Next Article in Journal
Ploidy in Vibrio natriegens: Very Dynamic and Rapidly Changing Copy Numbers of Both Chromosomes
Previous Article in Journal
Pluripotency-Associated microRNAs in Early Vertebrate Embryos and Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variations in NSP1 of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolated in China from 1996 to 2022

1
School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
2
Gladstone Institutes of Virology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Genes 2023, 14(7), 1435; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071435
Submission received: 11 June 2023 / Revised: 3 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Since its successful isolation in China in 1995, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has been mutating into highly pathogenic strains by constantly changing pathogenicity and genetic makeup. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and genetic variation of nonstructural protein 1 (NSP1) in PRRSV-2, the main strain prevalent in China. After formulating hypotheses regarding the biology of the NSP1 protein, the nucleotide and amino acid similarity of NSP1 were analyzed and compared in 193 PRRSV-2 strains. The results showed that NSP1 has a stable hydrophobic protein with a molecular weight of 43,060.76 Da. Although NSP1 lacked signal peptides, it could regulate host cell signaling. Furthermore, NSP1 of different strains had high nucleotide (79.6–100%) and amino acid similarity (78.6–100%). In the amino acid sequence comparison of 15 representative strains of PRRSV-2, multiple amino acid substitution sites were found in NSP1. Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that lineages 1 and 8 had different evolutionary branches with long genetic distances. This study lays the foundation for an in-depth understanding of the nature and genetic variation of NSP1 and the development of a safe and effective vaccine in the future.

1. Introduction

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), an acute and highly contagious infectious disease caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV), is characterized by adverse reproductive outcomes and respiratory symptoms in pigs [1]. Regardless of age, most PRRSV-infected pigs experience breathing difficulties [2]. When infected, pregnant sows suffer from miscarriages, premature births, stillbirths, and mummified fetuses. Boars experience shortness of breath and reduced semen quality [3]. Infected piglets become anorexic, breathless, and prone to coughing [4]. Sick pigs infected with PRRS often die from secondary infections, such as pleurisy, streptococcosis, and gasping disease [5]. PRRS has inflicted heavy economic losses on pig farms [6] and gravely threatened the development of Chinese pig industry.
PRRSV is a single-stranded positive-sense enveloped RNA virus. The diameter of the viral particles is between 50 and 65 nm, and the surface has apparent spikes [5]. The nucleocapsid is a three-dimensional symmetrical icosahedral with a diameter between 25 and 35 nm [7,8]. The PRRSV genome is approximately 15 kb long and contains eight open reading frames (ORFs) [9,10]. The replicase gene ORF1 is the largest ORF at approximately 12 kb, which accounts for 80% of the viral genome. The position of ORF1 is after the 5′ noncoding region sequence. ORF1 includes ORF1a and ORF1b, and ORF1a encodes the nonstructural proteins NSP1–NSP8 [11,12,13,14]. PRRSV is divided into two genotypes, PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2. Their nucleotide similarity is 55–70%, and amino acid similarity is 50–80% [15]. PRRSV-2 is the predominant strain in China. After analyzing more than 8500 PRRSV-2 ORF5 sequences, a global PRRSV-2 epidemic strain classification system was used to divide the global epidemic strains into nine lineages and thirty-seven sublineages [16].
The PRRSV-2 strain prevalent in China belongs to four lineages, lineage 1, 3, 5, and 8. Lineage 1 is a new epidemic lineage in China [17]. Its strains are collectively called NADC30-like strains, which undergo genetic recombination with domestic epidemic strains. Its representative strains are HNyc150, Chsx1401, JL580, FJ1402, FJW05, and TJnh1501 [15,18,19]. Lineage 3 is a late-onset strain, representing GM2 and QYYZ [20]. Lineage 5 is a long-running strain in China with a low clinical detection rate. Its representative strain BJ-4 has a high similarity with VR2332 [20]. Lineage 8 is common in China and is further divided into subgroups I–V. Subgroup I most resembles the genetic information of early isolated strains. The representative strains of subgroup I are CH-1a, BJ0706, NB-04, and JXA1, of which CH-1a is the earliest strain isolated in China [16]. The modified live virus (MLV)vaccine CH-1R was developed on the basis of the CH-1a [21]; it is widely used in China and provides over 70% cross protection against (HP-PRRS) HuN-4 strain [22] and provides 40% cross protection against (HP-PRRSV) TJ-F5 strain [23]. It induces lower levels of immune response and viremia [24]. Previous experiments have demonstrated the existence of genetic recombination between lineage 1, 3, 5, and 8 [25,26,27].
NSP1 is an inducing protein in PRRSV that influences host cells by regulating their immune response, blocking their tolerance to inflammation, and inhibiting signaling in specific cases. Moreover, NSP1 possesses hydrolase activity [28]. PRRSV mainly infects porcine alveolar macrophages, and NSP1 expression enhances the host’s inflammatory response by recruiting other immune cells around the infected macrophages [29].
NSP1 has two subunits, the conserved NSP1α and the variable NSP1β. At 18 °C, NSP1 is cleaved into NSP1α and NSP1β. At 37 °C, NSP1 is recombined into full-length NSP1 protein [30]. NSP1α protein contains three domains: (1) Met1–Glu65, which is the N-terminal zinc finger structure; (2) Pro66–Gln166, which is the papain-like protease domain; and (3) Arg167–Met180, which is the C-terminal extension region [31,32]. NSP1α is a multifunctional nuclear protein that regulates host interferon (IFN) [33]. Its N-terminal zinc finger structure has four cysteine binding sites with zinc ions, namely, Cys8, Cys10, Cys25, and Cys28. NSP1α inhibits IFN-β transcription at the N-terminal zinc finger structure and 167–177 amino acid (aa) regions by de-grading the CREB-binding protein and inhibiting the formation of enhancers [34,35,36]. The N-terminal zinc finger structure can also inhibit the NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activity in the host system [37]. There are 14 amino acids at the end of the C-terminal extension of NSP1α that play an important role in maintaining the immunosuppressive activity of NSP1α against IFN-β and nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) [33,38].
Furthermore, NSP1β suppresses the host’s innate immunity and inhibits IFN synthesis and signaling. It has four domains: (1) Ala1–Ser48, which is the N-terminal domain (NTD); (2) Phe49–Thr84, which is the articulation region of the N- and C-terminals; (3) Val85–Pro181, which is the papain-like cysteine auto protease domain β (PCPβ) of papain-like cysteine protease structural region; and (4) Asn182–Gly203, which contains constitutive transport elements (CTEs) [39]. When PCPβ is blocked, it affects the gene replication of PRRSV [40]. PCPβ cleaves NSP1/NSP2 sites and releases NSP1β from downstream NSP2 [41]. Cys276 and His345 are key amino acid sites of NSP1β [40]. NSP1β also inhibits the expression, synthesis, and signal transduction of IFN [42]. The NTD of NSP1β participates in the ubiquitin protein degradation of karyopherin alpha 1 (KPNA1), which increases the ubiquitination and shortens the half-life of KPNA1, thereby blocking the nuclear translocation of the interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 complex [43,44].
Because NSP1 is involved in inhibiting host cell immune regulation, promoting PRRSV replication and helping PRRSV evade the intrinsic antiviral immunity of the host [45], we used NSP1 as the target gene for the genetic evolution analysis of PRRSV. Additionally, NSP1α has been found to suppress the production of IFN-β, while NSP1β hinders both the synthesis and signaling of IFN, effectively blocking the production of IFN-I in the body. Zhao’s experiments have demonstrated that the NSP1β mutant vaccine strain can effectively combat the reversion to virulence that often occurs after vaccination, while also stimulating a specific natural immune response [46]. This suggests that further investigation into genetic mutations in NSP1 could potentially lead to the development of vaccines that offer improved cross protection and higher immune efficacy.
In this study, the genetic variation of PRRSV NSP1 was investigated by analyzing the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of NSP1 of 193 PRRSV-2 strains to construct a phylogenetic tree, and the amino acid sequences of NSP1 were compared to reflect the amino acid substitution of NSP1 in different lineages. The findings of this study provide a basis for further screening of amino acid loci affecting PRRSV virulence and for further studies on the regulatory role of NSP1 amino acid locus changes on the host cellular immune response and the impact on PRRS pathogenesis. We also discussed the role of NSP1 in regulating the immune response of host cells. Hence, our study on NSP1 mutations provides a theoretical basis for preparing a PRRSV vaccine to facilitate the prevention and control of PRRS. The approval number of the Foshan University Ethical committee is SYXK-2020-0235.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source of Sequences

The nucleotide information of NSP1 of the 193 PRRSV strains used in the experiments was obtained from GenBank, and the amino acid sequences of the virulent strains were translated on EditSeq function of DNASTAR software (version 7.0, Madison, WI, USA).

2.2. Sequence Analysis of PRRSV NSP1

For the CH-1R strain, the main physicochemical properties of NSP1 were analyzed using the ProtParam tool of the ExPASy resource portal (https://web.expasy.org/protparam, accessed on 27 August 2022) [47]. Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP-6.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP-6.0, accessed on 27 August 2022) [48]. The information about reference strains is shown in Table 1.

2.3. Nucleotide Sequence Comparison in NSP1

The MegAlign function of DNASTAR software (version 7.0, Madison, WI, USA) was used to analyze the nucleotide sequence similarity in NSP1. The information about reference strains is shown in Table 1.

2.4. Amino Acid Sequence Comparison in NSP1

The similarity of NSP1 amino acid sequences was analyzed using the Clustal W method in the MegAlign function of DNASTAR software (version 7.0, Madison, WI, USA). The amino acid sequences of representative strains of each lineage were compared using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). GeneDoc [49] annotated the amino acid sequence comparison chart. The information about reference strains is shown in Table 1.

2.5. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

The neighbor-joining tree (NJ) and the maximum likelihood tree (ML) of 193 strains of PRRSV based on NSP1 were generated using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). In testing the neighbor-joining tree, the phylogeny test w MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA) [50] as the bootstrap method, the number of bootstrap replications was 1000, and the p-distance was utilized. In testing the maximum likelihood tree, the model was the Tamura–Nei model. iTOL (iTOL: Interactive Tree Of Life (embl.de)) [51] annotated the phylogenetic tree. The information about 192 strains is shown in Table 1.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Analysis Equations

3.1.1. Base Distribution and Physicochemical Properties of NSP1

The total length of the PRRSV-2 NSP1 sequence was 1149 bp, corresponding to 383 amino acids. Among these, 242 were adenine (A) (21.06% of total bases), 308 were guanine (G) (26.81% of total bases), 280 were thymine (T) (24.37% of total bases), and 319 were cytosine (C) (27.76% of total bases). Furthermore, 522 were AT (45.43% of total bases), and 627 were CG (54.57%). Using the EditSeq function in the DNASTAR software package, the NSP1 encoded 42 highly basic amino acids (K and R), 36 highly acidic amino acids (D and E), 141 hydrophobic amino acids (A, I, L, F, W, and V), and 84 hydrophilic amino acids (N, C, Q, S, T, and Y).

3.1.2. Stability Coefficient and Signal Peptide Prediction of NSP1

ExPASy analysis showed that the predicted molecular weight of NSP1 was 43,060.76 Da, and the instability coefficient was 52.76, implying that it is an unstable protein. The fat solubility coefficient was 83.99, and the theoretical isoelectric point was 8.71. The total mean of hydrophilicity was −0.145, indicating that NSP1 is a hydrophobic protein. SignalP-6.0 estimated that the protein encoded by NSP1 had no signaling peptides.

3.2. Nucleotide Similarity of NSP1

The nucleotide similarity of NSP1 of 193 PRRSV-2 strains was compared and analyzed. The results showed that the nucleotide similarity was 79.6–100%. The lowest similarity level was for the SCcd2020 and YL strains and the SCya18 and YC strains (79.6%), whereas the highest was for the GX1002, JXA1-P45, JXA1-P70, JXA1-P80, and rJXA1-R strains (100%). Furthermore, the nucleotide sequences were identical for JXA1P10 and JXA1P15, rV63 and rV68, QY2010 and QYYZ, XJU-1 and JSTZ1907-714, and PRRSV03 and WUH1 strains.
Because the nucleotide similarity analysis plot of 193 strains of NSP1 was too large, we selected representative strains of each lineage for nucleotide analysis to obtain a comparative plot and elucidate the genetic variation of NSP1 in the evolution of PRRSV. As illustrated in Figure 1, the nucleotide similarity was 89.5–93.6% in the lineage 1 group, 85.8% in the lineage 3 group, 99.7% in the lineage 5 group, 93–99.9% in the lineage 8 group, 98.8–99.9% in the C-PRRSV-like group, and 99.3–99.7% in the HP-PRRSV-like group. Among these, the nucleotide sequence of the lineage 3 group showed the most considerable difference (Figure 1).

3.3. Amino Acid Sequence Similarity of NSP1

The results showed that the amino acid similarity of NSP1 of 193 PRRSV-2 strains was 78.6–100%. The lowest similarity was observed for the FJM4 and CH2002 strains (78.6%). The highest similarity was observed for the BJBLZ, FZ06A, HUN4, SHH, and TJ strains and the BJSY-1, GD, HUB1, HUB2, and Jiangxi-3 strains (100%). Furthermore, the amino acid sequences were the same for CH-1a and CH-1R; CH2003, CH2004, and CHsx1401; 07QN and JXA1; JSTZ1907-714 and XJu-1; PRRSV02, PRRSV03, and TP; and BJ-4 and rV63 strains.
Because the amino acid sequence similarity plot of 193 strains of NSP1 was too large, we selected representative strains of each spectrum for nucleotide sequence analysis to obtain a comparative plot and elucidate the genetic variation of NSP1 in the evolution of PRRSV. As shown in Figure 2, the amino acid similarity was 89.3–91.6% in the lineage 1 group, 87.5% in the lineage 3 group, 99.5% in the lineage 5 group, 90.1–100% in the lineage 8 group, 97.7–100% in the C-PRRSV-like group, and 99.7–100% in the HP-PRRSV-like group. Among these, the amino acid sequence in the lineage 3 group showed the most significant difference (Figure 2).

3.4. Amino Acid Sequence Alignment of NSP1 of Representative Strains

The amino acid sequences of the representative strains of each lineage were compared using MEGA software (Figure 3). The amino acid sequence of NSP1 PRRSV-2 consisted of 383 amino acid residues, with some substitutions and no additions or deletions. The NSP1 amino acid sequence was generally relatively conservative, particularly the 1–97 sites with low substitution frequency. However, among the 182–291 and 302–378 sites, the sequences of various pedigrees were different, and some substitutions were observed.
At the sites 183, 196, 198, 226, 234, 321, 349, 368, and 370, after comparison with the VR2332 and BJ-4 strains of lineage 5, the strains of lineages 1, 3, and 8 had amino acid substitutions, whereas the VR2332 and BJ-4 strains of lineage 5 did not. At the sites 202, 208, 209, 219, 223, 236, 249, 257, 263, 267, 276, 285, 291, and 319, the lineage 1 strains had amino acid substitutions. At sites 227, 232, 289, 368, and 371, three C-PRRSV-like strains had amino acid substitutions.
Finally, the amino acid substitution site of the new wild strain GDZQ-2021 was consistent with the traditional representative strains of HP-PRRSV-like and C-PRRSV-like groups.

3.5. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that the QYYZ and QY2010 strains of lineage 3 had close genetic distance with SDRZ01, HH08, CH2002, and CH-1a strains of lineage 8.1, whereas the VR2332 strain of lineage 5 had a long genetic distance with HNyc15, CHsx1401, and BJ-F1501 strains of lineage 8.7 (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

4. Discussion

In recent years, PPRSV has been consistently evolving and enhancing virulence, owing to genetic recombination and variation [52]. PRRS was first identified in the United States and Europe in 1986 and 1990 [53]. PRRSVs with antigenicity close to the United States-based strain were isolated in Japan in 1990 [54]. PRRSV appeared in China in 1995. In 1996, the virus was isolated by Guo et al. and named CH-1a [55]. In 1997, Yang et al. isolated BJ-4 [56]; CH-1a and BJ-4 are North-America-based strains. After spreading in China, the genetic diversity of PRRSV gradually increased, and the amino acids of NSP2 and ORF5 are highly pathogenic [57,58]. After the PRRSV outbreak in China, Tian et al. compared genomics through a trial. The analysis determined that the strain was of a North American genotype with high nucleotide sequence similarities with the Chinese HB-1 strain. Moreover, the NSP2 of the strain was analyzed using bioinformatics analysis. The results confirmed a discontinuous absence of 30 amino acids, which may have contributed to its high pathogenicity [59]. In 2014, Liu et al. compared 36 isolated PRRSV strains and glycoprotein 5 of eight vaccine strains. Similarity comparison and amino acid analysis revealed that the 2014 isolates had variations in the neutralizing expression of independent and N-glycosylation sites compared with the first subset of strains [60]. In 2017, Long confirmed through amino acid sequence analysis of NSP2 that the NADC34-like strain was introduced to China from North America. This strain and China’s native strain, HP-PRRSV, eventually recombined to form a new strain, SCcd2020 [61]. Therefore, PRRSV diversity is ever increasing.
Although the changes in NSP1 were not as evident as those in the highly variable NSP2 and ORF5, NSP1 still underwent considerable variation that impacted PRRSV evolution. Our analyses showed that NSP1 is a hydrophobic protein without any signaling peptides, indicating that NSP1 is not transportable and may be synthesized in the cytoplasm or organelle matrix from proteins composed of free ribosomes that can enter the cytosol and not from secreted or membrane proteins. NSP1 has high hydrophobicity, which is conducive to forming an α-helix and the inward folding of protein to form a secondary structure; therefore, it is considered stable. Nucleotide and amino acid similarity analyses of 193 PRRSV-2 NSP1 proteins showed that the nucleotide similarity was 79.6–100%, and the amino acid similarity was 78.6–100%. As shown in Figure 1, the lineage 3 strain FJFS had high similarity with the lineage 8 strain TJ, which was as high as 94.2%. This finding indicates that NSP1 undergoes genetic variation during evolution; moreover, there may be gene recombination between the two lineages, which needs to be further verified by recombinant analysis of the strains of the two lineages. Furthermore, lineage 3 is a late-onset strain, and lineage 8 is common in China, meaning that their survival rates differ despite their high nucleotide similarity in NSP1. This result implies that the effect of NSP1 may not be the main factor affecting the survival of PRRSV in the host, which warrants further study. As illustrated in Figure 2, the amino acid sequence of NSP1 had a high similarity. Regarding the differences within the lineage amino acid sequences, lineages 3 and 8 had the largest and smallest differences, respectively. The similarity within a pedigree was higher than that between pedigrees.
Based on the above results, we conclude that during the evolution of PRRSV, NSP1 is relatively conserved. However, genetic variation still occurs, and there may be recombination between strains of different pedigrees, which is worthy of further experimental confirmation. In the comparative analysis of amino acid sequences, NSP1 amino acids underwent substitutions at individual sites, and no additions or deletions were observed (Figure 3). The variation in NSP1 was more conserved than that of NSP2 and ORF5. In previous studies, Shi found that the smallest region of the carboxyl-terminal extension required for NSP1α to inhibit IFN-β transcription was the 167–176 amino acid site, in which the 176th amino acid and zinc finger structure played the most important roles [34,62]. Replacing the 176th amino acid significantly impacted the inhibition of IFN-β transcription. Shi et al. also found that Cys-270 and His-339 were the catalytic residues of NSP1β; therefore, if Cys were mutated to Ser or His to Ala, NSP1β would lose its enzymatic activity [38]. Wang et al. revealed that KPNA1 degradation and IFN-mediated signal inhibition decreased when residue 19 of NSP1β changed from Val to Ile [44]. These studies indicate that amino acid substitution is related to the viral inhibition of IFN transcription, which impacts virus virulence, phagocytosis, and cleavage.
The phylogenetic tree analyses in Figure 4 and Figure 5 show a relatively large genetic distance between lineages 1 and 8. Zhou et al. proved a genetic recombination between these two strains [62], which increased the survival rate of PRRSV in the host. Therefore, these two lineages are common in China. In genetics, species are determined by conserved, irreplaceable sequences that ensure species stability. In contrast, the differences within species are caused by non-conservative sequences. The recombination and variations in genetic information leads to new strains with different viability and virulence properties [63].
As NSP1 is a conserved sequence, its characteristics enable PRRSV to influence host cells by effectively regulating their immune response, inhibiting signal transduction in specific cases, and blocking their tolerance to inflammation. As the main protease of PRRSV, NSP1 can be used to study corresponding drugs according to their characteristics. In previous studies, Xue et al. studied the three-dimensional structure of PRRSV NSP1β and revealed that the CTD possessed a cleavage site of Trp-Tyr-Gly203 ↓ Ala-Gly-Lys. In contrast, the NTD had strict metal-dependent nuclease activity. In addition, their mutagenesis studies confirmed that Lys18 and Glu52 in the NTD surface-charged region contributed to NSP1β nuclease activity [64]. These results can aid in developing more multi-target drugs in the future. Shi et al. found that HnRNP A2/B1 overexpression can enhance PRRSV virulence without affecting the IFN-β transcription signaling pathway, implying a different mechanism is involved [34]. These studies provide a theoretical basis for future vaccine development. The findings of the present study on the genetic variation of NSP1 pave the way for further research on its role in vaccine development and the pathogenesis, prevention, and control of PRRSV.

5. Conclusions

The data showed that the strains of the same lineage and different lineages had high nucleotide and amino acid similarity regarding NSP1. The amino acid sequence is relatively conserved, and there are amino acid substitutions at some sites. The study discusses the role of NSP1 in the PRRS and contributes to the monitoring of the evolution of PRRSV in China and the development of methods to prevent and control PRRS. The genetic variation analysis of NSP1 in this study may provide a theoretical basis for the potential impact of NSP1 genetic variation on PRRSV virulence and merits further study in the future. It also provides a basis for future research into more cross-protective vaccines.

Author Contributions

Z.Z. and H.Z. performed the experiments, wrote the manuscript, and analyzed the data. Q.L. and Y.Z. assisted in modification. W.K., L.H. and M.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31902279). The funder had no role in the study design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lunney, J.K.; Benfield, D.A.; Rowland, R.R. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus: An update on an emerging and re-emerging viral disease of swine. Virus Res. 2010, 154, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sha, H.; Zhang, H.; Luo, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, N.; Qin, L.; Li, H.; Huang, L.; Zhao, M. Variations in the NSP4 gene of the type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolated in China from 1996 to 2021. Virus Genes 2023, 59, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rossow, K.D. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome. Vet. Pathol. 1998, 35, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, S.; Yin, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Sun, D. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. Prog. Vet. Med. 2008, 8, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lunney, J.K.; Fang, Y.; Ladinig, A.; Chen, N.; Li, Y.; Rowland, B.; Renukaradhya, G.J. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV): Pathogenesis and Interaction with the Immune System. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2016, 4, 129–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paploski, I.A.D.; Pamornchainavakul, N.; Makau, D.N.; Rovira, A.; Corzo, C.A.; Schroeder, D.C.; Cheeran, M.C.-J.; Doeschl-Wilson, A.; Kao, R.R.; Lycett, S.; et al. Phylogenetic Structure and Sequential Dominance of Sub-Lineages of PRRSV Type-2 Lineage 1 in the United States. Vaccines 2021, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wensvoort, G.; de Kluyver, E.P.; Pol, J.M.; Wagenaar, F.; Moormann, R.J.; Hulst, M.M.; Bloemraad, R.; den Besten, A.; Zetstra, T.; Terpstra, C. Lelystad virus, the cause of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome: A review of mystery swine disease research at Lelystad. Vet. Microbiol. 1992, 33, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dea, S.; Gagnon, C.A.; Mardassi, H.; Pirzadeh, B.; Rogan, D. Current knowledge on the structural proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus: Comparison of the North American and European isolates. Arch. Virol. 2000, 145, 659–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Conzelmann, K.K.; Visser, N.; Van Woensel, P.; Thiel, H.J. Molecular characterization of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, a member of the arterivirus group. Virology 1993, 193, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Park, I.B.; Chun, T. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) non-structural protein (NSP)1 transcriptionally inhibits CCN1 and CCN2 expression by blocking ERK-AP-1 axis in pig macrophages in vitro. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 132, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fang, Y.; Snijder, E.J. The PRRSV replicase: Exploring the multifunctionality of an intriguing set of nonstructural proteins. Virus Res. 2010, 154, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Ma, Y.; Liu, J. Advances in Biological Function of Structural and Nonstructural Proteins of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 2012, 43, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, J. Research progress on nonstructural proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2016, 43, 2183–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, C.; Baek, J.H.; Cho, S.H.; Jeong, J.; Chae, C.; You, S.-H.; Cha, S.-H. Field porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV) attenuated by codon pair deoptimization (CPD) in NSP1 protected pigs from heterologous challenge. Virology 2020, 540, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guo, Z.; Chen, X.; Li, R.; Qiao, S.; Guo, J.; Zhang, G. Epidemic history and current situation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China. Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 2018, 49, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi, M.; Lam, T.T.; Hon, C.C.; Murtaugh, M.P.; Davies, P.R.; Hui, R.K.; Li, J.; Wong, L.T.; Yip, C.W.; Jiang, J.W.; et al. Phylogeny-based evolutionary, demographical, and geographical dissection of North American type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8700–8711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Liu, Z.; Wang, F.; Wu, H. Research progress on nonstructural proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Prog. Vet. Med. 2010, 31, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Bao, H.; Wang, Y.; Tian, K. Widespread of NADC30-like PRRSV in China: Another Pandora’s box for Chinese pig industry as the outbreak of highly pathogenic PRRSV in 2006? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 49, 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Ji, G.; Wang, J.; Tan, F.; Zhuang, J.; Li, X.; Tian, K. Complete Genome Sequence of an NADC30-like Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Characterized by Recombination with Other Strains. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00330-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhai, J.; Li, B.; Wei, C.; Dai, A.; Yang, X.; Luo, M. Genetic diversity and evolutionary characteristics of type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in southeastern China from 2009 to 2014. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, N.; Xiao, Y.; Ye, M.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Xie, N.; Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J. High genetic diversity of Chinese porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses from 2016 to 2019. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 131, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, X.; Tian, Z.; Liu, Y.; An, T.; Wu, D. Valuation of protective efficacy of PRRS attenuated vaccine and inactivated mutant PRRSV strains. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 31, 392–396. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lei, X.; Shengsheng, C.; Rumei, Z.; Xianqiang, Z.; Xuxue, C.; Yang, L.G.; Liangming, Z.; Yizhu, H.; Chuen, L.P. Enhancement of the immune efficacy on porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome CH-1R vaccine by oligopeptide adjuvant. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 35, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, G.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tu, Y.; Tong, J.; Liu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Wang, S.; Zhou, E.-M.; et al. Immune responses to modified live virus vaccines developed from classical or highly pathogenic PRRSV following challenge with a highly pathogenic PRRSV strain. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 62, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Y.; Jiao, D.; Jing, Y.; He, Y.; Han, W.; Li, Z.; Ma, Z.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, S. Genetic characterization and pathogenicity of a novel recombinant PRRSV from lineage 1, 8 and 3 in China failed to infect MARC-145 cells. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 165, 105469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, J.; Wei, C.; Lin, Z.; Fan, J.; Xia, W.; Dai, A.; Yang, X. Recombination in lineage 1, 3, 5 and 8 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses in China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 68, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Lin, S.; Quan, D.; Wang, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ren, T.; Ouyang, K.; Chen, Y.; Huang, W.; et al. Full Genomic Analysis of New Variants of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Revealed Multiple Recombination Events between Different Lineages and Sublineages. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Y.; Cao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, P. The immunosuppressive effect of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus non-structural protein NSP1 on pigs. Chin. J. Vet. Sci. 2012, 32, 1597–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, I.-B.; Choi, Y.-C.; Lee, K.-T.; Chun, T. Transcriptome analysis of pig macrophages expressing porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus non-structural protein 1. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2021, 231, 110147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, Y. Analysis of B Cell Epitopes of NSP1 Nonstructural Protein and T Cell Epitopes of ORF3-7 Structural Protein of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Darwich, L.; Gimeno, M.; Sibila, M.; Diaz, I.; de la Torre, E.; Dotti, S.; Kuzemtseva, L.; Martin, M.; Pujols, J.; Mateu, E. Genetic and immunobiological diversities of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome genotype I strains. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 150, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Si, Z.; Shi, X.; Li, G.; Qiao, S.; Li, W.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G. Expression and activity detection of nonstructural protein nsp1α of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2015, 44, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Song, C.; Krell, P.; Yoo, D. Nonstructural protein 1alpha subunit-based inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and suppression of interferon-β production by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virology 2010, 407, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Shi, X. Study on the Molecular Mechanism of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Nonstructural Protein (nsp) 1α Inhibiting Interferon-β Transcription. Ph.D. Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. Han, M.; Kim, C.Y.; Rowland, R.R.R.; Fang, Y.; Kim, D.; Yoo, D. Biogenesis of non-structural protein 1 (nsp1) and nsp1-mediated type I interferon modulation in arteriviruses. Virology 2014, 458–459, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chen, Z.; Liu, S.; Sun, W.; Chen, L.; Yoo, D.; Li, F.; Ren, S.; Guo, L.; Cong, X.; Li, J.; et al. Nuclear export signal of PRRSV NSP1α is necessary for type I IFN inhibition. Virology 2016, 499, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, C.; Shi, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Si, Z.; Wang, A.; Deng, R.; Zhang, G. The N-terminal zinc finger structure of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nonstructural protein 1α (nsp1α) is necessary for its inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activity. Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 2015, 46, 2032–2039. [Google Scholar]
  38. Subramaniam, S.; Kwon, B.; Beura, L.K.; Kuszynski, C.A.; Pattnaik, A.K.; Osorio, F.A. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus non-structural protein 1 suppresses tumor necrosis factor-α promoter activation by inhibiting NF-kappaB and Sp1. Virology 2010, 406, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xue, F. Structure and Function of Nonstructural Protein 1β of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroese, M.V.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; Bos-de Ruijter, J.N.A.; Peeters, B.P.H.; Meulenberg, J.J.M.; Cornelissen, L.; Snijder, E.J. The nsp1alpha and nsp1 papain-like autoproteinases are essential for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus RNA synthesis. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shi, X.; Li, Q.; Chang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, P.; Yang, J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, G. Papain-like protease activity is not required for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nonstructural protein 1 to inhibit β interferon. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Beijing, China, 20–22 May 2013; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, Z.; Lawson, S.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, X.; Guan, X.; Christopher-Hennings, J.; Nelson, E.A.; Fang, Y. Identification of two auto-cleavage products of nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infected cells: nsp1 function as interferon antagonist. Virology 2010, 398, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.-J. Antagonizing cytokine-mediated JAK-STAT signaling by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 209, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, R.; Nan, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.J. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus Nsp1beta inhibits interferon-activated JAK/STAT signal transduction by inducing karyopherin-alpha1 degradation. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5219–5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, R.; Chen, C.; He, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tan, K.; Huang, J. E3 ligase ASB8 promotes porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus proliferation by stabilizing the viral Nsp1α protein and degrading host IKKβ kinase. Virology 2019, 532, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hua, G. Efficacy Evaluation of Two MLV Vaccines against Emerging PRRSV-2 NSP1β Mutant Vaccine Strain and Blocking Monoclonal Antibody. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Teufel, F.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Gíslason, M.H.; Pihl, S.I.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nicholas, K.B.; Nicholas, H.B.; Deerfield II, D.W. GeneDoc: Analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNEW News 1997, 4, 14. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sha, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhao, M.; Wang, N. Research Progress on the NSP9 Protein of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 872205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Albina, E. Epidemiology of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS): An overview. Vet. Microbiol. 1997, 55, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murakami, Y.; Kato, A.; Tsuda, T.; Morozumi, T.; Miura, Y.; Sugimura, T. Isolation and serological characterization of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) viruses from pigs with reproductive and respiratory disorders in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1994, 56, 891–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Guo, B.; Chen, Z.; Liu, W.; Cui, Y. Isolation of PRRSV from Suspected PRRS Abortion Fetuses. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 1996, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang, H.; Guan, S.; Yin, X.; Gan, M. Isolation and preliminary identification of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 1997, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chen, N.; Trible, B.R.; Kerrigan, M.A.; Tian, K.; Rowland, R.R.R. ORF5 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a target of diversifying selection as infection progresses from acute infection to virus rebound. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 40, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Fan, J.; Dai, A.; Deng, X.; Mao, W.; Huang, X.; Yang, X.; Wei, C. Epidemiology investigation of PRRSV discharged by faecal and genetic variation of ORF5. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 2334–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tian, K.; Yu, X.; Zhao, T.; Feng, Y.; Cao, Z.; Wang, C.; Hu, Y.; Chen, X.; Hu, D.; Tian, X.; et al. Emergence of fatal PRRSV variants: Unparalleled outbreaks of atypical PRRS in China and molecular dissection of the unique hallmark. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Li, K.; Hu, J.; Liang, J.; Liang, J.; Wang, Q.; Gao, F. Genetic variation analysis of PRRSV epidemic strains. J. Domest. Anim. Ecol. 2017, 38, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  61. Long, Y.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, L.; Yu, J.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, L. Complete genome sequence analysis of a NADC34-like porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022, 44, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, L.; Kang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, M.; Xie, B.; Tian, Y.; Wu, X.; Zuo, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, H. Whole Genome Analysis of Two Novel Type 2 Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses with Complex Genome Recombination between Lineage 8, 3, and 1 Strains Identified in Southwestern China. Viruses 2018, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Shi, M.; Holmes, E.C.; Brar, M.S.; Leung, F.C. Recombination is associated with an outbreak of novel highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses in China. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 10904–10907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Xue, F.; Sun, Y.; Yan, L.; Zhao, C.; Chen, J.; Bartlam, M.; Li, X.; Lou, Z.; Rao, Z. The crystal structure of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nonstructural protein Nsp1beta reveals a novel metal-dependent nuclease. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 6461–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence similarity analysis of NSP1 of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The strains were aligned by the Clustal W method and viewed by sequence distance in the MegAlign function of DNASTAR software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Furthermore, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8.
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence similarity analysis of NSP1 of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The strains were aligned by the Clustal W method and viewed by sequence distance in the MegAlign function of DNASTAR software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Furthermore, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8.
Genes 14 01435 g001
Figure 2. Amino acid sequence similarity analysis of NSP1 of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The strains were aligned by the Clustal W method and viewed by sequence distance in the MegAlign function of DNASTAR software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Furthermore, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8.
Figure 2. Amino acid sequence similarity analysis of NSP1 of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The strains were aligned by the Clustal W method and viewed by sequence distance in the MegAlign function of DNASTAR software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Furthermore, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8.
Genes 14 01435 g002
Figure 3. Amino acid sequence alignment of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The amino acid sequences of the representative strains of each lineage were compared using MEGA software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Further, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8. * means Conservative amino acid.
Figure 3. Amino acid sequence alignment of 15 representative lineage strains 1, 3, 5, and 8. The amino acid sequences of the representative strains of each lineage were compared using MEGA software. The strains included JL580, FJW05, HNyc15, and FJ1402 in lineage 1; QYYZ and FJFS in lineage 3; VR2332 and BJ-4 in lineage 5; JXA1, HUN4, and TJ in the HP-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8; and CH-1a, CH-1R, and CH2002 in the C-PRRSV-like group of lineage 8. Further, the GDZQ strain was a new wild strain in lineage 8. * means Conservative amino acid.
Genes 14 01435 g003aGenes 14 01435 g003b
Figure 4. The phylogenetic tree constructed by the neighbor-joining method (NJ) on NSP1 sequences of 193 PRRSV strains. Phylogenetic tree analysis of NSP1 gene constructed using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). The neighbor-joining method is supported using the p-distance model with uniform rates.
Figure 4. The phylogenetic tree constructed by the neighbor-joining method (NJ) on NSP1 sequences of 193 PRRSV strains. Phylogenetic tree analysis of NSP1 gene constructed using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). The neighbor-joining method is supported using the p-distance model with uniform rates.
Genes 14 01435 g004
Figure 5. The phylogenetic tree constructed by the maximum likelihood method (ML) on NSP1 sequences of 193 PRRSV strains. Phylogenetic tree analysis of NSP1 gene constructed using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). The maximum likelihood method is supported using the Tamura–Nei model with uniform rates.
Figure 5. The phylogenetic tree constructed by the maximum likelihood method (ML) on NSP1 sequences of 193 PRRSV strains. Phylogenetic tree analysis of NSP1 gene constructed using MEGA software (version 7.0; Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). The maximum likelihood method is supported using the Tamura–Nei model with uniform rates.
Genes 14 01435 g005
Table 1. Reference information for each PRRSV strain.
Table 1. Reference information for each PRRSV strain.
YearAreaStrainGenBank
Accession Number
1992USAVR2332EF536003
1999USAS1MW592733
2000ChinaBJ-4AF331831.1
2001ChinaCH-1aAY032626.1
2003ChinaHN1AY457635.1
2006ChinaJXA1EF112445
2006ChinaHUB2EF112446
2006ChinaHUB1EF075945.1
2006ChinaHEB1EF112447.1
2006ChinaFZ06AMF370557.1
2006ChinaCC-1EF153486.1
2007ChinaWUH1EU187484
2007ChinaSHHEU106888
2007ChinarV63EU360129
2007ChinarV68 EU360128
2007ChinaSY0608EU144079
2007ChinaNX06EU097706
2007ChinaLNEU109502
2007ChinaJiangxi-3EU200961
2007ChinaHUN4EF635006
2007ChinaHuNEF517962
2007ChinaHPBEDVEU236259.1
2007ChinaHN07-1KX766378.1
2007ChinaHenan-1EU200962.1
2007ChinaGDQJGQ374441.1
2007ChinaGD-2007EU880433.2
2007ChinaEm2007EU262603.1
2007ChinaCH-1REU807840.1
2007ChinaBJsy06EU097707.1
2007ChinaBJ0706GQ351601.1
2008ChinaTP EU864233
2008ChinaYN9GU232738
2008ChinaTJ EU860248
2008ChinaSHB EU864232
2008ChinaXH-GDEU624117
2008ChinaPRRSV01 FJ175687
2008ChinaPRRSV02 FJ175688
2008China PRRSV03FJ175689
2008ChinaNM1EU860249
2008ChinaJXA1_P80FJ548853
2008ChinaJXA1_P70FJ548852
2008ChinaJXA1_P45FJ548851
2008ChinaJXA1_P15FJ548855
2008ChinaJXA1_P10FJ548854
2008ChinaJX143EU708726
2008ChinaJsyxEU939312
2008ChinaJN-HSHM016158
2008ChinaGDBY1GQ374442.1
2008ChinaGDEU825724.1
2008ChinaCGEU864231.1
2008ChinaBJEU825723.1
2008China07QNFJ394029.1
2008China07NMFJ393456.1
2008China07HENFJ393457.1
2008China07HEBTJFJ393458.1
2008China07BJFJ393459.1
2009ChinaSY0909HQ315837
2009ChinaYN2008EU880435
2009ChinaXL2008EU880436
2009ChinaWUH2 EU678352
2009ChinaSX2009FJ895329
2009ChinaSX2007EU880434
2009ChinaSD1-100GQ914997
2009ChinaSX-1 GQ857656
2009ChinaZP-1HM016159
2009ChinaJXA1-P120KC422727
2009ChinaJX2006EU880432
2009ChinaHN-HW FJ797690.1
2009ChinaHN2007EU880437.2
2009ChinaGS2008EU880431.2
2009ChinaGS2004EU880443.3
2009ChinaGS2003EU880442.2
2009ChinaGS2002 EU880441.2
2009ChinaGD2007EU880433.2
2009ChinaCWZ-1-F3FJ889130.1
2009ChinaClone20FJ899592.1
2009ChinaCH2004EU880439.2
2009ChinaCH2003EU880440.2
2009ChinaCH2002EU880438.2
2009ChinaCBB-1-F3FJ889129.1
2009ChinaBJSY-1FJ950744.1
2009ChinaBJSDFJ950747.1
2009ChinaBJPGFJ950746.1
2009ChinaBJBLZFJ950745.1
2009China08HuNGU169411.1
2010ChinaQY2010 JQ743666
2010ChinaWUH3HM853673
2010ChinaHLJHL HM189676.1
2010ChinaGX09-32HM214915.1
2010ChinaGX09-29HM214914.1
2010ChinaGX09-16HM214913.1
2010China10FS-GDJX192634.1
2011ChinaQYYZJQ308798
2011ChinaHH08JX679179.1
2011ChinaGX10-48JQ309823.1
2011ChinaGX10-42JQ309822.1
2011ChinaGM2JN662424.1
2011ChinaDYJN864948.1
2012ChinaYN-2011JX857698
2012ChinaNTKP998420
2012ChinaHZ-31KC445138
2012ChinaGX1003JX912249.1
2012ChinaGX1002JQ955658.1
2012ChinaGX1001 JQ955657.1
2013China SH1211 KF678434
2013ChinaXJu-1KF815525
2013ChinaHLJB1KT351740.1
2013ChinaHENAN-XINXKF611905.1
2013ChinaHeNan-A9KJ546412.1
2013ChinaGD-2011KC527830.1
2013ChinaBJ-F150KP890342.1
2014ChinaZJXS1412MF669722
2014ChinaYN-1KJ747052
2014ChinaNMG2014 KM000066
2014ChinaHB2014001KM261784.1
2014ChinaGZ106KJ541663.1
2014ChinaGD1404MF669720.1
2014ChinaCHsx1401KP861625.1
2014ChinaBB0907-s34KM453698.1
2014ChinaBB0907-F44KM453699.1
2015ChinaSD-A19MF375260
2015ChinaXJzx1-2015 KX689233
2015ChinaSC-d MF375261
2015ChinaTJbd14-1KP742986
2015ChinaJXja15KR149645
2015ChinaJL580KR706343
2015ChinaHZL1501MF669721
2015ChinaHNyc15KT945018.1
2015ChinaHNyc13KT022072.1
2015ChinaHNjZ15KT945017.1
2015ChinaHeN1502MF766473.1
2015ChinaHeN1501MF766472.1
2015ChinaGDsgKX621003.1
2015ChinaGD3GU269541.1
2015ChinaFJZ03KP860909.1
2015ChinaFJW05KP860911.1
2015ChinaFJFSKP998476.1
2015China15LY02-FJKU215417.1
2016ChinaWUH6KU523367
2016ChinaWUH5 KU523366
2016ChinaSDbz16-2 MH588710
2016ChinaTJnh1501KX510269
2016ChinaJXwn06EF641008
2016ChinaHNhxKX766379.1
2016ChinaHeN1601MF766474.1
2016ChinaGDZS2016MH046843.1
2016ChinaGD-KPKU978619.1
2016ChinaFJ1402KX169191.1
2016China15LN1KX815423.1
2017ChinaSD17-36 MH121061
2017ChinaSD17-38MH068878
2017ChinaSCcd17 MG914067
2017ChinaXJ17-5 MK759853
2017ChinaQHD2 MH167387
2017ChinaQHD3 MH167388
2017ChinaJSTZ1712-12MK906026
2017ChinaGDzjMF772778.1
2017ChinaFJWQ16KX758249.1
2017ChinaFJM4KY412888.1
2017China17-ZJ-HZMF770574.1
2018ChinaSCya18MK144543
2018ChinaLNCH-1604MH651741
2018ChinaHNJYH-1606MH651740.1
2018ChinaHBFL-1604MH651739.1
2018ChinaHBap4-2018MZ579701.1
2018ChinaGZgy17MK144542.1
2018ChinaFJ0908MK202794.1
2019ChinaSDRZ01 MZ322956
2019ChinaNM-12MN026347
2019ChinaJSYZ1909-16MT780871
2019ChinaJSTZ1907-714MN547967
2019ChinaJSTZ1904-664MN547966
2019ChinaGXBB16-1MN026346.1
2019ChinaCH-YYMK450365.1
2020ChinaYCHM027595
2020ChinaSD-YL1712MT708500
2020ChinaSD-QD-2101MZ172971
2020ChinaSCcd2020MW803134
2020ChinaSXSZ-2020MW880772
2020ChinarJXA1-RMT163314
2020ChinaJS2020MZ342900
2020ChinaGD1909MT165636.1
2021ChinaSDHSW135-2009 OL516361
2021ChinaYL-2021MZ169406
2021ChinaLNTZJ1341-2012OL516360
2021ChinaJLTZJ2050-2107OL516359
2021ChinaHY21OL687155
2021ChinaHNTZJ165-2001OL516358.1
2021ChinaHLJTZJ2165OL516356.1
2021ChinaBJ2021OK095299.1
2022ChinaSD-RON254650
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Luo, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Kong, W.; Huang, L.; Zhao, M. Variations in NSP1 of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolated in China from 1996 to 2022. Genes 2023, 14, 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071435

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Zhang H, Luo Q, Zheng Y, Kong W, Huang L, Zhao M. Variations in NSP1 of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolated in China from 1996 to 2022. Genes. 2023; 14(7):1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071435

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhiqing, Hang Zhang, Qin Luo, Yajie Zheng, Weili Kong, Liangzong Huang, and Mengmeng Zhao. 2023. "Variations in NSP1 of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolated in China from 1996 to 2022" Genes 14, no. 7: 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071435

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop