Flood Mapping Proposal in Small Watersheds: A Case Study of the Rebollos and Miranda Ephemeral Streams (Cartagena, Spain)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review:

There is an error on line 43.

There is something wrong in table 1, please check.

Figure 4 is confused, please replace it with another one, more self-consistent.

Line 151, there is an error, please check.

Formula (2), a capital dot is missing.

Line 219 259, 268, ... etc.: there is the same recurrent error, please check.

good work!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We are really grateful with your comments and suggestions, we have worked in each one and we think we’ve improve our paper quality due to your constructive criticism. This research community is a good environment to contribute to our society and a way to do it is with this constructive spaces. Thank you very much and we hope to fulfil your requirements.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors are complimented on a well presented and written paper for improving traditional techniques for identifying flood zones by supplementing it with remote sensed data and analyses.

My only comment is:

Line 169-170: The variables in Equation 2 are not defined.

Otherwise, the presented approach can improve identification of flood hazard areas in the future, especially those impacted by anthropogenic activities. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We are really grateful with your comments and suggestions, we have worked in each one and we think we’ve improve our paper quality due to your constructive criticism. This research community is a good environment to contribute to our society and a way to do it is with this constructive spaces. Thank you very much and we hope to fulfil your requirements.

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accepted