Next Article in Journal
Multipurpose Cloud-Based Compiler Based on Microservice Architecture and Container Orchestration
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial Conclusion for the Special Issue “Measurements in Quantum Mechanics”
Previous Article in Journal
Applications on Double ARA–Sumudu Transform in Solving Fractional Partial Differential Equations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coherence Trapping in Open Two-Qubit Dynamics
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparing Hermitian and Non-Hermitian Quantum Electrodynamics

Symmetry 2022, 14(9), 1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091816
by Jake Southall, Daniel Hodgson, Robert Purdy and Almut Beige *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Symmetry 2022, 14(9), 1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091816
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 24 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measurements in Quantum Mechanics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We would like to thank Reviewer 1 for their consideration of our manuscript and for their supportive comments.  The reviewer’s suggestions for improving the introduction of our manuscript have been taken into account in this revised version, and we have made changes to the introduction accordingly.  In particular, a paragraph has been added that discusses the general theoretical aspects of introducing a new inner product to a field theory and the consequences of this change on the field observables.  This has been connected to other work that invokes a new inner product specifically in QED.  This discussion should prepare the reader for section 3 of the manuscript. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Non-Hermitian quantum physics is an important part of the quantum optics and condensed matter communities. This manuscript identifies a non-standard inner product that implies bosonic commutator relations for local electric and magnetic field observables and leads to a natural local biorthogonal description of the quantized electromagnetic field. Moreover, when comparing this description with an alternative local Hermitian description, the authors find that there is an equivalence between the two approaches. Careful consideration needs to be given to the physical interpretation of the different descriptions. Indeed, I found the idea is original and interesting. Its theoretical analysis, including the principle, calculation and etc, is in detail and looks sound. The proposed scheme has several advantages beyond previous works. So, it makes a useful contribution to the subject. Thus, I can recommend this manuscript for publication in Symmetry.

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewer for their supportive comments and for recommending the publication of our manuscript.

Back to TopTop