Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress Induces a VEGF Autocrine Loop in the Retina: Relevance for Diabetic Retinopathy
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanistic Models of Signaling Pathways Reveal the Drug Action Mechanisms behind Gender-Specific Gene Expression for Cancer Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Exosomal miRNAs and the Tumor Microenvironment in Drug Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Induction of the Endoplasmic-Reticulum-Stress Response: MicroRNA-34a Targeting of the IRE1α-Branch
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy

1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Bengal School of Technology, Chuchura 712 102, India
2
Department of Phytochemistry, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, Asansol 713 301, India
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bengal College of Pharmaceutical Technology, Dubrajpur 731 123, India
4
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(6), 1451; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061451
Submission received: 20 May 2020 / Revised: 7 June 2020 / Accepted: 8 June 2020 / Published: 11 June 2020

Abstract

:
Cancer is a prevalent cause of mortality around the world. Aberrated activation of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway promotes tumorigenesis. Natural agents, including phytochemicals, exhibit potent anticancer activities via various mechanisms. However, the therapeutic potency of phytoconstituents as inhibitors of JAK/STAT signaling against cancer has only come into focus in recent days. The current review highlights phytochemicals that can suppress the JAK/STAT pathway in order to impede cancer cell growth. Various databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, SpringerLink, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched using relevant keywords. Once the authors were in agreement regarding the suitability of a study, a full-length form of the relevant article was obtained, and the information was gathered and cited. All the complete articles that were incorporated after the literature collection rejection criteria were applied were perused in-depth and material was extracted based on the importance, relevance, and advancement of the apprehending of the JAK/STAT pathway and their relation to phytochemicals. Based on the critical and comprehensive analysis of literature presented in this review, phytochemicals from diverse plant origins exert therapeutic and cancer preventive effects, at least in part, through regulation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Nevertheless, more preclinical and clinical research is necessary to completely comprehend the capability of modulating JAK/STAT signaling to achieve efficient cancer control and treatment.

1. Introduction

Cancer, a significant and serious medical issue, is driving mortality throughout the globe [1]. It is distinguished by uncontrolled and unscheduled cell multiplication. Tumors associated with viral or bacterial infection and genetic mutations are known to influence the cancer growth rates [2]. Although cancer is thought to be preventable, there are several factors that will increase the risk for developing it. Various risk factors, such as smoking and chewing tobacco, alcohol, obesity, chronic inflammation, age, ethnicity, and geographical location, are the major determinants for developing cancer [3]. Emerging research suggests that the majority of cancers are brought about by malfunction of numerous protein coded genes, such as antiapoptotic proteins, growth factors, receptors of growth factor, tumor suppressors, and transcription factors. These factors constitute the target for cancer prevention and treatment.
When tumors are formed, their abnormal cells obtain at least 10 common characteristics that describe the malignant tumor cell’s complexity, including proliferation, resistance to growth suppressors, avoidance of programmed cell death (apoptosis), unlimited ability to replicate, growth of fresh blood vessels, tissue invasion with risk of metastatic growth, genetic instability and mutation of high frequency, tumor-driven inflammation, altered metabolism, and compromised immunological surveillance [4,5]. During tumor advancement and malignant conversion, abnormal cells evade the mechanisms of host defense. Targeting and inhibiting the previously mentioned characteristics has been perceived as potential approaches to cancer treatment. Apart from conventional treatment, an additional area of interest among researchers is the utilization of alternative therapy, particularly using dietary sources to regulate these key mechanisms.
The idea of chemoprevention is receiving extensive awareness because it is a cost-effective option for cancer control when compared to conventional chemotherapy [6,7]. Cancer chemoprevention by utilizing natural and dietary compounds, particularly phytoconstituents, minerals, and vitamins, in different in vivo and in vitro conditions, has produced empowering results against several cancers [8,9,10,11,12]. Herbal medicines are emerging as new and innovative substances with astounding pharmaceutical potential that can be utilized to abate human ailments, including cancer [13,14]. No conclusive evidence has been found that herbal medicines can cure or treat cancer by themselves. Nevertheless, certain plant extracts, fractions, and pure compounds have been found to possess anticancer properties, and are used to develop chemotherapy medicines. For example, vincristine and vinblastine, the active constituents of Catharanthus roseus, and taxanes present in Pacific yew tree, are approved chemotherapy drugs.
There is a correlation between dietary habits and cancer development of certain cancers. Food contains different bioactive compounds that improve health and counteract cancer and other chronic diseases. These bioactive elements are found mostly in plants [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Various findings have led to the identification and development of phytocompounds for cancer prevention and therapy. Phytochemicals affect proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis evasion, and angiogenesis of cancer cells. Such phytoconstituents are beneficial by reducing the harmful impacts of chemotherapy and increasing the viability of traditional chemotherapy [21]. Dietary phytochemicals prevent carcinogenesis, a multistage mechanism that involves tumor formation, growth, malignant development, and progression. The mechanism of action of many phytochemicals that suppress the development of tumors in animal models involve modulation of molecular signal transduction pathways that react to various external signals, and are implicated in cancer development.
A significant signaling pathway implicated in initiating changes in gene expression is the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. Aberrated activation of this signaling pathway promotes tumorigenesis. Abnormal activation occurs when a ligand binds to its receptor constitutively or when tyrosine kinase is inappropriately stimulated [22]. The JAK/STAT signaling may act either directly or indirectly by triggering nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation [23]. Blocking JAK/STAT signaling in cancer cells can suppress the expression of target genes that control essential cell functions and hamper cancer cells from evading growth control mechanism, such as apoptosis and invasion. Therefore, antagonizing JAK/STAT signaling could obstruct the transformation of preneoplastic lesions into a malignant tumor.
Studies have demonstrated that numerous phytochemicals can interfere with the JAK/STAT signaling mechanism in human malignant cells. There are only a few previous reviews which provide an in-depth analysis of this interesting research area. Most of the prior publications focus either on a single phytochemical [24,25,26] or natural compounds that modulate various transcription factors, including STATs [27,28,29,30,31]. In this context, this review article aims to explore various naturally-occurring phytoconstituents that can suppress the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting growth of cancer cells caused by aberrated JAK/STAT signaling. We have presented and critically analyzed up-to-date research conducted on this topic to identify possible chemopreventive and therapeutic agents with established molecular targets.

2. Literature Search Methodology

We have followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to perform literature searches [32]. In vitro, in vivo, and human studies that explored the antiproliferative potency of phytoconstituents by inhibiting JAK/STAT pathway were screened using authentic databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, SpringerLink, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Relevant full articles published until January 2020 in peer-reviewed journals have been included. Conference abstracts, books, book chapters, and unpublished findings have not been included. Only papers published in the English language have been considered and included in this review. The major keywords used for literature search included cancer, tumor, proliferation, JAK, STAT, phytochemicals, polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, steroids, in vivo, in vitro, and clinical studies.

3. JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

The JAK/STAT signaling pathway serves as an important agent involved in functional responses. Three main proteins are involved in JAK/STAT signaling, including cell-surface, JAK, and STAT receptors. Upon activation of the receptor complex, STAT is phosphorylated on its retained tyrosine residues, which prompts the release of STAT from the receptor and the dimerization of two STAT molecules. The dimer then translocates into the nucleus wherein the dimer gets attached to DNA and stimulates the expression of genes that are responsive to cytokines [33,34]. Cytokines, including interferon (IFN) and interleukin (IL), attach to their unique receptors involved in the JAK/STAT pathway. This binding induces JAK to phosphorylate one another and afterward phosphorylate the receptor by itself at the receptor STAT protein binding sites. After binding, STAT is phosphorylated by JAK and separated from the receptor where they then bind with another STAT molecule to form a dimer. The STAT complex then travels into the nucleus, gets attached to DNA, and initiates gene expression that promotes tumor cell proliferation and survival (Figure 1). Such cytokines bind specific cytokine receptors, which are related to the JAK lineage [35,36]. Four types of mammalian JAKs exist, and they include tyrosine kinases 2 (TYK2), JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3.
Transcriptional activity and its functional roles are needed for dimerization of STATs through phosphorylation of tyrosine residues. This promotes and mediates binding of regulatory receptors with the formation of phosphorylated complex [37]. STAT dimerization regulates the process of phosphorylation by associating with the SH2 domain. In the 1990s, it was found that STAT proteins are IFN-directed genes [33,34,38]. Among primates, STATs consist of seven structurally distinct members: STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6 [39]. STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 were elevated in various human cancer cells [40]. Such proteins involve cytoplasmic transcription factors; for example, transduction of signals from hormones, cytokines, and growth factors. Furthermore, STATs have downstream effector roles [39,41]. STAT proteins regulate numerous cellular biological functions, including organogenesis, fetal growth, programed cell death, differentiation, growth, inflammation, and the immune system [42,43,44,45,46]. Inside the cytoplasm, STAT proteins remain as monomers; however, they produce dimers after phosphorylation of their tyrosine domains [37]. The dimer travels to the nucleus to empower transcriptional functions. In the formation of tumors, STATs are constitutively stimulated by tyrosine kinases, including Cluster-Abelson breakpoint (Bcr-Abl), JAK, Src, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
Unregulated JAK/STAT signaling contributes to proliferation, survival, inflammation, invasion, new blood vessel formation, and metastasis, which are implicated in cancer initiation, progression, and advancement [27].

4. JAK/STAT Inhibitors

4.1. JAK Inhibitors

In 1996, it was revealed that AG490, a pan-JAK inhibitor, had the ability to impede the occurrence of recurrent B-cell leukemia based on in vitro and in vivo studies [47]. Since then, natural components, including resveratrol, curcumin, piceatannol, and flavopiridol, have been preclinically examined and found to inhibit innumerable inflammatory pathways [48]. These pathways inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation, primarily through decreased cytokine production or as a direct JAKs inhibitor [49,50]. Further, after the JAK2 mutation was discovered in myeloproliferative disorders, orally bioavailable and more effective JAK inhibitors have been developed. According to preclinical studies in myeloproliferative models, these compounds are incredibly efficient in their ability to abrogate illness, which has stimulated clinical testing [51,52,53]. The well-known JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424 (Incyte Corp., Wilmington, DE, USA) has demonstrated huge clinical benefits (reduction of splenomegaly, night sweats, weakness, and irritation) correlating with a decline in proinflammatory cytokines release. INCB018424 is in the third phase of clinical trials [52]. Merely marginal reductions were observed in the burden of the mutated JAK2 allele. This may be due to insufficient suppression of the JAK2 kinase mutant, or because the disease is the responsibility of another signaler. The additional JAK inhibitors (XL019, CEP-701, and TG101348) have shown similar results; however, they possess different adverse events, which include anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, transaminitis, neurotoxicity, and gastrointestinal intolerance [52]. The potency, sensitivity (JAK1/2 versus JAK2), and half-life of both JAK inhibitors are the factors underlying their side effect variations. Critically, JAK1/2 is required for natural hematopoiesis and thrombocytopenia, and anemia may result from these medications unless specific dosing schedules or lower doses are provided [54]. AZD1480, a JAK 1/2 inhibitor, was evaluated in the treatment of interleukin-6 (IL-6)-driven cancers, including prostate, breast, and ovarian cancer. The results of this study showed that AZD1480 suppressed tumor growth [55]. Such drugs are presently being studied for solid tumors, including lymphomas, sarcomas, and carcinomas, in phase 1 clinical trials.

4.2. STAT Inhibitors

An ideal STAT3-binding site (like double-stranded DNA) was made and injected intratumorally or intravenously to cultured cells to aim STAT3 as a DNA-binding protein. It prevents the STAT3 dimer from binding to its targets by isolating it into the STAT3 decoy [56,57,58,59]. Elevation of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 was analyzed preclinically by the STAT3 decoy in neck and head squamous cell carcinomas. The significant levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT3 resulted in cancer cell apoptosis, resulting in lower tumor growth. Interaction between the decoy and other therapies has also been demonstrated. Currently, this STAT3 decoy is clinically studied in patients with head and neck cancer, and is less intrusive and readily accessible for local injection.
Direct STAT3 inhibitors have been explored, and the research has concentrated on designing agents influencing the SH2 domain by restricting STAT3 phosphorylation and/or dimerization. The primary STAT3 inhibitors, such as peptidomimetics and engineered small molecules, act by inhibiting phosphorylation of intracellular STAT3, DNA-binding, and transcriptional activities [60]. In comparison, peptidomimetics may be associated with nonphosphorylated monomeric proteins of STAT3 via pY-SH2 domain binding (the peptide or mimetic incorporates the pY motif in the SH2 domain of the STAT3 monomer) to create a hetero complex. It decreases the rates of free nonphosphorylated STAT3 monomers usable for phosphorylation and de novo activation. Some of these agents have decreased the progression of cancer in various preclinical models [60,61,62]. Regardless of the fact that those components demonstrated a fair sensitivity to repress the activity of STAT3, they were not clinically tested because of the high concentrations required for them to be effective [63]. The utilization of a chemical database of previously synthesized compounds in a luciferase reporter cell-based analysis prompted the discovery of transcription-dependent STAT3 and STAT5 inhibitors [64,65,66]. For example, nifuroxazide, a drug used to treat diarrhea, could effectively inhibit JAK2 and TYK2, while decreasing the p-STAT3 levels in multiple myeloma [67]. The antimalarial drug, pyrimethamine, has been described as an STAT3 inhibitor and a myeloma growth inhibitor. It is currently undergoing clinical trials to treat lymphocytic leukemia [65].
The appearance of mutant (dominant-negative forms) STATs has allowed for delineation of the specific function of domains or residues, and it has led to the discovery of the novel or noncanonical functions for the STATs as mediators of tumorigenesis [68,69]. It has been suggested that both noncanonical and canonical functions of individual STAT play a central role in the initiation and promotion of tumors. The canonical pathway is characterized as tyrosine phosphorylated STATs functioning as transcription factors. The noncanonical signaling embodies various functions of nontyrosine phosphorylated STATs, including mediation of DNA methylation, focal adhesions activation, and regulation of mitochondrial functions [70,71,72,73]. The noncanonical mechanism represents the activation of nontyrosine phosphorylated STAT3, inducing transcription in combination with NF-κB or CD44, which is situated in the mitochondria to control the synthesis of ATP, and then interacts with the stathmin (a microtubule-linking protein) to inflect cell motility [74,75]. STAT3–tubulin associations may be affected by microtubule-targeting agents, e.g., paclitaxel [76]. Moreover, STAT3 phosphorylated on its serine residue, but not on its tyrosine residue, can control transcription in chronic lymphoblastic leukemia [77]. STAT acetylation, ubiquitylation, and sumoylation functions are being examined in controlling tumor growth and metastasis. Subsequently, both nontyrosine and tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 perform significant roles in cancer cells, and this knowledge can be utilized to develop potential anticancer agents.

5. Phytochemicals Inhibiting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

Several bioactive phytocompounds have demonstrated that the JAK/STAT pathway is inhibited by various mechanisms. The JAK/STAT pathway comprises more than one site of action that phytochemicals can target. Phytochemicals can block this signaling pathway by reducing the levels of cytokines or growth hormones which trigger JAK/STAT protein activation. Phytochemicals can also act by stopping JAK phosphorylation before STAT activation. Controlling JAK/STAT signaling can be achieved by inhibiting STAT dimerization and by preventing the translocation of STAT dimer from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. The ultimate goal in the signaling pathway is to hinder the STAT–DNA binding, which directly inhibits JAK/STAT-regulated gene transcription. Phytochemicals may also control the JAK/STAT pathway by association with JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors, such as SHP [78,79,80,81]. Few phytochemicals can specifically block one target site, while others can control the JAK/STAT system at multiple sites. In the following sections, we analyze the experimental evidence of the capacity of various phytochemicals from diverse plant origin to regulate JAK/STAT pathway in various preclinical cancer models.

5.1. Phenolics and Polyphenols

These phytocompounds comprise 15-C atoms as well as one or several hydroxyl groups attached to one or multiple aromatic rings and they are water soluble. More than 8000 phenolic components exist in nature, with many found in various vegetables and fruits. These are metabolites of plants that are considered to confer numerous health benefits via different biochemical and pharmacological actions, such as anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial actions, as well as regulation of numerous cell signaling pathways.

5.1.1. Resveratrol

Resveratrol (also known as, trans-3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene, Figure 2), a compound present in peanuts, berries, and grapes, has been demonstrated as a potent chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent [82,83,84,85]. Resveratrol’s antiproliferative and cytotoxic functions have been associated with JAK/STAT pathway inhibition. Resveratrol obstructed JAK phosphorylation and, as a result, blocked STAT1 phosphorylation in human epidermoid carcinoma (A431) cells [86] (Table 1). The growth of human multiple myeloma cells was inhibited by resveratrol to overcome the chemoresistance by suppressing both the inducible and constitutive activation of STAT3, resulting in downregulation of antiapoptotic gene expressions [87]. Besides the inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, resveratrol was also found to suppress the function of Src tyrosine kinase, which consequently blocked STAT3’s action in specific cancer cells [88]. Resveratrol was effective in blocking both signaling channels for JAK/STAT and Src/STAT in in vitro experiments. A resveratrol analog, 3,4,5,4′-tetramethoxystilbene, repressed STAT3 phosphorylation and exhibited greater antitumor activity than resveratrol [89]. An experimental study showed that resveratrol was bound to the estrogen receptor, but it did not cause the proliferation of estrogenic cells. Interaction with resveratrol has been found to result in a viable IL-6 transporter, a potent STAT3 mediator [90]. It is important to note that resveratrol studies have been concentrated on the short-term results with constrained clinical research.

5.1.2. Curcumin

Curcumin is one of the most studied polyphenols for anticancer potential [91,92,93,94]. Curcumin is the key curcuminoid present in Curcuma longa L., (family Zingiberaceae). Curcumin is known to regulate the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Unlike resveratrol, curcumin blocked STAT3 phosphorylation, thereby blocking STAT3 dimer translocation from cytoplasm into the nucleus of human multiple myeloma cells [95]. Curcumin has been found to suppress STAT1, STAT3, JAK1, and JAK2 phosphorylation in microglia stimulated with gangliosides, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and/or microglia cells. It was also found that activation of Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-2 (SHP-2), a negative JAK behavior regulator, was the probable mechanism influencing the JAK/STAT signaling pathway for curcumin-mediated inhibition [78]. Additional research showed curcumin’s potential to reduce STAT3 phosphorylation in small-cell lung cancer cells by desensitizing the downstream target genes, which was accountable for cancer cell proliferation [96]. The constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway was also disrupted by curcumin in T-cell leukemia, in which it decreased JAK and STAT phosphorylation and resulted in growth arrest and subsequent apoptosis [97,98].

5.1.3. Ascochlorin

Ascochlorin, an isoprenoid antibiotic obtained from the fungus Ascochyta viciae Lib., has exhibited significant antiproliferative response in many tumor cell lines and in vivo experimental models [99]. Ascochlorin has been found to suppress the migration and invasion in two human glioblastoma cell lines (A172 and U373MG cells) by decreasing matrix metalloproteinase-2 gelatinolytic action and expression. To understand the underlying mechanism by which the ascochlorin smothered cell invasion and migration, the effect of ascochlorin on JAK/STAT signaling has been explored. Ascochlorin essentially diminished JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation and blocked translocation of STAT3 to the nucleus [100].

5.1.4. Bergamottin

Bergamottin, a furanocoumarin, is present in grape juice, lime, lemon, and bergamot oils. It is a potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agent [101]. In human multiple myeloma (U266) cells, bergamottin has been found to suppress a constitutive activation of STAT3. This effect was achieved through resisting phosphorylation of JAK 1/2 and c-Src. Furthermore, bergamottin induced the expression of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and the silencing of the SHP-1 gene by siRNA abrogated the capability of bergamottin to hinder STAT3 actuation, which is a crucial factor in bergamottin’s action on SHP-1. It has also been associated with downregulation of the expression of STAT3-directed genes, such as VEGF, COX-2, survivin, cyclin D1, Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, and inhibitor of apoptosis protein-1 (IAP-1). This is related to substantial increase in apoptosis associated with cell cycle arrest at sub-G1 phase and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage induced by caspase-3 [102].

5.1.5. Capillarisin

One of the principal bioactive components of Artemisia capillaries Thunb., capillarisin is a naturally-occurring chromone. It is an analogue of benzopyran, and a coumarin isomer. It explicitly restrained both constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation at tyrosine 705, but not at serine 727, in human multiple myeloma cells [103]. Other than hindering phosphorylation of STAT3, capillarisin hindered constitutive STAT3 movement and nuclear translocation. The concealment of STAT3 was interceded through the restraint of the activation of upstream JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src kinases. Interestingly, knockdown of the SHP-1 and SHP-2 genes by siRNA depressed the capability of capillarisin to hinder the activation of JAK1 and STAT3. This suggests that SHP-1 and SHP-2 play a vital role in its potential mechanism of action. Apart from this, capillarisin also downregulated the STAT3-controlled antiapoptotic (Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, survivin, and IAP-1) and proliferative (cyclin D1) gene expression levels, resulting in decrease in cell viability levels, cell cycle arrest at sub-G1 phase, and induction of cell apoptosis. Overall, capillarisin represents a potent inhibitor of STAT3 that can have a negative regulatory effect on the chemoresistance and metastasis of neoplastic cells [103].

5.1.6. Bavachin

Bavachin, a flavonoid, is derived from the seeds of Psoralea corylifolia Linn., (currently known as Cullen corylifolium (L.) Medik.). It is a phytoestrogen, which activates both the estrogen receptors, namely estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and ERβ. Bavachin diminished the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells; however, it is not cytotoxic to normal cells. It restrained the activation of STAT3 in multiple myeloma cell lines. Moreover, bavachin expanded the gene expression of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1 (PMAIP1, alternative known as Noxa) and p53. It also diminished the expression of Bcl-2, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), survivin, and B-cell lymphoma-extra-large (Bcl-xL). Furthermore, bavachin was found to induce apoptosis through caspase-3 and caspase-9 activation, confirming the participation of mitochondrial pathway. Overall, bavachin targets STAT3 and could be used for the treatment of multiple myeloma [104].

5.1.7. Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG)

EGCG is the catechin commonly present in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze), and it has demonstrated promising anticancer properties against many types of tumors [105,106,107,108]. A study conducted by Tang et al. (2012) [109] found that both the JAK3 and STAT3 protein phosphorylation and translation were diminished by EGCG in two human pancreatic cancer cell lines, namely AsPC-1 and PANC-1. The expressions of STAT3-directed genes in pancreatic cancer cells were also inhibited by EGCG. By subduing the bioavailability of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), it also decreased the level of IGF-mediated phosphorylated-STAT3 proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [110]. Several investigators have found that EGCG treatment suppressed the action of STAT3 in breast, head, and neck carcinoma cells [111,112]. Very recently, EGCG has been found to inhibit the proliferation of chronic myeloid leukemia cells by inducing apoptosis via inhibition of the Bcr/Abl oncoprotein and controlling its downstream pathways, such as p38-MAPK/JNK and JAK2/STAT3/AKT [113].

5.1.8. Emodin

Emodin (1,3,8-trihydroxy-6-methyl anthraquinone) is an anthraquinone obtained from Japanese knotweed, buckthorn, and rhubarb. It is also explicitly extracted from Rheum Palmatum L., as well as Socotrine aloe, Barbados aloe, and Zanzibar aloe. Additionally, it is found in numerous fungi species, including members of genera Pestalotiopsis, Pyrenochaeta, and Aspergillus. Emodin is known to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antitumor properties [114,115,116]. A study was conducted by He et al., [117] with 26S proteasome inhibitors by utilizing cell-based screening test in which emodin was reported as an effective human 26S proteasome inhibitor. Emodin hindered chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like actions of the human 26S proteasome and enhanced the ubiquitination of endogenous cell proteins. Molecular docking studies demonstrated that the orientation/conformation in the active pocket of the 1, 2, and 5 subunits of 26S proteasome was suitable for nucleophilic attack. Emodin stimulated the antiproliferative role of interferon α/β (IFN-α/β) by increasing the STAT1 phosphorylation, diminishing the STAT3 phosphorylation, and expanding the expression of an endogenous gene activated by IFN-α. It also repressed IFN-α-stimulated ubiquitination and type I interferon receptor 1 (IFNAR1) degradation. Moreover, it promoted the antiproliferative impact of IFN-α against HeLa cells (a cervical carcinoma cell line) and diminished the development of tumors in Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma-bearing mice. Based on the results, it is possible that emodin enhanced the antiproliferative action of IFN-α/β by the inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway through restraining 26S proteasome-stimulated IFNAR1 degradation [117].

5.1.9. Chalcones

Chalcones are flavonoids found in various fruits (oranges, strawberries, and tomatoes), vegetables (bean sprouts, shallots, and potatoes), and spices (licorice). Chalcones have been shown to be promising chemopreventive and antitumor agents due to their antioxidant, cytotoxic, apoptosis-inducing, and numerous cell signaling-modulatory properties [118,119]. Chalcone, a α,β-unsaturated flavonoid, restrained the phosphorylation of STAT3 in LPS- and IL-6-regulated endothelial cells [120].

5.1.10. Formononetin

Formononetin, a naturally-occurring isoflavone, may be found in low quantities in numerous dietary products, such as beans, carrot, cauliflower, iceberg lettuce, green peas, and red potatoes. It is associated with the Fabaceae family and is isolated from the roots of Astragalus mongholicus Bunge. This root represents an essential ingredient utilized in the traditional Chinese medicine due to its suppressive effect against various malignant tumors. Formononetin has been under intense investigation during the last decade due to its ability to promote apoptosis and suppress proliferation in multiple in vitro and in vivo experimental cancer models, such as breast, colorectal, and prostate carcinoma [121,122]. One investigation demonstrated that formononetin effectively repressed the proliferation and invasion of HCT116 and SW1116 colon carcinoma cells. It also caused cell cycle arrest at the G0–G1 stage through the downregulation of protein expressions of cyclins D1. The anticancer impact of formononetin was found to be mediated by the impairment of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) and STAT3 signaling pathways [123].

5.1.11. Garcinol

Garcinol, a poly-isoprenylated benzophenone analog, is isolated from the dried fruit rind of Garcinia indica Choisy. The antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties of garcinol underscore its therapeutic benefits [124,125]. It may stop constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. The molecular docking analysis demonstrated garcinol’s capability to link with STAT3 at the SH2 domain and to depress its dimerization. It additionally repressed the acetylation of STAT3 and subsequently disabled its DNA binding capacity as a result of an acetyltransferase inhibitor. The restraint of STAT3 actuation by garcinol prompted repression of the expression levels of different genes associated with proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis. Moreover, it repressed the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by stimulating apoptosis. Astoundingly, garcinol hindered the development of human hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft tumors in athymic nu/nu mice by impairing STAT3 activation. The proapoptotic and antiproliferative impacts of garcinol in hepatocellular carcinoma were mediated through inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway [126].

5.1.12. Cardamonin

Cardamonin (chemically known as 3,4,2,4-tetrahydroxychalcone) is a chalconoid that has been found in a few plants, such as Alpinia conchigera Griff. and Alpinia hainanensis K.Schum. It has received considerable attention from researchers because of its putative health benefits, including anticancer potential [127]. A study investigated the impact of cardamonin on glioblastoma stem cells, and examined its effect on apoptosis and self-renewal and whether its activity is related to the STAT3 pathway in this cancer cell population. CD133-positive (CD133+) glioma stem-like cells (GSCs), a glioblastoma stem cell line was generated from human glioblastoma tissues. In CD133+ GSCs, cardamonin hindered proliferation and promoted apoptosis. The proapoptotic impacts of temozolomide were additionally elevated in vitro via cardamonin in U87 cells and CD133+ GSCs. Cardamonin additionally repressed STAT3 initiation by luciferase assay and stifled the downstream STAT3 gene expressions, for example, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, Bcl-2, survivin, and VEGF. Besides, cardamonin halted STAT3’s travel to the nucleus and dimerization in CD133+ GSCs. Apart from this, molecular docking study affirmed that cardamonin, with a favorable binding energy of −10.78 kcal/mol, was bound to the active sites of STAT3 [128]. All these results demonstrate that cardamonin has the ability to be a new anticancer agent for glioblastoma by virtue of its ability to act as a STAT3 inhibitor.

5.1.13. Caffeic Acid

Caffeic acid and phenethyl ester caffeic acid (CAPE) are phenolic compounds synthesized by different plant organisms. They are present in beverages, such as wine, tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) and coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Caffeic acid and CAPE are known to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties [129,130]. Caffeic acid blocked STAT3 phosphorylation by suppressing Src tyrosine kinase, which inhibited the proliferation and caused the downregulation of VEGF in the human renal carcinoma cells [131].

5.1.14. Silibinin

Silibinin, a flavanone present in Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. (milk thistle), is an extraordinary hepatoprotective agent with anticancer potential [132,133,134]. Silibinin’s benefits were also observed when used in conjunction with traditional chemotherapy since they decreased adverse effects of anticancer drugs (e.g., nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity) while preventing or even reversing chemotherapy resistance [24]. Silibinin blocked STAT3–DNA attachment, inhibited constitutively active STAT3 phosphorylation in prostate cancer cells, and induced caspase activation that contributed to cell death [135]. This research showed that in conjunction with silibinin, piceatannol (a JAK1 inhibitor) lessened STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705 and thus triggered caps, which induced the programmed cell death of prostate cancer cells [135]. Silibinin has also been shown to suppress STAT3 phosphorylation and thus decrease its transcriptional function in urethane-induced lung tumors in A/J mice [136].

5.1.15. Butein

A flavonoid named butein is isolated from the bark of Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F.A. Barkley (formerly Rhus verniciflua Stokes.) and the flowers of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze. Butein, a multitargeted agent, is considered to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, hypotensive, antidiabetic, anticancer, and neuroprotective effects [137,138]. In multiple myeloma cells, it restrained the constitutive and IL-6-induced activation of STAT3 through inactivation of JAK1 and c-Src in a concentration-dependent fashion [139]. Butein also suppressed the growth of xenografted human hepatocellular carcinoma in male nude mice [140].

5.1.16. 5,7-Dihydroxyflavone

5,7-Dihydroxyflavone is a natural flavonoid present in propolis and honey, in addition to various herbs, such as Passiflora incarnate L., Passiflora caerulea L., and Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz. Various in vivo and in vitro investigations have reported its potential for chemoprevention and therapy of various cancers [141,142]. By reducing Akt and STAT3 phosphorylation, 5,7-dihydroxyflavone significantly suppressed the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) tumor xenografts [143].

5.1.17. Honokiol

Honokiol, a phytochemical present in plants such as Magnolia officinalis Rehder & E.H.Wilson, and Magnolia grandiflora L., exhibited antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and cell-cycle-modulatory activities in gastric, colon, colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreatic, lung, glioblastoma, melanoma, leukemia, skin, breast, ovarian, renal, prostate, head and neck, mesangial, and squamous cell carcinoma through modulation of multiple oncogenic targets [144,145,146,147,148]. Honokiol diminished the generation of p-STAT3 tyr705 and p-JAK2 Tyr1007 in human monocytic cell line (THP1 cells), and human erythroleukemia cell line (HEL cells) [149]. It additionally restrained both constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation, resulting in other downstream impacts, such as the increased expression level of SHP1. However, SOCS1/3 protein levels and knockdown of SHP1 reversed honokiol-induced STAT3 signal hindrance [149]. In addition, honokiol decreased the percentage of mRNA of STAT3 target genes (cyclin D1, Bcl-2, surviving, and Bcl-xL) in a concentration-dependent fashion in myeloid leukemia cells [149].

5.1.18. Casticin

Casticin can be found in several plants, such as Achillea millefolium L., Artemisia abrotanum L., Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze, Centipeda minima (L.) A.Braun & Asch., Clausena excavate Burm.f., Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge., Croton betulaster Müll Arg., Daphne genkwa Siebold & Zucc., Ficus microcarpa L.f., Nelsonia canescens (Lam.) Spreng., Pavetta crassipes K.Schum., Vitex trifolia subsp. Litoralis steenis (formerly Vitex rotundifolia L.), Vitex agnus-castus L., Vitex negundo L., and Vitex trifolia L. Recent experimental evidence underscores the ability of casticin as a candidate for antineoplastic drugs [150,151]. It showed antiproliferative, cell-cycle-regulatory, and proapoptotic activities in breast, cervical, colon, colorectal, gastric, liver, leukemia, lung, pancreatic, ovarian, and prostate cancer cells [152,153]. It also promoted apoptosis, inhibited constitutively active STAT3, modulated STAT3 activation by modifying the activity of upstream STAT3 regulators, and abrogated IL-6-induced STAT3 activation, thereby suppressing the JAK/STAT pathway in various cancer cells, such as tongue squamous cell carcinoma (HN-9), hypertriploid renal cell carcinoma (786-O), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (YD-8) [154].

5.1.19. Apigenin

Found plentifully in many medicinal plants and in many vegetables and fruits, apigenin, a naturally-occurring flavonoid, has several physiological functions [155,156]. It showed anticancer activity via JAK/STAT pathway inhibition by reducing phosphorylated JAK1/2 and STAT3 in breast cancer (BT-474) cells [25]. Apigenin induced programmed cell death of colon cancer cells by hindering STAT3 phosphorylation and hence downregulated the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL [157].

5.1.20. Wedelolactone

Wedelolactone is a natural coumarin with promising anticancer activities [158]. Wedelolactone, obtained from Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. (formerly Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk.), and Sphagneticola calendulacea (L.) Pruski (formerly Wedelia calendulacea (L.) Pruski), exhibited antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing effects in breast, prostate, neuroblastoma, pancreatic, mammary carcinosarcoma, myeloma, and leukemia cells [159,160]. This prevented the dephosphorylation of STAT1 and prolonged the activation of STAT1 by mutual inhibition of T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TCPTP) in p-GAS-HepG2 cells [161].

5.2. Terpenoids

The terpenoids, also known as isoprenoids, are one broad family of naturally occurring, terpene-derived organic compounds. With more than 40,000 structurally diverse components, the terpenoids are the largest group of secondary metabolites from the plant kingdom. The majority of terpenoids with structural differences are biologically active and are used to treat numerous diseases around the world. Several terpenoids have been developed as anticancer drugs, including taxol. Natural terpenoids and related compounds have inhibited the proliferation of various human carcinoma cells and suppressed the tumor development in experimental animals [162,163,164]. Several phytoconstituents belonging to this category can inhibit the JAK/STAT pathway by inhibiting the phosphorylation of STAT3. Various terpenoids even inhibited the phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src in various carcinoma cell lines. The role of various terpenoids in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in various cancers is the focus of the subsequent sections.

5.2.1. Cucurbitacins

Cucurbitacins are associated with tetracyclic triterpenoids found in the Cucurbitaceae family. There are 17 major molecules in the cucurbitacins group, which range from cucurbitacin A to cucurbitacin T with hundreds of analogs [165]. Cucurbitacins and their derivatives have various biological and pharmacological actions, including anticancer effects [166,167]. Cucurbitacin B (Figure 3) demonstrated anti-STAT3 effects in human pancreatic cancer cells [168,169] and leukemia cells [170] (Table 2). Even though cucurbitacin E decreased the amount of phosphorylated STAT3 in human bladder cancer cells, it did not alter the levels of STAT3 [171]. Cucurbitacin I (JSI-124) reduced the phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK in Src-transformed fibroblast and in human lung carcinoma cells. This subsequently impaired STAT3–DNA binding [172]. Likewise, the phosphorylated levels of STAT3 in glioblastoma multiforme cells treated with cucurbitacin I were greatly decreased. This resulted in G2/M cell cycle suspension by downregulation of the expression of cdc2 and cyclin B1 [173]. Moreover, the inhibitory impact on JAK/STAT by cucurbitacin I was additionally determined in Sézary (Sz) syndrome [174] and anaplastic large cell lymphoma [175]. Cucurbitacin Q hindered STAT3 levels; however, it did not influence the activation of JAK [176]. Based on the aforementioned reports, various cucurbitacins exhibit distinct mechanisms to function as JAK and STAT inhibitors.

5.2.2. Andrographolide

Andrographolide, a diterpenoid lactone extracted from Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees, has strong anticancer and cancer preventive potential [177,178]. A study performed by Zhou et al. [179] analyzed the impact of andrographolide on the STAT3 pathway and assessed whether restraint of STAT3 action by andrographolide could sensitize MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells to doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic drug. Andrographolide can stifle both constitutively activated and IL-6-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 and, consequently, its nuclear translocation into cancer cells. Such restraint was accomplished through restraint of JAK1/2 and interaction between STAT3 and gp130. To comprehend the importance of the inhibiting effect of andrographolide on STAT3, the impact of it on doxorubicin-induced apoptosis via promoting caspase activation and apoptotic pathway has been evaluated in human cancer cells (HeLa, HepG2, HCT116, and MDA-MB-231). In that test, the constitutive activation level of STAT3 was found to correspond to the interference of malignant cell growth in doxorubicin-induced apoptosis. The long-term colony formation assay in addition to the short-term cell proliferation assay demonstrated that andrographolide significantly promoted doxorubicin-induced cell death in cancer cells, showing that andrographolide improves the sensitivity of cancer cells to doxorubicin principally by means of STAT3 suppression. These results uncover a novel anticancer function of andrographolide in cancer treatment.

5.2.3. Betulinic Acid

A natural pentacyclic triterpenoid, betulinic acid is extracted from the exterior bark of white birch plants. In recent years, betulinic acid has gained considerable attention due to its strong cytotoxic activity against a variety of tumor cells [180,181]. Betulinic acid hindered constitutive activation of STAT3, Src kinase, and JAK1/2 [182]. Betulinic-acid-induced expression of the PTP SHP-1 and silencing of the SHP-1 gene nullified the capability of betulinic acid to hinder STAT3 initiation and salvages betulinic-acid-induced cell death. It also downregulated the expression level of STAT3-directed genes, such as survivin, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and cyclin D1. There was also a rise in apoptosis as evidenced by cell cycle arrest at sub-G1 phase and increase in PARP cleavage induced by caspase-3. In addition, overactivation of constitutive dynamic STAT3 fundamentally diminished the betulinic acid-induced apoptosis [182].

5.2.4. γ-Tocotrienol

γ-Tocotrienol is one of the four types of tocotrienol, a type of vitamin E. γ-Tocotrienol has established potency in preclinical anticancer research [183,184]. There are eight forms of vitamin E, each consisting of a head segment associated with either a saturated (phytyl) or unsaturated (farnesyl) tail. γ-Tocotrienol prevented the phosphorylation of molecules involved in the JAK/STAT pathway, including JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src, in human liver cancer cells [185]. It also induced the expression of SHP-1, which is one type of tyrosine phosphatase engaged in the JAK/STAT signal’s negative regulation [79], in liver cancer cells in a concentration-dependent fashion [185,186].

5.2.5. Cryptotanshinone

Cryptotanshinone, a quinoid diterpene, has been isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Experimental investigations have demonstrated evidence that cryptotanshinone could be used as an anticancer agent [187]. In pancreatic carcinoma cells, cryptotanshinone repressed STAT3 phosphorylation via a mechanism autonomous of JAK2 phosphorylation [188]. It was found to bind directly with STAT3 and prevented STAT3’s dimerization. Computational modelling also demonstrated that cryptotanshinone has the capacity to bind with STAT3’s SH2 domain [188].

5.2.6. Nimbolide

Nimbolide, a triterpene isolated from the flowers and leaves of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.), is generally utilized in conventional medicinal practices. Emerging evidence showed that nimbolide possessed significant cytotoxic activities against various types of cancer cells and exhibited chemopreventive potential in several animal tumor models [189,190]. It can cause cell cycle arrest, most conspicuously at the G1/S stage of glioblastoma multiforme cancer cells that exhibit EGFRvIII [191]. EGFRvIII is an oncogene involved in 20% to 25% of cases of glioblastoma multiforme. Nimbolide restrained CDK4/CDK6 kinase action, which led to a decreased phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein. This prompted the arrest of the cell cycle at the G1/S phase and cell death [191]. Based on another investigation, nimbolide hindered STAT3 signaling and suppressed tumor formation in prostate cancer in vitro [192].

5.2.7. Celastrol

A pentagonal cyclic triterpenoid named celastrol is extracted from the plant Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f. It exhibits various pharmacological actions, and has antiproliferative, antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, proapoptotic, and antimetastatic properties [193,194]. It hindered the growth of multiple myeloma cells that are either sensitive or resistant to various chemotherapeutic drugs [195]. It also improved the proapoptotic actions of both bortezomib and thalidomide. In another study, celastrol inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation and STAT3-mediated IL-17 expression, and T-helper 17 (Th17) differentiation and proliferation in multiple myeloma cells [186].

5.2.8. Ursolic Acid

A pentacyclic triterpenoid compound, ursolic acid (3β-hydroxy-urs-12-en-28-oic-acid), is present in many plants (e.g., Mirabilis jalapa L.) including fruits and some herbs (e.g., apples, prunes, bilberries, cranberries, basil, lavender, rosemary, peppermint, thyme, elder flower, oregano, and hawthorn). Ursolic acid has shown significant promise in the treatment and prevention of various cancers [196,197]. By suppressing Src and JAK2 phosphorylation, ursolic acid prevented the activation of STAT3 in prostate carcinoma cells [198]. Additionally, ursolic acid decreased xenografted prostate tumor development in transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model without impacting the body weight via hindering the activation of STAT3 [198].

5.2.9. Brusatol

Brusatol, a natural triterpene lactone called quassinoid, is extracted from the air-borne parts of the Brucea javanica (L.) Merr., plant. It has been distinguished as a strong blocker of STAT3 in preventing the progression of neck and head squamous cell carcinoma cells. Brusatol also exhibited cytotoxicity, hindered the activation of STAT3 as well as upstream kinases, including JAK1, JAK2, and Src. It diminished nuclear STAT3 and its DNA binding capability. Therefore, brusatol-mediated inhibition of STAT3 could be valuable in treating neck and head squamous cell carcinoma [199].

5.2.10. Oridonin

Oridonin is a phytochemical present in Isodon rubescens (Hemsl.) H.Hara. Oridonin and its analogs have shown the ability to treat inflammation, neurodegeneration, and cancer [200,201]. Oridonin inhibited the proliferation of astrocytoma, breast, colorectal, hepatoma, leukemia, lung, multiple myeloma, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer cells [202,203,204,205]. It also decreased IL-6, STAT3, and p-STAT3 expression levels, implying that oridonin can downregulate the STAT3 pathway, which is accountable for the growth, invasion, and metastasis of human pancreatic carcinoma cells [206].

5.2.11. Thymoquinone

Thymoquinone is the active component of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seed oil, and preclinical studies have established its cancer prevention effects [26,207]. Thymoquinone inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in multiple myeloma cells, U266 and RPMI 8226 [208,209]. Thymoquinone caused downregulation of STAT3 activation in addition to a decrease in activity of JAK2 and c-Src in human gastric cancer cells. It also downregulated the expression of STAT3-controlled genes, namely survivin, cyclin D, Bcl-2, and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and activated caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-9 [208].

5.2.12. Parthenolide

Parthenolide, a sesquiterpene, is obtained from natural sources, such as Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip., Tanacetum vulgare L., Tanacetum larvatum (Pant.) Hayek., Centaurea ainetensis Boiss., and Helianthus annuus L. Parthenolide, a potent anticancer and anti-inflammatory agent, is presently being assessed in clinical research for cancer treatment [210]. It hindered the proliferation of bladder, pancreatic, lung, breast, skin, melanoma, glioma, skin, liver, and gastric cancer cells [211,212,213]. By suppressing JAK2 kinase activity, parthenolide also suppressed STAT3 phosphorylation induced by IL-6 in breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells [214].

5.2.13. Dihydroartemisinin

Dihydroartemisinin, is an analogue of artemisinin extracted from Artemisia annua L. Artemisinin and several of its analogs, including dihydroartemisinin, have been found to induce tumor cell death via inhibiting numerous tumor-related signal transduction pathways [215,216]. Dihydroartemisinin has been found to have potent cytotoxic and proapoptotic activity by suppressing activated JAK2/STAT3 signals. It also suppressed downstream targeted proteins in the human tongue (Cal-27), colon (HCT-116), liver (HepG2) as well as head and neck (FaDu) carcinoma cell lines [217,218].

5.2.14. Alantolacton

Alantolactone, a sesquiterpene, is obtained from several herbs, including Aucklandia costus Falc. (formerly Aucklandia lappa Decne.), Inula helenium L., Inula japonica Thunb. and Inula racemose Hook.f. It exhibits various pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities, without significant toxicity [219]. It hindered the proliferation of glioblastoma, leukemia, prostate, colon, liver, and pulmonary carcinoma cells [220,221]. The activation of STAT3 at tyrosine 705 was greatly decreased by alantolactone in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast carcinoma cells. Alantolactone prevented STAT3 from traveling into the nucleus and thus affecting transcription of DNA [222].

5.2.15. β-Caryophyllene oxide

β-Caryophyllene oxide is a natural bicyclic sesquiterpene. It is present in numerous essential oils, including clove oil, the oil of Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L. M. Perry (cloves) stems and flowers, as well as the essential oils of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabis), Psidium guajava L. (guava), Origanum vulgare L. (oregano), Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. (rosemary), and Humulus lupulus L. The potential therapeutic utility β-caryophyllene oxide is focused mainly on its analgesic and anticancer activities [223]. A study demonstrated that the anticancer effect of β-caryophyllene oxide was mediated through interfering with the activation of STAT3 in carcinoma cells, such as multiple myeloma cells (U266) and human prostate cancer cells (DU145). The impact of β-caryophyllene oxide on STAT3 activation, related protein kinases and phosphatases, STAT3-directed gene products, and apoptosis was investigated utilizing both functional proteomics and different tumor cell lines. It was found that β-caryophyllene oxide decreased the constitutive STAT3 activation in multiple myeloma, prostate, and breast cancer cells, and has a critical concentration- and time-dependent response in multiple myeloma cells. The restraint was mediated by the inhibition of upstream kinase c-Src and JAK1/2 activation. β-Caryophyllene oxide brought about the expression of SHP-1, which is connected with the downregulation of constitutive STAT3 activation. The STAT3 activation by β-caryophyllene oxide hindered proliferation, increased apoptosis, and blunted the invasive capability of DU145 prostate carcinoma cells [224].

5.3. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are natural organic compounds that possess numerous pharmacological actions, including chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects [225,226]. These components exist in diverse plants, and several alkaloids inhibit the JAK/STAT pathway, as described below.

5.3.1. Capsaicin

Capsaicin (Figure 4), an active element of chili peppers, exhibited strong anticancer properties in diverse cancer types [227,228,229]. Capsaicin also hindered IL6-induced STAT3 activation. It impaired the advancement of multiple myeloma xenograft tumors in male thymic mice by suppressing STAT3 activation by inactivating JAK1 and c-Srcin in various preclinical cancer models [139] (Table 3).

5.3.2. Evodiamine

Evodiamine, obtained from Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T.G. Hartley., is a multitargeted anticancer agent [230]. In hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2), evodiamine effectively hindered constitutive and IL-6-induced activation of STAT3 (Tyr705) phosphorylation. Evodiamine suppressed the phosphorylation of JAK2, Src, and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2). Additionally, evodiamine impeded STAT3–DNA binding activity [81]. The proliferation of HepG2 cells was inhibited by evodiamine via cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase. It also downregulated the protein expression levels of cyclin D1, Bcl-2, Mcl-1, survivin, VEGF, XIAP, MMP-9, and HIF1-α in SMMC-7721 and HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells [231].

5.3.3. Indirubin

Indirubin, a naturally occurring alkaloid, is isolated from indigo dye-containing herbs (Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels). It is an important potent component of “Danggui Longhui Wan”, a traditional Chinese medicine formulation used for the therapeutic intervention of inflammation, cancer, and various other chronic diseases. Recent research shows the potential of indirubin and related compounds in the treatment of cancer, especially inflammation-associated malignancies [232,233]. It is thought to hinder numerous kinases, and it might be utilized to treat chronic myelocytic leukemia, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. Indirubin has been shown to impede cyclin-dependent kinase dimers, triggering cell cycle arrest at G1/S or G2/M phase. Additionally, it repressed phosphorylated STAT3 expression [234].

5.4. Saponins

These components exist in diverse plants, and several alkaloids inhibit the JAK/STAT pathway as described below. Saponins are glycosidic secondary metabolites present in plants, grains, soybeans and certain herbs. Saponins may have one to three straight/branched chains of sugar (either D-glucose, D-xylose, D-galactose, L-arabinose L-rhamnose, or D-glucuronic acid). In vitro enzymatic assays and preclinical animal studies reveal that the saponins possess anticancer properties [235]. Interestingly, various saponins are known to augment the efficiency of several chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and paclitaxel [236]. The anticancer actions of saponins could be linked to their capability to inhibit the JAK/STAT pathway.

β-Escin

β-Escin, a triterpene–saponin mixture, is extracted from the seeds of horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.). β-Escin displayed anticancer action in various cancer models and increased the impact of chemotherapeutic agents [237]. β-Escin inhibited JAK1/2 and c-Src phosphorylation in HCC cells [238]. β-Escin also downregulated the expression levels of STAT3-regulated genes, for example, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, cyclin D1, Mcl-1, survivin, and VEGF [238].

5.5. Steroids

Various plant-derived steroids, including phytosterols, possess anticarcinogenic properties [239], and the intake of high phytosterol was inversely related to an elevated cancer risk [240].

5.5.1. Diosgenin

Diosgenin is a steroidal sapogenin that occurs in nature. It is a bioactive component present in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds. Studies show that diosgenin might confer several health benefits, including cancer preventive and anticancer effects [241,242,243]. Diosgenin suppressed the phosphorylation of c-Src, JAK1, and JAK2 in HCC cell lines (C3A and HepG2) [244]. This phytochemical increased the expression of SH-PTP2, and consequently inhibited STAT3 activation triggered by IL-6 [244]. It also hindered the proliferation of primary human thyrocytes by inducing apoptosis and causing cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase [245].

5.5.2. Ergosterol Peroxide

Ergosterol peroxide, derived from many plants and edible mushrooms, is known to possess immune-suppressive, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects [246]. It inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 and consequently reduced the expression level of phospho-STAT3 and CD-34 (an angiogenesis marker). Ergosterol peroxide also suppressed STAT3–DNA binding in multiple myeloma cells (U266). Moreover, it blocked phosphorylation of tyrosine kinases JAK2 and Src, but elevated the expression level of SHP-1 at the transcriptional level [80].

5.5.3. Guggulsterone

Guggulsterone, an antagonist of the farnesoid X receptor, is a phytosterol present in the gum resin of guggul plant (Commiphora mukul (Hook. ex Stocks) Engl.). Guggulsterone is broadly utilized in Indian traditional medicine for the management of various diseases, including cancer [247,248,249]. It suppressed U266 cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at the sub-G1 phase. It decreased the levels of Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, cyclin D1, Mcl-1, and VEGF. It activated caspase-3 and cleavage of PARP protein. In particular, guggulsterone abrogated the stimulation of c-Src and JAK2 and therefore inactivates STAT3 in human multiple myeloma cells [250]. It also suppressed the activation of STAT3 triggered by IL-6. Guggulsterone also elevated the expression of SHP-1, a nontransmembrane protein and negative regulator of the JAK/STAT pathway [251].

5.6. Lignan

Lignans are present in an assortment of natural products, including pumpkin seeds, flax seeds, sesame seeds, broccoli, soybean, and various berries. Secoisolariciresinoldiglucoside, the primary lignan found in flax seeds, is metabolized in the colon to produce mammalian lignans, such as enterodiol and enterolactone. Once lignan is ingested, it suppresses the development of malignant tumors, specifically hormone-sensitive ones, such as neoplasms of the prostate, breast, and endometrium [252].

Arctiin

Arctiin, anarctigenin glucoside, is found in numerous herbs of Asteraceae family, especially Centaurea imperialis Hausskn. ex Bornm. and Arctiumlappa L. (greater burdock), and in Forsythia viridissima Lindl., Himalaiella heteromalla (D.Don) Raab-Straube, and Trachelospermum asiaticum (Siebold & Zucc.) Nakai. Arctiin drew the attention of natural product researchers due to its significant therapeutic benefits in relation to inflammation and malignancy [253]. In human multiple myeloma cells, it suppressed the constitutive activation of STAT3 phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 residue. Arctiin abrogated the constitutive activation of Src phosphorylation and the activation of JAK1/2. Moreover, treatment of U266 cells with arctiin elevated the level of protein tyrosine phosphatase ε (PTPε), and the silencing of PTPε produced an inversion of the arctiin-induced PTPε expression and the blockage of STAT3 phosphorylation. Arctiin additionally inhibited the proliferation of U266 carcinoma cell line via apoptosis induction and halting cells at G2/M phase [254].

5.7. Phytoalexin

Phytoalexins are produced in plants when they are attacked by invading organisms. They act as toxins and are formed when the host plants come in contact with parasites. Phytoalexins have been found in at least 75 plants, including soybeans, cruciferous vegetables, tomatoes, beans, rice, garlic, potatoes, and grapes. In preclinical studies, phytoalexins demonstrated anticancer actions by hindering proliferation, invasion and metastasis, hormonal stimulation, and modulatory effects on expression of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes [255].

Brassinin

Brassinin, a phytoalexin present in cruciferous vegetables, displayed antiproliferative, anticancer, and chemopreventive properties [256]. In A549 human lung carcinoma cells, it inhibited constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 activation. Additionally, brassinin induced protein inhibitors of activated STATs-3 (PIAS-3) protein and mRNA, while SOCS-3 expression was diminished. Ablation of PIAS-3 by small interfering RNA inhibited brassinin-mediated cytotoxicity and the hindrance of STAT3. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3), when overexpressed in brassinin-treated cells, increases phosphorylation of STAT3 and the viability of the cell. Brassinin downregulated the expression of STAT3-directed genes (phospho-STAT3, Ki-67, and CD31), suppressed proliferation and invasion, and induced apoptosis in the xenograft lung cancer (A549) mouse model. When administered intraperitoneally, the combination of paclitaxel and brassinin diminished tumor growth by the downregulation of phospho-STAT3, CD31, and Ki-67 in a xenograft lung cancer model [257].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Cancer is a dangerous health risk for people worldwide. The morbidity and the mortality rates connected with cancer are alarming, despite the existence of multiple treatment modalities for patients suffering from this disease. Natural substances are important components that can be used for the discovery and the progression of new anticancer medications. Consumption of dietary and medicinal plants that contain active phytoconstituents has minimal or negligible adverse effects. Natural components, when extracted, purified, concentrated, and administered at higher therapeutic doses, very often exhibit adverse side effects apart from their beneficial anticancer activities. Hence, the development of these phytoconstituents can only be progressed further following the confirmation of their safety based on toxicity studies in different preclinical animal models. Once a safety profile is established, the utilization of these substances to develop novel anticancer agents would provide a promising choice for chemoprevention and novel cancer treatment. The current therapeutic intervention for the management of cancer poses several limitations due to the use of monotargeted synthetic agents, elevated cost, low effectiveness, and dangerous adverse actions. Consequently, it is necessary to develop novel and innovative medications for prevention and treatment of cancer. Phytochemicals, including phenolics and polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, and steroids, are known to prevent the development of many cancers.
JAK/STAT is a vital signaling pathway implicated in the proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis evasion, and survival of neoplastic cells. In addition, its aberrant activation results in cancer-promoting mechanisms. This review indicates the capacity of several phytochemicals to act as multitargeted agents of JAK/STAT signaling inhibition in order to impede cancerous cell growth. Most of the phytochemicals examined in this review have been found to decrease the activity of JAK2 in addition to diminishing STAT3 activation (Figure 5). In addition, these phytochemicals reduce the expression of STAT3-regulated genes, namely VEGF, Bcl-2, Mcl-1, cyclin D, and survivin, and activate caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-9. Phenolics and polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, and steroids present in natural sources inhibit the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and thereby inhibit cancer. The phenolic compounds obtained naturally include resveratrol, curcumin, EGCG, chalcone, caffeic acid, silibinin, butein, dihydroartemisinin, 5,7-dihydroxyflavone, honokiol, casticin, apigenin, and wedelolactone. All these phytoconstituents are efficient in arresting the progression of cancer cells. In addition, terpenoids, such as cucurbitacins (B, I, and Q), γ-tocotrienol, cryptotanshinone, celastrol, ursolic acid, pseudolaric acid B, oridonin, thymoquinone, parthenolide, and alantolactone, also have anticarcinogenic action against numerous malignant cells. Several alkaloids (such as evodiamine) and saponins (e.g., β-escin) also show antitumorigenic activity. Naturally occurring steroidal moieties (e.g., diosgenin, ergosterol peroxide, and guggulsterone) also exhibit anticancer activity. The aforementioned phytoconstituents act as negative regulators of the JAK/STAT pathway, which is a vital oncogenic signaling pathway for development and progression of cancer. Members of the JAK family are more commonly targeted than STATs by the negative regulators. JAK is STAT’s upstream protein, and therefore must be activated before STAT can be activated as well. Other signaling pathways that are independent of JAK can also reportedly activate the STATs [258]. Additionally, the anticancer effects of the various phytochemicals, as described in this review, may be achieved through a variety of complementary and multitargeted mechanisms, including modulation of yet unidentified targets, and one of these mechanisms could be the inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Most of the current literature on the effects of bioactive phytoconstituents on JAK/STAT signaling in cancer is limited to in vitro studies. Further in vivo studies must be carried out to confirm the potential for bioactive constituents in suppressing and/or treating cancer by inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. The limitation of many of these plant chemical components includes low aqueous solubility, limited absorption, and inadequate bioavailability, which may restrict their therapeutic use in clinical settings. It is indeed challenging to achieve sufficient concentration and/or bioavailability of a phytochemical via dietary consumption of its corresponding source food comparable to concentrations used in a research context. Human beings would need to eat an extraordinary amount of plant-based foods, which may not be feasible, to obtain the same results as achieved in in vitro or in vivo studies. However, it is also true that, unlike drugs, which may be administered at a specific dose and at a particular time under controlled conditions, phytochemicals are generally consumed at low and variable levels as a part of a complex dietary regimen at irregular intervals over a protracted period of time. Nevertheless, alternative or coadjuvant dietary interventions might help in the prevention and/or treatment of cancer.
Further research studies need to focus on investigation of the long-term impacts of phytochemical usage, the cause of the JAK/STAT pathway inhibition, the impact of phytochemicals to prevent cancer in high-risk populations, and their effects when used in combination with existing chemotherapy and when used in conjunction with diversified phytoconstituents. The impressive amount of research findings presented here establishes the promise of phytochemicals as anticancer agents and the necessity for implementation of phytochemicals in human clinical trials. Regardless, due to the side effects and resistance to current chemotherapeutic agents, phytochemicals must be further investigated in order to combat the cancer epidemic throughout the world.
Chemopreventive phytochemicals responsible for the inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway have been discussed throughout this article. A coordinated effort to discover new targets to boost the capability to restore normal JAK/STAT signaling will result in future chemopreventive and anticancer drugs. The findings of the studies presented in this review may enable researchers to create novel and effective cancer prevention and therapeutic approaches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and S.B. (Sankhadip Bose); Writing—original draft preparation, A.M., S.B. (Sankhadip Bose), U.C., and S.B. (Sabyasachi Banerjee); Writing—Review and editing, A.M., J.P., C.R.C. and A.B.; Visualization, J.P. and C.R.C.; Supervision, A.M. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this manuscript wish to express their sincere thanks to all researchers who made significant progress in our understanding of anticancer potential of phytochemicals with modulation of JAK/STAT signaling and sincerely regret for not being able to cite every relevant publication due to space limitation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.; Ward, E.; Hao, Y.; Xu, J.; Murray, T. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2008, 58, 71–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.; Xu, J.; Ward, E. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010, 60, 277–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wiart, C. Goniothalamus species: A source of drugs for the treatment of cancers and bacterial infections. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2007, 4, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Glade, M.J. Food, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research/World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Nutrition 1999, 15, 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sporn, M.B.; Liby, K.T. NRF2 and cancer: The good, the bad and the importance of context. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manson, M.M. Cancer prevention-the potential for diet to modulate molecular signalling. Trends Mol. Med. 2003, 9, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gullett, N.P.; Ruhul Amin, A.R.; Bayraktar, S.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Shin, D.M.; Khuri, F.R.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Surh, Y.J.; Kucuk, O. Cancer prevention with natural compounds. Semin. Oncol. 2010, 37, 258–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Block, K.I.; Gyllenhaal, C.; Lowe, L.; Amedei, A.; Amin, A.R.M.R.; Amin, A.; Aquilano, K.; Arbiser, J.; Arreola, A.; Arzumanyan, A.; et al. Designing a broad-spectrum integrative approach for cancer prevention and treatment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015, 35, 276–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bishayee, A.; Sethi, G. Bioactive natural products in cancer prevention and therapy: Progress and promise. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2016, 40–41, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kotecha, R.; Takami, A.; Espinoza, J.L. Dietary phytochemicals and cancer chemoprevention: A review of the clinical evidence. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 52517–52529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Christen, P.; Cuendet, M. Plants as a source of therapeutic and health products. Chimia 2012, 66, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Geldenhuys, W.J.; Bishayee, A.; Darvesh, A.S.; Carroll, R.T. Natural products of dietary origin as lead compounds in virtual screening and drug design. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Surh, Y.J. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McCullough, M.L.; Giovannucci, E.L. Diet and cancer prevention. Oncogene 2004, 23, 6349–6364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Russo, G.L. Ins and outs of dietary phytochemicals in cancer chemoprevention. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amin, A.R.; Kucuk, O.; Khuri, F.R.; Shin, D.M. Perspectives for cancer prevention with natural compounds. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 2712–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Meadows, G.G. Diet, nutrients, phytochemicals, and cancer metastasis suppressor genes. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012, 31, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fernando, W.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. Anticancer properties of phytochemicals present in medicinal plants of North America. In Using Old Solutions to New Problems—Natural Drug Discovery in the 21st Century, 1st ed.; Kulka, M., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Bose, S.; Banerjee, S.; Vishnuprasad, C.N.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Shin, H.S. Star anise (Illicium verum): Chemical compounds, antiviral properties, and clinical relevance. Phytother. Res. 2020, 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bowman, T.; Garcia, R.; Turkson, J.; Jove, R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2474–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Grivennikov, S.I.; Karin, M. Dangerous liaisons: STAT3 and NFkappaB collaboration and crosstalk in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010, 21, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bosch-Barrera, J.; Queralt, B.; Menendez, J.A. Targeting STAT3 with silibinin to improve cancer therapeutics. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017, 58, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ozbey, U.; Attar, R.; Romero, M.A.; Alhewairini, S.S.; Afshar, B.; Sabitaliyevich, U.Y.; Hanna-Wakim, L.; Ozcelik, B.; Farooqi, A.A. Apigenin as an effective anticancer natural product: Spotlight on TRAIL, WNT/-catenin, JAK-STAT pathways, and microRNAs. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 120, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shanmugam, M.K.; Arfuso, F.; Kumar, A.P.; Wang, L.; Goh, B.C.; Ahn, K.S.; Sethi, G. Modulation of diverse oncogenic transcription factors by thymoquinone, an essential oil compound isolated from the seeds of Nigella sativa Linn. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 129, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Siveen, K.S.; Sikka, S.; Surana, R.; Dai, X.; Zhang, J.; Kumar, A.P.; Tan, B.K.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway in cancer: Role of synthetic and natural inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1845, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Singh, B.N.; Singh, H.B.; Singh, A.; Naqvi, A.H.; Singh, B.R. Dietary phytochemicals alter epigenetic events and signaling pathways for inhibition of metastasis cascade. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014, 33, 41–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shanmugam, M.K.; Lee, J.H.; Chai, E.Z.P.; Kanchi, M.M.; Kar, S.; Arfuso, F.; Mustafa, M.R. Cancer prevention and therapy through the modulation of transcription factors by bioactive natural compounds. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2016, 40, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chen, H.; Liu, R.H. Potential mechanisms of action of dietary phytochemicals for cancer prevention by targeting cellular signaling transduction pathways. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3260–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rajagopal, C.; Lankadasari, M.B.; Aranjani, J.M.; Harikumar, K.B. Targeting oncogenic transcription factors by polyphenols: A novel approach for cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 130, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shuai, K.; Stark, G.R.; Kerr, I.M.; Darnell, J.E. A single phosphotyrosine residue of STAT91 required for gene activation by interferon-gamma. Science 1993, 261, 1744–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Darnell, J.E.; Kerr, I.M.; Stark, G.R. JAK-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science 1994, 264, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yeh, T.C.; Pellegrini, S. The Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases and their role in signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 55, 1523–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yamaoka, K.; Saharinen, P.; Pesu, M.; Holt, V.E.; Silvennoinen, O.; O’Shea, J.J. The Janus kinases (Jaks). Genome Biol. 2004, 5, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shuai, K.; Horvath, C.M.; Huang, L.H.; Qureshi, S.A.; Cowburn, D.; Darnell, J.E. Interferon activation of the transcription factor STAT91 involves dimerization through SH2-phosphotyrosyl peptide interactions. Cell 1994, 76, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sadowski, H.B.; Shuai, K.; Darnell, J.E.; Gilman, M.Z. A common nuclear signal transduction pathway activated by growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science 1993, 261, 1739–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Darnell, J.E. Stats and gene regulation. Science 1997, 277, 1630–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buettner, R.; Mora, L.B.; Jove, R. Activated STAT signaling in human tumors provides novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 945–954. [Google Scholar]
  41. Imada, K.; Leonard, W.J. The JAK-STAT pathway. Mol. Immunol. 2000, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dearolf, C.R. JAKs and STATs in invertebrate model organisms. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 55, 1578–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ihle, J.N. Cytokine receptor signalling. Nature 1995, 377, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schindler, C.; Darnell, J.E. Transcriptional responses to polypeptide ligands: The JAK-STAT pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995, 64, 621–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kotenko, S.V.; Pestka, S. JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway through the eyes of cytokine class II receptor complexes. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2557–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Loh, C.Y.; Arya, A.; Naema, A.F.; Wong, W.F.; Sethi, G.; Looi, C.Y. Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STATs) Proteins in Cancer and Inflammation: Functions and Therapeutic Implication. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Meydan, N.; Grunberger, T.; Dadi, H. Inhibition of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by a Jak-2 inhibitor. Nature 1996, 379, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Samadi, A.K.; Bilsland, A.; Georgakilas, A.G.; Amedei, A.; Amin, A.; Bishayee, A.; Azmi, A.S.; Lokeshwar, B.L.; Grue, B.; Panis, C.; et al. A multi-targeted approach to suppress tumor-promoting inflammation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015, 35, 151–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aggarwal, B.B.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Harikumar, K.B. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, inflammation, and cancer: How intimate is the relationship? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1171, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fletcher, S.; Drewry, J.A.; Shahani, V.M. Molecular disruption of oncogenic signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) protein. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 87, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wernig, G.; Kharas, M.G.; Okabe, R. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell 2008, 13, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Koppikar, P.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Hedvat, C. Efficacy of the JAK2 inhibitor INCB16562 in a murine model of MPLW515L-induced thrombocytosis and myelofibrosis. Blood 2010, 115, 2919–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Quinta´s-Cardama, A.; Vaddi, K.; Liu, P. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: Therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2010, 115, 3109–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sansone, P.; Bromberg, J. Targeting the interleukin-6/Jak/stat pathway in human malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Hedvat, M.; Huszar, D.; Herrmann, A. The JAK2 inhibitor AZD1480 potently blocks Stat3 signaling and oncogenesis in solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2009, 16, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Xi, S.; Gooding, W.E.; Grandis, J.R. In vivo antitumor efficacy of STAT3 blockade using a transcription factor decoy approach: Implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 2005, 24, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lui, V.W.; Boehm, A.L.; Koppikar, P. Antiproliferative mechanisms of a transcription factor decoy targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3: The role of STAT1. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007, 71, 1435–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Boehm, A.L.; Sen, M.; Seethala, R. Combined targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, and Bcl-X(L) enhances antitumor effects in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 73, 1632–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sen, M.; Tosca, P.J.; Zwayer, C. Lack of toxicity of a STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 63, 983–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhao, W.; Jaganathan, S.; Turkson, J. A cell permeable STAT3 SH2 domain mimetic inhibits STAT3 activation and induces antitumor cell effects in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 35855–35865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhang, X.; Yue, P.; Fletcher, S. A novel small molecule disrupts Stat3 SH2 domain-phosphotyrosine interactions and Stat3-dependent tumor processes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 79, 1398–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Redell, M.S.; Ruiz, M.J.; Alonzo, T.A. Stat3 signaling in acute myeloid leukemia: Ligand dependent and -independent activation and induction of apoptosis by a novel small-molecule Stat3 inhibitor. Blood 2011, 117, 5701–5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fletcher, S.; Singh, J.; Zhang, X.; Yue, P.; Page, B.D.; Sharmeen, S.; Shahani, V.M.; Zhao, W.; Schimmer, A.D.; Turkson, J.; et al. Disruption of transcriptionally active Stat3 dimers with non-phosphorylated, salicylic acid-based small molecules: Potent in vitro and tumor cell activities. Chembiochem 2009, 10, 1959–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Madoux, F.; Koenig, M.; Sessions, H. Modulators of STAT transcription factors for the targeted therapy of cancer (STAT3 inhibitors). In Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program; National Center for Biotechnology Information: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2011; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  65. Nelson, E.A.; Sharma, S.V.; Settleman, J. A chemical biology approach to developing STAT inhibitors: Molecular strategies for accelerating clinical translation. Oncotarget 2011, 2, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nelson, E.A.; Walker, S.R.; Weisberg, E. The STAT5 inhibitor pimozide decreases survival of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells resistant to kinase inhibitors. Blood 2011, 117, 3421–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nelson, E.A.; Walker, S.R.; Kepich, A. Nifuroxazide inhibits survival of multiple myeloma cells by directly inhibiting STAT3. Blood 2008, 112, 5095–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Li, W.X. Canonical and non-canonical JAK/STAT signaling. Trends Cell. Biol. 2008, 18, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Regis, G.; Pensa, S.; Boselli, D. Ups and downs: The STAT1:STAT3 seesaw of interferon and gp130 receptor signalling. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 19, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kumar, A.; Commane, M.; Flickinger, T.W. Defective TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in STAT1-null cells due to low constitutive levels of caspases. Science 1997, 278, 1630–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, J.; Chatterjee, K.M.; Staugaitis, S.M. Novel roles of unphosphorylated STAT3 in oncogenesis and transcriptional regulation. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 939–947. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.Y.; Marzec, M. STAT3- and DNA methyltransferase 1-mediated epigenetic silencing of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase tumor suppressor gene in malignant T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005, 102, 6948–6953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, X. STAT5A is epigenetically silenced by the tyrosine kinase NPM1-ALK and acts as a tumor suppressor by reciprocally inhibiting NPM1-ALK expression. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gough, D.J.; Corlett, A.; Schlessinger, K. Mitochondrial STAT3 supports Ras-dependent oncogenic transformation. Science 2009, 324, 1713–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Reich, N.C. STAT3 revs up the powerhouse. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Walker, S.R.; Chaudhury, M.; Nelson, E.A. Microtubule-targeted chemotherapeutic agents inhibit signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 78, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hazan-Halevy, I.; Harris, D.; Liu, Z. STAT3 is constitutively phosphorylated on serine 727 residues, binds DNA, and activates transcription in CLL cells. Blood 2010, 115, 2852–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kim, H.Y.; Park, E.J.; Joe, E.H.; Jou, I. Curcumin suppresses Janus kinase-STAT inflammatory signaling through activation of Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 in brain microglia. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6072–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Calvisi, D.F.; Ladu, S.; Gorden, A.; Farina, M.; Conner, E.A.; Lee, J.S.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Ubiquitous activation of Ras and Jak/Stat pathways in human HCC. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rhee, Y.H.; Jeong, S.J.; Lee, H.J. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling and induction of SHP1 mediate antiangiogenic and antitumor activities of ergosterol peroxide in U266 multiple myeloma cells. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Yang, J.; Cai, X.; Lu, W.; Hu, C.; Xu, X.; Yu, Q.; Cao, P. Evodiamine inhibits STAT3 signaling by inducing phosphatase shatterproof 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2013, 328, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aggarwal, B.B.; Bhardwaj, A.; Aggarwal, R.S.; Seeram, N.P.; Shishodia, S.; Takada, Y. Role of resveratrol in prevention and therapy of cancer: Preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24, 2783–2840. [Google Scholar]
  83. Bishayee, A. Cancer prevention and treatment with resveratrol: From rodent studies to clinical trials. Cancer Prev. Res. 2009, 2, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ko, J.H.; Sethi, G.; Um, J.Y.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Arfuso, F.; Kumar, A.P.; Bishayee, A.; Ahn, K.S. The role of resveratrol in cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Butt, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Peters, D.G.; Mubarak, M.S. Resveratrol as an anti-cancer agent: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1428–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Madan, E.; Prasad, S.; Roy, P.; George, J.; Shukla, Y. Regulation of apoptosis by resveratrol through JAK/STAT and mitochondria mediated pathway in human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 1232–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bhardwaj, A.; Sethi, G.; Vadhan-Raj, S. Resveratrol inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and overcomes chemoresistance through down-regulation of STAT3 and nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated antiapoptotic and cell survival gene products in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2007, 109, 2293–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Kotha, A.; Sekharam, M.; Cilenti, L. Resveratrol inhibits Src and Stat3 signaling and induces the apoptosis of malignant cells containing activated Stat3 protein. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ma, Z.; Molavi, O.; Haddadi, A.; Lai, R.; Gossage, R.A.; Lavasanifar, A. Resveratrol analog trans 3, 4, 5, 4′-tetramethoxystilbene (DMU-212) mediates anti-tumor effects via mechanism different from that of resveratrol. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2008, 63, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nwachukwu, J.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Bruno, N.E. Resveratrol modulates the inflammatory response via an estrogen receptor-signal integration network. Elife 2014, 3, 02057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Anand, P.; Sundaram, C.; Jhurani, S.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin and cancer: An “old-age” disease with an “age-old” solution. Cancer Lett. 2008, 267, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Darvesh, A.S.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Bishayee, A. Curcumin and liver cancer: A review. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sinha, D.; Biswas, J.; Sung, B.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Bishayee, A. Chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential of curcumin in breast cancer. Curr. Drug Targets 2012, 13, 1799–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kasi, P.D.; Tamilselvam, R.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Nabavi, S.F.; Daglia, M.; Bishayee, A.; Nabavi, S.M. Molecular targets of curcumin for cancer therapy: An updated review. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 13017–13028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Bharti, A.C.; Donato, N.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) inhibits constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 phosphorylation in human multiple myeloma cells. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3863–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yang, C.L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.G. Curcumin blocks small cell lung cancer cells migration, invasion, angiogenesis, cell cycle and neoplasia through Janus kinase–STAT3 signalling pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rajasingh, J.; Raikwar, H.P.; Muthian, G.; Johnson, C.; Bright, J.J. Curcumin induces growth-arrest and apoptosis in association with the inhibition of constitutively active JAK–STAT pathway in T cell leukemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 340, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Bordoloi, D.; Harsha, C.; Banik, K.; Gupta, S.C.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin mediates anticancer effects by modulating multiple cell signaling pathways. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 1781–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Min-Wen, J.C.; Yan-Jiang, B.C.; Mishra, S.; Dai, X.; Magae, J.; Shyh-Chang, N.; Kumar, A.P.; Sethi, G. Molecular Targets of Ascochlorin and Its Derivatives for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2017, 108, 199–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cho, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Nam, J.H.; Chang, Y.C.; Park, B.; Hoe, H.S. Ascochlorin suppresses MMP-2-mediated migration and invasion by targeting FAK and JAK-STAT signaling cascades. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ko, J.H.; Arfuso, F.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Pharmacological Utilization of Bergamottin, Derived from Grapefruits, in Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kim, S.M.; Lee, J.H.; Sethi, G.; Kim, C.; Baek, S.H.; Nam, D.; Ahn, K.S. Bergamottin, a natural furanocoumarin obtained from grapefruit juice induces chemosensitization and apoptosis through the inhibition of STAT3 signaling pathway in tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 2014, 354, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lee, J.H.; Chiang, S.Y.; Nam, D.; Chung, W.S.; Lee, J.; Na, Y.S.; Ahn, K.S. Capillarisin inhibits constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation through induction of SHP-1 and SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatases. Cancer Lett. 2014, 345, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Takeda, T.; Tsubaki, M.; Tomonari, Y.; Kawashima, K.; Itoh, T.; Imano, M.; Nishida, S. Bavachin induces the apoptosis of multiple myeloma cell lines by inhibiting the activation of nuclear factor kappa B and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 100, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Singh, B.N.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. Green tea catechin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG): Mechanisms, perspectives and clinical applications. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1807–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Darvesh, A.S.; Bishayee, A. Chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of tea polyphenols in hepatocellular cancer. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yang, C.S.; Wang, H. Cancer preventive activities of tea catechins. Molecules 2016, 21, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sinha, D.; Biswas, J.; Nabavi, S.M.; Bishayee, A. Tea phytochemicals for breast cancer prevention and intervention: From bench to bedside and beyond. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 46, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tang, S.N.; Fu, J.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. EGCG enhances the therapeutic potential of gemcitabine and CP690550 by inhibiting STAT3 signaling pathway in human pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 31067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shimizu, M.; Shirakami, Y.; Sakai, H. EGCG inhibits activation of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-1 receptor axis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2008, 262, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Masuda, M.; Suzui, M.; Weinstein, I.B. Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on growth, epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways, gene expression, and chemosensitivity in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 4220–4229. [Google Scholar]
  112. Masuda, M.; Suzui, M.; Lim, J.T.E.; Weinstein, I.B. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits activation of HER-2/neu and downstream signaling pathways in human head and neck and breast carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 3486–3491. [Google Scholar]
  113. Xiao, X.; Jiang, K.; Xu, Y.; Peng, H.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhang, G. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces cell apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia by regulating Bcr/Abl-mediated p38-MAPK/JNK and JAK2/STAT3/AKT signaling pathways. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2019, 46, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Harlev, E.; Nevo, E.; Lansky, E.P.; Ofir, R.; Bishayee, A. Anticancer potential of aloes: Antioxidant, antiproliferative, and immunostimulatory attributes. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Wei, W.T.; Lin, S.Z.; Liu, D.L.; Wang, Z.H. The distinct mechanisms of the antitumor activity of emodin in different types of cancer (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Sanders, B.; Ray, A.M.; Goldberg, S.; Clark, T.; McDaniel, H.R.; Atlas, S.E.; Farooqi, A.; Konefal, J.; Lages, L.C.; Lopez, J.; et al. Anti-cancer effects of aloe-emodin: A systematic review. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2017, 3, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. He, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, P.; Shen, X.; Li, S.; Yang, L.; Wang, F. Emodin potentiates the antiproliferative effect of interferon α/β by activation of JAK/STAT pathway signaling through inhibition of the 26S proteasome. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K.; Asati, V. Anti-cancer chalcones: Structural and molecular target perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 98, 69–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. León-González, A.J.; Acero, N.; Muñoz-Mingarro, D.; Navarro, I.; Martín-Cordero, C. Chalcones as Promising Lead Compounds on Cancer Therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 3407–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liu, Y.C.; Hsieh, C.W.; Wu, C.C.; Wung, B.S. Chalcone inhibits the activation of NF-kappaB and STAT3 in endothelial cells via endogenous electrophile. Life Sci. 2007, 80, 1420–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ong, S.K.L.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Fan, L.; Fraser, S.E.; Arfuso, F.; Ahn, K.S.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Focus on Formononetin: Anticancer Potential and Molecular Targets. Cancers 2019, 11, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Tay, K.C.; Tan, L.T.; Chan, C.K.; Hong, S.L.; Chan, K.G.; Yap, W.H.; Pusparajah, P.; Lee, L.H.; Goh, B.H. Formononetin: A Review of Its Anticancer Potentials and Mechanisms. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Wang, A.L.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Fan, L.Q. Formononetin inhibits colon carcinoma cell growth and invasion by microRNA-149-mediated EphB3 downregulation and inhibition of PI3K/AKT and STAT3 signaling pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 7721–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Liu, C.; Ho, P.C.; Wong, F.C.; Sethi, G.; Wang, L.Z.; Goh, B.C. Garcinol: Current status of its anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects. Cancer Lett. 2015, 362, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Behera, A.K.; Swamy, M.M.; Natesh, N.; Kundu, T.K. Garcinol and Its Role in Chronic Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 928, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Sethi, G.; Chatterjee, S.; Rajendran, P.; Li, F.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Wong, K.F.; Basha, J. Inhibition of STAT3 dimerization and acetylation by garcinol suppresses the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma In Vitro and In Vivo. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Chua, L.K.; Lim, C.L.; Ling, A.P.K.; Chye, S.M.; Koh, R.Y. Anticancer Potential of Syzygium Species: A Review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019, 74, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wu, N.; Liu, J.; Zhao, X.; Yan, Z.; Jiang, B.; Wang, L.; Cao, S.; Shi, D.; Lin, X. Cardamonin induces apoptosis by suppressing STAT3 signaling pathway in glioblastoma stem cells. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 9667–9676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Murtaza, G.; Sajjad, A.; Mehmood, Z.; Shah, S.H.; Siddiqi, A.R. Possible molecular targets for therapeutic applications of caffeic acid phenethyl ester in inflammation and cancer. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Damasceno, S.S.; Dantas, B.B.; Ribeiro-Filho, J.; Antônio, M.; Araújo, D.; Galberto, M.; da Costa, J. Chemical Properties of Caffeic and Ferulic Acids in Biological System: Implications in Cancer Therapy. A Review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 3015–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jung, J.E.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, C.S. Caffeic acid and its synthetic derivative CADPE suppress tumor angiogenesis by blocking STAT3-mediated VEGF expression in human renal carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 1780–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Deep, G.; Agarwal, R. Targeting tumor microenvironment with silibinin: Promise and potential for a translational cancer chemopreventive strategy. Curr. Cancer Drug Target. 2013, 13, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Mastron, J.K.; Siveen, K.S.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Silymarin and hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic, comprehensive, and critical review. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2015, 26, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Zhu, X.X.; Ding, Y.H.; Wu, Y.; Qian, L.Y.; Zou, H.; He, Q. Silibinin: A potential old drug for cancer therapy. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016, 9, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Agarwal, C.; Tyagi, A.; Kaur, M.; Agarwal, R. Silibinin inhibits constitutive activation of Stat3 and causes caspase activation and apoptotic death of human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 1463–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Tyagi, A.; Singh, R.P.; Ramasamy, K. Growth inhibition and regression of lung tumors by silibinin: Modulation of angiogenesis by macrophage-associated cytokines and nuclear factorkappaB and signal transducers and activators of transcription 3. Cancer Prev. Res. 2009, 2, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Padmavathi, G.; Roy, N.K.; Bordoloi, D.; Arfuso, F.; Mishra, S.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A.; Kunnumakkara, A.B. Butein in health and disease: A comprehensive review. Phytomedicine 2017, 25, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Jayasooriya, R.G.P.T.; Molagoda, I.M.N.; Park, C.; Jeong, J.W.; Choi, Y.H.; Moon, D.O.; Kim, M.O.; Kim, G.Y. Molecular chemotherapeutic potential of butein: A concise review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 112, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bhutani, M.; Pathak, A.K.; Nair, A.S. Capsaicin is a novel blocker of constitutive and interleukin-6-inducible STAT3 activation. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 3024–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Rajendran, P.; Ong, T.H.; Chen, L. Suppression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation by butein inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma in vivo. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Kasala, E.R.; Bodduluru, L.N.; Madana, R.M.; V, A.K.; Gogoi, R.; Barua, C.C. Chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of chrysin in cancer: Mechanistic perspectives. Toxicol. Lett. 2015, 233, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Khoo, B.Y.; Chua, S.L.; Balaram, P. Apoptotic effects of chrysin in human cancer cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Zhang, Z.; Ye, T.; Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Lu, W.; Hu, C. 5, 7-Dihydroxyflavone enhances the apoptosis-inducing potential of Trail in human tumor cells via regulation of apoptosis-related proteins. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013, 2013, 434709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Chen, X.R.; Lu, R.; Dan, H.X.; Liao, G.; Zhou, M.; Li, X.Y. Honokiol: A promising small molecular weight natural agent for the growth inhibition of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2011, 3, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Dikalov, S.; Losik, T.; Arbiser, J.L. Honokiol is a potent scavenger of superoxide and peroxyl radicals. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Averett, C.; Arora, S.; Zubair, H.; Singh, S.; Bhardwaj, A.; Singh, A.P. Molecular Targets of Honokiol: A Promising Phytochemical for Effective Cancer Management. Enzymes 2014, 36, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Prasad, R.; Katiyar, S.K. Honokiol, an Active Compound of Magnolia Plant, Inhibits Growth, and Progression of Cancers of Different Organs. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 928, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  148. Banik, K.; Ranaware, A.M.; Deshpande, V.; Nalawade, S.P.; Padmavathi, G.; Bordoloi, D.; Sailo, B.L.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Fan, L.; Arfuso, F.; et al. Honokiol for cancer therapeutics: A traditional medicine that can modulate multiple oncogenic targets. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 144, 192–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bi, L.; Yu, Z.; Wu, J.; Yu, K.; Hong, G.; Lu, Z.; Gao, S. Honokiol inhibits constitutive and inducible STAT3 signaling via PU. 1-induced SHP1 expression in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2015, 237, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Rasul, A.; Zhao, B.J.; Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Sun, J.X.; Li, J.; Li, X.M. Molecular mechanisms of casticin action: An update on its antitumor functions. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 9049–9058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Chan, E.W.C.; Wong, S.K.; Chan, H.T. Casticin from Vitex species: A short review on its anticancer and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Integr. Med. 2018, 16, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Chen, D.; Cao, J.; Tian, L.; Liu, F.; Sheng, X. Induction of apoptosis by casticin in cervical cancer cells through reactive oxygen species mediated mitochondrial signaling pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2011, 26, 1287–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zeng, F.; Tian, L.; Liu, F.; Cao, J.; Quan, M.; Sheng, X. Induction of apoptosis by casticin in cervical cancer cells: Reactive oxygen species-dependent sustained activation of Jun N-terminal kinase. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2012, 44, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Ko, J.H.; Jung, Y.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Kim, E.; Sethi, G. Casticin inhibits growth and enhances ionizing radiation–induced apoptosis through the suppression of STAT3 signaling cascade. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 9787–9798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Kowalczyk, A.; Bodalska, A.; Miranowicz, M.; Karłowicz-Bodalska, K. Insights into novel anticancer applications for apigenin. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 1143–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Madunić, J.; Madunić, I.V.; Gajski, G.; Popić, J.; Garaj-Vrhovac, V. Apigenin: A dietary flavonoid with diverse anticancer properties. Cancer Lett. 2018, 413, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Maeda, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Nakai, N.; Yanagita, T.; Ando, N.; Okubo, T.; Saito, K.; Shiga, K.; Hirokawa, T.; Hara, M.; et al. Apigenin induces apoptosis by suppressing Bcl-xl and Mcl-1 simultaneously via signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling in colon cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 1661–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. Anticancer Natural Coumarins as Lead Compounds for the Discovery of New Drugs. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 3190–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Benes, P.; Knopfova, L.; Trcka, F.; Nemajerova, A.; Pinheiro, D.; Soucek, K. Inhibition of topoisomerase IIalpha: Novel function of wedelolactone. Cancer Lett. 2011, 303, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Benes, P.; Alexova, P.; Knopfova, L.; Spanova, A.; Smarda, J. Redox state alters anti-cancer effects of wedelolactone. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2012, 53, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, Z.; Sun, X.; Shen, S.; Zhang, H.; Ma, X.; Liu, J.; Kuang, S.; Yu, Q. Wedelolactone, a naturally occurring coumestan, enhances interferon-γ signaling through inhibiting STAT1 protein dephosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 14417–14427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Rabi, T.; Bishayee, A. Terpenoids and breast cancer chemoprevention. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 115, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Thoppil, R.J.; Bishayee, A. Terpenoids as potential chemopreventive and therapeutic agents in liver cancer. World J. Hepatol. 2011, 3, 228–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Shanmugam, M.K.; Dai, X.; Kumar, A.P.; Tan, B.K.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Oleanolic acid and its synthetic derivatives for the prevention and therapy of cancer: Preclinical and clinical evidence. Cancer Lett. 2014, 346, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Chen, J.C.; Chiu, M.H.; Nie, R.L.; Cordell, G.A.; Qiu, S.X. Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: Structures and biological activities. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lee, D.H.; Iwanski, G.B.; Thoennissen, N.H. Cucurbitacin: Ancient compound shedding new light on cancer treatment. Sci. World J. 2010, 10, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Cai, Y.; Fang, X.; He, C.; Li, P.; Xiao, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, M. Cucurbitacins: A Systematic Review of the Phytochemistry and Anticancer Activity. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2015, 43, 1331–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Thoennissen, N.H.; Iwanski, G.B.; Doan, N.B. Cucurbitacin B induces apoptosis by inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway and potentiates antiproliferative effects of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 5876–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Zhou, J.; Liu, M.; Chen, Y.; Xu, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, L. Cucurbitacin B suppresses proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells by ceRNA: Effect of miR-146b-5p and lncRNA-AFAP1-AS1. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 4655–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Chan, K.T.; Li, K.; Liu, S.L.; Chu, K.H.; Toh, M.; Xie, W.D. Cucurbitacin B inhibits STAT3 and the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in leukemia cell line K562. Cancer Lett. 2010, 289, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Huang, W.W.; Yang, J.S.; Lin, M.W. Cucurbitacin E Induces G2/M phase arrest through STAT3/p53/p21 signaling and provokes apoptosis via Fas/CD95 and mitochondria dependent pathways in human bladder cancer T24 cells. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 952762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Blaskovich, M.A.; Sun, J.; Cantor, A.; Turkson, J.; Jove, R.; Sebti, S.M. Discovery of JSI-124 (cucurbitacin I), a selective Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway inhibitor with potent antitumor activity against human and murine cancer cells in mice. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar]
  173. Su, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, X. JSI-124 inhibits glioblastoma multiforme cell proliferation through G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis augmentation. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2014, 7, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Van Kester, M.S.; Out-Luiting, J.J.; von dem Borne, P.A.; Willemze, R.; Tensen, C.P.; Vermeer, M.H. Cucurbitacin I inhibits Stat3 and induces apoptosis in Sézary cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 1691–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Shi, X.; Franko, B.; Frantz, C.; Amin, H.M.; Lai, R. JSI-124 (cucurbitacin I) inhibits Janus kinase-3/signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signalling, downregulates nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and induces apoptosis in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma cells. Br. J. Haematol. 2006, 135, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Sun, J.; Blaskovich, M.A.; Jove, R.; Livingston, S.K.; Coppola, D.; Sebti, S.M. Cucurbitacin Q: A selective STAT3 activation inhibitor with potent antitumor activity. Oncogene 2005, 24, 3236–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Mishra, S.K.; Tripathi, S.; Shukla, A.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, H.M. Andrographolide and analogues in cancer prevention. Front. Biosci. 2015, 7, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Islam, M.T.; Ali, E.S.; Uddin, S.J.; Islam, M.A.; Shaw, S.; Khan, I.N.; Saravi, S.S.S.; Ahmad, S.; Rehman, S.; Gupta, V.K.; et al. Andrographolide, a diterpene lactone from Andrographis paniculate and its therapeutic promises in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018, 420, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zhou, J.; Ong, C.N.; Hur, G.M.; Shen, H.M. Inhibition of the JAK-STAT3 pathway by andrographolide enhances chemosensitivity of cancer cells to doxorubicin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 79, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhang, X.; Hu, J.; Chen, Y. Betulinic acid and the pharmacological effects of tumor suppression (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 4489–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Kumar, P.; Bhadauria, A.S.; Singh, A.K.; Saha, S. Betulinic acid as apoptosis activator: Molecular mechanisms, mathematical modeling and chemical modifications. Life Sci. 2018, 209, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Pandey, M.K.; Sung, B.; Aggarwal, B.B. Betulinic acid suppresses STAT3 activation pathway through induction of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in human multiple myeloma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Aggarwal, V.; Kashyap, D.; Sak, K.; Tuli, H.S.; Jain, A.; Chaudhary, A.; Garg, V.K.; Sethi, G.; Yerer, M.B. Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Tocotrienols in Cancer: Recent Trends and Advancements. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Montagnani Marelli, M.; Marzagalli, M.; Fontana, F.; Raimondi, M.; Moretti, R.M.; Limonta, P. Anticancer properties of tocotrienols: A review of cellular mechanisms and molecular targets. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 1147–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Rajendran, P.; Li, F.; Manu, K.A. γ-Tocotrienol is a novel inhibitor of constitutive and inducible STAT3 signalling pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma: Potential role as an antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic and chemosensitizing agent. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Banerjee, S.; Bose, S.; Mandal, S.C.; Dawn, S.; Sahoo, U.; Ramadan, M.A.M.; Mandal, S. Pharmacological Property of Pentacyclic Triterpenoids. Egypt. J. Chem. 2019, 62, 13–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chen, W.; Lu, Y.; Chen, G.; Huang, S. Molecular evidence of cryptotanshinone for treatment and prevention of human cancer. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Shin, D.S.; Kim, H.N.; Shin, K.D. Cryptotanshinone inhibits constitutive signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 function through blocking the dimerization in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Patel, S.M.; Nagulapalli Venkata, K.C.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Potential of neem (Azadirachta indica L.) for prevention and treatment of oncologic diseases. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2016, 40–41, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wang, L.; Phan, D.D.; Zhang, J.; Ong, P.S.; Thuya, W.L.; Soo, R.; Wong, A.L.; Yong, W.P.; Lee, S.C.; Ho, P.C.; et al. Anticancer properties of nimbolide and pharmacokinetic considerations to accelerate its development. Oncotarget. 2016, 7, 44790–44802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Karkare, S.; Chhipa, R.R.; Anderson, J.; Liu, X.; Henry, H.; Gasilina, A.; Pauletti, G.M. Direct inhibition of retinoblastoma phosphorylation by nimbolide causes cell-cycle arrest and suppresses glioblastoma growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Zhang, J.; Ahn, K.S.; Kim, C.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Siveen, K.S.; Arfuso, F.; Goh, B.C. Nimbolide-induced oxidative stress abrogates STAT3 signaling cascade and inhibits tumor growth in transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate model. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 24, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kannaiyan, R.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Sethi, G. Molecular targets of celastrol derived from Thunder of God Vine: Potential role in the treatment of inflammatory disorders and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2011, 303, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Kashyap, D.; Sharma, A.; Tuli, H.S.; Sak, K.; Mukherjee, T.; Bishayee, A. Molecular targets of celastrol in cancer: Recent trends and advancements. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2018, 128, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Kannaiyan, R.; Hay, H.S.; Rajendran, P. Celastrol inhibits proliferation and induces chemosensitization through downregulation of NF-κB and STAT3 regulated gene products in multiple myeloma cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1506–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Shanmugam, M.K.; Dai, X.; Kumar, A.P.; Tan, B.K.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Ursolic acid in cancer prevention and treatment: Molecular targets, pharmacokinetics and clinical studies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 1579–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Chan, E.W.C.; Soon, C.Y.; Tan, J.B.L.; Wong, S.K.; Hui, Y.W. Ursolic acid: An overview on its cytotoxic activities against breast and colorectal cancer cells. J. Integr. Med. 2019, 17, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Shanmugam, M.K.; Rajendran, P.; Li, F. Ursolic acid inhibits multiple cell survival pathways leading to suppression of growth of prostate cancer xenograft in nude mice. J. Mol. Med. 2011, 89, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lee, J.H.; Rangappa, S.; Mohan, C.D.; Sethi, G.; Lin, Z.X.; Rangappa, K.S.; Ahn, K.S. Brusatol, a Nrf2 Inhibitor Targets STAT3 Signaling Cascade in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Owona, B.A.; Schluesener, H.J. Molecular Insight in the Multifunctional Effects of Oridonin. Drugs RD 2015, 15, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Xu, J.; Wold, E.A.; Ding, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, J. Therapeutic Potential of Oridonin and Its Analogs: From Anticancer and Antiinflammation to Neuroprotection. Molecules 2018, 23, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Bu, H.Q.; Luo, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.H.; Li, H.H.; Guo, H.C. Oridonin enhance es antitumor activity of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer through MAPK-p38 signaling pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Chen, J.H.; Wang, S.B.; Li, E.M.; Chen, L.M.; Yuan, S.J.; Wang, R.L. Inhibitory effect of Oridonin injection on heterotransplanted gastric adenocarcinoma in nude mice and its mechanism. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008, 30, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  204. Chen, G.; Wang, K.; Yang, B.Y.; Tang, B.; Chen, J.X.; Hua, Z.C. Synergistic antitumor activity of oridonin and arsenic trioxide on hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Chen, R.Y.; Xu, B.; Chen, S.F.; Chen, A.S.; Zhang, T.; Ren, J.; Xu, J. Effect of oridonin-mediated hallmark changes on inflammatory pathways in human pancreatic cancer (BxPC-3) cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 14895–14903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Vitale, G.; Zappavigna, S.; Marra, M.; Dicitore, A.; Meschini, S.; Condello, M.; Arancia, G.; Castiglioni, S.; Maroni, P.; Bendinelli, P.; et al. The PPAR-γ agonist troglitazone antagonizes survival pathways induced by STAT-3 in recombinant interferon-β treated pancreatic cancer cells. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Imran, M.; Rauf, A.; Khan, I.A.; Shahbaz, M.; Qaisrani, T.B.; Fatmawati, S.; Gondal, T.A. Thymoquinone: A novel strategy to combat cancer: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 106, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Zhu, W.Q.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.F.; Liu, Z.; Dong, W.G. Thymoquinone inhibits proliferation in gastric cancer via the STAT3 pathway In Vivo and In Vitro. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Li, F.; Rajendran, P.; Sethi, G. Thymoquinone inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis and chemosensitizes human multiple myeloma cells through suppression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 161, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Ghantous, A.; Sinjab, A.; Herceg, Z.; Darwiche, N. Parthenolide: From plant shoots to cancer roots. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Cheng, G.; Xie, L. Parthenolide induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of human 5637 bladder cancer cells in vitro. Molecules 2011, 16, 6758–6768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Liu, J.W.; Cai, M.X.; Xin, Y.; Wu, Q.S.; Ma, J.; Yang, P. Parthenolide induces proliferation inhibition and apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 29, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Shanmugam, R.; Kusumanchi, P.; Appaiah, H.; Cheng, L.; Crooks, P.; Neelakantan, S. A water soluble parthenolide analog suppresses In Vivo tumor growth of two tobacco-associated cancers, lung and bladder cancer, by targeting NF-kappaB and generating reactive oxygen species. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 2481–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Liu, M.; Xiao, C.; Sun, M.; Tan, M.; Hu, L.; Yu, Q. Parthenolide inhibits STAT3 signaling by covalently targeting Janus kinases. Molecules 2018, 23, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Efferth, T. From ancient herb to modern drug: Artemisia annua and artemisinin for cancer therapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 46, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Slezakova, S.; Ruda-Kucerova, J. Anticancer Activity of Artemisinin and its Derivatives. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 5995–6003. [Google Scholar]
  217. Jia, L.; Song, Q.; Zhou, C.; Li, X.; Pi, L.; Ma, X. Dihydroartemisinin as a putative STAT3 inhibitor, suppresses the growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by targeting Jak2/STAT3 signaling. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 0147157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Wang, D.; Zhong, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, X. Dihydroartemisinin increases apoptosis of colon cancer cells through targeting Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 15, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Rasul, A.; Khan, M.; Ali, M.; Li, J.; Li, X. Targeting apoptosis pathways in cancer with alantolactone and isoalantolactone. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 248532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Pal, H.C.; Sehar, I.; Bhushan, S.; Gupta, B.D.; Saxena, A.K. Activation of caspases and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage to induce apoptosis in leukemia HL-60 cells by Inula racemosa. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Khan, M.; Yi, F.; Rasul, A.; Li, T.; Wang, N.; Gao, H. Alantolactone induces apoptosis in glioblastoma cells via GSH depletion, ROS generation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. IUBMB Life 2012, 64, 783–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Chun, J.; Li, R.J.; Cheng, M.S.; Kim, Y.S. Alantolactone selectively suppresses STAT3 activation and exhibits potent anticancer activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Cancer Lett. 2015, 357, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Fidyt, K.; Fiedorowicz, A.; Strządała, L.; Szumny, A. β-caryophyllene and β-caryophyllene oxide-natural compounds of anticancer and analgesic properties. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 3007–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kim, C.; Cho, S.K.; Kapoor, S.; Kumar, A.; Vali, S.; Abbasi, T.; Ahn, K.S. β-caryophyllene oxide inhibits constitutive and inducible STAT3 signaling pathway through induction of the SHP-1 protein tyrosine phosphatase. Mol. Carcinog. 2014, 53, 793–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Mondal, A.; Gandhi, A.; Fimognari, C.; Atanasov, A.G.; Bishayee, A. Alkaloids for cancer prevention and therapy: Current progress and future perspectives. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 858, 172472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Efferth, T.; Oesch, F. Repurposing of plant alkaloids for cancer therapy: Pharmacology and toxicology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Clark, R.; Lee, S.H. Anticancer Properties of Capsaicin Against Human Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  228. Chapa-Oliver, A.M.; Mejía-Teniente, L. Capsaicin: From plants to a cancer-suppressing agent. Molecules 2016, 21, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  229. Zhang, S.; Wang, D.; Huang, J.; Hu, Y.; Xu, Y. Application of capsaicin as a potential new therapeutic drug in human cancers. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2020, 45, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Hu, X.; Li, D.; Chu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Jia, Y.; Hua, H.; Xu, F. Antiproliferative Effects of Alkaloid Evodiamine and Its Derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Guo, X.X.; Li, X.P.; Zhou, P.; Li, D.Y.; Lyu, X.T.; Chen, Y.; Lyu, Y.-W.; Tian, K.; Yuan, D.-Z.; Ran, J.-H.; et al. Evodiamine induces apoptosis in SMMC-7721 and HepG2 cells by suppressing NOD1 signal pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  232. Blažević, T.; Heiss, E.H.; Atanasov, A.G.; Breuss, J.M.; Dirsch, V.M.; Uhrin, P. Indirubin and Indirubin Derivatives for Counteracting Proliferative Diseases. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015, 2015, 654098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Cheng, X.; Merz, K.H. The Role of Indirubins in Inflammation and Associated Tumorigenesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 929, 269–290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  234. Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Zheng, Q.; Hu, J. Indirubin suppresses ovarian cancer cell viabilities through the STAT3 signaling pathway. Drug. Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  235. Xu, X.H.; Li, T.; Fong, M.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.J.; Wang, Y.T.; Huang, M.Q.; Lu, J.J. Saponins from Chinese Medicines as Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2016, 21, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Koczurkiewicz, P.; Klaś, K.; Grabowska, K.; Piska, K.; Rogowska, K.; Wójcik-Pszczoła, K.; Podolak, I.; Galanty, A.; Michalik, M.; Pękala, E. Saponins as chemosensitizing substances that improve effectiveness and selectivity of anticancer drug-Minireview of in vitro studies. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Cheong, D.H.J.; Arfuso, F.; Sethi, G.; Wang, L.; Hui, K.M.; Kumar, A.P.; Tran, T. Molecular targets and anti-cancer potential of escin. Cancer Lett. 2018, 422, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Tan, S.M.L.; Li, F.; Rajendran, P.; Kumar, A.P.; Hui, K.M.; Sethi, G. Identification of beta-escin as a novel inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3/Janus-activated kinase 2 signaling pathway that suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 334, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Blanco-Vaca, F.; Cedo, L.; Julve, J. Phytosterols in cancer: From molecular mechanisms to preventive and therapeutic potentials. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 6735–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Jiang, L.; Zhao, X.; Xu, J.; Li, C.; Yu, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhu, L. The Protective Effect of Dietary Phytosterols on Cancer Risk: A Systematic Meta-Analysis. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 7479518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Raju, J.; Mehta, R. Cancer chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of diosgenin, a food saponin. Nutr. Cancer 2009, 61, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Nagulapalli Venkata, K.C.; Swaroop, A.; Bagchi, D.; Bishayee, A. A small plant with big benefits: Fenugreek (Trigonellafoenum graecum L.) for disease prevention and health promotion. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Sethi, G.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Warrier, S.; Merarchi, M.; Arfuso, F.; Kumar, A.P.; Bishayee, A. Pro-apoptotic and anti-cancer properties of diosgenin: A comprehensive and critical review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Li, F.; Fernandez, P.P.; Rajendran, P.; Hui, K.M.; Sethi, G. Diosgenin, a steroidal saponin, inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway leading to suppression of proliferation and chemosensitization of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 292, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Bian, D.; Li, Z.; Ma, H.; Mu, S.; Ma, C.; Cui, B.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J. Effects of diosgenin on cell proliferation induced by IGF-1 in primary human thyrocytes. Arch. Pharmacal. Res. 2011, 34, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Merdivan, S.; Lindequist, U. Ergosterol Peroxide: A Mushroom-Derived Compound with Promising Biological Activities—A Review. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2017, 19, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Shishodia, S.; Azu, N.; Rosenzweig, J.A.; Jackson, D.A. Guggulsterone for Chemoprevention of Cancer. Curr. Pharm Des. 2016, 22, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Bhat, A.A.; Prabhu, K.S.; Kuttikrishnan, S.; Krishnankutty, R.; Babu, J.; Mohammad, R.M.; Uddin, S. Potential therapeutic targets of Guggulsterone in cancer. Nutr. Metab. 2017, 14, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Banik, K.; Bordoloi, D.; Harsha, C.; Sailo, B.L.; Padmavathi, G.; Roy, N.K.; Gupta, S.C.; Aggarwal, B.B. Googling the Guggul (Commiphora and Boswellia) for Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Ahn, K.S.; Sethi, G.; Sung, B.; Goel, A.; Ralhan, R.; Aggarwal, B.B. Guggulsterone, a farnesoid X receptor antagonist, inhibits constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation through induction of a protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 4406–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  251. Kim, M.; Morales, L.D.; Jang, I.S.; Cho, Y.Y.; Kim, D.J. Protein tyrosine phosphatases as potential regulators of STAT3 signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  252. Touré, A.; Xueming, X. Flaxseed lignans: Source, biosynthesis, metabolism, antioxidant activity, bio-active components, and health benefits. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Gao, Q.; Yang, M.; Zuo, Z. Overview of the anti-inflammatory effects, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacies of arctigenin and arctiin from Arctium lappa L. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018, 39, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Lee, J.; Um, J.Y.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Arctiin is a pharmacological inhibitor of STAT3 phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 residue and potentiates bortezomib-induced apoptotic and anti-angiogenic effects in human multiple myeloma cells. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Romagnolo, D.F.; Davis, C.D.; Milner, J.A. Phytoalexins in cancer prevention. Front. Biosci. 2012, 17, 2035–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Chripkova, M.; Zigo, F.; Mojzis, J. Antiproliferative Effect of Indole Phytoalexins. Molecules 2016, 21, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway through modulation of PIAS-3 and SOCS-3 expression and sensitizes human lung cancer xenograft in nude mice to paclitaxel. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  258. Bousoik, E.; Aliabadi, H.M. “Do we know Jack” about JAK? A closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway activation leading to upregulation of genes involved in survival and tumor cell proliferation. Various steps in the JAK/STAT pathway: I: Cytokine binds to receptor and receptors dimerize. II: JAKs are phosphorylated by each other. III: JAK phosphorylates the receptor, forming phosphotyrosine binding sites for STAT’s SH2 domain. IV: STAT binds to the receptor. JAK phosphorylates STAT which changes the conformation of STAT and stimulates its release. V: Phosphorylated STAT dissociates from the receptor and dimerizes. VI: Phosphorylated STAT translocates into the nucleus. VII. Phosphorylated STAT binds to DNA. VIII. Stimulation of DNA transcription of target genes.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway activation leading to upregulation of genes involved in survival and tumor cell proliferation. Various steps in the JAK/STAT pathway: I: Cytokine binds to receptor and receptors dimerize. II: JAKs are phosphorylated by each other. III: JAK phosphorylates the receptor, forming phosphotyrosine binding sites for STAT’s SH2 domain. IV: STAT binds to the receptor. JAK phosphorylates STAT which changes the conformation of STAT and stimulates its release. V: Phosphorylated STAT dissociates from the receptor and dimerizes. VI: Phosphorylated STAT translocates into the nucleus. VII. Phosphorylated STAT binds to DNA. VIII. Stimulation of DNA transcription of target genes.
Cells 09 01451 g001
Figure 2. Structures of phenolics and polyphenols with anticancer activities correlated with inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Figure 2. Structures of phenolics and polyphenols with anticancer activities correlated with inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Cells 09 01451 g002
Figure 3. Structures of the terpenoids with anticancer activities related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathwa.
Figure 3. Structures of the terpenoids with anticancer activities related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathwa.
Cells 09 01451 g003
Figure 4. Structures of alkaloids, saponins, and steroids involved in anticancer activities related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Figure 4. Structures of alkaloids, saponins, and steroids involved in anticancer activities related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Cells 09 01451 g004
Figure 5. Illustration of various phytochemicals blocking specific steps in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in relation to their cancer preventive and anticancer actions.
Figure 5. Illustration of various phytochemicals blocking specific steps in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in relation to their cancer preventive and anticancer actions.
Cells 09 01451 g005
Table 1. Potential anticancer activities of phenolics and polyphenols correlated with inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Table 1. Potential anticancer activities of phenolics and polyphenols correlated with inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Phytochemical NameSourcesAnticancer EffectMechanism of ActionEC50/IC50References
ResveratrolVitis vinifera L., Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and Arachis hypogaea L.Inhibited proliferation in human epidermoid carcinoma (A431) cells┴ Phosphorylation of JAK that prevented STAT1 phosphorylation 40 µMMadan et al., 2008 [86]
Inhibited proliferation in human multiple myeloma (U266 and RPMI 8226) cells┴ Constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation50 and 50 µMBhardwaj et al., 2007 [87]
Inhibited tumor growth, induction of cytotoxicity, cell cycle arrest of v-Src-transformed mouse fibroblasts (NIH3T3/v-Src) at G0-G1 phase. Showed cytotoxicity in human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), pancreatic carcinoma (Panc-1), and prostate carcinoma (DU145) cells┴ Src tyrosine kinase activity;
┴ constitutive STAT3 activation
40, 70. and 25 µMKotha et al., 2006 [88]
CurcuminCurcuma longa L.Induction of cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma (U266, RPMI 8226, and MM.1S) cells┴ Constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 phosphorylation;
┴ IFN-inducible STAT1 phosphorylation
13.8, 12.7 and 10 µMBharti et al., 2003 [95]
Inhibited proliferation in human small cell lung cancer (NCI-H446 and NCI-1688) cells┴ STAT3 phosphorylation; ↓ STAT3 downstream gene expression15 and 15 µMYang et al., 2012 [96]
Antitumor activity in T-cell leukemia, treatment causes growth arrest with increase in apoptosis┴ Activation of the JAK/STAT pathway;
↓ JAK and STAT phosphorylation
Not specifiedRajasingh et al., 2006 [97]; Kunnumakkara et al., 2017 [98]
AscochlorinAscochyta viciaeInhibited cell migration and invasion in U373MG and A172 cancer cells ┴ MMP-9 expression,
┴ MMP-2 gelatinolytic action and expression;
┴ JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation, cancer cell migration, and nuclear translocation of STAT3
10 μMCho et al., 2018 [100]
BergamottinGrape juice, lime, lemon, and bergamot oilsAntitumor activity in U266 cells, induction of substantial apoptosis at sub-G1 stage┴ Constitutive STAT3 activation;
┴ Phosphorylation of JAK 1/2 and c-Src
100 μMKim et al., 2014 [102]
CapillarisinArtemisia capillaries Thunb.Negative regulator of growth and metastasis in human multiple myeloma cells; induces apoptosis; downregulated the expression level of various STAT3-regulated proteins ┴ Constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation at tyrosine 705;
┴ STAT3 phosphorylation;
┴ Activation of JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src kinases
Not mentionedLee et al., 2014 [103]
BavachinPsoralea corylifolia Linn.
[Cullen corylifolium (L.) Medik.]
Induced cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma cell lines; induced apoptosis by activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9;
inhibited activation of NF-κB, expression levels of Bcl-2, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), survivin, and B cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL)
┴ Activation of STAT3;
┴ Phosphorylation of STAT3
10 μMTakeda et al., 2018 [104]
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)Camellia sinensis (L.) KuntzeAnticancer activity in human pancreatic (AsPC-1 and PANC-1), breast (T47D), head and neck cancer (YCU-H861) cells┴ Phosphorylation and expression of both JAK3 and STAT3 proteins 40, 40, 14.17 µM, 1 µg/mLTang et al., 2012 [109]
EmodinRheum palmatum L.Stimulated the antiproliferation activity of interferon α/β in cervical carcinoma cell line (HeLa) and antitumor activity in Huh7 (hepatocellular cancer cell)-bearing mice in vivo┴ STAT3 activation,
┴ 26S proteasome activity
↑ STAT1 phosphorylation, ┴ STAT3 phosphorylation
Not specified, 1.22 μMHe et al., 2016 [117]
ChalconeMalus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. and Solanum lycopersicum L.Induced cytotoxicity in Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC)┴ IL-6-induced and LPS-induced STAT3 phosphorylation0.0069 µMLiu et al., 2007 [120]
FormononetinAstragalus mongholicus BungeInhibited proliferation and invasion of colon carcinoma cell lines HCT116 and SW1116, cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 stage┴ STAT3 signaling pathway;
┴ STAT3 phosphorylation
Not specifiedWang et al., 2018 [123]
GarcinolGarcinia indica (Thouars.) ChoisyInduced cytotoxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells,
cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase
┴ Constitutive and IL-6 inducible STAT3 activationNot specifiedSethi et al., 2014 [126]
CardamoninAlpinia conchigera Griff., and Alpinia hainanensis K. Schum.Antitumor activity in U87 cells (in vitro) and CD133+ GSCs (in vitro and in vivo); induced apoptosis┴ STAT3 signaling pathway;
┴ STAT3 activation;
┴ downstream STAT3 gene expressions (i.e., Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, Mcl-1, survivin, and VEGF)
Not specifiedWu et al., 2015 [128]
Caffeic acid or its derivative 3-(3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl)-acrylic acid 2-(3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl)-ethyl ester (CADPE)Camellia sinensis L. Kuntze., and Coffea arabica L.Induction of cytotoxicity in human renal carcinoma (Caki-1) cells┴ STAT3 phosphorylation;
┴ Src tyrosine kinase.
30 µMJung et al., 2007 [131]
SilibininSilybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.Induction of cytotoxicity in human prostate cancer (DU145) cells┴ Constitutively active STAT3, ↑ apoptosis and ┴ constitutive STAT3–DNA binding 50 µMAgarwal et al., 2007 [135]
Suppressed transcriptional function in urethane-induced lung tumors in A/J mice┴ STAT3 phosphorylationNot specifiedTyagi et al., 2009 [136]
ButeinToxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F.A. Barkley and Butea monosperma (Lam.) KuntzeExhibited antitumor activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2 and SNU-387)┴ Constitutive and IL-6- induced STAT3 activation by inactivating JAK1 and c-Src.50 and 50 µMBhutani et al., 2007 [139]; Rajendran et al., 2011 [140]
5,7-DihydroxyflavonePassiflora incarnate L., Passiflora caerulea L., and Oroxylum indicum (L.) KurzInhibited proliferation HepG2 tumor xenografts in vivo↓ Phosphorylation of STAT320 µMZhang et al., 2013 [143]
HonokiolMagnolia officinalis Rehder & E. H. Wilson and Magnolia grandiflora L.Inhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis in human leukemic cell lines (HEL and THP1), multiple myeloma cells (U266) and murine myeloid cell (32D) ┴ Constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation;
┴ mRNA levels of STAT3 target genes in a concentration-dependent manner;
↓ Nuclear translocation of STAT3
40 µM Bi et al., 2015 [149]
CasticinAchillea millefolium L., Artemisia abrotanum L., Vitex trifolia subsp. Litoralis Steenis, Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntz, Centipeda minima (L.) A.Braun & Asch, Clausena excavate Burm.f., Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge, Croton betulaster Müll Arg., Daphne genkwa Siebold & Zucc., Ficus microcarpa L.f., Nelsonia canescens (Lam.) Spreng., Pavetta crassipes K. Schum., Vitex trifolia subsp. Litoralis steenis, Vitex agnus-castus L., Vitex negundo L. and Vitex trifolia L.Inhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in colon (Panc-1), breast (MCF-7), lung (A549), gastric (SGC-7901), ovarian (SKOV3), liver (HepG2), leukemia (K562) cancer cells┴ Constitutively active STAT3 and modulates STAT3 activation by modifying upstream STAT3 regulator activity.10, 8.5, 14.3, 1, 2.18, 30, 5.95 µMChen et al., 2011 [152]; Zeng et al., 2012 [153]
Induced apoptosis in 786-O, YD-8, and HN-9 cancer cells┴ constitutively activation of STAT3;
Modulated STAT3 activation by altering the activity of upstream STAT3 regulators, and abrogated IL-6-induced STAT3 activation;
┴ JAK/STAT pathway
5 μMLee et al., 2019 [154]
ApigeninPetroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss., Apium graveolens L., and Matricaria chamomilla L.Anticancer and antitumor activity in colon cancer (HCT-116) cells┴ Phosphorylation of STAT3 and consequently downregulated the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-xL and Mcl-147.33 µMOzbey et al., 2018 [25]; Maeda et al., 2018 [157]
Anticancer activity in BT-474 (breast cancer) cells┴ JAK/STAT pathway
┴ STAT3 nuclear accumulation
┴ Phosphorylation of JAK1/2, and STAT3
Not specifiedOzbey et al., 2018 [25]
WedelolactoneEclipta prostrate (L.) L. and Sphagneticola calendulacea (L.) PruskiInhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis, causes cell cycle arrest at S and G2/M phases in breast (MDA-MB-231) and HepG2 cancer cells ┴ STAT1 dephosphorylation and prolonging STAT1 activation, ┴ T-cell protein tyrosine phosphataseNot specified in MDA-MB-231;
20 µM (EC50) in HepG2 cells
Benes et al., 2011 [159]; Benes et al., 2012 [160]; Chen et al., 2013 [161]
Various symbols (↑, ↓ and ┴) indicate increase, decrease and inhibition in the obtained variables, respectively.
Table 2. Potential anticancer activities of terpenoids related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Table 2. Potential anticancer activities of terpenoids related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Phytochemical NameSourcesAnticancer EffectMechanism of ActionEC50 /IC50References
Cucurbitacin BHemsleya endecaphylla C.Y. WuInduced cytotoxicity in human pancreatic cancer (MiaPaCa-2, AsPC-1) cells┴ JAK2, ┴ STAT3, and ┴ STAT5 activation0.278, 0.017 μMThoennissen et al., 2009 [168]; Zhou et al., 2017 [169]
Induced cytotoxicity in leukemia K562 cells┴ STAT3 activation50 µMChan et al., 2010 [170]
Cucurbitacin EWilbrandia ebracteate Cogn.Induced cytotoxicity in human bladder cancer (T24) cells↓ Levels of phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3)1012 nMHuang et al., 2012
[171]
Cucurbitacin ICucumis melo L.Induced cytotoxicity in human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells↓ Phosphotyrosine STAT3, ↓ JAK levels.
┴ STAT3-DNA binding; ┴ STAT3-mediated gene transcription
500 nMBlaskovich et al., 2003 [172]
Induced cytotoxicity in glioblastoma multiforme cells,
G2/M cell cycle arrest by downregulating cyclin B1 and cdc2 expression
┴ JAK/STAT pathway;
↓ Phosphorylated STAT3 levels
Not specifiedSu et al., 2014 [173]
Inhibitory activity in Sézary (Sz) syndrome and anaplastic large cell lymphoma┴ JAK/STAT pathway;
↓ Phosphorylated STAT3 levels
30 μMvan Kester et al., 2008 [174]; Shi et al., 2006 [175]
Cucurbitacin QPicrorhiza kurrooa Royle ex Benth.Antiproliferative effect in human non-small-cell lung carcinoma (A549) cells↓ STAT3 but not JAK2 activation3.7 µMSun et al., 2005 [176]
AndrographolideAndrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees.Enhanced anticancer activity of doxorubicin┴ STAT3 signaling pathway;
┴ Constitutively actuated and IL-6-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 and subsequent nuclear translocation
Not specifiedZhou et al., 2010 [179]
Betulinic acidWhite-barked birch plantsInhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in human multiple myeloma (U266) cells;
Cell cycle arrest at sub-G1 stage;
downregulated the expression level of STAT3-regulated gene products
┴ STAT3 signaling,
┴ STAT3-directed gene expression;
┴ Constitutive activation of STAT3, Src kinase, and JAK1/2
Not specifiedPandey et al., 2010
[182]
γ-TocotrienolElaeis guineensis Jacq.Anticancer effect in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2, C3A, Hep3B, SNU-387, and PLC/PRF5) cells┴ Both constitutive and inducible activation of STAT3;
┴ Phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src
Not specifiedRajendran et al., 2011 [185]; Banerjee et al., 2019 [186]
CryptotanshinoneSalvia miltiorrhiza BungeInduced cytotoxicity in human prostate cancer (DU145) cells┴ Phosphorylation of STAT3 through an independent mechanism of JAK2 phosphorylation7.59 µMShin et al., 2009 [188]
NimbolideAzadirachta indica A. Juss.Induced cytotoxicity and cell cycle arrest at G1–S stage in glioblastoma multiforme cells. It downregulates Bcl2┴ STAT3 pathway,
┴ STAT3 phosphorylation
Not specifiedKarkare et al., 2014 [191]; Zhang et al., 2016 [192]
CelastrolTripterygium wilfordii Hook.f.Induced cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma (U266, RPMI 8226 and RPMI-8226-LR-5) cells┴ Phosphorylation of STAT3 as well as STAT3-mediated IL-17 expressionNot specifiedKannaiyan et al., 2011 [193]
Inhibited differentiation and cell proliferation in multiple myeloma cells┴ STAT3 phosphorylation;
┴ STAT3-mediated IL-17 expression
┴ T-helper 17 (Th17)
Not specifiedBanerjee et al., 2019 [186]
Ursolic acidMirabilis jalapa L.Induced cytotoxicity in human prostate cancer (DU145 and LNCaP) cells┴ Activation of constitutive and inducible STAT3; ↓ phosphorylation of Src and JAK280 and 47 µMShanmugam et al., 2011b [198]
Inhibited tumor growth in prostate xenograft tumor in TRAMPmice in vivo┴ JAK/STAT signaling;
┴ activation of STAT3
Not specifiedShanmugam et al., 2011 [198]
BrusatolBrucea javanica (L.) Merr.Induced cytotoxicity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma┴ STAT3 signaling pathway;
┴ Activation of STAT3 as well as JAK1/2, and Src
Not specifiedLee et al., 2019 [199]
OridoninIsodon rubescens (Hemsl.) H. HaraInhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in breast (MCF-7), leukemia (K562), lung (A549), prostate (PC-3), liver (Bel7402), gastric (BGC823), and uterine cervix cancer (HeLa) cells
The viability of BxPC-3 (human pancreatic cancer) cells is reduced on treatment
┴ STAT3 signaling pathway;
↓ IL-6, ↓ STAT3, and ↓ phospho-STAT3 expression level, ↓ p21, ↓ cyclin A, ↓ cyclin B1, ↓ cyclin D1, ↓ VEGF, and ↓ MMP-2
18.4, 4.3, 18.6, 15.2, 7.6, 13.7 μg/mL
19.32 μg/mL
Bu et al., 2012 [202]; Chen et al., 2008 [203]; Chen et al., 2012 [204];
Chen et al., 2014 [205]
ThymoquinoneNigella sativa L.Induced cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma (U266 and RPMI 8226) cells.┴ STAT3 phosphorylation15 and 15 µMZhu et al., 2016 [208]; Li et al., 2010 [209]
ParthenolideTanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip., Tanacetum vulgare L., Centaurea ainetensis Boiss., Tanacetum larvatum (Pant.) Hayek., and Helianthus annuus L.┴ Proliferation, ↑ apoptosis, cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in breast (MCF-7), skin (MDMB-231), melanoma (LCC9), malignant glioma (ABCB5+), epidermal tumorigenesis (A375), liver (1205Lu), gastric cancer (WM793) cells┴ IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation; ┴ JAK2 kinase activity
9.54, 10 µM, 600 nM, 12, 2.9, 6, 12 µMCheng et al., 2011 [211]; Liu &Xie, 2010 [212]; Shanmugam et al., 2011 [213]
Inhibited JAK2 kinase activity in MDA-MB-231 cells┴ IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylationNot specifiedLiu et al., 2018 [214]
DihydroartemisininArtemisia annua L.Inhibited tumor cell growth in human head and neck cancer (FaDu), liver cancer (Hep-G2), colon cancer (HCT-116), and tongue cancer (Cal-27) cells┴ JAK2/STAT3 signaling activation; ↓ targeted proteins160, 80, 25, 80 µM Jia et al., 2016 [217]; Wang et al., 2017 [218]
AlantolactoneAucklandia costus Falc., Inula helenium L., Inula japonica Thunb., and Inula racemose Hook. f.Antiproliferative effect in glioblastoma (U87), colon (HCT-8), leukemia (HL-60), liver (HepG2), lung cancer (A549) cells┴ Both constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation at tyrosine 705;
┴ STAT3 translocation to the nucleus; ┴ DNA-binding, and ┴ STAT3 target gene expression
135.27 µM, 5 µg/mL, 1.1, 40, 8.39 µMPal et al., 2010 [220]; Khan et al., 2012 [221]; Chun et al., 2015 [222]
β-Caryophyllene oxideCannabis sativa L., Humulus lupulus L., Origanum vulgare L., Psidium guajava L., Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn., and Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L. M. PerryInhibited proliferation in multiple myeloma, prostate, and breast cancer cell lines┴ STAT3 pathway;
┴ STAT3 activation as well as JAK 1/2 and c-Src
Not specifiedKim et al., 2014 [224]
Various symbols (↑, ↓ and ┴) indicate increase, decrease and inhibition in the obtained variables, respectively.
Table 3. Anticancer activities of alkaloids, saponins, steroids, lignan, and phytoalexin related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Table 3. Anticancer activities of alkaloids, saponins, steroids, lignan, and phytoalexin related to inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Phytochemical ClassPhytochemical NameSourcesAnticancer EffectMechanism of ActionEC50/IC50References
AlkaloidsCapsaicinCapsicum frutescens L.Induction of cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma (U266 and MM.1S) cells┴ Constitutive and IL-6-induced activation of STAT3; ┴ JAK1 and c-Src activation50 and 50 µMBhutani et al., 2007 [139]
EvodiamineTetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. HartleyInhibited proliferation, and induced apoptosis;
Cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in murine Lewis lung (LLC), hepatocellular (HepG2), leukemia (K562), gastric (SGC-7901), colon (COLO-205) cancer cells.
↓ Constitutive and IL-6-induced activation of STAT3 tyrosine 705 (Tyr705);
↓ JAK2, Src and ERK1/2;
┴ STAT3–DNA binding activity
113, 8.516, 5, 10, 27.15 µMYang et al., 2013 [81]
IndirubinAngelica sinensis (Oliv.) DielsReduced cell viability in human prostate and breast cancer cells; induced apoptosis;
Cell cycle arrest at G1/S or G2/M
┴ STAT3 signaling;
┴ STAT3 phosphorylation
~4 µM for each cell lineChen et al., 2018 [234]
Saponinsβ-EscinAesculus hippocastanum L.Induction of cytotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2, PLC/PRF5, and HUH-7) cells┴ Activation of STAT3 and induced expression of SHP-1;
┴ Phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and c-Src
Not specified Tan et al., 2010 [238]
SteroidDiosgeninTrigonella foenum-graecum L.Induced cytotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma (C3A, HUH-7, and HepG2) cells┴ Constitutive and inducible activation of STAT3100, 100 and 50 µMLi et al., 2010 [244]
Ergosterol peroxideAgaricus bisporusInduced cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma (U266) cells┴ Phosphorylation of JAK2; ┴ phosphorylation;
┴ DNA binding activity;
┴ Nuclear translocation of STAT3
Not specifiedRhee et al., 2012 [80]
GuggulsteroneCommiphora mukul (Hook. ex Stocks) Engl. Induced cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma (U266) cells┴ Constitutive andIL-6-induced STAT3;
┴ Phosphorylation of JAK2 and Src
25 µMAhn et al., 2008 [250]
LignanArctiinCentaurea imperialis Hausskn. ex Bornm., Arctium lappa L., Forsythia viridissima Lindl., Himalaiella heteromalla (D. Don) Raab-Straube., and Trachelospermumas iaticum (Siebold & Zucc.) NakaiInhibited proliferation,
cell cycle arrest at G2/M stage in human multiple myeloma cells
┴ STAT3 phosphorylation in tyrosine 705;
┴ Constitutive enactment of Src phosphorylation and JAKs 1/2; ↑ mRNA, ↑ protein levels of protein tyrosine phosphatase ε; ┴ STAT3 regulated gene products
Not specifiedLee et al., 2019b [254]
PhytoalexinBrassininBrassica rapa L.Induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells (A549) in an in vivo mouse model┴ STAT3 activation;
┴ Both constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 activation; ┴ Phospho-STAT3, ┴ Ki-67 and ┴ CD31
Not specifiedLee et al., 2015 [257]
Various symbols (↑, ↓ and ┴) indicate increase, decrease and inhibition in the obtained variables, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bose, S.; Banerjee, S.; Mondal, A.; Chakraborty, U.; Pumarol, J.; Croley, C.R.; Bishayee, A. Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Cells 2020, 9, 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061451

AMA Style

Bose S, Banerjee S, Mondal A, Chakraborty U, Pumarol J, Croley CR, Bishayee A. Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Cells. 2020; 9(6):1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bose, Sankhadip, Sabyasachi Banerjee, Arijit Mondal, Utsab Chakraborty, Joshua Pumarol, Courtney R. Croley, and Anupam Bishayee. 2020. "Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy" Cells 9, no. 6: 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061451

APA Style

Bose, S., Banerjee, S., Mondal, A., Chakraborty, U., Pumarol, J., Croley, C. R., & Bishayee, A. (2020). Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Cells, 9(6), 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop