Next Article in Journal
Role of the Transcriptional Repressor Zinc Finger with KRAB and SCAN Domains 3 (ZKSCAN3) in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Defucosylated Mouse–Dog Chimeric Anti-EGFR Antibody Exerts Antitumor Activities in Mouse Xenograft Models of Canine Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond the X Factor: Relevance of Sex Hormones in NAFLD Pathophysiology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/cells10102503
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preclinical Evaluation of Podoplanin-Targeted Alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with the Novel Antibody NZ-16 for Malignant Mesothelioma

by
Hitomi Sudo
1,
Atsushi B. Tsuji
1,*,
Aya Sugyo
1,
Mika K. Kaneko
2,
Yukinari Kato
2,3,
Kotaro Nagatsu
4,
Hisashi Suzuki
4 and
Tatsuya Higashi
1
1
Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science (iQMS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
2
Department of Antibody Drug Development, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
3
Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan
4
Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Science, Institute for Quantum Medical Science (iQMS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(10), 2503; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102503
Submission received: 6 August 2021 / Revised: 6 September 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 22 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Development and Progression - A Themed Honorary Issue to Prof. Miguel Quintanilla)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The prognosis of advanced mesothelioma is poor. Podoplanin (PDPN) is highly expressed in most malignant mesothelioma. This study aimed to evaluate the potential alpha-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with a newly developed anti-PDPN antibody, NZ-16, compared with a previous antibody, NZ-12. Methods: The in vitro properties of radiolabeled antibodies were evaluated by cell binding and competitive inhibition assays using PDPN-expressing H226 mesothelioma cells. The biodistribution of 111In-labeled antibodies was studied in tumor-bearing mice. The absorbed doses were estimated based on biodistribution data. Tumor volumes and body weights of mice treated with 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 were measured for 56 days. Histologic analysis was conducted. Results: The radiolabeled NZ-16 specifically bound to H226 cells with higher affinity than NZ-12. The biodistribution studies showed higher tumor uptake of radiolabeled NZ-16 compared with NZ-12, providing higher absorbed doses to tumors. RIT with 225Ac- and 90Y-labeled NZ-16 had a significantly higher antitumor effect than RIT with 90Y-labeled NZ-12. 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 induced a larger amount of necrotic change and showed a tendency to suppress tumor volumes and prolonged survival than 90Y-labeled NZ-16. There is no obvious adverse effect. Conclusions: Alpha-RIT with the newly developed NZ-16 is a promising therapeutic option for malignant mesothelioma.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive tumor that arises primarily in the pleural or peritoneal mesothelial surfaces [1]. Surgical resection is only offered to patients with early-stage disease [1,2]. Most patients reach advanced-stage disease before diagnosis, and thus the primary treatment is systemic chemotherapy [1,2]. The prognosis is poor and the median overall survival of patients who undergo chemotherapy is approximately 12 months [2]. Therefore, the development of more effective treatments for unresectable malignant mesothelioma is strongly desired.
Mesothelioma is classified into three types, epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic, based on histological characteristics [1,2]. There are several markers for the epithelioid subtype, such as calretinin, WT-1, cytokeratin 5, and ERC/mesothelin [3,4]. Those markers do not express in the sarcomatoid subtype, but podoplanin (PDPN) is overexpressed in more than 80% of all types [5,6]. PDPN is a type I transmembrane sialomucin-like glycoprotein expressed in kidney podocytes, alveolar type I cells, and lymphatic endothelial cells [7]. High expression of PDPN in tumors is associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition, migration, invasion, and metastasis [8,9]. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated that anti-PDPN antibodies inhibit cancer metastasis [10] and cancer progression [11,12]. Therefore, PDPN is a promising therapeutic target for malignant mesothelioma.
Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a selective internal radiation therapy in which high-affinity antibodies against tumor-associated antigens are used to transport radionuclides to tumors [13]. In clinical practice, RIT for hematologic malignancies such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma utilizes anti-CD20 antibodies conjugated with β-emitters, 90Y or 131I, and the overall response rates are high, reaching 60–80%, with a complete remission rate of 15–40% [13,14]. The clinical efficacy of existing RIT for solid tumors, however, remains low, mainly due to the low radiosensitivity of solid tumors. Overcoming the radioresistance is necessary to enhance the clinical efficacy of RIT.
The clinical efficacy of α-particle emitters in the treatment of solid cancer was recently demonstrated [15]. α-Particle emitters have a greater linear energy transfer compared with β-emitters and deposit more energy into tumor cells, which results in greater DNA damage to the cells [16]. Actinium-225 is an α-particle-emitting radionuclide that generates a total of four α-particles in the decay chain [17]. The half-life of 225Ac is appropriate for the pharmacokinetics of antibodies. Therefore, RIT with 225Ac is expected to improve the therapeutic efficacy of RIT treatment for solid tumors.
A previous study reported that 90Y-labeled anti-PDPN antibody NZ-12 suppresses tumor growth in a mesothelioma model cell line NCI-H226 (H226); unfortunately, complete remission was not achieved [6]. To improve the therapeutic effect of RIT with an anti-PDPN antibody, we newly developed an anti-PDPN antibody, NZ-16, having a different constant region than NZ-12. NZ-16 has a higher affinity than NZ-12 for H226 mesothelioma cells and is, therefore, expected to deliver more radionuclides to the tumors. In the present study, we first compared the in vitro and in vivo properties of NZ-12 and NZ-16 radiolabeled with 111In. After confirming that NZ-16 has more favorable binding properties than NZ-12, the antitumor effects of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 were compared with those of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 in an H226 mesothelioma mouse model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antibody

A rat–human chimeric anti-human PDPN antibody, NZ-12, was previously generated [18]. To generate the novel chimeric anti-human PDPN antibody NZ-16, the appropriate heavy chain variable domain of a rat NZ-1 antibody [19] and heavy chain constant domain of human IgG1 were subcloned into the pCAG-Neo vector (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan), and the light chain variable domain of a rat NZ-1 antibody and human lambda light chain constant domain were subcloned into pCAG-Ble vectors (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). The vectors were transfected into ExpiCHO-S cells using the ExpiCHO Expression System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). NZ-16 was purified using Protein G-Sepharose (GE Healthcare BioSciences, Chicago, PA, USA).

2.2. Cell Culture

Mesothelioma cell line NCI-H226 (H226, CRL-5826) was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.3. Radiolabeling of Antibodies

For radiolabeling of radiometals 111In, 90Y, and 225Ac, antibodies are necessary to be conjugated with a chelator. The present study employed p-SCN-Bn-DOTA (DOTA, Macrocyclics, Dallas, TX, USA). All radiolabeled antibodies were conjugated with DOTA, but DOTA was abbreviated; namely, we presented them like 111In-, 90Y-, and 225Ac-labeled antibodies. Antibodies were conjugated with DOTA as described previously [20]. Briefly, antibodies (5 mg/mL) were reacted with four equal molar amounts of DOTA in 50 mM borate buffer (pH8.5) for 16 h at 37 °C. The conjugation ratios of DOTA to antibodies were estimated to be approximately 2.8 each as determined by radio-thin-layer chromatography with 80% methanol. The DOTA-conjugated antibodies were purified by elution with 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 6.0) using a Sephadex G-50 column (GE Healthcare BioSciences). 111InCl3 (Nihon Medi-Physics, Tokyo, Japan) or 90YCl3 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was incubated in 0.5 M acetate buffer (pH 6.0) for 5 min at room temperature. Each was mixed with the DOTA-antibody conjugate and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. Radiolabeling of the antibody with 225Ac was conducted as previously described [20]. 225AcNO3 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) dissolved in 0.2 M optima grade HCl (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was added to 2 M tetramethylammonium acetate (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and 150g/L L-ascorbic acid (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the solution was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The solution was then mixed with the DOTA-conjugated antibodies and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. The radiolabeled antibodies were purified using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and the purified antibodies were analyzed by radio-thin layer chromatography. The specific activity of 111In-labeled NZ-12, 111In-labeled NZ-16, 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 was approximately 4.9 ± 2.5, 9.7 ± 4.5, 662.3 ± 151.8, and 0.6 ± 0.1 kBq/μg, respectively. The radiochemical yield was approximately 40% for 111In-labeled NZ-12, 50–80% for 111In-labeled NZ-16, 90% for 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 25% for 225Ac-labeled NZ-16. The radiochemical purities were greater than 95% after purification.

2.4. Cell Binding and Competitive Inhibition Assays

For the cell binding assays, H226 cells (1.0 × 107, 5.0 × 106, 2.5 × 106, 1.3 × 106, 6.3 × 105, 3.1 × 105, 1.6 × 105, and 7.8 × 104) in phosphate-buffered saline with 1% bovine serum albumin (MilliporeSigma) were incubated with 111In-labeled NZ-12 or NZ-16 antibodies on ice for 60 min. After washing, cell-bound radioactivity was measured using a gamma counter (Wizard2 Automatic Gamma Counters, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). For competitive inhibition assays, H226 cells (1.0 × 106) in phosphate-buffered saline with 1% bovine serum albumin were incubated with 111In-labeled NZ-12 or NZ-16 in the presence of varying concentrations of intact NZ-12, intact NZ-16, DOTA-conjugated NZ-12, or DOTA-conjugated NZ-16 antibodies (0, 0.02, 0.07, 0.2, 0.7, 2.0, 6.1, 18.2, and 54.5 nmol/L) on ice for 60 min. After washing, cell-bound radioactivity was measured with a gamma counter. The dissociation constant was estimated by applying data to a one-site competitive binding model using GraphPad Prism 8 software (ver. 8.4.3, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.5. Tumor Model

The animal experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (13–1022, 26 May 2016), and all animal experiments were conducted according to the institutional guidelines regarding animal care and handling. H226 cells (5 × 106) were subcutaneously inoculated into male nude mice (BALB/c-nu/nu, 4 weeks old, CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) under isoflurane anesthesia.

2.6. Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Antibodies

When tumor volumes reached approximately 50 mm3, mice (n = 4–5/time-point), were intravenously injected with 111In-labeled NZ-12 (37 kBq, n = 4/time-point), 111In-labeled NZ-16 (37 kBq, n = 5/time-point), or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (3.7 kBq, n = 5/time-point) in a total of 40 μg of antibody adjusted by adding the corresponding unlabeled antibodies. The mice were euthanized by isoflurane inhalation at 1, 2, 4, or 7 days after injecting the 111In-labeled antibodies and 4 days after injecting the 225Ac-labeled NZ-16. Blood was obtained from the heart, and the tumor, brain, liver, spleen, intestine, kidney, and muscle were dissected and weighed. Radioactivity was measured using a gamma counter with an energy window of 150–350 keV for 111In and 200–300 keV for 225Ac. The uptake is represented as a percentage of the injected dose (radioactivity) per gram of tissue (% ID/g).

2.7. Dosimetry

As described previously [21], the absorbed doses of the 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled antibodies were estimated using the area under the curve based on the biodistribution data of the 111In-labeled antibodies and the mean energy emitted per transition of Y-90, 1.495 × 10−13 Gy kg (Bq s)−1 [22] and that of Ac-225 and all the daughter nuclei with corrections for branching, 4.6262 × 10−12 Gy kg (Bq s)−1 [22]. The absorbed dose of bone marrow was based on the blood data, considering a red-marrow-to-blood activity ratio of 0.4 [23]. Radiation weighting factors of 1 and 5 were used for Y-90 and Ac-225, respectively, as recommended by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee [24]. The estimated absorbed dose is expressed as Sv when considering the radiation weighting factors.

2.8. Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y- and 225Ac-Labeled Antibody

The mice were intravenously injected with intact NZ-16 (0 megabecquerel (MBq), n = 5), 90Y-labeled NZ-16 (3.7 MBq, n = 5), or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (11,1 and 18.5 kBq, n = 5) antibodies at a total of 40 μg of antibody adjusted by adding the corresponding unlabeled antibodies. Tumor sizes and body weights were measured at least twice a week for 8 weeks after administration. Tumor size was measured using a digital caliper, and tumor volume was calculated according to the following formula: tumor volume (mm3) = (length × width2)/2. When the tumor volume reached greater than 800 mm3 or body weight loss was more than 20% compared with that at day 0, the mouse was euthanized humanely by isoflurane inhalation.

2.9. Histologic Analysis

H226 tumors were resected from mice on days 1, 3, and 7 post injection with intact NZ-16 (0 MBq, n = 3/time-point), 90Y-labeled NZ-16 (3.7 MBq, n = 3/time-point), or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (18.5 kBq, n = 3/time-point). The tumors were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The tumor sections (1 µm thick) were deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tumor cell proliferation was evaluated by Ki-67-immunohistochemical staining with a rabbit anti-Ki-67 antibody (SP6, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and an anti-rabbit HRP/DAB Detection Kit (Abcam) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Ki-67 index was calculated by counting the percentage of Ki-67-positive tumor cells per >2500 tumor cells in a section with 200 × magnification (n = 3).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (ver. 8.4.3). Cell binding data and tumor volume data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Ki-67 staining data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test. Uptake data of radiolabeled antibodies were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on a tumor volume endpoint of 300 mm3. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all experiments.

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Characterization of the Antibodies

To confirm the reactivity of NZ-16 in H226 cells, immunofluorescence staining was conducted. A strong intensity was observed on the cell membranes of H226 (Figure S1). In the cell binding assays with H226, 111In-labeled NZ-16 showed significantly higher specific binding than 111In-labeled NZ-12 (p < 0.01). The maximum values were 29.6 ± 3.7% for NZ-16 at 1.0 × 107 cells and 22.9 ± 3.3% for NZ-12 at 1.0 × 107 (Figure 1a,b). The specific binding did not significantly differ between 111In- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (Figure S2). The results of the competitive inhibition assay are shown in Figure 1c,d. The binding affinities (KD) of intact NZ-12 and DOTA-conjugated NZ-12 were estimated to be 1.7 and 5.7 nM, respectively (Figure 1c). Those of intact NZ-16 and DOTA-conjugated NZ-16 were estimated to be 1.8 and 2.7 nM, respectively (Figure 1d). These results indicate that the DOTA conjugation procedure decreased the affinity of NZ-16 for PDPN to a lesser extent than that of NZ-12.

3.2. Biodistribution of 111In-Labeled Antibodies in Nude Mice Bearing H226 Tumors

The biodistribution of 111In-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 in H226 tumor-bearing mice is shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. 111In-Labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 gradually cleared from the blood and accumulated in the H226 tumors. The uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-16 in normal organs tended to be higher than that of 111In-labeled NZ-12, except in the liver (Table 1). The uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-16 in the liver was significantly lower than that of NZ-12 on days 1 and 2 post injection (p < 0.05 for day 1, p < 0.01 for day 2). The uptake of 225Ac-NZ-16 in normal organs was significantly higher than that of 111In-labeled NZ-16 (p < 0.01 in the brain, lung, spleen, and muscle, p < 0.05 in the intestine, Table 2). Tumor uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-16 tended to be higher than that of NZ-12 over the observation period (Figure 2). The maximal tumor uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-16 was significantly higher than that of 111In-labeled NZ-12 on day 4 post injection (15.1 ± 2.4% ID/g for NZ-16 and 10.0 ± 0.4% ID/g for NZ-12; p < 0.01, Figure 2). The tumor uptake of 225Ac-NZ-16 on day 4 was higher than that of 111In-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 (p < 0.01, Figure 2).

3.3. Dosimetry

The absorbed doses were estimated on the basis of the biodistribution studies when In-111 was replaced with Y-90 or Ac-225. Table 3 shows the estimated absorbed doses when the radiation-weighted factor was not considered. The absorbed doses of radiolabeled NZ-16 for tumors and organs tended to be higher than those of radiolabeled NZ-12, except for in the liver and kidney, although the difference between the two antibodies was not statistically significant (Table 3). The tumor-absorbed doses of 225Ac-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 were 60-fold greater than those of 90Y-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16, respectively (Table 3).
The relative biologic effect (RBE) was determined by calculating the absorbed doses from treatments with 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 without considering the radiation-weighted factor (Table 4). The dose absorbed by tumors treated with 3.7 kBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 was 5.7-fold higher than that of tumors treated with 11.1 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (Table 4).
With regard to safety, the absorbed doses considering radiation weighting factors of 1 for 90Y and 5 for 225Ac are shown in Table 5. The absorbed dose to bone marrow from treatment with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 was higher than that from treatment with 11.1kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (Table 5). The absorbed doses to tumors and organs injected with 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 were higher than those of tumors injected with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 (Table 5).

3.4. Treatment Effects of Radiolabeled Antibodies in Nude Mice Bearing H226 Tumors

Marked antitumor effects were observed in mice treated with 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (p < 0.01, vs. 0 MBq, Figure 3a). Treatment with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-NZ-16 reduced tumor volume from day 7 to day 21 post injection, and thereafter the tumor volume gradually increased (p < 0.01 vs. 0 MBq, Figure 3a and Figure S3). In the group injected with 11.1 kBq of 225Ac-NZ-16, the tumor volume increased during the first 10 days, and thereafter decreased until day 42 (p < 0.01 vs. 0 MBq, Figure 3a). In the group injected with 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-NZ-16, tumor growth was suppressed during the first 28 days, and thereafter the tumor volume decreased until the end of the observation period (p < 0.01 vs. 0 MBq and 3.7 MBq of 90Y-NZ-16, Figure 3a).
Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on a tumor volume endpoint of 300 mm3 are shown in Figure 3b. Injection with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, 11.1 kBq 225Ac-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 significantly prolonged survival compared with the 0-MBq groups (p < 0.01). At the end of the observation period, all mice treated with 11.1 kBq and 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-NZ-16 were defined as surviving, and survival in the 90Y-treatment group was 60%. No statistically significant difference in survival was detected among the three groups treated with the radiolabeled antibodies (Figure 3b).
The three radiolabeled treatments induced temporary weight loss. Body weight loss never exceeded 20% compared with that at day 0, however, which is the criterion for humane euthanasia (Figure S4a). No obvious damage was detected in the spleen, kidney, liver, or bone marrow in mice treated with 90Y- or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (Figure S4b).

3.5. Histologic Analysis of H226 Tumors Treated with 90Y- and 225Ac-Labeled NZ-16

Tumors treated with 0 MBq of NZ-16 (intact NZ-16 only) were composed of solid nests of epithelial cells and some mitotic cells (Figure 4, upper panels). Sections of H226 tumors treated with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 showed a few small necrotic foci on day 1, and expansion of the necrotic area was observed on days 3 and 7 (Figure 4, middle panels). In the tumors treated with 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-NZ-16 on day 1, more necrotic foci were observed compared with the tumors treated with 90Y-NZ-16, and extensive necrosis and lymphocyte infiltration were observed on day 3 post injection (Figure 4, lower panels). On day 7, the tumor cells decreased and partial replacement of necrotic tumor cells by fibrous tissue was observed in 225Ac-NZ-16-treated tumors (Figure 4, lower panels).
Treatment with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 and 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 significantly reduced the proliferation of (Ki-67-positive) tumor cells compared with tumors treated with 0 MBq NZ-16 (intact NZ-16) on days 1–7 post injection (p < 0.01, Figure 5a,b). A few apoptotic cells were observed in tumors treated with 90Y- and 225Ac-NZ-16, but no apoptosis was observed in the 0-MBq group (Figure S5).

4. Discussion

An anti-PDPN antibody, NZ-16, was newly developed from the parental antibody NZ-1. The constant region of the NZ-16 heavy chain differs from that in NZ-12, which was evaluated as a radioimmunotherapeutic agent in a previous study [6]. NZ-16 has a higher affinity and showed higher tumor uptake in a PDPN-expressing H226 mesothelioma mouse model than NZ-12. Therefore, RIT with NZ-16 was expected to be more effective and NZ-16 was selected for further evaluation. As expected, 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 showed significant antitumor effects in tumor-bearing mice, compared with 90Y-labeled NZ-12 [6]. The significantly higher effectiveness of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 compared with 90Y-labeled NZ-16 (p < 0.01) suggests that α-RIT with NZ-16 is a promising therapy for malignant mesothelioma. Our findings are encouraging and warrant further studies toward clinical applications.
PDPN is highly expressed in many types of cancer, such as brain tumors [11], squamous cell carcinoma [25], soft tissue tumors [26], and bladder cancer [27]. A preliminary study showed radiolabeled NZ-16 highly bound to PDPN-expressing LN-319 glioma cells and showed high tumor uptake. RIT with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 is applicable for the treatment of such cancers, although further preclinical studies in these cancer models are required.
Our pathologic analysis showed that 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 induced a larger extent of necrotic change in tumor tissues compared with 90Y-labeled NZ-16, although the extent of apoptotic cell death and reduction in proliferating cells were similar. α-Emitters can provide a large amount of energy and induce irreparable damage to cells, resulting in more cell death, manifested as apoptosis or necrosis, compared with β-emitters [13]. Our findings revealed that 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 more frequently induced necrosis than apoptosis. This result is consistent with previous reports of RIT with α-emitters that apoptotic change is not often observed in solid tumors [28]. Further studies with various cancer types are needed to evaluate whether α-particle-induced cell death is depending on the cancer type.
In the present study, the estimated tumor absorbed doses following treatment with 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 and 11.1 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 were 14.9 and 2.6 Gy, respectively (Table 4). Our finding indicates that the RBE of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 is 5.7, which is similar to the recommended amount for α-emitters by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee [24]. The treatment with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 was markedly more effective than that with 90Y-labeled NZ-16, suggesting that the real RBE is greater than 5.7. To estimate the RBE by another method, we referred to the results of X-ray treatment against H226 tumors in a previous report [6]. The efficacy of 11.1 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 was almost equivalent to that of 50 Gy of X-ray radiation, and the RBE was calculated to be 19.2 for 225Ac relative to X-rays. The efficacy of 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 was equivalent to 25 Gy of X-ray irradiation, and the RBE was calculated to be 1.7 for 90Y relative to X-rays. Taken together, the RBE for 225Ac to 90Y was calculated to be 11.3. The RBE values for the cell-killing effects of α-emitters are reported to be three to five on the basis of in vivo experiments [24]. Our previous study with α-emitting 211At-MABG also showed that the RBE was approximately three [28]. Compared with other α-emitting compounds, the calculated RBE for 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 is quite high. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear at present, but the increased RBE might depend on the tumor type. Further studies are necessary to estimate a more accurate RBE for 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 to predict the therapeutic efficacy and safety in patients.
The clinical safety of RIT with NZ-16 must be evaluated. Bone marrow is generally the dose-limiting tissue in RIT. The limiting absorbed doses in the bone marrow are 6–9 Sv in rodents and 4.5 Sv in humans [23,29]. We provided the estimated absorbed doses of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16, considering a radiation weighting factor of one for 90Y and five for 225Ac [24] in Table 5. The dose to the bone marrow was 8.1 SvRBE1 for 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16 and 7.0 SvRBE5 for 11.1 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16. These doses would be acceptable in rodents; treatment-related mortality and toxicity to the bone marrow were not observed in the present study, although there was a temporary decrease in body weight. The doses, however, are greater than the limiting dose in humans of 4.5 Sv. The injected dose to patients should thus be decreased. The biodistribution of drugs, including antibodies, however, is generally not identical between humans and animals. Clinical dosimetry studies are needed to determine a safe injected radioactive dose for humans.
In mesothelioma patients, most mesothelioma cells spread into the diaphragm, chest wall, and mediastinum; radiotherapy is therefore limited due to the high risk of injury to the lungs and surrounding organs [30]. Radiation pneumonitis is the most common toxicity in patients treated with radiation for cancers in the thorax [31]. The mean dose to the lungs for a 20% risk of radiation pneumonitis is 20 Sv [31]. Our dosimetry showed that the absorbed doses of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 in the lungs were lower than 20 Sv. The spleen, liver, and kidneys would also be tolerable because these doses were lower than the tolerated doses in humans [31]. Therefore, the risk of radiation-induced toxicity from RIT with radiolabeled NZ-16 is expected to be low.
As a SPECT imaging agent for dosimetry and treatment monitoring, 111In-labeled antibodies are a suitable surrogate for 225Ac-labeled antibodies [32]. In the present study, uptake of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 in most organs tended to be higher than that of 111In-labeled NZ-16, and the RBE of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 on tumor growth suppression was greater than five. Taken together, the dosimetry of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 could be underestimated by 111In-labeled surrogate imaging. Although the present study revealed no severe damage in mice treated with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16, further studies, including dosimetric assessments of toxicity in the therapeutic use of α-RIT for solid tumors, are needed to determine the appropriate dose of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 for first-in-human studies with high confidence.
The present study has several limitations. First, 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 did not achieve complete remission. Further strategies are needed to improve the antitumor effect. Fractionated therapy with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 is promising. Two fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab produced complete remission in patients with hematologic malignancies [33]. The therapeutic effects of RIT might be enhanced by combining them with chemotherapeutic agents. Pemetrexed, as a first-line chemotherapy for mesothelioma, has a radiosensitizing effect and might therefore be particularly effective with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 [34]. Second, our dosimetry in mice cannot be directly applied to determine the appropriate dose for malignant mesothelioma patients. Clinical imaging studies with 111In-labeled NZ-16 are required to guarantee the safety of therapeutic treatments. These studies would promote the possible clinical application of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 for malignant mesothelioma. Third, the present study employed only one PDPN-expressing mesothelioma cell line. Unfortunately, another mesothelioma cell line with high PDPN expression is not available. There is a need to genetically develop PDPN-expressing mesothelioma cell lines and evaluate the efficacy of radiolabeled NZ-16 in the future.

5. Conclusions

The novel anti-PDPN antibody NZ-16 has a higher binding affinity and higher tumor uptake compared with the previous antibody NZ-12. Treatment with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 showed a potent antitumor effect without obvious adverse effects in a mesothelioma mouse model. RIT with 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 is a promising potential therapeutic option for malignant mesothelioma patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells10102503/s1, Supplementary Methods, Figure S1: Immunofluorescence staining of H226 cells using anti-PDPN antibody NZ-12 and NZ-16 (Green), Figure S2: Cell binding assay of 111In- and 225Ac- labeled NZ-16 with H226 cells (1.3 × 106 cells), Figure S3: Photos of mice treated with 0 MBq, 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 at Day 56, Figure S4: Side effects after treatments, Figure S5: TUNEL-stained H226 tumors at days 1, 3, and 7 after injection with 0 MBq (intact NZ-16 only), 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 MBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo) and A.B.T.; methodology, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo), K.N., H.S. (Hisashi Suzuki) and A.B.T.; validation, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo) and A.B.T.; formal analysis, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo); investigation, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo), A.S. and A.B.T.; resources, Y.K. and M.K.K.; data curation, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo); writing—original draft preparation, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo); writing—review and editing, A.B.T.; visualization, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo); supervision, T.H.; project administration, T.H.; funding acquisition, H.S. (Hitomi Sudo), A.S., A.B.T., M.K.K. and Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by KAKENHI 18K07778 (H.S.), 21K07688 (H.S.), 21K07230 (A.S.), 18H02774 (A.B.T.), 21K07168 (M.K.K.), and 19K07705 (Y.K.), and in part by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Numbers JP21am0401013 (Y.K.) and JP21am0101078 (Y.K.), and 21ym0126002 (T.H.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (13-1022, 26 May 2016), and all animal experiments were conducted according to the institutional guidelines regarding animal care and handling.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuriko Ogawa, Naoko Kuroda, and Akihito Abe for technical assistance and the staff in the Laboratory Animal Sciences section for animal management.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Robinson, B.W.; Lake, R.A. Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kindler, H.L.; Ismaila, N.; Armato, S.G., III; Bueno, R.; Hesdorffer, M.; Jahan, T.; Jones, C.M.; Miettinen, M.; Pass, H.; Rimner, A.; et al. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1343–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ordonez, N.G. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: An update. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2005, 129, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sterman, D.H.; Albelda, S.M. Advances in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Respirology 2005, 10, 266–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nishinaga, Y.; Sato, K.; Yasui, H.; Taki, S.; Takahashi, K.; Shimizu, M.; Endo, R.; Koike, C.; Kuramoto, N.; Nakamura, S.; et al. Targeted Phototherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy Targeting Podoplanin. Cells 2020, 9, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sudo, H.; Tsuji, A.B.; Sugyo, A.; Saga, T.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y.; Higashi, T. Therapeutic efficacy evaluation of radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-labeled anti-podoplanin antibody NZ-12 for mesothelioma. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 1653–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Quintanilla, M.; Montero-Montero, L.; Renart, J.; Martín-Villar, E. Podoplanin in Inflammation and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Yuan, P.; Temam, S.; El-Naggar, A.; Zhou, X.; Liu, D.D.; Lee, J.J.; Mao, L. Overexpression of podoplanin in oral cancer and its association with poor clinical outcome. Cancer 2006, 107, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mishima, K.; Kato, Y.; Kaneko, M.K.; Nishikawa, R.; Hirose, T.; Matsutani, M. Increased expression of podoplanin in malignant astrocytic tumors as a novel molecular marker of malignant progression. Acta Neuropathol. 2006, 111, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakazawa, Y.; Sato, S.; Naito, M.; Kato, Y.; Mishima, K.; Arai, H.; Tsuruo, T.; Fujita, N. Tetraspanin family member CD9 inhibits Aggrus/podoplanin-induced platelet aggregation and suppresses pulmonary metastasis. Blood 2008, 112, 1730–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Chandramohan, V.; Bao, X.; Kato Kaneko, M.; Kato, Y.; Keir, S.T.; Szafranski, S.E.; Kuan, C.T.; Pastan, I.H.; Bigner, D.D. Recombinant anti-podoplanin (NZ-1) immunotoxin for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 2339–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Abe, S.; Morita, Y.; Kaneko, M.K.; Hanibuchi, M.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Goto, H.; Kakiuchi, S.; Aono, Y.; Huang, J.; Sato, S.; et al. A novel targeting therapy of malignant mesothelioma using anti-podoplanin antibody. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 6239–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Larson, S.M.; Carrasquillo, J.A.; Cheung, N.K.; Press, O.W. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gudkov, S.V.; Shilyagina, N.Y.; Vodeneev, V.A.; Zvyagin, A.V. Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Human Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kratochwil, C.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Giesel, F.L.; Weis, M.; Verburg, F.A.; Mottaghy, F.; Kopka, K.; Apostolidis, C.; Haberkorn, U.; Morgenstern, A. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-Targeted alpha-Radiation Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tafreshi, N.K.; Doligalski, M.L.; Tichacek, C.J.; Pandya, D.N.; Budzevich, M.M.; El-Haddad, G.; Khushalani, N.I.; Moros, E.G.; McLaughlin, M.L.; Wadas, T.J.; et al. Development of Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy for Solid Tumors. Molecules 2019, 24, 4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Miederer, M.; Scheinberg, D.A.; McDevitt, M.R. Realizing the potential of the Actinium-225 radionuclide generator in targeted alpha particle therapy applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kaneko, M.K.; Abe, S.; Ogasawara, S.; Fujii, Y.; Yamada, S.; Murata, T.; Uchida, H.; Tahara, H.; Nishioka, Y.; Kato, Y. Chimeric Anti-Human Podoplanin Antibody NZ-12 of Lambda Light Chain Exerts Higher Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity and Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Compared with NZ-8 of Kappa Light Chain. Monoclon. Antib. Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2017, 36, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kato, Y.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kuno, A.; Uchiyama, N.; Amano, K.; Chiba, Y.; Hasegawa, Y.; Hirabayashi, J.; Narimatsu, H.; Mishima, K.; et al. Inhibition of tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation using a novel anti-podoplanin antibody reacting with its platelet-aggregation-stimulating domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 349, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maguire, W.F.; McDevitt, M.R.; Smith-Jones, P.M.; Scheinberg, D.A. Efficient 1-step radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies to high specific activity with 225Ac for alpha-particle radioimmunotherapy of cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yoshida, C.; Tsuji, A.B.; Sudo, H.; Sugyo, A.; Kikuchi, T.; Koizumi, M.; Arano, Y.; Saga, T. Therapeutic efficacy of c-kit-targeted radioimmunotherapy using 90Y-labeled anti-c-kit antibodies in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eckerman, K.F.; Endo, A. MIRD Radionuclide Data and Decay Schemes, 2nd ed.; Society of Nuclear Medicine: Reston, VA, USA, 2007; p. 671. [Google Scholar]
  23. Behr, T.M.; Sgouros, G.; Stabin, M.G.; Behe, M.; Angerstein, C.; Blumenthal, R.D.; Apostolidis, C.; Molinet, R.; Sharkey, R.M.; Koch, L.; et al. Studies on the red marrow dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy: An experimental investigation of factors influencing the radiation-induced myelotoxicity in therapy with beta-, Auger/conversion electron-, or alpha-emitters. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 3031s–3043s. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sgouros, G.; Roeske, J.C.; McDevitt, M.R.; Palm, S.; Allen, B.J.; Fisher, D.R.; Brill, A.B.; Song, H.; Howell, R.W.; Akabani, G. MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 (Abridged): Radiobiology and Dosimetry of α-Particle Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kato, Y.; Kaneko, M.; Sata, M.; Fujita, N.; Tsuruo, T.; Osawa, M. Enhanced expression of Aggrus (T1alpha/podoplanin), a platelet-aggregation-inducing factor in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour. Biol. 2005, 26, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, Y.; Ogose, A.; Kawashima, H.; Hotta, T.; Ariizumi, T.; Li, G.; Umezu, H.; Endo, N. High-level expression of podoplanin in benign and malignant soft tissue tumors: Immunohistochemical and quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis. Oncol. Rep. 2011, 25, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kato, Y.; Sasagawa, I.; Kaneko, M.; Osawa, M.; Fujita, N.; Tsuruo, T. Aggrus: A diagnostic marker that distinguishes seminoma from embryonal carcinoma in testicular germ cell tumors. Oncogene 2004, 23, 8552–8556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Ohshima, Y.; Sudo, H.; Watanabe, S.; Nagatsu, K.; Tsuji, A.B.; Sakashita, T.; Ito, Y.M.; Yoshinaga, K.; Higashi, T.; Ishioka, N.S. Antitumor effects of radionuclide treatment using alpha-emitting meta-211At-astato-benzylguanidine in a PC12 pheochromocytoma model. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Frampas, E.; Maurel, C.; Remaud-Le Saec, P.; Mauxion, T.; Faivre-Chauvet, A.; Davodeau, F.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Bardies, M.; Barbet, J. Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases: Models and pharmacokinetics predict influence of the physical and radiochemical properties of the radionuclide. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2011, 38, 2153–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nadal, E.; Bosch-Barrera, J.; Cedres, S.; Coves, J.; Garcia-Campelo, R.; Guirado, M.; Lopez-Castro, R.; Ortega, A.L.; Vicente, D.; de Castro-Carpeno, J. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (2020). Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2021, 23, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Emami, B. Tolerance of Normal Tissue to Therapeutic Radiation. Rep. Radiother. Oncol. 2013, 1, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nedrow, J.R.; Josefsson, A.; Park, S.; Back, T.; Hobbs, R.F.; Brayton, C.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Sgouros, G. Pharmacokinetics, microscale distribution, and dosimetry of alpha-emitter-labeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies in an immune competent transgenic breast cancer model. EJNMMI Res. 2017, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jurcic, J.G. Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2019, 50, S53–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Oleinick, N.L.; Biswas, T.; Patel, R.; Tao, M.; Patel, R.; Weeks, L.; Sharma, N.; Dowlati, A.; Gerson, S.L.; Fu, P.; et al. Radiosensitization of non-small-cell lung cancer cells and xenografts by the interactive effects of pemetrexed and methoxyamine. Radiother. Oncol. 2016, 121, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 10 02503 g001 550
Figure 1. In vitro characterization of radiolabeled antibodies NZ-12 and NZ-16. (a) Cell binding assay of 111In-labeled NZ-12 with H226 cells. (b) Cell binding assay of 111In-labeled NZ-16 with H226 cells. (c) Competitive inhibition assay for intact NZ-12 (white circles) and DOTA-conjugated NZ-12 (black circles) with H226 cells. (d) Competitive inhibition assay for intact NZ-16 (white circles) and DOTA-conjugated NZ-16 (black circles) with H226 cells.
Figure 1. In vitro characterization of radiolabeled antibodies NZ-12 and NZ-16. (a) Cell binding assay of 111In-labeled NZ-12 with H226 cells. (b) Cell binding assay of 111In-labeled NZ-16 with H226 cells. (c) Competitive inhibition assay for intact NZ-12 (white circles) and DOTA-conjugated NZ-12 (black circles) with H226 cells. (d) Competitive inhibition assay for intact NZ-16 (white circles) and DOTA-conjugated NZ-16 (black circles) with H226 cells.
Cells 10 02503 g001
Cells 10 02503 g002 550
Figure 2. Tumor uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-12 (N = 4), and 111In- labeled NZ-16 (N = 5) and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (N = 5). Data indicate the mean and standard deviation (N = 4–5). ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Tumor uptake of 111In-labeled NZ-12 (N = 4), and 111In- labeled NZ-16 (N = 5) and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (N = 5). Data indicate the mean and standard deviation (N = 4–5). ** p < 0.01.
Cells 10 02503 g002
Cells 10 02503 g003 550
Figure 3. Therapeutic efficacy of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled antibodies in H226 tumor-bearing mice (N = 5/treatment group). (a) Tumor growth curves of individual mice after injection with 90Y- or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (thin lines). Bold lines indicate the mean. (b) Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on a tumor volume endpoint of 300 mm3. ** p < 0.01, vs. 0 MBq NZ-16.
Figure 3. Therapeutic efficacy of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled antibodies in H226 tumor-bearing mice (N = 5/treatment group). (a) Tumor growth curves of individual mice after injection with 90Y- or 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 (thin lines). Bold lines indicate the mean. (b) Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on a tumor volume endpoint of 300 mm3. ** p < 0.01, vs. 0 MBq NZ-16.
Cells 10 02503 g003
Cells 10 02503 g004 550
Figure 4. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of H226 tumors treated with 0 MBq (intact NZ-16 only), 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 at days 1, 3, and 7 after injection. Arrowheads indicate necrosis. N, necrosis; T, tumor; F, fibrous tissue; bars, 50 μm.
Figure 4. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of H226 tumors treated with 0 MBq (intact NZ-16 only), 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 kBq of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 at days 1, 3, and 7 after injection. Arrowheads indicate necrosis. N, necrosis; T, tumor; F, fibrous tissue; bars, 50 μm.
Cells 10 02503 g004
Cells 10 02503 g005 550
Figure 5. Tumor cell proliferation analysis using Ki-67 immunostaining. (a) Ki-67-stained H226 tumors at days 1, 3, and 7 after injection with 0 MBq (intact NZ-16 only), 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 MBq 225Ac-labeled NZ-16. Bar, 50 μm (b) Quantification of proliferating (Ki-67 positive) cells (N = 3/group). Data represent the mean and standard deviation. ** p < 0.01. is a figure. Schemes follow the same formatting.
Figure 5. Tumor cell proliferation analysis using Ki-67 immunostaining. (a) Ki-67-stained H226 tumors at days 1, 3, and 7 after injection with 0 MBq (intact NZ-16 only), 3.7 MBq of 90Y-labeled NZ-16, and 18.5 MBq 225Ac-labeled NZ-16. Bar, 50 μm (b) Quantification of proliferating (Ki-67 positive) cells (N = 3/group). Data represent the mean and standard deviation. ** p < 0.01. is a figure. Schemes follow the same formatting.
Cells 10 02503 g005
Table
Table 1. Biodistribution of 111In-labeled antibodies in H226 tumor-bearing mice.
Table 1. Biodistribution of 111In-labeled antibodies in H226 tumor-bearing mice.
Day 1Day 2Day 4Day 7
NZ-12
Blood18.0 ± 1.513.8 ± 1.58.6 ± 2.35.1 ± 0.5
Brain0.4 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
Lung6.2 ± 0.45.0 ± 1.03.6 ± 1.02.1 ± 0.3
Liver15.2 ± 2.114.1 ± 1.110.8 ± 1.07.3 ± 0.9
Spleen9.9 ± 0.79.0 ± 1.48.6 ± 0.95.4 ± 1.4
Intestine2.0 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.1
Kidney12.1 ± 0.39.5 ± 0.66.4 ± 1.03.7 ± 0.7
Muscle0.9 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.1
NZ-16
Blood21.8 ± 2.919.7 ± 2.6 **13.6 ± 1.4 *8.2 ± 4.0
Brain0.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.2
Lung7.7 ± 1.36.9 ± 0.7 *7.0 ± 2.73.4 ± 1.4
Liver11.3 ± 3.5 *9.3 ± 0.9 **7.9 ± 2.37.1 ± 1.6
Spleen7.5 ± 0.89.7 ± 0.78.0 ± 0.98.1 ± 3.1 *
Intestine2.6 ± 0.62.2 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.4
Kidney7.9 ± 1.2 **7.8 ± 0.77.0 ± 0.74.9 ± 1.6
Muscle1.2 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.3 *1.1 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.4
Data are indicated as the percentage of injected dose per gram (% ID/g) and as the mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. NZ-12.
Table
Table 2. Biodistribution of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 in H226 tumor-bearing mice.
Table 2. Biodistribution of 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 in H226 tumor-bearing mice.
Day 4
Blood12.4 ± 0.8
Brain2.0 ± 0.4 **
Lung9.9 ± 1.1 **
Liver10.5 ± 1.5
Spleen11.9 ± 1.0 **
Intestine2.7 ± 0.6 *
Kidney7.9 ± 1.0
Muscle3.6 ± 1.1 **
Data are indicated as the percentage of injected dose per gram (% ID/g) and as the mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 vs. 111In-NZ-16 (Table 1).
Table
Table 3. Estimated absorbed dose (Gy/MBq) for 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 based on the biodistribution data of 111In-labeled antibodies, not considering a radiation weighting factor.
Table 3. Estimated absorbed dose (Gy/MBq) for 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-12 and NZ-16 based on the biodistribution data of 111In-labeled antibodies, not considering a radiation weighting factor.
90Y225Ac
NZ-12NZ-16NZ-12NZ-16
Brain0.1 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.06.4 ± 0.59.7 ± 0.8
Lung1.7 ± 0.12.4 ± 0.284.6 ± 4.7124.2 ± 11.4
Liver4.6 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.2239.0 ± 7.3185.5 ± 13.5
Spleen3.2 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.1168.7 ± 9.4172.1 ± 36.4
Intestine0.5 ± 0.00.7 ± 0.025.8 ± 1.137.1 ± 2.0
Kidney3.1 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.1156.9 ± 4.7140.0 ± 9.5
Muscle0.3 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.015.5 ± 0.921.1 ± 1.7
Bone marrow a1.8 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.189.4 ± 4.0126.1 ± 6.1
Tumor3.0 ± 0.23.8 ± 0.2174.6 ± 158.0236.0 ± 108.6
Data indicate the mean ± standard deviation. a The absorbed doses of bone marrow were estimated based on the blood uptake (Table 1), considering a red-marrow-to-blood activity ratio of 0.4. There is no significant difference between NZ-12 and NZ-16.
Table
Table 4. Estimated absorbed doses (Gy) from the treatment dose of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16, not considering a radiation weighting factor.
Table 4. Estimated absorbed doses (Gy) from the treatment dose of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16, not considering a radiation weighting factor.
3.7 MBq 90Y11.1 kBq 225Ac18.5 kBq 225Ac
Brain0.70.10.2
Lung8.81.42.3
Liver12.82.13.4
Spleen11.41.93.2
Intestine2.70.40.7
Kidney9.71.62.6
Muscle1.50.20.4
Bone marrow a8.11.42.3
Tumor14.92.64.4
a The absorbed doses of bone marrow were estimated based on the blood uptake (Table 1), considering a red-marrow-to-blood activity ratio of 0.4.
Table
Table 5. Estimated absorbed doses (Sv) from the treatment dose of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 using radiation weighting factors a.
Table 5. Estimated absorbed doses (Sv) from the treatment dose of 90Y- and 225Ac-labeled NZ-16 using radiation weighting factors a.
3.7 MBq 90Y11.1 kBq 225Ac18.5 kBq 225Ac
Brain0.70.50.9
Lung8.86.911.5
Liver12.810.317.2
Spleen11.49.615.9
Intestine2.72.13.4
Kidney9.77.813.0
Muscle1.51.22.0
Bone marrow b8.17.011.7
Tumor14.913.121.8
a The radiation weighting factors of 1 for 90Y and 5 for 225Ac. b The absorbed doses of bone marrow were estimated based on the blood uptake (Table 1), considering a red-marrow-to-blood activity ratio of 0.4.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sudo, H.; Tsuji, A.B.; Sugyo, A.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y.; Nagatsu, K.; Suzuki, H.; Higashi, T. Preclinical Evaluation of Podoplanin-Targeted Alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with the Novel Antibody NZ-16 for Malignant Mesothelioma. Cells 2021, 10, 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102503

AMA Style

Sudo H, Tsuji AB, Sugyo A, Kaneko MK, Kato Y, Nagatsu K, Suzuki H, Higashi T. Preclinical Evaluation of Podoplanin-Targeted Alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with the Novel Antibody NZ-16 for Malignant Mesothelioma. Cells. 2021; 10(10):2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sudo, Hitomi, Atsushi B. Tsuji, Aya Sugyo, Mika K. Kaneko, Yukinari Kato, Kotaro Nagatsu, Hisashi Suzuki, and Tatsuya Higashi. 2021. "Preclinical Evaluation of Podoplanin-Targeted Alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with the Novel Antibody NZ-16 for Malignant Mesothelioma" Cells 10, no. 10: 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102503

APA Style

Sudo, H., Tsuji, A. B., Sugyo, A., Kaneko, M. K., Kato, Y., Nagatsu, K., Suzuki, H., & Higashi, T. (2021). Preclinical Evaluation of Podoplanin-Targeted Alpha-Radioimmunotherapy with the Novel Antibody NZ-16 for Malignant Mesothelioma. Cells, 10(10), 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop