Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Biomechanical Study of a Novel Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement
Previous Article in Journal
Realistic Gene Transfer to Gene Duplication Ratios Identify Different Roots in the Bacterial Phylogeny Using a Tree Reconciliation Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterogeneities in Ventricular Conduction Following Treatment with Heptanol: A Multi-Electrode Array Study in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts

1
Henan SCOPE Research Institute of Electrophysiology Co., Ltd., Kaifeng 475000, China
2
Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong, China
3
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
4
Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury CT2 7FS, UK
5
Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK
6
Department of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
7
Research Center of Ion Channelopathy, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(7), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070996
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 21 June 2022 / Accepted: 30 June 2022 / Published: 5 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)

Abstract

:
Background: Previous studies have associated slowed ventricular conduction with the arrhythmogenesis mediated by the gap junction and sodium channel inhibitor heptanol in mouse hearts. However, they did not study the propagation patterns that might contribute to the arrhythmic substrate. This study used a multi-electrode array mapping technique to further investigate different conduction abnormalities in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts exposed to 0.1 or 2 mM heptanol. Methods: Recordings were made from the left ventricular epicardium using multi-electrode arrays in spontaneously beating hearts during right ventricular 8 Hz pacing or S1S2 pacing. Results: In spontaneously beating hearts, heptanol at 0.1 and 2 mM significantly reduced the heart rate from 314 ± 25 to 189 ± 24 and 157 ± 7 bpm, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). During regular 8 Hz pacing, the mean LATs were increased by 0.1 and 2 mM heptanol from 7.1 ± 2.2 ms to 19.9 ± 5.0 ms (p < 0.05) and 18.4 ± 5.7 ms (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the mean LATs was increased from 2.5 ± 0.8 ms to 10.3 ± 4.0 ms and 8.0 ± 2.5 ms (p < 0.05), and the median of phase differences was increased from 1.7 ± 1.1 ms to 13.9 ± 7.8 ms and 12.1 ± 5.0 ms by 0.1 and 2 mM heptanol (p < 0.05). P5 took a value of 0.2 ± 0.1 ms and was not significantly altered by heptanol at 0.1 or 2 mM (1.1 ± 0.9 ms and 0.9 ± 0.5 ms, p > 0.05). P50 was increased from 7.3 ± 2.7 ms to 24.0 ± 12.0 ms by 0.1 mM heptanol and then to 22.5 ± 7.5 ms by 2 mM heptanol (p < 0.05). P95 was increased from 1.7 ± 1.1 ms to 13.9 ± 7.8 ms by 0.1 mM heptanol and to 12.1 ± 5.0 ms by 2 mM heptanol (p < 0.05). These changes led to increases in the absolute inhomogeneity in conduction (P5–95) from 7.1 ± 2.6 ms to 31.4 ± 11.3 ms, 2 mM: 21.6 ± 7.2 ms, respectively (p < 0.05). The inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50) was significantly reduced from 3.7 ± 1.2 to 3.1 ± 0.8 by 0.1 mM and then to 3.3 ± 0.9 by 2 mM heptanol (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Increased activation latencies, reduced CVs, and the increased inhomogeneity index of conduction were associated with both spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias.

1. Introduction

Conduction velocity (CV) is an important variable for the propagation of cardiac action potentials (APs) [1,2]. Defects in conduction are found with aging [3], and in many pathological states, such as heart failure [4], diabetic cardiomyopathy [5], long QT syndrome [6], and Brugada syndrome [7,8]. Therefore, the elucidation of the relative contributions of abnormal conduction to the arrhythmic substrate can provide opportunities for the development of novel pharmacotherapy that can potentially restore conduction. Gap junctions and sodium channels are the main ion channels that govern the cardiac CV [9,10,11,12]. Heptanol is a drug that uncouples gap junctions at concentrations < 2 mM and additionally inhibits sodium channels > 2 mM [13]. It has previously been used to explore the contributions of conduction abnormalities to ventricular arrhythmogenesis in different animal models [14,15]. In our previous work, we associated the arrhythmogenic effects of heptanol to reduced CVs [16], abnormalities in action potential duration (APD) and CV restitution [17], as well as alterations in beat-to-beat repolarization variability in repolarization, using monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings [18,19]. However, CV was reduced by similar extents in arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic hearts, which would suggest factors other than reduced CVs were predisposing to arrhythmogenesis. We hypothesized that increased conduction heterogeneities may be a contributory factor, but the use of MAP recordings does not allow for the visualization or the measurement of local activation and propagation through the myocardium or recording from multiple sites simultaneously [20]. By contrast, the multielectrode array allows the simultaneous recording of electrical activity from multiple sites and the reconstruction of activation maps from the recorded signals [21]. Therefore, this study used a multi-electrode array mapping technique to further investigate the following abnormalities of reduced CV: the increased temporal and spatial dispersion of conduction as determined by the standard deviation of local activation times and inhomogeneity indices in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts exposed to 0.1 or 2 mM heptanol. Using this platform, it is possible to investigate the effects of exogenous substances free from endogenous modulators released by the nervous system [22,23,24,25]. Thus, the experimental design allowed us to test the hypothesis that conduction abnormalities contribute to the arrhythmic substrate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Solutions

Krebs–Henseleit solution (composition in mM: NaCl 119, NaHCO3 25, KCl 4, KH2PO4 1.2, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.8, glucose 10, and sodium pyruvate 2, pH 7.4), which had been bicarbonate-buffered and bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2, was used in the experiments described in this study. Heptanol (Sigma, Dorset, UK; density: 0.82 g mL−1) is an agent that remains soluble in aqueous solutions up to 9 mM (The Merck Index, Hoboken, NJ, USA). Krebs–Henseleit solution was used to dilute the heptanol solution to produce a final concentration of 0.1 mM.

2.2. Preparation of Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts

All experiments involving animals were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (IACUC Number: 2307) and were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication, revised 2011). Male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Vital River Laboratories, Beijing, China. Mice between 5 and 7 months of age were used (n = 5). They were maintained at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C) and were subjected to a 12:12 h light/dark cycle with free access to sterile rodent chow and water in an animal facility. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. The hearts were removed from their chest cavities and then submerged in ice-cold Krebs–Henseleit solution. The aortas were cannulated using a custom-made 21-gauge cannula prefilled with ice-cold buffer. A micro-aneurysm clip was used to secure the hearts onto the Langendorff perfusion system. Retrograde perfusion was carried out at a flow rate of 2 to 2.5 mL min−1 by use of a peristaltic pump. The perfusate passed successively through 200 and 5 μm filters and was warmed to 37 °C using a water jacket and circulator before arriving at the aorta. Approximately 90% of the hearts regained their pink color and spontaneous rhythmic activity. These were therefore studied further. The remaining 10% did not and were discarded. The hearts were perfused for a further 20 min to minimize residual effects of endogenous catecholamine release before their electrophysiology properties were characterized.

2.3. Stimulating and Recording Procedures

Paired platinum electrodes (1 mm interpole distance) were used to stimulate the right ventricular epicardium electrically. This took place at 8 Hz, using square wave pulses of 2 ms in duration, with the stimulation voltage set to three times the diastolic threshold immediately after the start of perfusion. The multi-electrode array, which consisted of 64 electrodes (Teflon-coated silver wires; 0.125 mm diameter; Science Products), was arranged in an 8 × 8 configuration (grid dimensions: 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm; electrode diameter: 0.1 mm; inter-electrode distance: 0.21 mm). Signals were acquired at 1.5 kHz, amplified (100 times), and digitized with 4 PXI-6031E cards (National Instrument Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The array was placed against the LV surface with channel 1 near the base of the heart and channel 57 near the apex. The position of the array was determined in a consistent manner using the anatomical landmarks of the left anterior descending artery, the aorta, and the atria. Unipolar electrogram recordings were made from hearts during spontaneous activity, 8 Hz pacing, and S1S2 stimulation. A reference electrode was placed on the opposite ventricle, distant from the recording sites. The electrical signals were stored offline and subsequently analyzed using EMapScope (Version 4.0, MappingLab, Oxford, UK). Isochrones were drawn using the built-in function of the program. From these recordings, conduction parameters were calculated, as described previously by Lammers et al. in detail [26]. The following parameters were obtained: (1) local activation times (LATs), defined as the point of maximal negative slope and displayed in a grid representing the layout of the original recording array [27]. The mean values were taken from five cardiac cycles for each channel, and an overall mean value was taken from all 64 channels. The mean values from all hearts were then averaged; (2) the standard deviation of the mean LATs averaged over five cardiac cycles, across 64 channels was calculated; (3) the median values of histograms of the local maximum phase differences (P50); (4) the absolute inhomogeneity in conduction (P5–95); (5) the inhomogeneity index given by P5–95/P50 [26] and (6) P50, P5–95 and P5–95/P50 normalized to 1 mm.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All values were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Numerical data were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and was denoted by * in the figures.

3. Results

A multi-electrode array was used to investigate the activation patterns of the LV epicardium under different pharmacological conditions. A diagram of the 64-channel multi-electrode array organized in an 8 × 8 configuration is shown in Figure 1. From each channel, a unipolar electrogram was recorded from spontaneously beating hearts during 8 Hz or during S1S2 stimulation applied at the RV epicardium.
Representative traces of the electrograms recorded from the spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions showed regular activity (Figure 2, top panel). In the presence of 0.1 mM heptanol, ventricular arrhythmias could be detected (Figure 2, middle panel). At 2 mM heptanol, regular activity was seen (Figure 2, bottom panel). Enlarged traces from a single channel are shown in Figure 3A, whereas the activation maps are shown in Figure 3B for 0.1 mM heptanol. For 2 mM heptanol, the traces are shown in Figure 3C,D, respectively. Heptanol at 0.1 and 2 mM significantly reduced the spontaneous heart rate from 314 ± 25 to 189 ± 24 and 157 ± 7 bpm, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001; Figure 3E).
Subsequent experiments were conducted during 8 Hz pacing to further investigate the electrophysiological properties. The representative traces of the electrograms obtained under control conditions and in the presence of 0.1 mM or 2 mM heptanol are shown in Figure 4. Enlarged traces from a single channel are shown in Figure 5A, whereas the activation maps are shown in Figure 5B for 0.1 mM heptanol. For 2 mM heptanol, the traces are shown in Figure 5C,D, respectively.
The mean LATs were increased by 0.1 and 2 mM heptanol from 7.1 ± 2.2 ms to 19.9 ± 5.0 ms (ANOVA, p < 0.05) and 18.4 ± 5.7 ms (ANOVA, p < 0.05), respectively (Figure 6A). The standard deviation of the mean LATs was increased from 2.5 ± 0.8 ms to 10.3 ± 4.0 ms and 8.0 ± 2.5 ms, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 6B), and the median of phase differences was significantly increased from 1.7 ± 1.1 ms to 13.9 ± 7.8 ms and 12.1 ± 5.0 ms by 0.1 and 2 mM heptanol (ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 6C). P5 took a value of 0.2 ± 0.1 ms and was not significantly altered by heptanol at 0.1 or 2 mM (1.1 ± 0.9 ms and 0.9 ± 0.5 ms, respectively, p > 0.05; Figure 6D). By contrast, P50 was increased from 7.3 ± 2.7 ms to 24.0 ± 12.0 ms by 0.1 mM heptanol and then to 22.5 ± 7.5 ms by 2 mM heptanol (Figure 6E). P95 was increased from 1.7 ± 1.1 ms to 13.9 ± 7.8 ms by 0.1 mM heptanol and then to 12.1 ± 5.0 ms by 2 mM heptanol (Figure 6F) (ANOVA, p < 0.05 for all). These changes led to increases in the absolute inhomogeneity in conduction (P5–95) from 7.1 ± 2.6 ms to 31.4 ± 11.3 ms, 2 mM: 21.6 ± 7.2 ms, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 6G). The absolute inhomogeneity was then divided by the median to determine the inhomogeneity independent of conduction velocity, yielding the inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50). This index was significantly reduced from 3.7 ± 1.2 to 3.1 ± 0.8 by 0.1 mM and then to 3.3 ± 0.9 by 2 mM heptanol (ANOVA, p < 0.05) (Figure 6H).
The different measures of inhomogeneity are also normalized per unit of distance in millimeters. Thus, the normalized median of phase differences under control conditions was 4.0 ± 2.6 ms/mm and was increased to 32.5 ± 18.1 ms/mm and 28.2 ± 11.7 ms/mm by 0.1 mM and 2 mM heptanol (ANOVA, p < 0.05 for both cases; Figure 7A). The normalized values of P5 were not significantly altered by 0.1 mM heptanol (0.4 ± 0.2 ms/mm vs. 2.6 ± 2.0 ms/mm; ANOVA, p > 0.05) but were increased by 2 mM heptanol to 2.1 ± 1.1 ms/mm (ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 7B). By contrast, normalized P50 (Figure 7C) and P95 (Figure 7D) were both increased by 0.1 and 2 mM heptanol from 4.0 ± 2.6 ms/mm to 32.5 ± 18.1 ms/mm and 28.2 ± 11.7 ms, and from 17.1 ± 6.2 ms/mm to 75.9 ± 28.1 ms/mm and 52.5 ± 17.4 ms/mm, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05 for all). These changes led to increases in the normalized absolute inhomogeneity in conduction (P5–95) from 16.7 ± 6.0 ms to 73.4 ± 26.4 ms/mm and 50.4 ± 16.8 ms/mm, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 7E). The absolute inhomogeneity was then divided by the median to determine the inhomogeneity independent of conduction velocity, yielding the inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50). This index was significantly reduced by 0.1 and 2 mM from 7.8 1.2 mm−1 to 3.1 ± 0.8 mm−1 and 3.3 ± 0.9 mm−1 (ANOVA, p < 0.05), respectively (Figure 7F).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the contributions of gap junction and/or sodium channel blockade using the pharmacological agent, heptanol. A multi-electrode array was used to determine the activation latencies of 64 myocardial regions simultaneously, which permitted the construction of activation maps and the quantification of both spatial and temporal dispersion of conduction. The main findings are that heptanol at both 0.1 mM and 2 mM concentrations significantly increased local activation latencies (LATs) across myocardial regions, the standard deviations of LATs and absolute inhomogeneity, and decreased the inhomogeneity index.
Multi-electrode arrays can simultaneously record extracellular electrograms from multiple sites. The resulting electrogram data can be used to assess spatial heterogeneities in conduction. The standard deviation of LATs of the different recording channels can be calculated to provide a crude measure of the spread in activation times [28]. To further quantify the degree of inhomogeneity, Lammers and colleagues evaluated phase differences in LATs in the rabbit atria [26]. This enabled the building of histograms of percentile scores of the total population. Theoretically, absolute inhomogeneity in conduction, reflected by P5–95, can be a primary abnormality or a secondary one resulting from reduced CVs. To distinguish between these, the absolute inhomogeneity (P5–95) can be divided by the median score, P50, to calculate the inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50). If the inhomogeneity index were unchanged, then the inhomogeneity would be due to lower conduction velocities. If it were increased, then the increased inhomogeneity would be a primary abnormality.
Heptanol is a long-chain alcohol that decreased the fluidity of cholesterol-rich membrane domains, resulting in a reduced open probability of the gap junction channels [29,30] without influencing its unitary conductance [31]. Heptanol inhibited gap junctions reversibly with a KD value of 0.16 mM and a Hill coefficient of 2.3 in guinea pig ventricular cell pairs [32]. In rabbit hearts, a KD value of 0.20 mM and a Hill coefficient of 2.1 were determined [33]. In another study, KD values of 0.54 mM and 1.20 mM were found using the whole-cell and perforated patch recording techniques, respectively, with a Hill coefficient of 3.45 in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. The IC50 value of heptanol for gap junctions is 2.21 mM in HeLa cells expressing the gap junction protein connexin 43 [34]. However, it should be recognized that heptanol at higher concentrations affects the activity of other ion channels located at the plasma membrane. In canine cardiac Purkinje cells, heptanol blocks sodium channels with an IC50 of 1.3 mM, with 70% and 100% inhibition at 3 mM and 10 mM, respectively [13]. Heptanol at 0.7 mM was found to reduce the amplitude and dV/dt but not the APD of monophasic action potentials in Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts [35]. In the squid axon, heptanol inhibited sodium channels with a KD of 0.93 [36]. Heptanol also inhibited calcium channels at concentrations between 0.5 mM and 6 mM with an IC50 value of 0.75 mM and inward rectifier potassium channels at 3 mM, although IC50 was not provided [37].
Together, the inhibitory effects on gap junctions and sodium channels explain the conduction slowing and increased dispersion of conduction produced by heptanol [38,39]. In the canine ventricular myocardium, heptanol at 0.5 mM and 1 mM reduced conduction velocity both in the transverse and longitudinal directions, with greater effects in the transverse direction. The authors found that 1.5 mM heptanol produced only a 7% decrease in action potential upstroke velocity (Vmax), suggesting that its effect on the sodium current was negligible in these experimental conditions [40]. In sheep epicardial muscle, heptanol between 1.5 mM and 3 mM produced variable effects on Vmax but consistently reduced the overall conduction velocity, suggesting an interacting effect between alterations in intercellular coupling and the direction of action potential propagation [41]. The same group found that heptanol applied at concentrations between 1.5 mM and 3 mM reversibly produced a major decrease in conduction velocity and eventually led to conduction block when Vmax was only reduced by 38% in isolated sheep Purkinje fibers [42]. They further reported that Vmax at the proximal site was unaltered, whilst Vmax at the distal site was reduced by 27% following perfusion with 2 mM heptanol. However, conduction block was observed even when Vmax was relatively normal, suggesting that the effects were mediated through alterations in intercellular resistance. These experimental findings were supported by their computer simulations, which confirmed that increases in intercellular resistance led to reductions in the conduction velocity, even when Vmax was not significantly altered.
Heptanol can exert varying effects on cardiac arrhythmogenicity depending on the concentrations applied, but also on the cardiac chamber and experimental model used. Thus, heptanol at 0.5 and 1 mM exerted pro- and anti-arrhythmic effects, respectively, in the infarcted canine ventricular myocardium [14]. In isolated rabbit hearts, heptanol produced arrhythmogenic effects at concentrations between 0.1 mM and 0.3 mM [33]. By contrast, in a model of reentrant ventricular tachycardia around a ring of anisotropic myocardium from Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, heptanol perfusion at concentrations between 1 mM and 3 mM terminated VT [43]. Interestingly, perfusion with 1 mM heptanol reduced the defibrillation threshold without affecting the repolarization or refractoriness properties [44]. The regional perfusion of 0.5 mM heptanol to swine induced spontaneous ventricular fibrillation and also increased the defibrillation thresholds [45]. These effects are associated with impaired gap junctional conductance and the increased spatial dispersion of conduction. Furthermore, pre-treatment with 1 mM heptanol protects rabbit hearts against ischemia by reducing the infarct size [46]. Heptanol at 0.05 mM, 0.1 mM, 0.5 mM, and 1 mM conferred cardioprotective effects by reducing infarct size following ischemia and prevented the hearts from developing ventricular arrhythmias during reperfusion [47]. However, atrial fibrillation could be induced in the presence of heptanol at low concentrations of 2 μM in isolated perfused canine atria. This effect was attributed to intercellular uncoupling as Vmax and APD restitution were unaltered [48].
Our previous work found that 2 mM heptanol exerted anti-arrhythmic effects on the atria [49], but pro-arrhythmic effects in the ventricles [15], of isolated mouse hearts. These were attributable to relative changes between conduction and tissue refractoriness, represented by the excitation wavelength. In this study, we found higher values of absolute inhomogeneity given by P5–95 induced by heptanol. Moreover, the inhomogeneity index was reduced, suggesting that the inhomogeneity was lower than expected due to conduction slowing. Together, our findings implicate reduced conduction velocities and the increased spatial dispersion of conduction as the substrate for reentrant arrhythmias. Our findings complement previous work in a genetic mouse model of Brugada syndrome, in which temporal and spatial heterogeneities could be assessed by similar multi-electrode array setups [50]. Several factors have been identified as important contributors to spatial heterogeneity in conduction, including the direction of action potential propagation, pacing rate, and premature activation [26].
There are several limitations to the use of extracellular recordings from a multi-electrode array. It cannot distinguish between various mechanisms of conduction block. Nevertheless, some inferences can be made by comparing the phase maps obtained under different conditions. For example, if the inhomogeneities are observed only during premature pacing, then a possible cause is the spatial dispersion of refractoriness [51,52]. Moreover, if the inhomogeneities are present in a single direction only, then they are likely related to tissue anisotropy in axial resistance. By contrast, if they are present in all directions, structural abnormalities may be present. The mechanical movement of the heartbeat can cause the distortion of the electrical waveforms, especially for optical mapping techniques [53]. The motion artefact represents less of a problem for the multi-electrode array technique, because the electrode can move with the heart if the electrode is closely apposed to the heart surface. In our experiments, the electrode pins were made of silver and the outer casing material was made of aluminum. The recordings showed reproducible waveforms over a long period of time. Whilst motion artefact was not a significant problem, the use of flexible electrodes can reduce this problem further. For example, multi-electrode arrays that are composed of flexible materials, such as thin-film polymer, can maintain better conformal contact with the heart motion [54].
Finally, the mechanisms of heptanol at the cellular level, for example, the relative contributions to sodium channel and gap junction inhibition, were not explored in detail, and histological findings were not available.

5. Conclusions

Multi-electrode array recordings demonstrated conduction abnormalities in the form of a reduced CV and an increased spatial dispersion of conduction induced by heptanol in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.D., G.T. and Y.D.; methodology, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; software, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; validation, G.H. and Y.D.; formal analysis, X.D., G.T. and G.H.; investigation, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; resources, G.H. and Y.D.; data curation, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; writing—review and editing, X.D., G.T., G.H. and Y.D.; visualization, X.D., G.T. and G.H.; supervision, G.H. and Y.D.; project administration, G.H. and Y.D.; funding acquisition, G.H. and Y.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170326 and 81770328 to Y.D.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by Huazhong University of Science and Technology Tongji Medical College Committee on Animal Care and conformed to the US National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author without restriction.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is based on a chapter of a doctoral thesis by G.T., which has been deposited at the University of Cambridge Repository. G.T. holds sole copyright of the contents including permission for subsequent publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Antzelevitch, C.; Burashnikov, A. Overview of Basic Mechanisms of Cardiac Arrhythmia. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 2011, 3, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kotadia, I.D.; Whitaker, J.; Roney, C.H.; Niederer, S.; O’Neill, M.; Bishop, M. Anisotropic Cardiac Conduction. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev. 2020, 9, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mirza, M.; Strunets, A.; Shen, W.-K.; Jahangir, A. Mechanisms of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2012, 28, 555–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tolppanen, H.; Siirila-Waris, K.; Harjola, V.P.; Marono, D.; Parenica, J.; Kreutzinger, P.; Nieminen, T.; Pavlusova, M.; Tarvasmaki, T.; Twerenbold, R.; et al. Ventricular conduction abnormalities as predictors of long-term survival in acute de novo and decompensated chronic heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2016, 3, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tse, G.; Lai, E.T.; Tse, V.; Yeo, J.M. Molecular and Electrophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Cardiac Arrhythmogenesis in Diabetes Mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 2848759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Nowak, M.B.; Poelzing, S.; Weinberg, S.H. Mechanisms underlying age-associated manifestation of cardiac sodium channel gain-of-function. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2021, 153, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Letsas, K.P.; Vlachos, K.; Conte, G.; Efremidis, M.; Nakashima, T.; Duchateau, J.; Bazoukis, G.; Frontera, A.; Mililis, P.; Tse, G.; et al. Right ventricular outflow tract electroanatomical abnormalities in asymptomatic and high-risk symptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome: Evidence for a new risk stratification tool? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2021, 32, 2997–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Letsas, K.P.; Efremidis, M.; Asvestas, D.; Vlachos, K.; Georgopoulos, S.; Tse, G.; Liu, T.; Bazoukis, G.; Sideris, A.; Baranchuk, A.; et al. Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Electroanatomical Abnormalities Predict Ventricular Fibrillation Inducibility in Brugada Syndrome. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2018, 11, e005928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palatinus, J.A.; Gourdie, R.G. Diabetes Increases Cryoinjury Size with Associated Effects on Cx43 Gap Junction Function and Phosphorylation in the Mouse Heart. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 8789617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Veeraraghavan, R.; Lin, J.; Hoeker, G.S.; Keener, J.P.; Gourdie, R.G.; Poelzing, S. Sodium channels in the Cx43 gap junction perinexus may constitute a cardiac ephapse: An experimental and modeling study. Pflug. Arch. 2015, 467, 2093–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chang, C.J.; Cheng, C.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Kao, Y.H.; Chen, S.A.; Chen, Y.J. Gap junction modifiers regulate electrical activities of the sinoatrial node and pulmonary vein: Therapeutic implications in atrial arrhythmogenesis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 221, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Veenstra, R.D. Gap junction heterogeneity in reentrant ventricular tachycardia. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 72, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nelson, W.L.; Makielski, J.C. Block of sodium current by heptanol in voltage-clamped canine cardiac Purkinje cells. Circ. Res. 1991, 68, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Callans, D.J.; Moore, E.N.; Spear, J.F. Effect of coronary perfusion of heptanol on conduction and ventricular arrhythmias in infarcted canine myocardium. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 1996, 7, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tse, G.; Hothi, S.S.; Grace, A.A.; Huang, C.L. Ventricular arrhythmogenesis following slowed conduction in heptanol-treated, Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts. J. Physiol. Sci. 2012, 62, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tse, G.; Yeo, J.M.; Tse, V.; Kwan, J.; Sun, B. Gap junction inhibition by heptanol increases ventricular arrhythmogenicity by reducing conduction velocity without affecting repolarization properties or myocardial refractoriness in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 4069–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tse, G.; Liu, T.; Li, G.; Keung, W.; Yeo, J.M.; Fiona Chan, Y.W.; Yan, B.P.; Chan, Y.S.; Wong, S.H.; Li, R.A.; et al. Effects of pharmacological gap junction and sodium channel blockade on S1S2 restitution properties in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 85341–85352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tse, G.; Hao, G.; Lee, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Du, Y.; Liu, T.; Cheng, S.H.; Wong, W.T. Measures of repolarization variability predict ventricular arrhythmogenesis in heptanol-treated Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts. Curr. Res. Physiol. 2021, 4, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tse, G.; Du, Y.; Hao, G.; Li, K.H.C.; Chan, F.Y.W.; Liu, T.; Li, G.; Bazoukis, G.; Letsas, K.P.; Wu, W.K.K.; et al. Quantification of Beat-To-Beat Variability of Action Potential Durations in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Spira, M.E.; Hai, A. Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Issa, Z.F.; Miller, J.M.; Zipes, D.P. Chapter 6—Advanced Mapping and Navigation Modalities. In Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 2nd ed.; Issa, Z.F., Miller, J.M., Zipes, D.P., Eds.; W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 111–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yeo, J.M.; Tse, V.; Kung, J.; Lin, H.Y.; Lee, Y.T.; Kwan, J.; Yan, B.P.; Tse, G. Isolated heart models for studying cardiac electrophysiology: A historical perspective and recent advances. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 28, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tse, G.; Wong, S.T.; Tse, V.; Yeo, J.M. Monophasic action potential recordings: Which is the recording electrode? J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 27, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liao, R.; Podesser, B.K.; Lim, C.C. The continuing evolution of the Langendorff and ejecting murine heart: New advances in cardiac phenotyping. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 303, H156–H167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bell, R.M.; Mocanu, M.M.; Yellon, D.M. Retrograde heart perfusion: The Langendorff technique of isolated heart perfusion. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2011, 50, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lammers, W.J.; Schalij, M.J.; Kirchhof, C.J.; Allessie, M.A. Quantification of spatial inhomogeneity in conduction and initiation of reentrant atrial arrhythmias. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259, H1254–H1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Davies, L.; Jin, J.; Shen, W.; Tsui, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, G.; Wu, J.; Chen, S.; et al. Mkk4 is a negative regulator of the transforming growth factor beta 1 signaling associated with atrial remodeling and arrhythmogenesis with age. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e000340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Guzadhur, L.; Jeevaratnam, K.; Salvage, S.C.; Matthews, G.D.K.; Lammers, W.J.; Lei, M.; Huang, C.L.H.; Fraser, J.A. Arrhythmic substrate, slowed propagation and increased dispersion in conduction direction in the right ventricular outflow tract of murine Scn5a+/− hearts. Acta Physiol. 2014, 211, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bastiaanse, E.M.; Jongsma, H.J.; van der Laarse, A.; Takens-Kwak, B.R. Heptanol-induced decrease in cardiac gap junctional conductance is mediated by a decrease in the fluidity of membranous cholesterol-rich domains. J. Membr. Biol. 1993, 136, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Takens-Kwak, B.R.; Jongsma, H.J.; Rook, M.B.; Van Ginneken, A.C. Mechanism of heptanol-induced uncoupling of cardiac gap junctions: A perforated patch-clamp study. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 262, C1531–C1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burt, J.M.; Spray, D.C. Single-channel events and gating behavior of the cardiac gap junction channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3431–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rudisuli, A.; Weingart, R. Electrical properties of gap junction channels in guinea-pig ventricular cell pairs revealed by exposure to heptanol. Pflug. Arch. 1989, 415, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Keevil, V.L.; Huang, C.L.; Chau, P.L.; Sayeed, R.A.; Vandenberg, J.I. The effect of heptanol on the electrical and contractile function of the isolated, perfused rabbit heart. Pflug. Arch. 2000, 440, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Burnham, M.P.; Sharpe, P.M.; Garner, C.; Hughes, R.; Pollard, C.E.; Bowes, J. Investigation of connexin 43 uncoupling and prolongation of the cardiac QRS complex in preclinical and marketed drugs. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 4808–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Caillier, B.; Pilote, S.; Castonguay, A.; Patoine, D.; Menard-Desrosiers, V.; Vigneault, P.; Hreiche, R.; Turgeon, J.; Daleau, P.; De Koninck, Y.; et al. QRS widening and QT prolongation under bupropion: A unique cardiac electrophysiological profile. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 26, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Haydon, D.A.; Urban, B.W. The action of alcohols and other non-ionic surface active substances on the sodium current of the squid giant axon. J. Physiol. 1983, 341, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Niggli, E.; Rudisuli, A.; Maurer, P.; Weingart, R. Effects of general anesthetics on current flow across membranes in guinea pig myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 1989, 256, C273–C281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Spray, D.C.; Burt, J.M. Structure-activity relations of the cardiac gap junction channel. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 258, C195–C205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dhein, S. Pharmacology of gap junctions in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004, 62, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Balke, C.W.; Lesh, M.D.; Spear, J.F.; Kadish, A.; Levine, J.H.; Moore, E.N. Effects of cellular uncoupling on conduction in anisotropic canine ventricular myocardium. Circ. Res. 1988, 63, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Delmar, M.; Michaels, D.C.; Johnson, T.; Jalife, J. Effects of increasing intercellular resistance on transverse and longitudinal propagation in sheep epicardial muscle. Circ. Res. 1987, 60, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jalife, J.; Sicouri, S.; Delmar, M.; Michaels, D.C. Electrical uncoupling and impulse propagation in isolated sheep Purkinje fibers. Am. J. Physiol. 1989, 257, H179–H189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Brugada, J.; Mont, L.; Boersma, L.; Kirchhof, C.; Allessie, M.A. Differential effects of heptanol, potassium, and tetrodotoxin on reentrant ventricular tachycardia around a fixed obstacle in anisotropic myocardium. Circulation 1991, 84, 1307–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Qi, X.; Varma, P.; Newman, D.; Dorian, P. Gap junction blockers decrease defibrillation thresholds without changes in ventricular refractoriness in isolated rabbit hearts. Circulation 2001, 104, 1544–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sims, J.J.; Schoff, K.L.; Loeb, J.M.; Wiegert, N.A. Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, H10–H16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Saltman, A.E.; Aksehirli, T.O.; Valiunas, V.; Gaudette, G.R.; Matsuyama, N.; Brink, P.; Krukenkamp, I.B. Gap junction uncoupling protects the heart against ischemia. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002, 124, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, B.P.; Mao, H.J.; Fan, F.Y.; Bruce, I.C.; Xia, Q. Delayed uncoupling contributes to the protective effect of heptanol against ischaemia in the rat isolated heart. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005, 32, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ohara, T.; Qu, Z.; Lee, M.H.; Ohara, K.; Omichi, C.; Mandel, W.J.; Chen, P.S.; Karagueuzian, H.S. Increased vulnerability to inducible atrial fibrillation caused by partial cellular uncoupling with heptanol. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2002, 283, H1116–H1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tse, G.; Tse, V.; Yeo, J.M.; Sun, B. Atrial Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heptanol in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jeevaratnam, K.; Poh Tee, S.; Zhang, Y.; Rewbury, R.; Guzadhur, L.; Duehmke, R.; Grace, A.A.; Lei, M.; Huang, C.L. Delayed conduction and its implications in murine Scn5a(+/−) hearts: Independent and interacting effects of genotype, age, and sex. Pflug. Arch. 2011, 461, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Boineau, J.P.; Schuessler, R.B.; Mooney, C.R.; Miller, C.B.; Wylds, A.C.; Hudson, R.D.; Borremans, J.M.; Brockus, C.W. Natural and evoked atrial flutter due to circus movement in dogs. Role of abnormal atrial pathways, slow conduction, nonuniform refractory period distribution and premature beats. Am. J. Cardiol. 1980, 45, 1167–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Allessie, M.A.; Bonke, F.I.; Schopman, F.J. Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia. II. The role of nonuniform recovery of excitability in the occurrence of unidirectional block, as studied with multiple microelectrodes. Circ. Res. 1976, 39, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Brack, K.E.; Narang, R.; Winter, J.; Ng, G.A. The mechanical uncoupler blebbistatin is associated with significant electrophysiological effects in the isolated rabbit heart. Exp. Physiol. 2013, 98, 1009–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rajendran Pradeep, S.; Ajijola Olujimi, A.; Vetter, R.; Snellings, A.; Tompkins John, D.; Deb, A.; Kipke Daryl, R.; Shivkumar, K.; Ardell Jeffrey, L. Abstract 16717: Customizable High-density Microelectrode Arrays for Murine Cardiac Electrophysiology. Circulation 2016, 134, A16717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A cartoon of 64-channel multi-electrode array arranged in an 8 × 8 grid. Figure reproduced from MappingLab with permission.
Figure 1. A cartoon of 64-channel multi-electrode array arranged in an 8 × 8 grid. Figure reproduced from MappingLab with permission.
Life 12 00996 g001
Figure 2. Representative biphasic electrograms obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions (top) and in the presence of 0.1 mM (middle) or 2 mM heptanol (bottom).
Figure 2. Representative biphasic electrograms obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions (top) and in the presence of 0.1 mM (middle) or 2 mM heptanol (bottom).
Life 12 00996 g002
Figure 3. Representative biphasic electrograms from a single channel (A) and corresponding activation maps (B) obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions and in the presence of 0.1 mM. Representative biphasic electrograms from a single channel (C) and corresponding activation maps (D) obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions and in the presence of 2 mM. There was a dose-dependent reduction in heart rate as heptanol concentration increased (E). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Figure 3. Representative biphasic electrograms from a single channel (A) and corresponding activation maps (B) obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions and in the presence of 0.1 mM. Representative biphasic electrograms from a single channel (C) and corresponding activation maps (D) obtained from spontaneously beating hearts under control conditions and in the presence of 2 mM. There was a dose-dependent reduction in heart rate as heptanol concentration increased (E). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Life 12 00996 g003
Figure 4. Representative biphasic electrograms obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions (top) and in the presence of 0.1 mM (middle) or 2 mM heptanol (bottom).
Figure 4. Representative biphasic electrograms obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions (top) and in the presence of 0.1 mM (middle) or 2 mM heptanol (bottom).
Life 12 00996 g004
Figure 5. Representative biphasic electrograms (A) and corresponding activation maps (B) from a single channel obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions and in the presence of 0.1 mM. Representative biphasic electrograms (C) and corresponding activation maps (D) from a single channel obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions and in the presence of 2 mM.
Figure 5. Representative biphasic electrograms (A) and corresponding activation maps (B) from a single channel obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions and in the presence of 0.1 mM. Representative biphasic electrograms (C) and corresponding activation maps (D) from a single channel obtained during 8 Hz pacing under control conditions and in the presence of 2 mM.
Life 12 00996 g005
Figure 6. Mean local activation time (LAT) (A), standard deviation of mean LATs (B), median of phase differences (C), P5 (D), P50 (E), P95 (F), absolute inhomogeneity (P5–95, (G)), and inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50, (H)) obtained during 8 Hz pacing before and after introduction of 0.1 mM or 2 mM heptanol. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Mean local activation time (LAT) (A), standard deviation of mean LATs (B), median of phase differences (C), P5 (D), P50 (E), P95 (F), absolute inhomogeneity (P5–95, (G)), and inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50, (H)) obtained during 8 Hz pacing before and after introduction of 0.1 mM or 2 mM heptanol. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. * indicates p < 0.05.
Life 12 00996 g006
Figure 7. Normalized median of phase differences (A), P5 (B), P50 (C), P95 (D), absolute inhomogeneity (P5–95, (E)), and inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50, (F)) obtained during 8 Hz pacing before and after introduction of 0.1 mM or 2 mM heptanol. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Normalized median of phase differences (A), P5 (B), P50 (C), P95 (D), absolute inhomogeneity (P5–95, (E)), and inhomogeneity index (P5–95/P50, (F)) obtained during 8 Hz pacing before and after introduction of 0.1 mM or 2 mM heptanol. Data from n = 5 hearts. Differences between groups were tested using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. * indicates p < 0.05.
Life 12 00996 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, X.; Tse, G.; Hao, G.; Du, Y. Heterogeneities in Ventricular Conduction Following Treatment with Heptanol: A Multi-Electrode Array Study in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts. Life 2022, 12, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070996

AMA Style

Dong X, Tse G, Hao G, Du Y. Heterogeneities in Ventricular Conduction Following Treatment with Heptanol: A Multi-Electrode Array Study in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts. Life. 2022; 12(7):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Xiuming, Gary Tse, Guoliang Hao, and Yimei Du. 2022. "Heterogeneities in Ventricular Conduction Following Treatment with Heptanol: A Multi-Electrode Array Study in Langendorff-Perfused Mouse Hearts" Life 12, no. 7: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop