Next Article in Journal
Screening Canola Genotypes for Resistance to Ammonium Toxicity
Next Article in Special Issue
A Plastid RNA Polymerase-Associated Protein Is Involved in Early Chloroplast Development in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Moisture Conservation Practices to Improve Soil Properties and Nutrient Status of Robusta Coffee Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removing Harmful Pericarp Character of Weedy Rice as the First Step of Domestication towards Direct-Seeding Rice Using CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted Mutagenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Nutritional Assessment and Metabolomics of a WRKY Rice Mutant with Enhanced Germination Rates

by
Santiago Bataller
1,
Anne J. Villacastin
1,
Qingxi J. Shen
1 and
Christine Bergman
2,*
1
School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
2
Food & Beverage and Event Management Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(4), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041149
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 11 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovery and Utilization of Germplasm Resources in Rice)

Abstract

:
Rice is the primary staple food for half the world’s population. Climate change challenges and food insecurity supports the need for rice with agronomically advantageous traits. We report on a transposon insertional rice mutant with enhanced germination rates. This trait is advantageous for rice growth in limited water regions and to reduce yield constraints caused by weed and bird competition. Evaluations of vital nutritional components, compositional analysis, and comparative metabolomics on threshed grain samples are performed, as these assays are those used to assess the safety of foods from genetically modified crops. Compared with the wild type (cv. Nipponbare), oswrky71 mutant grains have a similar size, shape, amount of crude fiber, crude fat, and ash content but higher crude protein. Mineral analyses reveal higher contents of phosphorus and zinc but lower calcium, potassium, sodium, and manganese in the mutant. Analysis of B vitamins reveals significantly higher riboflavin concentrations but lower choline chloride, calcium pantothenate, and thiamine. In addition, untargeted metabolomics analyses identify approximately 50 metabolites whose levels differed between the mutant and its wild type. Physical traits and compositional parameters analyzed are mostly similar and within the range or very close to being considered safe for consumption by the International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database. Further agronomic evaluation and cooked rice sensory properties assessment are needed before positioning this mutant for human consumption.

1. Introduction

Rice is an essential source of kilocalories and various nutrients for more than a fifth of the world’s population, critically highlighting its role in achieving food security. In the last harvest year, nearly 510 million metric tons of milled rice were produced worldwide, with about 80% allocated for human consumption [1]. Milled rice supplies considerable kilocalories and provides vital minerals such as magnesium, selenium, and phosphorus, as well as vitamins B1, B3, and B9 [2]. Whole-grain rice is a rich source of carbohydrates, dietary fiber, lipids, protein, phosphorus, potassium, B vitamins, and phytochemicals [3].
Challenges in rice crop production are vastly intensified as industrialization progresses. With the expansion of economies comes the loss of arable land, fewer labor resources, and less water access as urbanization persists and populations increase [4]. Along with these challenges are the adverse threats of climate change on rice yield and end-use quality. For example, fluctuating average temperatures negatively impact rice production [5]. Heat stress is predicted to negatively affect parameters such as germination rates, seedling growth, pollen grain number, and grain filling [6]. Currently, climate change seriously affects approximately 52% of the world’s rice producers, including those in China, India, and Indonesia, who provide about 75% of the total rice demand worldwide [7]. The aggravated rice production comes alongside increasing consumption and demand [8]. It is, therefore, critical that we find ways to ensure rice’s stable and sustainable production despite these hurdles. Currently, the focus of cereal crop improvement programs includes the enhancement of seedling vigor, grain yield, and nutritional quality. These important traits and others are strongly controlled by genetic and environmental factors [9].
Pivotal to the cultivation of crops is the germination of seeds, which is the first step in the plant’s life cycle. In contrast, seed dormancy is an evolutionarily important cereal trait that allows for the storage of seeds until conditions become optimal for germination and growth. The ability of seeds to germinate or remain dormant is still a poorly understood area of research despite some significant breakthroughs in the field [10]. Seed dormancy entails a complex balance of molecular, biochemical, and physiological processes controlled by coordinating intrinsic and extrinsic cues [11]. Among these factors, the intricate crosstalk between two phytohormones—gibberellic acid (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA)—have long been shown to be primary endogenous players regulating the ability of seeds to germinate or stay dormant [12]. ABA promotes dormancy of seeds as it inhibits germination, while in contrast, the GA breaks this dormancy and promotes germination.
Pre-harvest sprouting of seeds, while the kernels are still attached to the plant, leads to a severe loss of quantity and quality of cereal harvest, a phenomenon especially significant in humid regions [11,13]. Additionally, pre-harvest sprouting threatens the plant’s growth as the lower grain weight is prone to infestation of saprophytic fungi [14]. On the other hand, prolonged dormancy of seeds also creates challenges, especially for farmers who plant via direct dry seeding [15,16,17,18]. Under this type of planting, prolonged seed germination times require fields to be flooded for longer periods of time. Shortening the time rice is ponded reduces water use by limiting evaporation and deep drainage below the crop root zone [15]. This is especially important in water-constrained regions. In addition, the longer it takes for seeds after planting to become seedlings, the greater the potential for yield loss caused by bird consumption of the seeds and for weeds to outcompete the rice seedlings, especially under organic production methods [16,17]. To date, research designed to improve rice germination rates has been limited [18,19]. Varieties that germinate rapidly and uniformly would be a valuable contribution to global rice-improvement efforts.
We have identified a rice mutant line from a rice transposon insertion library [20] that exhibited an early germination phenotype because of the knockout of a specific gene, OsWRKY71, a member of the WRKY superfamily transcription factors. WRKY transcription factors are highly conserved in the plant kingdom, and some members are key players in growth, development, and stress response [21]. An invariant amino acid sequence characterizes WRKYs, WRKYGQK, followed by a zinc-finger binding domain, both of which allow for the WRKY’s specificity for gene targets that have cis-regulatory elements called the W-box [22]. OsWRKY71 has been previously shown to be involved in the complex interaction of GA and ABA during germination [23,24,25]. In previous studies on rice aleurone cells, OsWRKY71 was shown to be induced by ABA, and its protein product binds to the W-box of GA-induced α-amylase genes [24,25]. It was proposed that the binding prevented the expression of the amylase and other GA-responsive genes and hindered germination. Our recent studies demonstrated that knocking out the gene led to a faster germination rate, suggesting this gene may be an important target in our efforts to find crops with a more controlled seed-sprouting phenotype. We believe this mutant line may be essential as we continue to find solutions to improve crop productivity and quality.
In this current study, we assess the nutritional properties of the oswrky71 rice mutant. We also used metabolomics to analyze the global metabolite differences between the wildtype and mutant kernels to evaluate the effect of the mutation comprehensively. As we recognize the agronomic value of this mutant’s early germination phenotype, this study aims to provide an exhaustive compositional and nutritional evaluation relative to its wild-type counterpart as a key step in the risk assessment process before its distribution for human consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Oryza sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare dSpm mutants were acquired from the Sundaresan Lab, University of California, Davis, CA, USA [21]. Wild-type (c.v. Nipponbare) and mutant seeds were sterilized with 10% bleach (The Clorox Company, Oakland, CA, USA) for 20 min and were then washed five times with sterile Milli-Q water for 2 min per wash. Seeds were placed on sterile filter paper in a Petri dish with sterile Milli-Q water, and germination occurred in a dark incubator at 28 °C. After 14 days, seedlings were transferred to a greenhouse at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and transplanted to 3:1 soil blend of Turface MVP calcined clay (Turface, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and lawn soil (Sta-Green, Mechanicsville, VA, USA). Plants were flooded every 6 h with water supplemented with Miracle-Gro All Purpose Plant Food (Scotts, Marysville, OH, USA). Growth conditions were maintained at 50–60% humidity, 28 ± 5 °C, with shaded natural lighting. Plants were grown to maturity in 6 months in the greenhouse, after which panicles were harvested. Nipponbare grows to maturity in approximately 4 months under field conditions [26]. However, the seeds were ready for harvest in the greenhouse after 6 months. Seed dormancy was broken by storing the seeds in the dark at room temperature for at least one month before germination assays.

2.2. Genotyping Mutant Lines by PCR

To verify homozygous mutant lines, genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissues, and PCR was performed to detect for insertion of the dSpm transposon. Approximately 2 cm of leaf blade tissues were collected for each line and homogenized using the MP FastPrep-24 homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA). Then, 500 μL Edwards buffer (0.2M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.25M NaCl, 0.025M EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5% w/v SDS) was added into each sample, and cell debris was separated out by centrifugation (21,000× g) for five minutes. Then, 230 μL isopropanol was added to 300 μL of supernatant, and DNA was pelleted out by centrifugation (21,000× g) for 10 min. The DNA pellet was washed thrice with 70% ethanol by centrifugation (21,000× g) for five minutes. Extracted genomic DNA served as a template for PCR diagnostics using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) and oligonucleotides listed in Supplementary Table S1. The following cycling conditions were used: initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C denaturation, 60 °C annealing and 72 °C extension, and final extension at 72 °C for five minutes. The products were analyzed on 1.0% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

2.3. Germination Assays

For germination assays, whole seeds were sterilized as described previously. All germination assays occurred in a dark 28 °C incubator, using at least 25 seeds per replicate and at least three replicates. For liquid germination assays, 15 mL of sterile Milli-Q water was used in a 50 mm Petri dish. Solid germination assays occurred on ½× Murashige and Skoog Media (pH 5.8) supplemented with 1% (w/v) agar and 0.05% (w/v) MES. Germination was determined by a radicle or coleoptile growth of at least 2 mm. Statistical significance in germination rate between the wild type and oswrky71 at each time point was determined via unpaired Student’s t-tests. T50 calculations were performed as previously described [27], and statistical significance was determined via Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.

2.4. Kernel Morphology

Phenotypic analyses were performed following the Standard Evaluation System for Rice (SES) [28] methods with minor modifications. Mature seeds and kernels were scanned using a Canon 8800F Scanner, and ImageJ was used to measure the length, width, and area [29]. For the 100-grain weight, 100 well-developed whole grains dried to less than 13% moisture content were weighed on a Mettler Ae50 analytical balance in triplicates. Rice grains were threshed using a compact rice husker (TR-200, Kett, Tokyo, Japan). For alkali digestion, four threshed-rice kernels were placed into a Petri dish with 10 mL 1.7% KOH and were arranged to prevent touching. After incubating for 23 h at 30 °C, the kernels were scored for spreading following the criteria in SES. Threshed rice samples were used for the subsequent analyses (proximate composition, total protein, amino acids, B vitamins, and metabolomics).

2.5. Proximate Composition

The proximate composition analyses (i.e., crude fiber, crude protein, crude fat, ash, and carbohydrate by difference) were performed using the official analysis methods by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC). After harvest, whole grains were dried to a final moisture content of 10 to 12%. Threshed samples were ground into flour before evaluation. Analyses were performed in triplicates, and data were expressed on a dry weight basis (DB).

2.6. Total Protein

The protein concentration of threshed, dry seeds was determined using the Pierce quantitative protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A standard curve was generated using the manufacturer’s procedure and the Peptide Digest Assay Standard. Threshed kernels were ground into flour using liquid nitrogen, and 0.095 g of each sample was used for protein extraction. The working reagent (WR) was prepared by mixing 50 parts of colorimetric peptide assay reagent A, 48 parts of colorimetric assay reagent B, and 2 parts of colorimetric assay reagent C. The WR was kept at room temperature for less than 30 min. Then, 20 μL standard or sample extract was pipetted into a well of a 96-well microplate. To each well, 180 μL of the WR was added, and the plates were thoroughly mixed on a plate shaker for 30 s to 1 min. The plate was covered and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 562 nm.

2.7. Amino Acids

Amino acids quantification of threshed, dry seeds was performed using three replicates for each genotype. Samples were ground in liquid nitrogen. Then, 6 N HCl was added to each sample and incubated at 110 °C to facilitate digestion. After 21 h of incubation, a 50 μL supernatant was taken, and a 4 N NaOH and 50 μL deproteinization reagent were added. After mixing with a vortex, the mixture was centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 4 min. A total of 8 μL was transferred into a tube and mixed with 42 μL of the buffer. Afterward, 20 μL derivation reagent was added. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 55 °C, and 50 μL of the mixture was used for downstream analysis. Amino acids were quantified using a Shimadzu LC20AD-API 3200MD TRAP HPLC-MS/MS.

2.8. B Vitamins

B-vitamin levels of threshed, dry seeds were determined using LC-MS/MS measurements on an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system coupled to an Agilent 6470 triple quadrupole system. System suitability tests were measured along with the samples to verify the calibration. The threshed samples were ground, and the vitamins were extracted from the resulting flour. Samples of 0.5 g were used for extraction in 5 mL of 50% methanol in water. Analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.9. Untargeted Metabolomics

Metabolomics was performed using 50 mg of each sample. The samples were precisely weighed into a 2 mL Eppendorf tube and extracted with 800 μL 80% methanol, and all samples were homogenized on a MM 400 mill mixer at 60 Hz for 2 min, followed by sonication for 30 min, 4 °C. Then, all samples were kept at −40 °C for 1 h. After that, samples were vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. A 200 μL supernatant and 5 μL of DL-o-Chlorophenylalanine (140 μg/mL) were transferred to a vial for LC-MS analysis. Separation was performed by Ultimate 3000LC combined with Q Exactive MS (Thermo) and screened with ESI-MS (targeted MS/MS mode). The LC system comprised a Thermo Hyper Gold C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm) with Ultimate 3000LC. The mobile phase was composed of solvent A (0.1% formic acid-5% acetonitrile-water) and solvent B (0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile) with gradient elution (0–1.5 min, 100–80% A; 1.5–9.5 min, 80–0% A; 9.5–14.5 min, 0% A; 14.5–14.6 min, 0–100% A; 14.6–18.0 min, 100% A). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.3 mL·min−1. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C, and the sample manager temperature was set at 4 °C. Mass spectrometry parameters in ESI+ were as follows: heater temp 300 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 45 arb; aux gas flow rate, 15 arb; sweep gas flow rate, 1 arb; spray voltage, 3.0 kV; capillary temp, 350 °C; S-Lens RF level, 30%. Mass spectrometry parameters in ESI− were as follows: heater temp 300 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 45 arb; aux gas flow rate, 15 arb; sweep gas flow rate, 1 arb; spray voltage, 3.2 kV; capillary temp, 350 °C; S-Lens RF level, 60%. At the beginning of the sequence, we ran three quality control (QC) samples to avoid small changes in chromatographic retention time and signal intensity. Quality control (QC) samples were used to evaluate the methodology. The exact amount of extract was obtained from each sample and mixed as QC samples. The QC sample was prepared using the same sample preparation procedure. Using the data of accurate masses and MS/MS fragments, the chemical structures of important metabolites were identified using the following online databases: Human Metabolome Database (www.hmdb.ca; accessed on 29 September 2022), Metlin (www.metlin.scripps.edu; accessed on 29 September 2022), and the Mass Bank (www.massbank.jp; accessed on 29 September 2022) [30,31,32].

2.10. Statistical Methods

All samples were analyzed statistically using the Student’s t-test. For untargeted metabolomics, the raw data were acquired and aligned using Compound Discoverer (3.0, Thermo) based on the m/z value and the retention time of the ion signals. For multivariate analysis, ions from ESI− and ESI+ were merged and imported into the SIMCA-P program (version 14.1). A principal components analysis (PCA) was first used as an unsupervised method for data visualization and outlier identification. Supervised regression modeling was then performed on the data set using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) or orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) to identify the potential biomarkers. The biomarkers were filtered and confirmed by combining the results of the VIP values (VIP > 1.5) and t-test (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Transposon-Mediated Mutation in OsWRKY71 Results in Early Germination Phenotype

Previous transient expression studies in barley aleurone showed that OsWRKY71 is a transcriptional repressor of the GA-induced α-amylase gene, Amy32b [24,25]. Hydrolytic enzymes such as α-amylases play an essential role in the mobilization of stored reserves during germination, providing nutrients to the growing embryo [33,34,35]. So, we hypothesized that a loss-of-function mutation in OsWRKY71 would result in an enhanced germination rate. To investigate the role of OsWRKY71 in seed germination, we obtained a rice mutant, oswrky71 [20]. Sequencing confirmed that the stable dSpm transposon insertions in oswrky71 occur in the 5′UTR (27 bp downstream of transcriptional start site (TSS) (Figure 1A). A PCR-driven breeding strategy was performed to ensure homozygosity of the oswrky71 mutation (Supplementary Table S1).
To determine whether the loss of a negative regulator of GA signaling could affect seed germination rates, oswrky71 and wild-type seeds were subjected to dark-grown germination assays in water. Seed germination rates were measured every 8 h, starting after 24 h, with germination determined by at least 2 mm of radicle or coleoptile growth. Relative to the wild type, oswrky71 mutants displayed a 1.4–1.8-fold increased germination rates at 36 h after imbibition (HAI) and a 1.3-fold increase at 48 HAI (Figure 1B). No significant differences were detected after 60 HAI when all lines approached maximum germination. The time to reach a 50% maximal germination (T50) was determined using the Farooq method [36], with oswrky71 mutant seeds reaching T50 at 38.0 HAI, which was 17.7% earlier than the 46.1 HAI observed for the wild type. Thus, the oswrky71 mutant displayed an early seed-germination phenotype.

3.2. Morphological Characterization of oswrky71 Kernel

To determine the effects of mutating OsWRKY71 on grain morphology, we used the standard evaluation system for rice [28]. Mutant kernels have similar seed surface area, length, and width compared to the wild type (Figure 2B,C). For the overall shape, kernels of both genotypes were categorized as ‘short’ (length < 5.5 mm) and ‘bold’ (length/width ratio = 1.1–2.0 mm). No difference in seed coat color (i.e., light brown) was observed between the wild type and mutants. In addition, mutant lines exhibited significantly lower 100-grain weight (p < 0.05; Figure 2D). Alkali spreading value (ASV), an indicator of gelatinization temperature (GT), was performed to assess this aspect of the grain end-use quality [28,37]. ASV is inversely related to GT, the temperature at which starch granules melt and the grains start to cook. It positively correlates with cooking time and texture in domesticated rice [38]. Wild type and oswrky71 had a mean ASV value of approximately 4, corresponding to intermediate GT for both genotypes (Figure 2E) [28].

3.3. Proximate Composition and Mineral Analyses

The proximate compositions of the wild-type and mutant kernels according to the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists’ (AOAC) official methods of analysis are shown in Table 1, which was calculated on a dry weight basis except for moisture, which is expressed on a fresh weight basis, to allow comparison with each other. The moisture content (MC) of both wild-type (11.6% MC) and mutant (9.6% MC) kernels is lower than the safe moisture content required for secure storage of processed rice during short periods (14% MC) and long-term storage (12% MC) to avoid microbial contamination and insect infestation [39,40,41]. Crude fat values were not significantly different between the wild type (1.6%) and mutant (1.7%). The crude protein content of the mutant line was significantly higher (13.7%) compared to the wild type (13.1%) (p < 0.05). The ash content values were similar between the wild type (4.1%) and the mutant (3.7%). The fiber percentages of the wild type (9.8%) and the mutant (9.8%) were the same. The total and available carbohydrates in 100 g of dehulled grains calculated by difference were similar between the wild type (69.7 g and 73.7 g, respectively) and the mutant (78.3 g and 82.4 g, respectively).
Mineral contents were analyzed for the wild type and the mutant kernels on a dry weight basis and are shown in Table 2. Mineral analyses revealed a higher content of phosphorus and zinc in the mutant grains but lower calcium, potassium, sodium, and manganese (p < 0.05). Magnesium, sulfur, iron, copper, and selenium contents were similar for both genotypes.

3.4. Amino Acids Composition Analysis

A comparison of the amino acid composition of the wild-type and the mutant kernels is shown in Table 3. There were no statistically significant differences in concentrations of most amino acids except for the reduced valine, aspartic acid, lysine, and phenylalanine concentrations in the mutant kernels (p < 0.05). The total protein (true protein) was also reduced in the mutant kernel (Table 1).

3.5. Quantification of B Vitamins

To determine the concentrations of water-soluble B vitamins (choline chloride, thiamine, calcium pantothenate, and riboflavin) in wild-type and mutant kernels, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed. Analysis of B vitamins showed significantly higher riboflavin concentrations in the mutant kernels but lower choline chloride, calcium pantothenate, and thiamine (Table 4).

3.6. Identification of Differential Metabolites

To compare the metabolite profiles between the wild-type and the mutant kernels, an untargeted metabolomic evaluation was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography time of flight mass spectroscopy (UPLC-TOF-MS) (Figure 3A). To demonstrate the stability of the LC-MS system, quality control (QC) samples were used in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) modes. The relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the QC samples was less than 30%, suggesting that the analysis procedure was robust and can be used for subsequent sample analysis. Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) for both positive and negative modes showed clear separations between the wild-type and mutant metabolic profiles, indicating significant differences in metabolites.
To identify the differential metabolites in the mutant kernels, the significantly changed metabolites between the two groups are filtered out based on a variable importance-in-projection (VIP) score (VIP > 1.5) for both positive and negative ESI modes (Figure 3B,C). Metabolites with VIP > 1.5, |log2FC| > 1.0, and p-value < 0.05 were considered differential metabolites (Figure 3C,D). Out of 3425 metabolites identified in the positive mode, 43 were differential metabolites, of which 41 were upregulated (log2FC > 1) and 2 were downregulated (log2FC < −1) in the mutant kernels (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). In the negative mode, out of 2605 identified, 31 were differential metabolites (28 upregulated, 3 downregulated; Supplementary Tables S4 and S5). Furthermore, 11 differential metabolites appeared in both positive and negative ESI modes, which are significantly increased in the mutant kernel (Figure 4A,B). The differential metabolites identified can be categorized into eight super-classes [30]: lipids and lipid-like molecules, organic acids and derivatives, organic nitrogen compounds, organic oxygen compounds, organoheterocyclic compounds, phenylpropanoids and polyketides, alkaloids and derivatives, and benzenoids. Hierarchical cluster analysis of the differential metabolites shows that mutation in OsWRKY71 led to more upregulated than downregulated metabolites in the kernels (Figure 4A,B). For positive and negative ESI modes, most differential metabolites belong to the major class of metabolites, carboxylic acids, which include amino acids, peptides, and analogs [30]. The next major class of metabolites that were increased were the organooxygen compounds. One of the most important compounds in this class is pantothenic acid, also called vitamin B5, which is significantly upregulated in the mutant kernel. Another upregulated metabolite of known nutritional importance is L-carnitine, an organonitrogen compound [42,43]. There were only five significantly downregulated metabolites: corchorifatty acid F, propyl gallate, N-(1-Deoxy-1-fructosyl)tyrosine, suberic acid, and niazirinin. All these differentially expressed metabolites are present in embryo and endosperm [44].
To investigate the metabolic pathways perturbed by the mutation in OsWRKY71, we performed pathway enrichment analysis using KEGG and MBRole [45,46]. All significant metabolites (Supplementary Tables S2 and S4) are imported to MBRole to obtain the categorical annotations, including pathways, enzyme interactions, and other biological annotations. There are mainly 34 and 51 enriched metabolic pathways from the differential metabolites in positive and negative ESI modes, respectively, that were affected by the mutation of OsWRKY71 (Table 5 and Table 6). Specifically, in the positive mode, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism, biosynthesis of plant hormones, and biosynthesis of alkaloids were among the pathways enriched. Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, amino acid metabolism, biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, and alkaloids were a few of the enriched pathways from differential metabolites in the negative ESI mode.

4. Discussion

For new varieties produced using genetic engineering methods, with or without the intention of modifying nutritional content, composition evaluation is used for risk assessments before commercialization and to determine whether any unintended changes of biological importance occurred that may warrant further investigation [47,48,49,50]. This ensures that genetically modified (GM) crops do not have inadvertent mutations that can lead to unintended harmful effects such as the production of toxins or toxic intermediates [47,51]. Comparison and evaluation of the composition and nutritional properties of GM crops and their wild-type counterparts are needed to determine if research in the future should position this mutant for human food.
Rice is the primary staple crop of Asia, where the average person consumes nearly 100 kg annually. While a good source of kilocalories, rice grains are considered relatively nutrient-poor because of the low levels of protein and important vitamins. This can lead to many nutritional deficiencies and diseases occurring when rice is the primary dietary component, disproportionately affecting impoverished populations that lack access to various foods. Thus, efforts have been made to biofortify rice, such as traditional and marker-assisted breeding, transgenic technology, and gene editing. An example is the famous “golden rice” strategy that produces grains enriched with a precursor for vitamin A [50,52,53,54]. In another study, a mutation in the DNA demethylase gene, OsROS1, significantly increased the vitamins and minerals compared with the wild type control [55].
Processing methods are also used to enhance the nutritional quality of threshed rice. One example is the production of rice that has been partially germinated, referred to as pre-germinated rice (PGR) and sprouted brown rice [56,57,58]. Pre-germinated rice and rice-based products such as multi-grain breads are available commercially. The rice germination process starts with the imbibition of water and terminates with the protrusion of the embryonic axes, either the radicle and/or the coleoptile, which usually takes place approximately 48 h after imbibition [10,59]. With faster germination rates, the oswrky71 mutant can reduce the energy required to produce PGR, which may result in a product with more consistent end-use quality.
We examined the physical characteristics and composition of the mutant and wild-type rice kernels from the Nipponbare cultivar grown in greenhouse conditions. Due to its genome being sequenced to a high degree of accuracy, the Nipponbare cultivar has become the standard reference sequence for studying the variations among numerous rice cultivars, including their wild relatives, and other economically important cereal crops that are vital to the world’s food supply [26]. A mutation in OsWRKY71 did not affect the seed appearance and shape as both genotypes have a white seed-coat color, and the kernels are categorized as ‘short’ and ‘bold’. Moreover, a mutation in OsWRKY71 has no effect on 100-grain weight, one of the determinants of crop yield. To precisely determine the effect of the mutation on rice yield and any possible tradeoffs, the mutants and wild-type lines should be grown in a natural field environment, and other parameters such as tiller number, panicle size, spikelet per panicle, and grain filling percentage should be recorded [28,60].
Most proximate composition parameters reported are similar between the wild type and mutant. Although the crude protein content was significantly higher in the mutant kernels, the total protein was reduced in the mutant. This is consistent with the decrease in concentration of amino acids valine, aspartic acid, lysine, and phenylalanine. Crude protein is a measure of all nitrogen sources, including non-protein nitrogen sources [61]. Wild-type alanine, arginine, glutamic acid, and valine concentrations were higher than the literature’s and the International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database’s (ILSI-CCDB) range for these amino acids [50,62,63,64]. Both wild type and oswrky71 have higher concentrations of aspartic acid and lysine but lower methionine and tryptophan concentrations compared with the literature and ILSI-CCDB range.
Mineral analyses revealed a higher content of phosphorus and zinc in the mutant grains and lower calcium, potassium, sodium, and manganese. All minerals analyzed are within the ILSI-CCDB range except for potassium [62,63,64]. Both wild-type control and oswrky71 threshed samples have potassium concentrations above the ILSI-CCDB range. Riboflavin (vitamin B2) was increased in the mutant but still within the ILSI-CCDB range. Thiamine (B1) and calcium pantothenate (B5) concentrations were reduced in oswrky71. Thiamine (B1) concentrations are within range in ILSI-CCDB in both wild-type and mutant kernels; however, both genotypes have slightly lower calcium pantothenate (B5) concentrations compared with the reference range. The nutrient profile of the pre-germinated mutant should still be evaluated to determine if there are differences compared with the wild type. Most comparative analyses of the nutritional composition of mutant or transgenic rice varieties were limited to comparing parameters such as proximate analyses, amino acids, minerals, vitamins, and anti-nutrient analyses [50,65,66,67,68].
With the advent of ‘omics’ profiling technologies, untargeted metabolomics is now being used in conjunction with current analytical methods to improve the risk assessment of genetically modified crops set by the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development [47,49]. Compared to their wild-type counterparts, OECD defines conventional comparative methods in evaluating the safety and nutritional content of foods from GM crops using validated targeted analytical protocols [47]. These analytical methods have limitations in providing complete coverage of the metabolome changes that might be affected by genetic engineering [47]. Thus, metabolomics, which combines analytical chemistry with bioinformatics, offers a much more comprehensive and high-throughput characterization of the metabolome [47]. Proposals have been made to leverage metabolomics for safety assessment and compositional analysis of GM crops alongside the methods outlined by the OECD [47,69,70,71]. Interestingly, a meta-analysis on omics-profiling publications comparing GM and non-GM crops, with or without intent to change any metabolic pathway, showed that genetic modifications, specifically transgene insertion, produce few inadvertent consequences [72,73,74].
Comparative metabolomics analysis has been used in several rice studies designed to improve rice quality and evaluate metabolome changes that may impact the nutritional content or therapeutic potential of different rice varieties [75,76,77,78]. In the metabolic profiling of GM rice lines transformed with insect-resistance genes, the study found three upregulated metabolites in the GM lines. Still, most metabolites were equivalent to the wild-type counterpart [79]. In another study comparing GM lines with different sets of antifungal and insect-resistance genes, significant changes in protein, amino acid, vitamin, and mineral concentrations were recorded. Still, they were all within the range according to OECD values [80]. In this study, we utilized untargeted metabolic profiling and identified a few metabolites that differed between the samples in terms of individual metabolite levels, but not in terms of different metabolites. If these metabolites are shown to have the same differences between the mutant and wild type across different growing environments, they could be used as biomarkers for the oswrky71 mutant. In addition to the results from the analyses performed in this study, the metabolic profiling provides some evidence that the oswrky71 mutant is substantially equivalent to its wild type, which has a history of safe use. However, it should be noted that there is not a single extraction method or analytical method available, including metabolomic analysis, that can determine the entire metabolome of a plant because of the physiochemical differences between the different classes of metabolites [47].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we performed a comparative compositional evaluation of a rice mutant with an early germination phenotype generated via transposon-mediated knockdown of the OsWRKY71 gene. Due to its novel germination-related phenotype, the oswrky71 mutant can improve rice germination rates, which is advantageous for farmers in water-constrained global regions. Among the compositional parameters evaluated, the key nutritional components in the mutant rice kernel were comparable to its wild-type counterpart and within or similar to safe ranges suggested by the ILSI-CCDB for safe consumption. Further agronomic evaluation and cooked-rice sensory properties must be assessed before positioning this mutant for human consumption.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13041149/s1: Table S1: Identified metabolites in both WT and wrky71 under ESI+ scan; Table S2: Identified metabolites in both WT and wrky71 under ESI− scan; Table S3: Identified metabolites showing a difference between wrky71 and WT under ESI+ scan; Table S4: Identified metabolites showing a difference between wrky71 and WT under ESI− scan; Table S5: Identified metabolite pathways showing a difference between wrky71 and WT group under ESI+ scan.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B., Q.J.S. and C.B.; methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, and visualization, S.B. and A.J.V.; data curation, S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B. and A.J.V.; writing—review and editing, S.B., A.J.V., Q.J.S. and C.B.; supervision, Q.J.S. and C.B.; funding acquisition, Q.J.S. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the UNLV Faculty Opportunity Awards 2018 and a USDA grant (2018-67013-27421).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the following reference. Bataller, S. et al. (2023): Comparative Nutritional Assessment and Metabolomics of a WRKY Rice Mutant with Enhanced Germination Rates. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22645096.v1. Additional data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the UNLV University Libraries Open Access Funds for providing the publication fees.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. David Lubin Memorial Library. In African Studies Companion Online; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fukagawa, N.K.; Ziska, L.H. Rice: Importance for Global Nutrition. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2019, 65, S2–S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gnanamanickam, S.S. Rice and Its Importance to Human Life. In Biological Control of Rice Diseases; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ramankutty, N.; Mehrabi, Z.; Waha, K.; Jarvis, L.; Kremen, C.; Herrero, M.; Rieseberg, L.H. Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 789–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pickson, R.B.; He, G.; Boateng, E. Impacts of climate change on rice production: Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Veronica, N.; Rani, Y.A.; Subrahmanyam, D.; Rao, K.N.; Ahamad, M.; Rani, P.P. Physiological and biochemical responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.) to high temperature: A review. Res. Crops 2016, 17, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ray, D.K.; Gerber, J.S.; MacDonald, G.K.; West, P.C. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussain, S.; Huang, J.; Huang, J.; Ahmad, S.; Nanda, S.; Anwar, S.; Shakoor, A.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, L.; Cao, X. Rice production under climate change: Adaptations and mitigating strategies. In Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 659–686. [Google Scholar]
  9. Achary, V.M.M.; Reddy, M.K. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutation in GRAIN WIDTH and WEIGHT2 (GW2) locus improves aleurone layer and grain nutritional quality in rice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nonogaki, H. Seed germination and dormancy: The classic story, new puzzles, and evolution. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019, 61, 541–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sohn, S.-I.; Pandian, S.; Kumar, T.S.; Zoclanclounon, Y.A.B.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Shilpha, J.; Satish, L.; Ramesh, M. Seed Dormancy and Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Rice-An Updated Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shu, K.; Meng, Y.J.; Shuai, H.W.; Liu, W.G.; Du, J.B.; Liu, J.; Yang, W.Y. Dormancy and germination: How does the crop seed decide? Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, D.; Zeng, M.; Wu, Y.; Du, Y.; Liu, J.; Luo, S.; Zeng, Y. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insights into the molecular basis underlying pre-harvest sprouting in rice. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, C.; Ni, P.; Francki, M.; Hunter, A.; Zhang, Y.; Schibeci, D.; Li, H.; Tarr, A.; Wang, J.; Cakir, M.; et al. Genes controlling seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in a rice-wheat-barley comparison. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2004, 4, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rice Extension. Rice Growing Guidelines for Managing Water Usage. Available online: https://riceextension.org.au/documents/2018/3/21/rice-growing-guidelines-for-managing-water-usage (accessed on 7 April 2023).
  16. de Mey, Y.; Demont, M. 19 Bird Damage to Rice in Africa: Evidence and Control. In Realizing Africa’s Rice Promise; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ni, H.; Moody, K.; Robles, R.; Paller, E.; Lales, J. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Sci. 2000, 48, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chao, S.; Mitchell, J.; Fukai, S. Factors Determining Genotypic Variation in the Speed of Rice Germination. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Farooq, M.; Siddique, K.H.; Rehman, H.; Aziz, T.; Lee, D.-J.; Wahid, A. Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Tillage Res. 2011, 111, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, C.S.; Wing, R.A.; Sundaresan, V. Efficient insertional mutagenesis in rice using the maize En/Spm elements. Plant J. 2005, 44, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Villacastin, A.J.; Adams, K.S.; Boonjue, R.; Rushton, P.J.; Han, M.; Shen, J.Q. Dynamic differential evolution schemes of WRKY transcription factors in domesticated and wild rice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Zou, X.; Huang, J.; Ruas, P.; Thompson, D.; Shen, Q.J. Annotations and functional analyses of the rice WRKY gene superfamily reveal positive and negative regulators of abscisic acid signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Z.-L.; Xie, Z.; Zou, X.; Casaretto, J.; Ho, T.-H.D.; Shen, Q.J. A rice WRKY gene encodes a transcriptional repressor of the gibberellin signaling pathway in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Z.L.; Zou, X.; Yang, G.; Komatsu, S.; Shen, Q.J. Interactions of two abscisic-acid induced WRKY genes in repressing gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant J. 2006, 46, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matsumoto, T.; Wu, J.; Itoh, T.; Numa, H.; Antonio, B.; Sasaki, T. The Nipponbare genome and the next-generation of rice genomics research in Japan. Rice 2016, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Farooq, M.; Basra, S.; Ahmad, N.; Hafeez, K. Thermal hardening: A new seed vigor enhancement tool in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2005, 47, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. IRRI, International Rice Research Institute. Standard Evaluation System for Rice; IRRI, International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Philippines, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins, T.J. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques 2007, 43, S25–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wishart, D.S.; Tzur, D.; Knox, C.; Eisner, R.; Guo, A.C.; Young, N.; Cheng, D.; Jewell, K.; Arndt, D.; Sawhney, S. HMDB: The human metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35 (Suppl. S1), D521–D526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guijas, C.; Montenegro-Burke, J.R.; Domingo-Almenara, X.; Palermo, A.; Warth, B.; Hermann, G.; Koellensperger, G.; Huan, T.; Uritboonthai, W.; Aisporna, A.E. METLIN: A technology platform for identifying knowns and unknowns. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3156–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Horai, H.; Arita, M.; Kanaya, S.; Nihei, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Suwa, K.; Ojima, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, S.; Aoshima, K. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 45, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, S.S.; Chang, J.L. Does gibberellic acid stimulate seed germination via amylase synthesis? Plant Physiol. 1972, 49, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaneko, M.; Itoh, H.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ashikari, M.; Matsuoka, M. The α-amylase induction in endosperm during rice seed germination is caused by gibberellin synthesized in epithelium. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 1264–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gong, D.; He, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Tian, S.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X. Understanding of Hormonal Regulation in Rice Seed Germination. Life 2022, 12, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Farooq, M.; Basra, S.; Saleem, B.; Nafees, M.; Chishti, S. Enhancement of tomato seed germination and seedling vigor by osmopriming. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 42, 3–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pang, Y.; Ali, J.; Wang, X.; Franje, N.J.; Revilleza, J.E.; Xu, J.; Li, Z. Relationship of rice grain amylose, gelatinization temperature and pasting properties for breeding better eating and cooking quality of rice varieties. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Levine, H.; Slade, L. Interpreting the behavior of low-moisture foods. In Water and Food Quality; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 71–134. [Google Scholar]
  39. Laca, A.; Mousia, Z.; Díaz, M.; Webb, C.; Pandiella, S.S. Distribution of microbial contamination within cereal grains. J. Food Eng. 2006, 72, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adair, C.; Bollich, C.; Bowman, D.; Joson, N.; Johnston, T.; Webb, B.; Atkins, J. Rice breeding and testing methods in the United States. USDA Agric. Handb. 1973, 289, 22–75. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cogburn, R.R. Susceptibility of varieties of stored rough rice to losses caused by storage insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1977, 13, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Goa, K.L.; Brogden, R.N. L-carnitine. Drugs 1987, 34, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Evans, A.M.; Fornasini, G. Pharmacokinetics of L-carnitine. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 941–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Galland, M.; He, D.; Lounifi, I.; Arc, E.; Clément, G.; Balzergue, S.; Huguet, S.; Cueff, G.; Godin, B.; Collet, B. An integrated “multi-omics” comparison of embryo and endosperm tissue-specific features and their impact on rice seed quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. The KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chagoyen, M.; Pazos, F. MBRole: Enrichment analysis of metabolomic data. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 730–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bedair, M.; Glenn, K.C. Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops. Metabolomics 2020, 16, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Codex. Guideline for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Recombinant-DNA Plants (CAC/GL 45-2003). 2003. Available online: http://files.foodmate.com/2013/files_1782.html (accessed on 17 November 2022).
  49. OECD. Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology: Concepts and Principles; OECD: Paris, France, 1993; Volume 93, p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  50. Swamy, B.M.; Samia, M.; Boncodin, R.; Marundan, S.; Rebong, D.B.; Ordonio, R.L.; Miranda, R.T.; Rebong, A.T.; Alibuyog, A.Y.; Adeva, C.C. Compositional analysis of genetically engineered GR2E “Golden Rice” in comparison to that of conventional rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7986–7994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kessler, D.A.; Taylor, M.R.; Maryanski, J.H.; Flamm, E.L.; Kahl, L.S. The safety of foods developed by biotechnology. Science 1992, 256, 1747–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Potrykus, I. Golden rice and beyond. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tang, G.; Qin, J.; Dolnikowski, G.G.; Russell, R.M.; Grusak, M.A. Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1776–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dipti, S.S.; Bergman, C.; Indrasari, S.D.; Herath, T.; Hall, R.; Lee, H.; Habibi, F.; Bassinello, P.Z.; Graterol, E.; Ferraz, J.P. The potential of rice to offer solutions for malnutrition and chronic diseases. Rice 2012, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, J.; Wu, X.; Yao, X.; Yu, R.; Larkin, P.J.; Liu, C.-M. Mutations in the DNA demethylase OsROS1 result in a thickened aleurone and improved nutritional value in rice grains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 11327–11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kayahara, H.; Tsukahara, K.; Tatai, T. Flavor, health and nutritional quality of pre-germinated brown rice. In Food Flavors and Chemistry: Advances of the New Millennium, Proceedings of the 10th International Flavor Conference, Paros, Greece, 4–7 July 2000; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2002; pp. 546–551. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bui, T.N.; Le, T.H.; Nguyen, D.H.; Tran, Q.B.; Nguyen, T.L.; Le, D.T.; Do, V.A.; Vu, A.L.; Aoto, H.; Okuhara, Y. Pre-germinated brown rice reduced both blood glucose concentration and body weight in Vietnamese women with impaired glucose tolerance. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2014, 60, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hsu, T.-F.; Kise, M.; Wang, M.-F.; Ito, Y.; Yang, M.-D.; Aoto, H.; Yoshihara, R.; Yokoyama, J.; Kunii, D.; Yamamoto, S. Effects of pre-germinated brown rice on blood glucose and lipid levels in free-living patients with impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2008, 54, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bewley, J.D. Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laza, M.R.C.; Peng, S.; Akita, S.; Saka, H. Effect of panicle size on grain yield of IRRI-released indica rice cultivars in the wet season. Plant Prod. Sci. 2004, 7, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Salo-väänänen, P.P.; Koivistoinen, P.E. Determination of protein in foods: Comparison of net protein and crude protein (N× 6.25) values. Food Chem. 1996, 57, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ridley, W.P.; Shillito, R.D.; Coats, I.; Steiner, H.-Y.; Shawgo, M.; Phillips, A.; Dussold, P.; Kurtyka, L. Development of the international life sciences institute crop composition database. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2004, 17, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alba, R.; Phillips, A.; Mackie, S.; Gillikin, N.; Maxwell, C.; Brune, P.; Ridley, W.; Fitzpatrick, J.; Levine, M.; Harris, S. Improvements to the international life sciences institute crop composition database. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sult, T.; Barthet, V.J.; Bennett, L.; Edwards, A.; Fast, B.; Gillikin, N.; Launis, K.; New, S.; Rogers-Szuma, K.; Sabbatini, J. Report: Release of the international life sciences institute crop composition database version 5. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 51, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Park, S.-Y.; Kim, J.K.; Jang, J.-S.; Lee, S.Y.; Oh, S.; Lee, S.M.; Yang, C.-I.; Yeo, Y. Comparative analysis of nutritional composition between the disease-resistant rice variety OsCK1 and conventional comparators. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 24, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xin, L.; Xiaoyun, H.; Yunbo, L.; Guoying, X.; Xianbin, J.; Kunlun, H. Comparative analysis of nutritional composition between herbicide-tolerant rice with bar gene and its non-transgenic counterpart. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nam, K.-H.; Nam, K.J.; An, J.H.; Jeong, S.-C.; Park, K.W.; Kim, H.-B.; Kim, C.-G. Comparative analysis of key nutrient composition between drought-tolerant transgenic rice and its non-transgenic counterpart. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cho, Y.-H.; Puligundla, P.; Oh, S.-D.; Park, H.-M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, S.-M.; Ryu, T.-H.; Lee, Y.-T. Comparative evaluation of nutritional compositions between transgenic rice harboring the CaMsrB2 gene and the conventional counterpart. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Aguilera, J.; Aguilera-Gomez, M.; Barrucci, F.; Cocconcelli, P.; Davies, H.; Denslow, N.; Lou Dorne, J.; Grohmann, L.; Herman, L.; Hogstrand, C. EFSA Scientific Colloquium 24–’Omics in Risk Assessment: State of the Art and Next Steps; EFSA: Parma, Italy, 2018; Volume 15. [Google Scholar]
  70. Christ, B.; Pluskal, T.; Aubry, S.; Weng, J.-K. Contribution of untargeted metabolomics for future assessment of biotech crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 1047–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Committee on Genetically Engineered Crops: Past Experience and Future Prospects. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ricroch, A.E. Assessment of GE food safety using ‘-omics’ techniques and long-term animal feeding studies. New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ricroch, A.E.; Bergé, J.B.; Kuntz, M. Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ricroch, A.; Bergé, J.B.; Messean, A. Literature review of the dispersal of transgenes from genetically modified maize. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2009, 332, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rajagopalan, V.R.; Manickam, S.; Muthurajan, R. A Comparative Metabolomic Analysis Reveals the Nutritional and Therapeutic Potential of Grains of the Traditional Rice Variety Mappillai Samba. Plants 2022, 11, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gong, R.; Huang, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, D.; Zhao, L.; Pan, Y.; Chang, Y.; Xiang, Y. Comparative metabolomics analysis reveals the variations of eating quality among three high-quality rice cultivars. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kim, H.; Kim, O.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, B.-M.; Oh, J.; Kim, H.-J. Metabolomic analysis of germinated brown rice at different germination stages. Foods 2020, 9, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kusano, M.; Saito, K. Role of metabolomics in crop improvement. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 21, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhou, J.; Ma, C.; Xu, H.; Yuan, K.; Lu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Xu, G. Metabolic profiling of transgenic rice with cryIAc and sck genes: An evaluation of unintended effects at metabolic level by using GC-FID and GC–MS. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jiao, Z.; Si, X.-X.; Li, G.-K.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Xu, X.-P. Unintended compositional changes in transgenic rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.) studied by spectral and chromatographic analysis coupled with chemometrics methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 1746–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mutant oswrky71 seeds display an early germination phenotype. (A) Gene diagram for OsWRKY71 showing the position of dSpm transposon insertions in oswrky71. Transcriptional start site (TSS) and start codon (ATG) are marked. Boxes indicate exons. Triangles with arrows represent the position of each insert. The number of base pairs downstream from TSS is shown. Scale is 200 bp. (B) Quantification of germination rates for wild-type (WT) and oswrky71 mutant. Seeds were incubated at 28 °C in the dark on ½× MS plates (0.05% MES (w/v), pH = 5.8). Germination was defined as a radicle or coleoptile reaching approximately 2 mm in length. Error bars represent ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significance for one mutant relative to the wild type in Student’s t test (p < 0.05). n = 3 biological replicates, each with 25 seeds.
Figure 1. Mutant oswrky71 seeds display an early germination phenotype. (A) Gene diagram for OsWRKY71 showing the position of dSpm transposon insertions in oswrky71. Transcriptional start site (TSS) and start codon (ATG) are marked. Boxes indicate exons. Triangles with arrows represent the position of each insert. The number of base pairs downstream from TSS is shown. Scale is 200 bp. (B) Quantification of germination rates for wild-type (WT) and oswrky71 mutant. Seeds were incubated at 28 °C in the dark on ½× MS plates (0.05% MES (w/v), pH = 5.8). Germination was defined as a radicle or coleoptile reaching approximately 2 mm in length. Error bars represent ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significance for one mutant relative to the wild type in Student’s t test (p < 0.05). n = 3 biological replicates, each with 25 seeds.
Agronomy 13 01149 g001
Figure 2. Seed morphology of oswrky71. (A) Representative images of WT and oswrky71 mutant seeds. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Length, width, length–width (L/W) ratio, and (C) surface area of WT and oswrky71 mutant kernels. Error bars represent ± SD. n = 100 kernels. (D) 100-grain weight of WT and oswrky71 kernels. Error bars represent ± SD. n = 4 biological replicates, each with 100 kernels. (E) alkali spreading value (ASV) of WT and oswrky71. Error bars represent ± SD. Asterisks indicate significance for one mutant relative to the wild type in Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). n = 4 biological replicates, each with 4 kernels.
Figure 2. Seed morphology of oswrky71. (A) Representative images of WT and oswrky71 mutant seeds. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Length, width, length–width (L/W) ratio, and (C) surface area of WT and oswrky71 mutant kernels. Error bars represent ± SD. n = 100 kernels. (D) 100-grain weight of WT and oswrky71 kernels. Error bars represent ± SD. n = 4 biological replicates, each with 100 kernels. (E) alkali spreading value (ASV) of WT and oswrky71. Error bars represent ± SD. Asterisks indicate significance for one mutant relative to the wild type in Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). n = 4 biological replicates, each with 4 kernels.
Agronomy 13 01149 g002
Figure 3. Untargeted metabolomics between WT and oswrky71 threshed grain samples. (A) Flowchart showing a pathway for untargeted metabolomics and subsequent bioinformatic analysis. (B) Scores scatter plot of the OPLS-DA model in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes. (C) Distribution of VIP values (VIP > 1.5) in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes. Red dots indicate significant metabolites. (D) Volcano plots of differentially expressed metabolites (purple dots) in oswrky71 threshed grain samples in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes.
Figure 3. Untargeted metabolomics between WT and oswrky71 threshed grain samples. (A) Flowchart showing a pathway for untargeted metabolomics and subsequent bioinformatic analysis. (B) Scores scatter plot of the OPLS-DA model in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes. (C) Distribution of VIP values (VIP > 1.5) in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes. Red dots indicate significant metabolites. (D) Volcano plots of differentially expressed metabolites (purple dots) in oswrky71 threshed grain samples in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes.
Agronomy 13 01149 g003
Figure 4. Heat map showed the differential metabolites between WT and oswrky71 threshed grain samples. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of differential metabolites from ESI+ mode. (B) Hierarchical cluster analysis of differential metabolites from ESI− mode. Red indicates upregulation of metabolite expression; green, downregulation.
Figure 4. Heat map showed the differential metabolites between WT and oswrky71 threshed grain samples. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of differential metabolites from ESI+ mode. (B) Hierarchical cluster analysis of differential metabolites from ESI− mode. Red indicates upregulation of metabolite expression; green, downregulation.
Agronomy 13 01149 g004
Table 1. Comparison of the proximate composition of threshed rice grain.
Table 1. Comparison of the proximate composition of threshed rice grain.
ComponentWToswrky71p-Value bLit. Range c
Mean ± SD aRangeMean ± SD aRange
Crude protein (% DB)13.10 ± 0.212.9–13.213.70 ± 0.213.6–13.90.015.9–11.8
True protein (mg)13.03 ± 1.811.1–14.79.49 ± 1.38.7–11.00.05Not available
Crude fiber (% DB)9.77 ± 0.39.5–10.19.83 ± 0.49.5–10.30.838.6–18.2
Crude fat (% DB)1.60 ± 0.01.6–1.61.70 ± 0.11.6–1.80.160.56–3.47
Ash (% DB)4.07 ± 0.14.0–4.13.70 ± 0.33.4–3.90.083.61–8.6
Carbohydrate (% DB)81.23 ± 0.281.1–81.480.83 ± 0.480.5–81.30.1980.0–86.4
Moisture (% FW)11.57 ± 0.311.4–11.99.57 ± 0.868.8–10.50.023.5–73.7
a Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values are expressed on a dry basis (DB) except for moisture, which is expressed on a fresh weight basis (FW). b Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). c Combined reference and ILSI-CCDB range.
Table 2. Comparison of the mineral composition of threshed rice grain.
Table 2. Comparison of the mineral composition of threshed rice grain.
Mineral
(mg/100 g DB)
WToswrky71p-Value bLit. Range c
Mean ± SD aRangeMean ± SD aRange
Calcium70.00 ± 0.070–7050.00 ± 0.050–500.0010–150
Phosphorus 380.00 ± 0.0380–380416.67 ± 5.8410–4200.00190–470
Magnesium 160.00 ± 10.0150–170180.00 ± 10.0170–1900.0730–170
Potassium 706.67 ± 11.5700–720640.00 ± 26.5610–6600.02170–472
Sulfur146.67 ± 1.5140–150143.33 ± 5.8140–1500.5230–220
Sodium33.67 ± 1.532–3510.00 ± 0.010–100.000–100
Zinc4.17 ± 0.24.2–4.06.0 ± 0.15.9–6.10.002.2–5.3
Iron8.63 ± 1.47.7–10.27.0 ± 0.26.8–7.10.111.6–9.08
Manganese6.67 ± 0.26.5–6.85.47 ± 0.25.3–5.70.002–11.7
Copper1.30 ± 0.11.2–1.41.33 ± 0.11.3–1.40.640.2–1.3
a Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values are expressed on a dry basis (DB). b Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). c Combined reference and ILSI-CCDB range.
Table 3. Comparison of the amino acid composition of threshed rice grain.
Table 3. Comparison of the amino acid composition of threshed rice grain.
Amino Acid (mg/100 g DB)WToswrky71p–Value bLit. Range c
Mean ± SD aRangeMean ± SD aRange
Glycine462.7 ± 21.5443.2–485.8389.0 ± 48.7360.8–445.20.07290–510
Alanine695.7 ± 7.0688.1–701.8622.2 ± 60.5554.6–671.50.10330–630
Serine497.4 ± 19.9481.8–519.8425.2 ± 43.6374.9–450.60.06230–560
Proline524.8 ± 14.9510.2–540.0469.5 ± 44.7417.9–496.80.11280–540
Valine730.0 ± 38.3700.5–773.3612.8 ± 59.9550.0–669.30.05340–650
Threonine382.6 ± 5.7376.5–387.8334.0 ± 42.1285.8–364.10.12220–410
Cysteine125.0 ± 23.4104.4–150.5125.2 ± 16.3114.8–143.90.99100–260
Isoleucine439.6 ± 10.4427.9–447.3378.3 ± 44.5328.3–413.70.08240–460
Aspartic acid1335.8 ± 39.21301.9–1378.81143.0 ± 81.51050.2–1203.10.02500–990
Glutamic acid2752.6 ± 72.02676.5–2819.72341.1 ± 291.92054.0–2647.40.08890–1990
Methionine91.8 ± 59.224.4–135.193.9 ± 4.289.3–97.40.95130–310
Histidine222.6 ± 9.0212.9–230.7197.8 ± 23.5171.7–217.30.16140–281
Phenylalanine499.5 ± 7.2491.1–504.1434.1 ± 29.4401.4–458.50.02280–620
Arginine920.8 ± 105.6830.8–1037.0775.9 ± 51.9717.0–814.60.10410–850
Tryptophan4.7 ± 0.14.6–4.75.9 ± 1.74.8–7.80.2850–180
Lysine736.2 ± 34.1698.7–765.4580.3 ± 72.8526.2–663.10.03210–430
Tyrosine321.5 ± 22.2301.4–345.3279.9 ± 19.5260.5–299.40.0750–180
Leucine937.1 ± 25.1919.9–965.9814.7 ± 80.6727.3–886.10.07460–920
a Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values are expressed on a dry basis (DB). b Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). c Combined reference and ILSI-CCDB range.
Table 4. Comparison of the B vitamin composition of threshed rice grain.
Table 4. Comparison of the B vitamin composition of threshed rice grain.
Vitamin (mg/kg DB)WToswrky71p-Value bLit. Range c
Mean ± SD aRangeMean ± SD aRange
Choline chloride555.33 ± 21.46541–580448.33 ± 23.71423–4700.00Not available
Calcium pantotenate (Vit B5)4.88 ± 0.094.88–4.963.65 ± 0.033.61–3.660.007.22–14.0
Riboflavin (Vit B2)0.33 ± 0.010.32–0.340.36 ± 0.010.35–0.360.020.4–1.4
Thiamine (Vit B1)2.72 ± 0.022.69–2.742.47 ± 0.032.44–2.500.002.35–6.25
a Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values are expressed on a dry basis (DB). b Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). c Combined reference and ILSI-CCDB range.
Table 5. Pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites in ESI+ scan.
Table 5. Pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites in ESI+ scan.
Pathwayp-ValueFDR
Metabolic pathways7.7 × 10−138.4 × 10−11
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis4.1 × 10−112.2 × 10−9
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism5.3 × 10−91.9 × 10−7
Cysteine and methionine metabolism2.2 × 10−86.5 × 10−7
ABC transporters3.6 × 10−67.8 × 10−5
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism10.0 × 10−61.8 × 10−4
Biosynthesis of plant hormones1.5 × 10−52.3 × 10−4
Glucosinolate biosynthesis3.0 × 10−54.1 × 10−4
Histidine metabolism4.2 × 10−55.1 × 10−4
Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from ornithine, lysine and nicotinic acid9.8 × 10−51.1 × 10−3
Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids2.6 × 10−42.5 × 10−3
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis3.2 × 10−42.9 × 10−3
Arginine and proline metabolism4.1 × 10−43.4 × 10−3
Lysine biosynthesis6.1 × 10−44.7 × 10−3
Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from histidine and purine9.3 × 10−46.7 × 10−3
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis1.2 × 10−38.4 × 10−3
Biotin metabolism1.5 × 10−39.8 × 10−3
Cyanoamino acid metabolism1.9 × 10−31.2 × 10−2
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism2.7 × 10−31.4 × 10−2
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis2.7 × 10−31.4 × 10−2
Table 6. Pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites in ESI− scan.
Table 6. Pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites in ESI− scan.
Pathwayp-ValueFDR
Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids2.5 × 10−13.0 × 10−9
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism4.2 × 10−12.5 × 10−8
Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids5.7 × 10−92.2 × 10−7
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis2.3 × 10−85.5 × 10−7
ABC transporters2.1 × 10−85.5 × 10−7
Metabolic pathways4.4 × 10−88.7 × 10−7
Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from ornithine, lysine and nicotinic acid7.1 × 10−81.2 × 10−6
Arginine and proline metabolism4.9 × 10−67.3 × 10−5
Biosynthesis of plant hormones7.6 × 10−61.0 × 10−4
Reductive carboxylate cycle (CO2 fixation)1.2 × 10−51.2 × 10−4
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism5.0 × 10−55.4 × 10−4
Pyrimidine metabolism1.7 × 10−41.7 × 10−3
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism2.3 × 10−42.1 × 10−3
Two-component system2.6 × 10−42.2 × 10−3
Proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation3.2 × 10−42.4 × 10−3
Phenylalanine metabolism3.0 × 10−42.4 × 10−3
Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from shikimate pathway4.4 × 10−43.1 × 10−3
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)6.1 × 10−44.0 × 10−3
Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from histidine and purine6.4 × 10−44.0 × 10−3
Propanoate metabolism7.3 × 10−44.3 × 10−3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bataller, S.; Villacastin, A.J.; Shen, Q.J.; Bergman, C. Comparative Nutritional Assessment and Metabolomics of a WRKY Rice Mutant with Enhanced Germination Rates. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041149

AMA Style

Bataller S, Villacastin AJ, Shen QJ, Bergman C. Comparative Nutritional Assessment and Metabolomics of a WRKY Rice Mutant with Enhanced Germination Rates. Agronomy. 2023; 13(4):1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bataller, Santiago, Anne J. Villacastin, Qingxi J. Shen, and Christine Bergman. 2023. "Comparative Nutritional Assessment and Metabolomics of a WRKY Rice Mutant with Enhanced Germination Rates" Agronomy 13, no. 4: 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop