Next Article in Journal
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene-Addition/Editing Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Severity in Zellweger Spectrum Disorder by Clinical Findings: A Scoping Review, Meta-Analysis and Medical Chart Review
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Adipose Tissue Beiging by HIV Integrase Inhibitors, Dolutegravir and Bictegravir, Is Associated with Adipocyte Hypertrophy, Hypoxia, Elevated Fibrosis, and Insulin Resistance in Simian Adipose Tissue and Human Adipocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker of Neurodegeneration in X-Linked Childhood Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Peroxisome Metabolism Contributes to PIEZO2-Mediated Mechanical Allodynia

1
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
2
Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Pediatric Neurology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(11), 1842; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111842
Submission received: 16 April 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 4 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peroxisomal Disorders: Development of Targeted Therapies)

Abstract

:
Mutations in the peroxisomal half-transporter ABCD1 cause X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, resulting in elevated very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA), progressive neurodegeneration and an associated pain syndrome that is poorly understood. In the nervous system of mice, we found ABCD1 expression to be highest in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), with satellite glial cells (SGCs) displaying higher expression than neurons. We subsequently examined sensory behavior and DRG pathophysiology in mice deficient in ABCD1 compared to wild-type mice. Beginning at 8 months of age, Abcd1−/y mice developed persistent mechanical allodynia. DRG had a greater number of IB4-positive nociceptive neurons expressing PIEZO2, the mechanosensitive ion channel. Blocking PIEZO2 partially rescued the mechanical allodynia. Beyond affecting neurons, ABCD1 deficiency impacted SGCs, as demonstrated by high levels of VLCFA, increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), as well as genes disrupting neuron-SGC connectivity. These findings suggest that lack of the peroxisomal half-transporter ABCD1 leads to PIEZO2-mediated mechanical allodynia as well as SGC dysfunction. Given the known supportive role of SGCs to neurons, this elucidates a novel mechanism underlying pain in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a debilitating progressive neurological disorder with pain often representing a persistent chronic symptom impacting the quality of life of patients [1,2,3]. X-ALD is caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene located on chromosome Xq28 [4]. The ABCD1 gene encodes a peroxisomal ATP-binding cassette (ABC) half-transporter, which shuttles CoA-activated very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA), such as C26:0-CoA and C24:0-CoA, into peroxisomes for degradation by beta-oxidation. This accumulation of saturated VLCFA is considered the biochemical hallmark of X-ALD and peroxisome dysfunction at large [5,6]. The most common phenotype of X-ALD is adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), a degenerative axonopathy that involves the ascending and descending tracts of the spinal cord [7,8,9]. In X-ALD, this form of myeloneuropathy affects almost all men and 80% of women [2,10]. Alongside gait disturbances and balance problems, neuropathic pain manifests as symmetrical, predominantly distal, burning or stabbing pain often requiring the use of analgesics. As a group of cell bodies responsible for transmitting sensory messages from various receptors to the CNS, the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are thought to play a central role. In AMN these DRG neurons undergo atrophy, with ultrastructural demonstration of abnormal mitochondria but no appreciable neuronal loss [11,12].
Although pain and peripheral neuropathy are well reported manifestations in AMN, there is no detailed research on sensory change and the pathophysiology of early changes in the peripheral nervous system. Hence, in the present study, we characterize the sensory behavior in Abcd1-/y mice and address the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms pertinent to the pathophysiology of DRG.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Congenic C57BL/6 Abcd1−/y and wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were acquired from the Jackson Laboratory [13]. Abcd1−/y mice were backcrossed onto a pure C57/B6 background over six generations. They were then bred from homozygous founders, and occasionally genotyped according to the protocol provided by the Jackson Laboratory. All mice were kept in the animal housing facility of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Center for Comparative Medicine, had ad libitum access to water and standard rodent food, and were kept on a 12 h light–dark cycle.

2.2. Mouse Hot Plate Testing

Each mouse was habituated at 37 °C on the hot plate for 1 min and then tested with the temperature set to 50 °C and 52 °C. Mice were removed from the hot plate as soon as stereotypic behavior indicating discomfort was noted, or after 20 s had elapsed, so that no damage was inflicted upon the paws. The timing of stereotypic behavior was observed, recorded, and used for analysis.

2.3. Von Frey Filament Testing Mechanical Sensitivity

Rodents exhibit a paw withdrawal reflex when the paw is unexpectedly touched. Mechanical sensitivity was assessed with Von Frey filaments presented in order of increasing stiffness and usually started with nominal force 1 (North coast medical, CA, USA). These filaments were applied to the underside of the paw after the mouse was settled into a comfortable position within a restricted area that has a perforated floor. If the mouse responded by withdrawing, flinching, or licking the paw 2 times out of 10, the examiner moved to the next finer (lower number) filament [14]. Examination proceeded in this manner until the mouse did not respond. The last filament to which the mouse responded was defined as the mechanical threshold.

2.4. Brush Assay Test

Similar to the Von Frey test, a soft paint brush was gently applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw and the percentage of withdrawals out of 5 trials was counted.

2.5. Satellite Glial Cell Culture

Satellite glial cells (SGCs) were cultured following the protocol described by Poulsen [15]. Briefly, DRG tissues from 1–2month old mice were dissected and incubated in 5 mg/mL collagenase IV for 45 min at 37 °C. Digested tissues were further mechanically dispersed with a glass pipette. The collagenase solution was centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL 0.125% trypsin and incubated for 10 min followed by another round of mechanical dissociation before the suspension was centrifuged once more. The cell pellet was resuspended in DMEM/F12 containing 10% FBS and 1% pen/strep and cultured at a humidified 5% CO2 incubator (37 °C). Cell medium was replaced after 2 h and 24 h and then every 2 days until confluency.

2.6. Immortalized Rodent DRG Neuron Culture and Lipid Supplementation

Immortalized rat DRG neurons were obtained from the GRCF Biorepository & Cell Center at the John Hopkins School of Medicine (thanks to Dr. Ahmet Hoke) [16]. Cells were maintained in neurobasal medium containing 10% FBS, 0.2% glucose, Glutamax, and B27. Differentiation was performed by supplementing medium with 75 μM forskolin, 25 ng/mL NGF, and 25 ng/mL GDNF. DRG neurons were differentiated for 3 days and then treated with lipids (5 μM of C16:0, C24:0 or C26:0 free fatty acids (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in ethanol) for 3 days.

2.7. Western Blotting

Tissue and cell lysates were prepared by using RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with 1% Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Protein samples were separated on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transferred on PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and probed with antibodies against ABCD1 (Abcam, ab197013, 1:5000), GFAP (Abcam, ab7260, 1:1000), CGRP (Santa Cruz, sc57053, 1:500) and peripherin (Merke, MAB1527, 1:500). Anti-β-ACTIN (Santa Cruz, SC-47,778, 1:1000) and anti-GADPH (Santa Cruz, sc3223, 1:1000) were used as a protein loading control. Membrane protein signals were prepared by using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo, Rockford, IL, USA) after incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies.

2.8. Immunofluorescence Staining and Confocal Microscopy Imaging

Sections of DRG tissue (14 μm) were cut at −23 °C using cryostat (Leica). Sections were stained with anti-ABCD1 (Abcam, ab197013, 1:200), anti-GFAP (Dako, Z0334, 1:500), anti-Neurofilament (SMI32) (Biolegend, 801,701, 1:1000), peripherin (Abcam, ab1530, 1:500, Cambridge, UK), CGRP (Abcam, ab42072, 1:1000), C-caspase3 (Cell signaling, 9661, 1:400), and anti-NeuN (Abcam, ab104224, 1:1000) antibodies separately or in combination. We used an anti-ABCD3 antibody to visualize peroxisomes (Abcam, ab3421, 1:1000). Isolectin GS-IB4 Alexa Fluor™ 488 Conjugate from Griffonia simplicifolia (Invitrogen) was prepared at 1mg/mL stock solution and applied to slides at 1:500 dilution when needed. The slides were imaged by confocal laser microscope. Fluorescence intensity was quantified by Image J (Wayne Rasband, NIH).

2.9. Lipid Analysis

DRG tissues or cultured SGCs were harvested and then analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), as described previously [6]. Absolute values of C24:0 and C26:0 in ng/mg protein were reported.

2.10. Transcriptome Sequencing

RNA from freshly dissected mouse DRG tissue and cultured SGCs was extracted using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). Transcriptome sequencing was performed by Macrogen. Analyses were performed on 6 WT and Abcd1−/y paired-end samples. Overall sequenced reads quality, total bases, total reads, GC (%), and basic statistics were calculated. The splice-aware alignment program STAR (http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/10/25/bioinformatics.bts635 (accessed on 1 January 2017 and 1 August 2017)) was used to map sample sequencing reads (from .fastq files) to a Mus musculus (mm10 build) reference genome file. Gene expression counts were calculated using the program HTSeq (http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq/doc/overview.html (accessed on 1 January 2017 and 1 August 2017) based on a current Ensembl annotation for mm10. The R package “edgeR” was employed to make differential gene expression calls from these counts per the following criteria: Gene expression was considered upregulated if log2 FC > +1 or downregulated if the log2 FC < −1 (FC = fold-change of average RPKM) with respect to the conditions being compared. Differentially expressed genes were identified through volcano plot filtering.

2.11. Enrichment Analysis

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) selected by the bioinformatical criteria above were used for functional analysis by the Metacore software. Process network, toxicity network, and gene ontology (GO) process enrichment analyses were performed.

2.12. Quantitative Real-Time Reverse-Transcription PCR

Total RNA was isolated by using Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). First-strand cDNA synthesis used 100 ng random primer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1.0 μg total RNA, 10 mM dNTP and 200 units of reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) per 20 μL reactions. PCRs were performed in duplicates in a 25 μL final volume by using SYBR Green master mix from applied biosystems (Warrington, UK), and the data were analyzed by calculating the delta Ct value between testing gene and internal control. Primers used in the experiment were as described in Supplementary Table S1.

2.13. Intrathecal Injection of D-GsMTx4

Briefly, 8–10-month-old male C57BL/6 Abcd1−/y mice were put under anesthesia by isoflurane. After the skin over the lumbar region was shaved and cleaned, a 3~4 cm mid-sagittal incision was made through the skin exposing the muscle and spine. A catheter was inserted between L4–L5 spine region and attached to a gas-tight Hamilton syringe with a 33-gauge steel needle. Then, 25 μM D-GsMTx4 dissolved in 10 μL saline were slowly injected at a rate of 5 μL/min with saline injection as control.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as means ± SEM and analyzed for statistical significance by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni testing for multiple comparisons among experimental groups (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.). Two-tailed t-tests were used for the comparison of WT and Abcd1−/y groups. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. ABCD1 Expression in DRG Tissue

Within the nervous system, DRG have higher ABCD1 expression than the brain and spinal cord (Figure 1A,B). The ABCD family member with closest homology and function to ABCD1 is ABCD2 [17,18]. Interestingly, ABCD2 expression in DRG is strikingly lower compared to that in the brain and spinal cord, possibly contributing to the vulnerability of DRG in the absence of ABCD1 (Figure S1). Within DRG, ABCD1 protein localized largely to SGCs that surround the neurons, whereas the neurons themselves had barely detectable ABCD1 protein (Figure 1C, thick arrow). Some ABCD1 protein was also detected around the axons (Figure 1C, thin arrow), pointing to Schwann cell expression of ABCD1. In addition, ABCD1 expression at the embryonic stage (E13.5), when glial cells are less developed, was much lower but increased significantly postnatally (Figure S2).

3.2. Nociceptive Behavior in Abcd1−/y Mice

Peripheral neuropathy in Abcd1−/y mice is known to manifest as motor impairment around 15 months of age. To characterize the sensory behavior of Abcd1−/y mice, we monitored sensation beginning at 6 months of age by using hot plate (thermosensitivity) and Von Frey (mechanical sensitivity) testing. On hot plate testing, no significant difference between WT and Abcd1−/y was found at either 10 or 14 months of age (Figure 2A,B). On the other hand, mechanical hypersensitivity developed around 8 months of age, and this hypersensitivity persisted until 20 months of age (Figure 2C). Abcd1−/y mice showed consistent acute sensitivity to gentle touch with small filaments which WT mice normally do not respond to. Although aging contributed to some variability, the early mechanical hypersensitivity was reproducible in separate sets of studies performed by different technicians over the years (Figure S3), indicating persistent peripheral sensory dysfunction in several generations of Abcd1−/y mice. Further brush assays on 9–10-month-old mice validated the hypersensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice, although not to the same degree as the Von Frey assay (Figure 2D).

3.3. Peroxisomal Dysfunction in Abcd1−/y Mice

While SGCs appear to be enriched in peroxisomes as visualized by ABCD3(PMP70) staining, an extensively used peroxisome marker, the distribution of peroxisomes in both SGCs and neurons showed little difference between Abcd1−/y and WT mice (Figure 3A,B). Lipid analysis revealed that Abcd1−/y DRG has higher VLCFA (C26:0 and C24:0) accumulation than spinal cord and liver but no increase in short chains such as C16:0 (Figure 3C). Compared to the 3.7-fold increase of the C26:0 level in Abcd1−/y spinal cord and the 2.9-fold increase in liver, DRG reached a 5.9-fold increase in C26:0 over WT. In addition, the absolute C26:0 level in the Abcd1−/y nervous system (10.9 nmol/mg protein in the spinal cord and 14.8 nmol/mg protein in DRG) was around 300 times higher than that in the liver (0.04 nmol/mg protein), implying the importance of ABCD1 protein to nerve function overall (Figure 3D,E).

3.4. Neuron Subtype Distribution in DRG

Sensory neurons can be broadly subdivided into functional classes based on their stimulus response. To determine whether there was any difference in neuron subtype distribution in Abcd1−/y mice, we performed neurofilament H(NF-H) and peripherin staining in mouse DRG tissue and quantified the percentage of NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons. Neurofilament-H primarily labels large-sized neurons mediating mechanoreception and proprioception, while peripherin primarily labels small neurons responsible for pain and temperature sensation and can be further divided into calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-positive and isolectin IB4-binding neurons (IB4+) [19].
No significant difference was found in the distribution of NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons between WT and Abcd1−/y mice at either 1 month (Figure 4A,B) or 13 months of age (Figure 4C,D). In addition, cleaved capase3 (C-caspase3) staining in DRGs of 15-month-old mice did not reveal apoptosis (Figure S4), suggesting no clear neuronal loss, as previously described in humans [12]. However, further neuronal subtyping revealed a decrease in the percentage of CGRP-positive but an increase in IB4-positive neurons at both 1 month (Figure 4E,F) and 11 months (Figure 4G,H) of age. The percentage of neurons that were both IB4- and CGRP-positive was only 1–2%, suggesting a clear segregation of these two types of nociceptors (Figure 4E–H). Further analysis of CGRP in DRG revealed significantly reduced CGRP expression at both the mRNA and protein levels, in line with the changes in cell proportion (Figure 4I,J). Since the CGRP-positive DRG neurons mainly project into the spinal cord dorsal horn, we assessed the CGRP expression at DRG axon terminals in the spinal cord. Consistent with the reduction of CGRP in DRG soma, CGRP at the spinal cord dorsal horn was also decreased by around 20% (Figure 4K,L).

3.5. DRG Transcriptomic Analysis

Following transcriptomic analysis, 15,474 genes were successfully mapped and identified from RNA-seq. In total, 161 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered out between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold, which consisted of 80 upregulated genes and 81 downregulated genes (Figures S5 and S6). Enrichment analysis by process network identified several pathways potentially linked to the sensory changes, including those involved in neuropeptide signaling and potassium transport (Table 1). The toxicity network analysis revealed pathways relevant to neuropeptide signaling and transmission of nerve impulses as well as opioid, galanin, and neurotensin receptors (Table S2). Enrichment analysis by GO processes also identified genes involved in responses to external stimuli and regulation of responses to biotic stimuli (Table S3). All these results pointed to a dysregulated ion transport and disturbance in neural signaling transmission, which could potentially contribute to mechanical hypersensitivity.
To confirm the accuracy of the RNA-seq results, we next used qPCR to assess several genes crucial to regulating neuronal ion transport and signaling transmission. Kcnj11, Slc24a4, and Gpr179 were significantly upregulated and Galanin and Npy significantly downregulated. Moderate increases of Gfap suggested by RNA-seq data were also verified (Figure 5A). We also profiled a cluster of mechanosensitive channel genes: Piezo2 and Trpc6 were significantly upregulated albeit not reaching the |log2 FC| > 1 threshold, while two genes responsible for caveolae formation on cellular membranes (Cav1 and Cav2) were downregulated (Figure 5B). Interestingly, lipid treatment with saturated VLCFA led to significantly increased Piezo2 but not Piezo1 mRNA expression, which is in line with RNA-seq data and suggested that the aberrant lipids could be contributing to the Piezo2 upregulation.
With the high abundance of PIEZO2 expression in DRG and its known role in mediating mechanosensitivity, we tested whether PIEZO2 contributed to the mechanical hypersensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice by performing intrathecal delivery of the PIEZO2-blocking chemical D-GsMTx4 (Figure 5F). Initially after intrathecal delivery Abcd1−/y mice remained hypersensitive, but by 7 days, the D-GsMTx4-injected mice showed a reduction in hypersensitivity compared to the saline-injected group (Figure 5D–E). Interestingly, Abcd1−/y mice after D-GsMTx4 injection also showed reduced balance time on the rotarod test 7 days post injection (data not shown). Prior reports showed that conditional knockout of PIEZO2 in mouse DRG led to defective proprioception, also manifesting as reduced latency on the rotarod test [20].

3.6. Increased GFAP Expression in DRG Tissue in the Absence of ABCD1

Aside from dysregulation in ion transport and neurotransmission, the DRG transcriptome data also suggested increased Gfap gene expression in Abcd1−/y DRG tissue. For verification, we compared GFAP protein expression between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG tissues at different ages. A significant increase (around 5-fold) of GFAP expression was detected in 15-month-old Abcd1−/y mouse DRG tissue. Surprisingly, a trend in increased GFAP was seen as early as 1 month of age (Figure 6A–D). Further immunohistochemistry suggested that the increased GFAP signal was localized to glial cells surrounding neurons (satellite glial cells, SGCs) as well as some Schwann cells (Figure 6E, magnification). To understand whether glial cell proliferation was contributing here, we quantified the average SGC number and found no significant difference (Figure S7).

3.7. Increased GFAP Expression and VLCFA Accumulation in Abcd1−/y SGCs

To study the functional consequences of ABCD1 deficiency in SGCs, we isolated SGCs from mouse DRG tissue and performed in vitro culture as well as subsequent protein and biochemical analysis. Interestingly, the SGCs isolated from 1–2 month-old Abcd1−/y DRG tissue showed significantly increased GFAP at the gene and protein level (Figure 7A–C), implying early SGC activation due to ABCD1 deficiency. Further lipid analysis revealed that Abcd1−/y SGCs had an approximate 4.5-fold increase of C26:0 fatty acid and 1.2-fold increase of C24:0 fatty acid (Figure 7D), in line with the overall C26:0 increase in DRG tissue.

3.8. SGC Transcriptomic Analysis

Transcriptomic analysis in isolated SGC mapped and identified 12,243 genes successfully from RNA-seq. In total, 196 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (85 upregulated genes and 111 downregulated genes) were identified between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold (Figure S8). In the enrichment analysis by process network, pathways involving cell adhesion and cell matrix interaction emerged and involved the following genes: membrane metalloendopeptidase (Mme) (up), neurocan (Ncan) (up), elastin (Eln)(down), laminin (Lama1) (down), caveolin1,2 (Cav-1,2) (down) (Table 2). Enrichment analysis by toxicity network also pointed to many cell adhesion–related pathways as well as lipid and vesicle transport which comprise CD36 (down), caveolin (down), SR-BI (down), HDL protein (down) and VDR (down) (Table S4). Enrichment analysis by GO processes discovered pathways related to responses to lipid perturbations, responses to external or biotic stimuli and regulation of cell motility (Table S5), which were in line with the pathways enriched in DRG transcriptomic analysis and of special importance to a metabolic disorder with mechanical hypersensitivity. We also selected several relevant genes for qPCR verification. Significant upregulation of the Mme and Ncan genes and downregulation of the Cav-1 and Cav-2 genes as well as trend changes in the Lama1 and Eln genes matched the RNA-seq results well, suggesting reliability of the RNA-seq data (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Mutations in ABCD1 cause a chronic degenerative disease called adrenoleukodystrophy with associated pain impacting gait, balance, and sleep in affected patients and requiring the use of chronic analgesics [1,2,3,21]. Examining the expression pattern of ABCD1 we found dorsal root ganglia (DRG) to have the highest levels of ABCD1 gene and protein expression in the entire nervous system (Figure 1). We further found that mice deficient in ABCD1 (Abcd1−/y) developed mechanical allodynia by 8 months of age, preceding motor abnormalities (Figure 2). Transcriptomics and lipid analysis of the DRG revealed an upregulation of PIEZO2 and lipid perturbations in neighboring glia (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Graphic abstract).
As in wild-type mice, high levels of detectable ABCD1 protein are seen in normal human DRG neurons [11]. Autopsy specimens of adults with AMN deficient in ABCD1 show no evidence of cell death in DRG [11,12], but DRG neurons undergo atrophy with ultrastructural demonstration of abnormal mitochondria. Similarly, in Abcd1−/y mice we found oxidative stress and lipid perturbation but no neuronal cell loss.
Sensory neurons are subdivided into functional classes based on their stimulus response. While Abcd1−/y mice showed no difference in the distribution of mechanoreceptive and proprioceptive (NF-positive) versus nociceptive neurons (peripherin-positive), further subtyping revealed a decrease in CGRP-positive and an increase in IB4-positive nociceptors (Figure 4). Since the non-peptidergic IB4-positive CGRP-negative nociceptive neurons mainly mediate noxious mechanical stimulus [19], these changes could partially explain the mechanical hypersensitivity observed. Prior studies have reported that following trauma, nociceptive neurons in DRG can proliferate ipsilateral to the injury [22]. Satellite glial cells in DRG may also directly communicate with sensory neurons, releasing neural modulating factors or stimulating the sprouting of axons [23,24].
We next considered whether the preponderance of IB4-positive neurons may be due to aberrant metabolism during early development. Peroxisome dysfunction in DRG was evident in Abcd1−/y mice at a young age (Figure 3). Saturated VLCFA, such as C26:0, were elevated 5.9-fold in DRG compared to 3.7-fold and 2.9-fold in the liver and the spinal cord, respectively. Saturated VLCFA (C26:0) are known to lead to lipid-induced ER stress, as evidenced by an increase in XBP1 [25]. While VLCFA are known to be toxic to cells, it is not known how this lipid perturbation could lead to sensory dysfunction. To investigate the pathways affected, we pursued transcriptomic analysis of DRG.
Electrical excitation of peripheral somatosensory nerves is commonly a first step in the generation of pain and is usually controlled by an intricate set of ion channels that together produce a degree of excitation proportional to the strength of external stimulation [26]. In Abcd1−/y mice, solute carrier (SLC) transporters, responsible for trafficking various substrates, such as inorganic ions, amino acids, fatty acids, neurotransmitters, and saccharides [27], were upregulated (Figure 5). Most important to our study of mechanical allodynia, transcriptomic analysis revealed an increase in PIEZO2 expression as well as a reduction in membrane caveolae structure proteins (CAV1 and CAV2) in Abcd1−/y mouse DRG.
PIEZO2 acts as the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation and provides diverse sensory functions within DRG neurons [20,28,29], including mediating tactile pain [30]. Significantly, IB4-positive neurons are rich in PIEZO2 compared to CGRP-positive neurons [20,31]. The increase of PIEZO2 gene expression matched the observed increase in IB4-positive neurons, possibly accounting for the increased mechanical sensitivity in Abcd1−/y mice. However, an increase of mechanosensitive channels (MSC) such as PIEZO2 could increase currents independent of cell number. Aberrant lipids could further impact PIEZO2-mediated mechanical allodynia, as VCLFA treatment increased PIEZO2 in cultured rat DRG neurons and tension within the membrane bilayer is also known to activate MSC [32]. Caveolae, the membrane invaginations of lipid raft domains, regulate mechanosensitive channel function by modulating membrane tension, and reducing caveolins can increase MSC currents, such as those in PIEZO channels, supporting the key roles of these proteins in the development of mechanical hypersensitivity [33,34]. The highly positively charged peptide GsMTx4 inhibits MSC gating by associating with the cell membrane and buffering tension transmission to the channels [35]. By blocking PIEZO2 in Abcd1−/y mice using GsMTx4, we were able to partially rescue the mechanical allodynia. This corroborated the significance of PIEZO2 to the sensory abnormalities seen in Abcd1−/y mice but also suggested recalcitrant pathology within the Abcd1−/y DRG.
While humans have high levels of ABCD1 protein expressed in neurons themselves [36], mice have very high ABCD1 expression in the SGCs that surround the neuronal cell body and barely detectable levels in neurons. Of note, glial cells such as SGCs are rich in peroxisomes and the enzymes responsible for lipid synthesis and can thereby contribute to VLCFA accumulation and subsequent axonal degeneration [24,37]. SGCs had an approximate 4.5-fold increase of C26:0 fatty acid (Figure 7D), in line with the overall C26:0 increase in Abcd1−/y DRG tissue (5.9-fold). Although DRG neurons are the cells transmitting nociceptive signals, SGCs are now recognized as important to both axonal regeneration and the pathogenesis of chronic pain [24,38,39]. Interestingly, nerve injury elicits changes in the expression of genes related to fatty acid synthesis, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) signaling in SGCs appears essential to axonal regeneration [40]. Conversely, structural and biochemical changes in SGCs can cause aberrant connectivity between neighboring SGCs and sensory neurons and contribute to chronic pain. This can involve gliosis (i.e., proliferation), increased expression of GFAP (a marker for SGC activation), modulation of glutamate transporters and ion channels, and increases in purinergic and cytokine signaling [24,38,39,41].
In our study, an increase in GFAP in SGCs from 1-month-old Abcd1−/y mice suggests early glial activation, even before alterations in sensory behavior (Figure 6). Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis revealed aberrant cell adhesion, cell matrix interactions, and membrane transport which involved the downregulation of laminin (Lama1), elastin, and caveolins (Cav1 and Cav2), as well as upregulation of membrane metalloendopeptidase (Mme) and the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan neurocan (Ncan), a member of the extracellular matrix of the nervous system (Figure 8). Lack of ABCD1 protein activates SGCs, thereby perturbing connectivity between neighboring neurons.
Prior studies examining the effects of saturated VLCFA upon model membranes predicted a disruptive effect upon cell membrane structure and function [10]. Membrane lipids have been found to impact mechanosensitive channels, as with stretching of the bilayer, the membrane and the local trans-bilayer pressure profile changes [36,42]. Pertinent to our finding of PIEZO2 dysfunction, the conformation of these ion channels is influenced by the stiffness of the lipid bilayer, thus producing gating movements to open the pore. While MSC are thus activated by bilayer tension in neuronal membranes, extracellular matrix (ECM) and cytoskeletal elements can contribute significantly as well [43,44]. In Abcd1−/y mice, activated SGC further alter neuronal membrane mechanical properties, thereby impacting MSC gating.
Limitations in our interpretation may arise from the role of other pathways identified by transcriptomic analysis. Many of the potassium channels upregulated in Abcd1−/y DRG, such as Kcnj11 (protein Kir6.2) and Kcnd2 (protein KV4.2), can be involved in peripheral pain–related pathways [26,45,46,47]. In addition to changes in ion transporters, various neuropeptides, such as galanin and neuropeptide Y, were downregulated in Abcd1−/y DRG. Galanin, a 29-aa peptide, is present in a small population of DRG neurons [48,49] and may influence nociception at different levels of the nervous system, including DRG, the spinal cord and brain [50,51].

5. Conclusions

We report that the pain syndrome seen in the myeloneuropathy of X-ALD arises from ABCD1 protein dysfunction in DRGs (Graphic abstract). Mice deficient in ABCD1 protein experience an early mechanical allodynia mediated by PIEZO2 dysfunction in DRG neurons. After blocking PIEZO2, a partial rescue of mechanical hypersensitivity occurs, but high levels of saturated VLCFA persist. These lipids accumulate specifically in SGCs, a metabolically active cell type surrounding DRG neurons. Our study thus points to dysregulated neuron–glia interactions in X-ALD and elucidates novel mechanisms involved in the genesis of mechanical allodynia and sensory pathology.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11111842/s1. Supplementary Table S1: Primer sequences used in qPCR analysis.; Supplementary Table S2: Enrichment analysis by toxicity network of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.; Supplementary Table S3: Enrichment analysis by GO processes of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.; Supplementary Table S4: Enrichment analysis by toxicity network of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.; Supplementary Table S5: Enrichment analysis by GO processes of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.; Supplementary Figure S1. Expression of ABCD family members (ABCD1, ABCD2, ABCD3) in DRG tissue compared to other nervous system at different ages. (A), Representative Western blot image showing ABCD family member expression in different nervous system tissues. Quantification of ABCD2 (B) and ABCD3 (C) protein levels in different nervous system tissues with GADPH as loading control. Results were expressed as means ± SEM. (n = 3 for each group).; Supplementary Figure S2. ABCD1 immunostaining in DRG from WT mouse at different ages including embryo 13.5(E13.5), postnatal day 8 (P8) and 2 months (2M) of age.; Supplementary Figure S3. Von Frey testing of Abcd1−/y mice by different technicians over the years show overall reproducibility of results across several generations of mice. (A) Mechanical sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by Von Frey testing in 2014 (n = 11 for WT and n = 14 for Abcd1−/y). (B) Mechanical sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by Von Frey testing in 2015 (n = 8 for WT and n = 8 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared with WT control.; Supplementary Figure S4. Confocal image showing cleaved-caspase 3 staining (green) and NF (red) co-staining in DRG tissue from WT and Abcd1−/y mice at 15 months of age.; Supplementary Figure S5. Transcriptomic RNA-seq of Abcd1−/y mouse DRG at 13 months of age (n = 3 for both WT and Abcd1−/y). (A) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG. Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of upregulated genes (B) and downregulated genes (C) in Abcd1−/y DRG at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold, indicating clean segregation between the WT and Abcd1−/y group.; Supplementary Figure S6. Bar graph showing the 80 upregulated genes (A) and 81 downregulated genes (B) in Abcd1−/y DRG at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold in the order from high to low. Genes selected for qPCR verification in Figure 5 were labeled with arrow.; Supplementary Figure S7. SGC/neuron ratio in Abcd1−/y DRG. (A) Representative images showing the SGC/neuron ratio in Abcd1−/y mouse DRG (Toluidine staining of 1 micron slices). C Quantification of SGC/neuron ratio from images (n = 4 for WT and n = 6 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM.; Supplementary Figure S8. Transcriptomic RNA-seq analysis of primary cultured SGCs of Abcd1−/y mice at 1 month of age (n = 3 for WT and n = 2 for Abcd1−/y). (A) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs. Bar graph showing the 85 upregulated genes (B) and 111 downregulated genes (C) in Abcd1−/y SGCs at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold in the order from high to low.

Author Contributions

Y.G.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. F.L.: methodology. A.B.: methodology, reviewing and editing. A.Q.: methodology. S.-O.P.: methodology. R.K.: methodology, reviewing and editing. M.S.: methodology. R.H.: methodology. R.S.: reviewing and editing. S.K.: methodology, data curation, writing—reviewing and editing. F.E.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from NINDS (R01 NS072446, R01 NS082331), the European Leukodystrophy Association (ELA 2019-012I2), the Arrivederci Foundation, the Cure ALD Foundation, the Leblang Charitable Foundation and the Hammer Family Fund for ALD Research and Therapies for Women.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at MGH.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Imaging was performed in the Microscopy Core of the Program in Membrane Biology, which is partially supported by a Centre for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Grant DK043351 and a Boston-Area Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center (BADERC) Award DK057521. The Zeiss confocal system was obtained with grant 1S10OD021577-01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huffnagel, I.C.; Van Ballegoij, W.J.C.; Van Geel, B.M.; Vos, J.; Kemp, S.; Engelen, M. Progression of myelopathy in males with adrenoleukodystrophy: Towards clinical trial readiness. Brain 2019, 142, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huffnagel, I.C.; Dijkgraaf, M.G.W.; Janssens, G.E.; Van Weeghel, M.; Van Geel, B.M.; Poll-The, B.T.; Kemp, S.; Engelen, M. Disease progression in women with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy is slow. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019, 14, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bachiocco, V.; Cappa, M.; Petroni, A.; Salsano, E.; Bizzarri, C.; Ceccarelli, I.; Cevenini, G.; Pensato, V.; Aloisi, A.M. Pain study in x-linked adrenoleukodystrophy in males and females. Pain Ther. 2021, 10, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mosser, J.; Douar, A.M.; Sarde, C.O.; Kioschis, P.; Feil, R.; Moser, H.; Poustka, A.M.; Mandel, J.L.; Aubourg, P. Putative X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy gene shares unexpected homology with ABC transporters. Nature 1993, 361, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moser, A.B.; Kreiter, N.; Bezman, L.; Lu, S.E.; Raymond, G.V.; Naidu, S.; Moser, H.W. Plasma very long chain fatty acids in 3000 peroxisome disease patients and 29,000 controls. Ann. Neurol. 1999, 45, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valianpour, F.; Selhorst, J.J.; Van Lint, L.E.; Van Gennip, A.H.; Wanders, R.J.; Kemp, S. Analysis of very long-chain fatty acids using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2003, 79, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Engelen, M.; Kemp, S.; De Visser, M.; van Geel, B.M.; Wanders, R.J.; Aubourg, P. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD): Clinical presentation and guidelines for diagnosis, follow-up and management. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2012, 13, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Berger, J.; Forss-Petter, S.; Eichler, F.S. Pathophysiology of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Biochimie 2014, 98, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Kemp, S.; Huffnagel, I.C.; Linthorst, G.E.; Wanders, R.J.; Engelen, M. Adrenoleukodystrophy—Neuroendocrine pathogenesis and redefinition of natural history. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ho, J.K.; Moser, H.; Kishimoto, Y.; Hamilton, J.A. Interactions of a very long chain fatty acid with model membranes and serum albumin. Implications for the pathogenesis of adrenoleukodystrophy. J. Clin. Invest. 1995, 96, 1455–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Hoftberger, R.; Kunze, M.; Weinhofer, I.; Aboul-Enein, F.; Voigtländer, T.; Oezen, I.; Amann, G.; Bernheimer, H.; Budka, H.; Berger, J. Bernheimer Distribution and cellular localization of adrenoleukodystrophy protein in human tissues: Implications for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2007, 28, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Powers, J.M.; Deciero, D.P.; Cox, C.; Richfield, E.K.; Ito, M.; Moser, A.B.; Moser, H.W. The dorsal root ganglia in adrenomyeloneuropathy: Neuronal atrophy and abnormal mitochondria. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 60, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Forss-Petter, S.; Werner, H.; Berger, J.; Lassmann, H.; Molzer, B.; Schwab, M.H.; Bernheimer, H.; Zimmermann, F.; Nave, K.A. Targeted inactivation of the X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy gene in mice. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997, 50, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Broom, D.C.; Samad, T.A.; Kohno, T.; Tegeder, I.; Geisslinger, G.; Woolf, C.J. Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in the spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2004, 124, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Poulsen, J.N.; Larsen, F.; Duroux, M.; Gazerani, P. Primary culture of trigeminal satellite glial cells: A cell-based platform to study morphology and function of peripheral glia. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 2014, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, W.; Mi, R.; Haughey, N.; Oz, M.; Hoke, A. Immortalization and characterization of a nociceptive dorsal root ganglion sensory neuronal line. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2007, 12, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kemp, S.; Wei, H.M.; Lu, J.F.; Bratierman, L.T.; McGuinness, M.C.; Moser, A.B.; Watkins, P.A.; Smith, K.D. Gene redundancy and pharmacological gene therapy: Implications for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pujol, A.; Ferrer, I.; Camps, C.; Metzger, E.; Hindel, C.; Callizot, N.; Ruiz, M.; Pàmpols, T.; Giròs, M.; Louis Mandel, J. Functional overlap between ABCD1 (ALD) and ABCD2 (ALDR) transporters: A therapeutic target for X-adrenoleukodystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 2997–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sleigh, J.N.; Dawes, J.M.; West, S.J.; Wei, N.; Spaulding, E.L.; Gómez-Martín, A.; Zhang, Q.; Burgess, R.W.; Zameel Cader, M.; Talbot, K.; et al. Trk receptor signaling and sensory neuron fate are perturbed in human neuropathy caused by Gars mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E3324–E3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Geng, J.; Zhou, S.; Xiao, B. Mechanically activated piezo channels mediate touch and suppress acute mechanical pain response in mice. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Winkelman, J.W.; Grant, N.R.; Molay, F.; Stephen, C.D.; Sadjadi, R.; Eichler, F.S. Restless legs syndrome in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Sleep Med. 2022, 91, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, L.; Xie, R.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Qi, C.; Bian, G.; Wang, M.; Shan, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; et al. Chronic pain induces nociceptive neurogenesis in dorsal root ganglia from Sox2-positive satellite cells. Glia 2019, 67, 1062–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gosselin, R.D.; Suter, M.R.; Ji, R.R.; Decosterd, I. Glial cells and chronic pain. Neuroscientist 2010, 16, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ji, R.R.; Berta, T.; Nedergaard, M. Glia and pain: Is chronic pain a gliopathy? Pain 2013, 154, S10–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Van de Beek, M.C.; Ofman, R.; Dijkstra, I.; Wijburg, F.; Engelen, M.; Wanders, R.; Kemp, S. Lipid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Disease 2017, 1863, 2255–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, X.; Gamper, N. Potassium channels in peripheral pain pathways: Expression, function and therapeutic potential. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2013, 11, 621–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, K.; Meng, Z.; Chen, L. The SLC transporter in nutrient and metabolic sensing, regulation, and drug development. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2019, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ranade, S.S.; Woo, S.H.; Dubin, A.E.; Moshourab, R.A.; Wetzel, C.; Petrus, M.; Mathur, J.; Bégay, V.; Coste, B.; Mainquist, J.; et al. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice. Nature 2014, 516, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W.; Deng, T.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Lei, J.; Li, X.; Xiao, B. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature 2019, 573, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szczot, M.; Liljencrantz, J.; Ghitani, N.; Barik, A.; Lam, R.; Thompson, J.H.; Bharucha-Goebel, D.; Saade, D.; Necaise, A.; Donkervoort, S.; et al. PIEZO2 mediates injury-induced tactile pain in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10(462), eaat9892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Murthy, S.E.; Loud, M.C.; Daou, I.; Marshall, K.L.; Schwaller, F.; Kühnemund, J.; Francisco, A.G.; Keenan, W.T.; Dubin, A.E.; Lewin, G.R.; et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 mediates sensitivity to mechanical pain in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaat9897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cox, C.D.; Bae, C.; Ziegler, L.; Hartley, S.; Nikolova-Krstevski, V.; Rohde, P.R.; Ng, C.A.; Sachs, F.; Gottlieb, P.A.; Martinac, B. Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huang, H.; Bae, C.; Sachs, F.; Suchyna, T.M. Caveolae regulation of mechanosensitive channel function in myotubes. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8, e72894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Diem, K.; Fauler, M.; Fois, G.; Hellmann, A.; Winokurow, N.; Schumacher, S.; Kranz, C.; Frick, M. Mechanical stretch activates piezo1 in caveolae of alveolar type I cells to trigger ATP release and paracrine stimulation of surfactant secretion from alveolar type II cells. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 12785–12804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gnanasambandam, R.; Ghatak, C.; Yasmann, A.; Nishizawa, K.; Sachs, F.; Ladokhin, A.S.; Sukharev, S.I.; Suchyna, T.M. GsMTx4: Mechanism of inhibiting mechanosensitive ion channels. Biophys. J. 2017, 112, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nomura, T.; Cranfield, C.G.; Deplazes, E.; Owen, D.M.; Macmillan, A.; Battle, A.R.; Constantine, M.; Sokabe, M.; Martinac, B. Differential effects of lipids and lyso-lipids on the mechanosensitivity of the mechanosensitive channels MscL and MscS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8770–8775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kassmann, C.M.; Lappe-Siefke, C.; Baes, M.; Brügger, B.; Mildner, A.; Werner, H.B.; Natt, O.; Michaelis, T.; Prinz, M.; Grahm, J. Axonal loss and neuroinflammation caused by peroxisome-deficient oligodendrocytes. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hanani, M. Role of satellite glial cells in gastrointestinal pain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ohara, P.T.; Vit, J.P.; Bhargava, A.; Romero, M.; Sundberg, C.; Charles, A.C.; Jasmin, L. Gliopathic pain: When satellite glial cells go bad. Neuroscientist 2009, 15, 450–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Avraham, O.; Den, P.Y.; Jones, S.; Kuruvilla, R.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Klyachko, V.A.; Cavalli, V. Satellite glial cells promote regenerative growth in sensory neurons. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Christie, K.; Koshy, D.; Cheng, C.; Guo, G.; Martinez, J.A.; Duraikannu, A.; Zochodne, D.W. Intraganglionic interactions between satellite cells and adult sensory neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 67, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kefauver, J.M.; Ward, A.B.; Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 2020, 587, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goodman, M.B. Mechanosensation. In WormBook: The Online Review of C Elegans Biology; WormBook: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nourse, J.L.; Pathak, M.M. How cells channel their stress: Interplay between Piezo1 and the cytoskeleton. In Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 71, pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zoga, V.; Kawano, T.; Liang, M.Y.; Bienengraeber, M.; Weihrauch, D.; McCallum, B.; Gemes, G.; Hogan, Q.; Sarantopoulos, C. KATP channel subunits in rat dorsal root ganglia: Alterations by painful axotomy. Mol. Pain 2010, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Luu, W.; Bjork, J.; Salo, E.; Entenmann, N.; Jurgenson, T.; Fisher, C.; Klein, A.H. Modulation of SUR1 KATP channel subunit activity in the peripheral nervous system reduces mechanical hyperalgesia after nerve injury in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zemel, B.M.; Ritter, D.M.; Covarrubias, M.; Muqeem, T. A-Type KV channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons: Diversity, function, and dysfunction. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ch’ng, J.L.; Christofides, N.D.; Anand, P.; Gibson, S.J.; Allen, Y.S.; Su, H.C.; Tatemoto, K.; Morrison, J.F.B.; Polak, J.M.; Bloom, S.R. Distribution of galanin immunoreactivity in the central nervous system and the responses of galanin-containing neuronal pathways to injury. Neuroscience 1985, 16, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Skofitsch, G.; Jacobowitz, D.M. Galanin-like immunoreactivity in capsaicin sensitive sensory neurons and ganglia. Brain Res. Bull. 1985, 15, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, H.X.; Hokfelt, T. The participation of galanin in pain processing at the spinal level. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2002, 10, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, S.Y.; Huo, M.L.; Wu, X.Y.; Huang, Y.Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Y.M.; Zhang, M.L.; Wang, L.L.; Yu, L.C. Involvement of galanin and galanin receptor 1 in nociceptive modulation in the central nucleus of amygdala in normal and neuropathic rats. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Within the nervous system, ABCD1 protein is highest in satellite glial cells (SGC) of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). (A) Representative Western blot image showing ABCD1 protein expression in different mouse organs with Abcd1−/y mouse DRG tissue as negative control. SC = spinal cord (B) ABCD1 protein level in different organs of WT mice was quantified by image J with β-ACTIN as loading control (n = 6). (C) Representative confocal images showing ABCD1 mainly expressed in SGCs (thick arrow) that surround DRG neurons; Schwann cells (thin arrow) surrounding axons also show ABCD1 expression. Magnification shows the close proximity of ABCD1 to the neuronal membrane surface. (D) In Abcd1−/y DRG, there is no ABCD1 detectable in SGCs. Bar = 20 μm. Results were expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 1. Within the nervous system, ABCD1 protein is highest in satellite glial cells (SGC) of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). (A) Representative Western blot image showing ABCD1 protein expression in different mouse organs with Abcd1−/y mouse DRG tissue as negative control. SC = spinal cord (B) ABCD1 protein level in different organs of WT mice was quantified by image J with β-ACTIN as loading control (n = 6). (C) Representative confocal images showing ABCD1 mainly expressed in SGCs (thick arrow) that surround DRG neurons; Schwann cells (thin arrow) surrounding axons also show ABCD1 expression. Magnification shows the close proximity of ABCD1 to the neuronal membrane surface. (D) In Abcd1−/y DRG, there is no ABCD1 detectable in SGCs. Bar = 20 μm. Results were expressed as means ± SEM.
Cells 11 01842 g001
Figure 2. Abcd1−/y mice exhibit mechanical but not thermal hypersensitivity. (A) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by hotplate testing at 10 months (n = 7 for WT, n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (B) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by hotplate testing at 14 months (n = 8 for WT, n = 7 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Mechanical sensitivity of Abcd1-/y mice measured by Von Frey testing from 6 months until 20 months of age (n = 7 for WT, n = 8 for Abcd1−/y). (D) Brush assay in 9–10-month-old mice (n = 7 for WT, n = 11 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 2. Abcd1−/y mice exhibit mechanical but not thermal hypersensitivity. (A) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by hotplate testing at 10 months (n = 7 for WT, n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (B) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1−/y mice measured by hotplate testing at 14 months (n = 8 for WT, n = 7 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Mechanical sensitivity of Abcd1-/y mice measured by Von Frey testing from 6 months until 20 months of age (n = 7 for WT, n = 8 for Abcd1−/y). (D) Brush assay in 9–10-month-old mice (n = 7 for WT, n = 11 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g002
Figure 3. Peroxisome dysfunction in Abcd1−/y mice leads to highest accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) within DRG. Peroxisomes are present in both SGCs and neurons as evident by ABCD3 staining. They are present in greater abundance within SGCs in both WT (A) and Abcd1−/y (B), Bar = 10 μm. The VLCFA C24:0 (D) and C26:0 (E) but not C16:0 (C) were higher in Abcd1−/y mouse organs compared to wild-type measured by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and reported as nmol/mg protein (n = 8–14 for WT and n = 9–16 for Abcd1−/y, numbers are labeled in each Figure). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 3. Peroxisome dysfunction in Abcd1−/y mice leads to highest accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) within DRG. Peroxisomes are present in both SGCs and neurons as evident by ABCD3 staining. They are present in greater abundance within SGCs in both WT (A) and Abcd1−/y (B), Bar = 10 μm. The VLCFA C24:0 (D) and C26:0 (E) but not C16:0 (C) were higher in Abcd1−/y mouse organs compared to wild-type measured by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and reported as nmol/mg protein (n = 8–14 for WT and n = 9–16 for Abcd1−/y, numbers are labeled in each Figure). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g003
Figure 4. Dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1−/y mice reveal an increase in IB4-positive mechanical nociceptors. (A) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. Bar= 50 μm. (B) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 6 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 13-month-old DRG. Bar = 100 μm. (D) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 13-month-old mouse DRG (n = 4 for WT and n = 4 for Abcd1−/y. (E) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. (F) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (G) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (Red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 11-month-old mouse DRG. (H) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 11-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 3 for Abcd1−/y). (I) Western blot images showing CGRP expression in Abcd1−/y DRG (n = 6 for each). (J) Quantification of CGRP gene and protein expression in Abcd1−/y DRG. (K) Representative confocal images showing NeuN (red) and CGRP (green) staining in 8-month-old mouse spinal cord dorsal horn. (L) Quantification of CGRP immunostaining intensity in spinal cord dorsal horn (n = 4 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Figure 4. Dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1−/y mice reveal an increase in IB4-positive mechanical nociceptors. (A) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. Bar= 50 μm. (B) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 6 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 13-month-old DRG. Bar = 100 μm. (D) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 13-month-old mouse DRG (n = 4 for WT and n = 4 for Abcd1−/y. (E) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. (F) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (G) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (Red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 11-month-old mouse DRG. (H) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 11-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 3 for Abcd1−/y). (I) Western blot images showing CGRP expression in Abcd1−/y DRG (n = 6 for each). (J) Quantification of CGRP gene and protein expression in Abcd1−/y DRG. (K) Representative confocal images showing NeuN (red) and CGRP (green) staining in 8-month-old mouse spinal cord dorsal horn. (L) Quantification of CGRP immunostaining intensity in spinal cord dorsal horn (n = 4 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g004aCells 11 01842 g004bCells 11 01842 g004c
Figure 5. PIEZO2 is highly expressed in dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1−/y mice and blocking the mechanosensitive channel partially rescues mechanical allodynia. (A) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA−seq that are involved in key neuronal functions (n = 6 for WT and n = 7 for Abcd1−/y). (B) Profiling of mechanosensitive channel genes and caveolin genes from RNA-seq data. (C) Impact of lipids upon Piezo1 and Piezo2 gene expression in differentiated rat DRG neurons. Changes in mechanical sensitivity in (D) Abcd1−/y and (E) WT mice after intrathecal (IT) delivery of PIEZO2 blocker D-GsMTx4 (25 μM; sensory thresholds assessed by Von Frey testing). (F) Schematic illustration of D-GsMTx4 blocking of PIEZO2 channels by IT delivery. Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 5. PIEZO2 is highly expressed in dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1−/y mice and blocking the mechanosensitive channel partially rescues mechanical allodynia. (A) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA−seq that are involved in key neuronal functions (n = 6 for WT and n = 7 for Abcd1−/y). (B) Profiling of mechanosensitive channel genes and caveolin genes from RNA-seq data. (C) Impact of lipids upon Piezo1 and Piezo2 gene expression in differentiated rat DRG neurons. Changes in mechanical sensitivity in (D) Abcd1−/y and (E) WT mice after intrathecal (IT) delivery of PIEZO2 blocker D-GsMTx4 (25 μM; sensory thresholds assessed by Von Frey testing). (F) Schematic illustration of D-GsMTx4 blocking of PIEZO2 channels by IT delivery. Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g005
Figure 6. Increased GFAP expression occurs early in Abcd1−/y mouse DRG. (A) Representative western blot images showing GFAP expression in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (B) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Representative Western blot images showing GFAP expression in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (D) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 6 for WT and n = 8 for Abcd1−/y). (E) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in 15-month-old Abcd1−/y mouse DRG. Results were expressed as means ±SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Figure 6. Increased GFAP expression occurs early in Abcd1−/y mouse DRG. (A) Representative western blot images showing GFAP expression in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (B) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1−/y). (C) Representative Western blot images showing GFAP expression in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (D) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 6 for WT and n = 8 for Abcd1−/y). (E) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in 15-month-old Abcd1−/y mouse DRG. Results were expressed as means ±SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g006
Figure 7. Gliosis and peroxisome dysfunction in satellite glial cells of Abcd1−/y mice. (A) Western blot images showing increased GFAP expression in primary cultured Abcd1−/y SGCs with β-ACTIN as loading control. ABCD1 expression confirmed knockdown in Abcd1−/y mice. (B) Quantification of GFAP gene (qPCR) and protein expression in Abcd1−/y SGCs (n = 4 for protein groups and n = 3 for gene groups). (C) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in primary cultured Abcd1−/y SGCs. (D) Increased C26:0 and C24:0(nmol/mg protein) in primary cultured SGCs from Abcd1−/y mice (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. # p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 7. Gliosis and peroxisome dysfunction in satellite glial cells of Abcd1−/y mice. (A) Western blot images showing increased GFAP expression in primary cultured Abcd1−/y SGCs with β-ACTIN as loading control. ABCD1 expression confirmed knockdown in Abcd1−/y mice. (B) Quantification of GFAP gene (qPCR) and protein expression in Abcd1−/y SGCs (n = 4 for protein groups and n = 3 for gene groups). (C) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in primary cultured Abcd1−/y SGCs. (D) Increased C26:0 and C24:0(nmol/mg protein) in primary cultured SGCs from Abcd1−/y mice (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. # p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g007
Figure 8. Activated satellite glial cells alter genes potentially affecting mechanical properties of neuronal membranes. (A) Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of genes related to cell adhesion and cell matrix interaction as well as lipid and vesicle membrane transportation in Abcd1−/y SGCs at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold. (B) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA-seq that are involved in membrane mechanical properties (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared with WT control.
Figure 8. Activated satellite glial cells alter genes potentially affecting mechanical properties of neuronal membranes. (A) Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of genes related to cell adhesion and cell matrix interaction as well as lipid and vesicle membrane transportation in Abcd1−/y SGCs at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold. (B) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA-seq that are involved in membrane mechanical properties (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared with WT control.
Cells 11 01842 g008aCells 11 01842 g008b
Table 1. Enrichment analysis by process network of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
Table 1. Enrichment analysis by process network of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y DRG in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
#Networksp-ValueNetwork Objects
1Muscle contraction1.601 × 10−4GALR2, K(+) channel, subfamily J, EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, MyHC, nAChR alpha, Galanin, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs
2Inflammation_Interferon signaling3.178 × 10−3TIMP1, IRF7, IFI56, IL21R, IFI44
3Signal transduction_Neuropeptide signaling pathways1.326 × 10−2NPY, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, Secretogranin V, Galanin, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs
4Signal transduction_Leptin signaling1.619 × 10−2NPY, Kir6.2, TIMP1, Galanin
5Development_Blood vessel morphogenesis1.695 × 10−2Tissue kallikreins, EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, RBP-J kappa (CBF1), Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs, EDNRB
6Cardiac development_FGF_ErbB signaling2.625 × 10−2Kv4.2 channel, EDNRA, MyHC, BARX2
7Transport_Potassium transport3.153 × 10−2K(+) channel, subfamily J, Kir6.2, Kv4.2 channel, SLC24A4, SERT
8Apoptosis_Apoptotic mitochondria3.513 × 10−2Bcl-G, HSP70, HRK
9Proliferation_Positive regulation cell proliferation5.056 × 10−2EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, TIMP1, ALK, CCKBR
10Protein folding_ER and cytoplasm6.076 × 10−2HSC70, HSP70
Table 2. Enrichment analysis by process network of differentially expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
Table 2. Enrichment analysis by process network of differentially expressed genes between WT and Abcd1−/y SGCs in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
#Networksp-ValueNetwork Objects
1Cell adhesion_Amyloid proteins1.453 × 10−5Frizzled, NOTCH3 (3ICD), SFRP4, WNT11, NOTCH3, FZD4, SR-BI, Notch, Actin cytoskeletal, WNT, Caveolin-1, Actin
2Development_Blood vessel morphogenesis2.888 × 10−4Galpha(q)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, FOXC1/2, PF4, Alpha-1B adrenergic receptor, ANGPTL4, Notch, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs, FOXC1, Transferrin
3Development_Ossification and bone remodeling1.463 × 10−3Frizzled, Follistatin, SFRP4, FOXC1/2, FOXC1, IGF-1, IBP, WNT
4Signal transduction_
Androgen receptor signaling cross-talk
3.145 × 10−3Frizzled, IL-6, IGF-1, WNT, Caveolin-1
5Cell adhesion_Cadherins3.809 × 10−3WISP1, Frizzled, WISP2, SFRP4, Actin cytoskeletal, WNT, F-Actin, Actin
6Proliferation_Negative regulation of cell proliferation3.938 × 10−3IBP2, WISP2, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, IBP5, IL-6, GPNMB (Osteoactivin), IGF-1, IBP
7Cell adhesion_
Glycoconjugates
7.156 × 10−3Fibulin-1, PF4, Elastin, HP, Actin cytoskeletal, Neurocan, Actin
8Cell adhesion_Cell-matrix interactions8.849 × 10−3WISP1, MMP-12, Fibulin-1, Elastin, ITGA11, Mindin, LAMA1, Neurocan
9Signal transduction_WNT signaling1.137 × 10−2WISP1, Frizzled, WISP2, SFRP4, WNT11, FOXC1, WNT
10Development_Regulation of angiogenesis1.152 × 10−2Ephrin-A receptors, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, Leptin receptor, AGTR2, PF4, IL-6, ANGPTL4, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs
11Development_Skeletal muscle development1.436 × 10−2Actin muscle, Elastin, ITGA11, ACTG2, IGF-1, Actin
12Development_Neurogenesis_Axonal guidance1.439 × 10−2Ephrin-A receptor 3, Ephrin-A receptors, NckAP1, PACAP receptor 1, Mindin, Actin cytoskeletal, DARPP-32, Actin
13Signal transduction
NOTCH signaling
1.620 × 10−2Frizzled, NOTCH3 (3ICD), SFRP4, WNT11, NOTCH3, FZD4, WNT, PDGF-B
14Development_Neurogenesis in general1.761 × 10−2Frizzled, Galpha(q)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific amine GPCRs, NOTCH3, FZD4, Notch, WNT
15Cell adhesion_Integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion7.696 × 10−2RHG7, Caveolin-2, ITGA11, Actin cytoskeletal, Caveolin-1, Actin
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, Y.; Laheji, F.; Berenson, A.; Qian, A.; Park, S.-O.; Kok, R.; Selig, M.; Hahn, R.; Sadjadi, R.; Kemp, S.; et al. Peroxisome Metabolism Contributes to PIEZO2-Mediated Mechanical Allodynia. Cells 2022, 11, 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111842

AMA Style

Gong Y, Laheji F, Berenson A, Qian A, Park S-O, Kok R, Selig M, Hahn R, Sadjadi R, Kemp S, et al. Peroxisome Metabolism Contributes to PIEZO2-Mediated Mechanical Allodynia. Cells. 2022; 11(11):1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gong, Yi, Fiza Laheji, Anna Berenson, April Qian, Sang-O Park, Rene Kok, Martin Selig, Ryan Hahn, Reza Sadjadi, Stephan Kemp, and et al. 2022. "Peroxisome Metabolism Contributes to PIEZO2-Mediated Mechanical Allodynia" Cells 11, no. 11: 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111842

APA Style

Gong, Y., Laheji, F., Berenson, A., Qian, A., Park, S. -O., Kok, R., Selig, M., Hahn, R., Sadjadi, R., Kemp, S., & Eichler, F. (2022). Peroxisome Metabolism Contributes to PIEZO2-Mediated Mechanical Allodynia. Cells, 11(11), 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop