Next Article in Journal
Comparison of COSMIC and COSMIC-2 Radio Occultation Refractivity and Bending Angle Uncertainties in August 2006 and 2021
Next Article in Special Issue
Electric Field-Driven Air Purification Filter for High Efficiency Removal of PM2.5 and SO2: Local Electric Field Induction and External Electric Field Enhancement
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Rated Health, Life Balance and Feeling of Empowerment When Facing Impacts of Permafrost Thaw—A Case Study from Northern Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Pore Distribution of Coal Char in the Char Fragmentation and Included Minerals Partitioning: A Percolation Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transformation and Migrant Mechanism of Sulfur and Nitrogen during Chemical Looping Combustion with CuFe2O4

State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(5), 786; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050786
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 5 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emissions, Control, and Utilization Technology of Particulate Matters)

Abstract

:
Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a key technology for capturing CO2. Different types of oxygen carrier (OC) particles are used in coal CLC. The migration and transformation behaviors of sulfur and nitrogen are basically the same when CaFe2O4 and Fe2O3/Al2O3 are used as OC. CLC can be divided into two reaction stages: coal pyrolysis and char gasification; SO2 and NO show bimodal release characteristics, both of which show a basic trend of rising first and then falling down. The contents of H2S and NO2 increased rapidly at the beginning of the reaction and then decreased slowly at the stage of char gasification. H2S is released rapidly during coal pyrolysis and discharged from the reactor with flue gas, and then part of H2S is converted to SO2 during the char gasification stage by OC particles. NO can be oxidized by OC particles and form NO2. The increase in the reaction temperature and oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O/C) contributes to the release of sulfur and nitrogen and higher reaction temperature and O/C can inhibit the formation of metal sulfide. O2 released by CuFe2O4 significantly increases the contents of SO2, H2S, NO and NO2 in flue gas. This work is helpful for improving control strategies for pollutants.

1. Introduction

Fossil fuel combustion inevitably leads to CO2 emissions, which are the main factor of land desertification and the greenhouse [1,2]. Reducing CO2 emissions is the most effective way to solve global warming. CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage) technology is the key technology to reduce CO2 emissions and improve CO2 utilization, and has attracted wide attention [3]. Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is considered to be one of the best carbon capture method in the world [4,5,6]. CLC uses lattice oxygen/molecular oxygen provided by oxygen carrier (OC) particles to oxidize fuel instead of air, which can avoid the generation of thermodynamic nitrogen oxides [7]. CLC can realize the self-heating operation [8]. The OC can release lattice oxygen/O2 in a fuel reactor (FR) and then it can be transferred to an air reactor (AR) for oxidative regeneration. Additionally, a large amount of heat can be released when reduced OC reacts with air. [9]. When steam is used as a gasification agent in CLC high concentration of CO2 can be obtained by condensing steam at the outlet of the FR. Therefore, CLC also has the advantage of internal separation of CO2. OC particles are an important link connecting the two reactors, it has the functions of loading heat and oxygen which plays an important role in the process of CLC [10]. At present, most OC particles are transition metal oxides. Among them, iron-based OC are widely used because of their low price, non-toxicity and stable cycle performance [11]. However, iron-based OC also exhibit a poor oxygen transformation performance. Copper-based OC are widely used in industry due to their better oxygen release characteristics [12]. However, it is easy to agglomerate at high temperatures, resulting in poor cycling stability. In order to solve the disadvantage of single metal OC, the development and utilization of bimetallic OC has attracted the attention of scholars [13]. Copper ferrite has the dual advantages of CuO and Fe2O3, which can release both lattice oxygen and molecular oxygen [4]. The existence of an iron phase in OC particles can significantly improve the stability [14]. Therefore, CuFe2O4 has wide application prospects in the process of CLC.
Compared with traditional combustion, coal CLC has many advantages, for example, realizing energy cascade utilization. However, in the complex structure and composition of coal, a large number of pollution elements such as sulfur and nitrogen and also trace elements such as Hg, As and Se can be found [15]. The release of pollutants cannot be avoided in the process of coal CLC [16,17]. The release of sulfur and nitrogen not only has a strong corrosive effect on equipment and pipelines, but also affects the storage and utilization of CO2. During CLC, the structure and oxygen release mode of OC can affect the migration and transformation behavior of sulfur and nitrogen in coal. Reaction conditions such as the reaction temperature and O/C (oxygen-to-carbon ratio) also have a significant impact on the fate of sulfur and nitrogen. Jinchen Ma et al. [18] found that Fe2O3/Al2O3 OC prepared by the sol–gel process had strong resistance to sulfur during in situ coal CLC and sulfur-containing substances were not detected on the surface of OC particles after reaction, and a low O/C could promote the formation of H2S. Because of its good reactivity, copper-based OC can promote the release of sulfur-containing substances and promote the conversion of H2S to SO2. The migration and transformation behavior of nitrogen is related to the oxygen-releasing mode of OC. OC such as Fe2O3 and NiO are used in coal CLC. Only N2 can be detected at the outlet of the FR without NOx (NO, NO2, and N2O) formation because of the release of lattice oxygen, and NO can be detected only in the AR [19]. When a copper-based OC is used, the molecular oxygen released by the OC particles can promote the formation of NO, which makes the CLC tend towards traditional combustion [20]. Similar to the release mechanism of sulfur, the increase in O/C and reaction temperature can promote the conversion of fuel nitrogen to N2 and NO [21]. Therefore, in the process of coal CLC, it is of great significance to explore the effects of OC particles with different oxygen release mode and reaction conditions on the migration and transformation of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants.
In this study, coal CLC experiments were carried out on a batch fluidized bed with Ningxia bituminous coal (NX coal) as fuel. Different OC particles (Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuFe2O4) were prepared by the mechanical mixing method to explore the fate of sulfur and nitrogen during CLC. By changing the reaction temperature and O/C, we explored the effect of reaction conditions on the migration and transformation mechanism of sulfur and nitrogen. Finally, ten cycles of experiments carried on the batch fluid bed and the cyclic stability of the two kinds of OC particles is discussed. We also confirm the reaction mechanism of OC particles on sulfur and nitrogen during the cyclic experiment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Coal Sample and Oxygen Carrier Particles

In our experiment, bituminous coal from Ningxia, China, was used as fuel. The contents of sulfur and nitrogen in coal were 0.4006% and 1.46%, respectively. The results of the proximate analysis and ultimate analysis we carried out are shown in Table 1 and the coal samples were screened to 106–150 μm.
Two kinds of OC particles with different configurations were prepared by the mechanical mixing method. Firstly, 160 g Fe2O3 and 80 g CuO were weighed according to n(Fe2O3):n(CuO) = 1:1, respectively. Additionally, 500 mL of deionized water was added to the colloid mill for mechanical mixing for 20 min. The mixed solution was vacuum filtered. The filter cake was oven dried at 150 °C for 24 h. Then, it was transferred to a muffle furnace at 900 °C and calcined for 6 h. Finally, CuFe2O4 particles were obtained and crushed to 150–270 μm. The preparation method of Fe2O3/Al2O3 is the same as that of CuFe2O4. It is necessary to note that the mass ratio of Fe2O3 and Al2O3 is 7:3 and the particle size of Fe2O3/Al2O3 is the same as CuFe2O4 particles.
An automatic physical chemistry adsorption instrument (Quantachrome, Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) was used to measure BET surface area of OC. Nitrogen was used as the adsorbate and helium was used as the carrier gas. The two gases were mixed in a certain proportion to reach the specified relative pressure, and then flowed over the OC. When the sample tube was heated in liquid nitrogen, the OC physically adsorbed nitrogen in the mixed gas, while the carrier gas was not adsorbed. Then, the BET specific surface area of the OC could be measured. X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE A25, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to determine the crystal phase of the OC particles.

2.2. Experimental Procedure

All experiments were conducted in a batch fluidized bed and the experimental device is shown in Figure 1. The specific description of the batch fluidized bed reactor (Figure S1) is consistent with previous work [22]. Additionally, the internal diameter of the fluidized bed is 60 mm and it is 1000 mm high. The mass of the NX coal was 0.5 g in all experiments. When O/C = 1, 3, 5 the mass of iron-based OC are 20 g, 40 g, and 100 g, respectively. The masses of CuFe2O4 are 12 g, 35.87 g, and 59.81 g, respectively.
The experiment used Ar as the fluidizing gas; the volume flow rate was 1300 mL/min, the steam mass flow rate was 1.2 g/min, and the volume ratio of argon and steam was 1:1. The minimum fluidization velocity (Umf) of the fluidized bed was 0.86 m/s, and the apparent gas velocity (U0) was 1.2 times Umf. The contents of CH4, CO, CO2, SO2, NO, and NO2 were measured online by a flue gas analyzer (DX4000, Gasmet, Finland, and the detection limit of selenium is 0.01 ppm), and the content of H2S in flue gas was measured online by an H2S flue gas analyzer (MRU VARIO PLUS, Germany) (Figure S2); the detection limit of selenium is 0.01 ppm. The reactor was heated to the reaction temperature and reaction temperature was controlled by three thermocouples in the temperature control system. Then, the feed was added to the feeder, allowing the samples to be transferred to the reactor by Ar. Then, valve4 was closed and valve3 was opened. The experimental batch fluidized bed is an isothermal reactor. The reaction then began. In order to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, the zero point of the flue gas analyzer was calibrated before the experiment and three groups of parallel experiments were carried out to ensure the reliability of the results.
The distribution of sulfur and nitrogen species of NX coal in flue gas was simulated by HSC Chemistry 6.0 when CuFe2O4 and Fe2O3/Al2O3 were used as the OC. The simulation temperature was 650–1000 °C and the O/C is from 1 to 10. The reaction equilibrium components were used and C, H, O, N, and S were converted into molar quantities according to the ultimate analysis of NX coal for calculation, as shown in Table 1.

2.3. Date Analysis

The volume flow rate of the outlet gas (Fout, L/min) is calculated by the mass balance of N2 flow introduced:
F o u t = F in 1 X i
i = (CO,CH4,CO2,H2S,SO2,NO,NO2)
where Fin is the inlet volume flow rate of Ar, L/min, and Xi are the instantaneous volume fractions of CO, CH4, CO2, H2S, SO2, NO and NO2 in the outlet gas flow on a dry basis, vol%.
The gas content (Xi, %) is calculated using the following:
X i = 0 t F o u t · y i dt 0 t F o u t · ( y CO + y CH 4 + y CO 2 + y CO 2 + y H 2 S + y SO 2 + y NO 2 + y NO ) dt
The molar number of coal is calculated as follows, where mcoal denotes the mass of coal, C means the content of carbon of NX coal, and M means the relative atomic mass of carbon
n c , coal = m coal × C M
The calculation method of carbon conversion during CLG is as follows:
X C = 0 t n out ( X CO + X CO 2 + X CH 4 + X CO 2 + X H 2 S + X SO 2 + X NO 2 + X NO ) dt n c , coal
The yield of per unit time of CO2 is as follows:
d X C O 2 = X C O 2 ( t ) t

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermodynamic Simulation of Fate of Sulfur and Nitrogen during CLC

The thermodynamic simulation software HSC Chemistry 6.0 was used to simulate the distribution of sulfur and nitrogen during coal CLC with NX coal. As shown in Figure 2a,b, the distribution of sulfur-containing substances in the process of coal CLC with two type of OC was simulated at 850 °C. SO2 was the main gaseous sulfur-containing substance and the content of SO2 increased with the increase in O/C. Due to the increase in O/C, OC particles can provide more lattice oxygen [6]. H2S was oxidized by OC particles, which resulted in the content of SO2 increasing. It can be found that the content of H2S gradually decreased with the increase om O/C and when O/C was fixed to 5 the content of H2S was 0, as shown in Figure 2a. For CuFe2O4, the content of Cu2S and H2S decreased with the increase in O/C. Therefore, when O/C increases, the content of SO2 also increases. This is because an increase in O/C can promote the oxidation of H2S to SO2, as shown in Figure 2b. Therefore, CuFe2O4 can effectively inhibit the formation of metal sulfide when O/C exceeds 5. A higher O/C can inhibit CuFe2O4 deactivation due to sulfur poisoning. In the process of coal CLC, minerals in coal can interact with sulfur to fix it and form alkali metal sulfate [23]. With the increase in O/C, the fixation effect of minerals in coal on sulfur is gradually enhanced. As mentioned above, when O/C is fixed to 5, OC particles have strong interactions with sulfur in coal. Therefore, when O/C is fixed to 5, the variation of sulfur-containing substances during CLC at different reaction temperatures is simulated, as shown in Figure 3a,b. The content of SO2 increased with the increase in temperature. With the increase in temperature, coal particles can react more completely, resulting in increased SO2(g) release. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the formation of metal sulfides was inhibited with the increase in reaction temperature (the contents of Fe0.877S, FeS and Cu2S gradually decreased).
According to the thermodynamic simulation results, the migration and transformation behavior of fuel nitrogen during CLC is related to the oxygen release mode of OC particles. N2 was the main form in the FR and its content decreased with the increase in O/C for iron-based OC and CuFe2O4, as shown in Figure 3. With the increase in O/C, the trend of OC particles converting fuel nitrogen into NOx gradually intensifies. Therefore, the NOx content gradually increased with the increase in O/C. Compared with iron-based OC, this can produce more N2 and NOx. This is because CuFe2O4 can release molecular oxygen and promote the transformation of fuel nitrogen to N2 and NOx [24,25]. We also observed similar phenomena in the fluidized bed experiment, which will be discussed in detail in the next section. When O/C was fixed to 5, with the increase in the reaction temperature, the content of N2 and NOx increased gradually, while HCN and NH3 increased first and then decreased, as shown in Figure 4. This is because the increase in the reaction temperature can promote the pyrolysis and gasification of coal, so that the fuel is completely reacted. Therefore, when the temperature increased from 500 °C to 800 °C, the HCN and NH3 contents increased with the increase in temperature, as shown in Figure 5. However, when the reaction temperature was higher than 800 °C, the content of HCN and NH3 began to decrease, while the content of N2 and NOx increased. This is because OC particles can promote HCN and NH3 to be oxidized N2 or NOx with an increasing reaction temperature [11].

3.2. Effect of Reaction Temperature and O/C on the Migration and Transformation Mechanism of Sulfur and Nitrogen during CLC

When iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 were used, the migration and transformation behaviors of sulfur in NX coal were basically the same and most of them were released in the form of SO2 and H2S. The oxygen release mode and structure of two types of OC particles were different. However, the releases of SO2 and H2S were basically the same, as shown in Figure 6. At different reaction temperatures with O/C = 5, SO2 shows a bimodal release, which is because the CLC can be divided into two stages: the rapid pyrolysis of coal and gasification of coal char. In the process of the rapid pyrolysis of coal, the volatile matter of coal was removed, and the unstable thermodynamically bound sulfur (FeS2) in coal would rapidly release and form H2S and COS. Sulfur precursors (H2S and COS) were rapidly oxidized by OC particles, resulting in the content of SO2 increasing. SO2 content decreased gradually at the end of the coal pyrolysis stage. Therefore, SO2 content increased first and then decreased in the rapid pyrolysis stage of coal. However, the variation trend of SO2 with time in the gasification stage of coal char was the same as that in the rapid pyrolysis stage of coal, and it still showed the basic trend of rising and then falling, but the overall release was less than that in the rapid pyrolysis stage of coal. This is because most of the sulfur in coal was released in a large amount during the process of coal devolatilization in the thermodynamically unstable combination state and only a small part of sulfur was released in the gasification stage [25,26]. In Figure 6a–e, it can be seen that the content of SO2 and H2S increased with the increase in reaction temperature when Fe2O3 and CuFe2O4 were used as OC, which is consistent with the thermodynamic simulation results. This indicates that temperature can promote the decomposition of coal particles, and more coal was involved in the reaction to promote the release of SO2 and H2S. As shown in Figure 6a–e, CuFe2O4 can effectively promote the release of SO2 and H2S. This is because CuFe2O4 can release molecular oxygen, which promotes the decomposition of sulfur-containing components in coal to a certain extent. Unlike lattice oxygen, molecular oxygen can undergo gas–solid (coal/char particles) reactions and gas–gas reactions to promote the complete reaction of coal. The formation of Cu2S was related to the reaction temperature. When the reaction temperature increased, the content of Cu2S decreased and the content of SO2 increased. As shown in Figure 4, this may be due to the decomposition of Cu2S at high temperature. In Figure 4b, it can be seen that the Cu2S phase can be observed when the reaction temperature increased from 650 °C to 850 °C.
The NOx precursors HCN and NH3 were not detected in the reaction process. Because OC particles had a strong oxidation effect, the nitrogen-containing precursor could be oxidized to N2 and NOx [15,16,26,27]. Therefore, the trend of HCN and NH3 could be speculated by the trend of NOx. NO showed a basic trend of bimodal release during the reaction, and its release amount increased with the increase in the reaction temperature, as shown in Figure 7. The reason for this phenomenon is similar to the formation mechanism of SO2. It is worth noting that CuFe2O4 can release both molecular oxygen and lattice oxygen. Therefore, compared with iron-based, OC CuFe2O4 has stronger oxidation effects on HCN and NH3, which can be converted into higher-valence NO and NO2 rather than released in the form of N2. With the increase in reaction temperature, the content of NO2 basically stayed the same, which may be due to the thermodynamic limitation of the conversion process of HCN and NH3 to NO2, resulting in no obvious change in NO2 with temperature. According to the thermodynamic simulation results, similar phenomena were also found and the change trend of NO with temperature was more obvious than that of NO2.
When the temperature was set to 850 °C, as shown in Figure 8, with the increase in O/C, the content of SO2 and H2S increased. An increase in O/C can promote the CLC reaction, which made the contact between OC particles and coal particles more intense, and helped to release gaseous sulfur. A high O/C also means that OC can release more O2/lattice oxygen [21,28], which can effectively promote the gasification reaction of coal char and promote the decomposition of coal char particles to release H2S and generate SO2. However, with the increase in O/C, the content of NO and NO2 has no obvious change, and OC particles have little effect on the migration and transformation characteristics of fuel nitrogen, which was mainly caused that solid–solid reaction was difficult to carry on between coal and oxygen carrier particles [11,19,27]. It can be seen in Figure 9 that NO and NO2 released a lot in the pyrolysis stage of coal. Although NO and NO2 are also produced in the gasification stage, their contents were relatively small. Most aromatic nitrogen-containing compounds in coal were released in large quantities in the pyrolysis stage due to their thermodynamic instability, resulting in insufficient contact between OC particles and nitrogen-containing products being taken out of the reactor [11,17]. Therefore, NO and NO2 cannot change significantly with the increase in O/C.
First of all, the increase in the reaction temperature can promote the release of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants in coal by promoting the decomposition of coal particles. Secondly, different oxygen release modes of OC particles have different effects on the migration and transformation behavior of sulfur and nitrogen in coal. The release of molecular oxygen from CuFe2O4 can promote the conversion of fuel nitrogen to higher-valence NOx. At the same time, due to the presence of the copper phase in OC, it can easily interact with H2S, and the formation of Cu2S leads to sulfur poisoning, as shown in Figure 10b. However, with the increase in O/C and temperature, the sulfur poisoning phenomenon of CuFe2O4 is gradually weakened, and the contents of SO2 and H2S in flue gas are significantly increased.

3.3. Transformation and Migrant Behavior of Sulfur and Nitrogen in Cyclic Experiment

In this section, the effects of O/C and reaction temperature on the migration and transformation mechanism of sulfur and nitrogen were discussed during CLC. When the reaction temperature was 850 °C and O/C = 5, the promotion effect of iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 on sulfur and nitrogen was obvious. On this basis, 10 cycles were carried out. With the increase in cycles, the contents of H2S, SO2 and NOx in flue gas gradually increased, as shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12. According to Table 2, it can be found that the BET specific surface area of the two types of OC increased gradually with the increase in the number of cycles. The increase in the specific surface area of the OC can promote the transformation of oxygen between the fuel and the OC, resulting in the increase in the concentration of the product layer on the surface of the OC, and the reaction on the surface of the OC was intensified. To a certain extent, it promoted the decomposition of coal particles and the release of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants in the fuel. On the other hand, as the number of cycles increases, the OC particles may be inactivated, resulting in a decrease in the fixation of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants in flue gas by OC. The XRD patterns of iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 after 10 cycles are shown in Figure 13 [26]. With the increase in cycles, the OC particles does not show the phase separation phenomenon and can still maintain a relatively complete crystal phase. However, the increase in cycle times leads to a decrease in the peak intensity of the XRD pattern of CuFe2O4 [13], which means that the content of effective components in OC decreases. Therefore, the interaction between CuFe2O4 and sulfur gradually decreases with the increase in cycle number, and the content of SO2 and H2S in flue gas is significantly higher than that of iron-based OC.

3.4. Reaction Characteristics of CLC

A higher reaction temperature and higher O/C can promote the release of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants during CLC [18,27,28]. The reaction characteristics of NX coal during CLC were investigated in a fluidized bed reactor at 850 °C and O/C = 5, and the results are shown in Figure 14. During the reaction, the outlet concentrations of CH4, CO and CO2 gradually increased with the increase in reaction time, and the outlet concentrations of CO2 were 90.55% and 98.75% when iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 were used. Therefore, because of its good oxygen release ability and good reactivity, CuFe2O4 can obtain a higher concentration of CO2 in the same reaction time compared with iron-based OC, which was more suitable for CO2 capture during CLC. CuFe2O4 still showed excellent reaction characteristics in the same reaction time, the conversion ability of carbon-based material was stronger, and the yield of per unit time of CO2 (dxCO2) was higher, as shown in Figure 14d.

4. Conclusions

In the process of CLC, the migration and transformation mechanism of sulfur and nitrogen elements with NX coal and two kinds of OC were systematically explored in fluidized bed reactor, and the mechanism of different OC on sulfur and nitrogen was simulated by thermodynamic simulation software, HSC Chemistry 6.0. On this basis, the effects of O/C, reaction temperature and cycle number on the migration and transformation behaviors of sulfur and nitrogen were expounded.
  • Different OC have different effects on CO, CH4 and CO2 at the same O/C and reaction temperature. CuFe2O4 contains both iron and copper phases, and so has the dual advantages of Fe2O3 and CuO. It can simultaneously release molecular oxygen and lattice oxygen, and has good oxygen release characteristics and reaction characteristics. Compared with iron-based OC, it is easier to obtain a high concentration of CO, which is more suitable for CLC.
  • H2S increased first and then decreased in the reaction process, and a lot was released in the coal pyrolysis stage, while SO2 showed a bimodal release trend. Compared with solid–solid reactions, CuFe2O4 can release molecular oxygen. A gas–solid reaction is more likely to occur. Therefore, CuFe2O4 can promote the release of H2S and SO2, and its promotion effect on H2S and SO2 is still obvious with the increase in O/C and reaction temperature. Based on the thermodynamic simulation and experimental results, when the reaction temperature is higher than 800 °C, CuFe2O4 can resist sulfur poisoning. Therefore, an appropriate reaction temperature can not only inhibit OC particles sulfur poisoning, but also promote combustion characteristics.
  • Considering nitrogen in coal, the content of NOx in flue gas increased significantly when OC released molecular oxygen, and the content of NO and NO2 increased with the increase in reaction temperature. The effect of O/C on NOx in flue gas was not obvious, and with the increase in O/C the content of NOx did not change obviously. Therefore, the oxygen release mode of OC only affects the conversion of the fuel nitrogen valence state. The oxygen decoupling oxygen carrier can convert fuel nitrogen into NO and NO2, so that CLC is similar to the traditional combustion process. Iron-based OC can convert fuel nitrogen into N2 instead of releasing fuel nitrogen in the form of NOx. Therefore, Fe2O3/Al2O3 can release lattice oxygen and is more suitable for CLC with a high content nitrogen of coal, which can convert fuel nitrogen into N2 release and reduce NOx release.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/atmos13050786/s1, Figure S1: The fluidized bed reactor used in experiment; Figure S2: (a) Gasmet gas analyzer (b) VARIO Plus MRU gas analyzer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M. and Q.G.; data curation, J.M., H.L. and Q.G.; investigation, C.H. and Z.H.; methodology, C.H. and Z.H.; resources, H.L.; writing—original draft, J.M. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support for the following projects: the Key Research and Development Program Project of Ningxia (2018BEE03009) and the National First-rate Discipline Construction Project of Ningxia (NXYLXK2017A04).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Saqline, S.; Chua, Z.Y.; Liu, W. Coupling chemical looping combustion of solid fuels with advanced steam cycles for CO2 capture: A process modelling study. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 244, 114455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abuelgasim, S.; Wang, W.; Abdalazeez, A. A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO2 capture technology: Fundamentals and progress. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 142892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhao, H.; Tian, X.; Ma, J.; Chen, X.; Su, M.; Zheng, C.; Wang, Y. Chemical looping combustion of coal in China: Comprehensive progress, Remaining Challenges, and Potential Opportunities. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 6696–6734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adánez-Rubio, I.; Abad, A.; Gayán, P.; García-Labiano, F.; Luis, F.; Adánez, J. The fate of sulphur in the Cu-based Chemical Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU) Process. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1855–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Linderholm, C.; Schmitz, M. Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels in a 100 kW dual circulating fluidized bed system using iron ore as oxygen carrier. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adánez, J.; Abad, A.; Mendiara, T.; Gayán, P.; De Diego, L.F.; García-Labiano, F. Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018, 65, 6–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, H.; Tian, X.; Ma, J.; Su, M.; Wang, B.; Mei, D. Development of tailor-made oxygen carriers and reactors for chemical looping processes at Huazhong University of Science & Technology. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2020, 93, 102898. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, P.; Howard, B.; Means, N. Investigation of reactivities of bimetallic Cu-Fe oxygen carriers with coal in high temperature in-situ gasification chemical-looping combustion (iG-CLC) and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) using a fixed bed reactor. Fuel 2021, 285, 119012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, X.; Shen, T.; Bollas, G.; Shen, L. Design and operation of a multi-stage reactor system for chemical looping combustion process. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, C.; Yu, D.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Yao, H.; Xu, M. Effect of the devolatilization process on PM10 Formation during oxy-fuel combustion of a typical bituminous coal. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 5682–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, T.; Shen, L.; Xiao, J.; Chen, D.; Gu, H.; Zhang, S. Nitrogen transfer of fuel-N in chemical looping combustion. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Izquierdo, M.T.; García-Labiano, F.; Abad, A.; Cabello, A.; Gayán, P.; de Diego, L.F.; Adánez, J. On the optimization of physical and chemical stability of a Cu/Al2O3 impregnated oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pachler, R.F.; Mayer, K.; Penthor, S.; Kollerits, M.; Hofbauer, H. Fate of sulfur in chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels using a copper-based oxygen carrier. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2018, 71, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, B.; Yan, R.; Zhao, H.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, C. Investigation of chemical looping combustion of coal with CuFe2O4 oxygen carrier. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 3344–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, B.; Wen, C.; Zeng, X.; Wu, J.; Yu, X. Emission Behaviors of Inorganic Ultrafine Particles during Zhundong Coal Oxy-Fuel Combustion with Characterized Oxygen Input Fractions Comparable to Air Combustion. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Luo, M.; Zhou, L.; Cai, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C. Migration of sulfur in in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion of Beisu coal with iron-and copper-based oxygen carriers. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 35, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mendiara, T.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Abad, A.; De Diego, L.F.; García-Labiano, F.; Gayán, P.; Adánez, J. Release of pollutant components in CLC of lignite. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 22, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ma, J.; Mei, D.; Wang, C.; Tian, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, H. Sulfur fate during in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion (iG-CLC) of coal. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, T.; Shen, T.; Shen, L.; Xiao, J.; Gu, H.; Zhang, S. Evaluation of hematite oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of coal. Fuel 2013, 104, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pérez-Vega, R.; Adánez-Rubio, I.; Gayán, P.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Abad, A.; García-Labiano, F.; Luis, F.; Adánez, J. Sulphur, nitrogen and mercury emissions from coal combustion with CO2 capture in chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2016, 46, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ishida, M.; Jin, H. A novel chemical-looping combustor without NOx formation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 2469–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. An, M.; Ma, J.; Guo, Q. Transformation and migration of mercury during chemical-looping gasification of coal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 20481–20490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adánez-Rubio, I.; Gayán, P.; García-Labiano, F.; Luis, F.; Adánez, J.; Abad, A. Development of CuO-based oxygen-carrier materials suitable for Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU) process. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, C.; Luo, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, H. Sulfur Transformation Behavior of Inorganic Sulfur-Containing Compounds in Chemical Looping Combustion. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 3969–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, J.; Tian, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, C. Fate of fuel-nitrogen during in situ gasification chemical looping combustion of coal. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chung, C.; Pottimurthy, Y.; Xu, M.; Hsieh, T.; Xu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; He, P.; Pickarts, M.; Fan, L.; et al. Fate of sulfur in coal-direct chemical looping systems. Appl. Energy 2017, 208, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gu, H.; Shen, L.; Zhong, Z.; Niu, X.; Ge, H.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, S.; Jiang, S. NO release during chemical looping combustion with iron ore as an oxygen carrier. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, P.; Gu, M.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.; Lin, Y. The effect of metal calcium on nitrogen migration and transformation during coal pyrolysis: Mass spectrometry experiments and quantum chemical calculations. Fuel 2020, 264, 116814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental flow chart.
Figure 1. Experimental flow chart.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g001
Figure 2. The variation trend of sulfur-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 under different O/C.
Figure 2. The variation trend of sulfur-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 under different O/C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g002
Figure 3. The variation trend of nitrogen-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different O/C.
Figure 3. The variation trend of nitrogen-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different O/C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g003
Figure 4. The variation trend of sulfur-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different reaction temperatures.
Figure 4. The variation trend of sulfur-containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different reaction temperatures.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g004
Figure 5. The variation trend of nitrogen containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different reaction temperatures.
Figure 5. The variation trend of nitrogen containing substances during coal CLC with (a) CuFe2O4 and (b) Fe2O3/Al2O3 with different reaction temperatures.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g005
Figure 6. The variation trend of SO2 and H2S with time in the process of CLC at (a) 650 °C, (b) 700 °C, (c) 750 °C, (d) 800 °C and (e) 850 °C.
Figure 6. The variation trend of SO2 and H2S with time in the process of CLC at (a) 650 °C, (b) 700 °C, (c) 750 °C, (d) 800 °C and (e) 850 °C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g006
Figure 7. The variation trend of NO and NO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) 650 °C, (b) 700 °C, (c) 750 °C, (d) 800 °C and (e) 850 °C.
Figure 7. The variation trend of NO and NO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) 650 °C, (b) 700 °C, (c) 750 °C, (d) 800 °C and (e) 850 °C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g007
Figure 8. The variation trend of H2S and SO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) O/C = 1, (b) O/C = 3 and (c) O/C = 5 in 850 °C.
Figure 8. The variation trend of H2S and SO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) O/C = 1, (b) O/C = 3 and (c) O/C = 5 in 850 °C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g008
Figure 9. The variation trend of NO and NO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) O/C = 1, (b) O/C = 3 and (c) O/C = 5 in 850 °C.
Figure 9. The variation trend of NO and NO2 with time in the process of CLC at (a) O/C = 1, (b) O/C = 3 and (c) O/C = 5 in 850 °C.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g009
Figure 10. XRD patterns of (a) Fe2O3/Al2O3 and (b) CuFe2O4 at different reaction temperatures.
Figure 10. XRD patterns of (a) Fe2O3/Al2O3 and (b) CuFe2O4 at different reaction temperatures.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g010
Figure 11. Trends of SO2 and H2S over time during reduction using iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 as OC in (a) 1st, (b) 5th and (c) 10th cyclic experiments.
Figure 11. Trends of SO2 and H2S over time during reduction using iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 as OC in (a) 1st, (b) 5th and (c) 10th cyclic experiments.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g011
Figure 12. Trends of NO and NO2 over time during reduction using iron-based oxygen carriers and CuFe2O4 as OC in (a) 1st, (b) 5th and (c) 10th cyclic experiments.
Figure 12. Trends of NO and NO2 over time during reduction using iron-based oxygen carriers and CuFe2O4 as OC in (a) 1st, (b) 5th and (c) 10th cyclic experiments.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g012
Figure 13. XRD patterns of (a) Fe2O3/Al2O3 and (b) CuFe2O4 in different cyclic experiments.
Figure 13. XRD patterns of (a) Fe2O3/Al2O3 and (b) CuFe2O4 in different cyclic experiments.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g013
Figure 14. Trend of (a) CH4, (b) CO, (c) CO2 and (d) dxCO2 over time of iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 during CLC.
Figure 14. Trend of (a) CH4, (b) CO, (c) CO2 and (d) dxCO2 over time of iron-based OC and CuFe2O4 during CLC.
Atmosphere 13 00786 g014
Table 1. The proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of NX coal.
Table 1. The proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of NX coal.
SampleProximate Analysis wt.%Ultimate Analysis wt.%
MAVFCCHNSO
NX5.184.5626.9563.3177.605.161.460.4010.77
Table 2. BET (Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller) specific surface area of CuFe2O4 and iron-based OC after cyclic experiment.
Table 2. BET (Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller) specific surface area of CuFe2O4 and iron-based OC after cyclic experiment.
SampleSBET/(m2/g) of CuFe2O4SBET/(m2/g) of Fe2O3/Al2O3
Fresh2.3391.872
After 1st5.1014.446
After 5th5.5764.782
After 10th6.4755.020
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Han, Z.; Hu, C.; Ma, J.; Guo, Q. Transformation and Migrant Mechanism of Sulfur and Nitrogen during Chemical Looping Combustion with CuFe2O4. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050786

AMA Style

Li H, Han Z, Hu C, Ma J, Guo Q. Transformation and Migrant Mechanism of Sulfur and Nitrogen during Chemical Looping Combustion with CuFe2O4. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(5):786. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Haichuan, Ziheng Han, Chenye Hu, Jingjing Ma, and Qingjie Guo. 2022. "Transformation and Migrant Mechanism of Sulfur and Nitrogen during Chemical Looping Combustion with CuFe2O4" Atmosphere 13, no. 5: 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050786

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop