Next Article in Journal
The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Ceramics Industry in Jingdezhen in the Last 40 Years
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: Díaz-Diego et al. The Last Attempt at Land Reform in Spain: Application and Scope of the Andalusian Agrarian Reform, 1984–2011. Land 2023, 12, 683
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Quality in an Intensive Agricultural Region of the North China Plain
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Perception of the Impact of Land-Use on Small and Large Cities by Tourists Using p2p Platforms
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis for Selecting Suitable Areas for Urban Green Spaces in Abomey-Calavi District, Southern Benin

Land 2023, 12(8), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081553
by Abdel A. Osseni 1, Hubert O. Dossou-Yovo 2,*, François G. H. Gbesso 1 and Brice Sinsin 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Land 2023, 12(8), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081553
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 5 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land-Use Planning in Borderlands and Ultra-Peripheral Regions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

 

I am thankful for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The article is interesting and the subject is worthy of investigation. In addition it is well known that site suitability is crucial important for sustainable land resource so current paper gives a good example All my comments and suggestions are made directly to the text. Finally, the current study is carrying important task. On the other hand, in order to increase paper quality, in text there are some cases which should be explained and reorganized. That is why, I suggest to the editor to accept this manuscript for publication after major revision.     

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks are due to Editors and reviewers

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Paper deals with a very interesting topic of urban green spaces selection, with a case study on example of Benin. Further down I have minor issues on technical editing and the conclusion should be rewritten and is not sufficient for this paper and its outcomes.

 

1. Please check spelling and grammar – there some extra spaces that should not be there.

2. Please delete Background Methods, Results and Conclusion form the Abstract

3. Line 20 large should be Large as the beginning of the sentence.

4. Formatting of the paper is not following instructions, chapters and subchapters are not numbered.

5. Tables are not numbered properly.

6. Line 330 link should be presented as URL.

7. Conclusion is poor, it looks more like an abstract then conclusion. The questions that should be explained in the conclusion are:

- what are the weaknesses of the research;

- what could be future research expectations;

- what are the recommendations and implications of the research;

- how could/should futures studies improve the model etc.

Overall, the topic is interesting, the research is well conducted and with changing this minor issues it can be published.

Author Response

Thankful to editors and reviewers for all.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop