Next Article in Journal
Late Pruning and Forced Vine Regrowth in Chardonnay and Pinot Noir: Benefits and Drawbacks in the Trento DOC Basin (Italy)
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Exogenous Nitric Oxide in Protecting Plants against Abiotic Stresses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Farmers’ Profitability through Online Sales of Organic Vegetables and Fruits during the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Empirical Study

by
Sureshkumar Girija Yogesh
1,* and
Deenadayalu Sudharani Ravindran
2
1
Department of Management Studies, Anna University, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Management Studies, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641004, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(5), 1200; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051200
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 24 April 2023

Abstract

:
The purpose of this research is to empirically identify the association of the IT literacy of farmers and their profitability through online sales of fresh organic fruits and vegetables during the COVID-19 pandemic. The methodology used in the research is quantitative in nature. A closed-end questionnaire has been used as a survey tool to collect data from Indian farmers. The farmers’ IT literacy and attitudes towards organic farming are independent variables, and the frequency of sales of products through online stores and farmers’ profitability are the dependent variables. The researcher has attempted to study how the outbreak of COVID-19 has moderated the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The sample size is 271 farmers who sell their products through online stores. The findings reveal that the farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and their IT literacy correlate with the profitability of online sales. Further, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has moderated the relationship between both the dependent and independent variables. This research will help the government in formulating policies for facilitating farmers to sell their produce through online modes. The study could be further extended by collecting data from farmers from different Asian countries and comparing the results with those of the present research findings.

1. Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries faced food shortage issues. The farmers were not able to transport their produce, and retailers failed to acquire produce to sell at physical stores. To reach the consumers, many farmers globally adopted e-commerce and then, yet again, failed to earn profit due to a lack of IT and computer literacy, leading to loss and an unwillingness to pay through insecure transactional ports [1]. Farming and agricultural products are generally considered as perishable goods that require a fast-selling strategy through safer payment modes. Post COVID-19, businesses had to change their operations and strategic management to earn profit [2].
Information and communication technology in e-commerce plays a fundamental and significant role, and farmers, especially rural farmers who lack IT literacy, will eventually struggle to earn through e-commerce since the middleman fills the gap and gains the original profit that should have been the farmers’ [3]. The essentiality and importance of IT literacy among farmers decides their online sales, profit, turnovers, and consumer frequency. Henceforth, by gaining IT literacy and knowledge, the urban-based farmers and rural farm producers could increase their profits through digitization [4]. Post COVID-19, the necessity of IT literacy in agricultural farming has been relevant for organic farmers since they invest huge capital and earn less profits. Thus, the attitudes of the farmers decide their profitability and consumer flow [5].
The Indian farmers during COVID-19 managed to adapt to the transition from traditional marketing to social and digital marketing via company websites, social marketing, advertisements, and more. During COVID-19, small farmers, who always relied on end-to-end sales or one-to-one sales, had to adopt mobile-application-based sales and online sales to earn income and mere profit [6]. Henceforth, the Indian government introduced the e-NAM (Electronic-National Agriculture Market) to digitize the agricultural sector. Along with the Indian government, startups, such as FarmBee, KVSMT, Vithai, eFarming, and so on, helped the Indian farmers in selling their crops online. Among these, the top application recognized as user-friendly by the farmers in Tamil Nadu is “Vithai”. Other than the above-mentioned applications, there are other applications, such as Kisan Suvidha, IFFCO Kisan agriculture, Pusa Krishi, AgriApp, Krishi Gyan, and more, that also assist the farmers with information and farming guidelines through which they can gain insight and knowledge [7].
During and post COVID-19, people in India have changed their consumption pattern [8], where consciousness around healthier diets and organic food, especially farm produce and own produce without pesticides and other harmful chemicals, has increased. Post COVID-19, the consumption of organic foods increased by 1.35–1.70 metric tons from 2019 to 2020, and a 26% increase in organic food consumption was recognized in India at the end of 2021 [9]. Hence, in this research, the focus is particularly on organic foods in the Indian market through online sales, and thus non-organic foods are not examined.
Though COVID-19 has changed the way in which organizations in India operate, it has brought in lot of benefits to e-commerce-based businesses. To date, there is little literature on the impact of COVID-19 on agricultural products, especially through online sales, and researchers are still studying this topic. This current research is the first of its kind to examine the variables of farmers’ IT literacy, attitudes towards organic farming, and the correlation with profitability through online sales. The research aims to identify how the frequency of sales through online stores is affected by these factors.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Literature Review

The author of [10] studied e-commerce models and how organic agricultural products are sold through online stores with transparency. The study was conducted in China-based online stores that sell vegetables and fruits. The author of ] [11] argued that agro-products-based e-commerce in China needs improvement, since online purchasers rely on feel and touch in traditional purchases (physical shopping), unlike many developed countries such as the US, Japan, and countries in Europe. Purchases and sales in the modern/digitized era adopt e-commerce as their platform to increase profits; here, the user, i.e., the farmer, should possess IT literacy.
Similarly, authors in [12] studied Romania-based farmers’ sales in agro-products (fruits and vegetables) through e-commerce and the correlation between purchasing decisions and the selling platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. They observed that people hesitated to buy perishable goods through online portals and websites selling vegetables and fruits and preferred to purchase directly from the local farm product “Producers”. However, according to [13], COVID-19 influenced the decisions of the purchasers/shoppers to switch from traditional purchasing to online shopping where they were forced to purchase fruits and vegetables based on availability and pricing. Contrarily, those who lacked IT literacy suffered a lot and still preferred local products over online sales, which resulted in lower profits for online sellers and thus reduced the frequency of online shopping, as argued in [14]. Thus, IT literacy impacts users at both ends (seller and purchaser).
Thus, Hypotheses 1 and 2 are formulated as follows:
H1: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ profitability through online sales.
H2: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and frequency of sales online stores.
The authors [15] studied Washington’s farming industry and market sales and found that, post COVID-19, physical markets earned lower margins compared to margins of online markets and stores. The study made a comparison of sales between the years 2019 and 2020.The study found that online sales had increased in 2020 when compared with that of 2019, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the study was not able to conclude that the farmers’ were profitable because they had to make a lot of additional investment in order to equip themselves in following the COVID-19 protocols like social distancing, face masks, etc., in order to perform sales.
Authors [16] studied China’s agricultural produces and how consumers chose their mode of shopping produces. They gathered data and analyzed it to find out that the government aided the poor farmers who earned lesser than 1 Lakh/year through government ecommerce platforms, but the farmers failed to retain their profit since many farmers lacked IT literacy. It was found that they even failed to manage transactions and transportations. Thus, according to author [17], IT literacy heightens profitability through online sales and online marketing.
Authors [18] studied Vietnam-based consumers’ behavior toward online shopping. They found that the farmers’ attitudes toward consumers impact the purchase decision through online sales. According to the author of [19], many consumers preferred online sales from local producers through affection, familiarity, security, safety regulations, payment issues (transaction failure and delivery issues), and willingness and awareness about product availability and shops’ attitude. Also, local farmers focused on producing agro-products through organic farming practices and developing an understanding of the demand-and-supply of those products to increase their profits.
Studies [20,21,22] insisted that the adoption of an e-commerce platform increased the profit of farmers especially when the local consumers were willing to pay higher prices in order to meet their demands. By meeting the demands of consumers through adequate supply of produce, especially through organic farming, farmers have gained huge profitability in online sales [23] However the impact of IT literacy also was found to affect the profit. Thus, it is clear that IT literacy is essential. Moreover, how the farmers dealt with consumers (attitude) during the pandemic without compromising quality also was found to impact the online sales. Thus, the attitude of farmers is related to profit and online sales frequency.
Thus, Hypotheses 3 and 4 were formulated as:
H3: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and farmers’ profitability through online sales.
H4: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and frequency of sales through online stores.
The study [24] examined the organic produce in agricultural farming, and study [25] evaluated the impact caused by COVID-19 on the farmers and their produce. The studies revealed that organic produces were preferred by online purchasers whereas the lack of organic produces in online stores, less IT literacy of farmers, and farmers’ attitude toward organic farming caused consumers to shift from online sales and to shop from local producers, resulting in less profit. Though the factors seem independent, they were in fact related. The study [26] insisted the impact of COVID-19 on farming and agro-products increased profits for farmers especially when the products were organic produce. The farmers with better IT literacy and knowledge of financial management sustained better than traditional farmers and earned more turnover during and post pandemic.
Thus Hypothesis 5 is formulated as follows:
H5: 
The relationship between farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ profitability through online sales is moderated by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.2. Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis

The research takes into consideration farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ attitude toward organic farming as independent variables. The frequency of sales through online stores and the profitability of farmers through online sales are considered as dependent variables. The moderating factor is the variable of the outbreak of COVID-19 (refer Figure 1).
After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations and companies transformed their leadership and operational strategies in order to meet the market demand through online sales. Therefore, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has been added as a moderating factor. The following hypotheses have been formulated taking into consideration the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic as a moderator:

3. Methodology

Research generally applies different systematic approaches, methodologies, and tools for collecting data and analyzing data.
This study adopts a positivism-paradigm since the researcher aims to reduce facts and truths from the acquired information. Since the research is toward examining and evaluating the relationship between the participants’ (in this case the farmers) IT literacy, attitude, their profitability through online sales, and their consumers’ purchase frequency through online stores, it falls-under the quantitative strategy. Additionally, the research is said to have adopted a deductive approach. Since the research describes, through systematic data collection, farmers’ attitude towards organic farming, IT literacy level, their profits through online sales, and their consumers frequency of online purchases, the design is ‘descriptive design’.

3.1. Instrumentation

The instrument designing and development include several criteria. In the process of instrument design, the major points upon which to be focused are the usage of scale, adoption of existing tools as per study’s necessity and purpose, validation of items, and variables/factors. In this research the instrument developed is to be rated using a 5-point Likert scale. The tool is divided into six sections, where the first section deals with demographic data (age, gender, education, annual income, and name); the second section includes the “frequency of online sales” (FOS) as single-item through which the consumers’ frequency of purchasing/ordering through online mode would be measured; the third section includes “outbreak of COVID” (OutCov) that is measured through 4 items; section four includes “IT literacy” (ITL) that is measured with 4 items; section five consists of “farmers’ attitude” (AT) with 4 items; and finally the sixth section “profitability through online sales” (PR) has 6 items. Thus, the customized scale includes a total of 19 items.
The items adopted are:
(1)
FOS with 1-item from [27];
(2)
PR with 6-items from [28];
(3)
AT with 4-items from [28]);
(4)
ITL with 4-items from [29];
(5)
OutCov with 4-items.
A 5-point Likert scale is adopted throughout, and the instrument is designed as closed-ended, in order to measure the responses accurately. From author [28] developed a scale of 46 items. However, the current research requires only 10 items that are relevant to the research objectives. Similarly, 1 item has been used for FOS to measure the ‘online purchasing-decisions’. In addition to that, the 6-item scale developed by [27] and 4 items for ITL from the 17-item scale developed by [29] have also been employed in this research. The items for COVID-19-related measures were designed by the researcher for the study’s purposes, in order to measure the moderating effect of the proposed variable on the dependent and independent variables.
The authors [30] studied digitization of farmers (IT and computer literacy) by adopting items from [29] and observed that outcomes were consistent throughout. The study by author [31] examined the consumer behavior (FOS) by adopting items from [27] and noted that the outcomes were reliable. Similarly, the authors [32] examined the farmers’ attitude (AT) and behavior post COVID-19 by adopting items from [28] and also the authors [33] adopted PR items from [28] and gained consistency in outcomes. Thus, the research instrument for the current research has been designed and customized for data collection, based on the above studies.

3.2. Reliability Statistics of the Research Instrument

Prior to analyzing the collected data, the reliability of scale through ‘reliability’ test using Cronbach’s alpha has been carried out, in order to ensure consistency in the outcomes. Table 1 shows items in scale developed and its Cronbach’s alpha score:
The value of Cronbach’s alpha for the items/scales in the developed tool is greater than 0.7 inferring that developed instrument is reliable. The values in the Table 1 prove that the items of the developed scale are valid and reliable.

3.3. Data Collection

Primary data collection has been done using the research instrument designed for this study. The participants are limited to Tamil Nadu (South India). The respondents were farmers who were engaged in the activity of cultivation of crops, fruits, vegetables, spices, and other agricultural based products. The respondents were chosen from various districts of Tamilnadu such as Villupuram, Tanjore, Coimbatore, Erode, Dindigul, Salem, and Madurai, since major organic farmers were found to hail from these regions. Though Kerala also produces and cultivates organic products, our study is restricted to Tamil Nadu, and thus other states or districts were not included. The timeline of the study was from January 2021 to April 2021. The organic and non-organic farmers were filtered from the survey, since they were classified based on their produce. Thus, the organic food producers alone were retained for primary data collection through the survey. Relevant secondary resources (research, studies, literatures, articles, e-journals, etc.) were also utilized in the study.

3.4. Target Respondents

The research exclusively focuses on farmers’ IT literacy, attitude towards organic farming, their profit through online sales, and frequency of consumers through online stores. Henceforth, the target respondents were just limited to farmers who produce organic products.

3.5. Sampling Plan and Size

From the desired targets, the sample-unit has been reduced as farmers from ‘Tamil Nadu’ with sampling design as ‘simple-random sampling’ and sample size as n = 271. The sample size is estimated through unknown population estimation using the formula by [34]. The Cochran’s formula utilized to estimate sample is:
S a m = p o p n ^ ± z × p o p n ( 1 p o p n ) S a m
where p o p n ^ = the proportioned population; Sam = the sample-size; and z = the z-score.
The survey was conducted through an online mode where 300 invitations (via Google form) were sent to the online farmers. Survey questionnaires were sent online, and the respondents filled them through a remote mode. After the elimination of incomplete surveys [22] and irrelevant responses [7], the remaining and complete number of responses were seggregated to find the final sample size. The sample size was thus estimated as n = 271, and the response rate was found to be 90.33%, which indicated an excellent response rate.
Indicators of the research: The indicators used in this research are the outbreak of COVID-19 (OutCov) as a moderating factor, IT literacy of farmers (ITL) and attitude toward organic farming (AT) as input factors, and Farmer’s profitability through online sales (PR) and Frequency of sales through online (FOS) as output factors.

3.6. Analysis Tools and Software

SPSS software has been used to analyze the data collected. ANOVA, Regression analysis, Simple percentage analysis, and Hayes PROCESS Macro have been employed in order to test the hypothesis.

4. Data Analysis

4.1. Descriptive Statistics

From Table 2, it can be inferred that the items with a Mode score of 4 represented higher central tendency. The standard deviation values of the items HEDUC and ITL were found to be nearer to ‘1’ showing that those values were widely spread unlike the other items FOS, PR, ITL, AT, and OutCov.

4.2. Demographic Statistics

The demographic data collected in this research include age, gender, educational level, and annual income (refer Table 3).
Age & Gender: A majority of respondents who participated in the research were found to be in the age-group of 30–40 years (35.1%) followed by 20–30 years (29.5%). Male respondents were found to be a majority (71.2%) when compared with that of the female respondents (28.8%).
Educational qualification: It was necessary to identify the educational level of the respondents since it was important to know how familiar they were with computers, in order to meet the objectives of this research. It was found that the highest level of education recorded was secondary schooling (25.8%) followed by undergraduates (23.6%) and diploma holders (20.7%). Contrarily, there were 15.9% respondents who had never attended schooling and 10.3% of respondents who had obtained postgraduate, and just 3.7% were found to have obtained a doctoral degree in agriculture.
Income: The highest turnover (annual) obtained by farmers was estimated to be around 5–10 Lakhs/year (38%) followed by 2–5 Lakhs/year (32.5%). It was recorded that only 19.6% of the farmers earned 10+ Lakhs/year, and there were also 10% farmers who earned less than 2 Lakhs/year.
From these statistics it could be inferred that the people with higher knowledge are lesser in numbers when organic farming is considered, and the same could be assumed toward IT literacy since they are focused toward possessing knowledge in relevant subjects (farming and agriculture) rather than possessing knowledge toward increasing their sales/profitability through online or e-commerce platforms. If the organic farmers and agro producers could increase their IT literacy and knowledge on e-commerce, it can indirectly benefit them, by boosting their profits and turnover especially in the digital era and during situations such as that of the pandemic, especially when there is a huge demand for agro-products [35].

4.3. Hypothesis Testing

4.3.1. IT Literacy versus Farmers’ Profitability

H1: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ profitability through online sales.
Model Summary b
ModelRR SquareAdjusted R SquareStd. Error of the EstimateChange Statistics
R Square ChangeF Changedf1df2Sig. F Change
10.631 a0.6100.5060.654040.61033.17212690.000
a. Predictors: (Constant), ITL
b. Dependent Variable: PR
Through the table of the model summary of the R-value, the Adjusted R2 value and R2 are obtained. The R-Value for developed model is 0.631; the R2 value is 0.610; and the Adjusted R2 value is 0.506. It shows that the independent variable concentrates and explains 61.0% of dependent variables’ variability. It is evident that the model’s variables are a good fit for research with a higher R-value than R2 value.
ANOVA a
ModelSum of SquaresDfMean SquareFSig.
1Regression14.190114.19033.1720.000 b
Residual115.0712690.428
Total129.261270
a. Dependent Variable: PR
b. Predictors: (Constant), ITL
From the above ANOVA table, the dependent variable is predicted from significant independent variable to be 33.172, i.e., F(269, 1), and the sig value 0.000 is <0.0005 proving that the regression model is significantly a good fit.
Coefficients a
ModelUn-Standardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.
BStd. ErrorBeta
1(Constant)2.6210.162 16.2160.000
ITL0.3070.0530.3315.7600.000
a. Dependent Variable: PR
The formulated hypothesis H1 “There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ profitability through online sales” is accepted, and the regression equation from the model’s coefficient estimation, where the farmers’ IT literacy is predicted with profitability through online stores, is estimated as:
ITL = 2.621 + (0.307 * PR)

4.3.2. IT Literacy versus Frequency through Online Sales

H2: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and frequency of sales online stores.
Model Summary b
ModelRR SquareAdjusted R SquareStd. Error of the EstimateChange Statistics
R Square ChangeF Changedf1df2Sig. F Change
10.632 a0.6010.6030.860650.6010.27012690.000
a. Predictors: (Constant), MOP
b. Dependent Variable: FPO
The model summary table gives the R-value, Adjusted R2 value, and R2 value. The R-Value for the developed model is 0.632; the R2 value is 0.601; and the Adjusted R2 value is 0.603, which states that the independent variable concentrates and explains 60.1% of the dependent variables’ variability. Thus, it can be inferred that the model’s variables are a good fit for research with a higher R-value than R2 value.
ANOVA a
ModelSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
1Regression0.20010.2000.2700.000 b
Residual199.2542690.741
Total199.454270
a. Dependent Variable: FPO
b. Predictors: (Constant), MOP
From the above ANOVA table, the dependent variable is predicted from significant independent variable to be 0.270, i.e., F(269, 1), and the sig value 0.000 is <0.0005 proving that the regression model is significantly a good fit.
Coefficients a
ModelUn-Standardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.
BStd. ErrorBeta
1(Constant)3.0070.213 14.1360.000
MOP0.0360.0700.0320.5200.000
a. Dependent Variable: FPO
The formulated hypothesis H2 “There is a correlation between farmers’ IT literacy and frequency of sales online stores” is accepted, and the regression equation from the model’s coefficient estimation, where the farmers’ IT literacy is predicted with frequency of sales through online stores, is estimated as:
ITL = 3.007 + (0.036 * FOS)

4.3.3. Farmers’ Attitude versus Profitability

H3: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and farmers’ profitability through online sales.
Model Summary b
ModelRR SquareAdjusted R SquareStd. Error of the EstimateChange Statistics
R Square ChangeF Changedf1df2Sig. F Change
10.683 a0.6070.6030.690800.6071.87512690.000
a. Predictors: (Constant), AT
b. Dependent Variable: PR
Through the model summary table, the R-value, Adjusted R2 value, and R2 values are obtained. The R-Value for developed model is 0.683; the R2 value is 0.607; and the Adjusted R2 value is 0.603, which states that the independent variable concentrates and explains 60.7% of the dependent variables’ variability. It is understood that the model’s variables are a good fit for research.
ANOVA a
ModelSum of SquaresDfMean SquareFSig.
1Regression0.89510.8951.8750.000 b
Residual128.3662690.477
Total129.261270
a. Dependent Variable: PR
b. Predictors: (Constant), AT
From the above ANOVA table, the dependent variable is predicted from significant independent variable to be 1.875, i.e., F(269, 1), and the sig value 0.000 is <0.0005 proving that the regression model is rather a good fit.
Coefficients a
ModelUn-Standardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientsTSig.
BStd. ErrorBeta
1(Constant)3.1080.307 10.1410.000
AT0.1050.0770.0831.3690.000
a. Dependent Variable: PR
The formulated hypothesis H3 “There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and farmers’ profitability through online sales” is accepted, and the regression equation from the model’s coefficient estimation, where the farmers’ attitudes towards organic farming are predicted with profitability through online sales value, is estimated as:
AT = 3.108 + (0.105 * PR)

4.3.4. Farmer’s Attitude versus Frequency of Online Purchase

H4: 
There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and frequency of sales through online stores.
Model Summary
ModelRR SquareAdjusted R SquareStd. Error of the EstimateChange Statistics
R Square ChangeF Changedf1df2Sig. F Change
10.578 a0.5060.5020.858450.5061.65312690.000
a. Predictors: (Constant), AT
Through the model summary table, it is clear that the R-Value for developed model is 0.578; the R2 value is 0.506; and the Adjusted R2 value is 0.502. It shows that the independent variable concentrates and explains 50.6% of the dependent variables’ variability. It is understood that the model’s variables are a good fit for research with a higher R-value than R2 value.
ANOVA a
ModelSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
1Regression1.21811.2181.6530.000 b
Residual198.2352690.737
Total199.454270
a. Dependent Variable: FOS
b. Predictors: (Constant), AT
From the above ANOVA table, the dependent variable is predicted from the significant independent variable to be 1.653, i.e., F(269, 1), and the sig value 0.000 is <0.0005 proving that the regression model is significantly a good fit.
Coefficients a
ModelUn-standardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientsTSig.
BStd. ErrorBeta
1(Constant)2.6290.381 6.9030.000
AT0.1230.0950.0781.2860.000
a. Dependent Variable: FOS
The formulated hypothesis H4 “There is a correlation between farmers’ attitude towards organic farming and frequency of sales through online stores” is accepted, and the regression equation from the model’s coefficient estimation, where the farmers’ attitudes towards organic farming are predicted with the frequency of sales through online stores, is estimated as:
AT = 2.629 + (0.123 * FOS)

4.3.5. Farmers’ IT Literacy versus Farmers’ Profitability with COVID-19 as Moderator

H5: 
The relationship between farmers’ IT literacy and farmers’ profitability through online sales is moderated by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Hayes PROCESS Macro” is used for examining the impact of the moderator on the dependent and independent variables. Generally, in order to examine the model’s path analysis, PROCESS Macro is used by researchers. It is used for examining the effect of one or more moderating (mediating) variables on the dependent and independent variables involved in research. The following Table 4 is the PROCESS Macro table for the developed model.
The Figure 2 above represents how the variable of the outbreak of COVID-19 moderates the variables profitability and IT literacy of the farmers. It can be inferred from Figure 2 that the outbreak of COVID-19 significantly moderates the relationship between the level of IT literacy of farmers and farmers’ profitability through online sales.

5. Findings and Discussion

This study aims to analyze the impact of farmers’ IT literacy and their attitude toward organic farming especially post COVID-19 in impacting the increase of profitability and sales through an online mode. Through the developed model and outcome, it is understood that COVID-19 correlates and moderates farmers’ IT literacy and their profitability through online sales along with their attitude towards organic farming in Tamil Nadu, India. The analysis of the demographic details of the respondents revealed that the educational level of the farmers who participated in the survey was very low (majorly secondary-schooling) whereas a majority of the respondents belonged to the age group 30+ years. The farmers were found to be earning approximately 5 Lakhs/year which could be increased with more online sales especially during and post pandemic situations [36]. However, in order to improve and gain IT literacy, it is necessary to analyze the cost, operations, and capital (finance management) and to study the supply-and-demand (market analysis) for organic produces. Analyzing costs such as environmental cost, information system cost, production cost, capital and investment transportation cost, operational cost, and transaction cost is very much important, since the lack of analysis could negatively impact the farmers and lead them toward bankruptcy. Similarly, analyzing the competitors and understanding their performance, technicality, strategies operations, logistics, supply chain, and demand (market analysis) is also important since the farmers could gain more knowledge and information to outrun the competitors and market players and attain sustainability.
Globally, more than 300 companies have been identified to be dealing with the sale of organic food products especially vegetables and fruits through e-commerce platforms. Companies such as WayCool (Chennai, India), FarmLead (Saskatoon, Canada), TaniHub (Jakarta, Indonesia), VnF (Mumbai, India), Crofarm (Gurgaon, India), Twiga (Nairobi, Kenya), Ninjacart (Bengaluru, India), Procsea (Montreux, Switzerland), Tridge (Seoul, South Korea), and Frubana (Bogota, Colombia) are noteworthy in the industry. Though there are several other companies, the above-mentioned are popular and known for their strategies in selling agro-products through an online (e-commerce) model at a global level. They are known for their better pricing strategy, transportation, transaction safety, reliability, quality, and reputation in meeting the consumers’ demand within a lesser span of time through a speedy delivery [37]. Local farmers developing their knowledge of e-commerce and adopting the strategies adapted by these global players can certainly gain better returns and profitability in business. By analyzing the transportation costs, delivery time, quality, and product availability, consumers might change the sellers, and hence it is necessary for the organic farmers to maintain balanced cost that will not affect their profitability and at the same time also increase the frequency of purchase by consumers in the long run.

6. Conclusions

The study aimed at exploring the relationship between the dependent variables of farmers’ profitability through online sales and the farmers’ frequency of sales through online stores and the independent variables of attitude towards organic farming and IT literacy level of farmers. The study analyzed the data collected from 271 farmers from Tamilnadu, India, who produced agricultural products through organic farming. The study also examined how the variable of the outbreak of COVID-19 moderated the relationship between the proposed dependent and independent variables. SPSS software has been used for analysis of the primary data. ANOVA and regression methods were employed for the testing of hypotheses.
It can be concluded from the research findings that the farmers’ profitability through online sales and the farmers’ IT literacy are moderated by the outbreak of COVID-19; similarly the frequency of online sales through stores is correlated to farmers’ attitude towards organic farming resulting in increased profit. The outbreak of COVID-19 has increased the digital marketing and sales when people were restricted to visit traditional stores due to social distancing issues. Further, the outbreak of COVID-19 has directly affected the traditional farmers who lacked digital literacy and stood as a hindrance to market their products through online sales. The farmers who transitioned from traditional marketing to online marketing sustained their market position; however, those who lacked digital marketing strategy encountered a huge loss.
It can be concluded that profitability of farmers is significantly correlated to farmers’ IT literacy, and at the same time online sales frequency of consumers is correlated to farmers’ attitude towards organic farming. COVID-19 positively moderates the online sales, which relatively were found to increase the profitability. It also was found to contribute toward successful and sustainable e-commerce, which in turn gives the farmers an upper-hand by facilitating dynamic pricing, increased production and operation in an electronic-based agro-market (demand-and-supply), management of transaction cost, the decision of transportation and delivering costs (cost management), and implementation of many more business strategies.

Author Contributions

All the Authors (S.G.Y. & D.S.R.) Contributed substantially to this Manuscript. Conceptualization, methodology, software validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing original draft preparation, review and editing, S.G.Y.; visualization, supervision, D.S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with Ethics Committee of PSG for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors declare there in no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, H.-H.; Meyerhoefer, C.D. COVID-19 and the demand for online food shopping services: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2020, 103, 448–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aday, S.; Aday, M.S. Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain. Food Qual. Saf. 2020, 4, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Piabuo, S.M.; Yakan, H.B.; Puatwoe, J.T.; Nonzienwo, V.Y.; Mamboh, T.R. Effect of rural farmers’ access to information on price and profits in Cameroon. Cogent Food Agric. 2020, 6, 1799530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patel, A. Digital India reaching to small, marginal & women farmers. Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah 2016, 4, 109–121. [Google Scholar]
  5. Balakrishnan, R.; Wason, M.; Padaria, R.N.; Singh, P.; Varghese, E. Attitude and Perception of Farmers towards e-Learning. Indian J. Ext. Educ. 2013, 49, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Srivatsava, S.; Sinha, S. Digitization of Rural India-Promises and Challenges. In Proceedings of the Effect of COVID Pandemic on Agriculture and Allied Sciences (ECPAAS-2020), Lucknow, India, 23 August 2020; Chapter 33. pp. 271–278. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhende, M.; Avatade, M.S.; Patil, S.; Mishra, P.; Prasad, P.; Shewalkar, S. Digital Market: E-Commerce Application for Farmers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Digital Market: E-Commerce Application, Pune, India, 16–18 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saxena, S.; Limbad, A. Consumption change of household food habits pre and post lockdown during COVID-19: A perspective study of Gujarat and Maharashtra. Glob. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 2021, 4, 16–36. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar, P.; Sharma, S.; Garg, N. Consumption Pattern And Purchase Intention Of Consumers Regarding Organic Food Products: An Empirical Study In Delhi Ncr. J. Contemp. Issues Bus. Gov. 2021, 27, 2672–2685. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, X. Analysis of Electronic Commerce Model of Organic Agricultural Products. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Management and Social Sciences (ISMSS 2019)—Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Wuhan, China, 13–14 April 2019; Volume 309, pp. 107–110. [Google Scholar]
  11. Santoso, W.; Asmara, K.; Abidin, Z. Measuring the Financial Literacy of Farmers Food Crops in the Poor Area of Madura, Indonesia. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci. 2020, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Butu, A.; Bruma, I.S.; Tansa, L.; Rodino, S.; Dinu Vasiliu, C.; Doboș, S.; Butu, M. The Impact of COVID-19 Crisis upon the Consumer Buying Behavior of Fresh Vegetables Directly from Local Producers. Case Study: The Quarantined Area of Suceava County, Romania. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sang, N.C.; Cheruiyot, J.K. Farmers’ Information Literacy and Productivity Performance of Smallholder Horticulture in a Highland Zone, Kenya. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2020, 26, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Research on the Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmer Households’ Green Cooking Energy Consumption: Evidence from Rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. O’Hara, J.K.; Woods, T.A.; Dutton, N.; Stavely, N. COVID-19’s impact on farmers market sales in the Washington, D.C., area. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2021, 53, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pan, D.; Yang, J.; Zhou, G.; Kong, F. The influence of COVID-19 on agricultural economy and emergency mitigation measures in China: A text mining analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. O’Leary, N.M. Farmer Attributes Associated with Farm Profitability—A Study of Dairy Farms in Great Britain. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pham, V.K.; Thi, T.H.D.; Le, T.H.H. A study on the COVID-19 awareness affecting the consumer perceived benefits of online shopping in Vietnam. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1846882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vijayan, D.; Ushadevi, K.N. Attitude of the Farmers towards Organic Vegetable Farming. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2020, 11, 37365–37367. [Google Scholar]
  20. Varshney, D.; Roy, D.; Meenakshi, J.V. Impact of COVID-19 on agricultural markets: Assessing the roles of commodity characteristics, disease caseload and market reforms. Indian Econ. Rev. 2020, 55, S83–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Su, L.; Peng, Y.; Kong, R.; Chen, Q. Impact of E-Commerce Adoption on Farmers’ Participation in the Digital Financial Market: Evidence from Rural China. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1434–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Manocha, S.; Bhullar, P.S.; Sachdeva, T. Factors determining the investment behaviour of farmers—The moderating role of socioeconomic demographics. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, R.M.; Yamanura Nagesha, N.; Ranganath, G.; Boraiah, B. Digital literacy in Indian Farming: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learnt during Covid-19 Pandemic. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 56, 16–28. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ostapenko, R.; Herasymenko, Y.; Nitsenko, V.; Koliadenko, S.; Balezentis, T.; Streimikiene, D. Analysis of Production and Sales of Organic Products in Ukrainian Agricultural Enterprises. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cariappa, A.G.A.; Acharya, K.K.; Adhav, C.A.; Sendhil, R.; Ramasundaram, P. Impact of COVID-19 on the Indian agricultural system: A 10-point strategy for post-pandemic recovery. Outlook Agric. 2021, 50, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mutya, T. Perspective of Financial Literacy on Agribusiness Performance in Uganda; A Close Look at Farmers’ Attitude and Social Media Platforms. Saudi J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2020, 5, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  27. Issa, I.; Hamm, U. Adoption of Organic Farming as an Opportunity for Syrian Farmers of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Structural Equation Modelling. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahmavathi, N.A.; Suroso, A.I.; Ramadhan, A. Factors influencing the purchase intention in online organic fruit and vegetable stores. J. Manaj. Agribisnis 2018, 15, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  29. Son, J.-B.; Park, C.N. Implementing Computer-Assisted Language Learning in the EFL Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions and Perspectives. Int. J. Pedagog. Learn. 2009, 5, 80–101. [Google Scholar]
  30. Upadhyaya, L.; Burman, R.R.; Sangeetha, V.; Lenin, V.; Sharma, J.P.; Dash, S. Assessment of Level of Digitization of Farmers and Extent of Digital Divide in Farm Information Delivery. Indian J. Ext. Educ. 2019, 55, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  31. Borsellino, V.; Kaliji, S.A.; Schimmenti, E. COVID-19 Drives Consumer Behaviour and Agro-Food Markets towards Healthier and More Sustainable Patterns. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cevher, C.; Altunkaynak, B.; Gürü, M. Impacts of COVID-19 on Agricultural Production Branches: An Investigation of Anxiety Disorders among Farmers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banerjee, T.; Mishra, M.; Debnath, N.C.; Choudhury, P. Implementing E-Commerce model for Agricultural Produce: A Research Roadmap. Period. Eng. Nat. Sci. 2019, 7, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cochran, W.S. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ceballos, F.; Kannan, S.; Kramer, B. Crop prices, farm incomes, and food security during the COVID-19 pandemic in India: Phone-based producer survey evidence from Haryana State. Agric. Econ. J. Int. Assoc. Agric. Econ. 2021, 52, 525–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Koch, J.; Frommeyer, B.; Schewe, G. Online Shopping Motives during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Lessons from the Crisis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Robina-Ramirez, R.; Chamorro-Mera, A.; Moreno-Luna, L. Organic and online attributes for buying and selling agricultural products in the e-marketplace in Spain. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 42, 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relationship between farmers’ IT literacy and profitability through online sales. Source: Author.
Figure 1. Relationship between farmers’ IT literacy and profitability through online sales. Source: Author.
Agronomy 13 01200 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between IT literacy and profitability. Source: Author.
Figure 2. Relationship between IT literacy and profitability. Source: Author.
Agronomy 13 01200 g002
Table 1. Reliability scale testing.
Table 1. Reliability scale testing.
S. NoConstructItemAlpha
1Outbreak of COVID-19 (OutCov)40.846
2IT literacy of farmers (ITL)40.797
3Farmer’s profitability through online sales (PR)60.922
4Attitude towards organic farming (AT)40.846
5Frequency of sales through online (FOS)10.916
Table 2. Descriptive statistical data.
Table 2. Descriptive statistical data.
NMeanMedianModeStd.
Deviation
Skewness
ValidMissing
AGE27102.56093.00003.000.97894
GENDER27101.49081.00001.000.50818
HEDUC27103.25093.00003.001.32907
OutCov127103.97054.00004.000.64338
OutCov227103.85244.00004.000.67246
OutCov227104.09234.00004.000.62270
OutCov227103.90044.00004.000.70530
FOS27103.11443.00003.000.85949
ITL127102.84133.00002.000.93130
ITL227103.39114.00004.000.88305
ITL327102.67903.00002.000.96431
ITL427102.86353.00002.001.01096
PR127103.46494.00004.000.82421
PR127103.45764.00004.000.85041
PR327103.52774.00004.000.83786
PR427103.70484.00004.000.72107
PR527103.37643.00004.000.86412
PR627103.61254.00004.000.78956
AT127103.97054.00004.000.64338
AT227103.85244.00004.000.67246
AT327104.09234.00004.000.62270
AT427103.90044.00004.000.70530
HEDUC—Highest level of education; FOS—Frequency of Online Sales; PR—Profitability; ITL—Farmer’s IT literacy; AT—Farmers’ attitude; OutCov—Outcome of COVID-19.
Table 3. Demographic statistical data.
Table 3. Demographic statistical data.
DescriptionFrequencyPercentage
Age (In years)18–204516.6
20–308029.5
30–409535.1
40 and above5118.8
Total271100
GenderMale19371.2
Female7828.8
Total271100
Highest level of educationNo schooling/until primary school4315.9
Until Secondary school7025.8
Until higher secondary/diploma5620.7
Undergraduate6423.6
Postgraduate2810.3
Doctorate103.7
Total271100
Annual Turnover (INR)less than 2 L2710.0
2 L TO 5 L8832.5
5 L TO 10 L10338.0
MORE THAN 10 L5319.6
Total271100
Table 4. PROCESS Macro analysis.
Table 4. PROCESS Macro analysis.
Run MATRIX Procedure:
Model: 1
Y: Profitability
X: IT literacy
W: Outbreak of COVID-19
Sample Size: 271
OUTCOME VARIABLE
PR
Model Summary
RR-sqMSEFdf1df2p
0.50520.41110.73870.99673.0000267.00000.000
Model
CoeffSetpLLCIULCI
constant1.01991.47180.69290.0000−1.87803.9178
MITL0.56990.50071.13820.0000−0.41591.5557
MOOC0.50980.36951.37980.0000−0.21771.2372
Int_10.13680.1247−1.09690.0000−0.38230.1087
Product terms key
Int_1: MOP × MOOC
Test(s) of highest order unconditional interaction(s)
R2-chngFdf1df2p
X * W0.40451.20331.0000267.00000.0000
* Level-of-Confidence for all confidence-intervals in retrieved output: 95.0000.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yogesh, S.G.; Ravindran, D.S. Farmers’ Profitability through Online Sales of Organic Vegetables and Fruits during the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Empirical Study. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051200

AMA Style

Yogesh SG, Ravindran DS. Farmers’ Profitability through Online Sales of Organic Vegetables and Fruits during the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Empirical Study. Agronomy. 2023; 13(5):1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yogesh, Sureshkumar Girija, and Deenadayalu Sudharani Ravindran. 2023. "Farmers’ Profitability through Online Sales of Organic Vegetables and Fruits during the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Empirical Study" Agronomy 13, no. 5: 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop