Next Article in Journal
Identification of miRNAs Interacting with Abscisic Acid to Regulate Fatty Acid Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Cover Crops into Soybean Systems in the Southern Great Plains: Impacts on Yield and Yield Components
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Fungicides on Fungal Development, Conidiophore Morphology, and Conidial Releases from Single Strawberry Powdery Mildew Colonies Assessed Using an Electrostatic Technique

1
Laboratory of Phytoprotection, Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara 631-8505, Japan
2
Nara Prefecture Agricultural Research and Development Center, Nara 633-0046, Japan
3
Agricultural Technology and Innovation Research Institute, Kindai University, Nara 631-8505, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1357; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071357
Submission received: 16 May 2024 / Revised: 10 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 23 June 2024

Abstract

:
We evaluated the effects of fungicides on strawberry powdery mildew (PM) fungus, Podosphaera aphanis, using an electrostatic technique. Thirty-six fungicides were sprayed on single colonies of P. aphanis on leaves of strawberry seedlings (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier). Colony development varied depending on the tested fungicides. Particularly, pyraziflumid, triflumizole, triforine, polyoxin, sodium hydrogen carbonate + copper wettable powder, and flutianil + mepanipyrim were highly effective for reducing colony development. P. aphanis colonies were histochemically stained to observe the morphological characteristics of fungal cells forming normal and abnormal conidiophores. Abnormal conidiophores were classified into seven types based on their morphological and cytological characteristics. Finally, asexual conidia were collected from single P. aphanis colonies on the leaves spray-treated with fungicides using a dielectrically polarized insulator plate (electrostatic spore collector); conidia attracted to the insulator plates were counted using a high-fidelity digital microscope. Most tested fungicides highly inhibited the production and/or germination of asexual conidia. The germination of asexual conidia was observed only in thiophanate-methyl (methyl benzimidazole carbamates fungicides; MBC fungicides) and azoxystrobin (quinone outside inhibitors; QoI fungicides). Assessing with the electrostatic technique, we clarified that P. aphanis has developed resistance to both thiophanate-methyl and azoxystrobin. Thus, the methodological assessment analyzing the colony development and the number of conidia released from single colonies will be helpful information for screening effective fungicides.

1. Introduction

Strawberry cultivation is very popular at our prefecture (Nara Prefecture) in Japan. Powdery mildew (PM) caused by Podosphaera aphanis (syn. Sphaerotheca aphanis, S. humuli, S. macularis, and S. macularis f. sp. fragariae) [1,2], an obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen, is one of the most important diseases of strawberry plants (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier) of the Rosaceae family in many countries. PM occurs on the surfaces of epigeal organs, including the leaves, petioles, stolons, fruits, receptacles, runners, and flowers [3,4,5,6,7]. A severe outbreak of PM can significantly reduce strawberry fruit productivity [6,7,8,9,10]. Regarding the pathogenicity of P. aphanis, some have reported the sporulation of PM isolates on the leaves of commercial strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) [3,4,11,12,13]. The ability of strawberry PM isolates to infect other plant species including Fragaria vesca L. (wild strawberry) and Potentilla hebiichigo (syn. Duchesnea chrysantha Miq.) (false strawberry) has been confirmed. Wild strawberry (F. vesca L.) is susceptible to the isolates described by Abiko [11] and Iwasaki et al. [14] but is resistant to the isolate studied by Peries [3], perhaps reflecting the existence of different pathotypes among strawberry PM isolates. Thus, the host range of strawberry PM fungi is very narrow, as described previously [11,13,14].
Chemical methods are commonly used in Japan and elsewhere to control strawberry PM diseases [15,16,17,18]. Strawberry PMs can be controlled using fungicides that target fungal respiration, nucleic acid synthesis, sterol biosynthesis, and signal transduction [19]. Notably, controlling PM in the fruit is more difficult than in the leaves. As such, fungicide application during early flowering period is important to efficiently control strawberry PM. During this period, protectant (sulfur) or systemic fungicides (myclobutanil and triflumizole) are mainly used [20,21]. However, previous studies have reported the resistance of strawberry PM to commercial fungicides, such as demethylation inhibitors (DMIs), including piperazines (triforine), pyrimidines (fenarimol and nuarimol), and triazoles (bitertanol, myclobutanil, penconazole, triadimefon, and triadimenol) [19,22,23,24]. In the current study, we examined the effects of commercial fungicides on the developments of P. aphanis Japanese isolate ex Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier, cv. Sagahonoka.
Asexual conidia of P. aphanis on conidiophores are an infection source for the host plants; PM dissemination over a wide area from conidiophores occurs under natural conditions [25,26,27]. Matsuda et al. [28] previously described that asexual conidia that enter into an electric field are attracted to polarized dipole insulators and can become trapped by them. This electrostatic technique has been successfully applied to collect asexual progeny conidia from living single PM colonies (i.e., barley, melon, strawberry, or tomato PM Japanese isolates) without harming or damaging the PM conidia [29]. For example, using the electrostatic technique, one research group was able to clarify that the strawberry PM Japanese isolate releases an average of 6.7 × 104 conidia from each of the single colonies over approximately 816 h during the fungal lifetime [29]. In a second experiment, our group counted the number of asexual conidia released from single PM colonies on strawberry plants spray-treated with commercial fungicides by combining digital microscopic and electrostatic techniques, and then examined the morphological characteristics of the conidiophores in the single PM colonies. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first study to assess the fungicide effects of PM fungi by quantitatively analyzing the conidia released from single strawberry PM colonies, spray-treated with individual different fungicides, on the leaves of living host seedlings. This scientific information is important for better understanding the ecological mechanisms of conidial releases from conidiophores in the strawberry production field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Cultivation

The seeds of strawberry (S1 progeny from Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne cv. Sagahonoka) were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C for 7 days. The dormant seeds were placed on wet filter paper inside Petri dishes. The seeds germinated for 14–16 days in an incubation room, under conditions controlled at 22 ± 1 °C, 60–70% relative humidity (RH), and continuous illumination of 59.5 μmoL m−2 s−1 under a 14 h photoperiod. Cotyledonal seedlings were placed on polyurethane cubic sponge supports (3 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm). The sponge supports with cotyledonal seedlings were inserted into 30 mL cylindrical plastic containers (diameter: 3 cm; length: 5 cm) containing 20 mL liquid fertilizer (Kyowa, Osaka, Japan). The seedlings were incubated for 60 days at 22 ± 1 °C, 60–70% RH, illumination of 210–260 µmoL m−2 s−1, and photoperiods of 14 h light/10 h dark, as described by Iwasaki et al. [14]. Light intensity was measured using an LI-250A light meter (LI-COR, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a quantum sensor that measures photosynthetically active radiation (400–700 nm).
Sixty-day-old healthy seedlings were transferred to a polystyrene plate (61.5 cm × 60.5 cm × 3.0 cm) floating in hydroponic solution in a hydroponic culture trough (67.0 cm × 65.5 cm × 21.0 cm) (Home Hyponica 303; Kyowa) of a cultivating table (100 cm high) that was installed in a pathogen-free greenhouse (10.0 m × 6.0 m; 22 ± 1 °C) [28]. The seedlings were used for maintaining strawberry PM Japanese isolates and spray-treating single strawberry PM colonies on the leaves with fungicides.

2.2. Fungal Materials, Inoculation, and Incubation

After isolation of a single conidium from the PM-infected strawberry leaves (cv. Sagahonoka) and multiplication of the fungal mycelia on PM-free strawberry leaves, Iwasaki et al. [14] identified the PM Japanese isolate based on the morphological characteristics of domestic and foreign isolates described previously [2,30,31] and through genetic analysis of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (rDNA-ITS) sequences [32], and then designated the Japanese isolate Podosphaera aphanis (Wallroth) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu var. aphanis KSP-7N. Mature conidia were collected from conidiophores on KSP-7N-infected strawberry leaves using a pencil-type electrostatic insulator probe. The insulator probe, consisting of an ebonite rod with a pointed tip (length: 7 cm; diameter: 4 mm; pointed tip diameter: 5 μm), was mounted on a micromanipulator placed near a KH-2700 high-fidelity digital microscope (KH-2700 DM; Hirox, Tokyo, Japan) [14]. The insulator probe was negatively charged by a direct-current HVA 10K202NA electrostatic voltage generator (Logy Electric, Tokyo, Japan). The conidia were inoculated onto well-developed young true leaves of three 60-day-old healthy strawberry seedlings, as described previously [14]. The isolate was maintained on potted strawberry plants for 14 days after inoculation of conidia in a greenhouse (10.0 m × 6.0 m) or in an LH-240N growth chamber (Nippon Medical and Chemical Instruments, Osaka, Japan) at 22 ± 1 °C.

2.3. Fungicide Testing

Thirty-six commercial fungicides were used to examine the effects of the fungicides on developments and conidial releases of P. aphanis (Table 1). All test fungicides were purchased from agrochemical manufacturers in Japan. The fungicides were diluted based on the manufacturer’s instructions. The leaves of 60-day-old strawberry seedlings were inoculated with single P. aphanis conidia using the insulator probe described. Single 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies (fungal fleck) on the leaves, as shown in Figure 1A, were spray-treated with the solution of adjusted fungicides, and then incubated for 3 days in a greenhouse at 22 ± 1 °C, 50–70% RH, under illumination of 190.6 to 400.4 µmol m−2 s−1 during the daytime hours. Each spray treatment with a fungicide involved five test plants. Fungal development on strawberry leaves and conidiophores, as shown in Figure 1B, was observed with a digital microscope. In addition, five fungal colonies on strawberry seedlings spray-treated with tap water served as controls.

2.4. Electrostatic Spore Collector

An electrostatic spore collector, a conductor plate (aluminum, 60 mm × 30 mm) between two insulator plates (polyethylene terephthalate, 80 mm × 50 mm), was used to collect all asexual conidia released from a single colony (Figure 2). The conductor (aluminum) plate was connected to an electric line from an HVA 10K202NA electrostatic voltage generator (Logy Electric). Electric current was supplied from the voltage generator to the aluminum plate. The outer surface of the insulator plate was negatively polarized by the current from the voltage generator. The transparent insulator plate (collector plate), charged with static electricity of 5.2 × 10−1 nC (nanocoulombs), was placed approximately 2 cm from the single P. aphanis colony on a strawberry leaf to collect the asexual conidia released, as mentioned previously [33]. An electrostatic field was produced by the negative charge on the outer surface of the electrified insulator plate (negatively charged on the conidium-collection side), thus creating an attractive force for trapping asexual conidia that entered into the field. Asexual conidia from normal P. aphanis conidiophores were collected on the collector plate by the electrostatic attraction.

2.5. Microscopic Observation of Single Conidiophores and Colonies Spray-Treated with Fungicides

Conidia of P. aphanis from the greenhouse were inoculated onto true leaves of 60-day-old strawberry seedlings and then incubated for 7 days under greenhouse conditions. The 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies were spray-treated with each fungicide. Three days later, conidiophores in colonies were observed using a KH-2700 DM and a BX-60 light microscope (BX-60 LM; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). At first, the conidiophores were photographed using the ½-inch Interline transfer charge-coupled device (CCD) camera of the KH-2700 DM. Photographs were processed using an image-processing software of Adobe Photoshop version 5 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA). After the asexual conidia from single colonies spray-treated with each fungicide were electrostatically collected as mentioned above, leaf segments (size: approximately 2 cm × 2 cm) were cut from the KSP-7N-infected strawberry seedlings. The leaf segments were fixed, and then, their color was removed by boiling in an alcoholic lactophenol solution including 10 mL glycerol, 10 mL phenol, 10 mL lactic acid, 10 mL distilled water, and 40 mL 99.8% ethanol for 1 to 2 min. Then, the leaves were stained histochemically using 0.1% Aniline Blue (Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan) dissolved in distilled water, as described previously [29]. Subsequently, the stained P. aphanis colonies were observed under a BX-60 LM and then photographed with a digital camera (EOS KISSX6i; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on the light microscope. The total number of normal and abnormal conidiophores in the five individual 10-day-old colonies from each leaf was calculated. Mycelial areas were calculated using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD) of five replicates.

2.6. Number and Germination Rates of Asexual Conidia Collected Electrostatically from Single Colonies Spray-Treated with Fungicides

Asexual conidia on each strawberry leaf, which was attached to the plants, were electrostatically collected from individual single colonies 3 days after the application of fungicides with the insulator plate, as described above. They were counted with the KH-2700 DM system and calculated at one replication for a single colony. Data are presented as the mean and SD of five replicates (for each fungicide). After collection, the insulator plates were placed in a humid box (RH, 95–99%) and incubated at 22 ± 1 °C for 24 h. The number of conidia germinated was counted with the KH-2700 DM, and the germination rates were determined. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five replicates (for each fungicide). In addition, to test the infectivity of conidia into host leaves, the asexual conidia trapped on the electrostatic insulator plate from single thiophanate-methyl-spray-treated colonies were inoculated onto leaf epidermal cells of healthy 60-day-old strawberry seedlings, spray-treated with the same fungicides in advance, and then incubated under growth chamber conditions. The development of the colonies was observed using the KH-2700 DM and BX-60 LM systems.

2.7. Statistical Analysis with Tukey’s Test

Tukey’s test was performed using the EZR software version 1.54 (Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) to identify significant differences among (1) colony areas, (2) the number of normal conidiophores in 10-day-old single colonies, (3) the number of asexual conidia collected from single colonies spray-treated with each fungicide, and (4) the conidial germination rates.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Fungicides on the Development of P. aphanis Colonies

Colony areas of P. aphanis isolate were measured 3 days after spray treatments with tap water or individual fungicides (Table 2). The areas of colonies spray-treated with pyraziflumid (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors; SDHIs) were much smaller, whereas those spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl (methyl benzimidazole carbamates fungicides; MBC fungicides) were only a little smaller compared to those treated with the tap water (Table 2). Statistically, the six fungicides that included the active ingredients of pyraziflumid, triflumizole, triforine, polyoxin, sodium hydrogen carbonate and copper wettable powder and both flutianil and mepanipyrim highly inhibited P. aphanis colony development. On the other hand, polyglycerol fatty acid ester did not completely inhibit colony development, and kresoxim-methyl and decanoyl octanoyl glycerol provided only moderate inhibition (Table 2).

3.2. Effects of Fungicides on Morphology of P. aphanis Conidiophores

Figure 3 shows the development of single P. aphanis colonies (7-day-old) spray-treated with tap water as a control and with pyraziflumid (SDHI) and thiophanate-methyl (MBC fungicides). Untreated P. aphanis conidiophores that formed in the colonies were concatenated. The morphology of P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl (C) was clearly different from that spray-treated with pyraziflumid (B), while similar to that spray-treated with tap water (A). In addition, almost all P. aphanis conidiophores treated with tap water (D) and most of those treated with thiophanate-methyl (F) were normal, while almost all those treated with pyraziflumid (E) were abnormal (disruptive). The number of normal conidiophores in a single colony spray-treated with fungicides that included active ingredients such as pyraziflumid significantly decreased compared to those treated with tap water (Table 3). Those spray-treated with fungicides containing thiophanate-methyl showed higher numbers than those treated with the other tested fungicides (Table 3). In the next experiments, P. aphanis colonies were histochemically stained to observe the morphologies and cytological characteristics of fungal cells forming normal (Figure 4A) and abnormal (Figure 4B–H) conidiophores. The seven abnormal (i.e., collapsed) conidiophores were classified into seven types (Figure 4B–H) based on their morphological and cytological characteristics. Table 3 shows the distributions of normal and abnormal morphologies of conidiophores in single colonies spray-treated with fungicides, based on the cytological characteristics of the histochemically stained conidiophores mentioned as footnotes to Figure 4. Particularly, the number of abnormal conidiophores in P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl was ca. 18%, while that with nine fungicides including pyraziflumid was higher by >50% compared to those treated with the other tested fungicides (G in Table 3). Consequently, the conidiophores had different morphologies and cytological characteristics, even when spray-treated with the related fungicides. The six effective fungicides mentioned under paragraph 3.1 all reduced colony sizes to less than 14 mm2, but all showed comparatively high percentages of category G damage (above 33%). The distribution was clearly different among the fungicides tested after three days.

3.3. Collection of Asexual Conidia from Single P. aphanis Colonies Spray-Treated with Fungicides Using an Electrostatic Spore Collection Technique

Asexual conidia were collected using an electrostatic spore collection technique from individual single P. aphanis colonies, spray-treated with tap water or fungicides. In single colonies spray-treated with tap water, the asexual conidia, fully constricted at the top of conidiophores (catenescent conidia), were attracted to the plate when the insulator plate was negatively polarized (Figure 5). Figure 5A,B show digital micrographs of P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with tap water, before and after negative electrification of the insulator plate, respectively. Asexual conidia (arrows at the top of picture in B) were successfully captured on the insulator plate from single tap water-spray-treated colonies after negative electrification. For example, in single P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with pyraziflumid, no conidia were attracted from the single colonies to the plate, even when the insulator plate was negatively polarized. In contrast, in single colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl, conidia were attracted from the single colonies. Consequently, the number of asexual conidia released from PM conidiophores varied, depending on the active ingredients included in the fungicides.

3.4. Germination Rates of Conidia Electrostatically Collected from P. aphanis Colonies Spray-Treated with Fungicides

The size and shape of asexual P. aphanis conidia electrostatically collected from single colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl were 28.3 ± 2.3 μm × 19.8 ± 1.4 μm and ellipsoid–ovoid to doliiform–limoniform, respectively (Figure 6A). In addition, they contained oil and fibrosin bodies (Fb). After the conidia were electrostatically collected from individual single colonies spray-treated with fungicides, the germination rates were measured (Table 2). Particularly, asexual conidia collected from single colonies spray-treated with azoxystrobin next to thiophanate-methyl had high germinative capacity. Figure 6B shows germination of conidia electrostatically collected from single colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl, and formation of appressoria (Ap) at the tip of germ tubes. On the other hand, conidia electrostatically collected from single colonies spray-treated with the other fungicides did not germinate at all.

3.5. Development of Single P. aphanis Conidia on Thiophanate-Methyl-Treated Strawberry Leaves

Conidia germinated 3 to 5 h after inoculation on thiophanate-methyl-treated strawberry leaves and formed primary appressoria 6 to 8 h after inoculation. They began to produce colony-forming hyphae from the conidial bodies 24 h after inoculation, and hyphae continued to elongate on the leaves. The isolate began to form conidiophores from elongated hyphae 5 to 6 days after inoculation (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

In several previous studies, P. aphanis developed resistance to DMI fungicides (nuarimol, fenarimol, tetraconazole, triadimefon, and triadimenol), SDHI (penthiopyrad), and aza-naphthalenes (quinoxyfen) [21,22,24,34,35]. In Japan (Nara, Miyagi, and Shiga Prefecture), strawberry PM fungi show low sensitivity (i.e., resistance) to DMI fungicides (bitertanol, fenarimol, triforine, and triadimenol) [23,36]. Recently, Ishii [37] reported the development of resistance to quinone outside inhibitors (QoI fungicides) in strawberry PM fungi. In the present study, we clarified that P. aphanis has developed resistance to both thiophanate-methyl (MBC fungicides) and azoxystrobin (QoI fungicides) using the electrostatic technique. Therefore, it is important to clarify the effects of various fungicides against strawberry PM fungi via sensitivity tests. We evaluated the sensitivity of P. aphanis to different fungicides to determine the effectiveness of the treatments. After fungicide application, colony areas of P. aphanis isolates varied depending on the fungicide treatment. Six fungicides, including pyraziflumid, triflumizole, triforine, polyoxin, sodium hydrogen carbonate + copper wettable powder, and flutianil + mepanipyrim, were highly effective at inhibiting colony development. Therefore, the evaluation of colony size may be useful for identifying effective fungicides.
The morphological and ecological characteristics of conidiophores in PM colonies sprayed with fungicides were observed in detail, as the conidiophores are infectious structures that release asexual conidia, thus facilitating the spread of PM diseases. In the present study, most of the tested fungicide applications resulted in abnormal morphological changes in conidiophores and conidial cells in the conidiophores of P. aphanis isolates. However, thiophanate-methyl, azoxystrobin, sodium bicarbonate, and DBEDC were less effective. Taken together, these results indicate that most of the fungicides, despite their different modes of action, have a temporary effect against P. aphanis. To the best of our knowledge, no study has detailed the morphological characteristics of conidiophores of strawberry PM fungi spray-treated with fungicides. In nature, P. aphanis (KSP-7N) forms sets of six linked conidia on conidiophores, with a straight and non-bulky generative cell [14].
The germination rates of asexual conidia collected electrostatically from single colonies spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl were the highest among the fungicides tested in this study. This means that the collected asexual conidia survived successfully without largely affecting the electrostatic forces or the effective components (active ingredients) of the fungicides. In addition, we clarified that the conidia collected on the insulators maintain their high germinative capacity [29]. Thus, this electrostatic spore collection method appears to be a superior method for estimating the spread of germinable PM conidia that do not respond to fungicides. In actual, a negatively charged dielectric body (insulator plate) is used to electrostatically induce the PM fungi, instead of charging the surface (surrounding) of the PM fungi (i.e., conidia) with static electricity, by spray-treating with the fungicides (some ingredients) having anti-static properties. Consequently, the PM fungi become net positive and, due to Coulomb force, are captured by a plate that is oppositely charged [38]. Eventually, using the electrostatic technique, the asexual conidia are successfully collected from fungicide-spray-treated PM colonies without being affected by some ingredients (i.e., ionic surfactant sodium oleate) of the fungicides having anti-static properties. Thus, we suggested that the collection of asexual conidia was inhibited by lack of conidial releases from unconstructed conidial cells at the upper parts of conidiophores or abnormal conidiophores (i.e., atrophied conidiophores).
Most studies have assessed the progress of strawberry PMs by recording the incidence or severity of disease on leaves [9,17,39,40,41]. For example, of the strawberry PM isolates that received fungicide application, Okayama et al. [17] inoculated the leaves and plants with strawberry PM fungi and recorded the number of leaflets that were infected by the disease and the severity of the disease in each leaflet; each leaflet was scored from one (no visible symptoms) to five (more than 50% of the surface of the leaf infected). Recently, Palmer and Holmes [35] defined the disease incidence as the presence of a sporulating colony on a leaflet and assigned one of five categories, depending on the disease incidence for each fungicide treatment: entirely sensitive (0%), sensitive (0.1–33.2%), somewhat sensitive (33.3–66.6%), resistant (66.7–99%), and entirely resistant (100%). Thus, most of the sensitivity tests in these earlier studies were conducted with the inoculation of P. aphanis after fungicide application to the leaflets, leaves, or leaf discs [17,24]. In contrast, with our method, inoculation was conducted before fungicide application. However, in general, there is little information on the best way to measure the progress of strawberry PM disease, as pointed out by Menzel [42], who emphasized the need to determine the variation in the severity of PM within and across experiments and the best way to record the development of the disease. In the present study, we included colony growth and the number of asexual conidia released from single PM colonies spray-treated with fungicides to assess fungicide sensitivity. In nature, PMs expand the infection source by releasing progeny conidia from conidiophores [43,44]. Previously, using an electrostatic technique (electrostatically activated insulator drum), Ayabe et al. [29] conducted a quantitative analysis of the number of progeny conidia dispersed from living single colonies of P. aphanis ex Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier cv. Sagahonoka throughout their lifetime. In the present study, by collecting the asexual conidia released from single fungicide-treated P. aphanis colonies with an electrostatic technique (electrostatically activated insulator plate), we clarified the existence of normal P. aphanis conidiophores and the production of asexual conidia by individual single colonies, and then quantitatively evaluated the sensitivity of strawberry PM fungi to fungicides. We observed sharp differences among the number of asexual conidia released from fungicide-treated colonies, based on the electrostatically collected data. Notably, isolates of strawberry PM colonies that the fungicides did not control released asexual conidia. Moreover, we confirmed that thiophanate-methyl (MBC fungicides) and azoxystrobin (QoI fungicides) do not adequately control colony size of P. aphanis isolates, because the isolates produce germinable conidia on normal conidiophores, regardless of the fungicide treatment. Consequently, we clarified that P. aphanis has developed resistance to both thiophanate-methyl and azoxystrobin. In the P. aphanis Japanese isolates (KSP-7N), no active fungal growth to aryl-phenyl-ketones, SDHIs, anilino-pyrimidines (AP fungicides), DMIs, polyoxins, bis-guanidines, or quinoxalines was observed.
To the best of our knowledge, this study reports the first methodology to precisely count the total number of asexual conidia released from single P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with individual commercial fungicides for estimating the sensitivity of P. aphanis to fungicides.

5. Conclusions

This study clarified the number of asexual conidia released from single P. aphanis colonies, spray-treated with individual fungicides (fungicides with different modes and mechanisms of action), using an electrostatic spore collector (an insulator plate). Thus, the electrostatic technique used in this study is expected to be useful for quantitatively analyzing conidial releases from single PM colonies, spray-treated with equivalent fungicide concentrations, to identify the most effective fungicides against strawberry PM disease. Also, more importantly, this electrostatic spore collection technique enables the accurate assessment of the presence or absence of infection expansion from PM colonies spray-treated with individual fungicides. The asexual conidia collected from P. aphanis colonies, spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl, germinated, and then infected with host leaves spray-treated with the same fungicides in advance. Based on our results, we suggest that electrostatic and digital microscopic techniques are useful for the early detection of PM fungi. As next steps, we will analyze the gene expression of the mutated β-tubulin gene, to gain insight into site-specific fungicide resistance in single conidia electrostatically collected from PM colonies for which the fungicides did not work, to determine the fungicide-resistant mechanisms of PM fungi. From the perspective of estimating the fungicide sensitivity of PM fungi by collecting germinable conidia with our electrostatic technique, this study provides new information on the ecological characteristics of strawberry PM fungi (P. aphanis var. aphanis) in host plants and the acquired fungicide resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.N.; methodology, A.T. and T.N.; software, A.T., M.K., K.S. and R.M.; validation, S.A. and T.N.; formal analysis, A.T., S.A. and T.N.; investigation, A.T., M.K., K.S., R.M. and T.N.; resources, A.T. and T.N.; data curation, S.A. and T.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T. and T.N.; writing—review and editing, S.A. and T.N.; visualization, S.A. and T.N.; supervision, T.N.; project administration, T.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant for Agriculture Technology and Innovation Research Institute, Kindai University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sets analyzed during the current study are available from the current author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Braun, U.; Takamatsu, S. Phylogeny of Erysiphe, Microsphaera, Uncinula (Erysipheae) and Cystotheca, Podosphaera, Sphaerotheca (Cystotheceae) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences—Some taxonomic consequences. Schlechtendalia 2000, 4, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun, U.; Cook, R.T.A. Taxonomic Manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery Mildews); CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peries, O.S. Studies on strawberry mildew, caused by Sphaerotheca macularis (Wallr. ex Fries) Jaczewski. I. Biology of the fungus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1962, 50, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peries, O.S. Studies on strawberry mildew, caused by Sphaerotheca macularis (Wallr. ex Fries) Jaczewski. II. Host-parasite relationships on the foliage of strawberry varieties. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1962, 50, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jhooty, J.S.; McKeen, W.E. Studies on powdery mildew of strawberry caused by Sphaerotheca macularis. Phytopathology 1965, 55, 281–285. [Google Scholar]
  6. Spencer, D.M. Powdery mildew of strawberries. In The Powdery Mildews; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 355–358. [Google Scholar]
  7. Maas, J.L. Powdery mildew. In Compendium of Strawberry Diseases, 2nd ed.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nelson, M.D.; Gubler, W.D.; Shaw, D.V. Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in greenhouse-grown versus field-grown California strawberry progenies. Phytopathology 1995, 85, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, C.L.; Chandler, C.K.; Price, J.F.; Duval, J.R.; Mertely, J.C.; Legard, D.E. Comparison of epidemics of Botrytis fruit rot and powdery mildew of strawberry in large plastic tunnel and field production systems. Plant Dis. 2001, 85, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carisse, O.; Morissette-Thomas, V.; van der Heyden, H. Lagged association between powdery mildew leaf severity, airborne inoculum, weather, and crop losses in strawberry. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abiko, K. Specialization of parasitism of Sphaerotheca humuli (DC.) Burr. Bull. Veg. Ornam. Crops Res. Stn. Jpn. Ser. A 1982, 10, 69–74, (In Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  12. Nelson, M.D.; Gubler, W.D.; Shaw, D.V. Relative resistance of 47 strawberry cultivars to powdery mildew in California greenhouse and field environments. Plant Dis. 1996, 80, 326–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harvey, N.; Xu, X.-M. Powdery mildew on raspberry is genetically different from strawberry powdery mildew. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 92, 775–779. [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwasaki, S.; Asano, S.; Yoshida, K.; Kitamura, S.; Taira, A.; Honda, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Takikawa, Y.; Kakutani, K.; Matsuda, Y.; et al. Analysis of conidiogenesis and lifelong conidial production from single conidiophores of Podosphaera aphanis on strawberry leaves using digital microscopic and electrostatic techniques. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2021, 50, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Freeman, J.A.; Pepin, H.S. A systemic fungicide (fungicide 1991) for the control of gray mold and powdery mildew in strawberries and raspberries. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 1967, 47, 104–107. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tanigawa, M.; Nakano, T.; Hagihara, T.; Okayama, K.; Sezaki, S. Relationship between the control effect of fungicides on powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca humuli) and their deposits on strawberry leaves. J. Pesticide Sci. 1993, 18, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Okayama, K.; Nakano, T.; Matsutani, S.; Sugimura, T. A simple and reliable method for evaluating the effectiveness of fungicides for control of powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis) on strawberry. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1995, 61, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hukkanen, A.T.; Kokko, H.I.; Buchala, A.J.; McDougall, G.J.; Stewart, D.; Kärenlampi, S.O.; Karjalainen, R.O. Benzothiadiazole induces the accumulation of phenolics and improves resistance to powdery mildew in strawberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 1862–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. FRAC Code List 2024. Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/frac-code-list/frac-code-list-2024.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2024).
  20. Legard, D.E.; Chandler, C.K. Evaluation of fungicides to control powdery mildew of strawberry, 1998. Fungic. Nematic. Tests 2000, 55, 128. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollomon, D.W.; Wheeler, I.E. Controlling powdery mildews with chemistry. In The Powdery Mildews: A Comprehensive Treatise; Belanger, R.R., Bushnell, W.R., Dik, A.J., Carver, T.L.W., Eds.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2002; pp. 249–255. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bal, E.; Gilles, G. Problems of resistance in powdery mildew control on strawberries. Med. Facult. Landbouw. Rijk Gent. 1986, 51/2b, 707–714. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nakano, T.; Higihara, T.; Okayama, K. Decreased sensitivity of strawberry powdery mildew to ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors. Bull. Nara Agric. Exp. Stn. 1992, 23, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sombardier, A.; Dufour, M.-C.; Blancard, D.; Corio-Costet, M.-F. Sensitivity of Podosphaera aphanis isolates to DMI fungicides: Distribution and reduced cross-sensitivity. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aylor, D.E. The role of intermittent wind in the dispersal of fungal pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1990, 28, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brown, J.K.M.; Hovmøller, M.S. Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 2002, 297, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Strand, L.L. Integrated Pest Management for Strawberries, 2nd ed.; UCANR Publications: Oakland, CA, USA, 2008; p. 176. [Google Scholar]
  28. Matsuda, Y.; Ikeda, H.; Moriura, N.; Tanaka, N.; Shimizu, K.; Oichi, W.; Nonomura, T.; Kakutani, K.; Kusakari, S.; Higashi, K.; et al. A new spore precipitator with polarized dielectric insulators for physical control of tomato powdery mildew. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ayabe, S.; Kimura, Y.; Umei, N.; Takikawa, Y.; Kakutani, K.; Matsuda, Y.; Nonomura, T. Real-time collection of conidia released from living single colonies of Podosphaera aphanis on strawberry leaves under natural conditions with electrostatic techniques. Plants 2022, 11, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Braun, U. A monograph of the Erysiphales (powdery mildews); J. Cramer: Berlin, Germany, 1987; p. 700. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakazawa, Y.; Uchida, K. First record of cleistothecial stage of powdery mildew fungus on strawberry in Japan. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 64, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Takamatsu, S.; Niinomi, S.; Harada, M.; Havrylenko, M. Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal a close evolutionary relationship between Podosphaera (Erysiphales: Erysiphaceae) and its rosaceous hosts. Persoonia 2010, 24, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Suzuki, T.; Nishimura, S.; Yagi, K.; Nakamura, R.; Takikawa, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Kakutani, K.; Nonomura, T. Effects of light quality on conidiophore formation of the melon powdery mildew pathogen Podosphaera xanthii. Phytoparasitica 2018, 94, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pertot, I.; Fiaming, F.; Amsalem, L.; Maymon, M.; Freeman, S.; Gobbin, D.; Elad, Y. Sensitivity of two Podosphaera aphanis isolates to disease control agents. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 89, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmer, M.G.; Holmes, G.J. Fungicide sensitivity in strawberry powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera aphanis in California. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 2601–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Arimoto, M.; Hasebe, M.; Shimokawa, Y. Distribution of sterol demethylation inhibitor (DMI)-resistant isolates of strawberry powdery mildew in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Bull. Shiga Pref. Agric. Tech. Promo. Cent. 2016, 54, 28–29. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Ishii, H. Current status of QoI fungicide resistance. Plant Prot. 2015, 69, 469–474. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nonomura, T.; Toyoda, H. Electrostatic spore-trapping techniques for managing airborne conidia dispersed by the powdery mildew pathogen. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, X.-M.; Robinson, J.; Berrie, A.; Simpson, D. Inconsistency in the plants to powdery mildew over time and over clonal propagation. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 2011, 70, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu, X.-M.; Robinson, J.; Simpson, D. Interactions between isolates of powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis) and cultivars of strawberry, Fragaria × ananassa. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 2008, 39, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  41. Carisse, O.; Lefebvre, A.; van der Heyden, H.; Roberge, L.; Brodeur, L. Analysis of incidence-severity relationships for strawberry powdery mildew as influenced by cultivar, cultivar type, and production system. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Menzel, C.M. A review of powdery mildew in strawberries: The resistance of species, hybrids and cultivars to the pathogen is highly variable within and across studies with no standard method for assessing the disease. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2022, 97, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Blanco, C.; de los Santos, B.; Barrau, C.; Arroyo, F.T.; Porras, M.; Romero, F. Relationship among concentrations of Sphaerotheca macularis conidia in the air, environmental conditions, and the incidence of powdery mildew in strawberry. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 878–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Willocquet, L.; Sombardier, A.; Blancard, D.; Jolivet, J.; Savary, S. Spore dispersal and disease gradients in strawberry powdery mildew. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 30, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Single PM colonies (Col) that developed on true leaves of 60-day-old strawberry seedlings used for fungicide testing and for collecting asexual conidia with an electrostatic spore collector 3 days after fungicide spray treatment (A), and digital micrograph of conidiophores formed in 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies (B). Inserted photo shows enlargement of a 7-day-old P. aphanis colony. The scale bars are 20 μm. PM: powdery mildew. White arrows show single 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies.
Figure 1. Single PM colonies (Col) that developed on true leaves of 60-day-old strawberry seedlings used for fungicide testing and for collecting asexual conidia with an electrostatic spore collector 3 days after fungicide spray treatment (A), and digital micrograph of conidiophores formed in 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies (B). Inserted photo shows enlargement of a 7-day-old P. aphanis colony. The scale bars are 20 μm. PM: powdery mildew. White arrows show single 7-day-old P. aphanis colonies.
Agronomy 14 01357 g001
Figure 2. Electrostatic spore collector system for collecting asexual conidia released from single Podosphaera aphanis colonies with and without spray treatment with commercial fungicides (cross-sectional view). The collector plate (5.2 × 10−1 nC) was placed <2 cm from a P. aphanis colony on a strawberry leaf (distance A). ‘nC’ means a unit of charge quantity.
Figure 2. Electrostatic spore collector system for collecting asexual conidia released from single Podosphaera aphanis colonies with and without spray treatment with commercial fungicides (cross-sectional view). The collector plate (5.2 × 10−1 nC) was placed <2 cm from a P. aphanis colony on a strawberry leaf (distance A). ‘nC’ means a unit of charge quantity.
Agronomy 14 01357 g002
Figure 3. Digital micrographs of Podospharea aphanis colonies and conidiophores in the colonies spray-treated with tap water (A,D), pyraziflumid (B,E), and thiophanate-methyl (C,F). Note that normal P. aphanis conidiophores possess a maximum number of six conidial cells in full-length chains, a generative cell (gc), and a foot cell (fc) on hyphae under greenhouse conditions. The scale bars are 100 μm (AC) and 20 μm (DF). Cp: conidiophore.
Figure 3. Digital micrographs of Podospharea aphanis colonies and conidiophores in the colonies spray-treated with tap water (A,D), pyraziflumid (B,E), and thiophanate-methyl (C,F). Note that normal P. aphanis conidiophores possess a maximum number of six conidial cells in full-length chains, a generative cell (gc), and a foot cell (fc) on hyphae under greenhouse conditions. The scale bars are 100 μm (AC) and 20 μm (DF). Cp: conidiophore.
Agronomy 14 01357 g003
Figure 4. Light micrographs of Podosphaera aphanis conidiophores histochemically stained for observation of morphological and cytological characteristics of the fungal cells after spray treatment of tap water and fungicides. (A) Normal catenescent conidiophores (concatenated conidia in chains) successfully stained in P. aphanis colonies. (B) Collapse of cell membranes and granulated cells in conidiophores while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (C) Atrophy and collapse of conidiophores. (D) Linear conidiophores. (E) Separation of cell membranes while maintaining the shape of globular conidia. (F) Separation of cell membranes and granulated cells in conidiophores while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (G) Hyaline cells by collapse of cell membranes while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (H) Thin conidiophores without dividing and enlarging cells. Arrows show septa (septal wall). The micrographs of histochemically stained conidiophores were taken 3 days after spray treatment with tap water and fungicides. The scale bars are 60 μm.
Figure 4. Light micrographs of Podosphaera aphanis conidiophores histochemically stained for observation of morphological and cytological characteristics of the fungal cells after spray treatment of tap water and fungicides. (A) Normal catenescent conidiophores (concatenated conidia in chains) successfully stained in P. aphanis colonies. (B) Collapse of cell membranes and granulated cells in conidiophores while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (C) Atrophy and collapse of conidiophores. (D) Linear conidiophores. (E) Separation of cell membranes while maintaining the shape of globular conidia. (F) Separation of cell membranes and granulated cells in conidiophores while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (G) Hyaline cells by collapse of cell membranes while maintaining the shape of ellipsoid-ovoid conidia. (H) Thin conidiophores without dividing and enlarging cells. Arrows show septa (septal wall). The micrographs of histochemically stained conidiophores were taken 3 days after spray treatment with tap water and fungicides. The scale bars are 60 μm.
Agronomy 14 01357 g004
Figure 5. Collection of asexual conidia released from single 10-day-old Podosphaera aphanis colonies, spray-non-treated and spray-treated with fungicides, on true leaves of living strawberry seedlings using an electrostatic spore collection technique (an electrostatic insulator plate; eip). The insulator plate was placed approximately 2500 µm from the apex of colonies. (A,B) show collection of asexual conidia from P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with tap water, before and after negative electrification to eip, respectively. Bar represents 400 µm.
Figure 5. Collection of asexual conidia released from single 10-day-old Podosphaera aphanis colonies, spray-non-treated and spray-treated with fungicides, on true leaves of living strawberry seedlings using an electrostatic spore collection technique (an electrostatic insulator plate; eip). The insulator plate was placed approximately 2500 µm from the apex of colonies. (A,B) show collection of asexual conidia from P. aphanis colonies spray-treated with tap water, before and after negative electrification to eip, respectively. Bar represents 400 µm.
Agronomy 14 01357 g005
Figure 6. Characteristics of thiophanate-methyl-resistant Podosphaera aphanis conidia attracted from a single P. aphanis colony to the insulator plate with an electrostatic technique. The scale bars are 20 μm (A,B).
Figure 6. Characteristics of thiophanate-methyl-resistant Podosphaera aphanis conidia attracted from a single P. aphanis colony to the insulator plate with an electrostatic technique. The scale bars are 20 μm (A,B).
Agronomy 14 01357 g006
Figure 7. Light micrograph of hyphae developed from thiophanate-methyl-resistant Podosphaera aphanis conidia after asexual conidia electrostatically collected were inoculated onto healthy strawberry leaf spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl (1500 dilutions; 466.6 µg mL−1) in advance. The scale bar is 40 μm. Co: conidium; Ap: appressorium.
Figure 7. Light micrograph of hyphae developed from thiophanate-methyl-resistant Podosphaera aphanis conidia after asexual conidia electrostatically collected were inoculated onto healthy strawberry leaf spray-treated with thiophanate-methyl (1500 dilutions; 466.6 µg mL−1) in advance. The scale bar is 40 μm. Co: conidium; Ap: appressorium.
Agronomy 14 01357 g007
Table 1. Mode of action of commercial fungicides used in this study to assess fungicide sensitivity against Podosphaera aphanis KSP-7N.
Table 1. Mode of action of commercial fungicides used in this study to assess fungicide sensitivity against Podosphaera aphanis KSP-7N.
Mode of ActionCodeTarget SiteGroup NameActive IngredientFRAC Code [19]
Cytoskeleton and motor proteinB1β-tubulin assembly in mitosisMethyl-benzimidazole carbamates (MBC fungicides)Thiophanate-methyl1
B6Actin/myosin/fimbrin functionAryl-phenyl-ketonesPyriofenone50
RespirationC2Complex II: succinate dehydrogenase (SdhB, SdhC, and SdhD)Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs)Fluopyram7
Isopyrazam7
Penthiopyrad7
Pyraziflumid7
C3Complex III: cytochrome bc1 at Qo site (Cytb)Quinone outside inhibitors (QoI fungicides)Azoxystrobin11
Kresoxim-methyl11
Amino acids and protein synthesisD1Methionine biosynthesis (proposed cgs gene)Anilinopyrimidines (AP fungicides)Mepanipyrim9
Sterol biosynthesis in membranesG1C14-demethylase in sterol biosynthesis (erg11/cyp51)Demethylation inhibitors (DMI fungicides)Difenoconazole3
Fenarimol3
Myclobutanil3
Simeconazole3
Triflumizole3
Triforine3
Cell wall biosynthesisH4Chitin synthasePolyoxinsPolyoxin19
Not specifiedUnknownDiversePottasium bicarbonateNC
Sodium bicarbonateNC
Chemicals with multi-site activityMMulti-site contact
activity
InorganicDodecylbenzenesulfonic acid bisethylenediamine copper complex salt (II) (DBEDC)M01
SulfurM02
Bis-guanidinesIminoctadine albesilateM07
QuinoxalinesChinomethionateM10
Biologicals with multiple modes of action: microbialBMMultiple effects describedMicrobialBacillus subtilisBM02
RespirationC2, C3Complex II: succinate dehydrogenase; Complex III: cytochrome bc1 at Qo siteSDHIs, QoI fungicidesBoscalid, kresoxim-methyl7, 11
Chemicals with multi-site activityMMulti-site contact activityInorganicCopper, sulfurM01, M02
Chemicals with multi-site activity, respirationM, C3Multi-site contact activity, complex III: cytochrome bc1 at Qo siteBis-guanidines, QoI fungicidesIminoctadine albesilate, pyribencarbM07, 11
Chemicals with multi-site activity, cell wall biosynthesisM, H4Multi-site contact activity, chitin synthaseBis-guanidines, polyoxinsIminoctadine albesilate, polyoxin complexM07, 19
Chemicals with multi-site activity, cytoskeleton and motor proteinM, B6Multi-site contact activity, actin/myosin/fimbrin functionBis-guanidines, aryl-phenyl-ketonesIminoctadine albesilate, pyriofenoneM07, 50
Not specified, chemicals with multi-site activityU, MUnknown, multi-site contact activityDiverse, inorganicSodium hydrogen carbonate and copper wettable powderNC, M01
Unknown, sterol biosynthesis in membranesU, G1Unknown, C14-demethylase in sterol biosynthesisPhenyl-acetamide, DMI fungicidesCyflufenamid, triflumizoleU06, 3
Unknown, amino acids and protein synthesisU, D1Unknown, methionine biosynthesisThiazolidine, AP fungicidesFlutianil, mepanipyrimU13, 9
Sorbitan fatty acid ester emulsion
Polyglycerol fatty acid ester
Propylene glycol fatty acid monoester
Sodium oleate
Decanoyl octanoyl glycerol
Table 2. Colony development of Podosphaera aphanis after spray treatment with individual fungicides, as assessed by counting asexual conidia trapped on electrostatically activated insulator plates, and the rates of conidial germination.
Table 2. Colony development of Podosphaera aphanis after spray treatment with individual fungicides, as assessed by counting asexual conidia trapped on electrostatically activated insulator plates, and the rates of conidial germination.
Active IngredientsConcentrations (µg mL−1)Colony Areas (mm2) *The Number of
Conidia Released from Single Colonies *
Germination Rates (%)
Thiophanate-methyl466.631.6 ± 3.5 cd72.0 ± 5.0 b79.0 ± 3.0 b
Pyriofenone89.334.2 ± 3.0 c0 i
Fluopyram208.518.4 ± 3.0 fg0 i
Isopyrazam18733.5 ± 2.3 c0 i
Penthiopyrad10022.6 ± 2.0 ef10.0 ± 1.0 e0 d
Pyraziflumid10012.5 ± 3.2 g0 i
Azoxystrobin13328.4 ± 2.6 de36.5 ± 5.5 c50.0 ± 10.0 c
Kresoxim-methyl14743.3 ± 3.4 b0 i
Mepanipyrim20025.6 ± 1.4 e1.0 ± 0.5 h0 d
Difenoconazole5031.7 ± 3.1 cd0 i
Fenarimol3017.2 ± 2.2 fg0 i
Myclobutanil5016.0 ± 3.0 fg0 i
Simeconazole10025.7 ± 2.8 def0 i
Triflumizole10013.5 ± 3.8 g0 i
Triforine9012.6 ± 2.2 g0 i
Polyoxin10013.8 ± 1.7 g0 i
Pottasium bicarbonate100031.3 ± 3.4 cd0 i
Sodium bicarbonate100035.3 ± 2.8 c19.0 ± 2.0 d0 d
DBEDC40029.2 ± 1.8 d7.0 ± 1.0 f0 d
Sulfur26018.5 ± 2.4 fg2.5 ± 1.0 h0 d
Iminoctadine albesilate15020.8 ± 3.3 f0 i
Chinomethionate83.323.1 ± 3.6 ef1.0 ± 0.5 h0 d
Bacillus subtilis1 × 108 CFU/g17.9 ± 2.9 fg0 i
Boscalid, kresoxim-methyl 133.5, 33.520.4 ± 3.1 f0 i
Copper, sulfur437.5, 312.522.1 ± 3.2 ef0 i
Iminoctadine albesilate, pyribencarb150, 10023.8 ± 3.5 ef0 i
Iminoctadine albesilate, polyoxin complex62.5, 7523.4 ± 3.1 ef0 i
Iminoctadine albesilate, pyriofenone150, 4018.3 ± 2.3 fg0 i
Sodium hydrogen carbonate and copper wettable powder613.3, 40014.2 ± 2.7 g3.7 ± 2.3 gh0 d
Cyflufenamid, triflumizole17, 7522.7 ± 3.2 ef3.0 ± 2.0 gh0 d
Flutianil, mepanipyrim9, 10013.9 ± 3.2 g0 i
Sorbitan fatty acid ester emulsion140022.4 ± 3.7 ef0 i
Polyglycerol fatty acid ester82558.9 ± 3.5 a0 i
Propylene glycol fatty acid monoester35024.7 ± 3.7 de0 i
Sodium oleate200018.6 ± 2.2 fg4.0 ± 3.0 gh0 d
Decanoyl octanoyl glycerol300038.2 ± 2.8 bc5.0 ± 1.0 g0 d
Control (water)59.5 ± 2.6 a188.5 ± 21.5 a85.5 ± 9.0 a
* Data show colony areas spray-treated with fungicides, and the number of asexual conidia collected using the electrostatic spore collector from individual 10-day-old colonies 3 days after spray treatment with fungicides. Single colonies were spray-treated with tap water, as a control. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of five replicates. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Table 3. Conidiophore shape of Podosphaera aphanis after spray treatment with individual fungicides.
Table 3. Conidiophore shape of Podosphaera aphanis after spray treatment with individual fungicides.
Active IngredientsThe Number of Normal or Abnormal Conidiophores (%)
A *BCDEFGH
Thiophanate-methyl70.0 ± 5.5 b0.6 ± 0.53.8 ± 2.87.0 ± 6.01.6 ± 1.23.8 ± 2.618.8 ± 11.70
Pyriofenone 0.6 ± 0.4 i3.0 ± 1.432.6 ± 11.67.0 ± 3.78.8 ± 3.141.8 ± 8.213.6 ± 8.80.6 ± 0.3
Fluopyram1.8 ± 1.6 ghi4.6 ± 3.524.0 ± 11.515.2 ± 8.328.6 ± 9.82.0 ± 0.820.2 ± 3.73.6 ± 1.9
Isopyrazam0.8 ± 0.2 i1.8 ± 0.72.6 ± 1.71.0 ± 0.211.4 ± 1.08.8 ± 4.867.0 ± 17.84.2 ± 1.8
Penthiopyrad16.0 ± 3.8 d5.2 ± 2.942.6 ± 17.55.6 ± 1.45.6 ± 1.41.4 ± 0.522.2 ± 9.81.0 ± 0.2
Pyraziflumid0 j18.2 ± 5.612.4 ± 7.82.0 ± 0.111.6 ± 5.53.4 ± 1.650.2 ± 32.11.6 ± 0.6
Azoxystrobin38.8 ± 4.3 c2.6 ± 0.929.2 ± 11.05.2 ± 1.25.4 ± 1.61.6 ± 0.828.0 ± 10.41.2 ± 0.3
Kresoxim-methyl0.8 ± 0.2 i0.6 ± 0.223.0 ± 4.32.4 ± 0.90.4 ± 0.311.6 ± 7.429.2 ± 11.930.0 ± 12.9
Mepanipyrim4.2 ± 1.7 fg3.8 ± 1.814.6 ± 6.05.4 ± 2.823.2 ± 10.53.6 ± 1.340.4 ± 21.80.8 ± 0.2
Difenoconazole2.0 ± 0.5 h17.0 ± 7.424.2 ± 10.820.4 ± 7.512.8 ± 9.52.6 ± 0.619.4 ± 8.00.6 ± 0.3
Fenarimol0 j17.6 ± 8.135.6 ± 11.830.4 ± 8.02.0 ± 0.1014.4 ± 8.80
Myclobutanil0.6 ± 0.3 i17.8 ± 11.18.8 ± 4.914.8 ± 8.73.6 ± 1.216.8 ± 4.631.6 ± 10.50
Simeconazole1.8 ± 0.4 h017.0 ± 1.1030.8 ± 4.81.0 ± 0.445.4 ± 11.40
Triflumizole3.4 ± 1.3 gh05.2 ± 1.69.8 ± 3.226.2 ± 12.011.4 ± 1.839.2 ± 11.30.8 ± 0.2
Triforine1.6 ± 0.2 h7.2 ± 1.95.2 ± 2.23.6 ± 2.12.0 ± 0.72.0 ± 0.576.8 ± 12.10
Polyoxin1.8 ± 0.8 h5.6 ± 2.514.4 ± 4.95.2 ± 1.12.2 ± 0.95.0 ± 1.854.6 ± 17.81.2 ± 0.8
Pottasium bicarbonate0.9 ± 0.1 i16.4 ± 8.623.0 ± 10.74.0 ± 1.02.2 ± 1.917.2 ± 6.428.2 ± 7.42.6 ± 0.8
Sodium bicarbonate31.4 ± 5.7 c4.0 ± 0.211.4 ± 5.75.2 ± 1.77.6 ± 2.04.0 ± 1.230.4 ± 15.40.2 ± 0.2
DBEDC15.0 ± 2.5 d9.8 ± 6.918.8 ± 5.95.2 ± 2.48.0 ± 5.12.6 ± 1.541.6 ± 9.01.0 ± 1.0
Sulfur4.6 ± 1.6 fg0.4 ± 0.221.4 ± 7.56.6 ± 3.528.2 ± 13.60.4 ± 0.331.6 ± 14.50
Iminoctadine albesilate0 j2.8 ± 1.011.6 ± 1.314.0 ± 7.36.2 ± 1.3061.6 ± 15.83.8 ± 1.4
Chinomethionate4.2 ± 1.0 g10.6 ± 4.818.4 ± 6.16.6 ± 1.310.8 ± 1.614.8 ± 6.633.2 ± 9.81.4 ± 0.9
Bacillus subtilis3.4 ± 1.0 gh2.4 ± 0.412.4 ± 1.814.2 ± 9.85.6 ± 2.115.6 ± 8.439.4 ± 14.12.4 ± 0.6
Boscalid, kresoxim-methyl 0.4 ± 0.2 i6.6 ± 2.17.6 ± 3.219.8 ± 5.316.2 ± 9.324.2 ± 11.325.4 ± 13.30.2 ± 0.1
Copper, sulfur1.0 ± 1.0 hi8.4 ± 5.811.4 ± 3.83.0 ± 2.111.0 ± 5.220.8 ± 4.444.4 ± 12.90
Iminoctadine albesilate, pyribencarb2.0 ± 1.5 ghi19.6 ± 8.118.6 ± 10.810.0 ± 8.83.2 ± 2.66.2 ± 3.538.2 ± 10.81.2 ± 0.8
Iminoctadine albesilate, polyoxin complex0.6 ± 0.2 i1.0 ± 1.06.2 ± 2.60.2 ± 0.21.0 ± 1.00.8 ± 0.684.4 ± 13.51.8 ± 1.6
Iminoctadine albesilate, pyriofenone2.8 ± 1.4 gh9.4 ± 7.911.8 ± 9.53.6 ± 3.04.0 ± 1.510.2 ± 4.157.0 ± 13.61.2 ± 1.2
Sodium hydrogen carbonate and copper wettable powder9.4 ± 2.2 e8.4 ± 3.216.6 ± 8.804.0 ± 3.9059.2 ± 16.60
Cyflufenamid, triflumizole7.2 ± 1.6 ef014.6 ± 9.301.4 ± 1.1076.8 ± 31.80
Flutianil, mepanipyrim0.4 ± 0.4 i4.2 ± 2.418.2 ± 6.336.0 ± 14.10.6 ± 0.54.0 ± 4.033.8 ± 8.92.8 ± 1.9
Sorbitan fatty acid ester emulsion2.8 ± 1.3 gh5.8 ± 2.317.0 ± 3.79.6 ± 2.82.0 ± 1.931.0 ± 14.726.8 ± 11.33.0 ± 3.0
Polyglycerol fatty acid ester0.6 ± 0.5 hi0.4 ± 0.420.4 ± 11.79.0 ± 6.010.4 ± 2.114.0 ± 7.944.6 ± 12.20.6 ± 0.5
Propylene glycol fatty acid monoester2.4 ± 1.7 ghi4.2 ± 1.333.4 ± 9.14.6 ± 1.127.8 ± 19.83.0 ± 1.717.8 ± 8.83.6 ± 1.1
Sodium oleate12.0 ± 2.0 de10.0 ± 8.010.8 ± 8.05.4 ± 1.43.2 ± 1.61.4 ± 0.549.2 ± 18.10
Decanoyl octanoyl glycerol13.8 ± 3.1 de18.2 ± 6.88.2 ± 4.59.0 ± 2.75.2 ± 3.912.2 ± 5.935.6 ± 19.11.8 ± 1.8
Control (water)98.8 ± 0.4 a
* A to H represents the morphological and cytological characteristics of conidiophores mentioned in the legends of Figure 4. The numbers of normal and abnormal conidiophores in the five individual 10-day-old colonies from each leaf were counted and calculated on average. Single colonies were spray-treated with tap water, as a control. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of five replicates, calculated for each category (A–H). Different letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahara, A.; Asano, S.; Kurokawa, M.; Shibata, K.; Muto, R.; Nonomura, T. Effects of Fungicides on Fungal Development, Conidiophore Morphology, and Conidial Releases from Single Strawberry Powdery Mildew Colonies Assessed Using an Electrostatic Technique. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071357

AMA Style

Takahara A, Asano S, Kurokawa M, Shibata K, Muto R, Nonomura T. Effects of Fungicides on Fungal Development, Conidiophore Morphology, and Conidial Releases from Single Strawberry Powdery Mildew Colonies Assessed Using an Electrostatic Technique. Agronomy. 2024; 14(7):1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahara, Ami, Shunsuke Asano, Minami Kurokawa, Kanon Shibata, Rina Muto, and Teruo Nonomura. 2024. "Effects of Fungicides on Fungal Development, Conidiophore Morphology, and Conidial Releases from Single Strawberry Powdery Mildew Colonies Assessed Using an Electrostatic Technique" Agronomy 14, no. 7: 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop