Next Article in Journal
Observational Constraints on F(T,TG) Gravity with Hubble’s Parametrization
Previous Article in Journal
The Genus of a Graph: A Survey
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Closed-Form Formulas for the nth Derivative of the Power-Exponential Function xx

1
School of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2
Institute of Mathematics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
3
Independent Researcher, Dallas, TX 75252-8024, USA
4
Department of Mathematics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung 82444, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(2), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020323
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023

Abstract

:
In this paper, the authors give a simple review of closed-form, explicit, and recursive formulas and related results for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function x x , establish two closed-form and explicit formulas for partial Bell polynomials at some specific arguments, and present several new closed-form and explicit formulas for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function x x and for related functions and integer sequences.

1. Motivations

The power-exponential function
f ( x ) = x x , x > 0 1 , x = 0
is elementary and typical in calculus for undergraduates. Its first few derivatives are often taught in calculus. However, its integrations and higher derivatives are not easy to be computed. Therefore, many mathematicians asked for, discussed, looked for, answered, and investigated derivatives and integrations of the function f ( x ) and similar ones on the internet such as
Surprisingly, at so many web sites above, we do not find any general formula, including explicit and closed-form formula, for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function f ( x ) .
Does the general formula for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function f ( x ) exist somewhere? What is the general formula for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function f ( x ) ? We curiously posed these two questions at the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/437097 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
In this paper, we have two aims.
The first aim is to simply review several known results on closed-form, explicit, and recursive formulas and related results for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function f ( x ) , including Comtet’s numbers discussed in the monograph [1] (pp. 139–140), Kulkarni’s recursive formula obtained and mentioned in [2,3] (see also https://math.stackexchange.com/a/803045 (accessed on 20 May 2014), and Lehmer’s investigation of Comtet’s numbers and several other integer sequences carried out in the paper [4].
The second aim of this paper is to present several new closed-form and explicit formulas for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function x x and for related functions and integer sequences. We derive these formulas by virtue of the Faà di Bruno formula for derivatives of composite functions, by establishing two closed-form and explicit formulas for partial Bell polynomials at some specific arguments, and with the help of some properties of the Bell polynomials of the second kind.

2. Preliminaries

For fluently and smoothly proceeding, we prepare some notions and notations.
The Stirling numbers of the first kind s ( n , k ) for n k 0 can be analytically generated [5] (p. 20, (1.30)) by
[ ln ( 1 + t ) ] k k ! = n = k s ( n , k ) t n n ! , | t | < 1 ,
which can be rearranged as Maclaurin’s series expansions of the power function
ln ( 1 + t ) t k = n = 0 s ( n + k , k ) n + k k t n n ! , | t | < 1 , k 0 .
The falling factorial of a complex number w C is defined [6] (p. 7497) by
w m = = 0 m 1 ( w ) = w ( w 1 ) ( w m + 1 ) , m N ; 1 , m = 0 .
The Faà di Bruno formula, see [7] (Theorem 11.4) and [1] (p. 139, Theorem C), can be described in terms of partial Bell polynomials B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) for n k 0 by
d n d x n f h ( x ) = k = 0 n f ( k ) ( h ( x ) ) B n , k h ( x ) , h ( x ) , , h ( n k + 1 ) ( x ) .
The partial Bell polynomials B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) for n k 0 satisfy the identities
B n , k a b x 1 , a b 2 x 2 , , a b n k + 1 x n k + 1 = a k b n B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) ,
B n , k ( 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n k ) ! ) = ( 1 ) n k s ( n , k ) ,
and
B n , k x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 = = 0 k n x 1 B n , k 0 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 .
These identities can be found in [7] (p. 412) and [1] (pp. 135–136).

3. A Simple Review of the nth Derivative of x x

Basing on comments and answers made by several mathematicians at the sites https://mathoverflow.net/q/437097 (accessed on 28 December 2022) and https://math.stackexchange.com/q/802256 (accessed on 28 December 2022), we simply review some works by four mathematicians on the nth derivative of the power-exponential function f ( x ) = x x for x > 0 .

3.1. Comtet’s Numbers

What is the nth derivative of x a x for x > 0 and any fixed real number a 0 ? In [1] (pp. 139–140, Example), Comtet introduced the integer sequence b ( n , k ) by
[ ( 1 + t ) ln ( 1 + t ) ] k k ! = n = k b ( n , k ) t n n ! ,
presented the explicit formula
b ( n , k ) = 1 , ( n , k ) = ( 0 , 0 ) ; 0 , n N , k = 0 ; = k n k k k s ( n , ) , n k > 0 ,
and obtained the closed-form formula
d n ( x a x ) d x n = a n x a x j = 0 n n j ( ln x ) j k = 0 n j b ( n j , n k j ) ( a x ) k , n N 0 .
As in [4], we call b ( n , k ) Comtet’s numbers.

3.2. Kulkarni’s Recursive Formula

In 1984, observing that f ( n + 1 ) ( x ) is the nth derivative of f ( x ) = x x ( 1 + ln x ) for x > 0 , writing down Leibniz’s rule for the nth derivative of a product of two n-time differentiable functions, and using the fact that the kth derivative of 1 + ln x is ( 1 ) k 1 ( k 1 ) ! x k , Kulkarni [2] gave the recursive formula
f ( n + 1 ) ( x ) = ( 1 + ln x ) f ( n ) ( x ) + k = 1 n ( 1 ) k 1 n k ( k 1 ) ! f ( n k ) ( x ) x k .
See also [3] or click the site https://math.stackexchange.com/a/803045 (accessed on 20 May 2014).

3.3. Lehmer’s Investigation

In the sense that F ( F 1 ( x ) ) = F 1 ( F ( x ) ) = x , the function
φ ( x ) = k = 1 ( 1 ) k 1 ( k 1 ) k 1 x k k ! ,
which is the inverse function of ( 1 + x ) ln ( 1 + x ) , was considered in the paper [4]. Via the function φ ( x ) , Lehmer introduced the notion B ( n , k ) by
[ φ ( x ) ] k k ! = n = 1 B ( n , k ) x n n ! .
In the paper [4], Lehmer treated b ( n , k ) , B ( n , k ) , s ( n , k ) , and S ( n , k ) together and presented numerous properties and relations.

4. A Lemma

The following lemma plays a key role in this paper.
Lemma 1. 
For n k 0 , partial Bell polynomials B n , k satisfy
B n , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n k 2 ) ! , ( n k 1 ) ! ) = ( 1 ) n k n ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! = 0 n k s ( + j , j ) ( + j ) ! j n k
and
B n , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n k 2 ) ! , ( n k 1 ) ! ) = ( 1 ) n k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j n k j b ( n k + j , j ) .
Proof. 
Making use of the formula
1 k ! m = 1 x m t m m ! k = n = k B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) t n n ! , k N 0
listed in [1] (p. 133) yields
B n + k , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n + 1 ) = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n m = 0 x m + 1 t m ( m + 1 ) ! k .
Taking
( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 , , x n , ) = ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n 2 ) ! , )
results in
B n + k , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n 2 ) ! , ( n 1 ) ! ) = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n m = 1 ( m 1 ) ! t m ( m + 1 ) ! k = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n 1 + ( 1 t ) ln ( 1 t ) t k = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n j = 0 k k j ( t 1 ) j ln ( 1 t ) t j = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n j = 0 k k j ( t 1 ) j = 0 s ( + j , j ) + j j ( t ) ! = n + k k j = 0 k k j = 0 s ( + j , j ) + j j ( 1 ) ! lim t 0 d n d t n ( t 1 ) j t = n + k k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j = 0 s ( + j , j ) + j j ( 1 ) ! lim t 0 d n d t n q = 0 j ( 1 ) q j q t + q = n + k k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j = 0 s ( + j , j ) + j j ( 1 ) ! lim t 0 q = 0 j ( 1 ) q j q + q n t + q n = ( 1 ) n n ! n + k k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j = 0 s ( + j , j ) + j j 1 ! j n = ( 1 ) n ( n + k ) ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! = 0 n s ( + j , j ) ( + j ) ! j n .
In conclusion, we arrive at
B n + k , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n 2 ) ! , ( n 1 ) ! ) = ( 1 ) n ( n + k ) ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! = 0 n s ( + j , j ) ( + j ) ! j n .
Replacing n + k by n leads to the closed-form Formula (8).
The Equation (6) can be rearranged as
( 1 + t ) ln ( 1 + t ) t k = n = 0 b ( n + k , k ) n + k k t n n ! .
Basing on the arguments in the proof of (8) and making use of (10), we obtain
B n + k , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n 2 ) ! , ( n 1 ) ! ) = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n 1 ( 1 t ) ln ( 1 t ) t k = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j ( 1 t ) ln ( 1 t ) t j = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j m = 0 b ( m + j , j ) m + j j ( t ) m m ! = n + k k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j lim t 0 m = n ( 1 ) m b ( m + j , j ) m + j j t m n ( m n ) ! = ( 1 ) n n + k k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j b ( n + j , j ) n + j j = ( 1 ) n j = 0 k ( 1 ) j n + k k j b ( n + j , j ) .
Replacing n + k by n gives (9). The proof of Lemma 1 is thus complete. □

5. Two New Formulas for the nth Derivative of x x

By virtue of the closed-form Formulas (8) and (9) in Lemma 1, we now present two new closed-form and explicit formulas for the nth derivative of x x as follows.
Theorem 1. 
For n N 0 = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , we have
( x x ) ( n ) = n ! x x n k = 0 n x k j = 0 k q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q ( ln x ) k j ( k j ) !
and
( x x ) ( n ) = x x n k = 0 n x k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j j n 1 j b ( n j , k j ) ( ln x ) j .
Consequently, Taylor’s series expansion around x = 1 is
x x = n = 0 k = 0 n q = k n s ( q , k ) q ! k n q ( x 1 ) n , | x 1 | < 1
and
x x = n = 0 k = 0 n b ( n , k ) ( x 1 ) n n ! , | x 1 | < 1 .
Proof. 
For n N 0 , we have
( x x ) ( n ) = e x ln x ( n ) = k = 0 n ( e u ) ( k ) B n , k u ( x ) , u ( x ) , , u ( n k ) ( x ) , u ( n k + 1 ) ( x ) = k = 0 n e x   ln   x B n , k ( 1 + ln x , 1 x , 1 x 2 , 2 x 3 , 6 x 4 , , ( 1 ) n k ( n k 2 ) ! x n k 1 , ( 1 ) n k + 1 ( n k 1 ) ! x n k ) ,
where u = u ( x ) = x ln x .
By the Formulas (3) and (5) in sequence, we acquire
( x x ) ( n ) = k = 0 n x x = 0 k n ( 1 + ln x ) B n , k ( 0 , 1 x , 1 x 2 , 2 x 3 , 6 x 4 , , ( 1 ) n k ( n k 2 ) ! x n k 1 , ( 1 ) n k + 1 ( n k 1 ) ! x n k ) = ( 1 ) n x x n k = 0 n x k = 0 k ( 1 ) n ( 1 + ln x ) × B n , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n k 2 ) ! , ( n k 1 ) ! ) .
By virtue of the Formula (8) in Lemma 1, we conclude the explicit formula
( x x ) ( n ) = n ! x x n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k x k = 0 k ( 1 ) [ j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! × q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q ] ( 1 + ln x ) ! = n ! x x n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k x k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q × = 0 k j ( 1 ) ( k j ) ! ( 1 + ln x ) ! = n ! x x n k = 0 n x k j = 0 k ( ln x ) k j ( k j ) ! q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q .
Accordingly, the explicit Formula (11) follows.
By virtue of the Formula (9) in Lemma 1, we arrive at
( x x ) ( n ) = x x n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k x k = 0 k ( 1 ) n × j = 0 k ( 1 ) j n n k + j b ( n k + j , j ) ( 1 + ln x ) = x x n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k x k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j b ( n k + j , j ) × = 0 k j ( 1 ) n n n ( k j ) ( 1 + ln x ) .
Since
= 0 m ( 1 ) n n n m x = m n 1 m ( x 1 ) m
for m , n N 0 , we finally obtain
( x x ) ( n ) = x x n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k x k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j n 1 k j b ( n k + j , j ) ( ln x ) k j .
The Formula (12) follows.
Taylor’s series expansions (13) and (14) can be derived from Taylor’s theorem and taking the limit x 1 in (11) and (12) respectively. The proof of Theorem 1 is thus complete. □
Remark 1. 
The variants of the results (11) and (13) in Theorem 1 have been announced at the sites https://mathoverflow.net/q/437097 (accessed on 23 December 2022) and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4605027 (accessed on 20 May 2014) as a comment and an answer without proof.
The form of Taylor’s series expansion (14) is very nice.
Remark 2. 
In the papers [8,9], among other things, several Maclaurin and Taylor series expansions have been discovered.

6. Two New Formulas for Comtet’s Numbers

Reformulating the generating function (6) of Comtet’s numbers b ( n , k ) , employing the series expansion (1) of the Stirling numbers of the first kind s ( n , k ) , applying the Faà di Bruno Formula (2), and using the identities (3) and (4), we now present two new closed-form and explicit formulas for the integer sequence b ( n , k ) , as follows. In next section, we will derive the third new closed-form and explicit formula for the integer sequence b ( n , k ) .
Theorem 2. 
For n k 0 , we have
b ( n , k ) = n ! ( n k ) ! j = 0 k 1 j ! = 0 n k n k + j j s ( + j , j ) s ( n k , k j )
and
b ( n , k ) = n ! j = n k n k n j s ( j , k ) j ! .
Proof. 
The series expansion (10) means that
b ( n + k , k ) n + k k = lim t 0 d n d t n ( 1 + t ) ln ( 1 + t ) t k = lim t 0 d n d t n ln ( 1 + t ) t + ln ( 1 + t ) k = lim t 0 d n d t n j = 0 k k j ln ( 1 + t ) t j [ ln ( 1 + t ) ] k j = lim t 0 j = 0 k k j = 0 n n ln ( 1 + t ) t j ( ) [ ln ( 1 + t ) ] k j ( n ) ,
where, by the series expansion (1) of the Stirling numbers of the first kind s ( n , k ) ,
ln ( 1 + t ) t j ( ) = m = 0 s ( m + j , j ) m + j j t m m ! ( ) = m = s ( m + j , j ) m + j j t m ( m ) ! s ( + j , j ) + j j , t 0
and, by the Faà di Bruno Formula (2) with f ( u ) = u k j and u = h ( t ) = ln ( 1 + t ) , and by the identities (3) and (4),
[ ln ( 1 + t ) ] k j ( n ) = m = 0 n u k j ( m ) B n , m ( 1 1 + t , 1 ( 1 + t ) 2 , , ( 1 ) n m ( n m ) ! ( 1 + t ) n m + 1 ) = m = 0 n k j m [ ln ( 1 + t ) ] k j m ( 1 ) n + m ( 1 + t ) n B n , m 0 ! , 1 ! , , ( n m ) ! ( 1 ) n + k j ( k j ) ! B n , k j 0 ! , 1 ! , , ( n k + j ) ! , t 0 = ( 1 ) n + k j ( k j ) ! ( 1 ) n k + j s ( n , k j ) = ( k j ) ! s ( n , k j ) .
Accordingly, we arrive at
b ( n + k , k ) n + k k = j = 0 k k j = 0 n n s ( + j , j ) + j j ( k j ) ! s ( n , k j ) .
Replacing n + k by n leads to (16).
From (10), we can also compute by
b ( n + k , k ) n + k k = lim t 0 d n d t n ( 1 + t ) ln ( 1 + t ) t k = lim t 0 d n d t n ( 1 + t ) k ln ( 1 + t ) t k = lim t 0 j = 0 n n j ln ( 1 + t ) t k ( j ) ( 1 + t ) k ( n j ) .
Making use of (18), we arrive at
b ( n + k , k ) n + k k = j = 0 n n j lim t 0 ln ( 1 + t ) t k ( j ) lim t 0 ( 1 + t ) k ( n j ) = j = n k n n j s ( j + k , k ) j + k k k n j = j = n k n n j s ( j + k , k ) j + k k k ! ( k n + j ) ! .
Replacing n + k by n and simplifying lead to
b ( n , k ) = n k j = n 2 k n k n k j s ( j + k , k ) j + k k k ! ( k ( n k ) + j ) ! = n ! j = n 2 k n k k n k j s ( j + k , k ) ( j + k ) ! = n ! j = n k n k n j s ( j , k ) j ! .
The Formula (17) is thus proved. The proof of Theorem 2 is complete. □
Remark 3. 
The form of the Formula (17) is better and simpler than the one of the Formula (7) for Comtet’s numbers b ( n , k ) .

7. The Third New Formula for Comtet’s Numbers

In [4] (p. 467, Theorem 1), Lehmer defined the function σ n ( t ) by
σ n ( t ) = k = 0 n b ( n , k ) t k
and proved that the function σ ( t ) can be generated by
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) = n = 0 σ n ( t ) x n n ! .
In this section, we discover closed-form formulas for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) , for the function σ ( t ) , and for the integer sequence b ( n , k ) .
Theorem 3. 
For n N 0 , we have
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = n ! ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n t k ( 1 + x ) k × j = 0 k q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] k j ( k j ) !
and
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n t k ( 1 + x ) k × j = 0 k ( 1 ) j j n 1 j b ( n j , k j ) [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] j .
Consequently, we acquire the closed-form formulas
σ n ( t ) = n ! k = 0 n j = k n k n j s ( j , k ) j ! t k , n 0
and
b ( n , k ) = n ! j = k n k n j s ( j , k ) j ! , n k 0 .
Proof. 
For n N 0 , we have
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = e t ( 1 + x ) ln ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = k = 0 n d k e t u d u k B n , k u ( x ) , u ( x ) , , u ( n k ) ( x ) , u ( n k + 1 ) ( x ) = k = 0 n t k e t ( 1 + x ) ln ( 1 + x ) B n , k ( 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) , 0 ! 1 + x , 1 ! ( 1 + x ) 2 , 2 ! ( 1 + x ) 3 , , ( 1 ) n k ( n k 2 ) ! ( 1 + x ) n k 1 , ( 1 ) n k + 1 ( n k 1 ) ! ( 1 + x ) n k ) ,
where u = u ( x ) = ( 1 + x ) ln ( 1 + x ) . By the Formulas (5) and (3) in sequence, we acquire
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) k = 0 n t k = 0 k n [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] B n , k ( 0 , 0 ! 1 + x , 1 ! ( 1 + x ) 2 , , ( 1 ) n k ( n k 2 ) ! ( 1 + x ) n k 1 , ( 1 ) n k + 1 ( n k 1 ) ! ( 1 + x ) n k ) = ( 1 ) n ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n t k ( 1 + x ) k = 0 k ( 1 ) n [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] × B n , k ( 0 , 0 ! , 1 ! , 2 ! , , ( n k 2 ) ! , ( n k 1 ) ! ) .
By virtue of the Formula (8) in Lemma 1, we conclude
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k t k ( 1 + x ) k = 0 k ( 1 ) n × [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] ( n ) ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q = n ! ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k t k ( 1 + x ) k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j ( k j ) ! × = 0 k j ( 1 ) k j [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q = n ! ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n t k ( 1 + x ) k j = 0 k [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] k j ( k j ) ! q = 0 n k s ( q + j , j ) ( q + j ) ! j n k q .
The explicit Formula (20) follows.
By virtue of the Formula (9) in Lemma 1, we conclude
( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k t k ( 1 + x ) k × = 0 k ( 1 ) n [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] j = 0 k ( 1 ) j n k j b ( n k + j , j ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k t k ( 1 + x ) k × j = 0 k ( 1 ) j = 0 k j ( 1 ) n n k j [ 1 + ln ( 1 + x ) ] b ( n k + j , j ) = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k t k ( 1 + x ) k × j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j n 1 k j b ( n k + j , j ) [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] k j = ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) n k = 0 n t k ( 1 + x ) k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j j n 1 j b ( n j , k j ) [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] j ,
where we interchanged the order of double summations and used the identity (15). The explicit Formula (21) follows.
Taking x 0 in (20) gives
σ n ( t ) = lim x 0 ( 1 + x ) t ( 1 + x ) ( n ) = n ! k = 0 n q = 0 n k s ( q + k , k ) ( q + k ) ! k n k q t k = n ! k = 0 n j = k n s ( j , k ) j ! k n j t k .
The Formula (22) is thus proved. Taking x 0 in (21) results in (19).
Comparing (19) with (22) and equating coefficients of the terms t k lead to the nice Formula (23). The proof of Theorem 3 is thus complete. □
Remark 4. 
The form of the Formula (23) is also better and simpler than the one of the Formula (7) for Comtet’s numbers.

8. Conclusions

The identity (9) in Lemma 1 connects partial Bell polynomials with Comtet’s numbers. Those two identities in Lemma 1 are applicable.
The closed-form and explicit Formulas (11) and (12) in Theorem 1 are our main results. Taylor’s series expansions (13) and (14) demonstrate the beauty and symmetry of our main results.
The Formulas (16) and (17) in Theorem 2 and the Formula (23) in Theorem 3 once again demonstrate the beauty and symmetry of our main results.
Comparing the Formula (17) in Theorem 2 and the Formula (23) in Theorem 3 shows some symmetry in form.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, J.C., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; writing—review and editing, J.C., F.Q. and W.-S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

J.C. is partially supported by Grant No. LY21A010019 of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China. W.-S.D. is partially supported by Grant No. MOST 111-2115-M-017-002 of the National Science and Technology Council of the Republic of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to Ravi Prakash Agarwal at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. The authors thank Ira Gessel https://stackexchange.com/users/2947115/ira-gessel (accessed on 28 December 2022), Iosif Pinelis (Michigan Technological University) https://stackexchange.com/users/3017582/iosif-pinelis (accessed on 28 December 2022), and Dave L. Renfro (Iowa City) https://stackexchange.com/users/844319/dave-l-renfro (accessed on 28 December 2022) for their comments and for their recommendation of the references [1] (pp. 139–140, Example) and [2,3,4] at the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/437097 (accessed on 23 December 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions; Revised and Enlarged Edition; D. Reidel Publishing Co.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kulkarni, S.B. Solution to Problem 3977. Sch. Sci. Math. 1984, 84, 629–630. [Google Scholar]
  3. Renfro, D.L. Derivatives of generalized power functions. Math. Teach. 2010, 103, 630–631. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lehmer, D.H. Numbers associated with Stirling numbers and xx. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1985, 15, 461–479. [Google Scholar]
  5. Temme, N.M. Special Functions: An Introduction to Classical Functions of Mathematical Physics; A Wiley-Interscience Publication; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, B.-N.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Series expansions of powers of arcsine, closed forms for special values of Bell polynomials, and series representations of generalized logsine functions. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 7494–7517. [Google Scholar]
  7. Charalambides, C.A. Enumerative Combinatorics; CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications; Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, B.-N.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Maclaurin’s series expansions for positive integer powers of inverse (hyperbolic) sine and tangent functions, closed-form formula of specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representation of generalized logsine function. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 2022, 16, 427–466. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qi, F. Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi. Demonstr. Math. 2022, 55, 710–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, J.; Qi, F.; Du, W.-S. Closed-Form Formulas for the nth Derivative of the Power-Exponential Function xx. Symmetry 2023, 15, 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020323

AMA Style

Cao J, Qi F, Du W-S. Closed-Form Formulas for the nth Derivative of the Power-Exponential Function xx. Symmetry. 2023; 15(2):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Jian, Feng Qi, and Wei-Shih Du. 2023. "Closed-Form Formulas for the nth Derivative of the Power-Exponential Function xx" Symmetry 15, no. 2: 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop