A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Sources
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Evaluation of Supply and Demand of ESV in BTH Region
3.1.1. Evaluation of NESV
3.1.2. Evaluation of ES Demand
3.1.3. Zoning of Supply and Demand of ESV
3.2. Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Scarcity of ES
3.2.1. Concept of SESV
3.2.2. Evaluation Method of SESV
4. Results
4.1. Different Ecological Zoning and Elasticity Coefficient of Supply and Demand
4.2. Changes in NESV and SESV
4.3. Ecological Zoning and Land-Use Strategy in the BTH Region
5. Discussion
5.1. The Relationship of NESV and SESV
5.2. Application in National Spatial Planning
5.3. Application in the Realization of ESV
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Costanza, R.; Arge, R.; Groot, R.D.; Farberk, S.; Belt, M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawton, J.H.; Daily, G.C. Nature’s Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC. 392 Pp. ISBN 1-55963-475-8 (Hbk), 1 55963 476 6 (Soft Cover). Anim. Conserv. 1998, 1, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers; Welzel+Hardt: Wesseling, Germeny, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, S.; Shi, Q. Global Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Changes in Multiple Ecosystem Services under Four IPCC SRES Land-use Scenarios. Earth’s Future 2020, 8, e2020EF001668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grêt-Regamey, A.; Weibel, B. Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 46, 101213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z. Study on the Change of Grassland Ecological Service Value and Ecological Compensation in Three-River Headwaters Region, Qinghai, China; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, F.; Yang, W.S.; Ma, G.X. The Latest Development and Prospect of Ecological Value Accounting at Home and Abroad. Environ. Prot. 2020, 48, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundimeda, H.; Sukhdev, P.; Sinha, R.K.; Sanyal, S. Natural Resource Accounting for Indian States—Illustrating the Case of Forest Resources. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M. Research on Land-use Change and the Value of Ecosystem Services in Baiyun Distric; South China Agricultural University: Guangzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.c. Study on Service Value of Island Ecosystem Based on Emergy Analysis---Taking Zhoushan as an Example; Zhejiang Ocean University: Zhoushan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Q.; Liu, K.; Gao, Y.; Ying, L.I.; Fan, Y.; Chao, G.U. Assessment on Social Values of Ecosystem Services in Xi’an Chanba NationalWetland Park based on SolVES Model. Wetl. Sci. 2018, 16, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Damme, S.V.; Li, L.; Uyttenhove, P. Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 37, 100925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rémi, J.; Jérôme, C.; Marti, B.; Stephanie, H. Historical dynamics of ecosystem services and land management policies in Switzerland. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 101, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.J.; Song, G.; Lu, S. Study on the ecological protection redline (EPR) demarcation process and the ecosystem service value (ESV) of the EPR zone: A case study on the city of Qiqihaer in China. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.J.; Yang, L.; Yu, Y.H.; Luo, W.B.; Wang, Z.F. Impact of land use fragmentation on ecosystem service values in an urbanecotourism area: A case study of East Lake ecotourism area, Wuhan. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.M.; Feng, C.C. Ecosystem service values and ecological improvement based on land use change: Acase study of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 4741–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Miao, H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1999, 19, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.Q.; Zhou, B.T.; Yu, L.; Xu, Y. Temporal-spatial dynamic pattern of forest ecosystem service value affected byclimate change in the future in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 1952–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.M.; Zhao, H.F.; Li, R.Q.; Zhang, L.Y.; Zhao, F.X.; Liu, L.X.; Shen, R.C.; Xu, M. Assessment on Grassland Ecosystem Services in Qinghai Province during 1998–2012. J. Nat. Resour. 2017, 32, 418–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Zou, W. The marine ecosystem services values for China based on the emergy analysis method. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018, 161, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, L.M.; Chen, W.H.; Li, S.M. Improvement of the Evaluation Method for Ecosystem Service Value Based on Per Unit Area. J. Nat. Resour. 2015, 30, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhang, Y.L.; Lu, C.X.; Zheng, D.; Cheng, S.K. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. J. Nat. Resour. 2001, 16, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, H.M.; Han, J.L.; Pan, D.Z.; Xie, H.C.; Le, T.C.; Ma, J.B.; Huang, S.Z.; Tan, F.L. Dynamic evaluation and driving forces of ecosystem services in Quanzhou bay estuary wetland. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 4286–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J. Spatial spillover effects of urbanization on ecosystem services value in Chinese cities. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 121, 107028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.M.; Chen, B.M.; Lu, Q.B.; Han, F. The ecological location correction of ecosystem service value: A case study of Beijing City. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 3526–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, S.; Kim, M.; Lee, J. Coastal landscape planning for improving the value of ecosystem services in coastal areas: Using system dynamics model. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 2040–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, Y. Agro-Ecosystem Service Value of Sichuan Province: An Assessment. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2021, 37, 154–160. [Google Scholar]
- Eigenbrod, F.; Bell, V.A.; Davies, H.N.; Heinemeyer, A.; Gaston, P.R. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 3201–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandhu, H.; Waterhouse, B.; Boyer, S.; Wratten, S. Scarcity of ecosystem services: An experimental manipulation of declining pollination rates and its economic con-sequences for agriculture. PeerJ 2016, 4, E2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Tang, H.; Zhang, Q. Exploring Connections among Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being in a Mountain-Basin System, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wei, H. Identifying Dynamic Changes in Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand for Urban Sustainability: Insights from a Rapidly Urbanizing City in Central China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgärtner, S.; Becker, C.; Faber, M. Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 59, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krutilla, J.V. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 1967, 57, 777–786. [Google Scholar]
- Batabyal, A.A.; Kahn, J.R.; O’Neill, R.V. On the scarcity value of ecosystem services. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2003, 46, 334–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahdjian, L.; Sala, O.E.; Havstad, K.M. Rangeland ecosystem services: Shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 13, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zank, B.; Bagstad, K.J.; Voigt, B.; Villa, F. Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: A case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 149, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, B.A.; Ye, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.E.; Jeffery, D.C. Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 144–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, K.; Cheng, C.X.; Liu, X.H.; Zhang, F.; Li, Z.H.; Lu, S.Q. An ecosystem services value assessment of land-use change in Chengdu: Based on a modification of scarcity factor. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2019, 110, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.L.; Qi, Y.Q.; Hu, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.C.; Shen, Y.J. Changes and driving forces of land use/cover and landscape patterns in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2011, 19, 1182–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaomin, G.; Chuanglin, F.; Xufang, M. Coupling and coordination analysis of urbanization and ecosystem service value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Li, W.; Wang, S. Assessing heterogeneity of trade-offs/synergies and values among ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 140, 109026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, A.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y. Simulation and Optimization of Supply and Demand Pattern of Multiobjective Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Nedkov, S.; Muller, F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Zhu, J.Y.; Wu, G.; Zhan, Y.J. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption ofecosystem services. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 2489–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Liu, H.; Peng, J.; Wu, J.S. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2017, 72, 1277–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.M.; Hao, X.Y.; Pan, Y.C.; Gao, Y.B. Ecological Regionalization Based on Ecological Demanding Evaluationin Beijing City. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2016, 47, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Land Use | Air Quality | Climate Regulation | Water Conservation | Soil Conservation | Waste Disposal | Biodiversity | Food Production | Raw Materials | Recreation and Culture | Total Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paddy field | 1185.632 | 2110.50 | 355.77 | 2596.79 | 1555.74 | 420.89 | 1778.72 | 118.59 | 309.70 | 10,432.33 |
Dryland | 592.816 | 1055.25 | 711.41 | 1731.15 | 1944.61 | 841.79 | 1185.77 | 118.59 | 253.93 | 8435.30 |
Forested land | 4149.98 | 3464.20 | 4105.68 | 5003.81 | 1680.84 | 4182.67 | 128.33 | 3335.44 | 1642.27 | 28,033.87 |
Shrub forest | 3319.984 | 3117.79 | 5337.45 | 4003.02 | 840.42 | 3346.17 | 128.33 | 3335.44 | 1313.85 | 25,014.97 |
Sparse woodland | 2489.988 | 2274.46 | 5391.18 | 2815.88 | 630.63 | 2353.89 | 96.29 | 2502.67 | 1078.21 | 19,670.36 |
Other woodlands | 2074.99 | 1612.64 | 5733.86 | 1863.54 | 626.00 | 1947.11 | 83.70 | 2173.77 | 917.46 | 17,048.54 |
High-coverage grassland | 948.586 | 1075.14 | 955.67 | 2329.56 | 1564.92 | 1302.08 | 358.43 | 59.67 | 415.13 | 9016.25 |
Medium-coverage grassland | 758.842 | 891.94 | 1189.30 | 1932.56 | 1298.36 | 1080.24 | 297.36 | 49.56 | 413.56 | 7945.70 |
Low-coverage grassland | 474.36 | 549.52 | 1270.01 | 1190.66 | 799.85 | 665.57 | 183.26 | 30.50 | 338.24 | 5516.14 |
Water body | 0 | 549.45 | 24,344.82 | 11.88 | 21,716.91 | 2974.46 | 119.48 | 11.88 | 5184.27 | 54,913.14 |
Desert | 0 | 0.00 | 37.10 | 24.78 | 12.32 | 421.12 | 12.32 | 0.00 | 140.73 | 648.37 |
Construction land | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Indicator Name | Indicator Meaning | Calculation Method | Positive and Negative | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population density | The larger the population of the region, the greater the demand for food and ecology | Total population/total area | + | 0.30 |
Per capita GDP | The higher the GDP per capita, the higher the level of economic development, and the higher the demand for environment and culture | GDP/total population | + | 0.30 |
Proportion of output value of tertiary industry | The higher the proportion of output value of tertiary industry, the higher the demand for environment and culture of regional service industry | Tertiary output value/regional output value | + | 0.20 |
Adult literacy rate | The higher the adult literacy rate, the higher the regional education level, and the higher the demand for environment and culture | Literate population/total population | + | 0.20 |
ES | Type of Good | Elasticity | |
---|---|---|---|
Demand | Supply | ||
Food production | Private | Inelastic mechanics | Elasticity |
Raw material | Private | Inelastic mechanics | Elasticity |
Air quality | Public | Elasticity | Inelastic mechanics |
Climate regulation | Private | Inelastic mechanics | Elasticity |
Water conservation | Private | Inelastic mechanics | Elasticity |
Waste disposal | Private | Inelastic mechanics | Elasticity |
Soil conservation | Public | Elasticity | Inelastic mechanics |
Biodiversity | Public | Elasticity | Inelastic mechanics |
Recreation and culture | Public | Elasticity | Inelastic mechanics |
Type | Relative Change in SESV | Private Goods | Public Goods | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supply | Demand | Supply | Demand | ||
High supply and high demand (H–H) | Elasticities | 5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.1 |
Δ P | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.83 | 0.92 | |
Low supply and high demand (L–H) | Elasticities | 2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
Δ P | 0.357 | 0.357 | 0.55 | 0.61 | |
High supply and low demand (H–L) | Elasticities | 5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
Δ P | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.50 | |
Low supply and low demand (L–L) | Elasticities | 2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.1 |
Δ P | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.357 | 0.392 | |
Other Areas (NS) | Elasticities | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 |
Δ P | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Y.; Feng, H. A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence. Land 2022, 11, 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091545
Tang X, Liu Y, Ren Y, Feng H. A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence. Land. 2022; 11(9):1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091545
Chicago/Turabian StyleTang, Xiumei, Yu Liu, Yanmin Ren, and Huiyi Feng. 2022. "A Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Scarcity Modification of Spatiotemporal Supply–Demand Influence" Land 11, no. 9: 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091545