Next Article in Journal
Path Loss Model for Outdoor Parking Environments at 28 GHz and 38 GHz for 5G Wireless Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimizing a Password Hashing Function with Hardware-Accelerated Symmetric Encryption
Previous Article in Journal
Algorithm for T-Spherical Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Improved Interactive Aggregation Operators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generalized Liouville–Caputo Fractional Differential Equations and Inclusions with Nonlocal Generalized Fractional Integral and Multipoint Boundary Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complex Spirals and Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials of Fractional Degree

by
Paolo Emilio Ricci
International Telematic University UniNettuno, Corso Vittorio Emanuele II, 39, 00186 Roma, Italy
Symmetry 2018, 10(12), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120671
Submission received: 9 November 2018 / Revised: 21 November 2018 / Accepted: 23 November 2018 / Published: 28 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integral Transforms and Operational Calculus)

Abstract

:
The complex Bernoulli spiral is connected to Grandi curves and Chebyshev polynomials. In this framework, pseudo-Chebyshev polynomials are introduced, and some of their properties are borrowed to form classical trigonometric identities; in particular, a set of orthogonal pseudo-Chebyshev polynomials of half-integer degree is derived.

1. Introduction

The purpose of this article is to emphasize some simple connections among mathematical objects apparently of different types as the Bernoulli spirals, the Grandi (rhodonea) curves, and the first and second kind Chebyshev polynomials. Namely, by considering polar coordinates and the complex form of the Bernoulli spiral, a straightforward connection between the real and imaginary part of the Bernoulli spiral with the Grandi curves follows. Even the Chebyshev polynomials come out immediately.
Since the rhodonea curves exist even for a fractional index, it is possible to define an extension of the first and second kind Chebyshev polynomials to the case of rational degree. Actually, the resulting functions are not polynomials, but irrational functions. However, several properties of these functions can be derived from their trigonometric definition, by using standard identities of circular functions. In particular, for the function of half-integer degree, T n + 1 / 2 and U n + 1 / 2 , the orthogonality property still holds, in the interval ( 1 , 1 ) , with respect to the same weight function of their polynomial counterparts.
The second section of the article is devoted to recalling the most simple examples of spirals, including the Archimedes, Bernoulli, Fermat, and other spirals, which can be derived by using an analogy with Cartesian coordinates. Namely, the above- mentioned spirals, considered in the plane ( ρ , θ ) , correspond to elementary curves in the plane ( x , y ) , which are, respectively, straight lines, exponential, and power functions. This is, possibly, the motivation for the frequent occurrence of spirals or Grandi curves in natural forms (see, e.g., [1,2]).

2. Spirals

The Archimedes spiral [3] (Figure 1) has the polar equation:
ρ = a θ , ( a > 0 , θ R ) .
If θ > 0 , the spiral turns counter-clockwise, if θ < 0 , the spiral turns clockwise.
Bernoulli’s (logarithmic) spiral [4] (Figure 1) has the polar equation:
ρ = a b θ , ( a , b R + ) , θ = log b ρ a .
Varying the parameters a and b, one gets different types of spirals.
The coefficient a changes the size, and the term b controls it to be “narrow” and in what direction it wraps itself.
Since a and b are positive constants, some interesting cases are possible. The most studied logarithmic spiral is called harmonic, as the distance between coils is in the harmonic progression whose ratio is ϕ = 5 1 2 , that is, the “golden ratio” relevant to the unit segment.
The logarithmic spiral was discovered by René Descartes in 1638 and studied by Jakob Bernoulli (1654–1705).
Pierre Varignon (1654–1722) called it an equiangular spiral because:
  • The angle between the tangent at a point and the polar radius passing through that point is constant.
  • The angle of inclination with respect to the concentric circles with the center in the origin is also constant.
It is an example of a fractal. As it is written on J. Bernoulli’s tomb: Eadem mutata resurgo, but the spiral represented there is of the Archimedes type.
Fermat’s spiral (or parabolic) (Figure 2) has the polar equation:
ρ = ± a θ 1 / 2 .
Fermat’s (parabolic) spiral suggests the possibility of introducing intermediate graphs between Archimedes’ and Bernoulli’s spirals.
In fact, in the plane ( θ , ρ ) , the graph of Archimedes’ spiral is a straight line, while the Bernoulli spiral has an exponential graph, and the Fermat spiral a parabolic graph.
Then, putting:
ρ = a θ m / n , ( m , n positive integers , n 0 ) ,
one gets a family of spirals at varying m and n.
Notice that, if m > n , the exponent being greater than one, the coils of the spiral are widening (Figure 2), while if m < n , the exponent is less than one, and therefore, the coils of the spiral are shrinking (as in Fermat’s case).
Another possibility is to assume θ m / n , where m / n < 0 (in this case, the coils are wrapped around the origin (Figure 3) or to use a graph with horizontal asymptotes, in order to get an asymptotic spiral.
In what follows, we consider a “canonical form” of the Bernoulli spirals assuming a = 1 , b = e n , that is the simplified polar equation:
ρ = e n θ , ( n N ) .

3. The Complex Bernoulli Spiral

We now introduce the complex case, putting:
ρ = ρ + i ρ ,
and considering a Bernoulli spiral of the type:
ρ = e i n θ = cos n θ + i sin n θ .
Therefore, we have:
ρ 1 = ρ = cos n θ , ρ 2 = ρ = sin n θ .

3.1. Rhodonea Curves

The curves defined in polar coordinates by:
ρ 1 = ρ = cos n θ ,
are called rhodonea curves or Grandi roses (examples in Figure 4), by the name of Luigi Guido Grandi (1671–1742), who communicated his discovery in a letter to Leibniz in 1713 [5].
Curves of the type:
ρ 2 = ρ = sin n θ ,
are essentially equivalent to the preceding ones, up to a rotation of π 2 n radians.

3.2. Chebyshev Polynomials

The Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kind were introduced by Pafnuty L. Chebyshev (1821–1894). They can be derived as the real and imaginary part of the exponential function e i n θ = ( cos θ + i sin θ ) n (see Equation (7)), putting x = cos θ , and using the Euler formula (see [6] for details).
The first kind Chebyshev polynomials are important in approximation theory and Gaussian quadrature rules. In fact, by using their roots—called Chebyshev nodes—the resulting interpolation polynomial minimizes the Runge phenomenon. Furthermore, the relevant approximation is the best approximation to a continuous function under the maximum norm.
Linked with these polynomials are also the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, which appear in computing the powers of 2 × 2 non-singular matrices [7]. Generalizations of such polynomials have been also introduced, in particular for computing powers of higher order matrices (see, e.g., [8,9]).
An excellent book is [10]. The importance of these polynomial sets in applications is shown in [11].
Recently, the Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kind have been used in order to represent the real and imaginary part of complex Appell polynomials [12,13].
The connection of the second kind Chebyshev polynomials with classical polynomials of number theory has been recently underlined by Kim T., Kim D.S. et al. (see, e.g., [14,15,16]).
Definition of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind:
T 0 ( x ) = 1 , T 1 ( x ) = x , T n + 1 ( x ) = 2 x T n ( x ) T n 1 ( x ) , T n ( x ) = cos ( n arccos ( x ) ) T n ( cos θ ) = cos ( n θ ) .
Definition of Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind:
U 0 ( x ) = 1 , U 1 ( x ) = 2 x , U n + 1 ( x ) = 2 x U n ( x ) U n 1 ( x ) , 1 x 2 U n 1 ( x ) = sin n arccos ( x ) U n 1 ( cos θ ) = sin [ n θ ] sin θ .
As a consequence of the above considerations, it is possible to note the connection of the rhodonea curves with the first kind Chebyshev polynomials.
In fact, the rhodonea curve ρ = cos ( n θ ) (Figure 4) can be interpreted as T n ( cos θ ) (Equation (11)).
In a similar way, the second kind Chebyshev polynomials have as graphical images the roses of the type U n ( cos θ ) corresponding to sin ( ( n 1 ) θ ) / sin ( θ ) (examples in Figure 5).
Note that, in both cases, the rhodonea curve has n petals if n is odd and 2 n petals if n is even.

4. Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials

The rhodonea curves exist even for rational values of the index n (see, e.g., [17]). This allows us to consider the sets of first and second kind pseudo-Chebyshev polynomials (graphical examples in Figure 6 and Figure 7). The prefix “pseudo” is used because actually, they are not polynomials, but irrational functions, as it is seen in what follows.
We start assuming the degree in the form n + 1 2 , that is a semi-integer number. This seems to be the most interesting case, since the resulting functions T n + 1 / 2 and U n + 1 / 2 are proven to be orthogonal, in the interval ( 1 , 1 ) , with respect to the same, corresponding weights, of the first and second kind Chebyshev polynomials.
We put, by definition:
T k + 1 2 ( x ) = cos ( k + 1 2 ) arccos ( x )
1 x 2 U k 1 2 ( x ) = sin ( k + 1 2 ) arccos ( x ) .
Remark 1.
It is worth noting that the third and fourth kind Chebyshev polynomials V n ( x ) and W n ( x ) (see, e.g., [18]) have a similar definition, but they do not coincide with the pseudo-Chebyshev, since actually they are true polynomials, and satisfy orthogonality properties with respect to different weights (see Figure 8 and Figure 9).
The third and fourth kind Chebyshev polynomials have been studied and applied by several scholars (see, e.g., [18,19,20]), because they are useful in quadrature rules, when the singularities occur only at one of the end points ( + 1 or 1 ) (see [10]). Furthermore, recently, they have been applied in numerical analysis for solving high odd-order boundary value problems with homogeneous or nonhomogeneous boundary conditions [19].

4.1. The Case of Half-Integer Degree

In particular, we have:
T 1 / 2 ( x ) = cos 1 2 arccos ( x ) = 1 + x 2 ,
1 x 2 U 1 / 2 ( x ) = sin 1 2 arccos ( x ) = 1 x 2 .
Therefore, we find:
T 3 / 2 ( x ) = cos 3 2 arccos ( x ) = cos arccos ( x ) + 1 2 arccos ( x ) = cos ( arccos ( x ) ) cos 1 2 arccos ( x ) sin ( arccos ( x ) ) sin 1 2 arccos ( x ) = x 1 + x 2 1 x 2 1 x 2 ,
T 5 / 2 ( x ) = cos 5 2 arccos ( x ) = cos 2 arccos ( x ) + 1 2 arccos ( x ) = cos ( 2 arccos ( x ) ) cos 1 2 arccos ( x ) sin ( 2 arccos ( x ) ) sin 1 2 arccos ( x ) = T 2 ( x ) 1 + x 2 1 x 2 U 1 ( x ) 1 x 2 .

4.2. Recurrence Relations

We have, in general:
T n + 1 / 2 ( x ) = cos n arccos ( x ) + 1 2 arccos ( x ) = T n ( x ) 1 + x 2 1 x 2 U n 1 ( x ) 1 x 2 ,
that is:
T n + 1 / 2 ( x ) = T n ( x ) T 1 / 2 ( x ) 1 x 2 U n 1 ( x ) U 1 / 2 ( x ) .
In a similar way, for the second kind, we find:
U n + 1 / 2 ( x ) = U n 1 ( x ) T 1 / 2 ( x ) + U 1 / 2 ( x ) T n ( x ) .
Remark 2.
Note that the number of rose petals of the curves ρ = cos ( n 2 θ ) , n = 1 , 3 , 5 , is given by the sequence { 2 , 6 , 10 , 14 , 18 , 22 , } , which appears in the Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences [21] at A016825: positive integers congruent to 2 mod 4 : a ( n ) = 4 n + 2 , for n 0 .

4.3. More General Formulas

By using cosine addition formulas, putting:
m n = p q + r s ,
we find:
T m / n ( x ) = T p / q ( x ) T r / s ( x ) 1 x 2 U ( p / q ) 1 ( x ) U ( r / s ) 1 ( x ) ,
and by using the sine addition formulas:
U m / n ( x ) = U ( p / q ) 1 ( x ) T r / s ( x ) + U ( r / s ) 1 ( x ) T p / q ( x ) .

Particular Results

T 1 ( x ) = T 1 / 3 ( x ) T 2 / 3 ( x ) 1 x 2 U 2 / 3 ( x ) U 1 / 3 ( x ) .
T 1 ( x ) = cos 3 · 1 3 arccos ( x ) = 4 T 1 / 3 3 ( x ) 3 T 1 / 3 ( x ) .
T 2 ( x ) = cos 3 · 2 3 arccos ( x ) = 4 T 2 / 3 3 ( x ) 3 T 2 / 3 ( x ) .
T 2 / 3 ( x ) = cos 2 · 1 3 arccos ( x ) = 1 2 sin 2 1 3 arccos ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 x 2 ) U 2 / 3 ( x ) .
U 1 / 3 ( x ) = sin 2 · 1 3 arccos ( x ) 1 x 2 = 2 1 x 2 sin 1 3 arccos ( x ) cos 1 3 arccos ( x ) = 2 U 2 / 3 ( x ) T 1 / 3 ( x ) .
U 2 / 3 ( x ) = sin 1 3 arccos ( x ) 1 x 2 = 1 T 1 / 3 2 ( x ) 1 x 2 .
Combining the above equations, we find:
T 1 ( x ) = T 1 / 3 ( x ) T 2 / 3 ( x ) 2 T 1 / 3 ( x ) 1 T 1 / 3 2 ( x ) = T 1 / 3 ( x ) 2 T 1 / 3 2 ( x ) + T 2 / 3 ( x ) 2 .

4.4. Orthogonality for Half-Integer Degree

Theorem 1.
The Chebyshev functions T m / 2 ( x ) satisfy the orthogonality property:
1 1 T m / 2 ( x ) T n / 2 ( x ) 1 1 x 2 d x = 0 , ( m n ) ,
where m, n are positive odd numbers such that m + n = 2k, k = 2, 3, 4, ⋯,
1 1 T m / 2 2 ( x ) 1 1 x 2 d x = π 2 .
Proof. 
As a consequence of Werner formulas, we have, under the above conditions,
1 1 cos ( m / 2 arccos ( x ) ) cos ( n / 2 arccos ( x ) ) 1 1 x 2 d x = ( putting x = cos ( 2 t ) ) = 2 0 π / 2 cos ( m t ) cos ( n t ) d t = 0 ,
and:
1 1 cos 2 ( m / 2 arccos ( x ) ) 1 1 x 2 d x = 2 0 π / 2 cos 2 ( m t ) d t = π 2 .
Theorem 2.
The Chebyshev functions U m / 2 ( x ) satisfy the orthogonality property:
1 1 U m / 2 ( x ) U n / 2 ( x ) 1 x 2 d x = 0 , ( m n ) ,
where m, n are positive odd numbers such that m + n = 2k, k = 2, 3, 4, ⋯,
1 1 U m / 2 2 ( x ) 1 x 2 d x = π 2 .
Proof. 
We have, under the above conditions,
1 1 sin ( m / 2 arccos ( x ) ) sin ( n / 2 arccos ( x ) ) 1 x 2 d x = ( putting x = cos ( 2 t ) ) = 2 0 π / 2 sin ( m t ) sin ( n t ) d t = 0 ,
and:
1 1 sin 2 ( m / 2 arccos ( x ) ) 1 x 2 d x = 2 0 π / 2 sin 2 ( m t ) d t = π 2 .

5. Conclusions

The complex form of the Bernoulli spiral, by using Euler formulas, allows us to emphasize connections with Grandi (rhodonea) curves. The rhodonea with the fractional index can be viewed as an extension of first and second kind Chebyshev polynomials to irrational functions. The properties of these “pseudo-Chebyshev functions” are borrowed from classical trigonometric identities. In particular, in the case of half-integer degree, the corresponding functions satisfy the same orthogonality property of the corresponding Chebyshev polynomials of integer degree.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Dedicated to Hari M. Srivastava with deep admiration.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bini, D.; Cherubini, C.; Filippi, S.; Gizzi, A.; Ricci, P.E. On the universality of spiral waves. Commun. Comput. Phys. 2010, 8, 610–622. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gielis, J. The Geometrical Beauty of Plants; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Heath, T.L. The Works of Archimedes; Google Books; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1897. [Google Scholar]
  4. Archibald, R.C. Notes on the logarithmic spiral, golden section and the Fibonacci series. In Dynamic Symmetry; Hambidge, J., Ed.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1920; pp. 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tenca, L. Guido Grandi Matematico Cremonense; Istituto lombardo di Scienze e Lettere: Milano, Italy, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rivlin, T.J. The Chebyshev Polynomials; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ricci, P.E. Alcune osservazioni sulle potenze delle matrici del secondo ordine e sui polinomi di Tchebycheff di seconda specie. Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 1975, 109, 405–410. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ricci, P.E. Sulle potenze di una matrice. Rend. Mat. 1976, 9, 179–194. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ricci, P.E. I polinomi di Tchebycheff in più variabili. Rend. Mat. 1978, 11, 295–327. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason, J.C.; Handscomb, D.C. Chebyshev Polynomials; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyd, J.P. Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd ed.; Dover: Mineola, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Srivastava, H.M.; Ricci, P.E.; Natalini, P. A Family of Complex Appell Polynomial Sets. Real Acad. Sci. Exact. Fis Nat. Ser. A Math. 2018. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  13. Srivastava, H.M.; Manocha, H.L. A Treatise on Generating Functions; Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester), John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Park, J.-W. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind and of Fibonacci polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Dolgy, D.V. Expressing Sums of Finite Products of Chebyshev Polynomials of the Second Kind and of Fibonacci Polynomials by Several Orthogonal Polynomials. Mathematics 2018, 6, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kim, T.; Rim, S.-H. Identities involving Bernoulli and Euler polynomials arising from Chebyshev polynomials. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2012, 15, 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, L. Trochoids, Roses, and Thorns-Beyond the Spirograph. Coll. Math. J. 1992, 23, 20–35. [Google Scholar]
  18. Aghigh, K.; Masjed-Jamei, M.; Dehghan, M. A survey on third and fourth kind of Chebyshev polynomials and their applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 199, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Doha, E.H.; Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alsuyuti, M.M. On using third and fourth kinds Chebyshev polynomials for solving the integrated forms of high odd-order linear boundary value problems. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2014, 23, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sloane, N.J.A.; Plouffe, S. The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Archimedes’ vs. Bernoulli’s spiral.
Figure 1. Archimedes’ vs. Bernoulli’s spiral.
Symmetry 10 00671 g001
Figure 2. Spiral, ρ = θ 3 / 2 , and Fermat spiral, ρ = θ 1 / 2 .
Figure 2. Spiral, ρ = θ 3 / 2 , and Fermat spiral, ρ = θ 1 / 2 .
Symmetry 10 00671 g002
Figure 3. Spiral, ρ = θ 1 / 2 , and asymptotic spiral, ρ = arctan ( θ ) .
Figure 3. Spiral, ρ = θ 1 / 2 , and asymptotic spiral, ρ = arctan ( θ ) .
Symmetry 10 00671 g003
Figure 4. Rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 4 θ ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 5 θ ) .
Figure 4. Rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 4 θ ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 5 θ ) .
Symmetry 10 00671 g004
Figure 5. U 4 r o s e , ρ = sin ( 3 θ ) / sin ( θ ) , and U 5 r o s e , ρ = sin ( 4 θ ) / sin ( θ ) .
Figure 5. U 4 r o s e , ρ = sin ( 3 θ ) / sin ( θ ) , and U 5 r o s e , ρ = sin ( 4 θ ) / sin ( θ ) .
Symmetry 10 00671 g005
Figure 6. Pseudo T 3 / 2 = cos ( 1.5 arccos ( x ) ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 1.5 θ ) .
Figure 6. Pseudo T 3 / 2 = cos ( 1.5 arccos ( x ) ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 1.5 θ ) .
Symmetry 10 00671 g006
Figure 7. Pseudo T 9 / 2 = cos ( 4.5 arccos ( x ) ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 4.5 θ ) .
Figure 7. Pseudo T 9 / 2 = cos ( 4.5 arccos ( x ) ) , and rhodonea, ρ = cos ( 4.5 θ ) .
Symmetry 10 00671 g007
Figure 8. Pseudo T n / 2 , n = 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 , and third kind V k ( x ) k = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
Figure 8. Pseudo T n / 2 , n = 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 , and third kind V k ( x ) k = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
Symmetry 10 00671 g008
Figure 9. Pseudo U n / 2 , n = 1 , 3 , 5 , 7 , and fourth kind W k ( x ) k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Figure 9. Pseudo U n / 2 , n = 1 , 3 , 5 , 7 , and fourth kind W k ( x ) k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Symmetry 10 00671 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ricci, P.E. Complex Spirals and Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials of Fractional Degree. Symmetry 2018, 10, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120671

AMA Style

Ricci PE. Complex Spirals and Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials of Fractional Degree. Symmetry. 2018; 10(12):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ricci, Paolo Emilio. 2018. "Complex Spirals and Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials of Fractional Degree" Symmetry 10, no. 12: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120671

APA Style

Ricci, P. E. (2018). Complex Spirals and Pseudo-Chebyshev Polynomials of Fractional Degree. Symmetry, 10(12), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop