Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Pasture Soil Fertility in Semiarid Agro-Silvo-Pastoral Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Variation in the Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils from Cultivars of Lavandula angustifolia and L. × intermedia
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Introgression of a Novel HMW-GS Gene from Aegilops tauschii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Efficacy and Convenience of Krameria lappacea for the Development of Botanical Fungicides and New Alternatives of Antifungal Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Studies on the Yield and Chemical Composition of the Herb of Plants of the Genus Ocimum Depending on the Development Stage of the Plant

by
Grażyna Zawiślak
,
Magdalena Walasek-Janusz
*,
Ewa Dorota Zalewska
* and
Robert Gruszecki
Department of Vegetable and Herb Crops, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Doświadczalna 50A, 20-280 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2710; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112710
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 29 October 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Diversity, Yield and Quality of Aromatic Plant)

Abstract

:
The research aimed to present the possibility of cultivating selected plants of the genus Ocimum in central-eastern Poland and to assess the chemical composition of the obtained raw material, considering the development stage of the plant. The research object consisted of six selected plants from the genus Ocimum: Ocimum basilicum, Ocimum basilicum var. purpurescens, Ocimum basilicum × citrodorum, Ocimum basilicum ‘Cinnamon’, Ocimum basilicum ‘Siam Queen’, Ocimum basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’. The herb was harvested on the following dates: mid-June (vegetative stage), mid-July (beginning of flowering), late July/early August (full flowering), end of August (late flowering). The research showed that plants of genus Ocimum sp. can be successfully introduced to cultivation in central-eastern Poland. The yield of these plants was at a high level (average yield of fresh herb—1.15 kg m−2 and average marketable yield—0.14 kg m−2). Plants of genus Ocimum sp. accumulated the least essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins in the vegetative stage (mean: essential oil—0.86%, flavonoids—0.60%, tannins—0.41%). The highest content of all tested secondary metabolites was found in the variety O. basilicum var. minimum “Minette”. The variability of the content of the analyzed compounds depending on the growth and flowering stage of the plants under study is diversified. For this reason, the date of harvesting raw materials from these plants should be selected individually to obtain a high-quality product.

1. Introduction

The Ocimum genus includes about 200 species of plants occurring in numerous cultivars and forms, differing in morphology and chemical composition [1,2,3]. Ocimum basillicum is one of Poland’s most popular species of spice herbs, which are grown in greenhouse and field crops. Due to the lower costs of field crops, it is advisable to prefer such plantations in our climate zone [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. O. basilicum L. is grown in temperate and hot regions [10,11]. In Italy and other Mediterranean countries (e.g., Spain and Turkey), professional basil production is primarily based on soilless cultivation techniques, especially hydroponics [12]. The rich chemical composition and the characteristic taste and aroma of O. basillicum L. have been widely used in Polish cuisine as a fresh, frozen, and dried seasoning [13]. Moreover, O. basilicum L. has not only spice but also medicinal properties [14,15,16,17,18]. Due to the wide availability of other cultivars and forms of the genus Ocimum, they should be popularized in field crops in Poland.
The research aimed to present the possibility of cultivating select development stage cultivars and forms of the genus Ocimum in central-eastern Poland and to assess the chemical composition of the obtained raw material, considering the development stage of the plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location of the Plantation

The research was conducted from 2017 to 2019. The experiment was established in the Experimental Station of the Department of Vegetable and Herb Crops of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, located in central-eastern Poland (51.23° N, 22.56° E).

2.2. Plant Material

The research objects of the genus Ocimum sp. were:
Ocimum basilicum;
Ocimum basilicum var. purpurescens (botanical variety);
Ocimum basilicum × citrodorum (hybrid);
Ocimum basilicum ‘Cynamon’ (breeding variety);
Ocimum basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ (breeding variety);
Ocimum basilicum var. minimum “Minette” (breeding variety).
The basil seedlings were grown in a greenhouse. The seeds were sown on 14 April in seed boxes filled with peat substrate. The sowing was covered with fine sand. The sand layer thickness was 2–3 mm. The first seedlings appeared after two weeks. The seedlings were planted into conical multi-pots on 4 May. In the conical multi-pots, the plants produce a well-developed root system, which facilitates planting in the field. The plants were planted in the field in mid-May, spaced 40 × 40 cm, in four replications. The size of one plot was 3.2 m−2. The experiment was assumed to be two-factorial. The factors were the plants of Ocimum sp. and the development stage of the plant (harvest time). The field was prepared following the recommendations of agrotechnics. Mineral fertilization was applied to the optimal level recommended for basil: 70 kg N ha−1, 60 kg P2O5 ha−1, and 80 kg K2O ha−1. The phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were applied when preparing the field before planting the seedlings. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied in two doses: half of the dose was applied during field preparation, and the remaining dose was applied after the seedlings had taken over. During the vegetation period, the weeds were controlled manually by hoes. The herbs were harvested at the following times:
  • mid-June (vegetative stage);
  • mid-July (beginning of flowering);
  • late July/early August (full flowering);
  • end of August (late flowering).
The basil herb was cut with a secateur 5–10 cm above the soil surface. Fixing the raw material through drying was carried out in a dryer heated at 35 °C. The drying process took about six days. Then, the basil yield was assessed by determining:
  • dry herb yield (kg m−2);
  • marketable yield (kg m−2);
  • share of marketable yield in the dry herb (kg m−2).
The marketable yield was obtained by manually separating the leaves from the thick stems. The marketable yield consisted of leaves and top thin fragments of stems.
The research material obtained from the field experiment was subjected to laboratory tests in which the content of essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins was determined.

2.3. Obtaining the Essential Oil

The hydrodistillation was performed in the Clevenger apparatus. For the determination, a sample of 20 g of the dry herb (marketable) was taken, placed in a round bottom flask, and 400 mL of distilled water was added. The mixture was brought to a boil, and the distillation rate was adjusted. The distillation was carried out for 3 h. After this time, the heating was turned off, and after 10 min, the volume of the oil collected in the calibration tube was read [19].

2.4. Flavonoid Determination

Flavonoids were determined spectrophotometrically (model UV-Vis Hitachi U-2900), after their extraction from the raw material. Samples of a raw material powder weighing an average 0.5 g and sieved by 0.315 mm sieve were placed in a round bottom flask. Then, solvents in the required amount were added to plant material according to the method described in the Polish Pharmacopoeia V [20]; they were 20 mL of acetone (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland), 2 mL of hydrochloric acid (250 g·L−1, Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland), and 1 mL methenamine (5 g·L−1, Merck, Poznań, Poland). The research material prepared in this way was maintained for 30 min under reflux on a water bath. The extract was filtered through cotton wool into a volumetric flask of 100 mL, and then together with the cotton pellet placed in a flask. Then, 20 mL of acetone was added to hydrolysate and heated again at boiling point for 10 min. The plant extracts were filtered back into a 100 mL volumetric flask. The missing amount of the extract was made up to 100 mL with acetone. Then, 20 mL of extract and 20 mL of water were dispensed into a separatory funnel and extracted with ethyl acetate (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) by 15 mL portions and three times with 10 mL. The combined organic layers were washed twice with 40 mL of water, filtered into a volumetric flask of 50 mL, and supplemented with ethyl acetate. To determine the two samples, 2 mL of a solution of aluminium chloride (20 g·L−1, Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) was added to 10 mL of the stock solution and supplemented with a mixture (1:19) of acetic acid (1.02 kg·L−1, Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) of methanol to 25 mL. The comparative solution was supplemented with 10 mL of the mixture (1:19) of acetic acid (1.02 kg·L−1) of methanol to 25 mL. After 45 min, the absorbance of the solutions was measured at a wavelength of 425 nm using the reference solution. The total content of flavonoids (%) was expressed in terms of quercetin, according to the formula:
X = (A·k)/m
A—the absorbance of the solution of the research;
k—convection factor for quercetin; k = 0.875;
m—the sample with the raw material in g [20].

2.5. Tannins Determination

Tannins were determined spectrophotometrically (model UV-Vis Hitachi U-2900), after their extraction from the dried raw material, according to the method described in the Polish Pharmacopoeia IX [19]. 1 g of finely powdered (0.16 mm sieve) raw material was weighed into a volumetric flask with a capacity of 250 mL, 150 mL of water was added and kept for 30 min in a boiling water bath. The mixture was cooled under a stream of water, quantitatively transferred to a volumetric flask with a capacity of 250 mL, filled up with water, and allowed the total raw material to sediment. The extract was filtered through filter paper; the first 50 mL was discarded, and the remaining filtrate was used for the determination. 5 mL of the obtained filtrate was moved to a flask and made up to 25 mL with water. Then, 1.0 mL of tungsten molybdenum phosphoric reagent (VWR Chemicals, Gdańsk, Poland) and 10.0 mL of water and sodium carbonate solution (290 g·L−1, Merck, Poznań, Poland) were added to 2 mL of the solutions to 25.0 mL. After 30 min, the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 760 nm, using water as a reference (A1). In order to determine that polyphenols are not associated with hide powder, 10.0 mL of 0.10 g of hide powder (Merck, Poznań, Poland) was added to the filtrate, shaken vigorously for 1 h, and filtered. Then, 5.0 mL of the filtrate was downloaded and supplemented with water to 25.0 mL, and then 2.0 mL of this solution was added 1.0 mL of tungsten molybdenum phosphoric reagent, then 10.0 mL of water, to make 25.0 mL sodium carbonate solution (290 g·L−1). After a further 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm using water as a reference (A2). Comparative A solution was prepared: just before the assay, 50.0 mg of pyrogallol (Merck, Poznań, Poland) was dissolved in water and made up to 100.0 mL with water. 5 mL of the resulting solution was supplemented with water to 100.0 mL; 1.0 mL of tungsten molybdenum phosphoric reagent and 10.0 mL of water, were added to 2.0 mL of this solution to make 25.0 mL sodium carbonate solution (290 g·L−1). After the next 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm, using water as a reference (A3). Tannin content (%) was calculated based on the pyrogallol:
62.5   ( A 1 A 2 )   m 2 A 3   m 1
A1—absorbance of polyphenols in the test solution,
A2—absorbance of polyphenols was not associated with powder leather in the test solution,
A3—absorbance of the solution comparative pyrogallol,
m1—starting weight of raw material,
m2—the sample with pyrogallol in g [19].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The obtained results are presented as means that were statistically analyzed by ANOVA according to a completely randomized design, and the averages were compared using Tukey’s HSD test at the probability level α = 0.05. Statistical analyses were calculated using Statistica 13.3 PL software (StatSof Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results

Based on the data in Table 1, it is shown that the yield of fresh and dry herb of the examined basil forms and cultivars was significantly influenced by the harvest date, which was determined by the plant development stage. The highest average yield of the fresh herb was obtained from the plants in the late flowering stage (1.55 kg m−2 on average) and the smallest from the plants harvested in the vegetative stage (0.62 kg m−2 on average). Analyzing the examined basil forms and cultivars, the highest average yield of the fresh herb was found in O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ (1.40 kg m−2). A smaller yield of the fresh herb was collected in O. basilicum × citrodorum, O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’, and O. basilicum, which were 1.29 kg m−2, 1.26 kg m−2, and 1.06 kg m−2, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest yield of fresh herb (less than 1 kg m−2) was obtained from O. basilicum var. purpurescens and O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’.
Analyzing the research results on dry herb (Table 1) and marketable yield (Table 2), it is shown that the raw material collected from plants in the full-flowering and late-flowering stages were at the highest level. The yield of dry herb obtained from plants in the full-flowering and late-flowering stages were 0.40 and 0.32 kg m−2 on average, while the marketable yields were 0.21 and 0.18 kg m−2, respectively. Considering the forms and cultivars of basil, the highest amount of dry herb was obtained from O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ (0.47 kg m−2 on average). This cultivar of basil was also characterized by the highest marketable yield (average 0.19 kg m−2).
Interestingly, the average yield of fresh O. basilicum herb (1.06 kg m−2) was not the highest among the tested samples (Table 1). O. basilicum is the most widespread cultivation in Poland. Therefore, considering the high yield value of other forms and cultivars of the genus Ocimum (O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’, O. basilicum × citrodorum, O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’), it is advisable to propagate them on production plantations.
When assessing the quality of raw basil yield, the share of the grated herb in dry form should be considered (Table 2). In all the examined forms and cultivars of basil, the highest share of marketable yield in dry herb was found during the harvesting of plants in the vegetative stage. It was, on average, 74.5%. Basil raw materials obtained from plants harvested during late flowering and full flowering were characterized by the lowest share of the marketable yield in dry herb (53.8% and 59.8%, respectively). The research showed the highest share of the marketable yield in the dried O. basilicum × citrodorum (68.6%).
As an aromatic plant, basil owes its fragrance to essential oils. The conducted research shows the significantly highest content of oil in O. basilicum (average 1.60%) and O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’ (average 1.48%) (Table 3). In other forms and cultivars of basil, the average level of essential oil was above 1%. Considering the development stage of the plant, it was shown that the least of this substance accumulates at the beginning of flowering (0.86% on average). The oil level rises until the plants full-flowering stage (average 1.49%) and then decreases (average 1.32%).
The conducted research shows that the content of flavonoids and tannins in the raw materials of all forms and cultivars of basil was also significantly the lowest in the vegetative stage (Table 3). With the development of the plant, the content of these compounds increased. The highest content of flavonoids was shown by plants in the fully flowering stage (0.73% on average), and the highest tannin content at the beginning and fully flowering stages (0.57% and 0.56% on average). The assessment of the effect of selected botanical, breeding, and hybrid varieties of the genus Ocimum sp. and the development stage of the plant on the yield and the content of essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins is presented in Table 4.

4. Discussion

One of the most important crops in the world containing oil, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and polyphenols is O. basilicum [9,21,22,23,24,25]. The quality of O. basilicum raw material is determined by climatic conditions, harvest time, plant spacing, fertilization, and irrigation [26,27].
In central-eastern Poland, the green-leaved O. basilicum and the purple-leaved form O. basilicum var. purpurescens are most commonly grown. Plantations are established less frequently, cultivating other forms and species of the genus Ocimum. This is due to the habits of producers and consumer preferences.
In all the examined forms and cultivars of basil, the highest yields of fresh herb were obtained from plants harvested in the full and late-flowering stages. This tendency was also visible in dry herb and marketable yields. The research by Zawiślak [28] on medical hyssop found a relationship between the plant’s development stage and yielding. The author showed a significantly higher yield of fresh herb, dry herb, and marketable yield from late-flowering plants. Literature data show that the relationship between the yielding of herbal plants and the plant’s development stage was found in thyme [29] and oregano [30].
The yield of fresh herbs depends on the form and cultivar of basil [6]. Majkowska-Gadomska et al. [6], in studies on the yield of selected forms and cultivars of basil harvested at the beginning of flowering, showed a lower yield of fresh and dry herbs than that obtained in the experiment. Only the yield of fresh herb O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’ was 1.05 kg m−2 and was higher than that obtained in central-eastern Poland. A similar tendency was visible in the yield of dry herbs.
Majdi et al. [31] indicated O. basilicum × citrodorum and O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ as natural sources of bioactive compounds, both in the form of direct consumption and infusions. The experiment showed a higher content of essential oil in cinnamon basil (1.28% on average) than in lemon basil (1.10% on average); these differences were statistically significant.
Zheljazkov [32], analyzing the content of essential oil in the dry herb of 38 genotypes of O. basilicum, indicated large fluctuations in the oil content (0.07–1.92%). In the experiment, the average oil content ranged from 0.86 to 1.49%. In all the tested forms and cultivars of basil, the lowest essential oil content was found in plants harvested in the vegetative stage. The oil content then increased until the plants started flowering (O. basilicum and O. basilicum × citrodorum) or until full flowering (O. basilicum var. purpurescens, O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’, O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’). The decrease in the oil content in the raw material was observed in all forms and varieties of basil harvested after flowering, with the exception of O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’.
Zawiślak [33] also showed a significant relationship between the plant development stage and the oil content in research on Hyssopus officinalis. The essential oil level in the hyssop herb increased from the vegetative to the full-flowering stage of the plant.
Seidler-Łożykowska et al. [34] showed the highest essential oil content in the herb O. basilicum of ‘Kasia’ and ‘Wala’ cultivars in full and late-flowering stages. Earlier research by Seidler-Łożykowska [34] showed oil levels in O. basilicum cultivars from 0.23% (‘Red Rubin’) to 1.67% (‘Kasia’).

5. Conclusions

The herb yield of plants of genus Ocimum sp. was diversified: the largest yield of fresh herb was obtained from O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ (average 1.40 kg m−2), and yield of dry herb and marketable yield from O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ (0.47 kg m−2 and 0.19 kg m−2, respectively). O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ had the highest yield of dry raw material and marketable yield from fresh raw material, which may indicate lower costs of obtaining it due to the need to evaporate smaller amounts of water, especially when harvested during full or late flowering. In light of the research carried out, O. basilicum var. purpurascens and O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’ should not be considered very effective. The delay in harvesting until late flowering contributed to the higher yield of fresh and dry herb, as well as the marketable yield.
Basil is perceived as an aromatic plant; therefore, the content of essential oil is decisive for the quality of the raw material. The greatest amount of oils was found in O. basilicum (average 1.60%) and O. basilicum var. minimum “Minette” (average 1.48%). On the other hand, the content of essential oils in Ocimum sp. plants varied depending on the flowering stage. In O. basilicum × citrodorum, the higher oil content was found at the beginning of flowering, in O. basilicum at the beginning and in full flowering, and in O. basilicum var. purpurascens and O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ during the full and late-flowering stages, while in O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ and O. basilicum var. minimum “Minette” throughout the flowering period. Maintaining a high oil content for a longer period of time should be considered a beneficial feature, as it allows us to extend the period of harvesting the raw material. The studied plants of the genus Ocimum sp. also differed in the content of flavonoids; their highest content was found in the herb O. basilicum var. minimum “Minette” (average 1.03%), and the least in O. basilicum “Cinnamon” (average 0.47%). As in the case of essential oils, changes in the content of these compounds during the growth and flowering of plants had different variability, e.g., O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’ contained a higher amount of flavonoids from the vegetative stage (average 0.63%) to the beginning of flowering (average 0.71%), while O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ during the late-flowering stage (average 1.19%).
In terms of tannin content, the studied plants of the genus Ocimum sp. can be divided into two groups. The first with a lower average tannin content (0.44–0.46%) (O. basilicum, O. basilicum var. purpurascens, O. basilicum × citrodorum and O. basilicum ‘Cinnamon’), and the second with an average content of tannins over 0.60% (O. basilicum ‘Siam Queen’ and O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’). Most often, the lowest levels of these compounds were found in the vegetative stage and at the end of the flowering period, and the highest at the beginning and in full flowering; however, for example, in O. basilicum × citrodorum and O. basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’, the highest level of tannins was found in the late-flowering period. The studied plants of the genus Ocimum sp. show significant differences in terms of both the yield and the content of essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins in the herb. The highest content of all tested secondary metabolites was found in the variety O. basilicum var. minimum “Minette”. The variability of the content of the analyzed compounds depending on the growth and flowering stage of the plants is diversified. For this reason, the time of harvesting raw materials from these plants should be chosen individually to obtain a high-quality product. Harvesting of raw material with a high content of essential oils of the studied plants of the genus Ocimum sp. allows us to obtain raw material with an intense smell, which can be used as a spice. The tannins, flavonoids, and essential oils contained in the raw materials can be an indicator of the use of basil in phytotherapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z.; methodology, G.Z.; software, G.Z.; validation, M.W.-J., R.G. and E.D.Z.; formal analysis, M.W.-J., R.G. and E.D.Z.; investigation, G.Z. and M.W.-J.; resources, G.Z., M.W.-J., E.D.Z. and R.G.; data curation, R.G. and E.D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, G.Z.; writing—review and editing, G.Z., M.W.-J., E.D.Z. and R.G.; visualization, M.W.-J. and R.G.; supervision, R.G.; project administration, M.W.-J. and E.D.Z.; funding acquisition, G.Z. and M.W.-J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Labra, M.; Mielem, M.; Ledda, B.; Grassi, F.; Mazzei, M.; Sala, F. Morphological characterization, essential oil composition and DNA genotyping of Ocimum basilicum L. cultivars. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Analiza zawartości i składu chemicznego dwóch form bazylii wonnej (Ocimum basilicum L.). Ann. UMCS 2001, 9, 189–193. [Google Scholar]
  3. Scharafzadeh, S.; Esmaeili, M.; Mohammadi, A.H. Interaction effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth, essential oil and total phenolic content of Sweet basil. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2011, 5, 1285–1289. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jadczak, D.; Błaszczuk, A.; Rekowska, E. Effect of concerning on the of microelements in field of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivated for bunch harvest. J. Elementol. 2006, 11, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Rożek, E.; Dzida, K.; Borowski, B. Growth response to nitrogen and potassium fertilization of common basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) plants. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2012, 11, 275–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Majkowska-Gadomska, J.; Mikulewicz, E.; Dobrowolski, A.; Dziedzic, A. Ecotype and Foliar Fertilization with Florovit Affect Herbage Yield and Quality of Greenhouse-Grown Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 7, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Saha, S.; Monroe, A.; Day, M.R. Growth, yield, plant quality and nutrition of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under soilless agricultural systems. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2016, 61, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Majkowska-Gadomska, J.; Kulczycka, A.; Dobrowolski, A.; Mikulewicz, A. Yield and nutritional value of basil grownin a greenhouse. Acta Agroph. 2017, 24, 455–464. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Chemical components and pharmacological benefits of Basil (Ocimum basilicum): A review. Inter. J. Food Proper. 2020, 23, 1961–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ȍzcan, M.; Chalchat, J.C. Essential oil composition of Ocimum basilicum L. and Ocimum minimum L. in Turkey. Czech J. Food Sci. 2002, 20, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ȍzcan, M.; Arslan, D.; Ȕnver, A. Effect of drying methods on the mineral content of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Food Eng. 2005, 69, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Corrado, G.; Chiaiese, P.; Lucini, L.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Successive Harvests Affect Yield, Quality andMetabolic Profile of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Biesiada, A.; Kuś, A. The effect of nitrogen fertilization and irrigation on yielding and nutritional status of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2010, 9, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiang, L.-C.; Ng, L.-T.; Cheng, P.-W.; Chiang, W.; Lin, C.-C. Antiviral activities of extracts and selected pure constituents of Ocimum basilicum. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005, 32, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hussain, A.J.; Anwar, F.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Przybylski, R. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of basil (Ocimum basilicum) essential oils depends on seasonal variations. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khair-ul-Bariyah, S.; Ahmed, D.; Ikram, M. Ocimum Basilicum: A Review on Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies. Pak. J. Chem. 2012, 2, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miraj, S.; Kiani, S. Study of pharmacological effect of Ocimum basilicum: A review. Der Pharm. Lett. 2016, 8, 276–280. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rubab, S.; Hussain, I.; Khan, B.A.; Unar, A.A.; Abbas, K.A.; Khichi, Z.H.; Khan, M.; Khanum, S.; Rehman, K.U.; Khan, H. Biomedical Description of Ocimum basilicum L. JIIMC 2017, 12, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  19. Farmakopea Polska IX. (Polish Pharmacopoeia IX); Urząd Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych: Warszawa, Poland, 2011.
  20. Farmakopea Polska, V. (Polish Pharmacopoeia V); Urząd Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych: Warszawa, Poland, 1990.
  21. Jayasinghe, C.; Gotoh, N.; Aoki, T.; Wada, S. Phenolics Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4442–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Javanmardi, J.; Khalighi, A.; Kashi, A.; Bais, H.P.; Vivanco, J.M. Chemical Characterization of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Found in Local Accessions and Used in Traditional Medicines in Iran. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5878–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bilal, A.; Jahan, N.; Ahmed, A.; Bilal, S.N.; Habib, S.; Hajra, S. Phytochemical and pharmacological studies on Ocimum basilicum Linn—A review. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 2012, 4, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  24. Baczek, K.; Kosakowska, O.; Gniewosz, M.; Gientka, I.; Weglarz, Z. Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Productivity and Raw Material Quality from Organic Cultivation. Agronomy. 2019, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mostafavi, S.; Asadi-Gharneh, H.A.; Miransari, M. The Phytochemical Variability of Fatty Acids in Basil Seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) Affected by Genotype and Geographical Differences. Food Chem. 2019, 276, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jadczak, D. Wpływ terminu siewu i odległości rzędów na plonowanie bazylii pospolitej (Ocimum basilicum L.). Rocz. AR Pozn. Ogrod. 2007, 383, 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ekren, S.; Sönmez, C.; Özcakal, E.; Kurttas, Y.S.K.; Bayram, E.; Gürgülü, H. The effect of different irrigation water levels on yield and quality characteristics of purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 109, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zawiślak, G. Hyssop herb yield and quality depending on harvest term and plant spacing. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2011, 10, 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  29. Badi, H.N.; Yazdani, D.; Ali, S.M.; Nazari, F. Effects of sparing and harvesting time on herbage field and quality/quantity of oil in thyme, Thymus vulgaris L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2004, 19, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Herb yield and chemical composition of common oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) essential oil according to the plant’s developmental stage. Herba Pol. 2009, 55, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  31. Majdi, C.; Pereira, C.; Dias, M.I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Rhourri-Frih, B.; Charrouf, Z.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phytochemical Characterization and Bioactive Properties of Cinnamon Basil (Ocimum basilicum cv. ‘Cinnamon’) and Lemon Basil (Ocimum citriodorum). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Callahan, A.; Cantrell, C.L. Yield and Oil Composition of 38 Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Accessions Grown in Mississippi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zawiślak, G. The chemical composition of essential hyssop oil depending on plant growth stage. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2013, 12, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  34. Seidler-Lożykowska, K.; Król, D. The content of essential oil in ten sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars and its composition. Herba Pol. 2008, 54, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Yield of the plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Table 1. Yield of the plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Ocimum sp.Development Stage of the PlantYield of Fresh Herb (kg m−2)Dry Herb Yield (kg m−2)
201720182019Mean201720182019Mean
Ocimum basilicumVegetative stage0.44 jk *0.55 f–h0.62 lm0.54 kl0.06 g0.07 ef0.09 g–i0.08 jk
Beginning of flowering1.11 e–h1.13 c–e1.09 g–j1.11 e–h0.25 b–e0.29 c–e0.23 d–g0.26 d–g
Full flowering1.12 e–h1.14 c–e1.27 d–h1.18 ef0.20 c–g0.27 c–f0.43 bc0.30 de
Late flowering1.58 bc1.31 b–d1.42 b–g1.44 cd0.35 b0.27 c–f0.30 cd0.31 de
Mean1.06 C1.03 C1.10 B 1.06 C0.22 BC0.23 B0.26 AB0.23 B
Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascensVegetative stage0.4 k0.70 e–h0.32 m0.47 l0.06 g0.07 ef0.03 i0.05 k
Beginning of flowering0.9 1g–i1.11 c–f0.78 i–l0.93 hi0.15 d–g0.22 c–f0.14 e–i0.17 g–j
Full flowering1.2 d–g1.19 c–e0.97 h–l1.12 e–h0.30 b–d0.23 c–f0.20 d–h0.24 e–h
Late flowering1.3 c–e1.52 a–c1.21 e–h1.35 de0.23 b–f0.40 bc0.19 d–h0.28 d–f
Mean0.95 C1.13 BC0.82 C0.97 D0.19 BC0.23 B0.14 C0.19 C
Ocimum basilicum × citrodorumVegetative stage0.6 i–k0.73 e–h0.69 k–m0.67 j–l0.09 fg0.10 d–f0.08 hi0.09 jk
Beginning of flowering1.25 c–f1.05 c–g1.32 c–h1.21 de0.18 c–g0.20 c–f0.21 d–h0.20 f–i
Full flowering1.42 b–e1.93 a1.59 a–d1.65 bc0.29 b–d0.32 cd0.30 cd0.31 de
Late flowering1.53 b–d1.87 ab 1.49 b–f1.63 bc 0.32 bc 0.40 bc0.32 cd0.35 d
Mean 1.20 B1.40 A1.27 A1.29 B0.22 BC0.26 B0.23 B0.24 B
Ocimum basilicum ‘Cinnamon’Vegetative stage0.7 i–k0.43 h0.62 lm0.59 kl0.08 fg0.05 f0.07 hi0.07 k
Beginning of flowering1.16 e–h1.07 c–g1.12 f–i1.12 e–h0.19 c–g0.15 d–f0.11 f–i0.15 h–k
Full flowering1.53 b–d1.51 a–c1.79 ab1.61 bc0.69 a0.62 b0.64 a0.65 b
Late flowering1.7 ab2.01 a1.52 b–e1.74 ab0.81 a1.72 a0.44 bc0.99 a
Mean 1.27 B1.26 AB1.26 A1.26 B0.44 A0.39 A0.32A0.47 A
Ocimum basilicum ‘Siam Queen’Vegetative stage0.85 hi0.50 gh0.72 j–l0.69 j–l0.12 e–g0.09 d–f0.10 g–i0.10 i–k
Beginning of flowering1.30 c–e1.35 b–d1.25 d–h1.30 de0.19 c–g0.20 c–f0.33 cd0.24 e–h
Full flowering1.72 ab1.54 a–c1.67 a–c1.64 bc0.31 bc0.24 c–f0.27 de0.27 d–f
Late flowering1.96 a2.01 a1.91 a1.96 a0.33 bc0.59 b0.49 b0.47 c
Mean 1.46 B1.35 AB1.39 A1.40 A0.24 B0.28 B0.30A0.27 B
Ocimum basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’Vegetative stage0.76 ij0.80 d–h0.72 j–l0.76 i–k0.11 e–g0.12 d–f0.10 g–i0.11 i–k
Beginning of flowering0.93 f–i0.78 d–h0.81 i–l0.84 ij0.11 e–g0.23 c–f0.10 g–i0.15 h–k
Full flowering0.89 g–i0.99 c–h1.01 h–k0.96 f–i0.13 e–g0.18 c–f0.20 d–h0.17 g–j
Late flowering1.21 d–g1.32 b–d1.20 e–h1.24 de0.30 b–d0.40 bc0.25 d–f0.32 de
Mean 0.94 C0.97 C0.94 C0.95 D0.16 C0.23 B0.16 C0.19 C
MeanVegetative stage0.63 J0.61 J0.62 I0.62 J0.09 J0.08 J0.08 I0.08 J
Beginning of flowering1.10 I1.09 I1.06 H1.09 I0.18 I0.22 I0.19 H0.19 I
Full flowering1.31 H1.41 H1.38 G1.37 H0.32 H0.31 H0.34 G0.32 H
Late flowering1.55 G1.64 G1.46 G1.55 G0.39 G0.46 G0.33 G0.40 G
Mean 1.15 XY1.19 X1.13 Y1.150.24 Y0.27 X0.23 Y0.25
* Means followed by the same letter in the columns do not differ significantly by the Tukey test at 5% of probability. The means being compared are marked with successive, capital, or lowercase letters.
Table 2. Marketable yield of the plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Table 2. Marketable yield of the plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Ocimum sp.Development Stage of the PlantMarketable Yield (kg m−2)Share of Grated in the Dry Herb (%)
201720182019Mean201720182019Mean
Ocimum basilicumVegetative stage0.05 gh *0.05 g–i0.07 f–h0.06 m–o83.371.477.877.5
Beginning of flowering0.19 cd0.18 b–g0.16 c–f0.18 d–f76.062.169.669.2
Full flowering0.10 c–h0.12 d–i0.32 a0.18 c–f50.044.474.456.3
Late flowering0.20 bc0.15 c–i0.14 c–g0.16 d–g57.155.646.753.1
Mean0.14 B0.13 C0.17 A0.15 B66.658.467.164.0
Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascensVegetative stage0.03 h0.04 hi0.02 h0.03 o50.057.166.757.9
Beginning of flowering0.08 e–h0.12 d–i0.09 f–h0.10 i–n53.354.564.357.4
Full flowering0.15 c–f0.19 a–g0.10 e–h0.15 e–j50.082.650.060.9
Late flowering0.10 c–h0.19 a–f0.12 c–g0.14 e–k43.547.563.251.4
Mean0.11 C0.17 BC0.08 C0.11 C49.260.461.056.9
Ocimum basilicum × citrodorumVegetative stage0.07 f–h0.09 e–i0.07 f–h0.08 k–o77.890.087.585.1
Beginning of flowering0.14 c–g0.12 d–i0.13 c–g0.13 f–l77.860.061.966.6
Full flowering0.19 bc0.21 a–e0.22 a–c0.21 cd65.565.673.368.2
Late flowering0.18 c–e0.23 a–d0.16 c–f0.19 c–e56.357.550.054.6
Mean0.15 B0.16 A–C0.15 AB0.15 B69.368.368.268.6
Ocimum basilicum ‘Cinnamon’Vegetative stage0.07 f–h0.03 i0.04 gh0.05 no87.560.061.469.6
Beginning of flowering0.10 c–h0.12 d–i0.07 f–h0.10 h–n52.680.063.665.4
Full flowering0.29 b0.27 a–c0.31 ab0.29 ab42.043.548.444.7
Late flowering0.42 a0.31 ab0.21 b–d0.31 a51.943.147.747.5
Mean0.22 A0.18 AB0.16 AB0.19 A58.556.755.356.8
Ocimum basilicum ‘Siam Queen’Vegetative stage0.09 d–h0.08 f–i0.07 f–h0.08 k–o75.088.970.078.0
Beginning of flowering0.08 e–h0.17 c–h0.2 c–e0.15 d–i42.185.060.662.6
Full flowering0.17 c–e0.19 a–f0.12 d–h0.16 d–h54.879.244.459.5
Late flowering0.19 cd0.32 a0.22 b–d0.24 bc57.654.244.952.2
Mean0.13 B0.19 A0.15 AB0.16 B57.476.855.063.1
Ocimum basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’Vegetative stage0.09 d–h0.05 g–i0.09 f–h0.09 j–o81.875.080.078.9
Beginning of flowering0.07 f–h0.09 e–i0.08 f–h0.07 l–o63.621.780.055.1
Full flowering0.1 c–h0.12 d–i0.13 c–g0.12 g–m76.966.765.069.5
Late flowering0.19 c0.21 a–e0.19 c–e0.20 c–e63.352.576.063.9
Mean0.11 C0.12 C0.12 BC0.12 C71.454.075.366.9
MeanVegetative stage0.07 J0.06 J0.06 I0.06 J75.973.773.974.5
Beginning of flowering0.11 I0.13 I0.12 H0.12 I60.960.666.762.7
Full flowering0.17 H0.18 H0.20 G0.18 H56.663.759.359.8
Late flowering0.21 G0.24 G0.17 G0.21 G54.951.754.753.8
Mean0.14 X0.15 X0.14 X0.1462.162.463.662.7
* Means followed by the same letter in the columns do not differ significantly by the Tukey test at 5% of probability. The means being compared are marked with successive, capital, or lowercase letters.
Table 3. The content of essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins in the herb of plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Table 3. The content of essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins in the herb of plants of Ocimum sp. depending on the development stage of the plant (average for 2017–2019).
Ocimum sp.Development Stage of the PlantEssential Oil (%)Flavonoids (%)Tannins (%)
201720182019Mean201720182019Mean201720182019Mean
Ocimum basilicumVegetative stage0.95 de *1.05 e–h0.85 f–h0.95 fghij0.55 e–g0.47 j–l0.60 f–h0.54 ij0.30 jk0.20 o0.70 cd0.40 ij
Beginning of flowering2.05 a2.10 ab1.98 a2.04 a0.83 c0.74 de0.93 c0.83 e0.42 f–h0.57 f–h0.49 h–j0.49 e–g
Full flowering1.73 ab2.17 a1.92 ab1.94 a0.71 c–e0.65 e–g0.82 d0.73 f0.47 d–f0.50 g–i0.43 i–k0.47 f–h
Late flowering1.20 b–e1.53 a–g1.72 a–c1.48 b–d0.63 d–f0.59 f–i0.65 ef0.62 gh0.40 f–i0.35 lm0.42 jk0.39 ij
Mean1.48 A1.71 A1.62 A1.60 A0.68 B0.61 C0.75 B0.68 B0.40 D0.41 E0.51 BC0.44 D
Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascensVegetative stage0.70 e0.58 h0.64 h0.64 j0.4 gh0.42 k–m0.39 lm0.40 mn0.45 ef0.39 k–m0.52 gh0.45 gh
Beginning of flowering1.25 b–e0.69 gh1.32 c–f1.09 e–i0.58 d–g0.64 e–g0.53 h–j0.58 hi0.50 de0.45 i–k0.53 f–h0.49 e–g
Full flowering1.78 ab1.34 a–h1.29 c–f1.47 b–d0.69 c–e0.70 d–f0.68 e0.69 fg0.52 d0.47 i–k0.60 ef0.53 de
Late flowering0.88 de1.32 b–h1.74 a–c1.31 c–f0.55 e–g0.47 j–l0.6 f–h0.54 ij0.37 g–i0.45 i–k0.32 l0.38 j
Mean1.15 B–D0.98 C1.25 BC1.13 C0.56 DE0.56 D0.55 D0.55 D0.46 C0.44 D0.49 C0.46 C
Ocimum basilicum × citrodorumVegetative stage0.9 de1.13 c–h0.83 f–h0.95 f–j0.60 d–f0.74 de0.55 g–i0.63 gh0.45 ef0.32 mn0.41 k0.39 ij
Beginning of flowering1.40 b–d1.57 a–f1.32 c–f1.43 b–e0.74 cd0.80 d 0.59 f–h0.71 f0.35 ij0.40 k–m0.69 cd0.48 fg
Full flowering1.03 de1.12 c–h1.07 d–h1.07 e–i0.60 d–f0.52 h–k0.47 jk0.53 ij0.35 h–j0.40 j–m0.54 f–h0.43 hi
Late flowering0.92 de0.73 f–h1.21 c–g0.95 f–j0.58 d–g0.63 e–h0.55 g–i0.58 hi0.5 de0.49 h–j0.52 gh0.50 ef
Mean1.06 CD1.14 BC1.11 C1.10 C0.63 BC0.67 B0.54 D0.61 C0.41 D0.40 E0.54 B0.45 CD
Ocimum basilicum ‘Cinnamon’Vegetative stage1.02 de0.93 e–h0.71 gh0.88 h–j0.36 h0.43 k–m0.38 lm0.39 mn0.27 k0.26 no0.19 m0.24 l
Beginning of flowering1.43 b–d1.62 a–e1.08 d–h1.38 b–e0.55 e–g0.48 i–l0.6 fg0.55 ij0.74 b0.93 a0.20 m0.63 c
Full flowering1.20 b–e1.54 a–g1.7 a–c1.48 b–d0.6 d–f0.40 lm0.53 g–j0.51 jk0.42 fg0.59 fg0.63 de0.55 d
Late flowering1.39 b–d1.27 b–h1.45 a–e1.37 b–e0.46 f–h0.47 j–l0.32 m0.42 lm0.36 g–j0.50 g–i0.32 l0.39 ij
Mean1.26 A–C1.34 B1.24 BC1.28 B0.49 E0.45 E0.46 E0.47 E0.45 C0.57 C0.34 D0.45 CD
Ocimum basilicum ‘Siam Queen’Vegetative stage0.79 e0.75 f–h0.83 f–h0.79 ij0.28 h0.32 m0.42 lk0.34 n0.3 jk0.42 i–l0.29 l0.34 k
Beginning of flowering0.76 e0.90 e–h1.30 cd–f0.99 f–j0.36 h0.66 e–g0.42 lk0.48 j–l0.75 b0.60 f0.50 hi0.62 c
Full flowering1.05 de1.70 a–e0.95 e–h1.24 d–h0.42 gh0.55 g–j0.50 ij0.49 jk0.70 b0.85 ab0.92 a0.82 a
Late flowering1.12 c–e1.12 d–h1.55 a–d1.26 d–g1.2 b1.02 c1.35 a1.19 C0.70 b0.75 cd0.82 b0.76 b
Mean0.93 D1.12 BC1.16 BC1.07 C0.57 CD0.64 BC0.67 C0.63C0.61 B0.66 B0.63 A0.64 B
Ocimum basilicum var. minimum ‘Minette’Vegetative stage0.93 de1.03 e–h0.84 f–h0.93 g–j1.28 b1.23 b1.35 a1.29 b0.61 c0.71 de0.59 e–g0.64 c
Beginning of flowering1.65 a–c2.02 ab1.36 b–f1.68 a–c0.87 c0.95 c1.13 b0.98 d0.72 b0.69 de0.73 c0.72 b
Full flowering1.28 b–e1.94 a–d1.97 a1.73 ab1.47 a1.4 a1.32 a1.4 a0.51 de0.64 ef0.48 h–k0.55 d
Late flowering1.45 b–d1.97 a–c1.28 c–f1.57 b–d0.35 h0.42 k–m0.55 g–i0.44 k–m0.89 a0.80 bc0.74 c0.81 a
Mean1.33 AB1.74 A1.36 B1.48 A0.99 A1.00 A1.09 A1.03A0.68 A0.71 A0.64 A0.68 A
MeanVegetative stage0.88 I0.91 I0.78 H0.86 I0.58 I0.60 H0.62 I0.60 J0.40 J0.38 I0.450.41 J
Beginning of flowering1.42 G1.48 GH1.39 G1.44 G0.66 H0.71 G0.70 G0.69 H0.58 G0.61 G0.520.57 G
Full flowering1.35 G1.64 G1.48 G1.49 G0.75 G0.70 G0.72 G0.73 G0.50 I0.58 H0.600.56 H
Late flowering1.16 H1.32 H1.49 G1.32 H0.63 HI0.60 H0.67 H0.63 I0.54 H0.56 H0.520.54 I
Mean1.20 Y1.34 X1.29 X1.280.65 Y0.65 Y0.68 X0.660.50 Y0.53 X0.52 X0.52
* Means followed by the same letter in the columns do not differ significantly by the Tukey test at 5% of probability. The means being compared are marked with successive, capital, or lowercase letters. Results represent the mean ± SD of three independent measurements.
Table 4. Evaluation of the effect of selected botanical, breeding, and hybrid varieties of the genus Ocimum sp. and the development stage of the plant on the yield, and essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins content.
Table 4. Evaluation of the effect of selected botanical, breeding, and hybrid varieties of the genus Ocimum sp. and the development stage of the plant on the yield, and essential oil, flavonoids, and tannins content.
Yield of Fresh HerbDry Herb YieldMarketable YieldEssential OilFlavonoidsTannins
Ocimum sp.******************
Development stage of the plant******************
Year****n.s.*******
Ocimum sp. × Development stage of the plant******************
Ocimum sp. × Year******************
Development stage of the plant × Year*****************
Ocimum sp. × Development stage of the plant × Year******************
Legends: *: significant difference at p < 0.05; **: significant difference at p < 0.01; ***: significant difference at p < 0.001; n.s.: not significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zawiślak, G.; Walasek-Janusz, M.; Zalewska, E.D.; Gruszecki, R. Studies on the Yield and Chemical Composition of the Herb of Plants of the Genus Ocimum Depending on the Development Stage of the Plant. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112710

AMA Style

Zawiślak G, Walasek-Janusz M, Zalewska ED, Gruszecki R. Studies on the Yield and Chemical Composition of the Herb of Plants of the Genus Ocimum Depending on the Development Stage of the Plant. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zawiślak, Grażyna, Magdalena Walasek-Janusz, Ewa Dorota Zalewska, and Robert Gruszecki. 2022. "Studies on the Yield and Chemical Composition of the Herb of Plants of the Genus Ocimum Depending on the Development Stage of the Plant" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop