Next Article in Journal
Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soil: Environmental Pollutants Affecting Crop Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of QTL for High-Temperature Tolerance in Rice Using a High-Density Bin Map
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Drip Irrigation Water Distribution Patterns Improve Fruit Quality and Economic Water Productivity in Early-Season Lemon Trees
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/agronomy13061520
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Specific Molecular and Phenotypic Marker-Based Haploid Inducers in Rice

by
Jian Wang
1,†,
Huijing Yan
1,2,†,
Xiaozhen Jiao
1,
Jun Ren
1,
Fengyue Hu
1,
Huan Liang
1,
Weihong Liang
2,* and
Chaolei Liu
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2023, 13(6), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061520
Submission received: 9 May 2023 / Revised: 26 May 2023 / Accepted: 27 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Molecular Research on Rice Grain Yield)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Doubled haploid (DH) technology is an efficient strategy for producing completely homozygous lines for breeding programs. Mutations in the MATRILINEAL (MTL) phospholipase trigger intraspecific haploid induction in cereals. Although an in vivo haploid induction system based on OsMTL-edited plants has been established in rice (Oryza sativa), DH technology is still limited by other factors, such as haploid identification, which is one of the essential steps required for DH technology. In the study, we addressed this technical challenge by integrating specific molecular and phenotypic markers into rice haploid inducers. We first generated large fragment insertion or deletion mutations within the OsMTL gene and designed a pair of primers flanking the mutational sites to be used as the specific and universal molecular markers between wild-type and Osmtl plants. Next, we screened for hairy leaf as a single dominant trait and integrated it into specific molecular marker-based haploid inducers using the cross and self-cross method. When crossing cytoplasmic male sterile lines with these haploid inducers, we utilized the specific InDel marker and hairy leaf phenotypic marker to identify putative haploids (or double haploids). These putative haploids were further confirmed through ploidy and phenotypic analysis, demonstrating the high efficiency of haploid identification using these markers. The haploid induction rate (HIR) of the developed specific molecular and phenotypic marker-based haploid inducers ranged from 3.7% to 12.5%. We have achieved successful integration of distinct molecular and phenotypic markers into rice haploid inducers. Our advanced marker-based system has significantly enhanced the accuracy of haploid identification, thereby expediting the adoption of DH technology in rice breeding.

1. Introduction

Compared with traditional methods of inbred line development, doubled haploid (DH) technology is a more efficient strategy for producing completely homozygous lines [1]. Although both in vivo and in vitro methods are available to generate haploids, only in vivo intraspecific hybridization using haploid inducers provides a promising approach for large-scale DH line production [2]. In maize, a haploid induction line called Stock 6, which was firstly reported in 1959, can produce 2–3% maternal haploid seed during self-pollination or when outcrossed as a male [3]. Stock 6 has contributed to the commercialization of maize haploid breeding, as the haploid induction rate (HIR) has been increased to 7–15% by academic and commercial routine users [4]. Recently, the genetic basis of haploid induction has been identified as two main molecular players in maize: MTL is responsible for haploid induction [4,5,6], and domain membrane protein (DMP) enhances haploid induction [7]. MTL is conserved in cereals, and knockout of OsMTL in rice can be used as a haploid inducer [8,9,10], which takes the first step towards developing an in vivo haploid induction system in rice.
DH technology comprises four distinct steps: haploid induction, haploid identification, genome doubling, and seed production from DH lines [1]. As an in vivo haploid induction system is newly emerging in rice, a number of issues should be addressed in each procedure [9]. Haploid identification, a key procedure in DH breeding technology, is highly limited by the efficiency of identifying haploids from diploids due to the low frequency of haploid induction [1]. Developing an efficient method for haploid identification will greatly increase DH technology efficiency and reduce downstream process costs. In maize, haploids can be efficiently identified by using genetic and phenotypic markers that are integrated in the haploid inducers, such as the R1-nj based anthocyanin marker [11], the high oil content marker [12], the red root marker [13], and the ZmC1/ZmR2-based anthocyanin marker [14]. However, efficient methods for distinguishing haploids from diploids are lacking in rice DH technology.
Haploid induction crossing between mtl haploid inducers and source germplasm generates diploids that contain both the male and female parents’ genome, as well as maternal haploids that carry only the female parent genome [1]. Applying this principle, unique molecular markers can be integrated into haploid inducers to aid in haploid identification. To achieve this, we propose utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology to create large insertion/deletion (InDel) mutations within the OsMTL gene, thereby integrating specific and universal genetic markers into rice haploid inducers. Additionally, we conduct a meticulous review of germplasms in order to identify dominant and visually discernible phenotypic markers. Next, we intend to incorporate these markers into our molecular marker-based haploid inducers, thereby boosting our overall efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Transformation

In this study, we utilized two OsMTL genome editing vectors from our previous research [9], namely pC1300-ACT:Cas9-sgRNATarget1 and pC1300-ACT:Cas9-sgRNATarget2, and introduced them into the typical indica-japanica hybrid rice ‘YongYou1540’ (YY1540). Following plasmid construction, the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (strain EHA105) experiments were conducted by Hangzhou Biogle Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China).

2.2. Detection of Mutations

To detect mutations, fresh leaf tissue from transgenic plants (100 mg) was pulverized using a tissuelyser (Jingxin, Shanghai). The genomic DNA was extracted using the CTAB method. Amplification of the fragments flanking the two targeted sites was performed using KOD FX DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Japan) and genotyped via Hi-TOM technology [15]. The Hi-TOM primers utilized for amplification are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Plant Growth Conditions

After being soaked in water at 37 °C for two days, the seeds were sown in a seedbed. After 25 days, the seedlings were transplanted to a transgenic field, with six plants per row. Plant materials were cultivated following the local (Hangzhou, China) standard agronomic practices during the summer growing season. In winter, the plants were grown in a greenhouse located at the China National Rice Research Institute (CNRRI) in Hangzhou, China, under conditions that maintained an average temperature of 30 °C during the day and 25 °C at night, with a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle and 75% relative humidity.

2.4. HIR Measurement

Investigation of HIR involved crossing ZhongguangA with haploid inducers to produce hybrids. Following harvesting, the seeds were germinated and cultured in the hydroponic nutrient solution as previously described by Liu et al. [16]. Subsequently, genomic DNA was extracted from each individual using the CTAB method. The 2×Taq Master Mix was used to amplify target sequences with InDel marker 1 and 2, and PCR products were analyzed by running them on 5% agarose gels. Putative haploids were then confirmed using a flow cytometer.

2.5. Ploidy Analysis

The material used for ploidy analysis comprised of approximately 2 cm2 of fresh leaf tissue, which was prepared following a previously described method [17]. Subsequently, the ploidy of the sample was determined using the BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer, with laser illumination at 552 nm and a 610/20 nm filter.

3. Results

3.1. Knockout of OsMTL in YongYou1540

The rice OsMTL gene encodes a sperm-specific phospholipase [8] and has four exons and three introns (Figure 1). Previously, we designed and developed two CRISPR/Cas9 vectors targeting exon 1 and exon 4 of OsMTL, respectively [9] (Figure 1). The two vectors were introduced into YongYou1540 (YY1540) for transformation. In the T0 generation, a total of 31 and 48 independent transgenic plants were obtained for target 1 and 2, respectively. We genotyped these lines and detected six heterozygous or homozygous large insertion/deletion mutants: line M1 (43 bp deletion) at the target 1 site, and line M2 (26 bp insertion), M3 (29 bp deletion), M4 (22 bp deletion), M5 (34 bp deletion), and M6 (13 bp deletion) at the target 2 site (Figure 2). These mutants were reproduced to the T1 generation to generate homozygous mutants and sufficient seeds for subsequent studies.

3.2. Integration of Specific Molecular Markers into mtl Mutants

The maternal haploids produced by mtl haploid inducers exclusively harbor the genome of the female parent [4,5,6,8], while the undesired diploids contain genomes from both the male and female parents. Therefore, molecular markers developed based on sequence differences between male and female parents can be employed to identify haploids. However, the heterozygous and variable breeding materials to be made homozygous limit the application of molecular markers in haploid identification. To integrate unique and universal molecular markers into the mtl haploid inducers, we designed two pairs of primers that flank targets 1 and 2. The PCR products were 132 bp and 100 bp with reference to the normal genome (Figure 3). The large insertion or deletion mutations in the mtl haploid inducers (Figure 2) allowed the designed primers to serve as unique and universal InDel markers between the wild-type (WT) and mtl mutants. We further tested the polymorphism of the two InDel markers and found they could be easily distinguished on a 5% agarose gel (Figure 4). Therefore, we successfully integrated specific molecular markers into mtl haploid inducers.

3.3. Development of Specific Phenotypic Marker Haploid Inducers

Phenotypic markers, such as the R1-nj based anthocyanin marker, greatly improve the efficiency of haploid identification in maize DH technology [11]. To identify visually discernible phenotypic markers in rice, we conducted a meticulous review of germplasms and identified the NWFB10 variety, which shows hairy leaves at the seedling stage and can be used as a phenotypic marker. The dense trichomes appear on the leaf surface of NWFB10 seedlings 10 days after germination and become increasingly prominent as the plant matures. To confirm that hairy leaf can be employed in haploid identification, we crossed the NWFB10 plant with the 93–11 variety (hairless leaf) and observed that all the F1 offspring had hairy leaves (Figure 5a). In the segregating population of 108 F2 plants, 76 plants displayed a hairy leaf phenotype similar to NWFB10, while 32 plants exhibited hairless leaves, fitting the typical segregation ratio of 3:1 (χ2 = 1.23 < χ0.05 = 3.84). These results indicate that hairy leaf is a single dominant trait and can be used as a phenotypic marker in haploid identification.
We then utilized the hairy leaf trait as a phenotypic marker to increase the efficiency of haploid identification in haploid inducers. Figure 5b displays a brief flow chart outlining the development of hairy leaf-based haploid inducers. Initially, we crossed the mtl haploid inducers with the NWFB10 variety and screened for lines exhibiting both the mtl mutation and the hairy leaf phenotype. Subsequently, we allowed the selected lines to self-fertilize and screened for lines with no hairless leaf phenotype in their progeny. We crossed the M1 haploid inducer with NWFB10 and identified seven mtl homozygous lines using the InDel1 marker in a segregating population of 46 F2 plants (Figure 5c). We harvested and grew the seeds of the seven mtl mutants separately for phenotypic analysis. Three lines, namely M-P1, M-P2, and M-P3, lacked segregation for the hairless leaf phenotype in their progeny and were therefore identified as phenotypic marker-based haploid inducers with both InDel and hairy leaf markers.

3.4. Identification of Putative Haploids Using Molecular and Phenotypic Markers

To test the efficiency of haploid identification by using the specific InDel and phenotypic markers, we used the cytoplasm male sterility (CMS) line ZhongguangA to cross with these haploid inducers and obtained a set number of hybrid seeds.
We first evaluated the efficiency of utilizing specific molecular markers to identify haploids. We germinated the hybrid seeds, extracted the genomic DNA of each individual, and amplified the fragments using InDel1 or InDel2 markers. After amplification, we electrophoresed the PCR products in a 5% agarose gel. Due to the elimination of paternal chromosomes that occurred during haploid induction [18], maternal haploids or spontaneously doubling haploids only showed one band consistent with ZhongguangA at the target sites. On the other hand, heterozygous diploids contained both ZhongguangA and mutant fragments, giving rise to two bands (Figure 6). Overall, we identified 10, 17, 11, 12, 8, and 10 putative haploids or double haploids out of 100, 159, 116, 96, 137, and 94 hybrid seeds from the cross between ZhongguangA and haploid inducer M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, and M6, respectively (Table 1), with a haploid induction rate (HIR) of 10.0%, 10.7%, 9.5%, 12.5%, 5.8%, and 10.6%.
We tested the effectiveness of using hairy leaf phenotypic marker to identify haploids. We analyzed 156, 261, and 188 hybrid seeds obtained from the cross between ZhongguangA and the haploid inducers M-P1, M-P2, and M-P3. Among the seeds, 8, 11, and 7 lines exhibited the hairless leaf phenotype, while the rest showed the hairy leaf phenotype (Figure 7a). We considered the hairless leaf individuals as potential haploids or double haploids and verified this by using the InDel1 marker (Figure 7b). Out of these individuals, 6, 10, and 5 showed one band consistent with ZhongguangA. Therefore, the haploid induction rate (HIR) for M-P1, M-P2, and M-P3 was found to be 5.1%, 4.2%, and 3.7%, respectively. Although a few hairless leaf individuals exhibited two bands, which may be due to the underdevelopment of trichome formation in the early seedling stage, using the hairy leaf marker remains an efficient method for haploid identification.

3.5. Verification of Haploids by Ploidy and Phenotypic Analysis

To verify the feasibility of haploid identification using specific molecular and phenotypic markers, we firstly determined the ploidy of putative haploids or doubled haploids (DHs) through flow cytometry. The ploidy of putative haploids 6, 24, and 33, which were harvested from the hybrid seeds of ZhongguangA and haploid inducer M1, was half of the heterozygous diploid used as the control (Figure 8a). This observation indicated the high accuracy of haploid identification through the specified markers. Following that, the haploids were transplanted to the field to analyze their phenotypic characteristics. At maturity, haploids exhibited a significant decrease in height compared to diploid plants, exhibited dwarf plant height, short spikelets, small glume size, and complete sterility (Figure 8b). The dwarf and small phenotypes of haploids were due to the half-reduced genome ploidy level, as previously reported [19].

4. Discussion

DH technology, based on an in vivo haploid inducer, is an efficient method for inbred development and has gained widespread use in modern maize breeding programs [2]. The identification of MTL, a conserved genetic factor in cereals for triggering haploid induction in maize, has facilitated the development of in vivo DH technology and synthetic apomixis systems in rice [4,5,6,8,9,10,17,20]. However, it is challenging to develop a high-throughput DH technology platform in rice.
DH technology encompasses induction, identification, and chromosome doubling of haploids [14]. Knockout of OsMTL produces 2–12% haploids in rice [8,9], which solves the problem of haploid induction. However, the step of haploid identification remains a limiting factor. Currently, there are four common methods available for identifying haploids in rice: (1) ploidy analysis using flow cytometry, (2) phenotypic comparison at the late stage of plant growth, (3) genotyping using molecular markers, and (4) phenotypic screening using visually discernible traits. Identification of haploids via methods (3) and (4) is more efficient and cost-effective compared to the time-consuming and expensive methods (1) and (2). In this study, we optimized methods (3) and (4) for haploid identification.
Molecular markers have long been deployed, in combination with flow cytometry, to determine homozygosity and identify haploids [21]. However, this method presents certain challenges due to the variability of female germplasms in the development of unique and universal InDel markers. To overcome this, we introduced large insertion or deletion mutations in the MTL gene, which allowed us to easily develop a unique and usable InDel marker without considering the variability in female germplasms. Our strategy can serve as an alternative method for haploid identification in maize, wheat, millet, and other species, as editing of the MTL gene has been shown to induce haploids in these species [4,5,6,22,23]. Furthermore, our strategy can also be employed in haploid identification for recently identified haploid genes such as ZmPLD3 [24], ZmPOD65 [25], and DMP [7]. Additionally, the identification of haploids through the use of unique InDel markers can be continuously optimized. With the development of various rapid and cost-effective DNA extraction techniques in plants [26,27], it will become more convenient and efficient to identify haploids by utilizing these methods in combination with the InDel markers.
Phenotypic marker systems have been widely used for screening haploids and greatly improve the efficiency of haploid identification in maize [1]. However, a visually discernible trait cannot always be found in rice. First, traits used as phenotypic markers for haploid identification must be dominant and visible at seed or early seedling stages, such as anthocyanin, high oil content, and red root markers [11,12,13,14]. Second, unlike big maize seeds, rice seeds are small and have husks. Fortunately, we identified hairy leaf, which was shown to be a single dominant trait that could be visible at the seedling stage. We integrated this trait into haploid inducers and found that it greatly improved the efficiency of haploid identification. As a result, we have made the first report of a phenotypic marker for identifying haploids in rice. In future, as the use of phenotypic markers greatly improves the efficiency of haploid identification, more markers such as anthocyanin can be integrated into haploid inducers. Furthermore, it is worth exploring the combination of different markers to enhance both the efficiency and accuracy of haploid identification.

5. Conclusions

We have successfully created haploid inducers in rice by introducing insertion/deletion mutations into the OsMTL gene and utilizing the hairy leaf trait, both of which serve as specific molecular and phenotypic markers. Our marker-based haploid inducers significantly enhance the efficiency of haploid identification, thus greatly accelerating the application of in vivo DH technology in rice breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13061520/s1. Table S1: The primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

C.L. and W.L. managed the project. J.W., H.Y. and J.R. performed the experiments. X.J., H.L. and F.H. analyzed the data. J.W. wrote the manuscript. C.L. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001527) and the earmarked fund for CARS--01.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets used in this study are included in the manuscript and the supplementary file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chaikam, V.; Molenaar, W.; Melchinger, A.E.; Boddupalli, P.M. Doubled haploid technology for line development in maize: Technical advances and prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 3227–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ren, J.; Wu, P.; Trampe, B.; Tian, X.; Lubberstedt, T.; Chen, S. Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lv, J.; Kelliher, T. Recent advances in engineering of in vivo haploid induction systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 2023, 2653, 365–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kelliher, T.; Starr, D.; Richbourg, L.; Chintamanani, S.; Delzer, B.; Nuccio, M.L.; Green, J.; Chen, Z.; McCuiston, J.; Wang, W.; et al. MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 2017, 542, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, C.; Li, X.; Meng, D.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, C.; Dong, X.; Xu, X.; Chen, B.; Li, W.; Li, L.; et al. A 4-bp insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase A generates haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 520–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gilles, L.M.; Khaled, A.; Laffaire, J.B.; Chaignon, S.; Gendrot, G.; Laplaige, J.; Berges, H.; Beydon, G.; Bayle, V.; Barret, P.; et al. Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase not like dad triggers gynogenesis in maize. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhong, Y.; Liu, C.; Qi, X.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, C.; Chen, B.; Tian, X.; et al. Mutation of ZmDMP enhances haploid induction in maize. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liang, D.; Liu, J.; Sahoo, G.; Kelliher, T. OsMATL mutation induces haploid seed formation in indica rice. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 530–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, C. Development of Multiple-Heading-Date mtl Haploid Inducer Lines in Rice. Agriculture 2022, 12, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Liang, D.; Yao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Kelliher, T.; Zhang, X.; et al. Rice haploid inducer development by genome editing. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2238, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chaikam, V.; Nair, S.K.; Babu, R.; Martinez, L.; Tejomurtula, J.; Boddupalli, P.M. Analysis of effectiveness of R1-nj anthocyanin marker for in vivo haploid identification in maize and molecular markers for predicting the inhibition of R1-nj expression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Melchinger, A.E.; Schipprack, W.; Würschum, T.; Chen, S.; Technow, F. Rapid and accurate identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds based on oil content in maize. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chaikam, V.; Martinez, L.; Melchinger, A.E.; Schipprack, W.; Boddupalli, P.M. Development and validation of red root marker-based haploid inducers in maize. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 1678–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, L.; Miao, L.; Yang, W.; Xiao, Z.; Zhong, Y.; et al. Co-expression of transcription factors ZmC1 and ZmR2 establishes an efficient and accurate haploid embryo identification system in maize. Plant J. 2022, 111, 1296–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Q.; Wang, C.; Jiao, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, K. Hi-TOM: A platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems. Sci. China Life Sci. 2019, 62, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, C.L.; Gao, Z.Y.; Shang, L.G.; Yang, C.H.; Ruan, B.P.; Zeng, D.L.; Guo, L.B.; Zhao, F.J.; Huang, C.F.; Qian, Q. Natural variation in the promoter of OsHMA3 contributes to differential grain cadmium accumulation between Indica and Japonica rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 314–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, C.; Liu, Q.; Shen, Y.; Hua, Y.; Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Wu, M.; Sun, T.; Cheng, Z.; Mercier, R.; et al. Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Meng, D.; Chen, S.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, W.; Yan, J. Single nucleus sequencing reveals spermatid chromosome fragmentation as a possible cause of maize haploid induction. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dunwell, J.M. Haploids in flowering plants: Origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 377–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, C.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, F.; Li, M.; Liu, Q.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; et al. Synthetic apomixis enables stable transgenerational transmission of heterotic phenotypes in hybrid rice. Plant Commun. 2022, 4, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tuvesson, S.D.; Larsson, C.T.; Ordon, F. Use of molecular markers for doubled haploid technology: From academia to plant breeding companies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2288, 49–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, H.; Wang, K.; Jia, Z.; Gong, Q.; Lin, Z.; Du, L.; Pei, X.; Ye, X. Efficient induction of haploid plants in wheat by editing of TaMTL using an optimized Agrobacterium-mediated CRISPR system. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheng, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhi, H.; Yin, T.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Diao, X.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1089–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Y.; Lin, Z.; Yue, Y.; Zhao, H.; Fei, X.; E, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, S.; Lai, J.; Song, W. Loss-of-function alleles of ZmPLD3 cause haploid induction in maize. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiang, C.; Sun, J.; Li, R.; Yan, S.; Chen, W.; Guo, L.; Qin, G.; Wang, P.; Luo, C.; Huang, W.; et al. A reactive oxygen species burst causes haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 943–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mutou, C.; Tanaka, K.; Ishikawa, R. DNA extraction from rice endosperm (including a protocol for extraction of DNA from ancient seed samples). Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1099, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narushima, J.; Kimata, S.; Soga, K.; Sugano, Y.; Kishine, M.; Takabatake, R.; Mano, J.; Kitta, K.; Kanamaru, S.; Shirakawa, N.; et al. Rapid DNA template preparation directly from a rice sample without purification for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of rice genes. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2020, 84, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 13 01520 g001 550
Figure 1. OsMTL gene structure and sgRNA target sites. Exons and introns are shown as boxes and lines, respectively. PAM motifs are highlighted in red.
Figure 1. OsMTL gene structure and sgRNA target sites. Exons and introns are shown as boxes and lines, respectively. PAM motifs are highlighted in red.
Agronomy 13 01520 g001
Agronomy 13 01520 g002 550
Figure 2. Generation of large insertion/deletion mutations in the OsMTL gene. The hybrid rice YongYou1540 was used for genetic transformation. Blue and red letters indicate the target and PAM sequences, respectively. The dashed lines represent nucleotide deletions. Insertions and SNPs are shaded in yellow, and the size of the deletion or insertion is shown on the right.
Figure 2. Generation of large insertion/deletion mutations in the OsMTL gene. The hybrid rice YongYou1540 was used for genetic transformation. Blue and red letters indicate the target and PAM sequences, respectively. The dashed lines represent nucleotide deletions. Insertions and SNPs are shaded in yellow, and the size of the deletion or insertion is shown on the right.
Agronomy 13 01520 g002
Agronomy 13 01520 g003 550
Figure 3. Design of specific molecular markers. The blue one-way arrows represent the sites of forward and reverse primers of the InDel markers. Targets and PAMs are indicated by blue and red letters, respectively. The dots represent the sequences between the primer and the target.
Figure 3. Design of specific molecular markers. The blue one-way arrows represent the sites of forward and reverse primers of the InDel markers. Targets and PAMs are indicated by blue and red letters, respectively. The dots represent the sequences between the primer and the target.
Agronomy 13 01520 g003
Agronomy 13 01520 g004 550
Figure 4. Polymorphism analysis of InDel1 and InDel2 markers in 5% agarose gel. The homozygous mutants of M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, and M6 from the T1 generation were used for analysis.
Figure 4. Polymorphism analysis of InDel1 and InDel2 markers in 5% agarose gel. The homozygous mutants of M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, and M6 from the T1 generation were used for analysis.
Agronomy 13 01520 g004
Agronomy 13 01520 g005 550
Figure 5. Development of hairy leaf marker-based haploid inducers. (a) Verification of the hairy leaf trait as a dominant characteristic. Bar = 1 mm. (b) Flow chart of the method used to develop hairy leaf marker haploid inducers. The solid and dotted arrows represent one generation and more than two generations, respectively. (c) Gel electrophoresis analysis to screen for homozygous mtl mutants. InDel1 marker was used for PCR amplification. The black numbers represent genotypes that are the same as the M1 haploid inducer. Marker = 2000 bp.
Figure 5. Development of hairy leaf marker-based haploid inducers. (a) Verification of the hairy leaf trait as a dominant characteristic. Bar = 1 mm. (b) Flow chart of the method used to develop hairy leaf marker haploid inducers. The solid and dotted arrows represent one generation and more than two generations, respectively. (c) Gel electrophoresis analysis to screen for homozygous mtl mutants. InDel1 marker was used for PCR amplification. The black numbers represent genotypes that are the same as the M1 haploid inducer. Marker = 2000 bp.
Agronomy 13 01520 g005
Agronomy 13 01520 g006 550
Figure 6. The represented gel electrophoresis analysis results of hybrid seedlings derived from crosses between cytoplasm male sterility line ZhongguangA and haploid inducers M1 (a), M2 (b), M3 (c), M4 (d), M5 (e), and M6 (f). Haploids or double haploids are marked with black numbers. WT represents the genome type of ZhongguangA. Marker = 2000 bp.
Figure 6. The represented gel electrophoresis analysis results of hybrid seedlings derived from crosses between cytoplasm male sterility line ZhongguangA and haploid inducers M1 (a), M2 (b), M3 (c), M4 (d), M5 (e), and M6 (f). Haploids or double haploids are marked with black numbers. WT represents the genome type of ZhongguangA. Marker = 2000 bp.
Agronomy 13 01520 g006
Agronomy 13 01520 g007 550
Figure 7. Identification of haploids using the hairy leaf marker. (a) Adaxial leaf epidermis morphology of ZhongguangA, M-P1, haploid, and diploid observed under light microscopy. Bar = 1 mm. (b) Polymorphism analysis of ZhongguangA, M-P1, haploid, and diploid was conducted using the InDel1 marker. The results were visualized in a 5% agarose gel. Marker = 2000 bp.
Figure 7. Identification of haploids using the hairy leaf marker. (a) Adaxial leaf epidermis morphology of ZhongguangA, M-P1, haploid, and diploid observed under light microscopy. Bar = 1 mm. (b) Polymorphism analysis of ZhongguangA, M-P1, haploid, and diploid was conducted using the InDel1 marker. The results were visualized in a 5% agarose gel. Marker = 2000 bp.
Agronomy 13 01520 g007
Agronomy 13 01520 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Ploidy analysis of heterozygous diploid plant (Het) and haploid lines (6, 24, and 33) by flow cytometry. (b) Whole plants, panicles. and glumes of heterozygous diploid plant (Het) and haploid lines (6, 24, and 33). Bars = 20 cm (left), 3 cm (middle), and 2 cm (right).
Figure 8. (a) Ploidy analysis of heterozygous diploid plant (Het) and haploid lines (6, 24, and 33) by flow cytometry. (b) Whole plants, panicles. and glumes of heterozygous diploid plant (Het) and haploid lines (6, 24, and 33). Bars = 20 cm (left), 3 cm (middle), and 2 cm (right).
Agronomy 13 01520 g008
Table
Table 1. Haploid induction rate (HIR) of the developed molecular and phenotypic markers based haploid inducers.
Table 1. Haploid induction rate (HIR) of the developed molecular and phenotypic markers based haploid inducers.
Haploid InducersPutative H/DHH/DHProgenyHIR (%)
Molecular markerM110 a1010010
M217 a1715910.7
M311 a111169.5
M412 a129612.5
M58 a81375.8
M610 a109410.6
Phenotypic markerM-P16 b81565.1
M-P211 b112614.2
M-P35 b71883.7
Note: a and b represent haploids or double haploids identified by the specific InDel marker or hairy leaf marker, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Yan, H.; Jiao, X.; Ren, J.; Hu, F.; Liang, H.; Liang, W.; Liu, C. Development of Specific Molecular and Phenotypic Marker-Based Haploid Inducers in Rice. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061520

AMA Style

Wang J, Yan H, Jiao X, Ren J, Hu F, Liang H, Liang W, Liu C. Development of Specific Molecular and Phenotypic Marker-Based Haploid Inducers in Rice. Agronomy. 2023; 13(6):1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jian, Huijing Yan, Xiaozhen Jiao, Jun Ren, Fengyue Hu, Huan Liang, Weihong Liang, and Chaolei Liu. 2023. "Development of Specific Molecular and Phenotypic Marker-Based Haploid Inducers in Rice" Agronomy 13, no. 6: 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061520

APA Style

Wang, J., Yan, H., Jiao, X., Ren, J., Hu, F., Liang, H., Liang, W., & Liu, C. (2023). Development of Specific Molecular and Phenotypic Marker-Based Haploid Inducers in Rice. Agronomy, 13(6), 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop