Particulate and Dissolved Metals in the Pearl River Estuary, China—Part 1: Spatial Distributions and Influencing Factors
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis
2.3. Saltwater Wedge
2.4. Statistical Methods
2.4.1. Descriptive Statistics
2.4.2. Correlation Analysis
2.4.3. Factor Analysis
2.4.4. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
2.5. Spatial Analysis Methods
2.5.1. Kriging Interpolation
2.5.2. Global Moran’s I
2.5.3. Local Moran’s I
- High–high cluster: higher observed values form a cluster.
- Low–low cluster: lower observation values form a cluster with low values.
- High–low dispersion: this indicates that the observation value at a given location is high, while the observation values in the neighboring areas are low.
- Low–high dispersion: the observed value at the location is low, while the neighboring values are high.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Water Environmental Factors
3.2. Metals in Suspended Matter
3.2.1. Metals Content in Suspended Particulate Matter
3.2.2. Spatial Distribution of Metals in Suspended Matter
3.2.3. Spatial Distribution Patterns of Metals in Suspended Matter
3.2.4. Correlation Analysis of Particulate Metals and Environmental Factors
3.2.5. Factor Analysis of Particulate Metals and Environmental Factors
3.2.6. Regression Analysis of Particulate Metals and Environmental Factors
3.3. Metals in Dissolved State
3.3.1. Dissolved Metals Content
3.3.2. Spatial Distribution of Dissolved Metals
3.3.3. Spatial Distribution Patterns of Dissolved Metals
3.3.4. Correlation Analysis of Dissolved Metals and Environmental Factors
3.3.5. Factor Analysis of Dissolved Metals and Environmental Factors
3.3.6. Regression Analysis of Dissolved Metals and Environmental Factors
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The primary spatial distribution characteristics of metals in the suspended particulate matter of the Pearl River Estuary show a decreasing trend from north to south. Several elements, including Co, Ni, Tl, Fe, Mo, and Cu, exhibit a high concentration near the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. In contrast, elements such as Cd, Zn, and Pb tend to have higher concentrations near the estuary and in areas influenced by anthropogenic emissions. Overall, the spatial distribution patterns of the vast majority of particulate metals (Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Mo, Cd, Tl, and Zn) show clustering.
- (2)
- Most particulate metals are primarily influenced by biochemical factors, in particular oxygen content, temperature, and salinity. However, environmental factors have no significant influence on Cd and Pb.
- (3)
- The main spatial distribution characteristics of dissolved trace metals in the Pearl River Estuary can be summarized into three types. The most common distribution pattern is characterized by high concentrations in the north and low concentrations in the south, with higher values in the west and lower values in the east, as observed for elements such as Cd, Tl, Co, and Cu. Secondly, concentrations are high in the northern and southern areas and low in the central area is low, such as Cr and Ni. Thirdly, the concentration decreases from the sea towards the land, as in the case of Fe and Mo. The dissolved concentrations of Fe, Cu, Mo, Cd, and Tl are mainly influenced by biochemical factors in the environment. Mn and Pb are influenced to a certain extent by physical factors in the environment. Cr, Cd, Cu, Fe, Ni, Mo, and Tl show a clustered distribution pattern.
- (4)
- The metals that are significantly affected by environmental factors are dissolved Fe, Ni, and Mo. The factors that have a significant influence on the dissolved metals are salinity, oxygen, and temperature.
- (5)
- This study fills the spatial gap in previous research on the Pearl River Estuary, which has mainly focused on the large estuaries and their upstream areas. It expands the scope of metal studies in the Pearl River Estuary and provides a more detailed examination of the distribution of metals and their contributing factors. By identifying patterns in elements with similar sources or geochemical behaviors, this study contributes to the development of metal pollution control strategies for the protection of marine and estuarine waters.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rinklebe, J.; Antoniadis, V.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rosche, O.; Altermann, M. Health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in soils along the Central Elbe River, Germany. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turner, A.; Millward, G.E. Suspended particles: Their role in estuarine biogeochemical cycles. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2002, 55, 857–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, F.; Huang, X.; Zhang, D.; Tian, L.; Zeng, Y. Distribution of heavy metals in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China: Implications for sources and historical changes. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strady, E.; Quoc Tuc, D.; Nemery, J.; Thanh Nho, N.; Guedron, S.; Nhu Sang, N.; Denis, H.; Phuoc Dan, N. Spatial variation and risk assessment of trace metals in water and sediment of the Mekong Delta. Chemosphere 2017, 179, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Huang, W.W.; Wang, J.H. Trace-metal chemistry of the Huanghe (Yellow River), China: Examination of the data from in-situ measurements and laboratory approach. Chem. Geol. 1994, 114, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Feng, C.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Z. Salinity increases the mobility of Cd, Cu, Mn, and Pb in the sediments of Yangtze Estuary: Relative role of sediments’ properties and metal speciation. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Strady, E.; Tran Thi, N.T.; David, F.; Marchand, C. Trace metals partitioning between particulate and dissolved phases along a tropical mangrove estuary (Can Gio, Vietnam). Chemosphere 2018, 196, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, J.M.; Palma, C.; Felix, P.M.; Brito, A.C. Spatial variation of metal(loid)s in sediments of an Atlantic mesotidal estuary (Sado estuary, Portugal). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 209, 117188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, G.; Wang, X.; Liu, E. Human health risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils in Sydney estuary catchment (Australia). Environ. Geochem. Health 2024, 46, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Morrison, C.; Doriean, N.J.C.; Welsh, D.T.; Bennett, W.W. Trace metal distribution in seagrass-vegetated sediments of an urbanized estuary in Queensland, Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 208, 116981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ming, H.; Zan, S.; Liu, J.; Su, J.; Ren, K.; Lin, J.; Chen, Q.; Shi, Y.; Shi, T.; Fan, J. Promoting the denitrification process by heavy metals in Liaohe Estuary sediment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 203, 116408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndhlovu, A.; Adams, J.B.; Nel, M.; Newman, B.; Rishworth, G.M.; Human, L.R.D. A review of metal pollution in a transformed, urban South African Estuary. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2024, 76, 103588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, P.; Qiu, R.; Mou, D.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Z. Evaluation of biotoxicity of heavy metals and binding characteristics of simultaneously extracted metals in sediments of Guishan Island, the Pearl River Estuary. Acta Sci. Circumst. 2010, 30, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, P.; Qiu, R.; Wang, C.; Mou, D.; Wang, Z. Evaluation of pollution and distribution of speciation of heavy metals in sediments of Pearl River Estuary. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2011, 30, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Cao, L.; Ni, Z.; Jin, G.; Wa Xi, L. Speciation, Source Analysis and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Superficoal Sediment of Inner Continental Shelf Near the Pearl River Estuary. Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 2014, 3, 175–185. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, P.; Li, X.; Yang, Q.; Peng, K.; Lin, F. Distribution and Evaluation of Heavy Metals in Surface Seawaters and Sediments in Huangmao Sea of the Pearl River Estuary. Adm. Tech. Environ. Monit. 2017, 29, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Wu, S.; Kang, M. Comprehensive assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediment of the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent shelf. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; He, Q.; Chen, J.; Lin, C.; Ji, W. Heavy metals process in water and pollution risk assessment in surface sediments of the Zhujiang River Estuary. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2013, 35, 178–186. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Yin, X.; Jiang, G.; Lu, C.; Zhong, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Ye, J.; Lu, X. Assessment of the potential ecological risk of heavy metals in the sediments of continental shelf and their sources off the Pearl River Estuary. J. Appl. Oceanogr. 2021, 40, 520–528. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, C.b.; Li, Y.h.; Chen, J.; Wang, A.j.; Li, D.y. Distribution patterns of heavy metals in suspended particles of the Quanzhou Bay and their influence factors. Environ. Sci. 2010, 31, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, R.Z.; Gu, Y.G.; Li, H.S.; Han, Y.J.; Niu, J.; Su, H.; Jordan, R.W.; Man, X.T.; Jiang, S.J. Multi-index assessment of heavy metal contamination in surface sediments of the Pearl River estuary intertidal zone. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, H.; Shahab, A.; Ye, F.; Wei, G.; Li, J.; Deng, L. Source-specific ecological risk assessment and quantitative source apportionment of heavy metals in surface sediments of Pearl River Estuary, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 179, 113726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Chen, J.; Liang, Z.; Li, S.; Li, R.; Gao, L.; Jin, G.; Shimizu, Y.; Onodera, S.-i.; Saito, M.; et al. Spatial and Temporal Variations and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Fractions in Sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 84, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.Y.; Peng, X.T.; Pan, J.M. Distribution, source and enrichment of some chemical elements in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Cont. Shelf Res. 2004, 24, 1857–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-L.; Xu, X.-R.; Sun, Y.-X.; Liu, J.-L.; Li, H.-B. Heavy metal pollution in coastal areas of South China: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 76, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.L.; Onyx, W.H.W. A review of heavy metal pollution in the Pearl River Estuary. J. Hydrodyn. 2004, 16, 367–378. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Wang, R.; Lal, R.; Ge, X.; Liu, J. The National Distribution Pattern and Factors Affecting Heavy Metals in Sediments of Water Systems in China. Soil. Sediment. Contam. 2018, 27, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haralambidou, K.; Sylaios, G.; Tsihrintzis, V.A. Salt-wedge propagation in a Mediterranean micro-tidal river mouth. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2010, 90, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moran, P.A.P. The interpretation of statistical maps. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 1948, 10, 243–251. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J.; Wang, Y.H.; Huang, Q.H.; Dai, Q.; Yang, Y.D. Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Suspended Particulate Matter in Pearl River Estuary and Its Influencing Factors. Environ. Sci. 2019, 40, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Dong, H.; Niu, L.; Yang, Q.; Luo, X.; Zhang, T. The characteristics and risk assessments of heavy metals in suspended particulate matter during summer in the Humen outlet of the Pearl River Estuary. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2021, 40, 184–189. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Zhou, F.; Chen, C.; Sun, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, F. Spatial distribution and correlation characteristics of heavy metals in the seawater, suspended particulate matter and sediments in Zhanjiang Bay, China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.; Tang, X.L.; Zhang, J.; Balzer, W. Estuarine modification of dissolved and particulate trace metals in major rivers of East-Hainan, China. Cont. Shelf Res. 2013, 57, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Zhou, F.; Chen, C.T.A.; Xing, Q. Trace metals in the suspended particulate matter of the Yellow River (Huanghe) Estuary: Concentrations, potential mobility, contamination assessment and the fluxes into the Bohai Sea. Cont. Shelf Res. 2015, 104, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.Z.; Li, J.F.; Dai, Z.J.; Zhao, J.C.; Feng, L.X. Spatial and temporal distribution of particulate metal pollutants in Changjiang Estuary. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2009, 28, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, B.; Liu, Q.; Jia, Z.; Li, S.; Hu, J. Heavy metal distribution patterns and their influence factors in Modaomen estuary of the Pearl River. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2021, 40, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.D.; Wai, O.W.H.; Li, Y.S.; Coles, B.J.; Ramsey, M.H.; Thornton, I. Heavy metal distribution in sediment profiles of the Pearl River estuary, South China. Appl. Geochem. 2000, 15, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
z-Score | p-Value | Confidence Level |
---|---|---|
<−1.65 or >+1.65 | <0.10 | 90% |
<−1.96 or >+1.96 | <0.05 | 95% |
<−2.58 or >+2.58 | <0.01 | 99% |
Depth of Water (m) | Temperature (°C) | Surface Salinity (psu) | Bottom Salinity (psu) | Oxygen (mg/L) | PH | TSM (mg/L) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min | 5.5 | 17.8 | 6.50 | 9.80 | 7.93 | 7.59 | 0.52 |
Max | 40.0 | 23.0 | 32.79 | 32.95 | 9.07 | 8.20 | 19.99 |
Mean | 18.6 | 20.3 | 26.75 | 28.22 | 8.75 | 8.02 | 6.96 |
CV | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.70 |
Metals | Min | Max | Mean | CV |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cr | 51.77 | 123.68 | 71.72 | 0.27 |
Mn 1 | 0.21 | 5.70 | 1.09 | 1.45 |
Fe 1 | 15.4 | 52.2 | 26.2 | 0.34 |
Co | 2.64 | 36.17 | 12.96 | 0.67 |
Ni | 18.74 | 188.21 | 50.79 | 0.91 |
Cu | 17.91 | 91.32 | 38.12 | 0.56 |
Zn | 99.82 | 330.63 | 169.33 | 0.39 |
Mo | 0.58 | 2.46 | 1.10 | 0.48 |
Cd | 0.06 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 1.03 |
Tl | 0.09 | 0.94 | 0.45 | 0.48 |
Pb | 34.89 | 344.73 | 79.55 | 0.88 |
Zhanjiang Bay | Major River Estuaries of East Hainan | Yellow River Estuary | Yangtze River Estuary | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Metric | Mean | Range | Mean | Mean |
Cr | 160.76 | No data | 62.7 | 78.4 |
Mn 1 | 0.89 | No data | No data | 0.811 |
Fe 1 | 22.07 | 31.81–106.0 | No data | 38.596 |
Co | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Ni | 112.47 | 18.78–76.31 | 30.5 | No data |
Cu | 27.14 | 15.88–56.52 | 32.5 | 40.2 |
Zn | 296.9 | No data | 77.4 | 182 |
Mo | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Cd | 23.55 | 0.19–0.75 | 0.278 | 0.25 |
Tl | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Pb | 56.28 | 22.79–66.30 | 31 | 31.5 |
Date | January 2014 | 2006–2007 | April 2013 | 2006 dry season |
References | [32] | [33] | [34] | [35] |
Metals | Moran’s I Index | z-Score | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Cr | 0.043 | 0.405 | 0.685 |
Mn | 0.760 | 3.718 | 0.000 |
Fe | 0.305 | 1.525 | 0.127 |
Co | 0.641 | 2.863 | 0.004 |
Ni | 0.708 | 3.422 | 0.001 |
Cu | 0.606 | 2.627 | 0.009 |
Zn | 0.520 | 2.280 | 0.023 |
Mo | 0.721 | 3.252 | 0.001 |
Cd | 0.377 | 1.999 | 0.046 |
Tl | 0.488 | 2.131 | 0.033 |
Pb | −0.192 | −0.997 | 0.319 |
Factors | PC1 | PC2 |
---|---|---|
Depth of water (m) | 0.287 | 0.899 |
Surface temperature (°C) | 0.635 | 0.646 |
Surface salinity (psu) | 0.949 | 0.283 |
Bottom salinity (psu) | 0.908 | 0.352 |
Surface oxygen (mg/L) | 0.966 | |
Surface PH | 0.923 | 0.351 |
Surface TSM (mg/L) | −0.109 | −0.924 |
Eigenvalue | 4.006 | 2.407 |
Cumulative variance (%) | 57.234 | 91.627 |
Objects | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
---|---|---|---|
HJ-1 1 | −0.978 | ||
HJ-2 2 | 0.113 | −0.824 | |
Cr | 0.265 | 0.381 | 0.878 |
Mn | 0.972 | 0.165 | |
Fe | 0.345 | 0.808 | 0.281 |
Co | 0.847 | 0.493 | 0.127 |
Ni | 0.960 | 0.201 | 0.103 |
Cu | 0.854 | 0.303 | 0.156 |
Zn | 0.801 | 0.550 | |
Mo | 0.897 | 0.252 | |
Cd | 0.871 | ||
Tl | 0.669 | 0.699 | 0.152 |
Pb | 0.939 | ||
Eigenvalue | 7.127 | 2.383 | 2.194 |
Cumulative variance (%) | 54.820 | 73.152 | 90.028 |
Depth of Water | Temperature | Salinity | Oxygen | pH | Suspended Solids | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cr | −0.87 * | −1.49 ** | 2.56 * | −2.91 *** | 1.36 | −0.41 |
Mn | 0.08 | −0.48 ** | 0.22 | −0.99 *** | 0.03 | −0.21 ** |
Fe | −0.58 | −1.97 *** | 2.23 ** | −2.61 *** | 1.62 * | −0.19 |
Co | −0.12 | −1.11 *** | 0.99 ** | −1.51 *** | 0.42 | −0.16 |
Ni | −0.01 | −0.43 ** | 0.46 | −0.94 *** | −0.27 | −0.23 ** |
Cu | −0.11 | −0.94 * | 0.88 | −1.34 ** | 0.25 | −0.29 |
Zn | −0.37 | −0.51 | 0.76 | −2.04 *** | 0.90 | −0.41 * |
Mo | 0.11 | −0.65 * | 0.08 | −1.41 *** | 0.83 | −0.24 |
Cd | 0.23 | 0.65 | −1.40 | 0.52 | −0.56 | 0.06 |
Tl | −0.31 | −1.48 *** | 1.67 ** | −1.99 *** | 0.76 | −0.12 |
Pb | −0.69 | −0.38 | 1.45 | −1.54 | 0.58 | −0.25 |
Metals | Min | Max | Mean | CV |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cr | 1.01 | 10.25 | 4.86 | 0.41 |
Mn | 0.78 | 1.54 | 0.98 | 0.20 |
Fe | 190.90 | 472.09 | 381.94 | 0.25 |
Co | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.13 |
Ni | 3.49 | 24.20 | 18.29 | 0.33 |
Cu | 1.08 | 3.55 | 2.10 | 0.40 |
Zn | 14.13 | 48.28 | 21.78 | 0.38 |
Mo | 4.61 | 10.63 | 8.74 | 0.24 |
Cd | 0.006 | 0.062 | 0.026 | 0.69 |
Tl | 0.015 | 0.045 | 0.025 | 0.37 |
Pb | 2.43 | 9.64 | 4.66 | 0.39 |
Metals | Moran’s I Index | z-Score | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Cr | 0.338 | 1.722 | 0.085 |
Mn | −0.351 | −1.310 | 0.190 |
Fe | 0.869 | 3.797 | 0.000 |
Co | 0.307 | 1.470 | 0.141 |
Ni | 0.716 | 3.379 | 0.001 |
Cu | 0.507 | 2.240 | 0.025 |
Zn | −0.213 | −0.777 | 0.437 |
Mo | 0.823 | 3.580 | 0.000 |
Cd | 0.420 | 1.910 | 0.056 |
Tl | 0.901 | 3.971 | 0.000 |
Pb | 0.004 | 0.231 | 0.818 |
Objects | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
HJ-1 1 | 0.973 | 0.122 | ||
HJ-2 2 | 0.155 | 0.476 | −0.686 | 0.246 |
Cr | 0.119 | 0.871 | ||
Mn | 0.193 | 0.689 | ||
Fe | 0.980 | 0.125 | ||
Co | −0.418 | 0.106 | 0.434 | 0.197 |
Ni | 0.914 | 0.184 | ||
Cu | −0.766 | 0.378 | ||
Zn | −0.108 | 0.971 | ||
Mo | 0.971 | 0.187 | ||
Cd | −0.809 | −0.169 | 0.297 | 0.211 |
Tl | −0.950 | 0.108 | ||
Pb | 0.119 | 0.490 | 0.581 | |
Eigenvalue | 5.229 | 2.209 | 1.773 | 1.109 |
Cumulative variance (%) | 40.221 | 57.217 | 70.855 | 79.383 |
Depth of Water | Temperature | Salinity | Oxygen | PH | Suspended Solids | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cr | −0.03 | −0.91 | 1.57 | −1.60 | 0.77 | −0.21 |
Mn | 0.59 | −0.27 | 0.46 | −0.14 | −0.32 | 0.64 |
Fe | 0.07 | −0.09 | 0.92 *** | −0.07 | 0.23 | 0.18 *** |
Co | 0.50 | −0.70 | 2.40 * | −0.89 | −1.50 | 0.51 |
Ni | −0.37 | −1.40 ** | 2.76 ** | −2.83 *** | 1.17 | −0.42 |
Cu | −0.14 | −0.23 | −0.58 | −0.43 | 0.49 | 0.05 |
Zn | −0.11 | 0.27 | −1.25 | 0.52 | 0.53 | −0.28 |
Mo | 0.04 | −0.12 | 1.04 *** | −0.25 ** | 0.29 * | 0.08 * |
Cd | −0.25 | −0.02 | −1.35 | 0.28 | 0.42 | −0.12 |
Tl | 0.10 | −0.28 | −0.09 | −0.43 | −0.29 | 0.03 |
Pb | 0.02 | −0.68 | 1.69 | −1.46 | 0.38 | 0.15 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ma, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y. Particulate and Dissolved Metals in the Pearl River Estuary, China—Part 1: Spatial Distributions and Influencing Factors. Water 2025, 17, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071019
Ma H, Wang Y, Chen C, Zhang Y. Particulate and Dissolved Metals in the Pearl River Estuary, China—Part 1: Spatial Distributions and Influencing Factors. Water. 2025; 17(7):1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071019
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Hongyan, Yunpeng Wang, Chuqun Chen, and Yuanzhi Zhang. 2025. "Particulate and Dissolved Metals in the Pearl River Estuary, China—Part 1: Spatial Distributions and Influencing Factors" Water 17, no. 7: 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071019
APA StyleMa, H., Wang, Y., Chen, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Particulate and Dissolved Metals in the Pearl River Estuary, China—Part 1: Spatial Distributions and Influencing Factors. Water, 17(7), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071019