Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Sources and Research Method
2.1. Data Sources
2.2. Research Method
2.2.1. Kernel Density Estimation
2.2.2. Imbalance Index
2.2.3. Gini Coefficient
2.3. Research Design
- The research framework and problem-solving parts were based on a review of the relevant data. The need for this research and its significance are proposed against the research background through a literature review.
- The problem-solving section represents the main body of this research, and was based on the four aspects (policy, social, geographical, historical levels) of the spatial distribution characteristics of NRTTC and the influencing factors. The summary presents the results of the research based on the conclusions, as well as any shortcomings.
3. Analysis of the Spatial Structure Characteristics of NRTTC
3.1. Overview of the Distribution of NRTTC
3.2. Spatial Distribution Characteristics
3.2.1. The Pattern of Spatial Distribution
- The core refers to the core density surrounding Beijing and Tianjin, where the kernel density was above 3.21;
- The two sub-cores are the two high-density areas, one with Jiangsu as the center, radiating to Zhejiang, Shanghai, Anhui, Hubei, Anhui, and Jiangxi, and the other with Hebei as the core and including Henan and Shaanxi. The kernel density estimation for these sub-cores was between 0.17 and 1.79;
- The small core areas, which include the rest of the rural tourist towns, cover every province of China. The kernel density estimation for this group was between 0.17 and 1.04.
3.2.2. Differences in Distribution between Administration Regions
3.2.3. Clustered Regional Distribution
4. Influencing Factors in the Spatial Distribution of NRTTC
4.1. Policy Level
- In 2014, China’s targeted poverty alleviation strategy was officially launched. China fully implemented the Opinions on Innovative Mechanisms to Solidly Promote Rural Poverty Alleviation and Development [55]. The supreme leader of the CCP, Xi Jinping, put forward the strategic idea of poverty alleviation to ensure that all poor habitats would be lifted out of poverty in 2019 and build a well-off society all around [56].
- On 30 December 2015, the General Office of the State Council of China issued the Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Development of Rural Areas 123 [57]. This document proposed to explore the deep integration of agriculture with the tourism, education, culture, health, and pension industries. The integration of agriculture and tourism can break through the traditional production mode, enhance the vitality of rural cultural development, and clear the path to agricultural ecological development [58].
- On 20 January 2016, the Ministry of Agriculture of China and the Poverty Alleviation Office of the State Council held a symposium to develop the key industries for precision poverty alleviation in Fuping County, Hebei Province [59]. This symposium pointed out that characteristic industries are the primary source of income for rural areas. The tourism poverty alleviation project is one of the ten major projects implemented by the Poverty Alleviation Office of the State Council of China for targeted poverty alleviation [60]. The practice of many places has proven that rural tourism poverty alleviation is an effective way to alleviate poverty.
- The Central Committee of the CCP and the State Council issued a strategic plan for rural revitalization (2018–2022) and requiring all regions and departments to implement it earnestly in light of the actual conditions [61].
4.2. Social Level
4.3. Geographical Level
4.4. Historical Level
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zeng, X.; Ma, Y.; Ma, L. Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. Toward Shared Prosperity: China’s New Leap Forward in Social Protection. Econ. Political Stud. 2014, 2, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C. The transformation of Chinese socialism. In The Transformation of Chinese Socialism; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Quan, B.; Zhu, H.-J.; Chen, S.-L.; Römkens, M.; Li, B.-C. Land suitability assessment and land use change in Fujian Province, China. Pedosphere 2007, 17, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Ma, L.; Chong, C.; Li, Z.; Ni, W. Development of smart energy towns in China: Concept and practices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Ji, X.; Wu, J.; Tian, F.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Z. Assessment of Cadmium (Cd) in Paddy Soil and Ditch Sediment in Polluted Watershed and Non-Polluted Watershed. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2021, 15, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.; Andreev, K.; Dupre, M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 2021, 3, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Shi, X. Dynamic evaluation of China’s ecological civilization construction based on target correlation degree and coupling coordination degree. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 93, 106734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, L.R. Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Communist Party; Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jinping, X. Secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and strive for the great success of socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era. In Proceedings of the delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Beijing, China, 18 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wenjing, S. A Brief Discussion on the Dilemma and Outlet of Rural Financial Development--Based on Empirical Data Research of Chongqing. Acad. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, S.; Song, J.; Wang, X.; Shang, Z.; Sheng, C.; Li, C.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, J. A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 117, 109474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Hui, E.C.; Chen, T.; Lang, W.; Guo, Y. From Habitat III to the new urbanization agenda in China: Seeing through the practices of the “three old renewals” in Guangzhou. Land Use Policy 2019, 81, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romao, J.; Neuts, B. Territorial capital, smart tourism specialization and sustainable regional development: Experiences from Europe. Habitat Int. 2017, 68, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tian, X.; Wu, M.; Ma, L.; Wang, N. Rural finance, scale management and rural industrial integration. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2020, 12, 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alberti, F.G.; Giusti, J.D. Cultural heritage, tourism and regional competitiveness: The Motor Valley cluster. City Cult. Soc. 2012, 3, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivona, A.; Rinella, A.; Rinella, F.; Epifani, F.; Nocco, S. Resilient rural areas and tourism development paths: A comparison of case studies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maroto-Martos, J.C.; Voth, A.; Pinos-Navarrete, A. The importance of tourism in rural development in Spain and Germany. In Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 181–205. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.H. How does globalisation affect regional inequality within a developing country? Evidence from China. J. Dev. Stud. 2003, 39, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Lin, Y.; Glendinning, A.; Xu, Y. Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes. Land Use Policy 2018, 75, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Long, H. The process and driving forces of rural hollowing in China under rapid urbanization. J. Geogr. Sci. 2010, 20, 876–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, E.L.-E. Citizens in Motion. In Citizens in Motion; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y. Communication in China: Political economy, power, and conflict; Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Gernet, J.; Foster, J.R.; Gernet, J.A. A History of Chinese Civilization; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, Y.; Lyu, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, W. Industrial agglomeration externalities, local governments’ competition and environmental pollution: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, A.; Yang, Y.; Chen, T.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y. Exploration of spatial differentiation patterns and related influencing factors for National Key Villages for rural tourism in China in the context of a rural revitalization strategy, using GIS-based overlay analysis. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, D.B.; Lawton, L.J. Resident perceptions in the urban–rural fringe. Ann. Tour. Res. 2001, 28, 439–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Wu, B. Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Dou, X.; Li, J.; Cai, L.A. Analyzing government role in rural tourism development: An empirical investigation from China. J. Rural Stud. 2020, 79, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, M.M.; Wall, G.; Wang, Y.; Jin, M. Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination-Hetu Town, Anhui Province, China. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Huang, S.; Huang, Y. Rural tourism development in China. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2009, 11, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, G. The hollow state: Rural governance in China. China Q. 2010, 203, 601–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Šimková, E.; Holzner, J. Motivation of tourism participants. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 159, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghadban, S.; Shames, M.; Abou Arrage, J.; Abou Fayyad, A. Rural tourism in Lebanon: What does the market reveal? Manag. Avenir 2017, 96, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hjalager, A.-M.; Kwiatkowski, G.; Østervig Larsen, M. Innovation gaps in Scandinavian rural tourism. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2018, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidali, K.L.; Kastenholz, E.; Bianchi, R. Food tourism, niche markets and products in rural tourism: Combining the intimacy model and the experience economy as a rural development strategy. J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 1179–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, B. Rural tourism in China. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 1438–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhongxin, L. Research on Beautiful Countryside Construction in China: Taking Shandong Province as an Example. Can. Soc. Sci. 2016, 12, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Yang, R.; Chen, M.-H.; Su, C.-H.J.; Zhi, Y.; Xi, J. Effects of rural revitalization on rural tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 47, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Cao, M.; Cheng, L.; Zhai, K.; Zhao, X.; De Vos, J. Exploring the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in travel behaviour: A qualitative study. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 11, 100450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chebli, A. The impact of Covis-19 on tourist consumption behaviour: A perspective article. J. Tour. Manag. Res. 2020, 7, 196–207. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Cenci, J.; Becue, V. A Preliminary Study on Industrial Landscape Planning and Spatial Layout in Belgium. Heritage 2021, 4, 1375–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Cenci, J.; Becue, V.; Koutra, S. Research of the industrial heritage category and spatial density distribution in the Walloon region, Belgium, and Northeast China. In Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XVII & Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures XIII; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2021; Volume 285. [Google Scholar]
- Palmer, J.R. Activity-space Segregation: Understanding Social Divisions in Space and Time; Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Cenci, J.; Becue, V. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the World Architectural Heritage. Heritage 2021, 4, 2942–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X. The historical evolution of China’s tourism development policies (1949–2013)—A quantitative research approach. Tour. Manag. 2017, 58, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Cenci, J.; Becue, V.; Koutra, S. Analysis of spatial structure and influencing factors of the distribution of national industrial heritage sites in China based on mathematical calculations. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 27124–27139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Tang, C.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.; Long, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Gan, M. Research on tourism resources in the new era: Protection, utilization and innovative development: Comments of young tourism geographers. J. Nat. Resour. 2020, 35, 04000992. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Qiao, S.; Tan, Q. Destination Management for Ecotourism Activity Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Sci. Program. 2022, 2022, 4143060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, G.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W.; Liang, G. Changing face of epidemiology of dermatophytoses in Chinese Mainland: A 30 years nationwide retrospective study from 1991 to 2020. Mycoses 2022, 65, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, C.; Liu, H.; Luo, K.; Yu, X. Process and proposal for comprehensive regionalization of Chinese human geography. J. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 1155–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, B.; Zheng, X.; Chen, M. Risk assessment of COVID-19 based on multisource data from a geographical viewpoint. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 125702–125713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trotsky, L. The Permanent Revolution & Results and Prospects; Red Letter Press: Seattle, WA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Zang, Y.; Yang, Y. China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management. J. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 1923–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keay, A.; Zhao, J. Transforming corporate governance in Chinese corporations: A journey, not a destination. Nw. J. Int’l L. Bus. 2017, 38, 187. [Google Scholar]
- Hao, S. Reducing the Interethnic Developmental Gap: A Road to Common Prosperity and Development. In China’s Solution to Its Ethno-National Issues; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 125–164. [Google Scholar]
- Weidong, W.; Yu, X. Research on the Development Path of Rural Electronic Commerce in the Perspective of Precision Poverty Alleviation. Innov. Reg. Public Serv. Sustain. 2016, 9, 137. [Google Scholar]
- Long, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tu, S. Rural vitalization in China: A perspective of land consolidation. J. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 29, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zuo, C. Regional Development and Poverty Reduction in Contiguous Destitute Areas (2011–2020). In The Evolution of China’s Poverty Alleviation and Development Policy (2001–2015); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 71–105. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Guo, L.; Liu, Y. Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: Theory and practice. Land Use Policy 2019, 82, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu-rui, L.; Chang-li, B.; Zhi, C.; Xuan-he, L.; Yan-sui, L. Village classification system for rural vitalization strategy: Method and empirical study. J. Nat. Resour. 2020, 35, 02000243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ericksen, P.J. Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tibetan Villagers Escape Poverty, Protect Borders in Southwest China. Available online: https://leftreviewonline.com/english/international/tibetan-villagers-escape-poverty-protect-borders-southwest-china.html (accessed on 16 May 2022).
- The Rebirth of the Menluo Nationality. Available online: https://inf.news/en/travel/1f19973f41db63dcf65cad0257ffc62e.html (accessed on 15 May 2022).
- Chen, M.; Gong, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, D.; Zhang, H. Population distribution and urbanization on both sides of the Hu Huanyong Line: Answering the Premier’s question. J. Geogr. Sci. 2016, 26, 1593–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, W.; Cheng, Y.-F.; Yu, H.; Peng, L.; Kong, B.; Hou, Y.-T. Spatio-temporal characteristics of population and economy in transitional geographic space at the southern end of “Hu Huan-yong Line”. J. Mt. Sci. 2022, 19, 350–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, X.; Shen, Z.; Yu, H. Drought risk assessment in China: Evaluation framework and influencing factors. Geogr. Sustain. 2020, 1, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, S.; Fesenmaier, D.R.; Fesenmaier, J.; Van Es, J.C. Factors for success in rural tourism development. J. Travel Res. 2001, 40, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, X.; Cai, Z.; Xu, J.; Shi, S. Spatial structure of urban agglomeration under the impact of high-speed railway construction: Based on the social network analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 62, 102404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walking into the Beautiful Countryside—Thinking That the Dream Was Originally “in the valley/Guli”. Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/426545864_267106 (accessed on 15 May 2022).
- Peng, B.; Li, Y.; Elahi, E.; Wei, G. Dynamic evolution of ecological carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint theory: A case study of Jiangsu province. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y. China’s below-replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development? Popul. Dev. Rev. 2010, 36, 419–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Wang, G.; Zhu, C.; Chi, X. Mapping the Challenges to the Sustainable Operation of Suburban Villages in a Metropolis: A Comparative Case Study from the Lens of Three Stakeholder-Led Approaches. Land 2021, 10, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Lai, C.; Wu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, X.; Lian, Y. Response of net primary production to land use and land cover change in mainland China since the late 1980s. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Jia, Z.; Wang, N.; Fang, M. Sustainable mountain village construction adapted to livelihood, topography, and hydrology: A case of Dong villages in southeast Guizhou, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, B.; Deng, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Qiu, H.; Lu, Y.; He, D. Mapping C hina’s freshwater fishes: Diversity and biogeography. Fish Fish. 2014, 15, 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Mo, D.; Mao, L.; Sun, G.; Zhou, K. Paleosalinity in the Tianluoshan site and the correlation between the Hemudu culture and its environmental background. J. Geogr. Sci. 2010, 20, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Jiang, G.; Yuan, D.; Polk, J.S. Evolution of major environmental geological problems in karst areas of Southwestern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 69, 2427–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nalati Town. Available online: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/%E9%82%A3%E6%8B%89%E6%8F%90%E9%95%87_%28IMG_20170512_164224%29.jpg (accessed on 15 May 2022).
- Yan, S.; Shan, Q.; Niu, H.-C.; Yang, W.-B.; Li, N.-B.; Zeng, L.-J.; Jiang, Y.-H. Petrology and geochemistry of late Carboniferous hornblende gabbro from the Awulale Mountains, western Tianshan (NW China): Implication for an arc–nascent back-arc environment. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 113, 218–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.-E.; Cheng, S.-K.; Zhong, L.-S.; Mu, S.-L.; Dhruba, B.G.; Ren, G.-Z. Rural tourism development in China: Principles, models and the future. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- French, H.W. Everything under the Heavens: How the Past Helps Shape China’s Push for Global Power; Vintage: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Former Residence of Mao Zedong, Shaoshan. Available online: http://m.tuniucdn.com/fb2/t1/G4/M00/D6/8A/Cii_J1oKltGIIblHAASdJ4otMM8AADQ8QGAn7gABJ0_907_w800_h0_c0_t0.jpg (accessed on 27 May 2022).
- Hunter, W.C. China’s Chairman Mao: A visual analysis of Hunan Province online destination image. Tour. Manag. 2013, 34, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denton, K.A. Museums, memorial sites and exhibitionary culture in the People’s Republic of China. China Q. 2005, 183, 565–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Yan, L.; Wang, F.; Lin, M. Self-congruity Theory in Red Tourism: A Study of Shaoshan City, China. J. China Tour. Res. 2022, 18, 46–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Administrative Region | Number of Towns | Proportion (%) | Cumulative Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Xinjiang | 6 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
2 | Jiangsu | 4 | 4.00 | 10.00 |
3 | Hubei | 4 | 4.00 | 14.00 |
4 | Guizhou | 4 | 4.00 | 18.00 |
5 | Zhejiang | 4 | 4.00 | 22.00 |
6 | Sichuan | 3 | 3.00 | 25.00 |
7 | Shandong | 3 | 3.00 | 28.00 |
8 | Jiangxi | 3 | 3.00 | 31.00 |
9 | Heilongjiang | 3 | 3.00 | 34.00 |
10 | Liaoning | 3 | 3.00 | 37.00 |
11 | Anhui | 3 | 3.00 | 40.00 |
12 | Hebei | 3 | 3.00 | 43.00 |
13 | Shanxi | 3 | 3.00 | 46.00 |
14 | Beijing | 3 | 3.00 | 49.00 |
15 | Shaanxi | 3 | 3.00 | 52.00 |
16 | Chongqing | 3 | 3.00 | 55.00 |
17 | Hunan | 3 | 3.00 | 58.00 |
18 | Yunnan | 3 | 3.00 | 61.00 |
19 | Henan | 3 | 3.00 | 64.00 |
20 | Gansu | 3 | 3.00 | 67.00 |
21 | Fujian | 3 | 3.00 | 70.00 |
22 | Tianjin | 3 | 3.00 | 73.00 |
23 | Shanghai | 3 | 3.00 | 76.00 |
24 | Tibet | 3 | 3.00 | 79.00 |
25 | Jilin | 3 | 3.00 | 82.00 |
26 | Guangdong | 3 | 3.00 | 85.00 |
27 | Qinghai | 3 | 3.00 | 88.00 |
28 | Ningxia | 3 | 3.00 | 91.00 |
29 | Guangxi | 3 | 3.00 | 94.00 |
30 | Inner Mongolia | 3 | 3.00 | 97.00 |
31 | Hainan | 3 | 3.00 | 100.00 |
32 | Hong Kong | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
33 | Macao | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
34 | Taiwan (R.O.C) | Not available | Not available | 100.00 |
Density Classification | Administrative Region | Kernel Density Zone |
---|---|---|
Core density | * Beijing | 0.52–3.21 |
Tianjin | 0.17–1.79 | |
High density | * Jiangsu | 0.17–1.79 |
Anhui | 0.17–1.79 | |
Shanghai | 0.52–1.79 | |
Zhejiang | 0.17–1.04 | |
Hubei | 0.17–1.04 | |
Jiangxi | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Henan | 0.17–1.79 | |
Shaanxi | 0.17–1.79 | |
Hebei | 0.17–1.04 | |
Medium density | * Sichuan | 0.17–1.04 |
Chongqing | 0.17–1.04 | |
Shanxi | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Hunan | 0.17–1.04 | |
Fujian | 0.17–1.04 | |
Guangdong | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Gansu | 0.17–1.04 | |
Qinghai | 0.17–0.52 | |
* Ningxia | 0.17–1.04 | |
Inner Mongolia | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Liaoning | 0.17–1.04 | |
Jilin | 0.17–1.04 | |
Heilongjiang | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Guizhou | 0.17–1.04 | |
Yunnan | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Hainan | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Guangxi | 0.17–1.04 | |
* Xinjiang | 0.17–1.04 | |
Low density | * Tibet | 0.17–0.52 |
* Shandong | 0.17–0.52 |
No. | Function | Index |
---|---|---|
1 | Kernel density estimation | 0.17–3.21 |
2 | Imbalance index | 0.15 |
3 | Gini coefficient | G = 0.97, C = 0.03 |
Administrative Division | Number of Towns | Proportion (%) | Cumulative Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|
East (Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Shandong, Fujian, Taiwan (R.O.C.)) | 23 | 23.00 | 23.00 |
Northwest (Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang) | 18 | 18.00 | 41.00 |
Southwest (Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet) | 16 | 16.00 | 57.00 |
North (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia) | 15 | 15.00 | 72.00 |
Central (Henan, Hubei, Hunan) | 10 | 10.00 | 82.00 |
Northeast (Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang) | 9 | 9.00 | 91.00 |
South (Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hong Kong, Macao) | 9 | 9.00 | 100.00 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhan, Z.; Cenci, J.; Zhang, J. Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns. Land 2022, 11, 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060812
Zhan Z, Cenci J, Zhang J. Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns. Land. 2022; 11(6):812. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060812
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhan, Zirui, Jeremy Cenci, and Jiazhen Zhang. 2022. "Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns" Land 11, no. 6: 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060812
APA StyleZhan, Z., Cenci, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns. Land, 11(6), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060812