Next Article in Journal
QTL Mapping of Trichome Traits and Analysis of Candidate Genes in Leaves of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Expression Profile of Follicles at Different Stages in High- and Low-Production Laying Hens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/genes15010041
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification, Expression and Interaction Analyses of PP2C Family Genes in Chenopodium quinoa

by
Dongdong Yang
1,
Xia Zhang
1,
Meng Cao
1,
Lu Yin
1,
Aihong Gao
1,
Kexin An
1,
Songmei Gao
1,
Shanli Guo
2,3,4,* and
Haibo Yin
1,*
1
College of Life Sciences, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
2
College of Grassland Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
3
High-Efficiency Agricultural Technology Industry Research Institute of Saline and Alkaline Land of Dongying, Qingdao Agricultural University, Dongying 257300, China
4
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Grassland Resources and Ecology in the Yellow River Delta, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010041
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 24 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant protein phosphatase 2Cs (PP2Cs) function as inhibitors in protein kinase cascades involved in various processes and are crucial participants in both plant development and signaling pathways activated by abiotic stress. In this study, a genome-wide study was conducted on the CqPP2C gene family. A total of putative 117 CqPP2C genes were identified. Comprehensive analyses of physicochemical properties, chromosome localization and subcellular localization were conducted. According to phylogenetic analysis, CqPP2Cs were divided into 13 subfamilies. CqPP2Cs in the same subfamily had similar gene structures, and conserved motifs and all the CqPP2C proteins had the type 2C phosphatase domains. The expansion of CqPP2Cs through gene duplication was primarily driven by segmental duplication, and all duplicated CqPP2Cs underwent evolutionary changes guided by purifying selection. The expression of CqPP2Cs in various tissues under different abiotic stresses was analyzed using RNA-seq data. The findings indicated that CqPP2C genes played a role in regulating both the developmental processes and stress responses of quinoa. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of six CqPP2C genes in subfamily A revealed that they were up-regulated or down-regulated under salt and drought treatments. Furthermore, the results of yeast two-hybrid assays revealed that subfamily A CqPP2Cs interacted not only with subclass III CqSnRK2s but also with subclass II CqSnRK2s. Subfamily A CqPP2Cs could interact with CqSnRK2s in different combinations and intensities in a variety of biological processes and biological threats. Overall, our results will be useful for understanding the functions of CqPP2C in regulating ABA signals and responding to abiotic stress.

1. Introduction

Protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are the main forms of reversible post-translational modifications, which control the important regulatory mechanisms of many biological processes by regulating the localization, conformation, stability, and activity of substrate proteins in eukaryotes [1]. The phosphorylation state of proteins is dynamically controlled by protein kinase (PK) and protein phosphatase (PP), where protein kinase transfers the phosphate group of donor ATP to the side chain of receptor protein, while protein phosphatase dephosphorylates phosphoprotein. According to their mechanism of catalysis, substrate specificity and specific response to inhibitors, eukaryotic PPs can be divided into protein tyrosine (Tyr) phosphatases (PTP), phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP), metallo-dependent protein phosphatase (PPM), and aspartate (Asp)-dependent phosphatase [2]. The PTP family includes Tyr specific phosphatases (PTPs) and dual-specificity phosphatase (DsPTP) that dephosphorylates serine (Ser), Thr (threonine), and Tyr phosphoresidue. The PPP family consists of seven members: PP1, PP2A, PP2B, and PP4/5/6/7 [2]. The PPM family includes protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C), pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase, and other magnesium (Mg2+)/manganese (Mn2+)-dependent STPs [3].
PP2Cs widely exist in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, are evolutionarily conserved, and significantly regulate stress signal pathways [4]. The relatively conserved catalytic domain in eukaryotic PP2C protein is located at the N- or C-terminus, while the region of the non-catalytic domain is not highly conserved and has diverse amino acid sequences with different functions. The non-catalytic domain region is important for defining the function of PP2C members, as it contains sequence motifs and/or transmembrane regions related to cellular signaling, including those that interact with protein kinases [5,6]. PP2Cs, as negative regulators of protein kinase cascades activated in different processes, participate in regulating signaling pathways. In fission yeast, genetic evidence has shown that PP2Cs are involved in the negative regulation of osmotic sensing signals transmitted through the Wis1-MAPK cascade [7]. In budding yeast, two PP2Cs, PTC1 and PTC3, are negative regulators of the PBS2-HOG1 MAPK pathway. In the yeast HOG pathway, four types of PP2C phosphatases Ptc1-Ptc4 dephosphorylated differently two activated phosphorylation sites of Pbs2 MAP2K [8]. In humans, PP2Calpha negatively regulates the stress-responsive MAPK cascades through dephosphorylation and inactivation of MKK6, SEK1, and MAPK (p38) [9], while PP2Cbeta dephosphorylates and inactivates the MAPKK kinase TAK1 to negatively regulate the TAK1 stress-signaling pathway [10] and PP2Cepsilon associates stably with TAK1 and dephosphorylates TAK1 to inhibit the TAK1 signaling pathway [11]. PpABI1A and PpABI2B of group A PP2C are directly involved in ABA response, acting downstream of ABA-activated kinase and regulating ABA-induced genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens [12].
To date, extensive research has been conducted on PP2C family genes across various plant species. In the investigation of Arabidopsis, six members (ABI1, ABI2, AHG1, HAB1, HAB2 and AHG3) belonging to the A subfamily have been confirmed as co-receptors for abscisic acid (ABA). These genes play a negative regulatory role in the ABA signaling pathway [13]. The MAPK phosphatase AP2C1 of the PP2C subfamily B interacts with MPK3, MPK4, and MPK6 to control their activity [14]. The expression of AP2C1 and the accumulation of AP2C1 protein are strongly and locally enhanced at the induction site of the syncytium, indicating that AP2C1 acts as a negative regulatory factor for MAPK (MPK3, MPK4, and MPK6) to ensure inhibition of MAPK activation in the developing syncytium [15,16]. POL-LIKE1 and POLTERGEIST encode the related protein phosphatases 2C of the PP2C subfamily C, which are crucial for the establishment of shoot and root meristem tissues during embryogenesis and the maintenance of stem cell pools during post-embryonic development in Arabidopsis [17,18]. AtPP2C of subfamily D participates in the response to saline and alkali stresses [19]. Within subfamily E, AtPP2C-6-6 engages in interactions with the histone acetyl transferase AtGCN5, contributing to the regulation of transpiration through the modulation of stomatal signaling [20]. In subfamily F, WIN2 plays a role in modulating plant defense by interacting with the bacterial effector HopW1-1 [21]. Likewise, the protein phosphatase homologue 1 (PPH1) of unclustered PP2Cs involves maintaining efficient photosynthesis through dephosphorylation of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 in plants [22]. In rice, OsPP2C09 (Os01g62760) of subfamily A PP2C interacts with RING-H2 type E3 ligase OsRF1 to participate in the salt tolerance of rice [23]. SAL1 encodes PP2C. D phosphatase is located on the plasma membrane and can interact with PM H+- ATPase to inhibit its activity, participating in rice aluminum resistance [24]. The subfamily F PP2C phosphatase ZmPP84 participates in regulating drought stress responses by dephosphorylating ZmMEK1 to inhibit its kinase activity in maize [25]. Likewise, the subfamily B PP2C phosphatase ZmPP2C26 can dephosphorylate ZmMAPK3 and ZmMAPK7, participating in the negative regulation of drought tolerance in maize [26]. All these researches indicate that PP2Cs have multiple functions and are worthy of further research.
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa wild.) is one of the most nutritious cultivated crops in the world. At the same time, it exhibits strong resistance to various soil and climatic conditions, which allows quinoa to be planted on marginal land. PP2C is a multifunctional gene that regulates plant growth, development, and stress response and has been analyzed in many plants [27]. Despite this, the PP2C gene family in quinoa has not been explored. This study conducted a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of the CqPP2C gene family in quinoa, including gene identification, chromosomal localization, phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, conserved motifs and domains, gene duplication analysis, cis-acting elements analysis, and relative expression of CqPP2C genes. Furthermore, we conducted an analysis to explore potential interactions between subfamily A CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s, both of which respond to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. These results will provide important information for understanding the mechanisms of PP2C in abiotic stress signal transduction.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Basic Information of PP2C Genes in Quinoa

A total of 121 PP2C-coding candidate genes were identified via BLASTP and HMM searching in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). By using the CDD program with default settings, it was found that 4 of the 121 candidate PP2Cs did not contain PP2C catalytic domains. Therefore, 117 genes in quinoa were identified as members of the PP2C family and labeled as CqPP2C1 to CqPP2C117 based on their order on chromosomes. The gene name, gene ID, chromosome location, number of amino acids (aa), molecular weight (Mw), isoelectric point (pI), instability index, hydrophilic coefficient, and subcellular localization prediction of 117 PP2C proteins were analyzed (Table S1). The lengths of proteins ranged from 110 aa residues (CqPP2C94) to 1501 aa residues (CqPP2C101). The Mw ranged from 11,495.04 kDa (CqPP2C94) to 167,616.03 kDa (CqPP2C101) and pI varied from 4.08 (CqPP2C8) to 9.44 (CqPP2C70). According to the instability index, it was determined that 62.3% of CqPP2Cs exhibit protein instability. Except for CqPP2C7, CqPP2C94 and CqPP2C108, all other CqPP2C showed GRAVY below zero, indicating that these proteins are hydrophilic. The results of subcellular localization prediction showed that most of the quinoa PP2Cs might be located in the cytoplasm, chloroplast, or nucleus. In addition, only CqPP2C6 might be located in the plasma membrane, CqPP2C7 and CqPP2C83 might be located in the mitochondria, CqPP2C51, CqPP2C72, CqPP2C73 and CqPP2C99 might be located in the endoplasmic reticulum, and CqPP2C57 might be located in the vacuole membrane. These results indicated that CqPP2C proteins were randomly distributed in cells and played a role in various environments.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of CqPP2C Genes

To study the phylogenetic relationships between PP2C genes in quinoa and Arabidopsis, we used the maximum likelihood method to construct a phylogenetic tree based on the alignments of 80 PP2C protein sequences in Arabidopsis and 117 in quinoa (Figure 1).
The results showed that 103 CqPP2C proteins were divided into 13 subfamilies (A-L), including A (14), B (8), C(8), D (14), E (17), F1(8), F2 (6), G (9), H(6), I (4), J (2), K(3), L (4) (Table S2). In addition, quinoa has seven separate branches. The phylogenetic analyses indicated that CqPP2C1, CqPP2C53, CqPP2C70 and AT1G18030 tend to form independent branches. CqPP2C60, CqPP2C79 and AT2G40860 tend to form an independent branch; CqPP2C55, CqPP2C83 and AT4G27800 tend to form independent branches; CqPP2C107, CqPP2C54 and AT3G23360 tend to form independent branches; CqPP2C93 and AT4G11040 tend to form independent branches; CqPP2C21, CqPP2C68, and CqPP2C109 tend to form independent branches; CqPP2C99 tends to form independent branches.

2.3. Gene Structural and Conserved Domain Analyses of CqPP2Cs

We analyzed the exon/intron structure patterns of CqPP2C genes and protein-conserved motifs. In quinoa, CqPP2Cs contain a range of exons from 1 to 18. Thereinto, CqPP2C93 in unclustered PP2Cs and CqPP2C94 and CqPP2C108 in subfamily A only had one exon without intron, while CqPP2C72 in subfamily J had 18 exons and 17 introns, and had the longest intron. Generally, most genes in the same subfamily share a similar exon/intron structure (Figure 2A).
By employing the MEME motif search tool, we identified twenty motifs in the CqPP2C proteins. As illustrated in Figure 2B, the number of motifs varied between 3 and 11, encompassing 8 to 50 residues across all CqPP2C proteins. Among them, 107 CqPP2C proteins all contained motif 2. Each group had specific motifs, except for common motifs. For example, motifs 8 and 9 existed in group D but not in other groups, motifs 13 and 17 only existed in groups C and D, motifs 18 only existed in group H, and motifs 19 only existed in group F1. The distribution pattern of protein motifs from a group of family members was similar, with the G family having exactly the same motif distribution, indicating that CqPP2C members in the same cluster might have similar functions.
We used the NCBI CDD/SPARCLE database to predict conservative structural domains (Figure 2C). Most CqPP2Cs contain the PP2Cc domain, with only nine members of the G subfamily, three members of the K subfamily, and CqPP2C21 without the PP2Cc domain. The seven members of the G subfamily (CqPP2C2, 9, 24, 25, 67, 71, 78) have PP2C_C superfamily domain and CqPP2C10 and CqPP2C38 in the G subfamily have a PLN03145 domain belonging to the PP2C superfamily. CqPP2C8, 47, 95 in the K subfamily and CqPP2C21 have a PP2Cc superfamily domain (Serine/threonine phosphatases, family 2C, catalytic domain). Additionally, domains FHA-PP2C70-like, PKC-like superfamily, GUB_WAK_bind, MDR superfamily, ZnF-BED, CAP-ED and 2A194 superfamily also appear in quinoa PP2C protein sequences.
As is well known, the A subfamily proteins (PP2CAs) of PP2Cs are involved in controlling abscisic acid (ABA) signaling and responding to various abiotic stresses, and have a negative regulatory effect on plant growth and development. To further investigate their biological functions, a further comparison was made between the subfamily A protein of PP2Cs in quinoa and the reported PP2C proteins in Arabidopsis. The catalytic domain of PP2C proteins contains 11 conserved motifs, in which 5 conserved residues participate in Mg2+/Mn2+ coordination. The multiple alignment results of the 14 CqPP2C (CqPP2CA) and 9 AtPP2C (AtPP2CA) in subfamily A indicated that not all CqPP2CA members contained all the 11 conserved motifs (Figure S1). It has been found that CqPP2C94, CqPP2C108 and CqPP2C44 may lead to the elimination and loss of function of some important motifs due to the partial deletion of the N-terminus or/and C-terminus of the PP2C catalytic domain. Five sites responsible for Mg2+/Mn2+ coordination were found within all CqPP2C catalytic domains: [xxxD], [DGxG], [CGD], [DG] and [xxDN] (C-cysteine; D-aspartic acid; G-glycine; N-asparagine) (Figure S1). Subfamily A proteins of PP2C (PP2CA) had several residues involved in their phosphatase activity in the catalytic domain. Among them, the critical active-site residues [Arg138, Glu142, Asp143, Asp177, Gly178, His179, Asp347 and Asp413 in ABI1] had been conserved. Similarly, the ABA-sensing tryptophan [Trp385 (W385) in HAB1] had been conserved. Whereas, the Arg residue [Arg505 (R505) in HAB1] that mediates interaction between the ABA box and HAB1 [28] showed less conservativeness. The well-described residues responsible for ABI1-PYL1 interaction [29] were also conserved (Figure S1). These results indicated that the structures of PP2CA proteins were similar, especially within the highly conserved catalytic domain, despite greater changes in the N-terminal region (Figure S1).

2.4. Chromosomal Location and Duplication of CqPP2C Genes

There were a total of 113 CqPP2Cs located on 18 chromosomes of quinoa, and only 4 CqPP2Cs could not be located on any chromosome, so they were assigned to chromosome zero. According to their order on chromosomes, they were named CqPP2C1–CqPP2C117 (Table S1 and Figure 3).
The largest number of CqPP2C genes were localized to chromosome 07 (17 CqPP2Cs), while chromosome 09, chromosome 13 and chromosome 18 had the smallest number of CqPP2Cs (only three CqPP2Cs). Gene duplication caused by polyploidization or replication-related segments and tandem duplication was the main mechanism for producing new genes, which contributes to the gene family expansion in the plant kingdom [30]. In this study, we found that there were no tandem duplication gene pairs, but 61 pairs of paralogous CqPP2C genes were involved in segment duplication events, indicating that segment duplication was the driving force for the expansion of the quinoa PP2C gene family. Among them, two CqPP2C gene pairs, including CqPP2C30/32/64/116 and CqPP2C29/74/101/113, had four copies. Three CqPP2C gene pairs, including CqPP2C12/13/36, CqPP2C31/63/117 and CqPP2C44/56/94, had three copies, other gene pairs contained two copies. There is only one copy of the remaining 18 CqPP2C genes in quinoa (Figure 3). These findings imply that gene loss could be a phenomenon within the quinoa PP2C gene family, leading to the elimination of certain homologous copies. Comparable patterns have been noted in the CqWRKY and CqNAC gene families in quinoa [31]. The ratio of Ka/Ks, as shown in Table S4, was consistently below 1, signifying that purifying selection predominantly drove the evolutionary dynamics of all duplicated CqPP2C genes.

2.5. Cis-Acting Elements Analysis

To clarify the role of the CqPP2C gene, a 2000 bp upstream promoter sequence of the CqPP2C genes was analyzed using PlantCARE. In addition to common cis-elements such as TATA boxes and CAAT boxes, other cis-elements were related to abiotic stress responses, light, hormones, plant growth and development, and other regulatory stresses (Figure 4).
According to the results, it could be seen that the number of photoresponsive elements is the largest, which was present in almost all CqPP2C genes. Hormone-responsive elements included abscisic acid, auxin, gibberellin, salicylic acid, and methyl jasmonate responsive elements. Abiotic stress-responsive elements included drought, anaerobic induction, low temperature, and defense and stress-responsive elements. Obviously, there were many cis-elements related to plant abiotic stress in the promoter region of the CqPP2C gene. Among 117 CqPP2C genes, 89 promoters contain ABA-responsive elements (ABRE), and CqPP2C110 contained twelve ABA-responsive elements, with the largest number. These indicated that CqPP2C genes played an important role in abiotic stress responses through the ABA signaling pathway

2.6. Expression of CqPP2C Genes in Different Quinoa Tissues

To investigate the expression of CqPP2C family genes in different quinoa tissues including apical meristems, leaves petioles, flowers and immature seeds, dry seeds, stems, seedlings, internode stems, inflorescence, leaves, fruit of white sweet quinoa, flowers of white sweet quinoa, flowers of yellow bitter quinoa, and fruit of yellow bitter quinoa, a heatmap was constructed using previously published RNA-seq data. The expression levels of CqPP2C family genes varied in different quinoa tissues (Figure 5).
Usually, most CqPP2C genes are expressed in various tissues of quinoa, and several CqPP2C genes are prominent in certain tissues. We identified three genes with leaf petioles-specific expression (CqPP2C55, CqPP2C59, and CqPP2C83). CqPP2C12 was highly expressed in apical meristems and CqPP2C51, CqPP2C61, and CqPP2C111 accumulated in the flower and immature seeds. In addition, nine CqPP2C genes were abundant in internode stems and nineteen genes were prominent in the seedlings. We also found subfamily A genes of PP2C (PP2CA) were abundant in dry seeds and fruit of white sweet quinoa except CqPP2C5, CqPP2C22, and CqPP2C105. Through analysis, we could identify candidate CqPP2Cs that might play important functions in the development of different tissues.

2.7. Expression Patterns of CqPP2C Genes under Stress Conditions

The prediction of cis-acting elements indicated that CqPP2C genes might be involved in the response to drought, cold, and NaCl stress. In addition, many studies have shown that PP2C gene expression in different plant species was regulated by abiotic stress and hormone treatment [32]. In this study, we analyzed the expression levels of CqPP2C genes in root and shoot under different abiotic stresses using transcriptome data (Figure 6).
The expression of PP2C genes in the shoot was lower than that in the root in the control. Under drought stress, compared with the control, the expression of some genes (CqPP2C30, CqPP2C55, CqPP2C82, and CqPP2C83) in shoot and genes (CqPP2C5, CqPP2C19, CqPP2C22, CqPP2C32, CqPP2C40, CqPP2C43, CqPP2C44, CqPP2C56, CqPP2C64, CqPP2C90, CqPP2C104, CqPP2C109, and CqPP2C116) in root significantly increased. Compared with control, some of these genes (CqPP2C2, CqPP2C6, CqPP2C51, CqPP2C52, CqPP2C60 and CqPP2C105) in shoot and genes (CqPP2C7, CqPP2C16, CqPP2C33, CqPP2C34, CqPP2C36, CqPP2C42, CqPP2C62, CqPP2C63, CqPP2C80, CqPP2C81, CqPP2C100, CqPP2C110, CqPP2C112, CqPP2C114, and CqPP2C117) in root were significantly increased under heat stress. Some of these genes (CqPP2C9, CqPP2C24, and CqPP2C101) in shoot and genes (CqPP2C13, CqPP2C14, CqPP2C17, CqPP2C28, CqPP2C31, CqPP2C48, CqPP2C59, CqPP2C61, CqPP2C68, CqPP2C99, and CqPP2C107) in root were significantly increased under low phosphorus stress compared with control. Only CqPP2C71, CqPP2C73, CqPP2C84, and CqPP2C89 in root were significantly increased under salt stress compared with control. The expression of three genes (CqPP2C42, CqPP2C43, and CqPP2C46) in shoot and three genes (CqPP2C52, CqPP2C82, and CqPP2C83) in root were significantly lower than that in control under drought stress. The expression of three genes (CqPP2C4, CqPP2C39, and CqPP2C47) in the shoot was significantly lower than that in control under low phosphorus. In conclusion, we found that in different treatments, most CqPP2C genes were highly or moderately expressed in root and shoot, indicating that most CqPP2C genes responded to abiotic stress.
It is well known that the subfamily A PP2Cs in rice and A. thaliana were transcriptionally regulated in abiotic stress responses dependent on ABA signaling pathways. The expression of several members of CqPP2C genes in subfamily A was examined by qRT-PCR under drought and salt stress in root and shoot. Six genes from subfamily A (CqPP2C5, CqPP2C30, CqPP2C44, CqPP2C104, CqPP2C105, and CqPP2C116) were randomly selected for this analysis (Figure 7).
The results showed that all six CqPP2C genes had varying degrees of response to these two stresses. Under drought treatment, six genes were up-regulated in both root and shoot, while under salt treatment, these six genes were only up-regulated in the root. In the shoot, only CqPP2C5 was up-regulated during salt treatment, while the other five genes were down-regulated. Some results were consistent with the analysis of the transcriptome data (Figure 6). In summary, the expression patterns of subfamily A CqPP2C genes indicated that these genes were responsive to abiotic stress.

2.8. Protein Interaction between Subfamily A CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s

The subfamily A PP2Cs (PP2CAs) has been identified to play a major negative regulatory role in the ABA signaling pathway. In this study, we studied the interactions between subfamily A CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s using yeast two-hybrid assay. Five CqSnRK2 members had been isolated previously in our lab, including three members of subclass II CqSnRK2s [CqSnRK2.1 (AUR62027801), CqSnRK2.4 (AUR62003254), and CqSnRK2.9 (AUR62007175)] and two members of subclass III CqSnRK2s [CqSnRK2.6 (AUR62003840) and CqSnRK2.11 (AUR62011423)]. We cloned the six subfamily A PP2C genes (CqPP2C5, CqPP2C30, CqPP2C44, CqPP2C104, CqPP2C105, and CqPP2C116) that had been detected for gene expression using qRT-PCR (Figure 7). As shown in Figure 8, CqPP2C104 and CqPP2C105, the homolog of AtABI1/2, could interact with CqSnRK2.1 and CqSnRK2.4, while CqPP2C104 also strongly interacted with CqSnRK2.9 but weakly interacted with CqSnRK2.11. CqPP2C5, CqPP2C30, and CqPP2C44 strongly interacted with CqSnRK2.11 and weakly interacted with CqSnRK2.1 and CqSnRK2.4.
In addition, the homolog CqPP2C30 of AtAHG3 strongly interacted with CqSnRK2.6, while the homolog CqPP2C116 of AtHAI1/2/3 only weakly interacted with CqSnRK2.1 and CqSnRK2.4. The results showed that the six subfamily A CqPP2Cs exhibited complex interactions with the five CqSnRK2s.

3. Discussion

Plant PP2Cs play a crucial role in governing various essential biological processes associated with development and stress response [33,34]. In the present study, we conducted a thorough analysis of the CqPP2C genes in C. quinoa, identifying a total of 117 CqPP2C genes. Compared with Arabidopsis thaliana (80), rice (78) [35], Brachypodium distachyon (86) [4], Medicago truncatula (94) [36], cucumber (56) [37], tomato (56) [38], and maize (97) [39], the amount of PP2C in quinoa was much more. Although the genome sizes of higher plants such as rice and Arabidopsis are comparable to those of lower plants such as green algae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), lycophyte (Selaginella moellendorffii) and moss (Physcomitrella patens), there are only 10 PP2C genes in green algae, and 50 PP2C genes in lycophyte and moss, while 78 in rice and 80 in Arabidopsis [40]. This indicated that there were differences in the expansion of the PP2C genes among different species, which may be related to the evolution of plants from unicellular organisms to multicellular organisms.
The PP2C gene of quinoa was organized into 13 subfamilies by branches of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), consistent with the PP2C groups in A. thalinan, Oryza sativa [35], B. distachyon [4], and cucumber [37]. In phylogenetic analysis, different PP2C groups of quinoa and Arabidopsis were arranged together to form a common branch, indicating that PP2C had sequence conservation and similar evolutionary lineages. Phylogenetic analysis can identify homologous genes from different species to predict gene function. In the A subfamily, the CqPP2C18, CqPP2C19, CqPP2C104 and CqPP2C105 protein was homologous with AtABI1 (AT4G26080) and AtABI2 (AT5G57050), indicating that these four CqPP2C proteins might be involved abiotic stress in plants and were believed to have a negative regulatory effect on ABA signaling [41,42]. Similarly, the AtPP2CF1 (AT3G05640) protein in the E subfamily can activate cell proliferation and expansion, as well as accelerate inflorescence growth, and its homologous CqPP2C41 and CqPP2C88 may have the same function [43].
The exon/intron structure of genes and protein-conserved motifs are important markers of the evolutionary relationship of family genes. Accordingly, we analyzed gene structure and protein-conserved motifs of CqPP2Cs (Figure 2). The findings revealed a consistent exon/intron structure among CqPP2Cs belonging to the same subfamily, with some exceptions, which might be due to different reasons. Previous studies on Brachypodium distachyon, Fragaria vesca, and Fragaria ananassa had shown that there were many PP2C genes with intron deletion [4,44], and similar results had been found in quinoa research. Twenty conserved motifs were identified. As shown in Figure 2B, CqPP2Cs in the same subfamily exhibited similar motif distribution. When analyzing conservative domains, in addition to the main PP2C phosphatase domain, we also found 14 other domains. KAPP (kinase-associated protein phosphatase) is an Arabidopsis PP2C that contains FHA (forkhead associated domain) at the N-terminus of its kinase interaction region, which is crucial for connecting to phosphorylated target proteins and thus facilitates signal transduction [45]. Therefore, studying the important functions of CqPP2Cs carrying these special structural domains would be of interest.
The CqPP2C gene exhibits a tissue-specific spatial expression pattern. The abundant presence of the PP2C subfamily A gene in the dry seeds and fruit of white sweet quinoa indicated that these genes are involved in ABA-mediated seed development, dormancy, and germination [46]. Cis-acting elements are important regulators of resistance to various stresses and hormone responses in plant development. We found that ABREs and DREs (Drought response elements) elements were abundant in most CqPP2C gene promoter regions, indicating that CqPP2C genes may play an indispensable role in the ABA signaling pathway, acting on drought resistance or salt stress resistance. Further expression analysis showed that most CqPP2Cs responded to drought, heat, salt stress, and Pi starvation. As is well known, the subfamily A PP2Cs plays an important role in the ABA signaling pathway and plant response to abiotic stress [47,48]. We identified fourteen PP2C genes belonging to the A subfamily in quinoa through sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. We found that most members of the A subfamily in quinoa were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated under drought and/or salt stress, which was consistent with reports from other plants. AtABI1 and AtABI2 have been identified as important components in the ABA signaling pathway [40,47,48]. CqPP2C64 and CqPP2C116, which are homologs of AtHAI PP2Cs, were significantly up-regulated under drought stress. AtHAI PP2Cs had unique drought resistance functions in Arabidopsis. The HAI PP2C mutant reduced the expression of several defense-related genes under low water potential but increased the expression of abiotic stress-related genes encoding late embryogenesis abundant proteins and dehydratin, as well as increased the accumulation of proline and osmoregulatory solutes [48]. Likewise, the expression of BdPP2Cs in B. distachyon and MtPP2Cs in M. truncatula from subfamily A were induced by cold, heat, drought, salt, or H2O2 treatment [4,36]. In P. euphratica, ABA has a moderate inducing effect on PeHAB1, while drought stress has a significant inducing effect on PeHAB1 [49]. Otherwise, the expression of TaPP2C59 in wheat and most FvPP2Cs in F. vesca were significantly down-regulated under drought and high salt stress, suggesting that these genes play a negative regulatory role [44]. Most members of subfamily A AtPP2Cs have been identified as negative regulators of ABA signaling. ABA treatment and abiotic stress can highly induce the expression of these genes [35,50]. The induction of PP2C gene expression by ABA might be the ABA desensitization mechanism that regulates ABA signaling and maintains plant homeostasis.
Similar to the research results of other plants, our study in quinoa also indicated that some CqPP2Cs from subfamilies other than subfamily A were induced by abiotic stresses. In the B subfamily, the expression of CqPP2C63 and CqPP2C117 was highly induced under heat stress, and the expression of CqPP2C28 and CqPPS2C31 was significantly altered after Pi starvation treatment in root. The expression of CqPP2C52 in the shoot and the expression of CqPP2C7, CqPP2C36, and CqPPS2C31 in the root were highly induced under heat stress. A study has shown that almost all members of subfamily D in Arabidopsis and soybean contain heat stress response elements (HSE) in their promoters, and subfamily D genes in wheat respond to heat treatment [19,51]. These results indicate that CqPP2Cs can play important functions under different stresses, and their detailed roles still need further exploration.
In Arabidopsis, members of subfamily A PP2Cs can interact with both ABA receptor PYLs and subclass III SnRK2s, mediating the ABA signaling pathway to regulate seed germination and response to abiotic stress [52,53]. Subclass III AtSnRK2 (AtSnRK2.2, AtSnRK2.3, AtSnRK2.6) proteins always interact with subfamily A PP2Cs and are inactivated by direct dephosphorylation of subfamily A PP2Cs [52,54]. In our study, the results of the yeast two-hybrid assay showed that all six CqPP2Cs interacted with one or two members of CqSnRK2s. Subfamily A CqPP2Cs interacted not only with subclass III CqSnRK2s but also with subclass II CqSnRK2s. This result was consistent with studies in rice, B. distachyon, and wheat. In rice, OsSAPK2 was classified as Class 2b (subclass II) and could interact with OsPP2C30 [55]. In B. distachyon, group A BdPP2C could interact with subclass II BdSnRK2.1 [56], and group A TaPP2C interacted with subclass II TaSnRK2s in wheat [51]. This suggested that subfamily A CqPP2Cs were essential for ABA signal transduction in quinoa, where subfamily A CqPP2Cs bound to CqSnRK2s in different combinations and intensities to respond to various biological processes and stresses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of the PP2C Gene Family in Quinoa

This experiment used BLASTP and the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [57] to identify the PP2C genes in quinoa. The sequences of 80 AtPP2C proteins were downloaded from the website (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 7 June 2022). The quinoa genome data (http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/chenopodiumdb/, accessed on 7 June 2022) were used for BLASTP and the retrieval threshold was set as E-value < E−10. To further screen candidate genes, we compared the protein sequences of Arabidopsis PP2C using TBtools. Then, the NCBI-CDD databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 7 June 2022) and Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/search#tabview=tab1, accessed on 7 June 2022) [58] were used for domain identification of candidate gene. We manually deleted candidate genes without specific domains of the PP2C (registration numbers PF00481, PF07830, and PF13672) [51]. The physicochemical properties were analyzed based on ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 7 June 2022) [59]. Online software WoLF PSORT (http://www.genscript.com/wolf-psort.html, accessed on 7 June 2022) predicted the subcellular localization of CqPP2Cs [60].

4.2. Evolutionary Relationship of the PP2C Gene Family

Validated quinoa PP2C protein sequences and Arabidopsis PP2C protein sequences (AtPP2Cs) were used to establish an evolutionary relationship. This analysis included a total of 197 amino acid sequences. Using MEGA 7 to align multiple protein sequences, the final comparison results were constructed through neighbor-joining (NJ), and the bootstrap value was set to 1000 [35,37]. The constructed tree was beautified using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 7 June 2022).

4.3. Gene Structure and Protein Conserved Motif Analysis

Conserved motifs of CqPP2Cs were determined using MEME (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 7 June 2022) for all CqPP2C sequences. The number of motifs was set to 20, and other parameters were defaults [61]. We extracted gene structures from genome annotation gff3 files and used TBtools to display the results. DNAMAN v.8.0 software was used for CqPP2Cs amino acid multiplex sequence alignment.

4.4. Chromosomal Location and Gene Duplication Analysis

TBtools-II (Toolbox for Biologists) v2.003 software was utilized to perform synteny analysis within the quinoa genome by employing all-vs-all BLASTP alignments. The plugin MCScanX method was employed for this analysis [62]. Duplication events and synteny analysis were visualized using TBtools software [63]. Additionally, TBtools was utilized to calculate the synonymous (Ks) and nonsynonymous (Ka) substitution rates of homologous genes in quinoa [63].

4.5. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements in the Promoter Regions

The promoter sequence (2000 bp upstream of the putative genes ATG) was extracted using TBtools. Then submitted the promoter sequence to PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 7 June 2022) for cis-element prediction [64].

4.6. Analysis of CqPP2C Gene Expression Patterns

The quinoa RNA-seq data from different tissues (No: PRJNA394651) and different treatments (No: PRJNA306026) were downloaded from the Bioproject database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accessed on 7 June 2022). RNA-seq data in TPM (transcripts per million reads) 491 is normalized and a log2 transformation is performed. We used TBtools software to visualize the heatmap of PP2C gene expression.

4.7. Quinoa Treatment and RNA Extraction

The quinoa material was “YT077”. Quinoa was cultivated in a greenhouse (with an average temperature of 22 °C, relative humidity of 70–75%, and 16 h/8 h of light/dark). To determine the expression of quinoa PP2C under salt and drought treatment. One-month-old quinoa seedlings with consistent growth were selected for salt stress (300 mM NaCl) and drought stress (20% PEG6000). The leaves and roots of seedlings were taken at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after treatment. The collected samples were frozen quickly with liquid nitrogen and placed at −80 °C until further usage. Three biological replicates for each treatment. TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (Transgen, Beijing, China) was used to extract total RNA from collected samples.

4.8. qRT-PCR Analysis

The primers were designed using Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/, accessed on 9 June 2022) (Table S5), synthesized by Qingdao BGI. The above preserved RNA was reverse-transcribed into single-stranded cDNA using the TransScript® One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen, Beijing, China). The cDNA product obtained by reverse transcription was used as a template, and the SYBR Green I dye method was used for real-time PCR, and the quinoa Tubulin gene was used as the internal reference gene [65,66]. The reaction volume was 20 μL, containing 2 μL of cDNA solution, 2 μM forward and reverse primers, 10 μL of SYBR, and 6 μL of deionized water. The amplification program conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s; Denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s; Annealing at 57 °C for 15 s; Extension at 72 °C for 30 s and set the number of cycles to 40 times. The relative expression of genes was calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCT method [67].

4.9. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays

The primers (Table S6) for the cloning of CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s were designed using the Primer3. Six CqPP2Cs in group A and five CqSnRK2s were amplified from the quinoa cDNA. The CqPP2C and CqSnRK2 genes were cloned into pGADT7 and pGBKT7 vectors, respectively. Yeast two-hybrid analysis was conducted with the yeast strain AH109, following the manufacturer’s protocol from Clontech, USA, and the experiment was repeated at least three times. Positive transformants screened from the SD medium lacking leucine and tryptophan (SD/-Leu/-Trp) are then transferred to the SD medium lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine (SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His) for further screening. The 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole (3-AT) was used to eliminate the background yeast growth on SD medium lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine (SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His).

5. Conclusions

In the present work, a total of putative 117 CqPP2C genes were identified and divided into 13 subfamilies. The chromosome localization, physical and chemical feature predictions, phylogenetic analysis, gene structure, conserved motif and domain analysis were thoroughly investigated. The results of collinearity and selection pressure analysis indicated that CqPP2C genes underwent amplification of segmental duplication and purification selection during evolution. In addition, the expression of CqPP2Cs in various tissues under different abiotic treatments was analyzed using RNA-seq data. CqPP2C genes were involved in regulating the development and stress responses of quinoa. qRT-PCR results showed that six CqPP2C genes in subfamily A were up-regulated or down-regulated under salt and drought treatments. Additionally, Yeast two-hybrid assays showed that subfamily A CqPP2Cs interacted with CqSnRK2s in different combinations and intensities to respond to various biological processes and stresses. Overall, our results provide new insights and a basis for further understanding the roles of the CqPP2C family in the regulation of abiotic stress response.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15010041/s1, Figure S1: Amino acid sequence and secondary structure alignment of subfamily A PP2C proteins in quinoa and Arabidopsis with 11 conserved motifs (A–K). The black arrowheads below the sequence indicate the active-site residues. The red circles below the sequence indicate the residues involved in the interaction with PYL1. The blue arrowhead indicates the conserved Gly residue. The green arrowhead indicates the conserved ABA-sensing tryptophan. The yellow arrowhead indicates the conserved Arg residue [Arg505 (R505) in AtHAB1] that mediates interactions between HAB1 and the ABA box; Table S1: The list of 117 CqPP2C genes and their basic characterizations; Table S2: The distribution of PP2C genes in Arabidopsis and quinoa; Table S3: Conserved motifs in the amino acid sequences of CqPP2C proteins; Table S4: Ka/Ks of syntenic gene pairs in quinoa genome; Table S5: Primers used for qRT-PCR in this study; Table S6: Primers for plasmid construction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and S.G. (Shanli Guo); methodology, D.Y., M.C., L.Y., A.G., K.A. and S.G. (Songmei Gao); software, D.Y., M.C., L.Y., A.G., K.A. and S.G. (Songmei Gao); validation, D.Y. and M.C.; formal analysis, D.Y., M.C. and L.Y.; investigation, D.Y., X.Z. and H.Y.; resources, X.Z. and H.Y.; data curation, X.Z. and H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Y., X.Z. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.G. (Shanli Guo) and H.Y.; visualization, D.Y., X.Z. and H.Y.; supervision, H.Y. and S.G. (Shanli Guo); project administration, H.Y. and S.G. (Shanli Guo); funding acquisition, S.G. (Shanli Guo). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Science and Technology Specific Projects in Agricultural High-tech Industrial Demonstration Area of the Yellow River Delta (2022SZX17), the “Bohai Sea Granary” Science and Technology Demonstration Project of Shandong Provincial (2019BHLC001), and Yantai City School and Local Integration Development Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hui Zhang in Shandong normal University for his providing quinoa seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hunter, T. Protein kinases and phosphatases: The yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling. Cell 1995, 80, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kerk, D.; Templeton, G.; Moorhead, G.B. Evolutionary radiation pattern of novel protein phosphatases revealed by analysis of protein data from the completely sequenced genomes of humans, green algae, and higher plants. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barford, D.; Das, A.K.; Egloff, M.P. The structure and mechanism of protein phosphatases: Insights into catalysis and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1998, 27, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cao, J.; Jiang, M.; Li, P.; Chu, Z. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analyses of the PP2C gene family with their expression profiling in response to multiple stresses in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schweighofer, A.; Hirt, H.; Meskiene, I. Plant PP2C phosphatases: Emerging functions in stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ho, D.T.; Bardwell, A.J.; Abdollahi, M.; Bardwell, L. A docking site in MKK4 mediates high affinity binding to JNK MAPKs and competes with similar docking sites in JNK substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 32662–32672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shiozaki, K.; Russell, P. Counteractive roles of protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) and a MAP kinase kinase homolog in the osmoregulation of fission yeast. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tatebayashi, K.; Saito, H. Two activating phosphorylation sites of Pbs2 MAP2K in the yeast HOG pathway are differentially dephosphorylated by four PP2C phosphatases Ptc1-Ptc4. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 299, 104569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takekawa, M.; Maeda, T.; Saito, H. Protein phosphatase 2Calpha inhibits the human stress-responsive p38 and JNK MAPK pathways. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 4744–4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hanada, M.; Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Komaki, K.; Ohnishi, M.; Katsura, K.; Kanamaru, R.; Matsumoto, K.; Tamura, S. Regulation of the TAK1 signaling pathway by protein phosphatase 2C. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 5753–5759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, M.G.; Katsura, K.; Nomiyama, H.; Komaki, K.; Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Matsumoto, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Tamura, S. Regulation of the interleukin-1-induced signaling pathways by a novel member of the protein phosphatase 2C family (PP2Cepsilon). J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 12013–12021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Komatsu, K.; Suzuki, N.; Kuwamura, M.; Nishikawa, Y.; Nakatani, M.; Ohtawa, H.; Takezawa, D.; Seki, M.; Tanaka, M.; Taji, T.; et al. Group A PP2Cs evolved in land plants as key regulators of intrinsic desiccation tolerance. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hirayama, T.; Umezawa, T. The PP2C-SnRK2 complex: The central regulator of an abscisic acid signaling pathway. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schweighofer, A.; Kazanaviciute, V.; Scheikl, E.; Teige, M.; Doczi, R.; Hirt, H.; Schwanninger, M.; Kant, M.; Schuurink, R.; Mauch, F.; et al. The PP2C-type phosphatase AP2C1, which negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6, modulates innate immunity, jasmonic acid, and ethylene levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2213–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sidonskaya, E.; Schweighofer, A.; Shubchynskyy, V.; Kammerhofer, N.; Hofmann, J.; Wieczorek, K.; Meskiene, I. Plant resistance against the parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii is mediated by MPK3 and MPK6 kinases, which are controlled by the MAPK phosphatase AP2C1 in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shubchynskyy, V.; Boniecka, J.; Schweighofer, A.; Simulis, J.; Kvederaviciute, K.; Stumpe, M.; Mauch, F.; Balazadeh, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Boutrot, F.; et al. Protein phosphatase AP2C1 negatively regulates basal resistance and defense responses to Pseudomonas syringae. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar]
  17. Song, S.K.; Hofhuis, H.; Lee, M.M.; Clark, S.E. Key divisions in the early Arabidopsis embryo require POL and PLL1 phosphatases to establish the root stem cell organizer and vascular axis. Dev. Cell 2008, 15, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Song, S.K.; Yun, Y.B.; Lee, M.M. POLTERGEIST and POLTERGEIST-LIKE1 are essential for the maintenance of post-embryonic shoot and root apical meristems as revealed by a partial loss-of-function mutant allele of pll1 in Arabidopsis. Genes Genom. 2020, 42, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, C.; Yu, Y.; Ding, X.; Liu, B.; Duanmu, H.; Zhu, D.; Sun, X.; Cao, L.; Zaib Un, N.; Li, Q.; et al. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of PP2C clade D under saline and alkali stresses in wild soybean and Arabidopsis. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Servet, C.; Benhamed, M.; Latrasse, D.; Kim, W.; Delarue, M.; Zhou, D.X. Characterization of a phosphatase 2C protein as an interacting partner of the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 in Arabidopsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1779, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, M.W.; Jelenska, J.; Greenberg, J.T. Arabidopsis proteins important for modulating defense responses to Pseudomonas syringae that secrete HopW1-1. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 54, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shapiguzov, A.; Ingelsson, B.; Samol, I.; Andres, C.; Kessler, F.; Rochaix, J.D.; Vener, A.V.; Goldschmidt-Clermont, M. The PPH1 phosphatase is specifically involved in LHCII dephosphorylation and state transitions in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4782–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, S.; Park, S.I.; Kwon, H.; Cho, M.H.; Kim, B.G.; Chung, J.H.; Nam, M.H.; Song, J.S.; Kim, K.H.; Yoon, I.S. The Rice Abscisic Acid-Responsive RING Finger E3 Ligase OsRF1 Targets OsPP2C09 for Degradation and Confers Drought and Salinity Tolerance in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 797940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xie, W.; Liu, S.; Gao, H.; Wu, J.; Liu, D.; Kinoshita, T.; Huang, C.F. PP2C.D phosphatase SAL1 positively regulates aluminum resistance via restriction of aluminum uptake in rice. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 1498–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guo, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, Z.; Qi, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. The clade F PP2C phosphatase ZmPP84 negatively regulates drought tolerance by repressing stomatal closure in maize. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 1728–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lu, F.; Li, W.; Peng, Y.; Cao, Y.; Qu, J.; Sun, F.; Yang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, L.; et al. ZmPP2C26 Alternative Splicing Variants Negatively Regulate Drought Tolerance in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 851531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Matilla, A.J. Seed Dormancy: Molecular Control of Its Induction and Alleviation. Plants 2020, 9, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Soon, F.F.; Ng, L.M.; Zhou, X.E.; West, G.M.; Kovach, A.; Tan, M.H.; Suino-Powell, K.M.; He, Y.; Xu, Y.; Chalmers, M.J.; et al. Molecular mimicry regulates ABA signaling by SnRK2 kinases and PP2C phosphatases. Science 2012, 335, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nishimura, N.; Sarkeshik, A.; Nito, K.; Park, S.Y.; Wang, A.; Carvalho, P.C.; Lee, S.; Caddell, D.F.; Cutler, S.R.; Chory, J.; et al. PYR/PYL/RCAR family members are major in-vivo ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C-interacting proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 61, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yue, H.; Chang, X.; Zhi, Y.; Wang, L.; Xing, G.; Song, W.; Nie, X. Evolution and Identification of the WRKY Gene Family in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Genes 2019, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jung, C.; Nguyen, N.H.; Cheong, J.J. Transcriptional Regulation of Protein Phosphatase 2C Genes to Modulate Abscisic Acid Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lim, C.W.; Baek, W.; Jung, J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.C. Function of ABA in Stomatal Defense against Biotic and Drought Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15251–15270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chu, M.; Chen, P.; Meng, S.; Xu, P.; Lan, W. The Arabidopsis phosphatase PP2C49 negatively regulates salt tolerance through inhibition of AtHKT1;1. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 528–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xue, T.; Wang, D.; Zhang, S.; Ehlting, J.; Ni, F.; Jakab, S.; Zheng, C.; Zhong, Y. Genome-wide and expression analysis of protein phosphatase 2C in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, Q.; Liu, K.; Niu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wan, Y.; Yang, F.; Li, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R. Genome-wide Identification of PP2C Genes and Their Expression Profiling in Response to Drought and Cold Stresses in Medicago truncatula. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, S.; Li, X.; Lyu, J.; Liu, Z.; Wan, Z.; Yu, J. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the cucumber PP2C gene family. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Qiu, J.; Ni, L.; Xia, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Lang, M.; Li, M.; Liu, B.; Pan, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Protein Phosphatase 2C Genes in Tomato. Genes 2022, 13, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, K.; Pan, S. Maize protein phosphatase gene family: Identification and molecular characterization. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuchs, S.; Grill, E.; Meskiene, I.; Schweighofer, A. Type 2C protein phosphatases in plants. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gosti, F.; Beaudoin, N.; Serizet, C.; Webb, A.A.; Vartanian, N.; Giraudat, J. ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 1897–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Merlot, S.; Gosti, F.; Guerrier, D.; Vavasseur, A.; Giraudat, J. The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 25, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sugimoto, H.; Kondo, S.; Tanaka, T.; Imamura, C.; Muramoto, N.; Hattori, E.; Ogawa, K.; Mitsukawa, N.; Ohto, C. Overexpression of a novel Arabidopsis PP2C isoform, AtPP2CF1, enhances plant biomass production by increasing inflorescence stem growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5385–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, L.; Lu, S.; Liu, T.; Nai, G.; Ren, J.; Gou, H.; Chen, B.; Mao, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Abiotic Stress Response Analysis of PP2C Gene Family in Woodland and Pineapple Strawberries. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, Z.; Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Morris, E.R.; Gallazzi, F.; Pandit, S.; Skolnick, J.; Walker, J.C.; Van Doren, S.R. Phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide interactions with the FHA domain from Arabidopsis kinase-associated protein phosphatase. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 2684–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kumar, M.; Kesawat, M.S.; Ali, A.; Lee, S.C.; Gill, S.S.; Kim, A.H.U. Integration of Abscisic Acid Signaling with Other Signaling Pathways in Plant Stress Responses and Development. Plants 2019, 8, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Singh, A.; Pandey, A.; Srivastava, A.K.; Tran, L.S.; Pandey, G.K. Plant protein phosphatases 2C: From genomic diversity to functional multiplicity and importance in stress management. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bhaskara, G.B.; Nguyen, T.T.; Verslues, P.E. Unique drought resistance functions of the highly ABA-induced clade A protein phosphatase 2Cs. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, C.; Xia, X.; Yin, W.; Tian, Q. A Putative PP2C-Encoding Gene Negatively Regulates ABA Signaling in Populus euphratica. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fujita, Y.; Fujita, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 2011, 124, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, X.; Han, J.; Wang, E.; Xiao, J.; Hu, R.; Yang, G.; He, G. Genome-Wide Identification and Homoeologous Expression Analysis of PP2C Genes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Umezawa, T.; Sugiyama, N.; Mizoguchi, M.; Hayashi, S.; Myouga, F.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Ishihama, Y.; Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K. Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 17588–17593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Umezawa, T.; Nakashima, K.; Miyakawa, T.; Kuromori, T.; Tanokura, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Molecular basis of the core regulatory network in ABA responses: Sensing, signaling and transport. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1821–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, S.C.; Lan, W.; Buchanan, B.B.; Luan, S. A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21419–21424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kim, H.; Hwang, H.; Hong, J.W.; Lee, Y.N.; Ahn, I.P.; Yoon, I.S.; Yoo, S.D.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, B.G. A rice orthologue of the ABA receptor, OsPYL/RCAR5, is a positive regulator of the ABA signal transduction pathway in seed germination and early seedling growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, L.; Hu, W.; Sun, J.; Liang, X.; Yang, X.; Wei, S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Yang, G.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of SnRK gene family in Brachypodium distachyon and functional characterization of BdSnRK2.9. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2015, 237, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Potter, S.C.; Luciani, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Park, Y.; Lopez, R.; Finn, R.D. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W200–W204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; Marchler, G.H.; Song, J.S.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: The conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D265–D268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duvaud, S.; Gabella, C.; Lisacek, F.; Stockinger, H.; Ioannidis, V.; Durinx, C. Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as designed by its users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W216–W227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xiong, E.; Zheng, C.; Wu, X.; Wang, W. Protein Subcellular Location: The Gap Between Prediction and Experimentation. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2015, 34, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xiaolin, Z.; Baoqiang, W.; Xian, W.; Xiaohong, W. Identification of the CIPK-CBL family gene and functional characterization of CqCIPK14 gene under drought stress in quinoa. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xiao-Lin, Z.; Bao-Qiang, W.; Xiao-Hong, W. Identification and expression analysis of the CqSnRK2 gene family and a functional study of the CqSnRK2.12 gene in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 15 00041 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of PP2C proteins among C. quinoa and Arabidopsis.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of PP2C proteins among C. quinoa and Arabidopsis.
Genes 15 00041 g001
Genes 15 00041 g002
Figure 2. Gene structure, conserved motifs and domains of quinoa CqPP2Cs. (A) Gene structures of CqPP2C genes, yellow regions, green regions and black lines represent UTR, CDS and introns, respectively. (B) Conserved motif distribution of CqPP2C proteins; different color modules represent different motifs. (C) conserved domains of CqPP2C proteins.
Figure 2. Gene structure, conserved motifs and domains of quinoa CqPP2Cs. (A) Gene structures of CqPP2C genes, yellow regions, green regions and black lines represent UTR, CDS and introns, respectively. (B) Conserved motif distribution of CqPP2C proteins; different color modules represent different motifs. (C) conserved domains of CqPP2C proteins.
Genes 15 00041 g002
Genes 15 00041 g003
Figure 3. Gene location, duplication, and collinearity analysis of CqPP2Cs. The gray lines represent all syntenic blocks, while the red lines represent duplicate pairs of PP2C genes in the quinoa genome. The chromosome number (Chr00–Chr18) represents each chromosome.
Figure 3. Gene location, duplication, and collinearity analysis of CqPP2Cs. The gray lines represent all syntenic blocks, while the red lines represent duplicate pairs of PP2C genes in the quinoa genome. The chromosome number (Chr00–Chr18) represents each chromosome.
Genes 15 00041 g003
Genes 15 00041 g004
Figure 4. Putative cis-acting elements. The elements are displayed in differently colored boxes and their functions.
Figure 4. Putative cis-acting elements. The elements are displayed in differently colored boxes and their functions.
Genes 15 00041 g004
Genes 15 00041 g005
Figure 5. Expression patterns of CqPP2C genes in various quinoa tissues. This figure was drawn using TBtools.
Figure 5. Expression patterns of CqPP2C genes in various quinoa tissues. This figure was drawn using TBtools.
Genes 15 00041 g005
Genes 15 00041 g006
Figure 6. Expression patterns of CqPP2C genes in different treatments.
Figure 6. Expression patterns of CqPP2C genes in different treatments.
Genes 15 00041 g006
Genes 15 00041 g007
Figure 7. qRT-PCR was used to quantify the expression levels of 6 subfamily A CqPP2C genes from quinoa shoot and root under NaCl and PEG treatments. The data are an average of ±SE for three independent biological samples, and the vertical bar represents the standard deviation. Untreated shoot or root (0 h) were normalized as “1” in each graph.
Figure 7. qRT-PCR was used to quantify the expression levels of 6 subfamily A CqPP2C genes from quinoa shoot and root under NaCl and PEG treatments. The data are an average of ±SE for three independent biological samples, and the vertical bar represents the standard deviation. Untreated shoot or root (0 h) were normalized as “1” in each graph.
Genes 15 00041 g007
Genes 15 00041 g008
Figure 8. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of subfamily A CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s. A pGADT7 vector was used to express CqPP2Cs, and a pGBKT7 vector was used to express CqSnRK2s. Positive transformants were cultured on selective medium SD-LT (SD/-Leu/-Trp) and SD-LTH+3 AT (SD/-Trp-Leu-Ade add 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole) separately. The interactions of the CqSnRK2-BD constructs with pGADT7 were used as controls to test for yeast self-activation. Yeast strains were assessed at different dilution rates (1, 1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000).
Figure 8. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of subfamily A CqPP2Cs and CqSnRK2s. A pGADT7 vector was used to express CqPP2Cs, and a pGBKT7 vector was used to express CqSnRK2s. Positive transformants were cultured on selective medium SD-LT (SD/-Leu/-Trp) and SD-LTH+3 AT (SD/-Trp-Leu-Ade add 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole) separately. The interactions of the CqSnRK2-BD constructs with pGADT7 were used as controls to test for yeast self-activation. Yeast strains were assessed at different dilution rates (1, 1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000).
Genes 15 00041 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, D.; Zhang, X.; Cao, M.; Yin, L.; Gao, A.; An, K.; Gao, S.; Guo, S.; Yin, H. Genome-Wide Identification, Expression and Interaction Analyses of PP2C Family Genes in Chenopodium quinoa. Genes 2024, 15, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010041

AMA Style

Yang D, Zhang X, Cao M, Yin L, Gao A, An K, Gao S, Guo S, Yin H. Genome-Wide Identification, Expression and Interaction Analyses of PP2C Family Genes in Chenopodium quinoa. Genes. 2024; 15(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Dongdong, Xia Zhang, Meng Cao, Lu Yin, Aihong Gao, Kexin An, Songmei Gao, Shanli Guo, and Haibo Yin. 2024. "Genome-Wide Identification, Expression and Interaction Analyses of PP2C Family Genes in Chenopodium quinoa" Genes 15, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010041

APA Style

Yang, D., Zhang, X., Cao, M., Yin, L., Gao, A., An, K., Gao, S., Guo, S., & Yin, H. (2024). Genome-Wide Identification, Expression and Interaction Analyses of PP2C Family Genes in Chenopodium quinoa. Genes, 15(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010041

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop