Next Article in Journal
Sources of Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Wild Barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum) Collected in Jordan, Lebanon, and Libya
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Atom Search-Optimized Thornthwaite Potential Evapotranspiration on Root and Shoot Systems in Controlled Carica papaya Cultivation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’—A Section of Agronomy: Advances and Perspectives

Department of Machinery Exploitation, Ergonomics and Production Processes, University of Agriculture in Krakow, ul. Balicka 116B, 31-149 Krakow, Poland
Agronomy 2023, 13(10), 2461; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102461
Submission received: 7 August 2023 / Revised: 18 September 2023 / Accepted: 20 September 2023 / Published: 23 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)
‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ is a peer-reviewed and open-access section of Agronomy (ISSN 2073-4395). ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ is dedicated to investigating plant biology and soil sciences, aiming to advance the understanding of plant–soil relationships. It covers a broad range of topics, encompassing fundamental and applied aspects of plant nutrition, plant productivity and quality, plant–soil interactions, and soil health. Soil health is understood as the ability to perform ecosystem functions, described through physical, chemical, and biological properties. Additionally, the scope of the section extends to articles that explore agrophysics and mathematical modelling of crop and soil systems.
The interest in crop nutrition and soil health has been growing, as the need for sustainable agriculture and preservation of natural ecosystems is rooted in all societies. Figure 1 indicates a significant increasing trend in research subjects related to plant nutrition. This highlights the growing total number of research reports and the very rapid growth in publications in Agronomy since 2017.
The main challenge faced by the authors contributing to ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ is linking soil quality with crop productivity. Crop productivity not only is critical to meet food demands but also serves as a feedstock for industry, including biofuel production. In recent decades, a real challenge has been devising agricultural systems with a lower environmental impact, particularly due to climate change and resource depletion. To address these problems, conducting interdisciplinary research is necessary. The development of genetic research, molecular biology, and plant physiology allows us to understand the basis of plant nutrition [1,2,3,4,5].

1. Recent Advances

Reviewing publications from recent years, the main issues addressed by authors are:
  • Mineral and organic soil amendments (biochar, compost, animal manure, sewage sludge, etc.) and their effect on soil properties and crop growth and quality.
  • Nitrogen loss and its causes and methods of prevention.
  • Soil biota as an indicator of soil health.
  • Crop productivity and quality.
Nitrogen losses not only diminish soil fertility and plant yield but can also have adverse effects on the environment. Nitrogen can be lost from the soil through processes such as leaching, denitrification, and volatilization, which lead to acidification in terrestrial systems, eutrophication of aquatic systems, and decline in biodiversity and contribute to climate change. The most commonly proposed solutions involve optimizing fertilizer doses, as well as considering the form of fertilizers used, such as slow-release fertilizers [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. A very promising solution is the application of nitrification inhibitors [15,16,17,18,19,20].
The most commonly researched soil amendments are organic. Studies focus on both the individual application of specific soil amendments and their mixtures. In the case of mixed amendments, the primary research aim has been to determine the optimal proportions and doses for different crop species in various climatic zones [21,22,23,24,25]. Many publications have also explored combining organic soil amendments with mineral fertilizers, with the main objective being nutrient supplementation [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. These investigations primarily aimed to determine the impact of soil amendments on chemical properties, but they also addressed physical properties, including soil structure and water-related characteristics, as well as their influence on soil biota.
Biochar is the most intensively investigated amendment and is widely described in the literature, including in the ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ section [6,21,22,23,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Many review papers (1327 reviews indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection in categories related to agronomy) and meta-analyses have already been written on this subject [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Biochar has been recognized as a soil amendment that provides opportunities for soil improvement and mitigates climate change by promoting carbon sequestration. Biochar amendment has a beneficial influence on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. The application of biochar increases crop production, providing a liming effect, increasing soil water and nutrient retention, and reducing N leaching. However, these results depend on the feedstock used for biochar production, the parameters of the pyrolysis process, and soil and climate conditions.
It is expected that further investigations into biochar will not be promising. However, there are still interesting topics such as the long-term effects of biochar application and the mechanisms of soil ecosystem responses.
The impact of mineral and organic fertilization on crop yield and crop quality is also a subject receiving less attention. The novelty of these studies is systematically decreasing despite the consideration of specialty crops, new features, or more precise measurement methods [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].

2. Perspectives

Many research topics remain interesting and innovative. However, some of the previously explored subjects are gradually losing novelty. This raises a fascinating question for every researcher: which research areas will be the most promising in the coming years?
Based on their increasing number of publications and citations in recent years, the following prospective research topics can be distinguished:
  • Searching for new soil amendments materials and formulations. Of particular interest is waste utilization in agriculture as a soil amendment.
  • Long-term soil amendment experiments and the effect after decades of systemic application.
  • Improving soil water management (especially irrigation systems in the context of limited water sources).
  • Climate change and crop production resilience and adaptation.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) adaptation in soil management and plant fertilization.
  • Soil–plant–microbe interactions.
Climate change has many negative effects on plants by creating numerous stresses. Agronomy practices are continuously adapted to the impacts of climate change to ensure food security and preserve natural resources. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms affecting these processes is highly relevant for researchers. Three areas regarding ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ are very promising in the context of climate change: soil amendments as a method of carbon sequestration, methods for improved soil water retention, and nitrogen management to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Interest in AI applications has rapidly grown in recent years. It is also expected to find applications in agronomy. AI application seems to be a useful tool in modelling soil processes and crop responses to environmental and agronomic factors. It can be used in crop yield prediction, to increase crop quality, in nutrient management and to find the optimal agrotechnical parameters in crop production and soil tillage.
Research on microbe application to increase crop production is increasingly promising. Abiotic stresses, such as salinity, drought, heavy metals, and climate change, are still important factors limiting agricultural production. To overcome the adverse effects of these stresses, the application of microbes is an effective, eco-friendly, and economically reasonable method. The microbial biome, especially in the soil ecosystem, plays a vital role in combating environmental stress and substantially impacts crop growth and product quality.
The ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’ section in the Agronomy journal welcomes articles in every agronomic aspect of soil–plant relationships, with a particular interest in the range of promising topics.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Calicioglu, O.; Flammini, A.; Bracco, S.; Bellù, L.; Sims, R. The Future Challenges of Food and Agriculture: An Integrated Analysis of Trends and Solutions. Sustainability 2019, 11, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Monokrousos, N.; Mourouzidou, S. Ensuring Plant Nutrition through Sustainable Soil Management Strategies: Assessing Research Progress and Challenges. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. von Wirén, N. Grand challenges in plant nutrition. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dobermann, A.; Bruulsema, T.; Cakmak, I.; Gerard, B.; Majumdar, K.; McLaughlin, M.; Reidsma, P.; Vanlauwe, B.; Wollenberg, E.; Zhang, F.; et al. A New Paradigm for Plant Nutrition. In Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gojon, A. Nitrogen nutrition in plants: Rapid progress and new challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2457–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qian, X.; Li, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhao, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C.; Yi, Z. Enhancing Soil Nitrogen Retention Capacity by Biochar Incorporation in the Acidic Soil of Pomelo Orchards: The Crucial Role of pH. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korsakov, K.; Stepanov, A.; Pozdnyakov, L.; Yakimenko, O. Humate-Coated Urea as a Tool to Decrease Nitrogen Losses in Soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rossi, G.; Beni, C.; Benedetti, A.; Felici, B.; Neri, U. Effect of Mineral or OFMSW Digestate Fertilization on Ryegrass and Nitrogen Leaching. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cassimiro, J.B.; de Oliveira, C.L.B.; Boni, A.d.S.; Donato, N.d.L.; Meirelles, G.C.; da Silva, J.F.; Ribeiro, I.V.; Heinrichs, R. Ammonia Volatilization and Marandu Grass Production in Response to Enhanced-Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers. Agronomy 2023, 13, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tubeileh, A.M.-S.; Alam-Eldein, S.M.; Banks, S. Effect of Polymer-Coated Urea/Urea Blends on Corn Yields under Short Growing Season Conditions in Eastern Canada. Agronomy 2023, 13, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. ten Huf, M.; Reinsch, T.; Zutz, M.; Essich, C.; Ruser, R.; Buchen-Tschiskale, C.; Flessa, H.; Olfs, H.-W. Effects of Liquid Manure Application Techniques on Ammonia Emission and Winter Wheat Yield. Agronomy 2023, 13, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, M.; Song, F.; Yin, Z.; Chen, P.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, Z.; Wang, B.; Zheng, E. Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates on Its Fate in Maize Fields in Mollisols in Northeast China: A 15N Tracing Study. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, L.; Zheng, H.; Wang, L.; Nie, X.; Zuo, J.; Liu, S.; Cheng, J. The Fate and Balance of Nitrogen on a Sloped Peanut Field on Red Soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Incrocci, L.; Maggini, R.; Cei, T.; Carmassi, G.; Botrini, L.; Filippi, F.; Clemens, R.; Terrones, C.; Pardossi, A. Innovative Controlled-Release Polyurethane-Coated Urea Could Reduce N Leaching in Tomato Crop in Comparison to Conventional and Stabilized Fertilizers. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Torabian, S.; Farhangi-Abriz, S.; Qin, R.; Noulas, C.; Wang, G. Performance of Nitrogen Fertilization and Nitrification Inhibitors in the Irrigated Wheat Fields. Agronomy 2023, 13, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Školníková, M.; Škarpa, P.; Ryant, P.; Kozáková, Z.; Antošovský, J. Response of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Fertilizers with Nitrogen-Transformation Inhibitors and Timing of Their Application under Field Conditions. Agronomy 2022, 12, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cui, L.; Li, D.; Wu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, L.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors on Soil Nitrification and Ammonia Volatilization in Three Soils with Different pH. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nakamura, S.; Saliou, P.S.; Takahashi, M.; Ando, Y.; Subbarao, G.V. The Contribution of Root Turnover on Biological Nitrification Inhibition and Its Impact on the Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea under Brachiaria Cultivations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giacometti, C.; Mazzon, M.; Cavani, L.; Ciavatta, C.; Marzadori, C. A Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrapyrin, Reduces Potential Nitrate Leaching through Soil Columns Treated with Animal Slurries and Anaerobic Digestate. Agronomy 2020, 10, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chiodini, M.E.; Perego, A.; Carozzi, M.; Acutis, M. The Nitrification Inhibitor Vizura® Reduces N2O Emissions When Added to Digestate before Injection under Irrigated Maize in the Po Valley (Northern Italy). Agronomy 2019, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ud Din, M.M.; Khan, M.I.; Azam, M.; Ali, M.H.; Qadri, R.; Naveed, M.; Nasir, A. Effect of Biochar and Compost Addition on Mitigating Salinity Stress and Improving Fruit Quality of Tomato. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Linh, D.T.T.; Khoi, C.M.; Ritz, K.; Sinh, N.V.; Phuong, N.T.K.; My, H.M.T.; Linh, T.B.; Minh, D.D.; Linh, T.T.; Toyota, K. Effects of Rice Husk Biochar and Compost Amendments on Soil Phosphorus Fractions, Enzyme Activities and Rice Yields in Salt-Affected Acid Soils in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De la Rosa, J.M.; Pérez-Dalí, S.M.; Campos, P.; Sánchez-Martín, Á.; González-Pérez, J.A.; Miller, A.Z. Suitability of Volcanic Ash, Rice Husk Ash, Green Compost and Biochar as Amendments for a Mediterranean Alkaline Soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Medyńska-Juraszek, A.; Marcinkowska, K.; Gruszka, D.; Kluczek, K. The Effects of Rabbit-Manure-Derived Biochar Co-Application with Compost on the Availability and Heavy Metal Uptake by Green Leafy Vegetables. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haque, A.N.A.; Uddin, M.K.; Sulaiman, M.F.; Amin, A.M.; Hossain, M.; Aziz, A.A.; Mosharrof, M. Impact of Organic Amendment with Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation on Rice Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Soil. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, B.; Tian, X.; Zhang, S.; Duan, M.; Wang, L. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizers on Rapeseed Root Growth and Properties of Purple Soil in Southwest China. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, S.; Wei, W.; Liu, S. Long-Term Organic Amendments Combined with Nitrogen Fertilization Regulates Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Calcareous Soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Lv, X.; Zhu, X.; Song, X. Beneficial Effects of Biochar Application with Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil Nitrogen Retention, Absorption and Utilization in Maize Production. Agronomy 2023, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dawar, K.; Ali, W.; Bibi, H.; Mian, I.A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Hussain, M.B.; Ali, M.; Ali, S.; Fahad, S.; Rehman, S.u.; et al. Effect of Different Levels of Zinc and Compost on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sifola, M.I.; Cozzolino, E.; Di Mola, I.; Ottaiano, L.; del Piano, L.; Mori, M. Yield and Quality of Three Cultivars of Dark Fire-Cured (Kentucky) Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Subjected to Organic (Compost) and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization. Agronomy 2022, 12, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uddin, S.; Islam, M.R.; Jahangir, M.M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Hassan, S.; Hassan, M.M.; Abo-Shosha, A.A.; Ahmed, A.F.; Rahman, M.M. Nitrogen Release in Soils Amended with Different Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers under Contrasting Moisture Regimes: A Laboratory Incubation Study. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hays, K.N.; Muir, J.P.; Kan, E.; DeLaune, P.B.; Brady, J.A.; Obayomi, O.; Mitchell, A.B. Tillage, Manure, and Biochar Short-Term Effects on Soil Characteristics in Forage Systems. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, S.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Y.; Sui, Y.; Jiao, X. Biochar Addition with Water and Fertilization Reduction Increases Soil Aggregate Stability of 0–60 cm Soil Layer on Greenhouse Eggplant in Mollisols. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, J.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhan, L. Ameliorating Effects of Biochar, Sheep Manure and Chicken Manure on Acidified Purple Soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, S.; Cong, P.; Wang, C.; Li, P.; Liu, S.; He, Z.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z. Properties of Biochar Obtained from Tropical Crop Wastes Under Different Pyrolysis Temperatures and Its Application on Acidic Soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Iacomino, G.; Sarker, T.C.; Ippolito, F.; Bonanomi, G.; Vinale, F.; Staropoli, A.; Idbella, M. Biochar and Compost Application either Alone or in Combination Affects Vegetable Yield in a Volcanic Mediterranean Soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Holatko, J.; Hammerschmiedt, T.; Latal, O.; Kintl, A.; Mustafa, A.; Baltazar, T.; Malicek, O.; Brtnicky, M. Deciphering the Effectiveness of Humic Substances and Biochar Modified Digestates on Soil Quality and Plant Biomass Accumulation. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wojewódzki, P.; Lemanowicz, J.; Debska, B.; Haddad, S.A. Soil Enzyme Activity Response under the Amendment of Different Types of Biochar. Agronomy 2022, 12, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zafeiriou, I.; Gasparatos, D.; Ioannou, D.; Kalderis, D.; Massas, I. Selenium Biofortification of Lettuce Plants (Lactuca sativa L.) as Affected by Se Species, Se Rate, and a Biochar Co-Application in a Calcareous Soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bu, F.; Nan, Q.; Li, W.; Bolan, N.; Sarkar, B.; Meng, J.; Wang, H. Meta-Analysis for Quantifying Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Paddy Soils One Year after Biochar Application. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cerven, V.; Novak, J.M.; Szögi, A.A.; Pantuck, K.; Watts, D.W.; Johnson, M.G. The Occurrence of Legacy P Soils and Potential Mitigation Practices Using Activated Biochar. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Conte, P.; Bertani, R.; Sgarbossa, P.; Bambina, P.; Schmidt, H.-P.; Raga, R.; Lo Papa, G.; Chillura Martino, D.F.; Lo Meo, P. Recent Developments in Understanding Biochar’s Physical–Chemistry. Agronomy 2021, 11, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arunrat, N.; Kongsurakan, P.; Sereenonchai, S.; Hatano, R. Soil Organic Carbon in Sandy Paddy Fields of Northeast Thailand: A Review. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cataldo, E.; Fucile, M.; Mattii, G.B. A Review: Soil Management, Sustainable Strategies and Approaches to Improve the Quality of Modern Viticulture. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rahim, H.U.; Akbar, W.A.; Alatalo, J.M. A Comprehensive Literature Review on Cadmium (Cd) Status in the Soil Environment and Its Immobilization by Biochar-Based Materials. Agronomy 2022, 12, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sohi, S.P.; Krull, E.; Lopez-Capel, E.; Bol, R. Chapter 2—A Review of Biochar and Its Use and Function in Soil. In Advances in Agronomy; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; Volume 105, pp. 47–82. [Google Scholar]
  47. Oliveira, F.R.; Patel, A.K.; Jaisi, D.P.; Adhikari, S.; Lu, H.; Khanal, S.K. Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lehmann, J.; Rillig, M.C.; Thies, J.; Masiello, C.A.; Hockaday, W.C.; Crowley, D. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1812–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bărdaş, M.; Rusu, T.; Russu, F.; Șimon, A.; Chețan, F.; Ceclan, O.A.; Rezi, R.; Popa, A.; Cărbunar, M.M. The Impact of Foliar Fertilization on the Physiological Parameters, Yield, and Quality Indices of the Soybean Crop. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Crista, F.; Radulov, I.; Imbrea, F.; Manea, D.N.; Boldea, M.; Gergen, I.; Ienciu, A.A.; Bănățean Dunea, I. The Study of the Impact of Complex Foliar Fertilization on the Yield and Quality of Sunflower Seeds (Helianhtus annuus L.) by Principal Component Analysis. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Safdar, M.E.; Qamar, R.; Javed, A.; Nadeem, M.A.; Javeed, H.M.R.; Farooq, S.; Głowacka, A.; Michałek, S.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Elshikh, M.S.; et al. Combined Application of Boron and Zinc Improves Seed and Oil Yields and Oil Quality of Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.). Agronomy 2023, 13, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xing, G.; Ma, J.; Liu, X.; Lei, B.; Wang, G.; Hou, S.; Han, Y. Influence of Different Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Fertilizer Ratios on the Agronomic and Quality Traits of Foxtail Millet. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Oliveira Junior, A.C.; Silva dos Santos, L.N.; Reis, M.N.O.; Vitorino, L.C.; Bessa, L.A.; Teixeira, M.B.; Soares, F.A.L. Effect of Mineral and Organic Nitrogen Sources on Vegetative Development, Nutrition, and Yield of Sugarcane. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. González, J.A.; Yousif, S.K.M.; Erazzu, L.E.; Martínez Calsina, L.; Lizarraga, E.F.; Omer, R.M.; Bazile, D.; Fernandez-Turiel, J.L.; Buedo, S.E.; Rejas, M.; et al. Effects of Goat Manure Fertilization on Grain Nutritional Value in Two Contrasting Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Varieties Cultivated at High Altitudes. Agronomy 2023, 13, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teliban, G.-C.; Burducea, M.; Mihalache, G.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Dincheva, I.; Badjakov, I.; Popa, L.-D.; Bodale, I.; Vlăduț, N.-V.; Cojocaru, A.; et al. Morphological, Physiological and Quality Performances of Basil Cultivars under Different Fertilization Types. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Muneer, M.A.; Jin, D.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, C.; et al. Characterization of Different Magnesium Fertilizers and Their Effect on Yield and Quality of Soybean and Pomelo. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The number of published articles, indexed by Scopus in the period of 2000–2022, which include the terms “plant nutrition” OR “fertilizers” OR “soil fertility” OR “soil properties” OR “soil amendments” OR “crop productivity” OR “nutrient uptake”.
Figure 1. The number of published articles, indexed by Scopus in the period of 2000–2022, which include the terms “plant nutrition” OR “fertilizers” OR “soil fertility” OR “soil properties” OR “soil amendments” OR “crop productivity” OR “nutrient uptake”.
Agronomy 13 02461 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Głąb, T. ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’—A Section of Agronomy: Advances and Perspectives. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102461

AMA Style

Głąb T. ‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’—A Section of Agronomy: Advances and Perspectives. Agronomy. 2023; 13(10):2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102461

Chicago/Turabian Style

Głąb, Tomasz. 2023. "‘Soil and Plant Nutrition’—A Section of Agronomy: Advances and Perspectives" Agronomy 13, no. 10: 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102461

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop