Next Article in Journal
Influence of Shaped Hole and Seed Disturbance on the Precision of Bunch Planting with the Double-Hole Rice Vacuum Seed Meter
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Soil Pesticide Residue Detection Using an Electronic Nose Based on Hybrid Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/agronomy14040767
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Magnesium on the Growth, Physiology and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Plants under Acid Stress

by
Xinhang Lv
1,
Haimin Kong
2,
Yubo Luo
1,
Dubin Dong
1,
Wenbin Liu
1,
Dongtao Wu
3,
Zhengqian Ye
1,
Jiawei Ma
4,* and
Dan Liu
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Soil Contamination Bioremediation of Zhejiang Province, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
Cultivated Land Quality and Fertilizer Administration of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310016, China
3
Lishui Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Lishui 323000, China
4
College of Tea Science and Tea Culture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(4), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040767
Submission received: 14 March 2024 / Revised: 31 March 2024 / Accepted: 6 April 2024 / Published: 8 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant-Crop Biology and Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Magnesium plays a crucial role in plant physiological processes. However, the specific mechanisms underlying the response of tea plants to altered magnesium nutrition under acid stress remain unclear. This study investigates how root environment acidification impacts tea seedlings and the role of magnesium (Mg) in mitigating these effects. We examine varying pH and Mg levels’ influence on tea seedlings’ resistance to abiotic stress, focusing on antioxidant capacity and nutritional content. In a hydroponic experiment, we varied root pH (3.5, 5.0, 6.5) and Mg concentrations (0.01, 0.4, 0.8 mM), assessing parameters like antioxidant capacity, peroxidative damage, and nutritional content at 1, 7, 15, and 30 days post treatment. Root environment acidification and Mg deficiency worsened peroxidative damage in tea plant leaves and roots. Increased Mg supplementation enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, reducing malondialdehyde and mitigating oxidative damage from root environment acid stress. Under acid stress, 0.8 mM Mg significantly increased tea leaf polyphenols, amino acids, and water-soluble extracts. Mg notably boosted chlorophyll content, surpassing lower Mg levels at pH 5. Additionally, Mg reversed root vitality inhibition induced by acid stress, leading to increased nitrogen, potassium, and Mg concentrations in leaves, promoting balanced nutrient absorption. Mg supplementation is crucial for enhancing tea plant antioxidant capacity, alleviating growth inhibition from root-environment acid stress, and improving chlorophyll content and root vitality, highlighting Mg’s significance in tea cultivation and broader agricultural practices.

1. Introduction

The tea plant originated from China’s Guizhou Plateau [1] and holds immense cultural significance and health benefits as a traditional beverage [2]. China is the world’s leading tea producer and exporter with a cultivation area of 3.165 million hectares in 2020 constituting 62.1% of global tea production [3].
However, the pursuit of higher tea yields has led to a notable increase in the use of ammonia nitrogen fertilizers in tea gardens [4,5], and the biogeochemical cycling of aluminum in soil and tea plants has further accelerated soil acidification in acidic-rain environments [6,7]. As a consequence, the degree of soil acidification in tea cultivation systems surpasses that observed in other economically significant crop systems. Soil pH levels < 4.0 can significantly hinder tea plant growth and this lowers both the quantity and quality of tea leaf production [8]. Additionally, soil acidification results in the leaching of crucial nutrients such as K, Na, Ca, Mg, and P, which also reduce productivity and tea leaf quality [9,10,11].
Among the nutrients prone to leaching in acidified soils, Mg is one of the necessary elements for plant growth and development and is an essential component of chlorophyll [12]. Most soil Mg is bound within crystal mineral lattices and 90–98% is unavailable for direct plant uptake [13]. Plants can only absorb magnesium ions (Mg2+), although their large size (ionic radius) results in weak associations with root cell walls and negatively charged soil particles, making the magnesium susceptible to leaching in acidic soils [13]. Plant Mg deficiency has become a significant factor inhibiting agricultural production [14].
Previous studies have also demonstrated that Mg deficiency suppresses photosynthesis, leading to carbohydrate accumulation in source leaves, inhibiting root growth, and altering both leaf and root morphologies [15]. The activity of key enzymes in photosynthesis including ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) also decrease under Mg deficiency, resulting in reduced photosynthetic rates [16]. Mg deficiency also leads to a reduction in chlorophyll content, the occurrence of leaf chlorosis, and changes in leaf ultrastructure including chloroplast swelling, deformation and disintegration as well as disruption of thylakoid continuity, resulting in photo-oxidative damage [17,18,19]. These structural changes adversely affect leaf functionality and photosynthetic efficiency. Moreover, Mg deficiency interferes with carbohydrate transport, preventing the effective transport of photosynthetic products to the roots and other non-photosynthetic tissues, thus limiting plant growth and development. Replenishing Mg rapidly enhances the export of sucrose from source leaves to the phloem [20].
Both soil acidification and Mg deficiency present stress factors for plants and increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [21,22]. ROS are toxic by-products of aerobic plant processes including photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration [23] and ROS can react with lipids, proteins and nucleic acids resulting in lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation and genomic mutations, respectively [24]. However, ROS also serve as signaling molecules in plant cells and play vital roles in programmed cell-death regulation and other physiological activities. Under normal conditions, the production and removal of ROS are in dynamic equilibrium [25]. The detrimental effects of excess ROS on cellular metabolism under stress conditions are countered in plants by an antioxidant defense system that minimizes lipid peroxidation of cellular and organelle membranes [21,26,27]. Enzymatic antioxidant systems are integral to this defense system, and under stress conditions cells initially enhance their antioxidant defense system by increasing the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), which acts in the first line of defense from ROS. The activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) also increase under these conditions [15]. SOD catalyzes the breakdown of superoxide anions (O2•−) into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) that is then converted to water and oxygen via CAT and POD, among others [28]. When ROS production exceeds the capacity of the clearance system, the latter cannot provide sufficient protection for the membrane to prevent photo-oxidation. This leads to oxidative stress and a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, which are also used as an indicator of the degree of exposure of the plant to these types of processes.
Soil acidification has become an established reality. Without a focus on plant nutrition, including Mg nutrition, the combination of acid and nutrient stress could result in significant losses in productivity, given that tea plants are predominantly grown in the rainy, acidic soils of southern China, characterized by low cation-exchange capacity and low Mg content. Therefore, we hypothesize that an appropriate concentration of magnesium may alleviate the adverse effects of acid stress on the physiological resilience of tea seedlings and the quality of tea leaves, while magnesium deficiency may exacerbate the impact of acid stress. We investigated the importance of Mg nutrition on the antioxidant response and quality of one-year-old tea seedlings under acid stress conditions, providing theoretical and technical support for the scientific cultivation of tea plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Culture and Mg Treatments

We obtained one-year-old tea seedlings (Longjing 43) from the Tea Seedling Breeding Base located in Fuyang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. These seedlings were propagated through asexual reproduction and were cultivated hydroponically at the Pingshan Experimental Base of Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University (30°15′52″ N, 119°42′54″ E), located in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Prior to cultivation, soil was thoroughly washed from the seedling roots using deionized water as part of a pre-cultivation process. The plants were then placed in black plastic containers (9 L) filled with deionized water for 6 days and the water was then replaced with a 25% aerated nutrient solution. The nutrient solution concentration was gradually increased every 6 days until it reached 100%. The experiments were commenced following a three-week acclimatization period. During the pre-cultivation phase, we adjusted the pH of the nutrient solution daily to 5.0 using 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M H2SO4. The nutrient solution was replaced every three days. Magnesium nutrition was provided using MgSO4. The experiment consisted of nine different treatment levels (refer to Table 1), and for treatments lacking SO42− we supplemented the missing ion with a Na2SO4 solution.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Tea seedlings were separated into roots, stems and leaves at random intervals of 1, 7, 15 and 30 days and the plants were thoroughly rinsed with deionized water to remove soil. Chlorophyll concentrations were measured in fresh leaf samples. Prior to evaluation of quality parameters and the nutrient element content of the tea leaves, fresh samples were blanched at 105 °C for 15 min, then dried in an oven at 60 °C to constant weight. The samples were ground to pass through a 40-mesh sieve and stored for later use. In addition, fresh tea leaf samples were promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at −80 °C.

2.3. Determination of Chlorophyll Concentration and Root Viability

The concentration of chlorophyll in fresh mature leaves was determined using a modified version previously described [29]. In brief, the leaves were washed and dried and primary veins were removed, followed by chopping into small pieces and placement (0.20 g) in a 25 mL volumetric flask. The flask was filled with 95% ethanol and the samples were allowed to steep in the dark until the leaves turned completely white. Absorbance values were measured at 470, 649 and 665 nm and the content of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids was calculated. Each treatment was replicated three times.
To determine root vitality, the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method was used. In brief, a 10 mL beaker was filled with 0.2 g of root tip sample and 5 mL of 4 g·L−1 TTC solution, and 5 mL of phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0, 1/15 mol·L−1) was added. The samples were kept in the dark at 37 °C for 2 h and the reaction was terminated by adding 2 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid. Simultaneously, a control experiment was conducted, wherein sulfuric acid was initially added to the root sample, followed by the addition of other chemicals after 10 min. The procedural steps were consistent with those outlined in the previous experiment. Extract the roots, remove excess moisture, and grind them together with 3–4 mL of ethyl acetate and a small amount of quartz sand in a mortar. Transfer the red extract to a test tube, and wash the residue with a small amount of ethyl acetate two or three times, combining all washings in the test tube. Finally, adjust the total volume to 10 mL with ethyl acetate. After thorough mixing, the absorbance of the extraction solution was measured at 485 nm using the blank sample as a reference. TTC reduction was determined based on the absorbance values using a standard curve constructed using red formazan (1,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium formazan).

2.4. Antioxidant Enzyme and Malondialdehyde Determination

Antioxidant enzyme levels (SOD, POD and CAT) and MDA content were measured as previously described, with slight modifications [30]. In brief, 0.1 g of leaf tissue (excluding the main vein) and root tissue and 3 steel balls were ground, using a mill, into a paste in 2 mL centrifuge tubes containing 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.8 containing 1.0% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,500× g for 20 min at 4 °C and antioxidant enzymes and MDA levels were measured in supernatants as follows (all assays were conducted at temperatures between 2 and 4 °C): SOD activity was measured using the nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT) photochemical reduction method, POD activity utilized the guaiacol method, CAT activity was determined via UV absorbance, and MDA content was measured using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) colorimetric method.

2.5. Nutrient Content Measurements

Tea samples (0.2 g) were digested in 5 mL concentrated HNO3 and 2 mL 30% H2O2 at 180 °C as previously described [31], with slight adjustments. In brief, following digestion, the mineralized samples were transferred to volumetric flasks, diluted to a final volume of 30 mL with ultrapure water and filtered through 0.22 μm filters. The filtrate was used for flame atomic absorption analysis to quantify the Mg content. Dried samples of roots, stems and leaves (0.2 g each) were boiled in concentrated H2SO4-H2O2 until the solution was clear and then diluted with ultrapure water and adjusted to 50 mL. The N content was determined using indophenol blue colorimetry, the K content using flame atomic absorption, and the molybdenum antimony method was used to determine P content.

2.6. Tea Quality Determination

Following the standards of GB/T 8305-2013 [32] “Determination of Water Extracts in Tea”, the differential weighing method was employed to measure water extracts. Referring to GB/T 8312-2013 [33] “Determination of Caffeine in Tea”, the caffeine content was determined using ultraviolet spectrophotometry. According to GB/T 8314-2013 [34] “Determination of Total Free Amino Acids in Tea”, the total free amino acids were quantified using the ninhydrin colorimetric method. The content of tea polyphenols was determined through the iron tartrate colorimetric method.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistical software for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and graphs were generated using Origin 2018 software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA). Significant differences among the data were processed on the basis of one-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Mg Nutrition and pH on Overall Plant Health

We initially examined the effects of Mg supplementation and acidic conditions measured on the growth of our experimental tea seedlings. We tested pH 3.5, 5 and 6.5 with Mg additions of 0.01, 0.4 and 0.8 mM. We found that by 30 days, seedlings exposed to pH 5.0 exhibited the highest fresh weights. These mass increases were also positively correlated with the Mg dose under similar pH conditions. We did not observe any significant distinctions among treatment groups (Table 2). Similarly, seedling dry weights did not significantly differ among the treatment groups, indicating a linkage between pH and Mg (Table 3).
These growth effects of pH and Mg were further examined by measuring the chlorophyll content of the plant leaves. Beginning on day 7, we found a significant difference in chlorophyll a content was observed among the pH groupings, which increased with increasing Mg level. High (H) Mg treatments were similar, and did not significantly differ; they increased by 13.9, 17.2 and 10.3% compared to the M2 treatment. Mg deficiency (L) conditions at pH 3.5 yielded the lowest chlorophyll a content: a decrease of 24.6%. By day 15, Mg treatments H1 and H3 generated chlorophyll a levels significantly lower than for the H2 treatment, but did not significantly differ from the M2 treatment. On day 30, all low Mg treatments (L1, L2, and L3) and the M1 treatment yielded significantly lower chlorophyll a levels than the M2 treatment, with reductions of 26.4, 13.8, 20.6 and 11.2%, respectively. The H2 treatment generated the highest chlorophyll a concentration, which was significantly greater than the M2 treatment, by 22.2% (Figure 1a).
The chlorophyll b content of the experimental plants displayed a pattern similar to that of chlorophyll a. On day 7, the tea seedling leaves subjected to Mg deficiency at a low pH had the lowest chlorophyll b levels, which were significantly lower than for the M2 treatment, with a reduction of 18%. The high Mg treatments H2 and H3 displayed significantly higher chlorophyll b levels versus M2, with increases of 24.3 and 24.2%, respectively. On day 15, H3 and M2 did not significantly differ. At the end of the experiment at day 30, low Mg and pH (except for H1) had significantly lower chlorophyll b levels than the M2 treatment (Figure 1b).
The total chlorophyll levels under Mg deficiency and acid stress (L1) were significantly less than for M2 on days 7, 15 and 30, with reductions of 22.9, 28.8 and 26.6%, respectively. On day 7, all three high Mg treatments (H1, H2, and H3) were significantly higher than M2, with increases of 14.9, 19.1 and 16.5%, respectively. At the end of the experiment, the provision of high Mg nutrition under the same pH conditions mitigated the reduction of total chlorophyll under acid stress. H1 levels were greater than for L1 and M1 by 34.4 and 10.7%; H2 exceeded L2 and M2 by 43.8 and 23.3% and H3 surpassed L3 and M3 by 22 and 3%, respectively. These results indicated that the combination treatment of pH 5.0 and high Mg significantly increased total chlorophyll (Figure 1c). These findings collectively suggest that acid stress is detrimental to the accumulation of total chlorophyll in tea leaf tissues.
Carotenoid content was the lowest under acid stress and Mg-deficient conditions, and on days 7 and 15 the levels were significantly enhanced under high Mg and, in particular, at pH 5. In contrast, by day 30 there were no significant differences in carotenoid content among the various treatment groups (Figure 1d).
Root vitality is another measure of plant health, peaking on day 7 under Mg deficiency but steadily declining thereafter in our experimental groups. By day 30, the pH 5.0 group (series 2) levels were significantly higher than those of the other treatments at the same Mg level. This indicated that a continuous decrease in root environment pH reduces tea seedling root vitality. Furthermore, under the same pH conditions, increasing Mg levels enhanced tea seedling root vitality. In particular, these effects could be ranked as H1 > M1 and L1 with increases of 6.5 and 40.2%; H2 > M2 and L2 with increases of 23.6 and 50.7% and H3 > M3; and L3 with increases of 22.2 and 41.4%, respectively (Figure 1e).

3.2. Mg and pH Effects on Plant Oxidative Stress Indicators

MDA levels are an indicator of prior exposure to oxidative stress conditions. The MDA content in the leaves of our experimental plants significantly increased under Mg deficiency and acid stress (L1). For all treatment groups on days 7, 15 and 30, MDA levels were maximal, at 87.33, 119.90 and 125.86 nmol·g−1, respectively. Particularly on days 15 and 30, L1 plants increased by 144.6 and 169.6%, respectively, compared to the M2 treatment. At low pH, Mg supplementation effectively reduced MDA accumulation in the tea seedling leaves. On day 30, H1 MDA levels were reduced by 64% compared to L1 and by 13.6% compared to M1, while H3 decreased by 88% compared to L3 and by 17.2% compared to M3. Therefore, Mg deficiency led to greater levels of MDA, i.e., L2 > M2 by 82.6% indicating the past exposure of greater levels of oxidative stress (Figure 2a).
The MDA content in the roots indicated that Mg deficiency generated significantly higher levels at pH 5.0 on days 15 and 30, with increases of 131.5 and 174.4%, respectively. Acid stress exacerbated the impact of Mg deficiency, resulting in a 10.8% increase at pH 3.5 and a 6.9% increase at pH 6.5 compared to the pH 5.0 treatment on day 15, and by day 30 these levels were 12 and 7%, respectively. An increase in Mg in the roots significantly alleviated the increase in MDA content under acid stress. In the final phase of the experiment, 0.4 and 0.8 mM Mg under acid stress reduced MDA levels by 33.2 and 35.8%, respectively, compared to the 0.01 mM Mg. Elevated pH conditions further reduced MDA levels, with decreases of 51.6 and 46.2%, respectively (Figure 2b).
Mg levels also correlated with SOD activities in the tea seedling leaves. Under acid stress, high Mg generated significant increases in SOD activity versus all other treatments starting from day 7, and this high activity was maintained for the remainder of the experiments. On day 30, SOD levels were significantly increased, by 60%, versus M2 treatment, which surpassed L2 and H2 by 122 and 9.9%, respectively. Conversely, low Mg did not lead to elevations in SOD activity. By day 30, the low-Mg group reduced SOD activity by 27.2% (Figure 2c).
The SOD activity in the roots of tea seedlings versus M2 treatment displayed significantly higher levels for M1, M3, H1, H2, and H3. These findings indicated that supplying Mg can offset the effects of acid stress. Furthermore, by day 30, Mg deficiency resulted in a significant reduction in SOD activity, by 13.1, 16.4 and 9.43%, compared to the M2 treatment, respectively (Figure 2d).
The POD activity in tea seedling leaves increased to a maximum on day 7, which was followed by a gradual decline. At pH 5.0, the POD activity in tea leaves consistently decreased, although Mg supplementation could enhance POD activity in the leaves (Figure 2e). In contrast, POD root activity under Mg deficiency significantly decreased and by day 30 groups L1, L2 and L3 exhibited reductions of 11.6, 8.1 and 11.1%, respectively, versus M2. Furthermore, POD activity for low-Mg treatments continually decreased over the experimental period and, conversely, Mg addition under acid stress significantly enhanced POD activity, which peaked at 0.8 mM; H1 levels increased by 58.2% compared to M2 and by 44.1% and 12.7% compared to L1 and M1, respectively (Figure 2f).
In tea seedling leaves, CAT activity reached its peak on day 7 day under Mg deficiency (0.01 mM) and gradually declined thereafter. On day 30, leaf CAT reached its minimum and decreased by 31.7, 30.6 and 8.6%, respectively, compared with M2. Therefore, Mg addition could increase CAT activity in tea seedling leaves, and by day 30 the high-Mg, low-pH (H1) treatment possessed CAT levels significantly higher than for the other treatments and 64.1% greater versus M2 (Figure 2g). In the seedling roots, Mg deficiency initially led to an increase and subsequent decrease in CAT activity under acid stress, with a decline in CAT activity over time when at pH 5.0. By day 30, CAT activity in the Mg-deficient tea seedling roots was consistently lower than for M2. Specifically, the L1 and L2 treatments exhibited reductions of 23.9 and 27.5%, respectively. Furthermore, Mg addition had a significant enhancing effect on CAT activity in tea seedling roots, and activity markedly increased as Mg was increased, under similar pH conditions (Figure 2h).

3.3. Effects of Mg Nutrition on Tea Quality under Acid Stress

Tea polyphenols are complex compounds of polyhydroxy phenols found in tea leaves. Under similar Mg concentrations, the polyphenol content in tea leaves was significantly higher at pH 5.0 compared to other treatments. Interestingly, on day 15, the polyphenol content in the L2 treatment was maximal among all periods, exceeding that of the M2 treatment by 18.57%. By day 30, this treatment showed a decrease of 18.97% compared to the M2 treatment, but still remained higher than the other two magnesium-deficient treatment groups. Moreover, at this time, high magnesium concentration correlated with higher polyphenol content, with increases of 8.1%, 9.3%, and 10.4% under acid stress conditions, respectively (Figure 3a).
The total free amino acid content in the tea leaves indicated that, on day 15, Mg deficiency resulted in significantly higher levels for treatments L2 and L3, exceeding those of the M2 treatment by 23.32% and 20.33%, respectively. However, by day 30, Mg deficiency led to significantly lower levels for treatments L1 and L2 compared to the M2 treatment, with reductions of 21.59% and 13.78%, respectively. Moreover, under high Mg levels, acid stress did not decrease the total free amino acid content in tea leaves. Additionally, at this point, an increase in Mg content led to increases at pH 5.0 and 6.5, exceeding those of the M2 treatment by 18.92% and 9.80%, respectively. Conversely, moderate Mg levels resulted in a reduction of total free amino acid content in tea leaves under acid stress, with reductions of 6.77% and 1.74% in acid stress and high pH treatments, respectively, although not significantly (Figure 3b).
Acid stress led to a decrease in tea leaf extractable water and on days 15 and 30, L1, M1 and H1 treatments were significantly lower than M2, with reductions of 23.45, 16.87 and 10.96%, as well as 28.37, 15.67 and 11.96%, respectively. By day 30, increased Mg could enhance the tea leaf extractable water. Specifically, H1 was 18.65% higher than L1, H2 was 22.1% higher than L2, and H3 was 19.4% higher than L3 (Figure 3c).
Caffeine content also varied with our experimental treatments of the seedlings. Starting from day 7, all treatments except for H2 exhibited a significant increase compared to M2. However, on days 15 and 30 the caffeine content decreased continuously under Mg deficiency and acid stress conditions. In addition, on day 30, all three Mg-deficient treatments yielded caffeine levels significantly lower than M2, with reductions of 18.30, 1.35 and 15.52%, while the remaining treatments were significantly higher than M2, with increases of 24.73, 14.65, 23.40, 14.18 and 11.29%, respectively. These data indicated that Mg deficiency and acid stress promoted accumulation of caffeine in the tea plant leaves (Figure 3d).

3.4. Nutrient Accumulation in Tea Leaves

The influence of root zone pH and Mg on plant nitrogen content indicated that by day 30, under equivalent Mg concentrations, N levels decreased with increasing pH. Under Mg deficiency, acid stress increased the N content by 9.6 and 13.4% compared to the other two groups. At Mg level of 0.4 mM, the increase was 3.3 and 5.5% and at 0.8 mM, the increases were 4.7 and 5.1%, respectively. Additionally, under Mg-deficient conditions, the N content in tea leaves was significantly lower than in the other treatments. At pH 5, the N content for M1, M2 and M3 were 3.6, 4.3 and 4.4%, respectively (Figure 4a).
The P content in leaves was also significantly increased as the Mg levels were increased, although at 0.8 mM Mg, P levels decreased with time. On day 30, Mg deficiency without acid stress (L2 and L3) and high-pH treatments under normal Mg conditions (M3 and H3) facilitated the accumulation of P, which increased by 14.1, 14, 6.5 and 10.9%, respectively, compared to M2. Furthermore, under conditions of equivalent Mg, acid stress had a detrimental impact on the accumulation of P in the leaves (Figure 4b). In contrast, K levels did not vary for any of the experimental treatments (Figure 4c).
Mg is a necessary element for photosynthesis and is an essential component of chlorophyll. For our experimental treatments, tea leaf Mg significantly increased as Mg and pH levels in the root environment increased. On days 7, 15 and 30, leaf Mg content increased with Mg and, concurrently, pH also significantly affected leaf Mg levels. On day 15, under Mg deficiency, an increase in pH led to a significant enhancement in leaf Mg level, with the M3 treatment exhibiting a 9.92% increase compared to M1 and a 6% increase compared to M2. The H3 treatment displayed an 8.7% increase compared to H1 and a 6.2% increase compared to H2. The trends in leaf Mg content on days 7 and 30 followed a similar pattern (Figure 4d). In summary, the Mg content in tea leaves significantly increased with the rise of supplemented Mg and pH.

4. Discussion

4.1. Chlorophyll and Root Vitality in Tea Seedlings

Mg is an essential nutrient in plant life processes and is present in the octahedral chlorophyll structure and acts as a regulator of chlorophyll synthesis [35]. In our study, we observed an increase in chlorophyll content that positively correlated with Mg concentration, while acid stress led to a decrease. Notably, Mg deficiency generated a significant reduction in chlorophyll content within 30 days, indicating that the two are tightly linked, as previously reported [29]. In agricultural practice, reduced chlorophyll content results in interveinal chlorosis in mature plant leaves [36], although our experimental plants displayed no significant chlorosis at any time.
Root vitality is a critical physiological indicator, reflecting a plant’s ability to withstand adverse environmental stress, and directly affects its growth status [37,38,39,40]. Previous studies have shown that under hydroponic conditions, Mimosa pudica root vitality is closely linked to pH level in the root environment [41]. Consistent with this, our experiments revealed that Mg deficiency significantly inhibited root viability [42] and higher Mg (0.8 mM) enhanced the root vitality of our tea seedlings. Furthermore, we found that short-term (7 days) magnesium deficiency may prompt roots to increase metabolic activity to cope with external stressors, counteracting magnesium deficiency. This response can enhance root vitality, in the short term, to rapidly adapt to new environments. However, prolonged exposure to magnesium deficiency can lead to accumulated cellular damage, subsequently reducing root vitality.

4.2. Oxidative Stress

Numerous environmental stressors can produce ROS in plants and this is a major contributor to significant crop productivity losses [43]. ROS can impact numerous cellular functions through mechanisms including nucleic acid damage, protein oxidation and membrane lipid peroxidation [44]. The effective removal of ROS generated under various environmental stress conditions relies on the action of several non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants present in plant tissues [21]. Among these, the antioxidant enzyme system plays a significant role in the removal of ROS in plants and includes antioxidant enzymes and cell protective enzymes. We found that POD, SOD and CAT activities were induced in the leaves and roots of tea seedlings under Mg deficiency and acid stress. Prolonged Mg deficiency also resulted in reduced antioxidant enzyme activities and this has been previously reported [15,45,46,47]. For example, Mg deficiency leads to a widespread suppression of the antioxidant defense system, accompanied by an increase in ROS. Therefore, under conditions of moderate Mg deficiency, the antioxidant defense system is generally inhibited [47]. In our research, we observed an initial increase and subsequent decrease in the activities of POD and CAT in both tea seedling leaves and roots under Mg deficiency and acid stress at 7 days. The decrease in CAT activity may be a reflection of the reduced Rubisco activity in response to Mg deficiency, leading to a reduced rate of photorespiration [48]. Additionally, our study indicated that increases in Mg supplementation also led to higher antioxidant enzyme activities. Enhancing the Mg supply to maize plants has been shown to increase their antioxidant capacity and promote expression of SOD, CAT and POD [49]. This suggests that Mg applications can be beneficial under acid stress, thereby improving the plants’ ability to eliminate ROS, stabilize leaf growth and enhance their adaptability to adverse rhizospheric acid environments.
When the production of ROS exceeds the clearance capacity of the antioxidant metabolic system, it fails to provide adequate protection for membrane lipids, resulting in a significant increase in the levels of MDA, a toxic metabolic byproduct of lipid peroxidation [15]. This type of elevation is thus a marker of oxidative stress exposure [50]. In our study, we found that long-term acid stress and Mg deficiency significantly increased the MDA content in tea seedling leaves and roots. This, coupled with the corresponding low antioxidant enzyme activities, indicates a notable decrease in the ability of tea seedlings to eliminate ROS under these conditions. This suggests that the rate of ROS production may exceed the cell’s clearance capacity. Moreover, our findings revealed a significant reduction in MDA content with increasing Mg supplementation. This has been previously reported for Mg-deficient corn [51], rice [52] and Citrus grandis and Citrus sinensis [53] leaves. Adequate Mg application can mitigate damage to cell membranes, improving the ability to withstand environmental stressors.

4.3. Tea Quality and Nutrient Uptake in Tea Seedlings

Tea polyphenols, free amino acids and caffeine are three essential chemical components of tea leaves, which to a certain extent determine the quality of tea. In our study, the content of tea polyphenols, free amino acids and caffeine exhibited a brief increase within the first 15 days under Mg deficiency but subsequently decreased significantly by day 30. Furthermore, this decrease could be counteracted by increasing Mg levels and prevented the decrease in tea polyphenol and free amino acid content under acid stress. This indicates that an appropriate Mg dosage supports the maintenance of tea leaf quality under acid stress. However, it is worth noting that some studies have suggested that tea plantations with soil pH levels > 6.0 may not require Mg fertilization. Interestingly, caffeine content significantly increased under prolonged acid stress, with increased Mg concentration in the nutrient solution. Field experiments have also indicated that Mg fertilization substantially increased caffeine content in black, oolong and green teas [54].
The content of tea leaf water extract is regarded as a crucial quality indicator. It reflects the abundance of soluble substances in tea leaves, influencing the tea’s taste profile in terms of thickness, strength and richness, and these have a decisive impact on tea quality [55,56]. Generally, higher water-extract content results in a more robust tea flavor [57]. Our research found that both Mg deficiency and acid stress significantly reduced the content of tea leaf water extract. Interestingly, we observed that an increase in Mg relatively enhanced the content of tea leaf water extract. This implied that Mg supplementation can stabilize and even improve the water extract content of tea leaves in the root zone environment under acid stress.
Nutrient deficiency in plants can lead to an imbalance in ion metabolism and inhibit plant growth [58]. Our study indicated that N, P and Mg in tea leaves increased as Mg levels were increased. Some nutrient elements in tea leaves have been found to decrease under Mg, due to reduced transport of photosynthetic products to the roots, but also to increase the lignification of transport tissues in roots and stems [59]. This contributes to a reduced nutrient-absorption capacity that can further alter nutrient uptake. The experiment revealed that acidic conditions are more conducive to nitrogen accumulation in tea leaves. This may be attributed to the fact that nitrogen metabolism in tea plants typically undergoes corresponding changes under different pH conditions, whereby excessive acidification of the root environment may increase the plant’s demand for nitrogen. For instance, acidic conditions may induce plants to produce more nitrogen metabolism-related products such as amino acids and proteins to cope with environmental stressors. The specific mechanism underlying this phenomenon still requires further investigation. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that Mg supplementation can increase the accumulation of N, P and Mg in tea leaves.
Interestingly, Mg deficiency without acid stress generated P levels in leaves that were significantly higher than that for the M2 treatment. This suggests that under these conditions, tea plants may promote P uptake and transport, possibly due to Mg deficiency, altering the ion balance and leading to changes in ion distribution [19]. During adverse environmental stress, ion metabolism in plants is disrupted and adversely affects normal metabolism. Acid stress can markedly inhibit root growth and even lead to root-tip cell death [60]. Our study results indicated that low-pH environments were not conducive to the accumulation of P, N and Mg in tea leaves and that increased pH facilitated Mg absorption, while N absorption tends to favor a low-pH root zone environment.

5. Conclusions

Mg, as a crucial nutrient element in agricultural soils, appears to be relatively overlooked, especially within the context of tea plantation systems. Given that tea plantation soils are often acidic with low cation-exchange capacity and Mg content, special consideration must be given to Mg supplementation. In these experiments we found that Mg deficiency negatively affected antioxidant capacity, tea quality, chlorophyll content and root vitality when tea seedlings were exposed to acid stress. The provision of Mg nutrition significantly improved the physiological status and quality of tea seedlings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and J.M.; methodology, X.L. and Y.L.; software, X.L. and Y.L.; validation, D.L., W.L. and H.K.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, D.W.; resources, D.L. and Z.Y.; data curation, D.L. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, X.L., J.M. and D.D.; visualization, X.L.; supervision, D.L. and J.M.; project administration, J.M.; funding acquisition, D.L., J.M. and Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371543), the Key Research and Development Project of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2022C02022), and Zhejiang High-level Talents Special Support Program (2020R52026).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.; Li, H.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; Xue, H.; Niu, Y. Rates of soil acidification in tea plantations and possible causes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 233, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ye, J.-H.; Ye, Y.; Yin, J.-F.; Jin, J.; Liang, Y.-R.; Liu, R.-Y.; Tang, P.; Xu, Y.-Q. Bitterness and astringency of tea leaves and products: Formation mechanism and reducing strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, W.; Lou, N.; Xie, D.; Hu, Z.; Song, H.; Lu, M.; Shang, D.; Wu, W.; Peng, J.; Yin, P.; et al. N-Ethyl-2-Pyrrolidinone-Substituted Flavan-3-Ols with Anti-inflammatory Activity in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages Are Storage-Related Marker Compounds for Green Tea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12164–12172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Peng, Y.; Wenyan, H.; Xin, L.; Liping, Z.; Lan, Z. Present Situation and Analysis of Soil Acidification in Chinese Tea Garden. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2020, 53, 795–801. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Ruan, J.; Ma, L.; Yi, X.; Shi, Y.; Ni, K.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Q. Integrated Nutrient Management in Tea Plantation to Reduce Chemical Fertilizer and Increase Nutrient Use Efficiency. J. Tea Sci. 2020, 40, 85–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Ruan, J.; Wong, M.H. Accumulation of Fluoride and Aluminium Related to Different Varieties of Tea Plant. Environ. Geochem. Health 2001, 23, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, H.; Xu, R.-K.; Wang, N.; Li, X.-H. Soil Acidification of Alfisols as Influenced by Tea Cultivation in Eastern China. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fung, K.F.; Carr, H.P.; Zhang, J.; Wong, M.H. Growth and nutrient uptake of tea under different aluminium concentrations. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1582–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Vries, W.; Posch, M.; Kämäri, J. Simulation of the long-term soil response to acid deposition in various buffer ranges. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1989, 48, 349–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, P.; Wu, L.; Wang, D.; Fu, J.; Shen, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Fan, L.; Wenyan, H. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yang, X.-D.; Ni, K.; Shi, Y.-Z.; Yi, X.-Y.; Zhang, Q.-F.; Fang, L.; Ma, L.-F.; Ruan, J. Effects of long-term nitrogen application on soil acidification and solution chemistry of a tea plantation in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 252, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rajonandraina, T.; Ueda, Y.; Wissuwa, M.; Kirk, G.J.D.; Rakotoson, T.; Manwaring, H.; Andriamananjara, A.; Razafimbelo, T. Magnesium supply alleviates iron toxicity-induced leaf bronzing in rice through exclusion and tissue-tolerance mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1213456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cakmak, I.; Kirkby, E.A. Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 133, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, W.; Nazim, H.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Farhat, N.; Khouni, A.; Zorrig, W.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Rabhi, M. Effects of magnesium deficiency on photosynthesis and carbohydrate partitioning. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andersson, I. Catalysis and regulation in Rubisco. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 1555–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fink, S. Microscopic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Abiotic Injuries to Conifer Needles. In Forest Decline in the Atlantic and Pacific Region; Huettl, R.F., Mueller-Dombois, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; pp. 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  18. Puech, L.; Mehne-Jakobs, B. Histology of magnesium-deficient Norway spruce needles influenced by nitrogen source. Tree Physiol. 1997, 17, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ogura, T.; Kobayashi, N.I.; Hermans, C.; Ichihashi, Y.; Shibata, A.; Shirasu, K.; Aoki, N.; Sugita, R.; Ogawa, T.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Short-Term Magnesium Deficiency Triggers Nutrient Retranslocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hermans, C.; Verbruggen, N. Physiological characterization of Mg deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marutani, Y.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Mizutani, M.; Sugimoto, Y. Damage to photosystem II due to heat stress without light-driven electron flow: Involvement of enhanced introduction of reducing power into thylakoid membranes. Planta 2012, 236, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Queval, G.; Foyer, C.H. Redox regulation of photosynthetic gene expression. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 3475–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Quiles, M.J.C.; López, N.I. Photoinhibition of photosystems I and II induced by exposure to high light intensity during oat plant growth: Effects on the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase complex. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schieber, M.; Chandel Navdeep, S. ROS Function in Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Choudhary, A.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, N. ROS and oxidative burst: Roots in plant development. Plant Divers. 2019, 42, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Candan, N.; Tarhan, L. Relationship among chlorophyll-carotenoid content, antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation levels by Mg2+ deficiency in the Mentha pulegium leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.; Li, Q.H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhang, L.Y.; Zhao, P.L.; Wen, T.; Zhang, J.Q.; Xu, W.L.; Guo, F.; Zhao, H.; et al. Exploring the Effects of Magnesium Deficiency on the Quality Constituents of Hydroponic-Cultivated Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Leaves. J. Agri. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14278–14286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, Q.; Liang, X.; Dong, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X.; Kong, J.; Liu, S. Effects of Exogenous Salicylic Acid and Nitric Oxide on Physiological Characteristics of Perennial Ryegrass Under Cadmium Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Batista dos Santos Espinelli Junior, J.; von Brixen Montzel Duarte da Silva, G.; Branco Bastos, R.; Badiale Furlong, E.; Carapelli, R. Evaluation of the influence of cultivation on the total magnesium concentration and infusion extractability in commercial arabica coffee. Food Chem. 2020, 327, 127012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. GB/T 8305-2013; Tea-Determination of Water Extracts Content. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China:: Beijing, China, 2013.
  33. GB/T 8312-2013; Tea-Determination of Caffeine Content. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
  34. GB/T 8314-2013; Tea-Determination of Free Amino Acids Content. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
  35. Beale, S.I. Enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 1999, 60, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tanoi, K.; Kobayashi, N.I. Leaf Senescence by Magnesium Deficiency. Plants 2015, 4, 756–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, H.F.; Zhu, Y.H.; Sun, H.J. Determination of drought tolerance using root activities in Robinia pseudoacacia ‘Idaho’ transformed with mtl-D gene. For. Ecosyst. 2006, 8, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bhadoria, P.S.; El Dessougi, H.; Liebersbach, H.; Claassen, N. Phosphorus uptake kinetics, size of root system and growth of maize and groundnut in solution culture. Plant Soil 2004, 262, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lv, B.-S.; Li, X.-W.; Ma, H.-Y.; Yang, S.; Wei, L.-X.; Jie, C.-J.; Liang, Z.-W. Differences in Growth and Physiology of Rice in Response to Different Saline-Alkaline Stress Factors. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, J.; Duan, L.; Dong, H. Comparative Effect of Nitrogen Forms on Nitrogen Uptake and Cotton Growth Under Salinity Stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2015, 38, 1530–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Z.X.; Fang, Z. Effects of different pH on the growth and development of Mimosa pudica in hydroponics. J. Cap. Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2008, 29, 43–45. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  42. Deng, N.; Zhu, H.; Xiong, J.; Gong, S.; Xie, K.; Shang, Q.; Yang, X. Magnesium deficiency stress in rice can be alleviated by partial nitrate nutrition supply. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, M.R. Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Functions and Deleterious Effects in Plants. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2014, 34, 1916–1926. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  44. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: Regulation and signalling. New Phytol. 2000, 146, 359–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, F.; Du, P.; Song, C.; Wu, Q.-S. Alleviation of Mycorrhiza to Magnesium Deficiency in Trifoliate Orange: Changes in Physiological Activity. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2015, 27, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rehman, H.u.; Alharby, H.F.; Alzahrani, Y.; Rady, M.M. Magnesium and organic biostimulant integrative application induces physiological and biochemical changes in sunflower plants and its harvested progeny on sandy soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ze, Y.; Yin, S.; Ji, Z.; Luo, L.; Liu, C.; Hong, F. Influences of magnesium deficiency and cerium on antioxidant system of spinach chloroplasts. BioMetals 2009, 22, 941–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tang, N.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.-S. Magnesium deficiency–induced impairment of photosynthesis in leaves of fruiting Citrus reticulata trees accompanied by up-regulation of antioxidant metabolism to avoid photo-oxidative damage. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012, 175, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kong, X.; Peng, Z.; Li, D.; Ma, W.; An, R.; Khan, D.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, E.; He, Y.; et al. Magnesium decreases aluminum accumulation and plays a role in protecting maize from aluminum-induced oxidative stress. Plant Soil 2020, 457, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cakmak, I. Activity of ascorbate-dependent H2O2-scavenging enzymes and leaf chlorosis are enhanced in magnesium- and potassium-deficient leaves, but not in phosphorus-deficient leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar Tewari, R.; Kumar, P.; Tewari, N.; Srivastava, S.; Sharma, P.N. Macronutrient deficiencies and differential antioxidant responses—Influence on the activity and expression of superoxide dismutase in maize. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ding, Y.-C.; Chang, C.-R.; Luo, W.; Wu, Y.-S.; Ren, X.-L.; Wang, P.; Xu, G.-H. High Potassium Aggravates the Oxidative Stress Inducedy by Magnesium Deflciency in Rice Leaves1 1Project supported by the Dead Sea Works Ltd., Israel. Pedosphere 2008, 18, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, G.-H.; Yang, L.-T.; Jiang, H.-X.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, L.-S. Physiological impacts of magnesium-deficiency in Citrus seedlings: Photosynthesis, antioxidant system and carbohydrates. Trees 2012, 26, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jian, R. Status of Mg Availability and the Effects of Mg Application in Tea Fields of Red Soil Area in China. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2002, 35, 815–820. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  55. Penna, E.; Zúñiga, M.; Fuenzalida, R.; López-Planes, R. Caracterización sensorial y química de la calidad de TÉS (Thea sinensis) consumidos en Chile. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 2005, 55, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, P.-A.; Lin, S.-Y.; Liu, C.-F.; Su, Y.-S.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Shiau, J.-H.; Chen, I.-Z. Correlation between nitrogen application to tea flushes and quality of green and black teas. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 181, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, M.; Tang, D.; Gong, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. Quantitative analysis and correlation evaluation on taste quality of green tea. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.) 2014, 40, 670–678. [Google Scholar]
  58. Maillard, A.; Etienne, P.; Diquélou, S.; Trouverie, J.; Billard, V.; Yvin, J.-C.; Ourry, A. Nutrient deficiencies modify the ionomic composition of plant tissues: A focus on cross-talk between molybdenum and other nutrients in Brassica napus. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5631–5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hannaway, D.B.; Bush, L.P.; Leggett, J.E. Mineral composition of kenhy tall fescue as affected by nutrient solution concentrations of Mg and K. J. Plant Nutr. 1982, 5, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Shaff, J.; Ohta, H.; Kochian, L.; Wagatsuma, T.; Kinraide, T.; Koyama, H. Molecular and Physiological Analysis of Al3+ and H+ Rhizotoxicities at Moderately Acidic Conditions. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agronomy 14 00767 g001
Figure 1. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium on tea plant seedlings. (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) chlorophyll b, (c) total chlorophyll, (d) carotenoids, and (e) root vitality. Experimental hydroponics modifications were as follows: series 1–pH 3.5 and Mg, 0.01 (L1), 0.4 (M1) and 0.8 (H1); series 2–pH 5.0 and Mg2+, 0.01 (L2), 0.4 (M2) and 0.8 mM (H2); series 3–pH 6.5 and Mg2+, 0.01 (L3), 0.4 (M3) and 0.8 mM (H3), respectively. FW: Fresh Weight. DW: Dry Weight. Mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Figure 1. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium on tea plant seedlings. (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) chlorophyll b, (c) total chlorophyll, (d) carotenoids, and (e) root vitality. Experimental hydroponics modifications were as follows: series 1–pH 3.5 and Mg, 0.01 (L1), 0.4 (M1) and 0.8 (H1); series 2–pH 5.0 and Mg2+, 0.01 (L2), 0.4 (M2) and 0.8 mM (H2); series 3–pH 6.5 and Mg2+, 0.01 (L3), 0.4 (M3) and 0.8 mM (H3), respectively. FW: Fresh Weight. DW: Dry Weight. Mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Agronomy 14 00767 g001
Agronomy 14 00767 g002
Figure 2. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium on oxidative stress markers in tea plant seedling roots and leaves. MDA content in (a) leaves and (b) roots. SOD activity in (c) leaves and (d) roots. POD activity in (e) leaves and (f) roots. CAT activity in (g) leaves and (h) roots. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium on oxidative stress markers in tea plant seedling roots and leaves. MDA content in (a) leaves and (b) roots. SOD activity in (c) leaves and (d) roots. POD activity in (e) leaves and (f) roots. CAT activity in (g) leaves and (h) roots. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Agronomy 14 00767 g002
Agronomy 14 00767 g003
Figure 3. Effects of altered root zone pH and magnesium supplementation on tea plant physiological markers. (a) Polyphenols, (b) free amino acids, (c) water leachate content and (d) caffeine. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Effects of altered root zone pH and magnesium supplementation on tea plant physiological markers. (a) Polyphenols, (b) free amino acids, (c) water leachate content and (d) caffeine. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Agronomy 14 00767 g003
Agronomy 14 00767 g004
Figure 4. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium supplementation on essential elements in experimental tea seedlings. (a) Nitrogen, (b) phosphorous, (c) potassium and (d) magnesium. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Figure 4. Effects of root zone pH and magnesium supplementation on essential elements in experimental tea seedlings. (a) Nitrogen, (b) phosphorous, (c) potassium and (d) magnesium. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations. Note: different lowercase letters in the figure represent the significance of differences among treatments in the same growth period at the 0.05 level.
Agronomy 14 00767 g004
Table 1. Root zone pH and Mg2+ levels (mM) for experimental tea plants used in this study.
Table 1. Root zone pH and Mg2+ levels (mM) for experimental tea plants used in this study.
pHMg2+ Concentrations (mM)
0.010.40.8
3.5L1M1H1
5.0L2M2H2
6.5L3M3H3
Table 2. Effects of Magnesium Nutrition on Fresh Weight of Tea Seedlings under Acid Stress for the indicated times.
Table 2. Effects of Magnesium Nutrition on Fresh Weight of Tea Seedlings under Acid Stress for the indicated times.
TreatmentFresh Weight (g) *
1 d7 d15 d30 d
L14.533 ± 0.571 a4.500 ± 0.573 a4.477 ± 0.655 a4.453 ± 0.118 a
L24.530 ± 0.656 a4.527 ± 0.792 a4.497 ± 0.865 a4.500 ± 0.866 a
L34.533 ± 0.853 a4.523 ± 0.591 a4.493 ± 0.868 a4.513 ± 0.927 a
M14.513 ± 0.637 a4.527 ± 0.554 a4.517 ± 0.863 a4.510 ± 0.857 a
M24.510 ± 0.997 a4.537 ± 0.486 a4.550 ± 0.631 a4.570 ± 1.003 a
M34.520 ± 0.612 a4.533 ± 0.693 a4.523 ± 0.761 a4.553 ± 0.901 a
H14.530 ± 0.530 a4.534 ± 0.510 a4.543 ± 0.184 a4.610 ± 0.799 a
H24.533 ± 0.156 a4.573 ± 0.162 a4.613 ± 1.073 a4.660 ± 0.802 a
H34.527 ± 0.667 a4.540 ± 0.932 a4.580 ± 0.501 a4.617 ± 0.489 a
* Mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between amendments (p < 0.05). See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Table 3. Effects of Magnesium Nutrition on Dry Weight of Tea Seedlings under Acid Stress for the indicated times.
Table 3. Effects of Magnesium Nutrition on Dry Weight of Tea Seedlings under Acid Stress for the indicated times.
TreatmentDry Weight (g) *
1 d7 d15 d30 d
L11.832 ± 0.059 a1.791 ± 0.070 a1.789 ± 0.147 a1.770 ± 0.095 a
L21.826 ± 0.003 a1.814 ± 0.026 a1.805 ± 0.135 a1.788 ± 0.089 a
L31.831 ± 0.054 a1.800 ± 0.046 a1.799 ± 0.226 a1.796 ± 0.080 a
M11.820 ± 0.099 a1.813 ± 0.176 a1.812 ± 0.215 a1.800 ± 0.074 a
M21.815 ± 0.106 a1.811 ± 0.380 a1.834 ± 0.159 a1.835 ± 0.199 a
M31.821 ± 0.021 a1.809 ± 0.171 a1.819 ± 0.092 a1.822 ± 0.415 a
H11.825 ± 0.100 a1.813 ± 0.242 a1.828 ± 0.155 a1.846 ± 0.204 a
H21.827 ± 0.138 a1.840 ± 0.108 a1.848 ± 0.202 a1.870 ± 0.074 a
H31.825 ± 0.078 a1.818 ± 0.143 a1.836 ± 0.124 a1.852 ± 0.145 a
* Mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between amendments (p < 0.05). See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, X.; Kong, H.; Luo, Y.; Dong, D.; Liu, W.; Wu, D.; Ye, Z.; Ma, J.; Liu, D. The Impact of Magnesium on the Growth, Physiology and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Plants under Acid Stress. Agronomy 2024, 14, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040767

AMA Style

Lv X, Kong H, Luo Y, Dong D, Liu W, Wu D, Ye Z, Ma J, Liu D. The Impact of Magnesium on the Growth, Physiology and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Plants under Acid Stress. Agronomy. 2024; 14(4):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Xinhang, Haimin Kong, Yubo Luo, Dubin Dong, Wenbin Liu, Dongtao Wu, Zhengqian Ye, Jiawei Ma, and Dan Liu. 2024. "The Impact of Magnesium on the Growth, Physiology and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Plants under Acid Stress" Agronomy 14, no. 4: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop