Next Article in Journal
Planting Structure Adjustment and Layout Optimization of Feed Grain and Food Grain in China Based on Productive Potentials
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Landscape Characteristics on Wind Dispersal Efficiency of Calotropis procera
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Effects of Study Area Size and Soil Sampling Density in the Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon by Vis-NIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in Two Forest Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of an Invasive Plant Species (Cynanchum acutum L.) to Changing Climate Conditions and Its Impact on Agricultural Landscapes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Spatial Variability of Forest Species: Case Study for Alto Alentejo, Portugal

by Ana Margarida Coelho 1, Adélia M. O. Sousa 2 and Ana Cristina Gonçalves 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The scientific value is high but need significant improvement in presentation. In some areas it is too long and English is way too week to make readers understand the value of it. However, I found it of value to me in the data (I am interested in protected area management).  I think it can be written in better language and structure. Perhaps you can involve a scientist whose mother tongue is English to help you edit.

Author Response

Response to the reviewers

 

1) Reviewer 1

The scientific value is high but need significant improvement in presentation. In some areas it is too long and English is way too week to make readers understand the value of it. However, I found it of value to me in the data (I am interested in protected area management).  I think it can be written in better language and structure. Perhaps you can involve a scientist whose mother tongue is English to help you edit.

Answer

A thorough revision of the manuscript was carried out, in particular of the introduction and methods. The structure of the manuscript as well as the English were revised.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is technically correct and largely well-written. Some minor elements of diction could be improved upon, but not doing so would not materially impact the readability.

Author Response

2) Reviewer 2

The manuscript is technically correct and largely well-written. Some minor elements of diction could be improved upon, but not doing so would not materially impact the readability.

Answer

A thorough revision of the manuscript was carried out, in particular of results. The English were revised.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop