel Electrolytes with Titania Nanoparticles. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Banapurmath, N.R. The State of Understanding of the Electrochemical Behaviours of a Valve-Regulated Lead–Acid Battery Comprising Manganese Dioxide-Impregnated Gel Polymer Electrolyte. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 6192–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chikkatti, B.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Banapurmath, N.R. Facilitating Ionic Conduction in the Valve-Regulated Lead Acid Battery by Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Halloysite Nano-Clay Gel Polymer Electrolyte. Energy Technol. 2024, 12, 2301265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Masikhwa, T.M.; Madito, M.J.; Bello, A.; Dangbegnon, J.K.; Manyala, N. High Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitor Based on Molybdenum Disulphide/Graphene Foam and Activated Carbon from Expanded Graphite. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2017, 488, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pazhamalai, P.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Manoharan, S.; Kim, S.J. High Energy Symmetric Supercapacitor Based on Mechanically Delaminated Few-Layered MoS2 Sheets in Organic Electrolyte. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 771, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lv, T.; Yao, Y.; Li, N.; Chen, T. Highly Stretchable Supercapacitors Based on Aligned Carbon Nanotube/Molybdenum Disulfide Composites. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 9337–9341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Moopri Singer Pandiyarajan, S.; Veerasubramani, G.K.; Bhattarai, R.M.; Gnanasekaran, G.; Kim, S.J.; Mok, Y.S. Designing an Interlayer-Widened MoS2-Packed Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nanotube Core-Shell Structure for Redox-Mediated Quasi-Solid-State Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 2218–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.; Shi, Q.; Shao, Y.; Hou, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, H. Cladding Nanostructured AgNWs-MoS2 Electrode Material for High-Rate and Long-Life Transparent in-Plane Micro-Supercapacitor. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 16, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Raman, V.; Rhee, D.; Selvaraj, A.R.; Kim, J.; Prabakar, K.; Kang, J.; Kim, H.K. High-Performance Flexible Transparent Micro-Supercapacitors from Nanocomposite Electrodes Encapsulated with Solution Processed MoS2 Nanosheets. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2021, 22, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 16 02184 g001
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of fabrication of the supercapacitor device; (b) FTIR spectra of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes; (c) Water contact angle measurements of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of fabrication of the supercapacitor device; (b) FTIR spectra of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes; (c) Water contact angle measurements of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
Polymers 16 02184 g001
Polymers 16 02184 g002
Figure 2. (a) EDS analysis of MoS2; (b) SEM image of MoS2 nanoparticle; (c–g) SEM images of plain PMMA-PLA, 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) EDS analysis of MoS2; (b) SEM image of MoS2 nanoparticle; (c–g) SEM images of plain PMMA-PLA, 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, respectively.
Polymers 16 02184 g002
Polymers 16 02184 g003
Figure 3. (a–d) Cyclic voltammograms of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable scan rates; (e) Cyclic voltammograms of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at scan rate of 50 mV s−1; (f) Variation in Csp concerning variable scan rate of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membranes.
Figure 3. (a–d) Cyclic voltammograms of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable scan rates; (e) Cyclic voltammograms of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at scan rate of 50 mV s−1; (f) Variation in Csp concerning variable scan rate of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA membranes.
Polymers 16 02184 g003
Polymers 16 02184 g004
Figure 4. (a) Fitted Nyquist curves of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA with equivalent circuit diagram; (b) Charge–discharge curves of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable current densities; (c) Variation in Csp of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable current densities; (d) Variation in energy density concerning power density of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA; (e) Life cycle of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at a current density of 3.00 mA g−1.
Figure 4. (a) Fitted Nyquist curves of 0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA, and 1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA with equivalent circuit diagram; (b) Charge–discharge curves of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable current densities; (c) Variation in Csp of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at variable current densities; (d) Variation in energy density concerning power density of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA; (e) Life cycle of 0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA at a current density of 3.00 mA g−1.
Polymers 16 02184 g004
Polymers 16 02184 g005
Figure 5. (a) Charge–discharge curves of the device at variable current densities. (b–d) Photo images of the device showing its flexibility at 0°, 90°, and 180°.
Figure 5. (a) Charge–discharge curves of the device at variable current densities. (b–d) Photo images of the device showing its flexibility at 0°, 90°, and 180°.
Polymers 16 02184 g005
Table 1. Mechanical properties of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of plain PMMA-PLA and MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
MembranesTensile Strength (MPa)Young’s Modulus (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)
Plain PMMA-PLA11.121301.07
0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA12.337610.628
0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA18.543160.519
0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA20.244630.338
1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA13.941670.426
Table 2. Impedance parameters of MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
Table 2. Impedance parameters of MoS2-incorporated PMMA-PLA membranes.
MembranesRs (Ω)Q (S-sn)nR1 (Ω)Q (S-sn)nRct (Ω)W (S-s5)
0.25 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA7.4040.001460.70.0820.0001030.84890.000816
0.5 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA6.3290.003110.80.0400.0001770.93170.000736
0.75 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA2.8520.005930.80.0200.0002420.81060.000172
1 wt% MoS2@PMMA-PLA4.3710.005630.70.0320.0001780.81370.000359
Table 3. Comparison study of MoS2 composed of different electrode materials.
Table 3. Comparison study of MoS2 composed of different electrode materials.
Sl. noCompositionMethodElectrolyteCapacitance Energy Density Power Density Capacitance RetentionReferences
1MoS2/GF//AEGHydrothermal3 M KCl59 F g−1
@ 1 Ag−1		16
Wh kg−1		758
W kg−1		95
%@ 2000
cycles		[46]
2Few layered MoS2Ball millingOrganic 14.7 F g−1
@ 0.75 Ag−1		18.43
Wh kg−1		1125
W kg−1		91.2% @ 5000 cycles[47]
3CNT/MoS2Chemical vapor depositionPVA/H3PO413.16 F cm−3
@ 0.1 mA		1.05
mWh cm−3		0.46 Wcm−398
%@ 10,000
cycles		[48]
4MoS2-CNT-PPYHydrothermalPVA/H2SO4
/Na2MoO4		37.4 F g−1
@ 1 mA		3.2
Wh kg−1		625
W kg−1		94.5% @ 5000[49]
5AgNW-MoS2Laser writingPVA-H2SO427.6 mF cm−2
@ 0.2 V s−1		2.453 mWh cm−21.472
mW cm−2		96.4
%@ 10,000
cycles		[50]
6MoS2-PEDOT:PSSSpin coating3 M KOH89.44 mF cm−2
@ 6 mA cm−2		12.42 mWh cm−26043
mW cm−2		-[51]
7MoS2@PMMA-PLASolution casting1 M H2SO4255.5 F g−1
@ 1.00 mA g−1		22.7
Wh kg−1		360
W kg−1		92
%@ 2500
cycles		This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chikkatti, B.S.; Kanaki, L.S.; Sajjan, A.M.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Umarfarooq, M.A.; Hosmath, R.S.; Badruddin, I.A.; Arabi, A.I.A.; Kamangar, S. Exploring the Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Entrenched in Miscible Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Poly(lactic acid) Blends as Freestanding Electrodes for Supercapacitors. Polymers 2024, 16, 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152184

AMA Style

Chikkatti BS, Kanaki LS, Sajjan AM, Banapurmath NR, Umarfarooq MA, Hosmath RS, Badruddin IA, Arabi AIA, Kamangar S. Exploring the Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Entrenched in Miscible Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Poly(lactic acid) Blends as Freestanding Electrodes for Supercapacitors. Polymers. 2024; 16(15):2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chikkatti, Bipin S., Lata S. Kanaki, Ashok M. Sajjan, Nagaraj R. Banapurmath, M. A. Umarfarooq, R. S. Hosmath, Irfan Anjum Badruddin, Amir Ibrahim Ali Arabi, and Sarfaraz Kamangar. 2024. "Exploring the Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Entrenched in Miscible Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Poly(lactic acid) Blends as Freestanding Electrodes for Supercapacitors" Polymers 16, no. 15: 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152184

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop