Next Article in Journal
Managing Soil Organic Carbon for Mitigating Climate Change and Increasing Food Security
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Treatment under Salinity Combined to Rhizoctonia solani Infection in Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Growth Prediction System: A Use Case of China Agriculture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influences of Priming on Selected Physiological Attributes and Protein Pattern Responses of Salinized Wheat with Extracts of Hormophysa cuneiformis and Actinotrichia fragilis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria—A Review

1
Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung, Chiayi County 62102, Taiwan
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung, Chiayi County 62102, Taiwan
3
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung, Chiayi County 62102, Taiwan
4
School of Applied Science, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
5
Department of Soil Science, University of Tehran, Tehran 31587-77871, Iran
6
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700121, West Bengal, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(8), 1552; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081552
Submission received: 19 June 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 27 July 2021 / Published: 3 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Biological Amendments in Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Crops)

Abstract

:
Among the environmental factors, soil salinity is one of the most detrimental factors affecting plant growth and productivity. Nutritional-imbalance is also known as one of the negative effects of salinity on plant growth and productivity. Among the essential plant nutrients, phosphorus (P) is a nutrient in which the uptake, transport, and distribution in plant is adversely affected by salinity-stress. Salinity-stress-mediated low a P availability limits the crop production. Adding additional P fertilizer is generally recommended to manage P deficit in saline-soils; however, the low-efficiency of available P fertilizer use in salt-affected soils, restricts P availability, and P fertilizers are also a cause of significant environmental concerns. The application of salinity-tolerant phosphate–solubilizing-bacteria (ST-PSB) can be as a greatly effective and economical way to improve the P availability, and recover the P-deficit in saline-land. This review focuses on soil salinization and its effect on P availability, the mechanisms of P solubilization by ST-PSB, ST-PSB diversity, their role in alleviating salinity stress in plants, the current and future scenarios of their use, and the potential application of this knowledge to manage the sustainable environmental system. According to this review, adding ST-PSB to saline soils could be an alternative for alleviating the negative effects of salinity on plants and may ameliorate salinity tolerance.

1. Introduction

Human population overshoot is profoundly connected with resource depletion, biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapses, climatic change, and an increase in poverty and hunger [1,2]. This overpopulation potentially jeopardizes both ecologists and agronomists, where the dilemma remains the question of maintaining the ecosystem as well as feeding large populations. To ensure global food demand, improving crop yield and sustaining soil fertility (mainly in terms of improving nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) availability to plants), is required in the worldwide agriculture sector. Soil fertility deterioration, particularly P depletion, is a major factor in restricting plant growth and crop production throughout the world as it comprises about 0.05–0.5% of a plant’s dry weight [3,4]. Generally, total P content in soil is around 0.05% (w/w), where only 0.1% of bioavailable P is consumed by plants [5]. Predominantly, the majority of P compounds occur an insoluble form; as a result, the crop productivity is limited to about 30–40% of the world’s cultivated land due to P deficiency [6]. Phosphorus availability in soil depends on several factors such as soil clay mineral, metal (Ca, Fe, and Al) oxides, pH, organic matter, temperature, aeration, and moisture [7,8,9,10]. It is well known that the reduction of P availability is also intensified by a salinity factor, which is increasing in several agricultural soils, especially arid, semiarid and irrigated land [11,12]. In every year, 1.5 million hectares of irrigated and 1–2% of arid and semi-arid land are becoming unsuitable for cultivation due to being severely invaded by salinity [13,14,15]. If the salinization proceeds in such a way, 50% of the arable land will be salinized by 2050 [16]. Hence, the management and maintenance of P availability at a high-level in saline-based agriculture might be the major challenge for agronomists in the future.
Salinity-induced P deficiency are individually or both major abiotic stresses in saline based agro-ecosystems, that negatively affect almost all facets of plant growth and development (e.g., seed germination, vegetation, flowering, fruiting and leaf senescence) as well as plant metabolism (e.g., photosynthesis, respiration, protein synthesis, and lipid metabolism) [17,18,19,20]. The effects of salinity on plants occur in two main ways; initially salinity suppresses the plant growth by the osmotic stress (e.g., decrease in the capacity of roots to absorb water) followed by the ionic toxicity (e.g., nutritive imbalance, oxidative stress, hormonal imbalance and increased susceptibility to pathogens) [21,22,23].
A characteristic of saline soil is low nutrient ion activity (macronutrients such as N, P, K, Mg, and Ca, and micronutrients such as Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu) due to extreme ratios of Na+/Ca2+, Na+/K+, Ca2+/Mg2+, and Cl/NO3 in the soil solution, which affect plant nutrition uptake and its growth [24,25]. Specifically, the availability of P is reduced due to the ionic strength effect, a high sorption capacity to soil particles and a low solubility of minerals in saline soil [26]. Traditionally, farmers have used injudicious P fertilizers to compensate for the deficiency of P in soil, driving to environmental issues such as (i) groundwater pollution and water eutrophication [27], (ii) the accumulation of toxic heavy metals in soil (e.g., arsenic, selenium, cadmium) [27,28], (iii) the disruption to microbial diversity and its related metabolic activities [29], and (iv) a reduction in soil fertility [30]. Moreover, almost 70–90% of applied P fertilizer in agricultural soils is fixed with cations in the form of calcium phosphate, aluminum phosphate, and ferric phosphate; as a result, P is immobilized into an inorganic P pool, and is no longer directly available to plants [31]. Even, the immobilized P pool is increased by salinity in cases of saline-soil-based agriculture. It has been proposed that this stored P (bio-unavailable) in agricultural soil can be exploited to produce maximum crop yields globally for about 100 years, only if, it transforms from a bio-unavailable to bio-available fraction [32].
Thus, P management and salt stress remediation in saline soil-based agriculture are the main issues in current day research. These problems are generally overcome through some strategies, such as organic amendments (e.g., sewage sludge, farmyard manure), and modified biochar in saline soil [33,34,35,36]. However, these mitigation approaches have limitations, and show negative effects on soil (e.g., unfavorable changes in soil physical, chemical, and biological properties as well as the accumulation of toxic heavy metal) [36,37]. Therefore, in an alternative approach to crop improvement (to enhance P availability and salt tolerance), it is essential to introduce salt-tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria (ST-PSB) that could supply adequate bioavailable P to plants through mobilizing bio-unavailable P in soil. In a quick look during the last few years, there are numerous studies which have demonstrated that the inoculation of rhizospheric and endophytic ST-PSB in diverse crop species could boost crop productivity with the alleviation of salt stress simultaneously to increase soil fertility. As per a previous report, the ST-PSB facilitates the development of saline-alkali-soil-based agriculture through maintaining P availability and salt mitigation [5]. Specifically, the ST-PSB increases the N, P and K uptake and enhances the salt tolerance efficiency in different plants such as wheat (Triticum sp.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), maize(Zea mays), and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) [38,39,40,41,42,43]. Principally ST-PSB is a plant growth-promoting rhizo-bacterium (PGPR), which manifests the ability of phosphate solubilization. The adaptive responses towards the salt stress of ST-PSB are executed by producing osmoprotectants, exopolysaccharides (EPS), reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes, and special transporters, that always assist to increase plant salt tolerance [44,45]. However, an understanding of the detailed mechanisms of phosphate solubilization, increments of plant salt tolerance, and plant growth promotion by ST-PSB, is needed to understand for sustainable crop production in saline environments.
Considering this background, the present study is exhibits the phosphate solubilization mechanisms of ST-PSB along with their salt mitigation, which can help us to understand the interaction of ST-PSB and plants under salt and P-deficiency stress. This study highlights the future diverse applications of ST-PSB as a bioinoculant, which could be a gateway of phosphate management with improved crop tolerance to salinity in saline soil-based sustainable agriculture.

2. Soil Salinization and Its Effect on P Availability

2.1. Soil Salinization

Salinization occurs in soil by the presence of salt, composed with various soluble ions (e.g., cations: Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ and anions: Cl, NO3 and HCO3) [46]. Soil salinity is categorized into three groups based on electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and pH. Accordingly, a soil with pH < 8.5, EC > 4 dS/m and ESP < 15 is a saline soil, a soil with pH > 8.5, EC > 4 dS/m, and ESP > 15, is a saline-sodic soil, and a soil with pH > 8.5, EC < 4 dS/m, and ESP > 15 is a sodic soil [47]. Soil-salinization is a growing environmental problem over time that can have a natural origin (primary salinization) like the weathering of parent materials, fossil salts, rising sea levels, rainfall, etc., and be caused by from anthropogenic activities (secondary salinization), such as poor irrigation, inadequate drainage, over-extraction of groundwater, inappropriate cropping patterns, rotations, overuse of agrochemicals and the use of waste effluents, etc. [48,49,50].
Salinization induces a nutritional disorder in salt-tolerant plants through changing nutrient availability, competitive absorption, transport, or partitioning within the plant [51]. The interaction of salinity and primary mineral nutrition is a very complex process that adversely affects N (e.g., a decrease in N availability and a disturbance in nodule formation), P (e.g., a decrease in availability and uptake of P by the plant), and K (e.g., an inhibition of transportation and decrease of K uptake by the plant) in soil [25].

2.2. Salinity Effect on P Availability in Soil

The phosphorus cycle is considered mainly as a “sedimentary cycle”, because the interchange involved is only between water and soil; limited to the atmosphere [32]. P is a significantly dynamic and highly reactive element in soil that persists in three forms depending on its solubility and chemical nature, such as (i) insoluble inorganic phosphate (Pi); (ii) soluble orthophosphate (bioavailable phosphate); and (iii) insoluble organic phosphate (Po). Generally, insoluble Pi exists in the form of more stable primary P minerals (apatites, strengite, and variscite), secondary P minerals (e.g., Ca–P, Fe–P, and Al–P), and sorbed P (e.g., in clay and in Fe and Al oxides) in soil [52]. The insoluble Po presents approximately 30% to 65% of total P, where it remains in different forms such as inositol phosphate (soil phytate: 50% of total organic P), phosphomonoesters, phosphodiesters including phospholipids, nucleic acids and phosphotriesters [53,54]. Phosphorus transformation/dynamicity occurs from one P pool to another through natural processes (physical and chemically) via weathering, desorption–adsorption, dissolution-precipitation, immobilization; and by microbial activity such as solubilization (insoluble Pi) and mineralization (insoluble Po) (Figure 1).
The orthophosphate in soil is mostly valuable due to its soluble nature, and it exists in three forms viz; mono-hydrogen phosphate (HPO42−), di-hydrogen phosphate (H2PO4), and tri-hydrogen phosphate (H3PO4) depending upon the pH condition [54]. The plant cell might consume soluble P in the form of HPO42− or H2PO4 [31].
Phosphorus availability and its uptake by plants in saline environments is affected by several factors in soil-plant environments. A High ionic strength, due to the electrolyte concentration in saline soil, can lead to enhanced P adsorption and low solubility of P; however, it varies with the different kinds of soil [26]. In alkaline soils, with a high concentration of electrolytes (e.g., Na and Ca), P adsorption increases through Na–P and Ca–P precipitation. In acidic soil, the formation of Al–P increases with the elevated concentration of salt [55,56]. Nasrin et al. [57] showed that the soil-salinity reduces the transformation of secondary P minerals to bioavailable P. In addition, the excessive salinity strongly effects on indigenous microbes and suppresses their activity, diversity and community dissimilarities [58], where the responsible P mobilizing microbes can be affected by salinity. Thus, the P availability for plant largely differs between saline and non-saline soil.

2.3. Effect of Salinity on P Uptake and Accumulation in the Plant

In a saline environment, the interaction and uptake of phosphorus in plant nutrition is very complex and contradictory. Champagnol, [59] showed that P addition to saline soils improved crop growth and yield in 34 of 37 crops; however, it did not affect, or increase crop salt tolerance as salinity increased from a low level to moderate and high levels, respectively. On the other hand, most of the investigations have suggested that salinity decreases the P accumulation of plant tissue, though a few results also showed either an increase in P uptake or no effect on P uptake by plants [26,60]. These contradictory results indicate to two statements: (i) the supply of P impacts plants’ salt tolerance in either a positive or negative manner, and (ii) salt stress either increases, or decreases, or does not affect the P accumulation in plants. Moreover, there is some evidence that the P-deficient plants are more salt tolerant than P-sufficient plants in maize [61], and soybean [62]. However, the effect of salt stress on P accumulation and its toxicity varies depending on the plant environmental conditions, crop species, and genotype within the species, physiological developmental stages, and external salinity concentration [51].

3. Plant Response to Salinity and P Deficiency

The individual impact of P deficiency and salinity stress on plant development as well as physiological (metabolic and biochemical) processes has been widely studied in several species, but the study of their combined effects is limited [23]. Phosphorus is an important hetero-element found as a major component in photosynthesis and respiration related compounds (ATP, NADPH, and sugar phosphates), macromolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, and phospholipid), secondary compounds (e.g., vitamins), and it also plays a major role in nitrogen compound metabolism, signal transduction, carbohydrate transportation, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [63,64]. Salt-induced oxidative and osmotic stress along with P deficiency, have a strong and significant influence on photosynthesis in several ways. They decrease the CO2 availability and assimilation, inhibit RuBisco (ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) and ATPase activity; and subsequently, reduce electron transportation, resulting in higher ROS production [19,65,66]. ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide anion (O2.−), and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are cytotoxic, damaging cellular organelles like DNA, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates through an imbalance in their neutralizing system [67]. Zribi et al. [23] have shown that the combined effect of salinity and P deficiency on the Catapodium rigidum (L.) plant inhibited the photosynthetic activity through decreasing stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, and CO2 assimilation.
Plant evolved several adaptive responses to cope with salinity and P deficiency stress in soil. In a P deficit condition, the plant undergoes several modifications, such as physiological (changes in roots architecture like substantial production of cluster roots, lateral roots and root hair density), biochemical (secrete large amounts of organic acid, H+ and phosphatase), molecular (regulation of phosphorus starvation genes like OsPTF1, AtPHR1, etc.) and microbial colonization, that lead to the solubilization and acquisition of unavailable P in soil [68,69,70]. In a saline environment, for survival, the plant develops several physiological and biochemical mechanisms, such as ionic homeostasis (maintaining Na+ transportation and its compartmentalization through the regulation of transporters like the Na+/K+ antiporter, H+-ATPase), biosynthesis of osmoprotectants (proline, glycine betaine, amino acids, sugars, polyols), the activation of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione, ascorbate peroxidase), the production of antioxidant compounds (flavonoids, ascorbate, tocopherol, reduced glutathione), hormonal modulation (e.g., IAA, ABA, ethylene, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid), the generation of nitric oxide (NO), and microbial association [22,71,72]. However, it is usually noticed that the rhizospheric microbial community has significantly coevolved with plants in their adaptive response against both stress conditions.

4. Diversity of Salt-Tolerant Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria

The rhizosphere is the greatest ecological niche of versatile microorganisms, belonging to archaea, bacteria, fungi, and even algae; some of them have the inherent capability to adapt towards a wide range of salt concentrations and stimulate plant growth through its metabolic activity and interaction. Halotolerant microbes employ two main strategies for their growth and survival under salt stress as (i) avoiding the high salt concentration in cytoplasm through the reducing uptake of salt ion (due to specialized cell membrane and wall composition), regulation of intracellular ion concentration by pumping out the ions from the cell (e.g., Na+/K+ antiporters, K+/Na+ ion transporter), and producing EPS that facilitate to development biofilm; and (ii) intracellular adaptation through the accumulation of osmolytes (e.g., sucrose, trehalose, and glycine betaine), protein, enzymatic adaptations, and increment energetic capacity [73,74]. Interestingly, fungi show a tendency to be more salt sensitive than bacteria, therefore bacteria/fungi ratio can be raised in saline soil [75]. In salt tolerant microbial community, ST-PSB are considered as one of the crucial PGPR which have the ability to solubilize P and K, which help for plant growth including N, as well as produce various plant growth promoting metabolites (e.g., phytohormone, siderophore, ACC deaminase, and anti-phytopathogens) under saline condition [38,41,44,45]. The diverse range of ST-PSB strains belonging to various genera (e.g., Pantoea, Burkholderia, Aerococcus, Pseudomonas , Bacillus, Ensifer, Gordonia, Acinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Providencia, Serratia, Alcaligenes, Cobetia, Microbacterium, Agrobacterium, Acromobacter, Tetrathiobacter, Aphanothece) tolerate the elevated concentration of salinity [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. Zhu et al. [5] reported Kushneria sp. YCWA18, a high phosphorus-solubilizing ST-PSB isolated from the sediment of Daqiao saltern on China’s eastern coast, was able to grow on a solid medium containing 20% (w/v) NaCl. An ecological survey was conducted by Johri et al. [88] and isolated 857 ST-PSBs from the root-free soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane of Prosopis juliflora growing in alkaline soils; and showed that PSB was highest in rhizoplane site. Several distinct ST-PSB are isolated from different rhizosphere and endophyte of the plants such as wheat [89], soyabean [76], Tamarix ramosissima [90] and even wide range of salt effected areas [78,91].

5. Mechanism of P Mobilization by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria

Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria a number of efficient P solubilization and mineralization processes to transform from unavailable P sources to bioavailable P in soil. (Figure 2). The mobilization mechanism of P is classified into two categories based on unavailable forms of P compounds in soil: (i) inorganic phosphate (Pi) solubilization through acidification, protonation, chelation and EPS, and (ii) organic phosphate (Po) mineralization through enzymatic activity such as phosphatase, phytase, phosphonatases, and C-P lyases.

5.1. Mechanism of Inorganic P Solubilization

5.1.1. P-Solubilization through Acidification

The Pi is solubilized following the secretion of both the organic and inorganic acids by PSB. In comparison, the organic acids play a pivotal role in the solubilization process due to a greater efficacy and contribution as compared to inorganic acids [54]. In the solubilization process, the potentiality of organic acids with Pi is influenced by different factors such as (i) reducing the pH; (ii) enhancing the chelation of P-bonded cations; (iii) competing with P for adsorption sites; and (iv) forming soluble complexed ions (Ca, Al, and Fe) linked with insoluble P and thus releasing the soluble P [92]. Generally, lowering the pH in a medium is accountable to produce several organic acids by ST-PSB, which are shown in Table 1.
Precisely, gluconic acid is a crucial acid in P solubilization, and it is derived from the extracellular oxidation of glucose in the periplasmic space, catalyzed by quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase [98,99]. All the organic acids are produced in the periplasmic space by the microbial metabolism, oxidative respiration, and fermentation of different organic sources [100,101,102]. In general, the produced organic acid further reacts with insoluble Pi to generate the metal-based organic acids and release bioavailable phosphate ions (Figure 2). In the case of the inorganic acid mechanism, Pi solubilization occurs through the production of inorganic acids by PSB, such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4), nitric acid (HNO3) and carbonic acid (H2CO3) [54]. Basically, the inorganic acids react with Pi to release the phosphate ion and metal-based anionic compound (Figure 2).

5.1.2. P-Solubilization through Protonation

The solubilization of Pi can occur through the protonation without the production of organic acid such as the excretion of protons following NH4+ assimilation and respiratory H2CO3 production by PSB [103]. In a previous study, P-solubilization by organic acids in a culture solution of Pseudomonas sp. and Penicillium aurantiogriseum was not reported while P solubilization was occurred [103]. The mineral phosphate generally reacts with the proton and produces bioavailable phosphate ions with free metal ions (Figure 2). ST-PSB possesses a proton extrusion property through the respiration and NH4+ assimilation; although phosphate solubilization by protons is not well known [104].

5.1.3. P-Solubilization through Chelation

The chelation process occurs through the combination of two or more different coordinate bonds between ligands (ions and molecules) and metal ions [105]. Organic acids (with hydroxyl or carboxyl groups), and siderophores are produced by PSB, which further bind with different cationic metals of insoluble Pi to generate the bioavailable phosphate and metal-chelating complex (Figure 2). Interestingly, some of the PSB produced strong chelating organic acids (e.g., humic acid, gluconic acid, fulvic acid, and 2-keto gluconic acid) and were reported as highly effective in the solubilization of mineral Pi [106]. However, Park et al. [107] suggested that both protonation and chelation of gluconic acid may involve insoluble P solubilization by ST-PSB (e.g., Pseudomonas fluorescence RAF15).
Under restricted iron availability conditions, bacteria generally secrete low molecular weight and high affinity iron chelating compound, called siderophore, which further form as iron-siderophore complexes and fulfil iron demand through the uptake of it [108,109]. Siderophores increase the availability of iron through the solubilization process from precipitated iron sources in soil [110]. Iron availability in saline and sodic soil is very low due to its high precipitation with anions, where the iron phosphate is one kind of P precipitate form in soil [35,111]. Iron phosphate might be solubilized via siderophores through the chelation of iron (Figure 2). However, the direct relationship between siderophore production and phosphate solubilization by PSB is still unknown. The role of siderophores in Pi solubilization needs to be further investigated in the future.

5.1.4. Solubilization by Extracellular Polymeric Substances

Microorganisms largely produce EPS (e.g., polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids), which accumulates outside the microbial cells; and provides a suitable environment for nutrient entrapment, chemical reactions, and protection against environmental stresses such as salinity and drought [112,113]. Moreover, microbial EPS have the ability to bind (bioadsorption) the metals, and influence the solubilization of metal phosphate, which is present in an unavailable form in soil [114]. The affinity of metal bioadsorption mediated microbial EPS depends on abundant anionic functional groups (e.g., carboxyl and hydroxyl) [113]. The EPS produced by ST-PSB contain various anionic groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups), which help to bind with Na+ for salt alleviation under the saline conditions [115]. Upadhyay et al. [116] reported that the EPS-producing bacterial strains exhibited the P solubilization efficiency under saline conditions. However, the correlation between the EPS and P solubilization could not be evaluated. Yi et al. [117] results showed that bacterial strains of Enterobacter sp. (EnHy-401), Arthrobacter sp. (ArHy-505), Azotobacter sp. (AzHy-510), and Enterobacter sp. (EnHy-402) could solubilize the tricalcium phosphate (TCP), where the solubilization efficiency of EnHy-401 was lower than others due to a lack of EPS production. Furthermore, this investigation also revealed that P is released during the synergetic effect of EPS and organic acid. However, EPS failed to release P, without organic acid. According to these studies, it is concluded that EPS may play an important and major role for the enhancement of phosphate solubilization; although it doesn’t have a direct effect on inorganic P solubilization (Figure 2). Therefore, the extensive and consistent research is required in the future to understand the exact role of EPS in inorganic P solubilization.

5.2. Mechanism of Organic Phosphate Mineralization

5.2.1. Phosphatase Activity

Phosphatase (organo-phosphoester scavenger) cleaves (dephosphorylation) the ester bond between the phosphate group and organic residue of organic phosphates, which provides P to the cell [118] (Figure 2). The release of orthophosphate from the organophosphate complex was reported in numerous ST-PSB producing the phosphatase enzyme (Table 1). According to the optimum pH, the phosphatase enzyme is classified into two groups: (i) alkaline phosphatase (maximum activity at an alkaline pH > 7) and (ii) acidic phosphatase (maximum activity at pH < 6), where both are produced by PSB depending upon external conditions [118,119].
Alkaline phosphatase consists of a homodimeric protein (metalloenzyme) and each catalytic site of the monomer contains three metal ions with five cysteine residues that are crucial to its catalytic function in optimally active alkaline pH conditions [120,121]. Prokaryotic alkaline phosphatases belong to three large families, i.e., PhoA, PhoD and PhoX, which are differentiated according to their structure, substrate specificity and activated metal ions [87]. Several alkaline phosphatase genes have been cloned and expressed from various bacterial species. The alkaline phosphatase gene (phoD) was cloned from a halotolerant cyanobacterium Aphanothece halophytica, where the expression of PhoDAp enzyme exhibited alkaline phosphatase (APase) and phosphodiesterase (APDase) activities through the activation of Ca2+ ions [87]. Interestingly, phoD gene expression was upregulated not only by P starvation but also under salt stress conditions. Noskova et al. [83] determined a novel extracellular alkaline phosphatase/phosphodiesterase in the PhoD family, which was encoded by the genome sequence of the marine bacterium Cobetia amphilecti KMM 296 (CamPhoD), and expressed in Escherichia coli cells. The salt tolerant bimetal-based enzyme CamPhoD catalyzes the breakage of phosphate mono- and di-ester bonds in nucleotides.
Acidic phosphatase enzymes are considered to be nonspecific acid phosphatases (NSAPs). The term was originally adopted to indicate bacterial enzymes, which show optimal catalytic activity at acidic to neutral pH levels and do not exhibit marked substrate specificity [122]. NSAPs are made up of three molecular families, which belong to molecular class A, B and C [123]. From a metagenomics study, the distribution of NSAPs genes is most abundant in marine than terrestrial ecosystems, where the class C, NSAPs genes are more than other two classes A and B [124]. In the last few decades, the isolation, identification and potential biotechnological application of acid phosphatase NSAP genes gradually increased due to NSAPs gene transfer to PGPB, and were acquired to develop the phosphate-solubilizing bacterial strains using recombinant DNA technology [125].

5.2.2. Phytase Activity

Phytase is a subgroup of phosphatase, which has the ability to dephosphorylate of phytate in a stepwise manner to produce inositol and bioavailable phosphorus [126] (Figure 2). Phytate is the principal source of inositol and a major stored form of P contained in plant tissue, grains, seeds, and pollen [127]. A number of phytase producing ST-PSBs are shown in Table 1. Phytate is an abundant form of the soil organic phosphate pool, where the plants have the limited capacity to directly acquire the bioavailable P from phytate, because phytase constitutes less than 0.8% of the total acid phosphomonoesterase activity of root extracts; and it was not detectable as an extracellular enzyme [128]. Therefore, the transgenic plants (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana and Trifolium subterraneum L.) were generated by genetic transformation of the phytase (phyA) gene, which was derived from Aspergillus niger. Both transgenic plants exhibit the extracellular phytase activity and a significant improvement of available P nutrition for their growth [128,129]. The highly thermostable and extremely salt tolerant phytase gene (PHY US573) was identified from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens US573, which showed phosphate solubilization activity [95].

5.2.3. Phosphonatases and C–P Lyase Activity

The cleavage of C–P bonds in organophosphate molecules is catalyzed through C-P lyases and phosphonatase enzymes, which are produced by a wide range of bacteria [125,130] (Figure 2). In a metagenomics study, the bacterial genome sequences revealed 44 strains out of 190 marine bacteria, which contain the phnJ gene which encodes a catalytic component of the C–P lyase enzyme complex [97].

6. The Role of ST-PSB in Plant Growth Promotion under Salinity

Plants have evolved complex mechanisms to deal with salinity stress where environmental adaptations and genetic traits modulate salinity tolerance in plants (halophytes and glycophytes), however, the transmission of knowledge acquired for crop improvement remains challenging [131]. The signaling networks of plant-microbe interactions that contribute to salt tolerance have been illuminated by recent developments in molecular investigations.

6.1. Ionic Homeostasis and Nutritional Balance

Ionic stress, which is caused by a high concentration of ions like Na+ and Cl, decreases the uptake of other mineral nutrients like Ca2+ and K+, causing serious physiological and metabolic problems to plants [132,133]. The weakly voltage-dependent nonselective cation channels (NSCCs) and the high–affinity K+ channel (HKT1) transport Na+ across the plasma membrane into the cell, and as a result, K+/Na+ ratios are reduced in the plant under high salinity conditions [134]. HKT1, which is a key factor of plant salinity tolerance in response to salt stress, can increase salt tolerance by decreasing Na+ accumulation in shoot tissue, which secures leaves from Na+ toxicity [134]. ST-PSB have the potential to boost K+ ion absorption in plants under saline conditions, by activating the high-affinity K+ transporter (HKT1), which can directly increase the greater K+/Na+ ratio that favors salt tolerance [135,136]. Furthermore, ST-PSB produce EPS and VOCs (volatile organic compounds), which are considered as protectors against ion stress under saline conditions. VOCs can reduce Na+ accumulation by downregulating HKT1 (K+ transporter) expression in roots while upregulating it in shoots and facilitating shoot-to-root Na+ recirculation [137]. The HKT1/K+ transporter, which inhibits Na+ inflow under salt stress in A. thaliana by downregulating HKT1 gene expression to improve salt tolerance, is also involved in VOC formation [138]. For salt stress tolerance in plants, EPS functions as a physical barrier surrounding the root where it binds the Na+ and restricts Na+ influx into roots, as a result, reducing the ion toxicity to the plant [74]. Mukherjee et al. [139] have proven that the extracted EPS (from Halomonas sp. Exo1) and sequestrated Na+ ion in vitro; and effect on growth promotion in salt-tolerant rice seedlings. Moreover, EPS is also supposed to play a role in stabilization of biofilm formation, soil aggregation and increasing root adhering of soil (RAS) by forming a sheath around the roots of plants, which increase the water availability and nutrient (N, P, K, and Fe) acquisition from the soil [74,140]. The ability of ST-PSB to produce EPS is closely linked to the plant’s ability to survive in high salt concentrations (Figure 3).
As mentioned above, salinity moderates the uptake/accumulation of plant nutrients including N, P, and K, which directly affect plant growth. In addition to phosphate solubilization, many strains of ST-PSB are able to supply N, K, and Fe to plant through nitrogen fixation, potassium solubilization and siderophore production; and as a result, could increase the concentration of N, K, and Fe in plant (Table 2).

6.2. Mitigation of Osmotic and Oxidative Stress

Salinity stress leads to the formation of ROS in the plants grown under saline conditions. Plants have developed an enzymatic antioxidant defense system of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle and antioxidant molecules (carotenoids, flavonoids, and other phenolics) that scavenge and detoxify ROS to protect plant tissues from oxidative damage [67]. There have been several studies on diverse ST-PSB-inoculant plants that are capable of increasing the antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic molecules than the non-inoculant plant (Table 2). As an example, Ansari et al. [44] demonstrated that B. pumilus FAB10 has been shown to produce high levels of antioxidant enzymes such as APX, POD, SOD, CAT, GPX and GR in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salinity stress.
The primary goal of osmoprotective compounds is to keep cells compatible with regular metabolic activities. Under salt stress, plants accumulate chemically diverse organic compatible osmolytes (e.g., such as proline, glycine betaine, sugar and polyols), which protect the structure and to maintain osmotic balance within the cell through continuous water absorption [22]. The synthesis and accumulation of organic osmolytes are varying in different plant species. However, the amino acid proline is found most commonly in taxonomically diverse plant species [158]. Moreover, proline also acts as a redox-buffering agent carrying antioxidant properties (scavenging ROS) under stress conditions [45]. The inoculation of ST-PSB in diverse crop plants (e.g., pea, maize, ground nut, etc.) enhances the production of osmoprotectants, and contributes to increased tolerance to salinity stress (Table 2).

6.3. Hormonal Modulation to Salt Tolerance Plant

Ethylene is considered as a key regulator of the salinity stress tolerance in plants, where it modulates downstream gene expression, which can modulate salt stress responses [159]. Additionally, signaling of ethylene is critical for rapid response of plant and salinity stress resistance [160]. Stress-induced ethylene synthesis can improve plant tolerance or hasten senescence [161]. Plant adaptation to stress is controlled by ethylene at the cost of growth and development. The transcription of auxin response factors is inhibited and restricts the plant development, when ethylene levels rise in a stressful (drought and salinity) environment. IAA, produced by ST-PSB, is one of the most widely used and researched bacterial signaling molecules in plant–microbe interactions. To protect plants from a range of stressors, PGPR generates IAA and ACC deaminase. [162]. IAA accumulation causes ACC synthase genes to be transcribed, resulting in an increase in ACC concentration and the production of ethylene [162] (Figure 3). ST-PSB with ACC deaminase activity can break down some of the excess ACC into ammonia and α-ketobutyrate as a source of nitrogen and carbon, as a result lowers plant ethylene levels during environmental stress, while also allowing IAA to promote plant growth [151,153,163]. Many studies have shown that the soil ST-PSB with ACC deaminase activity confers improved stress tolerance and growth promotion in plants by decreasing ethylene level [136,156,157,164,165,166].
Cytokinin involved in plant growth and development as well as imparts resistance to various stresses [167]. Inoculation of B. subtilis strain in Platycladus orientalis and lettuce plants resulted in increased cytokinin signaling from root to shoot, resulting in improved plant growth under stress conditions [168,169]. Gibberellins (GA) are another essential class of phytohormones that positively regulate cell division and elongation, as well as activity of meristem of the roots and leaves, as part of their role in the developmental and physiological processes of plants [170]. Under salinity stress, it is reported to increase the level of GA by ST-PSB to overcome the inhibition of plant growth. Abscisic acid (ABA), a plant stress hormone, aids plant life by regulating several developmental processes and adaptive responses to diverse stresses [74]. The overproduction of ABA hormone leads in the osmotic adjustment of the plant under salt stress by closing stomata (thereby reducing water loss), increasing ion exchange activity, and storing different proteins and osmoprotectants (proline and free amino acids) [171,172]. During the stress response, cytokinin (CKs) and ABA have antagonistic effects on transpiration, stomatal opening and photosynthesis, with CK levels decreasing and the stress response being regulated by ABA and ethylene [173]. The cytokinin producing PSB play vital role in plant salt tolerance through the inhibition of ABA [74].

6.4. Reduced Plant Susceptibility to Pathogens

In addition to disturbing the physiology and biochemical process of the plant, salinity increases the susceptibility of plant to pathogens. There have several mechanisms of ST-PSB that counter against the phytopathogen (Figure 3). Siderophore-producing rhizobacteria have been identified as potential biocontrol agents for controlling plant diseases (prevent or reduce pathogen proliferation) by depriving the iron availability to the pathogen [174]. Several ST-PSB produced siderophores. However, their direct relation with inhibition of plant pathogens still needs to be investigated (Table 2). ST-PSB can break down (hydrolysis of the (1→4)-β- glycosidic bond) the chitin, which is an integral cell wall component of fungus by the production of fungal cell walls degrading enzymes [154,175], such as chitinase, lipase, which can degrade the fungal cell-associated lipid; and protease, which can degrade the associated protein in call wall of fungus [174].The synthesis of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) by ST-PSB such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AMAAS57) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (BM6) may inhibit cytochrome C oxidase and other metalloenzymes, causing antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Sclerotium rolfsii in groundnut [155,176]. In the co-evolutionary competition between plant and pathogen, plants evolved two forms of induced resistance, such as ISR (induced systemic resistance) and SAR (systemic acquired resistance) [177]. Biocontrol bacteria play a pivotal role in inhibiting plant fungal pathogens by inducing plant defense mechanisms. The biocontrol ST-PSB reduces the adverse effects of plant pathogens by activating resistance mechanisms in crops [178,179]. The salicylic acid independent of ISR involves jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling, while SAR requires salicylic acid as a signaling molecule to induce a defense system in plants [180]. To regulate biotrophic pathogens, ST-PSB can use antagonism between jasmonic acid and salicylic acid signaling pathways to increase plant colonization. In conclusion, differential beneficial role of ST-PSB have been found as a suppressor of diverse plant pathogens by producing antagonistic metabolites (siderophores, HCN, hydrolytic enzymes, etc.) and inducing immunity potentiality of crops against pathogenic stress (Table 2).

7. Application of ST-PSB in Sustainable Agriculture in Saline Environments

In a sustainable agriculture practice, it is used to be maintained and preserved for long-term soil productivity and natural resources, including diverse and functional microbial populations. The plant-microbial association in rhizospheric soil is the best indicator of plant health, productivity, and soil fertility [20]. In the circumstance of salinity and P deficiency stress conditions, more particularly, the rhizospheric ST-PSB can mitigate the plant salt stress and increase phosphorus availability, resulting in improved crop yield.

7.1. Salt Alleviator and Phosphate Biofertilizer

Biofertilizer is a substance containing living or dormant cells of beneficial microbes (fungi, bacteria, and algae) with useful properties towards plant growth and development [181]. The biofertilizer formulations have been progressed over the years in different ways, such as solid carrier formulations (peat, powder, granules, etc.), liquid formulations (mineral oils, organic oils, etc.), polymer entrapped formulations (alginate, starch, chitosan, etc.), metabolite formulations, and nano-bioinoculant based formulations (gold-, silver-, lead-, copper-, and iron- nanoparticles) [182,183]. However, the liquid biofertilizer formulation is more dominated and used due to the better shelf life, low cost and easy to handle [184]. Phosphate biofertilizer is such fertilizer that meets P deficiency in the soil along with enhancing crop yield. In the global biofertilizer market, the second most dominated market is phosphate biofertilizer with 14%, after the nitrogen biofertilizer with 80% [185]. There are several beneficial endophytic and rhizospheric ST-PSB that exhibited inorganic and organic phosphate solubilization under saline and non-saline conditions, helping to diverse plants growth promotion (Table 3).
As an example, a potential endophytic ST-PSB, Bacillus altitudinis WR10, enhanced wheat crop productivity under low P and salinity stress by increasing available phosphate through phosphatases and phytases activity [89]. Mahdi et al. [43] have shown that inoculation of ST-PSB, Bacillus licheniformis QA1 and Enterobacter asburiae QF11, with Chenopodium quinoa plant significantly reduced salt toxicity; and increased P content in the plant compared to the non-inoculated plant. According to the previous findings, these strains can be used as a potentially suitable biofertilizer for the management of phosphate in saline affected agriculture fields.

7.2. ST-PSB as a Biocontrol Agent

Plant pathogens (biotic stress viz. viruses, fungi, nematodes, insects, and mites), cause widespread damage to the crop production, human health, and the stability of global economies [196]. However, salt-stressed plants are more susceptible to phytopathogens in saline soil-based agriculture, where both salinity and pathogens are predominant stresses limiting plant growth and productivity [197]. As previously described, the detailed possible mechanisms of several beneficial ST-PSB have been found as a suppressor of diverse plant pathogens (Table 3). The salt, cold and pH tolerant strain, Pseudomonas putida exhibited antifungal activity that inhibiting the growth of the phyto-pathogenic fungus (e.g., Alternaria alternata and Fusarium solani) as well as salt tolerance activity in maize [186]. Similarly, a ST-PSB, Pseudomonas sp. PF17 strain also suppressed the growth of a serious native phytopathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina by 75% in saline and non-saline conditions [154]. Singh and Jha, [175] reported on a potential salt alleviator ST-PSB strain, Bacillus licheniformis HSW-164, which showed the biocontrol of diverse groups of fungus and bacteria as well as promote the growth of wheat crop grown under salinity. Therefore, the high antagonistic potential of ST-PSB against phytopathogen may offer an eco-friendly approach for long-term plant disease management by using biopesticides as an alternative to chemical pesticides in saline and non-saline soil-based agriculture.

7.3. Bioremediation

Heavy metal pollution in soil is a serious concern in food production as well as human health and the environment. It is known that PSB strains have the potentiality to detoxify and remediate various heavy metals through different strategies, such as bio-precipitation, leaching, sorption, transformation, accumulation, assimilation, metal solubilization, and to assist phytoremediation (phyto-stabilization and phyto-extraction) [198]. Desale et al. [166] have proven that Halobacillus sp., and Halomonas sp. assisted to Sesuvium portulacastrum plant for phytoremediation, however, the possible mechanism was not evaluated in this study. Moreover, various mechanisms of solubilization of phosphate by PSB, such as organic acid production, H+ excretion, siderophores, and EPS contributed to bioremediation [106]. As an example, the ST-PSB strain, Halomonas sp. Exo1 efficiently produced EPS in the presence of salt and arsenic, where EPS had a major role in the sequestration of arsenic and alleviation of salt [139]. In general, the presence of salinity and heavy metal stress can lead to a remarkable reduction in productivity. Hence, the application of ST-PSB as a bioinoculant can sustainably contribute to the growth of plants under salinity and metal stress. However, there have been very limited studies on ST-PSB in bioremediation practice.

8. Future Prospects

Several suggestions and avenues of research would move us closer to adopting this strategy for developing environment-friendly P-biofertilizers to be used as supplements and/or alternatives to chemical P fertilizers in saline soil-based agriculture:
(i)
The comparative studies of interactions between plants and ST-PSB, which are currently lacking, would clarify about the mechanisms governing salinity stresses.
(ii)
Limited knowledge about the mechanisms by which ST-PSB-mediated P nutrition modifies the salt tolerance and P uptake of plants (specially P starvation gene expression), which should be further studied in the future.
(iii)
Since the ability of PSB to dissolve inorganic insoluble phosphate and mineralize organic phosphates decreases under salinity stress, in order to select and introduce the best ST-PSB, it is recommended that the screening of these bacteria be investigated in the presence of salinity and drought stress because in most studies these bacteria were screened under non-stress conditions.
(iv)
An assessment to select the best ST-PSB should be undertaken in poor soils because most these PSB are sensitive to environmental stresses. Under such conditions, PSB that can compete for limited resources should be selected.
(v)
Since both drought and salinity stress cause osmotic stress to plants, in order to select and introduce the best PSB, it is recommended that the efficacy of these bacteria in the presence of salinity and drought stress be investigated concurrently because most studies have investigated the effect of these bacteria on alleviating either salinity stress or drought stress in plants.
(vi)
Since most PSB are heterotrophic and require organic matter as a source of carbon and energy, in order to improve the efficiency of these bacteria in saline soils, it is recommended to use them along with organic matter in saline soils, which are mostly poor in organic matter.
(vii)
Most research has been executed on culturable PSB. Since most plant-associated microorganisms including PSB are un–culturable, more research is needed on un–culturable PSB in plant rhizosphere and endosphere, which will lead to an improved knowledge of the PSB community and the PSB-plant interactions.
(viii)
The expansion of basic science about the interactions between PSB and salinity-stressed plants facilitates a better understanding of decreased salinity stresses and possibly provides better forecasts about salinity-stressed plant responses. Therefore, it is anticipated that one of the most interesting research areas in the future for agricultural scientists will be to investigate the PSB mechanisms involved in decreasing salinity stress on plants.
(ix)
It is known that the plants inoculated with a combination of PSB and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can express synergistic effects to increase salinity-stressed plant growth indices, while maintaining safe natural resources, such as P stocks. Therefore, further research to evaluate the application and the efficacy of PSB as independent inoculations or as a co–inoculation with AMF under various environmental stresses including salinity stress on various crops fertilized with different low-solubility P sources in field conditions is necessary, where the survival of PSB and AMF, as well as how the mechanisms by which they promote plant growth, are cramped by competition with the endemic microorganisms, environmental stresses, and soil conditions (phosphorus sorption capacity, soil phosphorus status, pH, etc.).

9. Conclusions

Soil salinization and P deficiency are a the serious global threat in case of crop production by their adverse effects on plants and soil microbial community. To overcome this problem, our several management strategies have limitations in case of pollution, and their success rate. The use of phosphate chemical fertilizer has negative impacts on environmental issues. In this scenario, an alternative approach would be the use of phosphate biofertilizers like ST-PSB that could alleviate salt stress by producing plant growth hormones, enhancing the nutrient uptake and by acting as a biocontrol agent. These bacteria could play a major role in providing a cost-effective measure for salt stress and P management. Hence, under P deficiency conditions, ST-PSB are going to serve as efficient biofertilizers to increase the growth of the plants under salinity stress conditions. Further research is required to identify ST-PSB strains with multiple beneficial characteristics for better growth promotion of crops in sustainable saline soil-based agriculture.

Author Contributions

G.D. prepared the manuscript; P.B., Y.-H.H., R.K.S. revised manuscript, tables, and figures. J.P.M., A.K.S. and H.E. revised and gave necessary inputs. J.P.M., C.-Y.C., H.E. and. H.-B.H. revised and suggestion of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No received external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) for financial support (MOST 109-2811-M-194-502; MOST 108-2811-M-194-510).

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gilbert, N.; Gewin, V.; Tollefson, J.; Sachs, J.; Potrykus, I. How to feed a hungry world. Nature 2010, 466, 531–532. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitter, E.K.; Tosi, M.; Obregón, D.; Dunfield, K.E.; Germida, J.J. Rethinking Crop Nutrition in Times of Modern Microbiology: Innovative Biofertilizer Technologies. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malhotra, H.; Sharma, S.; Pandey, R. Phosphorus Nutrition: Plant Growth in Response to Deficiency and Excess. In Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adhikari, A.; Khan, M.A.; Lee, K.E.; Kang, S.M.; Dhungana, S.K.; Bhusal, N.; Lee, I.J. The Halotolerant Rhizobacterium—Pseudomonas koreensis MU2 Enhances Inorganic Silicon and Phosphorus Use Efficiency and Augments Salt Stress Tolerance in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, F.; Qu, L.; Hong, X.; Sun, X. Isolation and characterization of a phosphate solubilizing halophilic bacterium Kushneria sp. YCWA18 from Daqiao Saltern on the coast of yellow sea of China. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 615032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Talbi Zribi, O.; Abdelly, C.; Debez, A. Interactive effects of salinity and phosphorus availability on growth, water relations, nutritional status and photosynthetic activity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Biol. 2011, 13, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Power, J.F.; Grunes, D.L.; Reichman, G.A.; Willis, W.O. Soil Temperature Effects on Phosphorus Availability. J. Agron. 1964, 56, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Keith, H.; Jacobsen, K.L.; Raison, R. Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperature and moisture on soil respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora forest. Plant Soil 1997, 190, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fink, J.R.; Inda, A.V.; Tiecher, T.; Barrón, V. Iron oxides and organic matter on soil phosphorus availability. Cienc. E Agrotecnologia 2016, 40, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Penn, C.J.; Camberato, J.J. A critical review on soil chemical processes that control how soil pH affects phosphorus availability to plants. Agriculture 2019, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hu, Y.; Schmidhalter, U. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tchakounté, G.V.T.; Berger, B.; Patz, S.; Becker, M.; Fankem, H.; Taffouo, V.D.; Ruppel, S. Selected Rhizosphere Bacteria Help Tomato Plants Cope with Combined Phosphorus and Salt Stresses. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kafi, M.; Khan, M.A. Crop and Forage Production Using Saline Waters; Daya Books; Daya Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Etesami, H.; Maheshwari, D.K. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 225246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hossain, M.S. Present scenario of global salt affected soils, its management and importance of salinity research. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci 2019, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.; Bhowmik, P.C.; Hossain, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Ozturk, M.; Fujita, M. Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 589341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yoneyama, K.; Xie, X.; Kim, H.I.; Kisugi, T.; Nomura, T.; Sekimoto, H.; Yokota, T.; Yoneyama, K. How do nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies affect strigolactone production and exudation? Planta 2012, 235, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kosová, K.; Prášil, I.T.; Vítámvás, P. Protein contribution to plant salinity response and tolerance acquisition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6757–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Carstensen, A.; Herdean, A.; Schmidt, S.B.; Sharma, A.; Spetea, C.; Pribil, M.; Husted, S. The impacts of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Mokrani, S.; Nabti, E.H.; Cruz, C. Current Advances in Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Alleviating Salt Stress for Sustainable Agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Besri, M. Effects of salinity on plant diseases development. In Towards the Rational Use of High Salinity Tolerant Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Talbi Zribi, O.; Slama, I.; Trabelsi, N.; Hamdi, A.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C. Combined effects of salinity and phosphorus availability on growth, gas exchange, and nutrient status of Catapodium rigidum. Arid. Land Res. Manag. 2018, 32, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grattan, S.R.; Grieve, C.M. Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plants grown in saline environments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1992, 38, 275–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bidalia, A.; Vikram, K.; Yamal, G.; Rao, K.S. Effect of salinity on soil nutrients and plant health. In Salt Stress, Microbes, and Plant Interactions: Causes and Solution; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 273–297. [Google Scholar]
  26. Grattan, S.R.; Grieve, C.M. Salinity–mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 1998, 78, 127–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alori, E.T.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Roberts, T.L. Cadmium and phosphorous fertilizers: The issues and the science. Procedia Eng. 2014, 83, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Wani, P.A.; Oves, M. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2009, 7, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gyaneshwar, P.; Kumar, G.N.; Parekh, L.J.; Poole, P.S. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 2002, 245, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walpola, B.C.; Yoon, M.H. Prospectus of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A review. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 6600–6605. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kalayu, G. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: Promising approach as biofertilizers. Int. J. Agron. 2019, 2019, 4917256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Shao, H. Negative interactive effects between biochar and phosphorus fertilization on phosphorus availability and plant yield in saline sodic soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, L.; Wei, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Ding, X. MgO-modified biochar increases phosphate retention and rice yields in saline-alkaline soil. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Ding, X. Phosphorus retention using iron (II/III) modified biochar in saline-alkaline soils: Adsorption, column and field tests. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ding, Z.; Kheir, A.M.; Ali, M.G.; Ali, O.A.; Abdelaal, A.I.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, B.; Liu, B.; He, Z. The integrated effect of salinity, organic amendments, phosphorus fertilizers, and deficit irrigation on soil properties, phosphorus fractionation and wheat productivity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mukherjee, A.; Lal, R. The biochar dilemma. Soil Res. 2014, 52, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, J.S.; Saxena, A.K.; Singh, D.P. Impact of PGPR inoculation on growth and antioxidant status of wheat under saline conditions. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, D.P. Effect of salt-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on wheat plants and soil health in a saline environment. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mayak, S.; Tirosh, T.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Bisht, S.C.; Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Bisht, J.K.; Gupta, H.S. Isolation, molecular characterization and growth-promotion activities of a cold tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas sp. NARs9 (MTCC9002) from the Indian Himalayas. Biol. Res. 2009, 42, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Zamin, M.; Shah, S.; Mian, I.A.; Danish, S.; Zafar-ul-Hye, M.; Battaglia, M.L.; Naz, R.M.M.; Saeed, B.; et al. Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with phosphorus supplements improve maize phosphorus acquisition and growth under lime induced salinity stress. Plants 2020, 9, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahdi, I.; Fahsi, N.; Hafidi, M.; Allaoui, A.; Biskri, L. Plant Growth Enhancement using Rhizospheric Halotolerant Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterium Bacillus licheniformis QA1 and Enterobacter asburiae QF11 Isolated from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ansari, F.A.; Ahmad, I.; Pichtel, J. Growth stimulation and alleviation of salinity stress to wheat by the biofilm forming Bacillus pumilus strain FAB10. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 143, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yasmeen, T.; Ahmad, A.; Arif, M.S.; Mubin, M.; Rehman, K.; Shahzad, S.M.; Iqbal, S.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Alyemeni, M.N.; et al. Biofilm forming rhizobacteria enhance growth and salt tolerance in sunflower plants by stimulating antioxidant enzymes activity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 242–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rengasamy, P. Soil salinity and sodicity. In Growing Crops with Reclaimed Wastewater; CABI Publishing: Collingwood, Australia, 2006; pp. 125–138. [Google Scholar]
  47. Richards, L.A. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; LWW: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1954; p. 154. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar, P.; Sharma, P.K. Soil Salinity and Food Security in India. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 533781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sarkar, B.; Jat, H.S.; Sharma, P.C.; Bolan, N.S. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 280, 111736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abbas, R.; Rasul, S.; Aslam, K.; Baber, M.; Shahid, M.; Mubeen, F.; Naqqash, T. Halotolerant PGPR: A hope for cultivation of saline soils. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fageria, N.K.; Gheyi, H.R.; Moreira, A. Nutrient bioavailability in salt affected soils. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34, 945–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shen, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Bai, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F. Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dalal, R.C. Soil organic phosphorus. Adv. Agron. 1977, 29, 83–117. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Beji, R.; Hamdi, W.; Kesraoui, A.; Seffen, M. Effects of salts on phosphorus adsorption in alkalize Tunisian soil. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2017, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Fageria, N.K.; Moreira, A. The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants. Adv. Agron. 2011, 110, 251–331. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nasrin, S.; Biswas, T.K.; Amin, M.S.; Khatun, M. Study of salinity effects on the inorganic phosphorus transformation in three different soil series of Ganges River Floodplain. Jahangirnagar Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 5, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, K.; Shi, Y.; Cui, X.; Yue, P.; Li, K.; Liu, X.; Tripathi, B.M.; Chu, H. Salinity is a key determinant for soil microbial communities in a desert ecosystem. MSystems 2019, 4, e00225-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Champagnol, F. Relationships between phosphate nutrition of plants and salt toxicity. Phosphorus Agric. 1979, 33, 35–43.ill. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sharpley, A.N.; Meisinger, J.J.; Power, J.F.; Suarez, D.L. Root extraction of nutrients associated with long-term soil management. In Limitations to Plant Root Growth; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 151–217. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tang, H.; Niu, L.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Phosphorus limitation improved salt tolerance in maize through tissue mass density increase, osmolytes accumulation, and Na+ uptake inhibition. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Phang, T.H.; Shao, G.; Liao, H.; Yan, X.; Lam, H.M. High external phosphate (Pi) increases sodium ion uptake and reduces salt tolerance of ‘Pi-tolerant’ soybean. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 135, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hammond, J.P.; White, P.J. Sucrose transport in the phloem: Integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation. J Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. López-Arredondo, D.L.; Leyva-González, M.A.; González-Morales, S.I.; López-Bucio, J.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate nutrition: Improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 95–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Rohman, M.M.; Ahmed, I.; Molla, M.R.; Hossain, M.A.; Amiruzzaman, M. Evaluation of salt tolerant mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Genotypes on growth through bio-molecular approaches. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 2019, 44, 469–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, X.J.; Finnegan, P.M. Regulation of phosphate starvation responses in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gu, M.; Chen, A.; Sun, S.; Xu, G. Complex regulation of plant phosphate transporters and the gap between molecular mechanisms and practical application: What is missing? Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 396–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Aslam, M.M.; Akhtar, K.; Karanja, J.K.; Haider, F.U. Understanding the Adaptive Mechanisms of Plant in Low Phosphorous Soil. In Plant Stress Physiology; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  71. Qin, Y.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Pan, X.; Yuan, Z. Microbially mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1245–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ruppel, S.; Franken, P.; Witzel, K. Properties of the halophyte microbiome and their implications for plant salt tolerance. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 940–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Etesami, H.; Beattie, G.A. Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Yan, N.; Marschner, P.; Cao, W.; Zuo, C.; Qin, W. Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2015, 3, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Son, H.J.; Park, G.T.; Cha, M.S.; Heo, M.S. Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novel salt-and pH-tolerant Pantoea agglomerans R-42 isolated from soybean rhizosphere. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Park, K.H.; Lee, O.M.; Jung, H.I.; Jeong, J.H.; Jeon, Y.D.; Hwang, D.Y.; Lee, C.Y.; Son, H.J. Rapid solubilization of insoluble phosphate by a novel environmental stress-tolerant Burkholderia vietnamiensis M6 isolated from ginseng rhizospheric soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Srinivasan, R.; Yandigeri, M.S.; Kashyap, S.; Alagawadi, A.R. Effect of salt on survival and P-solubilization potential of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from salt affected soils. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 19, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Jiang, H.; Wang, T.; Chi, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, N.; Chen, M.; Pan, L.; Qi, P. Isolation and characterization of halotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria naturally colonizing the peanut rhizosphere in salt-affected soil. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jiang, H.; Qi, P.; Wang, T.; Wang, M.; Chen, M.; Chen, N.; Pan, L.; Chi, X. Isolation and characterization of halotolerant phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms from saline soils. 3 Biotech. 2018, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Behera, B.C.; Yadav, H.; Singh, S.K.; Mishra, R.R.; Sethi, B.K.; Dutta, S.K.; Thatoi, H.N. Phosphate solubilization and acid phosphatase activity of Serratia sp. isolated from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India. J. Genet Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Behera, B.C.; Yadav, H.; Singh, S.K.; Sethi, B.K.; Mishra, R.R.; Kumari, S.; Thatoi, H. Alkaline phosphatase activity of a phosphate solubilizing Alcaligenes faecalis, isolated from Mangrove soil. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2017, 1, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Noskova, Y.; Likhatskaya, G.; Terentieva, N.; Son, O.; Tekutyeva, L.; Balabanova, L. A Novel Alkaline Phosphatase/Phosphodiesterase, CamPhoD, from Marine Bacterium Cobetia amphilecti KMM 296. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Malboobi, M.A.; Owlia, P.; Behbahani, M.; Sarokhani, E.; Moradi, S.; Yakhchali, B.; Deljou, A.; Heravi, K.M. Solubilization of organic and inorganic phosphates by three highly efficient soil bacterial isolates. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Barua, S.; Tripathi, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Ghosh, S.; Chakrabarti, K. Characterization and crop production efficiency of diazotrophic bacterial isolates from coastal saline soils. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 167, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kumar, V.; Singh, P.; Jorquera, M.A.; Sangwan, P.; Kumar, P.; Verma, A.K.; Agrawal, S. Isolation of phytase-producing bacteria from Himalayan soils and their effect on growth and phosphorus uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kageyama, H.; Tripathi, K.; Rai, A.K.; Cha-Um, S.; Waditee-Sirisattha, R.; Takabe, T. An alkaline phosphatase/phosphodiesterase, PhoD, induced by salt stress and secreted out of the cells of Aphanothece halophytica, a halotolerant cyanobacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5178–5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Johri, J.K.; Surange, S.; Nautiyal, C.S. Occurrence of salt, pH, and temperature-tolerant, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in alkaline soils. Curr. Microbiol. 1999, 39, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yue, Z.; Shen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liang, A.; Chu, C.; Chen, C.; Sun, Z. Microbiological insights into the stress-alleviating property of an endophytic Bacillus altitudinis WR10 in wheat under low-phosphorus and high-salinity stresses. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Abdelmoteleb, A.; Gonzalez-Mendoza, D. Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizing Bacillus spp. from Tamarix ramosissima rhizosphere and their effect on growth of Phaseolus vulgaris under salinity stress. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sahay, R.; Patra, D.D. Identification and performance of sodicity tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates on Ocimum basilicum in sodic soil. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 71, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pradhan, A.; Pahari, A.; Mohapatra, S.; Mishra, B.B. Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture: Genetic Mechanism and Application. In Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 81–97. [Google Scholar]
  93. Xiang, W.L.; Liang, H.Z.; Liu, S.; Luo, F.; Tang, J.; Li, M.Y.; Che, Z.M. Isolation and performance evaluation of halotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria from the rhizospheric soils of historic Dagong Brine Well in China. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 2629–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Rastogi, R.P.; Verma, J.P. Salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting Bacillus pumilus strain JPVS11 to enhance plant growth attributes of rice and improve soil health under salinity stress. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Boukhris, I.; Farhat-Khemakhem, A.; Blibech, M.; Bouchaala, K.; Chouayekh, H. Characterization of an extremely salt-tolerant and thermostable phytase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Usint. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 80, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yadav, B.K.; Tarafdar, J.C. Efficiency of Bacillus coagulans as P biofertilizer to mobilize native soil organic and poorly soluble phosphates and increase crop yield. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2012, 58, 1099–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Villarreal-Chiu, J.F.; Quinn, J.P.; McGrath, J.W. The genes and enzymes of phosphonate metabolism by bacteria, and their distribution in the marine environment. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Liu, S.T.; Lee, L.Y.; Tai, C.Y.; Hung, C.H.; Chang, Y.S.; Wolfram, J.H.; Rogers, R.; Goldstein, A.H. Cloning of an Erwinia herbicola gene necessary for gluconic acid production and enhanced mineral phosphate solubilization in Escherichia coli HB101: Nucleotide sequence and probable involvement in biosynthesis of the coenzyme pyrroloquinoline quinone. J. Bacteriol. Res. 1992, 174, 5814–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Goldstein, A.H.; Liu, S.T. Molecular cloning and regulation of a mineral phosphate solubilizing gene from Erwinia herbicola. Nat. Biotechnol. 1987, 5, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Deubel, A.; Gransee, A.; Merbach, W. Transformation of organic rhizodepositions by rhizosphere bacteria and its influence on the availability of tertiary calcium phosphate. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 2000, 163, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Goldstein, A.H. Bioprocessing of rock phosphate ore: Essential technical considerations for the development of a successful commercial technology. In Proceedings of the 4th International Fertilizer Association Technical Conference; IFA: Paris, French, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhao, K.; Penttinen, P.; Zhang, X.; Ao, X.; Liu, M.; Yu, X.; Chen, Q. Maize rhizosphere in Sichuan, China, hosts plant growth promoting Burkholderia cepacia with phosphate solubilizing and antifungal abilities. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Illmer, P.; Schinner, F. Solubilization of inorganic calcium phosphates—Solubilization mechanisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1995, 27, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, W. Aerobic-heterotrophic nitrogen removal through nitrate reduction and ammonium assimilation by marine bacterium Vibrio sp. Y1-5. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 230, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. McNaught, A.D. Compendium of Chemical Terminology; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  106. Prabhu, N.; Borkar, S.; Garg, S. Phosphate solubilization by microorganisms: Overview, mechanisms, applications and advances. In Advances in Biological Science Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 161–176. [Google Scholar]
  107. Park, K.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Son, H.J. Mechanism of insoluble phosphate solubilization by Pseudomonas fluorescens RAF15 isolated from ginseng rhizosphere and its plant growth-promoting activities. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kloepper, J.W.; Leong, J.; Teintze, M.; Schroth, M.N. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 1980, 286, 885–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Schiessl, K.T.; Janssen, E.M.L.; Kraemer, S.M.; McNeill, K.; Ackermann, M. Magnitude and mechanism of siderophore-mediated competition at low iron solubility in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyochelin system. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Andrews, S.C.; Robinson, A.K.; Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Abbas, G.; Saqib, M.; Akhtar, J. Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency on different rice genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2015, 178, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Moscovici, M. Present and future medical applications of microbial exopolysaccharides. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Costa, O.Y.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Kuramae, E.E. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Gupta, P.; Diwan, B. Bacterial exopolysaccharide mediated heavy metal removal: A review on biosynthesis, mechanism and remediation strategies. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 13, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Shultana, R.; Kee Zuan, A.T.; Yusop, M.R.; Saud, H.M. Characterization of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and the effect on growth and yield of saline-affected rice. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, J.S.; Singh, D.P. Exopolysaccharide-producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under salinity condition. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yi, Y.; Huang, W.; Ge, Y. Exopolysaccharide: A novel important factor in the microbial dissolution of tricalcium phosphate. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dotaniya, M.L.; Aparna, K.; Dotaniya, C.K.; Singh, M.; Regar, K.L. Role of soil enzymes in sustainable crop production. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 569–589. [Google Scholar]
  119. Sharma, S.B.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Trivedi, M.H.; Gobi, T.A. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Coleman, J.E. Structure and mechanism of alkaline phosphatase. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1992, 21, 441–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Millán, J.L. Alkaline phosphatases. Purinergic Signal. 2006, 2, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Kier, L.D.; Weppelman, R.M.; Ames, B.N. Regulation of nonspecific acid phosphatase in Salmonella: PhoN and phoP genes. J. Bacteriol. Res. 1979, 138, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Thaller, M.C.; Berlutti, F.; Schippa, S.; Iori, P.; Passariello, C.; Rossolini, G.M. Heterogeneous patterns of acid phosphatases containing low-molecular-mass polypeptides in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1995, 45, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Neal, A.L.; Blackwell, M.; Akkari, E.; Guyomar, C.; Clark, I.; Hirsch, P.R. Phylogenetic distribution, biogeography and the effects of land management upon bacterial non-specific Acid phosphatase Gene diversity and abundance. Plant Soil 2018, 427, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R.; Gonzalez, T.; Bashan, Y. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Soil 2006, 287, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Rosales, E.; Pazos, M.; Sanromán, M.Á. Solid-state fermentation for food applications. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 319–355. [Google Scholar]
  127. Mullaney, E.J.; Daly, C.B.; Ullah, A.H. Advances in phytase research. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 47, 157–199. [Google Scholar]
  128. Richardson, A.E.; Hadobas, P.A.; Hayes, J.E. Extracellular secretion of Aspergillus phytase from Arabidopsis roots enables plants to obtain phosphorus from phytate. Plant J. 2001, 25, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Richardson, A.E.; Hadobas, P.A.; Simpson, R.J. Phytate as a source of phosphorus for the growth of transgenic Trifolium subterraneum. In Plant Nutrition; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 560–561. [Google Scholar]
  130. Seweryn, P.; Van, L.B.; Kjeldgaard, M.; Russo, C.J.; Passmore, L.A.; Hove-Jensen, B.; Jochimsen, B.; Brodersen, D.E. Structural insights into the bacterial carbon–phosphorus lyase machinery. Nature 2015, 525, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Ilangumaran, G.; Smith, D.L. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in amelioration of salinity stress: A systems biology perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Munns, R. Salinity, Growth and Phytohormones; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  133. Niu, X.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Pardo, J.M. Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Etesami, H.; Glick, B.R. Halotolerant plant growth–promoting bacteria: Prospects for alleviating salinity stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nadeem, S.M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Naveed, M.; Nawaz, S. Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Rojas-Tapias, D.; Moreno-Galván, A.; Pardo-Díaz, S.; Obando, M.; Rivera, D.; Bonilla, R. Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl. Soil Ecol. 2012, 61, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Etesami, H. Plant–microbe interactions in plants and stress tolerance. In Plant Life under Changing Environment; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 355–396. [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhang, H.; Kim, M.S.; Sun, Y.; Dowd, S.E.; Shi, H.Z.; Pare, P.W. Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter Hkt. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Mukherjee, P.; Mitra, A.; Roy, M. Halomonas rhizobacteria of Avicennia marina of Indian Sundarbans promote rice growth under saline and heavy metal stresses through exopolysaccharide production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Gupta, G.; Parihar, S.S.; Ahirwar, N.K.; Snehi, S.K.; Singh, V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2015, 7, 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  141. Safdarian, M.; Askari, H.; Nematzadeh, G.; Adriano, S.O.F.O. Halophile plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria induce salt tolerance traits in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Pedosphere 2020, 30, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sarkar, A.; Ghosh, P.K.; Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Soren, T.; Pandey, S.; Mondal, M.H.; Maiti, T.K. A halotolerant Enterobacter sp. displaying ACC deaminase activity promotes rice seedling growth under salt stress. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sharma, S.; Kulkarni, J.; Jha, B. Halotolerant rhizobacteria promote growth and enhance salinity tolerance in peanut. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Chakraborty, U.; Chakraborty, B.N.; Chakraborty, A.P.; Dey, P.L. Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Pandey, S.; Gupta, S. Diversity analysis of ACC deaminase producing bacteria associated with rhizosphere of coconut tree (Cocos nucifera L.) grown in Lakshadweep islands of India and their ability to promote plant growth under saline conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 324, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Fatima, T.; Mishra, I.; Verma, R.; Arora, N.K. Mechanisms of halotolerant plant growth promoting Alcaligenes sp. involved in salt tolerance and enhancement of the growth of rice under salinity stress. 3 Biotech. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Sukweenadhi, J.; Balusamy, S.R.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Koh, S.C.; Yang, D.C. A growth promoting bacteria, Paenibacillus yonginensis DCY84T enhanced salt stress tolerance by activating defense-related systems in Panax ginseng. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Li, X.; Geng, X.; Xie, R.; Fu, L.; Jiang, J.; Gao, L.; Sun, J. The endophytic bacteria isolated from elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) promote plant growth and enhance salt tolerance of Hybrid Pennisetum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Fan, P.; Chen, D.; He, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Tian, Y.; Gao, L. Alleviating salt stress in tomato seedlings using Arthrobacter and Bacillus megaterium isolated from the rhizosphere of wild plants grown on saline–alkaline lands. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Jan, R.; Kang, S.M.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, I.J. Rhizobacteria AK1 remediates the toxic effects of salinity stress via regulation of endogenous phytohormones and gene expression in soybean. Biochem. J. 2019, 476, 2393–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Shahid, M.; Akram, M.S.; Khan, M.A.; Zubair, M.; Shah, S.M.; Ismail, M.; Shabir, G.; Basheer, S.; Aslam, K.; Tariq, M. A phytobeneficial strain Planomicrobium sp. MSSA-10 triggered oxidative stress responsive mechanisms and regulated the growth of pea plants under induced saline environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 1566–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ullah, S.; Bano, A. Isolation of PGPRs from rhizospheric soil of halophytes and its impact on maize (Zea mays L.) under induced soil salinity. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  153. Habib, S.H.; Kausar, H.; Saud, H.M. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance salinity stress tolerance in okra through ROS-scavenging enzymes. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 6284547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Tewari, S.; Arora, N.K. Fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. PF17 as an efficient plant growth regulator and biocontrol agent for sunflower crop under saline conditions. Symbiosis 2016, 68, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ghorai, S.; Pal, K.K.; Dey, R. Alleviation of salinity stress in groundnut by application of PGPR. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2015, 2, 742–750. [Google Scholar]
  156. Qin, S.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yuan, B.; Xu, P.Y.; Xing, K.; Wang, J.; Jiang, J.H. Isolation of ACC deaminase-producing habitat-adapted symbiotic bacteria associated with halophyte Limonium sinense (Girard) Kuntze and evaluating their plant growth-promoting activity under salt stress. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. He, A.L.; Niu, S.Q.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.S.; Gou, J.Y.; Gao, H.J.; Suo, S.Z.; Zhang, J.L. Induced salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass by a novel bacterium strain from the rhizosphere of a desert shrub Haloxylon ammodendron. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Saxena, S.C.; Kaur, H.; Verma, P.; Petla, B.P.; Andugula, V.R.; Majee, M. Osmoprotectants: Potential for crop improvement under adverse conditions. In Plant Acclimation to Environmental Stress; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 197–232. [Google Scholar]
  159. Riyazuddin, R.; Verma, R.; Singh, K.; Nisha, N.; Keisham, M.; Bhati, K.K.; Kim, S.T.; Gupta, R. Ethylene: A master regulator of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tao, J.J.; Chen, H.W.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Morgan, P.W.; Drew, M.C. Ethylene and plant responses to stress. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012, 963401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Nadeem, S.M.; Ahmad, M.; Naveed, M.; Imran, M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Crowley, D.E. Relationship between in vitro characterization and comparative efficacy of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving cucumber salt tolerance. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mapelli, F.; Marasco, R.; Rolli, E.; Barbato, M.; Cherif, H.; Guesmi, A.; Ouzari, I.; Daffonchio, D.; Borin, S. Potential for plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria associated with Salicornia growing in Tunisian hypersaline soils. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 248078. [Google Scholar]
  165. Patel, D.; Jha, C.K.; Tank, N.; Saraf, M. Growth enhancement of chickpea in saline soils using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Plant Growth Reg. 2012, 31, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Desale, P.; Patel, B.; Singh, S.; Malhotra, A.; Nawani, N. Plant growth promoting properties of Halobacillus sp. and Halomonas sp. in presence of salinity and heavy metals. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. O’Brien, J.A.; Benková, E. Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Arkhipova, T.N.; Prinsen, E.; Veselov, S.U.; Martinenko, E.V.; Melentiev, A.I.; Kudoyarova, G.R. Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil. Plant Soil 2007, 292, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, F.; Xing, S.; Ma, H.; Du, Z.; Ma, B. Cytokinin-producing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that confer resistance to drought stress in Platycladus orientalis container seedlings. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9155–9164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, G.L.; Que, F.; Xu, Z.S.; Wang, F.; Xiong, A.S. Exogenous gibberellin altered morphology, anatomic and transcriptional regulatory networks of hormones in carrot root and shoot. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ryu, H.; Cho, Y.G. Plant hormones in salt stress tolerance. J. Plant Biol. 2015, 58, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Golan, Y.; Shirron, N.; Avni, A.; Shmoish, M.; Gepstein, S. Cytokinins induce transcriptional reprograming and improve Arabidopsis plant performance under drought and salt stress conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Olanrewaju, O.S.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Singh, R.P.; Jha, P.N. A halotolerant bacterium Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Nandi, M.; Selin, C.; Brawerman, G.; Fernando, W.D.; de Kievit, T. Hydrogen cyanide, which contributes to Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain PA23 biocontrol, is upregulated in the presence of glycine. Biol. Control 2017, 108, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Choudhary, D.K.; Prakash, A.; Johri, B.N. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: Mechanism of action. Indian J. Microbiol. 2007, 47, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Van Loon, L.C.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1998, 36, 453–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Halfeld-Vieira, B.D.A.; Vieira Júnior, J.R.; Romeiro, R.D.S.; Silva, H.S.A.; Baracat-Pereira, M.C. Induction of systemic resistance in tomato by the autochthonous phylloplane resident Bacillus cereus. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2006, 41, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Akhtar, M.S.; Siddiqui, Z.A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in biocontrol of plant diseases and sustainable agriculture. In Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 157–195. [Google Scholar]
  181. Dineshkumar, R.; Kumaravel, R.; Gopalsamy, J.; Sikder, M.N.A.; Sampathkumar, P. Microalgae as bio-fertilizers for rice growth and seed yield productivity. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chaudhary, T.; Dixit, M.; Gera, R.; Shukla, A.K.; Prakash, A.; Gupta, G.; Shukla, P. Techniques for improving formulations of bioinoculants. 3 Biotech. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Mącik, M.; Gryta, A.; Frąc, M. Biofertilizers in agriculture: An overview on concepts, strategies and effects on soil microorganisms. Adv. Agron. 2020, 162, 31–87. [Google Scholar]
  184. Phua, C.K.H.; Khairuddin, A.R. Multifunctional Liquid Bio Fertilizer as an Innovative Agronomic Input for Modern Agriculture; Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  185. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Pandey, A.; Trivedi, P.; Kumar, B.; Palni, L.M.S. Characterization of a phosphate solubilizing and antagonistic strain of Pseudomonas putida (B0) isolated from a sub-alpine location in the Indian Central Himalaya. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 53, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Dastager, S.G.; Deepa, C.K.; Puneet, S.C.; Nautiyal, C.S.; Pandey, A. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting strain Pantoea NII-From Western Ghat Forest soil, India. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Goswami, D.; Dhandhukia, P.; Patel, P.; Thakker, J.N. Screening of PGPR from saline desert of Kutch: Growth promotion in Arachis hypogea by Bacillus licheniformis A2. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Sultana, S.; Paul, S.C.; Parveen, S.; Alam, S.; Rahman, N.; Jannat, B.; Hoque, S.; Rahman, M.T.; Karim, M.M. Isolation and identification of salt-tolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their application for rice cultivation under salt stress. Can. J. Microbiol. 2020, 66, 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Yue, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Ma, K.; Tian, E.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, Z. Endophytic Bacillus altitudinis WR10 alleviates Cu toxicity in wheat by augmenting reactive oxygen species scavenging and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kadmiri, I.M.; Chaouqui, L.; Azaroual, S.E.; Sijilmassi, B.; Yaakoubi, K.; Wahby, I. Phosphate-solubilizing and auxin-producing rhizobacteria promote plant growth under saline conditions. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 43, 3403–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Joe, M.M.; Devaraj, S.; Benson, A.; Sa, T. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing endophytic bacteria from Phyllanthus amarus Schum & Thonn: Evaluation of plant growth promotion and antioxidant activity under salt stress. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aroma 2016, 3, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  193. Naz, I.; Bano, A. Biochemical, molecular characterization and growth promoting effects of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. isolated from weeds grown in salt range of Pakistan. Plant Soil 2010, 334, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Verma, M.; Singh, A.; Dwivedi, D.H.; Arora, N.K. Zinc and phosphate solubilizing Rhizobium radiobacter (LB2) for enhancing quality and yield of loose-leaf lettuce in saline soil. J. Environ. Sustain. 2020, 3, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mahdi, I.; Fahsi, N.; Hafidi, M.; Benjelloun, S.; Allaoui, A.; Biskri, L. Rhizospheric Phosphate Solubilizing Bacillus atrophaeus GQJK17 S8 Increases Quinoa Seedling, Withstands Heavy Metals, and Mitigates Salt Stress. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Jin, H.; Mitchum, M.; Panstruga, R.; Stone, J. Focus Issue Editorial: Biotic Stress. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 1193–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Chojak-Koźniewska, J.; Kuźniak, E.; Zimny, J. The effects of combined abiotic and pathogen stress in plants: Insights from salinity and Pseudomonas syringae pv lachrymans interaction in cucumber. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Ahemad, M. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria-assisted phytoremediation of metalliferous soils: A review. 3 Biotech. 2015, 5, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of salinity on P availability and its impact on plant.
Figure 1. Effect of salinity on P availability and its impact on plant.
Agronomy 11 01552 g001
Figure 2. Salt tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria mediated P transformation mechanism followed via inorganic phosphate (Pi) solubilization (I, II, III, and IV) and organic phosphate (Po) mineralization (V, VI, and VII). Abbreviation, OA: organic acid; BOA: base of an organic acid; NO3: nitrate; SO42−: sulphate; CO32−: Carbonate ion.
Figure 2. Salt tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria mediated P transformation mechanism followed via inorganic phosphate (Pi) solubilization (I, II, III, and IV) and organic phosphate (Po) mineralization (V, VI, and VII). Abbreviation, OA: organic acid; BOA: base of an organic acid; NO3: nitrate; SO42−: sulphate; CO32−: Carbonate ion.
Agronomy 11 01552 g002
Figure 3. A schematic overview of the salt tolerance mechanism in plant cells through the salt-tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria: (I) Ionic homeostasis and nutritional balance in plant (e.g., production of EPS bind with Na+ and decreasing Na+ uptake in root, increasing water intake, soil water holding capacity and increase root adhering-soil (RAS); Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can induce the high-affinity K+ transporter (HKT1) in shoots and decrease of HKT1 in roots, restricting Na+ entry into roots and promoting shoot-to-root Na+ recirculation; Enhance nutrient uptake of N, P, K and Fe through nitrogen fixation, P and K solubilization, and siderophore production). (II) Hormonal modulation in plant (e.g., decrease the excessive ethylene level by ACC deaminase; regulation of ABA through cytokinin; and overall growth facilitated by IAA and GA) (III) Mitigation of osmotic and oxidative stress in plant (e.g., induction of synthesizing plant antioxidative enzymes (POD, SOD, CAT, APX, and GR) to scavenge ROS; and increasing osmolyte accumulation (Proline, glycine betaine, soluble sugar and choline, etc.) to maintain osmotic balance into plant cells) (IV) Reduced Plant Susceptibility to Pathogens (e.g., production of HCN, siderophores, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and lytic enzymes to control phytopathogen infections).
Figure 3. A schematic overview of the salt tolerance mechanism in plant cells through the salt-tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria: (I) Ionic homeostasis and nutritional balance in plant (e.g., production of EPS bind with Na+ and decreasing Na+ uptake in root, increasing water intake, soil water holding capacity and increase root adhering-soil (RAS); Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can induce the high-affinity K+ transporter (HKT1) in shoots and decrease of HKT1 in roots, restricting Na+ entry into roots and promoting shoot-to-root Na+ recirculation; Enhance nutrient uptake of N, P, K and Fe through nitrogen fixation, P and K solubilization, and siderophore production). (II) Hormonal modulation in plant (e.g., decrease the excessive ethylene level by ACC deaminase; regulation of ABA through cytokinin; and overall growth facilitated by IAA and GA) (III) Mitigation of osmotic and oxidative stress in plant (e.g., induction of synthesizing plant antioxidative enzymes (POD, SOD, CAT, APX, and GR) to scavenge ROS; and increasing osmolyte accumulation (Proline, glycine betaine, soluble sugar and choline, etc.) to maintain osmotic balance into plant cells) (IV) Reduced Plant Susceptibility to Pathogens (e.g., production of HCN, siderophores, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and lytic enzymes to control phytopathogen infections).
Agronomy 11 01552 g003
Table 1. List of ST-PSB and their possible mechanism for inorganic and organic phosphate solubilization and mineralization.
Table 1. List of ST-PSB and their possible mechanism for inorganic and organic phosphate solubilization and mineralization.
Salt Tolerant PSBSource of PhosphateMode of Action for P Solubilization and MineralizationReference
Pantoea agglomerans R-42Ca3(PO4)2, CaHPO4, Hydroxyapatite, AlPO4,
FePO4
pH reduced; OC ND[76]
Burkholderia vietnamiensis M6pH reduced; gluconic and 2-ketogluconic acid[77]
Aerococcus sp. strain PSBCRG1-1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PSBI3-1Ca3(PO4)2ND[78]
Pseudomonas koreensis MU2malic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, and tartaric acid[4]
Ensifer sesbaniae, Gordonia terrae, Bacillus Sp., Acinetobacter Sp. Ca3(PO4)2, AlPO4, FePO4, and lecithinpH reduced[79]
Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Streptomyces sp., Arthrobacter sp., Providencia rettgeri sp. and Acinetobacter sp. Ca3(PO4)2, AlPO4, and FePO4,pH reduced; gluconic acid, formic acid, malic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, citric acid and propionic acid[80]
Serratia sp. Ca3(PO4)2, p-nitrophenyl phosphatemalic acid, lactic acid and acetic acid; acid phosphatase[81]
Alcaligenes faecalispH reduced, oxalic acid, citric acid, malic acid, succinic acid and acetic acid; alkaline phosphatase[82]
Kushneria sp. YCWA18Ca3(PO4)2 and LecithinpH reduced; OC ND[5]
Bacillus megateriumCa3(PO4)2 and Lecithin[93]
Cobetia amphilectip-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) and guanosine 5-triphosphate (GTP)alkaline phosphatase/phosphodiesterase activity[83]
Pantoea agglomerans strain P5, Microbacterium laevaniformans strain P7 and Pseudomonas putida strain P13Ca3(PO4)2; 5-bromo-4-choloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP)pH reduced; phosphatase[84]
Agrobacterium sp. & Bacillus sp.Ca3(PO4)2, AlPO4; beta-GlycerophosphatepH reduced; acid phosphatase[85]
Bacillus pumilus strain JPVS11NDalkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase[94]
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens US573Phytic acidphytase[95]
Acromobacter sp. PB-01, Tetrathiobacter sp. PB-03 and Bacillus sp. PB-13Ca3(PO4)2; Na-phytatepH reduced; phytase[86]
Bacillus coagulansK2HPO4, CaHPO4, Ca3(PO4)2; glycerophosphate and phytatealkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase; phytase[96]
Bacillus altitudinis WR10Ca-phytate[89]
Aphanothece halophyticaNDalkaline phosphatase[87]
Marine bacterial community C-P lyase[97]
Abbreviation: OC: organic acid; ND: not detected.
Table 2. List of salt -tolerant PSB and their possible mechanism of salt alleviation in diverse plants and crops.
Table 2. List of salt -tolerant PSB and their possible mechanism of salt alleviation in diverse plants and crops.
Salt Tolerant PSBPGP CharactersMode of Action for Alleviation of Salt StressInoculant PlantReference
Bacillus pumilus
FAB10
EPS, IAA, NH3, siderophore, PS, and HCNBiofilm development; enhancement of CAT, SOD, GR and decrease MDA; maintain Na+/K+ concentration & increase root colonizationWheat (Triticum aestivum)[44]
Halomonas sp. Exo1EPS, IAA, NH3, N2 fixation, siderophore,
PS, and HCN
Sequestration of Na+ by EPS; increasing P and N uptakeRice (Oryza sativa) varietyJarava[139]
Bacillus sp., Burkholderia sp., Enterobacter sp., Microbacterium sp., and Paenibacillus sp.EPS, IAA, and PSNa+ binds to EPS-decrease Na+ uptake; aggregate RAS; increase prolineWheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar K7903[116]
Enterobacter asburiaeIAA, siderophore, ACC deaminase, and PSreducing Na+ content and ethylene production; up-regulating the expression of HKT1, H+PPase, NHX7, CAT, and APXWheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. drya)[141]
Enterobacter sp. P23EPS, IAA, NH3, siderophore, PS, ACC deaminase, SA, and HCNReduce ethylene stress; increase protein and soluble sugar contentRice seedling (Oryza sativa)[142]
Bacillus subtilis SU47 and Arthrobacter sp. SU18EPS, IAA, PS and GAIncrease total soluble sugar, proline, P and K+ uptake; reduce the Na+ uptake and enhance CAT, GR & APX activityWheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar Raj-3077[38]
Bacillus licheniformis and Pseudomonas plecoglossicidIAA, PS, and ACC deaminase.Enhance the CAT, GPX and SOD activity; increase accumulation of phenolic, proline and ascorbic acid molecules, protein, P and K in grains and decrease the MDA accumulationSunflower (Helianthus annuus cv. Hysun-33)[45]
Klebsiella Sp., Pseudomonas Sp., Agrobacterium Sp., and Ochrobactrum Sp. IAA, N2 fixation, PS ACC deaminase and acetylene reduction.Reduce ethylene stress; lower shoot and root Na+/K+ ratio; increased shoot and root Ca2+ accumulation; enhance the expression of antioxidant genes APX, CAT, and SOD and maintain of ROS levelPea nut (Arachis hypogaea)[143]
Ochrobactrum pseudogregnonense and Bacillus safensisIAA, siderophore, PS, and ACC deaminaseEnhancement SOD, POD, APX, CAT and GR; increase accumulation of carotenoids and ascorbate; increase proline and P uptakeSix varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum)[144]
Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus paramycoidesIAA, NH3, siderophore, PS, and ACC deaminaseReduce stress ethylene & MDA content; increase water content.French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)[145]
Alcaligenes sp. AF7EPS, IAA, siderophore, PS, Zn solubilization, and GAEPS trapping Na+ from soil; increase water holding capacityRice plant
(Oryza sativa)
[146]
Paenibacillus yonginensis DCY84TIAA, siderophore, PS, and anti-bacterial activityIncrease sugars, proline, polyamine accumulation; enhance SOD, GPX, APX, and CAT activity; maintain moister content; decrease MDA, H2O2 level, and ABA accumulationPanax ginseng[147]
Sphingomonas sp., Pantoea sp, Bacillus sp., and Enterobacter sp. PS, N2 fixation, IAA, NH3, siderophore, ACC deaminaseColonization inside the root and mitigate salt stressHybrid Pennisetum (Pennisetum americanum
× P. purpureum Schumach)
[148]
Arthrobacter sp. and Bacillus megateriumIAA and PSβ-propeller phytase- BPP, choline oxidase- codA(a), β-amylase-amyG, γ-glutamyl kinase (γ-GK), and γ-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (γ-GPR)-proBA and HCN synthase-hcnBCTomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)[149]
Arthrobacter woluwensis AK1IAA, siderophores, PS, and GADecrease the Na+ and increase the Ca2+ concentration; increase GSH and SOD activity, decrease ABA; upregulate GmLAX, GmAKT2, GmST1, and GmSALT3; downregulate GmNHX1 and GmCLC1Soybean (Glycine max)[150]
Bacillus licheniformis and Enterobacter asburiaeIAA, NH3, siderophore, PS, and HCNEnhance P and K+ uptake and decreased plant Na+ uptake; biofilm developmentQuinoa plant (Chenopodium quinoa)[43]
Pseudomonas luridaIAA, siderophore, PS, and HCNEnhance uptake N, P and Kwheat (Triticum aestivum cv. VL 829)[41]
Planomicrobium sp. MSSA-10IAA, PS and ACC deaminaseDecrease level of MDA & H2O2; up-regulation CAT, POD, proline, phenolic activities; improve N, P, and K uptake Pea plants (Pisum sativum L)[151]
Arthrobacter pascens
and Bacillus sp.
Siderophore and PSEnhance the accumulation proline, sugar and amino acid; increase SOD, POD, CAT and APX activityMaize, Zea mays variety (Rakaposhi)[152]
Enterobacter sp. and Bacillus megateriumIAA, N2 fixation, PS, and ACC deaminaseReduce ethylene stress and increase APX, CAT, and SOD activityOkra (Abelmoschus esculentus L)[153]
Pseudomonas sp. PF17IAA, siderophore, pyocyanin, PS, HCN and chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanaseEnhance the RAS/RT ratio; biocontrol potentialitySunflower crop (Helianthus annuus)[154]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa AMAAS57 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa BM6.IAA, NH3, PS, and HCNIncrease carbohydrate level, phenol, free amino acid; decrease electrolytic leakage; and antifungal activityGround nut (Arachis hypogaea)[155]
Azotobacter chroococcumIAA, N2 fixation and PSIncrease K+/Na+ ratio and content of polyphenolCorn (Zea mays)[136]
Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiell sp., Serratia sp., Arthrobacter sp., Streptomyces sp., Isoptericola sp., and Microbacterium sp. IAA, N2 fixation, PS, and ACC deaminasemaintain the ethylene stress level; increase the accumulation of flavonoid production.Limonium sinense (Girard) Kuntze[156]
Pseudomonas sp. M30–35IAA, PS, N2 fixationIncrease CAT activity in leaf; decrease MDA content and REC; enhance accumulation soluble sugar and proline; and increase K+/Na+ concentrationRyegrass (Lolium perenne)[157]
Abbreviation: NH3: ammonia; EPS: extracellular polymeric substances; IAA: indole-3-Acetic Acid; PS: phosphate solubilization; ACC deaminase: aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase; HCN: Hydrogen cyanide; GA: gibberellic acid; CAT: catalase; GR: glutathione reductase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MDA: malondialdehyde; P: phosphate; N: nitrogen; K: potassium; RAS: root adhering soil; RT: root tissue; SA: salicylic acid; APX: ascorbate peroxidase; GPX: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: reduced glutathione; POD: Peroxidase; REC: relative electric conductivity.
Table 3. Application of salt-tolerant PSB in sustainable saline agriculture.
Table 3. Application of salt-tolerant PSB in sustainable saline agriculture.
ApplicationName of the ST-PSBResponseEffective CropReference
Biocontrol AgentPseudomonas sp. PF17 Antifungal- Macrophomina phaseolina Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)[154]
Pseudomonas putidaAntifungal- Alternaria alternata and Fusarium oxysporumMaize (Zea mays var. QPM-1)[186]
Pantoea sp. NII-186Antifungal-Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus niger, Geotrichum candidumNot detected[187]
Bacillus licheniformis HSW-164Antibacterial-Enterobacter sp., Erwinia carotovora, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli; Antifungal- Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Penicillium citrinum;Wheat (Triticum aestivum L., variety C-309)[175]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa AMAAS57 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa BM6.Antifungal-Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Sclerotium rolfsiiGround nut (Arachis hypogaea)[155]
Bacillus licheniformis A2Antifungal- Fusariun oxysporum[188]
BioremediationHalomonas sp. Exo1 Biosorption of arsenic through EPS Rice (Oryza sativa) variety Jarava[139]
Halomonas sp. MAN5, Halobacillus sp. ADN1, and Halobacillus sp. MAN6Assist phytoremediation (Sesuvium portulacastrum) against cadmium, nickel, mercury, and silverSesuvium portulacastrum[166]
Bacillus aryabhattai, Achromobacter denitrificans and Ochrobactrum intermediumResistant to Ni and CuRice (Oryza sativa L.)[189]
Bacillus altitudinis WR10Alleviated Cu toxicityWheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[190]
Salt alleviator and Phosphate biofertilizerAchromobacter piechaudiiIncrease fresh and dry weights of plant seedlings grown in the presence of up to 172 mM NaCl salt.Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L)[40]
Arthrobacter sp. and Bacillus sp. Increased plant growth in P-deficiency and salt-affected (12 ds m−1) soils by 47–115%. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L., cultivar Harzfeuer F1)[12]
Pseudomonas fluorescens Ms-01
Azosprillum brasilense DSM1690
Plant height, shoot and root weight are significantly increased by the inoculation of individual and co inoculation under salinity 7.49 ± 1.2 ds m−1 Wheat (T. aestivum L. var. Amal) [191]
Acinetobacter sp. and Bacillus sp. Both the endophytes alone or in combination promoted a greater vigor index, germination (%), plant biomass, P content compared to un- inoculated control under 160 mM NaCl.Phyllanthus amarus[192]
Bacillus altitudinis WR10The inoculated plant Significantly improved the seed germination rate, root dry weight, and enhance P availability from organic under salinity stress (200/400 mM NaCl) and phosphorus stress.Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[89]
Bacillus licheniformis and Enterobacter asburiaeEnhanced plant development/growth under 400 mM NaClQuinoa plant (Chenopodium quinoa)[43]
Bacillus megaterium AL-18 and Bacillus cereus AL-19Single and co inoculation of the strains in plant were significantly increased root length, plant height, root and shoot dry weight, phosphate content in plants and photosynthetic pigments under salt stress conditionsCommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Karnac)[90]
Pseudomonas mendocina Khsr2, Pseudomonas stutzeri Khsr3 and Pseudomonas putida Khsr4Root/shoot length and Root/shoot dry weight of the plant increase under normal and NaCl (20 ds m−1) stress. Maize (Zea mays L.) [193]
Rhizobium radiobacter LB2Enhance all parameter of plant growth with improved nutritional content in comparison to control under saline condition (EC~4.8 ds/m.) Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) [194]
Pseudomonas dimnuta, Xanthomanas sp. and Exiguobacterium sp.Increased the plant growth with respect to number of branches, height, dry matter accumulation and P content of plants under sodic conditionOcimum basilicum[91]
Bacillus atrophaeus S8 and Enterobacter sp. QE3Inoculation increase germination rate and seedling growth under salinity.Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa wild.)[195]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dey, G.; Banerjee, P.; Sharma, R.K.; Maity, J.P.; Etesami, H.; Shaw, A.K.; Huang, Y.-H.; Huang, H.-B.; Chen, C.-Y. Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081552

AMA Style

Dey G, Banerjee P, Sharma RK, Maity JP, Etesami H, Shaw AK, Huang Y-H, Huang H-B, Chen C-Y. Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria—A Review. Agronomy. 2021; 11(8):1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dey, Gobinda, Pritam Banerjee, Raju Kumar Sharma, Jyoti Prakash Maity, Hassan Etesami, Arun Kumar Shaw, Yi-Hsun Huang, Hsien-Bin Huang, and Chien-Yen Chen. 2021. "Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria—A Review" Agronomy 11, no. 8: 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop