Next Article in Journal
Thermo-Responsive Injectable MPEG-Polyester Diblock Copolymers for Sustained Drug Release
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphological Control Agent in Ternary Blend Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Bucillamine on Free-Radical-Mediated Degradation of High-Molar-Mass Hyaluronan Induced in vitro by Ascorbic Acid and Cu(II) Ions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards High Performance Organic Photovoltaic Cells: A Review of Recent Development in Organic Photovoltaics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 6
Issue 10
10.3390/polym6102645
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fused-Thiophene Based Materials for Organic Photovoltaics and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

by
Prabakaran Kumaresan
1,2,
Sureshraju Vegiraju
1,
Yamuna Ezhumalai
1,
Shueh Lin Yau
1,*,
Choongik Kim
3,*,
Wen-Hsi Lee
4,* and
Ming-Chou Chen
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, National Central University, Jhong-Li 32001, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemistry, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore 641014, India
3
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Sogang University, 1 Shinsoo-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul 121742, Korea
4
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No.1 University road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2014, 6(10), 2645-2669; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6102645
Submission received: 10 September 2014 / Revised: 7 October 2014 / Accepted: 15 October 2014 / Published: 22 October 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Solar Cells)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Organic photovoltaics (OPVs) and dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have drawn great interest from both academics and industry, due to the possibility of low-cost conversion of photovoltaic energy at reasonable efficiencies. This review focuses on recent progress in molecular engineering and technological aspects of fused-thiophene-based organic dye molecules for applications in solar cells. Particular attention has been paid to the design principles and stability of these dye molecules, as well as on the effects of various electrolyte systems for DSSCs. Importantly, it has been found that incorporation of a fused-thiophene unit into the sensitizer has several advantages, such as red-shift of the intramolecular charge transfer band, tuning of the frontier molecular energy level, and improvements in both photovoltaic performance and stability. This work also examines the correlation between the physical properties and placement of fused-thiophene in the molecular structure with regard to their performance in OPVs and DSSCs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Global warming due to greenhouse gases released from the burning of fossil fuels and an ever increasing demand for energy have spurred growing interest in environmentally benign alternative energy sources, which will eventually be needed to achieve continued and sustainable economic growth. Although nuclear power plays an important role in providing the required energy, the recent disaster in Japan aroused serious doubts about environmental safety and long term reliability of this power source. Among many options with regard to new energy sources, solar energy is regarded as one of the most ideal ones because of abundant supply and inherent inexhaustibility. The photovoltaic conversion of sunlight into electric energy is the optimal way to create a modern society powered by electricity. Various technologies have thus been developed in relation to photovoltaics, such as crystalline Si, semiconductor-based cells, thin-film solar cells, organic photovoltaics (OPVs) cells and dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), all competing for the future solar cell market. Among them, OPVs and DSSCs have been considered as the most promising candidates for next-generation solar cells, due to their low cost, flexibility, and roll-to-roll mass production feasibility [1,2].
As a result of significant progress in recent years, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of OPVs and DSSCs has greatly improved, exceeding 9% and 15%, respectively, for the current state-of-the-art devices [3,4]. However, there is still a need for improvements in PCE and costs, as well as in the long-term stability of OPVs and DSSCs, if they are to be used for practical applications. Dye molecules are the most crucial elements with regard to determining the performance of a solar cell. The development of new organic or organometallic dyes with good device performance and long term stability is thus of great importance, as this will allow the more widespread practical use of this technology. Owing to a unique combination of efficient electron transfer, a moderate band gap, environmental stability, and structural versatility, thiophene-based π-conjugated systems have progressively supplanted other classes of systems [5]. In particular, with structural ring planarity, extended molecular conjugation, intermolecular S···S interactions, and chemical stability, fused-thiophenes (thienoacenes) have emerged as a promising new class of π-conjugated moieties. Most notably, dithienothiophene- (DTT) [6] and benzothienobenzothiophene- (BTBT) [7] based molecules have recently been employed as building blocks in organic semiconductors (organic thin-film transistors; OTFTs), and have exhibited huge increase in hole mobility, as high as 10.2 and 43 cm2·V−1·s−1, respectively.
Therefore, a great deal of attention has been devoted to the performance of fused-thiophene in the particularly interesting field of OPVs and DSSCs, due to its versatility and unique properties. Herein, we review the structure-function relationships of fused-thiophene-based organic small molecules along with the most recent and significant scientific progress made in the fields of OPVs and DSSCs.

2. Organic Photovoltaics (OPV)

Organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices have attracted significant attention as a low-cost alternative to inorganic semiconductors for large area and lightweight applications [8]. Currently, polymer-based OPVs have been shown to achieve higher power conversion efficiencies than small molecule-based OPVs. However, small molecule-based OPVs have numerous advantages, such as simple synthesis and purification methods, uniform and defined molecular structures, higher open circuit voltages (Voc), and better batch-to-batch reproducibility [9,10]. Figure 1 illustrates the device structures of bilayer heterojunction (a), bulk heterojunction (b) and the fundamental steps occurring in donor-acceptor heterojunction solar cells (c).
Polymers 06 02645 g001 1024
Figure 1. Device structures of (a) bilayer heterojunction, (b) bulk heterojunction, (c) device working principle from light absorption to charge collection.
Figure 1. Device structures of (a) bilayer heterojunction, (b) bulk heterojunction, (c) device working principle from light absorption to charge collection.
Polymers 06 02645 g001
The photoenergy conversion of organic solar cells occurs in the following four steps: (i) light absorption of donor, leading to exciton formation; (ii) diffusion of the exciton within the active layer to the donor-acceptor interface; (iii) dissociation of exciton from the LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) of the donor to LUMO of the acceptor; and (iv) collection of free charge carriers at the electrodes.
Recently, several reviews have summarized the synthesis of thiazole- and diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based small molecules and their applications in OPVs [11,12]. In this review, we particularly summarize fused-thiophene based small molecules, examining the molecular design, optical and electrochemical properties of these organic molecules, as well as their device electrical performance, as organized in Table 1.

2.1. Vacuum-Deposited Fused-Thiophene-Based Small Molecules for OPVs

Seo et al. prepared asymmetric electron-donor molecules based on D (donor)–π–A (acceptor) structures 1 and 2 that comprise an electron rich triphenylamine as the donor unit, thienothiophene, thiophene or thiazole as the π-spacers, and a dicyanovinylene group as the acceptor unit for vacuum-deposited organic photovoltaic devices [13]. Chemical structures of molecules 1–8 are shown in Scheme 1. The absorption spectra of 1 and 2 in solution showed broad absorption bands over the region of 300–750 nm, and these compounds showed a broadening of the charge transfer (CT) band and a red-shift of the absorption onset by approximately 100 nm in thin films. The HOMO ((highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO energy levels derived from cyclic voltammetry for 1 and 2 were −5.51 eV/−3.48 eV and −5.57 eV/−3.58 eV, respectively. For 1, a PCE of 5.41% was achieved with a Voc of 0.87 V, a Jsc of 11.04 mA·cm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 0.57. For 2, replacing the thiophene bridge with thiazole, the PCE was increased to 6.20% with a Voc of 0.95 V, a Jsc of 12.01 mA·cm−2 and an FF of 0.54. The high value of Voc is attributed to its low lying HOMO level in 2.
Hong et al. developed a vacuum-deposited donor material 3 based on dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene (DDT) and pyrene [14]. The UV-vis spectrum of 3 showed a main absorption band at 387 nm, which originated from the DTT and pyrene units. The UV-vis spectrum of 3 in solid state showed a maximum absorption band at 412 nm. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of 3 were −5.66 eV and −2.95 eV, respectively. The low-lying HOMO energy levels of 3 result in a large energy difference relative to the LUMO of fullerenes. The maximum Voc, Jsc and PCE values of the BHJ device based on 3:C70 (1:4) were 0.98 V, 9.24 mA·cm−2, and 3.60%, respectively.

2.2. Solution-Processed Fused-Thiophene-Based Small Molecules for OPVs

Lee et al. designed and synthesized a push-pull organic semiconductor (4 and 5) comprising a triphenylamine donor and a methylene malononitrile acceptor linked by thieno[2,3-b]thiophene and dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene π-conjugated thiophene units [15]. The minor red-shift of the absorption band in 5 (527 nm) was due to the extended π-conjugation of the bridging units compared to 4 (523 nm). The absorption bands at longer wavelengths exhibited higher intensity for 5 than those of 4, indicating that greater planarity and longer π-conjugation of the bridging units effectively facilitated intermolecular π–π packing interactions in the solid state. The solution-processed OPV devices based on 4:PC71BM and 5:PC71BM showed a PCE of 2.09% with a Jsc = 7.58 mA·cm−2, an FF = 0.35, and a Voc = 0.80 V for 4; and a PCE of 1.80% with a Jsc = 7.60 mA·cm−2, an FF = 0.31, and a Voc = 0.74 V for 5, respectively.
Li et al. synthesized a new solution-processable star-shaped D–π–A molecule 6 with triphenylamine (TPA) as the core and donor unit, dicyanovinyl (DCN) as the end group and acceptor unit, and 3,6-dihexyl-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (DHT) as the π-bridge [16]. The absorption spectrum of the molecule in a chloroform solution exhibited strong absorption in a wavelength range from 300 to 650 nm, with two peaks at 429 and 542 nm, respectively. The red-shift in absorption indicated enhanced planarity in the 6 molecule. The absorption edge of 6 in the thin film was at 700 nm. The calculated HOMO and LUMO energy levels derived from cyclic voltammetry were −5.13 eV and −3.38 eV, respectively. Bulk-heterojunction OPVs were fabricated using 6 as the donor material, and either PC61BM or PC71BM as the acceptor materials. The OPV devices based on 6 as the donor and PC71BM as the acceptor (1:2 w/w) showed a Voc of 0.96 V and a PCE of 2.87%. The Voc of 0.96 V was among the top values for OPVs based on solution-processed TPA derivatives reported to date.
Li et al. also reported D–A–D type molecules (7 and 8) with benzothiadiazole (BT) as the acceptor unit and TPA-(4-hexyl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (TPA-HTT) or bis(octyloxy)TPA-(4-hexyl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (boTPA-HTT) as the donor units [17]. The absorption spectra of these linear molecules in chloroform solutions exhibited strong absorption in the wavelength range from 300 to 700 nm. The absorption peaks of the thin films red-shifted a little, which indicates some aggregation of the molecules in the solid state. The absorption spectra of 7 and 8 in solutions and thin films are broader due to the larger π-conjugation of the planar thieno[3,2-b]thiophene unit in 7 and 8 [18]. In addition, the absorption peaks of 8 in solution and the thin film were red-shifted slightly in comparison to 6 due to the electron-donating alkoxy groups on the TPA unit in 8. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels derived from cyclic voltammetry for 7 and 8 were −5.10 eV/−3.42 eV and −5.01 eV/−3.36 eV, respectively. The higher HOMO level of 8 as compared to 7 was due to the electron-donating alkoxy groups attached to TPA in 7. The OPV devices based on 7:PC71BM and 8:PC71BM showed a PCE of 1.44% with a Jsc = 5.71 mA·cm−2, an FF = 0.34, and a Voc = 0.74 V for 7; and a PCE of 0.75% with a Jsc = 3.61 mA·cm−2, an FF = 0.31, and a Voc = 0.61 V for 8, respectively. Compound 8 exhibited lower PCE than that of 7, due to the poorer morphology observed after the introduction of terminal alkoxy groups on TPA, a higher HOMO level, and poorer miscibility of the corresponding compound with PC70BM.
Polymers 06 02645 g003 1024
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of OPV molecules 1–8.
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of OPV molecules 1–8.
Polymers 06 02645 g003
Jo et al. synthesized an A–D–A type diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based small molecule 9 with thienothiophene as the electron donating unit [19]. Chemical structures of molecules 9–12 are shown in Scheme 2. The UV-vis absorption spectra showed a strong, broad absorption peak at a longer wavelength originating from the intramolecular charge transfer between the D and A units. The absorption spectra in solid state exhibited a red-shift in the maximum absorption and an onset relative to the solution state. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of 9, as measured by cyclic voltammetry, were −5.11 eV and −3.56 eV, respectively. The photovoltaic devices fabricated from the blends of 9 and PC71BM exhibited the highest PCE of 4.0% with a Jsc of 9.3 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.81 V, and an FF of 0.53. The morphology of the 9/PC71BM blend films with fused aromatic rings exhibited a needle-like nanoscale phase separation, which is beneficial for charge carrier transport.
Yao et al. reported a diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based solution-processable small molecule 10 with thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (TT) as the donor unit [20]. The absorption spectrum of 10 was red-shifted due to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from the terminal donor (TT) to the DPP core [21]. The absorption spectra of the thin film exhibited broader bathochromic absorption for the ICT band, due to both the donor–acceptor (D–A) interactions and the extending π–π interactions caused by the strongest polarity of the amide groups in the DPP units [22]. The HOMO (−4.98 eV) and LUMO (−3.38 eV) energy levels of 10 were obtained from cyclic voltammetry. Photovoltaic devices were fabricated using 10 as the electron donor and PC61BM as the electron acceptor. The best device was obtained when the donor–acceptor blend ratio was 2:1 for 10/PC61BM, with a PCE of 1.70%.
Seo, et al. synthesized a D–A type solution-processed small molecule 11 with dithienothiophene and diketopyrrolopyrrole chromophores [23]. The absorption spectra of 11 in both solution and thin film showed a maximum value at 670 nm. However, the absorption onset of the thin film was red-shifted by 70 nm relative to the solution due to increased aggregation and electronic delocalization in the solid state. Bulk heterojunction OPV devices were fabricated by spin-casting 11:PC71BM mixtures from chloroform solution onto substrates with various blend ratios, from 1:0.5 to 1:2. Device performance was significantly enhanced with the use of additives. The device performance was 2.19%, with a Voc of 0.57 V, a Jsc of 9.67 mA·cm−2, and an FF of 0.50.
Recently, Chen et al. synthesized a solution-processable A−D−A type organic small molecule (12) with diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) as the terminal acceptor units and pentathiophene as the central donor unit [24]. The absorption spectra of 12 in solution showed only one main absorption band at 600 nm, indicating an intermolecular charge transfer (ICT) between the donor and acceptor units. The absorption bands of 12 in the thin films were significantly broadened, extending the absorption onset to 782 nm. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of 12, as measured by cyclic voltammetry, were −5.10 eV and −3.58 eV, respectively. The optimized solar cells based on 12/PC71BM (1:1, w/w) resulted in a PCE up to 2.39% with a Jsc of 6.82 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.77 V, and an FF of 0.46.

3. Dye-sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs)

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are efficient photovoltaics designed to convert solar energy to electricity, and since the report by O’Regan and Grätzel they have been considered to be one of the most promising next-generation renewable energy sources presently available, due to their ease of fabrication, high efficiency, and low material cost [25]. Consequently, various research groups have extensively studied the detailed operating scheme of DSSCs to identify the processes that actually limit their performance [26]. The general structure of a DSSC is composed of a transparent conducting oxide substrate, a mesoporous semiconductor film adsorbed with photosensitizer dyes, an electrolyte layer containing redox couples, and a counter electrode, as shown in Figure 2. The main processes in DSSC involve absorption of sunlight by a photosensitizer dye anchored on the mesoporous TiO2 surface, and subsequent electron injection from the photo-excited dye molecules into the TiO2 conduction band. The electrons are then percolated through a thin mesoscopic semiconductor film towards the conduction substrate and flow into the external circuit. Simultaneously, the oxidized dyes are regenerated to their neutral state by the reducing species in the electrolyte solution and complete the whole circuit. DSSC devices thus repeat the cycle continuously without consuming any material to generate electric power from sunlight. Unfortunately, besides the desired pathway of the electron transfer processes, some loss reactions also occur during device operation. The injected electrons in the TiO2 can recombine with either oxidized dyes (recombination) or the redox mediator molecules (back reaction). A unique feature of DSSCs compared to other photovoltaic technologies is to separate the function of light absorption from the charge carrier transport, which allows the optimization of the device by careful screening of the light absorber and charge transport materials.
Polymers 06 02645 g004 1024
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of OPV molecules 9–12.
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of OPV molecules 9–12.
Polymers 06 02645 g004
Table
Table 1. Photophysical and photovoltaic performance of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) based on fused-thiophene containing organic semiconductors.
Table 1. Photophysical and photovoltaic performance of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) based on fused-thiophene containing organic semiconductors.
Cpd.λmax (nm)HOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)Band gap (eV)Jsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (V)FFPCE (%)Ref.
1 a528−5.51−3.482.0311.040.870.575.41[13]
2 a537−5.57−3.581.9912.010.950.546.20[13]
3 a387−5.66−2.952.719.240.980.403.60[14]
4 b523−5.15−3.511.657.580.800.352.09[15]
5 b527−5.13−3.461.667.600.740.311.80[15]
6 b542−5.13−3.381.756.800.960.432.87[16]
7 b568−5.10−3.421.685.710.740.341.44[17]
8 b585−5.01−3.361.653.610.610.340.75[17]
9 b618−5.11−3.561.549.30.810.534.00[19]
10 b617−4.98−3.381.605.740.780.381.70[20]
11 b670−5.00−3.501.507.670.570.52.19[23]
12 b600−5.10−3.581.526.820.770.462.39[24]
a via vacuum deposition; b via solution process.
Polymers 06 02645 g002 1024
Figure 2. Representation of the construction and operational principle of dye sensitized solar cell.
Figure 2. Representation of the construction and operational principle of dye sensitized solar cell.
Polymers 06 02645 g002
The dye sensitizer plays a key role in the sunlight absorption and electron generation/transfer processes in a typical DSSC [1]. To improve the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs, the ideal sensitizers should meet the following requirements: (i) the absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer adsorbed TiO2 film should cover the entire visible region with a high molar extinction coefficient to enable efficient light harvesting; (ii) molecular frontier orbital energy levels of the photosensitizers should be favorable for electron injection into the conduction band of TiO2 and dye regeneration from the redox electrolyte; (iii) the dye molecules should possess a molecular structure capable of suppressing the dye aggregation on the semiconductor surface and charge recombination at the TiO2/electrolyte interface; (iv) the dye should have suitable anchoring groups, such as carboxylates or phosphonates, in order to obtain high charge injection efficiencies; and (v) the photosensitizer should have photo and thermal stability to ensure that the DSSCs have a long life.
Based on these requirements, various photosensitizers, including metal-polypyridyl complexes, porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and metal-free organic dyes, have been developed and applied to DSSCs over the past two decades [27]. Among them, ruthenium and porphyrin dyes have exhibited high efficiency, although their large-scale application is limited due to many practical issues. On the other hand, metal-free organic sensitizers with good availability, ease of structural tuning, and high extinction coefficients, have recently received great attention [28,29]. However, only a few metal-free organic sensitizers have achieved >9% photovoltaic efficiency in DSSCs in combination with the classical iodide electrolyte. Moreover, achieving long-term device stability is still a great challenge. Compared to ruthenium complexes, organic dyes have many advantages, such as low material cost, ease of tuning in the spectral response and band gap, and flexibility with regard to systematic structural modification. Furthermore, the performance of the DSSCs can be effectively improved by molecular engineering, most often of sensitizers. The most commonly reported organic sensitizers for DSSCs have the structure of an electron donor–π–bridge-electron acceptor (D–π–A) chemical architecture [29]. In addition, star-burst multi-donors [30]. D–A–π–A [31] and a reconfigured cross shape of double D–π–A branched dyes [32] have also been developed to modulate the spectral responses and energy levels of sensitizers. Upon light harvesting, these push-pull structures induce an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from donor to acceptor through the π-bridge. Moreover, hundreds of metal-free organic dyes have been molecularly engineered in the donor, π-bridge, and acceptor moieties to tune their absorption spectra, as well as their HOMO and LUMO levels. Among the metal-free organic dyes, fused-thiophene-incorporated sensitizers, holding a validated efficiency of 9.8% without any co-adsorbent and exhibiting long-term stability, are promising candidates for highly efficient DSSCs.
Fused-thiophenes are well-known electron-rich compounds, which makes them good electron donors and important building blocks for a wide variety of materials with electronic and optical applications [33]. The performance of fused-thiophene is associated with the role of sulfur d-orbitals, which mix well with aromatic π-orbitals, such that electron-transfer across the π-center to the acceptor unit is facilitated, thereby enabling prolonged injection efficiency [34]. Furthermore, fused thiophene derivatives exhibit excellent photo and thermal stability, affording improved performance as photosentitizers. In the following section, fused-thiophene-based organic sensitizers are reviewed, with a specific focus on the relationship between the molecular structures, optical absorption, and energy levels, as well as the photovoltaic performance, as summarized in Table 2.

Fused-Thiophene-Based Sensitizers in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

As discussed above, to obtain organic dyes with both red-shifted absorption and high stability, introduction of new π-conjugation segment into the dye molecule is important. Yang et al. first introduced the thienothiophene moiety as the π-conjugation segment in compound 13, along with rhodamine-3-acetic acid as an anchoring moiety and diethylaniline as a donor to form the D–π–A dye system [35]. Chemical structures of dyes 13–28 are shown in Scheme 3. DSSC based on 13 exhibited a higher photocurrent of Jsc = 15.23 mA·cm−2 with a PCE efficiency of 6.2% as compared to a di(thiophen-2-yl)ethane-based analogue molecule.
Later, Jiang et al. replaced the donor and acceptor moieties with methyl-triphenylamine and cyanoacetic acid, respectively [36]. As a result, a 14-sensitized solar cell increased the photo-current density (Jsc = 15.4 mA·cm−2) and open-circuit voltage (Voc = 693 mV), thus enhancing the cell performance (η = 6.57%).
Wang et al. reported a series of organic dyes (15–18) that contain a triphenylamine unit as the donor and cyanoacetic acid as the acceptor [37]. These sensitizers were prepared with different alkyl chains on the triphenylamine unit to tune their HOMO energy levels. The incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies (IPCE) of these sensitizers exhibited a high plateau of over 85%. The short-circuit photocurrents and light-harvesting efficiencies for DSSCs based on 15, 16, and 17 increased gradually along with the red-shifted photocurrent response. The DSSC based on methoxy substituted molecule 16 showed an improved power-conversion efficiency (Jsc = 13.38 mA·cm−2; η = 6.54%) as compared to that of molecule 15 (Jsc = 11.74 mA·cm−2; η = 5.93%). Further introduction of a methoxy group in the TPA part of molecule 17 switched the up-shift of the HOMO level and increased the device efficiency (Jsc = 13.56 mA·cm−2; η = 6.80%). Under the same conditions, a longer alkoxy chain containing dye molecule 18 displayed improved photovoltaic parameters (Jsc = 14.49 mA·cm−2; Voc = 693 mV; η = 7.05%) with a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte; this could be attributed to a slower charge recombination rate and longer electron lifetime due to two hexyl chains with a TPA moiety. In view of the structure-property relationship of these dye molecules, the dihexyloxy-substitution on the TPA was undoubtedly successful. In combination with a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte, these dyes exhibited excellent stability under thermal and light-soaking dual stress.
Recently, Seo, et al. [38] reported the push-pull structured organic dye molecule 19 composed of 3-hexyl thiophenes and a planar fused-thiophene (TT) ring as a π-conjugated linker, which increased the conjugation length to broaden the absorption spectrum and the molar extinction coefficient. Various photoelectrode films were utilized to improve the light-harvesting capability as well as the photon conversion efficiency. The high and broad IPCE value (93% at 460 nm) of the 19-sensitized DSSC within the visible region was attributed to the π-conjugated linker composed of thiophenes and a thienothiophene ring. Dye molecule 19-based DSSC with a hierarchically structured TiO2 (HS-TiO2) electrode showed a surprisingly high Jsc value of 20.9 mA·cm−2 among the reported meta-free sensitized DSSCs. A solar-cell device based on sensitizer 19 yielded high overall conversion efficiencies of up to 9.18% and 7.44% after 800 h of irradiation with a light intensity of 100 mW·cm−2, using an HS-TiO2 electrode without an antireflection layer.
To further enhance the light-harvesting capacity and to gain insights into the related optoelectronic properties, Wang et al. investigated the cell performance of sensitizers 20 and 21, using an extension of the thienothiophene π-spacer with thienothiophene and 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) units, respectively [39,40]. The IPCE of dye 20 exceeded 80% in the range of 400–610 nm, yielding a high Jsc (15.2 mA·cm−2) value and an overall conversion efficiency of 8.02%. Using solvent-free ionic-liquid electrolytes, the sensitizer yielded a reasonable conversion efficiency of 6.5%. In particular, this cell showed good stability during 1000 h operation under full sunlight-soaking conditions at 60 °C. Nevertheless, bisthienothiophene dye 20 exhibited only an 8 nm bathochromically-shifted absorption peak (λmax = 524 nm) compared to its counterpart dye 18 (λmax = 516 nm). In contrast, when the spacer was incorporated with EDOT and thienothiophene, the absorption peak of 21 (λmax = 552 nm) was red-shifted by 36 nm compared to that of 18. DSSC based on dye 21 with a double layer TiO2 film had an IPCE of greater than 90% in the range of 440–590 nm, along with an impressive efficiency of 9.8% in an iodine electrolyte consisting of 1.0 M 1,3-dimethyl-imidazolium iodide, 50 mM LiI, 30 mM I2, 0.5 M t-butylpyridine, and 0.1 M guanidium thiocyanate in acetonitrile-veleronitrile (85:15, v/v). It should be noted that along with a high Jsc (16.1 mA·cm−2) related to good light-harvesting, dye 21 also exhibited a high Voc (803 mV) and an FF (0.759). Interestingly, the researchers claimed that the device with a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte showed cell performance of 8.1%. Moreover, they demonstrated the high stability and efficiency of a DSSC based on 21 in a solvent-free electrolyte.
Later, Grätzel et al. group modified the anchoring group into cyano-substituted benzoic acid to make efficient sensitizers (22–26) [41,42]. They found that the cyano-subsituent improved the ICT and allowed for a better adsorption on TiO2, thus leading to improved DSSC performance. Moreover, DSSC based on 26, with the cyano-substituent in a para-position, showed better photovoltaic performance, with a maximum IPCE of 80% and an efficiency of 4.50% in contrast with dye 22, which had a cyano-group in the meta-position (η = 3.30%). The insertion of an acetylene bond between the TT spacer and the benzoic acid (23 and 25) had no significant influence on cell performance.
Further, Xue et al. studied the structure-function relationship of dye molecules incorporating electron-rich and electron-deficient thienothiophene units. Two push-pull organic dyes (27 and 28) incorporating a binary spacer in orderly TT (3-methylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene (MTT) and 3-methylthieno [3,2-b]thiophene-4,4-dioxide (MTTO), respectively) and EDOT units showed similar absorption peaks at 494 and 492 nm, respectively. Importantly, the MTT bridged dye 27 enhanced not only the Jsc (14.47 mA·cm−2), but concomitantly the Voc (670 mV), yielding a high conversion efficiency (6.11%). The higher efficiency of 27 was attributed to an effective semiconductor surface blocking capability that occurred as a result of injecting the photogenerated electrons inside the TiO2 network with prolonged electron lifetime [43].
Polymers 06 02645 g005 1024
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of dyes 13–28.
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of dyes 13–28.
Polymers 06 02645 g005
Wang et al. further optimized the thienothiophene dye by introducing a fluorine-based triarylamine moiety to suppress the aggregation and molecular stacking, based on dye 15 [44]. Such a variation in the donor moiety brought a 21 nm red-shift in the absorption spectra. The IPCE (incident photon conversion efficiency) exceeded 80% from 450 to 580 nm, reaching a maximum of 91%. DSSC based on 29 with an acetonitrile-based electrolyte under an irradiance of AM 1.5G full sunlight showed an efficiency of 7.8% through enhancement of the Jsc (13.35 mA·cm−2) and Voc (777 mV). In addition, the devices based on a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte and an all-solid-state hole-transporting material exhibited impressive cell performances of 7.0% and 4.8%, respectively, and also showed excellent light soaking stability at 60 °C for 1000 h. Chemical structures of dyes 29–40 are shown in Scheme 4.
More recently, Ko et al. developed two organic dyes by incorporating thienothiophene-thiophene 30 and thienothiophene-EDOT 31 as the π-bridges [45]. However, such a small variation in the π-conjugation of the two dyes resulted in a 33 nm difference in their absorption spectra. In a CHCl3 solution, 31 bearing EDOT as an electron linker, showed a significant red shift in the long-wavelength band (469 nm) compared with that of dye 30 (436 nm). When adsorbed onto the TiO2, the absorption peak maximum was blue-shifted by 28 nm for 30 and red-shifted by 4 nm for 31. These blue- and red-shifts of the absorption peaks on the TiO2 film were attributed to H- and J-aggregation, respectively. Retardation of the charge recombination caused by the existence of the EDOT group linked to the thienothiophene segment effectively suppressed the approach of I3− ions in the electrolyte to the TiO2 surface, resulting in an increase in the electron lifetime. As a consequence, an improvement in the Voc (731 mV) and hence a high PCE (7.00%) was achieved for the DSSC based on 31.
Attempts at structural optimization of thienothiophene-based dyes 32–37 have also been made by incorporating long alkyl groups into the spacer group and triphenylamine derivatives [46]. Compared with hexyl-substituted thienothiophene 32, an unsubstituted TT group on the spacer unit of 33 extended the photoresponse to a panchromatic spectrum. It is notable that increasing the donating capability of the triphenylamine unit with hexyl or hexyloxy groups enhanced their absorption spectrum, while showing a blue-shift compared to the corresponding dyes with an unsubstituted TT spacer group. DSSC based on 36 and a redox electrolyte consisting of 0.6 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (DMPImI), 0.05 M I2, 0.1 M LiI, and 0.5 M TBP (4-tert-butylpyridine) in acetonitrile exhibited an IPCE of greater than 85% in the range of 440–620 nm, with the absorption onset at 800 nm. The 36-sensitized device had the highest conversion efficiency among the six sensitizers, because of its broad and intense photocurrent action spectrum. Under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the 36-sensitized cell resulted in a Jsc of 17.49 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.70 V and an FF of 0.70, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 8.70%. Under the same conditions, the dye 37-sensitized cell exhibited an efficiency of 7.04%. Moreover, the open circuit voltage and short circuit photocurrent for the device based on 36 were significantly higher than those of the other dye molecules. Importantly, the Voc of the 36-based cell increased by 40 mV relative to that of the 37-based cell. This improved Voc value was attributed to the suppression of a dark current through the blocking effect of the hexyl group substituted at the thienothiophene unit. This study revealed that either the end or middle alkyl chains of the dye molecules played a significant role in the attenuation of the interfacial charge recombination, which is a key determinant of the photovoltage. Also, the 36-based ionic liquid electrolyte DSSC showed good photo- and thermal-stability, and maintained almost constant performance during 1000 h of light soaking at 60 °C.
Efficient organic sensitizers 39 and 40, consisting of a dimethylfluorenylamino-appended thienothiophene-vinylene-thienothiophene unit with aliphatic chains to maintain the planar geometry of the conjugated linker, along with dye 38 comprising a thienothiophene- thienothiophene unit, were synthesized for comparison [47]. This type of structural modification with thienothiophene increased the extinction coefficient of the sensitizer (38, λmax= 372 nm; 39, λmax= 480 nm; 40, λmax= 490 nm) by extending the π-conjugation of the bridging linker as well as augmenting its hydrophobicity, and also increased the stability under long-term light soaking and thermal stress. A molecular-orbital calculation revealed smooth movement of the electron from the phenyl- or benzo[b]thiophene to the cyanoacetic acid moiety. Under AM 1.5 irradiation, dye 40, consisting of benzothiophene and a TT-vinyline-TT unit in a volatile electrolyte, resulted in a Jsc of 17.61 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.71 V, and an FF of 0.72, corresponding to an efficiency of 9.1%. Under the same conditions in a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte, it displayed a high conversion efficiency of 7.9%, and showed long-term stability under light soaking at 60 °C.
Polymers 06 02645 g006 1024
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of dyes 29–40.
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of dyes 29–40.
Polymers 06 02645 g006
Recently, Ko et al. introduced a planar 4,4-dimethyl-4H-indeno[1,2-b]thienothiophene bridging unit into the sensitizer (41), in which a 2-phenythienothiophene was bridged by a dimethyl-methylene at the 2',3-position, and showed enlargement of the π-conjugation of the indenothienothiophene unit, because the methylene bridge rendered the indenothienothiophene coplanar [48]. Chemical structures of dyes 41–54 are shown in Scheme 5. The IPCE of 41 exceeded 75% in the spectral range from 426 to 590 nm, and the photovoltaic performance in a volatile electrolyte afforded a PCE of 8.40% (Jsc = 15.50 mA·cm−2; Voc = 0.73 V; FF = 0.75). Using a polymer gel electrolyte, dye 41 resulted in a Jsc of 16.61 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.60 V and an FF of 0.72, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 8.31%. In addition, they claimed that the long-term stability of 41 in a quasi-solid electrolyte could be attributed to the rigid planar bridging unit.
Tian et al. developed two organic sensitizers, 42 and 43, containing thiophene-thieothiophene and bezothiadiazole-thienothiophene as the π-spacer, respectively, in order to enhance the photovoltaic performance and stability [49]. Furthermore, they introduced an indolocarbazole moiety and two phenyl rings connected to the central core of the donor to suppress dye aggregation when the dyes were loaded onto TiO2 film. In the case of the CT bands of these dyes, the introduction of a benzothiadiazole unit with TT (λmax = 522 nm) resulted in a red-shifted band compared to the thiophene-TT unit (λmax = 464 nm). The larger Jsc (13.96 mA·cm−2) of dye 43 demonstrated the beneficial influence of the higher and broader IPCE values. As a consequence, the overall conversion efficiency of 43 was 6.40%. It should be noted that the DSSC based on 43 in a CHCl3-EtOH solvent mixture exhibited very good performance, with η up to 7.03%, a Jsc of 14.81 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.69 V and an FF of 0.69.
Liang et al. developed a truxene-based organic sensitizer 44 bearing the binary π-conjugated linkers EDOT and an MTT unit [50]. Dye 44 showed a broad absorption spectrum covering a wide range of the visible region with superior light-harvesting efficiency, due to the strong electron-donating nature of MTT and relatively small torsional angles between the plane of the donor and that of the acceptor. The DSSC based on dye 44 with a cobalt electrolyte composed of 0.25 M [Co(II)(phen)3](PF6)2, 0.05 M [Co(III)(Phen)3](PF6)3, 0.5 M TBP and 0.1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in acetonitrile afforded a Jsc of 11.9 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.830 V, an FF of 0.70, and a PCE of 6.9%. In comparison, the dye 44-sensitized cell with an iodine electrolyte exhibited a slightly increased Jsc of 12.2 mA·cm−2 but a remarkably decreased Voc of 675 mV, leading to a relatively lower efficiency of 5.6%. It is noteworthy that varying the TBP concentration from 0.5 to 0.8 M in the cobalt electrolyte significantly enhanced the Voc by as much as 70 mV, as well improving efficiency by up to 7.6%.
Lin et al. designed and synthesized a series of new organic sensitizers, 45–54, containing a non-linear TT moiety of ethyl thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-2-carboxylate (ETTC) in the conjugated spacer [51]. This ETTC moiety and its isomeric forms were used in the sensitizers of n-type DSSCs. They replaced the phenyl group of the TPA attached with ETTC with phenyl thienyl, fluorene, furan, and a thienyl entity to enhance the light absorption properties. Replacement of a phenyl unit by a thienyl unit resulted in considerable red shift of the λmax values, which was attributed to low delocalization energy of thieophene. However, in terms of the photovoltaic performance, the sulphur atom near to the acceptor isomeric form of TT (50–54) exhibited much better cell performance than its isomer with a sulphur atom away from the acceptor. DSSCs based on 50 and 52 showed the best performance among the prepared sensitizers, with efficiencies of 5.03% and 5.31%, respectively.
Polymers 06 02645 g007 1024
Scheme 5. Chemical structures of dyes 41–54.
Scheme 5. Chemical structures of dyes 41–54.
Polymers 06 02645 g007
Lin et al. reported a series of nonarylamine type organic sensitizers, 55–58, incorporating a dithienothiophene (DTT) unit as electron donor, an oligothiophene moiety as the conjugated spacer, and 2-cyanoacrylic acid as the electron acceptor [52]. Chemical structures of dyes 55–65 are shown in Scheme 6. These compounds had an intense adsorption band at 426–440 nm, and the conversion efficiencies of the DSSCs ranged from 3.54% to 5.15%. Density functional calculations proved that the HOMOs of these dyes largely populated on the DTT moiety as well as on the thienyl conjugation chains, indicating the efficient donating ability of the DTT entity. The higher cell efficiency of 57 as compared to other dye molecules was attributed to the higher J-aggregation value, with significantly improved light-harvesting efficiency.
Kozma et al. demonstrated that a sterically hindered 3,4-dialkyl thiophene ring could be advantageously incorporated with a DTT π-spacer into the dye molecule to prevent dye aggregation on the TiO2 surface, and to enhance the tolerance of the cell towards water in the electrolyte. The cell based on 59 exhibited high conversion efficiency of 6.27% without the use of coabsorbant agents [53]. Noticeably, 100 mM DCA increased the Voc, but significantly depressed the current density, resulting in very poor PCE.
In addition, Bach et al. developed sensitizer 60 based on a 2,6-bis[2-(3-hexylthienyl)]dithieno[3,2-b;2,3-d]thiophene core as the π-spacer [54]. Structural modification through an additional double bond and 3-hexylthiophene in the spacer caused it to exhibit a broad absorption spectrum and inhibited the electron recombination from the TiO2 nanoparticle to the radical cation of the dye, due to the presence of the hexyl substituents. In a 12 + 6 μm double layer TiO2 film, this dye exhibited a broad IPCE spectrum range starting from 800 nm with a high plateau at 67%. Through the optimization of the 60-sensitized solar cell via an increase of the coabsorbant concentration up to 20 mM, the performance of the cell increased to 7.3% with a Voc of 679 mV, a Jsc of 14.4 mA cm−2, and an FF of 0.73. Removal of the 3-hexyl thiophene in the π-conjugation linker resulted in a hypsochrmoic shift in the absorption spectrum that was reflected in the performance of the device based on sensitizer 61 [55].
To develop and evaluate the potential of fused-thiophene based sensitizers, Lee et al. reported two organic dyes with dithienothiophene (DTT) and dithienothiepine (DPE) as bridging motifs [56]. Both of the dye molecules 62 and 63 showed similar maximum absorption wavelengths (λmax = 453 and 455 nm, respectively), and 63 exhibited a band edge red-shift by ~50 nm in its absorption spectrum, with significantly reduced molar absorptivity as compared to 62. The red-shifted absorption spectrum and low absorptivity could possibly be attributed to the reduced angular tension and the disrupted planarity of the π-conjugated conformation of the DPE motif, respectively. The devices fabricated with 62 and 63 exhibited a PCE of 3.57%, with a Jsc of 7.52 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.67 V and an FF of 0.71 for 62, and a PCE of 4.03% with a Jsc of 8.24 mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.67 V and an FF of 0.73 for 63, respectively. The higher Jsc in the case of 63 might have been caused by the increased absorption range. Further, the addition of CDCA coabsorbent (30 mM) resulted in a significant increase in the photovoltaic performance of the devices based on 62 and 63 (6.24% and 6.63%, respectively), but relatively smaller increases in the Voc. Importantly, the device based on DTT incorporating dye 62 exhibited long-term stability after 250 h of light soaking at 60 °C, but the DPF-based device showed a decrease in all parameters.
Polymers 06 02645 g008 1024
Scheme 6. Chemical structures of dyes 55–65.
Scheme 6. Chemical structures of dyes 55–65.
Polymers 06 02645 g008
Apart from the MTT and MTTO, other electron-rich/deficient fused thiophenes, such as dithienothiophene (DTT) and dithienothiophene-4,4-dioxide (DTTO), have also been incorporated into a D–π–A configuration by Liang et al. [43] Compared to the DTT counterpart, the introduction of DTTO into the binary spacer is advantageous with regard to light harvesting in terms of both the maximum absorption and the molar absorptivity. Alteration of the π-spacer into electron deficient segment 65 enhanced Jsc as well as Voc, leading to high photon-to-current conversion efficiency of 5.19%. This result revealed that the electron-deficient DTT moiety is a promising candidate for efficient organic dyes.
Further, Lin et al engineered the molecular structure of DTT-based organic sensitizer 66 featuring 3,4,5-tris (dodecyloxy)phenyl and cyanoacrylic acid moieties as the electron-donor and electron-acceptor units, respectively [57]. Chemical structures of dyes 66–74 are shown in Scheme 7. To extend the length of conjugation, bithiophene (67) or bithiazole (68) moiety was appended to the DTT unit to enhance the capacity for charge transfer and increase the range of absorption. As expected, the elongation of the π-conjugation in 67 and 68 resulted in red-shifted and broader absorptions than those of 66. The highest PCE was obtained for the DSSC incorporating 67, mainly because it had the highest short current density (Jsc = 9.98 mA·cm−2). The remaining parameters (Voc and FF) were similar for the DSSCs based on 66–68. The IPCE spectrum of 67 featured the broadest response in the range 300–750 nm, with a maximum value of 64%, which led to the highest conversion efficiency (η = 3.72%; Voc = 0.58 V; Jsc = 9.98 mA·cm−2; and FF = 0.65). This result was attributed to the greater packing nature of 67, which enhanced electron injection into the TiO2.
Tetrahydroquinoline was used as a donor due to its prominent electron-donating ability in the DTT-based sensitizers (69 and 70) by Yan et al. [58]. Different lengths of π-spacers were adopted for expansion of the π-conjugation backbone, adjusting the absorption spectra and HOMO/LUMO energy level of the dyes. A bathochromic shift in the absorption spectrum was achieved by the introduction of the C=C bond. A small structural change in the dyes, with/without C=C bond, resulted in significant changes in redox energy and in the adsorption characteristic of the dyes on the TiO2 surface, significantly affecting the DSSC performance based on these dyes. The elimination of the C=C bond in the spacer of the dye structure 70 was useful for obtaining high PCE values of 2.92% under simulated AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW·cm−2).
Structural modification of fused DTT-based dye 70 was performed through introducing different donating moieties of carbazole and indoline, yielding dyes 71–73 [59]. Sensitizers 72 and 73 incorporating the substituted indolines donor exhibited a red-shifted absorption relative to that of 71, which contained a carbazole moiety. Consequently, DSSCs based on dye 72 and 73 showed an impressive total solar-to-electric conversion efficiency of 6.11% and 6.38%, respectively.
To eliminate the dye desorption during long-term device operation, Wang et al. reported a DTT-based sensitizer 74 by employing a fluorene-based triarylamine moiety as the donating group and volatile acetonitrile based electrolytes, showing efficiency of 8.0% with double layer titania film (7 + 4 μm) [60]. In combination with a solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte, this dye exhibited excellent stability during a long-term accelerated test under light-soaking and thermal dual stress.
Polymers 06 02645 g009 1024
Scheme 7. Chemical structures of dyes 66–74.
Scheme 7. Chemical structures of dyes 66–74.
Polymers 06 02645 g009
Table
Table 2. Photophysical and photovoltaic performances of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) based on fused-thiophene containing organic sensitizers.
Table 2. Photophysical and photovoltaic performances of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) based on fused-thiophene containing organic sensitizers.
Dyeλmax (nm)Jsc (mA·cm−2)Voc (mV)FFη (%)Ref.
1348815.235600.7306.23[35]
1444315.46100.7006.57[36]
1549311.746610.7645.93[37]
1651213.386640.7366.54[37]
1751713.566730.7456.80[37]
1851614.496930.7027.05[37]
1945020.96870.6399.18[38]
2052415.27200.7338.02[39]
2155216.18030.7599.80[40]
224377.86000.7053.30[41]
234456.566290.7373.02[42]
244325.786880.7182.87[42]
254395.706850.7172.82[42]
264438.057560.7334.50[42]
2749414.476700.6306.11[43]
284927.565670.6302.70[43]
2951413.357770.7497.80[44]
3043611.516700.7315.67[45]
3146913.267320.7237.00[45]
3245013.025700.7205.34[46]
3348113.815900.6805.65[46]
3445516.346400.7407.83[46]
3547615.225800.7006.21[46]
3646617.497000.7008.70[46]
3748415.946600.6707.04[46]
383729.47100.7505.10[47]
3948015.76900.7408.00[47]
4049017.67100.7209.10[47]
4148515.507270.7468.40[48]
424499.406440.6804.11[49]
4348614.816880.6907.03[49]
4450011.99000.7107.60[50]
455248.805600.6903.40[51]
465464.865200.6901.72[51]
474968.145800.7003.30[51]
485533.645000.6801.23[51]
495702.924400.5200.66[51]
5050912.66100.6605.03[51]
515369.215400.6603.26[51]
5247712.26400.6805.31[51]
535237.525300.6602.65[51]
545486.645100.6502.17[51]
5542912.096200.6705.02[52]
5642612.726100.6404.99[52]
5744013.316200.6205.15[52]
584409.485700.6603.54[52]
5946513.57150.6506.27[53]
6048914.46970.7307.30[54]
614727.35700.6502.76[55]
6245312.086800.7606.24[56]
6345512.666900.7606.63[56]
6449711.426000.6104.18[43]
6551413.526200.6205.19[43]
664436.855700.7002.69[57]
674769.985800.6503.72[57]
684736.776000.7002.82[57]
694676.875140.6602.34[58]
704448.845220.6302.92[58]
7142813.456180.6795.64[59]
7248115.855890.6716.11[59]
7348516.175950.6636.38[59]
7452514.337340.7608.00[60]

4. Conclusions

This review article discussed recent developments with regard to using fused-thiophene based organic molecules for various photovoltaic applications, such as OPVs and DSSCs. Due to their unique characteristic properties, fused-thiophenes have been incorporated in the donor and π-spacer of the molecules. The photophysical properties and device performance of the organic small molecules are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2 for comprehensive comparison, as well as to provide an overview of the field. Promising results with overall power conversion efficiencies of 6.20% and 9.80% are obtained from the fused-thiophene incorporated organic structure for OPVs and DSSCs, respectively. The major advantage is that such devices are easy to design and have a very high light-absorbing capacity, so that thinner films can be used to generate optimal photovoltaic performance. Importantly, fused-thiophene sensitizers with solvent-free ionic liquid electrolyte exhibited impressive efficiencies and long-term stability under light-soaking and thermal dual stress.
Despite the excellent performance of fused-thiophenes in OTFTs [61,62,63,64,65,66], fused-thiophene-based OPV and DSSC studies are still in their infancy. It is well known that there are a number of factors determining the efficiency of the photovoltaic cells, and that the multiparameter problem remains to be solved. It is important to design sophisticated and appropriate organic molecules that satisfy the needs of OPV and DSSC technologies [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. Undoubtedly, there are still vast opportunities to improve performance in this area, and thus to secure an exciting future for OPV and DSSC technologies. Therefore, it is believed that continued efforts should be made with regard to the engineering of fused-thiophene based molecules and device fabrication techniques, in order to realize the potential of fused-thiophene materials in OPVs and DSSCs.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support received for this study (grants NSC102-2113-M-008-004 and NSC101-2113-M-008-003-MY2) from the National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan, and under the framework of international cooperation program managed by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013K2A1B8048388).

Author Contributions

Prabakaran Kumaresan reviewed the OSC dyes papers and drafted the OSC part. Sureshraju Vegiraju reviewed the OPV papers and drafted the OPV part. Yamuna Ezhumalai worked on figures and schemes revision, Shueh Lin Yau, Choongik Kim, Wen-Hsi Lee and Ming-Chou Chen are advisors of Prabakaran Kumaresan, Sureshraju Vegiraju, Yamuna Ezhumalai, and all worked on the manuscript revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mishra, A.; Bäuerle, P. Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: Promises for future solar energy technology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2020–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, Z.; Zhong, C.; Su, S.; Xu, M.; Wu, H.; Cao, Y. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nat. Photon. 2012, 6, 591–595. [Google Scholar]
  4. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Gratzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Skabara, P.J. Fused Oligothiophenes. In Handbook of Thiophene-Based Materials; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2009; pp. 219–254. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, Y.S.; Yasuda, T.; Kakizoe, H.; Mieno, H.; Kino, H.; Tateyama, Y.; Adachi, C. High performance organic field-effect transistors based on single-crystal microribbons and microsheets of solution-processed dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene derivatives. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6483–6485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan, Y.; Giri, G.; Ayzner, A.L.; Zoombelt, A.P.; Mannsfeld, S.C.B.; Chen, J.; Nordlund, D.; Toney, M.F.; Huang, J.; Bao, Z. Ultra-high mobility transparent organic thin film transistors grown by an off-centre spin-coating method. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Günes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N.S. Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Walker, B.; Kim, C.; Nguyen, T.Q. Small molecule solution-processed bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Mater. 2010, 23, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, Y.; Welch, G.C.; Leong, W.L.; Takacs, C.J.; Bazan, G.C.; Heeger, A.J. Solution-processed small-molecule solar cells with 6.7% efficiency. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, Y.; Fan, H.; Li, Y.; Zhan, X. Thiazole-based organic semiconductors for organic electronics. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3087–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Qu, S.; Tian, H. Diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based materials for organic photovoltaics. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3039–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, J.; Shim, H.S.; Lee, H.; Choi, M.S.; Kim, J.J.; Seo, Y. Highly efficient vacuum-processed organic solar cells containing thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-thiazole. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11559–11565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwon, J.; Kim, T.M.; Oh, H.S.; Kim, J.J.; Hong, J.I. Vacuum processable donor material based on dithieno[3,2-b:2[prime or minute],3[prime or minute]-d]thiophene and pyrene for efficient organic solar cells. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 24453–24457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, J.K.; Lee, S.; Yun, S.J. Effects of fused thiophene bridges in organic semiconductors for solution-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 2148–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, D.; Shen, S.; Zhang, J.; He, C.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. Solution-processable star-shaped photovoltaic organic molecule with triphenylamine core and thieno[3,2-b]thiophene–dicyanovinyl arms. Org. Electron. 2012, 13, 2546–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Z.G.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. Triphenylamine-containing linear D–A–D molecules with benzothiadiazole as acceptor unit for bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhao, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Poly(3,6-dihexyl-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene vinylene): Synthesis, field-effect transistors, and photovoltaic properties. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 9760–9766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, Y.S.; Jo, W.H. A strategy to enhance both VOC and JSC of A–D–A type small molecules based on diketopyrrolopyrrole for high efficient organic solar cells. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, J.; Jia, H.; Li, L.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, W.; He, W.; Jiang, B.; Tang, A.; Tan, Z.A.; Zhan, C.; et al. Fine-tuning device performances of small molecule solar cells via the more polarized DPP-attached donor units. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14238–14242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tamayo, A.B.; Walker, B.; Nguyen, T.Q. A low band gap, solution processable oligothiophene with a diketopyrrolopyrrole core for use in organic solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11545–11551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mazzio, K.A.; Yuan, M.; Okamoto, K.; Luscombe, C.K. Oligoselenophene derivatives functionalized with a diketopyrrolopyrrole core for molecular bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, J.K.; Kim, C.; Walker, B.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Seo, J.H. Morphology control of solution processable small molecule bulk heterojunction solar cellsviasolvent additives. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 2232–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, Q.C.; Fu, W.F.; Wan, J.H.; Wu, X.F.; Shi, M.M.; Chen, H.Z. Evaluation of heterocycle-modified pentathiophene-based molecular donor materials for solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 5798–5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O’Regan, B.; Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ning, Z.; Fu, Y.; Tian, H. Improvement of dye-sensitized solar cells: What we know and what we need to know. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1170–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Numata, Y.; Han, L. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: Progress and future challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1443–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mishra, A.; Fischer, M.K.R.; Bäuerle, P. Metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: From structure: Property relationships to design rules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2474–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liang, M.; Chen, J. Arylamine organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3453–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ning, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, W.; Pei, H.; Liu, B.; Tian, H. Starburst triarylamine based dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3791–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wu, Y.; Zhu, W. Organic sensitizers from D–π–A to D–A–π–A: Effect of the internal electron-withdrawing units on molecular absorption, energy levels and photovoltaic performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2039–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ren, X.; Jiang, S.; Cha, M.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Z.S. Thiophene-bridged double D–π–A dye for efficient dye-sensitized solar cell. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3493–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mishra, A.; Ma, C.-Q.; Bäuerle, P. Functional Oligothiophenes: Molecular design for multidimensional nanoarchitectures and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1141–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ortiz, R.P.; Ruiz Delgado, M.C.; Casado, J.; Hernández, V.; Kim, O.K.; Woo, H.Y.; López Navarrete, J.T. Electronic modulation of dithienothiophene (DTT) as π-Center of D–π–D chromophores on optical and redox properties: Analysis by UV−Vis−NIR and Raman spectroscopies combined with electrochemistry and quantum chemical DFT calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13363–13376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, S.L.; Jiang, K.J.; Shao, K.F.; Yang, L.M. Novel organic dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, G.; Jiang, K.J.; Li, Y.F.; Li, S.L.; Yang, L.M. Efficient structural modification of triphenylamine-based organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11591–11599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, M.; Li, R.; Pootrakulchote, N.; Shi, D.; Guo, J.; Yi, Z.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Wang, P. Energy-level and molecular engineering of organic D–π–A sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 19770–19776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, D.Y.; Seo, Y. Resonant multiple light scattering for enhanced photon harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5192–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, G.; Bai, Y.; Li, R.; Shi, D.; Wenger, S.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Gratzel, M.; Wang, P. Employ a bisthienothiophene linker to construct an organic chromophore for efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, G.; Bala, H.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, D.; Lv, X.; Yu, Q.; Wang, P. High efficiency and stable dye-sensitized solar cells with an organic chromophore featuring a binary π-conjugated spacer. Chem. Commun. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Katono, M.; Bessho, T.; Meng, S.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Rothenberger, G.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Kaxiras, E.; Grätzel, M. D–π–A dye system containing cyano-benzoic acid as anchoring group for dye-sensitized solar cells. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14248–14252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Katono, M.; Bessho, T.; Wielopolski, M.; Marszalek, M.; Moser, J.E.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Influence of the anchoring modes on the electronic and photovoltaic properties of D−π–A dyes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16876–16884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, X.; Liang, M.; Sun, S.; Shi, Y.; Ma, Z.; Sun, Z.; Xue, S. Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of organic sensitizers containing electron-deficient and electron-rich fused thiophene for dye-sensitized solar cells. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 5375–5385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, M.; Xu, M.; Shi, D.; Li, R.; Gao, F.; Zhang, G.; Yi, Z.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. High-performance liquid and solid dye-sensitized solar cells based on a novel metal-free organic sensitizer. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 4460–4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, M.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, D.H.; Ko, M.J. Novel D–π–A organic dyes with thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene unit as a π-bridge for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with long-term stability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4102–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Paek, S.; Choi, H.; Choi, H.; Lee, C.W.; Kang, M.S.; Song, K.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Ko, J. Molecular engineering of efficient organic sensitizers incorporating a binary π-conjugated linker unit for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 14646–14653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choi, H.; Raabe, I.; Kim, D.; Teocoli, F.; Kim, C.; Song, K.; Yum, J.H.; Ko, J.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. High molar extinction coefficient organic sensitizers for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem.Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Choi, H.; Paek, S.; Lim, K.; Kim, C.; Kang, M.S.; Song, K.; Ko, J. Molecular engineering of organic sensitizers for highly efficient gel-state dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 8226–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cai, S.; Tian, G.; Li, X.; Su, J.; Tian, H. Efficient and stable DSSC sensitizers based on substituted dihydroindolo[2,3-b]carbazole donors with high molar extinction coefficients. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11295–11305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zong, X.; Liang, M.; Chen, T.; Jia, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, Z.; Xue, S. Efficient iodine-free dye-sensitized solar cells employing truxene-based organic dyes. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6645–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Y.C.; Chou, H.H.; Tsai, M.C.; Chen, S.Y.; Lin, J.T.; Yao, C.F.; Chen, K. Thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-based organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 5430–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, H.Y.; Yen, Y.S.; Hsu, Y.C.; Chou, H.H.; Lin, J.T. Organic dyes incorporating the dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene moiety for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Org. Lett. 2009, 12, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kozma, E.; Concina, I.; Braga, A.; Borgese, L.; Depero, L.E.; Vomiero, A.; Sberveglieri, G.; Catellani, M. Metal-free organic sensitizers with a sterically hindered thiophene unit for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13785–13788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kwon, T.H.; Armel, V.; Nattestad, A.; MacFarlane, D.R.; Bach, U.; Lind, S.J.; Gordon, K.C.; Tang, W.; Jones, D.J.; Holmes, A.B. Dithienothiophene (DTT)-based dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: Synthesis of 2,6-Dibromo-DTT. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4088–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tian, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, R.; Zhang, R.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. Effect of different dye baths and dye-structures on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on triphenylamine dyes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11023–11033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, J.K.; Kim, H.S.; Yun, S.J. Synthesis of organic dye containing an alkylenesulfanyl-bridged bithienyl π-linker and its use in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2014, 275, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shellaiah, M.; Fang, H.P.; Lin, Y.L.; Hsu, Y.C.; Lin, J.T.S.; Lin, H.C. Synthesis of metal-free organic dyes containing tris(dodecyloxy)phenyl and dithienothiophenyl units and a study of their mesomorphic and photovoltaic properties. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 2124–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, R.; Yang, X.; Tian, H.; Wang, X.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. Effect of tetrahydroquinoline dyes structure on the performance of organic dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 4007–4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Menggenbateer; Islam, A.; El-Shafei, A.; Asao, N.; Jin, T.; Han, L.; Alamry, K.A.; Kosa, S.A.; Asiri, A.M.; et al. Structure–property relationship of different electron donors: Bovel organic sensitizers based on fused dithienothiophene π-conjugated linker for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 3444–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qin, H.; Wenger, S.; Xu, M.; Gao, F.; Jing, X.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. An organic sensitizer with a fused dithienothiophene unit for efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9202–9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, M.C.; Chiang, Y.J.; Kim, C.; Guo, Y.J.; Chen, S.Y.; Liang, Y.J.; Huang, Y.W.; Hu, T.S.; Lee, G.H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T.J. One-pot [1 + 1 + 1] synthesis of dithieno[2,3-b:3',2'-d]thiophene (DTT) and their functionalized derivatives for organic thin-film transistors. Chem. Commun. 2009, 14, 1846–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Youn, J.; Chen, M.C.; Liang, Y.J.; Huang, H.; Ortiz, R.P.; Kim, C.; Stern, C.; Hu, T.S.; Chen, L.H.; Yan, J.Y.; et al. Novel semiconductors based on functionalized benzo[d,d']thieno[3,2-b;4,5-b'] dithiophenes (BTDTs) and the effects of thin film growth conditions on organic field effect transistor performance. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5031–5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Youn, J.; Huang, P.Y.; Huang, Y.W.; Chen, M.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Huang, H.; Ortiz, R.P.; Stern, C.; Chung, M.C.; Feng, C.Y.; et al. Versatile α,ω-Disubstituted Tetrathienoacene Semiconductors for High Performance Organic Thin-Film Transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheng, S.S.; Huang, P.Y.; Ramesh, M.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, L.M.; Yeh, C.M.; Fung, C.L.; Wu, M.C.; Liu, C.C.; Kim, C.; et al. Solution-processed small-molecule bulk heterojunction ambipolar transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2057–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Youn, J.; Huang, P.Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.W.; Vegiraju, S.; Prabakaran, K.; Stern, C.; Kim, C.; Chen, M.C.; Facchetti, A.; et al. Functionalized benzothieno[3,2-b]thiophenes (BTTs) for high performance organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs). J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 7599–7607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, M.C.; Vegiraju, S.; Huang, C.M.; Huang, P.Y.; Prabakaran, K.; Yau, S.L.; Chen, W.C.; Peng, W.T.; Chao, I.; Kim, C.; et al. Asymmetric fused thiophenes for field-effect transistors: crystal structure–film microstructure–transistor performance correlations. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 8892–8902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, N.; Lin, H.; Lou, S.J.; Yu, X.; Guo, P.; Manley, E.F.; Loser, S.; Hartnett, P.; Huang, H.; Wasielewski, M.R.; et al. Morphology-performance relationships in high-efficiency all-polymer solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Guo, X.; Zhou, N.; Lou, S.J.; Smith, J.; Tice, D.B.; Hennek, J.W.; Ortiz, R.P.; Navarrete, J.T.L.; Li, S.; Strzalka, J.; et al. Polymer solar cells with enhanced fill factors. Nat. Photon. 2013, 7, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, N.; Guo, X.; Ortiz, R.P.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Chang, R.P.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T.J. Bithiophene imide and benzodithiophene copolymers for efficient inverted polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2242–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Guo, X.; Zhou, N.; Lou, S.J.; Hennek, J.W.; Ponce Ortiz, R.; Butler, M.R.; Boudreault, P.L.; Strzalka, J.; Morin, P.O.; Leclerc, M.; et al. Bithiopheneimide-dithienosilole/dithienogermole copolymers for efficient solar cells: Information from structure-property-device performance correlations and comparison to thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18427–18439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhou, N.; Lee, B.; Timalsina, A.; Guo, P.; Yu, X.; Marks, T.J.; Facchetti, A.; Chang, R.P. Cross-linkable molecular hole-transporting semiconductor for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 16967–16975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, N.; Buchholz, D.B.; Zhu, G.; Yu, X.; Lin, H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T.J.; Chang, R.P. Ultraflexible polymer solar cells using amorphous zinc indium tin oxide transparent electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lee, B.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Zhou, N.; Hao, F.; Malliakas, C.D.; Yeh, C.Y.; Marks, T.J.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Chang, R.P. Air stable molecular semiconducting iodosalts for solar cell applications: Cs2sni6, as a hole conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, H.; Zhou, N.; Ortiz, R.P.; Chen, Z.; Loser, S.; Zhang, S.; Guo, X.; Casado, J.; López Navarrete, J.T.; Yu, X.; et al. Alkoxy-functionalized thienyl-vinylene polymers for field-effect transistors and all-polymer solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2782–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Harschneck, T.; Zhou, N.; Manley, E.F.; Lou, S.J.; Yu, X.; Butler, M.R.; Timalsina, A.; Turrisi, R.; Ratner, M.A.; Chen, L.X.; et al. Substantial photovoltaic response and morphology tuning in benzo[1,2-b:6,5-b']dithiophene (bbdt) molecular donors. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4099–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumaresan, P.; Vegiraju, S.; Ezhumalai, Y.; Yau, S.L.; Kim, C.; Lee, W.-H.; Chen, M.-C. Fused-Thiophene Based Materials for Organic Photovoltaics and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Polymers 2014, 6, 2645-2669. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6102645

AMA Style

Kumaresan P, Vegiraju S, Ezhumalai Y, Yau SL, Kim C, Lee W-H, Chen M-C. Fused-Thiophene Based Materials for Organic Photovoltaics and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Polymers. 2014; 6(10):2645-2669. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6102645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumaresan, Prabakaran, Sureshraju Vegiraju, Yamuna Ezhumalai, Shueh Lin Yau, Choongik Kim, Wen-Hsi Lee, and Ming-Chou Chen. 2014. "Fused-Thiophene Based Materials for Organic Photovoltaics and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells" Polymers 6, no. 10: 2645-2669. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6102645

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop