Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Engineering of Hyaluronic Acid-Gelatin Hydrogels with Improved Cellular Attachment and Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Treatment of 3D-Printed Short-Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyamide (3D-SCFRPA66) using Homogeneous Low-Potential Electron Beam Irradiation (HLEBI) and Ductility Enhancement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Producing and Characterizing Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Starch and Chickpea Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures in Solid-State Fermentation

by
Karlo Grgurević
1,
Dora Bramberger
1,
Martina Miloloža
1,
Krešimir Stublić
2,
Vesna Ocelić Bulatović
1,
Jasmina Ranilović
3,
Šime Ukić
1,
Tomislav Bolanča
1,
Matija Cvetnić
1,
Marinko Markić
1 and
Dajana Kučić Grgić
1,*
1
Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Aqua V.M.V. d.o.o., Kralja Zvonimira 98, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Podravka Inc., Ante Starčevića 32, 48000 Koprivnica, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(23), 3407; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233407
Submission received: 8 November 2024 / Revised: 29 November 2024 / Accepted: 2 December 2024 / Published: 3 December 2024

Abstract

:
The environmental impact of plastic waste is a growing global challenge, primarily due to non-biodegradable plastics from fossil resources that accumulate in ecosystems. Biodegradable polymers like polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) offer a sustainable alternative. PHAs are microbial biopolymers produced by microorganisms using renewable substrates, including agro-industrial byproducts, making them eco-friendly and cost-effective. This study focused on the isolation and characterization of PHA-producing microorganisms from agro-industrial waste, including chickpeas, chickpeas with bean residues, and starch. Screening via Sudan Black staining identified PHA-accumulating strains such as Brevibacillus sp., Micrococcus spp., and Candida krusei, among others. To assess the potential for PHA biosynthesis, solid-state fermentation (SSF) was conducted using agro-industrial waste as substrates, along with a mixed culture of the isolated microorganisms. The highest observed yield was a PHA accumulation of 13.81%, achieved with chickpeas containing bean residues. Structural and thermal characterization of the PHAs was performed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). FTIR-ATR spectra indicated polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), suggesting it as the synthesized PHA type. This study highlights the potential of agro-industrial waste for sustainable PHA production and eco-friendly bioplastics.

1. Introduction

Plastics obtained from oil and its derivatives make one of the widely used materials in various aspects of human life. However, due to their increasing demand and production, new problems are arising such as plastics’ toxicity, adequate disposal of plastics, and their excessive accumulation in the environment [1]. According to Sabapathy et al. [2], over 4.8 to 12.7 million tons of plastics end up disposed in world’s oceans. Synthetic polymers exhibit low biodegradability, making recycling alone an inadequate solution for managing their environmental impact. Consequently, scientific research must prioritize the development of new materials that combine high biodegradability with the mechanical and thermal properties characteristic of synthetic polymers, aiming to replace them effectively [1]. In this context, bioplastics have become a major focus of study. Given the significant advancements already made in this field, bioplastics are now broadly classified into natural and synthetic biopolymers. Natural biopolymers are further categorized based on their production sources: those derived from biomass resources (such as polypeptides, lipids, and polysaccharides), those produced through biotechnological processes (e.g., polylactide, PLA), and those synthesized by microorganisms (such as polyhydroxyalkanoates, PHA). Synthetic biopolymers can likewise be categorized into three main groups: aliphatic biopolyesters (such as polycaprolactone, PCL), aliphatic copolyesters (such as polybutylene succinate, PBS), and aromatic copolyesters (such as polybutylene adipate terephthalate, PBAT) [3]. According to data from European Bioplastics [4], global plastic production exceeds 400 million tons annually, of which only around 0.5% consists of bioplastics. In 2023, the global production capacity for bioplastics was approximately 2.18 million tons. Of this, biodegradable plastics represented 52.1%, with PLA accounting for 31.0%, starch-containing polymer compounds (SCPC) for 6.4%, and PHAs for 4.8%, making them the most widely produced types. Production capacity for bioplastics is projected to grow to 7.43 million tons by the end of 2028, with biodegradable bioplastics expected to constitute 62.0% of this capacity. In this paper, PHAs and their synthesis methods will be further discussed.
PHAs are defined as biodegradable polyesters composed of various hydroxyalkanoate monomers [1]. This material has several properties, like high crystallinity, biodegradability, and resistance against ultraviolet radiation. Due to the presence of these properties, this material has been used for the packaging material of foods and medicines [5]. PHA are notable for their unique biosynthesis process, which occurs under nutrient-limited conditions in specific microorganisms. In these conditions, a substrate rich in carbon but limited in nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium, and other essential nutrients is provided. Under such fermentation conditions, microorganisms accumulate different types of PHAs as an alternative energy storage compound [6]. Currently, over 150 different types of PHAs have been identified, primarily classified by the number of carbon atoms in the side chain of their monomer units. PHAs are categorized into three main groups: short-chain-length PHAs (scl-PHAs), which contain 3 to 5 carbon atoms; medium-chain-length PHAs (mcl-PHAs), which consist of 6 to 14 carbon atoms; and long-chain-length PHAs (lcl-PHAs), which have 15 or more carbon atoms in their side chains [7]. Additionally, PHAs can be classified as either homopolymers (homopolyesters), composed of a single type of monomer, or copolymers (copolyesters), made up of two or more different monomers [8]. Among the most produced PHAs by microorganisms are poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV). PHB belongs to the scl-PHA group, while PHBV is categorized within the scl- and mcl-PHA copolymer group [9,10]. PHBV is the most influential and inclusive biodegradable polymer among the PHA polymer family, showcasing significant potential as a sustainable replacement for conventional plastics [5]. Microorganisms capable of producing scl-PHAs include Bacillus megaterium [11], Cupriavidus necator [12,13], Escherichia coli [14], Bacillus cereus [15], Chromobacterium violaceum [16,17], Alcaligenes latus [18], Paracoccus denitrificans [19], Azotobacter vinelandii [20], Halomonas alkalicola [21], and Bacillus megaterium [22]; mcl-PHA producers include Aeromonas hydrophila [23], Pseudomonas putida [24,25], Pseudomonas nitroreducens [26,27], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [25,28], Pseudomonas entomophila [29]; and lcl-PHA producers include Pseudomonas aeruginosa [30,31] and Bacillus thuringiensis [32].
One of the most common methods for producing PHAs is through the fermentation of sugars and fatty acids [33]. There are two generations of biomass that can be utilized in this fermentation process. The first generation consists of food products that serve as substrates for PHA production, including corn, sugarcane, beans, and nuts. While these resources are widely available, utilizing food products for PHA production can lead to increased food prices and a reduction in food supply. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [34], replacing the 170 million tons of global plastic food packaging produced annually with bioplastics would require 54% of corn crops and over 60% of Europe’s drinking water. Consequently, alternative sources such as agro-industrial waste are increasingly utilized as feedstock for PHA production [35,36]. This second generation of biomass, characterized by its lignocellulosic structure, generates over 1.3 billion tons annually [37], with much of it being disposed of in landfills or incinerated. This waste contributes significantly to environmental issues, including greenhouse gas emissions and toxic degradation byproducts, resulting in a carbon footprint equivalent to approximately 3.3 billion tons of CO2 released into the atmosphere. These facts highlight the urgent need to address agro-industrial waste through alternative methods that align with the principles of a circular economy.
Potato starch waste and chickpea waste are among the promising agro-industrial residues for PHA production. Potato starch waste is a by-product of industrial potato processing, primarily recovered from wastewater used to rinse peeled potatoes, along with other starch sources such as residual tubers, peels, and potato pulp. After sedimentation and starch separation, the remaining starch is filtered and dried [38,39,40]. Starch, comprising the polysaccharides amylose and amylopectin, is an abundant source of glucose monomers, which makes it a highly suitable substrate for PHA synthesis [41]. Chickpea waste, derived from the legume Cicer arietinum, is rich in macromolecules, including proteins [12.4–31.5%], starch [41–50%], unsaturated fatty acids (6%), lignocellulose, vitamins (e.g., riboflavin, thiamine), and minerals (iron, calcium) [42,43]. Primarily used as a protein source, chickpeas undergo processing that removes husks, leaving behind husks and spoiled chickpeas as waste. With suitable pretreatment, these macromolecules can be broken down into components usable by microorganisms for PHA synthesis [44].
Lignocellulose is composed of three main components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Cellulose and hemicellulose form an interconnected fibrous network, with lignin providing structural reinforcement. A significant challenge in utilizing agro-industrial waste for PHA production lies in the inherent resistance of lignocellulosic materials to microbial degradation. To enhance their bioavailability, various pretreatment methods are employed, including physical (e.g., ultrasonic [45], thermal [46,47,48], hydrothermal [49,50]), chemical (e.g., acidic hydrolysis [51,52], alkaline hydrolysis [53,54,55], oxidative agents [56]), physico-chemical (e.g., steam explosion [57,58,59], combined ultrasonic and alkaline treatments [60,61,62], extrusion [63]), biological (e.g., bacterial [64], fungal [65], enzymatic [66,67,68,69]), and “green-solvent” methods (e.g., ionic liquids [70], eutectic solvents [71,72], supercritical fluids [73]). These pretreatment strategies enhance waste porosity, surface area, and particle size optimization, increasing the concentration of reducing sugars essential for fermentation [35,74,75]. Table 1 summarizes agro-industrial wastes, corresponding pretreatment methods, and microbial species utilized for PHA synthesis.
For achieving high levels of PHA accumulation, specific cultivation conditions must be optimized, including moisture, pH, temperature, and the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio [82]. Moisture content is essential as it supports fermentation by creating an optimal environment for microbial growth. Insufficient moisture can lower nutrient solubility, while excessive moisture may inhibit enzyme activity. So, the ideal level should align with the biological needs of the microorganisms used [75]. Research by Catherine et al. [83] indicates that, within a certain range, pH has minimal impact on final PHA accumulation. For instance, pH values of 6.8, 7.3, 7.8, 8.3, and 8.8 led to PHA yields between 18 and 20% of dry cell weight, showing negligible variation. Conversely, Villano et al. [84] observed a decline in PHA yield as pH rose from 7.5 to 9.5, suggesting that the effect of pH on PHA accumulation may depend on the substrate, microorganisms, or other experimental parameters. Temperature also plays a critical role, with the highest PHA accumulations reported between 20 °C and 35 °C [83,85]. Temperatures outside this range can partially inactivate or inhibit metabolic pathways, reducing PHA production or even leading to PHA degradation. The C/N ratio further influences PHA synthesis, though requirements may vary by microorganism. Generally, the best yields are achieved with a high C/N ratio, as PHA production is favored in conditions where carbon is abundant, and nitrogen, magnesium, and phosphorus are limited. Wang et al. [86] demonstrated this by testing glucose and ammonium chloride in C/N ratios of 3.6:1, 36:1, and 360:1. The results confirmed that the highest PHA accumulation occurred at a 360:1 ratio, underscoring the importance of a high C/N ratio for optimal PHA yield.
PHA production can be achieved through two primary fermentation methods: Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) and Submerged Fermentation (SmF). In the SSF process, microorganisms grow and produce PHAs using a solid substrate that provides both support and nutrients. The substrate must contain an optimal level of moisture to facilitate microbial metabolic activity. SSF is particularly valuable for bioconversion of agro-industrial wastes into biofuels, biomaterials, or chemicals. The process can be divided into three stages: upstream, midstream, and downstream processes. During the upstream phase, the substrate and growth media are prepared, and microorganisms (often sourced from the waste itself) are isolated. The midstream phase is centered around fermentation, including substrate inoculation, incubation, and continuous monitoring and control of fermentation conditions. In the downstream phase, the final product is extracted, purified, and any residual biomass and organic waste are disposed of properly [87,88,89]. In contrast, the SmF process utilizes an aqueous system containing various nutrients and microbial suspension. SmF can be carried out in both batch and continuous (flow) bioreactors. In a batch process, nutrients and inoculum are added once, and the process ends when all nutrients have been converted into the desired product. The flow bioreactor, however, operates as an open system, where liquid nutrient broth and inoculum are continuously added while the product is simultaneously removed. As in SSF, any residual biomass from the fermentation is properly disposed of after the process is completed. Throughout both fermentation methods, key parameters such as temperature, pH, oxygen levels, and nutrient concentrations are continuously monitored to ensure optimal microbial growth and PHA production [90,91,92].
The following step in PHA production is extraction, which can roughly be divided into three parts. Extraction usually begins with the separation of dry cell weight from the residual biomass. After that, the cell wall is pretreated by heating, freezing, and thawing or by using alkaline or sodium chloride solution. These methods allow the PHA granules to exit the cells easily. The last part includes disrupting the cell completely and genuine extraction of PHAs by using appropriate solvent [8]. Cell disruption is most often carried out with sodium hypochlorite [93,94,95], hydrogen peroxide [96], various surfactants [97,98], enzymes [99] etc. Generally, using sodium hypochlorite, surfactants or enzymes gives high-quality and high-purity products. However, sodium hypochlorite can severely reduce the molecular weight of the obtained PHA, while using surfactants or enzymes is not financially beneficial due to the cost of the enzymes and the need for surfactant wastewater treatment [100]. To reduce the mentioned disadvantages, these chemicals can be combined in the cell disruption process. Marudkla et al. [101] used sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.5% w/v) and sodium hypochlorite (6% v/v) for PHB extraction and recorded 78.70% PHB recovery. Since PHAs are highly soluble in chlorinated hydrocarbons (mainly chloroform [102,103], dichloromethane [104]), they are frequently used for their extraction from microorganisms’ cells. Their main disadvantages are their toxicity and a large amount that should be disposed after the extraction [99]. Recently, methods such as supercritical fluid extraction [105,106], eutectic solvent extraction [71] and phage lysis [107] have been investigated. These methods have shown to be highly selective for PHAs, rapid, and environmentally friendly; however they are dependent on strictly defined process parameters that have to be constantly controlled and optimized (phage lysis can be carried out only on genetically modified microorganisms) [8].
The objective of this study was to isolate and identify microorganisms from various agro-industrial waste biomass sources, including chickpeas, chickpea-bean residues, and starch, in order to assess their potential for PHA production through SSF. Furthermore, the study aimed to characterize the produced PHA polymers using FTIR-ATR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The findings were intended to offer valuable insights into the feasibility of utilizing agro-industrial waste as a sustainable feedstock for biopolymer production, potentially reducing the environmental impact of plastic pollution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Physico-Chemical Characterization of Agricultural Waste

The substrates used in this experiment included waste starch, waste chickpeas (referred to as chickpea 1), and waste chickpeas with bean residues (referred to as chickpea 2). The starch was obtained from Kanaan d.o.o., located in Donji Miholjac, Croatia, while both types of waste chickpeas were sourced from Podravka d.d. in Koprivnica, Croatia. For the experiments, the substrates were homogenized using a knife mill GRINDOMIX GM 200 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) to achieve a uniform particle size. The substrates were analyzed for moisture content (MC) [108], dry matter (DM), volatile matter (VM) [109], nitrogen [110], and carbon [111] content. Additionally, the pH value and concentration of reducing sugars (RS) were measured to assess the chemical characteristics of the substrates. The pH-value of the substrates was determined by SenTix® 940 electrode (Xylem Inc., New York, NY, USA) and the concentration of RS was determined using the DNS method [112]. For this analysis, 10 g of each substrate (dry weight) was mixed with 100 mL of distilled water in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated at 37 °C for 40 min. Following incubation, the mixtures were subjected to centrifugation at 5500 rpm for 10 min using a Sigma 3K15 centrifuge (Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The supernatant was then decanted, and 1 mL of each sample was transferred into cuvettes. Subsequently, 1.5 mL of DNS reagent was added to each sample, and the absorbance for determining the concentration of reducing sugars was measured at a wavelength of 575 nm using a DR3900 spectrophotometer (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). These analyses were essential for understanding the physical and chemical properties of the substrates, which are crucial for evaluating their suitability as growth media for microbial isolation and subsequent fermentation processes.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of PHA-Producing Microorganisms

To isolate microorganisms from substrates, waste starch, chickpea 1, and chickpea 2, 10 g of each substrate (dry weight) was weighed and suspended in 100 mL of sterile distilled water in Erlenmeyer flasks. Eluates were prepared following ISO 21268-3:2019 [113] guidelines. The flasks were placed on a Biosan PSU-20i Orbital Shaker (Biosan, Riga, Latvia) at 160 rpm for 24 h at ambient temperature. After 24 h, bacterial and fungal colony-forming units (CFUs) were quantified on general-purpose media: nutrient agar (NA) for bacterial colonies and malt agar (MA) for fungal colonies, using the pour plate method as described by Briški et al. [114]. For all substrates, serial dilutions were prepared using a 0.9% NaCl aqueous solution (from 100 to 10−9), plated, and colonies were enumerated on the plates where the colony count fell within the optimal range of 20 to 400, ensuring accuracy and statistical reliability in the quantification of microbial populations. The plates were incubated at 80% relative humidity, with fungi cultivated at 28 °C and bacteria at 37 °C. After incubation, the number of colonies on agar plates were determined. The average CFU values for bacteria and fungi were determined by counting two serial dilutions as follows:
Before the experiment: Bacterial CFU: chickpea 1: 10−8 and 10−9; chickpea 2 and starch: 10−7 and 10−8; Fungal CFU: chickpea 1 and starch: 10−5 and 10−6; chickpea 2: 10−6 and 10−7.
At the end of the experiment: Bacterial CFU: chickpea 1 and 2: 10−8 and 10−9; starch: 10−7 and 10−8; Fungal CFU: chickpea 1 and 2; and starch: 10−6 and 10−7.
The results were expressed as CFU of microorganisms per gram of dry matter. Bacterial and fungal colonies with distinct morphological characteristics and predominance on nutrient agar (NA) and malt agar (MA) plates were selected and transferred to fresh NA and MA plates for isolation. Bacterial isolates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h, while fungal isolates required incubation at 28 °C for 3–5 days, as outlined in the method by Briški et al. [114]. To ensure purity, transfers to fresh media were repeated until single-species colonies were confirmed. After isolating pure cultures, each was preserved on slant agar to ensure viability for subsequent characterization and analysis. All microorganisms were stained with a 0.02% Sudan Black solution to assess their PHA production capacity. According to Kumar et al. [115], colonies that produced PHA exhibited a distinct dark blue coloration, while non-producing colonies retained their original color. This staining method effectively indicates PHA accumulation in microbial cells, facilitating the differentiation between PHA-producing and non-producing strains. Such differentiation is essential for selecting microorganisms for further investigation and potential applications in bioplastics and sustainable material production.
Identifying PHA-producing pure cultures involved systematically evaluating the isolated microorganisms, encompassing both bacterial and fungal species. Initially, the cultures were assessed based on their growth characteristics on agar plates, with particular attention to colony morphology, including variations in appearance, coloration, and shape [116]. This qualitative assessment facilitated preliminary identification is based on established taxonomic criteria. Subsequently, the cellular morphology of the isolates was analyzed using a light microscope (KERN OBE 134, KERN, and SOHN GmbH, Balingen, Germany). This microscopic examination provided essential information regarding the structural characteristics, such as cell shape, arrangement, and any distinctive features, which are critical for accurate microbial classification. For bacteria, identification followed the procedures outlined in the Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, which included techniques such as Gram staining and the KOH test [116]. Additional tests included oxidase, catalase, and nitrate-reductase assessments [116], along with a series of biochemical tests known as API (Analytical Profile Index, BioMérieux®, Lyon, France), utilizing API CH 50, API 20NE, API 20E, API Staph, and API Strep tests. Yeasts were identified using the API 20C AUX test. The final step of the identification of bacteria was a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) analysis, which is based on the protein identification of pulsed single ionic analytes (pure microbial culture), coupled with a TOF measuring mass analyzer, and the exact protein mass was determined.

2.3. PHA Production from Agricultural Waste via Solid-State Fermentation with Mixed Microbial Cultures

Isolated pure cultures capable of producing PHA were prepared as inoculum for PHA production from agricultural waste (Figure 1). Bacterial cultures were cultivated on NA at 37 °C for 24 h, while fungal cultures were cultivated on MA at 28 °C for 48 h. After incubation, each bacterium and fungi were harvested using a sterile inoculation loop and transferred into 25 mL of nutrient broth and malt broth, respectively. These suspensions were then incubated aerobically on a rotary shaker (Biosan PSU-20i Orbital Shaker, Riga, Latvia) at 160 rpm and 30 °C for 18 h to promote further growth and enhance the inoculum for subsequent applications in PHA production. The CFU value of the obtained pure bacterial and fungal suspensions was between 108 and 109. The next step involved preparing three distinct mixed culture suspensions using microorganisms isolated from waste starch, chickpeas 1, and chickpeas 2. One milliliter of each pure culture suspension was added to 50 mL of sterile water and thoroughly homogenized. The obtained suspensions were uniformly applied to 100 g of waste starch, chickpeas 1, and chickpeas 2, respectively. Solid-state fermentation was conducted in 0.5 L glass Erlenmeyer flasks that had been sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. Each flask was filled with 100 ± 1 g of the inoculated substrate and incubated in a thermostat at 30 °C for 7 days. The initial experimental conditions are summarized in Table 2. At the end of experiments, physical-chemical characterization was also performed (see Section 2.1).
The biomass produced during solid-state fermentation was quantified gravimetrically following two consecutive solid–liquid extractions, as described by Martínez-Avila et al. [66]. In summary, the extraction involved mixing the fermented sample (5–8 g) with distilled water at a 1:3 ratio in an orbital shaker set at 160 rpm and 30 °C for 30 min. The supernatant was then vacuum filtered through AP25 paper and collected quantitatively in Falcon tubes. The filtered solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm and 4 °C for 15 min, after which the supernatant was discarded. The pellet containing the biomass was washed with distilled water and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min to recover the solid fraction. The resulting pellet was dried at 60 °C for 24 h and weighed to determine the biomass or cell dry weight (CDW) in the solid sample. PHA extraction from the dried biomass was performed using the method outlined by Law and Slepecky [117,118]. The biomass was resuspended in a 10–13% v/v sodium hypochlorite solution and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to disrupt the cell membranes. Intracellular lipid granules were then separated and washed with water, acetone, and ethanol, respectively, through centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 15 min. Finally, the dissolved polymer was extracted by incubating the mixture in boiling chloroform for 2 min, followed by filtration of the solution containing the dissolved polymer. PHA accumulation was calculated according to the following equation, Equation (1) [116]:
P H A   a c c u m u l a t i o n % = D r y   w e i g h t   o f   e x t r a c t e d   P H A   ( g L ) D C W   ( g L ) × 100 %
where DCW is dry weight of biomass.
The characterization of PHA produced after 7 days of experimentation was performed using an FTIR spectrometer (FTIR-8400S, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an ATR sampling accessory (MIRacle™ Single Reflection ATR, PIKE Technologies, Fitchburg, WI, USA), covering a spectral range from 4000 to 650 cm−1. Approximately 15 mg of the extracted PHA sample was carefully placed on the ATR prism, ensuring complete surface coverage for optimal spectral acquisition. The recorded spectra were then analyzed and processed using IR Solution software 1.6 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to accurately identify the characteristic functional groups present in the sample. Each sample was measured at least four times and only the most representative spectra were selected. The thermal properties of PHA, specifically the melting temperature (Tm) and crystallization temperature (Tc), were assessed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on a Mettler Toledo DSC 3 Star System (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). The DSC analysis involved heating samples from room temperature to 200 °C, followed by a three-minute isothermal hold. The samples were then cooled from 200 to −60 °C and reheated to 200 °C. This process generated a thermogram that illustrates the relationship between heat flow and temperature. Additionally, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using a TGA Q500 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Approximately 5–7 mg samples were heated from 40 to 700 °C at a constant rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere (60 mL min−1). The resulting thermograms were analyzed to determine mass loss, thermal stability, and decomposition temperature ranges of the PHA samples.
All experiments and measurements were performed in triplicate. The standard deviation (σ) was calculated using Equation (2):
σ = ( x x ¯ ) 2 n
where x represents individual measurements, x ¯ is the mean value, and n is the number of measurements. The standard deviation was then expressed as ± and added to the reported results. All calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel (part of the Microsoft Office Suite).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Identification of PHA-Producing Microorganisms

Microorganisms with the potential to produce PHA were successfully isolated from three distinct carbon sources: starch, chickpea 1, and chickpea 2. A total of 12 microorganisms were isolated and identified, comprising 8 bacterial cultures and 4 yeast cultures. To assess their capability to produce PHA, the Sudan Black staining method was employed. This technique involves the use of a 0.02% Sudan Black solution [119], which selectively stains intracellular lipid granules, including PHA (Figure 2). The analysis revealed that the colonies exhibited a dark blue coloration, indicating the accumulation of PHA within the cells. This distinct color change serves as a visual marker for PHA production, allowing for easy differentiation between PHA-producing and non-producing strains. Notably, the intensity of the blue coloration correlates with the quantity of PHA accumulated, providing a qualitative assessment of the production capacity of each isolated microorganism. Such visual indicators are critical for selecting optimal microorganisms for further study and potential industrial applications in bioplastics.
Table 3 presents the microorganisms identified from the three agricultural waste sources, accompanied by their morphological characteristics. The successful isolation and characterization of these microorganisms not only emphasize their potential for biopolymer production but also demonstrates the feasibility of leveraging diverse agricultural waste for sustainable PHA synthesis. Notably, the results indicated that most PHA-producing microorganisms were isolated from starch, suggesting that starch serves as a particularly advantageous carbon source for the growth and metabolism of these organisms. This observation can be attributed to several interrelated factors. Starch, as a polysaccharide composed of glucose units, can be easily metabolized by a wide range of microorganisms. The availability of these simple sugars provides an efficient energy source, facilitating microbial growth. Additionally, some microorganisms may possess specific enzymatic pathways, such as amylase, which enable them to efficiently degrade starch into simpler sugars that can be utilized for growth and biopolymer production [120]. Furthermore, the conditions during the isolation and cultivation processes may have favored the growth of starch-utilizing microorganisms over those that metabolize chickpeas. Environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and moisture levels play a significant role in the proliferation of microorganisms, especially those involved in starch degradation [121]. Overall, these findings highlight the significance of selecting appropriate carbon sources to optimize microbial growth and biopolymer production in biotechnological applications, reinforcing the role of agricultural waste as a valuable resource in sustainable PHA synthesis.
Bacteria can be categorized into two primary groups based on their morphological features: rod shaped (bacilli) and spherical (cocci) [122]. The results of the isolation of bacteria from chickpea 1, chickpea 2, and starch showed that rod-shaped bacteria were the most dominant. Among these were Brevibacillus sp., Empedobacter brevis, and Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus, isolated from chickpea 1, along with Bacillus licheniformis and Citrobacter freundii, isolated from starch. Based on the properties of their cell walls, isolated bacteria were classified as either Gram-positive or Gram-negative.
According to the literature [123], research has shown that most bacteria capable of producing PHA have been found to be Gram-negative. Among the eight isolated bacterial strains, only two—Empedobacter brevis and Citrobacter freundii—exhibited red staining when examined under a microscope. This observation indicates that these strains are Gram-negative bacteria, as evidenced by their inability to retain the crystal violet stain used in the Gram staining procedure. This characteristic is a fundamental aspect of their cell wall structure, which is typically thinner and surrounded by an outer membrane containing lipopolysaccharides. The remaining 6 bacterial strains, Brevibacillus sp., Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus, Micrococcus spp., Leuconostoc sp., Bacillus licheniformis, and Staphylococcus lentus, showed purple staining upon microscopic examination, indicating that they are Gram-positive bacteria. While Gram-negative bacteria are well-known as the main and most researched producers of PHAs, recent studies highlight that certain Gram-positive bacteria can also produce these biopolymers, particularly PHB [124,125]. This ability is due to the presence of specific genes and enzymes, such as phaC (PHA synthase) and phaA (β-ketothiolase) [126], which are crucial for the PHA biosynthesis process. These enzymes help polymerize hydroxyalkanoic acid monomers into PHA polymers, allowing Gram-positive bacteria to produce and accumulate significant amounts of PHA when grown under suitable conditions. These findings are consistent with previous reports that recognize Gram-positive genera, such as Bacillus [125,127,128], Rhodococcus [129,130], Staphylococcus [131,132], Corynebacterium [133], and Nocardia [134,135] as efficient PHA producers. Unlike Gram-negative bacteria, which have an outer membrane rich in lipopolysaccharides, Gram-positive bacteria have a thicker peptidoglycan layer in their cell walls. This structural difference has been shown to provide certain advantages in biotechnological applications, including simplified downstream processing due to the absence of endotoxins and lipopolysaccharides, which are often problematic in the purification of biopolymers from Gram-negative strains. Furthermore, Gram-positive bacteria tend to grow faster and are more resistant to various environmental stresses, making them appealing candidates for large-scale industrial applications. Their ability to accumulate PHA under nutrient-limiting conditions, such as nitrogen or phosphorus limitation, coupled with their robustness in diverse environments, positions Gram-positive bacteria as promising microorganisms for sustainable biopolymer production.
Figure 2 illustrates the bacterial strains cultured on NA plates, including those stained with Sudan Black dye, alongside microscopic images of Gram-stained bacteria. The findings from the Gram staining, KOH test, and biochemical assays are summarized in Table 4.
For additional confirmation of Gram staining results, a rapid KOH test was also conducted. Since Gram-negative bacteria have a thin peptidoglycan layer in their cell walls, in contact with 3% KOH solution they form thin filaments, indicating a positive KOH test result (+). On the other hand, Gram-positive bacteria do not form filaments with KOH solution, which is marked as a negative KOH test result (−). When comparing the results of Gram staining and KOH test (Table 4), a few inconsistencies from expected outcomes were noticed, particularly for Brevibacillus sp., Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus, Micrococcus spp., and Citrobacter freundii. Several factors can lead to false results in the KOH test. In the case of Gram-negative bacteria, inaccurate KOH test results may occur due to an insufficient amount of bacteria. In contrast, for Gram-positive bacteria, false results tend to occur due to an excessive number of bacteria or growth of bacterial colonies with “sticky” structure [136].
A crucial step for identification of bacteria is conducting biochemical tests, as these tests reveal the presence of specific enzymes, such as oxidase, catalase, and nitrate-reductase [137]. Catalase is produced by many aerobic and most facultative anaerobic bacteria, breaking down H2O2 into water and oxygen [138]. The catalase test detects this enzyme, with a positive result shown by oxygen bubbles. Aerobic bacteria often contain cytochrome C oxidase, which reduces oxygen to water. Tests using N,N,N’,N’–tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine turn purple in its presence [138]. The final biochemical test identifies nitrate-reducing bacteria by detecting their ability to reduce nitrate to nitrite, indicated by the appearance of a pink color [139]. All the isolated bacteria, with the exception of Leuconostoc sp., showed positive results in catalase test (Table 4). In this study, various API strip tests were utilized to identify and characterize isolated bacterial strains, leveraging their metabolic and biochemical profiles. These standardized kits, including API CH50, API 20E, API 20NE, API Staph, and API Strep for bacteria, and API 20C AUX [140] for yeasts, provide efficient, reliable, and reproducible tools for species identification in microbiological diagnostics. Each test uses specific reagents and interprets results through a comprehensive database, enabling precise species classification. The API CH50 strip [141] is designed to test the fermentation of 50 different carbohydrates and assess related metabolic activities. This system is particularly effective for classifying both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria based on their ability to metabolize various compounds, making it a valuable tool for identifying bacteria from diverse environmental and clinical samples. In this study, API CH50 was used for the identification of Brevibacillus sp., Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus, Leuconostoc sp., and Bacillus licheniformis. For the identification of Brevibacillus sp., Bacillus licheniformis and Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus API 20NE [142] also used s for broader metabolic characterization, including oxidase, nitrate reduction, and enzymatic activities. The API 20NE strip evaluates 20 biochemical reactions, including carbohydrate assimilation, and is particularly useful for identifying opportunistic pathogens outside the Enterobacteriaceae family. It was used for identifying Empedobacter brevis. API Staph [143] identifies Staphylococcus species and other Gram-positive cocci by analyzing traits like enzyme activity (e.g., coagulase and urease) and carbohydrate fermentation. This strip was used for identifying Micrococcus spp. and Staphylococcus lentus. The API Strep test [144], tailored for identifying Streptococcus species, tests for their ability to ferment sugars and perform other specific metabolic activities. However, no strains were identified using this system in this study. Finally, Citrobacter freundii, a glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacterium from the Enterobacteriaceae family, was identified using the API 20E kit [145]. This test is specifically designed for Enterobacteriaceae, assessing characteristics like citrate utilization, lysine decarboxylase activity, and fermentation patterns. The identification process included the use of MALDI-TOF MS, which was employed as the final confirmation step following the API strip tests [146]. This technique is based on protein profiling, providing high-resolution identification of microorganisms through mass spectrometric analysis. MALDI-TOF MS identifies microorganisms by analyzing the protein fingerprint of pure microbial cultures. It uses a laser to ionize the sample, producing singly charged ions from the proteins present. These ions are then measured by a time-of-flight mass analyzer, which determines the exact mass of the proteins. By comparing the resulting spectra to a comprehensive database, the genera and species of the isolates were accurately confirmed. This method offers advantages such as rapid identification, high specificity, and reproducibility, making it an essential complement to biochemical testing for microbial classification.
Among the identified bacteria, only a few of them have been previously explored and reported for PHA production. According to the literature, Aneurinibacillus sp. [147], Citrobacter freundii, and Leuconostoc spp. [148] are known to produce PHB. Lastly, bacteria from genera Micrococcus and Staphylococcus are associated mostly with scl-PHA production [147].
Studies on yeast-based PHA production are less extensive than those focused on bacteria. However, in this investigation, four yeast strains were identified, and their morphological characteristics were examined using a light microscope, following the methodologies outlined in “Introduction to Industrial Mycology” [149]. Table 3 provides detailed information on these characteristics. Figure 3A–D shows yeasts cultured on MA plates, including strains stained with Sudan Black dye, along with microscopic images of the yeasts. Candida krusei stands out as the only yeast species with documented evidence of PHA production. Studies have shown that this yeast can produce the polymer PHB, with accumulation levels ranging from 2.44% to 9.26% [150].

3.2. PHA Production from Agricultural Waste via Solid-State Fermentation with Mixed Microbial Cultures

To optimize SSF implementation, a comprehensive physico-chemical analysis was undertaken to assess the fermentation suitability of three substrates. This analysis included determination of MC, DM, VM, pH, RS concentration, and CFU (Table 2 and Table 5). According to the initial conditions (Table 2), the moisture content of the substrates ranged from 44% to 60%, reflecting the inherent characteristics of each material [151]. The literature indicates that an MC range of 40–70% is generally optimal for bacterial and yeast growth [152]. Among the substrates, chickpea 2 exhibited the highest MC at 59.86%, while starch showed the lowest at 44.77%. All substrates had high VM, between 97% and 99%. Initial pH values of the substrates were within a range of 4.450 to 5.550, consistent with reported values in the literature [153,154]. Chickpea 2 had the highest concentration of reducing sugars, at 56.78 mg/gDM.
At the end of the SSF process (Table 5), it was observed that the moisture content (MC) increased in both chickpea 1 and chickpea 2. The changes in volatile matter were minimal across all three substrates (3–6%), suggesting that while some components of the substrate were metabolized, the overall matrix remained intact. In contrast, a significant reduction in the concentrations of RS was observed in chickpea 2 from the beginning to the end of fermentation (Table 2 and Table 5). This decline suggests that microorganisms actively utilized the available RS during fermentation, resulting in their depletion. This observation aligns with findings reported in the literature, which highlight the metabolic activity of microorganisms in converting available sugars into fermentation by-products. [155,156]. The observed differences in the changes in RS and volatile matter (VM) can be explained by the distinct metabolic pathways employed by the microorganisms. RS, being readily available, is preferentially consumed by microorganisms for energy and growth, leading to its reduction. In contrast, volatile matter consists of more complex organic compounds, such as cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose, which are not immediately available for microbial utilization. The complex hierarchical structure of cellulose, consisting of crystalline nanofibrils intertwined with lignin and hemicellulose, presents a barrier to microbial and enzymatic degradation, making the breakdown of cellulose into fermentable sugars challenging [157,158]. This intricate structure highlights the difficulty in developing universal pretreatment strategies for efficient biomass conversion. By implementing effective pretreatment strategies, such as dilute acid pretreatment, it is possible to optimize the substrate composition and enhance the bioavailability of carbon sources, thereby maximizing the potential for microbial growth and biopolymer production [158].
The change in CFU during SSF is significantly influenced by the physico-chemical characteristics of solid substrates and its interaction with nutrients and water [153]. The initial values of CFU for bacteria (Table 4) in all substrates were very high. A similar trend can be seen for fungi, although the CFU values were lower. After 7 days of experiment (Table 5), an increase in CFU values of bacteria and fungi was noticed on NA and MA, respectively. This proliferation reflects the microorganisms’ adaptation to the solid substrates and their effective utilization of available nutrients. Notably, the most significant increase in CFU value was observed with chickpea 2, where the CFU on NA increased from 1.2 × 109 to 4.7 × 1010 cell/gDM.
The final step of SSF involved drying the substrates to determine the dry cell weight (DCW) and extracting the PHA. This extraction used a biphasic system, where chloroform, the lower phase, was used to isolate the PHA [159]. This method relies on the fact that PHA is soluble in organic solvents like chloroform, which allows for the efficient separation of the polymer from the biomass. The results of the PHA extraction from various substrates, summarized in Table 6, indicated relatively low percentages of PHA accumulation overall. However, chickpea 2, which exhibited the highest CFU value (Table 5), demonstrated a notably higher accumulation percentage of 13.81%. In contrast to chickpea 1 and starch, which yielded a greater diversity of microbial cultures, only two distinct microbial cultures were isolated from chickpea 2. The observed limited microbial diversity in cultures isolated from chickpea 2 may have reduced competition among microorganisms, thereby enhancing their metabolic efficiency and promoting greater accumulation of PHAs. This observation is consistent with studies [160,161,162] showing that lower microbial diversity can improve metabolic output by reducing interspecies competition for resources. With fewer species present, microorganisms can more effectively utilize available carbon sources for PHA production. Additionally, the concentration of microbial cultures can influence biopolymer accumulation, as reduced competition allows for optimized resource utilization and enhanced microbial growth. In a previous study, Plasticicumulans was enriched with 27.6% and 50.6% as the most abundant populations, under high and low feast dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions, respectively. When both cultures were fed with a synthetic mixture of the four volatile fatty acids for PHA accumulation, butyrate and valerate were always taken up first, followed by acetate and propionate, regardless of the DO levels applied. It seemed that the abundance of Plasticicumulans in an enriched mixed microbial culture for PHA accumulation had a direct impact on substrate competition, with a clear preference for butyrate and valerate over acetate and propionate [162]. It is noteworthy that chickpea 2 contained a strain of Micrococcus, which previous studies have associated with the production of scl-PHAs [147]. This suggests that the presence of Micrococcus in chickpea 2 may have played a pivotal role in the biosynthesis of PHAs, thereby contributing to the higher accumulation observed in this substrate (Table 6). The implications of microbial diversity and strain-specific capabilities underscore the importance of substrate selection in optimizing PHA production during fermentation processes. This finding underscores the suitability of chickpea 2 as a substrate for microbial growth and PHA production, highlighting its potential for optimizing biopolymer yields. The correlation between CFU values and PHA accumulation can be attributed to several factors. First, the robust microbial population indicated by the CFU values suggests that chickpea 2 provided an optimal environment for microbial proliferation, which in turn facilitated higher PHA biosynthesis. Furthermore, the nutritional composition of chickpea 2 may have favored the metabolic pathways leading to PHA production, thereby enhancing the accumulation of this biopolymer [163]. Overall, the results emphasize the importance of substrate selection in SSF processes for PHA production, as the characteristics of the substrate directly influence both microbial growth and the efficiency of PHA accumulation [160,164]. Moreover, the choice of substrate can reduce or intensify competition among microbial communities, further influencing the efficiency of PHA synthesis [164]. Future investigations could focus on refining the extraction techniques and optimizing fermentation conditions to further improve PHA yields from different substrates. Additionally, incorporating preprocessing steps for agricultural waste prior to fermentation may enhance the accessibility of carbon sources for microorganisms. This could involve methods such as physical treatment (e.g., grinding or milling), chemical treatment (e.g., acid or alkali hydrolysis), or biological pretreatment (e.g., enzymatic degradation) [165]. By breaking down complex molecules into simpler sugars and increasing the surface area of the substrates, preprocessing could facilitate more efficient microbial metabolism and higher PHA production rates. Such approaches not only optimize the fermentation process but also contribute to the overall sustainability of using agricultural waste for biopolymer synthesis.

3.3. Characterization of Extracted PHA

3.3.1. FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy Analysis of the Extract

In FTIR spectroscopy, several characteristic functional groups and their corresponding absorption peaks are associated with PHAs. These groups are crucial for confirming the presence and structure of PHAs in a sample. All infrared (IR) spectra (Figure 4) exhibit a broad peak between 3281 and 3303 cm−1, indicating the presence of hydroxyl groups (–OH) and potentially water, which complicates the definitive identification of PHAs [166]. In Figure 5A, the IR spectrum for chickpea 1 shows absorption peaks at 2918 and 2850 cm−1, corresponding to asymmetric and symmetric stretching of methyl (–CH₃) and methylene (–CH₂) groups. The peak at 1708 cm−1 signifies C=O stretching associated with carbonyl bonds, while peaks at 1264, 1371, and 1456 cm−1 represent bending vibrations of methyl and methylene bonds. Additionally, absorption peaks at 1019 and 873 cm−1 indicate the presence of C–C bonds. Figure 5B presents the IR spectrum for chickpea 2, which closely resembles that of chickpea 1, with notable variations in the methyl and methylene stretching peaks at 2919 and 2850 cm−1, as well as C–C bond stretching peaks at 1006 and 872 cm−1. The IR spectrum for starch (Figure 5) also reveals characteristic peaks associated with PHA structure. Peaks at 2950 and 2920 cm−1 indicate asymmetric stretching of methyl and methylene groups, while smaller peaks at 1713 and 1246 cm−1 confirm carbonyl bond stretching and bending of methyl and methylene bonds, respectively [167]. Overall, the IR spectral analysis reinforces the identification of PHB in the substrates, emphasizing the molecular characteristics common to PHA structures. Further investigation may be necessary to clarify the presence of water and other components that could affect PHA quantification.

3.3.2. DSC Analysis of the Extract

The DSC thermograms of extracted samples derived from chickpea 1 and starch exhibit a broad endothermic peak during the first heating cycle, indicative of water evaporation from the structural matrix of the samples. This peak is absent in the thermogram of the extracted samples obtained from chickpea 2. All thermograms display irregular profiles characterized by numerous sharp peaks, which provide critical information regarding the glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), crystallization temperature (Tc), and the enthalpies of melting and crystallization (ΔHm and ΔHc, respectively). Such thermal data are essential for the characterization and identification of the synthesized PHA. The detailed results of the DSC analysis are summarized in Table 7.
The cooling cycle thermograms reveal a prominent exothermic peak, indicating the crystallization of PHA. This peak is distinctly observed in the thermograms (Figure 5A,B) for PHA samples derived from both chickpea 1 and chickpea 2, with crystallization temperatures recorded at 99.10 °C and 95.24 °C, respectively. These findings align with the published literature [168], which reports similar crystallization temperatures for polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV), exhibiting a crystallization temperature of approximately 70 °C for copolymers containing 3, 8, and 10 mol% of hydroxyvalerate (HV). In contrast, copolymers with higher HV content, specifically 17% and 30%, demonstrated lower crystallization temperatures of 60 °C and 40 °C, respectively. These comparisons underscore the thermodynamic behavior of PHAs and highlight the influence of compositional variations on their crystallization properties. The observed crystallization temperatures in the current study suggest that the molecular arrangement and interaction of the components in the PHA samples significantly affect their thermal properties. The melting curve, specifically the second heating cycle curve of PHA obtained from chickpea 2 (Figure 5B), reveals a glass transition temperature of 1.81 °C. Further analysis of the melting curve demonstrates the presence of distinct endothermic peaks, with melting temperatures of 128.16 °C, 124.52 °C, and 119.53 °C corresponding to the PHAs extracted from chickpea 1, chickpea 2, and starch, respectively. These melting temperatures align closely with those reported by Dias et al. [169], which indicate melting point 133 °C PHBV containing 25 mol% of hydroxyvalerate (HV), as well as for the copolymer P(3HB-co-6 mol% 3HA). The variations in melting temperature suggest that the composition of the substrates influences the thermal properties of the resulting PHA. The higher crystallization and melting temperatures observed in this study may be indicative of a more crystalline structure, which could contribute to improved mechanical properties and thermal stability of the produced biopolymers. This ordered structure may also reflect the specific microbial metabolic pathways utilized during PHA production, which can affect the copolymer composition and consequently its thermal characteristics. Additionally, the crystallization behavior of PHAs is crucial for their processing and application in biodegradable materials. Understanding these thermal properties helps in optimizing the production and processing conditions to enhance the performance of PHAs in various applications, including packaging, agricultural films, and other environmentally friendly products. Further investigation into the relationship between the composition of the substrate and the resulting thermal properties of PHA could provide insights for optimizing biopolymer production from agricultural waste.

3.3.3. TGA of the Extract

The TGA curves (Figure 6) obtained after seven days of SSF indicate a single-stage thermal degradation process for PHA, consistent with findings by Apiwatanapiwat et al. [129] and Akbari et al. [170]. This single-stage degradation suggests a uniform thermal behavior of the obtained PHA in this study, which may be attributed to the specific microbial activity and substrate conditions during fermentation. In contrast, Dikshit et al. [171] reported a two-stage thermal degradation profile for PHB synthesized using Cupriavidus necator and Bacillus megaterium, with degradation temperatures ranging from 100 °C to 160 °C. They attributed this phenomenon to the selective evaporation of adsorbed solvents, such as chloroform, which may influence the thermal properties of the synthesized PHB. The presence of these solvents can lead to variations in the degradation mechanisms, highlighting the importance of synthesis conditions on the thermal stability of biopolymers. The highest mass loss, recorded at 71.64%, was observed in the PHA sample derived from chickpea 1. This significant mass loss may reflect the degradation of less thermally stable components or impurities within the sample. The maximum degradation temperatures (Td,max) for the PHAs obtained in this study were found to be 302.75 °C, 309.06 °C, and 293.37 °C for samples from chickpea 1, chickpea 2, and starch, respectively. These temperatures align with those reported by Dikshit et al. [170], reinforcing the expected degradation profile for PHB. Notably, the Td,max values observed in this study are higher than those reported for commercial PHB, which exhibit degradation temperatures of 415 °C and 289 °C. This indicates that the PHB synthesized in this research is thermally more resistant than the commercially available variants. The enhanced thermal stability of the produced PHB may be advantageous for applications requiring materials that can withstand higher temperatures without degradation, further emphasizing the potential of utilizing agricultural waste as a substrate for biopolymer production.

4. Conclusions

This study explores the potential of utilizing agro-industrial waste, specifically starch and chickpea byproducts, as substrates for PHA production. A total of eight bacterial and four yeast strains capable of PHA biosynthesis were successfully isolated from these waste materials. Comprehensive characterization of the substrates, both before and after SSF, provided critical data on moisture content, dry matter, volatile matter, nitrogen and carbon content, and reducing sugar levels. The SSF process, conducted over seven days, achieved a maximum PHA accumulation of 13.81% from the chickpea 2 substrate. Structural and thermal analyses using FTIR-ATR, TGA, and DSC indicated the synthesis of PHB. While the results demonstrate the feasibility of PHA production from agro-industrial waste, further research is required to enhance yield, particularly through substrate pretreatment, optimization of fermentation conditions, and exploration of alternative substrates. Additionally, more detailed structural characterization will facilitate the development of bioplastics with tailored properties. This study contributes to advancing sustainable PHA production, supporting both environmental sustainability and the principles of the circular economy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.G., M.M. (Martina Miloloža) and K.G.; methodology, D.B., M.M. (Marinko Markić) and M.C.; investigation, D.B., M.M. (Marinko Markić), K.G. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. (Marinko Markić), K.G. and D.K.G.; writing—review and editing, D.K.G., V.O.B., J.R. and Š.U.; visualization, K.G., D.B. and M.C.; supervision, D.K.G., M.M. (Martina Miloloža) and T.B.; project administration, D.K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (funded by the European Union, NextGenerationEU) through the project production and development of compostable packaging from waste biomass for the packaging of industrially processed food products (NPOO.C3.2.R3-Il.04.0059).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Krešimir Stublić is employed by Aqua V.M.V. d.o.o. and Jasmina Ranilović is employed by Podravka Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Reddy, C.S.; Ghai Rashmi, R.; Kalia, V.C. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sabapathy, P.C.; Devaraj, S.; Meixner, K.; Anburajan, P.; Kathirvel, P.; Ravikumar, Y.; Zabed, H.M.; Qi, X. Recent development sin Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saharan, R.; Kharb, J. Exploration of Bioplastics: (A Review). Orient. J. Chem. 2022, 38, 840–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. European Bioplastics. Available online: https://www.european-bioplastics.org/market/ (accessed on 14 October 2024).
  5. Panda, P.K.; Dash, P. Preparation, Characterization, and Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)-Based Films and Coatings. In Biopolymer-Based Films and Coatings: Trends and Challenges, 1st ed.; Bangar, S.P., Siroha, A.K., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; Volume 1, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raza, Z.A.; Abid, S.; Banat, I.M. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Characteristics, production, recent developments and applications. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 126, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shrivastav, A.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, Y.-R. Advances in the Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Nanopaticles for Novel Drug Delivery System. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 581684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Madkour, M.H.; Heinrich, D.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Shabbaj, I.I.; Steinbüchel, A. PHA Recovery from Biomass. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2963–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, N.; Wang, M.; Song, L.; Yu, D.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Han, X. Polyhydroxybutyrate production by recombinant Escherichia coli based on genes related to synthesis pathway of PHB from Massilia sp. UMI-21. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, W.; Bergsma, S.; Colpa, D.I.; Euverink, G.-J.W.; Krooneman, J. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) synthesis and degradation by microbes and applications towards a circular economy. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 341, 118033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Faccin, D.J.L.; Correa, M.P.; Rech, R.; Ayub, M.A.Z.; Secchi, A.R.; Cardozo, N.S.M. Modeling P(3HB) production by Bacillus megaterium. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 87, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Haas, C.; El-Najjar, T.; Virgolini, N.; Smerilli, M.; Neureiter, M. High cell-density production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) in a membrane bioreactor. New Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Berezina, N.; Yada, B. Improvement of the poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) production by dual feeding with levulinic acid and sodium propionate in Cupriavidus necator. New Biotechnol. 2016, 31, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Centeno-Leija, S.; Huerta-Beristain, G.; Giles-Gomez, M.; Bolivar, F.; Gosset, G.; Martinez, A. Improving poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production in Escherichia coli by combining the increase in the NADPH pool and acetyl-CoA availability. Antoine Van Leeuwenhoek 2014, 105, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Akaraonye, E.; Moreno, C.; Knowles, J.C.; Keshavarz, T.; Roy, I. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) production by Bacillus cereus SPV using sugarcane molasses as the main carbon source. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 7, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Steinbüchel, A.; Debzi, E.-M.; Marchessault, R.H.; Timm, A. Synthesis and production of poly(3-hydroxyvaleric acid)homopolyester by Chromobacterium violaceum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1993, 39, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Steinbüchel, A.; Schmack, G. Large-scale production of poly(3-hydroxyvaleric acid) by fermentation of Chromobacterium violaceum, processing, and characterization of the homopolyester. J. Environ. Polym. Deg. 1995, 3, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, G.-Q.; König, K.-H.; Lafferty, R.M. Production of poly-D(-)-3-hydroxybutyrate and poly-D(-)-3-hydroxyvalerate by strains of Alcaligenes latus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1991, 60, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamane, T.; Chen, X.-F.; Ueda, S. Growth-Associated Production of Poly(3-Hydroxyvalerate) from n-Pentanol by a Methylotrophic Bacterium, Paracoccus denitrificans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 62, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Urtuvia, V.; Ponce, B.; Andler, R.; Peña, C.; Diaz-Barrera, A. Extended batch cultures for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) production by Azotobacter vinelandii OP growing at different aeration rates. Biotech 2022, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muigano, M.N.; Anami, S.E.; Onguso, J.M.; Mauti, G.O. Optimized Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) Production by Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Bacterium Halomonas alkalicola Ext. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2024, 2024, 6667843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akdoğan, M.; Çelik, E. Enhanced production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) biopolymer by recombinant Bacillus megaterium in fed-batch bioreactors. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jian, J.; Li, Z.-J.; Ye, H.-M.; Yuan, M.-Q.; Chen, G.-Q. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates consisting of high 3-hydroxyhexanoate content by recombinant Aeromonas hydrophila. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6096–6102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, H.-H.; Zhou, X.-R.; Liu, Q.; Chen, G.-Q. Biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate homopolymers by Pseudomonas putida. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, Q.; Luo, G.; Zhou, X.R.; Chen, G.-Q. Biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxydecanoate) and 3-hydroxydodecanoate dominating polyhydroxyalkanoates by β-oxidation pathway inhibited Pseudomonas putida. Met. Eng. 2011, 13, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yao, J.; Zhang, G.; Wu, Q.; Chen, G.-Q.; Zhang, R. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas nitroreducens. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1991, 75, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gong, Y.-A.; Wu, H.-S.; Wei, Y.-H.; Sun, Y.-M. Fermentation strategy for the production of poly(3-hydroxyhexanoate) by Aeromonas sp. KC014. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 25, 1422–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paduvari, R.; Bhat, K.S.; Somashekara, D.M. Biosynthesis of 3-hydroxydecanoate (3HD) and 3-hydroxydodecanoate (3HDd) in the polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymeric ester chain by Pseudomonas aeruginosa MCC 5300 using oleic acid as a carbon source. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2024, 25, 101690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chung, A.-L.; Jin, H.-L.; Huang, L.-J.; Ye, H.-M.; Chen, J.-C.; Wu, Q.; Chen, G.-Q. Biosynthesis and Characterization of Poly(3-hydroxydodecanoate) by β-Oxidation Inhibited Mutant of Pseudomonas entomophila L48. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3559–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barbuzzi, T.; Giuffrida, M.; Impallomeni, G.; Carnazza, S.; Ferreri, A.; Guglielmino, S.P.P.; Ballistreri, A. Microbial Synthesis of Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Fatty Acids: Identification of Higher Monomer Units and Structural Characterization. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 2469–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Impallomeni, G.; Ballistreri, A.; Carnemolla, G.M.; Rizzo, M.G.; Nicolo, M.S.; Guglielmino, S.P.P. Biosynthesis and structural characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 from long odd-chain fatty acids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ray, S.; Kalia, V.C. Co-metabolism of substrates by Bacillus thuringiensis regulates polyhydroxyalkanoate co-polymer composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 743–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zytner, P.; Kumar, D.; Elsayed, A.; Mohanty, A.; Ramarao, B.V.; Misra, M. A review on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production through the use of lignocellulosic biomass. RSC Sustain. 2013, 1, 2120–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brizga, J.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K. The Unintended Side Effects of Bioplastics: Carbon, Land, and Water Footprints. One Earth 2020, 3, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bardhan, S.K.; Gupta, S.; Gorman, M.E.; Haider, M.A. Biorenewable chemicals; Feedstocks, technologies and the conflict with food production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rosenboom, J.-G.; Langer, R.; Traverso, G. Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat. Rev. Mat. 2022, 7, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prado-Acebo, I.; Cubero-Cardoso, J.; Lu-Chao, T.A.; Eibes, G. Integral multi-valorization of agro-industrial wastes: A review. Waste Manag. 2024, 183, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chauhan, A.; Islam, F.; Imran, A.; Ikram, A.; Zahoor, T.; Khurshid, S.; Shah, M.A. A review on waste valorization, biotechnological utilization and management of potato. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 5573–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sanabria, D.P.; Farfan, H.I.; Quintana, D.N.; Abril, I.V.; Castro, H.F.; Paredes, R.A.; Roa, K.L. Synthesis of starch powder from differents organic waster: A green approach to a valuable material. IOP Conf. Ser. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1154, 012041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dorantes-Fuertes, M.-G.; López-Méndez, M.C.; Martínez-Castellanos, G.; Meléndez-Armenta, R.A.; Kimenéz-Martínez, H.-E. Starch Extraction Methods in Tubers and Roots: A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2024, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fraser-Reid, B.O.; Tatsuta, K.; Thiem, J. Glycoscience, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; p. 1437. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hirdyani, H. Nutritional composition of Chickpea (Cicerarietinum-L) and value added products. Indian J. Community Health 2014, 26, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  43. Aouine, M.; Elalami, D.; Haggoud, A.; Koraichi, S.I.; Roumeas, L.; Barakat, A. Dry chemo-mechanical pretreatment of chickpea straw: Effect and optimization of experimental parameters to improve hydrolysis yields. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 18, 101011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jose, S.; Pandit, P.; Pandey, R. Chickpea husk—A potential agro waste for coloration and functional finishing of textiles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 142, 111833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, Y.; Yao, S.; Narale, B.A.; Shanmugam, A.; Mettu, S.; Ashokkumar, M. Ultrasonic Processing of Food Waste to Generate Value-Added Products. Foods 2022, 11, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Khattab, M.M.; Dahman, Y. Production and recovery of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate bioplastics using agro-industrial residues of hemp hurd biomass. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tu, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, H. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from fermented thermal-hydrolyzed sludge by mixed microbial cultures: The link between phosphorus and PHA yields. Waste Manag. 2019, 96, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, D.; Jiang, H.; Chang, J.; Sun, J.; Tu, W.; Wang, H. Effect of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on volatile fatty acids production in sludge acidificaion and subsequent polyhydroxyalkanoates production. Biore. Technol. 2019, 279, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paul, A.; Jia, L.; Majumder, E.L.-W.; Yoo, C.G.; Rajendran, K.; Villarreal, E.; Kumar, D. Poly(3hydroxybutyrate) production from industrial hemp waste pretreated with chemicalfree hydrothermal process. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 381, 129161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tripathi, A.D.; Mishra, P.K.; Darani, K.K.; Agarwal, A.; Paul, V. Hydrothermal treatment of lignocellulose waste for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates copolymer with potential application in food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 223–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Naitam, M.G.; Tomar, G.S.; Kaushik, R.; Singh, S.; Nain, L. Agro-Industrial Waste as Potential Renewable Feedstock for Biopolymer Poly-Hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Production. Enz. Eng. 2022, 11, 190. [Google Scholar]
  52. Titz, M.; Kettl, K.-H.; Shahzad, K.; Koller, M.; Schnitzer, H.; Narodoslawsky, M. Process optimization for efficient biomediated PHA production from animal-based waste streams. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2012, 14, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Y.; Guo, L.; Liao, Q.; Ran, Q.; Ran, Y.; Hu, F.; Gao, M.; She, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, C.; et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production with acid or alkali pretreated sludge acidogenic liquid as carbon source: Substrate metabolism and monomer composition. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 142, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saratale, G.D.; Oh, M.-K. Characterization of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) produced from Ralstonia eutropha using alkali-pretreated biomass feedstock. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 80, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sachan, R.S.K.; Devgon, I.; Karnwal, A.; Mahmoud, A.E.D. Valorization of sugar extracted from wheat straw for eco-friendly polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production by Bacillus megaterium MTCC 453. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2024, 25, 101770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Radecka, I.; Irorere, V.; Jiang, G.; Hill, D.; Williams, C.; Adamus, G.; Kwiecién, M.; Marek, A.A.; Zawadiak, J.; Johnston, B.; et al. Oxidized Polyethylene Wax as a Potential Carbon Source for PHA Production. Materials 2016, 9, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Barrameda, H.J.C.; Requiso, P.J.; Alfafara, C.G.; Nayve, F.R.P., Jr.; Ventura, R.L.G.; Ventura, J.-R.S. Hydrolysate production from sugarcane bagasse using steam explosion and sequential steam explosion-dilute acid pretreatment for polyhydroxyalkanoate fermentation. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2023, 30, 100376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mabazza, K.A.A.; Requiso, P.J.; Alfafara, C.G.; Nayve, F.R.P., Jr.; Ventura, J.-R.S. Steam Explosion and Sequential Steam Explosion—Dilute Acid Pretreatment Opotimization of Banana Pseudostem for Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Production. Philipp. J. Sci. 2020, 149, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Perez, N.A.D.; Requiso, P.J.; Alfafara, C.G.; Capunitan, J.A.; Nayve, F.R.P., Jr.; Ventura, J.-R.S. Pretreatment Optimization of Corn Stover with Subsequent Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Production. Philipp. J. Sci. 2023, 152, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Saratale, G.D.; Saratale, R.G.; Varjani, S.; Cho, S.-K.; Ghodake, G.S.; Kadam, A.; Mulla, S.I.; Bharagava, R.N.; Kim, D.-S.; Shin, H.S. Development of ultrasound aided chemical pretreatment methods to enrich saccharification of wheat waste biomass for polyhydroxybutyrate production and its characterization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 150, 112425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zou, Y.; Yang, M.; Tao, Q.; Zhu, K.; Liu, X.; Wan, C.; Harder, M.K.; Yan, Q.; Liang, B.; Ntaikou, I.; et al. Recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) polymers from mixed microbial culture through combined ultrasonic disruption and alkaline digestion. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silambarasan, S.; Logeswari, P.; Sivaramakrishnan, R.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Kamaraj, B.; Ruiz, A.; Ramadoss, G.; Cornejo, P. Polyhydroxybutyrate production from ultrasound-aided alkaline pretreated finger millet straw using Bacillus megaterium strain CAM12. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huang, T.-Y.; Duan, K.-J.; Huang, S.-Y.; Chen, C.W. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from inexpensive extruded rice bran and starch by Haloferax mediteranei. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 33, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumar, M.; Singhal, A.; Verma, P.K.; Thakur, I.S. Production and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate from Lignin Derivatives by Pandoraea sp. ISTKB. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 9156–9163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. de Souza, L.; Manasa, Y.; Shivakumar, S. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic substrates for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biocat. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 28, 101754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Martínez-Avila, O.; Llimós, J.; Ponsá, S. Integrated solid-state enzymatic hydrolysis and solid-state fermentation for producing sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoates from low-cost agro-industrial residues. Food Bioprod. Process 2021, 126, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elain, A.; Le Grand, A.; Corre, Y.-M.; Le Fellic, M.; Hachet, N.; Le Tilly, V.; Loulergue, P.; Audic, J.-L.; Bruzaud, S. Valorisation of local agro-industrial processing waters as growth media for polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 80, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sarmiento-Vásquez, Z.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Karp, S.G.; Soccol, C.R. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates through Soybean Hull and Waste Glycerol Valorization: Subsequent Alkaline Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Fermentation 2022, 8, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tello-Cruzado, B.K.; Azanedo-Vargas, M.; Quinones-Cerna, C.E.; Fuentes-Olivera, A.; Rodríguez-Soto, J.C.; Quezada-Alvarez, M.A.; Cruz-Monzon, J.A. Use of Enzymatic Hydrolysate from Agroindustrial Asparagus Waste as Substrate for the Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate by Bacilluy thuringiensis. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 2024, 80, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Elgharbawy, A.A.; Alam, M.Z.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Goto, M. Ionic liquid pretreatment as emerging approaches for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 109, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Didion, Y.P.; Alvan Vargas, M.V.G.; Tjaslma, T.G.; Woodley, J.; Nikel, P.I.; Malankowska, M.; Su, Z.; Pinelo, M. A novel strategy for extraction of intracellular poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from engineered Pseudomonas putida using deep eutectic solvents: Comparison with traditional biobased organic solvents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 338, 126465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mondal, S.; Syed, U.T.; Gil, C.; Hilliou, L.; Duque, A.F.; Reis, M.A.M.; Brazinha, C. A novel sustainable PHA downstream method. Green Chem. 2023, 25, 1137–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Escobar, E.L.N.; da Silva, T.A.; Pirich, C.L.; Corazza, M.L.; Ramos, L.P. Supercritical Fluids: A Promising Technique for Biomass Pretreatment and Fractination. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Awogbemi, O.; Von Kallon, D.V. Pretreatment techniques for agricultural waste. Cast Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2022, 6, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kumar, V.; Ahluwalia, V.; Saran, S.; Kumar, J.; Patel, A.K.; Singhania, R.R. Recent developments on solid-state fermentation for production of microbial secondary metabolites, challenges and solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 323, 124566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rebocho, A.T.; Pereira, J.R.; Freitas, F.; Neves, L.A.; Alves, V.D.; Sevrin, C.; Grandfils, C.; Reis, M.A.M. Production of Medium-Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas citronellolis Grown in Apple Pulp Waste. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kurt-Kızıldoğan, A.; Türe, E.; Okay, S.; Otur, Ç. Improved production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by extremely halophilic archaeon Haloarcula sp. TG1 by utilization of rCKT3eng-treated sugar beet pulp. Biom. Conv. Bioref. 2023, 13, 10911–10921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sirohi, R. Sustainable utilization of food waste: Production and characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) from damaged wheat grains. Environ. Technol. Inn. 2021, 23, 101715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alva Munoz, L.E.; Riley, M.R. Utilization of Cellulosic Waste From Tequila Bagasse and Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Bioplastics by Saccharophagus degradans. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Obruca, S.; Benesova, P.; Petrik, S.; Oborna, J.; Prikryl, R.; Marova, I. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using hydrolysate of spent coffe grounds. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1409–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. López-Cuellar, M.R.; Alba-Flores, J.; Garcida Rodríguez, J.N.; Pérez-Guevara, F. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) with canola oil as carbon source. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Reis, M.; Albuquerque, M.; Villano, M.; Majone, M. Mixed Culture Processes for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Agro-Industrial Surplus/Wastes as Feedstocks. Compreh. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 669–683. [Google Scholar]
  83. Catherine, M.-C.; Guwy, A.; Massanet-Nicolau, J. Effect of acetate concentration, temperature, pH and nutrient concentration on polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production by glycogen accumulating organisms. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 20, 101226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Villano, M.; Beccari, M.; Dionisi, D.; Lampis, S.; Miccheli, A.; Vallini, G.; Majone, M. Effect of pH on the production of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates by mixedcultures enriched under periodic feeding. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lopez-Vazquez, C.M.; Hooijmans, C.M.; Brdjanovic, D.; Gijzen, H.J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Temperature effects on glycogen accumulating organisms. Water Res. 2009, 43, 2852–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, Y.; Hua, F.; Tsang, Y. Synthesis of PHA from waste under various C:N ratios. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1690–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Koller, M. A Review on Established and Emerging Fermentation Schemes for Microbial Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Biopolyesters. Fermentation 2018, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A.; Hernández-Martínez, R. Solid state fermentation (SSF): Diversity of applications to valorize waste and biomass. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yafetto, L. Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: A review and bibliometric analysis. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kolaković, A. Influence of Corn Silage Addition on Laccase Activity During Submerge Cultivation of Trametes versicolor. Master’s Thesis, University Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia, 17 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  91. Behl, M.; Thakar, S.; Ghai, H.; Sakhuja, D.; Bhatt, A.K. Fundamentals of fermentation technology. In Basic Biotechniques for Bioprocess and Bioentrepreneurship, 1st ed.; Bhatt, A.K., Bhatia, R.K., Bhalla, T.C., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2023; Volume 1, pp. 313–328. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ćurković, I. Design of Bioreactor for Microorganisms Cultivation in Semi-Solid and Solid Substrates. Master’s Thesis, University Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia, 13 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  93. Mohapatra, S.; Samantaray, D.P.; Samantaray, S.M. Impact of process recovery on PHA production by Bacillus thuringiensis RKD-12. Poll Res. 2015, 34, 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  94. Montiel-Jarillo, G.; Morales-Urrea, D.A.; Contreras, E.M.; López-Córdoba, A.; Gómez-Pachón, E.Y.; Carrera, J.; Suárez-Ojeda, M.E. Improvement of the Polyhydroxyalkanoates Recovery from Mixed Microbial Cultures Using Sodium Hypochlorite Pre-treatment Coupled with Solvent Extraction. Polymers 2022, 14, 3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Heinrich, D.; Madkour, M.H.; Al-Ghamdi, M.A.; Shabbaj, I.I.; Steinbüchel, A. Large scale extraction of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate from Ralstonia eutropha H16 using sodium hypochlorite. AMB Exress 2012, 2, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Obruca, S.; Marova, I.; Stankova, M.; Mravcova, L.; Svoboda, Z. Effect of ethanol and hydrogen peroxide on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) biosynthetic pathway in Cupriavidus necator H16. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Younas, T.; Ali, I.; Jamil, N. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production using canola oil by bacteria isolated from paper pulp industry. Kuwait J. Sci. 2015, 42, 236–249. [Google Scholar]
  98. Park, S.L.; Cho, J.Y.; Choi, T.-R.; Song, H.-S.; Bhatia, S.K.; Gurav, R.; Park, S.-H.; Park, K.; Joo, J.C.; Hwang, S.Y.; et al. Improvement of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) plate-based screening method for PHB degrading bacteria using cell-grown amorphous PHB and recovered by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Neves, A.; Müller, J. Use of enzymes in extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoates produced by Cupriavidus necator. Biotechnol. Prog. 2012, 28, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kunasundari, B.; Sudesh, K. Isolation and recovery of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 620–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Marudkla, J.; Patjawit, A.; Chuensangjun, C.; Sirisansaneeyakul, S. Optimization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) extraction from Cupriavidus necator DSM 545 using sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium hypochlorite. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2018, 52, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Song, J.-H.; Jeon, C.-O.; Choi, M.-H.; Yoon, S.-C.; Park, W.-J. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production Using Waste Vegetable Oil by Pseudomonas sp. Strain DR2. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 1408–1415. [Google Scholar]
  103. Fernández, D.; Rodríguez, E.; Bassas, M.; Vinas, M.; Solanas, A.M.; Llorens, J.; Marqués, A.M.; Manresa, A. Agro-industrial oily wastes as substrates for PHA production by the new strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCIB 40045: Effect of culture conditions. Biochem. Eng. J. 2005, 26, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yang, Y.-H.; Jeon, J.-M.; Yi, D.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Seo, H.-M.; Rha, C.K.; Sinskey, A.J.; Brigham, C.J. Application of a Non-halogenated Solvent, Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) for Recovery of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [P(HB-co-HV)] from Bacterial Cells. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nayir, T.Y.; Konuk, S.; Kara, S. Extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoate from activated sludge using supercritical carbon dioxide process and biopolymer characterization. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 364, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hejazi, P.; Vasheghani-Farahani, E.; Yamini, Y. Supercritical Fluid Disruption of Ralstonia eutropha for Poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) Recovery. Biotechnol. Prog. 2008, 19, 1519–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hand, S.; Gill, J.; Chu, K.-H. Phage-based extraction of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) produced from synthetic crude glycerol. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. ISO 18134-3; Solid biofuels—Determination of moisture content—Oven dry method—Part 3: Moisture in General Analysis Sample. ISO Publishing: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  109. ISO 18123:2023; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Volatile Matter. ISO Publishing: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  110. Önorm, S. Analytical Methods and Quality Control for Waste Compost; Austrian Standardization Institute: Vienna, Austria, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  111. ASTM D982-16; Standard Test Method for Organic Nitrogen in Paper and Paperboard. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  112. Marsden, W.; Gray, P.P.; Nippard, G.J.; Quinlan, M.R. Evaluation of the DNS method for analysing lignocellulosic hydrolysates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1982, 32, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. ISO 21268-3:2019; Soil Quality—Leaching Procedures for Subsequent Chemical and Ecotoxicological Testing of Soil and Soil-like Materials. Part 3: Up-Flow Percolation Test. ISO: Geneva, Switxerland, 2019.
  114. Briški, F.; Kopčić, N.; Ćosić, I.; Kučić, D.; Vuković, M. Biodegradation of tobacco waste by composting: Genetic identification of nicotine-degrading bacteria and kinetic analysis of transformations in leachate. Chem. Pap. 2012, 66, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumar, A.; Shah, S. Production and characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates from industrial waste using soil bacterial isolates. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 715–726. [Google Scholar]
  116. Benson, H.J. Microbiological Applications. In A Laboratory Manual in General Microbiology, 8th ed.; The McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 154–156, 160, 168, 169. [Google Scholar]
  117. Law, J.H.; Slepecky, R.A. A rapid spectrophotometric assay of alpha, betaunsaturated acid and beta-hydroxy acids. Anal. Chem. 1960, 32, 1697–1699. [Google Scholar]
  118. Law, J.H.; Slepecky, R.A. Assay of poly-b-hydroxybutyric acid. J. Bacteriol. 1961, 82, 33.e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Porras, M.A.; Villar, M.A.; Cubitto, M.A. Improved intracellular PHA determinations with novel spectrophotometric quantification methodologies based on Sudan black dye. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2018, 148, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Takayoshi, T. Structural insights into starch-metabolizing enzymes and their applications. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2024, 88, 864–871. [Google Scholar]
  121. Gamage, A.; Thiviya, P.; Mani, S.; Ponnusamy, P.G.; Manamperi, A.; Evon, P.; Merah, O.; Madhujith, T. Environmental Properties and Applications of Biodegradable Starch-Based Nanocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Talaie, A.; Alaee, S.; Mohanadoss, P. Guidelines for quick application of biochemical tests to identify unknown bacteria. Acc. Biotechnol. Res. 2015, 2, 65–82. [Google Scholar]
  123. Chen, C.-L.; Ge, L.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Mo, Y.; Razaad, I.M.N.; Tan, G.-Y.; Wang, J.-Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L. Start a research on biopolymer polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): A review. Polymers 2014, 6, 706–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Adebajo, S.O.; Bankole, P.O.; Ojo, A.E.; Akintokun, P.O. Screening and optimization of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) by Lysinibacillus fusiformis from diverse environmental sources. Microbe 2024, 2, 100043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hamdy, S.M.; Danial, A.W.; Gad El-Rab, S.M.F.; Shoreit, A.A.M.; Hesham, A.E.-L. Production and optimization of bioplastic (Polyhydroxybutyrate) from Bacillus cereus strain SH-02 using response surface methodology. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Cibichakravarthy, B.; Venkatachalam, S.; Prabagaran, S.R. Chapter 9—Unleashing Extremophilic Metabolites and Its Industrial Perspectives. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Microbial Secondary Metabolites Biochemistry and Applications, 1st ed.; Gupta, V.K., Pandey, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 119–130. [Google Scholar]
  127. de Oliviera Schmidt, V.K.; dos Santos, E.F.; de Oliveira, D.; Ayub, M.A.Z.; Cesca, K.; Cortivo, P.R.D.; de Andrade, C.J.; Hickert, L.R. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Bacillus megaterium: Prospecting on Rice Hull and Residual Glycerol Potential. Biomass 2022, 2, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vu, D.H.; Wainaina, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Akesson, D.; Ferreira, J.A. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) by Bacillus megaterium using food waste acidogenic fermentation-derived volatile fatty acids. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 2480–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Trakunjae, C.; Boondaeng, A.; Apiwatanapiwat, W.; Kosugi, A.; Arai, T.; Sudesh, K.; Vaithanomsat, P. Enhanced polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production by newly isolated rare actinomycetes Rhodococcus sp. Strain BSRT1-1 using response surface methodology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Maurya, A.C.; Bhattacharya, A.; Khare, S.K. Biodegradation of terephthalic acid using Rhodococcus erythropolis MTCC 3951: Insights into the degradation process, applications in wastewater treatment and polyhydroxyalkanoate production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2024, 31, 57376–57385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wong, A.L.; Chua, H.; Hoi Fu Yu, P. Microbial Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Bacteria Isolated from Oil Wastes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 85, 843–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Panchal, H.K. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Production and Optimization using Staphylococcus Gallinarum and One More Soil Isolate. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2019, 2, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  133. Jin, C.; Li, J.; Huang, Z.; Han, X.; Bao, J. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for synthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from lignocellulose biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2022, 119, 1598–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Matias, F.; Bonatto, D.; Padilla, G.; de Andrade Rodrigues, M.F.; Henriques, J.A.P. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production by Actinobacteria isolated from soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Mitra, R.; Xu, T.; Chen, G.-Q.; Xiang, H.; Han, J. An updated overview on the regulatory circuits of polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesis. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 15, 1446–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Powers, E.M. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 3756–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Microbe Notes. Available online: https://microbenotes.com/biochemical-test-of-bacteria/ (accessed on 9 October 2024).
  138. VetBact. Available online: https://www.vetbact.org/biochemtest/1 (accessed on 9 October 2024).
  139. Microbe Notes. Available online: https://microbenotes.com/nitrate-reduction-test-objectives-principle-procedure-and-results/ (accessed on 9 October 2024).
  140. Maria, W.; Johan, B.; Sabine, L. Comparison of Auxacolor with API 20 C Aux in yeast identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 1997, 3, 369–375. [Google Scholar]
  141. Boyd, M.A.; Antonio, M.A.D.; Hillier, S.L. Comparison of API 50 CH strips to whole—Chromosomal DNA probes for identification of Lactobacillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5309–5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dance, D.A.; Wuthiekanun, V.; Naigowit, P.; White, N.J. Identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in clinical practice: Use of simple screening tests and API 20 NE. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989, 42, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Almeida, R.J.; Jorgensen, J.H. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPH-IDENT system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1983, 18, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Groothuis, D.G.; Elzenaar, C.P.; van Silfhout, A. An Evaluation of the API-20 Strep System (Rapid-Strep System). System. Appl. Microbiol. 1986, 8, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Edinger, R.C.; Migneault, P.C.; Nolte, F.S. Supplementary Rapid Biochemical Test Panel for the API 20E Bacterial Identification System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1985, 22, 1063–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: And emerging technology for microbial identification for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hrubanova, K.; Kalina, M.; Koller, M.; Kourilova, X.; Kovalcik, A.; Krzyzanek, V.; Masilko, J.; Nebesarova, J.; Novackova, I.; Obruca, S.; et al. Introducing the Newly Isolated Bacterium Aneurinibacillus sp. H1 as an Auspicious Thermophilic Producer of Various Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) Copolymers-1. Isolation and Characterization of the Bacterium. Polymers 2020, 12, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Bosco, F.; Cirrincione, S.; Carletto, R.; Marmo, L.; Chiesa, F.; Mazzoli, R.; Pessione, E. PHA Production from Cheese Whey and “Scotta”: Comparison between a Consortium and a Pure Culture of Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Smith, G.; Onions, A.H.S.; Allsopp, D.; Eggins, H.O.W. Smith’s Introduction to Industrial Mycology, 7th ed.; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1981; pp. 1–398. [Google Scholar]
  150. Aslim, B.; Beyatli, Y.; Mercan, N.; Şafak, S. A study on the production of poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate by some eukaryotic microorganisms. Turk. Elec. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  151. Banu, J.R.; Ilamathi, P.M.K.; Khanna, Y.; Murugesan, K.; Selvam, A.; Udayakumar, M.; Wong, J. Food waste properties, In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Sustainable Food Waste Management: Resource Recovery and Treatment, 1st ed.; Kaur, G., Lasaridi, K., Pandey, A., Taherzadeh, M., Wong, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 11–41. [Google Scholar]
  152. Raghavarao, K.S.M.S.; Ranganathan, T.V.; Karanth, N.G. Some engineering aspects of solid-state fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003, 13, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bigelis, R. Solid-phase fermentation: Aerobic and anaerobic. In Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 3rd ed.; Bull, A.T., Junker, B., Katz, L., Lynd, L.R., Masurekar, P., Reeves, C.D., Zhao, H., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 235–252. [Google Scholar]
  154. Llenas, L.; Martínez, O.; Ponsá, S. Sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoates production via solid-state fermentation: Influence of the operational parameters and scaling up of the process. Food Bioprod. Process 2021, 132, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  155. Blunt, W.; Shah, P.; Vasquez, V.; Ye, M.; Doyle, C.; Liu, Y.; Saeidlou, S.; Monteil-Rivera, F. Biosynthesis and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesized from mixed C5 and C6 sugars obtained from hardwood hydrolysis. New Biotechnol. 2023, 77, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Londono-Hernandez, L.; de Jesús García-Gómez, M.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Polanía-Rivera, A.M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Prado-Barragán, L.A. Effect of Glucose Concentration on the Production of Proteolytic Extract by Different Strains of Aspergillus under Solid-State Fermentation. Fermentation 2024, 10, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yaverino-Gutierrez, M.A.; Ramos, L.; Ascencio, J.J.; Chandel, A.K. Enhanced Production of Clean Fermentable Sugars by Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Saccharification of Sugarcane Bagasse. Processes 2024, 12, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Marakana, P.G.; Dey, A.; Saini, B. Isolation of nanocellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Synthesis, characterization, modification and potential applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. de Souza, G.A.; Reis, G.A.; Michels, M.H.A.; Fajardo, G.L.; Lamot, I.; de Best, J.H. Optimization of Green Extraction and Purification of PHA Produced by Mixed Microbial Cultures from Sludge. Water 2020, 12, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Getino, L.; Martín, J.L.; Chamizo-Ampudia, A. A Review of Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Characterization, Production, and Application from Waste. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wang, X.; Oehmen, A.; Carvalho, G.; Reis, M.A.M. Community profile governs substrate competition in polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-producing mixed cultures. New Biotechnol. 2020, 58, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wang, X.; Oehmen, A.; Freitas, E.B.; Carvalho, G.; Reis, M.A.M. The link of feast—Phase dissolved oxygen (DO) with substrate competition and microbial selection in PHA production. Water Res. 2017, 112, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, C.; Singh, R.P.; Chen, W. Chickpea: Its Origin, Distribution, Nutrition, Benefits, Breeding and Symbiotic Relationship with Mesorhizobium Species. Plants 2024, 13, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gautam, S.; Gautam, A.; Pawaday, J.; Kanzariya, R.K.; Yao, Z. Current Status and Challenges in the Commercial Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate-Based Bioplastic: A Review. Processes 2024, 12, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yang, J.; Gao, C.; Yang, X.; Su, Y.; Shi, S.; Han, L. Effect of combined wet alkaline mechanical pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover and its mechanism. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2022, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ramezani, M.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Ventosa, A. Screening and comparative assay of poly-hydroxyalkanoates produced by bacteria isolated from the Gavkhooni Wetland in Iran and evaluation of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate production by halotolerant bacterium Oceanimonas sp. GK1. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Divyashree, M.S.; Davis, R.; Kumari, K.S.; Raj, B.; Shamala, T.R.; Vijayendra, S.V. Production and characterization of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers and evaluation of their blends by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Indian J. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 251–258. [Google Scholar]
  168. Bhati, R.; Mallick, N.; Sankhla, I.S.; Singh, A.K. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) co-polymer production from a local isolate, Brevibacillus invocatus MTCC 9039. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar]
  169. Dias, M.L.; Freire, D.M.; Oliveira, F.C.; Castilho, L.R. Characterization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) produced by Cupriavidus necator in solid-state fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 633–638. [Google Scholar]
  170. Akbari, V.; Cochez, M.; Langlois, V.; Michely, L.; Moradkhani, G.; Renard, E.; Saeb, M.R.; Vagner, C. Thermal stability and flammability behavior of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) based composites. Materials 2019, 12, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Dikshit, P.K.; Pradhan, S. Production, ultrasonic extraction, and characterization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) using Bacillus megaterium and Cupriavidus necator. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 2392–2400. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental workflow for PHA production.
Figure 1. Experimental workflow for PHA production.
Polymers 16 03407 g001
Figure 2. Obtained pure cultures by streaking method, cultures stained with Sudan Black dye, and microphotographs of Gram staining of bacteria isolates Brevibacillus sp. (A,A1,A2), Empedobacter brevis; (B,B1,B2), Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus; (C,C1,C2), Micrococcus spp.; (D,D1,D2), Leuconostoc sp; (E,E1,E2), Bacillus licheniformis; (F,F1,F2), Staphylococcus lentus; (G,G1,G2), Citrobacter freundii; (H,H1,H2), M = 1000×.
Figure 2. Obtained pure cultures by streaking method, cultures stained with Sudan Black dye, and microphotographs of Gram staining of bacteria isolates Brevibacillus sp. (A,A1,A2), Empedobacter brevis; (B,B1,B2), Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus; (C,C1,C2), Micrococcus spp.; (D,D1,D2), Leuconostoc sp; (E,E1,E2), Bacillus licheniformis; (F,F1,F2), Staphylococcus lentus; (G,G1,G2), Citrobacter freundii; (H,H1,H2), M = 1000×.
Polymers 16 03407 g002
Figure 3. Obtained pure cultures by streaking method, cultures stained with Sudan Black dye, and microphotographs of yeast isolates Trichosporon asahii (A,A1,A2), Cryptococcus humicola; (B,B1,B2), Geotrichum klebahnii; (C,C1,C2), Candida krusei; (D,D1,D2), M = 400×.
Figure 3. Obtained pure cultures by streaking method, cultures stained with Sudan Black dye, and microphotographs of yeast isolates Trichosporon asahii (A,A1,A2), Cryptococcus humicola; (B,B1,B2), Geotrichum klebahnii; (C,C1,C2), Candida krusei; (D,D1,D2), M = 400×.
Polymers 16 03407 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of PHAs obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of PHAs obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Polymers 16 03407 g004
Figure 5. DSC spectra of extracted samples (PHA) obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Figure 5. DSC spectra of extracted samples (PHA) obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Polymers 16 03407 g005
Figure 6. Thermograms of PHAs obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Figure 6. Thermograms of PHAs obtained in the fermentation processes using (A) chickpea 1; (B) chickpea 2; and (C) starch as a substrate.
Polymers 16 03407 g006
Table 1. Agro-industrial waste type and microorganisms used for production of PHA.
Table 1. Agro-industrial waste type and microorganisms used for production of PHA.
Agro-Industrial WastePretreatment MethodMicroorganismPHA YieldRef.
Apple pulp wasten.a.Pseudomonas citronellolis NRRL B-250430 ± 1.7%[76]
Sugar beetroot pulpEnzymatic–recombinant
endoglucanase (rCKT3eng), chemical hydrolysis
Haloarcula sp. TG145.6%/17.8%[77]
Wheat grainsAcidic hydrolysis
(hydrochloric acid)
Bacillus sp. NII21.413 mg/L[78]
Tequila bagasseBacterial pretreatment
(Saccharophagus degradans
ATCC 43961)
Saccharophagus degradans ATCC 439611.5 mg/L[79]
Coffee groundn-hexane oil extraction, acidic hydrolysis (sulphuric acid), and enzymatic digestionBurkholderia cepacia ATCC 177592.69 ± 0.07 g/L[80]
Canola oiln.a.Wautersia eutropha ATCC 1769918.27 g/L[81]
Sugarcane molassen.a.Bacillus cereus SPV61.07%[15]
Table 2. Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of agricultural wastes (standard deviation was between ±0.021 and ±0.044).
Table 2. Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of agricultural wastes (standard deviation was between ±0.021 and ±0.044).
Substratew(MC)/%w(DM)/%w(VM)/%pH/−ω(RS)/mg gDM−1CFUbacteria/gDMCFUfungi/gDMw(C)/%w(N)/%
Chickpea 158.0641.9497.695.54545.479.8 × 1091.6 × 10754.273.93
Chickpea 259.8640.1497.725.01156.781.2 × 1091.5 × 10854.284.02
Starch44.7755.2399.364.45333.541.5 × 1087.4 × 10655.200.02
MC—moisture content; DM—dry matter; VM—volatile matter; RS—reducing sugars; CFU—Colony Forming Unit.
Table 3. Morphology of identified microorganisms isolated from agricultural waste.
Table 3. Morphology of identified microorganisms isolated from agricultural waste.
SubstrateIdentified MicroorganismMorphology
Chickpea 1Brevibacillus sp.Transparent with flat elevation, and regular round configuration, rod shaped
Empedobacter brevisOrange with flat elevation, and regular round configuration, rod shaped
Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticusBrownish with raised elevation, and regular round configuration, rod shaped
Chickpea 2Micrococcus spp.Orange with flat elevation, and regular round configuration, round shaped (cocci)
Trichosporon asahiiWhite and cracked in the middle with smooth and shiny edges
StarchLeuconostoc sp.White with flat elevation, and regular round configuration, cocci/coccobacilli
Bacillus licheniformisWhite with raised elevation, wavy and smooth edges, rod shaped
Staphylococcus lentusTransparent with raised elevation, and regular round configuration, round shaped (cocci)
Citrobacter freundiiTransparent with raised elevation, irregular shape with twisted edges, rod shaped
Cryptococcus humicolaYellowish with raised elevation, round shape with jagged edges
Geotrichum klebahniiWhite with flat elevation, filamentous shape with jagged edges
Candida kruseiWhite with raised elevation, and regular round configuration
Table 4. Results of Gram staining, KOH test, and biochemical tests for bacteria isolates (+ is for Gram positive and − is for Gram negative).
Table 4. Results of Gram staining, KOH test, and biochemical tests for bacteria isolates (+ is for Gram positive and − is for Gram negative).
Identified BacteriaGram StainingKOH TestOxidaseCatalaseNitrate-Reductase
Brevibacillus sp.+ve++++
Empedobacter brevis−ve++/−+
Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus+ve+++
Micrococcus spp.+ve++/−++/−
Leuconostoc sp.+ve-
Bacillus licheniformis+ve++
Staphylococcus lentus+ve++
Citrobacter freundii−ve++
Table 5. Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of used substrates at the end of experiment (standard deviation was between ±0.012 and ±0.053).
Table 5. Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of used substrates at the end of experiment (standard deviation was between ±0.012 and ±0.053).
Substratew(MC)/%w(DM)/%w(VM)/%pH/-ω(RS)/mg gDM−1CFUbacteria/gDMCFUfungi/gDMw(C)/%w(N)/%
Chickpea 173.6626.3493.995.55730.343.8 × 10102.4 × 10852.211.73
Chickpea 274.9925.0191.905.21912.364.7 × 10102.1 × 10851.051.10
Starch45.9054.1096.327.21921.043.4 × 1091.3 × 10853.510.07
MC—moisture content; DM—dry matter; VM—volatile matter; RS—reducing sugars; CFU—colony forming unit.
Table 6. Percentages of PHA accumulation in mixed microbial cultures using agricultural wastes.
Table 6. Percentages of PHA accumulation in mixed microbial cultures using agricultural wastes.
SubstratePHA Accumulation/%
Chickpea 15.42 ± 0.062
Chickpea 213.81 ± 0.048
Starch5.29 ± 0.086
Table 7. DSC analysis results for PHA obtained from used substrates after 7 days of SSF.
Table 7. DSC analysis results for PHA obtained from used substrates after 7 days of SSF.
SampleTg/°CTm/°CΔHm/J g−1Tc/°CΔHc/J g−1
Chickpea 1/128.16 ± 0.007−8.46 ± 0.00299.10 ± 0.00116.20 ± 0.009
Chickpea 21.81 ± 0.007124.52 ± 0.010−6.28 ± 0.01795.24 ± 0.00111.33 ± 0.007
Starch/119.53 ± 0.007−0.46 ± 0.02185.37 ± 0.0061.96 ± 0.010
Tg—glass transition temperature; Tm—melting temperature; ΔHm—melting enthalpy; Tc—crystallization temperature; ΔHc—crystallization enthalpy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grgurević, K.; Bramberger, D.; Miloloža, M.; Stublić, K.; Ocelić Bulatović, V.; Ranilović, J.; Ukić, Š.; Bolanča, T.; Cvetnić, M.; Markić, M.; et al. Producing and Characterizing Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Starch and Chickpea Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures in Solid-State Fermentation. Polymers 2024, 16, 3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233407

AMA Style

Grgurević K, Bramberger D, Miloloža M, Stublić K, Ocelić Bulatović V, Ranilović J, Ukić Š, Bolanča T, Cvetnić M, Markić M, et al. Producing and Characterizing Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Starch and Chickpea Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures in Solid-State Fermentation. Polymers. 2024; 16(23):3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233407

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grgurević, Karlo, Dora Bramberger, Martina Miloloža, Krešimir Stublić, Vesna Ocelić Bulatović, Jasmina Ranilović, Šime Ukić, Tomislav Bolanča, Matija Cvetnić, Marinko Markić, and et al. 2024. "Producing and Characterizing Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Starch and Chickpea Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures in Solid-State Fermentation" Polymers 16, no. 23: 3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233407

APA Style

Grgurević, K., Bramberger, D., Miloloža, M., Stublić, K., Ocelić Bulatović, V., Ranilović, J., Ukić, Š., Bolanča, T., Cvetnić, M., Markić, M., & Kučić Grgić, D. (2024). Producing and Characterizing Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Starch and Chickpea Waste Using Mixed Microbial Cultures in Solid-State Fermentation. Polymers, 16(23), 3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233407

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop