Next Article in Journal
Correlations between Endoscopic and Histopathological Assessment of Helicobacter pylori-Induced Gastric Pathology—A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Lavender (Lavandula multifida L.) Ecotype from Arid Tunisia, with Differential Essential Oil Composition and Higher Antimicrobial Potential
Previous Article in Journal
The Bacterial Compositions of Nasal Septal Abscess in Patients with or without Diabetes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/life12122095
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integracides: Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from Fusarium sp.—Their 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Potential and Structure–Activity Relation Using In Vitro and Molecular Docking Studies

by
Maan T. Khayat
1,*,
Khadijah A. Mohammad
1,
Gamal A. Mohamed
2,
Martin K. Safo
3 and
Sabrin R. M. Ibrahim
4,5
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
4
Department of Chemistry, Preparatory Year Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(12), 2095; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122095
Submission received: 16 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Discovery and Application of Phytochemicals and Bio Actives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inflammation is a complicated disorder that is produced as a result of consecutive processes. 5-LOX (5-lipoxygenase) is accountable for various inflammation mediators and leukotrienes synthesis, and its inhibition is the target of anti-inflammation therapeutics. Fungi have acquired enormous attentiveness because of their capability to biosynthesize novel bio-metabolites that reveal diversified bio-activities. A new tetracyclic triterpenoid, integracide L (1), along with integracides B (2) and F (3), were separated from Mentha longifolia-associated Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014). Their structures were verified utilizing varied spectral analyses. The isolated metabolites (1–3), alongside the earlier reported integracides G (4), H (5), and J (6), were inspected for 5-LOX inhibition capacity. Interestingly, 1–6 possessed marked 5-LOX inhibition potentials with IC50s ranging from 1.18 to 3.97 μM compared to zileuton (IC50 1.17 µM). Additionally, molecular docking was executed to examine the interaction among these metabolites and 5-LOX, as well as to validate the in vitro findings. The docking study revealed their inhibitory activity interactions in the binding pocket. These findings highlighted the potential of integracides as lead metabolites for anti-inflammation drug discovery.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is a complicated reaction that is controlled by an interaction between the cells and inflammatory mediators [1]. Among the most important enzymes involved in this process are cyclo-oxygenases (COX-1 and 2), phospholipase A2, and lipoxygenases (LOXs) enzymes [2,3]. Leukotrienes (LTs) represent potent lipid mediators of allergic and inflammatory reactions such as kidney, skin, cardiovascular, allergic diseases, arthritis, asthma, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolic syndrome [4,5]. The 5-LOX metallo-enzyme activates the conversion of arachidonic acid (AA) to leukotrienes (LTs) [6,7]. Thus, the inhibition of the 5-LOX pathway is known to be interesting for treating various inflammatory disorders. 5-LOX inhibitors are of potential therapeutic value. Minocyclines and zileuton are LOX inhibitors available in pharmacies; however, their uses have been limited or forbidden due to their serious side effects [8,9]. Due to such side-effects, the development of new LOX inhibitors with minimum side effects is a recent challenge [10].
Fungi have acquired enormous attentiveness because of their capability to biosynthesize novel bio-metabolites possessing diversified bio-properties that are utilized in pharmaceutical, medicinal, and agricultural fields [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Endophytic fungi can inhabit the internal living tissues of the host plants, often without producing any external symptoms or apparent negative effects [19,20,21,22]. They are a prominent pool of new and biologically active natural products such as terpenoids, alkaloids, steroids, isocoumarins, quinones, lignans, phenols, phenylpropanoids, and lactones [23,24,25,26,27,28]. The Fusarium species, a widespread cosmopolitan group of fungi, have been separated from both marine and terrestrial sources [20,29,30]. Integracides, an under-explored class of oxygenated tetracyclic 4,4-dimethylergostane triterpenoids, possessing a 12-acetyl-Δ8,14-diene-11-ol moiety have been reported only from Fusarium sp. [20,31,32,33,34,35]. Integracides were reported to possess diversified bio-activities: cytotoxic, anti-leishmanial, HIV-1 integrase, elastase, rhinovirus 3C protease, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitory [20,30,31,32]. Integracides could represent a potential therapeutic target for degenerative and inflammatory diseases via their elastase inhibitory potential [33]. Our earlier studies on Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014) led to the characterization of 4 integracides [20,30]. When seeking more integracides from this fungus, a new culture of Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014) was inspected. Chromatographic separation of the EtOAc extract yielded a new integracide derivative: integracide L (1), along with three known metabolites. Their chemical structures were assigned by extensive spectral analyses and were compared with the literature. Additionally, the 5-lipoxygenase inhibition (5-LOI) capacity of integracides L (1), B (2), and F (3) and the formerly separated integracides G (4), H (5), and J (6) were assessed [20,30]. Molecular docking was also carried out for these metabolites to verify their 5-LOI potential. In addition, the structure–activity relationship of these metabolites was discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Purification of Metabolites

From the Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014) MeOH extract, a new integracide derivative integracide L (1) and two known metabolites (2 and 3) were purified utilizing SiO2/Sephadex LH-20/RP-18 (Figure 1). The known metabolites were specified as integracides B (2) [20,30] and F (3) [20,30] by comparing their spectral data to earlier published data and co-TLC with authentic samples (Supplementary Material).

2.2. Structural Elucidation of Integracide L

Compound 1 was separated as a white amorphous powder. It had a C34H54O7 molecular formula based on the molecular peak at m/z 575.3954 [M + H]+ (calcd for C34H55O7, 575.3948) in HRESIMS, indicating eight DBE. It showed a UV band at λmax 235 nm. The IR displayed absorptions at 3439, 1729, 1663, and 879 cm−1, corresponding to hydroxyl, ester carbonyl, and the exocyclic di-substituted double bond, respectively. Compound 1 was one degree of unsaturation and 18 mass units more than integracide F (3), indicating the loss of one double bond and the presence of an extra OH group in 1. It exhibited characteristic HRESIMS fragments at m/z 532.3758 [M + H-OAc]+ and 490.3658 [M + H-2OAc]. It’s NMR data of 1 were similar to that of 3 [20]. Thirty-four carbons were noted in the HSQC and 13C spectra, consisting of seven methyls, eight methylenes, and eight methines, four of them for oxymethine carbons, and nine quaternary carbons, including three olefinic, two carbonyls, and an oxygen-bonded carbon. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra displayed signals at δH 4.66 and 4.70 (H-28)/δC 106.9 (C-28) and 155.4 (C-24), 127.4 (C-8), and 143.5 (C-9) indicating the existence of a tetra-substituted olefinic double bond and an exomethylene group in 1 (Table 1). Their position at C8-C9 and C24-C−28 was assured by the observed HMBC peaks of H-26/H-22/H-27/C-24, H-28/C-23, and C-25, H-23/C-24, and C-28, H-6/H-11/H-15/C-8, and H-7/H-12/H-18/C-9 (Figure 2). Four methyls singlets at δH 1.20 (H-18), 0.91 (H-30), 0.73 (H-29), and 0.61 (H-19) and methyl doublet at δH 1.22 (H-21), relating to the carbons at δC 22.1 (C-18), 28.5 (C-30), 17.9 (C-29), and 13.2 (C-19) in the HSQC were observed. The HMBC peaks from H-18/C-1, C-9, C-5, and C-10, H-21/C-22 and C-17, H-30 and H-29/C-4, C-3, and C-5, and H-19/C-17, C-13, C-12, and C-14 proved the location of the CH3 groups. The 1H-1H COSY spin system extended from H-14 to H-16 and indicated the absence of the C14-C15 tri-substituted olefinic double bond in 1. Moreover, the 1H and 13C displayed signals that were characteristic of an isopropyl moiety, including a multiplet methine at δH 2.19 (H-25)/32.3 (C-25) and two methyls doublet at δH 0.98 (H-26)/δC 21.6 (C-26) and 0.96 (H-27)/δC 21.5 (C-27). This was secured by the 1H-1H COSY cross peaks of H-25/H-27 and H-26 and the HMBC peaks of H-25/C-26 and C-27 and H-26 and H-27/C-25. Its connectivity at C-24 was confirmed by the observed cross peaks of H-26 and H-27/C-24, H-28/C-25, and H-25/C-24 and C-23 in the HMBC. Furthermore, four oxymethine signals at δH 5.00 (H-12)/4.25 (H-11)/3.73 (H-3)/3.62 (H-3), correlating to the carbons at δC 78.3, 67.9, 66.8, and 88.0, respectively in the HSQC were observed. Their presence at C-12, C-11, C-2, and C-3, respectively, was established by the observed HMBC and 1H-1H COSY cross peaks (Figure 2).
A signal for the oxygen-linked quaternary carbon was observed at δC 86.0 (C-17). Its placement was secured by HMBC peaks of H-15, H-19, and H-12 to C-17. Moreover, the signals at δH 1.98 (H-32)/δC 20.6 (C-32), 2.05 (H-34)/21.0 (C-34), 169.5 (C-31), and 170.1 (C-33) indicated the existence of two acetoxy groups in 2 (Table 1).
This was confirmed by the HRESIMS fragment peaks at m/z 532.3758 [M + H-OAc]+ and 490.3658 [M + H-2OAc] (Figure 3).
Their attachment at C-3 and C-12 was secured by the HMBC correlations of H-3/C-33 and H-12/C-31. Furthermore, three OH signals were noted at δH 5.21 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 11-OH), 5.30 (brs, 2-OH), and 5.39 (s, 17-OH). The HMBC peaks of 11-OH/C-9/C-11/C-12, 2-OH/C-1/C-2/C-3, and 17-OH/C-13/C-17 proved their assignment. The relative configuration of 1 was assigned by comparing the 1H and 13C shifts and coupling constants with 3 and the related analogs [20,30,31,32]. Based on these findings, the structure of 1 was unambiguously elucidated and named integracide L.

2.3. 5-LOX Inhibitory Activity

In the present investigation, integracides 1–6 reported from Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014) were investigated to explore their 5-LOI capability. It is noteworthy that integracides G (4), H (5), and J (6) displayed potent 5-LOI potential (IC50s 1.18, 1.46, and 2.01 µM, respectively) compared to zileuton (IC50 1.17 µM) (Figure 4). In addition, integracides L (1), B (2), and F (3) demonstrated significant effectiveness with IC50s, 3.45, 3.97, and 2.76 µM, respectively.

2.4. Molecular Docking Studies

The docking study was performed with the Schrodinger program. Inregracides, zileuton, and NDGA (native co-crystallized-inhibitor) were prepared before docking using the “LigPrep” tool, where all ligand 2D structures were converted to 3D and energy minimized [36]. All the ligands’ possible tautomeric states and ionization were created as well. The crystal structure of stable 5-LOX complexed with the NDGA inhibitor was downloaded from the protein-data-bank (PDB-ID: 6N2W), prepared, and energy minimized employing “Protein_Preparation_Wizard” [37,38]. A grid box was created around the active site of the stable 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W) containing the co-crystallized inhibitor NDGA using Glide’s “Receptor-Grid-Generation” tool in the Schrödinger suite. Finally, the “Ligand_Docking” tool was implemented for docking [39,40]. All the studied ligands were docked inside the grid box with XP (extra-precision) protocol [41]. The docking method was validated by redocking NDGA (native co-crystallized-inhibitor) in the prepared protein active site. When it was superimposed over the original co-crystallized inhibitor, it gave a 1.3132 Å RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) calculated value, indicating a valid docking method (Figure 5).
The chosen crystal structure of 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W) is a protein-stabilized form in which stabilizing mutations are implemented, and membrane insertion loops are absent [37]. However, it still contains the canonical LOX fold, which is composed of the amino-terminal β-barrel membrane-binding domain and the α-helical domain in which the active site is located [38]. The active site of 5-LOX (where the arachidonic acid binds) forms a U-shape hydrophobic cavity, which contains a catalytic metal iron [37,42].
The docking findings performed with the XP mode for the energy-minimized 3D structures of integracides and zileuton are listed below in Table 2.
The docked compounds are ranked based on their gscores related to the free energy of the binding; the more negative scores imply better binding. The generated scores are the gscore (ranks different metabolites), emodel (ranks different conformers), and XP gscore. Glide employs emodel scoring to choose the docked compounds’ best poses; then, it ranks the best poses relying on the given gscores. The XP gscore ranks the Glide XP mode-created poses. In general, Glide uses the gscore to sort and rank the docked metabolites.

3. Discussion

Inflammation is a complicated response that is produced as a result of consecutive processes, one of which is arachidonic acid’s metabolism, which commences with oxidation by 5-LOX. It is proved that 5-LOX has a leading function in inflammation through the synthesis of various inflammation mediators and LTs (leukotrienes). 5-LOX has protruded as a prospective target for inflammation-linked disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. Many of the available 5-LOX inhibitors are of synthetic origin and reveal untoward aftereffects, such as zileuton, that have the hepato-toxic potential [8,9]. Hence, finding out safe and efficacious anti-inflammation agents that modulate LT production is an imperious demand.
Fungi possess a miracle capability to produce unrivaled metabolites, and the varied bioactivities among them are terpenoids, including sesqui-, di-, mero-, and tri-terpenoids. Several reports stated the anti-inflammation potential of fungal terpenoids through varied mechanisms [43,44].
Among the reported fungal terpenoids, integracides are an uncommon class of tri-terpenoids that report mainly from Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014). This class of metabolites displayed varied bioactivities.
In the current study, a new metabolite belonging to this class, along with the known ones, was purified and characterized utilizing various tools. Their in vitro anti-inflammation potencies, as assessed by their attenuation of 5-LOX, demonstrated the powerful 5-LOI capability of these metabolites. It was noted that compounds 4, 5, and 6 were the most potent compounds that had IC50 values that were comparable to that of the positive control, zileuton.
It is noteworthy that there were many studies that proved the anti-inflammatory effectiveness of triterpenoids via inhibition of 5-LOX [45,46,47].
In the molecular docking studies of this work, the data showed a better understanding of each inhibitor’s potency as well as their correlation with the bioassay throughout the binding and mode of interactions. For instance, the docking results of 4 were consistent with its biochemical inhibitory results, where it produced the lowest IC50 (1.18 μM) similar to that of zileuton (Figure 4).
The XP gscore ranking of integracide F (3), H (5), and J (6) showed minimal correlation to their in vitro inhibitory effectiveness, although the scores were close to each other. On the other hand, integracide B (2) and L (1) were ranked the least in terms of their gscores and IC50 values as well.
The general schematic structure of integracides contains a cyclic hydrophobic skeleton composed of four rings (A, B, C, and D), a hydrophobic R group on C17 of ring D, an acetyloxy group on C12 of ring C, a hydroxyl group on C11 of ring C, a hydroxyl group on C2 of ring A (which may be acetylated) and a hydroxyl group on C3 of ring A (which is usually esterified by different groups) (Figure 6). The presence and type of the esterified groups on C3 could influence the binding affinity to the 5-LOX active site.
Integracide G (4) was the top-scored metabolite with a gscore of −6.708 kcal/mol among the other derivatives and was closer in score to NDGA (co-crystallized inhibitor) (Table 2).
The aliphatic substitution on the cyclopentene ring (ring D) involved in hydrophobic interactions with a hydrophobic pocket contained mainly Ile, Leu, and Ala residues. Both the OH group on C11 and the carbonyl oxygen of the acetyloxy group on ring C formed aromatic–hydrogen and H–bond interactions, respectively, with His432. The molecule has a hydroxy decanoate chain (substituted on C3 of ring A) where part of it was exposed to the solvent, and the rest entered a small groove in the active site, adding extra binding interactions (Figure 7).
Integracide H (5) contains two acetyloxy substituents on C2 and C3 of ring A and is involved in H–bond interactions with Arg596. However, the two groups were partially solvent-exposed (Figure 8).
For integracide J (6), it has a p-hydroxybenzoyloxy substitution on C3 of ring A instead of the long chain present in 4. The C=O of the acetyloxy group on C12 and -OH on C2 interacted with His432 through H–bonds. Moreover, the benzoyl C=O formed an H–bond with Arg596; however, the phenolic OH group was exposed to the solvent and did not involve any type of binding with the protein (Figure 9).
Integracide F (3) has one acetyloxy group on C3 of ring A. The molecule showed similar H–bond interactions with His432 and Arg596 (Figure 10).
Integracide L (1) has a saturated cyclopenty ring and OH group on C17, which are not present in any other integracide analogs. These modifications may not be favored, directing the R group away from the hydrophobic pocket and being more exposed to the solvent. This change may influence the binding affinity and increase the gscore and IC50 for this compound (Table 2 and Figure 4). The acetyloxy groups on rings A and C formed H–bonds with Arg596 and His432, respectively (Figure 11).
Integracide B (2) was bound to the active site in a different mode, opposite to what has been noted with other integracides (Figure 12). The presence of free OH groups on ring A could contribute to its low binding affinity, illustrated by the gscore of −5.051 kcal/mol and IC50 value of 3.97 μM, among other integracides (Table 2).
The positive control inhibitor, zileuton, was also docked in the 5-LOX active site to investigate its binding mode. The amide-NH2 formed an H–bond with Gln363, whereas the thiophene ring formed a π–π interaction with the imidazole ring in His372 (Figure 13), similar to what was observed for NDGA (Figure 14). Although zileuton produced the highest potency in the biochemical assay (IC50 1.17 μM), little correlation was observed with its gscore (−4.766 kcal/mol), and it ranked last among the other tested compounds (Table 2).
Accordingly, it was noted that the substitution pattern of the intergracides’ terpenoid framework might influence the efficacy. Substitution at C-3 by long-chain fatty acid acyl as in 4 or p-hydroxy benzoyl as in 6 was found to elevate the activity. Additionally, increasing the number of acetyl groups raised the activity, as well as the conjugated C8-C9-C14-C15, which may have a role in the activity (Figure 15). Further, the lacking a C14-C15 double bond and the presence of the C17-OH group substitution minimized the efficacy.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotation was estimated using a 341LC Perkin-Elmer polarimeter (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). UV and IR were assessed employing Shimadzu UV/VIS 1601 and IR-400 spectrophotometers (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), respectively. Orbitrap LTQ (ThermoFinnigan, Bremen, Germany) and 850 INOVA BRUKER (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA) were utilized for HRESIMS and NMR measuring. The chromatographic investigation was achieved utilizing SiO260/Sephadex LH-20/RP-18, in addition to a 6-mL RP-18 LiChrolut extraction tube (Merck/Darmstadt/Germany) [20,30]. TLC was carried out on F254 SiO260 TLC plates while Linoleic acid, 5-LOX kits, and zileuton were secured by Sigma–Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Cultivation of Fungal Material

The earlier separated and identified Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014) was cultivated in 20 Erlenmeyer flasks (1 L each) as stated formerly [20,30].

4.3. Extraction and Isolation

The culture extraction was carried out utilizing EtOAc and was concentrated by a vacuum. Subsequently, mixing the extract with H2O (300 mL) and partitioning among n-hexane and MeOH (90%) were performed. The MeOH extract (6.9 g) was submitted to the Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (CC, MeOH/CHCl3 30/70) to result in eight sub-fractions: FS.1–FS.8. Sub-fraction FS.3 (311 mg) was separated on SiO2 CC (EtOAc/n-hexane 2/98–30/70) to yield 1, which was submitted to RP-18 CC (H2O/MeOH) to obtain 1 (4.8 mg). Sub-fraction FS.4 (465 mg) SiO2 CC (EtOAc/n-hexane 5:95–30:70) afforded 2, following that of RP-18 LiChrolut (acetonitrile/H2O gradient) to yield 2 (5.1 mg). Sub-fraction FS.5 (970 mg) SiO2 CC (EtOAc/n-hexane 3/97–20/80) following this RP18 CC (MeOH/H2O gradient) produced 3 (27.4 mg).

NMR Spectral Data of Integracide L (1)

White amorphous powder; [α]D +19.3 (c 0.2, MeOH); UV λmax (MeOH) (log ε): 239 (3.27) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3439, 1729, 1663, 879 cm−1; NMR data: see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 575.3954 (calcd for C34H55O7, 575.3948 [M + H]+).

4.4. 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Assay

5-LOI of integracides (1–6, Conc. 0.001, 0.01, 1.0, and 10 µM) was examined as priorly stated, utilizing zileuton as the positive control [2,48,49,50,51,52].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

IC50s were estimated by regression analysis (GraphPad-InStat 3, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The % 5-LOX inhibition of and IC50s are listed as mean-values ±SD. Statistical significance was analyzed among the samples by one-way-ANOVA and subsequently by Tukey–Kramer test (p < 0.005).

4.6. Molecular Docking Study

4.6.1. Ligand and Protein Preparation

The docking study was performed with the Schrodinger program (Schrödinger Release 2021-4: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2021). The crystal structure of stable 5-LOX complexed with the NDGA inhibitor was downloaded from the protein data bank (PDB; ID: 6N2W). The protein was prepared using the “Protein Preparation Wizard” tool in Maestro software, where the missing hydrogens were added to the residues, the metal ionization state was corrected, and the water molecules > 5 Å from protein residues were deleted. The protein contained two chains: A and B. Chain B was complexed with the inhibitor; therefore, it was chosen to perform the docking study. The protein was then refined by predicting the pKa of the ionizable residues using PROPKA and water molecules > 3 Å (not involved in the water bridge), which were removed [36]. Additionally, the proteins containing Fe2+ coordinates with His residues were in the active site. The protein-Fe2+ bonds were deleted, and finally, the minimization of the protein was applied using the OPLS4 force field. All ligands were prepared before docking using the “LigPrep” tool [53]. The 2D structures of the ligands were converted to 3D and energy-minimized using the OPLS3 force field. The hydrogens were added, and all possible ionization states and tautomeric forms were created at a pH of 7.0 ± 0.2 by Epik; a desalt option was also chosen. The H–bonds were optimized by predicting the pKa of ionizable groups using PROPKA [36].

4.6.2. Grid Generation and Molecular Docking

To perform the docking, a grid box was generated around the active site of stable 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W) containing the co-crystallized inhibitor NDGA and using Glide’s “Receptor-Grid-Generation” tool in Schrödinger suite [39]. All study ligands were docked inside the grid box with an extra precision (XP) protocol, and all other parameters were set to default [41]. The non-polar atoms were set for the VdW radii scaling factor by 1.0, and the partial charge cut-off was 0.25. Finally, the “Ligand Docking” tool was implemented for docking [40]. To validate the docking method, the co-crystallized inhibitor was re-docked inside the grid box and evaluated.

5. Conclusions

A new tetracyclic triterpenoid, integracide L (1) and two metabolites (2 and 3), were purified from Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014). Their specification was achieved with the assistance of extensive spectral analyses. Compounds 1–6 demonstrated a noticeable 5-LOX inhibition potential. The docking study of integracides illustrated their binding mode in the active site with possible amino acid interactions, which could explain their inhibitory activity.
These findings may foster more inspection of the possible usage of integracides as 5-LOX inhibitors and draw further interest to the synthesis of structure-similar analogs with enhanced 5-LOX inhibition capacity. Moreover, additional in vivo and mechanistic investigations are needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life12122095/s1. 1H and 13C NMR data of integracides (2–6).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A.M. and S.R.M.I.; methodology, G.A.M. and S.R.M.I.; validation, G.A.M. and S.R.M.I.; investigation, G.A.M. and S.R.M.I.; Molecular docking, M.T.K. and K.A.M.; resources, G.A.M., M.T.K. and K.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A.M., S.R.M.I., M.T.K., M.K.S. and K.A.M.; writing—review and editing, G.A.M., S.R.M.I., M.T.K., M.K.S. and K.A.M.; visualization, M.T.K., K.A.M. and G.A.M.; project administration, M.T.K.; funding acquisition, M.T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia has funded this project under grant no. (RG-26-166-42).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia has funded this project under grant no. (RG-26-166-42). The authors acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. White, M. Mediators of Inflammation and the Inflammatory Process. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999, 103, S378–S381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sinha, S.; Doble, M.; Manju, S.L. 5-Lipoxygenase as a drug target: A review on trends in inhibitors structural design, SAR and mechanism based approach. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 3745–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Al-Attas, A.; El-Shaer, N.S.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ibrahim, S.; Esmat, A. New Anti-Inflammatory Sesquiterpenes from the Rhizomes of Costus speciosus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 176, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewis, R.A.; Austen, K.F.; Soberman, R.J. Leukotrienes and Other Products of the 5-Lipoxygenase Pathway: Biochemistry and Relation to Pathobiology in Human Diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 645–655. [Google Scholar]
  5. Henderson, W.R. The Role of Leukotrienes in Inflammation. Ann. Intern. Med. 1994, 121, 684–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Su, C.; Oliw, E.H. Manganese Lipoxygenase: Purification and Characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 13072–13079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Steele, V.E.; Holmes, C.A.; Hawk, E.T.; Kopelovich, L.; Lubet, R.A.; Crowell, J.A.; Sigman, C.C.; Kelloff, G.J. Lipoxygenase Inhibitors as Potential Cancer Chemopreventives. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1999, 8, 467–483. [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlier, C.; Michaux, C. Dual Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 5-Lipoxygenase (5-LOX) as a New Strategy to Provide Safer Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Misra, S.; Ghatak, S.; Patil, N.; Dandawate, P.; Ambike, V.; Adsule, S.; Unni, D.; Swamy, K.V.; Padhye, S. Novel Dual Cyclooxygenase and Lipoxygenase Inhibitors Targeting hyaluronan–CD44v6 Pathway and Inducing Cytotoxicity in Colon Cancer Cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 2551–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tomy, M.J.; Sharanya, C.S.; Dileep, K.V.; Prasanth, S.; Sabu, A.; Sadasivan, C.; Haridas, M. Derivatives Form Better Lipoxygenase Inhibitors than Piperine: In Vitro and in Silico Study. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 85, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shankar, A.; Sharma, K.K. Fungal secondary metabolites in food and pharmaceuticals in the era of multi-omics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 3465–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Manganyi, M.C.; Ateba, C.N. Untapped Potentials of Endophytic Fungi: A Review of Novel Bioactive Compounds with Biological Applications. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Slusarczyk, J.; Adamska, E.; Czerwik-Marcinkowska, J. Fungi and Algae as Sources of Medicinal and Other Biologically Active Compounds: A Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mohamed, G.A.; Ibrahim, S.R.M. Untapped Potential of Marine-Associated Cladosporium Species: An Overview on Secondary Metabolites, Biotechnological Relevance, and Biological Activities. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Adebayo, E.A.; Azeez, M.A.; Alao, M.B.; Oke, A.M.; Aina, D.A. Fungi as veritable tool in current advances in nanobiotechnology. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohamed, A.G.T. Stachybotrys chartarum: A Novel Biological Agent for the Extracellular Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and their Antimicrobial Activity. Indones. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 18, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Macías-Rubalcava, M.L.; Sánchez-Fernández, R.E. Secondary metabolites of endophytic Xylaria species with potential applications in medicine and agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Zheng, C.; Guo, L.; Li, W.; Sun, P.; Qin, L. Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kaul, S.; Gupta, S.; Ahmed, M.; Dhar, M.K. Endophytic fungi from medicinal plants: A treasure hunt for bioactive metabolites. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 487–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ibrahim, S.R.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ross, S.A. Integracides F and G: New Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from the Endophytic Fungus Fusarium Sp. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 15, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adeleke, B.S.; Babalola, O.O. The plant endosphere-hidden treasures: A review of fungal endophytes. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2021, 37, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. De Souza, J.J.; Vieira, I.J.C.; Rodrigues-Filho, E.; Braz-Filho, R. Terpenoids from Endophytic Fungi. Molecules 2011, 16, 10604–10618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Noor, A.O.; Almasri, D.M.; Bagalagel, A.A.; Abdallah, H.M.; Mohamed, S.G.A.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ibrahim, S.R.M. Naturally occurring isocoumarins derivatives from endophytic fungi: Sources, isolation, structural characterization, biosynthesis, and biological activities. Molecules 2020, 25, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhang, H.W.; Song, Y.C.; Tan, R.X. Biology and Chemistry of Endophytes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 753–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, L.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W. Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Plant Endophytic Fungi. Fungicides: Chemistry, Environmental Impact and Health Effects; De Costa, P., Bezerra, P., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 91–119. [Google Scholar]
  26. Parthasarathy, R.; Chandrika, M.; Rao, H.Y.; Kamalraj, S.; Jayabaskaran, C.; Pugazhendhi, A. Molecular Profiling of Marine Endophytic Fungi from Green Algae: Assessment of Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities. Process Biochem. 2020, 96, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Preethi, K.; Manon Mani, V.; Lavanya, N. Endophytic fungi: A potential source of bioactive compounds for commercial and therapeutic applications. In Endophytes; Patil, R.H., Maheshwari, V.L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 247–272. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rai, N.; Kumari Keshri, P.; Verma, A.; Kamble, S.C.; Mishra, P.; Barik, S.; Kumar Singh, S.; Gautam, V. Plant Associated Fungal Endophytes as a Source of Natural Bioactive Compounds. Mycology 2021, 12, 139–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Summerell, B.A.; Salleh, B.; Leslie, J.F. A Utilitarian Approach to Identifying Fusarium Species. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ibrahim, S.R.; Abdallah, H.M.; Mohamed, G.A.; Ross, S.A. Integracides H-J: New Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from the Endophytic Fungus Fusarium Sp. Fitoterapia 2016, 112, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, S.B.; Ondeyka, J.G.; Schleif, W.A.; Felock, P.; Hazuda, D.J. Chemistry and Structure—Activity Relationship of HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor Integracide B and Related Natural Products. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1338–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.B.; Zink, D.L.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Polishook, J.D.; Ondeyka, J.G.; Hirshfield, J.; Felock, P.; Hazuda, D.J. Integracides: Tetracyclic Triterpenoid Inhibitors of HIV-1 Integrase Produced by Fusarium Sp. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 1577–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, S.B. A New Mild PTSA-Catalyzed Method for Sulfate Ester Hydrolysis and Acid-Catalyzed Rearrangement of 12-Acetyl-Diene-11-Ol Tetracyclic Triterpenoids Involving an Angular Methyl Migration. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6973–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brill, G.M.; Kati, W.M.; Montgomery, D.; Karwowski, J.P.; Humphrey, P.E.; Jackson, M.; Clement, J.J.; Kadam, S.; Chen, R.H.; McAlpine, J.B. Novel Triterpene Sulfates from Fusarium compactum using a Rhinovirus 3C Protease Inhibitor Screen. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tabata, N.; Tomoda, H.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Masuma, R.; BAMBERGER, M.J.; Omura, S. Inhibition of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein by Fungal Metabolites, L681, 512. J. Antibiot. 1999, 52, 1042–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Olsson, M.H.; Søndergaard, C.R.; Rostkowski, M.; Jensen, J.H. PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical P K a Predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gilbert, N.C.; Gerstmeier, J.; Schexnaydre, E.E.; Börner, F.; Garscha, U.; Neau, D.B.; Werz, O.; Newcomer, M.E. Structural and Mechanistic Insights into 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibition by Natural Products. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Madhavi Sastry, G.; Adzhigirey, M.; Day, T.; Annabhimoju, R.; Sherman, W. Protein and Ligand Preparation: Parameters, Protocols, and Influence on Virtual Screening Enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Friesner, R.A.; Banks, J.L.; Murphy, R.B.; Halgren, T.A.; Klicic, J.J.; Mainz, D.T.; Repasky, M.P.; Knoll, E.H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.K. Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schrödinger Release 2021-4: Glide; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  41. Friesner, R.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Repasky, M.P.; Frye, L.L.; Greenwood, J.R.; Halgren, T.A.; Sanschagrin, P.C.; Mainz, D.T. Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein—Ligand Complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Neau, D.B.; Bender, G.; Boeglin, W.E.; Bartlett, S.G.; Brash, A.R.; Newcomer, M.E. Crystal Structure of a Lipoxygenase in Complex with Substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 31905–31913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ge, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhuo, X.; Li, J.; Jiang, X.; Ye, X.; Xie, T.; Bai, R. Natural Terpenoids with Anti-Inflammatory Activities: Potential Leads for Anti-Inflammatory Drug Discovery. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 124, 105817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, J.; Yi, M.; Ding, L.; He, S. A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Compounds from Marine Fungi, 2000–2018. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Antony, T.; Chakraborty, K. Anti-inflammatory polyether triterpenoids from the marine macroalga Gracilaria salicornia: Newly described natural leads attenuate pro-inflammatory 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase-2. Algal Res. 2020, 47, 101791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koeberle, A.; Henkel, A.; Verhoff, M.; Tausch, L.; König, S.; Fischer, D.; Kather, N.; Seitz, S.; Paul, M.; Jauch, J.; et al. Triterpene acids from frankincense and semi-synthetic derivatives that inhibit 5-lipoxygenase and cathepsin G. Molecules 2018, 23, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Braca, A.; Dal Piaz, F.; Marzocco, S.; Vassallo, A.; De Tommasi, N. Triterpene derivatives as inhibitors of protein involved in the inflammatory process: Molecules interfering with phospholipase A2, cycloxygenase, and lipoxygenase. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 302–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mbarik, M.; Poirier, S.J.; Doiron, J.; Selka, A.; Barnett, D.A.; Cormier, M.; Touaibia, M.; Surette, M.E. Phenolic Acid Phenethylesters and their Corresponding Ketones: Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase and Stability in Human Blood and HepaRG Cells. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2019, 7, e00524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Mohamed, G.A.; Khayat, M.T.A.; Zayed, M.F.; El-Kholy, A.A.S. Anti-Inflammatory Terpenoids from Cyperus rotundus Rhizomes. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 31 (Suppl. 4), 1449–1456. [Google Scholar]
  50. Carter, G.W.; Young, P.R.; Albert, D.H.; Bouska, J.; Dyer, R.; Bell, R.L.; Summers, J.B.; Brooks, D.W. 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Activity of Zileuton. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1991, 256, 929–937. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mohamed, G.A. Tagenols A and B: New Lipoxygenase Inhibitor Flavonols from Tagetes minuta. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 16, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Noreen, Y.; Ringbom, T.; Perera, P.; Danielson, H.; Bohlin, L. Development of a Radiochemical Cyclooxygenase-1 and-2 in Vitro Assay for Identification of Natural Products as Inhibitors of Prostaglandin Biosynthesis. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schrödinger Release 2021-4: LigPrep; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
Life 12 02095 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of integracides 1–6 isolated from Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014).
Figure 1. Chemical structures of integracides 1–6 isolated from Fusarium sp. (FS No. MAR2014).
Life 12 02095 g001
Life 12 02095 g002 550
Figure 2. Some key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of 1.
Figure 2. Some key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of 1.
Life 12 02095 g002
Life 12 02095 g003 550
Figure 3. Possible fragmentation pattern of integracide L (1).
Figure 3. Possible fragmentation pattern of integracide L (1).
Life 12 02095 g003
Life 12 02095 g004 550
Figure 4. 5-Lipoxygenase inhibition potential of integracides (1–6). * Compared to control group; # compared to indomethacin group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer).
Figure 4. 5-Lipoxygenase inhibition potential of integracides (1–6). * Compared to control group; # compared to indomethacin group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer).
Life 12 02095 g004
Life 12 02095 g005 550
Figure 5. The 3D structures of the redocked NDGA superimposed on co-crystallized NDGA.
Figure 5. The 3D structures of the redocked NDGA superimposed on co-crystallized NDGA.
Life 12 02095 g005
Life 12 02095 g006 550
Figure 6. A representative integracide skeleton showing the numbering system.
Figure 6. A representative integracide skeleton showing the numbering system.
Life 12 02095 g006
Life 12 02095 g007 550
Figure 7. Molecular docking of integracide G (4) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide G (4) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide G with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide G (4) in blue color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic–hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Figure 7. Molecular docking of integracide G (4) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide G (4) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide G with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide G (4) in blue color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic–hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Life 12 02095 g007
Life 12 02095 g008 550
Figure 8. Molecular docking of integracide H (5) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide H (5) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide H (5) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide H (5) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Figure 8. Molecular docking of integracide H (5) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide H (5) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide H (5) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide H (5) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Life 12 02095 g008
Life 12 02095 g009 550
Figure 9. Molecular docking of integracide J (6) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide J (6) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide J (6) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide J (6) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Figure 9. Molecular docking of integracide J (6) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide J (6) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide J (6) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide J (6) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Life 12 02095 g009
Life 12 02095 g010 550
Figure 10. Molecular docking of integracide F (3) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide F (3) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide F (3) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide F (3) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Figure 10. Molecular docking of integracide F (3) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide F (3) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide F (3) with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide F (3) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond interactions are displayed in yellow dotted lines.
Life 12 02095 g010
Life 12 02095 g011 550
Figure 11. Molecular docking of integracide L (1) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide L (1) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide L with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide L (1) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic-hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Figure 11. Molecular docking of integracide L (1) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide L (1) in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide L with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide L (1) in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic-hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Life 12 02095 g011
Life 12 02095 g012 550
Figure 12. Molecular docking of integracide B (2) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide B in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide B with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide B in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic-hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Figure 12. Molecular docking of integracide B (2) in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed look of integracide B in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of integracide B with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of integracide B in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and aromatic-hydrogen interactions are in yellow and purple dotted lines, respectively.
Life 12 02095 g012
Life 12 02095 g013 550
Figure 13. Molecular docking of zileuton in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed image of zileuton in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of zileuton with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of zileuton in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and π–π staking interactions are in yellow and green dotted lines, respectively.
Figure 13. Molecular docking of zileuton in stable human 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W). (A) Molecular surface representation with solid style and electrostatic potential color scheme of red, white, and blue (min −0.3, max +0.3); (B) Zoomed image of zileuton in the active site of 5-LOX in molecular surface; (C) 2D representation of binding interactions of zileuton with amino acid residues in the active site within 4 Å distance; (D) 3D representation of zileuton in green color within the active site of 5-LOX. The H–bond and π–π staking interactions are in yellow and green dotted lines, respectively.
Life 12 02095 g013
Life 12 02095 g014 550
Figure 14. The 3D representation of zileuton-NDGA overlay in the active site of 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W).
Figure 14. The 3D representation of zileuton-NDGA overlay in the active site of 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W).
Life 12 02095 g014
Life 12 02095 g015 550
Figure 15. Structure–activity relationship of integracides. ↓: decrease; ↑: increase.
Figure 15. Structure–activity relationship of integracides. ↓: decrease; ↑: increase.
Life 12 02095 g015
Table
Table 1. NMR spectral data of compound 1 (DMSO-d6, 850 and 214 MHz).
Table 1. NMR spectral data of compound 1 (DMSO-d6, 850 and 214 MHz).
No.δH [mult., J (Hz)]δC (mult.)HMBC
12.65 m
1.11 m		42.6 CH22, 3, 5
23.73 dd (10.3, 4.2)66.8 CH1, 3, 5
33.62 d (10.3)88.0 CH2, 4, 29, 30, 33
4-39.2 C-
51.03 dd (12.8, 3.4)51.1 CH3, 4, 7, 10, 18
61.66 m
1.52 m		18.0 CH25, 7, 8
72.21 m
1.46 m		26.8 CH25, 8, 9
8-127.4 C-
9-143.5 C-
10-38.5 C-
114.25 brs67.9 CH8, 9, 12
125.00 d (3.4)78.3 CH9, 11, 13, 14, 19, 31
13-47.6 C-
142.06 t (6.2)39.8 CH-
151.68 m
1.45 m		31.3 CH28, 13, 14, 17
162.28 m
2.18 m		33.5 CH214, 15, 17
17-86.0 C13, 16, 22
181.20 s22.1 CH31, 5, 9, 10
190.61 s13.2 CH312, 13, 14, 17
201.67 m33.0 CH17, 21, 23
211.22 d (6.3)21.8 CH317, 20, 22
222.08 m
1.87 m		31.7 CH221, 24
232.41 m
1.81 m		35.0 CH224, 25, 28
24-155.4 C-
252.19 m32.3 CH23, 24, 26, 27
260.98 d (6.8)21.6 CH324, 25, 27
270.96 d (6.8)21.5 CH324, 25, 26
284.70 brs
4.66 brs		106.9 CH223, 24, 25
290.73 s17.9 CH33, 4, 5, 30
300.91 s28.5 CH33, 4, 5, 29
31-169.5 C-
321.98 s20.6 CH331
33-170.1 C-
342.05 s21.0 CH333
2-OH5.30 brs-1, 2, 3
11-OH5.21 d (6.8)-9, 11
17-OH5.39 s-13, 17
Table
Table 2. Docking results of integracides with stable 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W).
Table 2. Docking results of integracides with stable 5-LOX (PDB: 6N2W).
CompoundXP GscoreGlide GscoreGlide Emodel
NDGA−7.856−7.856−51.600
Integracide G (4)−6.708−6.708−66.318
Integracide F (3)−6.453−6.453−47.304
Integracide J (6)−6.169−6.169−47.646
Integracide H (5)−5.221−5.221−46.847
Integracide L (1)−5.109−5.109−34.117
Integracide B (2)−5.051−5.051−35.498
Zileuton−4.766−4.766−31.899
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khayat, M.T.; Mohammad, K.A.; Mohamed, G.A.; Safo, M.K.; Ibrahim, S.R.M. Integracides: Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from Fusarium sp.—Their 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Potential and Structure–Activity Relation Using In Vitro and Molecular Docking Studies. Life 2022, 12, 2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122095

AMA Style

Khayat MT, Mohammad KA, Mohamed GA, Safo MK, Ibrahim SRM. Integracides: Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from Fusarium sp.—Their 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Potential and Structure–Activity Relation Using In Vitro and Molecular Docking Studies. Life. 2022; 12(12):2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khayat, Maan T., Khadijah A. Mohammad, Gamal A. Mohamed, Martin K. Safo, and Sabrin R. M. Ibrahim. 2022. "Integracides: Tetracyclic Triterpenoids from Fusarium sp.—Their 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Potential and Structure–Activity Relation Using In Vitro and Molecular Docking Studies" Life 12, no. 12: 2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop