Next Article in Journal
Climatic Mechanism of Delaying the Start and Advancing the End of the Growing Season of Stipa krylovii in a Semi-Arid Region from 1985–2018
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Legume–Grass Ratio on C and Nutrients of Root and Soil in Common Vetch–Oat Mixture under Fertilization
Previous Article in Journal
Using Visible and Thermal Images by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Monitor the Plant Water Status, Canopy Growth and Yield of Olive Trees (cvs. Frantoio and Leccino) under Different Irrigation Regimes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lucerne Proportion Regulates Competitive Uptake for Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Lucerne and Grass Mixtures on the Loess Plateau of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Optimal Cropping System to Improve the Water Use Efficiency and Soil Water Restoration after Lucerne-to-Crop Conversion in the Semiarid Environment

1
State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Resources and Environmental Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1905; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081905
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 14 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forage and Grain Crops Productivity in Their Coupling Systems)

Abstract

:
Due to depleting water supplies and the cultivation of high water-demanding crops such as lucerne, the effect of water deficits in crop production has become a major concern, especially in semiarid regions of China. A six-year field experiment (2012–2018) was conducted to evaluate soil water recovery and soil fertility after lucerne-to-crop conversions on the western Loess Plateau of China. Six rotation treatments (lucerne initially grew from 2003 to 2012 followed by the rotation of other crops or fallow until assessments in 2018) were: (1) lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)–lucerne (L-L); (2) lucerne–fallow (L-F); (3) lucerne–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (L-W); (4) lucerne–corn (Zea mays L.) (L-C); (6) lucerne–potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) (L-P); and (6) lucerne–millet (Setaria italica) (L-M). The same crops were grown each year after cultivation during 2013–2018. According to the findings, all rotation types gradually increased the soil water content, with the 0–110 cm soil layer experiencing the maximum soil water replenishment rate, followed by the 110–200 and 200–300 cm soil layers. After converting lucerne to crops, the amount of organic carbon, total nitrogen, and mineral nitrogen in the soil decreased, whereas total phosphorus and accessible phosphorus increased. Soil bulk density was reduced under rotation treatments. Soil water absolute restoration index was the highest under L-F, followed by L-C, L-W, L-P, and L-M. The rate of soil water recovery was 39.5, 33.0, 33.7, 33.5, 29, and 8.2 mm yr−1 under L-F, L-W, L-C, L-P, L-M, and L-L, respectively. The net economic return was greatest under L-C, followed by L-L, L-W, L-P, and L-M. From the analysis of the long-term experimental results, this study shows that the effect of soil water restoration is greatest when continuous alfalfa is converted into wheat, corn, and potato or fallow after 9 years. When the economic benefits and soil moisture recovery are considered comprehensively, corn sown in a ridge–furrow system with fully plastic film annual mulching is the most suitable field management practice after lucerne-to-crop conversion on the western Loess Plateau of China.

1. Introduction

Dryland covers a substantial portion of China’s northwest, accounting for roughly 56 percent of the country’s overall land area [1,2]. This region has a loess topography and a large semiarid area, with average annual precipitation ranging from 300 to 600 mm, as well as extreme climatic conditions, such as periodic spring droughts and severe wind and water erosion [3,4,5]. Limited and erratic rainfall is the major water resource for agricultural production. As a result, water scarcity is the most significant constraint to agricultural production in this region [3,6,7]. The Chinese government began a program in 1998 to convert agriculture on steep slopes to forest and perennial plants, with the ultimate goal of reducing soil erosion [6,8,9]. Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the most productive forage plants as a result of its high herbage yield and protein concentration, tolerance to drought and cold, and ability to protect against soil erosion. Lucerne is regarded as the preferred species for returning farmland to perennial vegetation in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau [6,8,9,10]. Especially in the last decade, with the rapid development of animal husbandry, the demand for forage has increased significantly, and lucerne production has increased gradually in Northwest China.
Lucerne has a high evapotranspiration rate and water consumption compared to other crops [8,11]. Long-term lucerne production depletes soil phosphorus (P) and creates severe soil dryness in deep soil layers, limiting land productivity in arid climates [9,10,11,12]. Lucerne can increase soil water demand by at least 50 mm throughout the growing season when compared to other crops [13,14]. When the age of lucerne stands reaches ten years, the desiccation of the 0–6 m soil layer reaches an excessive level, and the restoration of soil water is difficult, according to a study [15]. Thus, in order to recover soil water in dry soil layers and maintain land productivity, the development of economical cropping systems with higher water use efficiency (WUE) for this semiarid region is required.
In dryland agroecosystems in North America, the adoption of a forage–grain crop rotation dramatically boosted crop productivity by conserving soil water and nutrients [16]. In Australia, leguminous forage–crop rotation has permitted the healthy development of agroecosystems [17]. A study in northwestern China demonstrated that lucerne–crop systems recover soil water in dry soil layers, and that crop yields in the lucerne–crop systems were comparable to those in a conventional system with fertilizer application, despite the fact that no fertilizer was applied [18]. After several years of lucerne production, this evidence suggests that lucerne crop rotation can restore soil water and maintain land productivity [10,19]. However, few studies have focused on soil water recovery, soil fertility, and economic return after lucerne-to-crop conversion. Knowledge of the soil water recovery response to the conversion of lucerne to crops in China, and how this is affected by crop species, is paramount for sustainable agricultural production. Such knowledge could serve as a basis for lucerne–crop rotation in semiarid environments. As a result, the goal of this research was to look at soil water recovery and economic returns when lucerne was converted to crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Site

From October 2012 to October 2018, a long-term field experiment was undertaken in Dingxi City (35°28′ N, 104°44′ E), Gansu Province, China. With an average yearly radiation of 593 J cm−2, annual sunshine hours of 2477 h, annual mean air temperature of 6.4 °C, maximum air temperature of 38 °C (July), and lowest air temperature of 22 °C, the experimental location has a medium temperate semiarid climate (January). The average annual pan evaporation is 1531 mm [20] and long-term average annual rainfall is 390 mm. The top 0−20 cm soil had 0.256 cm3 cm−3 field capacity, 0.085 cm3 cm−3 wilting point, 1.20 g cm−3 bulk density, 10.3 g kg−1 organic carbon, 8.4 pH, 1.1 g kg−1 total nitrogen (N), 1.9 mg kg−1 available P, and 230 mg kg−1 available potassium.

2.2. Experimental Design and Field Management

A nine-year-old lucerne-producing field was divided into two halves in April 2012: one was plowed, and the other was kept under lucerne. The plowed field was divided into five sections to plant selected crops in the following sequences: (1) lucerne–fallow (L-F); (2) lucerne–wheat (L-W); (3) lucerne–corn (L-C); (4) lucerne–potato (L-P); (5) lucerne–millet (L-M) (Table 1). In this study, each treatment was replicated three times, and each plot was 3 m wide × 4 m long. In this study, all field management practices for each crop (i.e., tillage, planting mode, fertilization) were operated according to the local farming practices in the area. Spring wheat (cv. Dingxi 42) and millet (cv. Longgu 11) were sown with a drill (6 rows spaced 20 cm apart) at a density of 470 and 30 plants m−2; corn (cv. Xianyu 335) was sown at a density of 52,500 plants ha−1 in a ridge–furrow system with fully plastic film annual mulching [21]; potato (cv. Xindaping) was sown at a density of 52,500 plants ha−1 with a within-row plant spacing of 45 cm without mulching on flat plot. Lucerne was only fertilized at a rate of 45.8 kg P ha−1 as triple superphosphate and 105 kg N ha−1 as urea at planting in 2003. Wheat, potato, and millet received 45.8 kg P ha−1 as triple superphosphate and 105 kg N ha−1 as urea, and maize received 45.8 kg P ha−1 as triple superphosphate and 200 kg N ha−1 as urea. Fertilizers were evenly broadcast on the soil surface and incorporated into the soil with tillage before sowing. Corn, millet, and potato were sown in early May and harvested in early October every year, while spring wheat was sown in late March and harvested in early August every year. All crop residues were removed from plots during harvest. All plots were plowed twice per year except for lucerne, once before sowing and again after harvest. Weeds were hand removed when sighted throughout the growing period.

2.3. Measurements and Data Analysis

Meteorological data was obtained from an automatic weather station located at the experimental site. Soil moisture was measured in October of each year, three soil samples of each plot from the 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depth layers were randomly collected using an auger (4.5 cm inner diameter) to determine soil moisture. A Trime-Pico IPH was used to measure volumetric soil water contents from the 30–50, 50–80, 80–110, 110–140, 140–170, 170–200, 200–250, and 250–300 cm soil layers (Precise Soil Moisture Measurement, IMKO Micromodul technik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). No irrigation was applied to crops during the experimental years. The drought index (DI) for yearly rainfall was generated similar to the previous study and used to examine fluctuations and status in rainfall over the six years [2].
Manual harvesting of lucerne took place twice a year, in late June and early October. Plant samples were weighed after being dried for 72 h at 75 degrees Celsius. The entire aboveground biomass taken from both harvests was used to calculate the lucerne annual fodder yield. At physiological maturity, all wheat, corn, potato, and millet plants in each plot were manually harvested. After harvest, the aboveground biomass was weighed before threshing, and a subsample of aboveground biomass was collected from each plot and baked for 30 min at 105 °C, then 48 h at 80 °C, and then weighed to assess moisture content, which was used to compute dry biomass yield. For each plot, the air-dried grain weight was also recorded and utilized to determine grain yield. Each plot’s fresh tuber yield was recorded and utilized to calculate potato yield.
Because crop yields are not directly comparable, they must be adjusted to account for differences in economic value per unit of yield weight. As a result, the net economic return on each treatment was determined in this study. Straw was included in the revenue calculations in this study for all crops except potato. According to a previous study, the net economic return was computed [21]. Previous studies were used to calculate the prices of grains, pasture, and numerous agricultural inputs [21,22,23,24].
The saturation of available soil water (SASW) for plants was quantified as the ratio of plant-available water storage and available water holding capacity. Information on the SASW in deep profiles is indispensable for understanding soil–plant interactions and soil water storage degree in the region [25]. The SASW was calculated according to the previous study [25]. The following equation was used to calculate the soil water relative restoration index [18].
W R = W C 1 W C 0 × 100 %
where WR is the soil water restoration index (%), WC1 is the amount of soil water storage in October 2018 (mm), and WC0 is the amount of soil water storage in October 2012 (mm).
Three soil cores from the surface to a depth of 300 cm were collected from each plot in October 2018 to determine soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. Soil organic carbon was determined by wet oxidation with K2Cr2O7 and H2SO4, soil total N was determined by Kjeldahl analysis, and soil total P was determined after digestion with perchloric acid according to the previous study [9]. Soil total porosity, bulk density, soil sorptivity, and saturated hydraulic conductivity were measured in October 2015. Soil bulk density and total porosity were measured in a beveled stainless-steel ring using the methods of Xie et al. (2020) and Yu et al. (2018) [21,26]. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity was determined using the single head pressure ring infiltrometer method (i.e., the constant head method) according to the previous studies [21,27]. Soil sorptivity (S) was assessed as:
S = I t
where S is soil sorptivity, I is the cumulative infiltration, and t denotes the time.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

SAS software was used to conduct the analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to conduct normality and homogeneity tests on the data before the ANOVA. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test indicated that the distributions of data were a typical normal distribution (p < 0.05). Therefore, all data were statistically analyzed as a completely randomized design with four replications using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significant differences between the means were estimated at 95% confidence level using Fisher’s protected LSD test.

3. Results

3.1. Weather Conditions

There was a significant difference in precipitation between the four growing seasons (Figure 1). Annual precipitation in 2014 and 2017 was similar to the long-term average of 390 mm (1970–2012), while it was wetter than the long-term average in 2013 (471 mm) and 2018 (445 mm), and drier than the long-term average in 2015 (340 mm) and 2016 (300 mm) (Table 2). Seasonal precipitation for wheat was similar to the annual average in 2016–2017 (204 mm), but was higher in 2013 (290 mm), 2015 (235 mm), and 2018 (287 mm), and lower in 2014 (154 mm). Seasonal precipitation for corn, potato, and millet was comparable to the long-term estimate in 2017, but wetter in 2013 (423 mm) and 2018 (366 mm) and drier in 2014–2015 (275 mm) and 2016 (227 mm) (data not shown).

3.2. Soil Properties

Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil sorptivity were significantly affected by the lucerne–crop rotation systems (Figure 2). Under lucerne with wheat rotation, the highest soil saturation hydraulic conductivity was found, followed by L-F, L-M, L-L, and L-C, and the lowest under L-P. Soil sorptivity increased by 1.19, 2.31, 0.66, 0.75 (p < 0.05), and 0.25 mm min−1/2 (p > 0.05) under L-F, L-W, L-P, L-M, and L-C crop rotations, respectively, compared to lucerne–lucerne. Crop rotation treatments also affected soil bulk density and porosity (Table 3). With the exception of L-M in the 10–30 cm soil layer, soil bulk density was highest under L-L and lowest under L-M in the 0–50 cm soil layers. In contrast, with the exception of L-M in the 10–30 cm soil layer, total soil porosity was lowest under L-L and highest under L-M in the 0–50 cm soil layers.
Crop rotation systems with lucerne had a significant effect on total nitrogen content, organic carbon content, total P content, mineral N content, and available P content in the soil (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Compared to lucerne–lucerne, all crop rotation treatments decreased soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, while increasing soil total P, mineral nitrogen content, and available P levels at all soil depths. In the 0–10 cm soil layer, lucerne–fallow, L-W, and L-P significantly reduced soil organic carbon, while L-C significantly reduced soil organic carbon in the 0–10 and 50–110 cm soil layers. In the soil layers of 0–80 cm, lucerne–wheat and L-C significantly reduced total soil N, L-F strongly reduced total N in the soil layers of 0–50 cm, and L-M significantly reduced total N in the soil layers of 50–80 cm. In the soil layers of 0–50 cm, lucerne–crop rotation drastically increased the total P content of the soil. In the soil layers of 0–170 cm, the mineral N content of the soil was significantly higher than in the L-L soil layers, and in the soil layers of 80–170 cm, the mineral N content of the soil was much higher in L-F than in the L-L soil layers. Available soil P content increased significantly in the 0–110 cm soil layers under lucerne–crop treatments and in the 0–80 cm soil layers under lucerne–fallow rotation treatments. L-P significantly decreased available potassium in the 0–50 cm soil layer, L-M significantly decreased available potassium in the 0–30 cm soil layer, and L-C significantly decreased available potassium in the 0–10 cm soil layer compared to L-L.

3.3. Soil Water Recovery

After the six-year experimental period, L-L had significantly less soil water content in all soil layers than other treatments (Figure 5). In the 0–180 cm soil layers, L-W, L-C, L-P, L-M, and L-F substantially enhanced soil water content compared to L-L; however, soil water content between L-W, L-C, L-P, L-M, and L-F was not significantly different in all soil layers. L-F had the highest saturation of available soil water at a 0–300 cm soil depth, followed by L-W, L-C, L-P, and L-M, and L-L had the lowest saturation of available soil water at a 0–300 cm soil depth (Figure 6). In soil layers 0–110 and 110–200 cm, the rate of soil water recovery was higher than in soil layer 200–300 cm (Figure 7). In soil layer 0–110 cm, the rate of soil water reclamation was 3.3, 16.7, 11.0, 10.6, 10.9, and 9.9 mm per year; in soil layer 110–200, the rate was 2.6, 13.9, 11.1, 12.2, 9.7, and 10.4 mm per year; and in soil layer 200–300, the rate was 2.3, 8.9, 10.9, 10.9, 9.9, and 8.8 mm per year. In the soil depth 0–300 cm, the rate of soil water recovery was 8.2, 39.5, 33.0, 33.7, 30.5, and 29.1 mm per year. L-F had the highest soil water absolute restoration index, preceded by L-C, L-W, L-P, and L-M and L-L had the lowest value (Table 4). The absolute soil water restoration indices at 0–300 cm soil depth was 116, 179, 166, 167, 161, and 158 percent among L-L, L-F, L-W, L-C, L-P, and L-M, respectively, during the six-year experimental period.

3.4. Net Economic Return

In dry years (2015–2016), the net economic return was substantially higher by 17% under L-C and lower by 101, 90, 69, and 34% under L-F, L-W, L-P, L-M, respectively, than under L-L; in normal years (2014 and 2017), the net economic return was significantly higher by 27% under L-C and lower by 101, 75, 26, and 47% under L-F, L-W, L-P, L-M than that in L-L, respectively; in wet years (2013 and 2018), the net economic return was significantly higher by 67% under L-L and 101, 86, 10, and 50% lower under L-F, L-W, L-P, and L-M, respectively, than under L-L (data not shown). Over the six years, the net economic returns were, significantly, 40% higher under L-C and 101, 84, 33, and 44% lower under L-F, L-W, L-P, L-M, respectively, than under L-L (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

High-water-use plants such as lucerne remove a lot of moisture from the soil when rainfall is limited and unpredictable, resulting in soil desiccation [10,28,29]. As a result, soil productivity cannot be maintained for many years by continuously cultivating lucerne because it results in a dried soil layers [28]. To avoid soil drying after several years of lucerne cultivation, some appropriate field management methods must be implemented [6]. In this research, soil moisture increased dramatically in all rotations during the experiment. Soil water restoration was the most efficient after lucerne-to-fallow conversion, mainly because annual water consumption was less by 6–31 mm under lucerne–fallowing compared to other treatments (data not shown). Interestingly, although corn had higher evapotranspiration than others crop [1,21,29], lucerne-to-corn conversion efficiently enhanced soil water restoration. This is most likely because the ridge–furrow system for corn with annual all-plastic film mulching had significant benefits in terms of furthering water infiltration, reducing soil evaporation [30,31], and replenishing soil moisture in the autumn (July to September), thereby increasing soil water storage in the surface soil moisture, agreeing with findings in a previous study [28]. Under wheat, saturated soil hydraulic conductivity and soil sorptivity were highest, reflecting the fact that the field was plowed after wheat harvest, resulting in a significant loss of soil evaporation due to the exposed surface during fallowing. Due to the limited and erratic rainfall in this region, soil water recovery in the soil layers of 30–180 cm was significantly higher in the lucerne-to-fallowing conversion than under the lucerne-to-crop conversions, which means that the infiltration of soil water in the autumn is primarily in the shallow soil layer. It also implies that bare land may not be conducive for water infiltrating into deep soil; in contrast, root channels formed by plant root growth might be beneficial for water infiltration into deep soil, agreeing with findings in a previous study [32].
After the conversion of lucerne to crops, the soil bulk density was reduced in all soil layers, mainly because the soil was plowed every year, leading to increased soil total porosity. However, after conversion from lucerne to cropland, soil organic carbon, total N, and mineral nitrogen decreased, consistent with previous research findings [33,34,35]. This was most likely due to the fact that soil respiration rates were greater under long-term intensive cropping in lucerne–crop rotation systems than in sole lucerne crops [18]. In addition, carbon loss during lucerne-to-crop conversions was significantly greater than that following lucerne–lucerne conversion, implying a greater opportunity for N loss [36]. On the other hand, because of its ability to fix atmospheric N, lucerne cultivation can be a renewable and environmentally friendly source of nitrogen [37], resulting in higher soil total N and mineral N content under L-L than under other treatments. Soil P content was accumulated by lucerne and depleted through forage harvesting, resulting in a lower soil P content under lucerne–lucerne, which is consistent with previous research findings [9,19,38]. Phosphate fertilization, on the other hand, provided timely soil P replenishment for the crop productivity of lucerne crops. As a result of the conversion of lucerne crops, the total and available soil P increased. Therefore, soil total P and available P contents were increased after the conversion of lucerne to crops.
For a long time, the main crops in the dryland farming on the western Loess Plateau were potato and spring wheat, supplemented by other short seasonal crops including millet and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.); these short seasonal crops are widely planted to avoid famines caused by wheat failures [5]. Corn has been considered one of the leading crops on the semiarid western Loess Plateau of China in the past 20 years due to the extensive use of the fully mulched ridge-furrow system and excellent yields. Wheat yields were low in this region, with harvested spring wheat yields in our study ranging from 903 to 2263 kg ha−1 (data not shown), which was due to the spring drought severely limiting wheat yield and economic returns; this is consistent with previous research findings [1,39]. In this study, the net economic return of corn was RMB 5377−29,443 ha−1 yr−1, consistent with the findings from previous studies with plastic mulching in this region [21] and without plastic mulching in northeastern China [23]; fresh tuber yields of potato varied from 6905 to 15,517 kg ha−1, with an average yield of 10,921 kg ha−1 (data not shown), which supports previous reports [40,41]. Interestingly, although continuous production of lucerne caused severe soil dryness in deep soil layers, it did not significantly reduce the yields of potato and corn, presumably because their critical growth period coincides with the main rainfall period, thereby maintaining a high yield. The results of this study demonstrated that lucerne-to-corn conversion had a greater soil water restoration and higher net economic return than other lucerne–crop rotation systems. These results highlight that when considering the economic benefits and soil water restoration, corn sown under the ridge–furrow system with fully plastic film annual mulching is the most suitable rotation species for sustainable land production.

5. Conclusions

Based on the analysis of long-term experimental results, this study shows that compared with long-term lucerne planting, the continued lucerne crop rotation decreased soil bulk density, soil organic carbon, total N, and mineral N, whereas total P and available P increased. Lucerne–corn rotation achieved the greatest economic return and rate of soil water recovery among four lucerne-to-crop conversion treatments. Considering the aforementioned factors such as economic benefits and soil moisture recovery, lucerne–corn rotation can be regarded as a suitable rotation mode when corn is sown under the ridge–furrow system with fully plastic film annual mulching.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.W. and Z.L.; methodology: L.L., J.X. and Z.L.; data analysis: J.X.; writing—original draft preparation: L.W; writing—review and editing: J.X., L.W., L.L., S.K.F. and E.Z.; supervision: L.L. and L.W.; funding acquisition: Z.L. and L.W.; project administration: Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University (GSCS-2019-04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42167008), the Fuxi young funds of Gansu Agricultural University (GAUfx-04Y09), and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (21JR7RA813).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the excellent technical assistance for field sampling and laboratory tests provided by undergraduate and graduate students at the Gansu Agricultural University Rainfed Agricultural Experimental Station.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, Z.; Wang, L.; Xie, J.; Li, L.; Coulter, J.A.; Zhang, R.; Luo, Z.; Cai, L.; Carberry, P.; Whitbread, A. Conservation tillage increases yield and precipitation use efficiency of wheat on the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 231, 106024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, L.; Palta, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; Deng, X. Nitrogen fertilization improved water-use efficiency of winter wheat through increasing water use during vegetative rather than grain filling. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 197, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, X.; Shan, L.; Zhang, H.; Turner, N.C. Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 80, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, X.; Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Sun, B.; Xinping, C. Long-term-fertilization effects on soil organic carbon, physical properties, and wheat yield of a loess soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, F.M.; Li, X.G.; Javaid, M.M.; Ashraf, M.; Zhang, F. Ridge-furrow plastic film mulching farming for sustainable dryland agriculture on the Chinese loess plateau. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 3284–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jun, F.; Mingan, S.; QuanJiu, W.; Jones, S.B.; Reichardt, K.; Xiangrong, C.; Xiaoli, F. Toward sustainable soil and water resources use in China’s highly erodible semi-arid loess plateau. Geoderma 2010, 155, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, X. Soil quality responses to alfalfa watered with a field micro-catchment technique in the Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Res. 2006, 95, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y. Productivity dynamic of alfalfa and its effects on water eco-environment. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2002, 39, 404–411, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, L.; Xie, J.; Luo, Z.; Niu, Y.; Coulter, J.A.; Zhang, R.; Lingling, L. Forage yield, water use efficiency, and soil fertility response to alfalfa growing age in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 243, 106415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Huang, M. Pasture yield and soil water depletion of continuous growing alfalfa in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 124, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Crawford, M.; Macfarlane, M. Lucerne reduces soil moisture and increases livestock production in an area of high groundwater recharge potential. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1995, 35, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ren, J.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Fang, X. Soil water and nutrient characteristics of alfalfa grasslands at semi-arid and semi-arid prone to drought areas in southern Ningxia. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 3638–3649. [Google Scholar]
  13. Latta, R.A.; Blacklow, L.J.; Cocks, P.S. Comparative soil water, pasture production, and crop yields in phase farming systems with lucerne and annual pasture in Western Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2001, 52, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ridley, A.M.; Christy, B.; Dunin, F.X.; Haines, P.J.; Wilson, K.F.; Ellington, A. Lucerne in crop rotations on the Riverine Plains. 1. The soil water balance. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2001, 52, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, X.C.; Li, J.; Tahir, M.N.; Fang, X.Y. Validation of the EPIC model and its utilization to research the sustainable recovery of soil desiccation after alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) by grain crop rotation system in the semi-humid region of the Loess Plateau. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 161, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jackson, T.; Halvorson, A.; Tucker, B.; Dregne, H.; Willis, W. Soil fertility in dryland agriculture. In Dryland Agriculture; Agron No. 23; American Society Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1983; pp. 297–332. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cantero-Martinez, C.; O’Leary, G.J.; Connor, D.J. Stubble retention and nitrogen fertilisation in a fallow-wheat rainfed cropping system. 1. Soil water and nitrogen conservation, crop growth and yield. Soil Tillage Res. 1995, 34, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Sun, G.; Jia, Y.; Li, F.; Xu, J. Crop yield and soil water restoration on 9-year-old alfalfa pasture in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2008, 95, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jia, Y.; Li, F.M.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, X.L.; Guo, R.; Siddique, K.H.M. Productivity and water use of alfalfa and subsequent crops in the semiarid Loess Plateau with different stand ages of alfalfa and crop sequences. Field Crops Res. 2009, 114, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Niu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Luo, Z.; Li, L.; Cai, L.; Li, G.; Xie, J. Contributions of long-term tillage systems on crop production and soil properties in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 2650–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xie, J.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Coulter, J.A.; Chai, Q.; Zhang, R.; Luo, Z.; Carberry, P.; Rao, K. Subsoiling increases grain yield, water use efficiency, and economic return of maize under a fully mulched ridge-furrow system in a semiarid environment in China. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 199, 104584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, R.; Li, F.; Li, K.; Cao, H.; Yang, N.; Li, M.; Dai, J.; Zan, Y.; et al. Optimal nitrogen input for higher efficiency and lower environmental impacts of winter wheat production in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 224, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, T.; Li, Z. Alfalfa-corn rotation and row placement affects yield, water use, and economic returns in Northeast China. Field Crops Res. 2019, 241, 107558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Coulter, J.A.; Li, L.; Luo, Z.; Xie, J. Plastic mulching reduces nitrogen footprint of food crops in China: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Jia, X.; Shao Ma An, Z. Variations in capacity and storage of plant-available water in deep profiles along a revegetation and precipitation gradient. J. Hydrol. 2020, 581, 124401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, B.; Xie, C.; Cai, S.; Chen, Y.; Lv, Y.; Mo, Z.; Liu, T.; Yang, Z. Effects of Tree Root Density on Soil Total Porosity and Non-Capillary Porosity Using a Ground-Penetrating Tree Radar Unit in Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R. Determination of Soil Sorptivity and Hydraulic Conductivity from the Disk Infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1997, 61, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Luo, Z.; Li, L.; Xie, J.; Fudjoe, S.K.; Zechariah, E. Land Use Affects Soil Water Balance and Soil Desiccation within the Soil Profile, Evidence from the Western Loess Plateau Case. Land 2022, 11, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, J.H.; Chai, Q.; Zhang, R.Z.; Luo, Z.Z.; Li, L.L.; Niu, Y.N.; Cai, L.Q. Suitable Succession Crop Screening After Perennial Alfalfa for Soil Dedication Restoration in Loess Plateau. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2014, 5, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gan, Y.; Siddique, K.H.; Turner, N.C.; Li, X.-G.; Niu, J.-Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, L.; Chai, Q. Ridge-furrow mulching systems—An innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 118, pp. 429–476. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang, X.; Li, X.G. Assessing the effects of plastic film fully mulched ridge–furrow on rainwater distribution in soil using dye tracer and simulated rainfall. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 152, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, G.-L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Cui, Z.; Deng, L.; Chang, X.-F.; Shi, Z.-H. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils. J. Hydrol. 2017, 546, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shi, P.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Li, Z.; Yu, K.; Ren, Z.; Xu, G.; Cheng, S.; Wang, F.; Ma, Y. Distribution of soil organic carbon impacted by land-use changes in a hilly watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, Y.; Guo, S.; Nan, Y.; Li, Z. The changes and influencing factors of soil C: N ratio in small watershed of hilly region of Loess Plateau. J. Nat. Resour. 2012, 27, 1214–1223. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Liao, X.; Wang, Z.; Wei, X.; Jia, X.; Shao, M. Synchronous sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen in mineral soils after conversion agricultural land to forest. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 295, 106866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tiessen, H.; Cuevas, E.; Chacon, P. The role of soil organic-matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 1994, 371, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oldroyd, G.E.; Dixon, R. Biotechnological solutions to the nitrogen problem. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, H.-M.; Jiang, J.-P.; Jia, Y.; Li, F.-M.; Xu, J.-Z. Soil carbon pool and effects of soil fertility in seeded alfalfa fields on the semi-arid Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 2350–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, G.; Zhang, R.; Li, G.; Li, L.; Chan, K.; Heenan, D.; Chen, W.; Unkovich, M.; Robertson, M.; Cullis, B.; et al. Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat–field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems. Field Crops Res. 2008, 107, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Y.; Chai, S.; Tian, H.; Chai, Y.; Li, Y.; Chang, L.; Cheng, H. Straw strips mulch on furrows improves water use efficiency and yield of potato in a rainfed semiarid area. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 211, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.C.; Guo, J.; Ma, Y.F.; Yu, X.F.; Hou, H.Z.; Wang, H.L.; Fang, Y.J.; Tang, Y.F. Effects of vertical rotary subsoiling with plastic mulching on soil water availability and potato yield on a semiarid Loess plateau, China. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 199, 104591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monthly precipitations in the years from 2013 to 2018 and 1997–2011 average for the lucerne-to-crop conversion treatment of the study at the Rainfed Agricultural Experiment Station of Gansu Agricultural University.
Figure 1. Monthly precipitations in the years from 2013 to 2018 and 1997–2011 average for the lucerne-to-crop conversion treatment of the study at the Rainfed Agricultural Experiment Station of Gansu Agricultural University.
Agronomy 12 01905 g001
Figure 2. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (a) and soil sorptivity (b) under lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2015. For a given dependent variable, bars with different letters indicate significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 2. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (a) and soil sorptivity (b) under lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2015. For a given dependent variable, bars with different letters indicate significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g002
Figure 3. Soil organic carbon (a), total nitrogen (b), and total phosphorus (c) after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 3. Soil organic carbon (a), total nitrogen (b), and total phosphorus (c) after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g003
Figure 4. Soil mineral nitrogen (a), available phosphorus (AP) (b), and available potassium (AK) (c) after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 4. Soil mineral nitrogen (a), available phosphorus (AP) (b), and available potassium (AK) (c) after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g004
Figure 5. Volumetric soil water content in the 0–300 cm soil depths after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 5. Volumetric soil water content in the 0–300 cm soil depths after lucerne-to-crop conversion in October 2018. Horizontal bars denote Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g005
Figure 6. The saturation of available soil water in the 0–300 cm soil depth in October 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 6. The saturation of available soil water in the 0–300 cm soil depth in October 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g006
Figure 7. Rate of soil water recovery of lucerne-to-crop conversion in October from 2012 to 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different among treatments in the 0–300 cm soil depth (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 7. Rate of soil water recovery of lucerne-to-crop conversion in October from 2012 to 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different among treatments in the 0–300 cm soil depth (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g007
Figure 8. Average net economic return of lucerne-to-crop conversion in October from 2012 to 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Figure 8. Average net economic return of lucerne-to-crop conversion in October from 2012 to 2018. Different letters indicate treatment means that are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1.
Agronomy 12 01905 g008
Table 1. Details of experimental treatments.
Table 1. Details of experimental treatments.
TreatmentDescription
Lucerne–lucerne (L–L)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and grown continuously until 2018.
Lucerne–fallow (L–F)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and plowed in March 2012, followed by bare fallow from 2012 to 2018.
Lucerne–wheat (L–W)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and plowed in March 2012, followed by fallow until March 2013, and then spring wheat was grown from 2013 to 2018.
Lucerne–corn (L–C)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and plowed in March 2012, followed by fallow until March 2013, and then maize was grown in a plastic film fully mulched ridge–furrow system from 2013 to 2018.
Lucerne–potato (L–P)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and plowed in March 2012, and then potato was grown from 2012 to 2018.
Lucerne–millet (L–M)Lucerne was sown in April 2003 and plowed in March 2012, and then millet was grown from 2012 to 2018.
Table 2. Annual rainfall from 2013 to 2018 and average of 1997–2011, drought index (DI), and soil water condition for the experimental years at the Rainfed Agricultural Experimental station of Gansu Agricultural University.
Table 2. Annual rainfall from 2013 to 2018 and average of 1997–2011, drought index (DI), and soil water condition for the experimental years at the Rainfed Agricultural Experimental station of Gansu Agricultural University.
YearAnnual Rainfall (mm)DI for Annual RainfallSoil Water Condition for Annual Rainfall *
20134711.20wet
2014384−0.09normal
2015340−0.73dry
2016300−1.32dry
2017361−0.42normal
20184450.80wet
Mean (1970–2011)390
* Classified as dry, normal, and wet when DI < −0.5, −0.5 ≤ DI ≤ 0.5, and DI > 0.5, respectively.
Table 3. Soil bulk density and soil total porosity of the crop rotation treatments in October 2015.
Table 3. Soil bulk density and soil total porosity of the crop rotation treatments in October 2015.
Treatment *Soil Bulk Density (g cm−3)Soil Total Porosity (%)
0–10 cm10–30 cm30–50 cm0–10 cm10–30 cm30–50 cm
L–L1.45 a #1.60 a1.54 a45.2 c39.7 b42.1 c
L–F1.36 bc1.47 b1.44 bc48.7 ab44.7 a45.5 ab
L–W1.37 bc1.38 b1.48 ab48.4 ab47.8 a44.3 bc
L–C1.41 ab1.42 b1.46 ab46.8 bc46.4 a44.8 bc
L–P1.37 bc1.34 b1.44 bc48.5 ab49.3 a45.6 ab
L–M1.33 c1.40 b1.39 c49.9 a47.1 a47.7 a
* Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1. # Different lowercase letters in the same column represent significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between treatments.
Table 4. Average soil water absolute restoration index of the crop rotation treatments in October from 2012 to 2018.
Table 4. Average soil water absolute restoration index of the crop rotation treatments in October from 2012 to 2018.
Treatment *Soil Water Absolute Restoration Index (%)
0–110 cm110–200 cm200–300 cmSum (0–300 cm)
L–L117 c #117 c115 c 116 c
L–F189 a191 a156 b179 a
L–W157 b173 ab168 a 166 ab
L–C157 b180 ab168 a 167 ab
L–P158 b163 b162 ab 161 ab
L–M153 b168 b155 b 158 b
* Treatment abbreviations are defined in Table 1. # Different lowercase letters in the same column represent significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between treatments.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Luo, Z.; Li, L.; Xie, J.; Fudjoe, S.K.; Zechariah, E. Exploring Optimal Cropping System to Improve the Water Use Efficiency and Soil Water Restoration after Lucerne-to-Crop Conversion in the Semiarid Environment. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081905

AMA Style

Wang L, Luo Z, Li L, Xie J, Fudjoe SK, Zechariah E. Exploring Optimal Cropping System to Improve the Water Use Efficiency and Soil Water Restoration after Lucerne-to-Crop Conversion in the Semiarid Environment. Agronomy. 2022; 12(8):1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Linlin, Zhuzhu Luo, Lingling Li, Junhong Xie, Setor Kwami Fudjoe, and Effah Zechariah. 2022. "Exploring Optimal Cropping System to Improve the Water Use Efficiency and Soil Water Restoration after Lucerne-to-Crop Conversion in the Semiarid Environment" Agronomy 12, no. 8: 1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop