Next Article in Journal
Elucidating Genetic Mechanisms of Summer Stress Tolerance in Chinese Cabbage through GWAS and Phenotypic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Water Relations and Physiological Response to Water Deficit of ‘Hass’ Avocado Grafted on Two Rootstocks Tolerant to R. necatrix
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Response of the Mycobiome to the Biofumigation of Replanted Soil in a Fruit Tree Nursery

by
Robert Wieczorek
1,*,
Zofia Zydlik
1,
Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka
2,
Adrianna Kubiak
2,
Jan Bocianowski
3 and
Alicja Niewiadomska
2
1
Department of Ornamental Plants, Dendrology and Pomology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Szydłowska 50, 60-656 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(9), 1961; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091961
Submission received: 7 July 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 27 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024

Abstract

In a long-term monoculture with fruit trees and tree nurseries, it is necessary to regenerate the soil due to the risk of apple replant disease (ARD). The occurrence of ARD is manifested in the structure of the mycobiome. The assumption of our experiment was that the use of oil radish (Raphanus sativus var. oleifera), white mustard (Sinapis alba), and marigold (Tagetes patula L.) as phytosanitary plants for biofumigation would provide crops with nutrients, improve soil physicochemical properties, and influence the diversity of microbiota, including fungal networks, towards a beneficial mycobiome. Metagenomic analysis of fungal populations based on the hypervariable ITS1 region was used for assessing changes in the soil mycobiome. It showed that biofumigation, mainly with a forecrop of marigold (Tagetes patula L.) (R3), caused an improvement in soil physicochemical properties (bulk density and humus) and the highest increase in the abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the Fungi kingdom, which was similar to that of agriculturally undegraded soils, and amounted to 54.37%. In this variant of the experiment, the most OTUs were identified at the phylum level, for Ascomycota (39.82%) and Mortierellomycota beneficial fungi (7.73%). There were no such dependencies in the soils replanted with forecrops of oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus var. oleifera) and white mustard (Sinapis alba). Biofumigation with marigold and oil radish contributed to a reduction in the genus Fusarium, which contains several significant plant-pathogenic species. The percentages of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of Fusarium spp. decreased from 1.57% to 0.17% and 0.47%, respectively.
Keywords: biodiversity; fungal networks; Mortierellomycota; Eurotiales; physicochemical properties of soil biodiversity; fungal networks; Mortierellomycota; Eurotiales; physicochemical properties of soil

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wieczorek, R.; Zydlik, Z.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Kubiak, A.; Bocianowski, J.; Niewiadomska, A. The Response of the Mycobiome to the Biofumigation of Replanted Soil in a Fruit Tree Nursery. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091961

AMA Style

Wieczorek R, Zydlik Z, Wolna-Maruwka A, Kubiak A, Bocianowski J, Niewiadomska A. The Response of the Mycobiome to the Biofumigation of Replanted Soil in a Fruit Tree Nursery. Agronomy. 2024; 14(9):1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wieczorek, Robert, Zofia Zydlik, Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka, Adrianna Kubiak, Jan Bocianowski, and Alicja Niewiadomska. 2024. "The Response of the Mycobiome to the Biofumigation of Replanted Soil in a Fruit Tree Nursery" Agronomy 14, no. 9: 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop