Next Article in Journal
Can the Application the Silicon Improve the Productivity and Nutritional Value of Grass–Clover Sward in Conditions of Rainfall Shortage in Organic Management?
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Biochar-Microbe Synergies for Improved Growth, Yield of Maize, and Post-Harvest Soil Characteristics in a Semi-Arid Climate
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Biochar Application and Re-Application on Soil Bulk Density, Porosity, Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Water Content and Soil Water Availability in a Silty Loam Haplic Luvisol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rhizobacteria Isolated from Saline Soil Induce Systemic Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against Salinity Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum as Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture

by
Brenda Sánchez-Montesinos
1,
Fernando Diánez
1,*,
Alejandro Moreno-Gavíra
1,
Francisco J. Gea
2 and
Mila Santos
1
1
Departamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación, Experimentación y Servicios del Champiñón (CIES), Quintanar del Rey, 16220 Cuenca, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(7), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071004
Submission received: 4 June 2020 / Revised: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 8 July 2020 / Published: 13 July 2020

Abstract

:
The main objective of this study was to determine the capacity of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum to promote pepper and tomato seedling growth compared to that of T. saturnisporum, a species recently characterised as a biostimulant. Consequently, in vitro seed germination and seedling growth tests were performed under commercial plant nursery conditions. Additionally, the effects of different doses and a mixture of both species on seedling growth under plant nursery and subsequently under greenhouse conditions were determined. Furthermore, mass production of spores was determined in different substrates, and their siderophore and indole acetic acid production and phosphate (P) solubilisation capacity were also determined. Direct application of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum to seeds in vitro neither increases the percentage of pepper and tomato seed germination nor improves their vigour index. However, substrate irrigation using different doses under commercial plant nursery conditions increases the quality of tomato and pepper seedlings. Tomato roots increased by 66.66% at doses of 106 spores per plant. Applying T. aggressivum f. europaeum or T. saturnisporum under plant nursery conditions added value to seedlings because their growth-promoting effect is maintained under greenhouse conditions up to three months after transplantation. The combined application of the two species had no beneficial effect in relation to that of the control. The present study demonstrates the biostimulant capacity of T. aggressivum f. europaeum in pepper and tomato plants under commercial plant nursery and greenhouse conditions.

1. Introduction

The success of applying Trichoderma in agriculture results from the multiple benefits that it generates in plants. Thus, the genus Trichoderma is characterised by its strong competitive and reproductive potential, presenting high survival rates under unfavourable or abiotic stress conditions, such as salinity [1], water stress [2], or the presence of various toxic chemicals, including fungicides [3], among others. Similarly, Trichoderma exhibits high efficiency in the promotion of nutrient uptake [4], the capacity to modify the rhizosphere and root structure in which the fungus is established [5,6], high aggressiveness against plant pathogenic fungi, efficiency in the promotion of plant growth [7,8,9,10,11,12], and the ability to induce plant defence mechanisms, among many additional benefits [8,9,13]. The properties of Trichoderma have generated considerable research interest in these fungi for use in agriculture, and a large number of commercial products have been developed using different Trichoderma species [10,14]. Many formulations contain mixtures of different species that provide a wider range of direct and indirect beneficial effects for the plants. Numerous studies have reported the benefits of Trichoderma application for plant growth and even increased production yield. Thus, applying Trichoderma species, to both soil and seeds, allows the multiplication of the fungus in conjunction with the developing root system [15]. Its ability to colonise plant roots from the appressorium-like structure directly enhances seed vigour [16] and germination and promotes seedling growth [10,11,17]; thereby, suggesting that these fungi should be applied from the plant nursery stage in the case of horticultural, ornamental, or forest species, which would allow the early colonisation of the roots by Trichoderma, before transplanting the seedlings in the field.
It has been reported that plant growth is enhanced in association with Trichoderma species similar to that of other plant-growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs), but the effects are greater with Trichoderma when plants are under biotic, abiotic, or physiological stress conditions [9,18,19,20,21]. Recently, T. aggressivum f. europaeum has been described as a melon seedling growth promoter under saline stress conditions, in addition to its capacity to control Pythium ultimum, decreasing the severity of the disease in seedlings [1]. Trichoderma aggressivum Samuels & W. Gams is the causal agent of the green mould disease, which causes economic losses in the cultivation of white button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus (J.E. Lange) Imbach) worldwide. There are two subspecies, T. aggressivum f. aggressivum and T. aggressivum f. europaeum found in North America and Europe, respectively [22]. Trichoderma aggressivum, a fast-growing filamentous fungus, colonises compost and casings used as growth substrates in mushroom cultivation and produces dense white mycelial colonies that change colour to green after sporulation [23]. This aggressive competitor is known to produce metabolites that are toxic to A. bisporus [24,25]. In areas colonised by T. aggressivum, fruit body formation is retarded, and fruit bodies may be of poor quality because of damage or discolouration [23]. Numerous Trichoderma species have been isolated from Agaricus compost and Pleurotus substrates, such as T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, Trichoderma ghanense, T. asperellu, and T. atroviride, although its aggressiveness has not been determined [26]. Sánchez-Montesinos et al. [1] demonstrated its high mycelial growth and sporulation on roots. Thus, T. aggressivum f. europaeum is a potential biofertilizer for different crops. In our study, the growth-promoting capacity of this species has been analysed in comparison to that of T. saturnisporum Ca1606, which was recently characterised as a biocontrol agent and a seedling growth promoter for different horticultural plants [11,16,27]. Since the effectiveness of microorganisms as growth promoters will depend on the crop, dose and application method, among many other factors, further studies on T. aggressivum f. europaeum are needed to determine its efficacy.
Consequently, in the present study, T. aggressivum f. europaeum Tae52481 and T. saturnisporum Ca1606, were tested to evaluate: (a) the effects of direct application to seeds of a fungus suspension on root colonisation of tomatoes and peppers and subsequent plant vigour; (b) the promotion of growth and quality of pepper and tomato seedlings under a conventional production system; and (c) the effects of applying different doses and the synergistic effect of both isolates on tomato seedlings and on their subsequent transplantation under greenhouse conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolates

Trichoderma saturnisporum Ca1606 (TS), already known for their plant growth promotion properties, were extracted from suppressive soils. TS was cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days at 25 °C in lightless conditions. The growth results measured were used to establish a comparison value.
For this study Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum Tae52481 (TA) were isolated from samples of substrate used for Agaricus bisporus cultivation at mushroom farms. These fungal spore samples were similarly cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days at 25 °C in dark conditions. The corresponding growth results were recorded. The spore suspensions for both samples were prepared using sterile distilled water. A concentration of 1 × 107 spores/mL was achieved with a Neubauer haemocytometer.

2.2. Analysis of Plant Growth-Promoting Attributes

In accordance with the method of Louden et al. [28], by the transference of fungal mycelial discs (5 mm) of active culture onto Chrome-Azurol S (CAS) agar medium, siderophore production was determined. At 24, 48 and 72 h the diameter of the siderophore colony indicative orange halos on blue were measured.
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production was estimated according to the procedure described by Diánez et al. [16]. Five independent replicates of TA and TS were analysed. This process is described as follows. A glucose peptone broth (GPB) of 50 mL, amended with or without L-tryptophan (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 100 mg L−1 was prepared. Flasks containing this broth inoculated with TA and TS were incubated on an orbital shaker at 150 rpm in dark conditions for 7 days at 25 °C. Subsequently the supernatants from each flask, having first being centrifuged for 30 min at 12,000× g and filtered through sterile Millipore membranes (pore size 0.22 μm), were collected into sterile test tubes. In order to determine the quantity of IAA, optical density tests were carried out and compared to a standard IAA curve. For both the TA and TS, 3 mL of the culture supernatant and 2 mL (0.5 mol L−1 FeCl3 + 98 mL of 35% HClO4) Salkowski reagent were combined and left for 30 min. The intensity of the resulting red pigmentation density was measured at 530 nm using a scanning spectrophotometer for each of the samples.
To determine the quantitative estimation of phosphate solubilisation, a modified version of the Lima–Rivera procedure [29] was followed. Then, 250 mL capacity flasks containing 50 mL National Botanical Research Institute’s phosphate (NBRIP) broth, inoculated with two 5 mm pure Trichoderma isolates agar disks were agitated at 100 rpm and incubated at 26 °C for 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 days. As a control the procedure was carried out on uninoculated flasks containing the same NBRIP broth. The experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Using the Fiske and Subbarow method [30] phosphate concentrations in culture supernatants were estimated as equivalent phosphate (µg mL−1), mean values expressed and pH analysed. The total P (phosphate) in the flasks was 10 mg mL−1.

2.3. Mass Production of TA and TS on Solid Substrates

A mixture of two kinds of substrates, one containing buckwheat husk (BH) and oat (O), the other containing BH and rice (R) were tested for the mass multiplication of TA and TS [31]. Different proportions of BH-O (90–10%, 80–20% and 70–30% v/v) and BH-R (90–10%, 80–20% and 70–30% v/v) were submerged in 30% v/v of water for 24 h. Each mixture was sterilised for 1 h at 125 °C twice on consecutive days. Each mixture was placed on a tray and aseptically inoculated by spraying with 5 mL of spore suspension containing 1 × 107 spores mL−1 of each isolate. The trays were kept at 25 °C in the dark for 15 days. In total, three samples (2 g) of the fungus-colonised substrate were removed from the trays in each treatment. The samples were successively diluted in sterile distilled water + 0.01% Tween 20® and the number of conidia g−1 of the solid substrate was quantified for each replicate using a Neubauer haemocytometer. There were three replications per treatment. The collected spores were used in the different experiments conducted in this study.

2.4. Analysis of Effects of TA and TS on Seed Germination under Laboratory Conditions

Three treatments (control, TA and TS) and four repetitions following a random block experimental design were implemented in this study. For each repetition of the three treatments 50 seeds of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum ‘Red Cherry’) and pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘Largo de Reus‘) were germinated on two sheets of sterile distilled water moistened Whatman No. 1 filter paper in (150 mm) Petri dishes. These seeds were first surface sterilized for 5 min with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), rinsed twice with sterile distilled water and dried under laminar airflow on sterile paper [16]. Germination was achieved by treating the seeds with 50 µL of spore suspension (1 × 105 spores mL−1) of TA, TS or 50 µL of sterile water (control). The trays were placed in a lightless incubator at 25 ± 1 °C, 7 days for tomato and 10 days for pepper seeds. For each Petri dish treated with one of the three solutions (control, TA and TS), percent germination, root length and shoot length of tomato and pepper seeds were recorded. A Seed Vigour Index (SVI) was calculated as follows: SVI (length) = seed germination% (mean root length + mean shoot length) [32].

2.5. Analysis of Promoter Effects of TA and TS on Pepper and Tomato Seedlings: Experiment 1

The following experiment was conducted in autumn using a completely randomised design at a commercial nursery (Almería, Spain). Pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘Largo de Reus’) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum ‘Red Cherry’) seeds were sown in 96-cell commercial peat mix filled nursery polystyrene planting trays (70 mL volume) and covered with vermiculite. Trays were relocated to a greenhouse and rinsed with sterile distilled water (control), or a 5 mL (TA or TS) spore suspension per cell at 105 spores per plant, after a 2 day (tomato) or 4 day (pepper) period in a germination room (relative humidity (RH) = 95%; 25 °C). Four trays of seedlings for each treatment were cultivated under standard nursery culture conditions (18–28 °C; 75.4 ± 6.7% RH). Then, 20 plants per treatment and control were randomly selected from the four replications at 45 days after sowing across the four replications. Different growth parameters: number of leaves, stem length, stem base diameter, total leaf area and root dry weights, as well as leaf area using the WINDIAS 3.1 of the plants, were measured. The formula: DQI = TDW/((LS/D) + SDW/RDW)) where TDW is the total dry weight (g), LS is stem length (cm), D is stem diameter (mm), SDW and RDW are stem and root dry weight (g), respectively; they were employed to determine the Dickson Quality Index (DQI) [33].

2.6. Analysis of Effects of Applying Different Doses of TA and TS to Tomatoes: Experiment 2

The experimental procedure followed for experiment 2 was similar to that described for experiment 1, although conducted in winter. Again, propagated in substrate appropriately irrigated according to climate and crop necessity under commercial plant nursery conditions and supplemented with a commercial complex nutrient fertiliser, 96 tomato seedlings per replicate of four were treated with three solutions of spore suspension, each with 5 mL of TA, TS conidia and TA + TS (M) (TA D1, TS D1 and M D1: 105 spores mL−1; TA D2, TS D2 and M D2: 106 spores mL−1; and TA D3, TS D3 and M D3: 107 spores mL−1). After 30 days of sowing, twenty plants from each of the three treatment batches and control were randomly selected for harvest. The plants were measured, and data were recorded for the same parameters described in experiment 1. In mid-February a further 25 plants were transplanted into a sandy soil and analysed in mid-May.
In all tests, roots inoculated with Trichoderma isolates were collected at the end of the tests. Roots were surface sterilized in 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and washed with sterilised water. Root fragments were placed in PDA medium to determine root colonisation by the fungal isolate.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The experimental results are presented as the means and standard error (± SE) for the different replicates. Mean separation was carried out using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. The data were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student’s t-test with significance defined as p-values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05). Statgraphics Centurion 18 Software was utilised for statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Mass Production of Trichoderma Isolates on Solid Substrates

The results are outlined in Table 1. Both isolates grew and sporulated well in all mixtures tested. The proportion of 70 + 30% for buckwheat husk and oats (Figure 1), respectively, and 80 + 20% for buckwheat husk and rice, resulted in significantly higher spore production for both species, followed by 90 + 10% and 70 + 30% of BH + 10% R (Table 1). The lowest spore production rate was observed for 80 BH + 20% O.

3.2. Siderophore Production, IAA and P Solubilisation

TA and TS siderophore production was observed in the formation of an orange-coloured zone around the fungal colonies at 24 and 48 h, and the production of TA was higher, in both cases. No increase in the diameter of the halo (mm) was detected at 72 h in any isolate (Table 2).
Although both Trichoderma strains exhibited an in vitro ability to produce IAA in medium supplemented with and without 100 mg L−1 tryptophan during a 7-day period, the production of T. saturnisporum was higher under both conditions tested (Table 2). In both TA and TS, IAA production increased in the medium supplemented with tryptophan.
The effects of TA and TS on the soluble phosphate concentration are shown in Figure 2. The initial concentration of P in the medium was used to quantify the concentration of P solubilised by both isolates. As shown in Figure 2, P solubilisation was significant from the fifth day of incubation, with no significant differences between the two isolates. Furthermore, no change in the pH of the medium was detected, which remained at approximately 6.5–7.

3.3. Effects of TA and TS Treatment on Germination and Vigour Index

The results from the in vitro application of TA and TS spores to tomato and pepper seeds are outlined in Table 3. No significant effects on pepper and tomato seed germination percentages were observed in either treatment. However, the application of both Trichoderma isolates led to a decrease in the radicle and hypocotyl length (growth) parameters and significantly decreased the SVI in peppers. The tomato seed vigour index was not affected by TA or TS treatment (p = 0.1918).

3.4. Effects of Trichoderma Inoculation on Tomato and Pepper Seedlings

The effects of TA and TS application on morphological parameters and DQI are shown in Table 4. Unlike the results from the direct application of both Trichoderma to the seeds, the application to the substrate increased the study parameters compared to that of the control, and the results were better in peppers than in tomatoes, with better quality seedlings, according to the DQI values (Figure 3). There were no significant differences after the application of TA and TS in both horticultural plants. The increased percentage assessed in pepper seedlings for each species (TA/TS) was 8%/8.5% for stem length, 12.32/~0.01 for stem diameter, 7.77/5.5 for leaf number, 22.22/25 for shoot dry weight, 36.36/63.63 for root dry weight and 13.83/13.74 for leaf area, respectively. In tomato seedlings, the percentages were 9/6 for stem length, 0.5/1.5 for stem diameter, 6/8.8 for leaf number, 12.5/5.3 for shoot dry weight, 0/–6.6 for root dry weight and 8/9.2 for leaf area. No significant differences in DQI were found in tomato seedlings for any treatment applied with respect to that of the control.

3.5. Effects of Dose of Application of T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum

Since no significant plant growth-promoting results were found in tomato seedlings, the effects of applying three doses of both species separately, as well as jointly, were determined. The results are outlined in Table 5, wherein values significantly higher than that of the control are highlighted in green, and negative values in red, for better visualisation.
The increase in the dose of both species improved seedling quality, increasing all study parameters in TA D2 and TS D3 treatments, with respect to that of the control. In treatment TA D2, stem length increased 14.37%, plant diameter 9.4%, leaf number 21.58%, shoot dry weight 16.66% and root dry weight 66.66%. In treatment TS D3, stem length increased 39.05%, plant diameter 15.22%, leaf number 11.55%, shoot dry weight 12.5% and root dry weight 33.33%. Although most treatments favoured the development of seedling shoots, no favourable results were found in roots; therefore, the seedling quality was not improved. The combination or mixture of the two species for the three doses tested did not improve the results compared to that of their separate application.
The results of the study parameters after transplantation of the seedlings into the soil are outlined in Table 5 (Figure 3). Three treatments, TA D1, TA D2 and TS D2, led to a good relationship between tomato shoots and roots, with significantly higher plant quality, compared to that of the control, without a new application of Trichoderma. Thus, shoot dry weight increased 43.20%, 22.84% and 29.58% and root dry weight increased 29.94%, 39.32% and 31.51% after the TA D1, TA D2 and TS D2 treatment, respectively. The establishment of the endophytic fungus at the root (Figure 4) enabled its effects to persist after transplantation.

4. Discussion

Numerous Trichoderma species have been described as plant-growth promoters, including T. harzianum, T. longipile, T. tomentosum, T. viride, T. koningii, T. asperellum, T. aureoviride and T. saturnisporum, among others [34]. This ability to promote growth depends on several factors, including the existence of isolates of the same species that may or may not promote plant growth, or for example, the crop and/or variety to which the species is applied [34]. Similarly, the use of a mixture of species has been extensively studied and commercialised to increase this activity [10]. In this study, the plant growth-promoting capacity of a new species, T. aggressivum f. europaeum, which is characterised by its rapid growth and sporulation, was analysed and compared to that of T. saturnisporum, a species characterised as a plant-growth promoter by Diánez et al. [16,18]. Although Allaga et al. [35] recommend not using species that produce green mould disease, these species do not create any problems in horticultural crops or pose any danger to mushroom crops, as long as they are applied in different geographical areas. Additionally, mushrooms are produced in closed locations and under completely different conditions. Furthermore, plant remains under horticultural production are not used to prepare substrates for mushroom cultivation, as shown in many commercial species; neither are plant remains that have been studied with plant-growth promoters, which may also cause green mould disease, such as T. harzianum [36] or T. longibrachiatum [37].
The first objective was to obtain viable spores with high yield on low-cost substrates. This product was used for additional tests, which demonstrated that the nutritional composition of the substrates used did not affect the biostimulant capacity of either Trichoderma species. Lane [38] determined that the nutrients provided in the medium could affect the biocontrol or biostimulant capacity of the agent. Different substrates have been used for Trichoderma spore production, including barley straw [39], wheat, rice, corn kernels [40] or a mixture of substrates, such as wheat straw, bran, cassava, potato starch and sugar beets [41,42], among others. In general, in our study, high yields, expressed as colony forming unit (CFU) g−1, were assessed in all substrate mixtures tested; the yields increased both in 80% buckwheat husk + 20% rice and 70% buckwheat husks + 30% oats. Although in laboratory tests, extraction could be performed without a problem in all mixtures, in the extractor tank, mixtures containing rice adhered to the walls and pipes, complicating the subsequent extraction and filtration processes. For this reason, to develop low-cost production methods for industrial scale-up, rice was rejected as a constituent of the production substrate for TA and TS. A high siderophore and IAA production and P solubilisation by TA and TS compared to other Trichoderma species or isolates were demonstrated in our study. These three components play key roles in plant biostimulation by increasing nutrient availability to plants, such as for hormone production [43,44]. However, the direct relationship between IAA production and plant-growth promotion is not yet clear because numerous species can produce IAA, but they do not promote plant growth [45]. Hoyos et al. [45] concluded that IAA production is not a species-dependent quality of Trichoderma and found no direct correlation between biostimulation and IAA and siderophore production or P solubilisation. In turn, Vinale et al. [46] highlighted the effects of siderophore (harzianic acid) production on the germination of tomato seeds and the improved growth of the seedlings even under iron-deficient conditions. Similarly, Qi and Zhao [47] demonstrated that applying T. asperellum enhanced cucumber growth by inducing physiological protection under saline stress, and its siderophores played a key role in mitigating the negative effects of salinity.
Many Trichoderma species can produce IAA, and high IAA secretion in the presence of tryptophan indicates the importance of tryptophan as a precursor for IAA production [48,49]. Gravel et al. [50] reported that IAA production induced by L-tryptophan increased the fresh weight of tomato shoots and roots. Our results indicate that TA and TS produce much higher amounts of IAA than those assessed by other authors. Accordingly, Saber et al. [48] described IAA production of T. harzianum isolates that were 10 times lower than that of T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum assessed in this study. Bader et al. [51] reported that IAA production ranged from 13.38 to 21.14 µg mL−1 in T. brevicompactum, T. gamsii and T. harzianum. Diánez et al. [16] described a highly similar IAA production for T. saturnisporum; therefore, the in vitro production capacity of IAA was preserved despite maintaining the isolate in the laboratory for 10 years. Similarly, phosphate solubilisation by Trichoderma species has been described both in vitro and in vivo [52,53,54]. Recently, Tandon et al. [55] evaluated P solubilisation of different Trichoderma koningiopsis isolates under abiotic stress conditions and determined a range from 1.6 to 71 µg mL−1. Bononi et al. [12] found that Trichoderma isolated from soils of the Amazon rainforest demonstrated a high potential for phosphate solubilisation, which ranged from 51.7 to 90.3% 10 days after inoculation. Despite their high P solubilisation capacity, some of these isolates inhibited the germination of soybean seeds. In our study, the P solubilisation range of both isolates was lowest on the tenth day of incubation, at 5.9% and 6.16% for TA and TS, respectively.
Applying PGPMs to seeds makes it possible to use a lower concentration of spores while ensuring that the PGPMs are readily accessible at germination and during early developmental plant stages, stimulating healthy and rapid establishment, and consequently, maximising crop production [43]. However, the direct application of different Trichoderma isolates or species to seeds (bioprimming) has not always had beneficial effects. In this study, the seed germination rate was not affected by T. aggressivum f. europaeum or T. saturnisporum application. Similar results were found by Azarmi et al. [18] after applying T. harzianum isolates to tomato seeds. Hajieghrari et al. [56] demonstrated that direct exposure of corn seeds to Trichoderma spores decreased the percentage of seed germination, as well as radicle and shoot length. However, You et al. [57] demonstrated that T. harzianum and T. koningiopsis isolates significantly enhanced the tomato seed vigour index when they were used to treat tomato seeds. Our results demonstrated that direct T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum application decreased seed vigour, significantly so in peppers but not in tomatoes. However, the application of either species under commercial plant nursery conditions, via substrate irrigation, similarly enhanced pepper seedling quality significantly, albeit again non-significantly for tomatoes. Optimising the application dose for each species is a factor that should be considered, among other factors, to enable companies and producers to adopt this technology with higher security [58]. Increasing the dose of T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum applied to tomato seedlings increased most of the study parameters, as well as the DQI value in treatments TA D2, TA D3 and TS D3. The endophytic establishment of Trichoderma in plant nurseries may ensure its colonisation once transplanted. As such, in the TA D2 treatment, tomato plants continued to show better quality, without any additional application of Trichoderma, and plant quality improved in other treatments with Trichoderma applied separately. The poorest results were obtained for mixtures of both species, with no improvement in study parameters for any dose tested, and even a reduction of 21.62%, 10.63% and 25% in stem length, diameter and shoot dry weight of tomato seedlings in the MD3 treatment, respectively. Similar results were found by Liu et al. [59], who reported that the combination of three species, T. afroharzianum, T. pseudoharzianum and T. asperelloides, decreased the biocontrol and growth-promoting effects in comparison to the application of each species separately.
Although major reductions in the use of chemical fertilisers without production losses is currently difficult in many farming systems, their gradual decrease accompanied by the use of biostimulants or biofertilizers is a tool that can optimise the use of chemical inputs while reducing environmental pollution and food crop contamination.

5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated, for the first time, the biostimulant capacity of T. aggressivum f. europaeum in pepper and tomato plants under commercial plant nursery and greenhouse conditions, with similar results to those of T. saturnisporum.

6. Patents

This isolate was patented with a Spanish patent number ES2706099: New strain of T. aggressivum f. europaeum, compositions and applications.

Author Contributions

F.D. and M.S. conceived and designed the experiments; B.S.-M., F.J.G., and A.M.-G. performed the experiments; M.S. analysed the data; F.D. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The present work benefited from the input of the project RTC-2017-6486-2 and was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Diánez, F.; Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Gea, F.J.; Santos, M. Plant growth promotion and biocontrol of Pythium ultimum by saline tolerant Trichoderma isolates under salinity stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Khoshmanzar, E.; Aliasgharzad, N.; Neyshabouri, M.R.; Khoshru, B.; Arzanlou, M.; Asgari Lajayer, B. Effects of Trichoderma isolates on tomato growth and inducing its tolerance to water-deficit stress. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 17, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adnan, M.; Islam, W.; Shabbir, A.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Lu, G. Plant defense against fungal pathogens by antagonistic fungi with Trichoderma in focus. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 129, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Halifu, S.; Deng, X.; Song, X.; Song, R. Efects of Two Trichoderma Strains on Plant Growth, Rhizosphere Soil Nutrients, and Fungal Community of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Annual Seedlings. Forests 2019, 10, 758. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vargas, W.A.; Crutcher, F.K.; Kenerley, C.M. Functional characterization of a plant-like sucrose transporter + from the beneficial fungus Trichoderma virens. Regulation of the symbiotic association with plants by sucrose metabolism inside the fungal cells. New Phytol. 2010, 189, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garnica-Vergara, A.; Barrera-Ortiz, S.; Muñoz-Parra, E.; Raya-Gonzalez, J.; Mendez-Bravo, A.; Macias-Rodriguez, L.; Ruiz-Herrera, L.F.; Lopez-Bucio, J. The volatile 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one from Trichoderma atroviride regulates Arabidopsis thaliana root morphogenesis via auxin signaling and ethylene insensitive 2 functioning. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1496–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species -opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shoresh, M.; Harman, G.E.; Mastouri, F. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hermosa, R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Monte, E. Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 2012, 158, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. López-Bucio, J.; Pelagio-Flores, R.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma as biostimulant: Exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diánez, F.; Santos, M.; Carretero, F.; Marín, F. Biostimulant activity of Trichoderma saturnisporum in melon (Cucumis melo). Hortscience 2018, 53, 810–815. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bononi, L.; Chiaramonte, J.B.; Pansa, C.C.; Moitinho, M.A.; Melo, I.S. Phosphorus-solubilizing Trichoderma pp. from Amazon soils improve soybean plant growth. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yuan, M.; Huang, Y.; Ge, W.; Jia, Z.; Song, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y. Involvement of jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid signaling pathways behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum H9 in cucumber. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sanjeev, K.; Manibhushan, T.; Archana, R. Trichoderma: Mass production, formulation, quality control, delivery and its scope in commercialization in India for the management of plant diseases. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 9, 3838–3852. [Google Scholar]
  15. Khan, M.R.; Mohiddin, F.A. Trichoderma: Its Multifarious Utility in Crop Improvement. In Crop Improvement through Microbial Biotechnology. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Aligarh Muslim University: Aligarh, India; Srinagar, India, 2018; Volume 13, pp. 263–291. [Google Scholar]
  16. Diánez, F.; Santos, M.; Carretero, F.; Marín, F. Trichoderma saturnisporum, a new biological control agent. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 1934–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed coating: A tool for delivering beneficial microbes to agricultural crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Azarmi, R.; Hajieghrari, B.; Giglou, A. Effect of Trichoderma isolates on tomato seedling growth response and nutrient uptake. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 5850–5855. [Google Scholar]
  19. Druzhinina, I.S.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M.; Monte, E.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Zeilinger, S.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bimenya, G.S.; Kaviri, D.; Mbona, N.; Byarugaba, W. Monitoring the severity of iodine deficiency disorders in Uganda. Afr. Health Sci. 2002, 2, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  21. Berg, G. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: Perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2009, 84, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Samuels, G.J.; Dodd, S.L.; Gams, W.; Castlebury, L.A.; Petrini, O. Trichoderma species associated with the green mold epidemic of commercially grown Agaricus bisporus. Mycologia 2002, 94, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Largeteau, M.L.; Savoie, J.M. Microbially induced diseases of Agaricus bisporus: Biochemical mechanisms and impact on commercial mushroom production. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krupke, O.A.; Castle, A.J.; Rinker, D.L. The North American mushroom competitor, Trichoderma aggressivum f. aggressivum, produces antifungal compounds in mushroom compost that inhibit mycelial growth of the commercial mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Mycol. Res. 2003, 102, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guthrie, J.L.; Castle, A.J. Chitinase production during interaction of Trichoderma aggressivum and Agaricus bisporus. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 96, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hatvani, L.; Antal, Z.; Manczinger, L.; Szekeres, A.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Kubicek, C.P.; Nagy, A.; Nagy, E.; Vagvolgyi, C.; Kredics, L. Green mold diseases of Agaricus and Pleurotus spp. are caused by related but phylogenetically different Trichoderma species. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sharma, V.; Shanmugam, V. Unraveling the multilevel aspects of least explored plant beneficial Trichoderma saturnisporum isolate GITX-Panog. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 152, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Louden, B.C.; Harmann, D.; Lynne, A.M. Use of Blue Agar CAS Assay for Siderophore Detection. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 2011, 12, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lima-Rivera, D.L.; Lopez-Lima, D.; Desgarennes, D.; Velázquez-Rodríguez, A.S.; Carrion, G. Phosphate solubilization by fungi with nematicidal potential. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 16, 507–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fiske, C.H.; Subbarow, Y. The colorimetry determination of phosphorous. J. Biol. Chem. 1925, 66, 375–400. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Diánez, F.; Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Santos, M. Paecilomyces variotii as a plant-growth promoter in horticulture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murali, M.; Amruthesh, K.N.; Sudisha, J.S.; Niranjana, R.; Shetty, H.S. Screening for plant growth promoting fungi and their ability for growth promotion and induction of resistance in pearl millet against downy mildew disease. J. Phytol. 2012, 4, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dickson, A.; Leaf, A.L.; Hosner, J.F. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. Forest Chron. 1960, 36, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stewart, A.; Hill, R. Applications of Trichoderma in Plant growth promotion. In Biology and Applications of Trichoderma; Mukherjee, P.K., Horwitz, B.A., Singh, U.S., Mukherjee, M., Schmoll, M., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2013; pp. 415–425. [Google Scholar]
  35. Allaga, H.; Bóka, B.; Poór, P.; Nagy, V.D.; Szuzs, A.; Stankovics, I.; Takó, M.; Manczinger, L.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Kredics, L.; et al. Composite Bioinoculant Based on the Combined Application of Beneficial Bacteria and Fungi. Agronomy 2020, 10, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, G.; Cao, X.; Ma, X.; Guo, M.; Liu, C.; Yan, L.; Bian, Y. Diversity and effect of Trichoderma spp. associated with green mold disease on Lentinula edodes in China. Microbiologyopen 2016, 5, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, T.; Lu, M.Z.; Zhang, C.L.; Xu, J.Z. First Report of Trichoderma longibrachiatum Causing Green Mold Disease on Ganoderma lingzhi. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lane, B.S.; Trinci, A.P.J.; Gillespie, A.T. Influence of culture conditions on the virulence of conidia and blastospores of Beauveria bassiana to the green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens. Mycol. Res. 1991, 95, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Serna-Díaz, M.G.; Mercado-Flores, Y.; Jiménez-González, A.; Anducho-Reyes, M.A.; Medina-Marín, J.; Seck Tuoh-Mora, J.C.; Téllez-Jurado, A. Use of barley straw as a support for the production of conidiospores of Trichoderma harzianum. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Flodman, H.R.; Noureddini, H. Effects of intermittent mechanical mixing on solid-state fermentation of wet corn distiller grain with Trichoderma reesei. Biochem. Eng. J. 2013, 81, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deschamps, F.; Giuliano, C.; Asther, M.; Huet, M.C.; Roussos, S. Cellulase production by Trichoderma harzianum in static and mixed solid-state fermentation reactors under nonaseptic conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27, 1385–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Michel-Aceves, A.C.; Otero-Sánchez, M.A.; Martínez-Rojero, R.D.; Rodríguez-Morán, N.L.; Ariza-Flores, R.; Barrios-Ayala, A. Producción masiva de Trichoderma harzianum Rifai en diferentes sustratos orgánicos. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2008, 14, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, F.G.; Yuan, J.; Yang, X.M.; Cui, Y.Q.; Chen, L.H.; Ran, W.; Shen, Q.R. Putative Trichoderma harzianum mutant promotes cucumber growth by enhanced production of indoleacetic acid and plant colonization. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Contreras-Cornejo, H.A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Cortés-Penagos, C.; López-Bucio, J. Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Phys. 2009, 149, 1579–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hoyos-Carvajal, L.; Orduz, S.; Bissett, J. Growth stimulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Trichoderma. Biol. Control. 2009, 51, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vinale, V.; Nigro, M.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Flematti, G.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Ruocco, M.; Varlese, R.; Marra, R.; Lanzuise, S.; Eid, A.; et al. Harzianic acid: A novel siderophore from Trichoderma harzianum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 347, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Qi, W.; Zhao, L. Study of the siderophore-producing Trichoderma asperellum Q1 on cucumber growth promotion under salt stress. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saber, W.I.A.; Ghoneem, K.; Rashad, Y.M.; AlAskar, A.A. Trichoderma Harzianum WKY1: An indole acetic acid producer for growth improvement and anthracnose disease control in sorghum. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 654–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Woo, S.L.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Pascale, A.; Ruocco, M.; Lanzuise, S.; et al. Trichoderma secondary metabolites active on plants and fungal pathogens. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gravel, V.; Antoun, V.; Tweddell, R.J. Growth stimulation and fruit yield improvement of greenhouse tomato plants by inoculation with Pseudomonas putida or Trichoderma atroviride: Possible role ofindoleacetic acid (IAA). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1968–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bader, A.N.; Salerno, G.L.; Covacevich, F.; Consolo, V.F. Native Trichoderma harzianum strains from Argentina produce indole-3 acetic acid and phosphorus solubilization, promote growth and control wilt disease on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2020, 32, 867–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Altomare, C.; Norvell, W.A.; Bjorkman, T.G.; Harman, E. Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2926–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kapri, A.; Tiwari, L. Phosphate solubilization potential and phosphatase activity of rhizospheric Trichoderma spp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Tandon, A.; Fatima, T.; Gautam, A.; Yadav, U.; Srivastava, S.; Singh, P.C. Effect of Trichoderma koningiopsis on chickpea rhizosphere activities under different fertilization regimes. Open J. Soil Sci. 2018, 8, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tandon, A.; Fatima, T.; Shukla, D.; Tripathi, P.; Srivastava, S.; Singh, P.C. Phosphate solubilization by Trichoderma koningiopsis (NBRI-PR5) under abiotic stress conditions. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2020, 32, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hajieghrari, B. Effects of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates on maize seed germination and seedling vigor. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 4342–4347. [Google Scholar]
  57. You, J.; Zhang, J.; Wua, M.; Yang, L.; Chen, W.; Li, G. Multiple criteria-based screening of Trichoderma isolates for biological control of Botrytis cinerea on tomato. Biol. Control 2016, 101, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Diniz, K.A.; Silva, P.A.; Oliveira, J.A.; Evangelista, J.R.E. Sweet pepper seed responses to inoculation with microorganisms and coating with micronutrients, aminoacids and plant growth regulators. Sci. Agric. 2009, 66, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, B.; Jib, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z. Isolation of Trichoderma in the rhizosphere soil of Syringa oblata from Harbin and their biocontrol and growth promotion function. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 235, 126445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mass production of (A) Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum and (B) Trichoderma saturnisporum on 70 + 30% for buckwheat husk and oats.
Figure 1. Mass production of (A) Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum and (B) Trichoderma saturnisporum on 70 + 30% for buckwheat husk and oats.
Agronomy 10 01004 g001
Figure 2. Effects of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum (TA) and Trichoderma saturnisporum (TS) on phosphate solubilisation in National Botanical Research Institute’s phosphate (NBRIP) broth containing tribasic calcium phosphate (10 g). T0: NBRIP broth without Trichoderma isolates. The results are shown as the average of the three replicates, in g L−1. Mean standard deviation is expressed in the error bar (n = 3). For each isolate, columns marked with different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum (TA) and Trichoderma saturnisporum (TS) on phosphate solubilisation in National Botanical Research Institute’s phosphate (NBRIP) broth containing tribasic calcium phosphate (10 g). T0: NBRIP broth without Trichoderma isolates. The results are shown as the average of the three replicates, in g L−1. Mean standard deviation is expressed in the error bar (n = 3). For each isolate, columns marked with different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 10 01004 g002
Figure 3. (A) Differential growth of pepper seedlings with T. aggressivum f. europaeum (TA), compared to control. (B) Tomato plants grown under field transplantation conditions (60 days).
Figure 3. (A) Differential growth of pepper seedlings with T. aggressivum f. europaeum (TA), compared to control. (B) Tomato plants grown under field transplantation conditions (60 days).
Agronomy 10 01004 g003
Figure 4. (A) Colonization of pepper and tomato roots by T. aggressivum f. europaeum. (C) Mycelium in pepper root (100×). (B) Conidiophores and mycelium in tomato root (100×). (D) Chlamydospores in pepper root (200×).
Figure 4. (A) Colonization of pepper and tomato roots by T. aggressivum f. europaeum. (C) Mycelium in pepper root (100×). (B) Conidiophores and mycelium in tomato root (100×). (D) Chlamydospores in pepper root (200×).
Agronomy 10 01004 g004
Table 1. Mass production of spores on solid substrates (CFU g−1).
Table 1. Mass production of spores on solid substrates (CFU g−1).
TreatmentsT. aggressivum f. europaeumT. saturnisporum
90% BH + 10% O6.65·108 ± 3.04·107 c6.48·108 ± 2.84·107 c
80% BH + 20% O5.63·108 ± 3.20·107 d5.17·108 ± 6.60·107 d
70% BH + 30% O1.04·109 ± 1.44·107 a9.98·108 ± 5.69·107 a
90% BH + 10% R8.32·108 ± 1.61·107 b7.88·108 ± 6.45·107 b
80% BH + 20% R1.04·109 ± 1.04·107 a1.02·108 ± 6.26·107 a
70% BH + 30% R8.00·108 ± 5.00·107 b7.12·108 ± 4.25·107 bc
p-value0.00000.0000
BH: buckwheat husk; O: oat; R: rice; CFU: colony forming unit. Data were analysed by ANOVA and treatment means were compared according to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) statistical procedure (F-test at p < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.05).
Table 2. Siderophores and IAA production by Trichoderma isolates.
Table 2. Siderophores and IAA production by Trichoderma isolates.
Radius of Siderophores Production (mm)IAA (mg mL−1)
Treatment24 h48 h72 h+Trp−Trp
p-value0.00000.0000-0.00680.0304
T. aggressivum9.73 ± 0.8918.50 ± 1.70-0.145 ± 0.0110.085 ± 0.009
T. saturnisporum5.45 ± 0.319.82 ± 0.56-0.199 ± 0.0140.129 ± 0.021
Values are average of five replications; values after ± represent standard deviation. IAA: indole-3-acetic acid; +Trp: with L-tryptophan; −Trp: without L-tryptophan.
Table 3. Effects of T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum on tomato and pepper seed germination 7 and 10 days after treatment, respectively.
Table 3. Effects of T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum on tomato and pepper seed germination 7 and 10 days after treatment, respectively.
Treatment% GerminationRoot Length (cm)Shoot Length (cm)Seed Vigour Index
Pepper
p-value0.54200.01260.00100.0030
T. aggressivum83 ± 6.83a0.64 ± 0.18b1.66 ± 0.55b138.14 ± 35.48b
T. saturnisporum80 ± 3.26a0.91 ± 0.11b1.29 ± 0.17b176.50 ± 18.14b
Control78 ± 4.61a2.16 ± 1.01a1.98 ± 0.56a320.32 ± 83.36a
Tomato
p-value0.52680.00200.31540.1918
T. aggressivum89 ± 6.83a4.53 ± 0.31a2.97 ± 0.47a671.80 ± 112.91a
T. saturnisporum92 ± 7.30a3.25 ± 0.37b2.55 ± 0.27a536.29 ± 76.26a
Control85 ± 8.32a3.95 ± 0.28b2.81 ± 0.29a580.13 ± 96.37a
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.05).
Table 4. Morphological parameters and quality index of pepper and tomato seedlings treated with T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum at 45 days after sowing.
Table 4. Morphological parameters and quality index of pepper and tomato seedlings treated with T. aggressivum f. europaeum and T. saturnisporum at 45 days after sowing.
TreatmentLength of Stem (cm)Diameter (mm)Number of LeavesAerial Dry Weight (g)Root Dry Weight (g)Leaf Area (mm2)DQI
Pepper
p-value0.00000.00000.00920.00000.00000.00010.0000
T. aggressivum29.18 ± 1.36a4.10 ± 0.24a7.22 ± 0.76a0.44 ± 0.06a0.15 ± 0.30b86.38 ± 12.58a0.06 ± 0.01a
T. saturnisporum29.31 ± 1.75a3.68 ± 0.22b7.07 ± 0.82a0.45 ± 0.06a0.18 ± 0.09a86.31 ± 13.22a0.06 ± 0.01a
Control27.01 ± 2.07b3.65 ± 0.23b6.70 ± 0.72b0.36 ± 0.04b0.11 ± 0.03c75.88 ± 11.15b0.04 ± 0.01b
Tomato
p-value0.00000.43870.00310.02320.02450.02950.0793
T. aggressivum27.93 ± 1.99a3.86 ± 1.84a4.45 ± 0.50a0.63 ± 0.09a0.15 ± 0.02ab74.63 ± 10.99a0.06 ± 0.01a
T. saturnisporum27.17 ± 1.62a3.90 ± 0.24a4.57 ± 0.50a0.59 ± 0.10ab0.14 ± 0.02b75,52 ± 13.40a0.06 ± 0.01a
Control 25.61 ± 2.07b3.84 ± 0.26a4.20 ± 0.46b0.56 ± 0.10b0.15 ± 0.02a69.12 ± 6.96b0.06 ± 0.00a
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.05). DQI: Dickson Quality Index.
Table 5. Morphological parameters and DQI of tomato seedlings and plants treated with different doses (105, 106 and 107 spores per plant; D1, D2 and D3, respectively) of T. aggressivum f. europaeum (TA), T. saturnisporum (TS) and mix (M) of two species.
Table 5. Morphological parameters and DQI of tomato seedlings and plants treated with different doses (105, 106 and 107 spores per plant; D1, D2 and D3, respectively) of T. aggressivum f. europaeum (TA), T. saturnisporum (TS) and mix (M) of two species.
Tomato Seedling
TreatmentLength of Stem (mm)Diameter (mm)N° LeavesAerial Dry Weight (g)Root Dry Weight (g)DQI
p-value0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
TA D1135.21 ± 28.79de3.91 ± 0.46ab4 ± 0.65b0.27 ± 0.09a0.03 ± 0.02cd0.025 ± 0.01de
TA D2143.80 ± 32.58d3.81 ± 0.34b4 ± 0.51b0.28 ± 0.07a0.05 ± 0.018a0.034 ± 0.01a
TA D3127.02 ± 25.41e3.76 ± 0.46b3.98 ± 0.64b0.27 ± 0.10a0.04 ± 0.02ab0.030 ± 0.01ab
TS D1141.25 ± 19.83d3.55 ± 0.49c3.65 ± 0.60cd0.23 ± 0.10b0.03 ± 0.01cd0.024 ± 0.01de
TS D2188.44 ± 30.29a4.07 ± 0.33a4.25 ± 0.73a0.28 ± 0.07a0.03 ± 0.01d0.021 ± 0.01e
TS D3174.83 ± 27.78b4.01 ± 0.45a3.67 ± 0.63cd0.27 ± 0.09a0.04 ± 0.02a0.030 ± 0.01ab
M D1157.25 ± 29.14c3.5 ± 0.39c3.56 ± 0.62de0.27 ± 0.061a0.04 ± 0.01bc0.026 ± 0.00bcd
M D299.08 ± 21.02b3.13 ± 0.23b3.35 ± 0.39bc0.28 ± 0.08a0.04 ± 0.01bcd0.029 ± 0.00bcd
M D398.54 ± 21.37f3.11 ± 0.45d3.33 ± 0.63ef0.18 ± 0.08c0.04 ± 0.01ab0.029 ± 0.00abc
Control125.73 ± 22.3e3.48 ± 0.31c3.29 ± 0.62f0.24 ± 0.07b0.03 ± 0.01cd0.025 ± 0.01cde
Tomato Plants
TreatmentLength of Stem (cm)Diameter (mm)InternodesAerial Dry Weight (g)Root Dry Weight (g)DQI
p-value0.00000.53790.01590.00150.27690.5373
TA D1101.40 ± 15.06ab12.11 ± 0.90a15.00 ± 1.15ab61.19 ± 11.27a4.99 ± 0.68ab3.23 ± 0.24a
TA D2102.80 ± 9.47a12.11 ± 1.24a14.10 ± 1.29ab52.49 ± 11.265.35 ± 0.57a3.20 ± 0.46a
TA D392.00 ± 9.82bc11.26 ± 1.17ab14.40 ± 0.84abc54.74 ± 13.09abc4.70 ± 1.10abc3.01 ± 0.58ab
TS D177.55 ± 7.76e11.74 ± 1.18ab13.90 ± 1.37bc49.26 ± 14.78bcde4.40 ± 1.04bc2.91 ± 0.56ab
TS D288.75 ± 10.63cd11.92 ± 1.57ab15.20 ± 1.03a55.37 ± 8.24ab5.05 ± 1.23ab3.19 ± 0.42a
TS D381.00 ± 12.39de11.58 ± 1.37ab13.20 ± 2.57c51.71 ± 7.97abcd4.34 ± 1.17bc3.01 ± 0.94ab
M D179.05 ± 13.20e10.87 ± 1.38b13.90 ± 1.29bc47.00 ± 11.38bcde4.14 ± 1.11bc2.73 ± 0.64ab
M D276.18 ± 11.91e11.61 ± 0.95ab13.20 ± 1.23c45.30 ± 9.79cde4.23 ± 0.99bc2.85 ± 0.59ab
M D378.45 ± 8.08e11.22 ± 1.18ab14.30 ± 1.16abc40.91 ± 11.56e4.28 ± 1.37bc2.72 ± 0.86ab
Control77.96 ± 7.29e11.52 ± 2.03ab14.25 ± 1.16abc42.73 ± 6.46de3.84 ± 0.62c2.60 ± 0.43b
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.05). Green: favourable; Red: unfavourable; Orange: no effect compared to control. DQI: Dickson Quality Index.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Montesinos, B.; Diánez, F.; Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Gea, F.J.; Santos, M. Role of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum as Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071004

AMA Style

Sánchez-Montesinos B, Diánez F, Moreno-Gavíra A, Gea FJ, Santos M. Role of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum as Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture. Agronomy. 2020; 10(7):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sánchez-Montesinos, Brenda, Fernando Diánez, Alejandro Moreno-Gavíra, Francisco J. Gea, and Mila Santos. 2020. "Role of Trichoderma aggressivum f. europaeum as Plant-Growth Promoter in Horticulture" Agronomy 10, no. 7: 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop