Abstract
In this article, we present some novel dynamic Hilbert-type inequalities within the framework of time scales . We achieve this by utilizing Hölder’s inequality, the chain rule, and the mean inequality. As specific instances of our findings (when and ), we obtain the discrete and continuous analogues of previously established inequalities. Additionally, we derive other inequalities for different time scales, such as for which, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, is a largely novel conclusion.
Keywords:
Hilbert-type inequalities; Hölder’s inequality; chain rule; mean inequality; dynamic inequality; time scale delta calculus MSC:
26D10; 26D15; 26E70
1. Introduction
In the early 1900s, the renowned mathematician David Hilbert formulated his famous inequality, known as the double series Hilbert inequality (see [1]), wherein he established that if are two real sequences, such that and then
In 1911, Schur demonstrated in his paper [2] that the constant in (1) is optimal. Furthermore, he established the integral analogue of (1), which is now recognized as the Hilbert integral inequality in the form
where S and T are real functions such that , and in (2) is still the best possible constant factor.
The inequalities expressed as (1) and (2) are crucial in the theory and application of integral inequalities, especially in analyzing both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of solutions to differential and integral equations. Recently, there has been rapid development in fractal theory, which has found widespread use in science and engineering. Some researchers have utilized fractal theory and weight function methods to generalize classical inequalities effectively. For instance, Liu [3] established a Hilbert-type integral inequality and its equivalent form on a fractal set. Hilbert-type inequalities play a significant role in mathematics, particularly in complex and numerical analysis. Over the years, these inequalities have seen numerous refinements, generalizations, extensions, and applications in the literature (see [4,5,6,7]).
In 1925, Hardy [8] extended (1) by introducing a pair of conjugate exponents , where and satisfying as follows. If , such that , and then
In [9], the authors established the equivalent integral form of (3) as
where , such that and The constant factor in (3) and (4) is optimal.
In 1998, Pachpatte [10] presented a new inequality akin to the Hilbert inequality as follows: let and with Define the operators as Then
In 2000, Pachpatte [11] generalized (5) by introducing one pair of conjugate exponents with and proved that if and with then
Also, the authors [12] established the continuous analogue of (7) as follows: if and and are real continuous functions on respectively, with then for we have
In 2011, Chang-Jian et al. [13] generalized (5) and demonstrated that if , such that , is a real sequence defined for where is a natural number and . Define the operator ∇ by for any function Then
where
Also, the authors of [13] proved that if and are constants such that , is a real valued differentiable function defined on where Assume for Then
where
Also, they demonstrated that if , such that , is a real sequence defined for where and are natural numbers and assuming that for all Define the operator and as
Then
where
In the last few decades, much attention has been devoted to establishing discrete analogues of the corresponding continuous results in various fields of analysis. This appears along with establishing a dynamic inequality in this paper by using a general domain called a time scale . A time scale is an arbitrary non-empty closed subset of the real numbers . For more details about dynamic inequalities and applications on time scales, see [14,15,16,17,18,19].
The aim of this paper is to prove similar analogues of the inequalities (8), (9) on time scales, and we can also generalize (10) on time scale delta calculus for an increasing function by establishing some new dynamic Hilbert-type inequalities on time scale delta calculus.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we show some basics of the time scale theory and some lemmas on time scales needed in Section 3, where we prove our results. These results as special cases when and give the inequalities ((8) and (10)), (9), respectively. Also, we can obtain other inequalities on different time scales, like for
2. Preliminaries and Basic Lemmas
In 2001, Bohner and Peterson [20] defined the forward jump operator by . For any function , the notation denotes . We define the time scale interval by
In the following, we state the definition of rd−continuous and Δ−derivative function.
Definition 1
([20]). A function is called rd−continuous provided it is continuous at right-dense points in and its left-sided limits exist (finite) at left-dense points in . The set of rd−continuous functions is denoted by .
Definition 2
([20]). Assume that is a function and let We define to be the number, provided it exists, as follows: for any , there is a neighborhood U of for some , such that
In this case, we say is the delta or Hilger derivative of S at t.
In the following, we state several values of —differentiable function at a point .
Theorem 1
([20]). Assume is a function and let . Then we have the following.
- 1.
- If S is differentiable at t, then f is continuous at t.
- 2.
- If S is continuous at t and t is right-scattered, then S is differentiable at t with
- 3.
- If t is right-dense, then S is differentiable if the limitexists as a finite number. In this case,
Example 1.
1. If then for we obtain
where is the usual derivative.
2. If then , and for we have
where Δ is the usual forward difference operator.
3. If , then we have and
The following theorem is about the chain rule formula on time scales.
Theorem 2
(Chain Rule [20] Theorem 1.87). Assume is continuous, is delta-differentiable on and is continuously differentiable. Then γ exists in the real interval with
Definition 3
([20]). A function is called an antiderivative of , provided that
In this case, the Cauchy integral of s is defined by
Theorem 3
([20]). Every rd–continuous function has an antiderivative. In particular, if , then
In the following, we present the properties of integration on time scales.
Theorem 4
([20]). If and , then
- 1.
- .
- 2.
- .
- 3.
- .
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- If for all then
Theorem 5
([21]). Let and Then, the following properties hold:
If , then
If , then
If , then
In the following, we present some auxiliary lemmas that we need to prove our results.
Lemma 1
(Integration by Parts [21]). If and then
Lemma 2
Let and be time scales. Assume that denotes the set of functions on where S is continuous in and Let denote the set of all functions for which both the partial derivative with respect to and the partial derivative with respect to exist and are in
Lemma 3
(Two dimensional Hölder’s inequality [23] Theorem 3.3). Assume that with and such that Then
Lemma 4
(Fubini’s theorem [24]). If and is Δ−integrable, then
Lemma 5
(Mean inequality [9]). If for then
Lemma 6.
Let with and where Then
3. Main Results
In this section, we present the key results of our study. Firstly, we establish the time scale version of (8).
Theorem 6.
Let , such that and let be a delta-differentiable function with Then
where
Proof.
Applying the property (5) of Theorem 4 and the hypothesis , we obtain
and then
Applying (16) with we have
Dividing (24) by and integrating over from to we observe that
Corollary 1.
If we put and for into Theorem 6, then , and we obtain the analogue of inequality (8) as follows
where
In the following, we present some special cases in (the continuous and quantum) calculie, i.e., when and for . These cases are new and interesting for the reader.
Corollary 2.
In Theorem 6, if , such that and is a differentiable function with then and we obtain
where
Corollary 3.
In Theorem 6, if for , such that and with then and we obtain
where
and
In the following theorem, we generalize the previous results for two variables.
Theorem 7.
Assume that , such that and with for and Then
where
Here, the —derivative of the function is the —derivative with respect to the first variable τ and the —derivative of the function is the —derivative with respect to the second variable
Proof.
Applying the property (5) of Theorem 4, Fubini’s theorem and the hypothesis , we obtain
and then
Applying (16) with we have
Dividing (38) by and integrating over and from to and for respectively, we observe that
Integrating (43) over from to and then applying Fubini’s theorem, we obtain
Corollary 4.
In the following corollaries, we show some particular cases in (the continuous and quantum) calculie, i.e., when and for , which are original.
Corollary 5.
If , such that with for and then and we obtain
where
Corollary 6.
If for such that and with for and then and we obtain
where
Theorem 8.
Let such that and is a delta-differentiable function and an increasing function with Then
where
Proof.
Applying the chain rule formula (11) on the term we obtain
where Since is an increasing function, and we know from (51) that
and then (where ), we observe that
Thus,
Applying (16) with we have
Dividing (56) by and integrating over from to we observe that
Remark 1.
If and for then we obtain the inequality (9) for the non-negative increasing function λ with
In the following remark, we present the discrete analogue of (9), i.e., when , which is new and interesting for the reader.
Corollary 7.
If , such that and is a non-negative and increasing sequence with then
where
4. Conclusions and Future Work
In this paper, we establish some new dynamic Hilbert-type inequalities on time scale delta calculus by applying Hölder’s inequality, the chain rule and the mean inequality. In the future, we will prove Hilbert-type inequalities on diamond—α calculus and fractional conformable calculus.
Author Contributions
Software and writing—original draft, H.M.R. and A.I.S.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., A.A.I.A.-T. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through large Research Project under grant number RGP 2/190/45.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through large Research Project under grant number RGP 2/190/45.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Hilbert, D. Grundzüge Einer Allgemeinen Theorie der Linearen Intergraleichungen; Springer: Göttingen, Germany, 1906; pp. 157–227. [Google Scholar]
- Schur, I. Bernerkungen sur theorie der beschrankten Bilinearformen mit unendlich vielen veranderlichen. J. Math. 1911, 140, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Q.; Sun, W. A Hilbert-type fractal integral inequality and its applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Debnath, L.; Yang, B. Recent developments of Hilbert-type discrete and integral inequalities with applications. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2012, 2012, 871845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guariglia, E. Riemann zeta fractional derivative-functional equation and link with primes. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 2019, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, G.H.; Littlewood, J.E.; Polya, G. The maximum of a certain bilinear form. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1926, 25, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, G.H. Notes on a theorem of Hilbert. Math. Z. 1920, 6, 314–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, G.H. Note on a theorem of Hilbert concerning series of positive term. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1925, 23, 45–46. [Google Scholar]
- Hardy, G.H.; Littlewood, J.E.; Polya, G. Inequalities, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1934. [Google Scholar]
- Pachpatte, B.G. A note on Hilbert type inequality. Tamkang J. Math. 1998, 29, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pachpatte, B.G. Inequalities Similar to Certain Extensions of Hilbert’s Inequality. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2000, 243, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kim, Y.H.; Kim, B.I. An Analogue of Hilbert’s inequality and its extensions. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2002, 39, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.-J.; Chen, L.-Y.; Cheung, W.S. On some new Hilbert-type inequalities. Math. Slovaca 2011, 61, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
- Řehak, P. Hardy inequality on time scales and its application to half-linear dynamic equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2005, 2005, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saker, S.H.; Ahmed, A.M.; Rezk, H.M.; O’Regan, D.; Agarwal, R.P. New Hilbert dynamic inequalities on time scales. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 20, 1017–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A.M.; AlNemer, G.; Zakarya, M.; Rezk, H.M. Some Dynamic Inequalities of Hilbert’s Type. J. Funct. Spaces 2020, 2020, 4976050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulsen, T.; Jadlovská, I.; Yilmaz, E. On the number of eigenvalues for parameter-dependent diffusion problem on time scales. Math. Metho. Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlNemer, G.; Zakarya, M.; Abd El-Hamid, H.A.; Agarwal, P.; Rezk, H.M. Some Dynamic Hilbert-Type Inequalities on Time Scales. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Hamid, H.A.A.; Rezk, H.M.; Ahmed, A.M.; AlNemer, G.; Zakarya, M.; ELsaify, H.A. Some Dynamic Hilbert-Type Inequalities for Two Variables on Time Scales. J. Inequal. Appl. 2021, 2021, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohner, M.; Peterson, A. Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, R.P.; O’Regan, D.; Saker, S.H. Dynamic Inequalities on Time Scales; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, R.P.; O’Regan, D.; Saker, S.H. Hardy Type Inequalities on Time Scales; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Tuna, A.; Kutukcu, S. Some integral inequalities on time scales. Appl. Math. Mech. 2008, 29, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohner, M.; Guseinov, G.S. Multiple integration on time scales. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2005, 14, 579–606. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).