Next Article in Journal
Confounding Factors in Container-Based Drought Tolerance Assessments in Solanum tuberosum
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Bermudagrass and Tall Fescue Turfgrass Irrigation in Central California: I. Assessment of Visual Quality, Soil Moisture and Performance of an ET-Based Smart Controller
Previous Article in Journal
Maximizing Land Use Efficiency and Productivity of Soybean and Fodder Maize Intercrops through Manipulating Sowing Schedule and Maize Harvest Regime
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Partial Root Drying and Soil Mulching on Squash Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Arid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Response of Chosen American Asparagus officinalis L. Cultivars to Drip Irrigation on the Sandy Soil in Central Europe: Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity

1
Department of Agrometeorology, Plant Irrigation and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-425 Kraków, Poland
4
Laboratory of Economics and Agribusiness Advisory, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
5
Department of Land Improvement, Environmental Development and Spatial Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-649 Poznań, Poland
6
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108-6024, USA
7
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
8
Department of Remote Sensing and Environmental Research, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland
9
Institute of Plant Production, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Kaposvár Campus, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(5), 864; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050864
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 24 April 2021 / Accepted: 25 April 2021 / Published: 28 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Water Conservation: Tools, Strategies, and Practices)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to verify the response of 13 American asparagus cultivars cultivated for green spear on surface postharvest drip irrigation. Irrigation, used to compensate for periodic deficiencies in precipitation, allows for high- and good-quality crops for many species. The field experiment was carried out in 2006–2008 on a very light sandy soil in central Europe (Poland). Irrigation treatments were applied using the tensiometer indications. Water requirements of asparagus were calculated on the base of reference evapotranspiration and crop coefficients. The following evaluations were made: Height, diameter, and number of summer stalks, as well marketable yield, weight, and number of consumption green spears. Drip irrigation applied for 2 years (2006–2007) in the postharvest period had a positive effect on all studied traits in both summer stalks and green spears in 2007–2008. A significant increase in the height, number, and diameter of summer stalks, as well an increase in the marketable yield, weight, and number of green spears was observed for most of the cultivars. In general, postharvest drip irrigation of asparagus cultivated in very light sandy soil significantly contributes to the increase in productivity of American cultivars of this species.

1. Introduction

Asparagus is a perennial vegetable species. Therefore, choosing the most advantageous cultivars for cultivation is a very important factor in yielding. Thanks to intensive breeding work carried out in many countries around the world, new cultivars of asparagus are quickly emerging. New cultivars of asparagus are usually very fertile, with relatively high soil and water requirements [1,2]. Therefore, to obtain maximum marketable yields of a given asparagus cultivar, it is recommended to create optimal growth and development conditions during the growing season. Maximum asparagus production possibilities can be achieved by applying organic and mineral fertilization adapted to species nutritional needs and ensuring optimal humidity, with the use of irrigation supplementing deficiency in precipitation. Due to the specific method of cultivation, i.e., harvesting of spears in early spring, the height and quality of asparagus sprouts depend on the amount of ingredients stored in asparagus rootstocks during the growing season of the previous year [1,2,3].
In recent years in Poland, asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) has been observed as a vegetable gaining increasing economic significance. On the one hand, this phenomenon is related to the increase in exports of asparagus spears to European Union countries (mainly Germany), and on the other hand, with an increase in demand for this valuable vegetable among domestic consumers, changing their eating habits noticeably. Basic “heavy” species of vegetables, primarily root vegetables such as potatoes, carrots, parsley or red beet, are replaced with low-caloric species with high biological and flavor values [1,2].
Asparagus is a plant grown primarily in light soils with low water content, i.e., limited retention capacity [1,4]. On the one hand, due to a deep-reaching and well-developed root system, asparagus is relatively resistant to water deficiency in soil [5,6,7]. On the other hand, asparagus, as a light soil plant, reacts very positively to irrigation treatments, which are used in the postharvest period, usually from June to August, in the climatic and soil conditions of Central Europe. Postharvest irrigation significantly increases the yield of asparagus spears in the following year [3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
One of the elements of sustainable plant production, which has the task of protecting the soil and plant raw materials, is melioration treatments, among which drip irrigation is of great importance in commercial crops. The aim of the study was to verify the response of 13 chosen American asparagus cultivars grown for green spear production to surface drip irrigation on sandy soil in the region of central Europe (Poland).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Location of the Experiment

The field experiment was carried out in the years 2006–2008 at Kruszyn Krajenski near Bydgoszcz (central Poland) on a sandy soil (Figure 1).
The soil was classified to Typic Hapludolls. The clay content in the topsoil was 7% and, in the subsoil, the clay content ranged from 3% to 5%. The average organic matter content was 1.19%. The water reserve to 1 m depth of soil at field capacity was 87 mm and the available water was 68 mm. The field experiment was conducted in a randomized block design of a 2-factorial “split-plot” system with 4 replications. The first factor was irrigation used in 2 variants: O–non-irrigated plots (control) and D–drip-irrigated plots. The second factor was 13 American’s cultivars asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) including Jersey Giant, Jersey Knight, Jersey Supreme, Jersey Deluxe, Jersey King, Atlas, Grande, Apollo, Purple Passion, UC 157, NJ 953, UC 115, and JWC 1. The asparagus crowns were planted 10th of April 2003.
Terms of single irrigation treatments of asparagus were determined on the basis of tensiometer indications according to Horticultural Institut in Geisenheim (Germany) [17]. During the irrigation season, the soil water potential was not less than −50 kPa. The surface drip irrigation of asparagus plants performed done using 16 mm diameter linear drip line T-Tape, with a 20 cm distance between the emitters. The flow rate was 5 l m−1 h−1.
The standard growing techniques as recommended for asparagus under Polish conditions according to Knaflewski [1] were applied. The asparagus was cultivated for green spears. The plot area for harvest was 15.12 m2 (24 pcs × 35 cm × 180 cm). Green spears were daily collected for 9 (2007) or 10 weeks (2008) depending on the year of harvest. The observation included both summer stalks in the years 2006–2007 and green consuming spears in the years 2007–2008. The following evaluations were made: Height (cm), number, and diameter (mm) of summer stalks, as well as marketable yield (t·ha−1), weight (g), and number of green spears. The irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) was also calculated, which is the quotient of the increase in yield obtained during irrigation and the seasonal dose of water used during irrigation. Irrigation water use efficiency (kg·ha−1·mm−1), which presents the effectiveness of water use, was calculated for a marketable yield of green spears using the following Equation (1):
IWUE = ( y a ) x ,
where
y = yield after irrigation (kg),
a = yield without irrigation (kg),
x = seasonal dose of water used in irrigation (mm).
The experimental data height, number, and diameter of summer stalks, as well marketable yield, weight, and number of green spears were statistically processed by variation analysis. Mean values were verified with Tukey’s test at a 5% level.

2.2. Assessment of Water and Irrigation Needs

Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was determined using Hargreaves’ model [18] modified by Droogers and Allen [19] and expressed in Equation (2):
ETo = HC × Ra × ( Tmax Tmin ) HE × ( Tmax + Tmin   2 + HT ) ,   ( mm )
where
HC = empirical Hargreaves coefficient = 0.0025,
Ra = extraterrestrial radiation (mm day−1),
Tmax = maximum air temperature (°C),
Tmin = minimum air temperature (°C),
HE = Hargreaves exponent = 0.5,
HT = Hargreaves temperature coefficient = 16.8.
Potencial evapotranspiration (ETp) was determined by the method of crop coefficients [20] using crop coefficients for asparagus as determined by Hargreaveas’ model modified by Droogers and Allen [14]. To take into account the specificity of drip irrigation (limited wetted area of soil), Equation (3) was applied [21]:
ETp = ETo × kc × kr ,   ( mm )
where
ETo = reference evapotranspiration (mm),
kc = crop coefficients,
kr = reduction coefficients.
Reduction coefficients were determined according to Freeman and Garzoli’s formula [22] based on the percentage of surface coverage of asparagus in the postharvest period [14]. The results are presented in Table 1.
Drought index (D) according to Stenz [23] is expressed in Equation (4):
D = ETo P ,
where
ETo = reference evapotranspiration (mm),
P = precipitation in a given period (mm).
To describe the precipitation conditions during the experiment, the worldwide recommended Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) was used [24]. Equation (5) was used to calculate SPI:
SPI = f ( P ) μ σ ,
where
f(P) = transformed totals of precipitation in a given period,
μ = mean value of the normalized historical precipitation series,
σ = mean standard deviation of the normalized historical precipitation series.

2.3. Meteorological Conditions

Precipitation conditions in individual decades of the growing and irrigation seasons for asparagus were described according to the season classification, based on the Standardized Precipitation Index, as presented in Table 2.
Numerical data from measurements taken in the meteorological station of the then Department (now the Laboratory) of Land Reclamation and Agrometeorology at the University of Science and Technology located in Mochełek near Bydgoszcz were used in the calculations.
Average air temperature values during the growing season (April–September) in the research years (2006–2007) were higher than in the long-term (1971–2000) by 0.8 °C and 0.5 °C, respectively (Table 3). In the first year of the study, high air temperature values were found in July (22.4 °C), with the value exceeding the long-term mean by as much as 4.2 °C. In the second year of the study, high air temperature values were found in June (18.2 °C, i.e., 1.9 °C above the long-term mean).
Total precipitation of the growing season in the research years, in relation to the long-term mean, was higher by 54 mm (i.e., by 19%) (Table 4). Higher precipitation totals were recorded in the year 2007 (367 mm, i.e., 131% of the long-term mean). Particularly heavy rainfall occurred in June and July 2007, amounting to 103 mm and 112 mm, respectively, which constituted 172% or 167% of the long-term mean. In the first year of the study, the highest rainfall was recorded in August (115 mm, i.e., 225% of the long-term mean).
Air temperature during the harvest of asparagus spears (from the third decade of April to the third decade of June) is a very important element of asparagus cultivation [1,14].

2.4. Irrigation Needs

Irrigation was carried out after the harvest period, during the summer months, as recommended [25]. In 2006, irrigation began on July 4 and ended on August 31. The irrigation season lasted 59 days. During the time, 10 single doses were used, amounting to 92 mm. In 2007, the irrigation season was shorter and lasted 37 days (from 15 July to 20 August). A total of 54 mm water was used in 6 doses.
The values of Stenz index, presented in Table 5, indicate the irrigation needs of asparagus cultivars in July and August of the years 2006 and 2007.
The values of the Standardized Precipitation Index, summarized in Table 6, reflect the actual precipitation conditions occurring in individual decades of the irrigation season. The first decade of July in 2006 was extremely dry, while the second decade of July in 2007 was moderately dry.
The smallest daily water needs under drip irrigation (below 1 mm) were found in the third decade of June when summer stalks were just beginning to grow (Figure 2). However, irrigation needs were much higher in the next 2 months of the irrigation season (from 3.2 mm to 4.4 mm). Depending on weather conditions (particularly temperature), asparagus irrigation needs variation in individual years. For comparison, in 9 years of trials with European cultivars (Gijnlim, Ramos, Vulkan) conducted in central Poland (region of Bydgoszcz), the average daily value of field water consumption at drip irrigated plots in June, July, and August, was 1.7 mm, 3.5 mm, and 4.4 mm, respectively [14]. In the lysimeter studies by Paschold, et al. [12] daily water consumption under drip irrigation was, on average, 1.6 mm in June, 2 mm in July, and 3 mm in August.
The total water needs of asparagus in the postharvest period were higher in the first year of the study (258 mm) than in the second year of the study (241 mm) (Figure 3). For comparison, in the Rolbiecki study [14], the water needs of asparagus plants under drip irrigation ranged from 205 mm to 272 mm in individual years. The results of tests carried out by Paschold and Kunzelmann [26] in Germany’s climatic conditions indicated that the water needs of asparagus plants from June 20 to September 1 ranged between 150–241 mm. Moreover, in prior studies carried out in Germany, Hartmann [8] estimated that, depending on precipitation conditions, the water needs of asparagus plants ranged between 179 mm and 240 mm. In turn, Pardo et al. [27] recorded the seasonal water consumption of asparagus under lysimeter conditions ranging from 274 mm to 294 mm. In the latest research on asparagus water needs in various regions of Poland reported by Rolbiecki et al. [28], the irrigation needs of asparagus plants were found to be, on average, 228 mm in the period from July 1 to August 31 in the central-north-west region of Poland, which also covers the area considered in the present study.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Height, Number, and Diameter of Asparagus Summer Stalks

Drip irrigation, used after the green spears harvest in the growing season preceding the next asparagus harvest, significantly increased the height of asparagus summer stalks for the studied cultivars and years, on average, from 152 cm to 172 cm (Table 7). Stalk height due to drip irrigation increased, on average, by 20 cm (13%). The highest increase in stalk height (above 180 cm) under drip irrigation, on average, for 2 years of research, was obtained for the cultivars Apollo (196 cm), Grande (185 cm), Atlas (182 cm), Jersey King, and Purple Passion (181 cm). The best response to drip irrigation, with reference to this characteristic, was noted in Atlas cultivar. Drip irrigation increased the height of its summer stalks by 40 cm (i.e., by 28%). Some researchers have also shown a significant impact of irrigation on the height of summer stalks in the year preceding the harvest. For example, in the third and fourth year of cultivation, Drost and Wilcox-Lee [29], Hartmann [8,9], Pardo et al. [27], Paschold et al. [12], and Sterrett et al. [30] obtained an average increase in summer stalk height of 14 cm in comparison to non-irrigated control variants.
Postharvest drip irrigation, applied in the growing season preceding the next asparagus harvest, significantly increased the number of asparagus summer stalks per plant for the studied cultivars and years, on average, from 7.9 to 11.1 (Table 8). Stalk number per plant due to drip irrigation increased, on average, by 3.2 pcs (40%). The highest increase in stalk number per plant (12 and more) under drip irrigation, on average, for 2 years of research, was observed for Jersey King (13.3), Apollo (12.6), Jersey Supreme, Atlas, and UC 157 (12) cultivars. The best response to drip irrigation, with reference to this characteristic, was noted in UC 157 and Grande. Drip irrigation increased the number of stalks per plant of these cultivars by 5.0 and 5.1 pcs (i.e., by 72%), respectively. The positive impact of drip irrigation on the increase in the number of summer stalks was also presented for Germany’s weather conditions, which are similar to Polish weather conditions, by Hartmann [9], Hartmann et al. [10], and Paschold et al. [12]. Drost [31] reported that under dry climatic conditions, lowering sandy soil moisture below −50 kPa reduced the number and height of stalks in comparison to drip-irrigated variants. Sterrett et al. [30] obtained an increase in stalk number due to irrigation, on average, of four stalks per plant, and Battilani [32] obtained an increase of one stalk per plant. The diverse response of asparagus cultivars to drip irrigation has been confirmed, i.a., by the results of Dutch [33] and Polish [14] studies.
Drip irrigation, used after the harvest in the growing season preceding the next asparagus harvest, significantly increased the diameter of asparagus summer stalks for the studied cultivars and years, on average, from 11.2 mm to 12.6 mm (Table 9). Stalk diameter due to drip irrigation increased, on average, by 1.3 mm (12%). The highest increase in stalk diameter under drip irrigation, on average, for 2 years of research, was observed for Apollo (15.3 mm) and Grande (14.6 mm) cultivars. The best response to drip irrigation, with reference to this characteristic, was also noted in Apollo and Grande. Drip irrigation increased the diameter of their summer stalks by 3.6 mm and 3.2 mm, respectively (i.e., by 31% and 29%). Researchers such as, i.a., Sterrett et al. [30], Contador [34], Rubio [35], and Battilani [32], also observed a significant impact of drip irrigation on stalk diameter. As numerous authors have stated, irrigation significantly affects the growth of summer stalks and, consequently, the yield of asparagus spears in the next year [4,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Based on the results of a cultivar trial in 2003 (carried out as part of the third IACT) in which 31 asparagus cultivars were compared, Rolbiecki and Rolbiecki [2] found a significant impact of drip irrigation on the formation of summer stalks and marketable yield in the first harvest season. The impact of irrigation was manifested by the increased accumulation of carbohydrates in asparagus rootstocks of the plants growing in optimal humidity conditions, used in spring of the next harvest year [30,31,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].

3.2. Marketable Yield, Weight and Number of Asparagus Green Spears

Postharvest drip irrigation treatment of asparagus plants used in the growing season preceding the asparagus harvest significantly increased green spear yields from 4.21 t·ha−1 to 6.23 t·ha−1 in the next growing season (Table 10). The marketable yield increase in green spears due to drip irrigation for the studied cultivars and 2 years of research was, on average, 2.02 t·ha−1 (48%). The highest marketable yield increase under drip irrigation—above 7 t·ha−1, on average, for 2 years of research—was obtained for Apollo, NJ 953, Jersey Deluxe, and Grande cultivars. High marketable yields above 6 t·ha−1 were obtained for UC 157, Jersey King, UC 115, Jersey Supreme, and Jersey Giant cultivars. Marketable yields above 5 t·ha−1 were obtained for Purple Passion and Jersey Knight. The lowest yields under drip irrigation (above 4 t·ha−1) were collected from JWC 1 and Atlas. The best response to drip irrigation was noted in Jersey Deluxe and Jersey Giant. Drip irrigation increased their marketable yields by 4.37 t·ha−1 (157%) and 3.91 t·ha−1 (142%), respectively. No significant response to drip irrigation was found in Purple Passion, Jersey King, and Atlas. The response to drip irrigation in other tested cultivars was positive, and the observed marketable yield increases ranged from 1.71 t·ha−1 to 2.78 t·ha−1 (35–79%). The results obtained are consistent with the results of studies conducted by other scientists. Hartmann [8,9], in weather conditions characteristic for Germany, obtained yield increases of 50% in his trials on sandy soil and 25% on loamy sand due to drip irrigation. Moreover, Paschold et al. [4,11,13], carrying out a cultivar trial using drip irrigation, recorded the highest marketable yields for Gijnlim cultivar. In Poland, Rolbiecki [14] also obtained the highest marketable yields for both control (no irrigation) (6.5 t·ha−1) and drip irrigated plots (10.9 t·ha−1) for Gijnlim. Pinkau and Grutz [49] obtained significantly lower marketable yield increases in spears, on average, of 12.4%, observing the highest yield increases in dry years. Mulder and Lavrijsen [33], in an asparagus cultivar trial under sprinkler irrigation conducted in the Netherlands, obtained the highest yields for Gijnlim, amounting to 4.5 t·ha−1 in the first harvest year and 12.8 t·ha−1 in the second year. Numerous other authors have also presented a significant impact of irrigation on yield increases in asparagus spears grown in different than Polish climate zones [15,16,29,30,47].
Drip irrigation, used after the harvest in the next growing season preceding the asparagus harvest, significantly increased the mean spear weight from 35.33 g to 40.35 g (Table 11). The mean spear weight due to drip irrigation increased for the studied cultivars and 2 years of research, on average, by 5.02 g (14%). The greatest mean spear weight under drip irrigation—above 40 g, on average, for 2 years of research—was obtained for the cultivars Grande (48.79 g), Jersey Knight (43.32 g), Apollo (43.03 g), Purple Passion (42.99 g), Atlas (42.71 g), and UC 115 (41.24 g). The best response to drip irrigation, with reference to this characteristic, was noted in Atlas and UC 115 cultivars. Drip irrigation increased the mean spear weight by 24% and 32%, respectively. For comparison, the spear weight for Gijnlim cultivar in asparagus trials under irrigation conducted by Mulder and Lavrijsen [33] was approximately 40 g. Paschold et al. [13] obtained values at the level of 35 g, and Sterret et al. [30] obtained values at the level of 25 g.
Drip irrigation, applied after the harvest in the growing season preceding the next asparagus harvest, significantly increased the number of green spears per plant from 6.50 to 9.49 (Table 12). Green spears number per plant increased due to drip irrigation for the studied cultivars and 2 years of research, on average, by 2.98 pcs (46%). The highest increase in green spears number per plant (10 or more) under drip irrigation conditions, on average, for 2 years of research, was observed for the cultivars Jersey Deluxe (11.10), Jersey King (10.90), Jersey Supreme (10.78), Jersey Giant (10.72), NJ 953 (10.46), and Apollo (10.00). The best response to drip irrigation, with reference to this characteristic, was noted in Jersey Deluxe cultivar. Drip irrigation increased the number of green spears per plant in this cultivar by more than six spears (i.e., by 123%). Hartmann [9], Paschold et al. [11], Rolbiecki and Rolbiecki [2], and Rolbiecki [14] also obtained an increase in the number of asparagus spears due to drip irrigation.

3.3. Irrigation Water Use Efficiency

The average value of irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) for the harvest years and cultivars was 31 kg·ha−1·mm−1 (Table 13). Irrigation water use efficiency in the first year of research (2007) was lower (19 kg·ha−1·mm−1) than in the second year of study (2008) (44 kg·ha−1·mm−1). This was due to the fact that, for the irrigation season in 2006, a higher seasonal irrigation norm was used than in 2007. Obviously, asparagus yields harvested at drip irrigated plots in 2007 were the result of irrigation carried out in 2006, and, respectively, postharvest irrigation carried out in 2007 had an impact on asparagus yields harvested in 2008. Jersey Deluxe and Jersey Giant were characterized by the highest IWUE, which, on average, for 2 years of research, was 64 kg·ha−1·mm−1 and 57 kg·ha−1·mm−1, respectively. The lowest IWUE (4 kg·ha−1·mm−1–6 kg·ha−1·mm−1) was found in Atlas, Jersey King, and Purple Passion cultivars. The other tested cultivars, on average, for 2 years of research, were described by IWUE as ranging from 26 kg·ha−1·mm−1 to 41 kg·ha−1·mm−1. Diverse irrigation water use efficiency in the cultivation of various asparagus cultivars has been confirmed by the results of previous trials conducted in the central Poland (region of Bydgoszcz) with other cultivars of asparagus [2,14] and vegetable species [50,51] or berry plants [52,53,54,55].

4. Conclusions

Drip irrigation of 13 cultivars of asparagus, applied for 2 years in the postharvest period (2006–2007), had a positive effect on all studied characteristics in both summer stalks and consumption green spears of this vegetable. On average, in 2006–2007, a significant increase in the height, number, and diameter of summer stalks was visible in 13, 12, and 9 of 13 studied asparagus cultivars, respectively. On average, in 2007–2008, the increase in marketable yield, weight, and number of green spears was significant for 12, 11, and 12 of 13 tested asparagus cultivars, respectively. The highest marketable yield increase of green spears under drip irrigation—above 7 t·ha−1, on average, for 2 years of research—was obtained for Jersey Deluxe, Grande, Apollo, and NJ 953 cultivars. The best response to drip irrigation was noted in Jersey Deluxe and Jersey Giant. Drip irrigation increased the marketable yields of these cultivars by 157% and 142%, respectively. Jersey Deluxe and Jersey Giant cultivars were characterized by the highest irrigation water use efficiency (calculated for the marketable yield of green spears), which, on average, for 2 years of research, was 64 kg·ha−1·mm−1 and 57 kg·ha−1·mm−1, respectively. High irrigation water use efficiency, over 30 kg·ha−1·mm−1, was observed in the case of 9 of 13 tested cultivars. In summary, postharvest irrigation of asparagus cultivated on a very light sandy soil significantly improved both the summer stalk characteristics, as well as the marketable yield features of consumption green spears of this vegetable species. Drip irrigation of asparagus, applied after the harvest in the growing season preceding the next green spears harvest, makes it possible to significantly increase the productivity of this vegetable, which contributes to the sustainable crop production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—R.R., S.R., and A.F.; methodology—R.R., S.R., and A.F.; software—R.R., S.R., and A.F.; validation—R.R., P.S., and F.P.-F.; formal analysis—R.R., P.S., D.L., and F.P.-F.; investigation—R.R., S.R., and A.F.; resources—R.R. and S.R.; data curation—R.R. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation—R.R., S.R., A.F., B.J., P.S., W.P., P.P., M.J.K., and H.A.S.; writing—review and editing—R.R., S.R., A.F., B.J., P.S., W.P., P.P., M.S., and M.J.K.; visualization—R.R., S.R., B.J., P.P., F.P.-F., M.J.K., and H.A.S.; supervision—R.R., S.R., B.J., P.P., F.P.-F., M.S., and M.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knaflewski, M. Szparag [Asparagus]; Ha-Ka: Komorniki, Poland, 1995; pp. 3–92. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rolbiecki, R.; Rolbiecki, S. Effect of surface drip irrigation on asparagus cultivars in central Poland. Acta Hortic. 2008, 776, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wichrowska, D.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rolbiecki, S.; Jagosz, B.; Ptach, W.; Kazula, M.; Figas, A. Concentrations of some chemical components in white asparagus spears depending on the cultivar and post-harvest irrigation treatments. Folia Hort. 2018, 30, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Paschold, P.J.; Hermann, G.; Artelt, B. Asparagus varieties tested over 6 years. Gemüse 1999, 35, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaniszewski, S. Nawadnianie Warzyw Polowych [Irrigation of Field Vegetables]; PlantPress: Kraków, Poland, 2005; pp. 3–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaniszewski, S. Technologia nawadniania warzyw. In Proceedings of the Nawadnianie warzyw w uprawach polowych, Skierniewice, Poland, 12–13 July 2005; pp. 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaniszewski, S. Nawadnianie Warzyw [Irrigation of Vegetables]. In Nawadnianie Roślin [Plant Irrigation]; Nowak, L., Karczmarczyk, S., Eds.; PWRiL: Poznań, Poland, 2006; pp. 295–332. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartmann, H.D. Die Bewasserung bei Spargel und ihre Auswikung auf die Pflanze. Arch. Gart. 1981, 29, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartmann, H.D. The influence of irrigation on the development and yield of asparagus. Acta Hortic. 1981, 119, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hartmann, H.D.; Hermann, G.; Kirchner-Ness, R. Effect of weather during the vegetative period on the yield of asparagus in the following year. Gartenbauwissenschaft 1990, 55, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  11. Paschold, P.J.; Hermann, G.; Artelt, B. Comparison of international asparagus cultivars under Rhine-Valley conditions in Germany. Acta Hortic. 1996, 415, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paschold, P.J.; Artelt, B.; Hermann, G. The water need of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) determined in a lysimeter station. Acta Hortic. 2004, 664, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paschold, P.J.; Artelt, B.; Hermann, G. Comparison of white asparagus cultivars (Asparagus officinalis L.) in Germany. Acta Hortic. 2008, 776, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rolbiecki, R. Ocena Potrzeb i Efektów Mikronawodnień Szparaga (Asparagus officinalis L.) na Obszarze Szczególnie Deficytowym w Wodę [Assessment of the Needs and Effects of Micro-Irrigation of Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) in an Area Particularly Water-Deficient]; UTP: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2013; pp. 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brainard, D.C.; Był, B.; Hayden, Z.D.; Noyes, D.C.; Bakker, J.; Werling, B. Managing drought risk in changing climate: Irrigation and cultivar impact on Michigan asparagus. Agr. Water Manag. 2019, 213, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Campi, P.; Mastrorilli, M.; Stellacci, A.M.; Modugno, F.; Palumbo, A.D. Increasing the effective use of water in green asparagus through deficit irrigation strategies. Agr. Water Manag. 2019, 217, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paschold, P.J.; Weithaler, A. Eignung von Sensoren zum Steuern der Bewässerung bei Freilandgemüse. Z. Bewässerungswirtschaft 2000, 35, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hargreaves, G.H.; Samani, Z.A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1985, 1, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Treder, W.; Wójcik, K.; Żarski, J. Wstępna ocena możliwości szacowania potrzeb wodnych roślin na podstawie prostych pomiarów meteorologicznych [Initial assessment of the possibility of estimating the water needs of plants on the basis of simple meteorological measurements]. Zesz. Nauk. Inst. Sad. Kw. Skiern. 2010, 18, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  20. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; p. 300. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vermeiren, L.; Jobling, G.A. Localized Irrigation; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 36; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1984; p. 198. [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith, M. CROPWAT a Computer Program for Irrigation Planning and Management; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 46; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1992; p. 132. [Google Scholar]
  23. Łabędzki, L. Susze rolnicze. Zarys problematyki oraz metody monitorowania i klasyfikacji [Agricultural droughts]. Woda. Środowisko. Obsz. Wiejskie. Rozpr. Nauk. Monogr. 2006, 17, 1–107. [Google Scholar]
  24. McKee, T.B.; Doesken, J.N.; Kleist, J. The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, USA, 17–22 January 1993; American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA, USA, 1993; Volume 17, pp. 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  25. Paschold, P.J.; Kleber, J.; Mayer, N. Geisenheimer Bewässerungssteuerung 2002. Z. Bewässerungswirtschaft 2002, 37, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paschold, P.J.; Kunzelmann, G. Umweltschonender und Effizienter Bewässerungseinsatz im Gemüseanbau. Praktische Empfehlungen zur Bewässerungss-Teuerung und Bewässerungstechnik im Hessischen Ried; Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Forsten: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2002; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pardo, A.; Arbizou, J.; Suso, M.L. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients in white asparagus. Acta Hortic. 1997, 449, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Jagosz, B.; Ptach, W.; Stachowski, P.; Kazula, M. Water needs of asparagus plants in the different regions of Poland. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2019, 21, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar]
  29. Drost, D.T.; Wilcox-Lee, D. Soil water deficits and asparagus: Bud size and subsequent spear growth. Sci. Hortic. 1997, 70, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sterrett, S.B.; Ross, B.B.; Savage, C.P., Jr. Establishment and yield of asparagus as influenced by planting and irrigation method. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1990, 115, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Drost, D.T. Soil water deficits reduce growth and yield of asparagus. Acta Hortic. 1999, 479, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Battilani, A. Response of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) to post-harvesting irrigation. Acta Hortic. 1997, 449, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mulder, J.H.; Lavrijsen, P. First results of the “Third International Asparagus Cultivar Trial” planted in Horst, the Netherlands. Acta Hortic. 2008, 776, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Contador, F.F. Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) Response to Different Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Fertilization Levels. Second Year after Planting. Master’s Thesis, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1991; p. 92. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rubio, F.A.H. Irrigation and Nitrogenous Fertilization during the First Establishment Year of an Asparagus Plantation. Master’s Thesis, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, 1992; p. 105. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaufmann, F. Intensivierung der Spargelproduktion durch Bewasserrung. Gartenbau 1977, 24, 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bussell, W.T. Asparagus—Irrigation and establishment methods. Asparagus Res. Newsl. 1985, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hartmann, H.D. Possibility of predicting asparagus yields in central Europe. In Proceedings of the 6th International Asparagus Symposium, Guelph, ON, Canada, 5–9 August 1985; pp. 318–323. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jerez, B.J.A. Differencial Irrigation in Two-Year Old Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Master’s Thesis, Univ. de Concepcion, Chillan, Chile, 1990; p. 115. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaufmann, F. Principles of plant density for green asparagus harvested by different methods. Acta Hortic. 1990, 271, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferreyra, E.R.; Peralta, A.J.M.; van Selles, S.G.; Fritsch, F.N.; Contador, F.F. Asparagus crop (Asparagus officinalis L.) response to different water regimes during the first two establishment seasons. Agric. Tec. 1995, 55, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dowtown, W.J.S.; Torokvalvy, W. Photosynnthesis in developing asparagus plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1975, 2, 367–375. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilcox-Lee, D. Soil matrics potential, plant water relations and growth in asparagus. Hort. Sci. 1987, 22, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pressman, E.; Schaffer, A.A.; Compton, D.; Zamski, E. The effect of low temperature and drought on carbohydrate content of asparagus. J. Plant Physiol. 1989, 134, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pressman, E.; Schaffer, A.A.; Compton, D.; Zamski, E. Carbohydrate content of young asparagus plants as affected by temperature regimes. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 143, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martin, S.; Hartmann, H.D. The content and distribution of carbohydrates in asparagus. Acta Hortic. 1990, 271, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roth, R.L.; Gardner, B.R. Asparagus yield response to water and nitrogen. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1989, 32, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Drost, D.T. Irrigation budget and plant growth of asparagus. Acta Hortic. 1996, 415, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pinkau, H.; Grutz, E.M. Effect of nitrogen, sprinkler irrigation and length of harvesting period on the yield and quality of green asparagus. Arch. Gart. 1985, 33, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rolbiecki, R.; Rolbiecki, S. Effects of micro-irrigation systems on lettuce and radish production. Acta Hortic. 2007, 729, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rolbiecki, R.; Rolbiecki, S.; Figas, A.; Jagosz, B.; Stachowski, P.; Sadan, H.A.; Prus, P.; Pal-Fam, F. Requirements and effects of surface drip irrigation of mid-early potato cultivar Courage on a very light soil in Central Poland. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rolbiecki, S.; Rzekanowski, C. Influence of sprinkler and drip irrigation on the growth and yield of strawberries grown on sandy soils. Acta Hortic. 1997, 439, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rzekanowski, C. Response of black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) cv. ‘Titania’ to micro-irrigation under loose sandy soil conditions. Acta Hortic. 2002, 585, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rzekanowski, C. Effect of micro-irrigation on the growth and yield of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cv. ‘Polana’ grown in very light soil. Acta Hortic. 2002, 585, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rzekanowski, C.; Derkacz, M. Effect of different irrigation regimes on growth and yield of ‘Elsanta’ strawberries planted on loose sandy soil. Acta Hortic. 2004, 646, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the Bydgoszcz region—within the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province—in Poland and in Europe.
Figure 1. Location of the Bydgoszcz region—within the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province—in Poland and in Europe.
Agronomy 11 00864 g001
Figure 2. Daily values of the potential evapotranspiration (mm) of the asparagus plants under drip irrigation conditions in particular months of the irrigation period.
Figure 2. Daily values of the potential evapotranspiration (mm) of the asparagus plants under drip irrigation conditions in particular months of the irrigation period.
Agronomy 11 00864 g002
Figure 3. Cumulative potential evapotranspiration (mm) of the asparagus plants under drip irrigation conditions in particular months of the irrigation period.
Figure 3. Cumulative potential evapotranspiration (mm) of the asparagus plants under drip irrigation conditions in particular months of the irrigation period.
Agronomy 11 00864 g003
Table 1. Values of the correction factor kr according to Freeman and Garzoli.
Table 1. Values of the correction factor kr according to Freeman and Garzoli.
Area Covering [%]Values of Factor kr
100.10
200.20
300.30
400.40
500.75
600.80
700.85
800.90
900.95
1001
Table 2. Classification of the period as dependent on Standardized Precipitation Index values [24].
Table 2. Classification of the period as dependent on Standardized Precipitation Index values [24].
PeriodStandardized Precipitation Index
Extreme drought≤−2.00
Severe droughtfrom −1.99 to −1.50
Moderate droughtfrom −1.49 to −1.00
Normalfrom −0.99 to 0.99
Moderate wetfrom 1.00 to 1.49
Severe wetfrom 1.50 to 1.99
Extreme wet≥2.00
Table 3. Air temperature (°C) in the 2006–2007 vegetation season.
Table 3. Air temperature (°C) in the 2006–2007 vegetation season.
Year10-Day PeriodMonthMean
AprMayJuneJulyAugSept
200615.312.911.822.717.615.2
27.313.118.921.817.415.7
38.711.419.722.715.014.6
Mean7.112.516.822.416.615.215.1
200715.99.318.815.718.612.6
29.312.719.521.118.611.3
310.219.016.217.316.413.2
Mean8.513.818.218.017.812.414.8
Mean for 2006–20077.813.117.520.217.213.814.9
Mean for 1971–20007.613.116.318.017.713.114.3
Difference (+/−)+0.20.0+1.3+2.2−0.5+0.7+0.6
Table 4. Rainfalls (mm) in the 2006–2007 vegetation season.
Table 4. Rainfalls (mm) in the 2006–2007 vegetation season.
Year10-Day PeriodMonthMean
AprMayJuneJulyAugSept
20061010707537
20201526230
3453405174
Mean4564223111542317
200715214379318
2023244115
33536294613
Mean8491031126036367
Mean for 2006–2007265662718739342
Mean for 1971–2000254360675142288
Difference (+/−)+1+13+2+4+36−3+54
Table 5. Values of the Stenz index for the 2006–2007 irrigation period.
Table 5. Values of the Stenz index for the 2006–2007 irrigation period.
YearMonth
JulyAugust
20066.20.9
20071.22.1
Table 6. Values of the Stenz index for the 2006–2007 irrigation period.
Table 6. Values of the Stenz index for the 2006–2007 irrigation period.
Month10-Days PeriodYear
20062007
July1−2.172.00
20.08−1.49
3−0.630.68
August11.95−0.69
20.690.06
30.311.17
Table 7. Height of the asparagus summer stalks (cm) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 7. Height of the asparagus summer stalks (cm) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Height of Summer Stalks
20062007Mean20062007Mean20062007Mean
Jersey Giant133139136164168166312930
Jersey Knight15816115916617517081411
Jersey Supreme149151150165169167161817
Jersey Deluxe151155153161180170102517
Jersey King156162159179183181232122
Atlas139145142179185182404040
Grande160165162181190185212523
Apollo169172170192201196232926
Purple Passion150155152178185181283029
UC 157141146143166176171253027
NJ 953155161158158170164396
UC 115159162160159171165094
JWC 1122149135130157143888
Mean149156152165178172182220
2006: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 6.343; Cultivars = 16.591; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 25.831; Irrigation/Cultivars = 13.599. 2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 7.225; Cultivars = 14.739; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 22.341; Irrigation/Cultivars = 12.664. 2006–2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 2.663; Cultivars = 11.936; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 16.879; Irrigation/Cultivars = 9.603.
Table 8. Number of the asparagus summer stalks (pcs) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 8. Number of the asparagus summer stalks (pcs) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Number of Summer Stalks
20062007Mean20062007Mean20062007Mean
Jersey Giant8.17.67.810.610.210.42.52.62.5
Jersey Knight6.77.06.810.510.710.63.83.73.7
Jersey Supreme8.08.28.112.111.912.04.13.73.9
Jersey Deluxe8.57.98.29.710.09.81.22.11.6
Jersey King10.510.310.413.213.513.32.73.22.9
Atlas9.28.89.012.112.012.02.93.23.0
Grande6.87.16.912.011.911.95.24.85.0
Apollo8.79.18.912.312.912.63.63.83.7
Purple Passion8.37.98.18.89.18.90.51.20.8
UC 1577.16.86.911.812.212.04.75.45.0
NJ 9538.58.18.310.711.210.92.23.12.6
UC 1156.87.37.010.611.511.03.84.24.0
JWC 17.26.97.09.19.09.01.92.12.0
Mean8.07.97.911.011.211.13.03.33.2
2006: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.870; Cultivars = 2.190; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 3.655; Irrigation/Cultivars = 2.413. 2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.987; Cultivars = 1.839; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 3.196; Irrigation/Cultivars = 2.417. 2006–2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 1.160; Cultivars = 0.719; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 1.017; Irrigation/Cultivars = 0.578.
Table 9. Diameter of the asparagus summer stalks (mm) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 9. Diameter of the asparagus summer stalks (mm) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Diameter of Summer Stalks
20062007Mean20062007Mean20062007Mean
Jersey Giant10.610.310.410.811.211.00.20.90.5
Jersey Knight12.612.312.412.013.512.7−0.61.20.3
Jersey Supreme10.09.19.511.912.212.01.93.12.5
Jersey Deluxe11.611.211.411.412.311.8−0.21.10.4
Jersey King13.212.412.813.013.613.3−0.21.20.5
Atlas14.011.212.611.013.812.4−3.02.6−0.2
Grande11.411.411.414.514.814.63.13.43.2
Apollo11.811.511.615.015.615.33.24.13.6
Purple Passion12.311.712.010.413.511.9−1.91.80.0
UC 15711.811.611.710.412.911.6−1.41.30.0
NJ 95310.510.110.313.213.713.42.73.63.1
UC 1159.59.89.611.311.911.61.82.11.9
JWC 110.010.210.110.812.611.70.82.41.6
Mean11.511.011.212.013.212.60.52.21.3
2006: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = ns; Cultivars = 3.293; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 4.657; Irrigation/Cultivars = 2.677. 2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.143; Cultivars = 1.532; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 3.221; Irrigation/Cultivars = 2.774. 2006–2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.499; Cultivars = 2.234; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 3.159; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.797.
Table 10. Marketable yield of the asparagus green spears (t·ha−1) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 10. Marketable yield of the asparagus green spears (t·ha−1) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Marketable Yield of Green Spears
20072008Mean20072008Mean20072008Mean
Jersey Giant2.552.952.756.466.876.663.913.923.91
Jersey Knight3.433.513.475.645.815.722.212.302.25
Jersey Supreme4.184.324.256.166.706.431.982.382.18
Jersey Deluxe2.662.912.786.967.347.154.304.434.37
Jersey King6.155.805.976.046.506.27−0.110.700.30
Atlas4.574.414.494.674.924.790.100.510.30
Grande5.424.805.116.917.257.081.492.451.97
Apollo5.775.405.587.217.847.521.442.441.94
Purple Passion5.755.015.384.965.645.30−0.790.63−0.08
UC 1574.163.984.075.726.586.151.562.602.08
NJ 9535.134.224.676.937.517.221.803.292.55
UC 1153.113.963.535.756.876.312.642.912.78
JWC 12.512.892.703.914.914.411.402.021.71
Mean4.264.174.215.956.526.231.692.352.02
2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.473; Cultivars = 1.572; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 2.223; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.274. 2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.581; Cultivars = 1.822; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 2.451; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.422. 2007–2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.211; Cultivars = 0.946; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 1.337; Irrigation/Cultivars = 0.761.
Table 11. Weight of the asparagus green spears (g) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 11. Weight of the asparagus green spears (g) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Weight of Green Spears
20072008Mean20072008Mean20072008Mean
Jersey Giant25.0226.0225.5234.5136.3135.419.4910.299.89
Jersey Knight36.7738.2237.4942.3344.3143.325.566.095.83
Jersey Supreme37.6336.6137.1235.9539.4537.70−1.682.840.58
Jersey Deluxe32.8731.8132.3435.3938.4036.892.526.594.55
Jersey King42.8634.7638.8135.1940.1937.69−7.675.43−1.12
Atlas34.8034.2234.5141.7043.7342.716.909.518.20
Grande43.5542.5543.0548.2949.3048.794.746.755.74
Apollo36.9538.5537.7542.0544.0143.035.105.465.28
Purple Passion39.4639.4639.4640.9944.9942.991.535.533.53
UC 15735.9732.9734.4737.4939.5038.491.526.534.02
NJ 95337.5236.5237.0236.7839.8838.33−0.743.361.31
UC 11530.2332.3331.2840.2442.2441.2410.019.919.96
JWC 129.9531.0530.5037.4438.4437.947.447.397.44
Mean35.6635.0135.3339.1041.6040.353.446.595.02
2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = ns; Cultivars = 8.822; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 11.316; Irrigation/Cultivars = 7.066. 2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 6.343; Cultivars = 6.022; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 9.416; Irrigation/Cultivars = 6.116. 2007–2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 1.031; Cultivars = 4.622; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 6.536; Irrigation/Cultivars = 3.718.
Table 12. Number of the asparagus green spears (pcs) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
Table 12. Number of the asparagus green spears (pcs) as dependent on cultivar and irrigation.
CultivarControl (Without Irrigation)Drip IrrigationIncrease of the Number of Green Spears
20072008Mean20072008Mean20072008Mean
Jersey Giant5.206.306.2510.1711.2710.724.974.974.97
Jersey Knight5.445.505.477.648.027.832.202.522.36
Jersey Supreme6.607.607.1010.2711.3010.783.673.73.68
Jersey Deluxe4.945.024.9811.6510.5511.106.715.536.12
Jersey King8.418.448.4210.3511.4510.901.943.012.47
Atlas6.496.226.357.538.538.031.042.311.67
Grande6.476.016.248.208.658.421.732.642.18
Apollo7.106.927.019.6910.3210.002.593.402.99
Purple Passion8.669.669.167.3210.328.82−1.340.66−0.34
UC 1576.775.616.199.079.849.452.304.233.26
NJ 9537.817.017.4110.8710.0510.463.063.043.05
UC 1154.465.214.838.569.228.894.104.014.05
JWC 15.176.205.687.158.837.991.982.632.30
Mean6.426.596.509.119.879.492.693.282.98
2007: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.747; Cultivars = 2.116; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 2.993; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.732. 2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.824; Cultivars = 1.811; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 2.459; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.562. 2007–2008: LSD0.05 for: Irrigation = 0.372; Cultivars = 1.666; Interaction: Cultivars/Irrigation = 2.356; Irrigation/Cultivars = 1.340.
Table 13. Irrigation water use efficiency (kg·ha−1·mm−1) as dependent on cultivar and year studied.
Table 13. Irrigation water use efficiency (kg·ha−1·mm−1) as dependent on cultivar and year studied.
CultivarIrrigation Water Use Efficiency
20072008Mean
Jersey Giant427357
Jersey Knight244333
Jersey Supreme224433
Jersey Deluxe478264
Jersey King-136
Atlas-94
Grande164530
Apollo164530
Purple Passion-126
UC 157174832
NJ 953206140
UC 115295441
JWC 1153726
Mean194431
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rolbiecki, R.; Rolbiecki, S.; Figas, A.; Jagosz, B.; Prus, P.; Stachowski, P.; Kazula, M.J.; Szczepanek, M.; Ptach, W.; Pal-Fam, F.; et al. Response of Chosen American Asparagus officinalis L. Cultivars to Drip Irrigation on the Sandy Soil in Central Europe: Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity. Agronomy 2021, 11, 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050864

AMA Style

Rolbiecki R, Rolbiecki S, Figas A, Jagosz B, Prus P, Stachowski P, Kazula MJ, Szczepanek M, Ptach W, Pal-Fam F, et al. Response of Chosen American Asparagus officinalis L. Cultivars to Drip Irrigation on the Sandy Soil in Central Europe: Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity. Agronomy. 2021; 11(5):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rolbiecki, Roman, Stanisław Rolbiecki, Anna Figas, Barbara Jagosz, Piotr Prus, Piotr Stachowski, Maciej J. Kazula, Małgorzata Szczepanek, Wiesław Ptach, Ferenc Pal-Fam, and et al. 2021. "Response of Chosen American Asparagus officinalis L. Cultivars to Drip Irrigation on the Sandy Soil in Central Europe: Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity" Agronomy 11, no. 5: 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050864

APA Style

Rolbiecki, R., Rolbiecki, S., Figas, A., Jagosz, B., Prus, P., Stachowski, P., Kazula, M. J., Szczepanek, M., Ptach, W., Pal-Fam, F., Sadan, H. A., & Liberacki, D. (2021). Response of Chosen American Asparagus officinalis L. Cultivars to Drip Irrigation on the Sandy Soil in Central Europe: Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity. Agronomy, 11(5), 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop