Next Article in Journal
Identification of Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction Using Combined Hydraulic and Hydrogeochemical Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Rice–Carp Coculture on Phytoplankton and Microzooplankton Community Composition in Paddy Water during Different Rice Growth Stages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Water Level Forecasting Using IoT Sensor Data: Hydrodynamic Model SWMM vs. Machine Learning Models Based on NARX Framework

1
Department of Computer Science, Kristianstad University, 291 88 Kristianstad, Sweden
2
Department of Urban Studies, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(19), 2776; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192776 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 August 2024 / Revised: 23 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 29 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Water Management)

Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of water level forecasting using two approaches: the hydrodynamic model SWMM and machine learning (ML) models based on the Nonlinear Autoregressive with Exogenous Inputs (NARX) framework. SWMM offers a physically based modeling approach, while NARX is a data-driven method. Both models use real-time precipitation data, with their predictions compared against measurements from a network of IoT sensors in a stormwater management system. The results demonstrate that while both models provide effective forecasts, NARX models exhibit higher accuracy, with improved Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) coefficients and 33–37% lower mean absolute error (MAE) compared to SWMM. Despite these advantages, NARX models may struggle with limited data on extreme flooding events, where they could face accuracy challenges. Enhancements in SWMM modeling and calibration could reduce the performance gap, but the development of SWMM models requires substantial expertise and resources. In contrast, NARX models are generally more resource-efficient. Future research should focus on integrating both approaches by leveraging SWMM simulations to generate synthetic data, particularly for extreme weather events, to enhance the robustness of NARX and other ML models in real-world flood prediction scenarios.
Keywords: Internet of Things; machine learning; stormwater management; water level forecasting; wireless sensor networks Internet of Things; machine learning; stormwater management; water level forecasting; wireless sensor networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frisk, F.; Johansson, O. Comparative Evaluation of Water Level Forecasting Using IoT Sensor Data: Hydrodynamic Model SWMM vs. Machine Learning Models Based on NARX Framework. Water 2024, 16, 2776. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192776

AMA Style

Frisk F, Johansson O. Comparative Evaluation of Water Level Forecasting Using IoT Sensor Data: Hydrodynamic Model SWMM vs. Machine Learning Models Based on NARX Framework. Water. 2024; 16(19):2776. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192776

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frisk, Fredrik, and Ola Johansson. 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Water Level Forecasting Using IoT Sensor Data: Hydrodynamic Model SWMM vs. Machine Learning Models Based on NARX Framework" Water 16, no. 19: 2776. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192776

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop