Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Detection and Counting of Wheat Spikes Based on Improved YOLOv10
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Twenty Years of Suction Trap Data on the Flight Activity of Myzus persicae and Brevicoryne brassicae, Two Main Vectors of Oilseed Rape Infection Viruses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Strubbelig-Receptor Family (SRF) Related to Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

by
Furqan Ahmad
1,
Shoaib Ur Rehman
1,
Muhammad Habib Ur Rahman
1,
Saghir Ahmad
2 and
Zulqurnain Khan
1,*
1
Sino-Pak Joint Research Laboratory, Institute of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan 60000, Punjab, Pakistan
2
Cotton Research Institute, Multan 60000, Punjab, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(9), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091933
Submission received: 10 May 2024 / Revised: 5 August 2024 / Accepted: 15 August 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)

Abstract

:
Cotton is one of the world’s leading fiber crops, but climate change, drought, heat, and salinity have significantly decreased its production, consequently affecting the textile industries globally. To acclimate to these environmental challenges, a number of gene families involved in various molecular, physiological, and hormonal mechanisms play crucial roles in improving plants response to various abiotic stresses. One such gene family is the GhSRF, a Strubbelig-Receptor family (SRF), and member of the leucine-rich repeat (LRR-V) group. This family encodes leucine-rich repeat transmembrane receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) and have not yet been explored in cotton. Arabidopsis thaliana Strubbelig-Receptor gene sequences were used as queries to identify the homologs in cotton, with subsequent support from the literature and functional prediction through online data. In the current study, a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of cotton was conducted, identifying 22 SRF putative proteins encoded by 22 genes. We performed the detailed analysis of these proteins, including phylogeny, motif and gene structure characterization, promoter analysis, gene mapping on chromosomes, gene duplication events, and chromosomal sub-cellular localization. Expression analysis of putative genes was performed under drought and heat stress conditions using publicly available RNAseq data. The qRT-PCR results showed elevated expression of GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 under drought and heat stress. So, it could be speculated that these genes may play a role in drought and heat tolerance in cotton. These findings could be helpful in cotton breeding programs for the development of climate-resilient cultivars.

1. Introduction

Upland cotton belongs to the Gossypium genus, which is divided into two groups: “Old World cotton” and “New World cotton”. The Old World cotton group includes two diploid cultivated species, G. arboreum and G. herbaceum. The New World cotton group includes tetraploid cultivated species such as G. hirsutum (AD1) and G. barbadense (AD2). Other tetraploid species, which are wild types, contain G. tomentosum (AD3), G. mustelinum s (AD4), G. darwinii (AD5), and G. ekmanianum (AD6). Diploid species are further classified into eight genomes based on geographical distribution [1]. Climate change is the biggest challenge of the 21st century and significantly hampering agricultural yields [2,3]. The unprecedented and abrupt patterns of climatic changes have severely impacted the sustainability of major field crops [4]. Abiotic stresses, intensified by the changing climate, impose severe adverse effects on the natural environment of plant species [5]. The high temperature, one of the key abiotic factors, evidently reduced the production of major crops worldwide due to increases ranging from 2.6 to 4 °C [6,7]. Heat and drought stresses have significantly influenced the seed cotton, whether these factors occurred separately, alternately, or simultaneously [8]. Heat stress accompanied by the droughts may reduce crop yields up to 60% [9].
Plant species research differs considerably in the 21st century as compared with the 20th century. Genome-based studies had been revolutionized after the whole-genome sequencing of Arabidopsis thaliana [10]. Utilizing genome-wide predictions has provided a comprehensive understanding of gene functions across various biological processes [11]. For sustainable cotton production, advanced fast-track breeding tools integrated with genomic selections are indispensable in changing climate [12]. The response of the cotton genome to abiotic stresses is highly complex and genome-wide analyses had assured the identification of multiple genes in cotton [13,14]. To cope with the adverse conditions and to survive in changing climate, genome-wide characterization is crucial, ultimately indicating the role of different genes [15].
The regulation of many aspects of plant life cycle is carried out through receptor-like kinases (RLKs), a distinct group of surface receptors [16]. The Strubbelig-Receptor family (SRF) belongs to the leucine-rich repeat (LRR-V) group, encoding leucine-rich repeat transmembrane receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs). These kinases play crucial roles in plant development, including the formation of different plant parts such as carpels, petals, ovules, and root hairs [17,18,19]. According to a study, the role of the SRF4 gene was reported as a positive regulator of leaf size [16]. In plants, apical meristems and organ development patterns were influenced by intercellular signaling. In Arabidopsis, the role of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like Strubbelig proteins had been shown to regulate floral shape, ovule integument morphogenesis, cell division, and root hair patterning, indicating their presence as a typical kinase with Strubbelig members [20,21]. Variations in the Strubbelig Receptor Kinase 3 (SRF3) gene had resulted incompatibilities among various accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana due to different immune responses [22]. Silencing of the SCRAMBLED/STRUBBELIG (SCM/SUB) gene resulted in decreased cell proliferation, compromised cell expansion, and clear changes in auxin distribution patterns [23]. Mutation in the sub-2 allele of the Scrambled/Strubbelig (SCM/SUB) Receptor-like Kinase gene resulted in slow development of leaf blades with irregular shape [24]. A study on root architecture traits resulted in Strubbelig-Receptor Family3 (SRF3/SUB) as a candidate gene in canola [25]. This SUB gene was involved in signal transduction, ultimately regulating the synthesis of the cellulose, which is a central carbohydrate component of the cell wall. The signaling transduction of the SUB gene is further involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which further influences stress-related gene activation mechanisms [26].
The SRF family has been studied in model plants and a few studies are reported in other plant species. As members of the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) class involved in membrane signal transduction, this family has been relatively underexplored for its role in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Therefore, we characterized this family for drought and heat tolerance in upland cotton.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sequence Retrieval of SRF Protein Family Members

SRF genes were downloaded from cotton database CottonFGD [27] and Phytozome13 [28] using the AtSRF (AT1G11130, AT1G53730, AT1G78980, AT2G20850, AT3G13065, AT3G14350, AT4G03390, AT4G22130, AT5G06820) query sequences. A Hidden Markov Model (HMM) confirmed the mined GhSRF proteins in Gossypium hirsutum to avoid the omission of useful genes. The targeted cotton species included G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. tomentosum, G. barbadense, G. mustelinum, G. hirsutum, and G. darwinii. Arabidopsis thaliana was selected as a model organism. Theobroma cacao species was selected as close relatives of upland cotton. Oryza sativa was selected from monocots to compare the evolutionary process of the SRF gene family. Organisms like Selaginella moellendorffii, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and Physcomitrium patens were selected as primitive organisms to compare the evolution of this gene family in cotton and other primitive and model organisms of diverse groups and further verified using SMART [29] and InterProScan5 [30]. The GhSRF genes were further examined thoroughly for biophysical properties using CottonFGD, EnsemblPlants [31], and ExPASy [32]. These properties were molecular protein length (A.A), protein molecular weight (KDa), charge, isoelectric point (pI), and grand average of hydropathy. Sub-cellular localization of the SRF gene was investigated using Cello V.2.0 [33].

2.2. Construction of Phylostratum, and Phylogeny Tree

The NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 25 March 2024)) was used to create the phylip file and visualized in iTOL [34] to generate the phyla-stratum tree of all studied species. The ClustalW program in MEGA V.11 [35] was used for multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of the retrieved sequences from all targeted species. The phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method with bootstrap values of 1000 replications was performed.

2.3. Sequence Logos and Conserved Amino Acid Analysis

Protein sequences from upland cotton species including G. hirsutum, G. arboruem, and G. raimondii were used to develop sequence logos using online WebLogo tool [36] and further visualized in TBtools [37]. The same region of all three species was used to perform this analysis.

2.4. Promoter, Protein Motifs, and Gene Structure Analyses

To investigate the cis-element from the promoter region of GhSRF genes, the 2000 bp upstream region of each gene was utilized. PlantCARE [38] was used to conduct promoter analysis, which was visualized in TBtools. Motifs present among the proteins were explored using MEME Suite [39]. All the default parameters were ensured except a few, like (i) occurrence of motif value of 1 for each sequence, (ii) residue range selected as 12–65 s in the motif width, (iii) motif number of 10, (iv) minimum sites in motif of 5. After setting default parameters, the MEME.xml or mast.xml file was retrieved. The further processing of these files to draw a motif structure was performed in TBtools. Gene structure display analysis was performed using Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 [40].

2.5. Sub-Cellular Localization, Gene Mapping on Chromosomes, Gene Duplication, Collinearity and Ratios of Ka/Ks

Sub-cellular localization was predicted using CELLO [41] and WOLFPSORT [42] and a heatmap of the studied genes was created with TBtools. MapChart v2.32 [43] was utilized to find the position of different genes on all the concerned chromosomes of the cotton. The codon alignment and duplication of genes was ensured using the CLUSTAL X 2.0 [44] PAL2NAL program [45]. The CODMEL program and PAML package [46] were the best-suited options used to evaluate the non-synonym (Ka) and synonym (Ks) values, as an indicator of duplication events. TBtools was used for the visualization of the results on the provided values of Ka/Ks. The circus-based tool “Circoletto” [47] was used to draw the sequence similarity and duplications in the Arabidopsis and upland cotton species. The peptide FASTA sequences of G. hirsutum were used as query sequences against peptide sequences of other cotton species. The similarity was provided in the form of a circle on the basis of bit-score values.

2.6. In Silico Expression Analysis of GhSRF Genes

RNA-seq data of GhSRF under drought and high temperature were retrieved from CottonFGD under the project available at the NCBI Geodataset (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA490626 accessed on 4 April 2024). The G. hirsutum line named Texas Marker 1 (TM-1) was used as experimental material. The expression of all genes under drought and heat stress conditions was presented through heat maps.

2.7. Expression Analysis and Validation of Candidate Genes

To perform the gene expression studies, the most tolerant line (VH-402) and most susceptible line (CIM-443) from previous investigations were used along with a standard line TM-1 (Texas Marker-1). The qRT-PCR was performed to investigate the relative expression patterns of selected candidate GhSRFs under drought and high-temperature conditions. Initially, the twenty-day-old seedlings of cotton genotypes were maintained under normal conditions with a temperature range of 30 °C during the day and 24 °C during the night, light intensity of 400–600 µmol m⁻2 s⁻1, and 16/8 h light/dark in a growth chamber. The humidity was kept to 50–60% under normal conditions. For drought stress, (PEG-17% mass fraction) was used to induce the drought effects on twenty-day-old cotton seedlings. For heat stress induction, seedlings were placed in another growth chamber with a day temperature of 45 °C, night temperature of 35 °C, and humidity of 60 to 70%, with the same light intensity of 400–600 µmol m⁻2 s⁻1 and the same photoperiods as the normal conditions. The experiment, designed as a completely randomized design with three replications, was maintained under normal and stress conditions for 72 h, after which leaf samples were collected for RNA extraction. The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from extracted RNA and Ghactin7 (NCBI-AY305729) was used as internal reference during the expression studies, and the experiment was independently repeated three times. The 2−ΔΔCT formula was used to determine the relative gene expression [48]. The primers used in this study are presented in (Supplementary Table S1).

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Physiochemical Properties of SRF Genes in Cotton

Thirteen (13) SRF family genes from G. arboreum, eleven from G. raimondii, twenty-two from G. hirsutum, twenty-five from G. barbadense, twelve from G. tomentosum, fifteen from G. mustelinum, sixteen from G. darwinii, eight from A. thaliana. Fifteen from O. sativa, eight from T. cacao, four from S. moellendorffii, one from C. reinhardtii, and six from P. patents gene were retrieved (Supplementary Table S2). Biophysical properties like coordinates, CDS length, strand, protein length (aa), molecular weight (kDa), charge, isoelectric point, and grand average of hydropathy of the studied GhSRF members from the G. hirsutum L. are presented in Supplementary Table S3.

3.2. Sequence Alignment, Phylostratum, and Phylogenetic Tree

The phylostratum analysis revealed the evolutionary relationships among the targeted species at the whole-genome level (Figure 1A). The phylogenetic analysis identified the origins of the SRF genes and provided knowledge of their emergence and diversification. The phylogenetic analysis further elucidated the evolutionary history of SRF proteins in cotton, highlighting their relationships with SRF gene members in other organisms (Figure 1B). A total of 156 SRF family genes from different organisms were used to construct the phylogenetic tree, which divided SRF members into five major groups viz. a, b, c, d, and e. The group (SRF-d) was the largest group, with 39 (39 proteins) members, and all belonged to the Gossypium genus, along with some members from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. cacao, indicating a closer evolutionary relationship and shared ancestral traits or recent common ancestry. The group (SRF-d) was followed by the group (SFR-c), exhibiting the same patterns for genes and their evolution. The groups (SRF-a and SRF-e) included 26 (26 proteins) members each, and most of the members were from the Gossypium species. SRF group a, c, d, and e contained most of the members from the Gossypium genus, including G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. mustelinum, G. darwinii, G. tomentosum, and only a few members from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. cacao. The group (SRF-b) represented the members from all cotton species, model plants, monocots, and most primitive organisms. The presence of SRF members in Gossypium species and primitive organisms (SRF-b) indicated the conserved behavior of SRF genes during the evolutionary process. The phylogenetic analysis indicated the evolutionary linkage of SRF genes in different primitive and higher organisms.

3.3. Finding of Conserved Amino Acid Patterns

Sequence logos were generated to analyze the conserved patterns of SRF family proteins in G. hirsutum (AADD genome), G. arboreum (AA), and G. raimondii (DD). Sequence logos indicated that the SRF family is conserved among these species across the N and C termini, such as N (1), F (3), G (5), P (8), L (17), L (22), N (25), L (27), D (33), F (34), L (36), L (39), D (43), L (44), S (45), N (47), L (53), P (54), S (56), and F (57) (Figure 2). The patterns of C and N termini served as indicators to demonstrate the pattern of SRF protein sequence conservation in other organisms.

3.4. Analysis of Cis-Element in Promoter, Motif Finding and Gene Structure

GhSRF contained different cis-elements, such as MeJARE, ABRE, AUX, AUX-R, MYB-DI, GARE, SARE, WUN, BEJARE, and DSRE (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S4). These elements are important for plant growth, development, and response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Moreover, similar patterns of motif were found in all members of this gene family among all studied genes of the SRF family indicating that this gene family is conserved in cotton (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S5).
To demonstrate the event of the evolutionary development among all GhSRF genes, we constructed the gene structures. Out of 22 GhSRF genes, 11 members contained only exons. Among all, GhSRF12 was the smallest gene, with only four exons, and GhSRF5 was the largest, with sixteen exons but without any intron (Figure 4).

3.5. Gene Mapping on Chromosomes, Ratio of Ka/Ks, Gene Duplication, and Sub-Cellular Localization

The gene locus linkage confirmed the paralogous gene pairs in G. hirsutum among GhSRF genes (Figure 5). The GhSRF genes were present in five color groups on different chromosomes. The SRF genes like GhSRF1, GhSRF10, GhSRF13, and GhSRF19 belonged to Group-I and are present on chromosomes A-3, A-10, D-2, and D-10. Group-II enclosed the SRF genes, including GhSRF6, GhSRF9, GhSRF18, and GhSRF20, which occupied positions on chromosomes A-6, A-10, D-6, and D-10. Similarly, Group-III involved the SRF genes like GhSRF2, GhSRF4, GhSRF14, and GhSRF16, situated on chromosomes A-5, A-6, D-5, and D-6. Group-IV was the largest group with five members, including GhSRF3, GhSRF5, GhSRF11, GhSRF15, and GhSRF22 located at A-5, A-6, A-10, D-5, and D-6. The last group, Group-V, also had four SRF genes entitled GhSRF7, GhSRF8, GhSRF12, and GhSRF19, positioned at chromosomes A-9, A-9, D-2, and D-9. Among all twenty-two genes, most of these were present on the extreme terminal position and some were present near to the terminal position on both ends and only were present at the central position of the chromosomes. Most of the genes were localized on the terminals of the chromosome, with chromosome A05 and D05 having the maximum number of genes. Chromosomes A-6 and A-8 contained the largest length but the lowest number of genes on them. A set of 10 gene pairs in G. hirsutum were predicted through the analysis, and all experienced segmental duplication events. To further estimate the magnitude and type of selection as per Darwinian theory, we generated Ka/Ks ratios through the events of duplication in genes. It was observed that all 10 duplicated gene pairs showed Ka/Ks values < 1, indicating that the patterns of negative selection ultimately led to purifying selection (Supplementary Table S6). The peptide similarity analysis was performed in Circoletto by providing the peptide sequence of G. hirsutum as query; all other cotton species sequences were set as targets to see the duplications. The sequences presented in red showed more than 75 percent similarity with each other. The single blue color of GhSRF12 in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense confirmed its singular presence with no duplication, as predicted by Ka and Ks ratios (Figure 6A). The sub-cellular location results indicated that most of the SRF genes are present in the plasma membrane (Figure 6B and Supplementary Table S7).

3.6. Gene Expression Analysis of GhSRF Genes Under Drought and Heat Stress Conditions

The FPKM values of cotton accession (TM-1) for GhSRF genes were retrieved from the CottonFGD database and expression graphs of cotton SRF genes were developed under abiotic stress conditions of drought and high-temperature stress (Figure 7 and Supplementary Table S8). Extracted data showed that GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 were highly expressed under drought stress conditions. The expression of GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 was high under high-temperature conditions. In general, GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, and GhSRF22 were highly expressed in different conditions of drought and heat. Based on FPKM expressions, highly expressed genes under abiotic stress conditions were selected to confirm the results through qRT-PCR. Relative gene expression results showed that GhSRF2, GhSRF4, and GhSRF10 have more transcript abundance of these genes under drought conditions, while GhSRF3 and GHSRF22 showed better transcript production under heat conditions (Figure 8). Further, the production of more transcripts in cotton accession VH-402 as compared to CIM-443 confirmed the higher tolerance in former accession under drought and heat conditions as compared to the latter.

4. Discussion

Genome-wide approaches has provided comprehensive understanding of the roles of gene families in various biological processes [11]. Genome-wide identification has facilitated the rapid identification of hundreds of novel genes in cotton research, accelerating the gene detection process [13,14]. The advancement in sequencing technologies, particularly in plant species such as “Gossypium” species, made the gene identification process much easier as compared to earlier times [49]. Members of the SRF protein family belong to the leucine-rich repeat (LRR-V) group, contributing in adaptation to environmental stresses. Several investigations have explored the role of SRF genes in various plant species [16,18,19,20,21,22]. In the current work, SRF genes in cotton (G. hirsutum) were explored for taxonomical classification, sequence similarities and duplication, gene mapping on chromosomes, motif, promoter, and expression analysis [50,51].
The SRF family is an expanded gene family across the plant kingdom due to their prints in multiple plant groups, including monocots (O. sativa), dicots (A. thaliana and T. cacao), tracheophytes (S. moellendorffii), embryophytes (P. patens), and chlorophytes (C. reinhardtii). In G. hirsutum, we identified 22 GhSRF genes, most of which present in pairs, except GhSRF7 and GhSRF12, identified as singletons without any pairing. The diversity of these SRF genes inferred their involvement in environmental and physiological adaptation in G. hirsutum. Gene duplication can lead to functional diversification, where duplicated genes evolve new functions (neofunctionalization) or subdivide the original function (subfunctionalization). Additionally, gene structure variation can result in alternative splicing, producing different protein isoforms from the same gene [52].
Phylogenetic analysis is usually performed to explore the lineage history of species [53]. We aligned the conserved peptide sequences of SRF’s in multiples species ranging from primitive to higher organisms and identified the evolutionary connections of SRF genes among these species [54]. The phylogenetic analysis divided the GhSRF family members into five different groups. Group-b included the genes from all species including mosses, ferns, model organisms, monocots, and dicots, indicating the origin of SRF genes earlier than divergence of monocots and eudicots. Group b represented the most primitive members of SRF genes, widely diversified among other species. In contrast, Groups a, c, d, and e contained a smaller number of GhSRF genes from ancient plants as compared to other species. The presence of SRF genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (chlorophyte) and Selaginella moellendorffii (lycophyte) clearly indicated their lineage with the oldest known organisms. The phylostratum analyses suggested that SRF genes originated from early land plants, with potential orthologs of SRF genes existing throughout the kingdom plantae. Both G. hirsutum and G. barbadense relatively contained a higher number of SRF genes as compared to other studied plant species. Our results of sequence logos of cotton (G. hirsutum) with its progenitor species (G. arboreum and G. raimondii) displayed the conserved behavior of SRF genes on C and N terminals. Mutations during the evolution process of genes and gene families can lead to function-based divergence, with genes being added or deleted over time [55]. The gene length and structure varied due to duplication or deletion events, being observed across 22 GhSRF genes, depicting the role of variation in crop breeding [56,57]. Motif analysis provided the list of motifs present in each gene, highlighting the consistent patterns of gene functions within the same subfamily or family [58]. Chromosomal localization analysis is a fundamental approach to predict the position of genes on a chromosome. Further, it involves mapping identified genes to their respective chromosomes. It provides the crucial insight on duplication events, genome evolution, and complex regulation mechanisms [59].
The Ka/Ks ratios depicted the minor segmental duplication in SRF genes, indicating minor functional divergence. Generally, the results of the Ka/Ks ratio are interpreted in three ways: values of Ka/Ks is < 1 indicate purifying selection, Ka/Ks > 1 indicates positive selection, and Ka/Ks = 1 indicates neutral evolution [60]. GhSRF genes were found to be evenly distributed on both of the cotton genomes (A and D). Gene expression variation on different time scales provides essential understandings of gene functions and promoter diversity [61]. Cis-acting regulatory elements within the promoter are crucial for regulating the gene function under severe environments [62]. Various stress-related cis-regulatory elements were identified in SRF genes, including MeJARE, ABRE, MBS, AUX, SARE, GARE, WUN, BeJARE, and MYB-DI, with varying numbers across different SRF genes. Several studies have highlighted the significance of these regulatory elements in growth, development, and stress resilience [63]. The online expression was used to elucidate the role and transcriptional variation of these genes, which was further validated by qRT-PCR analysis. The candidate genes showed a clear difference in transcript abundance under different conditions. GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 were selected as SRF candidate genes with a potential role under drought and heat stress conditions. The GhSRF2, GhSRF3, and GhSRF22 were expressed more under heat conditions, while GhSRF4 and GhSRF10 were expressed under drought conditions.
Future research should focus on knockout or overexpression studies of GhSRF genes to validate their roles in drought and heat tolerance mechanisms. Investigating interactions with other regulatory proteins and identifying downstream targets will enhance our understanding of their signaling pathways. Utilizing marker-assisted selection and gene editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 to develop cotton varieties with enhanced abiotic stress tolerance holds significant potential for improving yield and resilience. Field trials and breeding programs will be essential to evaluate the performance of these genetically modified plants under real-world conditions. This study lays a robust foundation for future research on the Strubbelig gene family, paving the way for innovative strategies to enhance cotton’s adaptability to environmental challenges.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has significantly advanced our understanding of the Strubbelig gene family (GhSRF) in cotton by elucidating their roles in drought and heat tolerance through comprehensive sequence and expression analyses. The identification of conserved motifs and regulatory elements, coupled with insights from gene duplication and evolutionary pressure analyses, highlights the genetic robustness and potential functional importance of GhSRF genes. Our findings suggest that GhSRF genes are integral to stress response mechanisms, providing a valuable resource for future genetic and biotechnological interventions. This work not only enriches the existing knowledge base but also offers practical implications for breeding programs aimed at developing more resilient cotton varieties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14091933/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Primers used in this study; primer properties; CDS and Protein Sequence, Supplementary Table S2. Gene ID’s and designated names in Studied Organisms. Supplementary Table S3: Physio-chemical Properties of GhSRF, CDS and Protein Lengths, Protein Molecular Weight, Isoelectric point, Grand Average of Hydropathicity, Number of Intron/Exon and Sub-cellular prediction. Supplementary Table S4. Cis-elements in GhSRF’s. Supplementary Table S5. Protein Motif, Description and Sequences. Supplementary Table S6. Ka & Ks value, type of duplications. Supplementary Table S7. Sub-cellular localization of gene on chromosome. Supplementary Table S8. Gene expression data based on FPKM values.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A. and Z.K.; methodology, F.A., S.A. and S.U.R.; software, F.A., S.U.R. and M.H.U.R.; validation, F.A., S.U.R. and Z.K.; formal analysis, F.A., S.A. and M.H.U.R.; investigation, F.A. and Z.K.; resources, S.U.R., Z.K. and M.H.U.R.; data curation, F.A. and Z.K.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.; writing—review and editing, F.A., S.U.R., M.H.U.R., S.A. and Z.K.; visualization, F.A. and Z.K.; supervision, Z.K.; project administration, F.A. and Z.K.; funding acquisition, F.A., Z.K. and S.U.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by grants ADP Funded Project entitled National Crop Genomics and Speed Breeding Center for Agricultural Sustainability (ADP-LO21002838 Punjab, Pak) and Pakistan Science Foundation-National Natural Science Foundation of China (PSF-NSFC-IV/Agr/P-MNSUAM (30)).

Data Availability Statement

All the relevant data are available from the corresponding authors upon request. There are no restrictions on data availability.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China for kind support in expression profiling experimentation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chattha, W.S.; Atif, R.M.; Iqbal, M.; Shafqat, W.; Farooq, M.A.; Shakeel, A. Genome-Wide Identification and Evolution of Dof Transcription Factor Family in Cultivated and Ancestral Cotton Species. Genomics 2020, 112, 4155–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abdullah, M.; Ahmad, F.; Zang, Y.; Jin, S.; Ahmed, S.; Li, J.; Islam, F.; Ahmad, M.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; et al. HEAT RESPONSIVE PROTEIN Regulates Heat Stress via Fine-Tuning Ethylene/Auxin Signaling Pathways in Cotton. Plant Physiol. 2022, 191, 772–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malhi, G.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaushik, P. Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zafar, M.M.; Chattha, W.S.; Khan, A.I.; Zafar, S.; Subhan, M.; Saleem, H.; Ali, A.; Ijaz, A.; Anwar, Z.; Qiao, F.; et al. Drought and Heat Stress on Cotton Genotypes Suggested Agro-Physiological and Biochemical Features for Climate Resilience. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1265700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eckstein, D.; Künzel, V.; Schäfer, L. Global Climate Risk Index 2021; Germanwatch: Bonn, Germany, 2021; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali, M.M.; Ali, Z.; Ahmad, F.; Nawaz, F.; Shakil, Q.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, A.A. Transcript Abundance of Heat Shock Protein Genes Confer Heat Tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iqbal, M.; Ul-Allah, S.; Naeem, M.; Ijaz, M.; Sattar, A.; Sher, A. Response of Cotton Genotypes to Water and Heat Stress: From Field to Genes. Euphytica 2017, 213, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abro, A.A.; Anwar, M.; Javwad, M.U.; Zhang, M.; Liu, F.; Jiménez-Ballesta, R.; Salama, E.A.A.; Ahmed, M.A.A. Morphological and Physio-Biochemical Responses under Heat Stress in Cotton: Overview. Biotechnol. Rep. 2023, 40, e00813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Provart, N.J.; Brady, S.M.; Parry, G.; Schmitz, R.J.; Queitsch, C.; Bonetta, D.; Waese, J.; Schneeberger, K.; Loraine, A.E. Anno Genominis XX: 20 Years of Arabidopsis Genomics. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 832–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhat, G.R.; Sethi, I.; Rah, B.; Kumar, R.; Afroze, D. Innovative in Silico Approaches for Characterization of Genes and Proteins. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 865182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Varshney, R.K.; Bohra, A.; Yu, J.; Graner, A.; Zhang, Q.; Sorrells, M.E. Designing Future Crops: Genomics-Assisted Breeding Comes of Age. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, Z.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Hu, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, F. Recent Progression and Future Perspectives in Cotton Genomic Breeding. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 548–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, S.; Zhu, G.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Fu, J.; Niu, E.; Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Guo, W. Genome-Wide Association Studies Reveal Genetic Variation and Candidate Genes of Drought Stress Related Traits in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X. Abundant Small Genetic Alterations after Upland Cotton Domestication. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9254302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Eyüboglu, B.; Pfister, K.; Haberer, G.; Chevalier, D.; Fuchs, A.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Schneitz, K. Molecular Characterisation of the STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY of Genes Encoding Putative Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-like Kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Meng, J.; Yang, J.; Peng, M.; Liu, X.; He, H. Genome-Wide Characterization, Evolution, and Expression Analysis of the Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-like Protein Kinase (Lrr-Rlk) Gene Family in Medicago truncatula. Life 2020, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bai, Y.; Vaddepalli, P.; Fulton, L.; Bhasin, H.; Hülskamp, M.; Schneitz, K. ANGUSTIFOLIA Is a Central Component of Tissue Morphogenesis Mediated by the Atypical Receptor-like Kinase STRUBBELIG. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Long, Z.; Sun, C.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Birch, P.R.J.; Tian, Z. A Potato STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY Member, StLRPK1, Associates with StSERK3A/BAK1 and Activates Immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 5573–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fulton, L.; Vaddepalli, P.; Yadav, R.K.; Batoux, M.; Schneitz, K. Inter-Cell-Layer Signalling during Arabidopsis Ovule Development Mediated by the Receptor-like Kinase STRUBBELIG. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fulton, L.; Batoux, M.; Vaddepalli, P.; Yadav, R.K.; Busch, W.; Andersen, S.U.; Jeong, S.; Lohmann, J.U.; Schneitz, K. DETORQUEO, QUIRKY, and ZERZAUST Represent Novel Components Involved in Organ Development Mediated by the Receptor-like Kinase STRUBBELIG in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alcázar, R.; García, A.V.; Kronholm, I.; De Meaux, J.; Koornneef, M.; Parker, J.E.; Reymond, M. Natural Variation at Strubbelig Receptor Kinase 3 Drives Immune-Triggered Incompatibilities between Arabidopsis thaliana Accessions. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 1135–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, L.; Zhong, S.H.; Cui, X.F.; Li, J.; He, Z.H. Characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals a role for receptor-like kinase SCRAMBLED/STRUBBELIG in coordinating cell proliferation and differentiation during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant J. 2012, 72, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, T.; Yu, L.X.; Zheng, P.; Li, Y.; Rivera, M.; Main, D.; Greene, S.L. Identification of Loci Associated with Drought Resistance Traits in Heterozygous Autotetraploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Using Genome-Wide Association Studies with Genotyping by Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arifuzzaman, M.; Oladzadabbasabadi, A.; McClean, P.; Rahman, M. Shovelomics for Phenotyping Root Architectural Traits of Rapeseed/Canola (Brassica napus L.) and Genome-Wide Association Mapping. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 294, 985–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chaudhary, A.; Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Leśniewska, B.; Hammerl, R.; Dawid, C.; Schneitz, K. The Arabidopsis Receptor Kinase STRUBBELIG Regulates the Response to Cellulose Deficiency. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, T.; Liang, C.; Meng, Z.; Sun, G.; Meng, Z.; Guo, S.; Zhang, R. CottonFGD: An Integrated Functional Genomics Database for Cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A Comparative Platform for Green Plant Genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Letunic, I.; Khedkar, S.; Bork, P. SMART: Recent Updates, New Developments and Status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D458–D460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-Scale Protein Function Classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martin, F.J.; Amode, M.R.; Aneja, A.; Austine-Orimoloye, O.; Azov, A.G.; Barnes, I.; Becker, A.; Bennett, R.; Berry, A.; Bhai, J.; et al. Ensembl 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D933–D941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The Proteomics Server for in-Depth Protein Knowledge and Analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, C.-S.; Lin, C.-J.; Hwang, J.-K. Predicting Subcellular Localization of Proteins for Gram-Negative Bacteria by Support Vector Machines Based on n -Peptide Compositions. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL) v6: Recent Updates to the Phylogenetic Tree Display and Annotation Tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharma, S.; Vakhlu, J. Evolution and Biology of CRISPR System: A New Era Tool for Genome Editing in Plants. Bot. Rev. 2021, 87, 496–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Crooks, G.E.; Hon, G.; Chandonia, J.M.; Brenner, S.E. WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1188–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van De Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a Database of Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements and a Portal to Tools for in Silico Analysis of Promoter Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nystrom, S.L.; McKay, D.J. Memes: A Motif Analysis Environment in R Using Tools from the MEME Suite. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021, 17, e1008991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An Upgraded Gene Feature Visualization Server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, C.S.; Cheng, C.W.; Su, W.C.; Chang, K.C.; Huang, S.W.; Hwang, J.K.; Lu, C.H. CELLO2GO: A Web Server for Protein SubCELlular LOcalization Prediction with Functional Gene Ontology Annotation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Horton, P.; Park, K.J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Adams-Collier, C.J.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein Localization Predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 585–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Voorrips, R.E. Mapchart: Software for the Graphical Presentation of Linkage Maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 2002, 93, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; Mcgettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suyama, M.; Torrents, D.; Bork, P. PAL2NAL: Robust Conversion of Protein Sequence Alignments into the Corresponding Codon Alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Darzentas, N. Circoletto: Visualizing Sequence Similarity with Circos. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2620–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing Real-Time PCR Data by the Comparative CT Method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hong, K.; Radian, Y.; Manda, T.; Xu, H.; Luo, Y. The Development of Plant Genome Sequencing Technology and Its Conservation and Application in Endangered Gymnosperms. Plants 2023, 12, 4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akram, U.; Song, Y.; Liang, C.; Abid, M.A.; Askari, M.; Myat, A.A.; Abbas, M.; Malik, W.; Ali, Z.; Guo, S.; et al. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of NHX Gene Family under Salinity Stress in Gossypium barbadense and Its Comparison with Gossypium hirsutum. Genes 2020, 11, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shahid, S.; Sher, M.A.; Ahmad, F.; ur Rehman, S.; Farid, B.; Raza, H.; Ali, Z.; Maqbool, A.; Alfarraj, S.; Ansari, M.J. Prediction of RNA Editing Sites and Genome-Wide Characterization of PERK Gene Family in Maize (Zea mays L.) in Response to Drought Stress. J. King Saud Univ.—Sci. 2022, 34, 102293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Su, J.; Song, S.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Dong, T.; Ge, X.; Duan, H. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of DREB Family Genes in Cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, X.; Xu, Y.; Yang, F.; Magwanga, R.O.; Cai, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, F.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification of OSCA Gene Family and Their Potential Function in the Regulation of Dehydration and Salt Stress in Gossypium hirsutum. J. Cott. Res. 2019, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Z.; Ge, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, G.; Chen, E.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, F. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of SnRK2 Gene Family in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xing, L.; Liu, M.; Li, P.; Lu, Q.; Peng, R. Genome-Wide Identification of the MIOX Gene Family and Their Expression Profile in Cotton Development and Response to Abiotic Stress. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, W.; Niu, Y.; Ju, L.; Deng, J.; Zhao, T.; Lian, J.; et al. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum Genomes Provide Insights into the Origin and Evolution of Allotetraploid Cotton. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peng, R.; Xu, Y.; Tian, S.; Unver, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Cai, X.; Wang, K.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Evolutionary Divergence of Duplicated Genomes in Newly Described Allotetraploid Cottons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2208496119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yadav, M.; Saxena, G.; Verma, R.K.; Asif, M.H.; Singh, V.P.; Sawant, S.V.; Singh, S.P. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Autophagy-Related Genes (ATG) in Gossypium spp. Reveals Their Crucial Role in Stress Tolerance. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 167, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kilwake, J.W.; Umer, M.J.; Wei, Y.; Mehari, T.G.; Magwanga, R.O.; Xu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shiraku, M.L.; Kirungu, J.N.; et al. Genome-Wide Characterization of the SAMS Gene Family in Cotton Unveils the Putative Role of GhSAMS2 in Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Agronomy 2023, 13, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wei, W.; Ju, J.; Zhang, X.; Ling, P.; Luo, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, W.; Su, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C. GhBRX.1, GhBRX.2, and GhBRX4.3 Improve Resistance to Salt and Cold Stress in Upland Cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1353365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, H.; Xiao, X.; Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, P.; Peng, R.; Lu, Q.; Wang, Y. Exploring the Plasmodesmata Callose- Binding Protein Gene Family in Upland Cotton: Unraveling Insights for Enhancing Fiber Length. PeerJ 2024, 12, e17625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Y.; Zheng, A.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Dong, Z.; Yao, L.; Han, X.; Wei, F. Characterization and Gene Expression Analysis Reveal Universal Stress Proteins Respond to Abiotic Stress in Gossypium hirsutum. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ali, F.; Qanmber, G.; Wei, Z.; Yu, D.; Li, Y.H.; Gan, L.; Li, F.; Wang, Z. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase Genes in Cotton (Gossypium spp.) in Plant Development and Abiotic Stresses. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of SRF family genes from 13 plant species. (A) Phylostratum analysis of SRF gene family for lineage study. (B) A phylogenetic tree exhibiting an evolutionary relationship of SRF family genes in eudicots, monocots, and primitive plant species. The analysis was performed using 156 SRF family genes and five groups (SRF-a, SRF-b, SRF-c, SRF-d, and SRF-e) represented by different colors. The bootstrap values are added near each branch node.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of SRF family genes from 13 plant species. (A) Phylostratum analysis of SRF gene family for lineage study. (B) A phylogenetic tree exhibiting an evolutionary relationship of SRF family genes in eudicots, monocots, and primitive plant species. The analysis was performed using 156 SRF family genes and five groups (SRF-a, SRF-b, SRF-c, SRF-d, and SRF-e) represented by different colors. The bootstrap values are added near each branch node.
Agronomy 14 01933 g001
Figure 2. Sequence logos of SRF family genes in G. hirsutum, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii. Amino acid, in the form of alphabets in two diploid cotton species (G. arboreum and G. raimondii) of sub-genomes A and D, with one tetraploid cotton species (G. hirsutum) of AD genome presented. Each upper-case letter represents the amino acids being conserved at that specific location.
Figure 2. Sequence logos of SRF family genes in G. hirsutum, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii. Amino acid, in the form of alphabets in two diploid cotton species (G. arboreum and G. raimondii) of sub-genomes A and D, with one tetraploid cotton species (G. hirsutum) of AD genome presented. Each upper-case letter represents the amino acids being conserved at that specific location.
Agronomy 14 01933 g002
Figure 3. Cis-element analysis in the promoter region of GhSRF genes. The cis-elements in each gene are indicated by different colors and rectangle shapes.
Figure 3. Cis-element analysis in the promoter region of GhSRF genes. The cis-elements in each gene are indicated by different colors and rectangle shapes.
Agronomy 14 01933 g003
Figure 4. Phylogeny and motifs in GhSRF genes. A total of ten (10) motifs are presented from each GhSRF gene and distribution of these motifs is presented in different colors. Gene structure of SRF family genes in G. hirsutum. Exon/intron structure display of GhSRF family genes; the upstream region was indicated by yellow and CDS is presented in green.
Figure 4. Phylogeny and motifs in GhSRF genes. A total of ten (10) motifs are presented from each GhSRF gene and distribution of these motifs is presented in different colors. Gene structure of SRF family genes in G. hirsutum. Exon/intron structure display of GhSRF family genes; the upstream region was indicated by yellow and CDS is presented in green.
Agronomy 14 01933 g004
Figure 5. GhSRF genes distributed on different chromosomes of G. hirsutum, respectively.
Figure 5. GhSRF genes distributed on different chromosomes of G. hirsutum, respectively.
Agronomy 14 01933 g005
Figure 6. (A) Peptide similarity analysis among SRF genes of G. hirsutum with SRF genes of G. arboruem, G. raimondii, and G. barbadense. (B) Sub-cellular localization of GhSRF genes within the cell. The color and size of solid circles indicate the higher presence levels of GhSRF genes in different sub-cellular compartments.
Figure 6. (A) Peptide similarity analysis among SRF genes of G. hirsutum with SRF genes of G. arboruem, G. raimondii, and G. barbadense. (B) Sub-cellular localization of GhSRF genes within the cell. The color and size of solid circles indicate the higher presence levels of GhSRF genes in different sub-cellular compartments.
Agronomy 14 01933 g006
Figure 7. Expression analysis of GhSRF genes based on FPKM values obtained from CottonFGD for drought and heat conditions. The color scale on the right side indicates the expression level from minimum (blue) to maximum (red).
Figure 7. Expression analysis of GhSRF genes based on FPKM values obtained from CottonFGD for drought and heat conditions. The color scale on the right side indicates the expression level from minimum (blue) to maximum (red).
Agronomy 14 01933 g007
Figure 8. qRT-PCR expression of GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 under drought and heat stress conditions. Three cotton lines, including one Chinese line (TM-1) and two local Pakistani tolerant (VH-402) and susceptible (CIM-443) genotypes, were used in this analysis. The CK indicates the control condition and others are drought and heat in blue and red. The CK (control) was normalized and kept constant at 1 to check the folds of expression in all three lines under drought and heat conditions. Error bars indicate standard deviations among three independent replications. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. qRT-PCR expression of GhSRF2, GhSRF3, GhSRF4, GhSRF10, and GhSRF22 under drought and heat stress conditions. Three cotton lines, including one Chinese line (TM-1) and two local Pakistani tolerant (VH-402) and susceptible (CIM-443) genotypes, were used in this analysis. The CK indicates the control condition and others are drought and heat in blue and red. The CK (control) was normalized and kept constant at 1 to check the folds of expression in all three lines under drought and heat conditions. Error bars indicate standard deviations among three independent replications. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Agronomy 14 01933 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmad, F.; Rehman, S.U.; Rahman, M.H.U.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Characterization of Strubbelig-Receptor Family (SRF) Related to Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agronomy 2024, 14, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091933

AMA Style

Ahmad F, Rehman SU, Rahman MHU, Ahmad S, Khan Z. Characterization of Strubbelig-Receptor Family (SRF) Related to Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agronomy. 2024; 14(9):1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmad, Furqan, Shoaib Ur Rehman, Muhammad Habib Ur Rahman, Saghir Ahmad, and Zulqurnain Khan. 2024. "Characterization of Strubbelig-Receptor Family (SRF) Related to Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)" Agronomy 14, no. 9: 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop