1. Introduction
Ecological protection is critical for human activities, yet the eco-environment faces severe impacts from global-warming-induced extreme weather and natural disasters [
1,
2]. The increasing global focus on the eco-environment necessitates stronger ecological management, active participation in environmental governance and collaborative efforts to tackle challenges posed by global environmental change [
3]. Addressing these challenges aligns with the United Nations (UN)’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [
4]. Amid rapid economic development, China is playing an increasingly important leadership role in global conservation activities, promoting global environmental governance and sustainable development through policy formulation, international cooperation and ecological civilization [
5]. Improving the eco-environment has become a fundamental criterion for assessing high-quality and green development. Human activities involving improper territorial spatial utilization and unreasonable structures contribute significantly to the degradation of terrestrial ecosystems. Excessive encroachment on ecological spaces by production and residential areas significantly exacerbates environmental problems [
6]. In response, China introduced the “National Master Plan for Major Function Zones” in December 2010. The NKEFZ policy has a wide range of pilots, a large number of beneficiaries and a large number of transfers, making it the world’s largest ecological poverty-alleviation program [
7]. This plan delineates the primary functions of different regions to foster a coordinated spatial development pattern integrating population, economic, resource and environmental considerations. Major function zones, according to their development focus, are categorized into urbanized areas, major agricultural production areas and key ecological function zones. The latter category primarily aims to improve the eco-environment and provide ecological products. Notably, National Key Ecological Function Zones (NKEFZs) serve as a vital natural ecological barrier in China, with the NKEFZ policy emerging as the country’s largest regional ecological compensation initiative [
8,
9]. In this context, addressing sustainable development challenges and ensuring that NKEFZs effectively enhance eco-environmental quality (EEQ) are pivotal for the stable and enduring success of this ecological policy.
Under the existing framework, NKEFZs primarily offer positive incentives to local governments via ecological transfer payments [
10]. Additionally, NKEFZs possess the financial capability to augment the government’s delivery of basic public services [
11]. Scholars have extensively explored the qualitative aspects of NKEFZs, focusing on policy interpretation, incentive effects, fund allocation and compensation standards. Initial studies indicated a modest ecological compensation effect from NKEFZs, closely linked to their transfer payment policies [
12] and the ecological conditions during the baseline period [
13]. The allocation of transfer payment funds for NKEFZs was not favorably biased towards zones with limited financial resources and poor EEQ [
14]. Furthermore, previous scholars have found discrepancy exists between the dual objectives of eco-environment protection and livelihood improvement, and the performance evaluation metrics employed in both central and local NKEFZs’ transfer payment policies [
15,
16,
17].
In the quantitative evaluation of NKEFZ policies, studies have utilized remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies to compare environmental changes before and after policy implementation. These studies reveal an overall trend of eco-environmental improvement within NKEFZs [
18,
19], albeit with varying degrees of ecological improvement across different NKEFZs [
20,
21]. There is also a study that shows improvements in EEQ in NKEFZs, but to a lesser extent than in non-NKEFZ areas [
22]. Furthermore, post-2010, the overall ecosystem service value of NKEFZs has significantly increased, though this varies among different types of NKEFZs [
23]. Additionally, various studies have employed the difference-in-differences (DID) model to assess diverse environmental aspects, including water quality [
24], afforestation areas [
25] and sustainable development [
26]. Zhu and Chen [
27] noted that transfer payments in NKEFZs have effectively enhanced the eco-environment in Guangdong Province, with a continually increasing beneficial effect.
While the existing literature has significantly contributed to the research on the effectiveness of NKEFZs, there remains a scope for further exploration. Studies on the environmental improvement of NKEFZs typically fall into two distinct categories. The first category, qualitative analysis, primarily scrutinizes the effectiveness of transfer payments, largely encompassing experiential summaries and theoretical explorations. The second category, quantitative analysis, tends to concentrate on specific dimensions or particular areas of environmental impact [
28]. On one hand, remote sensing images interpreted through GIS technology generally extract overall feature changes after policy implementation [
29]. However, isolating the impacts of NKEFZs from those of other ecological policies remains challenging [
30]. On the other hand, while the DID model is a widespread method for policy evaluation, its application is often confined to specific fields. The establishment of NKEFZs, viewed as an exogenous policy impact, is well suited for DID model analysis to assess its effect on EEQ. The DID model discerns the net effect by contrasting environmental differences before and after policy implementation and between areas that are under the policy’s purview and those that are not [
31]. This approach helps control pre-existing environmental variations, isolating the genuine impact of the policy [
32].
In order to deeply explore the long-term impacts of the National Key Ecological Function Zone (NKEFZ) policy on EEQ and the potential mechanisms of those impacts, this study utilizes and considers the establishment of the NKEFZs as a quasi-natural experiment. Employing panel data spanning 2001 to 2021 from 130 counties in Sichuan Province, this study uses a multi-period DID model to quantitatively evaluate the impact of NKEFZs on EEQ and explore the underlying mechanisms. This study significantly contributes to the empirical evidence base and institutional improvement for the sustainable implementation of ecological policies in China, while also providing valuable insights and guidelines for other nations developing eco-environmental protection policies.
2. Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesis
NKEFZs are pivotal in safeguarding national ecological security, performing key ecological functions including water conservation (WC), soil conservation (SC), windbreak and sand-fixation effects (WSF) and biodiversity maintenance (BM). NKEFZs represent China’s most extensive ecological compensation policy in terms of scale and range. By the end of 2010, China had established an initial set of 25 NKEFZs, encompassing 436 county-level regions. An additional 240 counties (including cities, districts and banners) were incorporated into the NKEFZs in 2016. The primary objective of NKEFZs is to augment regional ecological services and enhance EEQ. In comparison with non-NKEFZ areas, the policy constraints and incentives within NKEFZs strengthen environmental governance. This typically entails stricter environmental regulations, facilitating control over pollution emissions and reduction of negative environmental externalities. Consequently, protecting and restoring the eco-environment in NKEFZs is instrumental in improving EEQ. Additionally, the establishment of NKEFZs influences EEQ through the effects of territorial spatial configuration and industrial structure upgrading. Based on the above analysis, this study will formulate the first hypothesis as follows:
Hypothesis 1. NKEFZs have a significant beneficial effect on EEQ.
2.1. Territorial Spatial Configuration Effect
NKEFZs expand ecological space by optimizing territorial development patterns. NKEFZs impose strict controls on the intensity and scope of territorial development. Development within NKEFZs is aligned with the carrying capacity of regional resources and the environment [
33]. Restrictions on large-scale, high-intensity developments mandate that NKEFZs be strategically placed in cities and towns with robust resource and environmental carrying capacities. Additionally, all territorial space development must fall within the clearly defined ecological red lines. Restricted development areas and ecological red lines serve distinct ecological functions. By optimizing territorial development patterns, land use functions can be developed more rationally, enhancing the efficiency of territorial spatial configuration [
34] and thus contributing to eco-environmental improvement. Based on the above analysis, this study will formulate the second hypothesis based on the first hypothesis as follows:
Hypothesis 2a. NKEFZs can improve EEQ through a territorial spatial configuration effect.
2.2. Industrial Structure Upgrading Effect
NKEFZs enforce a stringent negative list system for industrial access. This system specifies industries with restricted or prohibited development and aligns these with corresponding industrial and environmental access standards. NKEFZs encourage the moderate development and utilization of regionally advantageous resources and the rational development of appropriate industries. With stricter industrial access requirements, it becomes crucial to either facilitate the gradient transfer or phase out outdated production capacities in industries misaligned with the main functional objectives. Encouraging the growth of ecological industries and low-pollution service sectors, such as tourism and sightseeing, supports the upgrading of the industrial structure in these functional areas [
35]. Structural upgrading and adjustment play a significant role in reducing pollutant emissions and enhancing the eco-environment. Accompanying technological advancements also lessen the impact of resource and environmental constraints on economic growth [
36], facilitating the green transformation of industrial development. Based on the above analysis, this study will formulate the third hypothesis based on the first hypothesis as follows:
Hypothesis 2b. NKEFZs can improve EEQ through an industrial structure upgrading effect.
5. Conclusions and Implications
5.1. Conclusions
This study treats the establishment of NKEFZs as a quasi-natural experiment. Using Sichuan Province as a case study, this study employs a multi-period DID model to assess the impact of NKEFZs on EEQ. The findings reveal that the establishment of NKEFZs significantly improves EEQ. Compared to areas without NKEFZs, the average treatment effect at the county level is a 0.0162 increase in EEQ. This conclusion is substantiated by parallel-trends analyses and comprehensive robustness checks. The positive impact of NKEFZs on EEQ is gradual and long-term, with modest initial effects that intensify progressively. Modifications in territorial spatial configuration and industrial structure upgrading emerge as effective mechanisms in the improvement of EEQ through NKEFZs. The policy impacts of NKEFZs vary across different functional-zone types, geographical locations and ethnic regions yet consistently contribute to EEQ enhancement.
5.2. Policy Implications
The conclusions of this study carry rich policy implications:
(1) Enhancing the sustainability of establishing and implementing NKEFZs is paramount. The establishment of NKEFZs serves as a significant incentive for local governments, encouraging proactive measures in ecological governance and environmental protection. To guarantee the long-term effectiveness of these incentives and mitigate the risk of ecological issues re-emerging, continuous national-level support and supervision are essential to bolster the stability and sustainability of policy implementation.
(2) Constructing a diversified ecological governance and supervision system, tailored to the specific needs of different functional zone types, geographical locations and ethnic regions, is crucial. In regions with high ecological vulnerability, including WC areas and ethnic minority regions, where eco-environmental conditions have been effectively improved, continued strengthening of ecological governance in key eco-functional zones is vital. This approach aims to enhance ecosystem services and consolidate the gains in improving EEQ. Additionally, the central government’s financial support for key eco-functional zones should be increasingly directed towards these high-vulnerability areas. Concurrently, it is essential to guide local governments to amplify their investment in environmental protection, enhance eco-environmental supervision and establish a sustainable ecological compensation mechanism.
(3) Strict adherence to the “National Master Plan for Functional Zones” is imperative for sustainable ecological management. Firstly, the plan mandates limiting human development and construction beyond the ecological red line, aligning with the environmental carrying capacity of ecological spaces. This approach aims to control the expansion and intensity of production spaces, thereby enhancing land-use efficiency and sustainability. Secondly, within the framework of enhanced ecological protection, the plan encourages exploring directions for industrial upgrading and transformation. These strategies should be compatible with and customized to the local eco-environment, promoting eco-friendly agriculture and service industries. Additionally, the plan highlights the importance of leveraging the ecological product potential of NKEFZs, integrating this potential with broader industrial transformation efforts. The plan also advocates for exploring development paths within the constraints of resource availability, environmental carrying capacity and market dynamics, with a focus on green industries such as eco-tourism and clean energy.