Next Article in Journal
The Origin of the Upper Cambrian Basin-Scale Massive Dolostones of the Xixiangchi Formation, Sichuan Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
Bioaccumulation and Human Health Risk Assessment of Arsenic and Chromium Species in Water–Soil–Vegetables System in Lephalale, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lead Mobilization and Speciation in Mining Waste: Experiments and Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue “Pollutants in Acid Mine Drainage”

Earth Sciences Department, Institute of Earth Sciences, Pole of the University of Minho, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
Minerals 2023, 13(7), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070931
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 2 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollutants in Acid Mine Drainage)
Acid mine drainage (AMD) is among the major environmental concerns related to mining activity and often causes the complete degradation of affected ecosystems during and/or after mine closure. AMD is a particular research focus owing to its incorporation of assessments of various pollutants’ presence, reactivity, and biogeochemical behavior [1,2]. Additionally, the properties of these polluted mine waters constrain the efficacy of monitoring plans and the environmental remediation approaches.
The systems affected by AMD have high heterogeneity and generate samples with complex matrices [3]. Moreover, AMD frequently creates high amounts of colloids [4], typically in the nanoscale dimensions [5]. Further, this mine drainage represents peculiar ecosystems dominated by acidophilic organisms involved in complex interactions that influence the migration and fate of pollutants [6,7,8,9]. In addition, the evolution of AMD promotes the development of new mineral phases that control the concentration of contaminants and seasonal behavior of the affected systems [10,11].
Extensive literature exists about the origin of AMD in relation to the oxidative dissolution of sulfide minerals [12,13,14]. Nevertheless, the complexity of biogeochemical processes involving the diversity of minerals and cyclic reactions with acidophilic microorganisms continue to be interesting research topics. Also, the state of the art refers to several works dealing with properties, environmental impacts, and treatment processes (e.g., [2,3,15,16]). However, in these peculiar waters, pollutants’ diversity, mobility, and geochemical behavior are very site-dependent. The paragenesis of each ore deposit, climate, and engineering options of exploitation and waste deposition (among many other factors) controls the nature and degree of pollution. Moreover, the importance of natural attenuation processes and monitoring efficiency depend on the geology (sensu lato), hydrology, and deposition structures, like waste piles and tailing dams. Important research efforts have been undertaken in the laboratory and field to increase knowledge about the behavior of these complex, affected systems [17].
In light of these considerations, this Special Issue addresses a wide variety of topics, such as the source and nature of pollutants, speciation, mobilization/precipitation, and toxicity of trace elements. Additionally, the articles featured in this publication cover the modeling of processes, innovative techniques for removal of hazardous elements, and advanced monitoring techniques, aiming to enlarge the base knowledge about pollutants in AMD. Therefore, the published papers present the latest advances in (bio)geochemistry and mineralogy of AMD and wastes from which AMD develops. The Special Issue contains 19 articles that provide examples of methodological approaches and novel tools and solutions for the monitoring, treatment, and remediation of AMD.
Geochemical modeling is an important research focus in this Special Issue [18,19,20,21,22]. This relevance is emphasized by Nordstrom’s work [18], which showed the role of these models in understanding aspects such as speciation and natural attenuation, while exploring treatment processes for the recovery of metals in these complex matrices. In different geological contexts, Drapeau et al. [19] and Skierszkan et al. [20] also presented geochemical modeling to investigate the mobilization of lead and uranium, respectively. Geochemistry and mineralogy were used by Lemos et al. [21] to determine the AMD potential and establish the ability to mobilize potentially toxic elements (PTE), even in alkaline conditions. The authors highlighted the importance of using geochemical experiments to support sustainable tailings management. Combining geochemical modeling with acid–base neutralizing capacity (ANC–BNC) tests, Drapeau et al. [22] proposed an approach for characterizing siliceous and calcareous mining wastes and modeling pH evolution, and advocated element mobility as a function of the added amount of acid or base. However, with regard to the topic of modeling, Raymond et al. [23] focused on the behavior of waste rock cover systems and used a numerical model for understanding metal release as a function of water infiltration. In the domain of previewing the AMD potential, Moyo et al. [24] investigated the uncertainties associated with standard static tests and the importance of sulfur speciation when calculating potential acidity. The impact of the oxidation state of sulfur on the mobility of metals in contaminated sediments was investigated by Langman et al. [25]. The authors concluded that adding algal detritus to Fe- and S-rich sediments in a mining-impacted lake enhances Mn release but may not affect other toxic elements (e.g., As, Cd). Ódri et al. [26] investigated how the degree of isotope fractionation could help to understand the release and transport of pollutants in AMD.
The articles by Pi-Puig et al. [27], Menshikova et al. [28], and Kim [29] focused on the secondary minerals formed in a diversity of geological and climate scenarios. Pi-Puig et al. [27] proposed a genetic model for crusts and efflorescence and highlighted their roles as sources of contamination during the wet season. Menshikova et al. [28] characterized the secondary precipitates, emphasizing the amorphous phases formed under the influence of mine waters. Kim [29] demonstrated the natural attenuation potential of iron and Mn oxyhydroxides, which are able to retain toxicity mobilized from wastes with pyrite and manganese pyroxene.
The papers by Zawierucha et al. [30], Kato et al. [31], Ryskie et al. [32], and Santos et al. [33] were related to diverse processes and tools for the treatment of AMD. Zawierucha et al. [30] showed a novel approach based on the selectivity of elements of environmental concern, especially arsenic. The technique consisted of applying polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs) and revealed an efficiency of 90% in the removal of arsenic. Passive treatment through wetlands was considered by Kato et al. [31]. The authors modeled the mechanisms of pollutant removal by incorporating reactions into GETFLOWS. The results were consistent with adsorption on ferrihydrite observed in analyzed sediment samples. Ryskie et al. [32] presented a review of contaminants of emergent concern (CEC) in mine water and cold climates, e.g., rare earth elements, cyanide, and nitrogen compounds. The authors began by clarifying the definitions of this concept and continued reviewing the treatment strategies based on the best available technologies that are still economically viable.
Santos et al. analyzed microalgae’s role in remediation [33], showing the use of algal growth for biosorption processes. The Scenedesmus genera revealed the ability to improve AMD quality and reduce pollutants toxicity. Algae were also analyzed in the study of Gomes et al. [34], exposing the stressful ecological conditions of AMD. The association between the algal community and hydrological patterns, obtained from digital surface models and flow maps of toxic elements, was presented as a relevant tool for biomonitoring AMD systems. In the same metallogenetic context (Iberian Pyrite Belt—IPB, SW Europe), there was the paradigmatic Rio Tinto, presented in the research of Olías et al. [35], which also showed the extreme conditions of AMD. The authors analyzed the evolution of pollutants concentrations and loads, highlighting the control by rainfall and concluding with the expected long-term persistence of pollutants mobilization in this river system. Still, in the IPB, the work by Flores et al. [36] presented a methodological approach to monitoring. They applied high-resolution unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based hyperspectral mapping and machine learning tools to detect geochemical and mineralogical variations and then related them with concentrations and physicochemical properties in the river system.
The above-presented works showed AMD to be a global problem worthy of investigation with manifestations worldwide. The diversity of addressed subjects illustrated the magnitude of this environmental problem and the recent evolution of knowledge about pollutants in AMD. Moreover, it contributed to new approaches to and techniques for AMD monitoring, modeling, and remediation.

Funding

This research was funded by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência and Tecnologia through projects UIDB/04683/2020, UIDP/04683/2020, and Nano-MINENV 029259 (PTDC/CTA-AMB/29259/2017).

Acknowledgments

The guest editor thanks the authors, reviewers, Academic Editor, and Minerals’ staff for their contributions to this special issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gray, N.F. Acid mine drainage composition and the implications for its impact on lotic systems. Water Resour. 1998, 32, 2122–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nordstrom, D.K.; Blowes, D.W.; Ptacek, C.J. Hydrogeochemistry and microbiology of mine drainage: An update. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 57, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wolkersdorfer, C.; Nordstrom, D.K.; Beckie, R.D.; Cicerone, D.S.; Elliot, T.; Edraki, M.; Valente, T.; França, S.C.A.; Kumar, P.; Oyarzún, R.; et al. Guidance for the Integrated Use of Hydrological, Geochemical, and Isotopic Tools in Mining Operations. Mine Water Environ. 2020, 39, 204–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kimball, B.A.; Callender, E.; Axtmann, E.V. Effects of colloids on metal transport in a river receiving acid mine drainage, Upper Arkansas River, Colorado, USA. Appl. Geochem. 1995, 10, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valente, T.; Barroso, A.; Antunes, I.M.; Gomes, P.; Fonseca, R.; Pinho, C.; Pamplona, J.; Sequeira Braga, M.A.; Sousa, J.P.S. Acid Mine Drainage Precipitates at the Nanometric Scale—Properties and Environmental Role; Stanley, P., Wolkersdorfer, C., Wolkersdorfer, K., Eds.; International Mine Water: Cardiff, UK; pp. 625–631.
  6. Ehrlich, H.L. Geomocrobiology; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1996; 719p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Robbins, E.I. Bacteria and Archaea in acidic environments and a key to morphological identification. Hydrobiologia 2000, 433, 61–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sabater, S.; Buchaca, T.; Cambra, J.; Catalan, J.; Guasch, H.; Ivorra, N.; Muñoz, I.; Navarro, E.; Real, M.; Romaní, A. Structure and function of benthic algal communities in an extremely acid river 1. J. Phycol. 2003, 39, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Valente, T.M.; Leal Gomes, C. The role of two acidophilic algae as ecological indicators of acid mine drainage sites. J. Iberian Geol. 2007, 33, 283–294. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bigham, J.; Schwertmann, U.; Traina, S.; Winland, R.; Wolf, M. Schwertmannite and the chemical modeling of iron in acid sulfate waters. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 2111–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Valente, T.M.; Gomes, C.L. Occurrence, properties and pollution potential of environmental minerals in acid mine drainage. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 1135–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. McKibben, A.A.; Barnes, H.L. Oxidation of pyrite in low temperature acidic solutions: Rate laws and surface textures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1986, 50, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Evangelou, V.P.; Zhang, Y.L. A review: Pyrite oxidation mechanisms and acid mine drainage prevention. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 25, 141–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rimstidt, J.D.; Vaughan, D.J. Pyrite oxidation: A state-of-the-art assessment of the reaction mechanism. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hudson-Edwards, K.; Jamieson, H.E.; Lottermoser, B.G. Mine wastes: Past, present, future. Elements 2011, 7, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valente, T.; Grande, J.; de la Torre, M.; Santisteban, M.; Cerón, J. Mineralogy and environmental relevance of AMD-precipitates from the Tharsis mines, Iberian Pyrite Belt (SW, Spain). Appl. Geochem. 2013, 39, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arnold, M.; Kangas, P.; Mäkinen, A.; Lakay, E.; Isomäki, N.; Lavén, G.; Gericke, M.; Pajuniemi, P.; Tommi Kaartinen, T.; Wendling, L. Mine water as a resource: Selective removal and recovery of trace antimony from mine-impacted water. Mine Water Environ. 2019, 38, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kirk Nordstrom, D. Geochemical Modeling of Iron and Aluminum Precipitation during Mixing and Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage. Minerals 2020, 10, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Drapeau, C.; Argane, R.; Delolme, C.; Blanc, D.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R.; Baumgartl, T.; Edraki, M.; Lassabatere, L. Lead Mobilization and Speciation in Mining Waste: Experiments and Modeling. Minerals 2021, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skierszkan, E.K.; Dockrey, J.W.; Mayer, K.U.; Bondici, V.F.; McBeth, J.M.; Beckie, R.D. Geochemical Controls on Uranium Release from Neutral-pH Rock Drainage Produced by Weathering of Granite, Gneiss, and Schist. Minerals 2020, 10, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lemos, M.; Valente, T.; Reis, P.M.; Fonseca, R.; Delbem, I.; Ventura, J.; Magalhães, M. Mineralogical and Geochemical Characterization of Gold Mining Tailings and Their Potential to Generate Acid Mine Drainage (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Minerals 2021, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Drapeau, C.; Delolme, C.; Vézin, C.; Blanc, D.; Baumgartl, T.; Edraki, M.; Lassabatere, L. ANC–BNC Titrations and Geochemical Modeling for Characterizing Calcareous and Siliceous Mining Waste. Minerals 2021, 11, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raymond, K.E.; Seigneur, N.; Su, D.; Poaty, B.; Plante, B.; Bussière, B.; Mayer, K.U. Numerical Modeling of a Laboratory-Scale Waste Rock Pile Featuring an Engineered Cover System. Minerals 2020, 10, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moyo, A.; Amaral Filho, J.R.D.; Harrison, S.T.L.; Broadhurst, J.L. Implications of Sulfur Speciation on the Assessment of Acid Rock Drainage Generating Potential: A Study of South African Coal Processing Wastes. Minerals 2019, 9, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Langman, J.B.; Ali, J.D.; Child, A.W.; Wilhelm, F.M.; Moberly, J.G. Sulfur Species, Bonding Environment, and Metal Mobilization in Mining-Impacted Lake Sediments: Column Experiments Replicating Seasonal Anoxia and Deposition of Algal Detritus. Minerals 2020, 10, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ódri, Á.; Becker, M.; Broadhurst, J.; Harrison, S.T.L.; Edraki, M. Stable Isotope Imprints during Pyrite Leaching: Implications for Acid Rock Drainage Characterization. Minerals 2020, 10, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pi-Puig, T.; Solé, J.; Gómez Cruz, A. Mineralogical Study and Genetic Model of Efflorescent Salts and Crusts from Two Abandoned Tailings in the Taxco Mining District, Guerrero (Mexico). Minerals 2020, 10, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Menshikova, E.; Osovetsky, B.; Blinov, S.; Belkin, P. Mineral Formation under the Influence of Mine Waters (The Kizel Coal Basin, Russia). Minerals 2020, 10, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, Y. Geochemical Behavior of Potentially Toxic Elements in Riverbank-Deposited Weathered Tailings and Their Environmental Effects: Weathering of Pyrite and Manganese Pyroxene. Minerals 2020, 10, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zawierucha, I.; Nowik-Zajac, A.; Malina, G. Selective Removal of As(V) Ions from Acid Mine Drainage Using Polymer Inclusion Membranes. Minerals 2020, 10, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kato, T.; Kawasaki, Y.; Kadokura, M.; Suzuki, K.; Tawara, Y.; Ohara, Y.; Tokoro, C. Application of GETFLOWS Coupled with Chemical Reactions to Arsenic Removal through Ferrihydrite Coprecipitation in an Artificial Wetland of a Japanese Closed Mine. Minerals 2020, 10, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ryskie, S.; Neculita, C.M.; Rosa, E.; Coudert, L.; Couture, P. Active Treatment of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Cold Mine Water Using Advanced Oxidation and Membrane-Related Processes: A Review. Minerals 2021, 11, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Santos, K.B.D.; Almeida, V.O.D.; Weiler, J.; Schneider, I.A.H. Removal of Pollutants from an AMD from a Coal Mine by Neutralization/Precipitation Followed by “In Vivo” Biosorption Step with the Microalgae Scenedesmus sp. Minerals 2020, 10, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gomes, P.; Valente, T.; Albuquerque, T.; Henriques, R.; Flor-Arnau, N.; Pamplona, J.; Macías, F. Algae in Acid Mine Drainage and Relationships with Pollutants in a Degraded Mining Ecosystem. Minerals 2021, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Olías, M.; Cánovas, C.R.; Macías, F.; Basallote, M.D.; Nieto, J.M. The Evolution of Pollutant Concentrations in a River Severely Affected by Acid Mine Drainage: Río Tinto (SW Spain). Minerals 2020, 10, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Flores, H.; Lorenz, S.; Jackisch, R.; Tusa, L.; Contreras, I.C.; Zimmermann, R.; Gloaguen, R. UAS-Based Hyperspectral Environmental Monitoring of Acid Mine Drainage Affected Waters. Minerals 2021, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valente, T. Editorial for Special Issue “Pollutants in Acid Mine Drainage”. Minerals 2023, 13, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070931

AMA Style

Valente T. Editorial for Special Issue “Pollutants in Acid Mine Drainage”. Minerals. 2023; 13(7):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valente, Teresa. 2023. "Editorial for Special Issue “Pollutants in Acid Mine Drainage”" Minerals 13, no. 7: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop