Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variation in Grain Yield and Quality Traits of Spring Malting Barley
Previous Article in Journal
Urban Organic Waste for Urban Farming: Growing Lettuce Using Vermicompost and Thermophilic Compost
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds

Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(6), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 9 June 2021

Abstract

:
Alternaria dauci (J.G. Kühn) J.W. Groves et Skolko and A. radicina Meier, Drechsler et E.D. Eddy are important seed-transmitted pathogens of carrot. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of acetic acid treatments on the quality of stored carrot seeds. Seeds of two samples were soaked for 30 min in 0.5, 1 and 2% acetic acid. Controls included untreated seeds, seeds soaked in distilled water and seeds treated with fungicide Zaprawa Nasienna T 75 WS/DS (a.i. thiram 75%). Germination, vigour and health of untreated and treated seeds were evaluated before and after 5 and 12 months of storage at 4 and 20 °C. Seeds of both samples treated with 0.5 and 1% acetic acid were characterized by higher germination capacity after storage than untreated seeds. However, treatments with 1 and 2% acetic acid negatively affected seed vigour. Generally, seeds of both samples treated with acetic acid were characterized by lower infestation with A. alternata and A. radicina after storage than untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water. Moreover, acetic acid often controlled these fungi more effectively than the fungicide. Regardless of the storage duration, infestation with fungi was higher if seeds of both samples were stored at a lower temperature.

1. Introduction

Fungi of the genus Alternaria, i.e., A. dauci (J.G. Kühn) J.W. Groves et Skolko and A. radicina Meier, Drechsler et E.D. Eddy, are the most important seed-transmitted pathogens of carrot, reported from many countries all over the world. Alternaria dauci is known as a causal agent of leaf blight, and A. radicina is mainly responsible for black rot of roots and pre- and post-emergence seedling damping-off [1,2]. Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl., another Alternaria species commonly associated with seeds of many plants as a saprotroph, is considered by some researchers as a weak pathogen of carrot [1]. The fungicides, such as thiram, chlorothalonil and iprodione, have been used to control Alternaria spp. on carrot seeds, however their effectiveness seems to be insufficient in the case of highly infested lots, especially if the pathogen is located in the inner tissues of the seeds [2]. Moreover, the use of synthetic fungicides in organic farming is strictly limited. A good alternative for standard chemical treatment may be in this case application of various compounds of natural origin, such as organic acids. Acetic acid occurs naturally in many fruits as a metabolic intermediate and is one of the main products of lactic acid bacteria (genera in the order Lactobacilliales) [3]. The best-known form of acetic acid is vinegar (4–18% acetic acid), commonly used as a food preservative. It is obtained commercially by submerged oxidative fermentation—the process in which acetic acid bacteria (Acetobacter) convert ethanol to acetic acid in the presence of oxygen [4]. Acetic acid, because of its well-known antifungal and antibacterial properties, has also been used against plant pathogens, including seed-borne fungi. It has been reported that acetic acid seed treatment successfully reduced common bunt (Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) G. Winter, syn. T. caries (DC.) Tul. and C. Tul. and T. laevis J.G. Kühn) in wheat [5,6,7], and leaf stripe (Pyrenophora graminea S. Ito and Kurib.) in spring barley [5], controlled Fusarium graminearum Schwabe and Bipolaris sorokiniana Shoemaker in barley and wheat seeds [8], and storage mold (Aspergillus flavus Link) in canola, corn, rice and wheat seeds [9], decreased zinnia seed infestation with A. alternata, Alternaria zinniae H. Pape and Fusarium spp. [10], and reduced the incidence of A. alternata, A. flavus, Aspergillus niger Tiegh., Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kűhn, Rhizopus sp., Stemphylium sp., Trichothecium sp. and Verticillium sp. on sunflower seeds [11]. In vitro assays, performed by Van der Wolf et al. [12], also exhibited a slight activity of acetic acid against A. dauci. Our previous experiments revealed that acetic acid treatment may effectively control Alternaria spp. associated with carrot seeds, without a negative effect on seed germination [13]. In practice it may be necessary to store treated seeds for a certain period of time before sowing. Generally, with a few exceptions, treating seeds with fungicides before storage is not recommended because pesticides can harm the seeds, and as a result, reduce their viability. Phytotoxicity can occur after several months of storage, but also after a longer storage period, e.g., 12 months for cereals [14]. Therefore, the question arose whether the organic treatment would affect carrot seed storability? Consequently, the aim of our experiment was to evaluate the possibility of 5- and 12-month storage of carrot seeds treated with acetic acid.

2. Materials and Methods

Two standard carrot seed samples cv. Amsterdam 3 (sample I—lot No PL 009/63/51/020A, sample II—lot No PL 409/63/51/703A), obtained from TORSEED Seed Company in Toruń, were used in the experiment. The samples were selected due to the various levels of seed infestation with fungi. Acetic acid (99.8%) produced by Sigma-Aldrich Co. was applied for seed treatment. Additionally, fungicide Zaprawa Nasienna T 75 WS/DS (a.i. 75% thiram), produced by Organika-Azot in Jaworzno, was used as an alternative chemical control.
Seeds were treated by soaking in 0.5, 1 and 2% acetic acid solutions for 30 min, and next rinsed three times with distilled water. Controls included untreated seeds, seeds soaked in distilled water for 30 min, and seeds treated with Zaprawa Nasienna T 75 WS/DS at a dose of 5 g per kg of seeds. After acetic acid treatments and soaking in distilled water, the seeds were dried at 20 °C and 45% RH for 48 h. Moisture content of dried seeds was evaluated with the high-constant-temperature oven method [15]. Depending on the treatment, the moisture content ranged from 7.2 to 7.7% in sample I and from 7.4 to 7.8% in sample II.
Untreated and treated seeds were stored in plastic, tightly closed containers at 4 and 20 °C. Germination, vigour and health of the seeds were evaluated before and after 5 and 12 months of storage.
Germination and vigour tests were performed separately in six replications of 50 seeds from each treatment. The seeds were incubated in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes on six layers of filter paper, 50 seeds per dish, in darkness at 20 °C. Percentages of normal seedlings (germination capacity), abnormal diseased seedlings and dead seeds were calculated after seven and fourteen days of incubation according to ISTA rules [15]. Mean germination time, characterizing seed vigour, was evaluated based on the number of seeds with visible radicle, counted daily.
The deep-freeze blotter test was performed on five replications of 40 seeds from each treatment according to ISTA rules [16,17]. Seeds were incubated in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes on six layers of filter paper, 20 seeds per dish, for three days at 20 °C in darkness, then transferred to −20 °C for 20 h and subsequently incubated for eight days at 20 °C, under 12 h alternating cycles of NUV light and darkness. After incubation the fungi were identified on the basis of their growth and sporulation using a stereomicroscope and a compound microscope [18,19]. Additionally, the percentage of seeds free of fungi was evaluated.
SeedCalculator version 2.1 software [20] was applied to analyse mean germination time. The results obtained before storage were compared by means of one-way analysis of variance, whereas two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the results obtained after 5 and 12 months of storage. Duncan’s multiple range test was applied to estimate the differences between the means at a level α = 0.05.

3. Results

The samples varied in terms of seed quality. Sample I was characterized by low seed germination capacity associated with high percentages of abnormal diseased seedlings and dead seeds (Table 1). The improvement of germination capacity was observed only if seeds were treated with fungicide and 0.5% acetic acid solution. All of the applied acetic acid treatments, as well as soaking seeds in distilled water, significantly decreased the number of abnormal diseased seedlings. However, in the case of acetic acid treatments, especially when 2% concentration was used, a significant increase in the number of dead seeds was observed. Sample II showed considerably higher seed germination capacity compared to sample I, which was related to lower numbers of abnormal diseased seedlings and dead seeds. The improvement of germination capacity was observed only if seeds were treated with fungicide and soaked in distilled water. Acetic acid did not affect this parameter, but at 1% concentration increased the number of dead seeds.
A reduction in the number of abnormal diseased seedlings was shown not only after fungicide and acetic acid treatments, but also after soaking seeds in distilled water. Soaking seeds in acetic acid solutions in some cases resulted in the deterioration of seed vigour (Table 1). An increase in mean germination time was observed when seeds of sample I were treated with 0.5 and 1% acetic acid, and after soaking seeds of sample II in 2% acetic acid solution.
The seeds of both samples were abundantly infested with fungi, especially A. alternata. This fungus was observed on 98.5 and 99.5% of untreated seeds in sample I and II, respectively (Table 2). Pathogenic Alternaria species, i.e., A. dauci and A. radicina, were also detected in both samples, however A. radicina prevailed. Alternaria dauci infected 12.0 and 2.0%, and A. radicina 59.5 and 17.5% of untreated seeds in sample I and II, respectively. Soaking seeds in the acetic acid solutions, regardless of concentration, resulted in an increase in the percentage of seeds free of fungi and a significant reduction in seed infestation with A. alternata and A. radicina, in both samples. In the case of sample I, treating seeds with 2% acetic acid controlled these fungi more effectively than fungicide, and additionally decreased seed infestation with A. dauci. None of the applied treatments affected the incidence of this fungus in sample II.
In sample I after 5 months of storage, irrespective of storage temperature, a deterioration of seed germination, compared to untreated seeds, was observed only if seeds were treated with 2% acetic acid (Table 3).
On the contrary, seeds treated with 0.5% acetic acid and stored at 20 °C were characterized by higher germination capacity than untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water. Moreover, seeds treated with 1% acetic acid germinated better than untreated seeds. After 12 months of storage, regardless of the storage temperature, none of the applied treatments negatively affected germination capacity of sample I seeds. Furthermore, the treatment with 0.5% acetic acid improved seed germination capacity as effectively as the fungicide. The enhancement of this parameter was also observed if seeds were soaked in 1.0% acetic acid solution and in distilled water. After storage at 20 °C, irrespective of its duration, all applied acetic acid treatments, as well as the fungicide, significantly reduced the number of abnormal diseased seedlings compared with untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water. This reduction was also observed if seeds were stored at a lower temperature, especially for 12 months, but mostly in relation to untreated seeds. After 5 months of storage at both temperatures, a significant increase in the percentage of dead seeds was observed when seeds were treated with 2% acetic acid solution. Only in the case of seeds treated with 0.5% acetic acid and stored at 20 °C for 5 months, and at 4 and 20 °C for 12 months, were a lower number of dead seeds shown than in the control. In sample I, there were no significant differences between mean values of germination capacity for seeds stored at 4 and 20 °C for 5 months. After 12 months of storage, the mean value of this parameter for seeds preserved at 4 °C was higher than for seeds stored at 20 °C. Regardless of the storage duration, higher mean percentages of abnormal diseased seedlings were found if seeds were stored at a lower temperature. On the other hand, the temperature did not influence the percentage of dead seeds.
Seeds of sample II treated with 0.5 and 1% acetic acid, the fungicide and soaked in distilled water were characterized by significantly higher germination capacity than untreated seeds after 5 months of storage at 20 °C and 12 months of storage at 4 and 20 °C (Table 4). This phenomenon was also observed after 12 months of storage at 20 °C in the case of seeds treated with 2% acetic acid. Regardless of the storage temperature and duration, all applied acetic acid treatments, except seeds soaked in 0.5% acetic acid solution and stored for 5 months at 4 °C, resulted in a significant decrease in the percentage of abnormal diseased seedlings compared to untreated seeds. Moreover, after 12 months of storage, a lower percentage of dead seeds was recorded in acetic acid treatments numerous times compared with the control. This was shown for seeds treated with 0.5, 1 and 2% acetic acid solution and stored at 4 °C and for seeds treated with 1 and 2% acetic acid and stored at 20 °C. In sample II, regardless of the storage duration, there were no significant differences between mean values of germination capacity for seeds stored at 4 and 20 °C. After 5 months of storage, the temperature had no effect on the mean percentage of abnormal diseased seedlings, but after 12 months a higher mean percentage of these seedlings was observed if seeds were stored at 4 °C. On the other hand, a significantly higher mean percentage of dead seeds was demonstrated after 5 months of storage at 4 °C, but the temperature did not affect the percentages of these seeds after 12 months of storage.
Seeds of sample I treated with 0.5% acetic acid solution and stored for 5 months at 4 °C were characterized by a lower value of mean germination time (MGT) than the control seeds (Table 5). Acetic acid at this concentration, irrespective of the storage duration and temperature, did not negatively affect the speed of germination in relation to untreated seeds. In the case of sample II, after 5 months of storage at 4 °C, the lowest value of MGT was shown in seeds soaked in distilled water. Treating seeds with 0.5 and 1% acetic acid, regardless of the storage temperature, did not delay germination compared to untreated seeds. Deterioration of MGT was observed only if seeds were treated with 2% acetic acid solution. After 12 months of storage, acetic acid treatments generally negatively affected MGT compared to the control. Only in the case of seeds treated with 0.5% acetic acid and stored at a lower temperature, was an adverse effect on the speed of germination not observed. Seeds of both samples stored for 5 and 12 months at 4 °C germinated faster, based on the average values of mean germination time, than those which were preserved at 20 °C.
Acetic acid and fungicide treatments, regardless of the temperature and duration of storage, significantly limited seed infestation with fungi of the genus Alternaria and increased the number of seeds free of fungi compared with untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water (Table 6). Moreover, acetic acid, especially at concentrations of 1 and 2%, was frequently more effective, or as effective as the fungicide. It was especially observed after 12 months of storage in the case of A. alternata and A. radicina. Acetic acid treatments, irrespective of the storage duration, resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of seeds free of fungi. Furthermore, after 12 months of storage at 20 °C, seeds treated with 0.5, 1 and 2% acetic acid solutions were less infested with fungi than seeds treated with the fungicide. It was also observed in the case of seeds treated with 2.0% acetic acid after 12 months of storage at 4 °C. Temperature, regardless of the storage duration, significantly influenced mean percentages of seeds infested with fungi in sample I. The significantly lower mean percentages of seeds infested with Alternaria spp. and a higher mean percentage of seeds free of fungi was found after storage at 20 °C, than at 4 °C.
In sample II acetic acid treatments, irrespective of the storage period and temperature, resulted in a decrease in seed infestation with A. alternata in comparison with untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water (Table 7). Moreover, treating seeds with 2% acid controlled this fungus, after storage at 4 °C, more efficiently than the fungicide. All applied acetic acid treatments reduced the number of seeds infested with A. radicina, after 5 and 12 months of storage, as effectively as the fungicide. Sample II seeds were characterized by a low infestation with A. dauci and none of the applied treatments affected the incidence of this fungus after 5 months of storage at 4 and 20 °C, and after 12 months of storage at 20 °C. However, after 12 months of storage at 4 °C all applied acetic acid treatments, as well as the fungicide and soaking seeds in distilled water, decreased significantly the number of seeds infected with this pathogen. Soaking in acetic acid solutions, regardless of the storage duration and temperature, resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of seeds free of fungi, compared with untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water. After 5 and 12 months of storage at 4 °C, in a 2% acetic acid treatment a higher percentage of seeds free of fungi was demonstrated than in the case of seeds treated with the fungicide.
Seeds of sample II, stored for 5 and 12 months at 20 °C were infested with A. alternata to a lower extent, based on mean percentages of infested seeds, than seeds stored at 4 °C. In the case of A. dauci and A. radicina this phenomenon was observed only after 12 months of storage. Moreover, after storage at a higher temperature a significantly lower mean percentage of seeds free of fungi was detected, regardless of the storage duration.

4. Discussion

Acetic acid, because of antifungal and antibacterial properties, has been commonly used in food production as a preservative and disinfectant [21,22,23,24]. These properties encouraged scientists, who have also been trying to use it for plant protection, including seed treatment [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,25]. Various methods of acetic acid application have been proposed to control seed-borne pathogens, e.g., fumigation in acetic acid vapour, mixing seeds with a specific amount of the acid, or soaking seeds in the acid solutions. Our previous experiments, as well as present results, revealed that soaking in acetic acid solutions effectively controlled fungi of the genus Alternaria associated with carrot seeds [13]. Moreover, the present experiment showed that the positive effect of acetic acid treatment persisted for short- (5 months) and long-term (12 months) storage. Generally, before and after storage, regardless of the temperature, seeds of both samples treated with acetic acid were characterized by a lower infestation with A. alternata and A. radicina than untreated seeds and seeds soaked in distilled water. Additionally, acetic acid often controlled these fungi more effectively than the fungicide. The treatment was also effective against A. dauci, however the decrease in seed infestation was most significant after storage, in the case of sample I, which was characterized by a higher level of initial seed infection with this fungus than sample II. Generally, especially after storage, an increase in the concentration of acetic acid resulted in a significant increase in the number of seeds free of fungi, and a decrease in seed germination. Carrot seeds soaked in 0.5 and 1% acetic acid solutions showed higher germination capacity after storage than untreated seeds, while, treating seeds with 2% acetic acid solution often adversely affected their germination and vigour. Previous experiments confirmed that too high a concentration of acetic acid may be phytotoxic to plants and seeds. Pasini et al. [26], who studied effectiveness of acetic acid against rose powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae Woron., syn. Podosphaera pannosa (Wallr.) de Bary) in a glasshouse, found that white vinegar, applied at 5 and 10% concentrations gave good disease control, but 0.25 and 0.5% acetic acid was phytotoxic. Sholberg et al. [7] observed that fumigation of wheat seeds with acetic acid vapour at 2 and 4 g kg−1 of seeds controlled common bunt (T. tritici and T. laevis) in the field as effectively as the fungicide, but acetic acid applied at the higher dose, i.e., 4 g kg−1, caused the reduction of tiller numbers. Szopińska [10] reported that soaking in 1, 2.5 and 5% acetic acid solution significantly decreased zinnia seed infestation with Alternaria spp., Cladosporium spp., Fusarium spp. and Gonatobotrys simplex Corda (syn. Melanospora simplex (Corda) D. Hawksw.), however, regardless of the concentration, the treatments decreased the total number of germinating seeds and germination capacity, increased the number of abnormally deformed seedlings, and prolonged germination. Despite of these observations, there are some reports that a properly applied acetic acid treatment may improve seed germination and storability. El-Saidy and El-Hai [11] found that dipping of sunflower seeds in acetic acid resulted in an increase in seed germination percentage and vigour, before and after 6 months storage. Moreover, the treatment reduced the incidence of several fungal genera, i.e., Alternaria, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Rhizoctonia, Rhizopus, Stemphylium, Trichothecium and Verticillium, before and after storage. In the aspect of seed storage, protection of the seeds from storage fungi, i.e., Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. is an additional benefit of acetic acid treatment, because these fungi are considered as the main reason for seed deterioration. This possibility was also examined by Sholberg and Gaunce [9], who treated canola, corn, rice and wheat seeds, artificially inoculated with A. flavus, with acetic acid vapour. The authors reported that fumigation of wheat seeds with acetic acid at 0.78 mL kg−1 of seeds resulted in the improvement of seed germination and the complete eradication of A. flavus after 102 days of storage at 20 °C. This fungus was also not detected on canola seeds treated with acetic acid at 0.58 mL kg−1 of seeds after 38 days of storage at the same temperature.
In the present experiment seed-borne fungi were significantly affected by the storage temperature. Seeds stored at 4 °C were characterized by a higher seed infestation with fungi than those stored at 20 °C. Low temperature, optimal for seed storage, usually also favours pathogens viability [27]. Therefore, the reduction of temperature may increase the length of survival of seed-borne microorganisms, however, some pathogens, especially in the case of short-term storage, may not respond to this factor [28]. We observed this phenomenon in sample II after 5 months of storage in relation to seed infestation with A. dauci and A. radicina. Nevertheless, after 12 months, seeds stored at a lower temperature were characterized by a higher level of infection with these fungi. Alternaria spp. are regarded as long-living fungi, and conditions favouring seed viability are also conducive to pathogens survival [2,29]. Therefore, the possibility of the control of these fungi during storage with a cheap and safe for the environment organic compound, seems to be very promising.

5. Conclusions

Regardless of the initial seed quality and the storage temperature, soaking carrot seeds in 0,5 and 1% acetic acid solutions effectively reduced their infestation with Alternaria spp. and improved seed germination capacity compared to untreated seeds, therefore these treatments may be recommended for controlling fungi during seed storage. However, it should be considered that the lower (4 °C) storage temperature favours seed infestation with Alternaria spp., and beneficial effects of acetic acid treatment might be clearer at 20 °C, especially in the case of seeds characterized by the higher initial incidence of fungi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D. and A.R.; methodology and formal analysis H.D., A.R., D.S.; investigation and data curation, A.R., D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.; writing—review and editing, H.D., D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tylkowska, K. The influence of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler on carrot (Daucus carota L.) seed germination. Phytopathol. Pol. 1991, 1, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tylkowska, K. Carrot seed-borne diseases caused by Alternaria species. In Alternaria, Biology, Plant Diseases and Metabolites; Chełkowski, J., Visconti, A., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stiles, M.E. Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gullo, M.; Verzelloni, E.; Canonico, M. Aerobic submerged fermentation by acetic acid bacteria for vinegar production: Process and biotechnological aspects. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Borgen, A.; Nielsen, B. Effect of seed treatment with acetic acids in control of seed borne diseases. In Proceedings of BCPC Symposium No. 76, 2001: “Seed Treatment: Challenges & Opportunities”, North Warwickshire, UK, 26–27 February 2001; Biddle, A.J., Ed.; BCPC: Farnham, UK, 2001; pp. 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  6. Saidi, B.; Azmeh, F.; Mamluk, O.F.; Sikora, R.A. Effect of seed treatment with organic acids on the control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici and T. laevis) in wheat. Meded. Rijksuniv. Gent. Fak. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. 2001, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Sholberg, P.L.; Gaudet, D.A.; Puchalski, B.; Randall, P. Control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici and T. laevis) of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. ‘Laura’) by fumigation with acetic acid vapour. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 2006, 86, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rioux, S.; Pouleur, S.; Randall, P.; Vanasse, A.; Turkington, T.K.; Dion, Y.; Belkacemi, K. Efficacy of acetic acid vapours and dry heat to control Fusarium graminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana in barley and wheat seeds. Phytoprotection 2016, 96, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sholberg, P.L.; Gaunce, A.P. Fumigation of high moisture seed with acetic acid to control storage mold. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1996, 76, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Szopińska, D. The Effects of Organic Acids Treatment on Germination, Vigour and Health of Zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq.) Seeds. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2013, 12, 17–29. Available online: MicrosoftWord-02SzopinskaHort12_5_2013.doc(actapol.net) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
  11. El-Saidy, A.E.A.; El-Hai, A.K.M. Effect of some evaporation matters on storability of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 19, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Van der Wolf, J.M.; Birnbaum, Y.; van der Zouwen, P.S.; Groot, S.P.C. Disinfection of vegetable seed by treatment with essential oils, organic acids and plant extracts. Seed Sci. Technol. 2008, 36, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dorna, H.; Qi, Y.; Szopińska, D. The effect of acetic acid, grapefruit extract and selected essential oils on germination, vigour and health of carrot (Daucus carota L.) seeds. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2018, 17, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. OEPP/EPPO. Efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. PP 1/135 (4) Phytotoxicity assessment. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 2014, 44, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. International Rules for Seed Testing; International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2012.
  16. International Rules for Seed Testing; Annexe to Chapter 7; Seed Health Testing Methods 7-001a: Blotter Method for the Detection of Alternaria Dauci on Daucus Carota (Carrot); International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: ISTA_SHMethods_2021_7-001a_final.pdf(seedtest.org) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
  17. International Rules for Seed Testing; Annexe to Chapter 7; Seed Health Testing Methods 7-002a: Blotter Method for the Detection of Alternaria radicina on Daucus carota (Carrot); International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: ISTA_SHMethods_2021_7-002a_final.pdf(seedtest.org) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
  18. Machado, J.C.; Langerak, C.J.; Jaccoud-Filho, D.S. Seed-borne Fungi: A Contribution to Routine Seed Health Analysis; International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathur, S.B.; Kongsdal, O. Common Laboratory Seed Health Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi; International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jalink, H.; Van der Schoor, R. Seed Calculator 2.1. License Number: 100200122; Plant Research International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sholberg, P.L.; Gaunce, A.P. Fumigation of fruit with acetic acid to prevent post harvest decay. HortScience 1995, 30, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lang, M.M.; Ingham, B.H.; Ingham, S.C. Efficacy of novel organic acid and hypochlorite treatments for eliminating Escherichia coli O157:H7 from alfalfa seeds prior to sprouting. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 58, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pao, S.; Kalantari, A.; Khalid, M.F. Eliminating Salmonella enterica in alfalfa and mung bean sprouts by organic acid and hot water immersions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2008, 32, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alawlaqi, M.M.; Alharbi Asmaa, A. Impact of acetic acid on controlling tomato fruit decay. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Escamilla, D.; Rosso, M.L.; Zhang, B. Identification of fungi associated with soybeans and effective seed disinfection treatments. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3194–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Pasini, C.; D’Aquila, F.; Curir, P.; Gullino, M.L. Effectiveness of antifungal compounds against rose powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae) in glasshouses. Crop Prot. 1997, 16, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hewett, P.D. Pathogen viability on seed in deep freeze storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 1987, 15, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  28. Maude, R.B. Seedborne Diseases and Their Control. Principles and Practice; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rotem, J. The Genus Alternaria. Biology, Epidemiology and Pathogenicity; APS (The American Phytopathological Society) Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination and vigour of carrot seeds.
Table 1. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination and vigour of carrot seeds.
SampleTreatmentGermination Parameters (%)Mean
Germination Time (Days)
Germination CapacityAbnormal Diseased SeedlingsDead Seeds
IC 144.0a 235.7d11.7ab3.41a
W52.0ab22.7c16.0bc3.36a
F79.0c4.3a9.0a3.65ab
0.5%AA57.0b19.3bc20.0c3.90bc
1%AA49.3ab20.3bc21.0c4.18c
2%AA49.3ab14.0b29.7d3.59ab
IIC 177.0a11.7b8.0ab3.10a
W83.0bc5.3a9.0bc3.09a
F85.0c2.7a5.3a3.55bc
0.5%AA81.7a–c4.3a9.7bc3.31ab
1%AA80.3a–c2.7a12.7c3.38ab
2%AA79.3ab2.0a10.7bc4.87c
1 C—control (untreated seeds); W—seeds soaked in distilled water for 30 min; F—seeds treated with fungicide Zaprawa Nasienna T 75 WS/DS at a dose of 5 g kg−1 of seeds; 0.5%AA, 1%AA, 2%AA—seeds soaked in 0.5, 1 and 2% acetic acid solutions, respectively. 2 Means in columns followed by the same letter, for each sample separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 2. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of carrot seeds.
Table 2. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of carrot seeds.
SampleTreatmentSeed Infestation with Fungi (%)Seeds Free of Fungi
Alternaria alternataAlternaria dauciAlternaria radicina
IC 198.5e 212.0b59.5c0a
W99.0e9.0b49.0c0.5a
F44.0b0a28.5b23.0d
0.5%AA62.0d7.0b21.0ab3.5b
1%AA68.5c7.5b22.5ab5.0b
2%AA28.5a2.0a15.0a12.5c
IIC 199.5d2.0a17.5b0a
W99.5d2.0a10.0b0a
F53.5a1.0a1.0a38.0d
0.5%AA89.0c0a2.0a7.0b
1%AA71.0b1.5a0.5a24.0c
2%AA60.0ab1.5a1.5a31.5cd
1, 2 For explanations see Table 1.
Table 3. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination of stored carrot seeds—sample I.
Table 3. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination of stored carrot seeds—sample I.
Germination Parameters (%)Storage Duration (Months)Storage Temp. (°C)TreatmentMean
C 1WF0.5%AA1%AA2%AA
Germination capacity5455.3c 262.7c75.3d64.0c55.3c39.3b58.7A
2046.0b60.7c72.7d73.7d62.0c25.3a56.7A
Mean50.7D61.7C74.0E68.9D58.7C32.3A
12441.3cd65.7f69.0g67.7fg53.0e38.0bc55.8B
2030.3ab48.0de75.3g69.7fg56.3e29.3a51.5A
Mean35.8A56.9B72.2C68.7C54.7B33.7A
Abnormal diseased seedlings5423.7ef16.3c–e9.0bc19.0de14.0cd15.7c–e16.3B
2031.7f21.7d–f3.0a6.0ab10.0bc10.7bc13.9A
Mean27.7D19.0C6.0A12.5B12.0B13.2B
12429.3f16.7cd5.3ab9.7bc15.7cd18.7de15.9B
2042.3g28.3ef3.3a5.7ab5.0ab5.7ab15.1A
Mean35.8D22.5C4.3A7.7AB10.4B12.2B
Dead seeds5414.3c–e12.0b–d4.0a10.3b–d20.7ef28.0f14.9A
2014.0c–e9.3b–d8.0a–c7.7ab15.3de45.0g16.6A
Mean14.2CD10.7BC6.0A9.0AB18.0D36.5E
12422.7f8.7b–d5.7ab8.7b–d12.7c–e20.7ef13.2A
2014.7d–f11.7b–d2.7a6.3a–c12.7b–e24.3f10.1A
Mean18.7D10.2BC4.2A7.5B12.7C22.5D
1 For explanation of abbreviations see Table 1. 2 Means in the table followed by the same letter, for each storage period separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 4. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination of stored carrot seeds—sample II.
Table 4. Effects of acetic acid treatments on germination of stored carrot seeds—sample II.
Germination Parameters (%)Storage Duration (Months)Storage Temp. (°C)TreatmentMean
C 1WF0.5%AA1%AA2%AA
Germination capacity5476.3a–c 282.3cd86.0d82.0cd83.0cd64.3ab79.0A
2069.3a78.0bc91.3e83.7cd82.0cd73.0ab79.6A
Mean72.8A80.2B88.7C82.9B82.5B68.7A
12464.7ab76.7cd83.7de83.7c–e83.0c–e73.7bc77.6A
2060.0a81.7c–e86.7e84.0e86.7e75.7cd79.1A
Mean62.4A79.2BC85.2D83.9CD84.9CD74.7B
Abnormal diseased seedlings5411.7d12.0d3.3ab7.7cd7.3bc5.0bc7.8A
2021.3e10.0cd1.3a4.7bc4.7bc5.0bc7.8A
Mean16.5D11.0C2.3A6.2B6.0B5.0B
12422.7de15.7d8.7c7.0bc6.3bc4.7bc10.9B
2030.0e8.3c3.0ab5.3bc3.0ab1.3a8.5A
Mean26.4D12.0C5.9AB6.2B4.7AB3.0A
Dead seeds549.3d4.0a–c2.7a-c6.0b-d4.0a–d7.0cd5.5B
204.0a–c5.7b–d2.3ab3.0a-c2.0a5.7b–d3.8A
Mean6.7B4.9AB2.5A4.5AB3.0A6.4B
1247.3c3.3a–c0.3a1.0a2.0ab2.0ab2.7A
205.3bc2.7a–c2.0ab1.3ab0.3a1.0a2.1A
Mean6.3B3.0A1.2A1.2A1.2A1.5A
1 For explanation of abbreviations see Table 1. 2 Means in the table followed by the same letter, for each storage period separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 5. Effects of acetic acid treatments on mean germination time of stored carrot seeds (days).
Table 5. Effects of acetic acid treatments on mean germination time of stored carrot seeds (days).
SampleStorage Duration (Months)Storage Temp. (°C)TreatmentMean
C 1WF0.5%AA1%AA2%AA
I543.18b 23.38bc3.49bc3.11a4.24d4.64e3.67A
203.39bc3.33bc3.68c3.64c4.35de5.28f3.95B
Mean3.29A3.36A3.59B3.38A4.30C4.96D
1243.25ab3.00a3.47b3.12ab4.15c4.50d3.58A
203.28ab3.14ab3.49ab3.52b4.32cd5.26e3.84B
Mean3.27AB3.07A3.48B3.32AB4.24C4.88D
II543.29b3.11a3.52cd3.43bc3.34b3.89f3.43A
203.55cd3.45bc3.85ef3.44bc3.73de4.45g3.75B
Mean3.42B3.28A3.69C3.44B3.54B4.17D
1243.11a3.20ab3.45cd3.07a3.36bc4.00e3.37A
203.19a3.41b–d3.59d3.38bc3.49cd4.36f3.57B
Mean3.15A3.31BC3.52D3.23AB3.43CD4.18E
1 For explanation of abbreviations see Table 1. 2 Means in the table followed by the same letter, for each storage period separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 6. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of stored carrot seeds—sample I.
Table 6. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of stored carrot seeds—sample I.
Seed Infestation with Fungi (%)Storage Duration (Months)Storage Temp. (°C)TreatmentMean
C 1WF0.5%AA1%AA2%AA
Alternaria alternata5498.5h 295.5gh18.0cd66.0f29.5de35.5e57.2B
2092.5g76.0f7.0ab12.0bc3.0a2.5a32.2A
Mean95.5D85.8C12.5A39.0B16.3A19.0A
124100.0h93.5g24.0d21.5d11.0c12.0c43.7B
2081.5f47.0e4.5b1.5ab2.0ab0a22.8A
Mean90.8E70.3D14.3C11.5BC6.5AB6.0A
Alternaria dauci5411.0d9.0cd1.0ab11.0d2.5ab4.0bc6.4B
207.5cd8.5cd3.0bc0.5a1.5ab2.5ab3.9A
Mean9.3B8.8B2.0A5.8A2.0A3.3A
1248.5d8.0d2.5bc5.0bc6.5ac3.5bc5.7B
2012.0d7.5cd1.0ab0.5ab0a0a3.5A
Mean10.3B7.7B1.8A2.8A3.3A1.8A
Alternaria radicina5447.0e34.0d16.5c18.0c13.0bc18.0c24.4B
2054.5e38.5de13.5bc11.0a-c8.5ab6.0a22.0A
Mean50.8C36.3B15.0A14.5A10.8A12.0A
12462.5d35.5c12.5b14.5b10.0b9.0b24.5B
2075.0e29.0c12.0b3.0a2.5a3.0a20.8A
Mean68.8D32.3C12.3B8.8A6.3A6.0A
Seeds free of fungi540a0.5a58.5d12.0b13.0b35.5c20.4A
200a9.0b67.0e65.0e66.0e73.5e46.8B
Mean0A4.8B62.8D38.5C39.5C54.5D
1240a0.5a53.5c50.0c60.5c73.0d39.6A
200a36.0b75.0d91.0e89.0e93.0e64.0B
Mean0A18.3B64.3C70.5D74.8D83.0E
1 For explanation of abbreviations see Table 1. 2 Means in the table followed by the same letter, for each storage period separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 7. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of stored carrot seeds—sample II.
Table 7. Effects of acetic acid treatments on health of stored carrot seeds—sample II.
Seed Infestation with Fungi (%)Storage Duration (Months)Storage Temp. (°C)TreatmentMean
C 1WF0.5%AA1%AA2%AA
Alternaria alternata54100.0g 296.5f32.0cd40.0d31.5cd17.0ab52.8B
20100.0g62.5e10.0a29.0cd22.5bc14.5ab39.8A
Mean100.0D79.5C21.0A34.5B27.0B15.8A
12498.5d81.5c29.5b30.5b25.0b5.0a45.0B
2093.5c29.0b1.5a4.5a3.0a5.0a22.8A
Mean96.0D55.3C15.5B17.5B14.0B5.0A
Alternaria dauci542.0a0.5a1.5a1.5a0a0a0.9A
202.5a3.0a0.5a0.5a1.0a0a1.3A
Mean2.3A1.8A1.0A1.0A0.5A0A
1244.5b1.5a0.5a1.5a0a1.5a1.6B
200.5a0.5a0a0.5a0a0a0.3A
Mean2.5B1.0A0.3A1.0A0A0.8A
Alternaria radicina5416.5ef9.0c–e1.0a3.5a–d3.0a–c1.5ab5.8A
2025.0f9.0de5.5b-d1.5ab1.5ab4.0a–d7.8A
Mean20.8C9.0B3.3A2.5A2.3A2.8A
12423.0d10.5c3.0ab2.0ab1.0a1.5a6.8B
2019.5d5.5bc0a1.0a3.0ab0a4.8A
Mean21.3C8.0B1.5A1.5A2.0A0.8A
Seeds free of fungi540a1.0a46.5bc44.5bc52.5cd65.5de35.0A
200a32.5b79.5f56.5c–e58.0c–e69.0ef49.3B
Mean0A16.8B63.0DE50.5C55.3CD67.3E
1240a7.5b59.0c60.5c67.0c83.0d46.2A
201.5a66.5c97.0e86.0d86.5d90.0d71.3B
Mean0.8A37.0B78.0DE73.3C76.8CD86.5E
1 For explanation of abbreviations see Table 1. 2 Means in the table followed by the same letter, for each storage period separately, are not significantly different at a level α = 0.05, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dorna, H.; Rosińska, A.; Szopińska, D. The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176

AMA Style

Dorna H, Rosińska A, Szopińska D. The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds. Agronomy. 2021; 11(6):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dorna, Hanna, Agnieszka Rosińska, and Dorota Szopińska. 2021. "The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds" Agronomy 11, no. 6: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop