Next Article in Journal
Statins Induce Locomotion and Muscular Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster That Are Reminiscent of Human Myopathy: Evidence for the Role of the Chloride Channel Inhibition in the Muscular Phenotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of ALFA-Tagging in the Nematode Model Organisms Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus
Previous Article in Journal
NMR-Based Chromatography Readouts: Indispensable Tools to “Translate” Analytical Features into Molecular Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Further Extension of Lifespan by Unc-43/CaMKII and Egl-8/PLCβ Mutations in Germline-Deficient Caenorhabditis elegans

1
Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
3
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order.
Cells 2022, 11(22), 3527; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223527
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 30 October 2022 / Accepted: 5 November 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Caenorhabditis elegans: A Model Organism, Endless Possibilities)

Abstract

:
Reduction of insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling (IIS) promotes longevity across species. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, ablation of germline stem cells (GSCs) and activity changes of the conserved signaling mediators unc-43/CaMKII (calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase type II) and egl-8/PLCβ (phospholipase Cβ) also increase lifespan. Like IIS, these pathways depend on the conserved transcription factor daf-16/FOXO for lifespan extension, but how they functionally interact is unknown. Here, we show that altered unc-43/egl-8 activity further increases the lifespan of long-lived GSC-deficient worms, but not of worms that are long-lived due to a strong reduction-of-function mutation in the insulin/IGF1-like receptor daf-2. Additionally, we provide evidence for unc-43 and, to a lesser extent, egl-8 modulating the expression of certain collagen genes, which were reported to be dispensable for longevity of these particular daf-2 mutant worms, but not for other forms of longevity. Together, these results provide new insights into the conditions and potential mechanisms by which CaMKII- and PLCβ-signals modulate C. elegans lifespan.

1. Introduction

Studies in invertebrate model organisms, such as the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, provided key insights into the biology of lifespan regulation that apparently are also applicable to human aging [1]. A prototypic example is provided by reduced insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling (IIS). IIS was first recognized in C. elegans to cause a dramatic, ~two-fold increase in lifespan and, subsequently, was confirmed to promote longevity in mammals [1]. In C. elegans, lifespan extension by reduced IIS, e.g., by reduction-of-function mutations in the daf-2 gene (the common ortholog of mammalian insulin and IGF1 receptors), is dependent on daf-16 (the ortholog of mammalian FOXO transcription factors) [1]. Of note, genetic variants in FOXO3 have been repeatedly and robustly associated with lifespan in humans [2].
Beyond daf-2 mutation, additional mechanisms for lifespan extension have been described in C. elegans, including two pathways that can even further extend the extraordinary long lifespan of daf-2 mutant worms: the absence of germline stem cells (GSCs) [3,4], and a gain-of-function mutation in the calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase type II (CaMKII), unc-43 [5]. This further extension of daf-2 lifespan raises the possibility that the germline- and the unc-43 signaling pathways are at least in part mechanistically different from the IIS/daf-2 pathway. Interestingly, both the germline- and the unc-43 pathway, just as the daf-2 pathway, depend on daf-16 for lifespan extension [3,5]. Whether other factors that promote longevity in GSC- and in daf-2 deficient animals, such as hlh-30 (TFEB), hsf-1 (HSF1), and skn-1 (NRF2) [6,7,8,9], are also shared with the unc-43 pathway has not yet been investigated.
Several lines of evidence indicate that activation and function of the FOXO-transcription factor DAF-16 differ between GSC(−) and daf-2(−) C. elegans. For example, only GSC(−) worms require the conserved adaptor protein KRI-1 and the translation elongation factor TCER-1 for lifespan extension [10,11]. Moreover, whilst DAF-16 acts in the intestine to ensure GSC(−) longevity, it acts in the intestine and neurons to ensure daf-2(−) longevity [12]. DAF-16/FOXO function is strongly regulated by multiple protein kinases [13], including, but not limited to, the CaMKII-ortholog UNC-43. UNC-43 promotes DAF-16 nuclear localization by direct phosphorylation at a site different from the sites at which DAF-16 is phosphorylated and inhibited by the kinase AKT downstream of IIS [5]. CaMKII, in turn, is activated upon a sudden increase in intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) levels by binding to Ca2+-calmodulin complexes [14]. Many additional mediators of Ca2+-signaling are conserved across metazoans and present in C. elegans, including multiple types of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum or plasma membrane channels, G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes, and Ca2+-pumps [15]. Among these, the G-protein α-subunit egl-30, the γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor gbb-1, and the PLCβ-ortholog egl-8, through their function in neurons, also contribute to intestinal daf-16 activation and longevity [16,17,18].
Given that both, germline-ablation and unc-43 gain-of-function mutation, activate DAF-16 and further extend daf-2(−) lifespan, we hypothesized that the two pathways are largely overlapping. We tested this hypothesis in the present study and provide evidence for a novel longevity-promoting mechanism triggered by unc-43(gf) and also, albeit more weakly, by unc-43 and egl-8 loss, which may explain their different effects on various lifespan-extending pathways in C. elegans.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. C. elegans Strains and Culture

Strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Worms were cultured following standard protocols on NG agar plates seeded with E. coli OP50 [19]. Worms carrying the glp-1(e2144ts) mutation served as a genetic model for germline ablation [4,9]. To eliminate germ cells, glp-1(ts) strains (referred to as GSC(−) in Results/Discussion), and corresponding glp-1(+) (i.e., GSC(+)) control strains were incubated at 25 °C for the first 24 h of postembryonic development and subsequently shifted to 20 °C for the remainder of the experiment. daf-2(e1370) worms and corresponding daf-2(+) control worms were continuously cultured at 20 °C. For experiments, all strains were routinely cultured on plates containing 20 µM 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FUDR; Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, Munich, Germany) from L4 onward to avoid progeny development and internal hatching in fertile strains carrying the unc-43(gf) mutation (allele n498).

2.2. Lifespan Analysis

Worms were synchronized by hypochlorite treatment, cultured under the appropriate temperature regimen (cf. above), and scored for survival every other day starting on days 8–10 of adulthood. From the late L4 stage onward, animals were maintained on 6 cm plates at a density of 40 worms/plate and every 10 days, they were transferred to fresh OP50-seeded FUDR-containing NG agar plates to prevent progeny development and desiccation, respectively. Worms were considered dead if they did not respond to gentle touching with a worm pick. Animals that showed a protruding vulva or had ruptured, died from internal progeny hatching (bagging), or escaped from the plate were censored.

2.3. Stress Resistance Assays

Worms were synchronized by hypochlorite treatment, cultured under the appropriate temperature regimen (cf. above), and transferred to assay plates on day 2 of adulthood (20–30 worms per 3 cm plate for heat stress experiments, 50–60 worms per 3 cm plate for oxidative stress experiments). Survival was scored every 1–2 h. Oxidative stress assay plates contained 15.4 mM tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) and were prepared 12 h before starting the experiment.

2.4. Growing Worms for RNA-Extraction

To obtain synchronized populations, gravid adults were treated with hypochlorite, and eggs were allowed to hatch in M9 overnight. ~700 L1 larvae per strain were plated on 10 cm NG agar plates seeded with concentrated E. coli OP50 (for RNA-seq: 1600 worms/2 plates) and cultured at the required temperatures (cf. above). At the L4-stage, 500 worms per strain were manually transferred to two E. coli OP50-seeded 6 cm NG agar plates supplemented with 20 µM FUDR to inhibit germ cell proliferation and progeny production (for RNA-seq: 1500 worms to two 10 cm plates). At day 1 of adulthood, worms were harvested by washing them off their plates with M9 buffer. After additional washing with M9 and RNAse-free water, worms were suspended in 1 mL Trizol, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

2.5. RNA-Extraction

RNA was extracted using Trizol and cleaned up with the Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit or RNA Cleanup Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of RNA extracted from three biological replicates were pooled for RNA-sequencing to mitigate batch effects.

2.6. RNA-Sequencing

RNA quality control, library preparation, and 50-bp paired-end RNA-sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq4000 platform were performed at Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany. For each sample, a minimum of 31.6 × 106 reads (maximum 39.1 × 106, median 37.4 × 106 reads) were obtained, resulting in at least 15.7× genome coverage (maximum 19.5×, median 18.7×). A minimum of 94.5% of reads (maximum 96.3%, median 95.7%) could be mapped to the C. elegans reference genome (cf. below).

2.7. RNA-Seq Data Analysis

The following tools provided by the European Galaxy Server (Freiburg Galaxy Team, Freiburg, Germany), at https://usegalaxy.eu (accessed on 30 May 2020) were used for the initial analysis steps: FastQC (v0.72) and MultiQC (v1.7) for initial quality control; Trimmomatic (v0.36.5; ILLUMINACLIP with default settings, LEADING:20, TRAILING:20, SLIDINGWINDOW:5:20, MINLENGTH:20) for gentle trimming of reads; STAR (v2.7.2b) for alignment to the C. elegans reference genome (WS276 release); and featureCounts (v1.6.4) for read summarization [20,21,22,23]. All subsequent analysis steps were performed using Bioconductor (v3.12; [24]) and custom R scripts (v4.0.4; R core team, Vienna, Austria). Differential expression analysis was performed using NOIseq (v2.34.0; [25,26]). Low counts (<5) were filtered by the CPM method, and replicate simulation was performed using TMM- or UQUA-normalization [27], and otherwise default settings of NOIseq-sim. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined as having a probability of differential expression >95%. Only DEGs that were detected in 20 repetitions of replicate simulation and that displayed an expression-fold chance ≥1.5 with each of the two normalization methods in each of the three repetitions of the entire NOIseq-analysis were considered further. PCA-analysis of CPM-filtered, TMM/UQUA-normalized RNA-seq count data was performed using the NOIseq PCA function. Heatmaps of filtered, normalized, log-transformed count data or of sample-to-sample distances were generated using the R package pheatmap (v1.0.12). Complete NOIseq-data is provided in Supplementary Table S14. Supplementary Tables S15 and S16 list NOIseq M and probability values for all DEGs, along with gene ontology (GO) term information.

2.8. Overlap of DEG-Lists

The statistical significance of overlaps between gene lists was calculated as the hypergeometric probability of detecting at least as many common genes as observed in the two lists using the phyper function in R. Representation factors were calculated as the number of overlapping genes divided by the expected number of overlapping genes in the two lists (http://nemates.org/MA/progs/overlap_stats.html; accessed on 31 August 2020). For all calculations, the number of genes in the genome was set to 10,602, i.e., the number of genes in Wormbase WS276 that passed CPM-filtering during NOIseq-analysis. DEG-lists from published studies were, if necessary, converted to WBGene-IDs using WormMine (http://intermine.wormbase.org/tools/wormmine/begin.do; accessed on 10 August 2020) and adjusted to genes in WS276 using custom R-scripts and manual curation.

2.9. GO Term Enrichment Analysis and Collagen/Matrisome Classification of DEG-Lists

GO term enrichment analysis was performed using the enrichment tool provided by Wormbase (https://wormbase.org/tools/enrichment/tea/tea.cgi; accessed on 27 May 2021) [28]. The q-value threshold was set to <0.05. GO term categories were retrieved using REViGO ([29]; http://revigo.irb.hr/; accessed on 27 May 2021). For WormCat analysis [30], the respective R package was downloaded and installed as described on www.wormcat.com (accessed on 9 January 2022). Collagen and matrisome classification [31] was performed using the lists provided at http://CeColDB.permalink.cc/ (accessed on 3 January 2022) and http://ce-matrisome-annotator.permalink.cc/ (accessed on 4 January 2022) and custom R scripts.

2.10. Dauer Analysis

Synchronized (hypochlorite treatment) L1 larvae were plated at a density of ~50 larvae/6 cm plate (2 plates per strain), incubated at 20 °C or 25 °C, and inspected for the presence of dauers every 12 h. At the 60 h (20 °C) or 48 h (25 °C) timepoint, when wildtype worms reached adulthood, worms were morphologically classified as “dauer” or “non-dauer”. Daf-2(−) strains, which all formed 100% dauers when incubated at 25 °C, were allowed to recover from dauer by incubation at 15 °C for 120 h before classification. Experiments in daf-2(+) strains were either conducted in parallel with experiments in daf-2(−) strains or included daf-2(−) control plates to provide a reference for the typical dauer morphology.

2.11. qPCR

A total of 1 µg total RNA was reverse transcribed using LunaScript RT SuperMix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). qPCR-reactions were performed in duplicates or triplicates in a 20 µL reaction volume on an CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The thermal cycling protocol comprised one activation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and combined annealing/extension at 60 °C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was performed from 65 °C to 95 °C with 0.5 °C increments at 5 s per step. Data were analyzed by the ΔΔCt method, and target gene expression levels were normalized to the geometric means of cdc-42, tba-1, and Y45F10D.4 expression [32,33]. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5 or 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Details on the particular tests used are specified in the figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. Unc-43(gf) and Unc-43(−) Further Extend Lifespan of Germline-Deficient C. elegans

To test the hypothesis that germline ablation extends C. elegans lifespan at least in part by activating unc-43/CaMKII, we generated a set of relevant double mutants and measured their lifespans. Thereby, we took advantage of a widely used genetic model for germline stem cell deficiency, glp-1(e2144ts) (hereafter referred to as GSC(−); [4]) and combined this allele with the previously studied [5] unc-43 alleles n498 and n498n1186 (referred to as unc-43(gf) and unc-43(−), respectively). All experiments were conducted in the presence of FUDR (cf. Materials and Methods), to avoid internal progeny hatching in fertile unc-43(gf) worms and to facilitate comparison with similar previous studies that also took advantage of FUDR to prevent progeny development in fertile strains [5,8,17,18,34]. In GSC(+), i.e., otherwise wildtype worms, unc-43(gf) robustly extended lifespan (36–87%; Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S3), consistent with a previous report [5]. However, in contrast to this previous report, unc-43(−) also consistently produced a small to moderate lifespan increase in otherwise wildtype worms (6–21%; Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S3). Similarly, in GSC(−) worms, unc-43(gf) substantially extended lifespan (67–92%), while unc-43(−) had a more modest effect (2/3 experiments; 22–24%; Figure 1B, Supplementary Table S3). Collectively, these data cannot easily be reconciled with our original hypothesis and instead indicate that unc-43(gf) and unc-43(−) both trigger longevity-promoting mechanisms. Moreover, these mechanisms apparently are not, or are not maximally, triggered by germline ablation.

3.2. Loss of Egl-8 Also Extends Lifespan of Germline-Deficient C. elegans

In parallel with the unc-43 alleles, we investigated how loss of egl-8/PLCβ influences the lifespan of GSC(−) worms. As unc-43(−), egl-8(md1971), a putative loss-of-function allele, extended the lifespan of otherwise wildtype worms (13–38%; Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S3), in agreement with published work [16,17,18]. Moreover, egl-8(md1971) further extended lifespan in GSC(−) worms (30–43%, Figure 1B, Supplementary Table S3). Similar results were obtained with another putative loss-of-function allele, egl-8(e2917) (Supplementary Figure S1A,B, Supplementary Table S3). Thus, egl-8(−), similar to unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) appears to induce lifespan-extending programs that are not, or not fully, active in GSC(−) worms.

3.3. Unc-43(gf), Unc-43(−) and Egl-8(−) Do Not Further Extend Lifespan of Daf-2(−) Worms

In addition to our lifespan analyses on unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) in intact and in GSC-deficient animals, we examined the effect of these alleles on the lifespan of worms harboring a strong reduction-of-function mutation in the insulin/IGF-1 like receptor daf-2 (allele e1370) [35]. As mentioned above, in wildtype (daf-2(+)) animals, unc-43(gf) substantially and unc-43(−) more modestly extended lifespan (34–82% and 5–23%; Figure 1C, Supplementary Table S3). In daf-2(−) worms, however, unexpectedly in the light of published work by others [5], unc-43(gf) did not further extend but rather slightly decrease lifespan (9–13%; Figure 1D, Supplementary Table S3). Moreover, unc-43(−) did not significantly decrease daf-2(−) lifespan. Consistent with our previous observations (Figure 1A), both egl-8(−) alleles extended lifespan in daf-2(+) worms (27–39%; Figure 1C, Supplementary Figure S1C, Supplementary Table S3). Finally, egl-8(−), similar to unc-43(−), had essentially no effect on daf-2(−) lifespan (Figure 1D, Supplementary Figure S1D, Supplementary Table S3). In summary, irrespective of the discrepancies with previously published work [5], our results suggest that unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) all trigger longevity-promoting pathways that are already highly active, or that are dispensable for longevity, in daf-2(−) worms.

3.4. Unc-43(gf), Unc-43(−) and Egl-8(−) Differentially Affect Stress Resistance of Wildtype, GSC(−) and Daf-2(−) Worms

Longevity frequently correlates with stress resistance [1]. Therefore, we examined how our gain- and loss-of-function alleles in unc-43 and egl-8 affect the resistance of GSC(−), daf-2(−) and otherwise wildtype worms to selected forms of physical stress. Specifically, we examined heat and TBHP-induced oxidative stress. Only in daf-2(−) background, unc-43(gf) slightly increased heat stress resistance, while only in otherwise wildtype worms, unc-43(−) conferred heat sensitivity (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S4). On the other hand, upon oxidative stress, unc-43(gf) and unc-43(−) both consistently caused at least trends towards sensitivity in most or all backgrounds, with only the GSC(−); unc-43(gf) strains being clearly not sensitive (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S4). All egl-8(−) strains consistently tended to be or were more resistant than controls to oxidative stress but more sensitive to heat stress, with the exception of daf-2(−); egl-8(−) strains, which did not consistently show heat sensitivity (Figure 2 and Figure 3, Supplementary Figures S2 and S3, Supplementary Table S4). In summary, in all backgrounds in which they (further) extended lifespan, unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) did not confer broad stress resistance but rather sensitivity to at least one of the two physical stressors examined.

3.5. Unc-43(gf) and Egl-8(−) Globally Shift Gene Expression towards Daf-2(−)

In our hands, unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) extended C. elegans lifespan more modestly, but in the same genetic background-dependent manner as unc-43(gf). To identify novel factors and pathways that may mediate unc-43′s and/or egl-8′s lifespan-regulatory functions in addition to daf-16, we performed an exploratory RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) study in daf-2(−) and otherwise wildtype (daf-2(+)) worms with normal or altered unc-43/egl-8 activity. GSC(−) worms were omitted from this study since unc-43/egl-8 mutations changed their lifespan in essentially the same way as the lifespan of otherwise wildtype worms. Out of the two egl-8 loss-of-function alleles, md1971 was chosen, and hereafter, egl-8(−) refers to md1971 unless otherwise stated. Initial comparison of gene expression between daf-2(−) and wildtype worms revealed highly significant overlaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from our study with published work [36,37], thus validating our data (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis clearly separated the wildtype and daf-2(−) control strains from each other, and strikingly, egl-8(−) and especially unc-43(gf) single mutant worms appeared closer to daf-2(−) in these analyses (Figure 4A–C). In line with this result, genes induced by unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−) in otherwise wildtype worms significantly overlapped with genes induced by daf-2(−) in our and in published studies (Supplementary Table S7). Similarly, unc-43(gf)/egl-8(−)- and most to all lists of daf-2(−) repressed genes significantly overlapped with each other. Interestingly, in otherwise wildtype worms, unc-43(−) induced and repressed genes also significantly overlapped with most to all lists of daf-2(−) induced and -repressed genes (Supplementary Table S7). In daf-2(−) worms, unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) seemed to support some gene expression changes already induced by daf-2(−), while opposing others (Supplementary Table S7). Similar overlap patterns resulted when comparing our lists of unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−)-regulated DEGs to genes regulated by daf-2(−) in a daf-16 dependent manner [38,39,40,41] (Supplementary Table S7). Taken together, our RNA-seq results indicate that unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−) globally shift gene expression towards daf-2(−), and they are consistent with previously reported roles of unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−) as positive regulators of daf-16 [5,16,17,18].

3.6. Unc-43 and Egl-8 Regulated Genes Are Enriched for Collagen-Related Processes

To functionally categorize unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) DEGs in otherwise wildtype and in daf-2(−) worms, we performed gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis [28] (Figure 4D,E, Supplementary Table S8). This analysis revealed overrepresentation of GO terms reminiscent of known functions of unc-43 and egl-8 in neurons, muscle, and immunity, respectively [16,42]. Moreover, multiple GO terms enriched among DEGs from unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) or egl-8(−) strains were also enriched among DEGs between daf-2(−) and wildtype worms, consistent with the previously observed overlaps between the respective DEG-lists (Supplementary Table S9). Strikingly, the most significantly enriched GO term among upregulated DEGs in all three daf-2(+) strains was “structural component of cuticle”, followed by additional GO terms containing many collagen genes (e.g., “collagen trimer”, “cuticle development”, and “molting cycle”), and by multiple GO terms related to pathogen defense. “Structural component of cuticle” and pathogen defense-related GO terms were also enriched among upregulated DEGs of most to all daf-2(−) strains. On the other hand, unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) downregulated DEGs were most significantly and commonly enriched for pathogen defense related GO terms in all daf-2(+)- and in the daf-2(−); egl-8(−) strain, and for organic acid-metabolism-related GO terms in daf-2(−); unc-43(gf) and daf-2(−); unc-43(−) worms. Enrichment of similar functional categories was detected by a different analysis tool, WormCat [30], including, most prominently among unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−)-induced genes, “extracellular material: collagen” (Supplementary Figure S4 and Table S9). Given the conditional requirement of collagens for C. elegans longevity [34], we focused on these genes for subsequent analyses.

3.7. Unc-43 and Egl-8 Modulate the Expression of Non-Dauer Longevity-Associated Collagen Genes

Certain cuticle-forming collagens have been shown to be required for longevity, specifically under conditions that do not induce processes related to dauer, an extremely stress-resistant alternative developmental stage, during adulthood [34]. Expression of these collagens appears to be indirectly controlled by the conserved transcription factor SKN-1/NRF2 [34]. Non-dauer-associated, collagen-dependent lifespan-extending conditions include germline deficiency and certain means of reducing IIS, but not the daf-2(−) allele analyzed by us, daf-2(e1370), at least not at the standard culture temperature of 20 °C at which we conducted our study [34]. Unc-43(gf), unc-43(−), and egl-8(−) do not sensitize C. elegans to dauer entry at 20 °C or 25 °C (Supplementary Figure S5 and Table S9). Therefore, we examined the effect of these alleles on the expression of “SKN-1 upregulated daf-2(−) collagens” ([34], subsequently referred to as “non-dauer longevity-associated collagens”). Significant numbers of these collagens were present in our lists of unc-43(−), egl-8(−) and especially unc-43(gf) upregulated DEGs from daf-2(+), as well as among unc-43(gf) upregulated DEGs from daf-2(−) worms (Supplementary Tables S10–S12). Up- and downregulated genes from these strains also significantly overlapped with the complete lists of genes up/downregulated by skn-1 under non-dauer longevity conditions. Yet, only egl-8(−) appeared to up- and downregulate significant numbers of genes that are up- or downregulated by skn-1 under normal conditions (Supplementary Table S11). Classification of collagen-genes [31] induced by unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−), especially in daf-2(+) backgrounds, revealed strong overrepresentation of cuticular collagens, as also seen for skn-1 upregulated (non-dauer longevity-associated) collagens ([34], Supplementary Table S12). When more broadly examining genes of the extracellular matrix, i.e., the matrisome [31], similar patterns were observed as well for unc-43(gf), unc-43(−), egl-8(−) and skn-1(−) induced DEG-sets, all of which showed particular enrichment of nematode-specific core matrisome genes (Supplementary Table S12). Of note, collagen or core-matrisome genes were not overrepresented in 5/6 published sets of daf-16-induced genes (Supplementary Table S12). qPCR analysis of selected non-dauer longevity-associated collagens [34] confirmed the picture suggested by our RNA-seq data: col-120, col-133, col-141, and col-176 all were strongly upregulated in unc-43(gf) relative to otherwise wildtype worms, while induction in unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) was less consistent and/or weaker (Figure 5A,C, Supplementary Table S13). In GSC(−) and daf-2(−) worms, col-120, col-141, and col-176 upregulation by unc-43(gf) was repeatedly observed, while unc-43(−) did not trigger strong alterations (Figure 5B,D, Supplementary Table S13). Additionally, in daf-2(−) worms, egl-8(−) appeared to at least mildly suppress all four collagen genes examined (Figure 5D, Supplementary Table S13). Relative to wildtype, both GSC(−) and daf-2(−) worms displayed at least trends towards elevated mRNA levels for most of the collagen genes examined (Supplementary Figure S6). Collectively, these results suggest that unc-43(gf), and to a smaller extent, unc-43(−) and egl-8(−), promote the expression of non-dauer longevity-associated collagens. Moreover, the effects of the three alleles appear strongest in GSC(+)/daf-2(+), and weakest, or even lost, in daf-2(−) background.

4. Discussion

In this study, we report lifespan-regulatory functions of the conserved signaling mediators unc-43 and egl-8 in long-lived GSC-deficient C. elegans. Moreover, our experiments confirm previously published positive roles of unc-43 hyperactivation and egl-8 loss for longevity of otherwise wildtype animals and further support the concept that unc-43 and egl-8 modulate the activity of the conserved lifespan-regulatory key transcription factor DAF-16 [5,16,17,18]. In addition, gene expression analyses indicate, to at least some extent, the induction of specific non-dauer longevity-associated collagens in response to unc-43 and egl-8 mutations. Currently available data do not support a prominent role for daf-16 in promoting expression of these collagens, raising the interesting possibility that they constitute a second, largely independent mechanism through which unc-43 and egl-8 regulate C. elegans lifespan (Figure 6).
A key finding of our study consists in the observation that altered unc-43 and egl-8 activities further extend the lifespan of wildtype and GSC-deficient but not of daf-2(−) (i.e., daf-2(e1370) at 20 °C) worms. This result may be explained by at least two, not mutually exclusive, models. First, unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) all may trigger processes that are already maximally induced by daf-2(−), but not by GSC(−) and wildtype worms. This model is supported by the fact that all three mutations induce similar gene expression changes than daf-2(−). Alternatively, processes triggered by unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) may not be critical to daf-2(e1370) longevity. Consistent with this possibility, unc-43(gf) and, to a lesser extent, unc-43(−) and egl-8(−), induce the expression of certain collagen genes, which are required for longevity under conditions that do not induce dauer-like traits in adults. These conditions include germline deficiency but not the daf-2(e1370) allele under our culture conditions of 20 °C [34]. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that these collagens constitute a second mechanism besides the regulation of daf-16, by which in particular unc-43(gf), but also unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) modulate lifespan. Of note, overexpression of a single key collagen, such as col-120, also examined by us by qPCR, is sufficient for lifespan extension [34]. Conversely, in daf-2(e1370), mild induction of collagen expression, which is still observed, at least in response to unc-43(gf), may not be functionally relevant. Clearly, it will be extremely interesting to directly examine the role of non-dauer longevity-associated collagens in unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) dependent C. elegans lifespan regulation and, eventually, to define the mechanisms that link unc-43/egl-8 to expression of these collagens. Although we have not yet experimentally confirmed or excluded the possibility that the known mediator of unc-43(gf)/egl-8(−) longevity, daf-16, regulates non-dauer longevity-associated collagen expression in the specific context of unc-43/egl-8 mutation, even though it does not do so in other contexts, an alternative candidate is emerging from the literature: skn-1 [34]. In support of this hypothesis, we already showed that unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) modulate the expression of similar gene sets, including similar collagens, than skn-1.
Yet, our study and a previous report [5] on the longevity effects of unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) differ from each other in several details despite the use of the same alleles. In the case of unc-43(−), these discrepancies may be explained by different experimental conditions, i.e., different temperatures, and by the use of FUDR, both of which have been shown to affect lifespan in certain genetic backgrounds [43,44]. Specifically, we conducted the respective assays at 20 °C rather than 25 °C [5] and analyzed the unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) alleles within the same experiments, which required the addition of FUDR not just to unc-43(gf) and corresponding control [5], but also to unc-43(−) strains. Importantly, FUDR does not affect wildtype lifespan nor daf-2(−)’s and GSC(−)’s basic ability to promote longevity [8,34,43].
Beyond different assay temperatures, our choice of daf-2(e1370), rather than daf-2 RNAi [5] to inhibit daf-2 activity may account for unc-43(gf) in our hands not extending the lifespan of worms with reduced IIS. Differential interactions of “strong” (e.g., e1370) and “weak” (e.g., RNAi) daf-2 inhibition with other lifespan-regulatory mechanisms are not unprecedented in the literature, e.g., with somatic gonad signaling and collagen expression [3,34,45]. Moreover, in contrast to genetic mutations, daf-2 RNAi does not efficiently reduce daf-2 activity in neurons [12,46,47]. Yet, activity of the common daf-2(−)- and unc-43(gf) lifespan-extending factors daf-16 in neurons accounts for a fraction of daf-2(−) longevity [12]. Thus, unc-43(gf) may trigger daf-16 regulated processes in neurons that are already active in daf-2(e1370), but not in daf-2 RNAi worms, which may explain why it further extends daf-2 RNAi- but not daf-2(e1370) lifespan.
The observation that both, unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) extend lifespan, at least in certain genetic backgrounds under certain experimental conditions, appears paradoxical at the first glance. On the other hand, the moderate to strong longevity increase of unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) worms can be expected, based on the nature of the—relatively moderate to relatively large—changes in gene expression triggered by these two mutations. Indeed, as discussed above, unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) regulated gene sets are similar to each other and to daf-2- and daf-16-regulated gene sets. In addition, both mutations, although to different extents, induce non-dauer longevity-associated collagens. How unc-43(−) and unc-43(gf) affect collagen expression and/or its indirect regulator skn-1 is currently unclear [34]. Previous work [5] suggested UNC-43 as a direct activator of DAF-16, implying that the induction of some daf-16 targets upon unc-43(−) loss, as observed in our RNA-seq study, represents additional, indirect effects of unc-43 on daf-16. Moreover, UNC-43′s direct contribution to DAF-16 activity appears to be dispensable for the maintenance of a normal/normally long lifespan in all genetic backgrounds tested, as unc-43(−), GSC(−); unc-43(−) and daf-2(−); unc-43(−) worms are long-lived, in contrast to daf-16(-), GSC(−); daf-16(-) and daf-2(−); daf-16(-) worms, which are short- to normal-lived [3,48]. As proposed previously for reduced IIS [5], GSC loss and other mechanisms induced by unc-43 loss may “overpower” (direct) DAF-16 regulation by UNC-43.
In agreement with published studies [16,17,18], we found that loss of egl-8 further extends wildtype lifespan. However, in contrast to previous work [16], we did not observe decreased oxidative stress resistance upon egl-8 loss. Again, this difference may be explained by different experimental conditions, such as different egl-8(−) alleles (md1971 vs. n488), different assay temperatures (20 °C vs. 25 °C) and treatment with different chemicals to impose oxidative stress (TBHP vs. arsenite). Indeed, TBHP and arsenite have already been shown to trigger different transcriptional responses [49]. In a current model, egl-8 modulates lifespan cell non-autonomously through its function in neurons: egl-8 loss reduces neuronal secretion of insulin-like peptides, which in turn increases daf-16 activity in the intestine; in addition, evidence suggests that this pathway is further mediated by the EGL-8-generated second messenger diacylglycerol (DAG) and the DAG-dependent kinase dkf-2 [16,17,18,50]. This model predicts that worms with compromised insulin/IGF1-like receptor function in the intestine will not display increased longevity upon an egl-8(−) mutation, while GSC(−) worms may display further intestinal daf-16 activation and lifespan extension. Results from our lifespan analyses are in line with this prediction. Conceptually, egl-8 loss also decreases the levels of another second messenger, inositol-1, 4, 5-trisphosphate and subsequently, intracellular Ca2+ levels, and CaMKII/UNC-43 activity [15]. Yet, additional studies are necessary to determine how egl-8(−) and unc-43(−) interact to modulate daf-16 activity and C. elegans lifespan.
In summary, our study identified new genetic backgrounds in which unc-43 and egl-8 can/cannot modulate lifespan in C. elegans and suggests collagen expression as a second lifespan-regulatory mechanism functioning downstream of unc-43 and egl-8, in addition to the known regulator daf-16.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11223527/s1. References [51,52,53,54] are cited within the Supplementary Materials. File S1, containing supplementary table legends and Figure S1: Modulating PLCβ-activity extends lifespan in wildtype and GSC(−) but not in daf-2(−) C. elegans; Figure S2: PLCβ modulates C. elegans heat stress resistance in a genetic background dependent manner; Figure S3: PLCβ modulates C. elegans oxidative stress resistance in a genetic background dependent manner; Figure S4: unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) promote the expression of collagens; Figure S5: unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) do not sensitize daf-2(+) worms to dauer entry, but unc-43(gf) enhances dauer-predisposition of daf-2(e1370); Figure S6: Effect of daf-2- and GSC-loss on the expression of non-dauer longevity-associated collagens. File S2, containing Table S1: List of strains used in this study; Table S2: List of qPCR primers used in this study; Table S3: Statistical analysis of lifespan data; Table S4: Statistical analysis of stress resistance data; Table S5: Differentially expressed genes detected in this study; Table S6: Overlap of genes regulated by daf-2(−) in this study and in published work; Table S7: Overlap of genes regulated by unc-43/egl-8 and daf-2/daf-16 in this study and in published work; Table S8: GO term enrichment among unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−)-dependent DEGs in daf-2(+) and daf-2(−) background; Table S9: Statistical analysis of dauer formation data; Table S10: Expression of skn-1 regulated collagen genes in strains analyzed by RNA-seq; Table S11: Overlap of genes regulated by unc-43/egl-8 and skn-1; Table S12: Classification of collagen- and matrisome genes regulated by unc-43/egl-8 and comparison to skn-1; Table S13: Statistical analysis of qPCR data. File S3, containing Table S14: Complete NOIseq analysis of RNA-seq data. File S4, containing Table S15: GO term information and NOIseq-data on differentially expressed genes. File S5, containing Table S16: WormCat category information and NOIseq-data on differentially expressed genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.I.D.M., H.L. and E.K.M.M.; methodology, H.I.D.M.; investigation, H.I.D.M., L.G.B., S.S. and J.K.; validation, H.I.D.M., L.G.B., S.S. and J.K.; formal analysis, H.I.D.M., L.G.B., S.S., J.K. and E.K.M.M.; data curation, H.I.D.M.; visualization, H.I.D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.I.D.M.; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, H.I.D.M., H.L. and E.K.M.M.; project administration, H.I.D.M. and H.L.; funding acquisition, H.I.D.M., H.L. and E.K.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Young Investigator Start-up Grant from the University of Innsbruck to H.I.D.M. and National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging grant R01AG032435 to H.L. E.K.M.M. is supported by the Clinician Scientist program of the Philipps University of Marburg and the University Hospital Gießen and Marburg. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supplementary files. The RNA-sequencing data set generated during the present study has been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-11045.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Howard Baylis for providing strains, T. Richard Parenteau for help with strain generation, Cynthia Kenyon for discussion, and Emina Coralic, Ismail Gumustop, Werner Kapferer, and Lesley Wierer for technical help. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs Grant P40 OD010440. The Galaxy server that was used for some calculations is in part funded by Collaborative Research Centre 992 Medical Epigenetics (DFG grant SFB 992/1 2012) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF grants 031 A538A/A538C RBC, 031L0101B/031L0101C de.NBI-epi, 031L0106 de.STAIR (de.NBI)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relating to this manuscript.

References

  1. Kenyon, C.J. The genetics of ageing. Nature 2010, 464, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Morris, B.J.; Willcox, D.C.; Donlon, T.A.; Willcox, B.J. FOXO3: A Major Gene for Human Longevity—A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2015, 61, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hsin, H.; Kenyon, C. Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans. Nature 1999, 399, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arantes-Oliveira, N.; Apfeld, J.; Dillin, A.; Kenyon, C. Regulation of life-span by germ-line stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2002, 295, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tao, L.; Xie, Q.; Ding, Y.H.; Li, S.T.; Peng, S.; Zhang, Y.P.; Tan, D.; Yuan, Z.; Dong, M.Q. CAMKII and calcineurin regulate the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans through the FOXO transcription factor DAF-16. Elife 2013, 2, e00518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hansen, M.; Hsu, A.L.; Dillin, A.; Kenyon, C. New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lapierre, L.R.; De Magalhaes Filho, C.D.; McQuary, P.R.; Chu, C.C.; Visvikis, O.; Chang, J.T.; Gelino, S.; Ong, B.; Davis, A.E.; Irazoqui, J.E.; et al. The TFEB orthologue HLH-30 regulates autophagy and modulates longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Steinbaugh, M.J.; Narasimhan, S.D.; Robida-Stubbs, S.; Moronetti Mazzeo, L.E.; Dreyfuss, J.M.; Hourihan, J.M.; Raghavan, P.; Operana, T.N.; Esmaillie, R.; Blackwell, T.K. Lipid-mediated regulation of SKN-1/Nrf in response to germ cell absence. Elife 2015, 4, e07836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, Y.; Kenyon, C. Roles for ROS and hydrogen sulfide in the longevity response to germline loss in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E2832–E2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Berman, J.R.; Kenyon, C. Germ-cell loss extends C. elegans life span through regulation of DAF-16 by kri-1 and lipophilic-hormone signaling. Cell 2006, 124, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ghazi, A.; Henis-Korenblit, S.; Kenyon, C. A transcription elongation factor that links signals from the reproductive system to lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Libina, N.; Berman, J.R.; Kenyon, C. Tissue-specific activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the regulation of lifespan. Cell 2003, 115, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Denzel, M.S.; Lapierre, L.R.; Mack, H.I.D. Emerging topics in C. elegans aging research: Transcriptional regulation, stress response and epigenetics. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2019, 177, 4–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bayer, K.U.; Schulman, H. CaM Kinase: Still Inspiring at 40. Neuron 2019, 103, 380–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baylis, H.A.; Vazquez-Manrique, R.P. Genetic analysis of IP3 and calcium signalling pathways in C. elegans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1253–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kawli, T.; Wu, C.; Tan, M.W. Systemic and cell intrinsic roles of Gqalpha signaling in the regulation of innate immunity, oxidative stress, and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13788–13793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chun, L.; Gong, J.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Zheng, T.; Yu, T.; Xu, X.Z.; Liu, J. Metabotropic GABA signalling modulates longevity in C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ch’ng, Q.; Sieburth, D.; Kaplan, J.M. Profiling synaptic proteins identifies regulators of insulin secretion and lifespan. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974, 77, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ewels, P.; Magnusson, M.; Lundin, S.; Kaller, M. MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3047–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Huber, W.; Carey, V.J.; Gentleman, R.; Anders, S.; Carlson, M.; Carvalho, B.S.; Bravo, H.C.; Davis, S.; Gatto, L.; Girke, T.; et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods 2015, 12, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tarazona, S.; Furio-Tari, P.; Turra, D.; Pietro, A.D.; Nueda, M.J.; Ferrer, A.; Conesa, A. Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43, e140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tarazona, S.; Garcia-Alcalde, F.; Dopazo, J.; Ferrer, A.; Conesa, A. Differential expression in RNA-seq: A matter of depth. Genome Res 2011, 21, 2213–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dillies, M.A.; Rau, A.; Aubert, J.; Hennequet-Antier, C.; Jeanmougin, M.; Servant, N.; Keime, C.; Marot, G.; Castel, D.; Estelle, J.; et al. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform 2013, 14, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Angeles-Albores, D.; RY, N.L.; Chan, J.; Sternberg, P.W. Tissue enrichment analysis for C. elegans genomics. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Supek, F.; Bosnjak, M.; Skunca, N.; Smuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Holdorf, A.D.; Higgins, D.P.; Hart, A.C.; Boag, P.R.; Pazour, G.J.; Walhout, A.J.M.; Walker, A.K. WormCat: An Online Tool for Annotation and Visualization of Caenorhabditis elegans Genome-Scale Data. Genetics 2020, 214, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Teuscher, A.C.; Jongsma, E.; Davis, M.N.; Statzer, C.; Gebauer, J.M.; Naba, A.; Ewald, C.Y. The in-silico characterization of the Caenorhabditis elegans matrisome and proposal of a novel collagen classification. Matrix Biol Plus 2019, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hoogewijs, D.; Houthoofd, K.; Matthijssens, F.; Vandesompele, J.; Vanfleteren, J.R. Selection and validation of a set of reliable reference genes for quantitative sod gene expression analysis in C. elegans. BMC Mol Biol 2008, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Smith, M.A.; Zhang, B.; Pan, X. Selection of reliable reference genes in Caenorhabditis elegans for analysis of nanotoxicity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ewald, C.Y.; Landis, J.N.; Porter Abate, J.; Murphy, C.T.; Blackwell, T.K. Dauer-independent insulin/IGF-1-signalling implicates collagen remodelling in longevity. Nature 2015, 519, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Gems, D.; Sutton, A.J.; Sundermeyer, M.L.; Albert, P.S.; King, K.V.; Edgley, M.L.; Larsen, P.L.; Riddle, D.L. Two pleiotropic classes of daf-2 mutation affect larval arrest, adult behavior, reproduction and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1998, 150, 129–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Seo, M.; Seo, K.; Hwang, W.; Koo, H.J.; Hahm, J.H.; Yang, J.S.; Han, S.K.; Hwang, D.; Kim, S.; Jang, S.K.; et al. RNA helicase HEL-1 promotes longevity by specifically activating DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E4246–E4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Senchuk, M.M.; Dues, D.J.; Schaar, C.E.; Johnson, B.K.; Madaj, Z.B.; Bowman, M.J.; Winn, M.E.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Activation of DAF-16/FOXO by reactive oxygen species contributes to longevity in long-lived mitochondrial mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, A.T.; Guo, C.; Itani, O.A.; Budaitis, B.G.; Williams, T.W.; Hopkins, C.E.; McEachin, R.C.; Pande, M.; Grant, A.R.; Yoshina, S.; et al. Longevity Genes Revealed by Integrative Analysis of Isoform-Specific daf-16/FoxO Mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2015, 201, 613–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kaletsky, R.; Lakhina, V.; Arey, R.; Williams, A.; Landis, J.; Ashraf, J.; Murphy, C.T. The C. elegans adult neuronal IIS/FOXO transcriptome reveals adult phenotype regulators. Nature 2016, 529, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Murphy, C.T.; McCarroll, S.A.; Bargmann, C.I.; Fraser, A.; Kamath, R.S.; Ahringer, J.; Li, H.; Kenyon, C. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2003, 424, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tepper, R.G.; Ashraf, J.; Kaletsky, R.; Kleemann, G.; Murphy, C.T.; Bussemaker, H.J. PQM-1 complements DAF-16 as a key transcriptional regulator of DAF-2-mediated development and longevity. Cell 2013, 154, 676–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Reiner, D.J.; Newton, E.M.; Tian, H.; Thomas, J.H. Diverse behavioural defects caused by mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans unc-43 CaM kinase II. Nature 1999, 402, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Anderson, E.N.; Corkins, M.E.; Li, J.C.; Singh, K.; Parsons, S.; Tucey, T.M.; Sorkac, A.; Huang, H.; Dimitriadi, M.; Sinclair, D.A.; et al. C. elegans lifespan extension by osmotic stress requires FUdR, base excision repair, FOXO, and sirtuins. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2016, 154, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Miller, H.; Fletcher, M.; Primitivo, M.; Leonard, A.; Sutphin, G.L.; Rintala, N.; Kaeberlein, M.; Leiser, S.F. Genetic interaction with temperature is an important determinant of nematode longevity. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 1425–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yamawaki, T.M.; Arantes-Oliveira, N.; Berman, J.R.; Zhang, P.; Kenyon, C. Distinct activities of the germline and somatic reproductive tissues in the regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans’ longevity. Genetics 2008, 178, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fraser, A.G.; Kamath, R.S.; Zipperlen, P.; Martinez-Campos, M.; Sohrmann, M.; Ahringer, J. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 2000, 408, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kamath, R.S.; Martinez-Campos, M.; Zipperlen, P.; Fraser, A.G.; Ahringer, J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001, 2, RESEARCH0002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kenyon, C.; Chang, J.; Gensch, E.; Rudner, A.; Tabtiang, R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 1993, 366, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oliveira, R.P.; Porter Abate, J.; Dilks, K.; Landis, J.; Ashraf, J.; Murphy, C.T.; Blackwell, T.K. Condition-adapted stress and longevity gene regulation by Caenorhabditis elegans SKN-1/Nrf. Aging Cell 2009, 8, 524–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Feng, H.; Ren, M.; Chen, L.; Rubin, C.S. Properties, regulation, and in vivo functions of a novel protein kinase D: Caenorhabditis elegans DKF-2 links diacylglycerol second messenger to the regulation of stress responses and life span. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31273–31288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garigan, D.; Hsu, A.L.; Fraser, A.G.; Kamath, R.S.; Ahringer, J.; Kenyon, C. Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: A role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation. Genetics 2002, 161, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mack, H.I.D.; Zhang, P.; Fonslow, B.R.; Yates, J.R. The protein kinase MBK-1 contributes to lifespan extension in daf-2 mutant and germline-deficient Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging 2017, 9, 1414–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Park, E.C.; Horvitz, H.R. Mutations with dominant effects on the behavior and morphology of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1986, 113, 821–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yook, K.; Hodgkin, J. Mos1 mutagenesis reveals a diversity of mechanisms affecting response of Caenorhabditis elegans to the bacterial pathogen Microbacterium nematophilum. Genetics 2007, 175, 681–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Modulating CaMKII- or PLCβ-activity extends lifespan in wildtype and GSC(−), but not in daf-2(−) C. elegans. Lifespan analysis was performed on (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 74 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S3 for complete statistical analysis.
Figure 1. Modulating CaMKII- or PLCβ-activity extends lifespan in wildtype and GSC(−), but not in daf-2(−) C. elegans. Lifespan analysis was performed on (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 74 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S3 for complete statistical analysis.
Cells 11 03527 g001
Figure 2. CaMKII and PLCβ modulate C. elegans heat stress resistance in a genetic background-dependent manner. Survival at 35 °C was scored for (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 75 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S4 for complete statistical analysis.
Figure 2. CaMKII and PLCβ modulate C. elegans heat stress resistance in a genetic background-dependent manner. Survival at 35 °C was scored for (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 75 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S4 for complete statistical analysis.
Cells 11 03527 g002
Figure 3. CaMKII- and PLCβ modulate C. elegans oxidative stress resistance in a genetic background-dependent manner. Survival in the presence of TBHP was scored for (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of four independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 70 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S4 for complete statistical analysis.
Figure 3. CaMKII- and PLCβ modulate C. elegans oxidative stress resistance in a genetic background-dependent manner. Survival in the presence of TBHP was scored for (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying mutations in CaMKII/unc-43 or PLCβ/egl-8 or no additional mutation (control) as indicated. Egl-8(−) refers to allele md1971. Data shown are representative of four independent experiments, each comprising ≥ 70 worms per strain. *** indicates p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 (Mantel–Cox test). See Supplementary Table S4 for complete statistical analysis.
Cells 11 03527 g003
Figure 4. unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−) globally shift gene expression towards daf-2(−). Gene expression was analyzed by RNA-seq in the strains indicated. (A) Heatmap of the filtered, tmm-normalized, log10-transformed RNA-seq count data of all genes evaluated during downstream analysis (cf. Materials and Methods). (B) Pairwise distances between the samples (strains) analyzed. (C) Principal component analysis of the samples analyzed. (D) GO term enrichment analysis among genes upregulated or (E) downregulated relative to the wildtype or daf-2 single mutant control strain in response to the genetic mutations indicated. The graphs show the five most significantly enriched GO terms for each strain, plus their occurrences in all other strains. See Supplementary Table S8 for a complete analysis.
Figure 4. unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−) globally shift gene expression towards daf-2(−). Gene expression was analyzed by RNA-seq in the strains indicated. (A) Heatmap of the filtered, tmm-normalized, log10-transformed RNA-seq count data of all genes evaluated during downstream analysis (cf. Materials and Methods). (B) Pairwise distances between the samples (strains) analyzed. (C) Principal component analysis of the samples analyzed. (D) GO term enrichment analysis among genes upregulated or (E) downregulated relative to the wildtype or daf-2 single mutant control strain in response to the genetic mutations indicated. The graphs show the five most significantly enriched GO terms for each strain, plus their occurrences in all other strains. See Supplementary Table S8 for a complete analysis.
Cells 11 03527 g004
Figure 5. unc-43 and egl-8 modulate the expression of non-dauer longevity-associated collagens. mRNA levels relative to the control strain of the same genetic background were determined by qPCR for selected non-dauer longevity-associated collagen genes in (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying the genetic mutations indicated. Bars and error bars indicate mean ± SEM across 3 biological replicates. # indicates p < 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-tests, FDR 10%). See Supplementary Table S13 for complete statistical analysis.
Figure 5. unc-43 and egl-8 modulate the expression of non-dauer longevity-associated collagens. mRNA levels relative to the control strain of the same genetic background were determined by qPCR for selected non-dauer longevity-associated collagen genes in (A) GSC(+), (B) GSC(−), (C) daf-2(+), and (D) daf-2(−) strains carrying the genetic mutations indicated. Bars and error bars indicate mean ± SEM across 3 biological replicates. # indicates p < 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-tests, FDR 10%). See Supplementary Table S13 for complete statistical analysis.
Cells 11 03527 g005
Figure 6. Proposed model for genetic background-dependent lifespan regulation by unc-43 and egl-8 mutations. Germline ablation [GSC(−)], unc-43(gf), and, more moderately (thin arrows), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) promote the expression of at least a subset of specific collagens. These specific collagens have been shown to promote longevity under conditions that do not predispose to dauer, such as GSC(−), and may also contribute to unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−)-triggered lifespan extension. Thereby, these specific collagens may act in parallel with other longevity-promoting factors, e.g., daf-16. Daf-16, but not these specific collagens, is also required for the dauer-predisposing daf-2(e1370) mutation to extend lifespan. Note that daf-16 dependency of lifespan extension has been shown for GSC(−), unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−), but not yet for unc-43(−). See the main text for details and references.
Figure 6. Proposed model for genetic background-dependent lifespan regulation by unc-43 and egl-8 mutations. Germline ablation [GSC(−)], unc-43(gf), and, more moderately (thin arrows), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−) promote the expression of at least a subset of specific collagens. These specific collagens have been shown to promote longevity under conditions that do not predispose to dauer, such as GSC(−), and may also contribute to unc-43(gf), unc-43(−) and egl-8(−)-triggered lifespan extension. Thereby, these specific collagens may act in parallel with other longevity-promoting factors, e.g., daf-16. Daf-16, but not these specific collagens, is also required for the dauer-predisposing daf-2(e1370) mutation to extend lifespan. Note that daf-16 dependency of lifespan extension has been shown for GSC(−), unc-43(gf) and egl-8(−), but not yet for unc-43(−). See the main text for details and references.
Cells 11 03527 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mack, H.I.D.; Buck, L.G.; Skalet, S.; Kremer, J.; Li, H.; Mack, E.K.M. Further Extension of Lifespan by Unc-43/CaMKII and Egl-8/PLCβ Mutations in Germline-Deficient Caenorhabditis elegans. Cells 2022, 11, 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223527

AMA Style

Mack HID, Buck LG, Skalet S, Kremer J, Li H, Mack EKM. Further Extension of Lifespan by Unc-43/CaMKII and Egl-8/PLCβ Mutations in Germline-Deficient Caenorhabditis elegans. Cells. 2022; 11(22):3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mack, Hildegard I. D., Laura G. Buck, Sonja Skalet, Jennifer Kremer, Hao Li, and Elisabeth K. M. Mack. 2022. "Further Extension of Lifespan by Unc-43/CaMKII and Egl-8/PLCβ Mutations in Germline-Deficient Caenorhabditis elegans" Cells 11, no. 22: 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223527

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop