Next Article in Journal
Modelling the Whole Profile Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Considering Soil Redistribution under Future Climate Change and Landscape Projections over the Lower Hunter Valley, Australia
Next Article in Special Issue
Planning and Designing Natural and Urban Environments with an Adaptive Visualization Framework: The Case of Pazhou Island, Guangzhou, Pearl River Delta
Previous Article in Journal
Simulating Future Land Use and Cover of a Mediterranean Mountainous Area: The Effect of Socioeconomic Demands and Climatic Changes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conservation Planning for Action: End-User Engagement in the Development and Dual-Centric Weighting of a Spatial Decision Support System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool

1
Botany Department, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth), Eastern Cape 6031, South Africa
2
Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA
3
Feaver’s Lane Enterprises Inc., St. John’s, NL A1C1T6, Canada
4
Bren School, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93117, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(1), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010254
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 14 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for Land Planning and Architecture Section)

Abstract

Spatial conservation prioritization does not necessarily lead to effective conservation plans, and good plans do not necessarily lead to action. These “science-action” gaps are pernicious and need to be narrowed, especially if the international goal of conserving 30% of the planet by 2030 is to be realized. We present the Earthwise Framework, a flexible and customizable spatial decision support system (SDSS) architecture and social process to address the challenges of these science-action gaps. Utilizing case study experience from regions within California, South Africa, and British Columbia, we outline the framework and provide the Little Karoo, South Africa SDSS data, code and results to illustrate five design strategies of the framework. The first is to employ an “open science” strategy for collaborative conservation planning and action. Another is that marginal value functions allow for the continuous accounting of element (e.g., habitat) representation in prioritization algorithms, allowing for an SDSS that is more automated and saves valuable time for stakeholders and scientists. Thirdly, we program connectivity modeling integrated within the SDSS, with an algorithm that not only automatically calculates all the least cost corridors of a region, but prioritizes among them and removes the ones that do not make ecological sense. Fourth, we highlight innovations in multi-criteria decision analysis that allow for both cost-efficient plan development, like representative solution sets, but also land-use planning requirements, like site specific valuation, in what appears to be a more transparent, understandable, and usable manner than traditional approaches. Finally, strategic attention to communicating uncertainty is also advocated. The Earthwise Framework is an open science endeavor that can be implemented via a variety of software tools and languages, has several frontiers for further research and development, and shows promise in finding a better way to meet the needs of both humans and biodiversity.
Keywords: spatial decision support system; collaborative conservation planning; habitat connectivity; habitat representation; 30 × 30 commitment; EEMS; OECM; LandAdvisor; Earthwise Framework spatial decision support system; collaborative conservation planning; habitat connectivity; habitat representation; 30 × 30 commitment; EEMS; OECM; LandAdvisor; Earthwise Framework

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gallo, J.A.; Lombard, A.T.; Cowling, R.M.; Greene, R.; Davis, F.W. Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool. Land 2023, 12, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010254

AMA Style

Gallo JA, Lombard AT, Cowling RM, Greene R, Davis FW. Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool. Land. 2023; 12(1):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gallo, John A., Amanda T. Lombard, Richard M. Cowling, Randal Greene, and Frank W. Davis. 2023. "Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool" Land 12, no. 1: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010254

APA Style

Gallo, J. A., Lombard, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Greene, R., & Davis, F. W. (2023). Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool. Land, 12(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop