Next Article in Journal
Biochar for Sustainable Farming and Recultivation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Sulfur Carriers on Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Potatoes—A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Stubble Righting after the Mechanical Harvest of Primary Rice Improves the Grain Yield of Ratooning Rice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Crisis—Alternative Use of Winter Bread Wheat Grain Depending on Protein Content
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contributions of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria to Nitrous Oxide Production in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Fields

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Agriculture and GHGs Mitigation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Xuhuai Region in Jiangsu, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huaian 223001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2420; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092420
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 16 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:
With excessive nitrogen (N) input, high nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions are frequently observed in greenhouse vegetable fields. We hypothesized that the underlying production mechanisms can be derived across a wide selection of vegetable fields in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Thus, we investigated the emission characteristics and relative contributions of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) and other microbial processes to the N2O production from five long-term greenhouse vegetable fields through an incubation experiment with combined inhibition methods. The results showed that the ammonia oxidation process is the dominant contributor to N2O production at all five sites, accounting for 88–97% of the total N2O emissions. Regardless of acidic, neutral, or alkaline soil, AOA-driven N2O emission rates were consistently higher than AOB-driven N2O emission rates. Both AOA-driven and AOB-driven N2O emissions exhibited positive correlations with soil pH, with significant increases in soil N2O production associated with high pH levels. Therefore, general production mechanisms were derived, such that more attention should be paid to AOA-driven N2O emissions and to vegetable soils with a relatively high pH in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

1. Introduction

In response to the growing demand for vegetables, driven by population growth, China has witnessed the significant development of its greenhouse vegetable production over the past four decades, with an area exceeding 4 million hectares [1]. The cultivation of vegetables in a greenhouse is a crucial method for intensive farming, with strategic significance in enhancing the efficiency of natural resource utilization and increasing economic returns for farmers. The regions along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are typical and important for greenhouse vegetable cultivation in China, encompassing 30% of the country’s total planted area and over 10% of local traditional croplands [2].
The application rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer in greenhouse vegetable ecosystems are significantly higher, ranging from three to five times more compared to staple food agricultural fields [2,3]. Excessive N fertilizer not only contributes significantly and directly to elevated nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, resulting in reduced N-use efficiency [4,5], but also leads to secondary salinization and the acidification of soil [6]. N2O is mainly produced after N fertilizer application and by a series of N conversion processes involving autotrophic nitrification, heterotrophic nitrification, nitrobacteria denitrification, chemical denitrification, etc. [7,8]. However, ammonia oxidation, as a necessary step of nitrification, is the main process of N2O production in greenhouse vegetable fields [9].
Ammonia oxidation is the first and rate-limiting step responsible for nitrification and N2O emission. The ammonia oxidation process alone may contribute up to 80% of the total N2O emission [3,10]. Ammonia oxidation involves the conversion of ammonia (NH3) to nitrate (NO3) by both ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) [11]. Previous studies suggested that in the presence of moist soil conditions and ammonium (NH4+) amendment, AOB are found to be the primary contributor to both ammonia oxidation and N2O production [12,13]. However, Giguere et al. [14] found that there were no notable disparities in N2O production between AOA and AOB. The physiologically diverse nature of AOA and AOB, which are influenced by various soil environmental conditions, results in varying degrees of ammonia oxidation [15,16]. These factors can influence the relative contributions of AOA and AOB to N2O production in soils [17,18]. There were contradictory findings reported [19].
The excessive application of N fertilizer, frequent irrigation, and tillage, as well as elevated soil temperatures within enclosed environments, can alter the community structure, abundance, and function of soil microorganisms [20]. Long-term greenhouse vegetable cultivation was found to cause a notable modification in soil physicochemical properties and functional microorganisms such as AOA and AOB [21,22,23]. While many studies focused on the changes in ammonia oxidation under various soil conditions [12,19,21], the characteristics of ammonia oxidation and the contribution of N2O emissions by AOA and AOB in greenhouse vegetables remain unexplored and contradictory. Zhong et al. [2] proposed that greenhouse vegetable cultivation with long-term high-N-input conditions may result in AOB playing a more significant role in ammonia oxidation compared to AOA. However, Duan et al. [24] reported that AOA played a dominant role in driving both ammonia oxidation and N2O production in greenhouse vegetable systems subjected to elevated soil temperatures. We assumed that the underlying microbial production mechanisms can be derived across a wide selection of vegetable fields in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.
Here, we conducted a series of inhibitor incubation experiments using long-term (>10 years) greenhouse vegetable soils. The objectives of this study were (1) to examine the corresponding contributions of AOA and AOB to N2O emission and (2) to explore the environmental factors and microbial mechanisms underlying N2O production. Thus, our research findings can serve as a valuable reference for implementing N2O mitigation measures for greenhouse vegetable production in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Collection and Preparations

Five soil samples were gathered from typical greenhouse fields that have long-term (>10 years) conventional vegetable cultivation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. All topsoil samples (0–20 cm) were collected post-harvest of vegetable crops between October and December 2021. The five sites are as follows: (1) Anthrosols in Hefei city, Anhui Province (AnHui) (31°54′ N, 117°15′ E); (2) Inceptisols in Huan’an city, Jiangsu Province (JiangSu) (33°53′ N, 119°30′ E); (3) Ultisols in Jiujiang city, Jiangxi Province (JiangXi) (29°36′ N, 115°49′ E); (4) Ultisols in Wuhan city, Hubei Province (HuBei) (30°20′ N, 114°13′ E); (5) Ultisols in Xiangtan city, Hunan Province (HuNan) (27°51′ N, 113°1′ E).
After removal of any visible stones and plant debris, one part of the sample was air-dried for analysis of fundamental physical and chemical properties, while another portion was sieved ≤2 mm and stored at 4 °C until laboratory incubation. The fundamental physical and chemical properties of the soil are displayed in Table 1.

2.2. Soil Microcosm Construction and Incubation

Previous studies demonstrated that acetylene can effectively inhibit ammonia oxidation by both AOA and AOB, while 1-octyne can specifically inhibit AOB, and 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide (PTIO) selectively inhibits AOA [13,25,26]. A group of inhibitors was implemented to differentiate the impacts of individual AOA or AOB on N2O emissions. According to procedures by Fan et al. [27] and Zhang et al. [28], an incubation trial was conducted for all soil samples as follows: 20 g fresh soils were added to 120 mL serum bottle for preincubation with 45% water-filled pore space (WFPS) at 25 °C for 7 days to revive soil microbial activity. After the end of pre-incubation, each soil sample was added to 2 mL (NH4)2SO4 solution (amount to 150 mg N kg−1 soil) and adjusted to 60% WFPS. Each soil sample was exposed to acetylene (0.01% v/v), 1-octyne (0.03% v/v), 300 μmol/kg PTIO, or no inhibitors, to establish four treatments. All serum bottles were placed at a constant temperature of 25 °C, with 60% WFPS, and incubated in darkness under tightly sealed condition for 21 days. Approximately 35 mL of gas samples were collected from the headspace using a 50 mL plastic syringe at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 21 days after the start of incubation for analysis of N2O concentration. Prior to gas sampling, the serum bottles were opened for 20 min to maintain aerobic conditions, and corresponding inhibitors were added and then sealed for 6 h to allow complete inhibition. Three serum bottles per treatment were destructively sampled after 0, 7, 14, and 21 days to extract soil NH4+, NO2, and NO3. On day 21, the soil samples were additionally used for DNA extraction and quantitative PCR analysis.

2.3. Soil Analyses and N2O Measurements

Soil pH was determined using 1:5 (weight:volume) ratios of soil with distilled water using a pH meter (PHS-3C, Shanghai, China). The SOC was analyzed by wet digestion with H2SO4–K2Cr2O7, and the TN was determined using semi-micro Kjeldahl digestion using TiO2, CuSO4, and K2SO4 as catalysts. The soil NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations were measured using the blue colorimetric method and dual-wavelength colorimetric method on soil extracts with 2 mol L−1 KCl, using an ultraviolet‒visible spectrophotometer (Qinghua UV1800PC, Shanghai, China). The gas samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A, Shanghai, China) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) for N2O analysis [29].

2.4. Soil DNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

The soil DNA was isolated from 0.5 g fresh soil using a Fast DNA SPIN Kit following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer [30]. The concentration and quality of the obtained soil DNA were assessed using a Nanodrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The functional genes were amplified by real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) after the DNA extract was diluted and described as the gene copy number per gram of dry soil. Following Harter et al. [31], the primer sets amo19F/CrenamoA616r48x and amoA1F/amoA2R were used to determine the copy numbers of archaeal and bacterial amoA genes, respectively. The amplification was performed in 20 μL reaction mixtures, which included 10 μL of SYBR Green (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan), 0.2 μL of Rox DYEII, 1 μL of template, 0.4 μL of each primer (10 μmol L−1), and 8 μL of sterile broth. Standard curves were generated with 10-fold serial dilutions of the plasmid DNA.

2.5. Calculations and Statistical Analysis

The N2O production rates were determined by measuring the linear increase in N2O concentrations in the headspaces at the start (0 h) and the end (6 h) of each sampling day. The cumulative N2O production was then calculated based on the production rates and incubation time. The contribution of N2O emission from AOA, AOB, and others were calculated using the following formulas [3,27].
N2OAOA = CN2O(no inhibitor) − CN2O(1-octyne) − CN2O(acetylene)
N2OAOB = CN2O(no inhibitor) − CN2O(PTIO) − CN2O(acetylene)
N2Oothers = CN2O(acetylene)
where N2OAOA is N2O-emission derived from AOA (ng N g−1 dry soil); N2OAOB is N2O-emission-derived from AOB (ng N g−1 dry soil); N2Oothers is N2O-emission-derived from others (ng N g−1 dry soil); CN2O(no inhibitor) is cumulative N2O emission for no inhibitor treatment (ng N g−1 dry soil); CN2O(acetylene) is N2O cumulative emission for acetylene treatment (ng N g−1 dry soil); CN2O(1-octyne) is cumulative N2O emission for 1-octyne treatment (ng N g−1 dry soil); and CN2O(PTIO) is cumulative N2O emission for PTIO treatment (ng N g−1 dry soil).
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Suzhou, China). An SNK multiple range test was used to determine whether significant differences were found among the treatment means, at a significance level of 0.05. Figure preparation was carried out using Origin 2022 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. N2O Fluxes

The peak value of the N2O flux significantly varied among the different soils, while the trends of the N2O fluxes were similar across these five soils throughout the 21-day incubation period (Figure 1). With the exception of negligible N2O emissions at the JiangXi site, the N2O fluxes at the other four sites were concentrated within a 7-day time frame. The highest peak for the N2O flux occurred on the second day following N addition. Notably, all sites exhibited their highest N2O fluxes when no inhibitor was applied. Conversely, acetylene inhibitors resulted in minimal-to-no N2O emissions and, thus, recorded the lowest levels of the N2O fluxes. The use of 1-octyne and PTIO inhibitors yielded intermediate levels between the treatment with no inhibitor and the acetylene treatment. After 7 days of incubation time, all treatments at all sites displayed consistently low levels of the N2O flux.

3.2. N2O Emission Derived by AOA and AOB

The cumulative N2O emissions significantly varied among different sites, with the total cumulative N2O emissions ranging from 4.11 to 43.92 ng N g−1 dry soil over a 21-day incubation period (Figure 2). The HuBei site exhibited the highest total cumulative N2O emission, 43.92 ng N g−1 dry soil, while the JiangSu, HuNan, AnHui, and JiangXi sites showed reductions in cumulative N2O emissions by 53.8%, 62.7%, 83.7%, and 90.6%, respectively, compared to the HuBei site. The N2O emissions driven by different modes exhibited a similar pattern to the total N2O emissions. The highest N2O emissions by AOA or AOB were observed at the HuBei site. However, compared to the HuBei site, the N2O emissions driven by AOA at the JiangSu, HuNan, AnHui, and JiangXi sites decreased by 60.4%, 60.8%, 87.8%, and 94.4%, respectively, while those driven by AOB correspondingly decreased by 54.3%, 70.9%, 79.9%, and 85.1%.
The N2O emissions driven by different pathways revealed that the AOA-driven N2O emissions were the highest across all sites, while other pathways resulted in the lowest emissions (Figure 2). The AOB pathway exhibited intermediate levels of N2O emissions between AOA and other drivers. The N2O emissions attributed to AOA accounted for 46–82% of the total N2O emissions, with AOA-driven N2O emissions contributing more than 50% of the total emissions when excluding the JiangXi site. The N2O emissions driven by AOB constituted 15–31% of the total emissions. The N2O emissions attributed to others contributed to 3–22% of the total emissions, while for sites with high N2O emissions (HuBei, JiangSu, and HuNan) these other contributions remained below 5%. The N2O emissions at the three medium or alkaline soil sites (HuBei, JiangSu, and HuNan) exhibited a 1.3–10.7-fold increase compared to those observed at the other two acidic soil sites (AnHui and JiangXi).

3.3. Abundance of AOA-amoA and AOB-amoA Genes

In all soil samples, the abundance of AOA-amoA functional genes exhibited a significantly higher level compared to the abundance of AOB-amoA functional genes (Figure 3). The different additions of inhibitors had a notable impact on the abundance of both AOA-amoA and AOB-amoA genes. The presence of acetylene and PTIO led to a significant reduction in the abundance of AOA-amoA functional genes. The inclusion of acetylene and 1-octyne inhibitors led to a substantial decrease in the abundance of AOB-amoA functional genes. Soil samples treated without inhibitors demonstrated elevated levels for both AOA-amoA and AOB-amoA functional gene abundances across all tested soils. Among the treatments without an inhibitor addition, the HuNan site exhibited the highest level (10.75) of AOA-amoA functional gene abundance, whereas the JiangSu, HuBei, AnHui, and JiangXi sites displayed progressively decreasing abundances of the AOA-amoA functional genes. Compared with the HuNan site, the abundance of AOA-amoA functional genes at the JiangSu, HuBei, AnHui, and JiangXi sites decreased by 3.4%, 4.9%, 16.0%, and 18.7%, respectively. Without the addition of inhibitors, the HuBei site exhibited the highest abundance of AOB-amoA functional genes at 10.2, while the HuNan, AnHui, JiangXi, and JiangSu sites showed a successive decrease in AOB-amoA functional gene abundance. AOB-amoA functional gene abundance decreased by 12.1%, 13.5%, 16.6%, and 28.6% at the HuNan, AnHui, JiangXi, and JiangSu sites, respectively, compared to that at the HuBei site.

3.4. Correlation between N2O Production of AOA and AOB and Soil Properties

The correlation analysis revealed a significantly positive association between AOA-driven N2O emissions and soil pH (R2 = 0.59) as well as between AOB-driven N2O emissions and soil pH (R2 = 0.40) (Figure 4). No significant correlation was found between the C:N ratio and either AOA-driven or AOB-driven N2O emissions. Both NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations exhibited a significantly positive correlation with both AOA-driven and AOB-driven N2O emissions.

4. Discussion

4.1. Relative Importance of AOA and AOB in N2O Emissions

The negligible N2O fluxes observed with acetylene inhibitors suggested minimal contributions from other processes. Ammonia oxidation was the primary source of N2O emissions, accounting for 78–97% of the total N2O emissions, while the other pathways accounted for only 3–22% of the total N2O emissions in our study (Figure 2). This finding is consistent with previous studies [13,28]. Soil N2O production processes primarily involve autotrophic nitrification, heterotrophic nitrification, nitrobacteria denitrification, and chemical denitrification [7,8,9]. Excessive N input and frequent tillage in greenhouse vegetable fields provide substrates and aerobic conditions for ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms [32,33]. Moreover, prolonged vegetable cultivation has resulted in the establishment of a distinct and dominant microbial population in the soil, specifically autotrophic nitrification dominated by ammonia-oxidation microorganisms [1].
The N2O emissions at five sites exhibited similar trends, primarily driven by AOA, regardless of acidic, neutral, or weakly alkaline soils (Figure 2). Although this observation was consistent with previous studies [24,34], it was inconsistent with some others stating that AOB predominantly drives N2O emissions in acidic soil, while AOA plays a dominant role in alkaline soil [27,28]. This phenomenon may be attributed to the significant influence of the high-temperature conditions in greenhouse vegetable fields on AOA-driven N2O emissions. Previous studies indicated that the AOA-driven ammonia oxidation process exhibits higher temperature adaptability, with the optimal temperature for AOA significantly exceeding that of AOB [3,34,35]. The vegetable fields were exposed to elevated temperatures in the greenhouse, which could potentially influence the dominant process of soil ammonia oxidation, though our incubation experiment was conducted at a constant temperature of 25 °C. Typically, temperatures in the greenhouse vegetable field reach 50–60 °C during the summer season, and this high-temperature season is usually accompanied by elevated N input. Thus, the field would have shifted in its dominant process for N conversions and microbial community structures under such a long-term planting regime [1]. The results pertaining to microbial functional genes without inhibitors (Figure 3) further support our assertion, revealing a significantly higher abundance of AOA functional genes compared to AOB functional genes, by one–two orders of magnitude. Consequently, for the effective mitigation of N2O emissions, it is imperative to prioritize strategies aimed at reducing AOA-driven N2O emissions from greenhouse vegetable production in this region.

4.2. N2O Production Affected by Soil Properties

As substrates and products of nitrification and denitrification, a significant positive relationship was observed between N2O production and soil ammonium and nitrate concentrations (Figure 4). However, these were soil background values when we collected them. We did not measure the dynamic changes during our incubations, which may explain the weak contribution of soil ammonium and nitrate to N2O production in the incubations (Figure 4).
Importantly, we observed a significant positive correlation between both AOA-driven N2O and AOB-driven N2O emissions and soil pH, which was consistent with the findings of Fan et al. [27]. Soil pH is recognized as one of the crucial factors influencing N2O production by AOA and AOB [36,37]. Acidic soil conditions were found to significantly inhibit AOB activity, leading to a reduction in AOB-driven N2O emissions [38]. Conversely, an increase in soil pH creates a favorable environment for AOB bacteria and enhances their microbial activity [31,39]. In our study, it was observed that an increase in soil pH led to a promotion of the abundance of AOB functional genes (Figure 3), as well as an enhancement in AOB-driven N2O emissions (Figure 2). However, with increasing pH levels, there was also a stimulation of AOA-driven N2O emissions (Figure 2). Notably, we found a significant correlation between increased N2O emissions and soil pH from ammonia oxidation in our study. The N2O emissions in the three medium or alkaline soils (HuBei, JiangSu, and HuNan) exhibited a 1.3–10.7-fold increase compared to those observed in the other two acidic soils (AnHui and JiangXi). These results aligned with previous research on the promotion of the ammonia oxidation process by pH [28]. In Fan et al. [27], the soil C/N ratio was identified as a significant factor influencing AOA- and AOB-driven N2O emissions. However, our study did not find any correlation between the C/N ratio and N2O emissions. This discrepancy may be attributed to the relatively consistent C/N ratio in our investigation, though with substantial variations in the TN and SOC among the different soils (Table 1). Given the considerable heterogeneity in soil physical and chemical properties (e.g., soil texture and pH), other factors than the C/N ratio index exerted a greater influence on N2O emission [40,41]. As pH increased, there was a significant rise in soil N2O emission. Notably, the N2O flux trend of the JiangXi soil was obviously different from that of the other four soils. For the JiangXi soil, there was no N2O flux peak during the 21-day incubation period, regardless of the addition of inhibitors (Figure 1), indicating that the low pH in the JiangXi soil (4.89) would have caused no substantial N2O emissions even after extra N addition. Soil pH is an important factor affecting ammonia oxidation and N2O production, with significant positive correlations observed [37,42]. Duan et al. [3] also reported that acidic soil exhibited diminished potential ammonia oxidation and N2O emission. In our study, the N2O emissions driven by AOA or AOB showed a significant positive correlation with pH, providing further evidence to support our perspective. Therefore, mitigating N2O emissions heightened attention toward alkaline soil conditions. Curbing pH levels within alkaline soils presented an effective measure for mitigating N2O emissions in greenhouse vegetable fields located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

5. Conclusions

The incubation research assessed the contributions of AOA and AOB to ammonia oxidation and the resulting N2O in greenhouse vegetable soils located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Although the N2O emissions varied among the different soil sites, a consistent production mechanism was observed. The dominant process driving N2O emissions at all soil sites was ammonia oxidation, while the contributions from other processes were negligible. Regardless of the soil acidity (acidic, neutral, or weakly alkaline), AOA-driven ammonia oxidation rather than AOB-driven ammonia oxidation played a major role in N2O emissions. Both AOA-driven and AOB-driven N2O emissions exhibited positive correlations with soil pH, with significant increases in soil N2O production associated with higher pH levels. Therefore, to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from vegetable cultivation soils in this region, particular attention should be paid to control AOA-driven N2O emissions in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Furthermore, curbing soil pH levels within alkaline soils presents an effective measure for mitigating N2O emissions from greenhouse vegetable fields in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X.; project administration, Y.D.; methodology, X.X.; lab analysis, J.Z.; software, Y.J. and B.W.; writing—original draft, review and editing, Y.D. and Z.X.; visualization, C.W.; supervision, Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42377292) and the Jiangsu Province Special Project for Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral Science and Technology Innovation (BE2022421).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, L.; Zhao, C.; Chen, Q.; Liu, T.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Study on microbial community structure and soil nitrogen accumulation in greenhouse vegetable fields with different planting years. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhong, W.; Bian, B.; Gao, N.; Min, J.; Shi, W.; Lin, X.; Shen, W. Nitrogen fertilization induced changes in ammonia oxidation are attributable mostly to bacteria rather than archaea in greenhouse based high N input vegetable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 93, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duan, P.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, C.; Xiong, Z. Thermodynamic responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria explain N2O production from greenhouse vegetable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 120, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Min, J.; Zhao, X.; Shi, W.; Xing, G.; Zhu, Z. Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in southeastern China. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tian, H.; Xu, R.; Canadell, J.G.; Thompson, R.L.; Winiwarter, W.; Suntharalingam, P.; Davidson, E.A.; Ciais, P.; Jackson, R.B.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; et al. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature 2020, 586, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, J.H.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, J.L.; Han, W.X.; Zhang, W.F.; Christie, P.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Vitousek, P.M.; Zhang, F.S. Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands. Science 2010, 327, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Homyak, P.M.; Kamiyama, M.; Sickman, J.O.; Schimel, J.P. Acidity and organic matter promote abiotic nitric oxide production in drying soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 1735–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jansen-Willems, A.B.; Lanigan, G.J.; Clough, T.J.; Andresen, L.C.; Müller, C. Long-term elevation of temperature affects organic N turnover and associated N2O emissions in a permanent grassland soil. SOIL 2016, 2, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duan, P.; Zhou, J.; Feng, L.; Jansen-Willems, A.B.; Xiong, Z. Pathways and controls of N2O production in greenhouse vegetable production soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2019, 55, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gödde, M.; Conrad, R. Immediate and adaptational temperature effects on nitric oxide production and nitrous oxide release from nitrification and denitrification in two soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 30, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beeckman, F.; Motte, H.; Beeckman, T. Nitrification in agricultural soils: Impact, actors and mitigation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 50, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hink, L.; Nicol, G.W.; Prosser, J.I. Archaea produce lower yields of N2O than bacteria during aerobic ammonia oxidation in soil. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 4829–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Shen, J.; Du, S.; Han, L.; He, J. Nitrogen fertiliser-induced changes in N2O emissions are attributed more to ammonia-oxidising bacteria rather than archaea as revealed using 1-octyne and acetylene inhibitors in two arable soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2016, 52, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Giguere, A.T.; Taylor, A.E.; Suwa, Y.; Myrold, D.D.; Bottomley, P.J. Uncoupling of ammonia oxidation from nitrite oxidation: Impact upon nitrous oxide production in non-cropped Oregon soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 104, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yao, H.; Campbell, C.D.; Chapman, S.J.; Freitag, T.E.; Nicol, G.W.; Singh, B.K. Multi-factorial drivers of ammonia oxidizer communities: Evidence from a national soil survey. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 2545–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Taylor, A.E.; Zeglin, L.H.; Wanzek, T.A.; Myrold, D.D.; Bottomley, P.J. Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials. ISME J. 2012, 6, 2024–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gubry-Rangin, C.; Novotnik, B.; Mandič-Mulec, I.; Nicol, G.W.; Prosser, J.I. Temperature responses of soil ammonia-oxidising archaea depend on pH. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 106, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szukics, U.; Abell, G.; Hödl, V.; Mitter, B.; Sessitsch, A.; Hackl, E.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrifiers and Denitrifiers Respond Rapidly to Changed Moisture and Increasing Temperature in a Pristine Forest Soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 72, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Taylor, A.E.; Giguere, A.T.; Zoebelein, C.M.; Myrold, D.D.; Bottomley, P.J. Modeling of soil nitrification responses to temperature reveals thermodynamic differences between ammonia-oxidizing activity of archaea and bacteria. ISME J. 2017, 11, 896–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Deng, J.; Wang, L. Assessing impacts of nitrogen management on nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching from greenhouse vegetable systems using a biogeochemical model. Geoderma 2021, 382, 114701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, J.; Shen, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, M.; Di, H. Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2364–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Segal, L.M.; Miller, D.N.; McGhee, R.P.; Loecke, T.D.; Cook, K.L.; Shapiro, C.A.; Drijber, R.A. Bacterial and archaeal ammonia oxidizers respond differently to long-term tillage and fertilizer management at a continuous maize site. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 168, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Han, C.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Q.; Deng, H.; Deng, Y.; Zhong, W. Long-term fertilization effects on active ammonia oxidizers in an acidic upland soil in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duan, P.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, Z. Temperature decouples ammonia and nitrite oxidation in greenhouse vegetable soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 139391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sauder, L.A.; Albertsen, M.; Engel, K.; Schwarz, J.; Nielsen, P.H.; Wagner, M.; Neufeld, J.D. Cultivation and characterization of Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus exaquare, an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon from a municipal wastewater treatment system. ISME J. 2017, 11, 1142–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taylor, A.E.; Vajrala, N.; Giguere, A.T.; Gitelman, A.I.; Arp, D.J.; Myrold, D.D.; Sayavedra-Soto, L.; Bottomley, P.J. Use of Aliphaticn-Alkynes to discriminate soil nitrification activities of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 6544–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, C.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Li, N.; Li, W.; Wang, Q.; Duan, P.; Chen, M. Residual effects of four-year amendments of organic material on N2O production driven by ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in a tropical vegetable soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 781, 146746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Duan, P.; Wu, Z.; Xiong, Z. Aged biochar stimulated ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria-derived N2O and NO production in an acidic vegetable soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 687, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Y.; Li, B.; Xiong, Z. Biochar amendment reduced greenhouse gas intensities in the rice-wheat rotation system: Six-year field observation and meta-analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 278, 107625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Y.; Xu, X.; Xiong, Z. Microbial explanations for field-aged biochar mitigating greenhouse gas emissions during a rice-growing season. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31307–31317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harter, J.; Krause, H.; Schuettler, S.; Ruser, R.; Fromme, M.; Scholten, T.; Kappler, A.; Behrens, S. Linking N2O emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of the N-cycling microbial community. ISME J. 2014, 8, 660–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, J.; Sang, C.; Yang, J.; Qu, L.; Xia, Z.; Hao, S.; Jiang, P.; Wang, X.; He, H.; Wang, C. Stoichiometric imbalance and microbial community regulate microbial elements use efficiencies under nitrogen addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 156, 108207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zou, W.; Lang, M.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Chen, X. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria rather than ammonia-oxidizing archaea dominate nitrification in a nitrogen-fertilized calcareous soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 811, 151402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, H.; Xu, Z.; He, J. Chapter six–Ammonia-oxidizing archaea play a predominant role in acid soil nitrification. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; Volume 125, pp. 261–302. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ouyang, Y.; Norton, J.M.; Stark, J.M. Ammonium availability and temperature control contributions of ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrification in an agricultural soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 113, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cayuela, M.L.; van Zwieten, L.; Singh, B.P.; Jeffery, S.; Roig, A.; Sánchez-Monedero, M.A. Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 191, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.; Hu, S.; Chen, J.; Müller, K.; Li, Y.; Fu, W.; Lin, Z.; Wang, H. Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions: A review. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 546–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, J.; Ling, N.; Chen, H.; Zhu, C.; Kong, Y.; Wang, M.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Distinct drivers of activity, abundance, diversity and composition of ammonia-oxidizers: Evidence from a long-term field experiment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, H.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Yao, H.; Su, J.; Zhu, Y. Biochar impacts soil microbial community composition and nitrogen cycling in an acidic soil planted with rape. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9391–9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meinhardt, K.A.; Stopnisek, N.; Pannu, M.W.; Strand, S.E.; Fransen, S.C.; Casciotti, K.L.; Stahl, D.A. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are the primary N2O producers in an ammonia-oxidizing archaea dominated alkaline agricultural soil. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 2195–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Hwarari, D.; Yang, Y.; Huo, A.; Wang, J.; Yang, L. Biochar-induced mitigation potential of greenhouse gas emissions was enhanced under high soil nitrogen availability in intensively-irrigated vegetable cropping systems. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, Z.; Wang, J.; Xu, P.; Sun, Z.; Ji, C.; Li, S.; Wu, S.; Liu, S.; Zou, J. Greater nitrous and nitric oxide emissions from the soil between rows than under the canopy in subtropical tea plantations. Geoderma 2021, 398, 115105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temporal dynamics of soil N2O fluxes by different inhibitors’ amendments at different soil sites over a 21-day incubation. Means and standard deviations of triplicate microcosms are plotted.
Figure 1. Temporal dynamics of soil N2O fluxes by different inhibitors’ amendments at different soil sites over a 21-day incubation. Means and standard deviations of triplicate microcosms are plotted.
Agronomy 13 02420 g001
Figure 2. The contributions of AOA and AOB to the total N2O production over a 21-day incubation. Different lowercase letters within the bars indicate significant differences among different soil sites at level of p < 0.05.
Figure 2. The contributions of AOA and AOB to the total N2O production over a 21-day incubation. Different lowercase letters within the bars indicate significant differences among different soil sites at level of p < 0.05.
Agronomy 13 02420 g002
Figure 3. The log10-transformed gene numbers for AOA-amoA and AOB-amoA at different soil sites. Bars indicate the standard deviation (mean ± SD; n = 3). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among different inhibitors’ amendments at the same site at level of p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The log10-transformed gene numbers for AOA-amoA and AOB-amoA at different soil sites. Bars indicate the standard deviation (mean ± SD; n = 3). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences among different inhibitors’ amendments at the same site at level of p < 0.05.
Agronomy 13 02420 g003
Figure 4. The relationship between AOA-driven and AOB-driven N2O emissions with soil pH (a,b), C/N ratio (c,d), NH4+-N (e,f), and NO3-N (g,h) across five field sites. The dark and light red areas represent confidence and prediction intervals at the 95% confidence level, respectively.
Figure 4. The relationship between AOA-driven and AOB-driven N2O emissions with soil pH (a,b), C/N ratio (c,d), NH4+-N (e,f), and NO3-N (g,h) across five field sites. The dark and light red areas represent confidence and prediction intervals at the 95% confidence level, respectively.
Agronomy 13 02420 g004
Table 1. Properties of greenhouse vegetable soils across five different sites.
Table 1. Properties of greenhouse vegetable soils across five different sites.
SitesSand (%)Silt (%)Clay (%)SOC
(g kg−1)
TN
(g kg−1)
C/N RatioNH4+-N
(mg kg−1)
NO3-N
(mg kg−1)
pH
(1:5)
AnHui20.442.836.816.60 ± 2.36 b0.97 ± 0.12 c17.08 ± 0.90 a40.56 ± 3.74 b60.84 ± 2.27 c6.91 ± 0.12 d
JiangSu43.840.915.321.95 ± 0.44 a1.83 ± 0.12 a12.00 ± 0.16 b66.83 ± 4.99 a122.79 ± 4.62 a7.43 ± 0.02 c
JiangXi22.637.240.27.51 ± 0.07 c0.53 ± 0.03 d14.23 ± 0.84 b13.66 ± 1.70 c11.26 ± 1.63 d4.89 ± 0.05 e
HuBei42.334.123.69.11 ± 0.23 c0.67 ± 0.07 d13.78 ± 1.80 b35.67 ± 8.50 a56.52 ± 3.98 b8.23 ± 0.01 a
HuNan24.251.528.320.61 ± 0.06 a1.56 ± 0.09 b13.24 ± 0.84 b64.69 ± 2.19 b85.47 ± 3.69 c7.84 ± 0.02 b
The data shown are the means ± standard errors of three replicates. Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences among sites. SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, J.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, C.; Xiong, Z. Contributions of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria to Nitrous Oxide Production in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Fields. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2420. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092420

AMA Style

Dong Y, Xu X, Zhang J, Jiao Y, Wang B, Wang C, Xiong Z. Contributions of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria to Nitrous Oxide Production in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Fields. Agronomy. 2023; 13(9):2420. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yubing, Xintong Xu, Junqian Zhang, Ying Jiao, Bingxue Wang, Chenyuan Wang, and Zhengqin Xiong. 2023. "Contributions of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria to Nitrous Oxide Production in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Fields" Agronomy 13, no. 9: 2420. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop