Next Article in Journal
Climatological Increased Precipitation from July to August in the Western North Pacific Region Simulated by CMIP6 Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping Groundwater Potential for Irrigation, by Geographical Information System and Remote Sensing Techniques: A Case Study of District Lower Dir, Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Ensemble Dispersion Simulation of a Point-Source Radioactive Aerosol Using Perturbed Meteorological Fields over Eastern Japan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Atmosphere
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/atmos12060663
atmosphere-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Foliar Potassium Sulfate Application Improved Photosynthetic Characteristics, Water Relations and Seedling Growth of Drought-Stressed Maize

by
Allah Wasaya
1,*,
Muhammad Affan
2,
Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir
1,
Atique-ur-Rehman
3,
Khuram Mubeen
4,
Haseeb ur Rehman
3,
Muqarrab Ali
4,
Farukh Nawaz
1,
Ahmed Galal
5,
Muhammad Aamir Iqbal
6,
Mohammad Sohidul Islam
7,
Mohamed El-Sharnouby
8,
Muhammad Habib ur Rahman
9 and
Ayman EL Sabagh
5,*
1
College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bahadur Sub-Campus Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
2
Department of Agronomy, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
3
Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60000, Pakistan
4
Department of Agronomy, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan 60000, Pakistan
5
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kafrelsheikh, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
6
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Rawalakot 12350, Pakistan
7
Department of Agronomy, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
8
Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
9
Department of Crop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2021, 12(6), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060663
Submission received: 8 April 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 22 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptation for Crop Production and Sustainable Agriculture in a Changing Climate)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Changing climates and frequent spells of drought have increased the risk of crop failure, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, thus multiplying the vulnerability of food-insecure populations. The exogenous application of potassium (K) can potentially ameliorate the adverse effects of drought in maize by maintaining cell osmotic potential and turgidity, provided its optimum doses are applied. The present experiment comprised two maize cultivars, viz. Islamabad Gold (drought tolerant) and Azam (drought susceptible), grown under well-watered (80% water-holding capacity (WHC)), mild drought (60% WHC) and severe drought (40% WHC) conditions. Different doses of K, viz. 0%, 1% and 2%, were also tested to screen out the most superior concentration. Drought stress markedly reduced root and shoot lengths (25% and 16%, respectively) along with their dry weights (20% and 10%, respectively). Moreover, a substantial reduction in leaf relative water content (RWC) (24%), stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis rates, chlorophyll pigments a, b and total chlorophyll contents (31%) were recorded, compared with well-watered conditions. However, foliar application of K2SO4 at 2% concentration outperformed other doses by improving growth attributes, RWC (10%), total chlorophyll (9%) and proline (12%) under severe drought conditions. Our findings confirmed the effectiveness of foliage-applied K2SO4 in ameliorating drought effects in rainfed maize; however, more doses and sources of K could be tested for developing it as a potent source to cope with water stress.

1. Introduction

Globally, maize, (Zea mays L.) occupies a pivotal position among cereals in ensuring food security by virtue of its huge area under cultivation (197 m. ha) and production (1148 m.t.) [1,2]. It has the potential to adapt to a wide range of physiographic, soil, and climatic conditions [3,4]. However, recent climate changes, especially abiotic stresses including drought, are imposing a pronounced fluctuation in maize production, increasing the risk of food insecurity [5,6,7]. Moisture deficiency has emerged as one of the most serious threats in arid and semi-arid climates by causing up to 40% yield reduction in maize [8,9,10]. Drought stress (DS) adversely affects root proliferation [11], crop morphology and physiology, hence reducing crop yield [12]. DS also decreases the transportation of water and nutrients from the soil to the plant body, which reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation and nutrient uptake [13]. This decline in nutrient uptake causes stunted growth and pronouncedly decreases crop productivity under the limited water conditions [14]. In addition, adverse effects imparted by DS depend on the intensity and duration of stress [15,16]. DS at critical growth stages, such as the seedling, vegetative or reproductive stages [17,18], leads to a severe reduction in relative water content and crop yield. Moreover, water deficit conditions at earlier growth stages when roots have not been fully developed results in stunted plant growth and a reduction in the binding of CO2 [17,19,20]. This leads to a significant reduction in the assimilation of photosynthates during the grain filling period, which produces shriveled grains and lower yield [19,21,22].
Under water stress, plant growth also gets suppressed, owing to the disruption of mineral nutrient transportation from the soil solution to the roots. Low soil moistures restrict root growth and therefore lower the uptake of nutrients through the roots [17]. Among all the macronutrients, potassium (K) is used as a stress alleviant plant nutrient that diminishes the adverse effects of abiotic stresses by improving the physiochemical as well as biological activities in plants [23,24,25,26]. Potassium application enables plants to survive under water deficit conditions by regulating rooting density, the turgidity of cells and the osmotic potential of cell walls [24]. The balanced application of K fertilizers improves plant yield and water use efficiency under moisture deficit circumstances [25,27].
Adequate exogenous supplies of K have shown beneficial effects in maintaining dry matter production, water retention, and membrane stability, compared to low K nutrition under drought stress conditions [25]. Similarly, K is essential under drought stress for maintaining cell turgor through osmotic adjustment [28] and transpiration through stomatal regulation [29]. K is generally a soil-applied mineral; however, its uptake by crop plants remains a challenge under moisture deficit conditions. Therefore, its deficiency in plants can be corrected through foliar application, which results in the rapid absorption and transportation in leaf tissues, leading to significantly higher crop yield [30]. Moreover, at the early plant growth stages, the root system may not have developed well enough to uptake nutrients from the soil. In such cases, foliage-applied K could be a viable option for supplying K to maize plants [31]. Thus, applying the optimum concentration of K through foliar application under moisture deficit conditions may be a realistic technique to enhance crop production [32,33,34]. Potassium application improved antioxidant activity, which imparted drought resistance in plants [33]. In addition, the metabolisms of plants depend on K concentration [25,27], while balanced K application assisted plants in boosting water use efficiency and grain yield. Moreover, foliar K enabled the plant to maintain cell turgor pressure under drought stress. The reduction in K application decreased the osmotic pressure and relative water content (RWC) in the plants, leading to a significant decline in the growth and yield of maize [35]. However, serious research gaps exist pertaining to the optimal doses of K for ameliorating the adverse effects of drought in maize under rainfed conditions. Moreover, very scant information is available regarding K dosage optimization for varying genotypes of maize under drought stress.
Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, we hypothesized that maize cultivars respond differently to different doses of foliage-applied K under varying levels of drought stress. The present study was carried out to assess the potential of K in alleviating the adverse effects of DS and improving water relations, photosynthetic characteristics and the growth of maize genotypes grown under well-watered and DS conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

This experiment was conducted at the greenhouse of the Department of Horticulture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, to study the effect of potassium sulfate (K2SO4) on two maize cultivars, Islamabad gold (drought tolerant) and Azam (drought susceptible), grown under DS. These cultivars were collected from the National Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan, and are high yielding and locally preferred for cultivation. The design of the experiment was a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates for each treatment. Earthen pots 20 cm in diameter and 45 cm in height were filled with an 8 kg mixture of soil and farmyard manure (FYM). Soil and FYM were mixed in a 2:1 ratio, and 6 seeds per pot were manually sown to avoid germination constraints. A soil sample from pot soil indicated that the soil was alkaline in nature with a 7.20 pH, an electrical conductivity of 0.75 dS m−1, 0.48% organic matter and 0.03% N, along with available phosphorous and K contents of 4.30 and 78 mg kg−1, respectively. Both maize cultivars were grown in pots under well-watered conditions. Thinning was done manually at the 3-leaf stage, and only 2 plants per pot were kept to maintain the optimum plant population and promote the establishment of seedlings. Drought was imposed after one week of thinning. For imposing drought, pots were divided into three sets, and drought was maintained as follows: (i) well-watered (WW) (80% water holding capacity-WHC); (ii) mild drought (MD) (60% WHC); and (iii) severe drought (SD) (40% WHC). To maintain WHC, pots were weighed after every 3–4 days of drought imposition, and a difference in weight was achieved by adding water to attain the required weight. After one week of imposing drought, a foliar spray of water and K2SO4 was applied twice in 3-day intervals. For this purpose, plants were treated as follows: (i) water spray (control) using distilled water; (ii) 1% K2SO4 (1 g K2SO4 was dissolved in 1L of distilled water); (iii) 2% K2SO4 (2 g K2SO4 was dissolved in 1L of distilled water), whereas Tween 20 at 0.2 mL L−1 was used as a surfactant. Before spraying, the soil surfaces of treated pots were covered with polythene sheets to avoid contamination. NPK, in the form of urea, DAP and SOP, was applied in quantities of 0.6, 0.27 and 0.06 g per pot, respectively. Seedlings were harvested 60 days after sowing for the measurement of morphological traits.

2.1. Estimation of Relative Water Content (%)

For measuring leaf relative water content (RWC), samples were randomly collected from each treatment and packed into polythene bags. The leaves’ fresh weight (FW) was measured by using a digital weighing balance. Then, the leaves were soaked in distilled water for 24 h to make them turgid, and then the turgid weight (TW) was measured using a digital weighing balance. Thereafter, the leaves were oven-dried at 75 °C for 72 h, and subsequently, the dry weight (DW) was measured. The RWC was calculated by using the below formula:
RWC = (FW − DW)/(TW − DW) × 100
  • FW = Fresh weight of leaves
  • DW = Dry weight of leaves
  • TW = Turgid weight of leaves.

2.2. Estimation of Gas Exchange Parameters

Gas exchange parameters, viz. stomatal conductance (Gs), photosynthesis rate (Pn) and transpiration rate (Tr), were measured using an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA Leaf Chamber Analyzer, Type LCA-4, manufacturer, city and state abbreviation, USA) two weeks after the foliar spray of K2SO4. For this purpose, fully developed expanded leaves were selected from each experimental pot and inserted in an IRGA Leaf Chamber Analyzer (Type LCA-4, manufacturer, city and state abbreviation, USA) [36]. Measurements were taken from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on a clear, sunny day by keeping the CO2 concentration at 400-μmol mol−1 [36].

2.3. Estimation of Chlorophyll Content

Chlorophyll (a, b and total) contents were measured by using the method proposed by Ref. [37]. About 1 g of fresh leaves were taken and divided into segments that were kept in 80% acetone solution for a whole night. Then, samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min, and supernatant was observed at 645 nm and 663 nm wavelengths using a UV spectrophotometer (Unicam 8620). Chlorophyll a, b and total contents were measured using the following formula
Chlorophyll a (mg/g FW) = [12.7(OD 663) − 2.69(OD 645) × V/1000 × W]
Chlorophyll b (mg/g FW) = [22.9(OD 645) − 4.68(OD 663) × V/1000 × W]
Total Chlorophyll (mg/g FW) = [20.2(OD 645) − 8.02(OD 663) × V/1000 × W]
where V = volume of the leaf extract (mL), W = weight of fresh leaf tissue (g).

2.4. Estimation of Proline (mg g−1)

The proline content was measured according to the procedure developed by [38]. Homogenization of 0.5 g of fresh leaves was done with 10 mL of 3% sulfosalicylic acid (C7H6O6S) solution. Filtration of the homogenized mixture was done with 2 ml of acid ninhydrin and 2 ml of glacial acid in a test tube. The mixture was incubated for 60 min at 100 °C. Then, the mixture was cooled in an ice bath and 4 mL of toluene was mixed into it while stirring simultaneously for 60 s. A spectrophotometer with 520-nanometer wavelength radiations was used to measure chromophore absorption. Proline contents were calculated on the basis of fresh weight from the optimized curve using the following formula:
µmol proline g−1 fresh weight = (µg proline mL−1 × mL of toluene/115.5)/(g of sample).

2.5. Morphological Traits

Plants were uprooted two weeks after foliar application of K2SO4 from well-watered and drought-stressed treatments, and the shoot length (SL) of plants was measured using a meter scale. After measuring the SL, the roots were separated, and their root length (RL) was measured using the same scale and then averaged to determine the RL per plant. After the measurement of the RL, the shoot and root from each treatment were placed into envelopes and dried in a hot air oven at 75 °C for 72 h. After drying the samples, the shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW) was measured using a digital weighing balance.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data for different attributes were analyzed using Statistix 8.1 software to determine the significance among the treatments. Tukey’s test at a 5% probability level was executed to find out the significant differences among treatment means [39]. Bar graphs using standard error were prepared in Microsoft Excel 2007.

3. Results

Various levels of DS and foliar K2SO4 significantly affected the RL of maize. Under drought regimes, increased RL was measured in WW conditions, while drought levels decreased the RL, and the lowest RL was recorded under severe drought (SD), where 40% WHC was maintained (Figure 1A). Similarly, maize cultivars varied significantly in terms of RL, and a higher RL was recorded in the Azam genotype, compared with Islamabad Gold (Figure 1A). Drought effects were mitigated through the foliar application of potassium sulfate, which improved the RL, and a 2% solution of potassium sulfate produced the highest RL compared to other treatments (Figure 1A). The interactive effect of both factors was significant regarding the RL (Table 1), and the highest RL (35cm) was recorded in Islamabad Gold under well-watered conditions with the foliar application of 2% potassium sulfate solution. The minimum RL (22 cm) was recorded by Azam under DS, where 40% WHC was maintained through spraying water only (Figure 1A). From the results of this study, it is shown that various drought conditions and K applications had significant effects on the RDW. Under drought regimes, the maximum RDW was measured under WW conditions, while the minimum RDW was measured under SD (Figure 1B). Similarly, maize cultivars were also found to be significant regarding RDW. The maximum RDW was obtained in Islamabad Gold, compared to Azam. Foliar application of potassium sulfate improved the RDW, and the highest RDW was recorded with the 2% potassium sulfate solution, compared with the control and the 1% solution (Figure 1B). Significant interactive effects were found, and the highest RDW was measured in Islamabad Gold with the 2% potassium sulfate solution under WW conditions, while the least RDW (8g) was measured for Azam with simple water spraying under SD (Figure 1B). Results also revealed that drought stress levels and potassium sulfate doses significantly influenced the SL of maize (Table 1; Figure 1C). The highest SL was measured under WW conditions while the least SL was recorded under SD (Figure 1C).
Similarly, exogenous K increased the SL and SDW, and the longest and heaviest shoots were produced by Islamabad Gold with the 2% potassium sulfate solution under WW conditions, while the minimum corresponding values were recorded for Azam with water spraying under SD (Figure 1C,D).
Photosynthetic characteristics including transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and photosynthesis rate (Pn) were significantly affected by the different levels of DS, the foliar doses of potassium sulfate and the maize cultivars (Table 1). However, their interaction effect varied significantly for those parameters. The interaction effect for transpiration rate was found to be significant, while for photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance, the interaction effects were found to be non-significant. The interaction effect between variety and drought levels on the stomatal conductance was found to be significant (Table 1). The highest transpiration rate was measured in WW Islamabad Gold with a 2% spray of potassium sulfate, while the lowest transpiration rate was measured in the SD-grown Azam cultivar (Figure 2A). On the other hand, maize varieties differed significantly for stomatal conductance, and higher stomatal conductance was recorded in Islamabad Gold, compared with Azam. Moreover, drought levels also significantly affected stomatal conductance, and the value decreased with the increasing stress levels. However, the foliar application of potassium sulfate increased stomatal conductance, compared to water spraying. Maize cultivars, by virtue of their genetic makeup, differed significantly in photosynthetic rate under different levels of DS and foliar K levels: Islamabad Gold performed better than Azam. Moreover, DS reduced the photosynthetic rate of both cultivars, compared to WW conditions. Approximately a 28% increase in photosynthetic rate was recorded in maize under WW condition compared to SD (Figure 2C). However, the foliar application of potassium sulfate (2%) improved photosynthetic rate by over 10% compared to the control (Figure 2C). The proline contents of maize were significantly affected by drought and K application. The maximum proline content was measured in the Islamabad Gold cultivar under SD conditions, while the minimum was observed in Azam under WW conditions (Figure 2D). Foliar application of K also improved proline contents, compared with water spraying (Figure 2D).
Drought levels, maize cultivars and foliar application had significant effects on RWC, chlorophyll (chl) b and total chl contents, while insignificant effects were recorded for chl a (Table 2). The interaction effect for RWC and chl b was also found to be significant. Maize plants maintained superior RWC under WW condition, while DS reduced the RWC. However, the foliar application of potassium sulfate (2%) improved RWC, especially for Islamabad Gold under WW conditions (Figure 3A). The interaction effects for varieties × drought and varieties × K were found to be significant (Table 2). Increase in chl a content was noticed in Islamabad Gold under WW, whereas it was reduced in Azam under SD (Figure 3B). Similarly, the foliar application of 2% potassium sulfate increased chl a in Islamabad Gold, while a decrease in chl a was observed in Azam grown with water spraying (Figure 3B). Likewise, the foliar application of 2% potassium sulfate increased chl b in Islamabad Gold (0.19 mg g−1) under WW conditions, while less chl b (0.01 mg g−1) was observed in Azam when it was grown under SD conditions, and only water was sprayed (Figure 3C). Moreover, total chl contents of maize were significantly affected by varieties, drought and K application, while their interaction effect was found to be insignificant. Higher total chl contents were produced in Islamabad Gold, compared with Azam. Similarly, the highest total chl contents were observed under WW conditions, whereas drought stress reduced total chl contents. Nevertheless, the foliar application of potassium sulfate improved total chl contents, and the highest total chl contents were observed under 2% foliar spray, compared with the control (Figure 3D).

4. Discussion

This study was conducted to optimize the dose of foliage-applied potassium sulfate for maize cultivars under varying levels of DS. The results revealed that all morphological and photosynthetic traits, as well as chl a, chl b and total chl contents, were decreased by drought, while proline contents were increased (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Nonetheless, the foliar application of potassium sulfate increased all these traits under DS (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3), because K+ is one of the essential macronutrients that triggers plant growth and development, even under unfavorable environmental conditions. Moreover, K is an integral part of various plant physiochemical and biological cellular mechanisms associated with osmotic adjustments, photosynthetic efficiency, the movement of photosynthates and the activation of enzymes in plant biomes [40]. A deficiency in K under water stress disturbs enzyme activity and the transportation of metabolites and decreases the production and assimilation of photosynthates [41].
Both drought levels significantly reduced the RL, RDW, SL and SDW compared to WW conditions in the current investigation, but foliar-applied K ameliorated the adverse effects of drought (Figure 1). Furthermore, better root and shoot characteristics were recorded in the drought-tolerant maize genotype, which might be due to the deep root system that assists maize plants in maintaining cellular hydration by increasing water uptake, leading to better growth and higher productivity [42,43]. Reduced RL, RDW, SL and SDW under drought stress were also reported in previous studies [44,45]. The foliar application of K improved the root and shoot characteristics in our study, which might be due to an increased root surface area that improved nutrient and water uptake by roots, and thus root growth was enhanced [46]. The exogenous application of K not only improved root dry matter but also improved shoot dry matter under drought conditions, which might be attributed to enhanced cell membrane permeability under DS, indicating its effectiveness as a drought mitigation agent [47,48].
In addition to morphological traits, photosynthetic characters Tr, Gs, and Pn were also significantly affected by the imposition of DS and the foliar application of K as potassium sulfate in the current investigation (Figure 2). Reduced photosynthetic characteristics were observed with lower doses of foliage-applied K, and the same was observed in previous studies, wherein K deficiency reduced chlorophyll concentrations in plant leaves [49]. Furthermore, K deficiency prohibited plant growth, while its balanced application improved photosynthetic rate, root and shoot ratio under moisture stress conditions [50]. This was attributed to the improved transpiration activity of plants caused by exogenously applied K, which maximized water loss through transpiration, enhanced nutrient assimilation in the roots and improved the efficiency of damaged tissues, leading to a reduction in osmotic stress under moisture deficit conditions. Additionally, the foliar K also enhanced RWC through the higher rate of transpiration activity [51,52,53,54].
Regularity in stomatal conductance has also been considered an important mechanism for energy generation during the photosynthesis process and for plant cooling, along with the transportation of moisture and mineral nutrients. In the present study, stomatal conductance was significantly improved by the exogenous application of K, probably owing to the modulation of stomatal opening and closing by K, thereby better regulating the gaseous movement between plants and the environment, leading to improved stomatal conductance. In addition, K application also regulated evapotranspiration via pores under moisture-stressed environments and helped the plants survive under moisture deficit conditions [55]. Previous studies report that K plays an integral part in carbohydrate synthesis and the transportation of metabolites, which enables plants to survive moderate spells of drought stress. The increase in photosynthetic efficiency under drought circumstances with K treatment is due to the improvement in leaf number and leaf size [40,56]. The improvement in leaf number and size latterly accelerates the photosynthesis rate per leaf area unit, which profoundly contributes to an overall improvement in the number of photosynthates available for plant growth [40]. Moreover, K regulates photosynthetic efficiency by increasing sunlight interception [57]. In our study, increased proline contents under SD in drought-tolerant cultivars ameliorated drought effects through improved osmoregulation [58,59]. It was also inferred that proline act as a signaling molecule to influence cell proliferation or cell death, and it triggered specific gene expression for plant recovery from stress [60].
Drought levels, maize cultivars and foliar application had a significant effect on relative water contents; however, drought-tolerant cultivars exhibited higher RWC, as they preserved more water under drought by virtue of osmotic adjustment and stomatal regulation [59]. Moreover, foliar application of K improved RWC (Figure 3), which might be due to the role of K in stomatal regulation and osmotic adjustment [25]. Chlorophyll a, b and total contents were reduced under moisture stress conditions due to the destruction of chlorophyll and reduced photosynthetic activity [61]. The inhibition of chlorophyll content in most stressed plants was probably due to the disorganization of thylakoid membranes and degradation of chlorophyll through the formation of proteolytic enzymes such as chlorophyllase [62]. Moreover, chlorophyll tends to decline under stress due to the biosynthesis of O2− and H2O2, which causes lipid peroxidation and ultimately chlorophyll degradation [61]. However, the foliar application of K in higher concentrations enhanced the chlorophyll contents, and similar results have also been reported by [63].

5. Conclusions

It is inferred that foliar potassium sulfate ameliorated the adverse effects of various levels of drought stress in maize genotypes. Foliage-applied potassium sulfate in a 2% concentration boosted root and shoot lengths (25% and 16%, respectively), along with the root dry weight. Moreover, a foliar spray of 2% K2SO4 improved proline and chlorophyll contents, which in turn enhanced photosynthetic activity and maintained higher relative water content under severe drought conditions. Moreover, we concluded that maize genotypes differ in their potential to cope with drought stress, and the screening of drought-tolerant cultivars of maize combined with foliage-applied potassium sulfate holds significant potential in increasing maize production under changing climates. However, there is a dire need to perform screening studies to identify more genetically superior cultivars of maize, along with testing other concentrations and sources of potassium to alleviate drought effects under changing climate scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W., M.A. (Muhammad Affan) and T.A.Y.; methodology, A.W., M.A. (Muhammad Affan), T.A.Y. and A.-u.-R.; software, K.M.; validation, M.A. (Muhammad Affan) and F.N.; formal analysis, A.W. and M.A. (Muhammad Affan); investigation, A.W., M.A. (Muhammad Affan) and T.A.Y.; data curation, A.G., A.E.S., K.M., H.u.R. and A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W., M.A. (Muhammad Affan), T.A.Y., A.-u.-R., M.A. (Muqarrab Ali) and F.N.; writing—review and editing, A.G., M.H.u.R., M.S.I., M.A.I. and A.E.S.; funding acquisition, M.E.-S. and A.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/139), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, for providing funds for completion of this research project. The authors also extend their appreciation to Taif University for funding current work by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/139), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ghosh, D.; Brahmachari, K.; Skalicky, M.; Hossain, A.; Sarkar, S.; Dinda, N.K.; Das, A.; Pramanick, B.; Moulick, D.; Brestic, M.; et al. Nutrients Supplementation through Organic Manures Influence the Growth of Weeds and Maize Productivity. Molecules 2020, 25, 4924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maqsood, Q.; Rana, N.A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Serap, K.A.; Asif, I.; Ayman, S. Overviewing of Weed Management Practices to Reduce Weed Seed Bank and to Increase Maize Yield. Planta Daninha 2020, 38, e020199716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khaliq, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Zafar, M.; Anis, G. Appraising Economic Dimension of Maize Production under Coherent Fertilization in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Cust. Agroneg. 2019, 15, 243–253. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sariyev, A.; Barutcular, C.; Acar, M.; Hossain, A.; EL-Sabagh, A. Sub-surface Drip Irrigation in Associated with H2O2 Improved the Productivity of Maize under Clay-rich Soil of Adana, Turkey. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 89, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Jonge, K.C.; Taghvaeian, S.; Trout, T.J.; Comas, L.H. Comparison of Canopy Temperature-based Water Stress Indices for Maize. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 156, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zalud, Z.; Hlavinka, P.; Prokes, K.; Semeradova, D.; Jan, B.; Trnka, M. Impacts of Water Availability and Drought on Maize Yield–A Comparison of 16 Indicators. Agric. Water. Manag. 2017, 188, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. ELSabagh, A.; Hossain, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Barutçular, C.; Islam, M.S.; Çiğ, F.; Erman, M.; Sytar, O.; Brestic, M.; Wasaya, A.; et al. Maize Adaptability to Heat Stress under Changing Climate. In Plant Stress Physiology; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Iqbal, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Amir, I.; Zubair, A.; Muhammad, M.; Zahoor, A.; Muhammad, U.F.; Ghulam, A.; Faisal, M. Boosting Forage Yield and Quality of Maize (Zea mays L.) with Multi-species Bacterial Inoculation in Pakistan. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 86, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Daryanto, S.; Wang, L.; Jacinthe, P.A. Global Synthesis of Drought Effects on Maize and Wheat Production. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Molla, S.H.; Nakasathien, S.; Ali, A.; Khan, A.; Alam, R.; Hossain, A.; Farooq, M.; El Sabagh, A. Influence of Nitrogen Application on Dry Biomass Allocation and Translocation in Two Maize Varieties under Short Pre-anthesis and Prolonged Bracketing Flowering Periods of Drought. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 928–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wasaya, A.; Zhang, X.; Fang, Q.; Zongzheng, Y. Root Phenotyping for Drought Tolerance: A Review. Agronomy 2018, 8, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Maqsood, M.; Shehzad, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; Mushtaq, S. Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Associated with Agronomical Traits under Water Stress Conditions. Asian J. Pharm. Biol. Res. 2012, 2, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  13. Selvakumar, G.; Panneerselvam, P.; Ganeshamurthy, A.N. Bacterial Mediated Alleviation of Abiotic Stress in Crops. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management; Maheshwari, D.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 205–224. [Google Scholar]
  14. Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Loreto, F.; Cornic, G.; Sharkey, T.D. Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C3 Plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Samarah, N.H.; Alqudah, A.M.; Amayreh, J.A.; McAndrews, G.M. The Effect of Late-terminal Drought Stress on Yield Components of Four Barley Cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2009, 195, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Majid, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; EL Sabagh, A.; Hasan, M.K.; Barutcular, C.; Ratnasekera, D.; Islam, M.S. Evaluation of Growth and Yield Traits in Corn under Irrigation Regimes in Sub-tropical Climate. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ge, T.; Sui, F.; Bai, L.; Tong, C.; Sun, N. Effects of Water Stress on Growth, Biomass Partitioning, and Water-use Efficiency in Summer Maize (Zea mays L.) throughout the Growth Cycle. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wasaya, A.; Abbas, T.; Yasir, T.A.; Sarwar, N.; Aziz, A.; Javaid, M.M.; Akram, S. Mitigating Drought Stress in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Through Exogenous Application of β-Aminobutyric Acid. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sehgal, A.; Sita, K.; Siddique, K.H.; Kumar, R.; Bhogireddy, S.; Varshney, R.K.; HanumanthaRao, B.; Nair, R.M.; Prasad, P.V.; Nayyar, H. Drought or/and heat-stress effects on seed filling in food crops: Impacts on functional biochemistry, seed yields, and nutritional quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fahad, S.; Ullah, A.; Ali, U.; Ali, E.; Saud, S.; Hakeem, K.; Alharby, H.; Sabagh, A.; Barutcular, C.; Kamran, M.; et al. Drought Tolerance in Plants Role of Phytohormones and Scavenging System of ROS. In Plant Tolerance to Environmental Stress Role of Phytoprotectants; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Tofazzal Islam, M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimaro, A.A.; Mpanda, M.; Rioux, J.; Aynekulu, E.; Shaba, E.; Thiongo, S.; Mutuo, M.; Abwanda, P.; Shepherd, S.K.; Neuf, H.; et al. Is Conservation Agriculture ‘Climate-smart for Maize Farmers in the Highlands of Tanzania? Nutr. Cycle. Agroecosystem 2016, 105, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Habben, J.E.; Schussler, J.R. Effects of Drought Stress on Maize Kernel Set. In Maize Kernel Development; Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International: Oxfordshire, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, R.; Ashraf, M.Y. Role of Mineral Nutrition in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Plants. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 764. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aslam, M.; Zamir, M.S.I.; Afzal, I.; Yaseen, M.; Mubeen, M.; Shoaib, A. Drought Stress, Its Effect on Maize Production and Development of Drought Tolerance through Potassium Application. Cercet. Agron. 2013, 46, 99–114. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The Critical Role of Potassium in Plant Stress Response. Int. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rahman, M.; Zahan, F.; Sikdar, M.S.; El Sabagh, A.; Barutçular, C.; Islam, M.S.; Ratnasekera, D. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance Mung Bean Genotypes and Mitigation of Salt Stress through Potassium Nitrate Fertilization. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 2017, 26, 7218–7226. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abbasi, H.; Jamil, M.; Haq, A.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, R.; Malik, Z. Salt Stress Manifestation on Plants, Mechanism of Salt Tolerance and Potassium Role in Alleviating It: A Review. Zemdirb. Agric. 2016, 103, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. DaCosta, M.; Huang, B.R. Osmotic Adjustment Associated with Variation in Bentgrass Tolerance to Drought Stress. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2006, 131, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, S.H.; Huang, J.Q.; Li, X.Q.; Zheng, B.S.; Wu, J.S.; Wang, Z.J.; Liu, G.H.; Chen, M. Effects of Potassium Supply on Limitations of Photosynthesis by Mesophyll Diffusion Conductance in Carya cathayensis. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chang, M.A.; Oosterhuis, D.M. Efficacy of Foliar Application to Cotton of Potassium Compounds at Different pH Levels. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX, USA, 4–7 January 1995. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mallarino, A.P.; Haq, M.U.; Wittry, D.; Bermudez, M. Variation in Soybean Response to Early Season Foliar Fertilization among and within Fields. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gewin, V. Food an Underground Revolution. Nature 2010, 466, 552–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Martineau, E.; Domec, J.C.; Bosc, A.; Denoroy, P.; Fandino, V.A.; Lavres, J.J.; Jordan-Meille, L. The Effects of Potassium Nutrition on Water Use in Field-grown Maize (Zea mays L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 134, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Etienne, P.; Diquelou, S.; Prudent, M.; Salon, C.; Maillard, A.; Ourry, A. Macro and Micronutrient Storage in Plants and Their Remobilization When Facing Scarcity: The Case of Drought. Agriculture 2018, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Subbarao, G.V.; Wheeler, R.M.; Stutte, G.W.; Levine, L.H. Low Potassium Enhances Sodium Uptake in Red-beet under Moderate Saline Conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2000, 23, 1449–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Long, S.P.; Bernacchi, C.J. Gas Exchange Measurements, What Can They Tell Us about the Understanding Limitations of Photosynthesis? Procedures and Sources of Error. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2393–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Arnon, D.T. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplasts Polyphenol-oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Bates, L.S.; Waldron, R.P.; Teaxe, I.W. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress Studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, J.H.; Dicky, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, 3rd ed.; McGraw Hill Book Int. Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 172–177. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pettigrew, W.T. Potassium Influences on Yield and Quality Production for Maize, Wheat, Soybean and Cotton. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 1339, 670–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, X.G.; Zhao, X.H.; Jiang, C.J.; Li, C.H.; Cong, S.; Wu, D.; Chen, Y.Q.; Yu, H.Q.; Wang, C.Y. Effects of Potassium Deficiency on Photosynthesis and Photoprotection Mechanisms in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Integ. Agric. 2015, 14, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burdon, J.J.; Rebetzke, G.; Morell, M. Targets and Traits in the Pre-breeding Development Pipeline at Csiro 2012 WA Agribusiness Crop Updates; Western Australian Agriculture Authority: Perth, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  43. Henry, A. IRRI’s Drought Stress Research in Rice with Emphasis on Roots: Accomplishments Over the Last 50 Years. Plant Root. 2013, 7, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ayalew, H.; Ma, X.; Yan, G. Screening Wheat (Triticum spp.) Genotypes for Root Length under Contrasting Water Regimes: Potential Sources of Variability for Drought Resistance Breeding. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2015, 201, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bahrami-Rad, S.; Hajiboland, R. Effect of Potassium Application in Drought-stressed Tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L.) Plants: Comparison of Root with Foliar Application. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2017, 62, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Römheld, V.; Kirkby, E.A. Research on Potassium in Agriculture: Needs and Prospects. Plant Soil 2010, 335, 155–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fazeli, F.; Ghorbanli, M.; Niknam, V. Effect of Drought on Biomass, Protein Content, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Two Sesame Cultivars. Biol. Plant. 2007, 51, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Degenkolbe, T.; Do, P.T.; Zuther, E.; Repsilber, D.; Walther, D.; Hincha, D.K.; Köhl, K.I. Expression Profiling of Rice Cultivars Differing in Their Tolerance to Long-term Drought Stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 133–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Hell, R.; Mendel, R.R. Cell Biology of Metals and Nutrients; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 209–246. [Google Scholar]
  50. Singh, P.; Blanke, M.M. Deficiency of Potassium but Not Phosphorus Enhances Root Respiration. Plant Growth Regul. 2000, 32, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sritontip, C.; Khaosumain, Y.; Changjeraja, S.; Changjeraja, R. Effects of Light Intensity and Potassium Chlorate on Photosynthesis and Flowering in ‘Do’ Longan. Acta Hortic. 2008, 787, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, Y.W.; Zou, Y.T.; Husaini, A.M.; Zeng, J.W.; Guan, L.L.; Liu, Q.; Wu, W. Optimization of Potassium for Proper Growth and Physiological Response of Houttuynia Cordata Thunb. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kanai, S.; Moghaieb, R.E.; El-Shemy, H.A.; Panigrahi, R.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Ito, J.; Nguyen, N.T.; Saneoka, H.; Fujita, K. Potassium Deficiency Affects Water Status and Photosynthetic Rate of the Vegetative Sink in Green House Tomato Prior to Its Effects on Source Activity. Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tartar, O. Influence of Water Stress on Leaf Relative Water Content of Wheat. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2008, 7, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cochrane, T.T.; Cochrane, T.A. The Vital Role of Potassium in the Osmotic Mechanism of Stomata Aperture Modulation and Its Link with Potassium Deficiency. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lu, Z.; Lu, J.; Pan, Y.; Lu, P.; Li, X.; Cong, R.; Ren, T. Anatomical Variation of Mesophyll Conductance under Potassium Deficiency Has a Vital Role in Determining Leaf Photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 2428–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bednarz, C.W.; Oosterhuis, D.M.; Evans, R.D. Leaf Photosynthesis and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Cotton in Response to Potassium Deficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1998, 39, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chakhchar, A.; Lamaoui, M.; Wahbi, S.; Ferradous, A.; El Mousadik, A.; Ibnsouda-Koraichi, S.; Filali-Maltouf, A.; Modafar, C.E. Leaf Water Status, Osmoregulation and Secondary Metabolism as a Model for Depicting Drought Tolerance in Argania spinosa. Acta Physiol. Planta 2015, 37, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shemi, R.; Wang, R.; Gheith, E.S.M.; Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Irfan, M.; Cholidah, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L. Effects of Salicylic Acid, Zinc and Glycine Betaine on Morpho-physiological Growth and Yield of Maize under Drought Stress. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Anjum, S.A.; Wang, L.C.; Farooq, M.; Khan, I.; Xue, L.L. Methyl Jasmonate-induced Alteration in Lipid Peroxidation, Antioxidative Defense System and Yield in Soybean under Drought. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2011, 197, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karimpour, M. Effect of Drought Stress on RWC and Chlorophyll Content on Wheat (Triticum durum L.) Genotypes. World Ess. J. 2019, 7, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rong-Hua, L.; Pei-Guo, G.; Baum, M.; Grando, S.; Ceccarelli, S. Evaluation of Chlorophyll Content and Fluorescence Parameters as Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Barley. Agric. Sci. China 2006, 5, 751–757. [Google Scholar]
  63. Asgharipour, M.R.; Heidari, M. Effect of Potassium Supply on Drought Resistance in Sorghum: Plant Growth and Macronutrient Content. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 2011, 48, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
Atmosphere 12 00663 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) root length (cm), (B) root dry weight (g), (C) shoot length (cm) and (D) shoot dry weight (g) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought. Different letters (a–i) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 1. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) root length (cm), (B) root dry weight (g), (C) shoot length (cm) and (D) shoot dry weight (g) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought. Different letters (a–i) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Atmosphere 12 00663 g001
Atmosphere 12 00663 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) transpiration rate (m mol−1m−2s−1), (B) stomatal conductance (mol m−2s−1), (C) photosynthesis rate (µmol CO2 m−2s−1) and (D) proline content (mg g−1) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought; NS = Non-significant. Different letters (a–n) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 2. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) transpiration rate (m mol−1m−2s−1), (B) stomatal conductance (mol m−2s−1), (C) photosynthesis rate (µmol CO2 m−2s−1) and (D) proline content (mg g−1) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought; NS = Non-significant. Different letters (a–n) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Atmosphere 12 00663 g002
Atmosphere 12 00663 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) relative water content (%), (B) chlorophyll a (mg g−1 FW), (C) chlorophyll b (mg g−1 FW) and (D) total chlorophyll content (mg g−1 FW) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought; NS = Non-significant. Different letters (a–k) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 3. Effect of foliar application of potassium sulfate on (A) relative water content (%), (B) chlorophyll a (mg g−1 FW), (C) chlorophyll b (mg g−1 FW) and (D) total chlorophyll content (mg g−1 FW) of maize genotypes grown under well-watered, mild drought and severe drought conditions. WW = Well-watered; MD = Mild drought; SD = Severe drought; NS = Non-significant. Different letters (a–k) in figures showed significant differences between the treatments.
Atmosphere 12 00663 g003
Table
Table 1. Mean squares of various morphological, photosynthetic and chlorophyll traits of maize genotypes for the influence of drought and potassium applications.
Table 1. Mean squares of various morphological, photosynthetic and chlorophyll traits of maize genotypes for the influence of drought and potassium applications.
SOVDFRLRDWSLSDWEAgs
Variety (V)1141.5 **3.9 ns44.1*589.2 **1.7 **2112.5 **0.021 **
Field Capacity (FC)291.6 **41.2 **226.4 **241.5 **10.2 **311.0 **0.007 **
Potassium (K)2234.6 **932.2 **61.6 **968.2 **34.4 **34.0 **0.001 *
V × FC2212.0 **479.4 **178.4 **196.8 **72.3 **0.007 ns0.004 **
V × K255.0 **22.2 **108.8 **228.3 **11.9 **0.010 ns0.000 ns
FC × K430.3 **29.2 **472.7 **31.8 **10.4 **0.001 ns0.001 ns
V × FC × K48.9 **246.2 **355.9 **132.9 **18.3 **0.001 ns0.000 ns
Error362.32.89.13.00.20571.850740.00024
** = Highly significant (P ≤ 0.01), * = Significant (P ≤ 0.05), ns= non-significant (P > 0.05), SOV = source of variance, DF = degree of freedom RL = root length, RDW = root dry weight, SL = shoot length, SDW = shoot dry weight, E = transpiration rate, A = photosynthesis rate and gs = stomatal conductance.
Table
Table 2. Mean squares of various morphological, photosynthetic and chlorophyll traits of maize genotypes for the influence of drought and potassium application.
Table 2. Mean squares of various morphological, photosynthetic and chlorophyll traits of maize genotypes for the influence of drought and potassium application.
SOVDFProlineRWCChl aChl bT Chl
Variety (V)10.085 **9657.7 **0.001 ns0.010 **0.120 **
Field Capacity (FC)20.015 **1224.2 **0.002 ns0.008 **0.031 **
Potassium (K)20.004 **145.7 **0.002 ns0.008 **0.002 **
V × FC20.005 **16.1 *0.005 **0.000 **0.002 **
V × K20.002 *13.7 ns0.010 **0.008 **0.000 ns
FC × K40.000 ns1.01 ns0.002 ns0.011 **0.000 ns
V × FC × K40.000 ns19.4 **0.002 ns0.010 **0.000 ns
Error360.0855.030.00071 0.000040.00031
** = Highly significant (P ≤ 0.01), * = Significant (P ≤ 0.05), ns = non-significant (P > 0.05), RWC = relative water contents, Chl a = chlorophyll a, Chl b = chlorophyll b and T Chl = total chlorophyll contents.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wasaya, A.; Affan, M.; Ahmad Yasir, T.; Atique-ur-Rehman; Mubeen, K.; Rehman, H.u.; Ali, M.; Nawaz, F.; Galal, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; et al. Foliar Potassium Sulfate Application Improved Photosynthetic Characteristics, Water Relations and Seedling Growth of Drought-Stressed Maize. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060663

AMA Style

Wasaya A, Affan M, Ahmad Yasir T, Atique-ur-Rehman, Mubeen K, Rehman Hu, Ali M, Nawaz F, Galal A, Iqbal MA, et al. Foliar Potassium Sulfate Application Improved Photosynthetic Characteristics, Water Relations and Seedling Growth of Drought-Stressed Maize. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(6):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wasaya, Allah, Muhammad Affan, Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir, Atique-ur-Rehman, Khuram Mubeen, Haseeb ur Rehman, Muqarrab Ali, Farukh Nawaz, Ahmed Galal, Muhammad Aamir Iqbal, and et al. 2021. "Foliar Potassium Sulfate Application Improved Photosynthetic Characteristics, Water Relations and Seedling Growth of Drought-Stressed Maize" Atmosphere 12, no. 6: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060663

APA Style

Wasaya, A., Affan, M., Ahmad Yasir, T., Atique-ur-Rehman, Mubeen, K., Rehman, H. u., Ali, M., Nawaz, F., Galal, A., Iqbal, M. A., Islam, M. S., El-Sharnouby, M., Rahman, M. H. u., & EL Sabagh, A. (2021). Foliar Potassium Sulfate Application Improved Photosynthetic Characteristics, Water Relations and Seedling Growth of Drought-Stressed Maize. Atmosphere, 12(6), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop