Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Insights into the Developmental Dynamics of Eimeria acervulina: A Comparative Study of a Precocious Line and the Wild Type
Previous Article in Journal
Mustn1 in Skeletal Muscle: A Novel Regulator?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Insights for the Captive Management of South China Tigers Based on a Large-Scale Genetic Survey
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Blue Whistling Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus)

1
Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2
Key Laboratory for Conserving Wildlife with Small Populations in Yunnan, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
3
Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Yunnan Province, Kunming 650224, China
4
College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
5
Key Laboratory of Monitoring Biological Diversity in Minshan Mountain of National Park of Giant Pandas, College of Life Science & Biotechnology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2024, 15(7), 830; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070830
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 13 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wildlife Genomics and Genetic Diversity)

Abstract

:
The blue whistling thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) is a bird belonging to the order Passeriformes and family Muscicapidae. M. caeruleus is widely distributed in China, Pakistan, India, and Myanmar and is a resident bird in the southern part of the Yangtze River in China and summer migratory bird in the northern part of the Yangtze River. At present, there are some controversies about the classification of M. caeruleus. We use complete mitochondrial genomes to provide insights into the phylogenetic position of M. caeruleus and its relationships among Muscicapidae. The mitochondrial genome (GenBank: MN564936) is 16,815 bp long and contains 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a non-coding control region (D-loop). The thirteen PCGs started with GTG and ATG and ended with five types of stop codons. The nucleotide composition of T was 23.71%, that of C was 31.45%, that of A was 30.06%, and that of G was 14.78%. The secondary structures of 22 tRNAs were predicted, all of which could form typical cloverleaf structures. There were 24 mismatches, mainly G–U mismatches. Through phylogenetic tree reconstruction, it was found that Saxicola, Monticola, Oenanthe, and Phoenicurus were clustered into one clade, together with the sister group of Myophonus.

1. Introduction

The mitochondrial genome is the genetic material within the mitochondria, most of which follows strict maternal inheritance, is highly conserved, and is almost unaffected by gene recombination [1]. Avian mitochondrial genomes are easy to extract and amplify, making them ideal markers for molecular-level evolutionary analysis [2,3]. The length of the avian mitochondrial DNA genome is about 16.3 kb to 20 kb and consists of one heavy chain (H) and one light chain (L) forming a closed circular double-stranded molecule [4]. It is usually composed of 37 genes, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNAs), 2 ribosomes RNA (rRNAs), and a large non-coding D-lLoop region [5,6]; in addition, there are many species that retain the pseudo-D-loop region, such as Sinosuthora conspicillata and Falco rusticolus [7,8]. The characteristics of mitochondrial genes in birds are due to a rearrangement near the control region that differs from the gene order found in most vertebrates. In addition, most mitochondrial DNA mutations are point mutations with few insertions or deletions [1]. At the same time, compared with a single gene that can only provide limited information, the complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome contains more abundant and accurate information. Because of these advantages, avian mitochondrial genomes have been widely used in phylogenetic reconstruction and interspecific genetic diversity analysis [9].
The blue whistling thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) is a bird belonging to the order Passeriformes and family Muscicapidae, and it occupies mountains and stream sides [10]. M. caeruleus has a dark bluish-purple body, with pale bluish-purple spots and markings all over the body except for the wings and tail and a yellow beak (Figure 1). There are nine species of Myophonus in the world, the Taiwan whistling thrush (M. insularis), blue whistling thrush (M. caeruleus), Ceylon whistling thrush (M. lighi), shiny whistling thrush (M. melanurus), Sunda whistling thrush (M. glaucinus), Bornean whistling thrush (M. borneensis), brown-winged whistling thrush (M. castaneus), Malayan whistling thrush (M. robinsoni) and Malabar whistling thrush (M. horsfieldii) [10]. Among them, the first two species are distributed in China and the last seven species are found in other countries. M. insularis is distributed only in the Taiwan Province. M. caeruleus is found in Central Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia. It is widely distributed in China, including Xizang and central and southern provinces of China.
At present, phylogenetic relationships of Muscicapidae have been studied using mtDNA and nDNA [11], but the complete mitochondrial genome sequence for M. caeruleus is lacking. To better understand the mitochondrial genome characteristics and phylogenetic relationships of M. caeruleus, we sequenced the M. caeruleus mitochondrial genome based on next-generation sequencing and reconstructed the M. caeruleus phylogenetic relationship in combination with published data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples and DNA Extraction

The sample of M. caeruleus was an individual who died of natural causes in the wild in Zhaotong City of Yunnan Province, China. All tissues used in this study were preserved in absolute ethanol and stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction. Using the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (DP304, TIANGEN, Beijing, China), DNA was extracted from the muscle according to the instructions. The DNA integrity was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis at 1% concentration, and the DNA concentration and purity were measured on a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.2. Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

The DNA extract was sent to Shanghai Paisenor Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), to construct a library using the whole-genome shotgun (WGS) strategy and utilize next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. These libraries featured paired-end (PE) sequencing based on the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. The mitogenome sequence is stored in GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 19 June 2024) with the accession number MN564936. High-quality second-generation sequencing data were assembled from scratch using A5-miseq v20150522 [12] and SPAdesv3.9.0 [13]. The results were corrected using Pilon v1.18 [14] software to obtain the final mitochondrial sequence. The tRNA was validated by the MITOS WebServer [15] (http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de, accessed on 19 June 2024); tRNAscan-SE 2.0 [16] adjusted the default setting to the vertebrate mitochondrial genetic code, and tRNAscan-SE 2.0 was used to predict the secondary structure of the tRNA. The open reading frame (ORF) finder [17] on NCBI was used to identify the protein-coding region, set the vertebrate mitochondrial genetic code, and translate it into specific proteins using GenBank. The base composition was calculated and the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) was analyzed using MEGA 7.0 [18]. The combined skewness was calculated using the formula “AT-skew = (A − T)/(A + T)” and “GC-skew = (G − C)/(G + C)”. The CGView Server was used to map the genome (http://stothard.afns.ualberta.ca/cgview_server/index.html, accessed on 19 June 2024) [19].

2.3. The Phylogenetic Position of M. caeruleus

In addition to the species targeted in this study, 16 complete mitochondrial genomes were downloaded from the GenBank database. The phylogenetic location of M. caeruleus in Muscicapidae was determined through a comparison of 17 complete mitochondrial genomes (Table 1). The outgroup selected was Paradoxornis heudei (NC_046943), which belongs to family Paradoxornithidae. In addition, HQ896033 was published as Cyanoptila cyanomelana and is still listed on GenBank as that species but is actually a misidentified Cyornis hainanus or C. rubeculoides. We used these sequences with the correct species labels. MEGA 7.0 [18] was used to compare 20 sequences and remove the missing base parts. Bayesian inference (BI) was used for the phylogenetic analysis. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in jModelTest v.0.1.1 was used to determine the optimal nucleotide replacement model as GTR + G + I [20]. Using MrBayes [21], we constructed a Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic tree based on 13 PCGs, respectively. Four Markov chains in the BI phylogenetic tree ran simultaneously, totaling 400,000 generations. Samples were collected every 100 generations, and the first 25% was discarded as burnin [22]. The phylogenetic trees were visualized with FigTree v.1.2.2.

3. Results

3.1. Organization and Structure of M. caeruleus Mitochondrial Genome

The mitochondrial genome of M. caeruleus (GenBank: MN564936) is 16,815 bp in length, of which the mitochondrial genome coding region is 15,568 bp in length and contained 37 genes, including 13 protein-coding genes, 2 rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a non-coding region (Figure 2). They accounted for 62.30%, 15.50%, 8.94%, and 5.75% of the mtDNA’s total length, respectively. There are nine genes in the L chain, including eight tRNA genes and one protein-coding gene (ND6), and the rest of the protein-coding genes are encoded through the H-chain.
The arrangement of genes in the mtDNA of M. caeruleus is relatively tight, and there are 32 bp (nine places) gene overlaps among 37 genes. There are a total of 22 gene intervals, with a length of 402 bp, accounting for only 2.43% of the total length of mitochondrial genes. The interval length ranged from 1 to 296 bp. The genes are closely arranged in seven places without overlapping or spacing. The mitochondrial genome analysis of M. caeruleus is shown in Table 2. MEGA 7.0 software was used to calculate the base composition of the complete mitochondrial genome as A = 30.06%, T = 23.71%, C = 31.45%, and G = 14.78%. Among them, the content of A + T base (53.77%) was slightly higher than that of G + C base (46.23%), and the skew of AT (AT-skew) was 0.118, while that of GC (GC-skew) was −0.36 (Table 3).

3.2. rRNA and tRNA Genes

Both the s-rRNA and l-rRNA genes of M. caeruleus are on the H strand. s-rRNA is 980 bp long and is located between trnF and trnV. l-rRNA is 1579 bp long and lies between trnV and trnL2. The A + T content of the two rRNA is s-rRNA = 51.94%, and the AT-skew is 0.202. The l-rRNA = 55.67%, and the AT-skew is 0.24.
There are 22 tRNA genes distributed between protein-coding genes and rRNA genes in the mitochondria of M. caeruleus. The total length of tRNA genes is 1546 bp, and the length of single genes ranged from 66 (trnS1) to 75 bp (trnL2 and trnS2). The construction of the predicted secondary structure of tRNA is found to be able to form a clover structure (Figure 3). There are 24 mismatches in 22 tRNAs, including 6 pairs on the DHU arm, 3 pairs on anticodon arm, 7 pairs on TΨC arm, and 8 pairs on amino acid arm, all of which are GU mismatches.

3.3. Protein-Coding Genes Composition

The total length of the 13 protein-coding genes is 10,246 bp, accounting for 60.93% of the total mitochondrial genome length. Among the 13 PCGs, only ND6 is encoded by the L strand, and the other 12 genes are encoded by the H chain. The ND5 gene had the longest length (1818 bp). The shortest gene is Atp8 with a length of 168 bp. In this study, the initial codon of M. caeruleus is usually ATG, but the start codon of COI was GTG. The stop codon is dominated by TAA. Among them, ND2, COII, Atp8, Atp6, ND3, and ND4l have TAA as the termination codons; COI has AGG as the termination codons; ND5 has AGA as the termination codons; ND6 has TAG as the termination codons; and ND1, COIII, and ND4 have incomplete termination codons. They are TA- and T-, respectively (Table 2). The highest RSCU of PCGs is CUA (2.35). The lowest used codon is GCG with a frequency of 0.25 (Table 4, Figure 4).

3.4. Non-Coding Sequencin

M. caeruleus has one control region. The total length of the mtDNA control region is 950 bp, located between trnE and trnF. The base combination in the D-loop region is: A: 22.32%; T: 30.63%; G: 17.68%; and C: 29.37%. The content of A + T (52.95%) is slightly higher than that of G + C (47.05%), indicating bias.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

In order to construct the phylogenetic tree, the complete mitochondrial genomes of 16 species of passerine birds from 12 genera in two families were searched and downloaded from the NCBI. This included one Myophonus, three Ficedula, one Niltava, two Muscicapa, one Copsychus, one Cercotrichas, one Saxicola, one Monticola, two Oenanthe, one Cyornis, and two Phoenicurus genera. C. heudei is an outgroup, and these sequences are constructed based on 13 PCGs. A BI phylogeny reconstructed using RAxML-GUI is shown in Figure 5.
Our results show that in the phylogenetic trees, all species are divided at the genus level into two large clades, with Muscicapa, Copsychus, and Cercotrichas clustered into one large clade and Oenanthe, Monticola, Saxicola, Phoenicurus, Myophonus, Ficedula, Niltava, and Cyornis clustered into another large clade. In the macroclades, Saxicola and Monticola are grouped together and were sister to Oenanthe. Some of these three genera are sister to Phoenicurus (BI bootstrap support 0.97). M. caeruleus is grouped with Saxicola, Monticola, Oenanthe, and Phoenicurus (BI bootstrap support 0.94). Among them, these four genera are grouped into a single branch and were sister to Myophonus. Furthermore, Ficedula is the sister clade of (Niltava + Cyornis).

4. Discussion

4.1. Mitogenome Characteristics

The Muscicapidae is the largest group of Passeriformes, with 312 species and 709 subspecies in 49 genera. Like other birds, the mitochondrial genome of M. caeruleus is covalent circular double-stranded, consisting of 37 genes, 13 PCGs, 2 rRNA genes (rrnL and rrnS), 22 tRNA genes, and 1 non-coding control region (CR) [2,5]. According to the literature, the mtDNA length of birds is generally between 15 and 20 kb. The mitochondrial genome of M. caeruleus in this paper is within this range.
Similar to other birds [32], gene overlap and gene spacing exist in the mitochondrial genome of M. caeruleus. The gene overlap was 1–10 bp, and the gene interval was 1–17 bp. The gene distribution of this species was the same as that of most vertebrates [33]. Except for NAD6 and eight trnas (trnQ, trnA, trnN, trnC, trnY, trnS2, trnP, and trnE), all genes were evenly distributed on the H strand. The mitochondrial A + T content of the whole genome was 53.77%, which was consistent with the typical base bias of vertebrates described by Huang L. [34]. The average length of tRNA was 70 bp, the longest was trnL and trnS2 (75 bp), and the shortest was trnS1 (66 bp). All tRNAs can be folded into a standard clover model. The two rRNAs were rrnS and rrnL, with lengths of 980 bp and 1579 bp, respectively, and the two rRNAs were located between trnF and trnL2 and were separated by trnV, as in most vertebrates. The start codon of PCGs was usually ATC, but it was GTG in CO I, consistent with previous findings [35]. Four complete terminal codons have been identified, namely TAA (NAD2, COII, Atp8, Atp6, NAD3, NAD4l, cob), AGG (COI), AGA (NAD5), and TAG (NDA6). For NAD1, COIII, and NAD4, the stop codons of these three PCGs are incomplete TA* (NAD1, NAD4) and T** (COIII). For these incomplete stop codons, we speculate that the loss of nucleotides may be due to polyadenylation of DNA during transcription, which is normal in vertebrate mitosis.

4.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

The mitochondrial sequences have been widely used to infer phylogenetic relationships between bird species [1]. Based on 13 PCGs, the phylogeny of M. caeruleus was studied in this study. The results show that Saxicola is sister to Monticola, and together these are sister to Oenanthe (BI bootstrap support 0.97), which is similar to other studies [36]. The grouping of Saxicola, Monticola, Oenanthe, and Phoenicurus as sisters to Muscicapa supports the idea of Fengjun Li and Min Zhao et al. [11,35]. Moreover, in the phylogenetic trees, the Muscicapa was a deep branch, which differs from the results of other studies [24].
The relationships of the large branches to which M. caeruleus belongs are: ((((Monticola + Saxicola) + Oenanthe) + Phoenicurus) + Myophonus).

5. Conclusions

The mitochondrial genome structure of M. caeruleus is similar to that of other passerine birds, including three PCGs, two rRNA genes, twenty-two tRNA genes, and a D-loop. In addition to trnQ, trnA, trnN, trnC, trnY, trnS2, trnP, trnE, and ND6 distributed on the L chain, the other protein-coding genes were evenly distributed on the H chain. There were 24 mismatches in 22 tRNA secondary structures, all of which were G–U mismatches. There were five types of stop codons. There was a control area between trnE and trnF. In the phylogenetic analysis, the two species (((Monticola+ Saxicola) + Oenanthe) + Phoenicurus) were sister to M. caeruleus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y.; Methodology, J.L. and Q.G.; Software, P.L., D.Z. and Q.G.; Investigation, J.L.; Resources, P.L., X.L. and J.L.; Data curation, X.L.; Writing—original draft, Z.Y., P.L., X.L., D.Z. and Q.G.; Writing—review & editing, W.Z. and Y.D.; Supervision, W.Z. and Y.D.; Project administration, W.Z. and Y.D.; Funding acquisition, Y.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Provincial Science and Technology Project of Yunnan (202301BD070001-082; 202101AT070040) and the First Class Forestry Academic Subject of Yunnan Province.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in GenBank at accession number MN564936.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bai, G.; Yuan, Q.; Guo, Q.; Duan, Y. Identification and phylogenetic analysis in Pterorhinus chinensis (Aves, Passeriformes, Leiothrichidae) based on complete mitogenome. ZooKeys 2023, 1172, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, Q.; Guo, Q.; Cao, J.; Luo, X.; Duan, Y. Description of the Three Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Sitta (S. himalayensis, S. nagaensis, and S. yunnanensis) and Phylogenetic Relationship (Aves: Sittidae). Genes 2023, 14, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taanman, J.W. The mitochondrial genome: Structure, transcription, translation and replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 1999, 1410, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Q.; Li, S.; Tian, C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y. Molecular evolution and variability in mitochondrial DNA in 10 species of passeriforme. Dong Wu Xue Bao 2002, 48, 625–632. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, C.; Hao, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X.; Yue, B. The first complete mitogenome of Picumnus innominatus (Aves, Piciformes, Picidae) and phylogenetic inference within the Picidae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2017, 70, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lan, G.; Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, R.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, B.; Wei, W.; Liu, J.; Qi, G. Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of Tarsiger indicus (Aves: Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Genes 2024, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sveinsdóttir, M.; Guðmundsdóttir, L.; Magnússon, K.P. Complete mitochondrial genome of the gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus (Aves, Falconiformes, Falconidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 28, 370–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, G.; Yang, C.; Chen, L.; Chen, G.; Wang, J. Complete mitochondrial genome of the spectacled parrotbill Sinosuthora conspicillata David, 1871 (Aves: Passeriformes: Sylviidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 3244–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Wu, W.; Feng, F.; Wang, Q.; Ying, X.; Qi, D.; Qi, G. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Otus lettia: Exploring the mitochondrial evolution and phylogeny of owls (Strigiformes). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 3443–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. HBW-BirdLife. Handbook of the Birds of the World and Birdlife. Version 2022-7. 2022. Available online: http://datazone.birdlife.org (accessed on 19 June 2024).
  11. Zhao, M.; Gordon Burleigh, J.; Olsson, U.; Alström, P.; Kimball, R.T. A near-complete and time-calibrated phylogeny of the Old World flycatchers, robins and chats (Aves, Muscicapidae). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2023, 178, 107646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coil, D.; Jospin, G.; Darling, A.E. A5-miseq: An updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; et al. Pilon: An Integrated Tool for Comprehensive Microbial Variant Detection and Genome Assembly Improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Jühling, F.; Externbrink, F.; Florentz, C.; Fritzsch, G.; Pütz, J.; Middendorf, M.; Stadler, P.F. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2013, 69, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lowe, T.M.; Chan, P.P. tRNAscan-SE On-line: Integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W54–W57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pombert, J.F. The Complete Mitochondrial DNA Sequence of the Green Alga Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae) Highlights Distinctive Evolutionary Trends in the Chlorophyta and Suggests a Sister-Group Relationship Between the Ulvophyceae and Chlorophyceae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 922–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Stothard, P.; Wishart, D.S. Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Santorum, J.M.; Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Posada, D. jmodeltest.org: Selection of nucleotide substitution models on the cloud. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1310–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, X.-R.; Lu, C.-H. The complete mitochondrial genome of red-throated flycatcher Ficedula albicilla (Passeriformes: Ficedula). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3322–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, N.; Liu, W.; Yang, K. The complete mitochondrial genome of the snowy-browed flycatcher Ficedula hyperythra (Passeriformes, Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 2870–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Y.; Meng, D.; Si, Y.; Zhou, X.; Teng, L.; Liu, Z. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Yellow-rumped Flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia) from Maorshan, China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2022, 7, 1848–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lu, C.-H.; Sun, C.-H.; Hou, S.-L.; Huang, Y.-L.; Lu, C.-H. The complete mitochondrial genome of dark-sided flycatcher Muscicapa sibirica (Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 2675–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Min, X.; Lu, C.-H.; Chen, T.-Y.; Liu, B.; Lu, C.-H. The complete mitochondrial genome of Asian brown flycatcher Muscicapa latirostris (Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3880–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Dong, Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of white-throated rock-thrush Monticola cinclorhynchus gularis (Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 684–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Feng, S.; Stiller, J.; Deng, Y.; Armstrong, J.; Fang, Q.; Reeve, A.H.; Xie, D.; Chen, G.; Guo, C.; Faircloth, B.C.; et al. Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics. Nature 2020, 587, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.; Luo, A.; Li, G.; Li, W. Complete mitochondrial genome of the isabelline wheatear Oenanthe isabellina (Passeriformes, Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, C.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Z.; Xu, Y. The complete mitochondrial genome of Daurian redstart Phoenicurus auroreus (Aves: Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 2231–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dong, Y.; Li, B.; Zhou, L. A new insight into the classification of dusky thrush complex: Bearings on the phylogenetic relationships within the Turdidae. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2018, 29, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huan, Z.; Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Qi, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, D.; Xie, M.; Ni, Q.; Zhang, M.; Xu, H. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Garrulax formosus (Aves, Passeriformes, Timaliidae) and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2015, 27, 2858–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, L.; Zeng, B. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Chinese hwamei (Garrulax canorus). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2015, 27, 4559–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, F.-j.; Qiao, L.; Yang, Y.-j.; Yang, K.; Yang, N.; Yue, B.-s. The complete mitochondrial genome of Phoenicurus frontalis (Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 2322–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Outlaw, R.K.; Voelker, G.; Outlaw, D.C. Molecular Systematics and Historical Biogeography of the Rock-Thrushes (Muscicapidae: Monticola). Auk 2007, 124, 561–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A picture of Myophonus caeruleus. The photo was taken by Jun Liu on 15 January 2020 at Baihualing of Gaoligong Mountain in Baoshan City, Yunnan province, China.
Figure 1. A picture of Myophonus caeruleus. The photo was taken by Jun Liu on 15 January 2020 at Baihualing of Gaoligong Mountain in Baoshan City, Yunnan province, China.
Genes 15 00830 g001
Figure 2. Complete mitochondrial gene map of M. caeruleus.
Figure 2. Complete mitochondrial gene map of M. caeruleus.
Genes 15 00830 g002
Figure 3. The twenty-two tRNAs as the secondary structure of M. caeruleus.
Figure 3. The twenty-two tRNAs as the secondary structure of M. caeruleus.
Genes 15 00830 g003
Figure 4. The relative codon usage frequency of the 13 PCGs.
Figure 4. The relative codon usage frequency of the 13 PCGs.
Genes 15 00830 g004
Figure 5. Phylogeny of mitochondrial genome sequence of M. caeruleus. Topology of Bayesian inference (BI) analysis inferred from the protein-coding genes.
Figure 5. Phylogeny of mitochondrial genome sequence of M. caeruleus. Topology of Bayesian inference (BI) analysis inferred from the protein-coding genes.
Genes 15 00830 g005
Table 1. List of the 17 Muscicapidae species and one outgroup used in this paper with their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 1. List of the 17 Muscicapidae species and one outgroup used in this paper with their GenBank accession numbers.
FamilyGenusSpeciesGenBank No.Reference
ParadoxornithidaeParadoxornisParadoxornis heudeiNC_046943Unpublished
MuscicapidaeMyophonusMyophonus caeruleusMN564936This study
FicedulaFicedula albicillaMN125374[23]
Ficedula hyperythraNC_058320[24]
Ficedula zanthopygiaOL639031[25]
NiltavaNiltava davidiNC_039538[24]
MuscicapaMuscicapa sibiricaNC_045374[26]
Muscicapa latirostrisNC_045375[27]
CopsychusCopsychus sechellarumMN356447[24]
CercotrichasCercotrichas coryphoeusMN356422Unpublished
SaxicolaSaxicola maurusMN356403Unpublished
MonticolaMonticola gularisNC_033536[28]
OenantheOenanthe oenantheNC_051036[29]
Oenanthe isabellinaNC_040290[30]
CyornisCyornis hainanus/rubeculoidesHQ896033Unpublished
PhoenicurusPhoenicurus auroreusMT366880[31]
Phoenicurus phoenicurusMN122900Unpublished
Table 2. Mitochondrial genome characteristics of M.caeruleus.
Table 2. Mitochondrial genome characteristics of M.caeruleus.
FeatureStrandPositionLength (bp)Initiation CodonStop CodonAnticodon
trnFH1–6868 GAA
rrnSH68–1047980
trnVH1047–111670 TAC
rrnLH1133–27111579
trnL2H2714–278875 TAA
NAD1H2794–3764971ATGTA(A)
trnIH3779–385072 GAT
trnQL3855–392571 TTG
trnMH3925–399369 CAT
NAD2H3994–50341041ATGTAA
trnWH5034–510471 TCA
trnAL5106–517469 TGC
trnNL5179–525173 GTT
trnCL5252–531867 GCA
trnYL5318–538871 GTA
cox1H5390–69401551GTGAGG
trnS2L6932–700675 TGA
trnDH7010–707869 GTC
cox2H7087–7770684ATGTAA
trnKH7772–783968 TTT
atp8H7841–8008168ATGTAA
atp6H7999–8682684ATGTAA
cox3H8688–9471784ATGT(AA)
trnGH9472–954069 TCC
NAD3H9541–9891351ATGTAA
trnRH9893–996270 TCG
NAD4lH9964–10,260297ATGTAA
NAD4H10,254–11,6311378ATGT(AA)
trnHH11,632–11,70271 GTG
trnS1H11,703–11,76866 GCT
trnL1H11,768–11,83871 TAG
NAD5H11,839–13,6561818ATGAGA
cobH13,665–14,8071143ATGTAA
trnTH14,811–14,87969 TGT
trnPL14,886–14,95570 TGG
NAD6L14,973–15,491519ATGTAG
trnEL15,493–15,56472 TTC
OHH15,569–16,518950
Table 3. Base composition of the complete mitochondrial genome, protein coding gene, and rRNA gene of M. caeruleus.
Table 3. Base composition of the complete mitochondrial genome, protein coding gene, and rRNA gene of M. caeruleus.
RegionA%C%G%T%A + T%G + C%AT SkewGC Skew
Whole genome30.0631.4514.7823.7153.7746.230.12−0.36
rrnS31.2226.9421.1220.7151.9448.060.20−0.12
rrnL34.3923.9420.3921.2855.6744.330.24−0.08
NAD126.6732.7514.5226.0652.7347.270.01−0.39
NAD230.7434.110.8524.355.0444.960.12−0.52
cox127.7930.517.1524.5652.3547.650.06−0.28
Table 4. Codon number and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of M. caeruleus mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs).
Table 4. Codon number and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of M. caeruleus mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs).
CodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCU
UUU (F)670.69UCU (S)960.97
UUC (F)1281.31UCC (S)1771.78
UUA (L)830.73UCA(S)1301.31
UUG (L)380.34UCG (S)400.4
CUU (L)980.87CCU (P)1501.19
CUC (L)1281.13CCC (P)1601.26
CUA (L)2652.35CCA (P)1541.22
CUG (L)660.58CCG (P)420.33
AUU (I)830.68ACU (T)1160.91
AUC (I)1761.44ACC (T)1961.54
AUA (I)1070.88ACA (T)1551.22
AUG (M)621ACG (T)430.34
GUU (V)370.91GCU (A)650.78
GUC (V)481.19GCC (A)1531.84
GUA (V)601.48GCA (A)941.13
GUG (V)170.42GCG (A)210.25
UAU (Y)780.77UGU (C)320.79
UAC (Y)1251.23UGC (C)491.21
UAA (*)1221.28UGA (*)770.81
UAG (*)860.91UGG (W)331
CAU (H)890.88CGU (R)340.78
CAC (H)1141.12CGC (R)330.76
CAA (Q)1621.47CGA (R)441.01
CAG (Q)590.53CGG (R)280.64
AAU (N)840.68AGU (S)450.45
AAC (N)1621.32AGC (S)1071.08
AAA (K)1491.35AGA (R)661.51
AAG (K)720.65AGG (R)571.31
GAU (D)500.85GGU (G)380.81
GAC (D)681.15GGC (G)471.01
GAA (E)861.25GGA (G)631.35
GAG (E)520.75GGG (G)390.83
Note: * stands for termination codon.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, Z.; Liu, P.; Lu, X.; Zhu, D.; Liu, J.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, W.; Duan, Y. Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Blue Whistling Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus). Genes 2024, 15, 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070830

AMA Style

Yuan Z, Liu P, Lu X, Zhu D, Liu J, Guo Q, Zhang W, Duan Y. Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Blue Whistling Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus). Genes. 2024; 15(7):830. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Zhenfeng, Peng Liu, Xi Lu, Dong Zhu, Jun Liu, Qiang Guo, Wenping Zhang, and Yubao Duan. 2024. "Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Blue Whistling Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus)" Genes 15, no. 7: 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop