Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Profile of PDCB Gene Family in Zea mays L.
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Three-Year Grazing on Plant Community Dynamics and Productivity in Habahe, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilizing Infrared Thermometry to Assess the Crop Water Stress Index of Wheat Genotypes in Arid Regions under Varying Irrigation Regimes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/agronomy14081857
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exogenously Applied Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviated Cadmium Toxicity in Different Aromatic Rice Cultivars by Improving Nitric Oxide Accumulation and Modulating Oxidative Metabolism

by
Muhammad Imran
1,2,
Saddam Hussain
3,
Muhammad Shoaib Rana
4,
Anas Iqbal
1,
Naveed Ur Rehman
1,
Xiaoyuan Chen
2 and
Xiangru Tang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation of Food and Medicinal Resources in Northern Region, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China
3
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Punjab, Pakistan
4
Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081857
Submission received: 7 July 2024 / Revised: 17 August 2024 / Accepted: 19 August 2024 / Published: 21 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Qualitative and Quantitative Plant Screening Measurements for Yield and Quality Enhancement)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exogenous application of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has previously been reported to trigger plant tolerance against a variety of environmental stresses. The present study was planned to investigate the possible role/s of exogenously applied SNP (50 or 100 μM) in alleviating cadmium (Cd)-induced effects on physio-biochemical processes, yield attributes, and grain quality traits of three fragrant rice cultivars, viz., Meixiangzhan-2 (MXZ), Guixiangzhan (GXZ), and Xiangyaxiangzhan (XYXZ) under 50 mg Cd kg−1 of soil. The results revealed that foliar spray of SNP (50 or 100 μM) on Cd-stressed rice plants reduced oxidative stress (lower hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and electrolyte leakage (EL)) and improved the photosynthetic apparatus through higher chlorophyll contents, gas exchange attributes, and intact chloroplast configurations, and reduced Cd concentration in the leaves and grains of aromatic rice cultivars. The reduced levels of cellular ROS, MDA, and EL were related to the endogenous NO-mediated improvement in the activity of anti-oxidative enzymes and those involved during the ascorbate–glutathione cycle. However, among the different SNP levels, the foliar spraying of 50 μM of SNP was recorded to be the best treatment for fragrant rice growth, which increased grain yield by 42.06%, 46.03%, and 31.21%, and the quality trait of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2-AP) content by 43.12%, 55.84%, and 35.72% in MXZ, GXZ, and XYXZ respectively, suggesting that GXZ is more responsive to SNP than MXZ and XYXZ fragrant rice cultivars. Collectively, our results deduced that cultivating the GXZ fragrant rice cultivar along with foliar application of 50 μM of SNP could sustain the grain yield and quality features of aromatic rice cultivation in heavy metal (especially Cd)-polluted soils.

1. Introduction

Industrialization and the broad use of farming techniques have caused a sudden rise in the amount of potentially harmful substances that have a negative impact on crop production around the globe [1]. The major heavy metals, including cadmium (Cd), aluminum (Al), mercury (Hg), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb), are well reported to induce phytotoxicity, which affects plant metabolism and defense systems [2]. Due to cadmium’s high mobility, solubility, and easy soil–plant transfer, it seriously threatens all life on earth [3]. In the metal-affected rhizosphere, Cd is readily absorbed by plant roots and subsequently travels up the food chain to humans, where it can harm their neurological, reproductive, and immune systems [4].
Cd building up over the threshold limit provokes many phytotoxic consequences including poor seed germination, stunted growth, and reduced defensive mechanisms [2]. Usually, the photosynthetic system is more vulnerable under Cd stress. Chlorophyll (Chl) is essential for photosynthesis, and any decline in its biosynthesis under Cd toxicity hinders the process of photosynthesis [5]. Cd inhibits Chl biosynthesis through the upregulation of chlorophyllase and the substitution of Mg2+ with Cd2+ ions [6]. Likewise, quantum yields of photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII) are the principal targets of Cd toxicity, which may affect the electron transport rate (ETR) owing to attachment to sensitive regions of the photosynthetic apparatus [7]. Cd stress causes a reduction in the cellular NADPH production, which disrupts the flow of electrons from PSII to PSI in chloroplasts and from complex I to IV in mitochondria [8]. These electrons react with molecular oxygen, which causes oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species (ROS) aggravation [9]. ROS produced during stress becomes the reason for cellular oxidative damage and genotoxicity [8]. The Cd-induced toxicity symptoms include a reduction in plant growth (biomass and elongation) and deteriorated crop yield and quality owing to the disruptions in various physio-biochemical processes, such as photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency, mitochondrial electron transport, and cellular functioning [10,11].
In recent times, one of the possible strategies to increase plant adaptability to stressful environments has been the use of signaling molecules. When it comes to biological messengers, NO stands out as a key player in plant tissues. It has a significant impact on the physio-biochemical and metabolic processes and the growth characteristics of plants under stressful environments [2]. NO, an endogenous plant bioactive signaling molecule, is involved in a variety of biotic and abiotic stress-related processes in plants, including fruit ripening, pollen tube growth, seed germination, photosynthesis, root growth, and interactions with other plant hormones [12,13]. The direct chemical interactions of NO with superoxide (O2·−) or lipid peroxyl radicals (LOO⋅) are of particular interest because they illustrate a molecular basis for some of the apparently antagonistic outcomes of similar chemical reactions. The reaction with O2·− is rapid and facile (k = 6.7 × 109 M/s), resulting in the formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [14]. Similarly, a termination reaction occurs between NO and LOO· (k = 2 × 109 M/s) [15] and the biological effects of these two reactions are generally viewed as being opposite, with the formation of ONOO− usually associated with a pro-oxidant response and scavenging of LOO⋅ being an antioxidant response [16]. Additionally, NO regulates several tolerance mechanisms in plants under harsh environments and regulates plants’ antioxidative defenses to counteract ROS, and prevents superfluous ROS production [17,18]. Many studies reported that adding exogenous NO via SNP improved plant tolerance to oxidative stresses caused by drought [19], aluminum toxicity [20], nickel stress [21], and salinity [22]. Foliar application of SNP has recently been proposed as a viable strategy for heavy metal detoxification in plants [18,23]. NO has emerged as a potential novel molecule in terms of extending post-harvest longevity while preserving fruit quality attributes including nutritional contents, flavor, color, and texture [24]. However, no studies have been conducted to understand how NO controls a range of Cd tolerance mechanisms, yield attributes, grain aroma, growth performance, and nutritional quality factors in aromatic rice.
Fragrant rice (Oryza sativa L.) is distinct from unscented rice by its distinguishing pleasant aroma, distinctive flavor, and taste [25]. Among the various fragrance-contributing volatile compounds, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2-AP) is a strong volatile compound that produces a characteristic aromatic flavor and taste in aromatic rice grains [26]. Recent studies have revealed that stressful conditions, whether heavy metals or plastic pollutants (nanoplastics), along with adversely affecting the grain quality and yield attributes of aromatic rice also repress plant growth and physio-biochemical processes [27,28]. Similarly, we have comprehensively elucidated that the fragrance-conducive features of aromatic rice grains, including the precursors and enzymes involved in the 2-AP biosynthetic pathway, are highly vulnerable to heavy metals [11]. In this context, the present experiment examined the potential of NO to strengthen fragrant rice’s natural defenses, including the effects on the photosynthetic apparatus, osmolyte accumulation, the antioxidant defense system, and grain quality traits and yield attributes of different fragrant rice cultivars under heavy metal (especially Cd)-polluted soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site, Plant Husbandry, and Growth Environments

A pot experiment was conducted in a rain-protected net house in open-air conditions at the Experimental Research Farm (23°15′ N, 113°21′ E), Agricultural College, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China. The mean temperature ranged from 23 °C to 29 °C during the growing season, with an average relative humidity of 75–85%. Each experimental pot contained 10 kg of soil, collected from paddy fields that had been cultivated for years, with fundamental chemical properties listed in Supplementary Table S1. Pots were filled with air-dried soil around 30 days before nursery transplanting and soil was contaminated with Cd by dissolving CdCl2·2.5H2O in deionized water and applying it at different concentrations, i.e., 0 and 50 mg kg−1 of soil. These concentrations were uniformly applied to the respective pots while mixed thoroughly at the same time. Pots were submerged with a water layer (3–4 cm) above the soil surface to maintain fully anaerobic and puddle-like conditions within the pots. After 10 days of transplanting, foliar spraying of SNP (50 or 100 µM) as Na2[Fe(CN)5NO] was initiated on the abaxial and adaxial sides of plant leaves with 20-day intervals (a total of 4 sprays).
Three fragrant rice cultivars, Meixiangzhan-2 (MXZ), Guixiangzhan (GXZ), and Xiangyaxiangzhan (XYXZ), were obtained from the Agricultural College of SCAU, Guangzhou, China. These fragrant rice cultivars have an almost identical growth cycle and are regionally renowned for their distinctive aroma and are widely cultivated on a commercial scale by local farmers in South China. The soil-filled pots were transplanted with uniform and stable rice seedlings (25-day-old) with 3–4 seedlings per hill and 5 hills per pot by following a cross mark (+) type of planting pattern (four seedlings a side and the fifth in the middle of the pot). All the pots were supplied with 2.25 g N (Urea), 3.33 g P (phosphorus pentoxide), and 1.35 g K (potassium oxide) with a starting dose of 70% and 30% at the tillering stage. There were four replications in our experiment. The fresh plant samples were selected at random for physio-biochemical analyses at the panicle heading stage. However, in order to quantify the buildup of above-ground biomass, the plants were harvested at maturity and grain quality traits and yield attributes were measured.

2.2. Estimating the Photosynthetic Efficacy, Pigment Contents, and Transmission Electron Microscopy

For the gas exchange measurement, one fully expanded mature leaf from the top was used per plant and five plants were randomly selected per treatment and the results were averaged. Net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (E), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in the rice plant leaves were measured by using a LI-6800 Portable Photosynthetic System on the same day at around 10:00 a. m. with an average temperature (25–30 °C) and relative humidity (75–80%). The photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, b, CAR) were measured in the same leaves as those used for photosynthetic attributes and fresh leaf tissues were extracted with 95% alcohol and a spectrophotometer was used to measure absorbance at 665, 649, and 470 nm [29].
Fresh leaf samples were randomly collected from different plants of fragrant rice cultivars for TEM analysis. Small sections of leaves 1–3 mm in length, were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in 0.2 mol/L PBS (sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) for 6–8 h and post-fixed in 1% OsO4 [Osmium (VIII) oxide] for 1 h, then in 0.2 mol/L PBS (pH 7.2) for 1–2 h. Dehydration was performed in a graded ethanol series (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%) followed by acetone, and then samples were filtrated and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Ultra-thin sections (80 nm) were prepared and mounted on copper grids for viewing under a transmission electron microscope (TALOS L120C, Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.3. Estimation of ROS Level, Lipid Peroxidation, Electrolyte Leakage, and Proline Content

To determine hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels in fragrant rice plants, fresh leaves were homogenized with 0.1% of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000× g. The reaction mixture contained supernatant, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and 1 M potassium iodide [30]. The H2O2 levels were quantified by a UV–VIS 2550 spectrophotometer operating at 390 nm and following the calibration curve (Supplementary Table S3). To measure malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, fresh plant samples were homogenized in 0.1% (w/v) cold TCA, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 mL of supernatant and 2.5 mL of 0.5% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution (dissolved in 20% TCA). The reaction mixture was boiled for 30 min, and then rapidly cooled and centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000× g. The difference between the absorbance values at 532 and 600 nm with an extinction coefficient of 155 mM cm was applied to calculate the MDA contents [31]. To determine electrolyte leakage (EL), fresh leaf samples (0.3 g) were washed with distilled water and placed in water-containing closed vials (10 mL, deionized) and incubated at 25 °C for 6 h and then electrical conductivity (EC) (EC1) was recorded with an EC meter (SX-650, Sansin, Guangzhou, China). Then, samples were incubated at 90 °C for 2 h and cooled down to 25 °C to record second EC (EC2). The EL of the leaf samples was calculated as (EL (%) = EC1/EC2 × 100) in triplicate and averaged [30]. The proline contents were estimated according to Bates et al. [32] by using ninhydrin. The reaction mixture was extracted with 5 mL toluene and the absorbance of the red chromophore in the toluene fraction was measured at 520 nm. The amount of proline was estimated using a calibration curve (Supplementary Table S4) and expressed as μg g−1 FW.

2.4. Estimating the Cd Concentrations in Roots, Leaves, and Grains

To measure Cd concentration, fragrant rice plant roots, leaves, and grains were sampled, oven-dried and pulverized, and then digested using an MLS1200 microwave oven (Milestone, FKV, Varese, Italy) in a di-acidic combination of HClO4:HNO3 (1:5). The Cd concentrations were estimated using an AA6300C Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer, Nippon Instruments Corporation, Osaka, Japan, [33].

2.5. Estimation of NO Content

Griess reagent was used to measure the NO contents [19]. Shortly, plant samples were mixed in 50 mM acetic acid buffer (pH 3.6) and zinc acetate (4%). The supernatant was reacted with activated carbon (0.1 g) and, subsequently, reacted with a mixture of sulfanilamide (1%) and HCl (3 M) and then incubated for 10 min (37 °C) under darkness. The absorbance was triplicated at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
Endogenous NO production was detected using diaminoflourescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA) and confocal microscopy (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [19]. The freshly cut plant samples were treated with 10 µM DAF-FM DA in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.8) for 30 min at 37 °C and then rinsed with 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (7.8 pH) for 20 min. The images were captured by a laser confocal scanning microscope (LSM-510) with a 515 nm emission and 495 nm excitation.

2.6. Estimating the Antioxidant Enzymes

The fresh plant samples were normalized in 50 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.8) for antioxidant determinations. The supernatant was collected by centrifuging for 10 min at 12,000× g and the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, peroxidase (POD) activity, catalase (CAT) activity, and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity were estimated [31]. The commercial detection kits “GSH-2-W”, “GR-2-W”, “DHAR-2-W”, “MDHAR-2-W”, and “ASA-1-W” were used to measure glutathione (GSH), glutathione reductase (GR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), manodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and ascorbic acid (AsA) levels, respectively, bought from (http://www.cominbio.com, accessed on 15 March 2024) Comin Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.

2.7. Estimating the Grain Yield Attributes and Quality Traits of Fragrant Rice

Grain yield and contributing attributes were determined at the maturity stage. The grains were manually threshed and sun-dried to around 12–14% moisture content. The productive tillers per pot were counted at the reproductive stage of the plants. To obtain the 1000-grain weight (g), 1000 grains were weighed, while grain yield pot−1 was calculated as the total weight of paddy collected from each pot. The harvested grains were taken from a stored seed lot to determine rice quality attributes. A rice huller (Jingsu, China) was used to obtain brown rice and brown rice rate (BRR) was calculated as follows: (brown rice weight/paddy weight) × 100. The brown rice was milled with a Jingmi testing rice miller (Zhejiang, China) and milling rate was recorded as follows: (milled rice weight/original weight) × 100. Grain chalkiness degree was assessed with the help of an SDE-A light box (Guangzhou, China).

2.8. Quantification of 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline (2AP)

Around 5 g of the fresh grains were weighed and ground for 2AP measurement. The 2AP content in the extraction solution was determined after drying over sodium sulfate and filtering by using the synchronization distillation and extraction method (SDE) combined with a GCMS-QP 2010 Plus (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The conditions of the GCMS-QP 2010 Plus were as follows: the gas chromatograph was equipped with an RTX-5MS (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) silica capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm) and high-purity helium gas (99.999%, Guangzhou Gases Co., LTD, Guangzhou, China) at a flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1. The temperature of the GC oven was 40 °C, increased to 65 °C and held at 65 °C for 1 min, and then further increased to 220 °C and held at 220 °C for 10 min. The ion source temperature was 200 °C. Under these conditions, the retention time of 2-AP was 7.5 min [26]. The 2-AP contents were determined using the calibration curves (Supplementary Data S1 and Table S5) and expressed as ng g−1 fresh weight (FW).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the studied parameters of individual aromatic rice cultivars were performed and the least significant difference test (LSD) was performed for treatment comparison at p < 0.05 using the ‘Statistix 8.1′ (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA). SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for graphical representation.

3. Results

3.1. Impacts of SNP Treatments on Cadmium Concentration, Nitric Oxide Content, and Plant Growth

Cd toxicity significantly diminished the plant dry biomass of all three aromatic rice cultivars as compared to non-Cd-stressed rice plants either with or without SNP treatments (Table 1). However, in Cd-stressed conditions, exogenous application of SNP with 50 µM and 100 µM on aromatic rice cultivars increased plant dry weight by 37.29% and 22.16% in MXZ, 40.22% and 32.86% in GXZ, and 34.89% and 25.61% in XYXZ, respectively, compared to no SNP (Table 1). Correspondingly, Cd stress lowered the NO contents, while SNP spray enriched the NO levels both in the shoot and root tissues of all three aromatic rice cultivars as follows, GXZ > MXZ > XYXZ, suggesting that the GXZ cultivar is more receptive to SNP application than other two aromatic rice cultivars. Under Cd-stressed conditions, foliar application of SNP with 50 µM and 100 µM on aromatic rice cultivars increased NO content in shoots by 60.88% and 40.14% in MXZ, 74.17% and 51.27% in GXZ, and 54.46% and 31.34% in XYXZ, respectively, while in roots by 57.74% and 32.43% in MXZ, 69.18% and 52.09% in GXZ, and 48.65% and 34.52% in XYXZ, respectively, compared to no SNP (Table 1). Moreover, the results were confirmed by taking visual pictures with a DAF-FM DA confocal microscope (Figure 1). The Cd concentration was higher under Cd treatments (Table 1) and roots retained higher quantities of Cd than shoots. Conversely, SNP treatment significantly decreased the Cd concentrations in all aromatic rice cultivars. Under Cd-stressed conditions, foliar application of SNP with 50 µM and 100 µM decreased Cd in shoots by 26.95% and 19.79% in MXZ, 29.16% and 24.48% in GXZ, and 24.49% and 14.65% in XYXZ, and in roots by 21.10% and 18.06% in MXZ, 24.23% and 21.99% in GXZ, and 15.92% and 8.96% in XYXZ, while in grains by 58.98% and 44.10% in MXZ, 64.13% and 51.07% in GXZ, and 35.83% and 42.99% in XYXZ, respectively, compared to no SNP (Table 1).

3.2. Effects of SNP Treatments on Photosynthetic Pigments

Cadmium toxicity decreased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll in all three aromatic rice cultivars MXZ, GXZ, and XYXZ, as compared with respective control plants. However, under Cd-stressed conditions, foliar application of SNP with 50 µM and 100 µM on aromatic rice cultivars increased total Chl content by 50.37% and 35.76% in MXZ, 55.98% and 41.34% in GXZ, and 42.67% and 30.99% in XYXZ, respectively, compared with no SNP application (Figure 2). The exogenous application of 50 µM SNP was more successful than the 100 µM treatment in preventing Chl loss under Cd stress (Figure 2C). In contrast to Chl a and b, the ratio of Chl a/b reduced with 50 µM and 100 µM SNP treatments by 4.29% and 3.08% in MXZ, 6.28% and 5.80% in GXZ, and 6.21% and 4.78% in XYXZ, respectively, compared to no SNP under Cd stress (Figure 2D). CAR contents decreased with Cd stress in all aromatic rice cultivars while foliar treatment of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP to Cd-stressed aromatic rice plants increased CAR by 38.68% and 31.74% in MXZ, 43.77% and 35.66% in GXZ and 33.80% and 39.58% in XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP application (Figure 2E).

3.3. SNP Application Improved Photosynthetic Apparatus

Cadmium toxicity decreased the efficacy of photosynthetic attributes (Pn, E, Ci, and Gs) in aromatic rice cultivars in the following order: GXZ < MXZ < XYXZ. However, foliar spray of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP enhanced net photosynthetic efficiency (Pn) by 43.73% and 46.45% in MXZ, 54.96% and 47.36% in GXZ, and 37.07% and 30.23% in XYXZ, respectively, as compared to no SNP application under Cd stress (Figure 3). Notably, both 50 and 100 µM SNP treatments enhanced photosynthetic attributes under Cd-stressed aromatic rice plants but the 50 µM treatment showed more prominent effects than the 100 µM SNP treatment, suggesting that the 50 µM SNP treatment was more efficient than the 100 µM SNP treatment in aromatic rice plants. Since photosynthetic efficiency largely depends upon the chloroplast integrity in green plants, SNP treatments effects were evaluated on the chloroplast ultrastructural configurations under Cd toxicity. In this experiment, Cd toxicity had a significantly negative impact on the integrity and ultrastructural configuration of the chloroplasts (Figure 4A–C). On the other hand, it was found that the SNP-treated plants’ chloroplasts were more uniform, well-organized, regularly oval shaped, and gathered more starch grains (Figure 4D–F). Moreover, under Cd stress, plant cells were observed with ruptured cell walls, scattered organelles, and fewer chloroplasts, while SNP treatment reversed the Cd-induced inhibitory effects in all aromatic rice cultivars (Figure 4).

3.4. Impact of Foliar SNP Treatments on Membrane Integrity

In all aromatic rice cultivars, cadmium stress significantly increased proline, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondaldehyde (MDA), and electrolyte leakage (EL) either with or without SNP treatments. Foliar treatment of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP further accumulated proline by 67.55% and 44.75% in MXZ, 75.17% and 55.13% in GXZ, and 63.03% and 54.89% in XYXZ respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd stress (Figure 5A). In contrast to proline content, H2O2, MDA, and EL were accumulated in the order of XYXZ > MXZ > GXZ under Cd stress, indicating that, in comparison to other cultivars, GXZ is relatively more resistant to Cd toxicity (Figure 5B–D). However, foliar application of SNP (50 µM) reduced H2O2 content (38.22%, 41.31%, and 34.82%), MDA (26.92%, 32.43%, and 27.66%), and EL (24.27%, 29.49%, and 22.12%) in MXZ, GXZ, and XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd stress. Foliar application of 50 µM SNP proved to be more effective in terms of reducing EL, MDA, and H2O2 contents than 100 µM SNP application (Figure 5).

3.5. Foliar Application of SNP-Enhanced Antioxidant Enzyme Activity under Cd Toxicity

In comparison to cultivars without Cd stress, the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT, APX, and GR) were considerably high under Cd stress in all aromatic rice cultivars. Moreover, foliar spray of SNP (50 µM) further enhanced SOD activity by 37.43%, 53.32%, and 29.54%, POD by 56.96%, 65.34%, and 48.19%, CAT by 34.45%, 35.62%, and 31.99%, APX by 79.73%, 85.40%, and 62.21%, and GR by 48.89%, 51.10%, and 44.58%, in MXZ, GXZ, and XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatments under Cd stress (Figure 6). In this study, foliar SNP treatment with 50 µM proved to be more efficient than 100 µM in all aromatic rice cultivars.

3.6. Foliar Application of SNP Regulated AsA-GSH Cycle

Cd stress reduced AsA content and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and manodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) activities in all aromatic rice cultivars relative to without Cd stress. However, SNP treatment (50 µM) increased AsA content by 62.98%, 68.81%, and 52.92%, DHAR activity by 48.69%, 53.26%, and 40.36%, and MDHAR by 49.38%, 50.73%, and 47.17% in MXZ, GXZ, and XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd stress (Figure 7). In contrast, GSH content increased under Cd toxicity relative to non-Cd-stressed plants. Furthermore, foliar treatments of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP further enhanced the GSH contents by 67.12% and 44.75% in MXZ; 81.97% and 51.48% in GXZ, and 56.28% and 39.15% in XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd toxicity (Figure 7D).

3.7. Influence of SNP Treatments on Aromatic Rice Yield and Grain Attributes

Cd toxicity degraded the grain quality characters as well as significantly decreased grain yield and yield attributes. Conversely, SNP treatments mitigated Cd-induced adversity in rice plants and except from 1000-grain weight, significantly improved all the grain yield attributes (Table 2). Foliar treatments of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP improved grain yield by 42.06% and 30.79% in MXZ, by 46.03% and 37.81% in GXZ, and by 31.21% and 25.82% in XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd stress (Table 2). Similarly, the degree of chalkiness, browning rate, milling rate, and 2AP concentrations in fragrant rice grains were all negatively impacted by Cd toxicity (Table 2). The Cd stress decreased the 2AP contents in the grains of all fragrant rice cultivars while SNP application restored the 2AP concentration in seeds. It was observed that GXZ was the least affected fragrant rice cultivar while being more responsive to SNP application than the other two cultivars, suggesting that GXZ is the most resistant relative to MXZ and XYXZ. However, foliar treatments of 50 µM and 100 µM SNP improved 2AP content by 43.12% and 51.02% in MXZ, 55.84% and 37.09% in GXZ, and 35.72% and 26.53% in XYXZ, respectively, relative to no SNP treatment under Cd stress (Table 2).

4. Discussion

In agricultural plants, all heavy metals, especially Cd toxicity, impair a variety of physio-biochemical processes, the antioxidant defense system, the photosynthetic apparatus, and plant metabolism. This leads to deteriorated grain quality and significant yield losses [34,35]. Hence, implementing Cd-toxicity-mitigating methods in plant growth, and improving yield and quality relapses through better plant metabolism, remain difficult objectives for plant scientists. Recent studies revealed that NO functions as a signaling molecule and helps plants withstand biotic and abiotic stresses [3,8]. Therefore, the present study demonstrated the advantageous impacts of foliar application of NO donor SNP on different aspects of plant metabolism, including the antioxidant defense system, photosynthetic apparatus, yield, and quality attributes of three fragrant rice cultivars exposed to Cd stress.
In the present experiment, photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic attributes were reduced under Cd stress (Figure 2 and Figure 3), which agrees with previous findings that Cd stress decreased photosynthetic efficacy and chlorophyll levels [4,8]. The possible reasons might be that Cd toxicity disorganized chloroplast ultrastructural configurations and induced higher production of ROS and this coincides with previous findings that Cd toxicity disrupted photosynthesis efficacy by affecting the stability and structural configuration of pigment–protein complexes [36]. On the other hand, foliar SNP treatments reversed the Cd-induced adversities in photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic efficiency, and chloroplast ultrastructure configurations (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The possible reason might be the ability of NO to decrease oxidative damage and preserve the ultrastructural configuration and membranes of chloroplasts [2,37] as well as reduce ROS production (Figure 5). Our findings agree with earlier reports that foliar application of NO maintained the structural and functional integrity of stomata and photosynthetic attributes [22] and protected chloroplast membranes and ultrastructural configurations [38,39].
Plants accumulate compatible solutes/osmolytes, particularly proline, to perform a variety of functions, including the protection of numerous enzymes, cellular membrane stability, acting as an osmoticum to maintain turgor, and ROS scavenging activities [40]. Proline contents were significantly higher in aromatic rice plants under Cd toxicity and these results also corroborate with other heavy metals and crops like Cr in Brassica juncea [41] and Ni in Glycine max [42].
The oxidative damage of Cd toxicity was seen in all three aromatic rice cultivars, as manifested by elevated levels of H2O2, MDA, and EL (Figure 5). In previous studies, it was also reported that heavy metals, such as Ni in rice [21] and Cr in Brassica juncea [41], elevated H2O2, EL, and MDA contents. Nevertheless, foliar SNP treatments, in this study, significantly reduced H2O2 production, and limited lipid peroxidation (Figure 5). The possible reason is that improved enzymatic antioxidant activities in SNP-treated aromatic rice plants decreased ROS production and increased membrane stability (Figure 6), and similar findings were reported in Vigna angularis [13] and Lycopersicon esculentum [43].
SOD dismutates superoxide radicals generated in the cells, thereby preventing the formation of toxic hydroxyl, and the resultant H2O2 is either neutralized by APX or CAT during the AsA-GSH cycle [8,44]. The Cd toxicity exacerbated oxidative damage and increased antioxidant enzymes activities (Figure 6). Higher antioxidant enzyme activity has also been reported under various heavy metals like Ni in Oryza sativa [21], Pb in Lycopersicon esculentum [43], and Cd in Vigna angularis [13]. However, foliar spray of SNP further increased their activities while reducing oxidative damages. The reason might be that NO prevents O2·−-mediated cytotoxic effects by converting O2·− to ONOO− [45], thus rendering plants tolerance to oxidative stress. Moreover, antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, APX, CAT, and GR scavenge ROS and stimulate the plant defense mechanism to shield from oxidative damage [46]. Our results are consistent with past research showing that NO treatment enhances plants’ resistance to free radicals in the presence of heavy metals, drought, cold, and heat stresses [21,23].
The non-enzymatic antioxidants AsA and GSH function as a redox buffer in the presence of heavy metal toxicity [47]. The SNP-induced higher AsA and GSH contents coincide with reduced H2O2, MDA, and EL levels, indicating that endogenous NO protected the cellular components from damage. It has also been discovered that applying exogenous NO to plants increases their tolerance to stress and activates the AsA-GSH cycle [20]. AsA, created from DHA with the help of GSH through the AsA-GSH cycle, functions as a substrate during the detoxification of H2O2 [43]. During H2O2 to H2O conversion, APX generates MDHA and DHA. Similarly, AsA synthesis depends on MDHA and DHA, which in turn are mediated by MDHAR and DHAR, respectively. According to [48], transgenic tobacco showed less oxidative damage with overexpressed DHAR. In the current study, NO-induced stress alleviation might be due to maintaining a higher GSH concentration because GSH helps during the synthesis of phytochelatins which chelate toxic metals [3]. Our results also confirm earlier studies that endogenous NO accelerated plant responses to stressful conditions through higher DHAR and GR activities and triggered several downstream signaling events to maintain higher AsA and GSH concentrations [20,49].
In rice, productive tillers, sterility percentage, 1000-grain weight, and number of grains per panicle are the determinants of grain yield, while milling recovery, chalkiness rate, and 2AP content are the key quality estimates of fragrant rice [11,26]. In the current experiment, the presence of Cd stress resulted in a decline in both yield-contributing traits and rice quality attributes. The most probable explanation is greater oxidative damage (Figure 5) and dwindled photosynthetic characteristics (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4), as the precursors and enzymes involved during the 2AP synthesis pathway are extremely susceptible to stressed conditions [11]. Previous research [38,39] indicated that endogenous NO production promoted net photosynthesis, modulated the ultrastructural configurations of chloroplasts both in vivo and in vitro, and mediated photosynthesis in the presence of stressed conditions. Similarly, in the current experiment, NO donor SNP treatments increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes, decreased MDA and H2O2 levels, and well maintained the photosynthetic apparatus and antioxidant defense system. Taken together, the current study infers that among three fragrant rice cultivars, GXZ is more resistant to Cd and more responsive to SNP application, as evidenced by the higher grain yield and improved quality traits which correspond with the enhanced photosynthetic machinery and strengthened enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system under Cd stress compared to other fragrant rice cultivars. Future studies, however, might look at how NO donor SNP treatments affect the precursors and intermediates involved during the 2AP synthesis pathway in aromatic rice cultivated in heavy metal-contaminated soil.

5. Conclusions

The current study’s findings indicate that different fragrant rice cultivars were severely and negatively affected by Cd stress in terms of plant growth, physio-biochemical processes, and grain yield and quality parameters. The Cd toxicity boosted H2O2 generation and enhanced electrolyte leakage as compared to the control. However, SNP treatments effectively mitigated the impediments caused by Cd toxicity on the metabolism, grain production, and quality features of fragrant rice plants. This can be explained by a combination of factors such as reduced absorption of Cd, improved photosynthetic machinery, consistent configurations of chloroplasts, and increased ROS neutralization. Our research revealed that between the two exogenously applied SNP treatments, the 50 µM of SNP treatment was the best treatment for the fragrant rice plants for improving the plant growth, grain quality, and yield attributes under Cd stress. Moreover, the GXZ fragrant rice cultivar showed the highest resistance under Cd stress and was more responsive to SNP application than XYXZ and MXZ cultivars. We deduced that cultivating the GXZ fragrant rice cultivar along with foliar application of 50 µM of SNP could sustain the grain yield and quality features for fragrant rice cultivation under heavy metal (especially Cd)-polluted soils.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14081857/s1, Table S1: The chemical properties of experimental soil; Table S2: Abbreviations used in the manuscript; Table S3: Calibration curve used for determining H2O2 contents; Table S4: Calibration curve used for determining proline contents; Table S5: Calculating the 2AP contents in fragrant rice grains; Data S1: Calibration curves used for determining 2AP contents; Figure S1: H2O2 standard curve; Figure S2: Proline standard curve.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, investigation, resources, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, M.I., S.H., M.S.R., A.I., N.U.R., X.C. and X.T.; project administration, supervision, M.I., X.C. and X.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32150410377 and 31971843), the Special Rural Revitalization Funds of Guangdong Province (2021KJ382) and Agricultural Research Projects of Guangdong Province (2011AO20202001).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bano, K.; Kumar, B.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Exogenously-Sourced Salicylic Acid Imparts Resilience towards Arsenic Stress by Modulating Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Potential and Arsenic Sequestration in Brassica Napus Plants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rather, B.A.; Masood, A.; Sehar, Z.; Majid, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Mechanisms and Role of Nitric Oxide in Phytotoxicity-Mitigation of Copper. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 675. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mir, I.R.; Rather, B.A.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Nitrogen Sources Mitigate Cadmium Phytotoxicity Differentially by Modulating Cellular Buffers, N-Assimilation, Non-Protein Thiols, and Phytochelatins in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 3847–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. El Rasafi, T.; Oukarroum, A.; Haddioui, A.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Bolan, N.; Tack, F.M.G.; Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Rinklebe, J. Cadmium Stress in Plants: A Critical Review of the Effects, Mechanisms, and Tolerance Strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 675–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parmar, P.; Kumari, N.; Sharma, V. Structural and Functional Alterations in Photosynthetic Apparatus of Plants under Cadmium Stress. Bot. Stud. 2013, 54, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, S.; Yang, W.; Yang, T.; Chen, Y.; Ni, W. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Leaf Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis of Elsholtzia Argyi—A Cadmium Accumulating Plant. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2015, 17, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Todorenko, D.; Volgusheva, A.; Timofeev, N.; Kovalenko, I.; Matorin, D.; Antal, T. Multiple in Vivo Effects of Cadmium on Photosynthetic Electron Transport in Pea Plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 2021, 97, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mir, I.R.; Rather, B.A.; Sehar, Z.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric Oxide in Co-Ordination with Nitrogen Reverses Cadmium-Inhibited Photosynthetic Activity by Interacting with Ethylene Synthesis, Strengthening the Antioxidant System, and Nitrogen and Sulfur Assimilation in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Sci Hortic 2023, 314, 111958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bano, K.; Kumar, B.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Protective Mechanisms of Sulfur against Arsenic Phytotoxicity in Brassica Napus by Regulating Thiol Biosynthesis, Sulfur-Assimilation, Photosynthesis, and Antioxidant Response. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 188, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y.; Xiong, J.; Tao, L.; Cao, Z.; Tang, W.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.; Fu, G.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Y. Regulatory Mechanisms of Nitrogen (N) on Cadmium (Cd) Uptake and Accumulation in Plants: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 135186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Imran, M.; Shafiq, S.; Ashraf, U.; Qi, J.; Mo, Z.; Tang, X. Biosynthesis of 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline in Fragrant Rice: Recent Insights into Agro-Management, Environmental Factors, and Functional Genomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 4201–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmad, P.; Abdel Latef, A.A.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Gucel, S.; Tran, L.-S.P. Nitric Oxide Mitigates Salt Stress by Regulating Levels of Osmolytes and Antioxidant Enzymes in Chickpea. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 347. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ahanger, M.A.; Aziz, U.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Combined Kinetin and Spermidine Treatments Ameliorate Growth and Photosynthetic Inhibition in Vigna Angularis by Up-Regulating Antioxidant and Nitrogen Metabolism under Cadmium Stress. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beckman, J.S.; Beckman, T.W.; Chen, J.; Marshall, P.A.; Freeman, B.A. Apparent Hydroxyl Radical Production by Peroxynitrite: Implications for Endothelial Injury from Nitric Oxide and Superoxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 1620–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Padmaja, S.; Huie, R.E. The Reaction of Nitric Oxide with Organic Peroxyl Radicals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 195, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rubbo, H.; Radi, R.; Trujillo, M.; Telleri, R.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Barnes, S.; Kirk, M.; Freeman, B.A. Nitric Oxide Regulation of Superoxide and Peroxynitrite-Dependent Lipid Peroxidation. Formation of Novel Nitrogen-Containing Oxidized Lipid Derivatives. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 26066–26075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Corpas, F.J.; Leterrier, M.; Valderrama, R.; Airaki, M.; Chaki, M.; Palma, J.M.; Barroso, J.B. Nitric Oxide Imbalance Provokes a Nitrosative Response in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 604–611. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, S.; Husain, T.; Kushwaha, B.K.; Suhel, M.; Fatima, A.; Mishra, V.; Singh, S.K.; Bhatt, J.A.; Rai, M.; Prasad, S.M. Regulation of Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle by Exogenous Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Peroxide in Soybean Roots under Arsenate Stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 409, 123686. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Wu, S.; Hu, C.; Tan, Q.; Xu, S.; Sun, X. Nitric Oxide Mediates Molybdenum-Induced Antioxidant Defense in Wheat under Drought Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1085. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun, C.; Liu, L.; Yu, Y.; Liu, W.; Lu, L.; Jin, C.; Lin, X. Nitric Oxide Alleviates Aluminum-induced Oxidative Damage through Regulating the Ascorbate-glutathione Cycle in Roots of Wheat. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Rizwan, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Imtiaz, M.; Mehmood, S.; Adeel, M.; Dai, Z.; Li, Z.; Aziz, O.; Zhang, Y. Nitric Oxide Induces Rice Tolerance to Excessive Nickel by Regulating Nickel Uptake, Reactive Oxygen Species Detoxification and Defense-Related Gene Expression. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Fatma, M.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Nitric Oxide Alleviates Salt Stress Inhibited Photosynthetic Performance by Interacting with Sulfur Assimilation in Mustard. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 521. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ozfidan-Konakci, C.; Yildiztugay, E.; Elbasan, F.; Kucukoduk, M.; Turkan, I. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Nitric Oxide (NO) Alleviate Cobalt Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by Modulating Photosynthesis, Chloroplastic Redox and Antioxidant Capacity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 122061. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mukherjee, S. Recent Advancements in the Mechanism of Nitric Oxide Signaling Associated with Hydrogen Sulfide and Melatonin Crosstalk during Ethylene-Induced Fruit Ripening in Plants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 82, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wakte, K.; Zanan, R.; Hinge, V.; Khandagale, K.; Nadaf, A.; Henry, R. Thirty-three Years of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, a Principal Basmati Aroma Compound in Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.): A Status Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Mo, Z.; Li, Y.; Nie, J.; He, L.; Pan, S.; Duan, M.; Tian, H.; Xiao, L.; Zhong, K.; Tang, X. Nitrogen Application and Different Water Regimes at Booting Stage Improved Yield and 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline (2AP) Formation in Fragrant Rice. Rice 2019, 12, 74. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kanu, A.S.; Ashraf, U.; Mo, Z.; Fuseini, I.; Mansaray, L.R.; Duan, M.; Pan, S.; Tang, X. Cadmium Uptake and Distribution in Fragrant Rice Genotypes and Related Consequences on Yield and Grain Quality Traits. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1405878. [Google Scholar]
  28. Imran, M.; Junaid, M.; Shafiq, S.; Liu, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Tang, X. Multiomics Analysis Reveals a Substantial Decrease in Nanoplastics Uptake and Associated Impacts by Nano Zinc Oxide in Fragrant Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 474, 134640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Imran, M.; Hu, C.; Hussain, S.; Rana, M.S.; Riaz, M.; Afzal, J.; Aziz, O.; Elyamine, A.M.; Ismael, M.A.F.; Sun, X. Molybdenum-Induced Effects on Photosynthetic Efficacy of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Different Nitrogen Sources Are Associated with Nitrogen Assimilation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 141, 154–163. [Google Scholar]
  30. Valentovic, P.; Luxova, M.; Kolarovic, L.; Gasparikova, O. Effect of Osmotic Stress on Compatible Solutes Content, Membrane Stability and Water Relations in Two Maize Cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 2006, 52, 184. [Google Scholar]
  31. Imran, M.; Sun, X.; Hussain, S.; Ali, U.; Rana, M.S.; Rasul, F.; Shaukat, S.; Hu, C. Molybdenum Application Regulates Oxidative Stress Tolerance in Winter Wheat under Different Nitrogen Sources. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Stress Studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar]
  33. Filipiak-Szok, A.; Kurzawa, M.; Szłyk, E. Determination of Toxic Metals by ICP-MS in Asiatic and European Medicinal Plants and Dietary Supplements. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 30, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Cao, F.; Cai, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, M.; He, X.; Zhang, G.; Wu, F. Differences in Photosynthesis, Yield and Grain Cadmium Accumulation as Affected by Exogenous Cadmium and Glutathione in the Two Rice Genotypes. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 715–723. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ismael, M.A.; Elyamine, A.M.; Moussa, M.G.; Cai, M.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C. Cadmium in Plants: Uptake, Toxicity, and Its Interactions with Selenium Fertilizers. Metallomics 2019, 11, 255–277. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Quan, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X. Response of Photosynthesis to Different Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Davidia Involucrata. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228563. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Z.; Gao, J.; Gao, F.; Liu, P.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, J. Photosynthetic Characteristics and Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Summer Maize Response to Different Nitrogen Supplies. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 576. [Google Scholar]
  38. Khan, M.N.; Siddiqui, M.H.; AlSolami, M.A.; Alamri, S.; Hu, Y.; Ali, H.M.; Al-Amri, A.A.; Alsubaie, Q.D.; Al-Munqedhi, B.M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, A. Crosstalk of Hydrogen Sulfide and Nitric Oxide Requires Calcium to Mitigate Impaired Photosynthesis under Cadmium Stress by Activating Defense Mechanisms in Vigna Radiata. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 278–290. [Google Scholar]
  39. Misra, A.N.; Vladkova, R.; Singh, R.; Misra, M.; Dobrikova, A.G.; Apostolova, E.L. Action and Target Sites of Nitric Oxide in Chloroplasts. Nitric Oxide 2014, 39, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Inafuku, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Oku, H. Nitric Oxide Regulates Plant Growth, Physiology, Antioxidant Defense, and Ion Homeostasis to Confer Salt Tolerance in the Mangrove Species, Kandelia Obovata. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Handa, N.; Kohli, S.K.; Thukral, A.K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Protective Role of Selenium against Chromium Stress Involving Metabolites and Essential Elements in Brassica juncea L. Seedlings. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 66. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sirhindi, G.; Mir, M.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P.; Gucel, S. Jasmonic Acid Modulates the Physio-Biochemical Attributes, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, and Gene Expression in Glycine Max under Nickel Toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 591. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bali, S.; Kaur, P.; Kohli, S.K.; Ohri, P.; Thukral, A.K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Wijaya, L.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Jasmonic Acid Induced Changes in Physio-Biochemical Attributes and Ascorbate-Glutathione Pathway in Lycopersicon Esculentum under Lead Stress at Different Growth Stages. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 1344–1360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Laxa, M.; Liebthal, M.; Telman, W.; Chibani, K.; Dietz, K.-J. The Role of the Plant Antioxidant System in Drought Tolerance. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Leterrier, M.; Airaki, M.; Palma, J.M.; Chaki, M.; Barroso, J.B.; Corpas, F.J. Arsenic Triggers the Nitric Oxide (NO) and S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) Metabolism in Arabidopsis. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 166, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Al Mahmud, J.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.-J. The Relationship between Metal Toxicity and Cellular Redox Imbalance. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chang, L.; Sun, H.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Su, Z.; Chen, F.; Wei, W. Over-Expression of Dehydroascorbate Reductase Enhances Oxidative Stress Tolerance in Tobacco. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 25, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Domingos, P.; Prado, A.M.; Wong, A.; Gehring, C.; Feijo, J.A. Nitric Oxide: A Multitasked Signaling Gas in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 506–520. [Google Scholar]
Agronomy 14 01857 g001
Figure 1. Influence of sodium nitroprusside (NO donor), on endogenous NO production as measured by diaminoflourescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA) fluorescence microscopy under SNP0 µM + Cd50 mg/kg treatment (A–C) and SNP50 µM + Cd50 mg/kg treatment (D–F) and relative fluorescence density levels in fragrant rice leaves (G), expressed as a color level on a range from 0 to 255. Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Influence of sodium nitroprusside (NO donor), on endogenous NO production as measured by diaminoflourescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA) fluorescence microscopy under SNP0 µM + Cd50 mg/kg treatment (A–C) and SNP50 µM + Cd50 mg/kg treatment (D–F) and relative fluorescence density levels in fragrant rice leaves (G), expressed as a color level on a range from 0 to 255. Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g001
Agronomy 14 01857 g002
Figure 2. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on the following: chlorophyll (Chl a) (A); chlorophyll (Chl b) (B); total chlorophyll (Chl a + b) (C); ratio of chlorophyll (Chl a/b) (D); and carotenoid (CAR) contents (E) in aromatic rice leaves under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on the following: chlorophyll (Chl a) (A); chlorophyll (Chl b) (B); total chlorophyll (Chl a + b) (C); ratio of chlorophyll (Chl a/b) (D); and carotenoid (CAR) contents (E) in aromatic rice leaves under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g002
Agronomy 14 01857 g003
Figure 3. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on (A) net photosynthesis rate Pn, (B) transpiration rate E, (C) intercellular CO2 conc. Ci and (D) stomatal conductance gs in leaves of aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on (A) net photosynthesis rate Pn, (B) transpiration rate E, (C) intercellular CO2 conc. Ci and (D) stomatal conductance gs in leaves of aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g003
Agronomy 14 01857 g004
Figure 4. Effect of foliar sodium nitroprusside (SNP) treatments on TEM images of the leaves of three aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity, where (A–C) show TEM images under Cd stress (50 mg) without SNP application while (D–F) are the images with foliar application of SNP (50 µM) under Cd-stressed (50 mg) fragrant rice cultivars; Pg, Plastoglobuli; Cw, cell wall; Sg, starch grains; Vc, vacuoles; Chl, chloroplast.
Figure 4. Effect of foliar sodium nitroprusside (SNP) treatments on TEM images of the leaves of three aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity, where (A–C) show TEM images under Cd stress (50 mg) without SNP application while (D–F) are the images with foliar application of SNP (50 µM) under Cd-stressed (50 mg) fragrant rice cultivars; Pg, Plastoglobuli; Cw, cell wall; Sg, starch grains; Vc, vacuoles; Chl, chloroplast.
Agronomy 14 01857 g004
Agronomy 14 01857 g005
Figure 5. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on proline (A); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content (B); malondialdehyde (MDA) (C); and electrolyte leakage (%) (D) in aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on proline (A); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content (B); malondialdehyde (MDA) (C); and electrolyte leakage (%) (D) in aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g005
Agronomy 14 01857 g006
Figure 6. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on enzymatic antioxidants activities: (A) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) peroxidase (POD), (C) catalase (CAT), (D) ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and (E) glutathione reductase (GR) of aromatic rice plants under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on enzymatic antioxidants activities: (A) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) peroxidase (POD), (C) catalase (CAT), (D) ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and (E) glutathione reductase (GR) of aromatic rice plants under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g006
Agronomy 14 01857 g007
Figure 7. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on (A) ascorbic acid (AsA); (B) dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR); (C) manodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR); and (D) glutathione (GSH) contents in different aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effects of SNP treatments (50 and 100 µM) on (A) ascorbic acid (AsA); (B) dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR); (C) manodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR); and (D) glutathione (GSH) contents in different aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity (50 mg). Bars above means indicate ±S.E. of four independent replicates (n = 4) and different small alphabetical letters above means reveal significant differences among treatments within a particular cultivar according to the LSD test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 01857 g007
Table 1. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on plant dry weight, nitric oxide contents, and cadmium conc. in aromatic rice cultivars under Cd stress.
Table 1. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on plant dry weight, nitric oxide contents, and cadmium conc. in aromatic rice cultivars under Cd stress.
Rice CultivarsTreatmentsTotal Plant DW (g)NO Content in Roots
(nmol g−1 FW)		NO Content in Leaves
(nmol g−1 FW)		Cd Conc. in Root (mg kg−1 DW)Cd Conc. in Leaves
(mg kg−1 DW)		Cd Conc. in Grains
(mg kg−1 DW)
MXZSNP0Cd03.21 ± 0.18 bc8.34 ± 0.56 b15.69 ± 1.03 b–––
Cd502.17 ± 0.10 d5.16 ± 0.23 c9.65 ± 0.55 c27.06 ± 1.16 a19.97 ± 1.27 a1.21 ± 0.10 a
SNP50Cd04.69 ± 0.35 a15.42 ± 1.26 a28.84 ± 1.52 a–––
Cd502.98 ± 0.18 c8.14 ± 0.21 b15.53 ± 1.03 b26.87 ± 0.69 a14.86 ± 0.41 b0.59 ± 0.05 b
SNP100Cd03.79 ± 0.22 b13.49 ± 0.86 a26.24 ± 1.45 a–––
Cd502.65 ± 0.17 cd6.83 ± 0.15 bc13.53 ± 0.66 b25.62 ± 1.22 a15.21 ± 0.49 b0.68 ± 0.04 b
GXZSNP0Cd03.70 ± 0.42 c8.78 ± 0.51 c16.99 ± 0.94 c–––
Cd502.64 ± 0.10 d5.70 ± 0.47 d11.26 ± 0.80 d27.94 ± 1.31 a18.42 ± 0.92 a0.98 ± 0.07 a
SNP50Cd05.66 ± 0.38 a17.25 ± 1.24 a31.92 ± 1.60 a–––
Cd503.71 ± 0.19 c9.64 ± 0.45 c19.62 ± 0.93 c25.08 ± 0.91 a12.93 ± 0.95 b0.35 ± 0.02 c
SNP100Cd04.86 ± 0.19 b12.44 ± 0.90 b24.56 ± 1.80 b–––
Cd503.51 ± 0.10 c8.67 ± 0.64 c17.04 ± 1.31 c26.91 ± 1.12 a14.40 ± 0.46 b0.48 ± 0.04 b
XYXZSNP0Cd02.81 ± 0.13 b8.28 ± 0.66 bc14.19 ± 0.80 b–––
Cd501.88 ± 0.07 c4.84 ± 0.32 e8.08 ± 0.42 d28.86 ± 1.27 a20.55 ± 0.82 a1.47 ± 0.11 a
SNP50Cd04.36 ± 0.22 a13.67 ± 0.78 a24.44 ± 1.64 a–––
Cd502.53 ± 0.17 b7.20 ± 0.57 cd12.47 ± 0.55 bc25.20 ± 1.05 a16.82 ± 1.17 b0.94 ± 0.07 b
SNP100Cd03.77 ± 0.30 a9.43 ± 0.70 b21.41 ± 1.74 a–––
Cd502.36 ± 0.21 bc6.51 ± 0.10 de10.61 ± 1.12 cd26.93 ± 1.10 a17.54 ± 0.66 b0.84 ± 0.04 b
Note: Cd in the form of CdCl2·2.5H2O was treated in the soil as 0 and 50 mg/kg, while foliar SNP treatments were in the form of Na2[Fe(CN)5NO] at three levels (0, 50, and 100 µM). The numerical values reflect means from four independent replicates (±S.E.) with different treatments. Data presented in individual columns indicated with dissimilar alphabets (a, b, c, etc.) differ significantly within a cultivar by LSD test at p < 0.05. MXZ, Meixiangzhan-2; GXZ, Guixiangzhan; and XYXZ, Xiangyaxiangzhan.
Table 2. Effects of SNP treatments on yield traits and grain quality attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity.
Table 2. Effects of SNP treatments on yield traits and grain quality attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars under Cd toxicity.
Yield Traits Grain Quality Attributes
Rice CultivarsTreatmentProductive Tiller per PotGrains per Panicle1000-Grains WeightGrain Yield per Pot Browning Rate (%)Milling Rate (%)Chalkiness Degree (%)2AP Content
(ng g−1 FW)
MXZSNP0Cd025.10±1.27 b137.66 ± 2.10 bc18.49 ± 0.47 ab53.35 ± 1.51 b 70.08 ± 3.58 a56.52 ± 1.74 bc13.96 ± 0.30 bc136.70 ± 6.17 bc
Cd5019.93 ± 0.61 c119.76 ± 5.62 c17.40 ± 0.99 b40.42 ± 2.86 c 67.53 ± 1.69 a51.32 ± 2.35 c18.91 ± 1.35 a98.18 ± 7.11 c
SNP50Cd036.63 ± 2.47 a175.04 ± 11.37 a20.95 ± 0.92 a80.79 ± 5.53 a 76.43 ± 1.84 a65.77 ± 2.56 a10.92 ± 0.86 d276.00 ± 25.26 a
Cd5028.44 ± 1.41 b159.34 ± 8.06 ab18.88 ± 0.89 ab57.42 ± 2.45 b 71.35 ± 2.19 a54.91 ± 1.82 bc14.87 ± 0.64 b140.53 ± 8.82 b
SNP100Cd034.85 ± 1.29 a159.68 ± 9.11 ab19.04 ± 0.67 ab71.85 ± 5.54 a 73.35 ± 3.78 a62.96 ± 5.73 ab12.10 ± 0.19 cd259.26 ± 10.96 a
Cd5025.85 ± 1.80 b149.94 ± 5.04 b18.57 ± 1.61 ab52.87 ± 2.14 b 71.29 ± 4.30 a53.33 ± 1.53 c16.26 ± 0.86 b148.27 ± 9.17 b
GXZSNP0Cd030.75 ± 2.00 b140.33 ± 8.85 c19.15 ± 0.65 b64.36 ± 4.16 b 81.52 ± 1.61 ab66.39 ± 2.05 a11.55 ± 0.20 bc158.47 ± 11.30 bc
Cd5021.24 ± 0.76 c120.99 ± 4.16 c17.98 ± 0.89 b46.08 ± 2.76 c 77.28 ± 2.90 b57.28 ± 2.17 b15.31 ± 0.44 a115.32 ± 4.30 c
SNP50Cd043.80 ± 3.12 a195.44 ± 10.82 a21.94 ± 1.28 a99.23 ± 6.75 a 90.06 ± 1.68 a69.14 ± 1.47 a9.58 ± 0.53 d302.23 ± 29.26 a
Cd5031.57 ± 0.98 b166.81 ± 7.64 b19.90 ± 0.14 ab67.30 ± 1.17 b 83.35 ± 1.93 ab64.79 ± 2.73 ab12.64 ± 0.41 b179.72 ± 14.47 b
SNP100Cd038.09 ± 2.11 a182.69 ± 11.96 ab20.76 ± 0.98 ab90.72 ± 6.22 a 86.65 ± 3.29 ab68.82 ± 4.17 a10.58 ± 0.58 cd283.60 ± 21.02 a
Cd5030.04 ± 1.92 b174.54 ± 4.64 ab18.28 ± 1.18 b63.51 ± 4.68 b 82.95 ± 6.90 ab66.09 ± 1.82 a14.42 ± 0.35 a158.10 ± 8.91 bc
XYXZSNP0Cd022.68 ± 1.18 bc128.20 ± 2.49 bc18.19 ± 0.85 bc47.61 ± 3.76 b 64.10 ± 3.28 abc52.05 ± 1.34 c19.75 ± 0.64 c117.31 ± 8.59 b
Cd5017.63 ± 1.29 c111.54 ± 5.23 c15.99 ± 0.70 c35.51 ± 2.68 c 59.23 ± 1.48 c49.11 ± 1.99 c23.90 ± 0.88 a80.10 ± 6.38 c
SNP50Cd035.08 ± 2.67 a162.53 ± 9.84 a20.63 ± 1.07 a77.42 ± 5.76 a 69.81 ± 2.22 ab61.34 ± 2.32 ab12.33 ± 0.55 d245.17 ± 23.62 a
Cd5023.88 ± 1.67 b145.68 ± 7.37 ab16.90 ± 0.43 c46.59 ± 3.86 bc 64.12 ± 3.54 abc55.52 ± 1.24 bc22.42 ± 0.74 ab108.72 ± 8.72 bc
SNP100Cd031.74 ± 2.71 a144.26 ± 6.96 ab20.34 ± 0.77 ab78.17 ± 4.04 a 71.96 ± 5.48 a64.04 ± 5.01 a11.64 ± 0.47 d212.55 ± 6.99 a
Cd5022.15 ± 1.19 bc136.41 ± 2.55 b16.40 ± 0.89 c44.68 ± 0.88 bc 61.32 ± 1.80 bc56.98 ± 2.15 abc21.64 ± 1.03 bc101.36 ± 3.70 bc
Note: Cd in the form of CdCl2·2.5H2O was treated in the soil as 0 and 50 mg/kg, while foliar SNP treatments were in the form of Na2[Fe(CN)5NO] at three levels (0, 50, and 100 µM). The numerical values reflect means from four independent replicates (±S.E.) with different treatments. Data presented in individual columns indicated with dissimilar alphabets (a, b, c, etc.) differ significantly within a cultivar by LSD test at p < 0.05. MXZ, Meixiangzhan-2; GXZ, Guixiangzhan; and XYXZ, Xiangyaxiangzhan; 2AP, 2-acetyle-1-pyrolline.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Imran, M.; Hussain, S.; Rana, M.S.; Iqbal, A.; Rehman, N.U.; Chen, X.; Tang, X. Exogenously Applied Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviated Cadmium Toxicity in Different Aromatic Rice Cultivars by Improving Nitric Oxide Accumulation and Modulating Oxidative Metabolism. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081857

AMA Style

Imran M, Hussain S, Rana MS, Iqbal A, Rehman NU, Chen X, Tang X. Exogenously Applied Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviated Cadmium Toxicity in Different Aromatic Rice Cultivars by Improving Nitric Oxide Accumulation and Modulating Oxidative Metabolism. Agronomy. 2024; 14(8):1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Imran, Muhammad, Saddam Hussain, Muhammad Shoaib Rana, Anas Iqbal, Naveed Ur Rehman, Xiaoyuan Chen, and Xiangru Tang. 2024. "Exogenously Applied Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviated Cadmium Toxicity in Different Aromatic Rice Cultivars by Improving Nitric Oxide Accumulation and Modulating Oxidative Metabolism" Agronomy 14, no. 8: 1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081857

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop