Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Genomic Parental Selection for Categorical and Continuous–Categorical Multi-Trait Mixtures
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional Modulation during Photomorphogenesis in Rice Seedlings
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Pathogenic Characterization of Akanthomyces muscarius Isolated from Living Mite Infesting Hazelnut Big Buds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patterns in Genome-Wide Codon Usage Bias in Representative Species of Lycophytes and Ferns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Analysis of the 5′ Untranslated Region Length-Dependent Control of Gene Expression in Maize: A Case Study with the ZmLAZ1 Gene Family

1
College of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
2
Chengdu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu 611130, China
3
Institute for Advanced Study, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
4
Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(8), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080994
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 25 July 2024 / Accepted: 26 July 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetics and Genomics of Plants)

Abstract

:
The untranslated regions (UTRs) within plant mRNAs play crucial roles in regulating gene expression and the functionality of post-translationally modified proteins by various mechanisms. These regions are vital for plants’ ability to sense to multiple developmental and environmental stimuli. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide analysis of UTRs and UTR-containing genes in maize (Zea mays). Using the ZmLAZ1 family as a case study, we demonstrated that the length of 5′ UTRs could influence gene expression levels by employing GUS reporter gene assays. Although maize and arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), as well as rice (Oryza sativa), have distinct functional categories of UTR-containing genes, we observed a similar lengthwise distribution of UTRs and a recurring appearance of certain gene ontology (GO) terms between maize and rice. These suggest a potentially conserved mechanism within the Poaceae species. Furthermore, the analysis of cis-acting elements in these 5′ UTRs of the ZmLAZ1 gene family further supports the hypothesis that UTRs confer functional specificity to genes in a length-dependent manner. Our findings offer novel insights into the role of UTRs in maize, contributing to the broader understanding of gene expression regulation in plants.

1. Introduction

The untranslated regions (UTRs) in eukaryotic organisms are crucial for the regulation of gene expression, despite not encoding proteins themselves. They significantly influence gene expression through interactions with various molecular elements, such as ribosomes and initiation factors. These interactions can alter translation efficiency and protein synthesis rates [1,2,3]. In plants, both the 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR are instrumental in modulating gene expression across diverse tissues, developmental stages, and in response to environmental stresses. This regulatory flexibility enables plants to adapt to a broad spectrum of growth conditions [4,5,6]. For example, examining the function of the 3′ UTR in rice (O. sativa) contributes to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that confer disease resistance. Investigating the variations in UTRs among different disease-resistant varieties can elucidate their contribution to resistance, thereby providing valuable insights for the development of crops with enhanced disease resistance [7]. Beyond their involvement in stress responses, 5′ UTRs in plants also play a significant role in development, influencing processes such as pollen formation and embryonic development [8].
Sequences within the 3′ UTR serve as critical binding sites for microRNAs, which regulate gene expression through interacting with microRNA. An instance is observed in the Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel (VDAC) family member, VDAC3, in arabidopsis (A. thaliana), which produces two mRNA variants characterized by either short or long 3′ UTRs. The distal 140 nt sequence in the long UTR plays a pivotal role in the co-translational import of VDAC3 and other unrelated mRNAs to the mitochondrial surface [9]. The FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) serves as a crucial gene regulating arabidopsis flowering time. Its 3′ UTR region contains multiple binding sites for microRNAs, which interact with the 3′ UTR of FLC to affect the stability of its mRNA, thereby regulating the flowering time. This regulatory mechanism enables plants to adjust their lifecycle in response to environmental conditions [10]. The OsSERK2 gene in rice plays a role in resistance to multiple diseases. According to research, specific sequences within its 3′ UTR are able to respond to pathogen infection by interacting with particular microRNAs or RNA-binding proteins, regulating the expression level of OsSERK2, and thereby influencing the disease resistance of rice [11]. Zm401 is associated with drought tolerance in maize. Its 3′ UTR contains conserved cis-acting elements that can affect the stability and translation efficiency of Zm401 mRNA. Under drought conditions, the activity of these cis-acting elements changes, thereby adjusting the expression level of Zm401 and helping maize adapt to the drought environment [12].
The stability, transport, and translation efficiency of mRNA are regulated by elements within the 5′ UTR, which in turn affect the functionality and subcellular localization of the resulting proteins [13]. For instance, AtNRAMP3 is a gene responsible for metal ion transport in arabidopsis. Specific sequences within its 5′ UTR can influence the translation initiation rate of its mRNA, thereby regulating the expression of the AtNRAMP3 protein. This regulation is crucial for maintaining intracellular metal ion balance [14]. In wheat, the 5′ UTR of TaNAC29 contains multiple cis-acting elements that can regulate the expression of the TaNAC29 protein, helping wheat adapt to adverse environmental conditions [15]. In potatoes, editing the 5′ UTR of the VInv gene can achieve stable cold-induced sweetening resistance [16]. Consequently, a detailed examination of the functional mechanisms of plant UTRs can significantly advance our comprehension of plant biological characteristics and functions.
The length of the 5′ UTR in plants significantly influences the functional specificity of genes [17,18]. In arabidopsis, some genes involved in the stress response have longer 5′ UTRs. These UTR regions may contain cis-acting elements that respond to stress signals [6]. In addition, genes involved in metabolic processes tend to have longer 5′ UTRs, whereas those associated with signal transduction often feature shorter ones [19]. Previous research has detailed the 5′ UTR characteristics of model plants such as arabidopsis and rice [20]. The 5′ UTRs ranging from 1 to 500 bp are linked with responses to environmental stresses like salt, cadmium ion, and cold. UTRs spanning 501–1000 bp correlate with cellular protein modification processes, biosynthetic activities, and signal transduction mechanisms. Those measuring 1001–2000 bp are associated with the regulation of ion transmembrane transportation, phospholipid catabolic processes, and leaf formation, among other functions. UTRs exceeding 2000 bp are related to processes such as sister chromatid cohesion, cytokinin-activated signaling pathways, and meiotic chromosome segregation. However, the underlying mechanisms that link UTR length with gene expression modulation remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether insights regarding UTRs derived from arabidopsis and rice are applicable to other crop species such as maize (Z. mays), highlighting an area for further investigation.
Lazarus 1 (LAZ1) is a conserved transmembrane protein that exhibits sequence homology and structural similarity to members of the DUF300 family [21]. Despite their shared characteristics, the physical and chemical properties, secondary structures, transmembrane structures, transport substrates, subcellular localization, and expression regulation of coding genes within this family are highly diverse. In arabidopsis, two LAZ1 proteins have been identified as localized on the vacuolar membrane, where they play crucial roles in maintaining vacuole integrity and mediating brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathways [22]. Our previous research successfully cloned eight members of the ZmLAZ1 gene family in maize [23,24]. The differential expression of these genes across various organs, developmental stages, and under abiotic stress conditions implies functional diversity within the family. Furthermore, we identified that the ZmLAZ1-4 protein may function as a zinc transporter on plasma and vacuolar membranes [25]. Notably, the 5′ UTR sequence lengths of these ZmLAZ1 members display a gradient distribution, which presents a potential avenue for investigating the relationship between 5′ UTR length and gene function.
In this study, we conducted a genome-wide analysis of the 5′ and 3′ UTRs in maize. Our findings suggest the potential conservation of relative proportions and functional specificity across these regions. Using the ZmLAZ1 family as a case study, we employed GUS activity assays and cis-acting element predictions to explore the potential relationship between 5′ UTR length and gene function. Our data lend support to the hypothesis that UTRs contribute to gene regulation and confer functional specificity to genes in a length-dependent manner. These insights open a new avenue for further investigation into the functional roles of plant genes, emphasizing the significance of UTRs in gene expression and functionality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification of the UTRs from Maize, Rice, and Arabidopsis

The bioinformatics analysis methods were mainly referenced from Srivastava, Lu, Zinta, Lang, and Zhu [20]. Briefly, the Exon, 5′ UTR, and 3′ UTR lengths of each gene transcript were calculated using Python scripts based on the gtf annotation information for the maize genome (B73, version 4; Jiao et al. [26]). For genes with more than one transcript, the longest transcript was screened for final analysis. The length of the UTR was then divided into four gradients (i.e., 1–500 bp, 501–1000 bp, 1001–2000 bp, and >2000 bp), and statistically analyzed using the “awk” command of the bash script. For cross-species homolog analysis, blastn (2.7.1) was used to compare all genes of maize with those of arabidopsis (TAIR10) and rice (IRGSP-1.0), respectively. The unique gene with the highest score was selected as the target gene for subsequent analysis.

2.2. Gene Ontology (GO) Enrichment Analysis on UTR-Containing Genes

The 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR of the maize genome were enriched by GO analysis according to four gradients of sequence length. The gene database (http://www.geneontology.org/, accessed on 12 December 2023) was used to map each term and calculate the number of genes. Then, hypergeometric tests were applied to identify significantly enriched GO terms. The data were finally visualized using Graph Pad Prism (9.5.0).

2.3. Sample Preparation

The seeds of the maize inbred line B73 were surface sterilized with 30% H2O2, germinated in a petri dish, and transplanted into a plastic mesh grid for hydroponic culturing at 28 °C under a photoperiod of 14 h light/10 h dark. At the three-leaf stage, the leaf and root were sampled, ground in liquid nitrogen, and used for total RNA extraction using an RNAiso plus kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) with technical replicates, respectively. After removing probable genomic DNA using RNase-free DNase (TaKaRa, Japan), the RNA samples were quantified on NanoDrop 2000 (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and reverse transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScriptTM reagent kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan).

2.4. Gene 5′ UTR Cloning

According to the 5′ UTR sequences of ZmLAZ1s (Table S1), specific primers were designed by the Premier 5.0 software (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/, accessed on 9 May 2022) and were used for amplification of the 5′ UTR of the ZmLAZ1 genes. The PCR reaction system was 25 μL in total volume and contained 1 μL cDNA sample from the blank control (0 h), 0.3 μL Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) (2.5 U/μL), 5 μL 5 × bufer, 2 μL dNTP mix (0.4 mM), and 0.5 μL each primer (10 pM), 15.7 μL H2O. The temperature cycle was as follows: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10–15 s; annealing at the annealing temperature of each pair of primers for 15 s; extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min; and re-extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The target fragments were recovered using DNA recovery and a purification kit (TianGen, Beijing, China), subcloned into vector pCAMBIA1381-GUS (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) to generate transient expression vectors pCAMBIA1381-ZmLAZ1-5′ UTR-GUS, and sequenced at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). All the primers used in this study are listed in Table S4.

2.5. GUS Histochemical Staining

The GUS report vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101, which was infiltrated into the abaxial air space leaves of 3-week-old tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana). The pCAMBIA1381-GUS was used as a control. After infiltration, the tobacco was cultured 48 h at 25 °C under 14 light/10 dark. Injected tobacco leaves were cut into 2 cm × 2 cm used for Gusblue kit (Huayueyang, Beijing, China). After decolorization with 70% ethanol for 3–5 times until the background shows negative control (i.e., appears white), observe with the naked eye and record the results by taking photos.

2.6. GUS Activity Measurement

The GUS enzyme activity determination method mainly follows Jefferson et al. [27]. Around 0.1 g of plant tissue was transferred into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube pre-cooled with liquid nitrogen and 200 µL of the extraction solution was added. It was allowed to thaw at room temperature and was mixed well. It was centrifuged at 4 °C and 12,000 r/min for 15 min. A total of 50 µL of the GUS crude protein extract was taken out and added to 950 µL of ddH2O, then 5 mL of G250 solution was added and mixed well. After placing it at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance value was measured at 595 nm based on the standard curve to calculate the protein concentration. Additionally, 70 µL of the GUS crude protein extract was taken out and mixed with 80 µL of the GUS reaction solution. A total of 30 µL of the mixture was immediately pippeted out and placed into a 60 µL mixture of 0.2 mol/L Na2CO3 to terminate the reaction. The remaining reaction solution in a water bath was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, and then 240 µL of 0.2 mol/L Na2CO3 was added to terminate the reaction. This was mixed well and 90 µL of the mixture was taken out for reading in a 96-well microplate reader. A microplate luminometer was used to read the values at a excitation wavelength of 340 nm and emission wavelength of 465 nm for both 0 h and 1 h time points. The MU concentration was calculated at 0 h and 1 h based on the standard curve, and the GUS activity value was the concentration difference between the MU concentration at 1 h and that at 0 h divided by the incubation time (1 h) and protein concentration, as a reference for GUS activity.

2.7. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements

The 5′ UTR sequences of the ZmLAZ1 genes were retrieved from the MaizeGDB database (http://www.maizegdb.org/, accessed on 10 January 2024) and used for the prediction of cis-acting elements by the online tool PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 12 January 2024). Furthermore, the TBtools software (version 2.029) was employed to visualize the composition of cis-elements in the 5′ UTR [28].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed with three replicates. The data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using Student′ s t-test at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 levels.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Whole-Genome Survey of UTRs in Maize

To explore the potential role of UTRs in maize, we conducted a comprehensive whole-genome survey of UTRs in maize. The results showed that UTRs constitute approximately 24.7% of the transcribed sequences, suggesting their significance in the maize genome (Figure 1A). When compared with previous studies on arabidopsis and rice [20], maize UTRs were found to represent a larger fraction of the transcribed sequences than those in rice and arabidopsis. Given the maize genome’s substantial size of about 2.3 Gb—significantly larger than the rice genome (~380 Mb) and the arabidopsis genome (~140 Mb)—this discrepancy in the UTR/CDS ratio may reflect differences in genome size among these species. Notably, in all three plants, the proportion of 3′ UTRs consistently exceeded that of 5′ UTRs.
Further classification of maize UTRs into four length categories revealed a distribution pattern in the 1−500 bp, 501−1000 bp, and 1001−2000 bp ranges for both 5′ and 3′ UTRs: 87.64%, 9.87%, and 2.30% and 78.46%, 17.03%, and 4.04%, respectively (Figure 1B). This pattern is similar to that observed in rice (87.7%, 8.4%, and 3% and 73%, 19%, and 6%) [20]. However, for sequences longer than 2000 bp, maize exhibited unique proportions of its 5′ UTR (0.19%) and 3′ UTR (0.46%) compared to rice and arabidopsis. Moreover, the average sequence length of maize’s 5′ UTR was 430 bp, longer than that in rice (259 bp) and arabidopsis (155 bp), while the mean 3′ UTR length in maize (382 bp) fell between that of rice (469 bp) and arabidopsis (242 bp).
By analyzing protein sequences across species, we identified 31,380 maize genes with homologs in both rice and arabidopsis (Figure 1B). The average sequence lengths of these maize genes’ 5′ UTR (273 bp) and 3′ UTR (399 bp) were also longer than their counterparts in rice and arabidopsis [29]. In orthologs, the UTR distributions of maize and rice exhibited similar length gradients, likely due to their shared Poaceae family membership and closer genetic relationship. Collectively, these findings suggest that the relative proportion of UTR length is also conserved in maize.

3.2. Functional Enrichment Analysis of UTR-Containing Genes in Maize

Utilizing methodologies previously applied to arabidopsis and rice [20], we categorized UTR-containing genes within the maize genome based on the lengths of their 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR and conducted a gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. Our analysis focused on the top five enrichment terms within the biological process category. Consistent with expectations, genes with short (1−500 bp), medium (501−1000 and 1001−2000 bp), and long (>2000 bp) UTRs in maize were each enriched in distinct functional classes (Figure 2A). For genes with 5′ UTRs measuring 501−1000 bp, the most enrichment term was “Phosphorus metabolic process”, followed by “Protein phosphorylation”, “Cellular protein modification process”, “Cellular communication”, and “Regulation of cellular processes”. In contrast, genes with 1−500 bp 5′ UTRs predominantly showed enrichment in “Developmental process”, “Response to abiotic stimulus”, “Organic substance transport”, “Anatomical structure development”, and “mRNA transport”. The enrichment index for genes with 5′ UTRs exceeding 2000 bp was comparatively lower, likely due to their smaller proportion. Intriguingly, the terms “Iron ion transport” were enriched across both the 1001−2000 and >2000 bp length categories, indicating specific biological processes that may be influenced by UTR length.
While most enrichment terms for 3′ UTR-containing genes in maize differ from those associated with 5′ UTRs, common terms such as “Anatomical structure development” and “RNA processing” are observed in both categories (Figure 2B). Similar to 5′ UTRs, genes with 3′ UTRs in the 501−1000 bp range exhibit a higher enrichment index, with “RNA metabolic process” displaying the highest index within this category. In the category representing the largest proportion of UTRs, the 1−500 bp range, the top five enrichment terms included “Response to oxidative stress”, “Anatomical structure development”, “Reactive oxygen species metabolic process”, “Hydrogen peroxide metabolic process”, and “Detoxification”. Conversely, in the categories representing the smallest proportions (>2000 bp), the enrichment terms were “Regulation of SREBP signaling pathway”, “RNA processing”, “Cellular response to sterol depletion”, “Positive regulation of cell communication”, and “Regulation of signal transduction”. This diversity in enrichment terms across different UTR lengths supports the complexity and specificity of regulatory mechanisms mediated by UTRs in gene expression.
Previous research has revealed variability in functional enrichment associated with UTR lengths in arabidopsis and rice [20]. Intriguingly, our analysis revealed that the term “transport” was consistently enriched among genes with 5′ UTRs across all three species (arabidopsis, rice, and maize) (Figure 2A). This finding suggests a potentially conserved role of 5′ UTRs in material transport across these species. Additionally, maize and rice shared several similar enrichment terms, including “Cellular protein modification process” and “Ion transport” for genes with 5′ UTRs, as well as “Metabolic processes”, “Nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process”, and “Regulation of signal transduction” for genes with 3′ UTRs (Figure 2) [20]. Given the similarity in the lengthwise distribution of UTRs between maize and rice (Figure 1), it is plausible that UTRs in Poaceae species exhibit conserved functional mechanisms. These findings lend further support to the hypothesis that UTRs contribute to gene regulation and confer functional specificity to genes in a length-dependent manner.

3.3. Characterization of the 5′ UTR Region of the ZmLAZ1 Gene Family

The regulatory role of the 5′ UTR in gene expression in eukaryotes is well recognized. Nonetheless, the detailed mechanisms linking 5′ UTR length to gene expression remain poorly understood [20,29]. Our prior research characterized the ZmLAZ1 gene family in maize, uncovering not only functional specificity but also considerable variation in the length of their 5′ UTRs [23,25]. Therefore, we selected the ZmLAZ1 gene family for further detailed analysis. We cloned the 5′ UTRs of the ZmLAZ1 gene family and found that ZmLAZ1-3 lacks the 5′ UTR component, while ZmLAZ1-6, suspected to be a pseudogene, was excluded from our analysis. We successfully amplified the 5′ UTRs of the remaining seven members (Figure 3; Table S1). Sequence alignment confirmed that these amplified fragments matched perfectly with reference sequences from the MaizeGDB database (http://www.maizegdb.org/, accessed on 5 May 2022). The lengths of the 5′ UTRs in the ZmLAZ1 gene family varied from 149 bp to 1391 bp. Specifically, ZmLAZ1-1 and ZmLAZ1-2 possessed the longest 5′ UTRs, measuring 1391 bp and 1237 bp, respectively. The medium-length 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-7, ZmLAZ1-8, and ZmLAZ1-9 measured 493 bp, 376 bp, and 355 bp, respectively, while ZmLAZ1-4 and ZmLAZ1-5 had the shortest 5′ UTRs, at 162 bp and 149 bp, respectively. These variations in 5′ UTR length and sequence among the family members suggest potential impacts on the expression and function of these genes.

3.4. Effect of 5′ UTR Length on Gene Expression

To elucidate the correlation between 5′ UTR length and gene expression, we conducted GUS activity assays (Figure 4). Tobacco leaves were inoculated with bacteria containing a blank vector as a control, alongside experimental samples inoculated with other bacteria containing the reporters. The results demonstrated higher GUS expression levels in leaves harboring the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-1 and ZmLAZ1-2 (Figure 4b). Leaves with the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-4 and ZmLAZ1-7 exhibited medium staining intensity, whereas those with the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-5, ZmLAZ1-8, and ZmLAZ1-9 showed minimal coloration. Quantitative analysis of GUS activity corroborated the staining observations (Figure 4c). Enzyme activities for ZmLAZ1-1 5′ UTR- and ZmLAZ1-2 5′ UTR-derived reporters were significantly elevated, approximately fivefold higher than the control. ZmLAZ1-4 5′ UTR and ZmLAZ1-7 5′ UTR-derived reporters also displayed increased enzyme activity, about two-fold higher than the control. The reporter of ZmLAZ1-9 5′ UTR’s enzyme activity was notably higher than the control, while ZmLAZ1-5 5′ UTR- and ZmLAZ1-8 5′ UTR-derived reporters showed no significant difference in GUS activity compared to the control. These findings substantiate the hypothesis that the length of the 5′ UTR enhances gene expression.
To further explore the expression patterns of the seven ZmLAZ1 gene family members across different maize varieties and tissues, we utilized the Plant Public RNA-seq Database (PPRD), which houses over 19,664 maize RNA-seq libraries [30]. This extensive collection allows for a comprehensive analysis of gene expression levels using big data. Our analysis revealed a wide range of FPKM values for these ZmLAZ1 members across various tissues and developmental stages in maize, indicating diverse expression profiles (Figure S1). We then aggregated the total expression abundance of all FPKM values across different libraries (Figure 5). Notably, ZmLAZ1-1, which possesses the longest 5′ UTR sequence, exhibited the highest expression abundance (Figure 4b, Figure 5 and Figure S1). However, ZmLAZ1-2, with the second-longest 5′ UTR sequence, demonstrated lower expression abundance. ZmLAZ1-9, which has the shortest 5′ UTR sequence, did not exhibit the lowest expression levels. This observation suggests the complex regulatory mechanisms governing eukaryotic gene expression, where the 5′ UTR represents just one of many contributing factors. Collectively, we can infer that the length of the 5′ UTR does, to some extent, affect the expression of ZmLAZ1 family members in maize.

3.5. Cis-Elements Analysis of 5′ UTR of ZmLAZ1 Gene Family

The cis-elements within the 5′ UTR are crucial sequence features that significantly influence gene expression [5,20]. To investigate the potential transcriptional regulatory mechanisms mediated by the 5′ UTR in the ZmLAZ1 gene family, we performed cis-acting element predictions on the 5′ UTRs of seven ZmLAZ1 members. As expected, the analysis revealed that genes with longer 5′ UTRs harbored a greater number of cis-elements, with the majority of ZmLAZ1 gene 5′ UTRs containing stress response elements (STREs) (Figure 6; Table S2). We categorized the potential functions of these cis-acting elements, finding that those on the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-1 and ZmLAZ1-2 were associated with “Abiotic and biological stresses”, “Phytohormone response”, and “Plant growth and development” (Figure 6; Table S2). The 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-4 and ZmLAZ1-5, which have the fewest cis-acting elements, were linked to “Abiotic and biological stresses”. Meanwhile, the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-7, ZmLAZ1-8, and ZmLAZ1-9, which possess moderate 5′ UTR lengths, also exhibited a moderate number and diversity of cis-acting elements.
Utilizing the PPRD database, we assessed the response of these genes to various treatments and correlated these responses with the cis-acting elements identified in their 5′ UTRs (Figure 6; Tables S2 and S3). Terms related to light response were predicted in the cis-acting elements of the 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-1, ZmLAZ1-2, ZmLAZ1-4, ZmLAZ1-7, and ZmLAZ1-8 (Figure 6; Table S2). Correspondingly, all but ZmLAZ1-7 among these genes exhibited light response-related differential expression in the PPRD database (Table S3). The 5′ UTRs of ZmLAZ1-7 and ZmLAZ1-9 contained elements associated with low temperature, aligning with their differential expression under cold treatment (Table S3). In the realm of “Phytohormone response”, ZmLAZ1-7, which features MeJA-related elements in its 5′ UTR, showed differential expression following JA treatment according to the database (Figure 6; Tables S2 and S3). Notably, ZmLAZ1-4 and ZmLAZ1-5, lacking “Phytohormone response”-associated elements in their 5′ UTRs, also did not exhibit differential expression in relation to phytohormone treatments (Figure 6; Tables S2 and S3). Thus, the results of the transcriptome big data positively support the findings from the analysis of 5′ UTR cis-acting elements.
Subsequently, we extended our analysis to the 5′ UTR cis-acting elements of the arabidopsis and rice LAZ1 gene families, aligning these 5′ UTRs with the phylogenetic tree of LAZ1 across the three species (Figure S2). Although there appears to be no direct correlation between 5′ UTR length and the phylogenetic clustering of LAZ1 amino acids, we found an increased number of cis-acting elements in genes with longer 5′ UTRs, such as OsLAZ1-2, OsLAZ1-6, OsLAZ1-7, AtLAZ1-4, AtLAZ1-5, and AtLAZ1-7. This finding supports the idea that the length of the 5′ UTR contributes to its functional diversity, at least to a certain extent. Additionally, we identified some conserve cis-acting elements across all three species, including those associated with abscisic acid responsiveness, anoxic specific inducibility, light responsiveness, low-temperature responsiveness, and the MYB binding site involved in drought inducibility (Figure S2; Table S2). This information may imply the conserved functions of LAZ1 members in plant responses to various environmental stresses and provide potential guidance for further experiments to study the specific biological functions of LAZ1 members.

3.6. The Potential Relationship between 5′ UTR Length and Gene Function in the LAZ1 Gene Family

The LAZ1 family, characterized by its transmembrane proteins with six DUF300 domains, is posited to play a crucial role in transmembrane transport across eukaryotes [22,31,32]. Our previous work identified the ZmLAZ1 gene family in maize, revealing that ZmLAZ1-4 encodes a zinc transporter that modulates zinc homeostasis under the negative regulation of the brassinosteroid (BR) signaling transcription factor ZmBES1/BZR1-11 [23,25]. Additionally, we found that the ZmLAZ1-3 gene is a negative regulator of drought tolerance, and can be used to improve maize drought tolerance [24]. However, as with many studies on plant transmembrane transporters, our understanding of LAZ1’s functions remains hampered by challenges in expression purification systems and subcellular localization techniques. In this study, we explored the 5′ UTR of the ZmLAZ1 family, revealing a gradient distribution in 5′ UTR length (Figure 3). Results from GUS reporter assays suggest a positive correlation between 5′ UTR length and gene expression (Figure 4). Further, our analysis of cis-acting elements indicates that the distribution of 5′ UTR functions may also correlate with sequence length (Figure 6 and Figure S2). In light of existing hypotheses regarding UTR function in plants [20], it is plausible that the 5′ UTR in the ZmLAZ1 gene family not only modulates gene expression but also imparts functional specificity to genes in a length-dependent manner.
Our earlier study observed a notable increase in ZmLAZ1-7 expression following NaCl treatment, suggesting its potential involvement in salt stress resistance [23]. Correspondingly, cis-acting elements associated with “defense and stress responsiveness” were identified within the 5′ UTR region of ZmLAZ1-7 (Table S2). Despite the lack of correlation between the presence of the 5′ UTR in LAZ1 genes from maize, rice, and arabidopsis with amino acid sequence homology, the presence of over 50 light responsiveness-related terms (Table S2) suggests a potential conserved role for the LAZ1 family in regulating plant light response. Moreover, a recent study has found that rare variations of upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in maize 5′ UTRs affect the abundance of the main ORF proteins, thereby affecting plant metabolism and phenotypic changes [33]. This indicates that using the 5′ UTR to design or regulate changes in proteins may help address problems in synthetic biology, genome editing, crop improvement, and human disease. Therefore, the analysis of 5′ UTRs not only provides a new perspective for the experimental design and analysis of the LAZ1 and other gene families but also serves as a valuable reference for the functional study of other gene families.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we employed bioinformatics methods to analyze UTR-containing genes across the entire maize genome. Our analysis revealed that maize UTRs constitute a slightly larger proportion of the transcribed sequence compared to those in rice and arabidopsis, with a conserved gradient in their length distribution. GO enrichment analysis highlighted the relationship between UTR length distribution and specific functions in maize. Notably, we observed recurrent GO terms associated with material transport and signal transduction in both maize and rice, likely reflecting their shared genetic heritage within the Poaceae family. Using the ZmLAZ1 gene family as a case study, we conducted GUS reporter gene assays and cis-acting element analyses on the 5′ UTR. Our results indicate that the 5′ UTR of ZmLAZ1 can modulate gene expression and likely confer functional specificity in a length-dependent manner. These insights enhance our understanding of the potential roles of maize 5′ UTRs and offer a novel perspective for unraveling the intricate gene regulatory mechanisms in plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15080994/s1, Figure S1: Expression abundance of the ZmLAZ1 family members in different maize tissues in the PPRD database; Figure S2: Phylogenetic analysis of the 5′ UTR-containing LAZ1 family in maize, rice, and arabidopsis and their 5′ UTR cis-elements; Table S1: 5′ UTR DNA sequences of ZmLAZ1 genes; Table S2: Analysis of 5′ UTR cis-acting elements of 5′ UTR-containing ZmLAZ1 members and their homologues; Table S3: Differential expression of ZmLAZ1 family members in various treatments in the PPRD database; Table S4: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L.; methodology, B.L., Y.S., D.L., L.H. and Y.T.; software, X.L. and M.S.; resources, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.T.; supervision, B.L. and Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32300318), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M720546), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2024NSFSC1202 and 2024NSFSC1324), and the Key Laboratory of Dry-Hot Valley Characteristic Bio-Resources Development at University of Sichuan Province (GR-2023-E-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article (and its additional files).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mortimer, S.A.; Kidwell, M.A.; Doudna, J.A. Insights into RNA structure and function from genome-wide studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cerezo, M.; Robert, C.; Liu, L.; Shen, S. The Role of mRNA Translational Control in Tumor Immune Escape and Immunotherapy Resistance. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 5596–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, W.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Dong, D.; Zhu, J.; Fu, W.; Liu, T. Adipose-derived stem cells enriched with therapeutic mRNA TGF-β3 and IL-10 synergistically promote scar-less wound healing in preclinical models. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 9, e10620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wissink, E.M.; Fogarty, E.A.; Grimson, A. High-throughput discovery of post-transcriptional cis-regulatory elements. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chung, B.Y.W.; Simons, C.; Firth, A.E.; Brown, C.M.; Hellens, R.P. Effect of 5′UTR introns on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hardy, E.C.; Balcerowicz, M. Untranslated yet indispensable—UTRs act as key regulators in the environmental control of gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 4314–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Holcik, M.; Sonenberg, N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xue, S.; Tian, S.; Fujii, K.; Kladwang, W.; Das, R.; Barna, M. RNA regulons in HOX 5′ UTRs confer ribosome specificity to gene regulation. Nature 2015, 517, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Michaud, M.; Ubrig, E.; Filleur, S.; Erhardt, M.; Ephritikhine, G.; Maréchal-Drouard, L.; Duchêne, A.-M. Differential targeting of VDAC3 mRNA isoforms influences mitochondria morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8991–8996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, Y.; Doyle, M.R.; Amasino, R.M. PAF1-complex-mediated histone methylation of FLOWERING LOCUS C chromatin is required for the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2774–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singla, B.; Khurana, J.P.; Khurana, P. Structural Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SERK/SERL Gene Family in Rice (Oryza sativa). Int. J. Plant Genom. 2009, 2009, 539402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, D.; Qiao, H.; Qiu, W.; Xu, X.; Liu, T.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, R.; Jiao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Bi, L.; et al. Identification and functional characterization of intermediate-size non-coding RNAs in maize. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McCue, A.D.; Nuthikattu, S.; Reeder, S.H.; Slotkin, R.K. Gene Expression and Stress Response Mediated by the Epigenetic Regulation of a Transposable Element Small RNA. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cailliatte, R.; Schikora, A.; Briat, J.-F.; Mari, S.; Curie, C. High-Affinity Manganese Uptake by the Metal Transporter NRAMP1 Is Essential for Arabidopsis Growth in Low Manganese Conditions. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 904–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Chang, J.; Chen, M.; Li, K.; Yang, G.; He, G. TaNAC29, a NAC transcription factor from wheat, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shumbe, L.; Soares, E.; Muhovski, Y.; Smit, I.; Vanderschuren, H. Mutation of the Vinv 5′ UTR regulatory region reduces acrylamide levels in processed potato to reach EU food-safety standards. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zheng, H.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Q.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, Z. Functional analysis of 5′ untranslated region of a TIR-NBS-encoding gene from triploid white poplar. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2009, 282, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Araujo, P.R.; Yoon, K.; Ko, D.; Smith, A.D.; Qiao, M.; Suresh, U.; Burns, S.C.; Penalva, L.O.F. Before It Gets Started: Regulating Translation at the 5′ UTR. Comp. Funct. Genom. 2012, 2012, 475731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Davuluri, R.V.; Suzuki, Y.; Sugano, S.; Zhang, M.Q. CART classification of human 5′ UTR sequences. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 1807–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Srivastava, A.K.; Lu, Y.; Zinta, G.; Lang, Z.; Zhu, J.-K. UTR-Dependent Control of Gene Expression in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palma, K.; Thorgrimsen, S.; Malinovsky, F.G.; Fiil, B.K.; Nielsen, H.B.; Brodersen, P.; Hofius, D.; Petersen, M.; Mundy, J. Autoimmunity in Arabidopsis acd11 Is Mediated by Epigenetic Regulation of an Immune Receptor. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Q.; Vain, T.; Viotti, C.; Doyle, S.M.; Tarkowská, D.; Novák, O.; Zipfel, C.; Sitbon, F.; Robert, S.; Hofius, D. Vacuole Integrity Maintained by DUF300 Proteins Is Required for Brassinosteroid Signaling Regulation. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, B.L.; Yu, H.Q.; Wen, Q.; Fu, F.L.; Li, W.C. Genome-Wide Analysis of LAZ1 Gene Family from Maize. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 39, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, H.; Liu, B.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Li, W.; Fu, F. Maize ZmLAZ1-3 gene negatively regulates drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, B.; Yu, H.; Yang, Q.; Ding, L.; Sun, F.; Qu, J.; Feng, W.; Yang, Q.; Li, W.; Fu, F. Zinc Transporter ZmLAZ1-4 Modulates Zinc Homeostasis on Plasma and Vacuolar Membrane in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 881055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jiao, Y.; Peluso, P.; Shi, J.; Liang, T.; Stitzer, M.C.; Wang, B.; Campbell, M.S.; Stein, J.C.; Wei, X.; Chin, C.-S.; et al. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 2017, 546, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Petrillo, E.; Godoy Herz, M.A.; Barta, A.; Kalyna, M.; Kornblihtt, A.R. Let there be light: Regulation of gene expression in plants. RNA Biol. 2014, 11, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Long, Y.; Shu, Y.; Zhai, J. Plant Public RNA-seq Database: A comprehensive online database for expression analysis of ~45,000 plant public RNA-Seq libraries. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malinovsky, F.G.; Brodersen, P.; Fiil, B.K.; McKinney, L.V.; Thorgrimsen, S.; Beck, M.; Nielsen, H.B.; Pietra, S.; Zipfel, C.; Robatzek, S.; et al. Lazarus1, a DUF300 Protein, Contributes to Programmed Cell Death Associated with Arabidopsis acd11 and the Hypersensitive Response. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, W.; Seward, D.J.; Li, L.; Boyer, J.L.; Ballatori, N. Expression cloning of two genes that together mediate organic solute and steroid transport in the liver of a marine vertebrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9431–9436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gage, J.L.; Mali, S.; McLoughlin, F.; Khaipho-Burch, M.; Monier, B.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Vierstra, R.D.; Buckler, E.S. Variation in upstream open reading frames contributes to allelic diversity in maize protein abundance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2112516119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The percentages of coding sequence (CDS) and untranslated region (UTR) elements in maize and their lengths. (A) A genome-scale survey showing the percentages of transcript bases involved in protein coding (CDS) and in gene regulation (UTR) in maize (Z. mays). (B) Percentages of 5′ and 3′ UTRs in different length categories along with the average UTR length (bp) at the whole-genome level and in orthologs.
Figure 1. The percentages of coding sequence (CDS) and untranslated region (UTR) elements in maize and their lengths. (A) A genome-scale survey showing the percentages of transcript bases involved in protein coding (CDS) and in gene regulation (UTR) in maize (Z. mays). (B) Percentages of 5′ and 3′ UTRs in different length categories along with the average UTR length (bp) at the whole-genome level and in orthologs.
Genes 15 00994 g001
Figure 2. Functional enrichment analysis of untranslated region (UTR)-containing genes in maize. UTR-containing genes of maize genomes were sorted according to their 5′ UTR (A) and 3′ UTR (B) lengths before functional enrichment analysis was independently performed for genes with short (1−500 bp), medium (501−1000 and 1001−2000 bp), and long (>2000 bp) UTRs. On the basis of p values, the top five GO terms related to biological processes are represented independently for 5′ and 3′ UTRs.
Figure 2. Functional enrichment analysis of untranslated region (UTR)-containing genes in maize. UTR-containing genes of maize genomes were sorted according to their 5′ UTR (A) and 3′ UTR (B) lengths before functional enrichment analysis was independently performed for genes with short (1−500 bp), medium (501−1000 and 1001−2000 bp), and long (>2000 bp) UTRs. On the basis of p values, the top five GO terms related to biological processes are represented independently for 5′ and 3′ UTRs.
Genes 15 00994 g002
Figure 3. Percentages of coding sequence (CDS) and untranslated region (UTR) elements in maize (a) Schematic representation of the ZmLAZ1 gene family members with 5′ UTRs. (b) Specific fragments of the 5′ UTR sequences of the ZmLAZ1 genes cloned from the maize cDNA sample and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Figure 3. Percentages of coding sequence (CDS) and untranslated region (UTR) elements in maize (a) Schematic representation of the ZmLAZ1 gene family members with 5′ UTRs. (b) Specific fragments of the 5′ UTR sequences of the ZmLAZ1 genes cloned from the maize cDNA sample and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Genes 15 00994 g003
Figure 4. GUS reporter assays. (a) Schematic diagrams of the reporters used for the GUS assay. (b) Histochemical GUS staining in tobacco leaves. The depth of color represents the different expression levels of the GUS protein. (c) GUS enzyme activity assay in tobacco leaves. Student’s t-test; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05.
Figure 4. GUS reporter assays. (a) Schematic diagrams of the reporters used for the GUS assay. (b) Histochemical GUS staining in tobacco leaves. The depth of color represents the different expression levels of the GUS protein. (c) GUS enzyme activity assay in tobacco leaves. Student’s t-test; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05.
Genes 15 00994 g004
Figure 5. FPKM distribution of the ZmLAZ1 family members in all libraries of the PPRD database.
Figure 5. FPKM distribution of the ZmLAZ1 family members in all libraries of the PPRD database.
Genes 15 00994 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of cis-acting elements in the 5′ UTR of the ZmLAZ1 gene family. (a) The cis-acting elements of the 5′ UTR region, and different color blocks represent different elements. (b) The putative cis-elements were quantified and functionally classified based on their established roles in gene transcriptional regulation.
Figure 6. Analysis of cis-acting elements in the 5′ UTR of the ZmLAZ1 gene family. (a) The cis-acting elements of the 5′ UTR region, and different color blocks represent different elements. (b) The putative cis-elements were quantified and functionally classified based on their established roles in gene transcriptional regulation.
Genes 15 00994 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Sun, M.; Sun, Y.; Liu, D.; Hao, L.; Tao, Y. Analysis of the 5′ Untranslated Region Length-Dependent Control of Gene Expression in Maize: A Case Study with the ZmLAZ1 Gene Family. Genes 2024, 15, 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080994

AMA Style

Liu B, Liu X, Sun M, Sun Y, Liu D, Hao L, Tao Y. Analysis of the 5′ Untranslated Region Length-Dependent Control of Gene Expression in Maize: A Case Study with the ZmLAZ1 Gene Family. Genes. 2024; 15(8):994. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bingliang, Xiaowei Liu, Min Sun, Yanxia Sun, Dayu Liu, Li Hao, and Yang Tao. 2024. "Analysis of the 5′ Untranslated Region Length-Dependent Control of Gene Expression in Maize: A Case Study with the ZmLAZ1 Gene Family" Genes 15, no. 8: 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop