Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Source and Preprocessing
2.3. Research Methodology
2.3.1. Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Characteristics of Rural Settlements
2.3.2. Implications of Rural Settlement Changes
2.3.3. Analysis Model of Factors Influencing the Change of Rural Settlements
3. Results
3.1. Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Characteristics of Rural Settlements
3.1.1. Rural Settlement Expansion Characteristics
3.1.2. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Rural Settlements and Their Changes
3.1.3. Landscape Shape Change in Rural Settlements
3.2. Implications of Rural Settlement Changes
3.2.1. Impact of the Changes in RURAL Settlement on Cultivated Land
3.2.2. Population Agglomeration Characteristics of Rural Settlements
3.3. Analysis of Factors Affecting Changes in Rural Settlements
4. Discussion
4.1. The Change of Rural Settlements in Northeast China Is a Complex Systematic Process
4.2. Changes in Northeast Rural Settlement Affect National Grain Production
4.3. Limitations and Future Application Prospects
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yang, R.; Liu, Y.; Long, H.; Qiao, L. Spatio-temporal characteristics of rural settlements and land use in the Bohai Rim of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2015, 25, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J. Conversion from rural settlements and arable land under rapid urbanization in Beijing during 1985–2010. J. Rural Stud. 2017, 51, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanbo, Q.; Guanghui, J.; Yaya, T.; Ran, S.; Shuwen, W.; Yuling, L. Urban-Rural construction land Transition(URCLT) in Shandong Province of China: Features measurement and mechanism exploration. Habitat Int. 2019, 86, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhi, C.; Hu, X. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China’s southeast coast. Habitat Int. 2020, 100, 102182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Xu, Q.; Long, H. Spatial distribution characteristics and optimized reconstruction analysis of China’s rural settlements during the process of rapid urbanization. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 47, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Song, W. Pattern of spatial evolution of rural settlements in the Jizhou District of China during 1962–2030. Appl. Geogr. 2020, 122, 102247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, L. Expansion of Rural Settlements on High-Quality Arable Land in Tongzhou District in Beijing, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5153. [Google Scholar]
- Li, N.; Jiang, S. Study on Spatial Pattern of Rural Settlements in Wuling Mountainous Area Based on GIS. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2018, 102, 2745–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imon, M. Exploring Counterurbanisation in a Post-Socialist Context: Case of the Czech Republic. Sociol. Rural 2014, 54, 117–142. [Google Scholar]
- Popjaková, D.; Blažek, M. Verification of Counterurbanisation Processes: Example of the České Budějovice Region. Bull. Geography. Socio-Econ. Ser. 2015, 27, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, W.; Lo, K.; Zhang, P. Land Consolidation in Rural China: Life Satisfaction among Resettlers and Its Determinants. Land 2020, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z. Quantifying the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Rural Settlements and the Associated Impacts on Land Use in an undeveloped area of China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, C.; Haase, D.; Su, M.; Wang, Y.; Pauleit, S. Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2020, 47, 1361–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.B.; Zhang, B. Impact of Rural Land Consolidation on the Changes of Landscape Pattern: Take Haiyan County as an example. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 1065–1069, 2870–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Shu, S.; Liu, H.; Song, W.; Wu, J.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z. Object-based spatial cluster analysis of urban landscape pattern using nighttime light satellite images: A case study of China. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2014, 28, 2328–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, C.; Li, G.; Wang, S. Changing and Differentiated Urban Landscape in China: Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Forces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 2217–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Settlement Pattern and Its Influencing Factors in China from 1995 to 2015. Land 2021, 10, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanušin, J. Impact of dispersed settlement on the structure and diversity of rural landscape (Case study of village Hrušov, Slovak Republic). Geogr. Pol. 2021, 94, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, G.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y. The Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Pattern of Rural Residential Land in China in the 1990s Using Landsat TM Images and GIS. Environ. Manag. 2007, 40, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, R.; Long, H.; Gao, J.; Wang, J. Implications of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yucheng, Shandong province. Land Use Policy 2014, 40, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aimar, F.; Gullino, P.; Devecchi, M. Towards reconstructing rural landscapes: A case study of Italian Mongardino. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 88, 446–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, G.; Qiao, Z.; Gao, X. Rural settlement land dynamic modes and policy implications in Beijing metropolitan region, China. Habitat Int. 2014, 44, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, M.; Liu, C.; Lu, L.; Huang, A.; Duan, Y.; Liu, L. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of rural settlements based on typical transects: A case study of Zhangjiakou City, China. Habitat Int. 2022, 123, 102545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; He, J.; Deng, Z.; Ma, J.; Chen, G.; Zhang, M.; Li, D. Comparative Changes of Rural Residential Area Influence Factors Based on Spatial Econometric Regression Model: A Case Study of Lishan Township, Hubei Province, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanbo, Q.; Guanghui, J.; Wenqiu, M.; Zitong, L. How does the rural settlement transition contribute to shaping sustainable rural development? Evidence from Shandong, China. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 82, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Shi, P.; Lin, T.; Chen, N.; Huang, S. Rural Morphology and Forces Driving Change in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study in Fujian, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, X.; Liao, F.; Liu, Z.; Wu, G. Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Land-Use Transition from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta. Land 2022, 11, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.; Zhang, M.; Wang, A.; Ni, Q. Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Rural Settlements in Low Hilly Region-A Case Study of 17 Cities in Hubei Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Zhuang, D.; Gao, Z. Impacts of LUCC process on potential land productivity in China in the 1990s. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2005, 48, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarco-Perello, S.; Simões, N. Ordinary kriging vs inverse distance weighting: Spatial interpolation of the sessile community of Madagascar reef, Gulf of Mexico. PeerJ 2017, 5, e4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Li, H.; Wang, D.; Liu, S. Optimization of Rural Settlement Distributions Based on the Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study of Da’an City in Jilin Province of China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 824–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.-L.; Xu, Y.-Q.; Liu, Q.-G.; Liu, C.; Wang, H.-L. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of changes in rural settlements in the poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin: A case study of Zhangjiakou city, Hebei Province. J. Mt. Sci. 2017, 14, 980–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Xu, B.; Devereux, B. Urban landscape pattern analysis based on 3D landscape models. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 55, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, G.; Qiao, Z.; Zhang, Y. The investigation of relationship between rural settlement density, size, spatial distribution and its geophysical parameters of China using Landsat TM images. Ecol. Model. 2012, 231, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Guo, X.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, M. Micro-Study of the Evolution of Rural Settlement Patterns and Their Spatial Association with Water and Land Resources: A Case Study of Shandan County, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yurui, L.; Luyin, Q.; Qianyi, W.; Karácsonyi, D. Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: Theoretical framework and empirical case study. Habitat Int. 2020, 105, 102241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Y.; Zhan, L.; Jiang, G.; Ma, W.; Dong, X. How to Address “Population Decline and Land Expansion (PDLE)” of rural residential areas in the process of Urbanization: A comparative regional analysis of human-land interaction in Shandong Province. Habitat Int. 2021, 117, 102441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Liu, M. Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Y. Land-use change and socio-economic driving forces of rural settlement in China from 1996 to 2005. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2013, 24, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Gao, J.; Chen, J. Institutional changes, land use dynamics, and the transition of rural settlements in suburban China: A case study of Huishan District in Wuxi city. Habitat Int. 2017, 70, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-F.; Wang, J.-Y.; Zhang, F.-R.; Liu, Y.-S.; Cheng, S.-K.; Zhu, J.; Si, W.; Fan, S.-G.; Gu, S.-S.; Hu, B.-C.; et al. New patterns of globalization and food security. J. Nat. Resour. 2021, 36, 1362–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y.; Han, L. Spatial hydrological responses to land use and land cover changes in a typical catchment of the Yangtze River Delta region. Catena 2018, 170, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unger, E.-M.; Bennett, R.; Lemmen, C.; de Zeeuw, K.; Zevenbergen, J.; Teo, C.; Crompvoets, J. Global policy transfer for land administration and disaster risk management. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Pu, L.; Zhang, L. Spatial Pattern and the Process of Settlement Expansion in Jiangsu Province from 1980 to 2010, Eastern China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 8180–8194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
First Class Type | Secondary Type | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Numbering | Name | Numbering | Name | Meaning |
1 | Arable land | Land for planting crops, including cultivated land that has been in use, newly opened cultivated land, leisure land, land for crop rotation, and land for grass field rotation; agricultural fruit, mulberry, and agricultural and forestry land mainly used for planting crops; Beaches and tidal flats. | ||
11 | Paddy field | There are related facilities for water source guarantee and irrigation, generally irrigated arable land, arable land for growing aquatic crops such as rice and lotus root, and arable land where rice and dryland crops are planted in turn. | ||
12 | Dry land | There is no irrigation water source or facilities, and the arable land for growing aquatic crops depends on natural precipitation; the dry crop arable land that has water source and irrigation facilities and can be irrigated normally under normal conditions; the arable land mainly for vegetable cultivation; the idle land for crop rotation planting. | ||
2 | Woodland | Growing trees, shrubs, bamboos, and forestry land such as coastal mangroves. | ||
21 | High-density woodland | Refers to natural forests and plantations with canopy closure greater than 30%. | ||
22 | Bushland | Refers to low woodland and shrubland with canopy closure greater than 40% and height below 2 m. | ||
23 | Sparse woodland | Refers to forest land with a canopy density of 10–30%. | ||
24 | other woodland | Refers to undeveloped forest land, slashed land, nursery, and various gardens. | ||
3 | Grassland | All kinds of grasslands with a coverage of more than 5%, mainly of growing herbs, including nomadic shrub grasslands and sparse forest grasslands with a canopy closure of less than 10%. | ||
31 | High coverage grass | Natural grasslands, improved grasslands and mowing grasslands with coverage greater than 50%. This type of grassland generally has better water conditions, and the grass is densely grown. | ||
32 | Medium coverage grass | Natural grassland and improved grassland with 20–50% coverage. This type of grassland generally has better water conditions, and the grass is densely grown. | ||
33 | Low coverage grass | Natural grassland with 5–20% coverage. This type of grassland lacks water conditions, the grass is sparse, and the conditions for animal husbandry use are poor. | ||
4 | Waters | Natural land waters and land for water conservancy facilities | ||
41 | Canals | Naturally formed or artificially excavated rivers and land below the annual water level of the main trunk. | ||
42 | Lake | Naturally formed stagnant water area. The land below the perennial water level. | ||
43 | Reservoir pond | The land below the perennial water level in artificially constructed water storage areas. | ||
44 | Permanent glacier snow | Land covered by glaciers and snow all year round. | ||
45 | Tidal flat | Tide flood zone between high tide level and low tide level of coastal spring tide. | ||
46 | Beach | The land between the water level of the river and lake during the flat-water period and the water level during the flood period. | ||
5 | Urban and rural construction land | Urban and rural residential areas and other lands for industry, mining, transportation, etc. | ||
51 | Urban land | Large, medium, and small cities and built-up areas above county and town | ||
52 | Rural settlement | Rural settlements independent of towns | ||
53 | Other construction land | Refers to factories and mines, large industrial areas and other land and traffic roads, airports, and special land. | ||
6 | Unused land | Unused land, including difficult-to-use land. | ||
61 | Sand | The surface is covered with sand, and the vegetation coverage is less than 5% of the land, including deserts but excluding deserts in water systems. | ||
62 | Gobi | The surface is dominated by crushed gravel, and the vegetation coverage is less than 5% of the land. | ||
63 | Saline-alkali land | The surface salt-alkali is concentrated, the vegetation is sparse, and only the soil with strong salt-alkali-tolerant plants can grow. | ||
64 | Wetlands | The terrain is flat and low-lying, with poor drainage, long-term humidity, seasonal or perennial water accumulation, and land with wet plants growing on the surface. | ||
65 | Bare earth | Land with surface soil coverage and vegetation coverage less than 5%. | ||
66 | Bare rock gravel | The surface is rock or gravel covering >5% of the land. | ||
67 | Other unused land | Other unused land, including alpine desert, tundra, etc. |
T2 | P+i | Reduce Area | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | A1 | A2 | … | An | ||||
A1 | P11 | P12 | … | P1n | P1+ | P1+ − P11 | ||
A2 | P21 | P22 | … | P2n | P2+ | P2+ − P22 | ||
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | ||
An | Pn1 | Pn2 | … | Pnn | Pn+ | Pn+ − Pnn | ||
P+j | P+1 | P+2 | … | P+n | 1 | |||
Add area | P+1 − P11 | P+2 − P22 | … | P+n − Pnn |
Type of Cultivated Land Occupied | Soil Organic Matter Content (g/kg) | Area (m2) | Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Paddy field | 10–20 | 15,777.47 | 7.17 |
20–30 | 1150.96 | 0.52 | |
Dry land | <6 | 1520.40 | 0.69 |
10–20 | 197,359.74 | 89.71 | |
20–30 | 3930.62 | 1.79 | |
30–40 | 55.38 | 0.03 |
Independent Factor | RSI | RCI | MSI | KDE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Location conditions | 0.131 | −0.048 | −0.01 | −0.019 | −0.023 |
Water Resources Conditions | −0.215 ** | 0.209 ** | −0241 ** | −0273 ** | −0.018 |
Terrain conditions | 0.015 | 0.244 ** | −0.102 | −0.092 | −0.03 |
County Economic Development Level | −0.01 | −0.045 | −0166 * | −0.098 | −0.017 |
Traffic conditions | 0.180 * | −0.058 | −0.016 | 0.017 | −0.055 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Du, G.; Zhang, H. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020. Land 2022, 11, 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101640
Wang J, Wang X, Du G, Zhang H. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020. Land. 2022; 11(10):1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101640
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Jieyong, Xiaoyang Wang, Guoming Du, and Haonan Zhang. 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020" Land 11, no. 10: 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101640
APA StyleWang, J., Wang, X., Du, G., & Zhang, H. (2022). Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020. Land, 11(10), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101640