Next Article in Journal
Cross-Correlation among Seismic Events, Rainfalls, and Carbon Dioxide Anomalies in Spring Water: Insights from Geochemical Monitoring in Northern Tuscany, Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Crude Oil Biodegradation in Bioreactors: A Model Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Three-Dimensional CFD Model to Determination of the Capacity of Existing Tyrolean Intake
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater through a Series System: Upflow Anaerobic Reactor and Artificial Wetland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/w16050738
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Trends and Future Prospects of Constructed Wetland Treatment Technology in China

by
Yuyang Liu
1,2,
Bo Feng
2,* and
Yu Yao
3,*
1
XAUAT UniSA An De College, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710399, China
2
Jiangsu Urban Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210019, China
3
School of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(5), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050738
Submission received: 18 January 2024 / Revised: 21 February 2024 / Accepted: 26 February 2024 / Published: 29 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Treatment of Water Contaminants: A New Insight)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the intensification of water pollution problems worldwide, constructed wetlands, as a green, efficient, and energy-saving wastewater treatment technology, have gradually attracted the wide attention of scholars at home and abroad. In order to better understand and master the research trends of constructed wetland treatment technology in China and promote its development, the literature from 2000 to 2023 in the CNKI database and the Web of Science (WoS) database (located in China) were selected as research objects. Then, CiteSpace software (6.2.R4) was used to visualize and analyze the literature, revealing the research trends and hot areas of constructed wetland treatment technology in China. Then, the optimized way of operation effect of constructed wetland was discussed to provide a theoretical and technical basis for the wide application of constructed wetland technology in our country. The results indicate that the annual publication volume of research on constructed wetlands in China is showing a rapid upward trend. Among them, the Chinese literature mainly focuses on how to improve the application effect of constructed wetlands on nitrogen and phosphorus removal of rural domestic wastewater by matching different wetland plants or developing combined processes. The English literature from the Web of Science (WoS) database mainly focuses on how to remove emerging pollutants, such as heavy metals and resistance genes in wastewater in China, by changing the filling matrix and microbial community structure or developing new processes, and the related mechanisms have been discussed. One of the hot spots for the future research of constructed wetlands in China is to vigorously develop microbial fuel cells, and try to overcome the problem of poor purification efficiency of constructed wetlands under complex conditions such as low temperature, low carbon-nitrogen ratio, and high pollution load. In order to strengthen its application, the specific optimization methods can be divided into two categories: self-optimization strategies such as increasing oxygen supply and transfer, providing electron donor matrix, preventing matrix blockage, and combination processes coupled with anaerobic treatment and other technologies.

1. Introduction

Constructed wetlands, a novel wastewater treatment approach, are inspired by the water purification processes of natural wetlands. This method simulates natural systems artificially, involving processes like laying down matrix and planting aquatic vegetation. It leverages physical, chemical, and biochemical reactions to purify wastewater [1,2]. Unlike traditional wastewater treatment technologies, constructed wetlands are often more cost-effective and efficient in handling pollutants, including challenging ones like heavy metals and emerging contaminants [3,4]. Additionally, they offer ornamental and touristic value, contributing to regional development [5].
Since the installation of the first full-scale plant for treating domestic and industrial wastewater in the 1960s, constructed wetlands have undergone extensive research. Over the past two decades, researchers have conducted more studies to address the challenges of treating recalcitrant pollutants and improving the quality of discharged or reused water. They have explored the application of different types of materials as substrates in continuous water treatment to enhance the removal efficiency of target pollutants in wastewater [6]. Additionally, substantial work has been done in the laboratory and pilot-scale studies to investigate different types of macrophytes and determine the role of microorganisms in improving treatment efficiency in continuous water treatment [7].
Research related to operational factors such as changes in flow patterns, different aeration and recirculation methods, variations in depth, hydraulic loading rate, and hydraulic retention time has also proven to be significant in enhancing system efficiency and has received widespread attention.
While constructed wetlands as a standalone treatment technology may not always meet strict effluent standards, particularly when dealing with high organic and suspended solids’ loading rates in wastewater, coupling and integrating them with other treatment processes have been proposed as a solution to address this issue [8]. Several novel approaches have been introduced, including the integration of constructed wetlands with algae ponds, photocatalytic oxidation processes, and anaerobic biofilters, among others [9]. These integrated systems have shown success in treating specific pollutants and, in some cases, even allow for energy recovery, making them economically viable and environmentally friendly approaches for wastewater remediation [10].
In recent years, China has increasingly applied constructed wetlands for treating various polluted water sources, including domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, and contaminated surface water [11,12]. While the volume of research has grown rapidly, comprehensive combs and assessments of this field within China remain limited. Bibliometrics, a method introduced by Alan Pritchard in 1969, effectively evaluates the impact and value of research through keyword analysis [13]. Utilizing bibliometric techniques and CiteSpace software (6.2.R4), this study conducts a statistical analysis of the literature concerning constructed wetlands in China, spanning from 2000 to 2023. This study aims to assess the current research status, forecast future trends, and offer recommendations for the development of constructed wetlands in China.

2. Data Collection and Research Methods

2.1. Data Sources

This study focused on the Chinese and English scholarly literature on constructed wetlands, published in core database journals by domestic scholars since 2000. The Chinese articles were sourced from the CNKI core journal database, while the English articles were obtained from the WoS core collection database. The search timeframe spanned from January 2000 to July 2023. In the CNKI database, a “topic” search approach was employed with the terms “constructed wetlands” and “wastewater treatment”, focusing on academic journals in Chinese. The WoS database search was conducted using the terms “TS = (constructed wetland OR artificial wetland) AND TS = (wastewater treatment OR waste water treatment)”. This search included research papers, conference proceedings, reviews, and online publications in English, with a national focus on “CHINA AND TAIWAN”. After meticulous manual review and screening, the study gathered a total of 2573 valid Chinese documents and 2194 valid English documents.

2.2. Research Method

This article employs statistical software to analyze data samples, focusing on identifying trends in the annual publication count, predominant journals, and key references in the field of constructed wetlands. Additionally, we utilize CiteSpace 6.2.R4, a visualization software, to visualize the keyword information from the articles. The analysis includes examining keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and emergence to provide insights into research directions and frontiers in wastewater treatment technology of constructed wetlands. This approach not only highlights the current status of research, but also forecasts future research trends in this area.

3. Research Trends of Constructed Wetland in China

3.1. Mechanism of Pollutants Removal in Constructed Wetlands

In constructed wetlands, the synergy of aquatic plants, microorganisms, and matrix plays crucial role in wastewater purification. They work together to remove pollutants through physical, chemical, biochemical reactions, and synergistic effects between them [14]. Among them, the physical effects include filtration, sedimentation, and retention of suspended solids in the water by the matrix as well as plant stems, leaves, and roots [15]. Chemical effects include ion exchange, chemical precipitation, redox reactions, adsorption, antagonism, etc. These effects and reactions mainly depend on the characteristics of the matrix type [16]. Biochemical reactions refer to the action of aerobic, facultative anaerobic, and anaerobic microorganisms. They refer to the conversion of polymer pollutants in wastewater into simple small molecules, thereby achieving the decomposition of pollutants [17]. In constructed wetlands, plants, matrix, and microorganisms, each has individual purification capabilities [18,19].

3.2. Annual Number of Publications

As shown in Figure 1, since 2000, there has been a consistent annual increase in publications on domestic constructed wetlands, with a significant surge after 2005. This trend is closely linked to China’s major national initiatives for water pollution control and treatment science and technology projects. The efficiency and low cost of constructed wetlands align well with China’s national priorities, triggering continued in-depth research on constructed wetlands by domestic scholars. Notably, after 2015, the volume of English-language publications began to surpass those in Chinese, with the gap widening each year. In 2022, English-language publications reached a peak of approximately 273 articles. This shift may be attributed to the maturing understanding of constructed wetlands among domestic scholars and the deepening research in this field. Many domestic scholars are increasingly choosing to submit their work to international journals, thereby fostering enhanced global exchanges.

3.3. Keyword Analysis

Analyzing and clustering keywords from the literature can reveal the current state of research in constructed wetland wastewater treatment technology and summarize research topics in this area [20]. Figure 2a,b illustrates a network co-occurrence analysis of keywords in the domain of domestic constructed wetlands. The betweenness centrality (BC) reflects the number of keywords strongly linked to others, with line thickness representing the connection strength [21]. A comparison between keyword co-occurrence maps of the Chinese and English literature reveals a sparser network with lower keyword frequency in the Chinese literature. For clarity, in comparison, Figure 2a highlights keywords with a frequency of 5 or more, while Figure 2b focuses on those with a frequency of 20 or more.
Both the Chinese and English literature regard constructed wetlands as suitable for treating domestic wastewater. The Chinese literature shows that constructed wetlands are particularly suitable for rural domestic wastewater, possibly due to the dispersed nature of rural wastewater and the impracticality of extensive piping, long transport distance, and multiple pumping stations required for centralized treatment in traditional wastewater plants [22]. Additionally, the keyword co-occurrence map shows that both the Chinese and English literature are keenly interested in the wastewater treatment effect of constructed wetlands. The Chinese literature focus on enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal through combined processes, whereas the English literature focus on the removal of emerging contaminants through the development of new processes (such as microbial fuel cells).
After clustering high-frequency keywords in the domestic literature on constructed wetlands, according to Figure 2c,d, the research topics of domestic scholars on constructed wetland wastewater treatment technology since 2000 can be mainly summarized into the following categories, and these research topics show some differences in the Chinese literature and English literature:
(1)
Research on the mechanism of pollutant removal by constructed wetlands. The three keywords cluster of “plants”, “microbial community”, and “porous medium” reveal the mechanism of pollutant removal in constructed wetlands, which uses the triple synergy of physics, chemistry, and biology of plants, matrix, and microorganisms [23,24]. Among them, the Chinese literature emphasize the crucial role of plants in pollutant removal, including cold-resistant breeding of wetland plants [25], the screening and matching of wetland plants, etc. [26,27]. At present, aquatic plants are mainly used in surface-flow wetlands; subsurface flow wetlands mainly use aquatic herbs, supplemented by hygrophytes [28]. The English literature mainly focuses on the two influencing factors of filling matrix and microorganisms. As for the matrix, recent research focused on the selection and the proportion of traditional matrix, such as gravel, zeolite, sand and gravel, etc. It also includes the development of a new matrix such as biochar, sponge iron, and carbonized slow-release fillers [29]. The leading roles in constructed wetland purification are mainly heterotrophic bacteria, autotrophic bacteria, fungi, and other types of microorganisms [30], so research has been carried out on functional genes such as nosZ, nirS, nirK, and anammox [31], as well as microbial community structure composition and diversity [32], to explore the mechanism of microorganisms in the transformation and mineralization process of nutrients and organic pollutants.
(2)
Research on pollutant removal objects in constructed wetlands. Combined with the keywords co-occurrence map, both the Chinese and English literature concentrate on conventional pollutants such as “organic matter”, “nutrient removal (denitrification and phosphorus removal)”, and “heavy metal”. However, the English literature placed gravity center of research on the removal of emerging contaminants “antibiotic resistance gene” and “personal care product” in the later phase. For instance, Chen’s research on antibiotic removal in a mesoscale wetland, which combined artificial aeration and mixing, achieved an 87.4% reduction rate [33]. Kootttep et al. selected different aquatic plants and iron-rich media to explore the removal effect of constructed wetlands on personal care products [29]. Overall analysis shows that the scope of targeted pollutant removal for constructed wetlands in China has been increasing, but the specific manifestations are reflected in major published the English literature.
(3)
Research on optimization and application of constructed wetland process combination. Domestic scholars are further enhancing the potential of constructed wetlands to purify wastewater through developing combined processes and optimization technologies, such as traditional constructed wetland + ecological pond technology [34,35,36] and new constructed wetland + biofuel cell technology [37,38], and they appear in the Chinese literature and the English literature, respectively. The Chinese literature also delves into application aspects, the first is the application of water bodies. Considering that the technology of constructed wetlands in various wastewater treatment has become mature, in addition to applying it to conventional “domestic wastewater” and other wastewater treatment, it also includes the constructed wetlands to treat low-pollution-load water bodies, such as advanced treatment of “tail water” and “reclaimed water” [39]. The second is application conditions. Related research involves improving the pollutant purification effect of constructed wetlands under complex working conditions such as low temperature, low carbon-nitrogen ratio, and high load [40,41,42].
(4)
Research on coordinated regulation of water–air pollution in constructed wetlands. Constructed wetlands are both economical pollutant removers and potential greenhouse gas emitters, and there is a risk of converting “water pollution” into “air pollution”. In the process of removing organic matter and nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients in constructed wetlands, the oxidation of organic matter and microorganisms, respiration of animals and plants, etc., will release CO2. The anaerobic decomposition of organic matter will produce CH4, and the nitrification-denitrification process will produce N2O [43]. The theme of “nitrous oxide and greenhouse gas emission” shows that domestic scholars have carried out research on the key processes and mechanisms of harmful gas emissions from constructed wetlands, as well as emission reduction measures [11,44].

3.4. Research Hotspot

The sudden increase and bursty frequency of a certain keyword in a short period of time can reflect the frontier hotspots of a research field. In the field of constructed wetland wastewater treatment technology, the results of keyword burstiness analysis based on keyword co-occurrence are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. According to the results of published papers, the analysis is carried out by taking 2014 as the boundary. In Table 1, the early Chinese literature was keen to study the impact mechanism of plants on the treatment efficiency of constructed wetland, and developed various combination processes to improve the wastewater treatment efficiency. The later Chinese literature focused on the application of constructed wetland technology in rural sewage, tail water, and other water bodies, as well as the specific purification effect of nitrogen and phosphorus removal. In Table 2, the research hotspots in the English literature have changed from strategies to improve the removal efficiency of traditional pollutants, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, to the removal of new pollutants, exploring the mechanism of microbial community structure for pollutant treatment and developing microbial fuel cells. Therefore, combining with the results of Table 1 and Table 2, the future research hotspots and development trends of constructed wetlands in our country can be classified as follows:
(1)
In terms of pollutant treatments, nitrogen, and phosphorus should still be used as an important indicator of effluent water quality evaluation standards, and heavy metals should be taken as the focus of attention among emerging pollutants.
(2)
In terms of process combination and application, the combined form of constructed wetland + microbial fuel cell can not only improve the degradation efficiency of pollutants, but also achieve part of the energy recovery [38], which should be vigorously developed in the future. The main application object of constructed wetland should continue to be rural sewage, and further try to treat the tail water of sewage treatment plant. In the process of application, it is necessary to overcome the problem of poor purification effect of constructed wetlands under complex conditions such as low temperature, low carbon nitrogen ratio, and high load. Existing methods have been proved to include the allocation of different types of wetland plants [45,46], the addition of exogenous microorganisms [47], intermittent aeration [48], and the addition of carbon sources [49], etc. Based on the key words highlighted in the English literature, this article suggests focusing on carbon source supplementation and intermittent aeration to alleviate the above problems.
(3)
In terms of research methods. With the rapid development of microbiology, genomics and other disciplines, the focus of future data analysis needs to be placed on the study of the structure, metabolic characteristics, and functional diversity of bacterial flora so as to improve the mechanism of decontamination and strengthen the decontamination efficiency from a microscopic perspective [50].

4. Optimization Measures for the Operation Effect of Constructed Wetland Technology

4.1. Constructed Wetland Technology Optimization Strategy

The problems and optimization strategies faced by constructed wetland operations are shown in Table 3 [50]:
(1)
Increase oxygen supply and transfer. The efficiency of constructed wetlands is often hampered by poor oxygen transfer rates. To counter this, artificial aeration introduces compressed air, boosting the oxygen transfer rate and thereby enhancing pollutant removal efficiency. Additionally, tidal flow wetlands present another effective solution to oxygen transfer limitations, where wastewater is cyclically injected and discharged into the wetland, acting as a passive pump to draw fresh air into the bottom through repeated cycles of wetting and drying [51].
(2)
Combined with electron donor matrix. The availability of electron donors in constructed wetlands may not be sufficient to sustain pollutant removal. Many low-cost organic matrix from nature (including wheat straw, oyster shells, compost, organic wood mulch, rice shells, walnut shells, and sugarcane bagasse) and waste products from natural ores and industrial or mines (such as coal gangue, iron ore, and manganese ore) have been employed in benchmark and pilot-scale studies of chemical waste [52,53]. These matrix and wastes have notably enhanced both heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification processes [54].
(3)
Improve low-temperature performance. Plant physiology and nutrient absorption are directly controlled by temperature and solar radiation. Low temperatures stymie the growth and activity of most pollution-degrading microorganisms, leading to reduced purification efficiency [55]. The performance of low-temperature continuous water treatment can be improved by selecting cold-resistant plants, inoculating cold-resistant microorganisms, and adding insulation materials. However, potential ecological risks must be considered when using exotic species or microorganisms.
(4)
Risk and prevention of substrate clogging. The primary operational challenge of constructed wetlands is substrate clogging. Clogging leads to water overflowing on the substrate surface due to reduced conductivity and porosity [56]. The biological approach of earthworm processing is able to reduce and repair clogging by ingesting particulate organic matter and converting refractory organic matter into easily biodegradable substances during the digestion process [57]. In addition, pretreatment reagents with strong oxidizing (such as hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite) can enhance the conductivity of the matrix through strong oxidation of organic matter, which can alleviate clogging [57]. While these methods are operationally effective, they require continuous monitoring and maintenance.
Table 3. Optimization strategies for the operation effects of constructed wetlands.
Table 3. Optimization strategies for the operation effects of constructed wetlands.
LimitationsEnhancement Strategies and TechnologiesIntensification Performance
Oxygen
limitation		The oxygen transfer rate in constructed wetlands has been increased, and pollutant removal rates improved through artificial aeration (intermittent and/or continuous aeration) [58,59]. Tidal flow wetlands have been constructed, where wastewater is cyclically injected and discharged in response to tidal operations. This repetitive wetting and drying cycle acts as a passive pump, allowing fresh air to be drawn into the bed [51,60].Intermittent aeration
COD RE: 97%
NH4+-N RE: 95%
TN RE: 80%
Tidal operation
Oxygen transfer rate:
350 g m−2 d−1
TN RE: 70%
Electron limitationLow-cost organic substrates derived from natural waste materials, including wheat straw, oyster shells, compost, organic mulch, rice straw, rice husk, walnut shells, and sugarcane bagasse, have been added [52]. Additionally, other inorganic substrates derived from natural minerals and industrial or mining waste, such as coal gangue, iron ore, and manganese ore, have been used to provide electron donors and improve heterotrophic denitrification [61].Organic-rich substrates
COD RE: 73%
BOD RE: 79%
NH4+-N RE: 91%
Inorganic electron donor substrates
TN RE: 88%
TP RE: 69%
Cold
climate		Improving the performance of low-temperature continuous water treatment can be achieved by selecting cold-tolerant plants, inoculating with cold-tolerant microorganisms, and adding insulation materials [62,63].Adding insulation material
BOD RE: 95% (in winter)
NH4+-N RE: 84% (in winter)
TP RE: 88% (in winter)
Inoculating cold-resistant
microorganisms
NO3-N RE: 97% (in winter)
Selecting cold-resistant plants
NH4+-N RE: 94% (in winter)
Clogging
risk		Improving system performance can be achieved through pre-treatment, the addition of organisms such as earthworms, and the use of highly oxidizing chemical agents such as hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite [64].Adding earthworms
Increases the hydraulic conductivity by more than 60%
Adding reagent (sodium
hypochlorite)
Recovery to 69% of the original condition

4.2. Combination with Other Processes

In order to further stimulate the potential of constructed wetland to purify wastewater, the combined process and optimization technology of constructed wetland were raised recently (Figure 3).
First, some studies combine constructed wetlands with anaerobic treatment technologies, including anaerobic sequencing batch reactors, Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB), adsorption biodegradation (AB), ultraviolet disinfection processes, and combined processes of septic tanks and constructed wetlands [57]. This approach has proven effective in treating chromium-rich wastewater, reducing energy consumption in brewery wastewater treatment, significantly lowering cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in wastewater, achieving high removal rates of total nitrogen and coliform bacteria. Additionally, the treated product offers some economic value.
Secondly, the process of combining constructed wetlands with microbial fuel cells is currently in the development phase. At present, most studies focused on the effects of electrode materials, plant species, matrix, and carbon sources on the treatment effectiveness [65,66]. A large number of existing research results show that this type of combined process can be used to treat antibiotics and refractory substances [67], and the clogging phenomenon of constructed wetlands has also been alleviated to a certain extent.
Finally, constructed wetlands are also being combined with technologies like photocatalysis [68], sand filters [69], the photo-Fenton advanced oxidation process [70], moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) [71], and electrolysis technology [72]. These combinations have effective treatment effects on cadmium-containing wastewater, organic matter, drugs, and other refractory organic matter.

5. Conclusions

The main conclusions of this article are as follows:
(1)
The primary focus areas in constructed wetland research in China encompass four categories: pollutant removal mechanism, pollutant removal objects, process combination optimization and application, and collaborative control of water–air pollution. Among them, the Chinese literature primarily explores enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal from rural domestic wastewater by combining different wetland plants or developing combined processes, with the aim of broader application across different water bodies. The English literature concentrates on removing emerging pollutants such as heavy metals and resistance genes by altering the filling matrix and microbial community structure or developing new processes (microbial fuel cells), while also considering greenhouse gas emissions during the purification process.
(2)
Future research about constructed wetlands will focus on integrating microbial fuel cells to unify ecological and economic benefits in the purification process. Research efforts are directed towards trying to use the methods of adding carbon sources and intermittent aeration to overcome the problem of the poor purification effect of constructed wetlands under complex working conditions such as low temperature, low carbon-nitrogen ratio, and high load. The goal is to apply these solutions in actual projects in a cost-effective manner.
(3)
In order to enhance the application capabilities and effects of constructed wetlands, specific optimization measures can be summarized as self-optimization strategies such as increasing oxygen supply and transfer, providing electron donor matrix, and preventing substrate clogging. Additionally, it also combines with anaerobic treatment and other technologies to form a combined process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y. and B.F.; data curation and writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y. and B.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to [privacy or ethical restrictions].

Acknowledgments

The authors of this paper express their most sincere gratitude to all the staff who helped during the experiment and writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yuyang Liu and Bo Feng were employed by the company Jiangsu Urban Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, J.; Chen, Y.H.; Li, K.L.; Peng, L.; Chen, D.D. Mode of constructed wetland in treatment of rural mixed sewage and its effect analysis. Environ. Pollut. Control 2019, 41, 231–235+256. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiang, X.M.; Song, C.; Zhou, J.R.; Zhou, X.; Yang, F.L. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Progress, problem and improving measures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 29, 101. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carty, A.; Scholz, M.; Heal, K.; Gouriveau, F.; Mustafa, A. The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for farm constructed wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6780–6792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, P.; Zhou, S.Q. Research progress and applications of the constructed wetlands. Ecologic. Sci. 2005, 24, 278–281. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu, J.R.; Dong, J.H. Response of ecosystem in service value to changes in landscape pattern of the Nansi Lake Wetland. J. Ecol. Rural. Environ. 2013, 29, 471–477. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballantine, D.J.; Tanner, C.C. Substrate and filter materials to enhance phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands treating diffuse farm runoff: A review. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 53, 71–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, M.; Zhou, Q.H.; Tao, M.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.J.; Wu, Z.B. Comparative study of microbial community structure in different filter media of constructed wetland. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruiz, I.; Díaz, M.A.; Crujeiras, B.; García, J.; Soto, M. Solids hydrolysis and accumulation in a hybrid anaerobic digester-constructed wetlands system. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, L.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.P.; Chen, Q.R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.P.; Wu, J.M.; Wu, Z.B.; Zhou, Q.H. Removal performance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater by integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands with zeolite substrate. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 721, 137765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dalmau, M.; Atanasova, N.; Gabarrón, S.; Rodriguez-Roda, I.; Comas, J. Comparison of a deterministic and a data driven model to describe MBR fouling. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuchs, V.J.; Mihelcic, J.R.; Gierke, J.S. Life cycle assessment of vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment considering nitrogen and carbon greenhouse gas emissions. Water Res. 2011, 45, 2073–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, D.; Ge, Y.; Chang, J.; Peng, C.H.; Gu, B.; Chan, G.Y.; Wu, X.F. Constructed wetlands in China: Recent developments and future challenges. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Y.X.; Lin, M.W.; Zhuang, D. Wastewater treatment and emerging contaminants: Bibliometric analysis. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 133932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yuan, C.; Zhao, F.C.; Zhao, X.H.; Zhao, Y.Q. Woodchips as sustained-release carbon source to enhance the nitrogen transformation of low C/N wastewater in a baffle subsurface flow constructed wetland. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 392, 124840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ajibade, F.O.; Wang, H.C.; Guadie, A.; Ajibade, T.F.; Fang, Y.K.; Sharif, H.M.A.; Liu, W.Z.; Wang, A.J. Total nitrogen removal in biochar amended non-aerated vertical flow constructed wetlands for secondary wastewater effluent with low C/N ratio: Microbial community structure and dissolved organic carbon release conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 322, 124430. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, S.D.; Wang, G.F.; Xie, X.F.; Wu, L.; Li, X.N. Effect of matrix on denitrification efficiency and distribution of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in constructed wetlands. J. Southeast Univ. 2011, 41, 400–405. [Google Scholar]
  17. Du, X.L.; Xu, Z.X.; Wang, S.; Zheng, L. Cyclic batch subsurface wetland for treating rural sewage with low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. China Water Wastewater 2012, 28, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, Y.R.; Liu, Q.Q.; Wu, H.T.; Su, L.; Ma, J.X.; Li, H.Z. Enhancement of nitrogen removal by a modular design of vertical flow constructed wetlands with a plant carbon source: Optimization of carbon dosage for nitrogen removal, practicability evaluation and strategy exploration for water quality control. Chemosphere 2022, 306, 135560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, T.; Tang, X.M.; Zhang, S.X.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, H.L.; Fang, L. Roles of functional microbial flocculant in dyeing wastewater treatment: Bridging and adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.Z.; Yi, S.Y.; Wu, J.M.; Wu, Z.B.; Zhou, Q.H. Bibliometric analysis of constructed wetlands based on the CNKI database. J. Hydrol. 2022, 43, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tong, Y.S.; Zhang, C.P.; Yang, Z.Z.; Yu, Y.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zhang, X.F.; Li, C.D.; Dong, Q.M. Research of domestic and international grassland fertilization in the 2012~2021 based on CiteSpace bibliometric analysis. Chin. J. Grassl. 2023, 45, 130–142. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, X.Y.; Yang, L.J.; Xu, K.Q.; Bei, K.; Zheng, X.Y.; Lu, S.W.; An, N.; Zhao, J.S.; Jin, Z. Application of constructed wetlands in treating rural sewage from source separation with high-influent nitrogen load: A review. World. J. Microb. Biot. 2021, 37, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ji, Z.H.; Tang, W.Z.; Pei, Y.S. Constructed wetland substrates: A review on development, function mechanisms, and application in contaminants removal. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, S.J.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, J. Management and high-value utilization of constructed wetland plants:an overview. Environ. pollut. control. 2017, 39, 432–438. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, J.M.; Zhou, Q.H.; Wu, Z.B.; He, F. Research advances on plant cold resistance in constructed wetlands. J. Hydrol. 2021, 42, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, R. Effects of sewage purification by different plant communities in the constructed wetland. J. Soil. Water Conserv. 2019, 26, 364–371. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yan, Y.Q.; Yuan, X.T.; Yu, C.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.Y. Investigation and research on wetland plants along Puya river in Heilongjiang. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2013, 40, 160–163. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zuo, Z.; Chen, Y.Q.; Cheng, B.X.; Hu, W.; Zhu, X.D.; Cang, J.J.; Wang, P.; Investigation, S. Ecological characteristics of macrobenthic communities in SFWs of different hydrophytes and their relationships with environmental factors. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 953–960. [Google Scholar]
  29. Koottatep, T.; Vo, H.N.P.; Chapagain, S.K.; Panuvatvanich, A.; Polprasert, C.; Ahn, K. Performance evaluation of selected aquatic plants and iron-rich media for removal of PPCPs from wastewater in constructed wetlands. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 91, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, W.; Song, L.Y.; Li, D.; Qiao, J.; Zhao, T.T.; Zhao, H.P. Production, characterization, and flocculation mechanism of cation independent, pH tolerant, and thermally stable bioflocculant from Enterobacter sp. ETH-2. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ji, G.D.; Wang, R.J.; Zhi, W.; Liu, X.X.; Kong, Y.P.; Tan, Y.F. Distribution patterns of denitrification functional genes and microbial floras in multimedia constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 44, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verduzo Garibay, M.; Fernández del Castillo, A.; de Anda, J.; Senés-Guerrero, C.; Gradilla-Hernández, M.S. Structure and activity of microbial communities in response to environmental, operational, and design factors in constructed wetlands. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 19, 11587–11612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, J.; Deng, W.J.; Liu, Y.S.; Hu, L.X.; He, L.Y.; Zhao, J.L.; Wang, T.T.; Ying, G.G. Fate and removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hybrid constructed wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Duan, T.L.; Cheng, G.; Zheng, Y.Y.; Luo, S.Y. Advanced treatment of tail water from sewage plant by high-efficiency vertical flow constructed wetland-multistage ecological ponds. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2017, 11, 5828–5835. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhao, W.; Lu, X. Review of using constructed wetland and ecological pond system for road runoff treatment. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. 2013, 30, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhu, P.; Wang, Q.; Song, J. Treatment of rural polluted river water by combined system of constructed wetlands with submerged macrophyte pond. Environ. Pollut. Control 2014, 36, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gupta, S.; Patro, A.; Mittal, Y.; Dwivedi, S.; Saket, P.; Panja, R.; Saeed, T.; Martínez, F.; Yadav, A.K. The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 162757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, G.; Shi, Y.C.; Liu, S.; You, S.H.; Ma, L.L.; Long, Y. Research progress on constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell technology. Environ. Prot. Chem. Ind. 2022, 42, 518–525. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cen, L.Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.; Wu, Q.M. Pilot-scale study on advanced treatment of tail water of urban sewage treatment plant by constructed wetlands with different plants. J. Lake Sci. 2019, 31, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, J.N.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Q.H.; Zhou, W.D.; Zhu, R.T.; Zheng, Y.C.; Xiong, J.Q.; Wang, X.C.; Dzakpasu, M. Performance of a high loading hybrid constructed wetland on wastewater treatment plant effluent purification in low temperature period. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2021, 15, 3561–3571. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei, L.L.; Liu, D.S.; Liao, X.K.; Chen, Y.C.; Yan, H.L.; Chen, Q.W. Low temperature purification performance and the microbial activity in the vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2021, 41, 4039–4048. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, R.X.; Liu, R.; Jiao, Y.E.; Fu, J.X. Effect of low temperature on growth distribution and treatment efficiency of microorganisms in wetland fillers. Environ. Pollut. Control 2018, 40, 387–391. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gu, X.S.; Chen, D.Y.; Wu, F.; Tang, L.; He, S.B.; Zhou, W.L. Function of aquatic plants on nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas emission in enhanced denitrification constructed wetlands: Iris pseudacorus for example. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gui, P.; Inamori, R.; Matsumura, M.; Inamori, Y. Evaluation of constructed wetlands by wastewater purification ability and greenhouse gas emissions. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.Y.; Fu, B.R.; Zhu, H.; Chen, X.; Cheng, R.; Yan, B.X. Research progress on intensification of pollutant removal in constructed wetlands by introducing exogenous microbials. China Water Wastewater 2023, 39, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao, D.H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Z.; Sheng, J.; An, S.Q. Can cold-season macrophytes at the senescence stage improve nitrogen removal in integrated constructed wetland systems treating low carbon/nitrogen effluent? Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, M.; Zhang, D.Q.; Dong, J.W.; Tan, S.K. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climate—A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 57, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fu, G.P.; Huangshen, L.K.; Guo, Z.P.; Zhou, Q.H.; Wu, Z.B. Effect of plant-based carbon sources on denitrifying microorganisms in a vertical flow constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Recknagel, F. Current scope, case studies and future directions of ecological informatics. J. Environ. Inform. 2013, 21, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, H.M.; Wang, R.G.; Yan, P.H.; Wu, S.B.; Chen, Z.B.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Cheng, C.; Hu, Z.; Zhuang, L.L.; Guo, Z.Z.; et al. Constructed wetlands for pollution control. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 4, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Green, M.; Friedler, E.; Ruskol, Y.; Safrai, I. Investigation of alternative method for nitrification in constructed wetlands. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jia, L.X.; Gou, E.F.; Liu, H.; Lu, S.Y.; Wu, S.B.; Wu, H.M. Exploring utilization of recycled agricultural biomass in constructed wetlands: Characterization of the driving force for high-rate nitrogen removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, R.G.; Zhao, X.; Wang, T.C.; Guo, Z.Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.B.; Wu, H.M. Can we use mine waste as substrate in constructed wetlands to intensify nutrient removal? A critical assessment of key removal mechanisms and long-term environmental risks. Water Res. 2022, 210, 118009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jones, E.R.; Van Vliet, M.T.; Qadir, M.; Bierkens, M.F. Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth. Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Du, L.; Trinh, X.T.; Chen, Q.R.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.H.; Xia, X.; Zhou, Q.H.; Xu, D.; Wu, Z.B. Enhancement of microbial nitrogen removal pathway by vegetation in integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands (IVCWs) for treating reclaimed water. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Winter, K.J.; Goetz, D. The impact of sewage composition on the soil clogging phenomena of vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fang, Y.X.; Kong, L.W.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.W.; Xiang, X.Q.; Cheng, S.P.; Zhang, H.J.; Ju, F.; Li, L. Fifteen-year analysis of constructed wetland clogging: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 365, 132755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Park, J.B.K.; Sukias, J.P.S.; Tanner, C.C. Floating treatment wetlands supplemented with aeration and biofilm attachment surfaces for efficient domestic wastewater treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 139, 105582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Austin, D.; Vazquez-Burney, R.; Dyke, G.; King, T. Nitrification and total nitrogen removal in a super-oxygenated wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, Y.Q.; Sun, G.; Allen, S.J. Anti-sized reed bed system for animal wastewater treatment: A comparative study. Water Res. 2004, 38, 2907–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jia, L.X.; Liu, H.; Kong, Q.; Li, M.; Wu, S.B.; Wu, H.M. Interactions of high-rate nitrate reduction and heavy metal mitigation in iron-carbon-based constructed wetlands for purifying contaminated groundwater. Water Res. 2020, 169, 115285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, Y.J.; Xu, J.C. Improving winter performance of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in northern China: A review. Wetlands 2014, 34, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ji, B.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Vymazal, J.; Qiao, S.X.; Wei, T.; Li, J.; Mander, Ü. Can subsurface flow constructed wetlands be applied in cold climate regions? A review of the current knowledge. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 157, 105992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alemu, T.; Mekonnen, A.; Leta, S. Integrated tannery wastewater treatment for effluent reuse for irrigation: Encouraging water efficiency and sustainable development in developing countries. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 30, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, H.; Song, H.L.; Yang, X.L.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Y.L.; Zhang, L.M.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.W. A continuous flow MFC-CW coupled with a biofilm electrode reactor to simultaneously attenuate sulfamethoxazole and its corresponding resistance genes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tao, Z.K.; Jing, Z.Q.; Tao, M.N.; Chen, R.J. Recycled utilization of ryegrass litter in constructed wetland coupled microbial fuel cell for carbon-limited wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2022, 302, 134882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wen, H.Y.; Zhu, H.; Xu, Y.Y.; Yan, B.X.; Shutes, B.; Bañuelos, G.; Wang, X.Y. Removal of sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline in constructed wetlands integrated with microbial fuel cells influenced by influent and operational conditions. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 272, 115988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, D.D.; Chen, F.Z.; Han, J.Q. A study of the treatment of high-salt chromium-containing wastewater by the photocatalysis-constructed wetland combination method. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 80, 1956–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Achak, M.; Boumya, W.; Ouazzani, N.; Mandi, L. Preliminary evaluation of constructed wetlands for nutrients removal from olive mill wastewater (OMW) after passing through a sand filter. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 136, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Casierra-Martinez, H.A.; Madera-Parra, C.A.; Vargas-Ramírez, X.M.; Caselles-Osorio, A.; Torres-López, W.A. Diclofenac and carbamazepine removal from domestic wastewater using a constructed wetland-solar photo-fenton coupled system. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 153, 105699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Casas, M.E.; Chhetri, R.K.; Ooi, G.; Hansen, K.M.; Litty, K.; Christensson, M.; Kragelund, C.; Andersen, H.R.; Bester, K. Biodegradation of pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater by staged moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR). Water Res. 2015, 83, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Gao, B.; Jia, W.; Miao, A.J.; Xiao, L.; Yang, L.Y. Highly efficient removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in an electrolysis-integrated horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland amended with biochar. Water Res. 2018, 139, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Water 16 00738 g001
Figure 1. Comparison of the number of Chinese and English publications on constructed wetlands by Chinese scholars from 2000 to 2023.
Figure 1. Comparison of the number of Chinese and English publications on constructed wetlands by Chinese scholars from 2000 to 2023.
Water 16 00738 g001
Water 16 00738 g002
Figure 2. The co-occurrence and cluster network of keywords based on data from the Chinese literature (a,c) and the English literature (b,d).
Figure 2. The co-occurrence and cluster network of keywords based on data from the Chinese literature (a,c) and the English literature (b,d).
Water 16 00738 g002
Water 16 00738 g003
Figure 3. The combination of constructed wetland and other treatment processes improves the operation effect.
Figure 3. The combination of constructed wetland and other treatment processes improves the operation effect.
Water 16 00738 g003
Table 1. The top 25 most frequently cited keywords in the Chinese literature. The blue line represents the base timeline, and the red part indicates the burst duration of each keyword.
Table 1. The top 25 most frequently cited keywords in the Chinese literature. The blue line represents the base timeline, and the red part indicates the burst duration of each keyword.
KeywordsYearStrengthBeginEnd2000–2023
plant20008.0720002006▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
wastewater treatment20007.8120002005▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
wetland20032.9820032005▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
subsurface flow wetland20043.6820042005▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
municipal sewage20056.1820052012▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
sewage20025.1320052012▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
purification mechanism20033.7420052007▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
contact oxidation20063.0720062012▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
ecological treatment20033.4320072014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
removal mechanism20043.3920072008▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
handle20022.7920072014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
combined technology20086.5720082015▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
treatment effect20122.9320122015▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
anaerobic20132.8220132014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
tidal current20144.4320142016▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
hydraulic load20142.8520142016▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
matrix20042.8220142019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂
biological filter20155.5220152018▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
rural sewage200713.8420172023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃
processing technology20126.9920172021▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂
apply20073.6120172021▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂
treatment technology20003.620172023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃
tail water20145.2220192023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃
purification effect20122.6520192023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃
nitrogen and phosphorus removal20063.0320202021▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂
Table 2. The top 25 most frequently cited keywords in the English literature. The blue line represents the base timeline, and the red part indicates the burst duration of each keyword.
Table 2. The top 25 most frequently cited keywords in the English literature. The blue line represents the base timeline, and the red part indicates the burst duration of each keyword.
KeywordsYearStrengthBeginEnd2000–2023
effluent20029.7120022012▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
subsurface flow20049.8320042016▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
retention20067.3620062014▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
removal efficiency200714.6320072016▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
macrophytes20088.2120082015▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
flow200719.4820092014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
vegetation20099.5520092014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
nutrients20007.9220092012▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
phosphorus20058.6820102013▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
accumulation20107.5820102015▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
diversity200913.1920122017▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
temperature20067.1920122014▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
horizontal subsurface flow201118.6920142018▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
sediment20057.0820152016▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
china200610.8720162017▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
activated sludge201316.1120172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂
nitrate removal201413.9420182020▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂
carbon source201813.2820182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂
intermittent aeration20189.6820182020▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂
heavy metals20008.5320182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂
bacterial community20177.9820192023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃
degradation202017.3720202023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
bacteria20079.4720202023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
microbial fuel cell20158.1320202023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
electricity generation20211320212023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Feng, B.; Yao, Y. Research Trends and Future Prospects of Constructed Wetland Treatment Technology in China. Water 2024, 16, 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050738

AMA Style

Liu Y, Feng B, Yao Y. Research Trends and Future Prospects of Constructed Wetland Treatment Technology in China. Water. 2024; 16(5):738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yuyang, Bo Feng, and Yu Yao. 2024. "Research Trends and Future Prospects of Constructed Wetland Treatment Technology in China" Water 16, no. 5: 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050738

APA Style

Liu, Y., Feng, B., & Yao, Y. (2024). Research Trends and Future Prospects of Constructed Wetland Treatment Technology in China. Water, 16(5), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop