Skip to Content
CellsCells
  • Review
  • Open Access

3 April 2025

Extracellular Vesicles in Asthma: Intercellular Cross-Talk in TH2 Inflammation

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 37134 Verona, Italy
2
Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona Integrated University Hospital, 37126 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Asthma is a complex, multifactorial inflammatory disorder of the airways, characterized by recurrent symptoms and variable airflow obstruction. So far, two main asthma endotypes have been identified, type 2 (T2)-high or T2-low, based on the underlying immunological mechanisms. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly exosomes, have gained increasing attention due to their pivotal role in intercellular communication and distal signaling modulation. In the context of asthma pathobiology, an increasing amount of experimental evidence suggests that EVs secreted by eosinophils, mast cells, dendritic cells, T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and epithelial cells contribute to disease modulation. This review explores the role of EVs in profiling the molecular signatures of T2-high and T2-low asthma, offering novel perspectives on disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic airway condition, characterized by bronchial hyperreactivity, airway obstruction, and inflammation [1]. Based on the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms, different asthma endotypes have been described, encompassed within a broader classification including T2-high asthma (allergic/eosinophilic) and T2-low asthma (non-eosinophilic) [2]. The T2-high endotype includes early-onset allergic asthma, late-onset eosinophilic asthma, and Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) [3], while the non-T2 endotype comprises phenotypes like obesity-related asthma and late-onset neutrophilic asthma [4]. The regulation of asthma phenotypes involves both innate and adaptive immune responses, with immune cells playing a critical role in the pathogenesis of asthma [5]. Epithelial cells and dendritic cells (DCs) are particularly significant, influencing the activation and differentiation of T helper cells through cytokine secretion and antigen presentation [6,7]. This complex interplay between environmental factors, immune mechanisms, and cellular actions underlines the importance of identifying asthma based on endotypes [8]. However, the number and accuracy of biomarkers available in daily clinical practice are limited. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), blood eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) contribute to identify T2-high asthma, whilst their absence defines a T2-low endotype. Figure 1 displays the available clinical biomarkers for T2-high and T2-low phenotypes, which have been identified based on recent literature [9,10]. Therefore, discovering new clinical and measurable biomarkers for asthma endotypes can provide deeper understanding into the mechanisms of the disease and eventually support personalized treatment approaches for patients [11].
Figure 1. Clinical and exploratory biomarkers for T2-high and T2-low asthma phenotypes. T2-high asthma is characterized by elevated eosinophils, serum IgE, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, with additional exploratory biomarkers including serum/plasma concentration of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and Periostin. T2-low asthma is defined by the absence of T2 biomarkers and the presence of sputum neutrophils, with exploratory markers such as serum/plasma concentration of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6, IL-17, IL-33, IL-8.
In this scenario, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are gaining growing importance as they play pivotal roles in cell-to-cell communication and distal signaling activation. EVs are membranous vesicles secreted by almost every kind of cell. They can be subdivided into different classes according to their function, size, and origin. Exosomes are a family of EVs characterized by small size (mean diameter ranging from 40 to 160 nm ca) and originating from late endosomes. Exosomes are the most studied type of vesicles, either for elucidating pathophysiological mechanisms or for disease treatments. The concept of “exosome” was first introduced by Rose Johnstone as a way to better understand the biological transformation of a reticulocyte into a mature red blood cell [12]. From this point on, EVs are commonly referred to by the authors of this review as exosomes. EVs are present in various body fluids, including plasma, urine, semen, bronchial fluid, synovial fluid, tears, and milk, highlighting their widespread role in intercellular communication [13]. EVs have been extensively studied in various physiological and disease status, including chronic respiratory disease [14,15], highlighting their potential as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. EVs originate from the inward folding of the cell membrane through endocytosis, followed by the formation of multivesicular bodies (MVB), secreted via exocytosis, and they can modulate various immune-regulatory pathways [16,17]. They are characterized by a lipid bilayer membrane surface composed by high concentrations of lipid biomolecules, including phosphatidylserine (PS), sphingomyelin, cholesterol, and ceramides [18,19,20]. Within the lipid bilayer membrane, EVs and in particular exosomes carry tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81), adhesion molecules, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens from both class I and class II [21]. As exosomes originate from endosomes, they are are marked by cellular origin-specific proteins like ALIX, tumor susceptibility gene (TSG101), flotillin involved in MVB formation, and proteins (annexins, Rabs, and GTPases) essential for membrane transport and fusion [22]. EVs and exosomes also carry various proteins inside, along with potential metabolic enzymes, nucleic acids, consisting of DNAs, mRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding (lnc) RNAs, and circular (circ) RNAs [23,24]. Certain proteins found in exosomes are unique to their originating cells, whereas others remain constant regardless of the cellular origin [25]. RNA sequencing has shown that miRNAs dominate RNA content, especially in human plasma-derived exosomes, representing over 42.32% of total sequencing reads and 76.20% of reads aligning to recognized sequences [26,27]. The peculiar characteristics of EVs, such as stability, accessibility, biosafety, molecular cargo, surface antigens, etc., make them useful indicators of disease severity and progression, offering opportunities for their use in investigating the differences between asthma phenotypes but also in developing targeted and effective therapeutic approaches [28]. EVs have been extensively investigated to explore their links to the development of inflammatory and various respiratory conditions [29], leading to important comprehension of the cellular cross-talk mechanism of allergic diseases [30,31]. They are also implicated in the disrupted signaling processes associated with allergies and allergic asthma, underscoring their significant contribution to disease processes [32]. EVs possess diverse functions within the immune system, encompassing the expression of several genes, regulation of immune responses, presentation of antigens, promotion of antitumor immunity, and inhibition of immune system activity [33]. Moreover, they are crucially involved in the development of specific immune-related disorders, including asthma, underlining their impact on immune system dynamics [34]. Moreover, they contribute to tissue remodeling by delivering growth factors and miRNAs that promote healing and regeneration [35]. Their functions in both sustaining homeostasis and promoting immunomodulation make them a focal point of research for novel insight on the knowledge of asthma endotypes [36]. In this review, we will explore the potential relevance of EVs, particularly derived from cells of the immune system, or related to it, involved in asthma pathophysiology, in profiling different asthma endotypes and phenotypes, particularly focusing on T2-high vs. T2-low molecular fingerprints.

3. The Paradigm of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived EVs

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently emerged as important for cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine and are widely studied in respiratory diseases such asthma [130]. Various sources of MSCs are known to display distinct properties, with bone marrow-, adipose tissue-, umbilical cord-, and placenta-derived stem cells being the most commonly used in current research. MSCs primarily exert their beneficial effects through EVs, with exosomes being the most well-characterized among MSC-EVs. Moreover, MSC-EVs exhibit therapeutic effects similar to MSCs but with reduced risks of immune rejection, tumorigenicity, and pulmonary embolism [131].
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes showed to have similar therapeutic effect to their parental cells [132] and have a potential role to replace them in asthma treatment by impacting the immune cells and inhibiting airway remodeling [13]. Research has demonstrated that adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and other MSCs can reduce allergic airway inflammation in bronchial asthma mouse models [133]. Additionally, ASC-conditioned media and ASC-derived extracellular vesicles have shown similar effectiveness to ASCs in alleviating allergic airway diseases. The immunomodulatory effects of ASC-derived EVs in allergic airway inflammation are thought to involve the suppression of Th2 cytokine production. Recent studies have also indicated that ASC-derived EVs can improve allergic airway inflammation in mouse models of asthma [134]. The systemic administration of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD-MSCs) showed beneficial effects on ovalbumin-induced allergic asthma, with a decrease in BALF total cells and eosinophils count, a decrease in IL-5 and TGF-β levels in lung tissue, and a decrease in CD3+CD4+ T cells in the thymus. The same effect was showed for AD-MSC-derived exosomes [135]. Numerous experimental and clinical studies have shown that the secretome produced by MSCs, which includes both soluble factors and EV-encapsulated components, plays a key role in their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. As a result, the direct use of MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) has been proposed as a promising alternative to MSCs for treatments such as cartilage protection and asthma [136]. As a general statement, we can consider that MSC-EVs influence the biological activity of target cells by either directly activating surface receptors or delivering signaling molecules into cells. Many studies were conducted recently on the effect of MSC-EVs on inflammatory mechanisms and in particular asthma, both in vivo and in vitro. As an example, Xiang Li et al. showed that bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMMC)-derived exosomes highly expressed a specific miRNA, miR-223-3p, targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome known to be associated with high inflammation and the exacerbation of asthma. Specifically, they showed in OVA rats that miR-223-3p is able to regulate the NLRP3-induced ASC/Caspase-1/GSDMD signaling pathway, suggesting its possible role in protection against asthma [137]. MSC-derived exosomal miR-1470 is an interesting therapeutic target for asthma treatment since it induces the expression of P27KIP1 in asthmatic patients, promoting the differentiation of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs [138]. A recent study showed that exosomes secreted from human bone marrow MSCs contain miR-188, which has a negative effect on airway remodeling and lung injury. It mitigates the pathological development of asthma with the modulation of the JARID2/Wnt/β-catenin pathway [139]. Furthermore, even other types of MSCs-EVs have been studied in the context of asthma research, such as umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs (UCMSC-EVs). Exosomes from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs) have a therapeutic effect in SSRA with an action on the NF-kB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. They promote macrophage M2 polarization and inhibit the expression of TRAF1 [140]. In a recent study, the effect of migrasomes, which recently identified EVs produced from migrating cells and involved in cell-to-cell communication, were evaluated in an asthma model. In particular, the inhibition of migrasomes secreted from hUCMSCs reduced the hUCMSCs’ anti-inflammatory action on OVA-induced animals, suggesting that migrasomes play a role in the protective effect of hUCMSCs in asthma. In fact, it was observed that migrasomes suppress the Th2 response induced by dendritic cells reducing airway inflammation and mucus secretion [141]. Xu et al. first demonstrated that nebulized hypoxic hUCMSC-EVs (Hypo-EVs) were able to reduce airway inflammation and remodeling in asthmatic mice [142] and then investigated their possible therapeutic effect on epithelial barriers. The authors suggested that the mechanism through which Hypo-EVs have a therapeutic effect on epithelial barriers both in vivo and in vitro could be the inhibition of p-STAT6 pathways after the delivery of CAV-1 to bronchial cells and increasing the expression of ZO-1 and E-cadherin [143]. In the context of asthma treatment, the therapeutic mechanisms of MSC-EVs can be categorized into a few key pathways: (i) MSC-EVs enhance the proliferation of regulatory T cells, strengthening immunosuppression, reducing eosinophil levels, and mitigating inflammation in asthma. (ii) They inhibit the activity of human type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), thereby reducing Th2 cytokine levels, suppressing lung inflammation, and alleviating AHR. (iii) MSC-EVs facilitate the transition of macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. (iv) They contribute to the inhibition of airway remodeling. Chen and colleagues very recently proposed a nice review of the potential therapeutic use of MSC-EVs in the treatment of asthma. Moreover, compared to MSC treatment, MSC-derived EV-based cell-free therapy, based on ASC-, BMMC-, UCMSC-derived EVs, etc., offers several advantages, including enhanced safety, easier handling and storage, a lower risk of immune rejection, and no threat of vascular occlusion. However, several challenges, particularly related to the stability, efficiency, production, and quality control of EV content, as well as the delivery methods of MSC-EVs, continue to hinder the implementation of this approach for asthma treatment [144].
Table 1. Summary of research studies concerning cell-derived EVs and their contribution to asthma pathophysiology.
Table 1. Summary of research studies concerning cell-derived EVs and their contribution to asthma pathophysiology.
Cell TypeMain FindingsReferences
Epithelial cellsExosomes derived from AECs can cause inflammation by increasing IL-8 and LTC4.[31]
BECs play a pivotal role in exosome-driven cell-to-cell communication and promote the proliferation and infiltration of undifferentiated macrophages.[43]
AEC-derived exosomes with intertwined filamentous formations on their surface lead to airway inflammation remodeling.[44]
Exosomes secreted by OVA-induced AECs promote CD4+ T cell differentiation in Th2-like cells.[45]
AEC-derived exosomes with CNTN1 protein play a significant role in modulating allergic responses via DCs.[46]
Mechanical stress leads to TF expression and its transport via exosomes in normal BECs.[47]
Exosomes can transport TF between different cells, linking it to asthma.[48,49]
TF expression levels were higher in asthmatic patients, and TGF-β plays an important role in asthma mechanical stress.[50]
TGF-β2 expression in exosomes was reduced in severe asthmatic patients.[51,52]
TGF-β2 secreted from exosomes has a regulatory effect in cell proliferation.[52]
Epithelium-derived exosomes secrete miRNA involved in asthma development.[53]
MiR-34a regulates the functions of dendritic cells and their maturation, targeting the Wnt pathway.[54]
MiR-92b is involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.[55]
EosinophilsEosinophil-derived exosomes mediate immune responses and structural changes.[60,61]
Eosinophil-derived exosomes significantly influence asthma pathogenesis.[36]
EVs from the eosinophils of asthmatic patients increase NO and ROS production. Patients enhance chemotaxis, upregulate cell adhesion molecules, and upregulate integrin α2 in eosinophils.[62,63]
EVs from eosinophils contribute to the inflammatory response and structural changes in the lungs.[64,65]
Eosinophil-derived exosomes alter gene expression in various cell types, including lung cells, contributing to asthma pathology.[63,64]
Eosinophils express exosomal markers such as CD63 and CD9. [66]
The stimulation of eosinophils with IFN-γ enhanced exosome production, particularly in asthma patients.[61]
Eosinophils from asthmatic patients have a greater production of exosomes.[63]
Eosinophil-derived exosomes promote inflammation related with asthma.[68]
Eosinophil-derived exosomes contribute to airway structural changes.[64]
LymphocytesB cell-derived exosomes exhibit the features of their originating cells and present HSP70, important for DC maturation.[72,74]
B cell-derived exosomes can present antigen peptides to T cells, inducing the release of proinflammatory cytokines.[73]
Antigen-presenting cell (APC)-derived exosomes are significant contributors to T cell activation.[75]
Two mechanisms through which B cell-derived exosomes activate T cells are direct stimulation and through the involvement of APC.[76,77,78]
B lymphocyte-produced exosomes stimulate the release of cytokines IL-5 and IL-13.[80,81]
Activated T cells release exosomes upon activation.[29,82]
T cell-derived exosomes trigger mast cell activation and degranulation, cytokine release, tissue remodeling, and increasing airway reactivity.[83]
T cell-derived exosomes inhibit CD8+ T lymphocyte activity.[84]
T cell-derived exosomes shape an optimal environment for immune cell operations, mediating communications to enhance immune response.[59,85]
T cell EVs are able to activate MC degranulation and the release of cytokines.[86]
Th2 cells promote eosinophil survival through the inhibition of apoptosis.[87]
Mast cellsMC-derived exosomes carry immune-related factors, which play an important role in immunity.[92,93]
Mast cell-derived exosomes secrete miR-21, which promotes oxidative stress and inflammation in asthmatic mice.[94]
BMMC-derived exosomes could activate immune cells without direct contact, suggesting the mobilization of B and T cells into lungs.[95]
MCs can exchange RNA with each other through EVs.[96]
MC-derived exosomes enhance the ability of DCs to present antigens to T cells and regulate T lymphocyte activation.[29]
BMMC-derived exosomes are able to lower IgE levels and block mast cell activation.[97]
MC-derived EVs convey a protective message under oxidative stress, decreasing mortality.[98]
miR-21 released from MC-derived exosomes enhances oxidative stress and triggers inflammatory reactions in asthmatic mice.[94]
Exosomes activated by IgE from MCs exacerbate atherosclerosis by inducing endothelial dysfunction through the circular RNA CDR1as, linking asthma with atherosclerosis.[99]
Dendritic cellsDC-derived exosomes can activate allergen-specific Th2 cells.[29]
DC exosomes specifically activate OVA-targeted CD8+ T cells and promote OVA-specific IgG antibody production.[104]
DC-derived exosomes carry enzymes necessary for producing leukotrienes.[105,106]
DC-derived exosomes, when packed with chemotactic eicosanoids, promote inflammation and granulocyte migration in vitro.[106]
Various subsets of pulmonary DCs have been identified, each contributing differently to asthma pathogenesis.[107,108]
NeutrophilsNeutrophil-derived exosomes play a role in regulating changes in airway smooth muscle structure.[113,114]
OVA-induced airway epithelium-derived exosomes increase AHR and trigger the accumulation/activation of macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils.[115]
Neutrophil-derived EVs disrupt epithelial cell connections.[116]
Exosomes released by neutrophils contribute to airway structural changes, promoting the migration and proliferation of ASMCs in response to LPS.[117]
Neutrophil-derived exosomes containing elastase contribute significantly to airway inflammation.[118]
MacrophagesMacrophage-derived exosomes have a significant impact on T1 immune reactions.[126,127]
In SSRA, M1 macrophages release high levels of inflammatory molecules, contributing to neutrophil-rich infiltration, AHR, and airway structural changes.[128]
Exosomes secreted from human macrophages have a proinflammatory role in asthma and contain enzymes that favor LTC4 production.[106]
Exosomes secreted by M2 macrophages reduce lung inflammation and asthma progression through the action of miR-370.[129]
Mesenchymal stem cellsMSC-EVs exhibit therapeutic effects similar to MSCs but with reduced risks of immune rejection, tumorigenicity, and pulmonary embolism.[131]
EVsderived from mesenchymal stem cells have a similar therapeutic effect to their parental cells. [132]
EVsderived from mesenchymal stem cells impact immune cells and inhibit airway remodeling. [13]
ASCs and other MSCs can reduce allergic airway inflammation in bronchial asthma mouse models. [133]
ASC-derived EVs immunomodulatory effects are thought to involve the suppression of Th2 cytokine production in airway allergic inflammation.[134]
AD-MSC-derived exosomes showed beneficial effects on ovalbumin-induced allergic asthma.[135]
MSC-derived extracellular vesicles have been proposed as a promising alternative to MSCs for treatments such as asthma. [136]
BMMC-derived exosomes highly expressed a specific miRNA, miR-223-3p, known to be associated with high inflammation and the exacerbation of asthma.[137]
MSC-derived exosomal miR-1470 induces the expression of P27KIP1 in asthmatic patients, promoting the differentiation of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs. [138]
BMMC-derived exosomes contain miR-188, which has a negative effect on airway remodeling and lung injury.[139]
hUCMSC-derived EVs have a therapeutic effect in SSRA, with an action on the NF-kB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways.[140]
Migrasomes secreted from hUCMSCs play a role in the protective effect of hUCMSCs in asthma.[141]
Hypo-EVs are able to reduce airway inflammation and remodeling in asthmatic mice.[142]
Hypo-EVs have a therapeutic effect on epithelial barriers both in vivo and in vitro.[143]
The therapeutic mechanisms of MSC-EVs can be categorized into several key pathways in the context of asthma treatment. [144]

4. Methods for EVs Analysis: Available Tools, Potential, and Challenges

A crucial step in understanding EVs’ biological roles is their efficient extraction and enrichment. As research on EVs progresses, their potential applications are becoming increasingly evident. Exosomes have the potential to serve as powerful biomarkers and therapeutic agents for early disease diagnosis, monitoring treatment responses, and predicting prognosis. For large-scale clinical application, key requirements include rapid and straightforward isolation methods, high yield, purity, reliable characterization, safety, cost-effectiveness, and therapeutic efficacy. However, identifying exosomes remains challenging due to their variability in size, composition, function, and origin. Different isolation techniques are utilized based on the specific application and objective [145]. The most commonly employed methods include immunoaffinity capture, polymer precipitation, size-based isolation techniques, and ultracentrifugation, as illustrated in Figure 3. Depending on factors such as sample type, environmental conditions, and vesicle abundance, EVs can be extracted from various sources, including bodily fluids, solid tissues, and cell culture media, using different isolation techniques. The optimal method for isolation should be selected based mainly on the specific source (bodily fluid, tissue, cell culture supernatant) and on the further application, such as cargo analysis, basic research, clinical applications, etc. Key factors to consider include the sample type, equipment availability, yield, purity, and efficiency in terms of time and effort. An ideal isolation technique should be simple, rapid, cost-effective, and capable of producing high-purity and high-yield exosomes without altering their natural structure or requiring expensive equipment. While each method has its strengths and limitations, improvements through protocol modifications or combining techniques could enhance EV research for both fundamental and therapeutic applications. A complete description of all the available methods is beyond the scope of our review and can be accessed elsewhere [146]. Nevertheless, for the isolation of cell culture model-derived EVs, for example, including both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, various methods have been developed, each with their own advantages and limitations. Since many extracellular particles share similar properties with exosomes, most isolation techniques focus on separation based on size and density. Initially, cells and debris are removed from the culture medium through sequential centrifugation at low speed. The resulting supernatant, which contains exosomes, is then transferred to a new tube for further processing using the chosen isolation method or stored for future use. Although the physiological environment in vivo differs from that of cell culture, using cell culture media as a source of EVs allows for more controlled conditions during EV production. However, due to the challenge of eliminating contaminating serum exosomes, other EVs, proteins, and lipoproteins, it is advisable to culture cells in a chemically defined medium when highly pure exosomes are required for omics analysis or functional studies. To ensure accuracy and prevent contamination, strict procedural guidelines should be followed during vesicle isolation [147,148].
Figure 3. Overview of available techniques for extracellular vesicle isolation and characterization. EVs can be obtained from various sources, including cells (from tissues or culture supernatants) and biological fluids (e.g., blood, nasal lavage fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, sputum, and exhaled breath condensate). Isolation techniques include ultracentrifugation, size-based separation, immunoaffinity capture, precipitation, and microfluidics-based approaches. Characterization methods encompass ultrastructural analysis (e.g., electron microscopy), nanoparticle tracking, flow cytometry, fluorescence-based assays, and antibody-based techniques such as Western blotting.
After isolation and enrichment, EVs are usually characterized (in terms of size and concentration) by microscopy and optical/physical methods such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and all its variants as well as nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Western immunoblotting is also employed to detect EV-related biomarkers such as tetraspanins. EV cargo analysis can then be achieved by several approaches including NGS, MS, and antibody-based methods. Surface antigens analysis by flow cytometry also represents an interesting way of assessing EVs’ characteristics, highlighting the peculiar markers of originating cells and the precise molecules needed for targeting the EVs to the recipient cells. For updated information on best practices in EVs research, one can refer to the latest guidelines provided by the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) [149]. As the research in this field rapidly advances, new methodologies are expected to facilitate their translation into therapeutic applications. However, current isolation and analysis methods often require costly equipment and specialized expertise. Future advancements in exosome/EVs technology will focus on improving preservation, detection sensitivity, and resolution to enable more efficient separation and application. Next-generation techniques should be faster, more sensitive, cost-effective, and reliable. Despite challenges in isolation, purification, characterization, large-scale production, the standardization of operation methodologies, potential immune response, and drug loading, their unique properties make them promising for early disease diagnosis and treatment.

5. Discussion

Bronchial asthma is a complex disease which has been extensively studied in recent years. Despite increasing knowledge about immunological mechanisms, disease phenotyping in everyday clinical practice is still limited by the relatively poor accuracy of easily available biomarkers. They include blood eosinophils, IgE, and exhaled nitric oxide in the case of T2-high asthma or the absence of those biomarkers in T2-low phenotypes. Such simplification does not reflect the complex background underlying clinical manifestations. Therefore, a targeted therapy selection process is also hampered.
On the contrary, EVs can be considered a much more accurate source of information about the immunological activation. In fact, the molecular structures expressed on their surface can be related to the cells where EVs come from and where they are moving to. In addition, the reach repertoire EVs contain provides some details about the kind of “message” they are carrying out within the context of the ongoing inflammation.
Among the molecules carried by EVs, non-coding-RNA are the most abundant. Exosome cargo is also characterized by a variety of non-coding RNAs, including miRNAs and long non-coding RNA [36,150]. Furthermore, miRNAs were earlier described as associated with asthma pathogenesis and response to treatment [30]. Elevated levels of MiR-21 were detected in serum samples of patients affected by eosinophilic asthma as compared to healthy individuals. MiR-21 stimulates Th2 responses by inhibiting IL-12 gene expression and decreasing the release of IFN-γ, which leads to elevated Th2 cytokines. Moreover, it can induce the differentiation of T cells through action on Gata3 and IL-4 [151]. In recent years, it was shown that miR-223 had elevated expression levels in asthma [134], and at exosomal levels, miR-223 was upregulated in subjects with asthma as compared to healthy controls [152]. Moreover, a recent study utilizing a logistic regression model revealed that the collective expression of miR-21-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-215-5p extracted from serum exosomes could distinguish between levels of asthma severity. In particular, miR-21-5p and miR-126-3p showed an overexpression in bronchial epithelial cells that correlated with the induction of IL-13 production [153]. MiR-146a-5p, also expressed in the bronchial epithelium, is induced by different cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-17A, and it is correlated with the Nf-kB pathway [154]. MiR-21-5-p and miR-126-3pm levels were found to be increased in type 2 high atopic asthma, and a significant decrease in miR-21-5p, miR-126-3p, and miR-146a-5p corresponded with the IL-6 high endotype, obesity, or neutrophilic asthma [153].
EVs’ role in asthma and other respiratory diseases has been widely assessed by using biological fluids as a source [15]. Serum, plasma, nasal lavage fluid, sputum, and bronchoalveolar fluids have been used as they are easily accessible and allow a broader range of information to be gained on the function of EVs. According to the evidence mentioned above, EV analysis has the potential to pave the way to a new perspective on asthma endotyping by uncovering the communication among immune and epithelial cells. In particular, EVs could be helpful in the understanding of the inflammatory mechanisms that could drive inflammation in different asthma endotypes. Taken together, the available evidence supports the relevance of EVs as valuable markers of asthma molecular profile and severity. On the other hand, they remain quite limited to the research setting as they require specific tools and expertise to be measured and interpreted. Ensuring the safety and purity of exosome samples is essential, especially in research and medical applications. When used in medical treatments, exosomes must undergo rigorous safety testing and comply with all regulatory standards before being administered to patients [155]. As a further, future perspective, EVs could be considered potential targets for new extremely selective therapeutic approaches.

6. Conclusions

Traditional Th1/Th2-based phenotyping, especially when relying on routinely available biomarkers, lacks accuracy in capturing the complexity of the immunological background underlying asthma pathobiology. In a clinical context, it might hamper asthma patients’ correct classification and consequently the treatment selection process. EVs can be considered as dynamic biomarkers providing the unique opportunity to “track” the cell-to-cell cross-talk which is ongoing at the time of observation [156]. Under a pathobiological perspective, EV assessment might pave the way to a better understanding of asthma inflammation and to an innovative way of endo-phenotyping besides traditional Th1/Th2 labels and related biomarkers [138]. At the moment, a major limitation is represented by the applicability of EVs assessment in everyday clinical practice. This is basically related to the lab procedures required for EVs investigation and to the lack of standardized reference values validated on large population samples.
Additionally, due to the complexity of their biogenesis and heterogeneity, further research is needed to fully understand their biological functions and therapeutic potential. To maximize their clinical benefits, future advancements should focus on enhancing targeted delivery, developing scalable and reproducible isolation methods, and refining exosome engineering techniques.
However, although still limited to translational research, EVs exploration seems a promising field for advancing the knowledge on the disease mechanisms and potentially highlighting therapeutic targets.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was performed, in part, in the LURM (Laboratorio Universitario di Ricerca Medica) Research Center, University of Verona, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AD-MSCsAdipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cell
AERDAspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease
AHRAirway hyperresponsiveness
APCAntigen-presenting cell
ASCsAdipose-derived stem cells
ASMAirway smooth muscle
BALFBronchoalveolar lavage fluid
BECsBronchial epithelial cells
BMMCsBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
BSMCsBronchial smooth muscle cells
circCircular
cysLTCysteinyl leukotrienes
DCsDendritic cells
DRMsDetergent-resistant membrane microdomains
ECPEosinophil cationic protein
EDNEosinophil-derived neurotoxin
EPXEosinophil peroxidase
ETMEpithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
EVsExtracellular vesicles
FeNONitric oxide
FGM1Fibroblast growth factor 1
GM-CSFGranulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor
hUCMSCsHuman umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells
Hypo-EVsHypoxic hUCMSC-EVs
IFN-γInterferon-gamma
IgEImmunoglobulin E
ISEVInternational Society for Extracellular Vesicles
LAMP1Liposomal-associated membrane protein 1
LFA1Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1
lncLong noncoding
LPSLipopolysaccharide
MBPMajor basic protein
MCsMast cells
MHCMajor histocompatibility complex
miRNAsMicroRNAs
MSC-EVsMSC-derived extracellular vesicles
MSCsMesenchymal stem cells
NHBENormal human bronchial epithelial cells
NONitric oxide
NTANanoparticle tracking analysis
PDCsPlasmacytoid
PSPhosphatidylserine
ROSReactive oxygen species
SSRASevere steroid-resistant asthma
TCRT cell receptor
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
TFTissue factor
TregsRegulatory T cells
UCMSC-EVsUmbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs

References

  1. Holgate, S.T.; Wenzel, S.; Postma, D.S.; Weiss, S.T.; Renz, H.; Sly, P.D. Asthma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kuruvilla, M.E.; Lee, F.E.-H.; Lee, G.B. Understanding Asthma Phenotypes, Endotypes, and Mechanisms of Disease. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 56, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ricciardolo, F.L.M.; Guida, G.; Bertolini, F.; Di Stefano, A.; Carriero, V. Phenotype Overlap in the Natural History of Asthma. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2023, 32, 220201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Popović-Grle, S.; Štajduhar, A.; Lampalo, M.; Rnjak, D. Biomarkers in Different Asthma Phenotypes. Genes 2021, 12, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ozyigit, L.P.; Morita, H.; Akdis, M. Innate Lymphocyte Cells in Asthma Phenotypes. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2015, 5, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, S.; Jeong, Y.; Ashraf, M.U.; Bae, Y.-S. Dendritic Cell-Mediated Th2 Immunity and Immune Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Srinivasan, A.; Sundar, I.K. Recent Updates on the Role of Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathogenesis of Allergic Asthma. Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucl. Acids 2021, 2, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sugita, K.; Soyka, M.B.; Wawrzyniak, P.; Rinaldi, A.O.; Mitamura, Y.; Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A. Outside-in Hypothesis Revisited: The Role of Microbial, Epithelial, and Immune Interactions. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020, 125, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Habib, N.; Pasha, M.A.; Tang, D.D. Current Understanding of Asthma Pathogenesis and Biomarkers. Cells 2022, 11, 2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akar-Ghibril, N.; Casale, T.; Custovic, A.; Phipatanakul, W. Allergic Endotypes and Phenotypes of Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020, 8, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Porpodis, K.; Tsiouprou, I.; Apostolopoulos, A.; Ntontsi, P.; Fouka, E.; Papakosta, D.; Vliagoftis, H.; Domvri, K. Eosinophilic Asthma, Phenotypes-Endotypes and Current Biomarkers of Choice. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johnstone, R.M.; Adam, M.; Hammond, J.R.; Orr, L.; Turbide, C. Vesicle Formation during Reticulocyte Maturation. Association of Plasma Membrane Activities with Released Vesicles (Exosomes). J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 9412–9420. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.-F.; Luh, F.; Ho, Y.-S.; Yen, Y. Exosomes: A Review of Biologic Function, Diagnostic and Targeted Therapy Applications, and Clinical Trials. J. Biomed. Sci. 2024, 31, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kalluri, R.; LeBleu, V.S. The Biology, Function, and Biomedical Applications of Exosomes. Science 2020, 367, eaau6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Purghè, B.; Manfredi, M.; Ragnoli, B.; Baldanzi, G.; Malerba, M. Exosomes in Chronic Respiratory Diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 144, 112270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Modani, S.; Tomar, D.; Tangirala, S.; Sriram, A.; Mehra, N.K.; Kumar, R.; Khatri, D.K.; Singh, P.K. An Updated Review on Exosomes: Biosynthesis to Clinical Applications. J. Drug Target. 2021, 29, 925–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Tang, W.H. Exosomes: Biogenesis, Biologic Function and Clinical Potential. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghadami, S.; Dellinger, K. The Lipid Composition of Extracellular Vesicles: Applications in Diagnostics and Therapeutic Delivery. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1198044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verderio, C.; Gabrielli, M.; Giussani, P. Role of Sphingolipids in the Biogenesis and Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1325–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, W.; Zhu, N.; Yan, T.; Shi, Y.-N.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C.-J.; Xie, X.-J.; Liao, D.-F.; Qin, L. The Crosstalk: Exosomes and Lipid Metabolism. Cell Commun. Signal 2020, 18, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vatrella, A.; Maglio, A.; Pelaia, C.; Ciampo, L.; Pelaia, G.; Vitale, C. Eosinophilic Inflammation: An Appealing Target for Pharmacologic Treatments in Severe Asthma. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gurung, S.; Perocheau, D.; Touramanidou, L.; Baruteau, J. The Exosome Journey: From Biogenesis to Uptake and Intracellular Signalling. Cell Commun. Signal 2021, 19, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, X.; Xia, J.; Yang, L.; Dai, J.; He, L. Recent Progress in Exosome Research: Isolation, Characterization and Clinical Applications. Cancer Gene Ther. 2023, 30, 1051–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kowal, J.; Tkach, M.; Théry, C. Biogenesis and Secretion of Exosomes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 29, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, K.W.A.; Chan, L.K.W.; Hung, L.C.; Phoebe, L.K.W.; Park, Y.; Yi, K.-H. Clinical Applications of Exosomes: A Critical Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA Delivery by Extracellular Vesicles in Mammalian Cells and Its Applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Turchinovich, A.; Drapkina, O.; Tonevitsky, A. Transcriptome of Extracellular Vesicles: State-of-the-Art. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cañas, J.A.; Sastre, B.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Del Pozo, V. Exosomes: A New Approach to Asthma Pathology. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 495, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mortaz, E.; Alipoor, S.D.; Varahram, M.; Jamaati, H.; Garssen, J.; Mumby, S.E.; Adcock, I.M. Exosomes in Severe Asthma: Update in Their Roles and Potential in Therapy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 2862187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sastre, B.; Cañas, J.A.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Del Pozo, V. Novel Modulators of Asthma and Allergy: Exosomes and MicroRNAs. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Torregrosa Paredes, P.; Esser, J.; Admyre, C.; Nord, M.; Rahman, Q.K.; Lukic, A.; Rådmark, O.; Grönneberg, R.; Grunewald, J.; Eklund, A.; et al. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Exosomes Contribute to Cytokine and Leukotriene Production in Allergic Asthma. Allergy 2012, 67, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alashkar Alhamwe, B.; Potaczek, D.P.; Miethe, S.; Alhamdan, F.; Hintz, L.; Magomedov, A.; Garn, H. Extracellular Vesicles and Asthma—More Than Just a Co-Existence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, N.; Wang, Q.; Du, T.; Gabriel, A.N.A.; Wang, X.; Sun, L.; Li, X.; Xu, K.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y. The Potential Roles of Exosomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 618506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gangadaran, P.; Madhyastha, H.; Madhyastha, R.; Rajendran, R.L.; Nakajima, Y.; Watanabe, N.; Velikkakath, A.K.G.; Hong, C.M.; Gopi, R.V.; Muthukalianan, G.K.; et al. The Emerging Role of Exosomes in Innate Immunity, Diagnosis and Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1085057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tienda-Vázquez, M.A.; Hanel, J.M.; Márquez-Arteaga, E.M.; Salgado-Álvarez, A.P.; Scheckhuber, C.Q.; Alanis-Gómez, J.R.; Espinoza-Silva, J.I.; Ramos-Kuri, M.; Hernández-Rosas, F.; Melchor-Martínez, E.M.; et al. Exosomes: A Promising Strategy for Repair, Regeneration and Treatment of Skin Disorders. Cells 2023, 12, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cañas, J.A.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Gil-Martínez, M.; Sastre, B.; Pozo, V. del Exosomes: A Key Piece in Asthmatic Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Caminati, M.; Pham, D.L.; Bagnasco, D.; Canonica, G.W. Type 2 Immunity in Asthma. World Allergy Organ. J. 2018, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alladina, J.; Medoff, B.D.; Cho, J.L. Innate Immunity and Asthma Exacerbations: Insights from Human Models. Immunol. Rev. 2025, 330, e70016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duffus, E.K.; Holguin, F.; Rastogi, D. Non-T2 Asthma. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2025, 31, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calvén, J.; Ax, E.; Rådinger, M. The Airway Epithelium-A Central Player in Asthma Pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.; Gu, W.; Tan, J.; Jiang, W.; Ji, W. Exosomes from Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin-Activated Dendritic Cells Promote Th2 Differentiation through the OX40 Ligand. Pathobiology 2019, 86, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pilette, C. Role of Exosomes in Allergic Asthma: Signaling Platforms between the Epithelium and Type 2 Immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 1478–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kulshreshtha, A.; Ahmad, T.; Agrawal, A.; Ghosh, B. Proinflammatory Role of Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomes in Allergic Airway Inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 1194–1203.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kesimer, M.; Gupta, R. Physical Characterization and Profiling of Airway Epithelial Derived Exosomes Using Light Scattering. Methods 2015, 87, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, Y.; Wang, M.; Xie, J.; Jiao, L.; Ding, Y.; Luo, Y. Exposure to Ephedrine Attenuates Th1/Th2 Imbalance Underlying OVA-Induced Asthma through Airway Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomal Lnc-TRPM2-AS. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2024, 22, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, M.; Yu, Q.; Tang, W.; Wu, Y.; Lv, J.; Sun, L.; Shi, G.; Wu, M.; Qu, J.; Di, C.; et al. Epithelial Exosomal Contactin-1 Promotes Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell-Dominant T-Cell Responses in Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mitchel, J.A.; Antoniak, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; McGill, M.; Kasahara, D.I.; Randell, S.H.; Israel, E.; Shore, S.A.; Mackman, N.; et al. IL-13 Augments Compressive Stress-Induced Tissue Factor Expression in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 54, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, J.-A.; Sharif, A.S.; Tschumperlin, D.J.; Lau, L.; Limbrey, R.; Howarth, P.; Drazen, J.M. Tissue Factor-Bearing Exosome Secretion from Human Mechanically Stimulated Bronchial Epithelial Cells in Vitro and in Vivo. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 130, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zareba, L.; Szymanski, J.; Homoncik, Z.; Czystowska-Kuzmicz, M. EVs from BALF—Mediators of Inflammation and Potential Biomarkers in Lung Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mwase, C.; Schworer, S.A.; Gilmore, R.C.; Khan, F.; Dy, A.B.C.; Haber, A.L.; Boucher, R.C., Jr.; Randell, S.H.; Mackman, N.; Park, J.-A. TGF-β Receptor-Dependent Tissue Factor Release and Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicles from Mechanically Compressed Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, X.; Corry, D.B.; Li, E. Mechanisms of Allergy and Adult Asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 20, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Haj-Salem, I.; Plante, S.; Gounni, A.S.; Rouabhia, M.; Chakir, J. Fibroblast-Derived Exosomes Promote Epithelial Cell Proliferation through TGF-Β2 Signalling Pathway in Severe Asthma. Allergy 2018, 73, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bartel, S.; La Grutta, S.; Cilluffo, G.; Perconti, G.; Bongiovanni, A.; Giallongo, A.; Behrends, J.; Kruppa, J.; Hermann, S.; Chiang, D.; et al. Human Airway Epithelial Extracellular Vesicle miRNA Signature Is Altered upon Asthma Development. Allergy 2020, 75, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Huang, A.; Yang, Y.; Chen, S.; Xia, F.; Sun, D.; Fang, D.; Xiong, S.; Jin, L.; Zhang, J. MiR-34a Promotes DCs Development and Inhibits Their Function on T Cell Activation by Targeting WNT1. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17191–17201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Loffredo, L.F.; Abdala-Valencia, H.; Anekalla, K.R.; Cuervo-Pardo, L.; Gottardi, C.J.; Berdnikovs, S. Beyond Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Common Suppression of Differentiation Programs Underlies Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction in Mild, Moderate, and Severe Asthma. Allergy 2017, 72, 1988–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Long, C.M.; Lukomska, E.; Marshall, N.B.; Nayak, A.; Anderson, S.E. Potential Inhibitory Influence of miRNA 210 on Regulatory T Cells during Epicutaneous Chemical Sensitization. Genes 2016, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boonpiyathad, T.; Sözener, Z.C.; Satitsuksanoa, P.; Akdis, C.A. Immunologic Mechanisms in Asthma. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 46, 101333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gigon, L.; Yousefi, S.; Karaulov, A.; Simon, H.-U. Mechanisms of Toxicity Mediated by Neutrophil and Eosinophil Granule Proteins. Allergol. Int. 2021, 70, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sangaphunchai, P.; Todd, I.; Fairclough, L.C. Extracellular Vesicles and Asthma: A Review of the Literature. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2020, 50, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Barnes, P.J. Th2 Cytokines and Asthma: An Introduction. Respir. Res. 2001, 2, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mazzeo, C.; Cañas, J.A.; Zafra, M.P.; Rojas Marco, A.; Fernández-Nieto, M.; Sanz, V.; Mittelbrunn, M.; Izquierdo, M.; Baixaulli, F.; Sastre, J.; et al. Exosome Secretion by Eosinophils: A Possible Role in Asthma Pathogenesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1603–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pastor, L.; Vera, E.; Marin, J.M.; Sanz-Rubio, D. Extracellular Vesicles from Airway Secretions: New Insights in Lung Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cañas, J.A.; Sastre, B.; Mazzeo, C.; Fernández-Nieto, M.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; González-Guerra, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Barranco, P.; Quirce, S.; Sastre, J.; et al. Exosomes from Eosinophils Autoregulate and Promote Eosinophil Functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017, 101, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cañas, J.A.; Sastre, B.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Fernández-Nieto, M.; Barranco, P.; Quirce, S.; Sastre, J.; Del Pozo, V. Eosinophil-Derived Exosomes Contribute to Asthma Remodelling by Activating Structural Lung Cells. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Gil-Martínez, M.; Sastre, B.; Del Pozo, V. Emerging Evidence for Pleiotropism of Eosinophils. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mahmudi-Azer, S.; Downey, G.P.; Moqbel, R. Translocation of the Tetraspanin CD63 in Association with Human Eosinophil Mediator Release. Blood 2002, 99, 4039–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Akuthota, P.; Melo, R.C.N.; Spencer, L.A.; Weller, P.F. MHC Class II and CD9 in Human Eosinophils Localize to Detergent-Resistant Membrane Microdomains. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012, 46, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sastre, B.; Rodrigo-Muñoz, J.M.; Garcia-Sanchez, D.A.; Cañas, J.A.; Del Pozo, V. Eosinophils: Old Players in a New Game. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 28, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. van Oosterhout, A.J.M.; Bloksma, N. Regulatory T-Lymphocytes in Asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 918–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Inclan-Rico, J.M.; Ponessa, J.J.; Siracusa, M.C. Contributions of Innate Lymphocytes to Allergic Responses. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 19, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lindell, D.M.; Berlin, A.A.; Schaller, M.A.; Lukacs, N.W. B Cell Antigen Presentation Promotes Th2 Responses and Immunopathology during Chronic Allergic Lung Disease. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Satitsuksanoa, P.; Iwasaki, S.; Boersma, J.; Bel Imam, M.; Schneider, S.R.; Chang, I.; van de Veen, W.; Akdis, M. B Cells: The Many Facets of B Cells in Allergic Diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023, 152, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Afzal, A.; Khawar, M.B.; Habiba, U.; Afzal, H.; Hamid, S.E.; Rafiq, M.; Abbasi, M.H.; Sheikh, N.; Abaidullah, R.; Asif, Z.; et al. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of EVs in Lungs Diseases and Inflammation. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 51, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Clayton, A.; Turkes, A.; Navabi, H.; Mason, M.D.; Tabi, Z. Induction of Heat Shock Proteins in B-Cell Exosomes. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 3631–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Admyre, C.; Bohle, B.; Johansson, S.M.; Focke-Tejkl, M.; Valenta, R.; Scheynius, A.; Gabrielsson, S. B Cell-Derived Exosomes Can Present Allergen Peptides and Activate Allergen-Specific T Cells to Proliferate and Produce TH2-like Cytokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 1418–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Admyre, C.; Johansson, S.M.; Paulie, S.; Gabrielsson, S. Direct Exosome Stimulation of Peripheral Human T Cells Detected by ELISPOT. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 1772–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Raposo, G.; Nijman, H.W.; Stoorvogel, W.; Liejendekker, R.; Harding, C.V.; Melief, C.J.; Geuze, H.J. B Lymphocytes Secrete Antigen-Presenting Vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vincent-Schneider, H.; Stumptner-Cuvelette, P.; Lankar, D.; Pain, S.; Raposo, G.; Benaroch, P.; Bonnerot, C. Exosomes Bearing HLA-DR1 Molecules Need Dendritic Cells to Efficiently Stimulate Specific T Cells. Int. Immunol. 2002, 14, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hazrati, A.; Soudi, S.; Malekpour, K.; Mahmoudi, M.; Rahimi, A.; Hashemi, S.M.; Varma, R.S. Immune Cells-Derived Exosomes Function as a Double-Edged Sword: Role in Disease Progression and Their Therapeutic Applications. Biomark. Res. 2022, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Calvo, V.; Izquierdo, M. Inducible Polarized Secretion of Exosomes in T and B Lymphocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Peng, H.; Huyan, T.; Cacalano, N.A. Exosomes: Versatile Nano Mediators of Immune Regulation. Cancers 2019, 11, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ventimiglia, L.N.; Alonso, M.A. Biogenesis and Function of T Cell-Derived Exosomes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shefler, I.; Salamon, P.; Mekori, Y.A. Extracellular Vesicles as Emerging Players in Intercellular Communication: Relevance in Mast Cell-Mediated Pathophysiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, H.; Xie, Y.; Li, W.; Chibbar, R.; Xiong, S.; Xiang, J. CD4+ T Cell-Released Exosomes Inhibit CD8+ Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses and Antitumor Immunity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2011, 8, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Harker, J.A.; Lloyd, C.M. T Helper 2 Cells in Asthma. J. Exp. Med. 2023, 220, e20221094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Shefler, I.; Salamon, P.; Reshef, T.; Mor, A.; Mekori, Y.A. T Cell-Induced Mast Cell Activation: A Role for Microparticles Released from Activated T Cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 4206–4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bunn, K.E.; Giese-Byrne, B.G.; Pua, H.H. Th2 Cell Extracellular Vesicles Promote Eosinophil Survival through the Cytokine Cargo IL-3 and Prolong Airway Eosinophilia. bioRxiv 2024, 2024.07.23.600647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Maurer, M.; Theoharides, T.; Granstein, R.D.; Bischoff, S.C.; Bienenstock, J.; Henz, B.; Kovanen, P.; Piliponsky, A.M.; Kambe, N.; Vliagoftis, H.; et al. What Is the Physiological Function of Mast Cells? Exp. Dermatol. 2003, 12, 886–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dileepan, K.N.; Raveendran, V.V.; Sharma, R.; Abraham, H.; Barua, R.; Singh, V.; Sharma, R.; Sharma, M. Mast Cell-Mediated Immune Regulation in Health and Disease. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1213320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deho’, L.; Monticelli, S. Human Mast Cells and Mastocytosis: Harnessing microRNA Expression as a New Approach to Therapy? Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2010, 58, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Krystel-Whittemore, M.; Dileepan, K.N.; Wood, J.G. Mast Cell: A Multi-Functional Master Cell. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lecce, M.; Molfetta, R.; Milito, N.D.; Santoni, A.; Paolini, R. FcεRI Signaling in the Modulation of Allergic Response: Role of Mast Cell-Derived Exosomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Merluzzi, S.; Betto, E.; Ceccaroni, A.A.; Magris, R.; Giunta, M.; Mion, F. Mast Cells, Basophils and B Cell Connection Network. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zou, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y. MicroRNA-21 Released from Mast Cells-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Drives Asthma in Mice by Potentiating Airway Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 7475–7491. [Google Scholar]
  95. Skokos, D.; Le Panse, S.; Villa, I.; Rousselle, J.C.; Peronet, R.; David, B.; Namane, A.; Mécheri, S. Mast Cell-Dependent B and T Lymphocyte Activation Is Mediated by the Secretion of Immunologically Active Exosomes. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-Mediated Transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs Is a Novel Mechanism of Genetic Exchange between Cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xie, G.; Yang, H.; Peng, X.; Lin, L.; Wang, J.; Lin, K.; Cui, Z.; Li, J.; Xiao, H.; Liang, Y.; et al. Mast Cell Exosomes Can Suppress Allergic Reactions by Binding to IgE. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 788–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Eldh, M.; Ekström, K.; Valadi, H.; Sjöstrand, M.; Olsson, B.; Jernås, M.; Lötvall, J. Exosomes Communicate Protective Messages during Oxidative Stress; Possible Role of Exosomal Shuttle RNA. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Xue, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, T.; Jiao, L.; An, Q.; Liu, B.; Wang, J.; et al. Exosomes from IgE-Stimulated Mast Cells Aggravate Asthma-Mediated Atherosclerosis Through circRNA CDR1as-Mediated Endothelial Cell Dysfunction in Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2024, 44, e99–e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sabado, R.L.; Bhardwaj, N. Directing Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy towards Successful Cancer Treatment. Immunotherapy 2010, 2, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gaurav, R.; Agrawal, D.K. Clinical View on the Importance of Dendritic Cells in Asthma. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 9, 899–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lamiable, O.; Mayer, J.U.; Munoz-Erazo, L.; Ronchese, F. Dendritic Cells in Th2 Immune Responses and Allergic Sensitization. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2020, 98, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Theofani, E.; Tsitsopoulou, A.; Morianos, I.; Semitekolou, M. Severe Asthmatic Responses: The Impact of TSLP. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wahlund, C.J.E.; Güclüler, G.; Hiltbrunner, S.; Veerman, R.E.; Näslund, T.I.; Gabrielsson, S. Exosomes from Antigen-Pulsed Dendritic Cells Induce Stronger Antigen-Specific Immune Responses than Microvesicles in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huang, F.; Jia, H.; Zou, Y.; Yao, Y.; Deng, Z. Exosomes: An Important Messenger in the Asthma Inflammatory Microenvironment. J. Int. Med. Res. 2020, 48, 300060520903220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Esser, J.; Gehrmann, U.; D’Alexandri, F.L.; Hidalgo-Estévez, A.M.; Wheelock, C.E.; Scheynius, A.; Gabrielsson, S.; Rådmark, O. Exosomes from Human Macrophages and Dendritic Cells Contain Enzymes for Leukotriene Biosynthesis and Promote Granulocyte Migration. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 1032–1040, 1040.e1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kawasaki, T.; Ikegawa, M.; Kawai, T. Antigen Presentation in the Lung. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 860915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Vroman, H.; Hendriks, R.W.; Kool, M. Dendritic Cell Subsets in Asthma: Impaired Tolerance or Exaggerated Inflammation? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yamasaki, A.; Okazaki, R.; Harada, T. Neutrophils and Asthma. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Seys, S.F.; Lokwani, R.; Simpson, J.L.; Bullens, D.M.A. New Insights in Neutrophilic Asthma. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2019, 25, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. De Volder, J.; Vereecke, L.; Joos, G.; Maes, T. Targeting Neutrophils in Asthma: A Therapeutic Opportunity? Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 182, 114292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ray, A.; Kolls, J.K. Neutrophilic Inflammation in Asthma and Association with Disease Severity. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 942–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Vargas, A.; Roux-Dalvai, F.; Droit, A.; Lavoie, J.-P. Neutrophil-Derived Exosomes: A New Mechanism Contributing to Airway Smooth Muscle Remodeling. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 55, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Xie, Y.; Abel, P.W.; Casale, T.B.; Tu, Y. TH17 Cells and Corticosteroid Insensitivity in Severe Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Di, C.; Zhao, C.; Chen, J.; Su, W.; Wu, Q.; Wu, M.; Su, X.; Xia, Z. Increased Airway Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomes Activate Macrophage-Mediated Allergic Inflammation via CD100 Shedding. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 8850–8862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Butin-Israeli, V.; Houser, M.C.; Feng, M.; Thorp, E.B.; Nusrat, A.; Parkos, C.A.; Sumagin, R. Deposition of Microparticles by Neutrophils onto Inflamed Epithelium: A New Mechanism to Disrupt Epithelial Intercellular Adhesions and Promote Transepithelial Migration. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 4007–4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, X.-Y.; Chen, Z.-C.; Li, N.; Wang, Z.-H.; Guo, Y.-L.; Tian, C.-J.; Cheng, D.-J.; Tang, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.-X. Exosomal Transfer of Activated Neutrophil-Derived lncRNA CRNDE Promotes Proliferation and Migration of Airway Smooth Muscle Cells in Asthma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2022, 31, 638–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Genschmer, K.R.; Russell, D.W.; Lal, C.; Szul, T.; Bratcher, P.E.; Noerager, B.D.; Abdul Roda, M.; Xu, X.; Rezonzew, G.; Viera, L.; et al. Activated PMN Exosomes: Pathogenic Entities Causing Matrix Destruction and Disease in the Lung. Cell 2019, 176, 113–126.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Arora, S.; Dev, K.; Agarwal, B.; Das, P.; Syed, M.A. Macrophages: Their Role, Activation and Polarization in Pulmonary Diseases. Immunobiology 2018, 223, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shanley, L.C.; Mahon, O.R.; Kelly, D.J.; Dunne, A. Harnessing the Innate and Adaptive Immune System for Tissue Repair and Regeneration: Considering More than Macrophages. Acta Biomater. 2021, 133, 208–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Komlósi, Z.I.; van de Veen, W.; Kovács, N.; Szűcs, G.; Sokolowska, M.; O’Mahony, L.; Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Allergic Asthma. Mol. Asp. Med. 2022, 85, 100995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Muraille, E.; Leo, O.; Moser, M. Th1/Th2 Paradigm Extended: Macrophage Polarization as an Unappreciated Pathogen-Driven Escape Mechanism? Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abdelaziz, M.H.; Abdelwahab, S.F.; Wan, J.; Cai, W.; Huixuan, W.; Jianjun, C.; Kumar, K.D.; Vasudevan, A.; Sadek, A.; Su, Z.; et al. Alternatively Activated Macrophages; a Double-Edged Sword in Allergic Asthma. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Barnes, P.J. Immunology of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gharavi, A.T.; Hanjani, N.A.; Movahed, E.; Doroudian, M. The Role of Macrophage Subtypes and Exosomes in Immunomodulation. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022, 27, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Alobaidi, A.H.; Alsamarai, A.M.; Alsamarai, M.A. Inflammation in Asthma Pathogenesis: Role of T Cells, Macrophages, Epithelial Cells and Type 2 Inflammation. Antiinflamm. Antiallergy Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 20, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nagano, T.; Katsurada, M.; Dokuni, R.; Hazama, D.; Kiriu, T.; Umezawa, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Nishimura, Y. Crucial Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Bronchial Asthma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hansbro, P.M.; Kim, R.Y.; Starkey, M.R.; Donovan, C.; Dua, K.; Mayall, J.R.; Liu, G.; Hansbro, N.G.; Simpson, J.L.; Wood, L.G.; et al. Mechanisms and Treatments for Severe, Steroid-Resistant Allergic Airway Disease and Asthma. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 278, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, C.; Deng, C.; Zhou, T.; Hu, J.; Dai, B.; Yi, F.; Tian, N.; Jiang, L.; Dong, X.; Zhu, Q.; et al. MicroRNA-370 Carried by M2 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Alleviates Asthma Progression through Inhibiting the FGF1/MAPK/STAT1 Axis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 1795–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Abbaszadeh, H.; Ghorbani, F.; Abbaspour-Aghdam, S.; Kamrani, A.; Valizadeh, H.; Nadiri, M.; Sadeghi, A.; Shamsasenjan, K.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Roshangar, L.; et al. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Therapeutic Tools. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Y. Mesenchymal Stem Extracellular Vesicles in Various Respiratory Diseases: A New Opportunity. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024, 17, 9041–9058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Fujita, Y.; Kadota, T.; Araya, J.; Ochiya, T.; Kuwano, K. Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-Based Therapeutics for Inflammatory Lung Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kim, R.L.; Bang, J.-Y.; Kim, J.; Mo, Y.; Kim, Y.; Lee, C.-G.; Elias, J.A.; Kim, H.Y.; Kang, H.-R. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exert Their Anti-Asthmatic Effects through Macrophage Modulation in a Murine Chronic Asthma Model. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mun, S.J.; Kang, S.A.; Park, H.-K.; Yu, H.S.; Cho, K.-S.; Roh, H.-J. Intranasally Administered Extracellular Vesicles from Adipose Stem Cells Have Immunomodulatory Effects in a Mouse Model of Asthma. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 6686625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. de Castro, L.L.; Xisto, D.G.; Kitoko, J.Z.; Cruz, F.F.; Olsen, P.C.; Redondo, P.A.G.; Ferreira, T.P.T.; Weiss, D.J.; Martins, M.A.; Morales, M.M.; et al. Human Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles Act Differentially on Lung Mechanics and Inflammation in Experimental Allergic Asthma. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Worthington, E.N.; Hagood, J.S. Therapeutic Use of Extracellular Vesicles for Acute and Chronic Lung Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, X.; Yang, N. Exosome miR-223-3p in the Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviates the Inflammation and Airway Remodeling through NLRP3-Induced ASC/Caspase-1/GSDMD Signaling Pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 123, 110746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhuansun, Y.; Du, Y.; Huang, F.; Lin, L.; Chen, R.; Jiang, S.; Li, J. MSCs Exosomal miR-1470 Promotes the Differentiation of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs in Asthmatic Patients by Inducing the Expression of P27KIP1. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 77, 105981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shan, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Shang, Y. Human Bone Marrow-Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal microRNA-188 Reduces Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation in Asthma through Suppressing the JARID2/Wnt/β-Catenin Axis. Cell Cycle 2022, 21, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Dong, B.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Gu, Y.; Guo, X.; Zuo, X.; Pan, H.; Hsu, A.C.-Y.; Wang, G.; et al. Exosomes from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate the Inflammation of Severe Steroid-Resistant Asthma by Reshaping Macrophage Polarization. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gu, W.; Zheng, T.; Li, W.; Luo, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Mao, C.; Ma, Y.; Dong, L. Migrasomes Derived from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A New Therapeutic Agent for Ovalbumin-Induced Asthma in Mice. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2025, 16, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Gao, X.; Gu, W.; Ma, Y.; Xu, L.; Yu, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; et al. A Non-Invasive Strategy for Suppressing Asthmatic Airway Inflammation and Remodeling: Inhalation of Nebulized Hypoxic hUCMSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1150971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Luo, X.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Xu, X.; Gu, W.; Li, W.; Mao, C.; Zheng, T.; Dong, L. Nebulization of Hypoxic hUCMSC-EVs Attenuates Airway Epithelial Barrier Defects in Chronic Asthma Mice by Transferring CAV-1. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 10941–10959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Chen, S.; Gao, J.; Zhang, T. From Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Their Extracellular Vesicles: Progress and Prospects for Asthma Therapy. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 19, 100942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jangam, T.C.; Desai, S.A.; Patel, V.P.; Pagare, N.B.; Raut, N.D. Exosomes as Therapeutic and Diagnostic Tools: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Dilsiz, N. A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advances in Exosome Isolation and Characterization: Toward Clinical Applications. Transl. Oncol. 2024, 50, 102121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lehrich, B.M.; Liang, Y.; Fiandaca, M.S. Foetal Bovine Serum Influence on in vitro Extracellular Vesicle Analyses. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Brennan, K.; Martin, K.; FitzGerald, S.P.; O’Sullivan, J.; Wu, Y.; Blanco, A.; Richardson, C.; Mc Gee, M.M. A Comparison of Methods for the Isolation and Separation of Extracellular Vesicles from Protein and Lipid Particles in Human Serum. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.I.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.P.; Erdbrügger, U.; et al. Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV2023): From Basic to Advanced Approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bobrie, A.; Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Théry, C. Exosome Secretion: Molecular Mechanisms and Roles in Immune Responses. Traffic 2011, 12, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. ElKashef, S.M.M.A.E.; Ahmad, S.E.-A.; Soliman, Y.M.A.; Mostafa, M.S. Role of microRNA-21 and microRNA-155 as Biomarkers for Bronchial Asthma. Innate Immun. 2021, 27, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Soccio, P.; Moriondo, G.; Lacedonia, D.; Tondo, P.; Pescatore, D.; Quarato, C.M.I.; Carone, M.; Foschino Barbaro, M.P.; Scioscia, G. MiRNA and Exosomal miRNA as New Biomarkers Useful to Phenotyping Severe Asthma. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Vázquez-Mera, S.; Martelo-Vidal, L.; Miguéns-Suárez, P.; Saavedra-Nieves, P.; Arias, P.; González-Fernández, C.; Mosteiro-Añón, M.; Corbacho-Abelaira, M.D.; Blanco-Aparicio, M.; Méndez-Brea, P.; et al. Serum Exosome Inflamma-miRs Are Surrogate Biomarkers for Asthma Phenotype and Severity. Allergy 2023, 78, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Chang, K.-J.; Baltimore, D. NF-kappaB-Dependent Induction of microRNA miR-146, an Inhibitor Targeted to Signaling Proteins of Innate Immune Responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12481–12486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zhang, Y.; Bi, J.; Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Du, S.; Li, P. Exosome: A Review of Its Classification, Isolation Techniques, Storage, Diagnostic and Targeted Therapy Applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 6917–6934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Jadamba, B.; Jin, Y.; Lee, H. Harmonising Cellular Conversations: Decoding the Vital Roles of Extracellular Vesicles in Respiratory System Intercellular Communications. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2024, 33, 230272. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.