Next Article in Journal
Pre-Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Human Limbus-Derived Stromal/Mesenchymal Stem Cells with and without Alginate Encapsulation for Future Clinical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Systematic Review of Roles of Arecoline and Arecoline N-Oxide in Oral Cancer and Strategies to Block Carcinogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Two Homeobox Transcription Factors, Goosecoid and Ventx1.1, Oppositely Regulate Chordin Transcription in Xenopus Gastrula Embryos
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human β-Defensins in Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Molecular Signature of Long Non-Coding RNA Associated with Areca Nut-Induced Head and Neck Cancer

by Hung-Han Huang 1,2, Guo-Rung You 2, Shang-Ju Tang 2, Joseph T. Chang 3,4,* and Ann-Joy Cheng 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 22 January 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 March 2023 / Published: 11 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor, 

This is an interesting title and manuscript and authors investigated  systemic strategy to identify lncRNA signatures related to areca nut-induced head and neck cancer. There are some comments which should be followed before next steps;

-It would be better to explain the aim clearly.

- Introduction is poor about head and neck cancer and I suggest you the below references:

-Hajmohammadi E, Ghahremanie S, Alam M, Abbasi K, Mohamadian F, Khayatan D, Rahbar M. Biomarkers and common oral cancers: Clinical trial studies. JBUON. 2021;26(6):2227-37. 

-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34486685/ (https://www.europeanreview.org/article/26522)

-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32135187/ (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117483)

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014299920307494 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173657)

- Method and materials sections are ok and well categorized.

-Results are ok and understandable 

- It would be better to present the figure 7 in results 

- It would be better to explain more about HNC in first part of discussion and use the above mentioned references.

Best regards,  

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all the concerns and changed the manuscript accordingly. The revised version is significantly better and I recommend that this can be accepted for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor, 

The revised manuscript is acceptable. 

 

Best regards,  

Back to TopTop