Next Article in Journal
LD-SMOTE: A Novel Local Density Estimation-Based Oversampling Method for Imbalanced Datasets
Previous Article in Journal
Subfamilies of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with the Imaginary Error Function and Subordinate to Jacobi Polynomials
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Numerical Quadrature Functional Inequalities on Hilbert Spaces in the Framework of Different Forms of Generalized Convex Mappings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the h-Additive Functions and Their Symmetry Properties

by
Mahmood Kamil Shihab
1,† and
Paweł Artur Kluza
2,*,†
1
Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk 36001, Iraq
2
Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2025, 17(2), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020158
Submission received: 30 December 2024 / Revised: 15 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Functional Equations, Second Edition)

Abstract

:
Our goal in this paper is to generalize the class of additive functions to a more general class of functions, h-additive functions, and give several characterizations of this class by using its symmetry. Also, we provide a definition of this class of h n -additive functions and give several characteristics for it. The density of this class of functions in the plane is given as well. The characterization of the continuity of this class also is presented.
MSC:
52A99; 26A51

1. Introduction

Throughout this paper, Q , Q + , R , R + , and G denote the set of rational numbers, positive rational numbers, the set of real numbers, the set of non-negative real numbers, and an additive group, respectively. A function f : R R is said to be additive if the equality
f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + f ( y ) ( x , y R )
holds true. Additive functions have many applications in functional equations and other mathematical fields including real and complex analysis, functional analysis, geometry, fluid and dynamical systems, statistics, probability, economics, and partial differential equations. Equation (1) is also known as Cauchy’s functional equation. Cauchy [1] first found the general continuous solution for (1). An investigation of (1) assumes various types of regularity of the known function f : R R ; each of these regularities yields the existence of c R such that f ( x ) = c x for all x R . For instance, Cauchy [1] supposed that f is continuous, Darboux [2] assumed that f is either bounded on an interval or monotone, Fréchet [3], Sierpiński [4] and Figiel [5] assumed that f is Lebesgue measurable, Mehdi [6] supposed that f is bounded above on a second Baire set, and Kormes [7] imposed that f is bounded on a measurable set of positive measures. Hamel [8] investigated Equation (1) without any regularity on f; he used the Hamel bases to find all nonlinear solutions. Maksa and Volkmann [9] characterized the additive functions and gave inequalities that imply them. Aczél and Dhombers [10] gave the proof of the density of additive functions in the plane. A function f : R R is said to be a square-norm (or quadratic, parallelogram, or Jordan–von Neumann) function if it fulfills the equality
f ( x + y ) + f ( x y ) = 2 f ( x ) + 2 f ( y ) ( x , y R ) .
A function f : R R is said to be a monomial if
Δ y n f ( x ) = n ! f ( y ) ( x , y R ) ,
where Δ y 1 f ( x ) = Δ y f ( x ) = f ( x + y ) f ( x ) for all x , y R and Δ y n + 1 f ( x ) = Δ y ( Δ y n f ( x ) ) for all x , y R and n N . The additive function is a monomial with n = 1 and the square-norm function is a monomial with n = 2 .
Gilanyi [11] gave several characterizations of square-norm functions. Daroczy and Kátai [12] gave a characterization of a differentiable additive function. Daroczy and Kátai [13] gave a characterization of continuous additive functions. Daroczy and Kátai [14] characterized the additive functions in the circle group. Páles and Shihab [15] proved that the discontinuous additive functions satisfy several inequalities. For more details and characteristics of additive functions, we refer to references [10,16,17,18,19]. Ng [20] characterized the Wright convex function by the convex and additive functions. Maksa and Páles [21] generalized Ng’s Theorem to a higher-order convexity. Páles and Shihab [22] gave a new proof of the decomposition theorem of Maksa and Páles. In addition, Páles and Shihab [23] gave a generalization of Ng’s Theorem for the convexity with respect to the Chebyshev system.
In this paper, we generalize the additive functions to a more general class, namely h-additive functions, and give several characterizations for it in Section 2. In Section 3, we study such a class of h-additive functions, namely h n -additive functions.
Our investigation of this class assumes that f is continuous to introduce the existence of c R such that f ( x ) = c x for all x R . We give a solution for the problem studied by Cauchy and the authors mentioned above in our new class of h n -additive functions. We prove the homogeneity of this class with respect to rational numbers. The density of discontinuous functions in this class is given. The continuity characterization of this class is presented as well. The motivation of this generalization is to introduce a class of functions that satisfy several symmetry properties of the standard class of additive functions.

2. h-Additive Functions

In this section, we give a definition of h-additive functions and several characterizations of this class. In what follows, we say that a function f : G R is h-additive if there exists a function h : G R such that the equality
f ( x + y ) = h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) ( x , y G )
holds true. We give an example of an h-additive function.
Example 1. 
Let f ( x ) = x + c and h ( x ) = x + 1 2 c x + c , where f , h : R R and c is a real constant with c x . Therefore, the right-hand side of (2) is
x + 1 2 c x + c ( x + c ) + y + 1 2 c y + c ( y + c ) = x + y + c ,
which is the left-hand side of (2). This equality shows that f is an x + 1 2 c x + c -additive function.
Clearly, the particular case of (2) when h ( x ) = 1 is an additive function. In the present paper, we consider h : G R as an arbitrary function. We consider the norm defined by x = x , x for all x R .
In the next two theorems, we give characterizations of h-additive functions. The next theorem is a counterpart of a result given by Maksa and Volkmann [9].
Theorem 1. 
Let f : G R be an arbitrary function. If the inequality
f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) ( x , y G )
holds, then f is h-additive.
Proof. 
According to (3), we have that
f ( x + y ) 2 + h ( x ) f ( x ) 2 2 f ( x + y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 2 ( x , y G )
By exchanging the role of x and y in this equation, we have that
f ( x + y ) 2 + h ( y ) f ( y ) 2 2 f ( x + y ) , h ( y ) f ( y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) 2 ( x , y G )
Adding the above two inequalities, we have that
2 f ( x + y ) 2 2 f ( x + y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G )
This inequality, after being divided by 2, implies that
f ( x + y ) , f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
According to the inequality (4), we have that
f ( x + y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
In view of the positivity of h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) , we have that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) 2 0 ( x , y G )
This inequality implies that
h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
Adding (6) and (7), we have that
f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
Adding (5) and (8), we have that
f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) , f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
This inequality implies that
f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) 2 0 ( x , y G ) .
Therefore, the equality (2) is proven. Thus, f is h-additive.  □
Corollary 1. 
Let f : G R be an arbitrary function. If the inequality
f ( x + y ) h ( y ) f ( y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) ( x , y G )
then the equality (2) holds.
Proof. 
By changing the role of x and y in the inequality (9), we have that
f ( x + y ) h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( y ) f ( y ) ( x , y G ) .
Now, applying Theorem 1 yields that Equation (2) holds for x , y G .  □
The next example shows that the inequality
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) ( x , y G ) ,
in general does not imply Equation (2). If we assume that h = 0 and f is a non-zero constant c, then we have that this inequality holds but the equality (2) does not hold.
We look for a condition on the function h such that the inequality (10) implies (2).
Theorem 2. 
Let f : G R be an arbitrary function. If (10) and
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , f ( x + y ) 0 ( x , y G )
hold, then the equality (2) holds.
Proof. 
Equation (10) is equivalent to
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) + f ( x + y ) 2 f ( x + y ) 2 ( x , y G ) .
This inequality implies that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) 2 + f ( x + y ) 2 + 2 h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , f ( x + y ) f ( x + y ) 2 ( x , y G ) .
This inequality implies that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) 2 + 2 h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , f ( x + y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
Adding this inequality to (11), we have that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) 2 + h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , f ( x + y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
From this inequality, we infer that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
Now, combining this inequality with (11), we obtain that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) , h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) 0 ( x , y G ) .
Therefore, this inequality yields that
h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( y ) f ( y ) f ( x + y ) 2 0 ( x , y G ) ,
which implies Equation (2).  □

3. A New Class of h-Additive Functions

In this section, we define a subclass of additive functions called h n -additive functions. For all n N , a function f : G R is said to be h n -additive if there exists a function h : G R such that for x 1 , , x n G , the function f satisfies the equation
f ( x 1 + + x n ) = h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) + + h ( x n ) f ( x n ) ( x 1 , , x n G ) .
One can easily see that any h n -additive function is h additive, but the converse implication is not always true. The first result of this section shows the homogeneity of the multiplication of h and h n -additive functions with rational numbers. The next theorem is a counterpart of a result given by Cauchy [1].
Theorem 3. 
If a function f : R R is h n -additive and satisfies
h ( 0 ) = 0 ,
then
h ( r x ) f ( r x ) = r h ( x ) f ( x ) ( r Q , x R ) .
Furthermore, if h and f are continuous, then h ( x ) f ( x ) = c x , where x R and c is a constant.
Proof. 
Putting x = y = 0 in (2), we have that
f ( 0 ) = h ( 0 ) f ( 0 ) + h ( 0 ) f ( 0 ) .
Using (13), this equality shows that
f ( 0 ) = 0 .
By definition, we have that
f ( x 1 + + x n ) = h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) + + h ( x n ) f ( x n ) ( x 1 , , x n R ) .
If x 1 = = x n = x , we have that
f ( n x ) = n h ( x ) f ( x ) ( x R ) .
Assume x = n m t , where m N and t R . This implies that
m x = n t .
This equation yields that
f ( m x ) = f ( n t ) .
In view of (16), we conclude that
m h ( x ) f ( x ) = n h ( t ) f ( t ) .
This equation yields that
m h ( n m t ) f ( n m t ) = n h ( t ) f ( t ) .
This equation implies that
h ( n m t ) f ( n m t ) = n m h ( t ) f ( t ) .
If t = 1 , we obtain
h ( n m ) f ( n m ) = n m h ( 1 ) f ( 1 ) .
Assume h ( 1 ) f ( 1 ) : = c and r : = n m . Therefore, this equality implies that
h ( r ) f ( r ) = c r ( r Q + ) .
If r = 0 , then by (15), we have that (18) holds. Since h and f are continuous, by taking limit on both sides of (18), we obtain
h ( x ) f ( x ) = c x ( x R + ) .
We show that (18) also holds for negative rational r. Since f is h-additive, (2) holds. Putting y = x in (2), we have that
f ( 0 ) = h ( x ) f ( x ) + h ( x ) f ( x ) ( x R ) .
In view of our assumption f ( 0 ) = 0 , this equation yields that
h ( x ) f ( x ) = h ( x ) f ( x ) ( x R ) .
Now, this equation and (17) imply that
h ( n m t ) f ( n m t ) = n m h ( t ) f ( t ) .
Therefore, we have that (18) also holds for negative rational r. This proves (14).
Putting x = 1 in (14), we have that
h ( r ) f ( r ) = r h ( 1 ) f ( 1 ) ( r Q ) .
Assume that h ( 1 ) f ( 1 ) : = c ; therefore, we have that
h ( r ) f ( r ) = c r ( r Q ) .
Furthermore, the continuity of h and f allows us to take a limit on both sides of this equation; thus, we have that
h ( x ) f ( x ) = c x ( x R ) .
 □
Our next result, as a corollary of Theorem 3, shows the homogeneity of the h n -additive function.
Corollary 2. 
Assume that a function h satisfies the equality
h ( r x ) = h ( x ) ( r Q + , x R ) .
If a function f : R R is h n -additive and satisfies f(0) = 0, then
f ( r x ) = r f ( x ) ( r Q , x R ) .
Furthermore, if f is continuous, then f ( x ) = c x , where x R and c is a constant.
Our next result shows that the h n -additive function is dense in the plane. To prove this result, we need this lemma in the sequel.
Lemma 1. 
Let f : R R be an h n -additive function and
f ( 0 ) = 0 .
Assume that n N for r 1 , , r n Q and x 1 , , x n R ; we have that
f ( r 1 x 1 + + r n x n ) = r 1 h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) + + r n h ( x n ) f ( x n ) .
Proof. 
By definition of h n -additive functions and Theorem 3, we have that
f ( r 1 x 1 + + r n x n ) = h ( r 1 x 1 ) f ( r 1 x 1 ) + + h ( r n x n ) f ( r n x n ) = r 1 h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) + + r n h ( x n ) f ( x n ) .
So, we obtain what we needed.  □
Theorem 4. 
If the function f : R R is a discontinuous h n -additive and
h ( 0 ) = 0 ,
then everywhere is dense in R 2 .
Proof. 
Let x 1 0 in R . Assume that f is a discontinuous h-additive, h n -additive function with f ( 0 ) = 0 ; therefore, by Theorem 3, for some x R , the function f does not satisfy the equation
h ( x ) f ( x ) = c x ( c is   constant ) .
Thus, we can find a non-zero point x 2 R such that
h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) x 1 h ( x 2 ) f ( x 2 ) x 2 .
In other words, we have that
x 1 h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) x 2 h ( x 2 ) f ( x 2 ) 0 .
Therefore, the two rows p 1 = ( x 1 , h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) ) and p 2 = ( x 2 , h ( x 2 ) f ( x 2 ) ) are linearly independent. Therefore, they span the plane R 2 . So, any vector in R 2 can be written as a linear combination of these two vectors. Let r 1 and r 2 be two rational numbers. By performing simple calculations and applying Lemma 1, we have that
r 1 p 1 + r 2 p 2 = r 1 ( x 1 , h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) ) + r 2 ( x 2 , h ( x 2 ) f ( x 2 ) ) = ( r 1 x 1 + r 2 x 2 , r 1 h ( x 1 ) f ( x 1 ) + r 2 h ( x 2 ) f ( x 2 ) ) = ( r 1 x 1 + r 2 x 2 , f ( r 1 x 1 + r 2 x 2 ) ) .
For x 1 0 and x 2 0 satisfying (21), we have that the set
G : = { ( x , y ) : x = r 1 x 1 + r 2 x 2 , y = f ( x ) ; ( r 1 , r 2 ) Q 2 }
is dense everywhere in R 2 . This shows that f is dense in R 2 .  □
It is known that additive functions are dense everywhere in R 2 ; therefore, this theorem generalizes the density of h n -additive functions.
Note that the h-additive function is a special case of h n -additive functions for n = 2 . Therefore, in view of the above theorem in the case where n = 2 , we conclude that the h-additive function is dense everywhere in R 2 .
Darboux [24] proved that if an additive function is continuous at a single point x 0 , then it is continuous throughout its domain. Therefore, Theorem 4 is a counterpart of Darboux’s Theorem. The motivation of Theorem 4 is to introduce a class of functions larger than additive functions satisfying Darboux’s Theorem.
In the following, we generalize this result to the h-additive function.
Theorem 5. 
Let f : R R be an h n -additive function. If f and h are continuous at a single point x 0 and h is idempotent, then f is continuous on R .
Proof. 
If h = 0 , then f = 0 , which is continuous on all of the real line. Assume that h is non-zero, and f and h are continuous at x 0 ; therefore, for x R , we have that
lim u x f ( u ) = lim u x + x 0 x 0 f ( u x + x 0 + x x 0 ) = lim t x 0 f ( t + x x 0 ) = lim t x 0 h ( t ) f ( t ) + lim t x 0 h ( x ) f ( x ) lim t x 0 h ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) = h ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) + h ( x ) f ( x ) h ( x 0 ) f ( x 0 ) = h ( x ) f ( x ) .
Now, we have that
lim u x f ( u ) = h 2 ( x ) h ( x ) f ( x ) .
Since h is idempotent, we have that
lim u x f ( u ) = f ( x ) .
This equality shows that f is continuous on R .  □
It is known that additive functions satisfy the above theorem; therefore, this theorem is a generalization of additive functions. The motivation of Theorem 5 is to introduce a class of functions larger than additive functions that characterize the continuity of the h n -additive functions.
According to the above theorem, when n = 2 , we have the following corollary:
Corollary 3. 
Let f : R R be an h-additive function. If f and h are continuous at a single point x 0 and h is idempotent, then f is continuous on R .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we define such a class of functions called “h-additive functions”. This class is more general than the additive functions. The additive functions have many applications. In this work, we show that h-additive functions have several of these. We generalize Cauchy’s Theorem to the h-additive function setting. We prove the homogeneity of this class with respect to rational numbers. The density of discontinuous functions of this class is given. The continuity characterization of this class is presented as well. We leave several investigations of additive functions that can be generalized to our new class for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.S.; methodology, M.K.S.; software, P.A.K.; validation, P.A.K.; formal analysis, M.K.S.; investigation, M.K.S.; resources, P.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.S.; writing—review and editing, P.A.K.; visualization, P.A.K.; supervision, M.K.S.; project administration, M.K.S.; funding acquisition, P.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referee for their useful observations and comments that helped us to prepare the final version of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cauchy, A. Cours d’analyse de l’École Royale Polytechnique. Impr. R. 1821, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Darboux, M.G. Sur le théorème fondamental de la géométrie projective. Math. Ann. 1880, 1, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fréchet, M. Pri la funkcia equacio f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Enseign. Math. 1913, 15, 390–393. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sierpiński, W. Sur l’équation fonctionnelle f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Fundam. Math. 1920, 1, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Figiel, T. O równaniu funkcyjnym f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Wiadom. Mat. 1969, 11, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mehdi, M.R. On convex functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1964, 1, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kormes, M. On the functional equation f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1926, 32, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamel, G. Eine Basis aller Zahlen und die unstetigen Lösungen der Funktionalgleichung: f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Math. Ann. 1905, 60, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maksa, G.; Volkmann, P. Characterization of group homomorphisms having values in an inner product space. Publ. Math.-Debr. 2000, 56, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aczél, J.; Dhombres, J. Functional Equations in Several Variables; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989; Volume 31. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilányi, A. Eine zur parallelogrammgleichung äquivalente ungleichung. Aequationes Math. 2001, 62, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daróczy, Z.; Kátai, I. On differentiable additive funcitons. Ann. Univ. Eötvös L. Sect. Comput. 1985, 6, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  13. Daróczy, Z.; Kátai, I. Additive functions. Anal. Math. 1986, 12, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daróczy, Z.; Kátai, I. Characterization of Additive functions with Values in the Circle Group-II. Publ. Math.-Debr. 1994, 44, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Páles, Z.; Shihab, M.K. Cauchy–Schwarz-type inequalities for solutions of functional equations. Period. Math. Hung. 2024; to appear. [Google Scholar]
  16. de Bruijn, N.G. Functions whose differences belong to a given class. Nieuw Arch. Voor Wiskd. 1951, 23, 194–218. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bernardi, C. Discontinuous additive functions: Regular behavior vs. pathological features. Expo. Math. 2015, 33, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aczél, J. Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuczma, M. An Introduction to the Theory of Functional Equations and Inequalities; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ng, C.T. Functions Generating Schur-Convex Sums; General Inequalities 5; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; pp. 433–438. [Google Scholar]
  21. Maksa, G.; Páles, Z. Decomposition of higher-order Wright-convex functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 359, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Páles, Z.; Shihab, M.K. Decomposition of higher-order Wright convex functions revisited. Results Math. 2022, 77, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Páles, Z.; Shihab, M.K. On convexity properties with respect to a Chebyshev system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2024, 530, 127728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Darboux, G. Sur la composition des forces en statique. Bull. Des Sci. Math. Astron. 1875, 9, 281–288. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shihab, M.K.; Kluza, P.A. On the h-Additive Functions and Their Symmetry Properties. Symmetry 2025, 17, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020158

AMA Style

Shihab MK, Kluza PA. On the h-Additive Functions and Their Symmetry Properties. Symmetry. 2025; 17(2):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shihab, Mahmood Kamil, and Paweł Artur Kluza. 2025. "On the h-Additive Functions and Their Symmetry Properties" Symmetry 17, no. 2: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020158

APA Style

Shihab, M. K., & Kluza, P. A. (2025). On the h-Additive Functions and Their Symmetry Properties. Symmetry, 17(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop